Fiscal Year 1984 Annual Reort FY 8* f t a Ee SiM Cii Wok Activities r.S 0ou e1 FY 1984 STATISTICAL HIGHLIGHTS ITEM APPROPRIATIONSI (8 Millions) Navigation. ................................. Flood Control Total........................... Flood Control Mississippi River and Tributaries2 .... Multipurpose, including power Beach Erosion Control Total New Work ....... Other W ork .. ...................... T ota l ....................... .............. NAVIGATION (Calendar Year) Ton-Miles of Commerce (Millions Foreign, Coastal Ports ... Foreign, Great Lakes Ports ........ Domestic, Coastal (Intraterrtory, not compiled) Domestic, Great Lakes ................ Domestic, Inland ................ Domestic, Local ............................. TOTAL ............ Toms of Commerce (Millions) Foreign Coastal Ports ....................... Foreign Great Lakes Ports .......... Domestic, Coastal and Intraterritory Domestic, Great Lakes ............ Domestic, Inland Domestic. Local . TOTAL ..... FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED IS Billions) .... POWER Installed (Cumulative in millions of kw) .. Generated (Billions of kwh) ..... RESERVOIR STORAGE (Millions of acre-feet) All Purposes............... Flood Control (Maximum) .................. Water Supply ........... Irrigation ...................................... PUBLIC ATTENDANCE AT RESERVOIRS (Millions of visitor days, calendar years) ....... 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 257 577 552 607 485 395 357 261 358 221 674 882 774 772 873 802 895 859 1.004 580 (203) (291 1177) (145> 1211) (158) (188) (17314' 158) 4 ' 12214 171 221 247 275 538 358 155 464 479 287 25 5 7 12 9 12 12 16 10 3 1127 1,685 1.580 1.666 1.905 1.567 1,719 1.600 1,851 1.098 1561 1.734 1.417 1,331 1.296 1,223 1,070 887 992 659 2688 3.419 2,9974 2.997 3,201 2.790 2.789 2.487 2,843 1.757 45,2870 51,262 7 58,9292 60,569.8 59,9405 58.925 6 58,925 1 50.979.6 43,521.7 24.309.4 27.165.5 35,294.0 33.679.6 43.146.4 42,1088 37,734.3 34,347.9 29,944.8 649,749.4 632,7071 634.7653 631,1492 532.290.2 540,373.2 343.536.6 322,932.3 315.,834.9 43,088.1 35,623.3 62.148.4 61,749.1 77,9719 76.284.0 52,416 9 70,684.2 68.5168 225,6282 217.026.7 231,184.1 227,343.0 217,0902 209,266.2 201,7842 197,072.8 180,399.2 1,099.6 1,111.7 1,315.6 1,596.4 1,710.2 1,3398 1.262.3 1,1642 1,2223 989.161.7 964.897.0 1,023,636.5 1,016,085 .1 931,846.4 928.297.6 692,527.4 477,181.0 639,450.7 702.7 769.2 823.9 860.8 919.7 8755 8661 7903 6918 48.4 50.4 62.3 60.6 73.8 70.6 69.2 65.7 569 312.8 313.9 322.0 3332 3087 308.6 251.7 2392 234.8 83.5 72.1 115.4 115.2 143.6 1427 109.1 1321 129.3 487.1 495.5 5207 535.0 535.0 534.5 528.7 524 0 53.9 73 1 75 6 93.2 942 931 89.5 834 837 783 1.707 6 1,776.7 1.9384 1.999.0 2,0739 2,021 4 1,908.2 1,832 1 1,692.2 16.8 23.2 4.3 12 73 19.4 63 2.6 17 15.9 20.1 19.7' 197' 19.27 19.0' 190 7 ' 17.9 16.4 160 14.9 83.7 88.2 75.8 77.3 77.8 81.2 83.6 64.0 1080 829 272.1 270.6 269.0 268.5 263.3 263.3 262.9 252.0 2506 2483 123.0 123.0 123.0 122.7 120.4 120.4 120.1 104.0 102.9 101.0 9.2 92 92 91 8.9 7.8 7.7 7.6 73 72 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 482 470 480 469 457 449 439 424 391 376 SFY 1976 includes 1976T (Transition Quarter) figures cover period from July 1, 1975 through s Operation and maintenance surveys, administration and misc programs and activities September 30, 1976. FY 83 funds provided under continuing resolution authority of PL s $102 million deferred in FY 82. 97-377 and the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983 (PL 98-8). ' Includes New Melones and Snettisham, built by the Corps and operated by others. 2Advance engineering and design, and construction. (Including major rehabilitation projects.) Savings and slippage applied to projects. * For further information on waterborne commerce, see Waterborne Commerce of the United SIncluded in Floor Control. States, published annually It may be obtained by writing the District Engineer, U.S Army 'Revised figure. Engineer District, New Orleans. P.O. Box 60267, New Orleans, Louisiana 70160. (Note 1984 navigation figures were not available as of press time, and will be included in the FY 1985 Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers on Civil Works Activities.) CONTENTS Page NEW ENGLAND DIVISION ................................................. 1-1 NORTH ATLANTIC DIVISION: New York, NY, District ..... ...... ............. ......... ..... .......................... 2-1 Philadelphia, PA, District ............................ ................................ 3-1 Baltimore, MD, District .................... ..................... ................ 4-1 Norfolk, VA, District . ................................................................ 5-1 SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION: Wilmington, NC, District ............... ...... ................. ..................... 6-1 Charleston, SC, District ...................................... . ................... 7-1 Savannah, GA, District............ ........................ . ................... ..... 8-1 Jacksonville, FL, District ........................................... ............... 9-1 Mobile, AL, District ......................... .... ........................... 10-1 LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION: New Orleans, LA, District ......... .................................................... 11-1 V icksburg, M S, D istrict ............... ........................................................... 12-1 Memphis, TN, District .......................... ................................. 13-1 St. Louis, MO, District ...................... .................................... 14-1 SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION: Galveston, TX, District...................... .......... ............................ 15-1 Fort Worth, TX, District ..................................................................... 16-1 Albuquerque, NM, District ................................ ..................... ... .... 17-1 Little Rock, AR, District ........... ......... ...................................... . 18-1 Tulsa, OK, District.............. .. .......... 19-1 MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION: Kansas City, MO, District ................ .................. ................... 20-1 Omaha, NE, District ..................... .......................................... 21-1 OHIO RIVER DIVISION: Ohio River ..................... .......................................................... 22-1 Nashville, TN, District ............................... ............................... 23-1 Louisville, KY, District .................. .............................................. 24-1 Huntington, WV, District........... ............ ............................................ 25-1 Pittsburgh, PA, District .............. .. ................ ................. 26-1 NORTH CENTRAL DIVISION: St. Paul, MN, District.................. ............................ ...... 27-1 Rock Island, IL, District ....................................................................... 28-1 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ................................... 29-1 - Chicago, IL, District............................. .. ...... ....................................... 30-1 Detroit, MI, District............... ...... ......................................................... 31-1 Buffalo, NY, District ............ ......... ... ........................................ ...... 32-1 SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION: Los Angeles, CA, District............ ........ ...................................... ..... 33-1 San Francisco, CA, District ............. ....... ............ .................................. 34-1 Sacram ento, CA , D istrict ......................................................................... 35-1 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION: ...................................................................... 36-1 -5 E iNEER CENTER 1-BG.9000 GPO-Army Corps of Engineers 461-021 20503 NORTH PACIFIC DIVISION: Portland, OR, District........................... .................................... .... 37-1 Seattle, WA, District ................... .................................................. 38-1 Walla Walla, WA, District ............................... ........................ 39-1 Alaska District .......................................................................... 40-1 Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors ............... ................................. 41-1 Mississippi River Commission............................ ............ ................... 42-1 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response & Recovery Activities ............. ........................ 43-1 California Debris Commission ................................ ........................ . .. 44-1 Waterways Experiment Station ......................... ............................. 45-1 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses ................... .................. 46-1 Investigations of Projects Under Federal Power Act .......................... ... 47-1 Regulatory Sunken Vessel Removal and National Emergency Preparedness............................ 48-1 International Boundary Waters Boards .............................. .. ............................. 49-1 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory ................... . ...... ............................ 50-1 Engineer Topographic Laboratories ........... ... .............................................. 51-1 Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory ........... ....... ... ...... ....... ....... 52-1 Water Resources Support Center ........................................................ 53-1 APPENDICES: Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1984 ......................................... A-1 Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1984 .................................. B-1 Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1984 ........................................ C-1 Navigation Projects Under Construction September 30, 1984 ............. ......................... D-1 Multipurpose Projects Including Power In Operation September 30, 1984 .......................... E-1 Multipurpose Projects Including Power Under Construction September 30, 1984 ....................... F-1 Flood Damages Prevented (By Region and by District) During Fiscal Year 1984 ........................... G-1 INDEX...................................... ........... ...................... I-1 2-BG.9000 GPO-Army Corps of Engineers 461-021 20503 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION * The New England I)ivision, an operating division with both district and division functions, comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tri)butarv to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean vast of the New York-Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers Island, N Y. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control .................. . 1-3 2. Black Rock Harbor, CT .................. 1-3 3. Boston Harbor, MA ...................... 1-3 4. Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA ............. 1-3 5. Cape Cod Canal, MA .................... 1-4 6. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA ............. 1-4 7. Clinton Harbor, CT ...................... 1-5 8. (Connecticut River Below Hartford, CT ...... .................... 1-5 9. Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME ............ 1-5 10. Eastport Harbor, ME ......... ........ 1-6 11. Fall River Harbor, MA .................. 1-6 12. Green Harbor, MA ..................... 1-6 13. Hampton Harbor, NH .................... 1-6 14. Kennebunk River, ME ................... 1-7 15. Mianus River, CT ....................... 1-7 16. Mystic River, MA ........................ 1-7 17. New Haven Harbor, CT .................. 1-8 18. New London Harbor, CT ......... ...... 1-8 19. Patchogue River, CT .................. . 1-8 20. Penobscot River, ME ................... 1-9 21. Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, Point Judith, RI ................ 1-9 22. Portland Harbor, ME .................. 1-10 23. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH ........... 1-10 24. Provincetown Harbor, MA ............... 1-10 25. Stonington Harbor, ME ................ 1-10 26. Reconnaissance and condition surveys .............................. 1-11 27. Other authorized navigation projects ................................ 1-11 28. Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) .................... . 1-11 29. Authorized bridge alteration.............1-11 Beach Erosion Control 30. Cliff Walk, Newport, RI ................. 1-11 :31. 32. 33. Inspection of completed beach erosion control projects ................. Other authorized beach erosion control projects ......................... Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) ............ P'age 1-11 1-11 Flood Control 34. 34A. 34B. 34C. 35. 35A. 35B. 35C. 35D. 35E. 35F. 35G. 35H. 351. 35J. 35K. 35L. 35M. 35N. 350. 35P. 35Q. 36. 36A. 36B. 36C. 36D. Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI ....... 1-12 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI ............ 1-12 West Hill I)am, MA ................... .. 1-12 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA ................... ..- 12 Connecticut River Basin, VT NH, MA and CT ........................ 1-12 Ball Mountain Lake, VT ................. 1 -13 Barre Falls I)am, MA ................... 1-13 Birch Hill Dam, MA .................... 1-14 Colebrook River Lake, (T ................ 1-14 Conant Brook Dam, MA ................. 1-14 Knightville Dam, MA ................... 1-14 Littleville Lake, MA .................... 1-14 North Hartland Lake, VT ................ 1-14 North Springfield Lake, VT .............. 1-15 Otter Brook Lake, NH ................... 1-15 Park River, Hartford, CT ................ 1-15 Saxtons River, Rockingham, VT .......... 1-15 Surry Mountain Lake, NH ............... 1-16 Townshend Lake, VT ..................... 1-16 Tully Lake, MA ........................ 1-16 Union Village Dam, VT .................. 1-16 West Springfield, Connecticut River Basin, M A ........................ 1-16 Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA ...... 1-17 Black Rock Lake, CT .................... 1-17 Hancock Brook Lake, CT ................ 1-17 Hop Brook Lake, CT .................... 1-17 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA .......... 1-17 1-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 36E. Northfield Brook Lake, CT ............... 36F. Thomaston Dam, CT .................... 37. Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT .......... 38. Islesboro (The Narrows), ME ............. 39. Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME ................. 40. Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT ........... 41. Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA ..... 41A. Blackwater Dam, NH .................. 41B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH ............ 41C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH ............... 41D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH ............ 42. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA ......................... 43. New London, CT ........................ 44. Saint John River Basin, ME .............. 44A. Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes, ME ........ 45. Bagaduce River, Castine, ME ............ 46. Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME .............. 47. Sebasticook River, Hartland; ME ......... 48. Stamford, CT .......................... 49. Thames River Basin, CT, RI and MA ................................ 49A. Buffumville Lake, MA ................... 49B. East Brimfield Lake, MA ................ 49C. Hodges Village Dam, MA .............. 49D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT .............. 49E. West Thompson Lake, CT ................ 49F. Westville Lake, MA .................. . 50. Inspection of completed flood control projects ....................... 51. Flood control reservoir operations .............................. 52. Hurricane barrier operations ............. 53. Other authorized flood control projects ....................... 54. Flood control work under special authorization .................. Page 1-18 1-18 1-18 1-18 1-18 1-19 1-19 1-19 1-19 1-19 1-20 55. Page Deauthorized Projects ................... 1-25 General Investigations 56. Surveys ................................ 1-25 57. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 1-25 58. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ........................ 1-26 59. Advance Engineering and Design ......... 1-26 Tables Table 1-A Cost & Financial 1-20 Statement ........................ 1-27 1-20 Table 1-B Authorizing Legislation ............. 1-35 1-20 Table 1-C Other Authorized 1-21 Navigation Projects ................. 1-41 1-21 Table 1-D Other Authorized Beach 1-21 Erosion Control Projects ............. 1-45 1-21 Table 1-E Other Authorized Federal 1-22 Flood Control Projects .............. 1-46 Table 1-F Other Authorized Multiple- 1-22 Purpose Projects including Power .... 1-47 1-22 Table 1-G Deauthorized Projects ............... .1-48 1-22 Table 1-H Navigation Activities 1-22 Pursuant to Sec. 107 ................ 1-49 1-23 Table 1-I Beach Erosion Activities 1-23 Pursuant to Sec. 103 ................ 1-49 1-23 Table 1-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sec. 205 ................ 1-50 1-23 Table 1-K Blackstone River Basin .............. 1-50 Table 1-L Connecticut River Basin ............. 1-51 1-23 Table 1-M Housatonic River Basin ............. 1-52 1-24 Table 1-N Merrimack River Basin ............. 1-54 Table 1-0 Thames River Basin ................ 1-55 1-25 Table 1-P Boston Harbor, MA ................. 1-55 Table 1-Q Reconnaissance and 1-25 Condition Surveys .................. 1-56 1-2 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. The program is conducted in all navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels and associated waters under the New England Division jurisdiction. Existing project. The purpose of the program is to eradicate or control aquatic plants that are causing or have the potential to cause major economic problems in the above waterways. The plant control is done in the interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and research. The program is administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, and in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing program). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 30 percent of the cost of controlling the aquatic plants, and in addition must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from control operations. Operations during fiscal year. The office received many requests from communities to help with their aquatic plant problems. Field surveys and meetings with local people were held to determine the extent and cause of the problems. In most cases, the problems resulted from excess nutrients washing into the waters from adjacent lands. This problem does not meet the criteria for Corps particpation. 2. BLACK ROCK HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island, about 51 miles east of New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12369). Existing project. Black Rock Harbor and Cedar Creek Channel, 18 feet deep and 100 to 200 feet wide from the 18 foot contour in Black Rock Harbor to the heads of both branches of Cedar Creek, about 2.4 miles. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for Black Rock Harbor breakwaters and Burr and Cedar Creek anchorage there is no reasonable prospect that required cooperation will be forthcoming from local interests. For further details see Annual Report for 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 6 waterfront facilities serving Black Rock Harbor. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract awarded in September 1983 for dredging at New Haven Harbor and construction of an upland/wetland disposal site as part of the Field Verification Program (FVP) was completed in December 1983 with a total contract amount of $1,019,682. Final contract amount for the FVP work was $138,224. Hired labor costs of $34,622 were incurred for the preparation of plans and specifications and supervision and inspection. 3. BOSTON HARBOR, MA Location. Harbor includes all expanse of tidewater lying within a line from Point Allerton to Point Shirley and extending from that line westward to mainland. This comprises an area of about 47 square miles, exclusive of the islands. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13270 and 13272). Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1917, 1938. Existing project. The existing project for Boston Harbor, adopted in 1825 and supplemented by enactments through 1958, provides for the improvement of the harbor proper and its approaches-Fort Point Channel, Reserved Channel, Chelsea River and Weir River. For a more detailed description see page 3 of Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing projects). Existing project was completed in May 1966 with the construction of Chelsea River 35-foot channel and maneuvering basin. That portion of Fort Point Channel from northeasterly side of Summer Street Highway Bridge to the easterly side of Dorchester Highway Bridge has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 91-624 dated 31 December 1970. Remaining area of the authorized channel from the entrance to the northeasterly side of the Summer Street Bridge has not been abandoned. (See Table 1-P at end of chapter for total Federal cost of existing project to September 1984). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 156 wharves and piers in harbor, not including Mystic, Weymouth-Fore, and Town Rivers, which are reported elsewhere. Of the terminals, 28 are publicly owned, 13 are open to public use, 73 have mechanical-handling facilities, and 70 have railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. For a full description of channel facilities in Chelsea River refer to House Document 350, 87th Congress, 2nd session (See Port Series No. 3, Part 2, Port of Boston, MA dated 1967). Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired lbor costs of $19,020 were incurred for sampling and testing work in conjunction with dredging completed in the previous fiscal year. Disposal area monitoring costs for the fiscal year amounted to $33,129. A dredging contract for Chelsea River was awarded in June 1984 and completed in July 1984. Contract costs thru fiscal year 1984 were $131,620. Final contract payment will be made next fiscal year. Hired labor costs of $73,287 were incurred for an environmental assessment, preparation of plans and specifications, surveys and supervision and inspection. A contract for removal and disposal of sunken vessel "ROSE ANNA" at Jeffries Point was awarded in September 1984. No costs were incurred this fiscal year. 4. BUTTERMILK BAY CHANNEL, MA Location. Buzzards Bay, MA, is at the southern end of Cape Cod Canal. It is connected with Buttermilk Bay to the north by a natural channel branching from Cape Cod Canal and extending northerly past Butler Cove for a 1-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 distance of 2 miles into Buttermilk Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13236). Existing project. Provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water through the sand bar across the channel, to just above Taylor's Point, then a 2,500 foot extension 6 feet deep and 80 feet wide to the site of a public marina to be built by the Town of Bourne and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Project except for channel extension was completed in 1953. Construction of extension was completed in February 1984. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are no wharves bordering on the channel. The only facilities in Buttermilk Bay are small private piers for shallow-draft boats. Operations during fiscal year. New work and maintenance: The contract awarded late in the prior year for maintenance dredging of the existing channel and extension (new work) of the existing channel was completed in February 1984. A total of 10,300 cubic yards were removed in the maintenance portion at a cost of $75,770. The lumpsum cost for the improvement dredging was $79,500. In addition, $42,970 was expended for surveys, contract administration, and supervision and inspection. 5. CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending from head of Buzzards Bay, MA, to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, MA. In general direction canal trends from Buzzards Bay easterly to Cape Cod Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13246). Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1975. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of East Boat Basin extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations, which were completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boston Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Initial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in December 1965. Minor rehabilitation of stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt' and storage of oil. Seventh terminal is State pier, owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and on north bank of canal at Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for which they are used. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The following contracts awarded in latter part of fiscal year 1983 were completed in current fiscal year at a cost of: $130,400 for public sanitary facilities; $12,894 for roofing repairs to Railroad Bridge; $13,620 for paving the West Boat Basin Pier; and $9,700 for installation of sanitary disposal system Administration Area. Contracts awarded and completed in fiscal year 1984 were: replacement of water-proofing surface on the Bourne Bridge sidewalk $123,800; inspection and preparation of Condition Survey Report on Buzzards Bay Railroad Bridge $215,800; Project Condition Survey of the Cape Cod Canal waterway $102,500; repairs to tug boats and patrol boats $173,900; procurement of office computer $16,800; and purchase of vehicles $22,800. Installation of a modern, state-of-the-art computerized Electronic Traffic Control System including 3 new field radar stations and a new Traffic Control Center console with support equipment to provide radar coverage and vessel tracking through the entire length of the Canal has been completed under a continuing contract to upgrade the Canal Vessel Surveillance System. Contract costs this fiscal year were $1,288,200. Other fiscal year 1984 project costs for work accomplished by hired labor and contract were: contract operation and maintenance of Railroad Bridge Tower and Signal System $157,400; Condition Surveys $37,500; operational costs for roads, bridges and project facilities $917,700; real estate activities $55,000; traffic control activities $1,423,600; administrative costs $147,900; engineering and design including preparation of plans and specifications $369,500; and contract supervision and inspection $34,500. Contracts awarded in fiscal year 1984 with work to be accomplished next fiscal year included: repair of mooring dolphins $87,000; repair of suicide deterring fence on Bourne Highway Bridge $38,082; replacement of comfort station $337,895; repair Railroad Bridge elevators $21,500; and replacement of Control Center windows $11,600. 6. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA Location. At northeastern corner of Nantucket Sound, about 16 miles east of Hyannis Harbor, MA and 66 miles south of Providence Harbor at northern extremity of Cape Cod.(See National Ocean Survey Chart 13237). Previous Project. For details see Annual Report for 1942. Existing project. An entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Construction of existing project was initiated in September and completed in October 1957. By 1961, a break in barrier beach connecting Morris and Monomoy Islands caused Federal Channel to fill in completely. Local interests dredged an emergency channel to obtain 8-foot depth in June 1962 and performed additional dredging in 1963. Minimal maintenance dredging by the Federal Government in April and May 1964, provided access to inner harbor for 1964 boating season. A new 10-foot channel through Harding Beach to Morris Island was completed in July 1965. 1-4 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are three commercial wharves on north side of inner harbor open to public use subject to owner's convenience. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging contract was awarded in January 1984 and completed in March 1984. A total of 120,750 c.y. of material was removed at a final contract cost of $391,100. Hired labor costs of $117,125 were incurred for an environmental assessment, preparation of plans and specifications, surveys and supervision and inspection. 7. CLINTON HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island sound, about 10 miles west of mouth of Connecticut River and about 20 miles east of New Haven Habor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12374 and 12354). Previous Project. For details see page 640, Annual Report for 1894 and page 112, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from Long Island Sound to upper end of wharves at Clinton, an anchorage area of same depth opposite and above wharves, 50 feet wide south of channel and extending 600 feet above end of channel, with widths of 150 to 250 feet, and for maintenance of a stone dike closing a breach in the sandy peninsula which separates the river from outer harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Project, was completed in 1950. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are several small private wharves, some of which are open to public use. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract in amount of $97,200 for maintenance dredging was awarded in September 1984. Work has not begun. Hired labor costs of $8,137 were incurred for surveys. 8. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CT Location. Has its source in Connecticut Lake in northern New Hampshire, flows southerly 380 miles and empties into Long Island Sound at Saybrook, CT, 14 miles west of New, London. Hartford, now head of commercial navigation, is 52 statute miles, by channel, from mouth. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12373 and 12377). Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Eightmile River, CT, elimination as separate project: Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 75 feet wide from deep water in Connecticut River to Hamburg and for turning basin of same depth, 150 feet wide, approximately 300 feet long at Hamburg. Project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of 1910. Costs and expenditures were $9,000 all for new work. In accordance with River and Harbor Act of 1950, project for Connecticut River below Hartford was modified to include project for Eightmile River. Aforementioned Act also provided for an anchorage basin 6 feet deep and about 6.5 acres in area in upper cove in Hamburg. A channel 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide for a distance of 52 miles upstream to Hartford; two riprap jetties at the mouth of the river; and dikes, training walls, revetments and other regulatory works along the river between Hartford and Gildersleeve Island. The project provides for small-boat improvements at Wethersfield Cove; Eightmile River; Essex; and North Cove, Old Saybrook. For a more detailed description of project see page 7 of Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Existing project was completed in September 1965 with the construction of channel and anchorage in North Cove, Old Saybrook, CT. For further details, see Annual Report for 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along both Connecticut and Eightmile Rivers there are two or three wharves at each river town, one or more in each town being open to public use. At Hartford and Middletown there is about one-half of wharf frontage along west bank of river. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract awarded in Spetember 1983 for maintenance dredging of the lower bars was completed in January 1984. Contract costs were $770,027 with a toal of 167,800 c.y. of material removed. Another contract awarded in September 1983 for maintenance dredging of the upper bars was completed in December 1983. A total of 123,053 c.y. were removed at a final contract cost of $553,203. A contract was awarded in July 1984 for rental of a hopper dredge with operating personnel and attendant plant for dredging various bars in the Connecticut River. Work was completed in September 1984 at a total cost of $1,248,396. Hired labor costs of $676,295 were incurred for the preparation of plans and specifications, supervision and inspection, surveys and sampling and testing. A dredging contract for North Cove was awarded in March 1984 and completed in June 1984. A total of 65,000 c.y. of material was dredged at a cost of $385,770. Hired labor costs of $43,472 were incurred for the preparation of plans and specifications, supervision and inspection and surveys. 9. COREA HARBOR GOULDSBORO, ME Location. Corea Harbor is located within the village of Corea in the town of Gouldsboro, Hancock County, Maine. It is 130 miles northeast of Portland and 55 miles southeast of Bangor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13324). Existing project. Provides for an anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 600 feet long in an east and west direction and 400 feet wide in a north and south direction. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Construction was completed in 1982. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There 21 wharves, 15 of which are small and cannotbe approached by vessels at low tide. The wharves are privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 1-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract was awarded in November 1983 for removal of some hard digging areas remaining from the improvement dredging contract completed in November 1982. Contract earnings were $40,000 and $14,686 was expended for contract administration, supervision and inspection. Work was completed in May 1984. 10. EASTPORT HARBOR, ME Location. On east side of Moose Island, Maine and on Friar Roads an international boundary passage between Moose and Campbello Islands, New Brunswick. Harbor is an open waterfront about 3 miles north of Lubec and 40 miles northeast of Machias, Maine. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 13328). Existing project. Provides for a breakwater 500 feet long parallel to the central waterfront and an anchorage basin of 1.4 acres with depths of 10 and 14 feet. (See Table 12B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Construction of existing project was started in July 1961 and completed in August 1963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are about 15 wharves along easterly shore of Eastport. There are two fish wharves in Prince Cove, two wharves in Broad Cove and two on north side of island. Two wharves owned by Maine Central Railroad and one used by Passamaquoddy Ferry and Navigation Co., are equipped with rail sidings and transit sheds. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded in November 1983 and completed in June 1984 for repairs to the breakwater. Contract costs were $83,550 with hired labor costs of $12,835 for plans and specifications, supervision and inspection and surveys. In July 1984 the Federal project was turned over to local interests for subsequent operation and maintenance. 11. FALL RIVER HARBOR, MA Location. At mouth of Taunton River, on east side and at head of Mount Hope Bay, which empties into ocean through Narragansett Bay and Sakonnet River; it is about 18 miles northerly from Newport Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 13221). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1978. Deepening to 35 feet was completed in March 1959. The authorized deepening to 40 feet has not yet begun. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. For terms of local cooperation pertinent to remaining work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1968, see Annual Report for 1975. Terminal facilities. In upper harbor there are several deep-draft terminals, two of which are in Somerset and three in Fall River, four more deep-draft terminals are located along the Tiverton waterfront in Rhode Island. These are modern terminals used in connection with electrical generating stations; receipt, distribution and storage of oil and petroleum products; and a State Pier for handling general cargo, and a permanent berth for the battleship Massachusetts. There are six other wharves with berthing depth of less than 25 feet used for mooring recreational and training craft, receipt and storage of petroleum products, boat servicing and repairs. (See Port and Terminal Facilities of Southern New England, No. 4 Revised in 1976). Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination continued throughout the year between local interests and local, regional and Federal officials concerning the identification and acceptance of a disposal site for the materials to be dredged during proposed improvement. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) agreed to take the lead role in development of an Environmental Impaet Statement for a regional disposal site, and the Corps continues to provide technical support to that effort. 12. GREEN HARBOR, MA Location. On west side of Massachusetts Bay within the town of Marshfield about 30 miles southeast of Boston and 9 miles north of Plymouth Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13253) Existing project. Provides for channel 6 feet deep (8 feet at entrance), 100 feet wide extending about 4,000 feet from deep water to head of navigation with small turning basin at upstream limit; 5-acre anchorage near Town Pier, 6 feet deep; sealing, rebuilding in part, and a 200 feet extension of existing west jetty at elevation +12, with dike to beach berm at elevation +14 feet, and raising east jetty to elevation +14. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Construction was completed in October, 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on south side of harbor near head of navigation. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Additional contract payment of $101,602 was made to close out a dredging contract completed last fiscal year. Hired labor costs of $23, 472 were incurred for plans and specifcations, supervision and inspection, and work on entrance evaluation study. 13. HAMPTON HARBOR, NH Location. On New Hampshire seacoast 13 miles south of Portsmouth Harbor, 5 miles north of mouth of Merrimack River at Newburyport, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13278). Existing project. Extending north jetty 1,000 feet, raising outer 300 feet of south jetty and constructing a 180-foot spur to high ground, and dredging to provide a channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across entrance bar. 1-6 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in November 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers in Hampton Harbor. State of New Hampshire maintains three pile and timber piers, two in Hampton about 1,500 feet north of entrance and one in Seabrook one-half mile south of entrance. Hampton pier has a 6-foot walkway to a float that has depths of 4 to 6 feet. Seabrook pier has a float and a water depth of about 3 feet at outer end. One landing is open to public. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging contract was awarded in May 1984 and completed in July 1984. A total of 27,900 c.y. of material was removed at a final contract cost of $243,810. Hired labor costs of $61,231 were incurred for plans and specifications, supervision and inspection and surveys. 14. KENNEBUNK RIVER, ME Location. Source of Kennebunk River is in central part of York County in southwestern Maine. Stream flows about 15 miles southeasterly and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 350 miles southwest of Portland, Maine. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13286). Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1977. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Project was completed in December 1968 with completion of rock removal at entrance to west channel. Extension of west jetty was completed in April 1965. Dredging and sand fence were completed in November 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 22 landings 16 of which are private, 1 public, 2 yacht clubs, 1 hotel, and 2 boatyards. Marine railway facilities include two of 15-ton capacity, and one of 10-ton capacity. There are 4 berths and 10 moorings. Open storage, boat building, repairs, and supplies are available for pleasure and commercial craft. Public landing of granite block construction, has unloading facilities which include two tackle and falls on arms; and is used by fishing craft to transfer catches for transportation. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging contract was awarded in September 1984. Work had not begun at the end of the fiscal year. Hired labor costs of $17,370 were incurred for plans, specifications and surveys. 15. MIANUS RIVER, CT Location. Has its source in southeastern New York, and flows in a southerly direction about 20 miles, crossing southwestern corner of Connecticut, emptying into Captain Harbor, Long Island Sound. Project is about 3 miles west of Stamford Harbor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12367). Previous project. For details see page 106, Annual Report for 1904. Existing project. Provides for channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cos Cob Harbor to head of navigation at Boston Post Road, Mianus, distance of about 1.2 miles. Lower end of project is about 1 mile above entrance to Cos Cob Harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 1951. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are two town wharves with about 750 feet of berthing space, a commercial wharf, several piers at small shipyards and one at the yacht club and two marinas. Most of these are open to the public subject to owners convenience. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $23, 506 were incurred for an environmental assessment and preparation of plans and specifications for proposed dredging. 16. MYSTIC RIVER, MA Location. Rises in Mystic Lake, MA, flows southeasterly 7 miles and empties into Boston Harbor near Boston Naval Shipyard. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13272). Previous projects. For details see page 1743 of Annual Report 1915, and page 59 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channel 35 feet deep, extending from limit of 35-foot channel of Boston Harbor at Mystic River Bridge to approximately 300 feet downstream of Malden Bridge, having width varying from about 940 feet at its lower end, to about 1,060 feet at a point about 1,200 feet below the Malden Bridge, thence decreasing to 150 feet at its upper limit; channel 20 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot channel to a point 800 feet above Malden Bridge, with widths decreasing from 150 feet at lower end to 75 feet through drawspan, thence increasing to about 340 feet to form turning basin above bridge; channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Boston & Maine Railroad (western division) Bridge to about 2,500 feet above Wellington Bridge, about 1 mile, and thence 4 feet deep, gradually narrowing from 100 to 50 feet at upper end for about 2 miles to head of commercial navigation at Craddock Bridge in Medford. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean range of tide is 9.6 feet at Mystic River Bridge, 9.6 feet at Wellington Bridge, and 9.3 feet at Craddock Bridge. Extreme range is 13.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $3,097,054, exclusive of amounts expended for previous projects. Project was completed in June 1958. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In section of river benefited by 35- foot channel project there are on the south bank four wharves consisting of substantial stone or wooden bulkheads filled solid, aggregating over 4,000 feet of berthing space; also a lumber terminal, the largest of its kind on the Atlantic Coast, equipped with most modern mechanical 1-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 appliances, has railroad connections and occupies 4,400 feet of waterfront. On north bank of river there is a large wharf used for receipt and shipment of oil on extensive scale; and adjacent thereto an extensive terminal used in connection with an iron works. There are several other wharves downstream of Malden Bridge and on west bank of Island End River used for receipt and shipment of coal, coke, tar, oil and in connection with a generating plant. None of the above is publicly owned or opened to general public use. In 20-foot channel section on south bank there are 1,850 feet and on north bank 1,235 feet of available dockage; none of which is publicly owned, two are open to public on payment of charges. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for $49,665 was completed for monitoring of disposal area used for dredging in prior year. 17. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 67 miles east of New York City. (See National Ocean Survey C(hart 12371). Previous project. For details, see Annual Report for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1978. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.). Project is complete. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Port of New Haven is served by 53 waterfront facilities; 40 are within city limits of New Haven, and 5 in West Haven. Improved waterways within port area along which facilities are located include West River, Main Harbor, West and East Branches of Mill River, and Quinnipiac River channels. Facilities are all privately owned and operated with exception of city wharf and U.S. Coast Guard wharf. Depths alongside piers and wharves range from 35 to zero feet at mean low water. Nearly half of the facilities have rail connections either on or at rear which connect with NY, NH & Hartford Railroad and most are accessible by paved streets. Nineteen wharves have mechanical handling facilities, six wharves are open to public use upon agreement with the owners. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port and Terminal Facilities of Southern New England No. 4, revised 1964). Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded in September 1983 for dredging which also included work in the Black Rock Harbor area. In New Haven Harbor, a total of 229,288 c.y. of material was removed at a cost of $786,458. Hired labor costs of $132,268 were incurred for supervision and inspection and surveys. In addition a contract for $63,900 was awarded for disposal area monitoring work. 18. NEW LONDON HARBOR, CT Location. On the north shore of Long Island, at its eastern end and about 14 miles east of the mouth of the Connecticut River. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13213). Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880, March 3, 1881, and July 13, 1892. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. pages 1753 and 116, respectively. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1978. Project was completed in 1938. The Department of the Navy has twice deepened extensive lengths of the Harbor in the interest of the National Defense. In May 1980 they completed their second effort. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work; for new work, local interests are required to provide easements and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; make sure alterations to underwater utilities as necessary to enable full realization of the project benefits; and improve berth and access channels commensurate with the project depth. Terminal facilities. There are 36 wharves and piers in a developed frontage of about 3 miles. Seven piers are owned by the Federal Government of which five are being used. One pier is owned by the State and one by the city. Eight waterfront facilities are equipped to receive petroleum products. Seven of the wharves have direct rail connections. The total available berthage space is about 27,000 feet. (For further details, see Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Southern New England, 1976.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The government owned Hopper Dredge MCFARILAND performed dredging at a cost of $378,809. Another contract was awarded in May 1984 to restore the approach to 40 feet deep. It was completed in June 1984 at a total cost of $289,000. Hired labor costs of $24,445 were incurred for the preparation of plans and specifications, supervision and inspection and surveys. 19. PATCHOGUE RIVER, CT Location. A small tidal stream 3 miles long, in town of Westbrook, CT, on north shore of Long Island Sound, about 7 miles west of mouth of Connecticut River. (See National Ocean Survey charts 12374 and 12354). Existing project. Provides for a channel 75 feet wide and 8 feet deep extending about one mile from deep water in Duck Island Roads to highway bridge on U.S. Route 1; an anchorage and maneuvering area 8 feet deep, 75 feet wide, 500 feet long opposite town wharf; a sand-tight stone jetty extending 600 feet southerly into Duck Island Roads from a point on west side of river mouth; and an access channel 8 feet deep extending from deep water in Long Island Sound to the confluence of the Patchogue and Menunketesuck Rivers, a distance of 1,800 feet, at a width of 125 feet. (See Table 1-B at the end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Project is complete. Construction of breakwater was initiated in April and completed in July 1956. Dredging 8-foot channel, anchorage, and maneuvering basin was initiated in September and completed in November 1956. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Terminal facilities. There are 5 wharves along the Patchogue River. The town of Westbrook constructed on right bank of river a free public wharf. It has no boat servicing nor transfer facilities. There are 60 feet of wharf space used principally by local fishing fleet for transfer of its catch to motor trucks that transport it directly to market. Wharf is solid-fill construction with rubblestone sides and earthfill, topped with a bituminous pavement. There are four private wharves in the central reach, two owned by Standard Fish Co., flank town wharf on north and south sides and are timber and pile construction. Wharf on south side is a 90-foot marginal landing constructed on planks on 2-pile bents. Adjacent to this wharf is a marine railway, capable of handling boats up to 30 feet long, with storage space for 30 boats. Wharf on north side is 35-foot long marginal landing of plank and pile construction with fishhouse attached. This wharf is used principally in fish and lobster business. Immediately upstream and abutting this wharf is a privately owned 100-foot marginal wharf of similar construction, which will be used in conjunction with the boatyard. Fuelhandling facilities are installed on the wharf. Remaining private wharf is on left bank of river, immediately below highway bridge. It is a 180-foot long marginal structure of timber, pile and rubblestone construction. Dock space is rented at this wharf and there is a building on shore adjacent to wharf, in which a retail and wholesale fish business is operated. There is adequate room for expansion of terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contract for maintenance dredging from the previous year was completed in December 1983. Contract earnings for maintenance dredging were $54,704. Survey, supervision and inspection and final plotting cost totalled $32,765. New work: The same contract provided for construction of an 8-foot access channel. Final contract cost for this portion of the work was $94,432. Survey, supervision, inspection and final plotting costs totalled $43,938. 20. PENOBSCOT RIVER, ME Location. Drains a large number of lakes and small streams in north, central and eastern Maine and, after assuming definite character as a stream, flows about 100 miles southerly through middle of State, discharging into Penobscot Bay, about 90 miles northeast of Portland, Maine. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13309). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1938, and 1949. Existing project. Dredging channel 22 feet deep between Winterport and Bucksport, about 16 miles below Bangor; for straightening, widening, and deepening to 15 feet channel near Stearns Mill and near Crosby's Narrows from 3 to 4.5 miles below Bangor; and for deepening harbor at Bangor to 14 feet and widening it along Bangor front, giving an additional width of from 100 to 300 feet for a length of about 2,000 feet. Project depths refer to mean low water which is 3 feet above extreme low tide. Mean range of tide at Bangor is 13.1 feet, and extreme about 15 feet. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Existing project was completed in 1913. Controlling depths at mean low water were: 22-foot channel between Winterport and Bucksport. generally 22.1) feet (1964) except 19.3 feet in channel opposite Lawrence ('ove (1968); and 19.0 feet in channel opposite Frankfort Flats (1968): 15-foot channel near Sterns Mill and near Crosby's Narrows. 15 feet available for variable widths (1964); 14 foot harbor at Bangor, 13 feet available for a width of 270 to 6(1)0 feet (1964). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Riverfront of Bangor has 12 wharves, most of which are timber-crib stone-ballasted type. Eleven wharves have railroad connections. On east side of river at Brewer, opposite Bangor, there is one water terminal, a coal handling plant having mechanical appliances and three petroleum products storage plants. At South Brewer there is a large pulp and paper plant which has water connections, oil pumping and storage facilities. A number of private wharves are open to public at moderate charges. At Bucksport north side of river there are three important terminals, one a coal handling plant and two used by a large paper manufacturing plant which has terminal facilities for receipt and storage of oil products and pulpwood. Facilities are adequate for existing needs. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded in June 1984 and completed in August 1984 for dredging the 22 foot Lawrence Cove Channel. Contract amount was $239,268f date $172,000 has been paid out. Final payment will be made in the next fiscal year. Hired labor costs to (date were $30,700 for supervision and inspection and surveys. 21. POINT JUDITH POND AND HARBOR OF REFUGE POINT JUDITH, RI Location. Point Judith marks southwestern entrance to Narragansett Bay. Harbor lies in shallow bight west of point, about 14 miles southwest of Newport Harbor, RI, and 33 miles east of New London Harbor, CT. Point Judith Pond is a shallow salt pond, with a length north and south of about 4 miles., lying in rear of sandy beach of Rhode Island shore, just west of Point Judith Harbor by a narrow opening through sand dunes. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13218 and 13219). Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1977. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). All work for project authorized prior to 1949 was completed in 1950. Breakwaters were completed in 1914 and dredging of shoals in project area was done in 1921. Main and east shore arm breakwater had deteriorated and required restoration to project design. In 1962 reconstruction of east arm breakwater and main breakwater dock facilities were completed. Rehabilitation required for remainder of 1-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 breakwater restoration was completed in October 1963. The extension of the 15-foot channel was completed in April 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. For further details on terminal facilities see Annual Report for 1977. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract awarded last fiscal year to repair the east shore arm breakwater was completed in November 1983. The total contract amount was $784,369. Costs this fiscal year were $175,800. A contract to repair the main breakwater was awarded in August 1983 in the amount of $2,275,000. The contract is scheduled to be completed in September 1985. Contract costs this fiscal year were $324,364. Hired labor costs of $95,561 were incurred for the preparation of plans and( specifications, supervision and inspection, surveys and sampling and testing. 22. PORTLAND HARBOR, ME Location. On southwestern coast of Maine about 100 miles northeast of Boston, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13292). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1936. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1978. Project was completed in 1966, except for ledge removal that was completed in 1968. Iocal cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 37 waterfront facilities, of which 4 are not used. Seven wharves are publicly owned, 4 by the U.S. Government, 2 by State of Maine, and 1 by city of South Portland. Mechanical-handling facilities are available at 24 wharves. Railroad connections have been made to 27 of them. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see page 13, H. Doc. 216, 87th Cong., and Port Series 1 for Ports of Searsport Harbor and Portland, Maine and Portsmouth, NH (revised 1964). Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract awarded in July 1984 for maintenance dredging of the 35 foot channel was completed in September 1984. Contract payment was $279,998.A total of 20,000 c.y. of material was removed. Hired labor costs of $70,123 were incurred for the preparation of plans and specifications, supervision and inspection and surveys. 23. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER, ME AND NH Location. Piscataqua River forms a portion of boundary between Maine and New Hampshire. Mouth of this river is called Portsmouth Harbor. It is 45 miles northeast of Boston Harbor, MA and 37 miles southwest of Portland harbor, ME. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13278). Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1892. Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1972. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Removal of ledge rock areas in the 35-foot channel, except for removal of sand shoal 400 feet upstream of Interstate Bridge, and removal of railroad engine from the harbor were completed in 1966. Shoal removal was completed in 1969 in the 35-foot channel. Construction of 6-foot channel and anchorage was completed in 1971 at a reduced scope due to high construction costs, evidenced by initial bids received. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. For further details on terminal facilities see Annual Report for 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by government Hopper Dredge MCFARLAND was awarded and completed in March 1984 at a cost of $837,332. Hired labor costs of $84,219 were incurred for range layouts, an environmental assessment and surveys. 24. PROVINCETOWN HARBOR, MA Location. In the bight at northern extremity of Cape Cod, 40 miles southeast of Gloucester, 24 miles northeast of Cape Cod Canal and about 40 miles southeast of entrance to Boston Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13249 and 13246). Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1931. Existing project. Preservation of point of land forming the harbor, a rubblestone protection dike 5 feet wide and 15 feet above mean low water, 6,150 feet across House Point Island Flats from Steven's Point to Wood End, and a stone breakwater to elevation 15.5 feet with a top width of 10 feet commencing at a point about opposite MacMilliam (Town) wharf, approximately 835 feet from shore and extending 2,500 feet northeasterly. The 300-foot extension of Long Point beach protection and bringing it up to grade, where necessary, portion is considered inactive. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Existing project is complete except for inactive portion. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Developed waterfront of Provincetown is approximately 1.5 miles in extent and mostly privately owned. There are seven piers in this area which handle entire commerce of harbor. None of the piers has railroad connections. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded in March 1984 for repairs to the harbor dike. Completion is scheduled for next fiscal year. Contract earnings through this fiscal year amount to $547,260. Hired labor costs of $80,253 were incurred for the preparation of plans and specifications and supervision and inspection. 25. STONINGTON HARBOR, ME Location. The town of Stonington in Hancock County is the southernmost of two municipalities located on Deer 1-10 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Isle at the eastern boundry of Penobscot Bay approximately 90 miles east of Portland and 40 miles south of Bangor, ME. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13315 and 13308). Existing project. Provides for an access channel 10 feet deep extending from deep water in Deer Isle Thoroughfare 525 feet for a width of 100 feet, narrowing to 60 feet in width for a length of 275 feet, for a total length of 800 feet; and an anchorage basin 10 acres in size, of which 3 acres would be dredged to a depth of 8 feet mean low water and 7 acres dredged to a depth of 6 feet mean low water. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project is complete. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are presently no public shore facilties in Stonington Harbor. There are several private commercial piers and wharves where Stonington fishermen currently offload. There are also two municipally- owned docks which are only accessible at higher stages of the tide. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for construction of the newly-authorized Federal project was awarded in November 1983. Work began in December and was completed in May 1984. A total of 44,600 cubic yards of ordinary material were dredged at a cost of $289,900 and the removal of rock ledge cost $200,000 for a total contract cost of $489,900. Hired labor costs of $90,983 were incurred for supervision and inspection, surveys and final plotting. 26. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 1-Q at end of chapter). 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 1-C at end of chapter). 28. NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-H at end of chapter). Alterations of Bridges 29. AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION Location. Chelsea Street Highway Bridge MA. Construction was completed in October 1961 with a Federal cost of $138,518. In addition non-Federal contributed funds amounted to $8,062. For details see page 63 of Annual Report for 1962. Beach Erosion Control 30. CLIFF WALK, NEWPORT, RI Location. In Newport. RI, about 25 miles south of Providence, it faces the Atlantic Ocean near mouth of Narragansett Bay on south side of Aquidneck Island. and extends 3.5 miles southward from west end of Newport (Eastons) Beach to and around Lands End and thence northward to east end of Bailey Beach. (See Coast Guard and Geodetic Survey Coast Charts 236, 353, and 1210). Existing project. Provides for construction of improvements for shore protection at Newport, RI, extending 18,000 feet from west end of Newport Beach to east end of Bailey Beach; consisting of: Intermittent reaches of backfill, dumped riprap, stone mounds, slope revetment and breakwaters; concrete toe walls, seawalls and parapet walls; grading and surfacing Cliff Walk and providing drainage therefor. Mean range of tide is 3.5 feet and spring range is 4.4 feet. Latest approved estimate of cost is $3,281,000 of which $2,558,000 is non-Federal. Latest published map is in project document (H. Doc. 228, 89th Cong., 1st sess). (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Initial portion of the project was completed in 1972. Remainder of project could not be completed at that time due to lack of local funds. A second portion is now proposed to be accomplished in an area near Salve Regina College. Congress appropriated funds in FY 1982, but work on additional area has not been initiated. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Due to financing difficulties on the part of the City of Newport with regard to their obtaining National Park Service funding up-front to participate in a Corps cost-shared project, the City opted to undertake the next phase of project construction on its own using City, State and National Park Service funds. Accordingly, at the City's request, the Corps turned over the completed plans and specifications documents to the City of Newport in February 1984. 31. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of beach erosion projects were not conducted in fiscal year 1984. 32. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-D at end of chapter). 33. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-I at end of chapter). 1-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Flood Control 34. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN MA AND RI Works covered by this plan consist of a dam and reservoir on West River and local protection works at three cities on Blackstone River. Flood C(ontrol Act of 1944 authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local protection works at Worcester, MA, and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, RI, substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2nd session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project at Lower Woonsocket, RI, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2nd session. Local protection nonstructural project authorized in 1982 for Belmont park section of Warwick, RI along the Pawtuxet River. (See Table 1-K at end of chapter on reservoir and local protection projects, Blackstone River basin, for projects comprising authorized plan). 34A. PAWTUXET RIVER, WARWICK, RI Location. The Pawtuxet River flows in a northeasterly direction through West Warwick, Warwick and Cranston before it discharges into Narragansett Bay at Pawtuxet Cove. The watershed has a maximum length of 18 miles running west to east and 23 miles width from north to south. The drainage area at its mouth in Pawtuxet Cove is 230 square miles. The project is located in the Norwood section of Warwick, locally referred to as Belmont Park Existing project. Consists of acquisition, demolition and removal from the flood plain a total of 60 homes; acquisition of 19 privately-owned vacant lots; construction of 17 above-ground utility room additions to residences which experience basement flooding; and the installation of an automated flood forecasting and warning system. The current estimated project cost is $3,700,000 with the Federal government paying 80 percent of the project cost up to a Federal limit of $4 million. After implementation, the City of Warwick would be responsible for the cost of operating and maintaining the flood forecasting/warning system. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for authorizing legislation). Project implementation was begun in September 1982 with property acquisition. Local cooperation. Local interests must implement acqusition and removal of properties and pay 20 percent of project costs unless total project costs exceed $5,000,000 in which case local interests incur all costs above that figure. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Acquisition continued. A total of 22 properties were acquired during the year, bringing the total to date to 46. Design of the utility room additions continued. 34B. WEST HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on West River, MA, 3 miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast of Uxbridge, MA. (See Geological Survey maps - Blackstone, MA and RI, Milford, MA, and Grafton, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Work on contract for dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in June 1967. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 34C. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS) MA Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts- Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles Existing project. The project provides for Federal acquisition and protection of 17 natural valley storage areas totalling 8,136 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. The acquisition in fee or by easement of the major natural valley storage areas within the Charles River watershed is intended as a multiple-purpose project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife management. The latest cost estimate for new work is $8,300,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Land acquisition is complete. A total of 3,252 acres have been acquired in fee at a cost of $2,011,566 and restrictive easements have been obtained for 4,863 acres at a cost of $521,493. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, utilities bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characteristics of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plan lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances have been received. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Resolution of remaining condemnation cases continued. Of 99 tracts remaining to be settled at the beginning of the fiscal year, 27 were resolved leaving a total of 72 remaining in condemnation at year end. Fiscal year costs totalled $118,167 including $32,522 for fee/easement acquisition, $23,245 for miscellaneous contracts such as appraisals and title evidence, and $62,400 in hired labor costs for project administration. Maintenance: Contract costs of $50,486 for boundary marking and $5,000 for trail marking were incurred. Hired labor costs for project surveillance and inspection as well as land use administration were $65,973. 35. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN VT, NH, MA AND CT Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a 1-12 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION radius of 230 miles from Hartford, CT, and local protection works at several cities in the basin Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by Act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction of 10 reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2nd session, as the same may be revised upon further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control of floods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress, 2nd session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood protection projects in the plan. Act of October 15, 1940, modified Act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, CT, as set forth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session. Act of August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3rd session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter Act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, CT. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conservation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir in West River Basin, VT; directing consultation with affected States during course of investigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected State for written views and recommendations for reservoir projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, CT, authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, NH, in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This Act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain. The Island, and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch of Westfield River, MA and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winstead, CT. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, MA, substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, MA, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, CT, substantially in accordance with House Document 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, NH, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60, 90th Congress: and plan for protection on Park River, CT, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction of a reservoir at Claremont, NH. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of Gaysville Lake. Vermont project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, Vermont; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, New Hampshire were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, New Hampshire project expired in April 1978 due to lack of local cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, MA, Hartford, VT and Wethersfield, CT authorized and constructed in accordance with section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-L at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works included in comprehensive plan. 35A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT. It is 2 miles north of village of Jamaica, VT. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Construction of initial recreation facilities was initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre,MA, 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles, northwest of Worcester, MA (See Geological Survey maps for Barre, MA, and Wachusett Mountain, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 1-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 35C. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, MA and 7.5 miles northwest of city of (;ardtner. MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, MA-Nil and Templeton, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. IProject is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. IAcal cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. IAocal interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35D. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT Location. I)amsite is in town of Colebrook, Litchfield County, CT, on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at Riverton, CT, and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. Local cooperation. Water supply contract was signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. Repayment is being made in accordance with provisions of 1958 Water Supply Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35E. CONANT BROOK DAM, MA Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about 2 miles southwest of community of Monson. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Construction of dam, highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35F. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is 4 miles north of town of Huntington. MA, and about 12 miles west of city of Northampton. MA. (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, M A). Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed December 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for painting the service gates awarded in August 1983 was completed in November 1983. Final contract amount was $16,500. A contract awarded in May 1984 for rehabilitation of the gatehouse is scheduled for completion in June 1985. The contract amount is $284,122. 35G. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Middle Branch of Westfield River, I mile above its confluence with main stem of Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town of Chester. (See Geological Survey map for Chester,M A). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 applies and fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in September 1983 to replace the emergency generator was completed in April 1984. Contract amount was $19,200. 35H. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 15 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and 1 mile northwest of North Hartland, VT. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover, NH-VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in June 1984 to replace the emergency generator and feeder circuit is scheduled for completion in November 1984. The contract amount is $24,980. 1-14 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 351. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT Location. Dam is in town of Springfield. VT. on Black River. 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and 3 miles northwest of Springfield. VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Ludlow, VT and Claremont, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35J. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Otter Brook. 2.4 miles upstream from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene. (See National Ocean Survey maps for Keene, NH - VT, and Monadnock, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in June 1983 to repair project roads and parking areas was completed in October 1983. Final contract costs were $54,232. A contract awarded in June 1984 to replace the emergency generator is scheduled for completion in November 1984. The contract amount is $21,375. Another contract awarded in July 1984 for $8,900 to replace the heating system in the Control Tower is scheduled for completion in December 1984. 35K. PARK RIVER, HARTFORD, CT Location. On the Park River in the city of Hartford, Hartford County, CT. (See Geological Survey map of Hartford North, CT). Existing project. Authorized as a modification to completed Hartford, CT local protection project. (For details on completed project see Annual Report for 1960). Two sections of reinforced concrete conduit totalling 2,569 feet with width of 34 feet and height of 26.5 feet on the Park River; one section of reinforced concrete conduit 103 feet long, 36 feet wide and 27.5 feet high on the South Branch; two sections of reinforced concrete conduit 1,364 feet long, 22 feet wide and 25 feet high on the North Branch; a reinforced concrete junction structure to cornmbine the flows from the North and South Branches and distribute them to the Park River and auxiliary conduits and thence to the Connecticut River, circular auxiliary conduit approximately 9,200 feet long to be constructed as a deep tunnel in rock with an inside diameter of 22 feet and lined with 9-inch thick precast concrete walls, an inlet structure and an outlet structure; a concrete headwall at the entrance to the North Branch conduit extension: and two pumping stations on the banks of the Park River. The lastest approved cost estimate (September 1984) for new work is $1,300,000 for lands including relocations and $60,177,000 for construction, a total of $61,477,000. Total includes local costs of $1,200,000 for lands and $100,00() for relocations, a total of $1,300,000. (See Table I-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). (Construction was completed in 1981. Resolution of claims and administrative close out to be accomplished. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction and operation of project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works: maintain and operate all works after completion; upon completion of conduit construction replace pavements, sidewalks, drainage and other appurtenances, including those at Broad Street, Flower Street and Laurel Street and bear cost of removal, replacement and modification to sewers, drains, utilities or highways beyond the area required for excavation and construction of the project; prevent changes in headpool ponding areas which would decrease the effectiveness of the improvements and if ponding areas and capacities are impaired, promptly substitute equivalent storage capacity; and undertake all practical measures to prevent pollution from entering the Park River conduit system. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A remedial work contract to correct undersized stone at the upstream end of the project was awarded in April 1984. Work began in June and was completed in September at a contract cost of approximately $170,000. 35L. SAXTONS RIVER, ROCKINGHAM, VT Location. The town of Rockingham is located along the west bank of the Connecticut River in southeastern Vermont, about 22 miles north of Brattleboro and 8 miles south of Springfield. The town is comprised of several villages, including Saxtons River which is located along the banks of the Saxtons River, a tributary of the Connecticut River. The total drainage area of the Saxton is 78 square miles and it flows from its upper watershed in the Green Mountains generally west to east for a distance of about 20 miles to its confluence with the Connecticut River. Existing project. Provides for correction of streambank erosion problems that endanger town-owned access ramps to the Saxtons River which are used during fire emergencies to pump water from the river. Work includes providing for construction of a precast concrete, modulartype wall about 175 feet long to protect the primary pumping site. The current estimated project cost is $120,000 (September 1984). (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights- 1-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 of-way and utility relocations necessary for project construction; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functhe project; and assume the responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work on the prior year contract was begun and the project was 95 percent complete at fiscal year end. Contract earnings were $64,057. The project is expected to be completed in October 1984. 35M. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and 5 miles north of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, NH - VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary phase in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35N. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT, and about 2 miles west of Townshend, VT. Reservoir extends upstream about 4 miles. (See Geological Survey maps for Saxtons River, VT, and Londonderry, VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in October 1969. Secondary phase completed in September 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance A contract to replace the floodgate hoisting cables was awarded in January 1984 and completed in April 1984. The contract amount was $8,575. A contract awarded in June 1984 to replace the exterior gatehouse hoist is scheduled for completion in January 1985. The contract amount is $17,875. 350. TULLY LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. It is 1 mile north of Fryville, MA, and 3.5 miles north of Athol, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, MA-NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood ('ontrol Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35P. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT Location. I)am is on Ompompanosuc River 4 miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is one-fourth mile north of Union Village, VT, and 11 miles north of White River Junction, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Strafford, VT and Mount Cube, NH -VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in May 1983 for repairs to the Operating House masonry was completed in October 1983. Final contract costs were $14,089. 35Q. WEST SPRINGFIELD, CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, MA Location. The West Springfield local protection works are located in the town of West Springfield, MA. The project is on the west bank of the Connecticut River, 76 miles above its mouth. (See Geological Survey maps for Springfield South and West Springfield, MA-CT). Existing project. This project consists of a system of earth levees and concrete floodwalls approximately 24,500 feet in length. The system starts at high ground, in the vicinity of Harrison Place, and extends downstream along the Connecticut River and up the north bank of the Westfield River to high ground at the Boston & Albany Railroad. The work involved raising 13,700 feet of existing levee, constructing 2,300 feet of floodwall, improving 2,400 feet of river bank, and treating 6,100 feet of existing levee foundation. Three pumping statons with appurtenant drainage facilities were also constructed for the disposal of interior drainage. The project, with the approved plan of reservoirs, is designed to protect against a flood greater than any of record. The levee and floodwall grades are, at all points, above the maximum stage of the greatest flood of record, that of March 1936. A modification to the project was authorized in October 1982 providing for the raising of the floodwall sections by one foot and the provision of a flood forecasting system. 1-16 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION The project is a unit of the comprehensive plan of flood control and other purposes in the Connecticut River Basin and was authorized by the Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938. The project is complete. Construction of the prior project work was initiated in March 1939 and completed in July 1942 with the exception of foundation treatment along the Westfield River south of Agawam Bridge, which was initiated in May 1947 and completed in November 1947, and relief well and drainage system, which was initiated in August 1952 and completed in July 1953. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: On-site work for the contract awarded in September 1983 for floodwall modification began in April 1984. The contract was completed in August 1984 at a cost of $72,364. 36. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA Authorized improvements in Housatonic River Basin are comprised of seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of the Housatonic River, and seven local protection projects, five of which are along Naugatuck River, one on Housatonic River and one on Still River. Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Emergency bank protection projects at Alford, Green River, Massachusetts and at Sheffield, MA, and Salisbury, CT along the Housatonic were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. A project for local flood protection along the Housatonic River in Pittsfield, Massachusetts was authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project; also Table 1-M on dams and reservoirs and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin). 36A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook about 2 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Road relocation completed in November 1967. Contract for construction of dam and appurtenances was awarded in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 36B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook in town of Plymouth CT, about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See (;eological Survey map for Waterbury, C(T). Existing project. For description of complete(d improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 and completed in August 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2. Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 36C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook in city of Waterbury and towns on Middlebury and Naugatuck, CT, about 1.4 miles upstream of confluence of Naugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete except for construction of additional recreational facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 36D. HOUSATONIC RIVER, PITTSFIELD, MA Location. The city of Pittsfield is located in Berkshire County, approximately 6 miles east of the Massachusetts- New York border and about 40 miles northwest of Springfield, Massachusetts, where the confluence of the East and West Branch of the Housatonic Rivers from the headwaters of the main stem. Existing project. Supplement the existing 8 foot high by 15 foot wide stone arch culvert under the Penn Central Railroad embankment with a new 15 foot diameter pipe culvert. Construct an improved channel by clear cutting the existing stream bank extending about 2,000 feet upstream from the railroad culvert. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project is complete. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 1-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Operations during fiscal year. New work: The contract awarded in September 1982 for construction of the local protection project was completed in November 1983. Contract earnings this fiscal year were $109,188 for a final contract cost of $421.318. 36E. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town of Thomaston, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1966 and completed in August 1967. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislationn requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 36F. THOMASTON DAM, CT Location. On Naugatuck River about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, CT. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was started in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 37. NONEWAUG RIVER, WOODBURY, CT Location. The town of Woodbury is located in western central Connecticut about 14 miles west of Waterbury, at the headwaters of the Pomperaug River. Located in the lower portion of the Housatonic River Basin, the Pomperaug River is formed by the confluence of the Weekeepeemee and Nonewaug Rivers in Woodbury. Existing project. A gabion-type retaining wall along the base of the eroded riverbank with compacted pervious backfill placed behind the wall up to the roadway. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations necessary for project construction. Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation and prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for project construction was awarded in October 1983. Work began in November and was completed in August 1984. Contract earnings were $151,244 to date, pending determination of final quantities. 38. ISLESBORO (THE NARROWS), ME Location. The town of Islesboro is an island, located in the west-central section of Penobscot Bay about three miles east of Lincolnville and about 30 miles south of Bangor. The island is about 10 miles long and the project is located at the center of the island in a location known as The Narrows. Existing project. Provides for shoreline erosion protection extending along about 325 feet adjacent to Main Road which connects the two halves of the island by placement of stone slope protection. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Project is complete. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the contract awarded in September 1983 began in November and all work was completed in January 1984. Contract earnings were $105,025. 39. JOHNSON BAY, LUBEC, ME Location. The town of Lubec is located in the Maine Eastern Coastal Area. It is the easternmost community in the continental United States, situated on Holmes Bay adjacent to Campobello Island, Canada. It is approximately 25 miles northeast of Machias, ME and 25 miles southeast of Calais, ME. Existing project. Emergency bank protection project provides for protection of eroded shoreline at Johnson Bay adjacent to a section of Commercial Street. Work consists of removal of existing timber bulkhead and its replacement with stone protection, random fill and a gabion wall. Construction along a 300-foot reach of shoreline was completed in June 1980. Following a fire in adjacent timber bulkhead, protection along an additional 125 feet of shoreline was authorized in May 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to extend the shore protection an additional 125 feet was awarded in September 1983. The work began in January 1984 and was completed that month. Final contract cost was $34,708. 1-18 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 40. PORT 5 FACILITY, BRIDGEPORT, CT Location. The Naval Veterans Port 5 Facility is located in the city of Bridgeport in coastal southwestern Connecticut, specifically on a peninsula extending from the right bank at the mouth of Cedar Creek and facing south toward Black Rock Harbor and Long Island Sound. Existing project. Provides for protection of Naval Veterans property against further shoreline erosion from wave action by placement of 250 linear feet of graded riprap slope protection. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Project is complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States all private lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility relocation necessary for project construction; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project; and assume responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal limitation of $250,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for project construction was awarded in January 1984. Work began in April and was completed in June. Paid contract earnings to date were $152,415. Pending computation of final quantities, the final contract cost is anticipated to be approximately $159,000. 41. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by Act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control reservoirs, related flood control works which may be found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and reported under projects for individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merimack River Basin. For final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report for 1946. A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system for four reservoirs and three local protection projects for flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction of Saxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. An emergency bank protection project at Amesbury, MA was authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-N at end of chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works included for construction under comprehensive plan). 41A. BLACKWATER DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, NH, 8.2 miles above confluence with Contocook River and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, just above village of Swetts Mills, 12.5 miles by highway northwest of Concord, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsage, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 41B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, NH and 14 miles east of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Manadnock, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and completed in March 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 41C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Pemigewasset River, NH main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 24 miles upstream of Franklin, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Holderness, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded 1-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 in September 1983 for removal of debris and sediment is scheduled for completion in November 1984. The contract amount is $95,000. 41D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH Location. Hopkinton i)am is on Contoocook River, NH, 17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton. Everett dam is on Piscataquog River, NH, 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of East Weare. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey map for Hillsboro, NH, and Concord, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 42. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN, AND ACUSHNET, MA Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, MA and National Ocean Survey Charts 13230, 13070 and 13218). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is completed. Construction of barrier and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962 and completed in January 1966. Construction of the pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract awarded last fiscal year for installation of 12 new axle and wheel assemblies was completed in May 1984. Contract earnings of $143,000 were incurred this fiscal year. Two new automatic nitrogen bubbler-type recording gauges to monitor ocean and harbor tide levels were purchased and installed at a cost of $11,200. Operating costs included: $121,800 for project operations; $22,400 for administration activities; $300 for engineering and design; and $30,000 for contract supervision and administration. 43. NEW LONDON, CT Location. In the city of New London, CT, about 45 miles southeast of Hartford, CT, and 50 miles southwest of Providence, RI. (See Geological Survey map for New London, CT). Existing project. The hurricane protection project consists of approximately 715 feet of rock-faced earthfill dike and 800 feet of I-walls around the northerly shore of Shaw C(ove and the regrading of approximately 21 acres of land along the west shore of the Cove to elevation 12.5 feet mean sea level. Top of dike and floodwalls will be 14.5 feet mean sea level. Appurtenant structures will include a street gate, pressure conduit and a pumping station to discharge interior drainage. Latest estimate (December 1983) for the project is $10,360,000 for construction and $1,140,000 for lands and damages including relocations, a total of $11,500,000 for new work. Total includes local costs of $1,140,000 for lands and relocations and a $2,310,000 cash contribution. (See Table I-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project is under construction and is approximately 93 percent complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide lands and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make alterations and relocations: (c) bear 30 percent of construction cost with credit allowed for (a) and (b): (d) hold the United States free from damages; and (e) maintain and operate all works. Assurances have been provided. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the Part IV contract awarded in May 1982 was continued and completed in April 1984. Fiscal year earnings were $171,672 for a total to date of $845,172 exclusive of work being done for the Federal Railroad Administration. A contract for Part V - Dike and Appurtenant Structures, was awarded in January 1984. Earnings to date are $410,000 and this contract is 50 percent complete. Final design of the last contract, Part VI, continued. 44. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, ME Comprehensive plan for water resources development within the basin was comprised of the multiple-purpose Dickey and Lincoln School Reservoirs on the upper Saint John River. Projects were authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 substantially in accordance with plans included in report of Department of Interior and Corps of Engineers dated August 1964 which is supplement to July 1963 report of International Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project and Upper Saint John River Hydroelectric Power Development. *The Dickey Dam component of the project was deauthorized by Public Law 97-128 on 29 December 1981. Local protection project at Fort Kent authorized by Chief of Engineers on 25 September 1975 in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-F at end of chapter for authorized multiple-purpose projects including power). 44A. DICKEY-LINCOLN SCHOOL LAKES, ME Location. On Upper Saint John River near village of Dickey, ME, about 340 miles north of Boston, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Allagash, ME). 1-20 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Existing project. Plan consists of Dickey and Lincoln School Reservoirs functioning as a single coordinating unit. Dickey Dam. on Saint John River immediately above its confluence with the Allagash River, would consist of two rolled earthfill embankments about 10.200 feet total length with maximum height of 335 feet. Five earthfilled perimeter dikes acting in conjunction with the dam would impound a reservoir with total capacity of 7,700,000 acrefeet of which 2,900,000 acre-feet would be actively utilized for power and flood control purposes. Reservoir area at maximum operating level is 86,000 acres and its upper reaches extend into the Canadian Province of Quebec. Power facilities would be provided at the dam consisting of 4 units at 190,000 kilowatts each, one of which would be a reversible unit, for a total of 760,000 kilowatts. The outlet works would include two 25 foot diameter tunnels; a low level diversion tunnel at streambed elevation and an intermediate level tunnel approximately 110 feet above streambed. A chute-type spillway with two 600-foot long curved crest would be located between the two embankments. Drainage area controlled is 2,725 square miles. Basic provisions would be included in the initial project to accommodate future installation of two additional 190,000 kilowatt reversible units at Dickey. Provisions include excavation of forebay and tailrace channels, construction of headworks and powerhouse foundation, and increasing the height of Lincoln School Dam. Lincoln School Dam, 11 miles downstream from Dickey Dam, would consist of an earthfill embankment, a powerhouse in the right abutment, and a gated spillway structure between the embankment and powerhouse. Overall length would be 2,100 feet and maximum height 90 feet. Power facilities would include two 30,000 kilowatt units and one 10,000 kilowatt unit for a total of 70,000 kilowatts. Concrete spillway structure would be 294 feet long and contain four 60-by-50 foot taintor gates. A public highway would be constructed across the dam and spillway. The reservoir would have 32,450 acre-feet of usable storage for regulation of Dickey Dam discharges, powder pondage and afterbay storage for the Dickey pumpback operations. Drainage area above Lincoln School is 4,086 square miles. Aproved estimate (October 1981) for new work is $67,110,000 for land including relocations and $727,890,000 for construction, a total of $795,000,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Deauthorization of the Dickey Dam component was recommended by the Congress and enacted into law on December 29, 1981. At the direction of Congress, a study was conducted to determine the engineering, economic and marketability feasability of a Lincoln School only. The study of the economic and financial feasibility of a Lincoln School only project was completed in 1983. The report concludes that while the project is questionably feasible economically, it is not feasible financially at this time. Estimate (October 1982) for a Lincoln School only project is $183,000,000. Local cooperation. No local cooperation requirements were stipulated in the authorizing document. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Reclassification of Lincoln School project to inactive category has been recommended. 45. BAGADUCE RIVER, CASTINE, ME Location. The town of Castine is located along the northeast side of Penobscot Bay in Hancock County about 30 miles south of Bangor and 10 miles east of Belfast. The town forms the southern end of a peninsula that juts into Penobscot Bay where the Penobscot and Bagaduce Rivers converge. The specific project location is at historic Fort Pentagoet along the Bagaduce River at Castine Harbor. Existing project. Provides for protection against further shoreline erosion of the archeological remains of Fort Pentagoet by the placement of stone slope protection along 200 linear feet of shoreline. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project is complete. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work on the contract awarded in September 1983 began in November and was completed in May 1984. Final contract cost was $75,653. 46. SAND COVE, GOULDSBORO, ME Location. Gouldsboro, Maine is situated west of Gouldsboro Bay and east of Bar Harbor. The study area is located 130 miles northeast of Portland. Maine and 55 miles southeast of Bangor, Maine. Existing project. Construction of a graded riprap revetment along 500 feet of Corea Causeway to prevent erosion and loss of the roadway. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations necessary for project construction. Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Assume all responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation. Prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract in amount of $85,778 for project construction was awarded in May 1984. Work began in June and was completed in August. Final contractor earnings were $82,318. 47. SEBASTICOOK RIVER, HARTLAND, ME Location. Hartland is situated on the Sebasticook River in Somerset County, approximately 50 miles west of Bangor and 30 miles north of Augusta, ME. Existing project. Provides for a system of earth dikes and floodwalls to protect a major tanning company, removal of the Right Mill Dam and construction of an earth dike across the bypass channel to protect residential and cornm- 1-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 mercial properties, and construction of a water supply pipeline to ensure continued fire protection and process water. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for authorizing legislation). Project is complete. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work on the contract awarded in September 1982 was completed in November 1983. Total contract earnings were $1,300,363. Project was turned over to local interests for future operation and maintenance. 48. STAMFORD, CT Location. In Fairfield County on north shore of Long Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Stamford, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project was completed in 1969. Local interests still owe a substantial amount based on recent claims settlements, including interest payment under the Contract Disputes Act. Local cooperation. Local interests will provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; make modifications to existing storm drainage system which may be required to obtain full benefits of protection plan, all necessary modifications to existing sanitary sewer facilities required to prevent entry of tidal-waters, and all changes, alterations and additions to or relocations of any buildings and utilities made necessary by construction of project; bear 30 percent of total first cost, estimated at $4,340,000 and consisting of cost items listed above plus a cash contribution estimated at $3,150,000; contribute in cash, in lieu of cost of annual maintenance and operation of tidal portion of East Branch barrier which is to be operated and maintained by the United States, an amount estimated at $880,000; maintain and operate all works after completion with exception of tidal portion of East Branch barrier and aids to navigation; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances received and cash contributions have been deposited except for $662,000 outstanding which is local share of final claims settlement including interest payment. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in September 1983, for gate realignment was completed in April 1984. Total contract amount was $180,700. 49. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI, AND MA Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles from Norwich, CT, and a channel enlargement on Shetucket River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and authorized $6 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2nd session. (Table 1-0 at end of chapter on reservoirs and local protection districts, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan). 49A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River and 8 miles northeast of Southbridge, MA. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA and CT, and Leicester, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract from prior year to repair Davis Road was completed in November 1983. The final contract amount was $24,476. 49B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River and 1 mile southwest of village of Fiskdale, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Whales, MA and CT, Southbridge, MA and CT, East Brookfield, MA, and Warren, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 49C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in town of Oxford, MA, about 5 miles north of Webster, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA, and CT, Leicester, MA, Worcester South MA, and Oxford, MA). 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act a 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 49D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, CT, on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with Willimantic River. It is 4 miles northeast of city of Willimantic, CT. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 49E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River in town of Thompson, CT. Site is in village of West Thompson, 2 miles upstream from city of Putnam, CT. (See Geological Survey map, Putnam, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood-Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 49F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of Sturbridge and Southbridge, MA, and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps for Southbridge, MA and RI, and East Brookfield, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 50. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works constructed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regular inspections of the following projects were made during the fiscal year: CONNECTICUT: October 1983 and May 1984 - Ansonia, Derby, East Hartford, New London, Pawcatuck, Stamford; November 1983 and May 1984 - Hartford; April 1984 -- Colchester/East Hampton, North Canaan, Salisbury, Torrington, Winsted; May 1984 - Danbury, East Branch, Hall Meadow, Mad River, Norwalk, Squantz Pond, Sucker Brook, Waterbury/Watertown, Wethersfield. MAINE: May 1984 - Beals, Blaine, Cherryfield, Fort Kent, Harpswell, Hartland, Lubec, Indian Island, Whiting. MASSACHUSETTS: October 1983 and May 1984 - Charles River Dam, Northampton, Saxonville, Springfield, West Springfield; October 1983 and April 1984 - Haverhill, Lowell; November 1983 - Chicopee Falls; November 1983 and May 1984 - Chicopee, Holyoke; May 1984 - Amesbury, Blackstone, Canton, Fitchburg, Gardner, Hayward Creek, Huntington, Quincy, Scituate, Smelt Brook, Three Rivers, Ware; April 1984 - Alford, Lancaster, Lee, Sheffield, West Warren, Worcester. NEW HAMPSHIRE: October 1983 - Keene; October 1983 and May 1984 - Nashua; April 1984 - Charlestown, Lincoln, Shelburne, Wilton; May 1984 - Farmington, North Stratford, West Stewartstown; September 1984 - Lancaster. RHODE ISLAND: November 1983 and May 1984 - Upper and Lower Woonsocket; May 1984 - Fox Point Hurricane Barrier. VERMONT: April 1984 - Weston. 51. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS A coordinated system of reservoirs, many of which are multipurpose in anature and all containing significant amounts of storage for flood control purposes, has been established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of floodflows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upom its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply and flow augmentation releases were made from selected reservoirs. Operation of Corps flood control reservoirs in New England accounted for $443.5 million in damages prevented FY1984. The New England area experienced three flooding events during FY1984, with the first occurring in December 1983 as a result of heavy rainfall coincedent with snowmelt. All Corps reservoir releases were throttled as a precaution during this event, and avariable amounts of storage were utilized; however, only the Connecticut River Basin experienced appriciable riverflows. Because of the 1-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 operation of Corps reservoirs in the basin, significant damages were prevented during this event. In April 1984, another intense storm hit New England with 2 to 3 inches of rain in western Massachusetts, Connecticut, and southern Vermont, and 1 to 2 inches of rain in central Massachusetts and New Hanpshire. This rain coupled with snowmelt from temperatures in the forties and fifties caused all rivers in the region to rise to bankful capacities. On the Merrimack River at Lowell, the discharge was the highest since 1977; however, due to the operation of Corps reservoirs, flood damages were minimized along the entire length of the Merrimack River. In the smaller basins, Corps reservoirs prevented flood levels from occurring along the Naugatuck, Thames and Blackstone Rivers. Although stages on the Connecticut River approached channel capacities in Massachusetts and Connecticut, flood crests were kept 1 to 2 feet below damaging flood levels. On the tributaries of the Connecticut, extensive damages were prevented downstream of Corps reservoirs. During the last week of May 1984, a large slow moving storm system passed through New England bringin rainfall on Memorial Day that continued for approximately a week. Precipitation amounts varied from 8 to 9 inches in Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island to about 5 to 7 inches in New hampshire and Vermont. Flood levels on the Connecticut River, in its lower 120 miles, were the highest since 1938, exceeding the hurricane "Diane" flood of August 1955. Higher levels have been recorded only for the September 1938 and March 1936 floods since records were initiated in the 17th century. Notwithstanding the actual experienced flooding, Corps reservoirs, which control runoff from 1,570 of the 11,250 square mile drainage area, reduced riverflows along the Connecticut by between 15 and 20 percent from its mouth to the northern Massachusets state line. The lower 55 mile reach of the Merrimack River reached the highest levels since April 1960. However, everywhere else along the mainstream, river stages were kept below flood stage throughout the entire event. Discharges were reduced along the entire mainstem between 33 and 55 percent as a result of regulation of Corps reservoirs. Within the Thames, Naugatuck and Blackstone River Basins, river levels downstream of Corps dams were kept from rising above bankfull capacity throughout the prolonged period of rainfall. Regulation for canoe activities occurred at Hall Mountain and Townshend - October 1983, May 1984 and September 1984. Otter Brook - April 1984, Knightville and Littleville - April 1984. Birch Hill and Tully - April 1984 and (C'olebrxook - August 198-1. Water supplvy and fisheries releases wtere made from ('colebrook Lake throughout the year. Merrimack River Basin Peak storages utilized at reservoirs in the Merrimack River Basin during the May-June flood amounted to 85 percent at Macl)owell. 73 percent at Franklin Falls. 59 percent at lopkinton-Everett and 48 percent at Blackwater Dam. At Macl)owell and Hoplkinton-Everett, these storages represented new maximum values. Releases were made in April from Blackwater I)am to accommodate canoeists. Thames River Basin Peak storages utilized at projects in this basin during the May-June event, ranged from 34 percent at BHuffumville to 56 percent at Mansfield Hollow. West Thompson. Westville, and East Brimfield each experienced record amounts of flood control storage with 5. 56 and 47 percent of total storage utilized respectively. Other regulation activities of C:orps projects in the basin were Mansfield Hollow - releases for canoeing in .June and raising of the pool in September to accommodlate canoe races; Westville and East Brimfield - releases for combination canoeing and river cleanup in April: West Thompson - raising the pool level to accommodate A K(' retriever trials on several occasions and East Brinlfield - releases from conservation storage in September. Housatonic River Basin Regulation of reservoirs in the Naugatuck River Basin during the May-June flood resulted in record storages being utilized at Thomaston - 50 percent, Hall Meadow - 24 percent, East Branch - 29 percent, Northfield Broo)k - 40 percent and Black Rock - 65 percent. Elsewhere, Hop Brook and Hancock Brook experienced the second greatest storage utilized at 47 and 37 percent respectively. Blackstone River Basin West Hill Dam in the Blackstone River Basin utilized Connecticut River Basin 40 percent of storage during the May-June flood. Due to the continuing precipitation and extended length of time the flood control gates were closed during the May-June flood (many remained closed for approximately five days), stored flood waters rose to record levels at 20 reservoirs and the second highest at seven other reservoirs. In the Connecticut River Basin, flood control storage during this flood rose to 98 percent at Knightville, 90 percent at Colebrook, 89 percent at Surry Mountain, 83 percent at Littleville and 82 percent at Otter Brook. With the exception of Knightville, these levels represented record storages at each project. Five other reservoirs in the basin also experienced record storages. 52. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Four hurricane barriers situated(a long the southern coast of New England protect coastal communities from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes or severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, Connecticut and New Bedford-Fairhaven, Massachusetts barriers. The Fox Point, Rhode Island and Pawcatuck, Connecticut barriers are operated by the local communities. A brief resume of operations for the fiscal year follows: 1-24 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Stamford Barrier. The barrier gates were operated on 14 occasions for coastal storms with estimated benefits of $425,000. New Bedford-Fairhaven Barrier. The New Bedford- Fairhaven barrier was operated on six occasions for coastal storms with estimated benefits of $250,000. Fox Point and Pawcatuck Barriers. There were no operations at these barriers during fiscal year. 53. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-E at end of chapter). 54. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control acti'ities ipursuant to Section 205, IPubhlic Lawu 858, soth Congress, as a mended (prea Uthorizat ion). (See Table l-J at end of chapter). Snagg and calerainrig actir'ities1p ursuant to Suction 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Cocheco River, Dover, NH $4,600 Connecticut River, South 4,000 Hadley, MA French Stream, Rockland, ME 2.900 Konkapot River, North 15,647 Canaan, CT Naugatuck River, Seymour, CT 6,000 Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Bagaduce River, Castine, ME $95,694 (See Section 45 of Text) Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 34,149 Castine Harbor, Castine, ME 3,500 Chandler River, Jonesboro, ME 4,500 Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA 33,286 Islesboro Island, ME 131,976 (See Section 38 of Text) Island Avenue, Quincy, MA Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME (See Section 39 of Text) Lamprey River, Newmarket, NH Little River, Westfield, MA North Branch, Presque Isle Stream, Mapleton, ME Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT (See Section 37 of Text) Penobscot River, Brewer, ME Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT (See Section 40 of Text) Salmon River, Colchester, CT Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME (See Section 46 of Text) Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT SR-161, St. John River. Fort Kent. ME Village of Saxtons, VT (See Section 35I, of Text) West Branch, Westfield River Huntington, MA Westfield River, Huntington, MA 125,201 933 7,.500 84.474 22,690 3.500 Emergency flood control actir ities - repa ir, flood fightingl, and rescue work. (Public Laou 99, 84th ('onl.,. and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $118,663 for disaster preparedness: $14,140 for emergency operations and $111,24:3 for Rehabilitation Work in Westfield, MA. Streamhbank Erosion C'ontrol Evraluation and D)eronstration Act of 1974 as amended in 1976 (Section 32 of the Water Resources )DerelopmenAt ct of 1974. P.I,. 9.J-251). There were no fiscal year costs for demonstration project proposals. Total costs to 30 September 1984 were $1,204,996. 55. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 1-G at end of chapter). General Investigations 56. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year for surveys from regular funds were $1,781,977 of which $293,652 was for five navigation studies; $409,819 for four flood damage prevention studies; $280,146 for one special study; $359,714 for three comprehensive studies; $181,543 for review of five completed projects; $255,225 for coordination studies and $1,878 for one supplemental pre-authorization study. 57. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 973 The Division Engineer is the U.S. member on Saint 39,861 Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and a continuing program of compilation of basic hydrologic information 4,600 is carried out. Division Engineer's representatives during 5,000 the past year kept closely in touch with developments in 2,200 the basin and cooperated with their Canadian counterparts assisting in development of basins' resources. Total 177,186 costs for the fiscal year were $12,533. Total costs to 30 September 1984 were $156,904. 4,500 Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon responsible local request, of information on 171,445 floods and potential flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various 658 magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for 1-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering advice to local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the fiscal year were $123,068. Total costs to 30 September 1984 were $4,563,716. 58. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Total costs for continuation of Planning and Engineering were $763,362 of which $506,924 was for channels and harbors and $256,438 for local protection. The channels and harbor study was at Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The continuing local protection studies were for Town Brook in Quincy, Massachusetts and for Roughans Point in Revere, Massachusetts. 59. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Advance Engineering and design costs were $10,999 for the navigation project at Bristol Harbor, Rhode, Island. 1-26 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Black Rock Harbor. CT 3. Boston Harbor, MA 4. Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA (Contributed Funds-Required) 5. Cape Cod Canal, MA 6. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA 7. Clinton Harbor, CT 8. Connecticut River below Hartford, CT 9. Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (),584() 5,584 5,000) 9,793 10.000 2.093 1,426,000 1,244,713 7.995 175.4%9 175,494 9,.359 1,505.359 242,071 1.486,784 25.313.083' 25.313.083' 82,023 143,195 3.302 53,000 45,368 3,185,120 3,149,829 834,128 1,858,677 815,704 1,822,960 20,386 18,534 386 100,000 22,793 4,816,821 3,965,408 9,240,000 7,475,000 9,437,523 7,426,768 55,000 29,799 95,00) 14,363 60,500 -9,000 75,308 4,541,756 5,043,968 874,00() 930,549 306.777 9.647,839 358,833 9.644.016 13,229 40,823 30,000 94,0)94 8.823 63.323 182.517 182,246 160,.214' 143,671 69.323 63.323 - 32,786,7504,S - 32,786,219*, 4,865,718 74.133,783 5.311,711 73,559,363 - 390,.677 3:9-0 ,677 - 26,609,000 14,269 26,608,831 266,70546 266,7054 36,623 6.334 33,130 22,280 6,700 23,479 215,100 222,200 9,511 22,341 -6,000 -2,250 509,000 1,900,493;' 509,225 1,900,038 ' 95,277 83,414 104,957 104,957 802,111 790,248 1,541,1851".' - 1,541,1851", 1 790,000 589,547 25,000 34,075 906,650 2,011,524 1,775,602 14,436,942 '2 815,033 695,246 3,387,864 14,435,36712 380,000 214,967 88,845 478,120 26.580 54,686 60,000 60,000 797,954 797,952 73,150 73,150 1-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30,1984 10. Eastport Harbor, ME 11. Fall River Harbor, MA Contributed Funds (Other) 12. Green Harbor, MA (('ontributed Funds) 13. Hampton Harbor, NiH 14. Kennebunk River, ME : 15. Mianus River, CT 16. Mystic River, MA 17. New Haven Harbor, CT 18 New London Harbor, CT New Work A pprop. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work A pprop. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. A pprop. (ost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. A pprop. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. A pprop. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work A pprop. (Cost Mai nt. A pprop. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -... 638.675 -.. 638,675 1 102,00)8 101,992 325,000 200.0(K) 294,647 212,183 27,941 27,941 -6,988 -73 110,(000 167,204 73 35.400 323,867 90,(000 22,876 19,145 19,145 27,915 27,915 17,500 7,145 34,392 31,535 -. 198,0(0) 237,202 99,400 166,710 422 422 1,018,542 1,009,340 275,000 80,076 36,221 36,221 10,000 6,44() 305,561 272,598 11,701) 13,301 61,740 57,095 17,299 17,299 50,132 9,148 91,588 1,155,078 2,678,304 111,641 1,075,600 2,437,301 5,922 284,093 284.077 -- 6,367,726'4 15.643 6,164,7341' 36,533 2,064,76715 36,533 2,O64,767 ' s 41,771 46,419 37,200 37,200 323.783 314,516 154,525 1,.4 52,283 192,598 1.431.642 - 168,000 - 158,342 - 200,000w - 200.,000&2 317,558 1,764.216> 311,599 1,758,174N - 350,334 - 350,334r 70,528 64,640 56,026 54,532 946.157 935,569 132,4353' 132,4353' 234,622 232,296 - 3,222,777 - :3,222,777 12,791 1,928,336 62,474 1,927,833 - 4,205,2462 -- 4,205,2462 648,500 12,661.08941 971,281 12,660,11614 638,7744" 638,77440 773,584 1,051,618 772,839 1,050,873 1-28 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE i-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 19. Patchogue River, CT (Contributed Funds- Required) 20. Penobscot River, ME 21. Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI 22. Portland Harbor, ME 23. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH 24. Provincetown Harbor, MA 25. Stonington Harbor, ME 30. Cliff Walk, Newport, RI (Contributed Funds) Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI (Contributed Funds) - Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 61,719 61.719 -1,242 -1,242 65,000 25,298 85,000 16,293 88,518 8.1:32 8,132 22,611 22,611 31,530 2,463,926 31,530 722,522 310,000 2,328,445 397,620 2,328,942 53,288 55,315 4,276 4,276 -5,872 -6,880 2,200 1,894 700,000 119,117 230,000 79,533 395,000 416,515 215,000 170,382 130,000 139,192 -8,092 31,000 87,469 -31,824 56,694 293,060 225,760 215,000 175,298 634,188 621,950 156,694 156.694 501,020 501,020 904,247 836.947 - 2,714,510 - 2.714,510.1 -125,695 3.772,770 612,029 2,769,090 - 1,926,000 1,926,000 - 9,588,710 -1 - 9,588,710 450,608 7,844,831 450,729 7,843,944 - 5,384,0433 - 5,384,0433 889,482 1,933,327 889,033 1,932,315 - 3,548,954m - 3,548,9543 770,730 1,069,366 628,243 926,879 580,883 - -115,000 6,500 28,967 -10,800 -132 700,000 700,000 405,49113 405,49113 955,237 955,237 559,200 211 559,200 -33,825 10,793 181,175 181,175 160,000 682,000 48,612 795,670 596,000 516,528 - 1,186,830 - 1,186,830 -79,472 889,330 889,330 1-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30,1984 Willard RPach 'Jcn Wnrk South Portland, ME 34A. Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI 34B West Hill Dam, MA 34C. Charles River (Natural Valley) Storage Areas), MA 35A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT 35B Barre Falls Dam, MA 35C. Birch Hill Dam, MA (Contributed Funds) 35D. Colebrook River Lake, CT 35E. Conant Brook Dam, MA 35F. Knightville Dam, MA 35G. Littleville Lake, MA Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 85,000 81,236 60,000 32,498 183,600 174,244 1,033,000 1,037,653 274,500 368,174 234,300 219,729 234,900 253,331 207,200 165,219 60,800 57,866 368,400 271,722 212,600 222,372 40,000 50,000 -50,000 175,000 38,940 3,834 - 170,115 80,000 770,000 1,015,000 1,925,000 89,094 635,554 1,128,982 1,886,128 - - - 2,306,90239 - - - 2,306,90239 187,000 150,650 182,000 2,247,534 185,689 168,669 171,654 2,237,107 1,100,000 615,000 125,000 8,275,000 1,119,443 567,600 118,167 8,199,417 - - 132,000 132,000 - - 120,973 120,973 221,000 16,000 4,000 11,038,9626 60,336 176,430 3,872 11,038,60053 254,000 256,800 354,000 4,282,939 270,347 255,273 341,628 4,259,292 - - - 1,967,819 - - - 1,967,819 247,200 243,000 252,000 2,865,027 254,804 243,211 240,017 2,838,320 - - - 4,815,67941 - - - 4,815,67941 298,000 278,400 230,000 3,319,927 239,837 328,596 204,543 3,281,691 -- - - 32,00030 -- - - 32,00030 - - - 14,263,971 - - - 14,263,971 176,000 111,500 107,000 1,658,544 219,707 129,544 104,747 1,643,850 - - - 2,950,530 - - - 2,950,530 58,000 48,000 82,000 895,680 54,872 54,350 76,250 889,768 - - - 3,415,64044 - - - 3,415,64044 606,100 231,200 588,000 4,283,504 622,331 305,915 465,260 4,126,288 - - - 7,013,412 - - - 7,013,412 221,800 213,191 222,000 216,117 237,000 251,701 2,497,091 L,488,185 1-30 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 35H. North Hartland New Work 351. North Springfield Lake, VT 35J. Otter Brook Lake, NH 35K. Park River, Hartford, CT (Other Contributed Funds) - Salmon River, Colchester, CT 35L. Saxtons River, Rockingham, VT 35M. Surry Mountain Lake, NH 35N. Townsend Lake, VT 350. Tully Lake, MA (Contributed Funds) 35P. Union Village Dam, VT 35Q. West Springfield, Connecticut River Basin, MA Lake, VT 185,500 422,311 256,000 272,950 - 7,312,22550 - 7,312,22550 229,600 301,000 3,164,115 232,025 281,472 3,135,593 - 6,831,52625 - 6,831,52625 297,700 518,041 296,000 270,300 312,000 4,303,097 313,424 280,799 309,613 4,281,439 185,000 48,856 Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Approp. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 26,000 61,045 38,000 30,736 4,000 4,028 211,600 217,233 310,000 286,020 236,400 232,818 183,200 173,965 13,000 148,619 2,000 4,360,44843 2,525 4,360,44843 302,000 352,300 339,000 2,962,314 299,122 341,681 321,897 2,917,918 281,919 864,059 204,000 194,516 75,000 225,000 60,176,919 67,401 233,110 60,109,851 -2,900 13,273 127,500 35,842 658 84,474 246,000 234,993 247,100 247,100 127,500 120,316 - -- - 2,833,61033 - - - 2,833,61033 580,000 364,000 394,000 3,822,143 558,862 369,268 403,328 3,802,196 - 7,398,41349 - 7,398,41349 422,000 235,000 289,000 3,930,571 471,918 241,188 266,179 3,890,277 - - 1,666,7527 - - - 1,666,7527 291,000 244,500 285,000 2,915,086 265,168 256,745 279,572 2,892,350 - - - 40,00030 -- - - 40,00030 - - - 4,095,16051 - - - 4,095,16051 280,000 204,700 235,444 241,811 - 215,000 - 58,510 293,000 3,058,856 284,628 3,030,726 112,162 13,000 215,000 170,672 13,000 1-31 210,100 196,899 4,365,000 4,836,262 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 36A. Black Rock Lake. New Work CT Approp. - - - 36B. lancock Brook Lake, CT 36C. Hop Brook Lake, CT 36). Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA 36E. Northfield Brook lake, (CT -Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT 36 F. Thomaston Dam, CT 37. Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT - Island Avenue, Quincy, MA :38. Islesboro (The Narrows), ME 39. ,Johnson Bay. Lubec, M E 40. Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT 41A. Blackwater Dam, NH 41B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 137,700 155,370 73,600 74,191 4,748 307,300 320,967 2,534 93,700 88,620 89,000 31,044 219,100 241,387 16,000 12,695 199,900 215,952 200,800 213,344 162,500 163,710 61,000 56,261 375,500 432,924 460,000 72,045 20,000 7,039 81,000 82,780 24,000 24,404 279,500 279,613 116,000 31,770 167,000 153,854 199,000 187,080 171,600 169,835 192,200 186,989 61,500 65,798 307,550 312,547 67,000 384,636 12,961 122,500 118,349 3,296 59,915 237,000 241,314 187,500 27,285 40,000 126,562 195,500 26,848 75,000 13,728 32,500 27,705 224,000 234,591 1-32 8,182.30) 8,182.300 181,000) 1.817,609 178,239 1.807.419 - 4.178,.911 -- 4,178,911 79,00) 897.249 77,599 895,324 - 6,151.562= - 6.151,562 :; 382,000 3,024.485 379,251 3,002,250 84.000 739.000 137,008 721,659 - 2,850,512" 2,850,512' 129,000 1,290.911 117,350 1,271,167 - 116,296 933 116,296 -- 14,282,112 - 14.282,112 254,000 3,361,267 236,598 3,333,721 50,000 237,500 177,186 204.471 - 172,000 973 172,000 - 195,500 131.976 158,824 -17,000 163,082 39,861 158,671 207,000 239,500 171,445 199,150 - 1,319,746:17 - 1,319.746;7 167,000 2.409,785 165,282 2,404,524 - 2,014,253" - 2,014,253" 205,000 2,861,792 207,435 2,846,543 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 41C. Franklin Falls New Work Dam, NH Approp. 41D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH 42. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (Contributed Funds) 43. New London, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Other Contributed Funds) 44A. Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes, ME 45. Bagaduce River, Castine, ME 46. Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME 47. Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME 48. Stamford, CT (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 49A. Buffumville Lake, MA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 320,400 377,872 378,600 325,239 120,700 114,792 665,000 667,821 270,000 51,000 131,000 1,695,000 1,262,532 20,000 25,069 100,600 96,314 198,800 213,059 - 7,950,487- ? - - - 7,950,4873 364,000 438,000 325.000 4,465,037 277,490 434,604 336.139 4,376,677 -- - 21,452,440' - - 21,452,440( 507,000 533,900 429,000 5.107,240 517,152 564,139 428,898 5,088,736 - - - 11,510,088 - - - 11.510,088 527,000 509,000 202,000 3,212,114 444,272 475,213 330,791 3,206,734 - - - 6,513,763'9 - - - 6,513,7632 410,000 1,160,000 825,000 8,922,046 523,521 1,018,945 625,839 8,578,798 250,000 140,000 300,000 2,190,000 '9 573,505 165,095 93,884 1,978,13619 - - 84,750 215,750 83,894 36,008 58,208 178,110 - -100,000 - 13,155,300 418,227 85,477 24,476 13,155,298 - 132,500 - 160,500 - 28,359 95,694 152,053 - - - 39 - - - 39 - - 142,500 142,500 - - 125,201 125,201 573,475 900,000 260,000 1,863,475 171,361 1,242,753 284,927 1,829,026 - 121,000 - 9,911,300 2,023 120,960 - 9,900,618 118,000 341,000 190,000 2,092,372 121,346 150,264 364,097 2,057,241 - - - 3,367,97024 - - - 3,367,45324 - - - 210,000 - - - 209,969 - - - 2,998,603' - - - 2,998,6039 207,000 182,146 239,000 297,000 2,533,922 253,141 305,796 2,530,899 1-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 49B. East Brimfield New Work Lake, MA Approp. - - - - 7,057,0438 Cost - - - - 7,057,0438 Maint. Approp. 177,800 166,000 170,000 164,000 2,114,583 Cost 175,367 160,056 179,248 137,426 2,086,116 49C. Hodges Village New Work Dam, MA Approp. - - - - 4,461,07342 Cost - - - 4,461,07342 Maint. Approp. 128,500 168,000 225,300 308,000 2,361,798 Cost 142,947 162,332 203,446 291,612 2,313,965 49D. Mansfield Hollow New Work Lake, CT Approp. - -- - 6,447,16416 Cost - -- - 6,447,16416 Maint. Approp. 149,500 206,000 203,000 207,000 2,673,297 Cost 167,188 179,166 228,848 204,938 2,667,117 49E. West Thompson New Work Lake, CT Approp. - 25,000 3,000 - 7,001,22048 Cost - 7,812 19,708 480 7,001,22055 Maint. Approp. 188,500 257,000 477,800 320,000 2,616,698 Cost 200,240 252,752 434,456 376,345 2,608,931 49F. Westville Lake, New Work MA Approp. - - - -5,684,68347 Cost -- - - 5,684,68347 Maint. Approp. 168,300 229,000 213,000 243,000 2,313,796 Cost 165,378 224,705 199,653 199,852 2,249,345 1 Includes $1,465,123 for previous projects. Includes $935,303 Emergency Relief Funds and $1,030,806 Public Works Funds. 2 Includes $17,879 for previous projects. Excludes $17,767 Contributed Funds. 3 Excludes $99,707 expended from Contributed Funds and includes $130,393 for previous projects. 4 Includes $6,138,157 from Public Works Funds and $4,849,740 from Emergency Relief Funds. Excludes $115,432 Contributed Funds. 5 Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $412,988 Code 713 funds. 6 Includes $503,724 Code 711 funds. 7 Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 funds. 8 Includes $208,100 Code 711 funds. 9 Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. 10 Includes $287,374 for previous projects. Excludes $130,410 Contributed Funds. 11 Excludes $9,000 for subproject "Eightmile River, CT." 12 Includes $366,348 for previous projects. 13 Completed except for inactive portion. '4 Includes $330,204 for previous project. 15 Includes $81,410 for previous project. 16 Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. 17 Improvement adequate for commerce. 19 Excludes $22,517 expended to date for land condemnations. 20 Includes $83,276 for maintenance of previous project. 21 Excludes $141,530 expended Contributed Funds, Other. 22 Includes $331,626 for previous projects. Includes $290,877 National Industrial Recovery Funds and $59,207 Public Works Funds. 23 Includes $32,570 for previous projects. 24 Cash for construction only. Excludes $199,410 expended to date for land condemnations. 25 Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. 26 Excludes $193,761 expended Contributed Funds. 27 Includes $88,917 expended Contributed Funds. 28 Includes $35,214 from previous project. 29 Cash for construction only. Excludes $164,020 expended to date for land condemnation. 30 Recreational Cost Sharing. 3' Excludes $46,500 expended Contributed Funds. 32 Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. 33 Includes $470,077 Code 711 funds. 34 Includes $179,728 Code 711 funds. 35 Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. 36 Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. 37 Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. 38 Includes $215,801 for previous project. Excludes $760,000 Contributed Funds expended. 39 Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. 40 Includes $40,800 for previous project. 41 Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 713 funds. 42 Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,158 Code 713 funds. 43 Includes $364,688 Code 711 funds. 44 Includes $199,304 Code 711 funds. 45 Includes $32,570 for previous projects. 46 Includes $7,889 for previous project. 47 Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 48 Includes $319,503 Code 711 funds. 49 Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds. 50 Includes $228,236 Code 711 funds. 51 Includes $84,462 Code 711 funds. 52 Excludes $193,761 expended Contributed Funds. 3" Includes $503,362 Code 711 funds. 54 Includes $20,000 Code 711 funds. 55 Includes $314,281 Code 711 funds. 56 Includes $692,435 for previous projects. 57 Includes $12,000 for previous project and excludes $17,587 expended for new work from Contributed Funds. 1-34 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1825 June 14, 1880 Aug. 5, 1886 Sept. :19, 1890 July 25, 1892 July 13, 1892 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 19352 Do. August 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Sept. 7, 1940 Mar. 2, 19453 July 24, 946 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960, as amended AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths from the waters and streams in the U.S. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BLACK ROCK HARBOR, CT (See Section 2 of Text). Black Rock Harbor 18 feet deep and 100 to 200 feet wide from the 18-foot contour in harbor to the heads of both branches of Cedar Creek, about 2.4 miles. BOSTON HARBOR, MA (See Section 3 of Text) Preservation of islands by seawalls. Weir River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9% ft. deep, 100 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Fort Point Channel.6 Weir River (Nantasket Beach Channel) 92 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Weir River (Nantasket Beach Channel) from mouth of Weir River to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket Beach 12 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide. Channel 15 feet deep from Long Island to Nixes Mate Shoal (Nixes Mate to Nubble Channel). Channel 27 feet from Nantasket Roads to President Roads. Dredge Chelsea River channel to 18 feet For 30-foot channel from sea to President Roads through Broad Sound by less direct route than 35 and 40-foot channels. For 35-foot channel from sea to Boston Naval Shipyard, Chelsea and Charles River Bridges. Elimination from project of removal of Finns Ledge at outer entrance. Dredge Chelsea River channel 25 ft. Depth of 40 feet (45 feet in rock) in Broad Sound Channel. Present project dimensions of channel from President Roads to Commonwealth pier No. 1, East Boston and anchorage area north side of President Roads. Present project dimensions of that part of approach channel to U.S. Navy drydock No. 3, at South'Boston between Main Ship Channel and U.S. harbor line. Chelsea River, channel 30 feet deep Reserved channel 30 feet deep. Abandons seaplane channel authorized in 1940 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 262, 76th Cong., 1st sess.) Extension of 40-foot channel. Extension of President Roads anchorage. Reserved channel 35 feet deep, 430 feet wide, extending 1 mile from 40-foot main channel to L St. Chelsea River Channel and Maneuvering Basin 35 feet deep. BUTTERMILK BAY CHANNEL, MA- (See Section 4 of Text) Channel extension 2,500 feet long, dredging only upper 300 feet. Mark jurisdictional channel in lower 2,200 feet of channel. Channel to be 80 feet wide with a depth of -6 feet at MLW. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 87-874, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong. H. Doc. 281, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 518 H. Ex. Doc. 206, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1885, p. 543. Annual Report, 1890, p. 503. Annual Report, 1893, p. 769 Annual Report, 1887, p. 517. Annual Report, 1893, p. 766. H. Ex. Doc. No. 162 53rd Cong., 3rd sess., Annual Report 1895, p. 648 H. Doc. 133, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1898, p. 886. H. Doc. 119, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1901, p. 1096. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 11, 1913 H. Doc. 272, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 931, 63d Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 244, 72nd Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 225, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' Public Law 420, 78th Cong. H. Doc. 733 Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 244, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 349, 84th Cong.' H. Doc. 350, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.' P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 7, 1983. 1-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents CAPE COD CANAL, MA. (See Section 5 of Text) Purchase canal from Boston, Cape Cod & New York Canal Co., in accordance with contract dated July 29, 1921. executed by that company. Included in Public Construct 3 bridges and widen Works Administration program. Sept. 6, 1933 June 26. 1934 (Perma- Operation and care of works of nent Appropriations for the funds from War Depal Repeal Act) rivers and harbors. Included in Public Construct a mooring basin. Works Administration program Apr. 29, 1935 Included in Emergency Dredging and bank protection. Relief Program. May 28, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Existing project for main canal Mar. 2, 1945 July 3. 1958 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 2, 1882 Mar. 2, 1945 June 10, 1872 Mar. 3, 1881 June 25, 1910 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 May 24, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950-1 July 14, 1960, as amended Aug. 30, 1935 July 14, 1960 as amended July 14, 1960 canal to 250 feet. improvement provided rtment appropriations for adopted. 15-foot channel and turning basin in Onset Bay. Extend East Boat Basin for an area of about 4.3 acres to a depth of 8 feet. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA (See Section 6 of Text) Entrance Channel 10 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. CLINTON HARBOR, CT (See Section 7 of Text) Maintenance of a stone dike closing a breach in sandy peninsula which separates river from outer harbor. 8-foot channel and anchorage. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CT (See Section 8 of Text). Jetties at the mouth The Hartford dike. Channel and turning basin in Eightmile River. Present project dimensions of channel over Saybrook bar. Dikes, training walls, and revetments Present project dimensions of channel and additional dikes, training walls, revetments, and accessory works. Park River declared nonnavigable. Channel and anchorages, North Cove, Old Saybrook Channel, anchorage, and turning basin, Eightmile River. Channel and anchorage in Essex Cove. Channel and anchorage in Wethersfield Cove. COREA HARBOR, GOULDSBORO, ME (See Section 9 of Text) Anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 600 feet long and 400 feet wide. Construction of an access channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from deep water to existing anchorage basin, a distance of approximately 2,000 feet. In addition the existing 5.5 acre anchorage would be expanded 3 acres. EASTPORT HARBOR, ME (See Section 10 of Text). Construction of breakwater 500 feet long and 1.4 acre anchorage basin with depths of 10 and 14 feet. H. Doe. 139, 67th ('ong.. 2nd sess. H. Doc. 795. 71st. ('ong.. 3rd sess. Do. [)o. Do. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doec. 15, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doe. 431, 77th Cong.. 1st sess. H. Doe. 168 85th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doe. 456, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1942. S. Ex. Doe. 84, 47th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doe. 240, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Present project dimensions approved by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 22, 1887. Present project dimensions authorized by Chief of Engineers in 1889. H. Doc. 327, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doec. 1294, 61st. Cong.,3rd sess. H. Doec. 132, 65th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doec. 49, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Ltr. Sec. War, Apr. 21, 1937. H. Doc. :368, 76th Cong., 1st sess.) H. Doe. 666, 80th Cong., 2nd sess.4 P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 18, 1961. P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1960. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 27, 74th Cong., 1st sess.4 P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, August 14, 1981. S. Doe. 98, 86th Cong., 2d sess. 1-36 Jan. 21, 1927 (Sec. 2) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 July 24, 1946 Sept. 3, 1954 Aug. 13, 1968 July 14, 1960, as amended July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 14, 1876 Sept. 19, 1890 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 2, 1945 July 13, 1892 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19351 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Aug. 2, 1882 Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Do. July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935' Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Aug. 16, 1949 Aug. 9, 1955 FALL RIVER HARBOR, MA (See Section 11 of Text). .30-foot channel including Hog Island Shoals, and maintenance of 25-foot anchorage. 35-foot channel and turning basin. Deepening mid bay channel to 35 feet for a width of 400 feet between deep water in Mount Hope Bay and Globe Wharf. I)eepening Mount Hope Bay and Tiverton Channels to 40 feet. GREEN HARBOR, MA (See Section 12 of Text) (Channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water to head of navigation; anchorage near town pier; sealing rebuilding in part and extension of existing west jetty. HAMPTON HARBOR, NH (See Section 13 of Text) Extending north jetty 1,000 feet, raising outer 300 feet south jetty and constructing 180-foot spur to high ground, channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide across entrance bar. KENNEBUNK RIVER, ME (See Section 14 of Text). Repair of pier on east side of channel entrance. Deepening at Wading Place and Mitchells Point. Jetty at Wading Place. 8-foot channel. 6-foot channel. 6-foot anchorage, west side of channel. 6-foot anchorage, east side of channel. Extension of west jetty, and construction of sand fence. MIANUS RIVER, CT (See Section 15 of Text). Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cos Cob Harbor to head of navigation at Boston Post Road, Mianus, distance about 1.2 miles. MYSTIC RIVER, MA (See Section 16 of Text). Improve upper Mystic Improve channel downstream from mouth of Island End River to 35-foot channel of Boston Harbor. Improve channel upstream from mouth of Island End River to city playground at Charlestown. Improve channel upstream from city playground at Charlestown to a point 800 feet above Malden Bridge. Improve channel from upper limit of 35-foot Boston Harbor channel to Malden Bridge. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT (See Section 17 of Text) Sandy Point dike. The 16-foot anchorage basin. Brewery Street channel, removal of rocks in Morris Cove and present project dimensions of 15-foot basin. Present project dimensions of channels in Mill River. Present project dimensions of West River channel and anchorage. 18- and 16-foot channels in Quinnipiac River. 25-foot channel 30-foot channel and anchorage and present location of 16-foot anchorage. 35-foot main channel, elimination of 30-foot anchorage, present location and extent of 16-foot anchorage and 22-foot channel and turning basin in Quinnipiac River." Brewery Street channel declared nonnavigable. Abandonment of upper end of West River. H. I)oc. 158, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doe. 628, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 405, 83rd Cong. H. I)oc. 175, 90th (Cong., 1st sess.) Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, I)ec. 15, 1965. Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers February 18. 1964. Annual Report, 1875,. p. 115 H. Ex. Doc. 136, 51st Cong., Ist sess. and Annual Report 1890, p. 471. H. Doc. 459, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 4 H. Doc. 549, 78th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1891, p. 672. H. Doc. 1086, 60th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doec. 33, 74th Cong., 1st seas. H. Doc. 542, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 645, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. 9 Plans approved by a Board of Engineers, Oct. 2, 1882. H. Doc. 82, 55th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1159, 60th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 26, 62nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc: 535 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 686, Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 479, 72d Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 307, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 517, 79th Cong., 2nd sess.4 1-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 13, 1902 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 22, 1976 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended July 5, 1884 Aug. 11, 1888 July 31, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Sept. 16, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 June 30, 1948 July 14, 1960, as amended July 14, 1836 June 23, 1866 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 (sundry civil) July 25, 1912 August 8, 191712 Mar. 2, 1945 Do. July 24, 1946 Aug. 13, 1957 Oct. 23, 1962 NEW LONDON HARBOR, CT (See Section 18 of Text). Waterfront channel and branch channels in Winthrop Cove and east of Central Vermont Railroad pier. Dredging in Shaws Cove. Entrance channel. Maneuvering area and present project extent of entrance channel. Deepening existing channel to 40 feet; providing a 40-acre turning basin 30 feet deep and a 4.9-acre maneuvering area 32 feet deep. (Phase I Authorization) PATCHOGUE RIVER, CT (See Section 19 of Text) 8-foot channel from Duck Island Roads to U.S. Route 1 bridge, anchorage and maneuvering area, 600-foot jetty. Widen existing navigation channel to 125 feet in Long Island Sound to confluence of Patchogue and Menunketesuck Rivers. Maintain depth of 8-feet MLW. PENOBSCOT RIVER, ME (See Section 20 of Text). Widening channel at Bangor and Crosby's Narrows. Dredging between Winterport and Bucksport. Widening the channel at Bangor. Further widening of the harbor at Bangor. POINT JUDITH POND AND HARBOR OF REFUGE, POINT JUDITH, RI (See Section 21 of Text). The main breakwater. Present dimensions of eastern shore arm. Western shore arm. Removing 3 shoals from the harbor arm. Abandons project for entrance to Point Judith Ponds, and authorizes channels and anchorages in lower pond and upper pond. Extension of existing 15-foot channel. PORTLAND HARBOR, ME (See Section 22 of Text). Breakwater on southerly side of mouth of inner harbor. Extension of breakwater. Dredging to 30 feet over greater part of inner harbor. Extension of 30 foot depth up Fore River to Boston & Maine R.R. bridge and in channel of approach to Back Cove. 30-foot anchorage: 14 feet at entrance to Back Cove; restore 12-foot depth in Back Cove and 30-foot depth in approach as well as in lower part of harbor. 35-foot depth in lower part of main harbor and channel of approach and remove 2 obstructing ledges in main channel. 35-foot anchorage approximately 170 acres in area northwest of House Island. Maintain Soldier Ledge Channel in Hussey Sound at depth of 40-feet. Deepen 30-foot channel to 35-feet, 35-foot turning basin easterly of Vaughon Bridge: breakwater at Spring Point. Abandonment of upper end of 12-foot channel from 2,500 feet upstream of Tukey Bridge to head of Back Cove. Entrance channel 45 feet deep from deep water in Casco Bay to a line opposite Fort Gorges. A maneuvering basin and anchorage 45 feet deep in existing House Island anchorage area. H. Doc. 392, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 329, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 613, 63d Cong., 2d sess. 4 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 82, 74th Cong., 2d sess.4 Chief of Engineers report dated February 20, 1975. H. Doc. 164, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 12, 1983. S. Ex. Doc. 44, 48th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1884, p. 475. H. Ex. Doc. 133, 50th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1888, p. 425. H. Ex. Doc. 37, 52d Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1892, p. 553. H. Doc. 739, 59th Cong., 1st sess. (Other maps are in H. Doc. 652, 71st. Cong., 3d sess.) H. Doc. 66, 51st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 60, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 911, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 2001, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 15, 80th Cong., 1st sess. PL 86-645, Section 107, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Sept. 29, 1976. H. Doc. 491, 23d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 271, 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 489, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 71, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 560, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 730, 79th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 510, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 126, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 71 stat. 344 H. Doc. 216, 87th Cong., 1st sess. 1-38 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 June 25, 1910 June 30, 1948 July 14, 1960. as amended Oct. 27, 1965 June 30, 1948, as amended Mar. 7, 1974, Aug. 13, 1968 July 24, 1946, as amended June 30, 1948, as amended June 30, 1948, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended PORTSMOUTH HARBOR & PISCATAQUA RIVER, ME and NH (See Section 23 of Text). Removal of ledge rock; widening 35-foot channel; extending channel and maneuvering basins above Boiling Rock and at head of project. Modified existing project for widening and extending 35-foot channel. PROVINCETOWN HARBOR, MA (See Section 24 of Text). Rubblestone protection dike across House Point Island Flats from Stevens Point to Wood End and extension of Long Point beach protection. Offshore breakwater about 2,500 feet long. STONINGTON HARBOR, ME (See Section 25 of Text). Dredge access channel 10 feet deep extending from deep water in Deer Isle Thoroughfare 525 feet for a width of 100 feet, narrowing to 60 feet in width for a length of 275 feet. An anchorage basin 10 acres in size (3 acres dredged to a depth of 8 feet MLW and 7 acres dredged to a depth of 6 feet MLW.) CLIFF WALK, NEWPORT, RI (See Section 30 of Text). Improvements for shore protection along the Cliff Walk. PAWTUXET RIVER, WARWICK, RI (See Section 34A of Text). Flood damage reduction through acquisition of land and improvements in the flood plain. Demolition and removal of acquired structures. Flood proofing certain dwellings and installing a flood forecasting system. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE) AREAS) MA (See Section 34C of Text). Federal acquisition and perpetual protection of 17 crucial natural valley storage areas totalling 8,422 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. PARK RIVER, HARTFORD, CT (See Section 35K of Text). Flood protection on Park River in Hartford, CT. SAXTONS RIVER, ROCKINGHAM, VT (See Section 35L of Text). Construct about 175 feet of "doublewal" pre-cast concrete cells along enbankment slope. Wall would be approx. 12 feet high WEST SPRINGFIELD, CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, MA (See Section 35Q if Text). Raise the floodwall section of the West Springfield project by 1 foot in combination with a flood forecasting system. HOUSATONIC RIVER, PITTSFIELD, MA (See Section 36D of Text). Supplement the existing 8-foot high by 15-foot wide stone arch culvert under Penn Central Railroad embankment with four 10-foot diameter concrete pipe culverts. NONEWAUG RIVER, WOODBURY, CT (See Section 37 of Text). Construct a gabion-type retaining wall extending to a height of 17 feet above channel invert and angled back from river at a slope of 6 vertical on 1 horizontal. 1-39 Annual Report 1892 H. Doc. 556, 82nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 482, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 821, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 600, 80th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 7, 1983. H. Doc. 228, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 858, Sec. 205. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 1982. Chief of Engineers report dated December 6, 1972. S. Doc. 43, 90th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, February 24, 1983. P.L. 80-858, Sec. 205. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 5, 1982. P.L. 80-858, Sec. 205. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, August 1981. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 15, 1983. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended I)o. July 24, 1946., as amended July 3. 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 22. 1976 Oct. 27, 1965 July 24, 1946., as amended July 24, 1946, as amended June ;30, 1948, as amended July 14, 1960 ISLEBORO (THE NARROWS), ME (See Section 38 of Text). Construct graded quarry stone revetment along 325 feet of shoreline. Riprap revetment extend above Main Road to height of 18 feet MLW. JOHNSON BAY, LUBEC, ME (See Section 39 of Text). Emergency bank and shoreline protection. Extension of existing emergency bank and shoreline protection. PORT 5 FACILITY, BRIDGEPORT, CT (See Section 40 of Text). 250 linear feet of graded riprap slope protection. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET, MA (See Section 42 of Text). Hurricane barriers in New Bedford Harbor. NEW LONDON, CT (See Section 43 of Text). Hurricane barrier protecting city of New London from tidal damage. DICKEY-LINCOLN SCHOOL LAKES, ME (See Section 44A of Text). Construction of multi-purpose project on the upper St. John River to provide for power, flood control and recreation. BAGAI)UCE RIVER, CASTINE, ME (See Section 45 of Text). Placement of approximately 200 linear feet of stone slope protection along the shoreline of Castine Harbor adjacent to Fort Pentagoet. SAND COVE, GOULDSBORO, ME (See Section 46 of Text). Construct stone slope protection along 500 linear feet of shoreline at Sand Cove to protect the Corea Causeway. SEBASTICOOK RIVER, HARTLAND, ME (See Section 47 of Text). Raise concrete wall near abutment of Great Moose Lake Dam. Construct earthfill dikes outward from left and right abutments of Great Moose Lake I)am. Clear main river channel at base of Great Moose Iake Dam and extending downstream to Main Street Bridge. Repair sluice gates in lower dams and reconstruct concrete bridge abutment approach wall. STAMFORD, CT (See Section 48 of Text). Hurricane barrier protecting areas of Stamford from tidal damage. P.L. 79-526 Sec. 14 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 7. 1982. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 15, 1979. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14. Authorized by Chief of Enginners, May 3, 1983. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14 Authorized by ('hief of Engineers, May 26, 1983. S. Dox. 59, 85th ('ong., Ist sess. H. I)oc. 478, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 236, 89th C(ong., 1st sess P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. February 23, 1983. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, November 2, 1983. P.L. 80-858, Sec. 205. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, March 9, 1982. H. Doc. 210, 86th Cong.. 1st sess. Contains latest published maps. See also Annual Report, 1911, p. 1178 (seawalls and Nixes Mate Channel) and Annual report, 1903, p. 770 (Fort Point Channel). 2 Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. A portion deferred for restudy. Contains latest maps. " Inactive. 6 A portion has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 624, Dec. 31,1970. 7 Rock removal at Hog Island Shoal inactive. Also Emergency Relief Act of 1935. 9 Contains latest published map; a map showing entire river is in H. Doc. 2108, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. 1o Also Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. " Quinnipiac River 22 foot channel and turning basin deferred for restudy. 12 The 300-foot extension of Long Point beach protection is inactive. 1-40 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Andrews River, MA' 1981 $ 219,042' $ 385.398 $ 187.500 Apponaug Cove. RI' 1964 156,8742 20,453; Bar Harbor, ME' 1932 406.591 2,187 Bass Harbor, ME' 1965 188.859 21.475 Bass Harbor liar, ME' 1920 4,076 12,175 Beals Harbor, ME' 1959 184,880 47.486 Belfast Harbor. ME' 1971 61,561 224,449 Bellamy River, NI1',3 ,4 1897 34.643 Beverly Harbor, MA' 1951 246,048 16,821 100,0(00 Boothbay Harbor, ME' 1953 18,000 22,983 Branford Harbor, CT' 1978 9,537 975,345 Bridgeport Harbor, CT' 1983 4.491,119 1,918,884 ,' 147,887 Bristol Harbor, RI 1983 238.288 1,654 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME'.' 1976 277,420 16,838 Bucksport Harbor, ME' 1907 18.421 13.593 Bullocks Point Cove, RI' 1979 170.902 76.667 123.757 Bunker Harbor, ME' 1969 95,372 28.406 Camden Harbor, ME' 1960 102,400 125.936 Canapitsit Channel, MA'-. 1899 9,113 12,279 Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME' 1977 175,037 347,865 20,000 Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME' 1964 190,438 9,021 Cathance River, ME'3 1884 21,000 Coasters Island Harbor. RI'*. 1911 5,500 13.161 Cobscook Bay, ME',3 ,4 1866 4,173 Cocheco River, NH', 34 1913 119,089 42,617 Cohasset Harbor, MA' 1979 267,76731 216,038 127,000 Connecticut River (above Hartford), CTS 1932 116,324 15,84 Cotuit Harbor, MA'S 1962 8,541 Criehaven Harbor, ME' 1939 40,776 8,125 Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, MA' 1954 24,200 54,328 Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA' 1978 27,167 943,420 15 Damariscotta 11,643 River, ME',4 1906 5,000 905 Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME'S, 1916 40,000( Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA" 1968 94,584 301,944 Duck Island Harbor, CT' 1953 482,166 370,617 Duxbury Harbor, MA' 1978 421,297 798,722 35,0003East Boothbay Harbor, ME' ' 1953 6,500 17,238 Edgartown Harbor, MA' 1978 65,61435 32,589 10,000 Eightmile River, CT' - - 6,063 Essex River, MA' 1948 21,759 83,93814 Exeter River, NH',4 1913 27,454 3,032 Falmouth Harbor, MA' 1978 123,763 248,454 35,000 Fivemile River Harbor, CT' 1969 35,490 188,802 Fore River, Braintree & Weymouth, MA' 1983 319,160 25,153 189,896 Frenchboro Harbor, ME' 1978 657,345 24,616 Georges River, ME' 1978 25,788 228,063 Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA' 1983 1,296,93436 1,360,883 25,000 Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI'" 1983 189,037', 523,153 Greenwich Bay, RI' 1893 2,000 6,527 Greenwich Harbor, CT' 1969 198,758 204,872 100,000 Guilford Harbor, CT' 1983 137,222 1,224,965 25,000 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI' 1983 576,856 1,311,185 Harraseeket River, ME'I, 1896 30,963 5,309 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY' 1931 8,401 3,032 Hendrick's Harbor, ME' 1957 28,204 6,325 Hingham Harbor, MA' 1954 28,316 129,392 Housatonic River, CT2 1983 859,69147 2,341,594 222,010 Hyannis Harbor, MA' 1975 484,499 268,55712 103,001 1-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Ipswich Harbor, MA Island End River, Chelsea, MA Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH1 Jonesport Harbor, ME Josias River, ME' Kennebec River, ME 5 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA' Lagoon Pong, Martha's Vineyard, MA1,6 Lamprey River, NH', 4 Little Harbor, NH1,4, 26 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA', 14 Little Narragansett Bay, RI Lubec Channel, ME' Lynn Harbor, MA19 Machias River, ME' Malden River, MA1, 20 Matinicus Harbor, ME' Medomak River, ME' Menemsha Creek, MA' Merrimack River, MA 1 Milford Harbor, CT Moosabec Bar, ME' Mystic River, CT' Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA 5 Narraguagus River, ME' New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA 5 New Harbor, ME' New Haven Breakwater, CT' Newburyport Harbor, MA 5 Newport Harbor, RI' Niantic Bay and Harbor, CTI Northeast Harbor, ME' Norwalk Harbor, CT' Owl's Head Harbor, ME'S Pawcatuck River, RI & CT' Pawtuxet Cove, RI' Pepperell Cove, ME' Pig Island Gut, ME1,6 Pleasant Bay, MA Pleasant River, ME' Plymouth Harbor, MA' Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA' Potowomut River, RI' Providence River & Harbor, RI' Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, MA 9 Richmond Harbor, ME', 4 Richmond's Island Harbor, ME', 4 Rockland Harbor, ME" Rockport Harbor, MA' Rockport Harbor, ME', 3 Royal River, ME' Rye Harbor, NH' Saco River, ME' St. Croix River, ME' Sakonnet Harbor, RI' Sakonnet River, RIl,xo Salem Harbor, MA 5 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA" lo69 5 6X 1n 3nC 1983 1980 1977 1981 1977 1982 1895 1976 1913 1977 1906 1956 1956 1972 1922 1962 1953 1981 1940 1981 1930 1957 1965 1969 1953 1966 1950 1983 1953 1972 1954 1983 1968 1978 1975 1969 1966 1971 1892 1978 1956 1882 1976 1972 1883 1882 1976 1979 1915 1977 1965 1983 1950 1983 1909 1969 1922 o,010 311,850 137,653 80,691 236,437 115,565 1,599,94046 8,940 99,098 19,980 133,227 18,000 380,322 755,576 32,000 104,853 14,00021 17,000 56,92640 369,891 90,50641 11,400 197,582 502,66123 821,144 1,857,618 118,62024 1,242,246 565,22551 733,524 66,464 138,942 531,12939 124,158 318,7873' 295,356 171,351 191,753 3,500 2,127,21832,33 1,083,504 5,000 25,417,02228 38,764 20,000 119,844 1,948,462 22,000 32,000 336,704 130,342 1,064,983 179,550 764,651 38,427 1,693,202 1,925,553 1-42 32,947 140,747 643,364 122,173 1,770,753 6,587 33,563 266,119 5,224 48,634 23,941 178,866 185,217 45,097 8,989 92,359 622,346 158,224 600,287 25,227 104,932 441,163 33,965 708,967 24,314 40,273 4,033,964 128,223 71,570 35,423 3,723,52042 13,867 591,600 152,105 23,406 33,142 217 914,50634 846,590 50 3,830,502 1,808 452,800 194,963 6,002 287,490 51,541 1,506,262 36,392 180,016 9,549 364,945 16,060 314,50048 26,813 80,990 62,000 12,500 11,380 14,000 20,385 7,015 67,500 34,500 4,383 20,000 295,356 541,611 255,000 49,56227 61,33817 19,892 21,928 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Sasanoa River, ME1,3,4 1915 35,000 124 Scarboro River, ME 1 1976 392,635 1,239,293 10,000 Scituate Harbor, MA 1 1971 379,851 108,195 69,976 Searsport Harbor, ME' 1966 572,56816 31,120 Seekonk River, RI' 1954 672,214 793,234 67,792 Sesuit Harbor, MA 1 1983 226,306 - 124,588 South Bristol Harbor, ME' 1971 89,593 11,052 2,663 Southport Harbor, CT1 1962 96,9277 215,039 18,525 Southport Harbor, ME -- 167 Southwest Harbor, ME' 1962 180,042 41,892 7,501 Stamford Harbor, CT 1980 892,82437 1,683,02045 169,636 Stockton Harbor, ME',3,4 1915 33,000 23,216 Stonington Harbor, CT' 1959 377,328 123,060 Stony Creek, Branford, CT1 1978 112,487 263,746 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME' 1914 19,871 - Taunton River, MA5 1948 442,895 32,917 Tenants Harbor, ME' 1920 18,750 13,292 Thames River, CT 5 1967 1,471,919 1,458,888 Union River, ME3,15 1912 146,855 113,939 Vineyard Haven, MA' 1943 27,186 8,699 Wareham Harbor, MA 5 1896 95,997 10,296 Warren River, RI' 1890 5,000 - Warwick Cove, RI1,6 1975 155,430 51,196 107,220 Wellfleet Harbor, MA' 1981 157,63425 857,408 32,000 Wells Harbor, ME' 1979 360,973 1,534,991 212,000 Westcott Cove, CT' 1978 55,960 203,834 21,000 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT' 1972 19,308 180,824 Westport River, MA 4 ,9 1942 - Wethersfield Cove, CT - - 22,855 Weymouth Back River, MA' 1944 48,740 7,184 20,000 Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivs., Boston Hbr,, MA 1979 29,875,45343 1,257,40544 440,237 Wickford Harbor, RI1,22 1973 233,410 70,435 49,094 Wilson Point Harbor, CT',4 1895 54,177 - Winnipesaukee Lake, NH 1 1952 7,500 29,870 Winter Harbor, ME1,6 1976 162,937 Winthrop Harbor, MA' 1895 8,992 38,515 Wood Island Harbor, and Pool at Biddeford, ME' 1957 143,112 14,707 12,000 Woods Hole Channel, MA' 1940 230,000 51,718 York Harbor, ME 1977 239,654 351,090 32,161 1 Completed. 2 Excludes costs of $137,583 for local cooperation requirements, which includes $104,583 cash contribution. 3 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. 4 No commerce reported. 5 Completed except for inactive portion. 6 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). 7 Includes $37,714 Emergency Relief Funds. Excludes $18,525 Contributed Funds, of which $1,785 was for work outside approved project. s Inactive. 9 Awaiting local cooperation. Improvement to be restudied. 10 Commerce included under Tiverton Harbor, RI. " Authorized work remaining on project is comprised of an incomplete and an inactive portion. 12 Excludes $129,757 expended for rehabilitation; breakwaters repaired on 1961. 13 Recommendation for abandonment of existing project made in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress 1st session. Portion of project authorized by the Chief of Engineers (P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107) is complete. 14 Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds expended. 15 Improvement adequate for commerce. 16 Costs to local interests for berth improvements are estimated to be $60,000. 17 Excludes $81,548 Contributed Funds "Other" expended. 18 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64th Congress, 1st session, and in River and Harbor Committee Doc. 3, 65th Congress, 1st session. 19 Improvement to be restudied. 20 Under State maintenance. 21 Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1962. 22 Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 23 Excludes $211,649 expended for rehabilitation; jetty repaired in 1963. 24 All assurances of local cooperation have not been fulfilled. Public landing at Back Cove has not been constructed. Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). 25 Includes $11,350 for previous project. Excludes $32,000 Contributed Funds expended. 26 H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. recommended eliminating maintenance dredging. 1-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS SExcludes $49,562 (Contributed Funds "Other" expended. Final fund adjustment made FY 1978 ($52,323.28). 9 Includes $37,000 for new work for previous project. "" Excludes local requirements of $65.000 consisting of $13,000 for public wharf and $52,000 for additional construction costs. 3' Includes $133,357 for previous project. 32 Includes $188.647 for previous project. : Excludes $894,475 major rehabilitation for Long Beach Dike. Includes $2,013 for previous projects. In addition $400( was expended for maintenance of Contributed Funds. :u Includes $15,614 for new work for previous projects. .' Includes $21,000 for previous projects. . Includes $135,143 for previous project. Includes $10,000 for previous project. :9 Includes $162,517 for previous project. 40 Excludes $12,500 expended from Contributed Funds. 1 Excludes $11,380 Contributed Funds expended. 4' Includes $66,120 for previous projects. " Includes for previous projects $735,9010 (Weymouth, Fore R.) and $25,000 (Town R.). " Includes for previous project $5,250 (Weymouth, Fore River and $12.577 (Weymouth Town River). " Includes $59,420 for previous project. 4 Includes $509,411 for previous projects. " Excludes costs of $137,583 for local cooperation requirements, which includes $104,583 cash contribution. ' Excludes $829,000 Contributed Funds "Other" expended. ' Includes $378,450 for previous project. ' Includes $11,949 for maintenance of previous project. 5' Excludes $1,415,524 expended for Major Rehabilitation. 1-44 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sept. 30, 1984 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT' 1958 $ 5,810 $ 11.612 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT' 1964 56,286 120,179 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA' 1982 228,081 228,080 Compo Beach, Westport, CT' 1962 84.544 169,089 Cove Island, Stamford, CT' 1961 47,131 94,262 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT' 1963 26,886 53,771 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT' 1961 15,620 31,241 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT' 1958 21,.303 42,606 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT' 1956 163,183 326,366 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH' 1966 260.868 385,641 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT' 1956 14,401 28,802 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT' 1961 3,930 7,859 Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA - 50,000 - Matunuck Beach, South Kingston, R12 1961 - Middle Beach, CT' 1958 8,810 17.620 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI3 1963 14,512 29,024 Nantasket Beach, MA' 1971 -- - North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH' 1963 - North Scituate Beach. Scituate, MA' 1969 106,552 106,552 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA' 1976 273,334 198,583 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI' 1982 558,988 181,175 Plum Island, MA' 1977 118,882 Prospect 104,875 Beach, West Haven, CT' 1958 104,573 240,819 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MA' 1962 621,440 1,242,880 Revere Beach, Revere, MAs 1981 253,713 142,965 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI' 1959 40,143 82,000 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT' 1961 23,759 47,518 Seaside Park, CT' 1958 150,000 329,921 Short Beach, CT' - Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT 1964 62.560 270,695 Southport Beach, CT' 1960 17,631 35,263 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA 1964 5,490 10,981 Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA 1961 - Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH' 1966 65,131 435,942 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA' 1971 180,944 200,208 Winthrop Beach, MA' 1960 176,5676 353,134 Woodmont Shore, Milford, CT' 1961 53,838 111,6797 'Completed. 2 Project to be included in Point Judith water resources development plan authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act. 3 Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874. Project inactive. Project completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from federal navigation improvement at Housatonic River. 6 Project is complete. There are three additional groins, construction of which is deferred until it is determined that they are necessary. 7 Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of proje1ct. Excludes $73,800 for previous project. Excludes $142,965 contributed. 1-45 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FEDERAL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Alley Bay, Beals, ME3,4 Alford, Green River, MA3,4 Amesbury, Powwow River, MA3 ,4 Ansonia-Derby, CT 3 Bound Brook, Scituate, MA3, 4 Canton, MA3,4 Charles River Dam, MA3 Charlestown, NH3, 4 Cherryfield, ME 3 ,4 Chicopee, MA 6 Chicopee Falls, MA 3 Cocheco River, NH 3 ,4 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH314 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH3, 4 Danbury, CT 3 Derby, CT 3 East Branch Dam, CT3 East Hartford, CT3 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT3 ,4 Fort Kent, ME3,4 Fox Point Barrier, RI3 Gardner, MA3,4 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT3 Hartford, CT3 Hartford, White River, VT3,4 Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA3,4 Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME3 Holyoke, MA3 Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT3,4 Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA3 Huntington, MA3 ,4,' 0 Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME 3 Keene, NH3, 4 Lancaster, Israel River, NH3,4 Lee, Housatonic River, MA3,�' 0 Little River Dike, Westfield, MA 3 Lowell, MA3 Lower Woonsocket, RI3 Mad River Lake, CT3 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME 3 Monoosnoc Brook, MA'3 Monoosnoc Lake, MA' 3 Nashua, NH 3 Nookagee Lake, MA Northampton, MA3 North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT3,4 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA3 North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA3 ,4 Norwalk, CT3,4 Norwich, Ct3 Old Town, Penobscot River, ME 3 ,4 Pawcatuck, CT3 Phillips Lake, MA Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME 3 Riverdale, MA3 Saxonville, MA' Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NHa,4 Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA3,4 Springdale, MA 3 1979 1977 1978 1977 1974 1964 1981 1976 1963 1954 1978 1963 1982 1976 1978 1977 1973 1951 1979 1979 1976 1970 1970 1960 1973 1979 1980 1953 1982 1981 1960 1980 1955 1982 1976 1945 1977 1973 1980 1967 1967 1950 1976 1950 1977 1981 1979 1952 1960 1978 1966 1982 1980 1952 1981 1977 1978 1952 $ 190,500 41,419 132,113 18,266,040 47,300 180,670' 41,163,452 113,330 203,000 1,433,6007 2,183,912 183,100 180,000 54,703 13,143,000 7,582,642 1,959,836 2,135,000 220,284 1,997,820 11,112,801 495,691 2,572,357 6,094,1009 332,236 2,235,470 207,390 3,418,000 102,800 202,608 3,900 105,082 44,100 551,606 37,852 5,000 490,60011 6,600,681 4,773,020 107,681 270,0008 563,677 680,00017 73,865 3,235,00023 81,671 52,150 1,209,000 148,045 644,311 300,000 73,674 1,138,000 4,218,700 37,657 1,803,739 700,000 21 92,891 5,554,087' 5 385 411,29222 - 2 19 7,637 3,679,50014 15,500 2,781,100 24,447 25 1,266,63820 327 214,106 25,000 24 1-46 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FEDERAL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Springfield, MA3 1950 577,00018 5,350 Stony Brook, Wilton, NH3 ,4 1973 19,500 - Sucker Brook Dam, CT 3 1976 2,227,712 58,800 Three Rivers, MA3 1970 1,577.18912 Torrington, East Branch, CT3 ,4 1963 389,200 - Torrington, West Branch, CT3,4 1963 228,300 - Trumbull Lake, CT' 1983 1,498,799 Ware, MA3,4 1963 400,000 - Waterbury-Watertown, CT 3 ,4 1963 263,300 Westerly, RI 1966 - Weston, VT3,4 1957 13,000 1,800 West Springfield, MA 3 1954 1,334,0001 West Warren, MA3,4 1964 389,200 41,000 Whitmanville Lake, MA 1979 605,023 Winsted, CT 3 1954 245,500 - Woonsocket, RI3 1962 4,040,000 224, 500 Worcester Diversion, MA 3 1978 5,086,895 79,300 1 Inactive. 14 Cash for construction only. Excludes $245,000 expended 2 Excludes $1,146,828 expended from Contributed Funds, for land condemnation. Other. 15 Excludes $1,674,567 Contributed Funds, Other. 3 Completed. 16 Excludes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. 4 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 17 Excludes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 5 Reflects FY1967 settlement of outstanding claims. 18 Excludes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 6 Completed except for inactive portion. 19 Excludes $406,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 7 Includes $295,000 Public Works Administration funds. 20 Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. 8 Excludes $147,366 flood control and coastal emergency 21 Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. funds expended. 22 Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and E9x cludes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. 10 Emergency Bank Protection. 23 Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration funds 1 Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. expended on Fitchburg, MA. 12 Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. 24 Excludes $8,503 Contributed Funds, Other. 13 To be restudied. 25 Excludes $3,000 Contributed Funds, Other. TABLE 1-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME' 1935 6,384,394 Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. 1-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date C(ontributed Project Report For Deauthorized Federal Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir Aug 1977 $ - $ - Andover Lake, ("rT Aug 1977 - - Bagaduce River. ME (uncompleted portion) O()c19t7 8 -- - Raker Brook, MA 1972 Nov 1979 94,000(1 Beards Brook Reservoir, NHl 1949 Aug 1977 78.000 - Beaver Brook Lake. Nil 1973 Apr 1978 :78,.300 - Bennington Reservoir, Nil 1949 Aug 1977 205.000 - Brant Rock IBeach, Marshfield, MA 1961 Nov 1979 Bridgeport Harbor, ('T (uncompleted portion) 1980 Nov 1979 Brockway lake. VT 1946 Aug 1977 Cambridgelxprt Lake, VT - Aug 1977 (Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) 1954 Aug 1977 ('laremnont Lake, Nil 1968 Dec 1970 242700 - ('lyde. RI 1948 Apr 1951 8,800 - ('Connecticut River below Hartford 1979 Oct 1978--- ('T (uncompleted lportion) (otuit Harbor, MA 1962 Oct 1978 8,541 - I)ickey Lake, ME 1983 Dec 1981 13,130,000' Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1969 Oct. 1978 Gaysville Lake, VT 1970 Oct 1976 206,6()0 - Greenwich Point Beach, C'T 1959 Oct 1978 -- - Housatonic River, ('T (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - Honey Hill Lake, Nil 1949 Aug 1977 92,000 - Ludlow Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Manchester Harbor, MA 1949 Nov 1979 23,986 - Marblehead Harbor, MA 1968 Oct 1978 43,711 - Mattapoisett Harbor, MA 1950 Oct 1978 - Mountain Brook Dam, NH 1949 Aug 1977 57,000 Mystic, CT 1968 Aug 1972 67,700 - Napatree Beach, RI - Nov 1979 - - Narragansett Pier, RI 1966 Nov 1970 115,590 - North Andover and Lawrence, MA 1949 Aug 1977 20,000 - Norwalk-Wilton, ('T 1973 Nov 1979 - - Pawcatuck River, RI & (:T (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - - Pawtucket, RI 1949 Nov 1977 - - Point Judith, RI 1968 Nov 1977 198,477 - Pontiac Diversion, RI 1948 Apr 1951 24,200 Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA 1961 Oct 1978 - - (uncompleted portion) Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Saco River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1979 - Sakonnet Harbor, RI 1982 Jun 1982 176,000 - Sandy Bay, ('ape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) 1922 Oct 1978 South Coventry Lake, CT 1951 Aug 1977 96,000 South Tunbridge Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Stamfiord Harbor, ("r 2 projects uncompleted portions) 1979 Oct 1978 - Stonington Harbor, ME 1961 Nov 1979 2,543 Stratford, CT 1973 Mar 1977 934,500 - Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH 1946 Dec 1944 - The Island Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - Wareham-Marion, MA 1965 Aug 1977 81,715 Victory Lake. VT 1967 Aug 1977 168,400 West Brookfield Reservoir. MA 1948 July 1960 67,000 West Canaan Lake, Nil 1948 Aug 1977 92,000 Westfield, MA 1967 Sep 1969 507,200 Westport, CT 1965 Feb 1970 29,634 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT 1972 Nov 1979 (uncompleted portion) Williamsville Reservoir, VT 1949 Dec 1944 146,500 For Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes Project. 1-48 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-H NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year C'osts Basin Cove, South Harpswell, ME 3,174 Bass River, MA 37,197 Eel Pond, Falmouth, MA 9,930 Fishermans Cove, Swampscott, MA 7,698 Gloucester Harbor, Gloucester, MA 83.416 Kennebunk River, Kennebunkport, ME 3,495 Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, MA 988 Patchogue River, CT 49,852 Perkins Cove, Ogunquit, ME 92,605 Pine Point Harbor, Scarborough, ME 69,791 Pines River, Revere, MA 97,614 Plymouth Harbor, Plymouth, MA 1,289 Provincetown Harbor, MA 1.683 Rockport and Old Harbors, MA 2,258 Saquatuck Harbor, Harwich, MA 9,102 Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA 74,670 Scituate Harbor, MA 51,282 Winthrop Harbor, Winthrop, MA 5.000 Wood Island Harbor, Biddeford, ME 62,747 TABLE 1-I BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 78-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Bass River Beach, Yarmouth, MA Belfast City Park, Belfast, ME Breakwater Beach, Rockland, ME City Park Beach, Warwick, RI Conimicut Beach, Warwick, RI Cornhill Beach, Truro, MA Malibu and Savine Hill Beaches, Boston, MA Sea Gull Beach, Yarmouth, MA Seaview and Parkers River, MA Short Beach, Winthrop, MA South End Beach, Rockland, ME Town Beaches, Old Saybrook, CT West Haven Beaches, CT 7,462 74,.539 7,100 18,015 22.024 5.,586 5,000 36,630 89,674 3,000 7,303 52,391 77,224 1-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year ('osts Beaver Brook. Keene, NIl 22.795 Blackstone River, ('umberland, RI 5,904 East Branch. Ilousatonic River, Pittsfield, MA 14,000 Gunstock River, Gilford, Nil 4,100 Ilousatonic River, New Milford, CT 10,223 Kennebec River, Augusta, ME 12,500 I,atimer Brook, East lyme. ('T 7.500 Mad River, Waterbury, ('T 44.939 Means Brook, Shelton, (CT 16,800 Mystic River, Medford, MA 5,200 Nashua River, Lancaster, MA 2,200 Otter Stream, Bradley, ME 6,500 Point of Pines, Revere, MA 144,994 Prestile Stream, Mars Htill, ME 7.50() Quinnipiac River, Wallingford, CT 17,125 Spot Pond Brook, Melrose, MA 4,500) Ten Mile River, Cheshire, CT 42,187 Three Ponds Brook, Warwick, RI 7.500 Turkey Brook, Watertown, CT 3,500 Wepawaug River, Milford, CT 123,729 Wepawaug River, Orange, ('T 26,265 West River, New Haven. ('T 118,898 TABLE 1-K BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI (See Section 34 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total West Hill2 Worcester, MA 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,366,902 $940,000 $2,306,902 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 See individual report for details. 1-50 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-K (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Black- Lands stone and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Worcester, MA 48 I)iversion tunnel and channel $4,923,500 $1.179,000 $6,102,500 Woonsocket, RI 15 Channel improvement 3,740,100 1,069,000: 4,809,100 Lower Woonsocket, RI 13 Flood wall, conduits and channel improvement 8,356,239 435,000 8,791,239 ' Includes relocations. 2 $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. : $300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. TABLE 1-L CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 35 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Conne- Reservoir Lands cticut Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Vermont: Union Village" White River 228.4 170 Earthfill 38,000 $3,186,860 $ 908,300 $4,095,160( Junction North Hartland2 White River 211.7 185 Earthfill 71,400 6,349,225 963,000 7,312,225 Junction North Springfield2Springfield 191.3 120 Earthfill 50,600 4,781,526 2,050,000 6,831,526 Ball Mountain2 Brattleboro 178.2 265 Rockfill- 54,600 10,688,600 350,000 11,038,600 earth Townsend2 Brattleboro 168.3 133 Earthfill 33,200 5,520,413 1,878,000 7,398,413 New Hampshire: Surry Mountain2 Keene 174.4 86 Earthfill 32,500 2,448,610 385,000 2,833,610 Otter Brook2 Keene 171.2 133 Earthfill 18,300 2,982,048 1,378,400 4,360,448 Massachusetts: Birch Hill2 Gardner 153.3 56 Earthfill 49,900 1,740,679 3,075,000 4,815,679 Tully2 Athol 148.7 62 Earthfill 22,000 1,298,752 368,000 1,666,752 Barre Falls' Worcester 130.2 62 Rockfill- 24,000 1,928,819 39,000 1,967,819 earth Knightville2 Northampton 102.8 160 Earthfill 49,000 2,594,440 821,200 3,415,640 Littleville2 Northampton 102.0 150 Earthfill 32,400 5,863,412 1,150,000 7,013,412 Conant Brook2 Springfield 122.0 85 Rockfill- 3,740 1,935,530 1,015,000 2,950,530 earth Connecticut: Colebrook River2 Winsted 116.0 223 Rockfill- 98,500 8,341,971 5,92200()(0( 14,263,971 earth Mad River Winsted 120.0 178 Earthfill 9,700 3,380,000 2,210,00' 5,590,000 Sucker Brook Winsted 118.5 68 Earthfill 1,480 2,550,000 180,000: 2,730,000 'Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. 3 Non-Federal cost. 4 Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. 1-51 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-L (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Conne- Lands cticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Charlestown, NH 181 Riverbank protection $ 114,000 - $ 114,000 Chicopee, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,738,000 $ 250,000 1,988,000 Chicopee Falls, MA 83 Wall and levee 2,600,000 70,000 2,670,000 East Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 2,135,000 271,000 2,406,000 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 50 Channel improvement 220,300 - 220,300 Gardner, MA 163 Dam and levee 493,900 35,000 528,900 Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 6,930,0004 1,150,000 8,080,000 Hartford, VT 216 Channel improvement 332,000 - 332,000 Holyoke, MA 85 Wall and levee 3,418,000 150,000 3,568,000 Huntington, MA 100 Riverbank protection 4,000 - 4,000 Israel R., Lancaster, NH 314 Gabion overflow weir 475,000 - 475,000 Keene, NH 167 Channel improvement 44,000 - 44,000 Northampton, MA 94 Wall and levee 960,000 150,000 1,110,000 North Stratford, NH 345 Slope protection 170,000 - 170,000 Park River, CT2 51 Conduit 59,877,000 1,300,000 61,177,000 Riverdale, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,138,000 50,000 1,188,000 Salmon R., Colchester, CT2 38 Slope protection 235,000 - 235,000 Springdale, MA 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 932,000 272,000 1,204,000 Three Rivers, MA 98 Wall and levee 1,580,000 700,000 2,280,000 Ware, MA 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Weston, VT 195 Channel improvement 13,000 2,000 15,000 West Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 1,579,0003 30,000 1,609,000 West Warren, MA 111 Wall and levee 390,000 64,000 454,000 Winsted, CT 115 Channel improvement 246,000 30,000 276,000 STo be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests 3 Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. portion of relocation. 4 Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. 2 For details see individual report. TABLE 1-M HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA (See Section 36 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS1 Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Nagua- Reservoir Lands tuck Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages 2 Total Hall Meadow 4 East Branch 5 Thomaston Northfield Brook Black Rock Torrington, CT Torrington, CT Torrington, CT Torrington, CT Waterbury, CT 41.0 73 Rock and earthfill 43.7 92 Earthfill 30.5 142 Rock and earthfill 30.6 118 Earthfill 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,620 $1,852,400 $1,290,0003 $3,142,000 4,350 1,509,800 1,290,0003 2,799,800 42,000 6,382,112 7,900,000 14,282,112 2,432 1,875,512 975,000 2,850,512 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 1-52 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-M (Continued) HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA (See Section 36 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS 1 Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Nagua- Reservoir Lands tuck Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages2 Total Hancock Brook Waterbury, CT 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 $1,593,911 $2,585,000 $4,178,911 Hop Brook Waterbury, CT 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,701,562 3,450,000 6,151,562 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 4 For last full report. see Annual Report for 1970. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 5 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1973. 3 Includes cost of lands borne by local interests. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 1 Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Housa- Lands tonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total Alford, Green River, 111.0 Earth dike and stone slope $ 41,400 $ - $ 41,400 MA protection Ansonia-Derby, CT 13.0 Wall. levee, channel 17,850,000 1,178,000 18,995,000 improvement and pumping station Danbury, CT 56.0 Walls, channel improvement 13,182,000 1,862,000 15,044,000 and bridge replacememt Derby, CT 12.0 Walls, levees and pumping 7,583,000 647,000 8,230,000 station North Canaan, Blackberry 83.0 Snagging and clearing 73,900 - 73,900 River, CT project Pittsfield, MA 133.0 Stone arch culvert 580,000 85,000 665,000 Salisbury, CT 76.0 Gabionade with slope 100,000 - 100,000 protection Sheffield, MA 96.0 Stone slope protection 203,000 - 203,000 Squantz Pond, New 43.0 Timber Bulkhead 116,300 - 116,300 Fairfield, CT Torrington, East Branch, CT 51.0 Dike and channel 389,200 - 389,200 improvement Torrington, West Branch, CT 52.0 Walls, dikes and channel 228,300 - 228,300 Waterbury- Watertown, CT 32.00 Wall dike and channel 263,300 - 263,300 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. 1-53 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-N MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH, AND MA (See Section 41 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Merri- Reservoir Lands mack Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Franklin Falls2 Franklin, NH 118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 $ 6,190,487 $ 1,760,000 $ 7,950,487 Blackwater2 Concord, NH 118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 766,746 553,000 1,319,746 Hopkinton-Everett 2 ,4 Concord, NH 87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 12,715,440 8,737,000 21,452,440 Edward MacDowell2 Keene, NH 161.3 67 Earthfill 12,800 1,708,253 306,000 2,014,253 Monoosnoc3 Leominster, MA 100.6 71 Earthfill 2,000 3,430,000 370,000 3,800,0006 Phillips2 Fitchburg, MA 105.4 48 Earthfill 1,600 13,450,000 7,350,000 20,800,0006 Nookagee Fitchburg, MA 107.9 106 Earthfill 8,100 15,476,000 5,742,000 21,200,000 Whitmanville Fitchburg. MA 110.6 76 Earthfill 9,350 11,590,000 6,210,000 17,800,000 ' Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. " Substituted for Bennington and Beards Brook. Distance and 2 For details, see individual report. height are for Everett Dam. Distance and height for Hopkinton 3 Project deferred, cost not revised on current price basis. Dam are 118 miles and 76 feet, respectively. 5 Includes Non-Federal reimbursement. 6 Based on "large" Phillips plan which would eliminate Nookagee Lake. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Merri- Lands mack and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Amesbury, Powwow and 3.0 Wall and reventment $ 133,400 $ - $ 133,400 Merrimack Rivers, MA 2,4 Nashua, NH2 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,0005 Lowell, MA 2 39.0 Wall and levee 490,600 90,000 580,600 Monoosnoc Brook, MA3 98.4 Channel improvement 310,000 90,000 400,000 North Nashua River, MA2" 4 100.5 Channel improvement 3,235,000 - 3,235,000 Saxonville, MA2 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,218,700 530,000 4,748,700 1 To be borne by local interests. 2 Project completed. " Project deferred. Cost has not been revised on current price basis. 4 For details, see individual report. 5Excludes $15,000 expended from contributed funds. 1-54 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-0 THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA (See Section 49 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Reservoir Lands Thames Height Capacity and Name Nearest River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Hodges Village2 Webster, MA 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 $1,317,073 $3,144,000 $4,461,073 Buffumville2 Webster, MA 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 2,157,603 841,000 2,998,603 East Brimfield2 Southbridge, MA 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 1,337,043 5,720,000 7,057,043 Westville2 Southbridge, MA 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 2,284,683 3,400,000 5,684,683 West Thompson2 Putman, CT 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 5,036,221 1,965,000 7,001,221 Mansfield Hollow2 Willimantic, CT 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 4,107,164 2,340,000 6,447,164 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Lands Thames and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages Total Norwich, CT 15.0 Channel improvements $1,209,000 $72,000 $1,281,000 1 Borne by local interests. TABLE 1-P BOSTON HARBOR, MA Total Federal Cost for Existing Project to September 1984 (See Section 3 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $21,881,851 $ 8,919,498 $30,801,349 Public Works 1,030,806 - 1,030,806 Emergency Relief 935,303 935,303 $23,847,960 $8,919,4981 $32,767,458 Excludes $17,767 contributed funds. 1-55 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 1-Q RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Date Survey Project Conducted Project Conducted Connecticut Massachusetts Black Rock Harbor Clinton Harbor Connecticut River below Hartford Eightmile River Fivemile River Guilford Harbor Housatonic River Mianus River Mystic River New London Harbor Niantic Harbor Norwalk Harbor Stamford Harbor Stony Creek Thames River Wethersfield Cove Wickford Harbor May 1984 Oct 1983 Oct 1983: Jun 1984 Feb 1984 Jun 1984 Mar 1984 Oct 1983 Oct 1983 Mar 1984 Oct 1983 Apr-May 1984 Feb 1984 Oct 1983 Mar 1984 Mar 1984 Mar 1984 Andrews River Boston Harbor Cape Cod Canal Cohasset Harbor Duxbury Harbor Fall River Harbor Green Harbor Hingham Harbor Hyannis Harbor Nantucket Harbor Newburyport Harbor Plymouth Harbor Provincetown Harbor Salem Harbor Scituate Harbor Sesuit Harbor Wellfleet Harbor Weymouth-Fore and Town Rivers Apr 1984 May. Aug 1984 Dec 1983-.lan 1984 Apr 1984 Oct 1983 Oct 1983 Apr 1984 Mar 1984 Oct-Nov 1983 Jun 1984 Mar 1984 Jul 1984 Oct 1983 Dec 1983 Oct 1983 Apr 1984 Aug 1984 Aug 1981 New Hampshire Maine Beals Harbor Eastport Harbor Georges River Kennebunk River New Harbor Northeast Harbor Owls Head Harbor Penobscot River Pepperell Cove Portland Harbor Rockland Harbor Rockport Harbor Royal River Saco River Searsport Harbor Southport Harbor Southwest Harbor Wells Harbor Jun 1984 Apr 1984 Jun 1984 Mar 1984 Jun 1984 Apr 1984 Jun 1984 Aug 1984 Apr 1984 Oct-Nov 1983 Jun 1984 Jun 1984 May-Jun 1984 Oct 1983 Apr 1984 Mar 1984 Apr 1984 Dec 1983 Little Harbor Hampton Harbor Portsmouth Harbor Rye Harbor Mar 1984 Feb-Mar, Aug 1984 Apr 1984 Apr 1981 Rhode Island Bullocks Point Cove Little Narragansett Bay Newport Harbor Pawtuxet Cove Providence River Sakonnet Harbor Warwick Cove Apr 19841 Mar 1984 May 1984 Apr 1984 Mar-Apr 1984 May 1984 Mar-Apr 1984 1-56 NEW YORK, N.Y., DISTRICT * This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of western Massachusetts, Connecticut, and eastern and south-central New York, including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State line to but not including Manasquan Inlet, N.J. It exercises jurisdiction, however, over all matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the laws enacted for the preservation on the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary water, and the waters of Long Island Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control ..................... 2. Bay Ridge-Red Hook Channels, N.Y........ 3. East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. ............... 4. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, N.Y ........... 5. Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y ............ 6. Hudson River, N.Y. ............... ... 7. Jones Inlet, N.Y . ........ ........ 8. Keyport Harbor, N.J. ............. ... 9. Lake Montauk Harbor, N.Y. ................. 10. Long Island Intra Coastal W/W, N.Y. ........ 11. Matawan Creek, N.J .................. 12. Milton Harbor, N.Y ....................... 13. Moriches Inlet, N.Y ......................... 14. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. .......... 15. Newark Bay Hackensack Passaic Rivers, N.J. 16. New York & New Jersey Channels ............ 17. New York Harbor-collection and removal of drift ............................ 18. New York Harbor-entrance channels & anchorage areas .......................... 19. Raritan River, N.J. ...................... . 20. Shark River, N.J ............. ............. . 21. Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, N.J. .......... 22. Supervisor of New York Harbor .......... 23. Reconnaissance and conditions surveys ........ 24. Other authorized navigation projects .......... 25. Navigation work under special authorization ... Page 2-2 2-2 2-2 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-4 2-4 2-4 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-6 2-6 2-7 2-8 2-8 2-8 2-9 2-10 2-10 2-11 2-11 2-11 Beach Erosion Control 26. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part 1) ............. 27. Other authorized beach erosion control projects .......................... 28. Beach erosion control work under special authorization .............................. Flood Control 29. Ardsley, N.Y. ............. ........ 30. Elizabeth, N.J. ........ ............. 31. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, N.Y. ...... 32. Passaic River Basin, N.J. & N.Y. Phase I ..... . 2-11 2-11 2-11 2-11 2-12 2-13 2-15 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. Sawmill River Elmsford-Greenburg, N.Y. ...... South Ellenville, N.Y....................... Yonkers, N.Y. ...... .............. Inspection of completed flood control projects .. Other authorized flood control projects ........ Dam Safety Program ....................... Flood control work under special authorization Emergency streambank and shoreline protection under special authorization ......... General Investigations 41. 42. 43. Surveys ................................ Collection and study of basic data ............. Deauthorized projects ................... 2-16 2-17 2-18 2-19 2-19 2-19 2-19 2-19 2-19 2-19 2-19 Tables Table 2-A Cost & Financial Statement ............ 2-20 Table 2-B Authorizing Legislation ................. 2-24 Thble 2-C Hudson River, N.Y. Features of Lock and Dam Included in Existing Project ......... 2-29 Table 2-D Tobtal Costs for Existing Project .......... 2-29 Thble 2-E Supervisor of New York Harbor Statement of Activities .................. 2-29 Table 2-F Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .... 2-30 Thble 2-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..... 2-31 Thble 2-H Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............................... 2-32 Table 2-I Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ... 2-33 Thble 2-J Surveys ............................... 2-34 Table 2-K Flood Plain Studies Completed During the Period ............................. 2-34 Thble 2-L Costs for Flood Plain Management Services ............................... 2-34 Thble 2-M Deauthorized Projects .................. 2-35 Thble 2-N Section 17 Continue Detailed Project Report ................................ 2-36 Thble 2-0 Section 13 Complete Preauthorization Reconnaissance Report ...................... 2-36 Thble 2-P Section 25 Continue Preauthorization Reconnaissance Report ................ 2-37 Table 2-Q Section 14 Complete Reconnaissance Reports ................ .............. 2-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligator-weed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures (See 'ITable 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide 30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. Operations and results during period. During the third year of a ten year control program for removal of nuisance aquatic plants in Lake Champlain, a contract for removal of 162 acres of these plants was completed at a cost of $135,700. The fourth segment of the control program will be undertaken during the summer of 1985. Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division area was completed in August 1967. Planning for the waterchestnut control in the Hudson-Mohawk basin was completed by the New York District, contracts for $181,562 accomplished during FY1971 through FY1976. Reconnaissance report for Lake Champlain, Vermont and a General Design Memorandum have been completed. 2. BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, N.Y. Location. These channels lie along east shore of Upper Bay, New York Harbor and, with Buttermilk Channel, form an easterly channel along Brooklyn waterfront from the Narrows to East River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 369 and 541.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 1768 and 195, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 1,200 feet wide and 40 feet deep at mean low water from the Narrows to Bay Ridge Avenue, Brooklyn, thence 1,750 feet wide to junction of Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, thence 1,200 feet wide through Red Hook Channel to junction with Buttermilk Channel and a channel of same depth extending into Gowanus Bay from junction of Bay Ridge Channel with Red Hook Channel, narrowing uniformly in width to about 500 feet at 28th Street, Brooklyn. Section included in project is 4 miles long. Mean tidal range, 4.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.2 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $4,277,197, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978. Vol. 2. Operations and results during Period. A Contract was awarded February 9, 1984 for removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 35 feet below mean low water in specified sections of Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channel. Work commenced April 4, 1984 and was completed May 1, 1984. Removed 290,006 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $1,339,000. Reconnaissance surveys cost $56,614. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced March 1901 and completed June 1940. 3. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island between main body of island and western end of Long Beach. It is 10 miles east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and east from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Atlantic Ocean for about 0.6 mile to 12-foot contour in Long Beach Channel protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $603,969, including $100,000 contributed funds. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 39 terminals in Oceanside, Island Park, Long, Beach, and East Rockaway. Nine of these are oil terminals, one of which has a railroad spur. Other terminals are repair and mooring docks with a berthage of 7,655 feet. Of these, 21 have marine railways and 1 has mechanical- handling facilities. There are public wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on northside of Long Beach has been bulkheaded. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. Reconnaissance surveys cost $3,936. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began February 1933 and is 100 percent complete. East jetty, 4,250 feet long, was completed in July 1934. Project channel was completed in May 1935. 4. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. Fire Island Inlet is the main entrance into Great South Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 578.) Existing project. A jetty extending generally southwest 2-2 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT and south for 5,000 feet from high ground on Democrat Point at west end of Fire Island, and a channel 10 feet deep and 250 feet wide from deep water in ocean to deep water within inlet. Mean tidal range at ocean and inlet ends of Democrat Pobint are 4.1 and 2.4, respectively. Mean range of spring tides on the ocean side is 5.0 feet. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.5 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water on the ocean side. New work for completed project cost $684,545, including $90,190 contributed local interests. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None within area immediately adjacent to Federal improvement. In Great South Bay there are 28 board repair and storage yards, 3 commercial fish terminals and 3 ferries, with a total berthage of 25,440 feet. Twentyeight terminals have marine railways and 13 are public wharves. In addition, Patchogue River has 12 boat repair and storage yards, 1 ferry, and 3 fuel oil terminals, with a total berthage of 8,380 feet. Fourteen have marine railways and 2 are public wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. In addition to the commercial facilities there are numerous privately-owned terminals. Operations and results during period. At the request of local interests, maintenance dredging of the Inlet has been postponed until an Inlet Dynamic Study is completed. The residents of Oak Beach contend that dredging the Inlet exposes Oak Beach to direct wave attack, thereby causing an erosion problem. An Inlet Dynamic Study completed in November 1984 being reviewed. Cost for Fiscal Year 1984 was $21,004. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced June 1939. Jetty was completed in 1941. Since a November 1953 survey revealed a channel with dimensions substantially the same as those authorized, work under existing project was considered complete November 1953. Jetty has surpassed its capacity as a sand entrapping agent and, when examined in June 1969, was found to be in poor condition. 5. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, N.Y. Location. On north shore Long Island, opening into East River, 12 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. Bay is 1.8 miles long in a northwest-southeast direction and from 0.4 to 0.8 mile wide. Flushing Creek enters bay from southeast and is about 1.1 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 226.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1932, and 1938; pages 1772, 169, and 168, respectively. Existing project. (a) A bay channel with a depth of 15 feet at mean low water, and 3000 feet wide from deep water in East River 1.8 miles to maneuvering area; (b) thence a creek channel with a depth of 15 feet at mean low water and 200 feet wide to Northern Boulevard Bridge, thence decreasing uniformly in width to 170 feet at a point 50 feet downstream from Van Wyck expressway Bridge, a distance of about 1.1 miles; (c) a branch channel with a depth of 15 feet at mean low water and width of 200 feet from bay channel maneuvering area 0.1 mile long; (d) an irregularly shaped maneuvering area about 2,000 by 750 feet with a depth of 15 feet at mean low water except approach to west side of municipal boat basin which will remain at 12 feet at mean low water; (e) an anchorage basin about 2,100 by 1,800 feet, encompassing about 84 acres with a depth of 6 feet at mean low water; and (f) riprap revetment of 1,400 feet extension of earth dike. Mean tidal range, 6.5 feet at mouth of Flushing Bay, 6.8 feet at Northern Boulevard Bridge; mean range of spring tides 8.1 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 4 feet low water to 7.6 feet above mean high water. New work from completed project cost $1,894,282 including $419,879 contributed by local interests; and excluding $8,752 expended by local interests for required work, $580,435 contributed, other, funds, and amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish lands, easements and rights-of-way for maintenance and for aids to navigation upon request of Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; make necessary removals or relocations of pipelines, cables and other utilities and all necessary protective measures to bridges and other structures crossing or adjacent to the waterway; and maintain necessary mooring facilties and utilities for recreational boating open to all on equal terms. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1965, Vol. 2 Part 2, pages 244-248. Operations and results during period. A Continuing Contract for maintenance dredging of channel to restore project depths was awarded in FY1983. Work started October 26, 1983 and was completed January 26, 1984. Removed 342,933 cubic yards, place measurement, of material under this contract in FY1984 at a total cost to project of $915,855. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced April 1963 and was completed October 1964. 6. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery, New York City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay. Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335, 12341, 12343, 12347, 12348, and 14786.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 1764 and 226, respectively. Existing project. A channel 600 feet wide from New York City to Kingston and thence 400 feet wide to Albany, with widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, 1 near Hudson and 1 near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depths of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2,200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.50 miles below Water- 2-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 ford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising "! pairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State of New York. Mean range of pool elevation above Federal dam at Troy, in seasons of moderate rains, is about 2.2 feet, as determined in 1934. Mean tidal range is about 4.8 feet between May and October and 5.1 feet between July and September at Albany, extreme range due to freshets is 33.1 and 25.9 feet, respectively normal pool level above Federal dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.33 feet above mean sea level. In tidal section of river below dam, assumed lowest low water plane from Troy to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, N.Y., to 12 feet deep at a cost of $552,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $458,000 (1957) are inactive. Construction of dikes at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See 'able 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable soil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6, revised 1979. Operations and results during period. A Contract for maintenance dredging in the Vicinity of Albany Turning Basin, N.Y. to restore project depths was awarded in FY1983. Work started October 8, 1983 and was completed November 5, 1983. Removed 59,396 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $57,765. Reconnaissance surveys cost $7,643. By use of Government plant and hired labor, stumps and snags which formed a potential menace to navigation, and other obstructions, were removed from the shores and channel of the river at a cost of $148,666 for maintenance in FY1984. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently through the fiscal year in performing surveys to restore horizontal and vertical controls at a cost of $163,678 for maintenance in FY1984. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently through the fiscal year on repairs to Cedar Hill Dike at a cost of $115,131 for maintenance in FY1984. The lock and dam on the Hudson at Troy, N.Y. were operated and maintained. Operation of Lock for 1984 navigation season was suspended December 9, 1983 and resumed April 30, 1984. Cost incurred was $379,018 for Operation and Maintenance in FY1984. In Fiscal Year 1984, a Contract was let to determine the extent of deterioration and needed repairs to Troy Lock and Dam. A design report for the Concrete Repair Program was submitted by the Contractor and is presently being reviewed by the Division and District. An additional Contract was let to determine if corrective measures are necessary to increase the stability of the Troy Lock and Dam. A feasibility report detailing the results of the findings and any recommendations is due in the first Quarter Fiscal Year 1985. Costs incurred during this period were $225,198. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and dam at Troy, removal of dam at Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet were raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York City to Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear-foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project which has never been dredged to project depth. Additionally, the 1,300 linear feet of the 27-foot project remains undredged. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet except for a small part of the widening to form a harbor at Troy. Work remaining under the project consists of completion of the 12-foot harbor at Troy and dredging the 27-foot and the remainder of the 32-foot channels at Albany which are not deemed necessary at this time; and reconstruction of dikes. Started coordination with State regarding mooring facilities. (See Table 2-D for total costs of existing project to September 30, 1983.) 7. JONES INLET, N.Y. Location. A small inlet on south shore of Long Island connecting Hempstead Bay with Atlantic Ocean, 37 miles by water southeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352). Existing project. An entrance jetty and a channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from that depth in the ocean through the inlet to Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek. Section included in project is about 2.1 miles long. Mean tidal range varies from 4.2 feet at ocean entrance to 3.1 feet at Loop Causeway Bridge; mean range of spring tide varies from 5 to 3.7 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required, and must maintain a channel 12 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide from Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek to head of navigation in Freeport Creek at Mill Road. Terminal facilities. Within area tributary to Jones Inlet there are a number of privately owned small wharves and 40 boat repair and storage yards. The latter are equipped for repair of pleasure craft and fishing vessels. In addition, there are nine public wharves open to the public free of charge, with a total dockage of 2,180 feet. Additional terminals would have to be constucted for receipt of commercial freight in any sizable quantity. Operations and results during period. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced August 1953 and completed June 1959. JONES INLET - JETTY REHABILITATION ($34,500.00). The purpose of this study is to develop a feasible and cost effective design for rehabilitation of the Jones Inlet Jetty to insure structural stability and maximize the sand trapping 2-4 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT efficiency of the structure. Inlet hydrographic and existing jetty condition surveys have been performed. Preliminary design and cost estimates for alternative schemes have been developed and the superior scheme recommended. Study completion is January 1985. JONES INLET - MAINTENANCE MODIFICATIONS ($49,264.40). The purpose of this study is to develop feasible and cost efficient alternatives which would minimize channel maintenance requirements. Existing tidal/ inlet hydraculics, inlet/bay stability, jetty impoundment rates, etc., have been evaluated. Several methods of shoaling analysis were reviewed and the most applicable used. Preliminary design layouts and cost estimates for a deposition basin and navigation channel have been developed and the superior scheme recommended. Study completion is January 1985. 8. KEYPORT HARBOR, N.J. Location. At mouth of Matawan Creek, on south side of Raritan Bay, about 9 miles west of Sandy Hook. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 369). Existing project. A channel about 1 mile long from Raritan Bay to the steamboat dock at Keyport, 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Mean range of tides is 4.9 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.9 feet. High easterly or westerly winds cause tides to fluctuate from 3.8 feet feet below mean low water up to 5.9 feet above mean high water. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are two privately owned wharves located at the head of improvement, both in poor condition. Operations and result during period. A Contract was awarded July 9, 1984 in the amount of $535,087 for the removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 8 feet below mean low water in Keyport Harbor. Contractor will commence dredging in Fiscal Year 1985. Reconnaissance surveys cost $139. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1883 and was completed October 1911. 9. LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On east end of Long Island, about 3 miles by land west of Montauk Point and 125 miles by water east of New York City. It is land-locked on the east, south and west sides and is connected to the north with Block Island Sound by an artificial inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 362.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide extending from 12-foot contour in Block Island Sound to same depth in existing yacht basin east of Star Island; a boat basin 10 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long, northwest of Star Island; repair and extension shoreward of the east and west jetties; and addition of sport fishing facilities on top of both jetties. Section included in the project is 0.7 miles long. Mean tidal range, 1.9 feet; mean range of spring tides, 2.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2 feet below; mean low water up to 7 feet above mean high water. For latest published map see project document. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are fourteen marinas and mooring facilities for recreational boats. In addition, two terminals are used for commercial fishing vessels. None of the terminals have rail connections or are equipped with freight handling devices. Terminals are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A Contract was awarded November 4, 1983 for removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 12 feet below mean low water. Work commenced January 9, 1984 and was completed January 17, 1984. Removed 21,876 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a total cost to project of $203,000. Reconnaissance surveys cost $8,782. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced August 1942 and was completed November 1968. Dredging entrance channel and shoreward extension of west jetty were performed from August 1942 to January 1943, at the request of the Navy Department with Navy funds. Extension of east jetty and repair of both jetties, provision of sport fishing facilities on both jetties and dredging the boat basin was completed November 1968. 10. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, N.Y. Location. Extends from East Rockaway Inlet, on the south side of Long Island, to Great Peconic Bay at eastern end of Long Island. Section included under this project extends from Great South Bay opposite Patchogue to the south end of Shinnecock Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 578.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at mean low water from the federally improved channel in Great South Bay, opposite Patchogue to south end of Shinnecock Canal. Section included in project is 34 miles long. Mean tidal range varies from 1 foot in Shinnecock Bay to 0.7 foot in Patchogue Bay; mean range of spring tides varies from 1.2 feet to 0.8 foot; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.8 feet below mean low water to 12 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are 17 boat repair and storage yards within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvement. There is ample room for expansion and development of terminals when future commerce warrants. Operations and results during period. A Contract was awarded July 26, 1984 for the removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 10 feet below mean low water in a specified section of Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. in Moriches Bay. Work commenced August 30, 1984 and was completed September 24, 1984. Removed 106,047 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $446,909. Reconnaissance surveys cost $60,715. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing 2-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 project was commenced October 1939 and completed September 1940. 11. MATAWAN CREEK, N.J. Location. A small stream rising near Matawan, N.J., and flowing through marshes into Keyport Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart No. 369). Existing project. A channel about 1 mile long, 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Winkson Creek, thence for about 1 mile, 75 feet wide to New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge at Matawan. Mean range of tides is 4.9 feet. Strong easterly and westerly winds cause tides to fluctuate from 1 to 2 feet above or below mean range. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are two boatyards, seven privately owned marinas and one publicly owned dock suitable for small pleasure craft located on the Creek. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded July 9, 1984 in the amount of $46,529 for the removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 4 feet below mean low water in specified section of Matawan Creek. Contractor will commence dredging in Fiscal Year 1985. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 64 percent complete. The project depth has been completed from the mouth to the town dock at Matawan with the following widths: 90 to 100 feet from the mouth to the first highway bridge; thence 80 feet wide to Winkson Creek; and thence 60 to 70 feet wide to the town dock at Matawan. (See table at end of chapter for controlling mean low water depth of sections.) 12. MILTON HARBOR, N.Y. Location. A cove on north shore of Long Island Sound, about 29 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 222.) Existing project. An entrance channel 100 feet wide and 1.1 miles long from 6-foot contour in outer harbor; thence an inner channel 60 and 50 feet wide, and 0.15 mile long; thence a branch channel 70 and 50 feet wide and 0.17 mile long all with depths of 6 feet at mean low water. Project report was authorized May 14, 1964, and project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers April 23, 1965, pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. Federal cost for completed new work is $151,373 exclusive of $119,276 required contributed funds furnished by the State of New York. The Federal cost represents 53 percent of the cost of construction, plus $16,870 non-shared pre-authorization costs. Completed cost for non-Federal local cooperation items for dredging proposed marina extension and deepening existing marina which were included in the Federal contract under authority granted by the Secretary of the Army on November 10, 1966, is $72,619 from other contributed funds furnished by the State of New York. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute 47 percent of the first cost of dredging and furnish assurances that they will pay the entire cost of dredging proposed marina extension and deepening existing marina; provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of project and aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers; assume full responsibility for all costs in excess of the federal cost limitation of $200,000 if applicable; hold the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with the depths provided in related project areas; provide and maintain necessary mooring facilities and utilities including public landings and suitable supply facilities and public parking areas open to all equally; maintain a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and development of the harbor facilities with the understanding that these facilities will be open to all equally. Assurances of local cooperation were executed by the city of Rye, N.Y., on October 7, 1965, and accepted by District Engineer for the United States October 12, 1965. Assurances with a modified Federal cost limitation of $500,000, and supplement to assurances covering the local work at local cost under a Federal Contract, were executed by the State of New York on November 17, 1966 and accepted by District Engineer on December 19, 1966. Terminal Facilities. There are two marinas, one boat yard and one boat repair yard in the inner harbor, and one boat club on Long Island Sound. Except for one public marina, all facilities are privately owned. Operations and results during period. A Contract was awarded March 15, 1984 for the removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 6 feet below mean low water in Milton Harbor, N.Y. Work commenced April 12, 1984 and was completed June 8, 1984. Removed 69,252 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $461,000. Reconnaissance surveys cost $15,400. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced March 1967 and physically completed June 1967. Dredging consisted of an entrance channel 100 feet wide and 1.2 miles long in the outer harbor; thence an inner channel 60 and 50 feet wide, and 0.15 mile long; thence a branch channel 70 and 50 feet wide and 0.17 mile long, all with depths of 6 feet at mean low water. 13. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 80 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the narrow sandy barrier beach on the south shore of Long Island which separates the Atlantic Ocean from a series of interconnected bays. (See Coast and Geodetic Survy Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for a channel, 15 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide extending from that depth in the Atlantic Ocean to Moriches Bay, a distance of 0.8 mile; thence a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 1.1 miles; rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments. Estimate of cost for work is $5,000,000 (October 1984); including $50,000 from Coast Guard and $2,450,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 2-6 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Local cooperation. The River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960 provides that local interests shall, prior to construction, agree to contribute in cash 45 percent of the construction by the Corps of Engineers and agree to contribute in cash 50 percent of the maintenance, operation, and replacement, or perform work of equal value when and as acceptable to the Chief of Engineers; and, provide further that in connection with the improvement of the inlet, local interests, prior to construction, agree to (a) make the cash contribution either a lump sum prior to commencement of the work, or in installments prior to commencement of pertinent work items, in accordance with work schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; (b) furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way and suitable spoil-disposal areas for the initial work and for subsequent maintenance when and as required; and (c) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project; (d) provide and maintain suitable terminal facilities when and as required for the accommodation of vessels that would navigate the inlets and adjacent bays, open to all on equal terms; and (e) maintain for the duration of the economic life of the project, continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores and their administration for public use, and continued availability for public use of the privately owned shores upon which a portion of the Federal share of the cost is based. Minor modifications of local cooperation are being coordinated with state. Terminal facilities. No terminals are within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvement. However, numerous- public and private terminal facilities are available in Moriches Bay and in the connecting canals. Several yacht clubs, boatyards, and public wharves and landings, and numerous private landings are located in Moriches y. The yacht clubs and boatyards have equipment for serviciig boats. There are boat basins open to the public. The facilities 'existing in the bay are considered adequate for present and probable future needs under present conditions of Moriches Inlet. There is room for expansion should future commerce warrant. Operations and results during period. Preconstruction planning resumed in October 1977. Coordination continued with Federal, State and local agencies on current problems and need for all project purposes (i.e., navigation; beach erosion control; water quality improvement). Formulated plans for single purpose navigation project. In January 1980, a breach occurred adjacent to the eastern jetty. Emergency funds ($11.3 million) were authorized under the authority of PL84-99 to close the breach. About 1,185,000 cubic yards of sand fill were used to effect closure of the breach by March 1981. Condition as of September 30. Construction has not been initiated. Preconstruction planning (advance engineering and design) has been completed and contract plans and specifications are being prepared. 14. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VT. Location. This waterway, 37 miles long, comprises southern end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point, N.Y. at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, Vt. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 14784). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1931, and 1963, pages 256 and 177, respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, N.Y., at head of Lake Champlain, to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden Pulpit Point and Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low lake level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 20 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion, revised in (1954), was $1,573,000. (See 'Tble 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In Whitehall Harbor consisting of three timber wharves, aggregating 4,200 feet in length. State of New York constructed a barge canal terminal at Whitehall, just south of terminus of canal, which has been equipped with a 5-ton hand-operated derrick and a storehouse. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during period. Government and hired labor were employed intermittently during the fiscal year in removal of stumps and snags at a cost of $14,427. Government plant and hired labor were employed in replacing deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $11,340. Total costs for the project were $28,744. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 77 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least a width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow (Putts Leap and Putts Rock). (Fender booms opposite the Delaware and Hudson Railroad trestle have been removed as they are no longer considered necessary for navigation). The work remaining to complete the project consists of widening the channel throughout its entire length to the project width of 200 feet. 15. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, N.J. Location. Newark Bay is an estuary about 1.25 miles wide and 6 miles long extending southerly from confluence of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers to New York and New Jersey Channels. Hackensack River rises near Haverstraw, Rockland County, N.Y. and flows about 45 miles into Newark Bay. Passaic River rises in highlands of northeastern New Jersey and flows about 80 miles into Newark Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 285 and 287.) Previous projects. For details see 1926 Annual Report, pages 265 and 266; and Annual Reports for 1929, 1938, 1954, and 2-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 1976, pages 301, 244, 134, and 2-11, respectively. Existing project. A main channel 700 feet wide to the branch channel to Port Newark, thence 500 feet wide to a turning basin 1,300 feet long and 900 feet wide at the junction of the Hackensack and Passaic River channels, length about 4.7 miles; a maneuvering area south of the former Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge 2,200 feet long and 300 feet wide with depths of 38 feet in the south half and 35 feet in the north half; a combined bend cutoff and maneuvering area at the south side of the junction with Elizabeth branch channel; and widening of bends at the Kill Van Kull and Port Newark Channels. (Authorized depth 35 feet except as noted aboveXadopted 1966). At Port Newark-A branch channel 800 feet wide leading to an inshore channel 400 feet wide 1.6 miles (adopted 1945). Authorized depth 37 feet in rock and 35 feet in soft material; a pierhead channel 200 feet wide along the east bulkhead between the Port Newark and Elizabeth branch channels, length 4,100 feet Authorized depth 35 feet (adopted 1962). At Elizabeth Marine Terminal-A branch channel 500 feet wide, length about 1.4 miles; a pierhead channel along the east bulkhead 290 feet wide, length about 1.1 miles; a south channel along the south bulkhead 290 feet wide, length about 2,600 feet; a southern approach area just above Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge enlarged for turning and maneuvering, with a maximum length of about 2,700 feet and width (between the pierhead channel and Newark Bay channel) of about 800 feet. Authorized depth 35 feet (adopted 1962). Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provides local interests furnish lands, rights-of-way, and suitable spoildisposal areas for initial construction and future maintenance; provide depths commensurate with channel depth in approaches and berths at terminals of companies which would use improvement; and hold the United States free from damages. River and Harbor Act of 1962 provides that local interests must provide lands, easements and rights-of-way for maintenance and construction, hold United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities, and accomplish without cost to the United States, removal or relocation of pipelines, cable and other utilities. Assurances were furnished by Port of New York Authority and accepted June 12, 1964. Local cooperation required by previous modifications is fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A Contract was awarded June 14, 1984 for the removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 35 feet below mean low water in specified section of Newark Bay, N.J. Work commenced August 14, 1984 and was continuing at the end of the fiscal year. Removed 667,250 cubic yards, place measurement of material at total cost to project of $3,982,353. Reconnaissance surveys cost $145,162. Condition as of September 30. Work under the active portion of project began June 1976 and is 100 percent complete. Work remaining to complete existing project consists of: deepening the Hackensack River channel to depths of 32 feet and 15 feet. Work was initiated for modification of project consisting of additional widening at junction with Kill Van Kull by deepening to 37 feet a triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island. Two contracts for the removal of all material including ledge rock to 37 feet mean low water were completed at a total cost of $4,402,631. 16. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS Location. Extends from deep water northwest of Sandy Hook, through Lower New York bay and Raritan bay, to Perth Amboy, and thence through Arthur Kill, lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to deep water in Upper New York Bay. This route is approximately along boundary line between States of New York and New Jersey. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 285, 286, and 369.) Previous projects. For details see 1963 Annual Report pages 184 and 185. Existing project. A channel through Lower New York Bay, Raritan Bay, Arthur Kill, lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay, depths of 37 feet in rock and 35 feet in soft material throughout, 600 feet wide across Lower New York Bay and Raritan Bay and in Arthur Kill to a point 1,000 feet north of Smith Creek, widened to 800 feet in vicinities of Seguine Point and Wards Point, respectively; thence 500 wide to a point 1,000 feet south of Piles Creek; thence 500 to 600 feet wide and passing north of Shooters Island and protected by a dike on its northern side to junction of channel into Newark Bay; thence 800 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Constable Hook; thence 1,000 feet wide from a point opposite the east end of Constable Hook to a point near the intersection with the channel along New Jersey pierhead line; and thence 1,400 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay; with an anchorage 38 feet deep to accommodate five vessels south of Perth Amboy, all with suitable easing at bends and junctions. Section included in project is 30.8 miles long. In addition, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island and two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island and the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River, were completed under previous projects and maintained under existing project. A triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island was deepened to 35 feet in order to provide additional widening in the vicinity of Bergen Point and is included in the Newark Bay project. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Mean range of tides varies between 4.7 and 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 to 6.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. Anchorage at Sandy Hook, and cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel are deferred for restudy and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion (1957) is $2,150,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for the middle section of Arthur Kill where local interest must furnish spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. 2-8 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Operations and results during period. A Contract was awarded December 27, 1983 for removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 35 feet below mean low water in Arthur Kill, New York and New Jersey Channels. Work commenced January 12, 1984 and was completed March 21, 1984. Removed an estimated 700,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $4,983,087. A Contract was awarded February 7, 1984 for the removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 30 feet below mean low water for half channel width along the southern portion of the Channel South of Shooters Island. Work commenced February 15, 1984 and was completed April 3, 1984. Removed 471,252 cubic yards, place measurement of material at a cost of $2,001,969. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Hopper Dredge McFARLAND was employed from April 7, 1984 to May 1, 1984 to restore project dimensions in Raritan Bay Channel. Removed 212,576 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $1,750,451. Reconnaissance surveys cost $70,100. Conditions as of September 30. Work under active portion of existing project began in October 1933. Work completed consists of providing authorized project depth and widths throughout entire channel from Lower New York Bay to Upper New York Bay and providing depths of 37 and 25 feet in Perth Amboy Anchorage. In addition to above mentioned work, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island, two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island, the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River were completed under previous projects. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel to dimensions authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and May 17, 1950, dredging anchorage in vicinity of Sandy Hook. (See Table 2-D for total cost for existing project to September 30, 1982.) 17. NEW YORK HARBOR COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor; East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, N.Y., New York and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, N.J., and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore structures. Work authorized before Act of 1970 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterways and was funded as a maintenance activity. Estimate of first cost of improvement under Act of 1974 is $80,600,000 (October 1984) including $26,200,000 cash contribution from local interests. plus $54,500,000 to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Thble 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for the improvement; hold the United States free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by the Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. Operations and results during period. New work: Liberty State Park Contract IVB was completed at a cost of $1,197,974. East River-Manhattan Waterfront contract was completed at a cost of $1,477,806. A contract for the removal of Piers 17 and 18 on the East River was completed at a cost of $219,609. The city of Elizabeth contract was completed at a cost of $761,171. A contract for the City of Hoboken reach was awarded in August 1983 at an estimated cost of $1,663,244. A continuing contract for the Stapleton, Staten Island reach was awarded in September 1983 at an estimated cost of $2,544,400. A continuing contract for the Jersey City South Reach was awarded in September 1984 at an estimated cost of $838,000. Engineering and design for the balance of project continued. Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster, Gelberman and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the work of removing and disposing of drift. Removed and disposed of 558,005 cubic feet (4,359 cords) of driftwood, ranging in size from small blocks to timbers of large dimensions, including piles and pieces of wreckage at a cost of $2,700,447 in FY1984. Conditions as of September 30. Work authorized under River and Harbor Acts of 1915, 1917 and 1930 is continuous maintenance for which no percentage of completion exists. Fbr work authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has been completed in New Jersey at Liberty State Park and the City of Elizabeth. In New York City, work has been completed along the Manhattan side of the East River inclusive of Piers 17 and 18. Removal work is currently underway in Hoboken, N.J. and Stapleton, Staten Island. 18. NEW YORK HARBORENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower bays, New York Harbor is 330 miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor, Mass., and 165 miles northeast of entrance to Delaware Bay, N.J. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327, 12334, 12335, and 12349.) Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, extending about 10.2 miles from the sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, an extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay, opposite anchorage grounds, about 5.7 miles long; a southerly entrance channel, Sandy Hook Channel (East Sec- 2-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY tion) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35-foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside- Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 3.7 miles from junction with new southerly entrance to junction with Main Ship Channel; Main Ship Channel 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel along New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in Anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage, 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with widening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long, extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Swinburne Island; for an anchorage area n Red Hook Flats to depths of 45, 40 and 35 feet and an anchorage area in Gravesend Bay to 47 feet deep. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 feet at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised Vol. 2, 1978. Operations and results during period. A Continuing Contract for maintenance dredging of Red Hook Flats Anchorage, N.Y. to restore project depths was awarded June 30, 1983 at a cost of $1,525,724. Work started October 10, 1983 and was completed December 10, 1983. Removed 467,862 cubic yards, place measurement, of material under the contract in FY1984. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hopper Dredge McFARLAND was employed from May 1-8 1984 to June 12-30 1984; June 30, 1984 to 22 August 1984 and from August 22, 1984 to September 4, 1984, respectively, to restore project dimensions in Ambrose Channel, Gravesend Bay Anchorage and Sandy Hook Channel. Removed 591,005 cubic yards, place mesurement, of material at a cost of $5,996,921. Dredging under a modification to a contract awarded October 15, 1982 for maintenance dredging of Ambrose Channel, N.Y. in conjunction with Beach Nourishment of Sandy Hook Unit Gateway National Recreational Area, N.J. was in progress from April 1, 1984 to May 18, 1984. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $1,990,135 were used for the Corps of Engineers dredging portion of Contract. Reconnaissance surveys cost $115,313. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to 45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 600-foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600-foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was completed in December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. Channel along New Jersey pierhead line from Kill Van Kull to Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends near southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed in November 1960. Red Hook Flats anchorage was completed to depths of 45, 50 and 35 feet in October 1976. Anchorage Channel was relocated to the westward in 1982. Red Hook Flats Anchorage was accordingly increased in area. No dredging was required. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944. Sandy Hook Channel (east section) was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay Anchorage was completed to a 47-foot depth in November 1977. 19. RARITAN RIVER, N.J. Location. Rises in north-central part of New Jersey and flows generally southeasterly into Raritan Basin, between Perth Amboy and South Amboy, about 24 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. (See coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 375.) Previous projects. For Details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1918, and 1938, pages 1777, 359, and 259 respectively. Existing projects. A channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide extending 5.8 miles from turn in New York and New Jersey Channels near Great Beds Light to Government wharf on Main Channel, widened to 600 feet for 1,000 feet long opposite wharf to form a turning basin of same depth; thence a channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide 3 miles to Washington Canal; thence 10 feet deep in soft material, 11 feet deep in rock, and generally 100 feet wide with widening at bends 5 miles to Delaware and Raritan Canal entrance at New Brunswick, and a South Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide 0.8 mile from junction with Main Channel at y Channels near Great Beds Light to Government wharf on Main Channel, widened to 600 feet for 1,000 feet long opposite wharf to form a turning basin of same depth; thence a channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide 3 miles to Washington Canal; thence 10 feet deep in soft material, 11 feet deep in rock, and generally 100 feet wide with widening at bends 5 miles to Delaware and Raritan Canal entrance at New Brunswick, and a South Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide 0.8 mile from junction with Main Channel at Keasby to upper limit of Titanium Pigment Co. property; thence 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide 0.4 mile to dock of Middlesex County Sewerage Authority; thence 100 feet deep and 150 feet wide 2 miles to a point 1,300 feet below upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tides is 5.1 feet at mouth of river and 5.6 feet at New Brunswick; mean range of spring tides, 6.1 and 6.6 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to winds and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. New work for completed portion of project, consisting of channels described above cost $1,237,000, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and including 2-10 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT $66,000 contributed by local interests. Dredging South Channel to 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 1,300 feet to upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island is inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. Cost estimate for this portion is $86,000 (1954). (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil-disposal areas for maintenance to 25-foot channel from New York & Long Branch Railroad bridge to junction of Main and South Channels, and in South Channel to Titanium Pigment Co. property. River and Harbor Act of 1962, provides local interests furnish spoil-disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefore, required for maintenance of improvement, and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1965, Vol. 2, Part 2, pages 274-279 and 281. Operations and results during period. A Continuing Contract ws awarded August 10, 1984 for the removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 15 feet below mean low water in specified sections of the South Channel, Raritan River, N.J. Dike construction on disposal area commenced September 21, 1984 and was continuing at the end of the fiscal year at a total cost to Project of $177,126. Condition as of September 30. Entire existing project is about 96 percent complete. Work under active portion of existing project was commenced September 1919 and completed July 1941. A shoal along northerly channel line in vicinity of Victory Bridge was eliminated by relocation of channel in February 1959. Main Channel dredged 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from junction with New York and New Jersey Channels to and including a turning basin of same depth opposite Government wharf, thence 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to mouth of Washington Canal, thence 10 and 11 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Delaware and Raritan Canal outlet locks at New Brunswick. South Channel dredged 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,200 feet, thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 12,400 feet to within 1,300 feet of junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. Model study of Raritan River was completed in March 1952. Work remaining under existing project is dredging South Channel to 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 1,300 feet to upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. 20. SHARK RIVER Location. A small stream entering Atlantic Ocean 20 miles south of Sandy Hook on the New Jersey coast. Forty miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 795 and 1215.) Existing project. A 1.7 mile channel 18 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide across the bar at entrance to inlet; thence 12 feet deep and generally 100 feet wide through main channel and south channel to Route 35 bridge; thence 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide to upper limit of the Belmar municipal boat basin, with additional depths and widths where necessary and practicable to produce satisfactory current velocities at bridges: and an anchorage 12 feet deep over about 7.3 acres east of Route 4-N bridge. Mean tidal range at mouth is 4 feet; mean range of spring tides 4.8 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.6 feet below mean low water up to 8.4 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost was $150,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Two yacht basins are located on south shore of lower portion of Shark River. One is publicly owned and has a berthage of 2,600 feet. Several boatyards, boathouses, and landings for commercial and recreational craft are located in the lower portion of Shark River. Operations and results during period. A Continuing Contract for maintenance dredging of Channel to restore projects depth was awarded in FY1981. Work was completed February 24, 1982. Expended $29,985 in Fiscal Year 84 for Modification of Contract for survey costs. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1947 and was completed October 1947. 21. SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, N.J. Location. Shoal Harbor is on south shore of Sandy Hook Bay about 4 miles west of Sandy Hook. Compton Creek is a small stream rising on the west side of the Navesink Highlands and flowing north through meadows into Shoal Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey chart 369.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1934 and 1938, pages 211, and 265 respectively. Existing project. A 1.8 mile channel 12 feet deep at mean low water extending from deep water in Sandy Hook Bay to first bend in creek, thence 8 feet deep to the Main Street Bridge across Compton Creek with a width of 150 feet in the bay and 75 feet inside the mouth of the creek, with widening at bends. Mean tidal range, 4.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.8 feet below mean low water up to 5.9 feet above mean high water. New work for the completed portion of the project cost $107,572, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and exclusive of $77,247 expended from contributed funds. Dredging of channel in the creek to a depth of 8 feet to a point 1,000 feet upstream from Main Street Bridge is inactive and is excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion (1957) is $52,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945, provides that no work shall be undertaken until harbor lines have been established by the Secretary of the Army along that portion of Compton Creek extending 1,000 feet upstream from Main Street Bridge and until local interests have: (a) conveyed to the United States, free of cost, a perpetual easement to excavate all lands above ordinary high water included between said harbor lines; and have removed all 2-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 structures or ports thereof extending channelward of said harbor lines; (b) furnished, free of cost to the United States, suitable areas for the disposal of dredged material for new work and subsequent maintenance as needed; (c) given releases to hold and save the United States free from all claims for damages resulting from the improvement; and (d) constructed the public wharf, assurances for which were furnished under the project of August 30, 1935, at location and in accordance with plans to be approved by the Chief of Engineers and Secretary of the Army and given assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army and that they will maintain this wharf open to all on equal and reasonable terms. The clerk of Middletown Township was notified of conditions of local cooperation in letter dated January 18, 1946. A letter dated July 2,1946, advised that township committee had given assurances that it will comply with all of above conditions. The requirements under prior acts have been fully complied with. The River and Harbor Act of September 3, 1954, further provides that local interests contribute in cash 50 percent of first cost of work, and agree to: (a) furnish, without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial work and for subsequent maintenance when and as required; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project; and (c) deepen to 14 feet the berths at the terminals along the improved section of channel; and provided further that no work shall be undertaken until local interests have complied with the outstanding condition of local cooperation required under existing project which pertains to construction of a public wharf. Assurances of compliance by local interests with requirements under Act of September 3, 1954, dated July 30, 1956, were accepted September 25, 1956 by the District Engineer for the United States of America. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1965, Vol. 2, Part 2, page 272. Operations and results during period. A Contract was awarded February 28, 1984 for removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the planes of 8 and 12 feet below mean low vater in specified sections of Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, N.J. Work commenced April 11, 1984 and was completed June 10, 1984. Removed, 107,- 577 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $658,384. Reconnaissance surveys cost $1,563. Condition as of September 30. Work under the entire existing project is about 78 percent complete. Work under active portion of the existing project was commenced in August 1936 and completed in November 1956. Work remaining to be done under the project consists of extending the 8-foot channel 1,000 feet upstream from the Main Street bridge. 22. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (Prevention of Obstruction and Injurious Deposits) The District Engineer, New York District, was designated Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 (33 U.S.C. 452) makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation of those channels by ocean steamships and ships of deep draft; the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 307, 409) prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and willful or negligent abandonment of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of New York Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under jurisdiction of the New York District was accomplished by means of two patrol vessels whose scope of duty includes surveillance of the waterfront for unauthorized construction or fill, surveillance to the 3-mile limit of tows enroute to dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is no illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor, and investigation of wrecks and abandoned vessels. In addition to the patrol vessels, whose range of patrol was limited to New York Harbor, inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with twoway radios patrolled shorefront facilities and property. These inspectors operate out of field offices located at Troy and Riverhead, New York and one inspector working at the New York District Office. Their duties include inspection of authorized construction, fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to ensure that work is performed in accordance with the Corps permit. The inspectors also patrol all waterways in their respective areas and inform the public of the Corps role and jurisdiction as well as provide assistance in the preparation of permit application. (See Table 2-E at end of chapter.) 23. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 24. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 25. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 3 of Public Law 14, 79th Congress - River and Harbor Act of 2 March 1945. Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th congress as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 2-N at end of Chapter.) 2-12 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Beach Erosion Control 26. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET & JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (PT. 1) Location. Atlantic coast of New York City, between East Rockaway and Rockaway Inlets, and the lands within and surrounding Jamaica Bay. The coastal area (about 10 miles long) is a peninsula in Queens County separating the ocean and the bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 12327, 12350, and 12326.) Existing project. The project provides for approximately 8.7 million cubic yards of sand fill including the advanced placement of a two year supply of beach nourishment, and Federal participation in the cost of periodic beach nourishment of the shore protection works for 10 years after completion of the initial beach fill. Federal participation (50 percent) includes $8,840,000 (October 1984) first cost and $17,070,000 for periodic beach nourishment, a total of $25,900,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including borrow areas; bear 50 percent of total first cost presently estimated at $26,800,000 consisting of a cash contribution of $8,930,000 the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs and values have been determined and $17,966,500 for periodic nourishment, total non- Federal cost $26,800,000, hold the United States free from damages; maintain, during economic life of project, continued public ownership and use of non-Federal publicly-owned shores upon which Federal participation in beach protection is based; maintain and operate all works after completion, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; local cooperation agreement was executed by the State May 17, 1974 and approved for Secretary of Army May 21, 1974. On May 22, 1974 sent to State an approved Escrow Agreement. Operations and results during period. Periodic Nourishment Contract No. 2 and groin construction at Beach 149th Street completed in August and September 1982, respectively. Condition as of September 30. Advance engineering and design is completed. Final Environmental Impact Statement on file with Council of Environmental Quality on April 16, 1971. Initial beach restoration completed in FY1977. Contract for first increment of periodic nourishment completed in May 1980. Contract for second increment of periodic nourishment was completed in August 1982. Contract for construction of stone groin at Beach 149th Street was completed in September 1982. Contract for third periodic nourishment was completed in August 1984. Periodic nourishment contract No. 4 is scheduled to awarded in May 1986. Completion of 10-year periodic nourishment remains. 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter.) 28. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Public Law 826, 84th Congress as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 2-0 at end of chapter.) Flood Control 29. ARDSLEY, N.Y. Location. The Village of Ardsley in Westchester County, New York is located on the Saw Mill River approximately 5 miles upstream from its junction with the Hudson River. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, White Plains, N.Y.) Existing project. The Federal flood control project provides for relocation of the existing channel from the upstream limit of the project downstream for approximately 1,000 feet, and approximately 290 feet of concrete channel upstream of the new Ashford Avenue Bridge. Upstream of the concrete channel along the left bank of the Saw Mill River, 425 feet of floodwall will be constructed along the modified channel with an additional 400 feet of closure wall. Between the Conrail Bridge and the New York State Thruway, a total of 230 feet of floodwall will be constructed on the right bank. A 325 foot closure levee is to be constructed running north of the Conrail Bridge. Ponding areas, drainage ditches and other drainage structures will be provided. The total estimated Federal cost for the project is $4,311,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $767,000 (October 1984 price levels). Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including spoil areas, within the areas necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain without expense to the United States all works after completion; provide without cost to the United States for relocation of utilities and resurfacing of a parking lot; protect the channel and flood control works from future encroachment or obstruction, including waste disposal, that would reduce their flood-carrying capacity; agree to take appropriate measures to control development of the fringe areas not protected by the improvement, with a view to preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential; provide a pumping station or additional gravity outlets, due to the modification of or encroachment upon, such area by local interests; agree to adopt and enforce adequate land use and control measures in the area within the village along the Saw Mill River that will not be protected by the recommended project; agree to be bound by and to incorporate into any contract for construction the prescribed Equal Opportunity Clause, and to cooperate actively in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with said Equal Opportunity Clause, in accordance with Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964 as it pertains to civil works projects; and at least annually notify interests affected that the improvements will not provide protection from floods greater than the design condition. 2-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 New York State is the local cooperating agency. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, by letter dated January 25, 1982, reaffirmed the State's intention to cooperate in the proposed plan. Operation and results during period. Preconstruction planning continued. Condition as of September 30. Plan of Study approved in March 1979. Preconstruction planning started in February 1979. Preconstruction planning continued through Fiscal Year 1982. 30. ELIZABETH, N.J. Location. In city of Elizabeth, N.J. (Union County), extending 4.2 miles upstream from mouth of Elizabeth River at Arthur Kill. The river continues 7.7 miles northward through Union and Essex counties to its headwaters in East Orange, N.J. (See Geological Surveys quadrangles, Roselle, Elizabeth, Caldwall and Orange; and Army Map Service quandrangles, similarly designated.) Existing project. Includes an improved channel with levees and/or walls where necessary between Bridge Street and Arthur Kill (2.1 miles); a concrete channel between Trotter's Lane and U.S. Highway No. 1 (1.4 miles); closure to high ground at upstream and downstream ends; interior drainage, including 5 pumping stations and 11 ponding areas; reconstruction or replacement of 16 bridges and associated street regrading; and utilities relocations. Total estimated Federal cost is $54,600,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation excluding maintenance is $12,900,000 including $1,170,000 cash contribution. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance, the costs and values incurred in the interest of hurricane tidal flood protection to be credited to required local contribution to the project firsts costs allocated to hurricane tidal protection; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works including all dredging required in the channel to maintain the design depths in the tidal reach; reconstruct all bridges and approaches except railroad bridges, and relocate existing sewerage and drainage facilties, streets, utilities, and other structures, such costs and values incurred in interest of hurricane tidal flood protection to be credited to required local contribution to protect first costs allocated to hurricane tidal flood protection; bear 30 percent of first costs allocated to hurricane tidal flood protection, including the two items listed above pertaining to lands, reconstruction and alterations, and a cash contribution now estimated at $1,170,000 to be paid either in a lump sum before starting construction, or in installments before starting construction, or in installments before starting pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; take necessary action to protect channels from future obstruction or encroachment including waste disposal that would reduce their flood-carrying capacity; take appropriate measures to control development in partially protected areas and fringe areas not included in the project with a view to preventing an undue increase in flood damage potential; maintain existing natural detention areas along the Elizabeth River between Union Avenue and Trotters Lane free from encroachment so as not to reduce their detention capacity; to provide any additional gravity outlets or pumping station capacities made necessary by any modifications or encroachments on the ponding areas; bear any increased Federal costs for the improvement that may result from any future requirements for parkway developments; and at least annually, notify interests affected that the improvements will not provide complete protection for fluvial floods greater than in July 1897. Agency responsible for local cooperation in City of Elizabeth (with concurrence of Union County and State of New Jersey.) Signed assurances of local cooperation were accepted by the District Engineer on January 9, 1970. Operations and results during period. Construction of the Downstream Section was completed December 17, 1981. The Upstream Section of the project was awarded in March, 1982 at a cost of $22,964,500 and is 99 percent complete. Condition as of September 30. Advance planning (begun January 1966), leading to first construction (Ursino Basin) add the Penn-Central Bridge and downstream dredging contracts, has been completed. General design memorandum and its supplement submitted. Penn-Central Railroad Bridge agreement executed. Environmental Impact Statement submitted to the Council on Environmental Quality on April 20, 1971. Upstream Ursino Basin construction complete. Contract, executed with New Jersey Department of Transportation on June 2, 1977 for placement of 132 foot section of flume to be accomplished in conjunction with bridge replacement, has been completed. Contract for the Downstream Area Arthur Kill to U.S. Highway 1, was awarded September 29, 1978 and completed in December 1981. Upstream contract was awarded in March 1982. Project scheduled for completion in December 1985. 31. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, N.Y. Location. That portion of Atlantic Coast of Long Island in Suffolk County extending from Fire Island Inlet easterly to Montauk Point, N.Y. - about 83 miles long. This frontage comprises about 70 percent of total ocean frontage of Long Island. Fire Island Inlet is about 50 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 13209, 12354 and 12353.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in improvement to prevent beach erosion and hurricane damages by: widening beaches along developed areas between Kismet and Mecox Bay, to a minimum width 100 feet at elevation 14 feet above mean sea level; raising dunes to an elevation of 16 feet above mean sea level from Fire Island Inlet to Hither Hills State Park, at Montauk and opposite Lake Montauk Harbor; planting grass on dunes; constructing gated interior drainage structures at Mecox Bay, Sagaponack Lake, and Georgica Pond; constructing not to exceed 50 groins, if needed; and Federal participation in cost of beach nourishment for not to exceed 10 years from year of completion of a useful nourishment unit. Total estimated Federal cost is $230,000,000 (October 1984) which includes participation in periodic beach nourishment for 10 years at $200,000 annually. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is 2-14 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT $175,300,000 inclusive of $86,390,000 cash contribution by local interests. Project cost estimate reflects revised cost sharing provisions of 1962 River and Harbor Act. Increased Federal participation from about 53 percent due to an adjustment of cost sharing in accordance with Section 31 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 to about 70 percent of first cost of project construction, excluding annual nourishment costs. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1960 provides that before starting construction, local interests give assurance they will (a) provide lands, rights-of-way, including borrow areas, for construction; (b) make alterations and relocations of buildings, streets, storm drains, utilities, and other structures made necessary by construction; (c) bear 30 percent of total first cost estimated at $175,300,000 to consist of items listed in (a) and (b) above and a cash contribution estimated at $86,390,000 or, if any section is undertaken by separately apportionment of first cost will be as shown in District Engineer's report, with due regard to change in public use and ownership and other changes before construction; provided that cash contribution be paid either in a lump sum before starting entire project, or in installments before starting pertinent items, in accordance with construction schedules as required by Chief of Engineers, final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works and undertake periodic beach nourishment after completion, except that for 10 years after completion of a useful nourishment unit Federal Government should contribute, dependent on conditions of public use and ownership and other changes at time of construction an amount for entire project now estimated at $200,000 annually; (f) maintain during economic life of project continued public ownership of non-Federal publicly owned shores and continued availability for public use of privately owned shore equivalent to that upon which recommended Federal participation is based; (g) adopt appropriate ordinances to provide for reservation of dunes and their protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; (i) obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of detailed plans and specifications for work contemplated and arrangements for its prosecution before starting any work on beach protection phase of project for which Federal participation is planned, if undertaken separately from recommended combined project; and (j) contribute in cash toward cost of hurricane protection works constructed under this plan, in addition to apportionment required in (c) above, an amount equal to increased Federal cost resulting from separate construction of beach protection work referred in to (i) above. Responsible agency is State of New York. On July 30, 1963, the State reflected the desires of Suffolk County, requested the inclusion of a minimum of 13 groins in initial construction of Moriches-Shinnecock reach. Chief of Engineers concurred in inclusion of up to 13 groins. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Public Works, State of New York, on August 14, and accepted by the District Engineer August 20, 1963. On February 5, 1964, the State requested consideration of a plan, as proposed by Suffolk County, for initial construction of 13 groins of which 11 would be in the Moriches-Shinnecock reach, and 2 in the Southampton- Beach Hampton reach in vicinity of Georgica Pond, and that sandfill and dune construction be withheld for the present except for 1 mile on each side of Shinnecock Inlet. On February 27, 1964, the Chief of Engineers accepted the proposals, in part, and supplemental assurances were executed by State of New York on April 20, 1964, and accepted by District Engineer April 27, 1964, as follows: the State of New York now elects to proceed with authorized combined beach erosion control and hurricane protection project for South Shore of Long Island; that Superintendent of Public Works hereby reaffirms his assurance of August 14, 1963, relative to complete project; that State of New York, as cooperating agency, will now agree that artificial fills will be added when and to extent found necessary by the Chief of Engineers, but not earlier than 3 years after completion of groins unless both the State of New York and the Chief of Engineers mutually agree to an earlier placement; that the superintendent agrees for State of New York to contribute the full amount of any increase in Federal costs resulting from the separate construction of the groins and subsequent fill; and that the State agree that construction of the two groins in the Georgica Pond area will depend on a favorable finding, following a study by the Chief of Engineers. Study was completed July 31, 1964, recommending construction, and approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 22, 1964. By letter dated November 5, 1964, the New York State Department of Public Works confirmed that title to all properties and interests in properties necessary for constructing the 11 groins was fully vested in Suffolk County. By letter dated December 7, 1964, the Department stated that the county had obtained easements or fee title for the parcels necessary for constructing the two groins. New York State Department of Public Works furnished $884,600 and $830,330 required contributed funds October 30, 1964, and September 7, 1965, respectively, for construction of 11 groins in Moriches-Shinnecock reach and $439,900 on January 22, 1965, for construction of 2 groins in Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach. The completed 2 groins and 11 groins were accepted by the New York State Department of Public Works for maintenance on May 11, 1966 and April 10, 1967 respectively. On March 22, 1965, the State recommended that planning priority be in the order: Southampton-Beach Hampton (drainage structures first); Shinnecock Inlet-Southampton; Beach Hampton-Montauk Point; and Fire Island Inlet-Moriches Inlet. Planning on the drainage structures was initiated but was suspended, based on: meeting of October 28, 1965 with Georgica Pond Association and the Preservation Society of East End wherein concern was indicated regarding the effects of the proposed drainage structure on ecology, salinity, pond level and aesthetic values; meeting with the Congressional representatives, State legislators, Federal agencies and local officials held on May 26, 1966; and resolution of the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted June 13, 1966 requesting advancement of the planning of the Fire Island-Moriches Inlet reach (Fire Island National Seashore). On June 16, 1967, the New York State Department of Public Works requested that the following works be undertaken as immediate priority items: in Moriches-Shinnecock reach, beach and dune fill at 11 groin site, construction of four groins west of the completed 11 groins, beach and dune fill east of the 11 groins; in Southampton- Beach Hampton reach (at East Hampton), construction of two additional groins, and the outlet struture at 2-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY Georgica Pond. On March 18, 1968 the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution supporting constrution of 4 groins in Reach 2 (Moriches-Shinnecock) and 2 groins in Reach 4 (Southampton-Beach Hampton). On April 22, 1968 the Board adopted a more inclusive resolution authorizing participation in beach erosion and hurricane protection for the Moriches- Shinnecock reach and in the Georgica Pond area of the Southampton- Beach Hampton reach. On December 24, 1968, the Commissioner of the New York State Conservation Department executed the second supplement to the assurances of local cooperation, which was accepted by the District Engineer on January 24, 1969. The reaffirmed previous assurances contained provisions for constructing four additional groins in an area extending 6,000 feet west from the most westerly groin in the existing elevengroin field in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach, and for placing beach and dune fill in this area to the full design cross section as defined in the authorized project report, except for the portion of the dune mean sea level elevation 16 feet and 20 feet. Thus this stage construction established the top of the dune to an elevation of 16 feet m.s.l. with a 65 foot width at that elevation and the top of berm to 14 feet m.s.l. with a 100 foot width at that elevation. These assurances also required that the State obtain and provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, to permit entry for the period of construction, and that the necessary rights will be obtained, as required, of lands, easements and rights-of-way, for maintenance and repair of the groins, dunes, and berms, and to insure the integrity of the completed structure. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Continued study of coastal protection needs for present and future conditions. Planning was completed in period for another increment of work at Westhampton Beach in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet reach consisting of placement of beach and dune fill in the initial 11 groin field constructed in 1966 and along the 9,500 feet of shore westward of the existing groin field. The draft Environmental Impact Statement on the entire project was revised and a final Environmental Impact Statement prepared for review and approval prior to submission to the Council on Environmental Quality. At the request of the local cooperating agency a Phase I design study was initated in the Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet reach of the project. This was terminated June 6, 1978 when the Council on Environmental Quality recommended the project be reformulated. Active scoping for reformulation commenced in July 1979. Operations and results during period. Continued common base studies for reformulation. Public scoping meetings October 1980. Interagency scoping review meeting January 1980, with Federal agencies agreeing, but New York State having strong reservations. District Engineer of New York formalized his decision March 1980. Governor of New York and Council on Environmental Quality informed May 1980. Plan of study submitted July 1980. Initiation and the continuation of reformulation studies. Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design began November 1962 and project construction commenced in January 1965. Two groins in Reach 4: Southampton-Beach Hampton, Section 3, were initiated in March, and completed in September 1965, at a total cost of $720,950 of which $382,109 2-16 were incurred against required contributed funds. Eleven groins in Reach 2: Moriches-Shinnecock, Section 2, were initiated in January 1965, and completed in October 1966 at a total cost of $2,854,565 of which $1,370,191 were incurred against required contributed funds. Initial beach fill placement for 750,000 cubic yards in Reach 2, Section 1A was completed on May 23, 1969. On August 4, 1969 work started on 4 groins and sandfill in Reach 2, Section 1A and was completed on May 23, 1969. On August 4, 1969 work started on 4 groins and sandfill in Reach 2, Section 1A and was completed November 14, 1970. 3,083 tons of stone and 1,111,000 cubic yards of sand was placed. Total cost for all Section 1A was $3,663,455 including $1,791,428 required contributed funds. Planning for another increment of work at Westhampton Beach underway. Funds in the amount of $70,000 were allotted on April 14, 1977 for initiation of the Phase I study in Reach I, Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet. Environmental Impact Statement on entire project prepared. The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Environmental Protection Agency on January 28, 1978. On March 7, 1978 Department of the Interior supported by the other agencies referred the Environmental Impact Statement to Council on Environmental Quality as unacceptable. On June 6, 1978, The Council on Environmental Quality agreed with the unacceptable finding and recommended project reformulation. Subsequent to strong objections on the project's final Environmental Impact Statement, meetings were held in September 1978, January and July 1979 with Department of Interior, Environmental Protection Agency and other interested Federal agencies. Subsequently, the Federal agencies have agreed to a basis for the reformulation of the Fire Island to Montauk Point project, including a general agreement on the studies necessary to answer the outstanding concerns. Public meetings were held in October 1979 in order to delineate the full scope and level of effort needed to reformulate the project. A final scoping session was held January 17, 1980 and agreement reached between the Federal agencies although New York State had strong objections. A plan of study was submitted in July 1980. Reformulation will result in a new General Design Memorandum. However, because of New York State's inability to financially participate in construction at West Hampton Beach, reformulation will be indefinitely postponed after FY1983. Completion of the remaining scopes of work for reformulation, engineering and design, and construction of the project remain. Coordination made with the Departments of Interior and Commerce and the Environmental Protection Agency to develop an acceptable solution to mitigate immediate threats to property and human welfare at Westhampton Beach where serious erosion is occurring. The interim plan has been accepted by the Departments of Interior and Commerce in letters dated December 22, 1978 and December 21, 1979 respectively. Subsequently, in a letter dated January 18, 1979, Council on Environmental Quality approved the Corps' intention to take interim remedial action in cooperation with the interested agencies. The supplemental General Design Memorandum and the Environmental Analysis have been completed. Plans and specifications have been completed. Initiation of construction in Westhampton, scheduled for FY1981, has been indefinitely postponed due to NY State's inability to finanically participate in the project at the present time. NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT It should be noted that the proposed work at Westhampton Beach is a remedial measure to alleviate the present erosion problem. Upon completion of the reformulation study, the recommended plan of study will be implemented for the entire Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point Reach, including Westhampton Beach. Completion of the study is indefinite at this time, however, since work has not been funded in FY1985. 32. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y. Location. The Passaic River Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles in southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape 26 miles long and 56 miles wide--and contains portions of Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties in New Jersey. The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous Projects. Two Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in Passaic River Basin. A $67,400 desnagging, debris removal and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Ibwnship, N.J. Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, N.J., was completed in 1954 at a cost of $50,000. Existing project. The project was authorized for Phase I advance engineering and design study in Section 101 (a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the February 18, 1976 report of the Chief of Engineers. The estimate of Federal cost under the authorizing legislation is $1,450,000,000 (October 1984), plus a $3,410,000 cash contribution from local interests, and $166,000,000 for items of work to be contributed by local interests. The recommended plan for flood protection, navigation, hurricane protection and recreation, included a flood detention reservoir, channel diversions and modifications, levees and floodwalls, and streambank filling and grading. These works would provide protection against storm with a recurrence interval of 235 years, which is 20 percent larger than the October 1903 flood of record. Six independent tributary local protection plans were also recommended. However, because of a lack of public support for structural components of the project in the New Jersey portion of the Basin, the entire project is being reformulated during the Phase I study. The House Public Works Committee Report (94-1702) on the 1976 Water Resources Development Act directed "...the reformulation of the plan for water management and flood control for the entire Passaic Basin." This report further states that local opposition to any plan which relies upon extensive use of dikes, dams and levees, such as those proposed in previous survey reports, mandates that the following alternatives, or any combination thereof, shall be the only ones surveyed and considered: (a) A full range of nonstructural flood control alternatives to include land acquisition, flood plain mapping, flood-proofing, developing early warning systems and relocation of buildings; (b) A tunnel diversion plan; (c) A system of tunnels addressing the needs of the entire basin; (d) Plans that combine local protection works where locally acceptable and nonstructural solutions including improvements to stream carrying capacity in accordance with different needs in the Lower Basin and in the Central basin; (e) Evaluation of fulfilling water supply objectives together with flood control; (f) Aquifer recharge and underground storage; and (g) Reservoir management in the headwaters. The Phase I Study is evaluating these alternatives in the formulation of revised plans. Condition as of September 30. The reformulation study was initiated in October 1977 under the existing authorization and Congressional Guidance in House Report 94-1702. The Study schedule runs through September 1987 at an estimated cost of $21,000,000. During FY1984, major effort was made to present feasibility basin-wide plan alternatives to the public. These alternatives included plans featuring tunnel diversions, channel improvements, levees and floodwalls, and non-structural measures. During this period, the basin experienced severe flooding in April which was estimated to be the worst flooding in 40 years. In June the State of New Jersey selected the dual i:.iet tunnel plan as the local option plan for further study. Study effort is now focused on this plan and the candidate NED plan. Plan formulation has been completed for tributary flood damage areas along the Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers at Mahwah, N.J., and Suffern, N.Y., Molly Ann's Brook at Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, N.J., the Ramapo River at Oakland, N.J., and the Lower Saddle River in Bergen County, N.J. These areas are being considered under the interim flood protection guidance provided by the Congress and are scheduled for recommendation prior to the completion of the overall study report. The Longwood Valley Reservoir plan is now part of the Passaic River basin study as a result of a Congressional resolution. This plan will include water resource development for flood control on the Upper Rockaway River, water supply and proposed storage hydroelectric power. 33. SAW MILL RIVER AT ELMSFORD AND GREENBURGH, N.Y. Location. On the Saw Mill River in the town of Greenburgh, N.Y. One portion known as Babbitt Court lies along the river immediately south of the Village of Elmsford. The second portion of the project, known as the Elmsford-Greenburgh area, is north of the Village of Elmsford, separated from Babbit Court by approximately 4,000 feet. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, White Plains, N.Y.) Existing project. In the Babbitt Court area, the project provides for approximately 1,450 feet of levees and flood walls with associated ponding and interior drainage facilities. Within the Elmsford-Greenburgh area, the existing channel is to be widened and deepened for 2,450 feet with an additional 600 2-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 feet of channel modification on the tributary Mine Brook. Levees and flood walls will be constructed on both banks of the Saw Mill River totaling approximately 4,400 feet and extending along Mine Brook to high ground. Ponding areas, a pumping station and other drainage structures will be provided. The total estimated Federal cost (October 1984 P.L.) for the project is $6,490,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $1,860,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction, including borrow, ponding, and waste disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works; provide all alterations, relocations, and necessary replacements of existing facilities, including bridges, highways, sewers, (including those storm sewers and drains required to convey interior drainage to improved channels of ponding areas) utilities, and railroad modifications and relocations other than bridges and bridge approaches; protect the channel and other flood works from future encroachment or obstruction, including waste disposal which would reduce or otherwise impair their floodcarrying capacity, or provide a pumping station or additional gravity outlets, as appropriate, to compensate for any loss in ponding area effectiveness due to modification of or encroachment upon such areas; take appropriate measures to control development in partially protected areas and fringe areas not included in the project with a view toward preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential; and at least annually, notify those affected that flooding will still be possible from large floods. New York State is the Local Cooperating Agency. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, by letter dated June 12, 1974, indicated the State's intention to cooperate in the proposed plan. Operation and results during period. During Phase I preconstruction planning the authorized project was found to be no longer economically justified. Project reformulation to develop an alternative plan of improvement is continuing. Condition as of September 30. Plan of Study approved January 28, 1977. Preconstruction planning started in February 1977. Indications from Phase I Planning accomplished to date, are that some features of the authorized project are no longer economically justified. Alternative flood control measures are being considered during reformulation. 34. SOUTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. Location. In Ellenville, N.Y., on North Gully just above its confluence with Sandburg Creek, which discharges into Rondout Creek at Napanock, N.Y., about 2 miles downstream from Ellenville. (See U.S. Geological Survey, Ellenville quadrangle; Army Map Service, Ellenville quadrangle.) Existing project. Includes: a 2,300 foot concrete chute, a crib dam to prevent debris from entering chute; 380 feet of walls and a stilling basin; 823 feet of levees to protect against backwater from Sandburg Creek; a ponding area, drainage ditches and other interior drainage facilities. Physical model study to determine design of stilling basin required and authorized on August 28, 1970. Existing project, also known as "North Gully at Ellenville, N.Y.," is one of three physically and functionally independent projects included in Rondout Creek and Wallkill River, N.Y. and N.J. Survey Report. Estimated Federal cost work is $7,895,000 (October 1984), exclusive of lands, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $770,000. (See 'Table 2-B Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must, prior to construction, give assurances they will furnish all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of improvements; perform all alteration of highways, highway bridges, utility and related facilities made necessary for construction of project; hold the United States free from damages; protect channels, ponding areas and other flood works from future encroachment or obstruction that would reduce their flood carrying capacity and control development of fringe areas not protected by proposed improvement with a view to preventing an undue increase in flood damage potential; and maintain and operate completed works. Agency responsible for local cooperation is State of New York. The Commissioner, New York State Department of Conservation (now Department of Environmental Conservation) executed assurances of local cooperation on March 5, 1968 which was accepted by the District Engineer for the United States on March 25, 1968. To comply with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (PL91-611), the preparation of an agreement of Local Cooperation is being initiated to replace the signed assurance. Operations and results during period. Continued coordination with the State of New York. Condition as of September 30. Preconstruction planning was started in January 1967. Model study completed in January 1972 and final report from Waterways Experiment Station received on May 4, 1974. General Design Memorandum submitted and returned for revisions. Environmental Impact Statement submitted to Council on Environmental Quality on July 27, 1971. Evaluation of plan under current conditions and completion of engineering and design and construction remain. 35. YONKERS, N.Y. Location. On Saw Mill River in Yonkers, N.Y. About 1 mile upstream from junction of Saw Mill and Hudson Rivers. (See Geological Survey, Yonkers quadrangle.) Existing project. Project provides for: constructing a 20-foot wide concrete channel extending 3,781 feet along most congested reach of the channel; improving channel in other reaches (5,689 feet); constructing floodwalls (5,370 feet), one closure structure, closure levee, various interior drainage facilities; reconstructing or raising of nine bridges, and miscellaneous utility changes. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $12,530,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $2,550,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction, including borrow, ponding, and waste disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works; provide all alterations, relocations, and necessary replacements of existing facilities, including bridges, highways, sewers, including those storm sewers and drains required to convey interior drainage 2-18 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT to improved channels or ponding areas, utilities, and railroad modifications and relocations other than bridges and bridge approaches; protect the channel and other flood works from future encroachment or obstruction, including waste disposal, which would reduce or otherwise impair their flood-carrying capacity, or provide a pumping station or additional gravity outlets, as appropriate, to compensate for any loss in ponding area effectiveness due to modification of or encroachment upon such areas; take appropriate measures to control development in partially protected areas and fringe areas not included in the project with a view toward preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential; and at least annually, notify those affected that flooding will still be possible from large floods. New York State is the Local Cooperating Agency. An agreement of Local Cooperation was signed by the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on April 9, 1974 and signed by the New York District Engineer on April 30, 1974 for the United States and approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 17, 1974. The City of Yonkers, through the State, furnished $93,000 (contributed, funds "other") for non-Federal design costs. Operations and results during period. Construction of Contract No. 2 was completed in July 1983. Condition as of September 30. Started preconstruction planning December 1970. Phase I General Design Memorandum completed on October 1, 1973 and approved on April 19, 1974. Phase II General Design Memorandum completed and approved June 1, 1976. Agreement of Local Cooperation executed with New York State. Final Environmental Impact Statement and supplement in Federal Register on May 13, 1974, and August 13, 1976, respectively. Addendum filed with Council on Environmental Quality on August 25, 1976. Initial plans and specifications for Contract No. 1 completed and construction contract for this increment awarded August 30, 1974. Construction of Contract No. 1 completed. Construction for remaining increment of project (Contract No. 2) was completed in July 1983. 36. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. Inspections of completed flood control works are performed semi-annually to determine the extent of compliance by local interests with the requirements of operation and maintenance. 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-I at end of chapter.) 38. DAM SAFETY PROGRAM Beginning in FY1985, the New York District will be performing a two phase modification to Waterbury Dam in an attempt to drastically reduce or totally eliminate a long existing seepage problem at the dam. The first phase of construction is the addition of 48 inch pipe to the two existing 54 inch pipes that comprise the existing outlet works of the dam. This work is scheduled to begin in December of 1984 and will take approximately five months to complete at an estimated cost of $900,00. The second phase of work is the partial rebuilding of the toe of the dam to include a seepage filter and monitoring system and to fill voids in the toe by means of sand injection. This work is slated to begin in May of 1985 at an estimated cost of $2,100,000 and is expected to be complete in November of 1985. All design work is being performed by the Baltimore District for the New York District. 39. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities. Pursuant to Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation - advance preparation, emergency operations, rehabilitation, emergency drinking water and advance measures. Under disaster preparedness, the New York District completed revisions of various emergency manuals and pamphlets, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency response and preparation, provided in-house training to District employees in emergency operations activities, and purchased supplies and equipment to maintain its' flood fighting and response capability. Under emergency operations, the New York District monitored the effects of several severe low pressure systems during the winter and spring which resulted in wide-spread flooding of low-lying areas in northern New Jersey, southeastern and central New York State and western Vermont as well as significant erosion along coastal regions in central and southern New Jersey and the north and south shores of Long Island. Technical assistance and sandbags were provided to numerous local, county and state governmental organizations in the affected areas. Approximately 75,000 sandbags were distributed during FY1984. Several requests were received by New York District for the rehabilitation of Federal flood control projects in New York State and New Jersey. The District considered available information on current levels of maintenance by local sponsors, the degree of damage that occurred as a result of a particular storm and the ability of the local sponsor to perform repairs or restoration utilizing their own O&M funds before recommending approval for federal assistance. The District forwarded only one of the requests to higher authority for approval; to rehabilitate a section of the Raritan Bay - Sandy Hook Bay BE-HUR project at Keansburg, New Jersey. The request was subsequently approved by North Atlantic Division and OCE for $770,000. The remainder of the funds to restore the damaged section of the project will be provided by the State of New Jersey. 40. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION Activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization) (See Table 2-Q at end of chapter.) 2-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 41. SURVEYS (See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 42. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $156,111 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. (See also Table 2-K on completed flood plain studies.) 43. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS A total of 23 projects were deauthorized by Congressional Action pursuant to Section 12 of Public Law 93-251, Water Resources Development Act of 1976. (See Thble 2-M at end of chapter.) 2-20 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Projects Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 September 30, 1983 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Bay Ridge & Red Hook Channels, N.Y. 3. East Rockaway, N.Y. 4. Fire Island To Jones Inlet,N.Y. 5. Flushing Bay and Creek,N.Y. 6. Hudson River,N.Y. 7. Jones Inlet,N.Y. 8. Keyport Harbor,N.Y. 9. Lake Montauk Harbor 10. Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. (Required Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Appro. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 74,000 61,635 -420,000 29,365 84,000 150,771 - 1,598,000 - 1,590,956 10,600 1,039,000 10,600 988,914 - 5,614 105,000 102,224 100,000 43,973 336,000 1,339,000 343,044 1,339,000 -800 45,349 100,000 129,779 - 1,602,000 1,220,000 - 1,599,894 1,111,251 31,390 2,451 656,400 661,987 18 - 488,000 1,838,256 482,930 1,314,247 284,400 1,315,000 292,184 1,315,000 3,937 21,005 805,000 915,859 758,400 1,299,002 98,000 98,000 603,000 603,000 203,000 203,000 887,000 816,138 70,862 450,000 449,913 2-21 718,806 642,465 5,523,29731 5,523,29731 22,945,988 22,945,988 83,9694 533,3344 5,102,702 5,102,702 594,35532 594,35532 3.004,704 3,061,102 2,113,5029,1 2,102,9059,11 4,352,090 4,352,089 44,249,8035 , 6 44,249,865 26,909,815 26,817,329 1,822,53010 1,822,53010 9,427,210 9,427,209 40,475 40,475 817,148 817,148 791,68031 791,68037 849,709 849,709 235,964 235,964 3,703,862 3,716,775 9,182 9,182 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Projects Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 September 30, 1983 11. Matawan Creek 12. Milton Harbor 13. Moriches Inlet, N.Y. (Required Contributed Funds) 14. Narrows of Lake Champlain,N.Y. 15. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers,N.J. 16. New York and New Jersey Channels 17. New York Harbor- Collection and Removal of Drift (Required Contributed Funds) 18. New York Harbor- Entrance Channel and Anchorage Areas New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. & Oper. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 72,000 72,000 100,000 47,534 60,390 20,660 461,000 461,000 100,000 81,283 21,000 21,000 236,806 236,806 151,37338 151,37338 996,000 986,520 1,031,000 1,012,282 9,422 9,422 43,446 24,400 24,400 16,000 14,453 358,855 25,000 26,547 630,000 630,000 3,390,000 402,301 68181112 681,81112 29,000 28,744 - 2,224,000 7,681,000 3,866,000 - 2,218,610 2,615,509 3,936,107 2,617,600 3,632,000 2,616,513 3,623,281 584,000 1,251,792 2,195,700 2,215,037 2,752,200 2,752,459 333,000 93,429 9,626 1,100,000 1,293,239 4,435,000 4,363,879 3,025,000 2,850,036 286,222 727,405 680,000 8,704,000 657,732 8,386,840 2,570,000 2,700,000 1,654,623 2,960,800 - 2,700,000 3,245,344 2,960,800 470,459 1,380,950 181,077 1,250,972 970 - - 8,047,000 8,739,000 - 7,525,976 9,132,502 909,695 909,418 29,014,510 29,014,511 27,546,036 22,550,652 3,814,35918 38,163,60118 454,773 454,773 15,299,00033 14,419,427 42,192,89619 42,387,71819 15,249,00033 14,419,467 5,757,23236 5,056,272 45,009,71020 45,009,71020 32,929,82434 35,563,23934 2-22 73,053,43515.16. ' 7 73,052,4351516,17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 2-A(Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Projects Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 September 30, 1983 19. Raritan River, N.J. 20. Shark River, N.J. (Other Contributed Funds) 21. Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, N.J. 22. Supervisor of New York Harbor 26. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I) (Required Contributed Funds) 29. Ardsley, N.Y. 30. Elizabeth, N.J. (Other Contributed Funds) 31. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point *N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds 32. Passaic River Basin, N.J. & N.Y., Phase I 33. Sawmill River, Elmsford-Greenburg, N.Y. 34. South Ellenville, N.Y. 35. Yonkers, N.Y. (Other Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 180,000 5,000 177,126 100,000 98,362 437,500 2,895 550,000 545,294 332,188 6,221 91,000 72,616 1,003,200 1,002,417 -420,000 29,365 6,000 100,000 88,736 3,614,000 3,792,146 266,834 482,853 1,500,000 1,478,528 745,000 745,758 3,800,000 3,664,868 3,457,300 3,479,764 48,886 7,650,000 7,841,068 1,136,390 882,918 1,710,000 1,723,778 - 138,155 2,645,950 1,845,076 2,645,950 1.845.076 48,376 2,552,000 2,114,363 156,081 5,638 1,682 1,115,834 38,850 141,804 30,000 29,295 640,000 658,384 832,000 483,006 784,221 526,571 - 2,900,000 220,088 2,918,123 127,660 186,169 846 9,663,000 8,841,979 1,214,707 1,635,180 800,000 768,695 100,000 129,780 3,967 45,000 32,325 6,300,000 7,293,978 100,000 139,000 1,634,000 1,535,000 1,635,287 1,523,696 7,600 5,055 55,217 51,004 19,000 51,207 2-23 1,551,47031 1,551,47040 10,293,70341 10,291,02942 150,000 150,000 1,125,404 1,125,281 437,500 335,083 1,104,94035 1,104,94035 27,003,447 27,481,655 15,650,356 15,646,617 14,804,961 12,382,743 345,000 332,324 51,456,800 51,456,799 3,363,665 4,035,090 9,651,438 9,653,523 113,973 143,753 4,012,930 3,788.341 13,520,7003 13,442,6789 490,000 490,000 289,700 289,702 12,548,900 12,529,183 568,050 622,871 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 3. Includes $1,040,000 for new work and $1,040,000 expended for the portion under construction general. 4. Excludes $100,000 for new work expended from contributed funds and includes $82,600 for new work expended from public works funds. 5. Deferred. 6. Includes $5,112,694 for new work for previous project. 7. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $31,461 emergency relief funds. Excludes $81,373 expended from contributed funds. 8. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18, 1915 and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at Troy, N.Y., under permanent indefinite appropriation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. 9. Includes $628,502 for new work and $210,365 for maintenance for previous projects. 10. Excludes $1,882,530 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Excludes $419,879 for new work expended from contributed funds and $58,425 contributed funds from other, and $8,752 expended by the Worlds Fair Corp. for riprap protection of rubble dike. 12. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 13. Includes $19,140 for maintenance for previous projects. 14. Includes $31,166 for U.S. Lake Survey Revisory and Inshore Sounding Program. 15. Includes $12,809,975 for new work for previous projects and $6,621 for new work for Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 16. Excludes $7,712 for new work expended from contributed funds. 17. Includes $807,000 for new work expended from public works funds and $2,023,308 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 18. Includes $1,160,380 for maintenance for previous project, and $1,621 for maintenance of Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 19. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813 in O&M funds). 20. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing project. 21. Includes $673,155 for new work for previous project. 22. Includes $1,836,403 for new work expended from contributed funds. 23. Excludes $285,600 for new work expended from contributed funds. 24. For pilot program to improve coastal storm warnings. 25. Includes $1,409,713 for maintenance for previous projects. 26. Includes $77,182 for new work for previous projects. 27. Includes $66,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 28. Includes $673,155 for new work for previous project. 29. Excludes $292,685 for new work expended from Ordinance funds and $66,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 30. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects and $64,560 extended from public works funds. 31. Includes $1,246,100 for new work for previous projects and $64,560 extended from public works funds. 32. Excludes $90,190 for new work expended from contributed funds. 33. Includes $400,000 Jobs Bill funds. 34. Includes $50,000 Jobs Bill funds. 35. Includes $50,000 Jobs Bill funds. 36. Includes $200,000 Jobs Bill funds. 37. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. 38. Excludes $119,276 for new work expended from contributed funds. In addition, excludes $72,619 for new work expended from contributed funds, other. 39. Includes $673,155 for new work for previous projects. 40. Excludes $292,685 for new work expended from ordinance funds and $66,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 41. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects. 42. Includes $673,155 for new work for previous projects. 2-24 TABLE 2-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents River and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 104 and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 302 River and Harbor act of 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 June 25, 1910 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19351 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3,1954 P.L. 89-72 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and Progressive Eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths. Provided that all research and Planning cost to be borne fully by the United States. Modified project to include control of waterchestnut. BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 40 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide. Dredging to obtain first a depth of 35 feet, subsequently increasing depth of 40 feet for full width. Widening of Bay Ridge Channel to 1,780 feet. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and a jetty. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) Construction of jetty. Channel 10 feet deep. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) 15 foot bay, creek and branch channels: 15-foot maneuvering area; 6-foot anchorage basin; revetment of dike extension; and abandonment of portion of creek channel and repair of dike. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam.2. Channel 27 feet deep from Hudson to Albany, N.Y. Channel 27 feet deep below Hudson Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project July 1, 1935. Relocation of 12-foot channel between Troy and Waterford. Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany and Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. Mooring facilities. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 337, 54th Cong. 2d Sess. (Annual Report 1899, P. 1177). Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 71st Cong. 2d sess.' H. Doc. 19, 71st Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 33, 75th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 762, 80th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 551, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 350, 68th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc 210, 70th Cong., 1st sess.' S. Doc. 155, 72nd Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 572, 75th cong., 3d sess.' H. Doc. 228, 83d Cong., 1st sess.' 2-241 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 2, 1882 Mar. 2, 1945 August 26,1937 Mar. 3, 1881 July 14,1960 Aug. 8,1917 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27,1911 July 25, 1912 Jan. 21,1927 July 3, 1930 Mar. 22, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) Construction of jetty and channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide. KEYPORT HARBOR, N.J. (See Section 8 of Text) A channel 8 feet deep, 200 feet wide from Raritan Bay to the former Steamboat Dock at Keyport. LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, 10 foot boat basin; repair and extension of two jetties; and addition of sport fishing facilities on top of jetties. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, N.Y. (See Section 10 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. MATAWAN CREEK, N.J. (See Section 11 of Text) A channel 4 feet, 100 feet wide from Keyport Harbor to Winkson Creek, thence 4 feet deep, 75 feet wide to the New York Long Branch Railroad Bridge at Matawan, N.J. MILTON HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 12 of Text) Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 100 ft. wide; inner channel 60 and 50 feet width and Branch channel 70 and 50 feet width, all in 6 feet depth. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VERMONT (See Section 14 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, N.J. (See Section 15 of Text) 16-foot channel in Passaic River Widening 16-foot channel in Passaic River 20-foot channel in Passaic River.7 10-foot channel in Passaic River. 30-foot channel in Passaic River. 35 and 37 feet in main channel of Newark Bay and branch channel to an inshore channel at Port Newark terminal and remove portion of rock area at Bergen Point to same depths. Modification of local cooperation for 10-foot channel in Passaic River. H. Doc. 409, 77th Cong. R&H Act Public Law 42-153 3rd sess. H. Doc. 369. 76th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 181, 75th Cong., 1st sess. R&H Act Public Law 46-45 3rd sess. Chief of Engineers Section 107, 1960 R&H Act Public Law 86-645. H. Doc. 1387, 62nd Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 707, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 284, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 156, 71st Cong., 2d sess.1 S. Doc. 250, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 430, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 2-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 H. Doc. 252, 82d Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 289, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 494, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Report on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. 34-32-foot channel in Hackensack River including approach channel in Newark Bay from branch channel at Port Newark Terminal and a 25-foot turning basin. 35-foot channels at Port Elizabeth. Widening 35-foot channel in Newark Bay, provision of two maneuvering areas, widening entrance into Port Elizabeth and Port Newark branch channels, deepening and widening Newark Bay 32-foot channel, and provision of a turning Basin at junction of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers; and deepening 12-foot channel in Hackensack River to 15 feet Additional widening at junction with Kill Van Kull by deepening to 35 feet a triangular area at the eastern end of the 30-foot channel south of Shooters Island. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEYS CHANNELS (See Section 16 of Text). Anchorage off Perth Amboy to 35 feet. Channels 35 feet deep from lower bay to upper bay, except between vicinity of Smith Creek and vicinity of Piles Creek to 30 feet with anchorage 38 feet deep at Sandy Hook and Perth Amboy. Channel 35 feet deep from vicinity of Smith Creek to vicinity of Piles Creek Widen entrance to Kill Van Kull to 1,400 feet narrowing to a minimum width of 1,000 feet. NEW YORK HARBOR, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 17 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore structures. NEW YORK HARBOR, ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 18 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feet for width of 1,000 feet (dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, Dec. 27,1886, by authority of act of Aug. 5, 1886). Ambrose Channel (East Channel) to 40 feet. Maintenance of entrance channel under 1 head. Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay Removal of Craven Shoal P.L. 91-611, 91st Cong., H.R. 19877. P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., H.R. 10203 Annual Reports 1887, p. 62 and 1888, p. 63 H. Doc. 159, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1899, p. 1279) H. Doc. 518, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 557, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 2-26 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 233, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 108, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Sept. 6, 19334 Aug. 30, 1935 May 28, 19351 May 17, 1950 Oct. 27,1965 Mar. 4, 1915 Aug. 8,1917 July 3, 1930 Dec. 31,1970 Mar. 7, 1974 July 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30,1935 August 26, 1937 July 3, 1958 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 31, 1982 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3,1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26,1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands Relocation of southerly section of Anchorage Channel. Dredging south end of Red Hook Flats, Liberty Island Anchorage, and channel along New Jersey pierhead line. Deepen Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet. Deepen Ambrose and Anchorage Channels to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet. Dredging South Channel, Elimination of portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel. Deepen and expand Red Hook Flats Anchorage. Deepen Gravesend Bay Anchorage. Further expansion of Red Hook Flats Anchorage and the relocation of Anchorage channel. RARITAN RIVER, N.J. (See Section 19 of Text) Channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Washington Canal, thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide to canal locks and 10 feet deep thru South Channel.7 Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide up to New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge. Channel 10 feet deep in earth and 11 feet in rock to New Brunswick. Width reduced to 100 feet. Relocation of lower reach of South Channel. Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide to junction of main and south channels, thence of same depth on South Channel to Titanium Pigment Co. Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from junction of main and south channels to government wharf, including a turning basin. In South Channel, maintenance of 15-foot channel to dock of Middlesex County Sewerage Authority. SHARK RIVER, N.J. (See Section 20 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep, 150 feet wide across entrance bar, 12 feet deep 100 feet wide to Route 35 bridge, 8 feet deep 100 feet wide to upper limit of Belmar boat basin; and 12-foot anchorage. SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, N.J. (See Section 21 of Text) 8-foot channel from the first bend in the creek to Main St. Bridge Extension of 8-foot channel to 1,000 feet upstream from Main St. Bridge. 12-foot channel in bay to the first bend in the creek. H. Doc. 625, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 183, 73d Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., 1st sess.1 Senate Commerce Doc., 75th Cong., 1st sess.' S. Doc. 45, 84th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 17, 89th Cong., 1st sess. OCE Letter 31 Mar. 1982 H. Doc. 1341, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 127, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 454, 70th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 74, 74th Cong., 2d sess. Report on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers (report not printed) H. Doc. 455, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 102, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 58, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 673, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 89, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. 2-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 1965 Flood Control Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act Section 201 Flood Control Act of 1965 1965 Flood Control Act 1960 River and Harbor Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act 1976 Water Resources Development Act Section 101 (a) 1965 Flood Control Act 1962 Flood Control Act 1965 Flood Control Act EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (PART 1). (See Section 26 of Text) Hurricane barrier, dikes, levees, floodwalls, fill, placement, stoplog structures, stairways, ramps, road raising, fishing platforms, annual nourishment. Authorized beach erosion control aspect to be constructed independent of the hurricane flood protection aspect of the project. ARDSLEY, N.Y. (See Section 29 of Text) Channel improvement, concrete flume, flood walls, levees, various drainage structures. ELIZABTH, N.J. (See Section 30 of Text) Channel improvement, flume, levees; floodwalls, bridges, interior drainage facilities. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, N.Y. (See Section 31 of Text) Raising dunes, widening beaches, interior drainage structures, groins, beach replenishment, annual nourishment. Project modified to provide that non-Federal interest shall contribute 30 percent of the first costs. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y. PHASE I (See Section 32 of Text) Advanced engineering and design study, involving reformulation of plans for flood control and water resource management. SAW MILL RIVER at ELMSFORD and GREENBURGH, N.Y. (See Section 33 of Text) Levees, floodwalls, channel improvement. SOUTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. (See Section 34 of Text) Levees, drainage ditches, walls, a concrete chute and a crib dam. YONKERS, N.Y. (See Section 35 of Text) Channel improvement, concrete flume, flood walls, closure structure, various drainage facilities, reconstruct or raise nine bridges. H. Doc. 215, 89th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 215/89/1. Doc. 249, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 425, 86th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., H.R. 10203 H. Rpt. 94-1702 H. Doc. 94-465, 94th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 113, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 258, 89th Cong., 1st sess.1 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy considered to 12 feet deep inactive. 3. Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 4. Public Works Administration. 5. Emergency Relief Act of 1935. 6.Portion from 3,000 feet above Lincoln Highway Bridge to Jacksi Street Bridge complete. From Jackson Street Bridge to Nairn Linoleut Works considered inactive. 2-28 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-C HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 6 of Text) Location: Below Waterford Above Battery, New York City Locks: Clear Width Greatest length available for full width Lift at lowest stages Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) Lower (at lowest low water) Character of foundation: Rock Kind of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Completed: 1917 Cost: $1,463,014 2.2 miles 153.8 miles 44.4 feet 492.5 feet 17.3 feet 16.3 feet 13.0 feet TABLE 2-D TOTAL COSTS FOR EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 See Section Operation of Text Project Funds New Work Rehabilitation Maintenance and Cost Total 6. Hudson River, Regular $38,560,839 - $518,437 $780,565 $41,287,833 N.Y. Public Works 238,350 - - 238,350 Emergency Relief 311,461 - - 5 311,461 TOTAL $39,110,650 - $518,437 $780,565 $41,837,644 16. N.Y. and N.J. Regular $57,412,152 - $8,736,000 - $66,805,884 Channels Public Works 807,000 - - 807,000 Emergency Relief 2,023,308 - - 2,023,308 Contributed 7,712 - - -7,712 TOTAL $60,250,172 - $8,736,000 - $69,643,904 TABLE 2-E SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (See Section 22 of Text) STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES-FY 1984 1. Number of Patrols a. Shore b. Vessel c. Air (helicopter) Total 2. Number of Inspections a. Shore Facilities b. Vessels Total 3. Disposition of Cases a. Voluntary Restoration b. After-the-fact Permit Applications Accepted c. Permit not required or already under permit d. Submitted for litigation to OCE or US Attorney e. Cases pending as of October 1, 1982 Total 690 376 3 1,071 4,420 1,174 5,594 11 90 13 2 31 147 2-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 2-F RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 1984 Name of Project Date Survey Conducted NEW JERSEY Keyport Harbor, N.J.............. ............. Feb., Apr. 1984 Matawan Creek, N.J.................. Feb., Apr. 1984 Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, N.J.......... Jan., Feb., Apr., Jun., Aug. 1984 Sandy Hook Bay, N.J.......................... May 1984 Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, N.J...................... Mar., Apr. 1984 Shrewbury River, N.J............. ........... May 1984 NEW YORK Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, N.Y ............. Jul., Sep. 1984 Bronx River, N.Y.. ............ ........... Sep. 1984 Buttermilk Channel, N.Y.... ..... .............. Oct. 1983, Jul., Aug. 1984 East River, N.Y............. .................. Sep. 1984 East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y......... ............. Apr., Aug. 1984 Great South Bay, N.Y............. ........... Mar., Apr. 1984 Jamaica Bay, N.Y ................................. Feb., Sep. 1984 Jones Inlet, N.Y................. ............. Apr., Aug. 1984 Lake Montauk Harbor, N.Y...................... Oct. 1983 Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y............ Mar., May, Jun. 1984 Milton Harbor, N.Y............. ............. Dec. 1983 New York & New Jersey Channels...................... Nov. 1983, May 1984 New York Harbor, N.Y. ............................. Jan., Mar. 1984 Port Chester Harbor, N.Y.............................. Nov. 1983 Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y............................. Apr., Aug. 1984 Total cost of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys in FY1984 was $799,395. 2-30 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1983 Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Burlington Harbor, Vt.' Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. Channel between North and South Hero Island, Lake Champlain, Vt.1.2 Coney Island Inlet, N.Y. East Chester Creek, N.Y. East River, N.Y. Echo Bay Harbor, N.Y.' Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. Gordons Landing, Lake Champlain, Vt.',2 Gowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. Great Chazy River, N.Y. Great Kills Harbor, N.Y.' 2, Great Lakes to Hudson River Waterway, N.Y. Great South Bay, N.Y.' Greenport Harbor, N.Y.' Harlem River, N.Y.' Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. Hudson River Channel, N.Y. Jamaica Bay, N.Y. Larchmont Harbor, N.Y. Lemon Creek, N.Y. (Inactive)2 .3 Little Neck Bay, N.Y.' Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y. Manhasset Bay, N.Y. (Inactive)3 Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y. 1.2 Newton Creek, N.Y. (Active)",' Northport Harbor, N.Y.' Orowoc Creek, N.Y. (Inactive)3 Otter Creek, Vt. Peconic River, N.Y.' Peekskill Harbor, N.Y.' Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y.' Port Henry Harbor, N.Y.' Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. Raritan River to Authur Kill Cutoff Channel, N.J.' Rondout Harbor, N.Y.' Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y.' Sag Harbor, N.Y.' St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, Vt. '2 Sandy Hook Bay, N.J.' Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo, N.J.' ,2 Saugerties Harbor, N.Y.' .2 Sheephead Bay, N.Y.' Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. Shooters Island, N.Y. & N.J. Shrewsbury River, N.J. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. bridge across Arthur Kill, N.Y. Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y. 1.2 Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y.' Wallabout Channel, N.Y.' Wappinger Creek, N.Y.'.2 Washington Canal and South River, N.J.' Waycake Creek, N.J.23, Woodbridge Creek, N.J.' 1966 1982 1909 1973 1975 1981 1953 1981 1892 1972 1980 1962 1976 1974 1953 1969 1969 1980 1981 1970 1937 1969 1981 1948 1981 1971 1974 1956 1949 1977 1953 1951 1972 1931 1977 1972 1972 1895 1964 1917 1957 1967 1968 1948 1961 1983 1979 1973 1895 1974 1953 1950 1953 1949 1953 706,4149 31,000 111,371 592,0564.40 32,723,662 64,584 29,76033 34,750 346,831 18,000 137,301's 5,644'13 266,857 74,681 3,616,119 39,468 6,771,87037 4,545,753 76,065 6,6211i 1,741,2101 513,764 177,925:" 73,2148 1,168,354 78,64423 60,254 25,000 19,400 198,415 69,40625 221,12832 810,500 142,437 98,468 121,80526 3,125 508,93627 56,470 81,905 33,828 100,000 1,145,45821)121 7,730,476 7,000 69,836 18,174 13,000 206,116 9 49,823 283,556 4,239,773 1,288 284,109 755,0424 3,012,76937, 3 11,5711 126,820 115 255,291 292,919 88,029 457 1,290,469 21,720 480,777 76,49716 24,970,637 2,604,54736 267,768 1,621 537 551,677 4,636 935,786 142,411 1,626,35122 1,487 4,951 27,059 116,509 66,037 229,111 1,299 359,294 2,019,141 260,441 249 11,710 385 154,565 93,964 169,18121 5,364 22 1,732,8801 13 431,199 36,312 44,691 212,82730 2,781 178,398 2-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 2-G (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 20. Includes $220,894 for new work for previous projects. 21. Excludes $36,311 for new work expended from contributed funds. 22. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenance for previous projects. 23. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 24. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 25. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 27. Excludes $53,790 for new work expended from contributed funds. 28. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 29. Excludes $365 for new work expended from contributed funds. 30. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. 31. Uncompleted portion deauthorized on August 5, 1977. 32. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance $20,646 for previous projects. 33. Deferred. 34. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. 35. Includes $346,797 for maintenance for previous project. 36. Includes $2,961 for maintenance for previous project. 37. Includes $6,187,694 for new work for previous project. 38. Includes $37,664 for maintenance for previous project. 39. Excludes $34,580 for new work expended from contributed funds. 40. Includes $183,507 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. Excludes $14,403 for new work expended from contributed funds for previous projects. 1. Completed. 2. No commerce reported. 3. Awaiting local cooperation. 4. Costs for previous projects only. 5. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 6. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 7. Excludes $419,879 for new work expended from contributed funds and $58,425 contributed funds other and $8,752 expended by the Worlds Fair Corp. for riprap protection of rubble dike. 8. Includes $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes cost of maintenance prior to July 1, 1986. Excludes $1,425,133 or rehabilitation. 10. Includes $286,606 for maintenance for previous projects. 11 Includes $10 for maintenance for previous projects. 12. Excludes $29,774 for new work expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $4,813,400 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 14. Excludes $94,366 for rehabilitation. 15. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. 16. Includes $64,034 for maintenance fo previous projects. 17. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 18. This amount also included in costs for New York and New Jersey channels. No work has been done on the existing project for Lemon Creek. 19. Excludes $1,741,210 for new work expanded from contributed funds. TABLE 2-H For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1983 Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Atlantic Coast of N.J., Sandy Hook to Barnegat InletsI 1959 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlets, N.Y. 1981 18,044,667 217,899 North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, N.Y. 1979 8,880,0001 Perth Amboy, N.J. 1966 1. Deferred. 2-32 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Adams, Hossic River Basin, Mass.' 1964 6,282,3072 - Bennington, Vt. 1974 670,000 Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn. 3 1959 363,515 - East Barre Dam, Winooski River, Vt.' 1963 2,832,084 - East Rockaway inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part II) 1976 1,185,365 Herkimer, N.Y. 1973 1,201,2759 - Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, N.Y.' 1956 1,064,626 - Lamoille River, Vt.: Hardwich Dams4.5 ,9 1939 - - Liberty State Park Levee & Seawall, N.J. 1983 180,038 Mississquoi River at Richford, Vt.' 3, 1965 221,476 - North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. 1968 15,409,325 - North Ellenville, N.Y. 1978 3,900,650 - Rahway, N.J. 1971 973,142 - Rahway, South Branch, N.J. 1979 15,863,723 - Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. 1981 11,061,256 262 Rosendale, N.Y. 1975 3,684,966 - Rutland, Otter Creek, Vt.4 1963 211,015 - Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, N.Y. 1976 109,702 South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, N.Y.' 1967 1,564,976 South Orange, N.J. 1981 6,857,484 Staten Island, N.Y. 1983 644,998 - Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y.1,3 1959 142,075 - Waterbury Reservoir, Winooski River Basin, Vt. 1976 883,769 8,200 Winooski River, Vt.' 1940 5,897,427 Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. 1970 1,549,929 - Completed. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended. Inactive. Incudes $23,507 emergency relief funds. 6. Excludes cost of $2,718,624 under other contributed funds. 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 8. Excludes cost of $51,500 under other contributed funds. 9. Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized on August 5, 1977. 10. Entire project deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2-33 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 2-J SURVEYS (See Section 41 of Text) Study Class Cost Navigation Studies Flood Control Studies Beach Erosion Studies Special Studies' Total Surveys $1,850,738 6,525 0 1,966,311 $3,623,574 'Includes review of Authorized Projects, Inspection of Dams, Coordination Studies with Other Agencies, Planning Assistance to States, International Water Studies Special Investigations, Review of FERC Licenses, Continuation of Planning and Engineers, Advance Engineering and Design and $3,842 by North Atlantic Division. TABLE 2-K FLOOD PLAIN STUDIES COMPLETED DURING THE PERIOD (See Section 42 of Text) Location Requesting Agency Date Completed Federal Cost NONE-PROGRAM TERMINATED TABLE 2-L COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES (See Section 42 of Text) Studies and Services Cost Flood Plain Technical Services $91,111 Flood Plain Management Unit 65,000 Total $156,111 2-34 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-M DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 43 of Text) For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed Operation See Annual and Funds Funds and Projects Report For Authority Expended Construction Expended Maintenance Bronx River, N.Y. 4.6 Brown's Creek, N.Y. Cheesequake Creek, N.J. 4,6 Coney Island Creek, N.Y.4.6 East Rockaway (DEBS) Inlet, N.Y. Elizabeth, N.J. Glen Cover Harbor, N.Y. Hudson River, NYC to Albany 4,1s Huntington Harbor, N.Y. Irvington Harbor, N.Y. Lamoille River, Vt. Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, N.J.7'16 New York and New Jersey 4 17 Portchester Harbor, N.Y.2.3 Proctor, Otter Creek, Basin, Vt.6,7 Rahway River, N.J.7,9 Raritan River, N.J.4. Rome, Mohawk River, N.Y. 6 7 Swanton Harbor, Vt. (Inactive)6 Ticonderoga River, N.Y.' .6 Waterbury (1941 Act), Vt.7 ,6 Waterford, N.Y. 6,7 Westchester Creek, N.Y. 1981 1980 1953 1952 1963 1948 1966 1982 1953 1947 1939 1982 1982 1967 1937 1948 1981 1959 1888 1895 1951 1939 1981 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Nov. 1983 Nov. 1981 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 1,149,946 33,976 40,000 69,489 503,969 60,481 165,882 49,035 49,837 433,470 1,551,470 7,000 17,760 9,253 175,933 1,159,94612 33,9768 40,000 69,489 603,96913 60,481 165,8824-11 68,5814.5.14 49,837 433,4704 37,0004 1,617,47016 7,000 70,5004 16,500 9,253 175,933 10,000 100,000 19,546 66,000 1,947,8536 505,369 30,675 1,622 829,421 59,391 2,455 51,566 441,656 3074 10,113,903 235 1,260 2,921,311 1. No commerce reported. 2. Completed. 3. A portion of th is project is classified "inactive." 4. Uncompleted portion deauthorized. 5. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 6. Inactive. 7. Entire project deauthorized. 8. Excludes $71,423 for rhabilitation. 9. Deferred. 10. Under Section 12 Public Law 93-251. 11. Includes $93,882 for Rehabilitation. 12. Includes $10,000 expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $100,000 expended from contributed funds. 14. Includes $19,546 expended from contributed funds. 15. Includes $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 16. 1912 authorization. 17. 1935 authorization. 18. 1910 construction dikes. 2-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 2-N SECTION 3 CONTINUE DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (See Section 25 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1984 Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. $279,337 SECTION 107 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (See Section 25 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1984 CONTINUE Hudson Channel, Freeport, N.Y. $60,663 Woodcleft Canal, Freeport, N.Y. $71,000 COMPLETE Sheepshead Bay, N.Y. $555 TABLE 2-0 SECTION,103 (See Section 28 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1984 CONTINUE DETAILED PROJECT STUDY Orchard Beach, Bronx, N.Y. COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION Neptune City, Memorial Park Beach, N.J. $100,000 $42,464 2-36 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 SECTION 205 (See Section 39 of Text) Name of Project COMPLETE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Lamoille River, Hardwick, Vt. Winooski River, Richmond, Vt. CONTINUE DETAILED PROJECT REPORTS Beaver Brook, Dolgeville, N.Y. Elizabeth River, Hillside, N.J. Missisquoi River, Vt. Ramapo River, Monroe, N.Y. Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, N.Y. Yonkers, Nepera Park, N.Y. COMPLETE DETAILED PROJECT REPORTS Esopus Creek, Ulster, N.Y. Halesite Area, Huntington, N.Y. Sheldon Brook, Tarrytown, N.Y. CONTINUE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Sawkill Creek, Kingston, N.Y. CONTINUE CONSTRUCTION Wallkill River (Black Dirt Area), N.Y. COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION Chappaqua, N.Y. (Saw Mill River) SECTION 14 (See Section 40 of Text) Name of Project CONTINUE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Bouquet River, Elizabethtown, N.Y. COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Chichester Creek, Shandaken, N.Y. COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION Sandburg Creek, Ellenville, N.Y. Cost to Sept. 30, 1984 $12,664 $5,623 $168,657 2-37 TABLE 2-P TABLE 2-Q Cost to Sept. 30, 1984 $164 $7,500 $45,885 $168,198 $147,000 $110,739 $845,693 $76,000 $50,907 $7,264 $19,036 $65,426 $1,127,877 $7,960 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeasternm New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and southeastern Delaware, and a small part of northeastern Maryland embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, N.J., inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, Md. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation P 1. Abeecon Inlet, NJ.......................... 2. Barnegat Inlet, NJ. ......................... 3. Cohansey River, N.J ...................... . 4. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ ....................... 5. Delaware River between Philadelphia, Pa, and Trenton, N J........... 6. Delaware River, Pa, NA. and Del. Philadelphia to the Sea ........ . . . ........ 7. Harbor of Refuge, Delaware Bay, Del.......... 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del.............. . 9. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del ........................... 10. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del., and Md. ............ 11. Manasquan River, NJ ................ ...... 12. Mispillion River, Del......................... 13. Murderkill River, Del. ........................ 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................. ............. 15. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway ........... 16. Salem River, NJ. .......................... 17. Schuylkill River, Pa. ......................... 18. Wilmington Harbor, Del ............... age Flood Control Local Protection cont. Page 3-2 25. Flood Control Work Under 3-2 Special Authorization ........................ 3-14 3-3 26. Francis E. Walter Dam, Pa.................. 3-14 3-3 27. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, Pa..................... .......... 3-15 3-3 28. Hay Creek, Birdsboro, Schuylkill River Basin, Pa. .......... ...... 3-15 3-4 29. Inspection of Completed Flood 3-5 Control Projects............................. 3-15 3-5 30. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees ............. 3-16 31. Pottstown and Vicinity, Schuylkill 3-6 River Basin ............................... 3-16 32. Prompton Lake, Pa. ...... .............. 3-16 3-6 33. Tamaqua, Pa. ............................ 3-17 3-7 34. Reconnaissance and Conditions 3-8 Surveys.....................................3-17 3-8 35. National Emergency Preparedness ............. 3-17 3-9 3-9 3-10 3-10 3-11 Beach Erosion Control Page 19. Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration .............................. 3-12 20. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ................. 3-12 Flood Control Local Protection Page 21. Beltzville Lake, Pa........................... 3-12 22. Blue Marsh Lake, Pa. ......................... 3-13 23. Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, N.J.............................. 3-13 24. Delaware Coast Protection, Del. ............. 3-13 General Investigations Page 36. Surveys ................................ 3-17 37. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........... 3-17 38. Advance Engineering and Design ............ 3-17 Tables Page TABLE 3-A Cost and Financial Statement ....... 3-18 TABLE 3-B Authorizing Legislation ............. 3-22 TABLE 3C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. 3-25 TABLE 3-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ........... 3-27 TABLE 3-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................... 3-27 TABLE 3-F Multiple Purpose Project Including Power ................... 3-28 TABLE 3G Deauthorized Projects ............... 3-28 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 3-1 Pe REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. ABSECON INLET, N.J. Location. On New Jersey coast about 65 miles north of Delaware breakwater, between Brigantine Beach on the north and Absecon Beach on the south. It forms entrance to harbor at Atlantic City, N.J. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 826 and 1217). Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1936, page 319. Existing project. This provides for an inlet entrance channel 20 feet deep at mean low water and 400 feet wide, for an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the inlet channel in Clam Creek, and for a turning basin 15 feet deep within Clam Creek. The act authorizing the inlet entrance channel also provides that should the channel at any time have deleterious effect on the Atlantic City Beach, work upon the improvements may cease; it being understood that the project is adopted on the basis that the interests of the beach in front of the city are superior to those of the inlet. The total length of the section included in the project is about 1.5 miles. The extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed May 1957. Inlet channel was completed in 1938. Dredging entrance from inlet channel into Clam Creek was completed in 1957. The cost for the completed project was $307,712. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable spoildisposal areas for maintenance when and as required for the dredging of the entrance channel into Clam Creek and the turning basin within Clam Creek. Terminal facilities. See pages 239 and 240 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Work included maintenance dredging of Clam Creek, which commenced on 9 November 1983 and was completed 5 December 1983. A total of 34,000 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $140,000. Maintenance, hired labor Work included general surveys, engineering and design, and supervision and administration on maintenance dredging. 2. BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. Location. On the east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is main entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep through inlet and 10 feet through outer bar, channel to be protected by two converging stone jetties extending to 12- foot contour in the ocean and spaced 1,000 feet apart at outer ends; a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from gorge in inlet to Oyster Creek Channel just northwest of Sunset Shoal, thence via Oyster Creek Channel to deep water in the bay; and maintenance of a channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat City harbor with main inlet channel. Total length of section included in project is about 4.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Extreme tidal range at inlet is from about 2 feet below mean low water to about 3 feet above mean high water. Project was completed in 1940. (For details, see page 203, Annual Report for 1964). (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing projects.). Recommended modifications. The existing Federal project at the inlet, which was completed in 1940, has failed to maintain a suitable and safe channel for navigation. As a result of the finding of AE&D studies on this matter, the Chief of Engineers decided on 20 January 1983 that modification to the project should be implemented to correct a design deficiency. The recommended modification would serve to correct the design deficiency through the construction of a new south jetty aligned more nearly parallel to the existing north jetty, the dredging and maintenance of a new realigned navigation channel, and the removal of a shoal located between the proposed navigation channel and the north jetty. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light which furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract Work included monitoring program surveys, program aerial photography, and tide gages. New work, hired labor: Preconstruction planning studies were undertaken regarding the proposed plan of improvement for the inlet. Maintenance, contract: Work included subsurface explorations, and tests on undisturbed Shelby tube samples for Barnegat Inlet South Jetty required for jetty design. Maintenance, hired labor Maintenance dredging by U.S. Government Side-Casting Dredge FRY was performed from 1 October 1983 through 26 October 1983 and 10 April 1984 through 9 August 1984. Removed an estimated 50,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $413,800. Other work 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT included'subsurface testing, preparation of design deficiency memorandum, general maintenance, engineering surveys on dredging, and supervision and administration. 3. COHANSEY RIVER, N.J. Location. Rises in Salem County, N.J., flows southerly and southwesterly 27 miles through Cumberland County, and empties into Delaware Bay about 62 miles below Philadelphia, Pa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218.) Previous projects. For details see page 1785, Annual Report for 1915, and page 348, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from that depth in Delaware Bay through a neck of land at the mouth and within the river to the south side of Glass Street in Bridgeton, 19 miles above the mouth; thence a channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide to Broad Street; and thence 75 feet wide to Commerce Street Bridge, 19.25 miles above the mouth; and a turning basin 12 feet deep and 800 feet long formed by widening the channel on the south side to a maximum width of 250 feet just below Glass Street Section included in project is about 19.5 miles long. All depths refer to the plan of mean low water. Extreme tidal range is from about 2 feet below mean low water to about 3 feet above mean high water. Completed project cost $110,756 for new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Existing project was completed in 1939. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for required maintenance. Terminal facilities. Twenty wharves, of which 16 are at Bridgeton and 4 at Greenwich. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract Environmental assessment prepared. Maintenance, hired labor Only work performed was preparation of environmental assessment, and supervision and administration. 4. COLD SPRING INLET, N.J. Location. In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 1219). Existing project. This provides for an entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties; thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed in 1942. (For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962.) (See table at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor, which is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities. See page 238, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging by U.S. Government Side- Casting Dredge FRY commenced 19 June 1984 and was completed 25 July 1984. An estimated total of 17,800 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $111,999. Maintenance, hired labor. Work included general maintenance and supervision and administration on dredging. 5. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA., AND TRENTON, N.J. Location. Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundry line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous projects. For details see page 1778 of Annual Report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central Railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S. Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, N.J., and for construction such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 3-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Iower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turing basin at terminal which is in deferred category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) (See Table 3-C at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept 30, 1984.) Local cooperation. Modification authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local interest complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities. There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa., to Trenton, N.J. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966) Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Work included environmental monitoring, and operation of stream gages in cooperative stream gaging program by USGS. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included engineering surveys, general maintenance, environmental monitoring, plans and specification, and supervision and administration on maintenance dredging, and general engineering and design. 6. DELAWARE RIVER, PA., N.J., AND DEL., PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location. See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. Previous projects. For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and 800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000-foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa., 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective lengths of 8,000, 5,200, 13,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and a width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and of 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to generate navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel to 37 deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet deep and 60 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion of project is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion is $2,951,000. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from naval base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and about 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) (See Table 3-C at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1984.) Local cooperation. Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details). 3-4 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT Terminal facilities. There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966 - Corps of Engineers). Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of Cherry Island, Marcus Hook Anchorage, Marcus Hook, and New Castle Range, performed by the American Dredging Company during the period of 1 October 1983 through 17 February 1984. Removed approximately 1,086,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $6,443,400. Maintenance dredging at Tinicum Range performed by Weeks Dredging Company during the period of 3 November 1983 through 15 February 1984. Removed a total of 28,500 cubic yards of material at a cost of $332,200. Maintenance dredging of Mifflin Range, Mantua Creek Anchorage, and New Castle Range performed by American Dredging Company during the period of 21 May through 30 September 1984. Removed a total of 1,309,400 cubic yards of material at a cost of $7,000,000. Other work included sturgeon studies, blue crab inventory, lease and maintenance of equipment for disposal areas, construction of dikes and sluices at disposal areas, construction of soil bentonite trench, disposal area groundwater testing, subsurface exploration, bucket dredging study, replaced sluice pipes, raising banks. and operation of stream gages by USGS. Maintenance, hired labor: Dredging performed by U.S. Hopper Dredge McFARLAND at Baker and Liston Range during the period of 4 September through 30 September 1984. Removed a total of 250,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,887,500. Other work included, engineering survey, general maintenance, sturgeon studies, blue crab inventory, maintenance of disposal area equipment, snagging and clearing, debris removal, ditching at disposal areas, groundwater testing, bucket dredging study, chemical analysis, operation of stream gages by USGS, environmental assessment, subsurface explorations, raising banks, handling shore pipe, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 7. HARBOR OF REFUGE, DELAWARE BAY, DEL. Location. At lower end of Delaware Bay, a few miles from Atlantic Ocean on Delaware side of bay. It is about 120 miles south of New York Harbor, about 114 miles north of entrance to Chesapeake Bay and about 101 miles from Philadelphia, Pa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1218, 1219 and 379.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1874, Chart II, page 146; page 330; and 1938, page 330. Existing project. Existing project was completed in 1951. Controlling depth at low water in channel in July 1963 was 16.8 feet. For details see page 229 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See page 229 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. BCR update prepared. 8. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DEL. Location. Indian River rises in Sussex County, Del., and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1219.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project. This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steel-sheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing; thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the interior channel dimensions may, in the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963. The cost for new work for the completed project was $511,210, exclusive of $10,000 expended on previous projects and exclusive of $210,000 contributed funds. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) 3-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Local Cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. Terminal facilities. There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 mile west of the highway bridge near the inlet and .25 mile north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Subsurface testing performed. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included engineering and design on bulkhead cap repair, and supervision and administration on dredging. 9. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DEL. Location. A tidal canal in southeasterly part of Sussex County, Del. It extends 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence through marshes back of Cape Henlopen to Lewes River; thence down Lewes River to its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218, and 1219.) Previous projects. A canal along a slightly different route formed a part of projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, begun in 1886 and abandoned in 1905. Existing project. This provides for an entrance channel near Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to South Street Bridge at Lewes, and a basin of the same depth 1,200 feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut near Rehoboth Bay) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the construction of one highway bridge and one railroad Bridge at Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 12 miles. The cost for new work for the completed portion of the project was $561,514, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $60,000 contributed funds. The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost. The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to be $816,000. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. Work remaining, extension of existing jetties at Delaware Bay entrance, is considered inactive. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. Terminal facilities. See page 228, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included erosion survey at Lewes Beach, plans and specification on Lewes Beach and Roosevelt Inlet, supervision and administration on Lewes Beach erosion study, and Real Estate management activity. 10. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DEL., AND MD. Location. Begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, Pa., and passes through sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, Md. It then passes for 5 miles down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, Del., with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a minimum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1000 feet long, and 12 feet deep; dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. Existing project is about 89 percent completed. Channel 27 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide. Delaware River to Pooles Island, completed in 1938. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2 -lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide St. Georges and Summit bridges and Summit and Goose Island was completed on June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21, 1972. Channel work for Part II is about 87 percent complete. Work remaining consists of completing channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide between Reedy Point Bridge and St. Georges Bridge; widening and deepening the channel between Delaware River and Reedy Point Bridge, the completion of recreation facilities, and miscellaneous completion items. Deepening Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 is $139,574,000 (October 1977). Total estimated cost of new work including original purchase is $151,683,755. Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $145,000 (July 1954). (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approved February 16, 1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities. Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging performed by Norfolk Dredging Company in the canal and upper bay during the period of 3 November 1983 through 8 March 1984, removed a total of 645,600 cubic yards of material at a cost of $3,057,700. The American Dredging company removed a total of 21,500 cubic yards of material during the period of 17 July through 30 July 1984 at a cost of $307,700; and during the period of 1 September 1984 through 30 September 1984 removed a total of 228,600 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,022,000. Other work included maintenance of Chesapeake City, Summit, St. Georges and Reedy Pt Bridges; general maintenance of Pearce Creek South and Courthouse Pt disposal areas; maintenance of rip-rap, roadways, night lighting, buildings and grounds, banks, auxiliary works and traffic controlled TV; plans and specifications for repair to Town Point bulkhead, environmental, dredge and sludge monitoring, drainage of disposal areas, disposal area construction, lease of equipment for Pearce Creek South, emergency deck repair St Georges bridge, handling pipe at Courthouse Pt disposal area, Reedy Pt bridge overlay, fish and wildlife study, and supervision and administration. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and ordinary maintenance of bridges, general maintenance of Pearce Creek South, and Courthouse Pt. disposal areas, painting Reedy Pt, Summit and Chesapeake City Bridges, disposal area construction, maintenance of rip-rap, night lighting, buildings and grounds, banks, auxiliary works, and traffic controlled TV; Summit Bridge erosion study, St Georges bridge joint repairs, inspection of bridges, snagging and clearing, plans and specification for St Georges bridge deck repair, painting of bridges, and dredging, engineering survey, general maintenance, and supervision and administration. 11. MANASQUAN RIVER, N.J. Location. This small stream flows in eastern part of New Jersey, rises near Freehold, flows easterly and empties into the Atlantic Ocean, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 795.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1909, page 186, and Annual Report for 1938, page 269. Existing project. A channel 14 feet deep and 250 feet wide, protected by jetties and other works, extending from the Atlantic Ocean to inner end of north 3-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 jetty, thence 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide to within 700 feet of New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge, thence of same depth and narrowing to 100 feet wide to within 300 feet of bridge; for a widening on northerly side of channel of 200 feet for 3,150 feet to a depth of 8 feet; for a 19-acre anchorage to 10 feet deep on south side of channel and for a 27.5-acre anchorage to 12 feet deep about 0.5 miles west of route 35 highway bridge. Section included in project is about 1.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.7 feet at inner end of inlet and 4 feet at ocean end; mean range of spring tides, 4.4 and 4.8 feet, respectively, irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 2.7 feet below to 7.5 feet above mean low water at inner end of inlet. Project, excluding 10- and 12-foot anchorages, cost $518,243. Estimated cost (1958) for 10- and 12-foot anchorages portion of project considered inactive is $504,000. Restoration of bulkheads completed 16 August 1965 at a cost of $117,807. Existing project was completed in June 1963. Dredging 19-acre anchorage south of channel and 27.5-acre anchorage west of highway bridge is in the inactive category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances to date have been complied with. Terminal facilities. Five landings with a total wharfage of 700 feet used by commercial fishermen, and 7 landings and boat basins for pleasure craft. Existing facilities are considered adequate for present requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation, hired labor: Work consisted of enginering and design related to rehabilitation of north jetty. Maintenance, contract: Work included repair of sinkholes, resetting of bulkhead caps, fence repair, and repairs to north bulkhead. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included plans and specificiations for repairs to north bulkhead, resetting of bulkhead caps, engineering and design, and supervision and administration on north and south bulkhead repairs. 12. MISPILLION RIVER, DEL. Location. Rises in Kent and Sussex Counties, Del., flows northeasterly 15 miles along the boundary line between the two counties and empties into Delaware Bay about 16 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218.) Previous projects. For details see page 1786, Annual Report for 1915, page 448 of Annual Report for 1918, and page 327 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Project is about 31 percent complete. Four cutoffs for 6-foot channel were completed in 1923; 6-foot channel from Delaware Bay to Milford in 1924; and jetties at the mouth in 1939. Work remaining is dredging channel to 9-foot depth, 80 feet wide in Delaware Bay to the mouth, thence 60 feet wide to Milford, with the provision of three cutoffs to eliminate bends, and a turning basin at Milford. Controlling depths at mean low water: In October 1964 from Delaware Bay to mouth 7.1 feet, and thence to fixed highway bridge at Milford, 6.1 feet. For details see page 243 of Annual Report for 1957. Local Cooperation. Assurances required by 1954 River and Harbor Act have not been furnished. For details see page 243, Annual Report for 1957. Prior requirements fully complied with. Terminal facilities. For details see page 244, Annual Report for 1957. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included preparation of BCR update and supervision and administration on dredging contract. 13. MURDERKILL RIVER, DEL. Location. Rises in Kent County, Del., flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1218.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal ornigse from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 21,52d Cong., 1st Sess.). (See page 981 Annual Report of 1892.) Latest published map is in House Document 1058, 62d Congress 3d Session. 3-8 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Environmental Impact Statement prepared. Maintenance, Hired labor: Lease plant dredging of miscellaneous shoals commenced 16 April 1984 and was completed 12 June 1984. Removed 48,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $145,000. Prepared BCR updated. 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). Reconnaissance Reports Name of Project Cost to 30 Sep 1984 Beach Creek, Cape May County, NJ $7,469 Schuylkill River-Fairmount Park, PA 14,764 Upper Manasquan River, NJ 7,500 Detailed Project Reports Petty Island, Back Channel, Camden, NJ 220,940 15. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location. A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, N.J., to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May harbor; thence across Cape May County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts, 234, 795,825, 826, 827,1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, N.J., to Delaware Bay above Cape May, N.J., by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, N.J., and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the constructin of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.). Latest published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525, 79th Cong., 2d Sess., as extended by Public Law 240, 82d Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over canal. Existing project is about 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942; two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrance and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining, dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. Local cooperation. The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rights-of-way, and structures other than bridges for the Bayhead-Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rightsof- way, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the 3-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvement. Terminal facilities. See Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Work included erosion report on West End of Cape May Canal, survey and preliminary design, Pt Pleasant Canal bulkhead design, hydrographic survey, and preparation of disposal area for dredging. Maintenance, hired labor: Lease plant dredging was in progress at the end of Fiscal year 83 thru 5 December 1983, removed a total of 70,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $17,000, and from 3 May 1984 through 10 September 1984, a total of 234,800 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $635,700. Other work included engineering surveys, general maintenance, bank stabilization, preparing preliminary plans and estimates for erosion repair, monumentation bulkhead design, engineering and design and supervision and administration. 16. SALEM RIVER, N.J. Location. This river rises in Salem County, N.J., flows through the county westerly 13 miles, thence southerly 7 miles to the City of Salem, and thence westerly 3 miles, emptying into Delaware River about 45 miles below Philadelphia, Pa. It is joined at Salem by Little Salem River, or Fenwick Creek, from the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 294.) Previous projects. The River and Harbor Act of July 11, 1870, provided for a survey and the original project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1871, and modified in 1878, and a subsequent project adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1907. For further details see page 1784, Annual Report for 1915; page 349 of Annual Report for 1924; and page 346 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware River across Salem Cove to the mouth, thence 100 feet wide to the fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River at Salem, 2/ miles above the mouth. It also provides for a cutoff to eliminate a large horseshoe bend between the mouth and Salem. The total length of the section included in the project is about 4 miles. The mean tidal range is 5.4 feet. The extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. The estimate of cost for new work is $51,825 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $51,825 contributed by local interests. The portion of the project comprising the deepending of Little Salem River to 12 feet is to be restudied and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. The estimated cost of this portion revised in 1953 is $28,000 excluding an equal amount to be contributed by local interests. The existing project is about 64 percent complete. The dredging of the channel from Penns Neck Bridge to project dimensions, including the cutoff, was completed in 1928. The channel from Penns Neck Bridge to the fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River was dredged to a depth of 9 feet under a previous project. The work remaining to be done is the deepening of the channel in Little Salem River from 9 feet to 12 feet. The controlling depths at mean low water were as follows: In January 1961, Delaware River to Penns Neck Highway Bridge 12.0 feet; and thence in December 1956 to the fixed highway bridge at Salem, 0.9 feet. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1925 (H. Doc. 110; 68th Cong. 1st Sess.). The latest published map is in the document. Local cooperation. The existing project required local interests contribute 50 percent of the estimated costs of new work and that a right-of-way for the proposed cutoff shall be conveyed to the United States free of cost. The contributions thus far made provided the right-of-way for the cutoff and 50 percent of the cost of the 12-foot channel up to a point 225 feet above the county (Penns Neck) highway bridge, amounting to $51,825. Terminal facilities. There are 9 wharves on the river all at Salem, N.J. Eight wharves are privately owned and one is owned by the City. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Dredging performed by C.J. Langenfelder and Sons, Inc. during the period of 4 June 1984 through 2 August 1984. Removed a total of 350,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $971,300. Environmental assessment perpared. Maintenance, hired, labor: Work included preparation of environmental assessment, plans and specification, surveys, and supervision and administration on dredging. 17. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA. Location. Rises in Schuylkill County, Pa., flows generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, Pa. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) 3-10 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT Previous project. For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River to the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $2,809,007. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, imposed the condition that the city of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the completion of sewage-treatment works by the city of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7-Revised 196 7-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Dredging in the 33' project was performed by the American Dredging Company from 29 October 1983 through 11 December 1983. Removed a total of 438,400 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,140,000. Other work included subsurface exploration, subsurface testing at Ft Mifflin disposal area. Maintenance, Hired labor: Work included engineering survey, general maintenance, design for new dikes at Ft Mifflin disposal area, survey of 26-foot channel, and supervision and administration on 26- foot and 33-foot channel. 18. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DEL. Location. Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle County, Del., flows northeasterly 16 miles, passing through the city of Wilmington, Del., and empties into Delaware River about 29 miles below Philadelphia, Pa. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 294.) Previous projects. For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. This provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for the distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River ship channel; thence decreasing a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No. 4; and thence 7 feet and 100 feet wide for a distance of about 5.6 miles to Newport, Del., approximately 9.9 miles above Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 35 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for t r removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-andtimber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. Depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details see page 222, Annual Report 1962.) (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within improvement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 8, revised 1966,-Corps of Engineers). Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, Contract: Maintenance dredging in the Christina River was performed by the American Dredging Company during the period of 17 December 1983 through 15 January 1984. Removed a total of 507,600 cubic yards of material at a cost of $638,000. Other work included cultural resource survey phase II, subsurface testing, ecological study, environmental monitoring, aerial photos, construction of dike sluices, 3-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 raising banks, and ditching at Wilmington Harbor South, and Edgemoor disposal areas. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance at Wilmington Harbor South and Edgemoor disposal areas, preparation of environmental impact statement, environmental monitoring, plans and specifications for dredging, survey on maintenance dredging of the Christina River, ditching, and construction of dike sluices at Wilmington Harbor South and Edgemoor disposal areas. Supervision and Administration on dredging and general maintenance. Beach Erosion Control 19. SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEMONSTRATION Location. Demonstration projects were undertaken at a total of 16 sites nationwide, 6 of which are located in the Delaware Bay and include Pickering Beach, Kitts Hummock, Slaughter Bowers Beach, Broadkill Beach, and Lewes, Delaware. The latter three sites were only monitored as there are presently Federal and State projects in progress. Existing project. Section 54 of Water Resources Development Act of 1974 authorized a nationwide, 5 year program to test and evaluate low cost shoreline erosion control measures, both structural and vegetative, which can be implemented by individual private property owners. The emphasis of the program was not to solve individual problems, so much as to explore the effectiveness of various ways to control erosion at different types of shorelines, and provide this information to private and public landowners. The construction and evaluation at all sites are completed and information dissemination has been started. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Only costs incurred were in support of information dissemination program. Cost during this period was $7,839. 20. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). Name of Project Port Mahon, Del. Lewes, Del. Detailed Project Reports Cost to 30 Se Construction ?p 1984 143,997 459,207 Flood Control 21. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA. Location. Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, Pa. -1960.) Existing project. A multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed; a spillway around north end of dam; and gatecontrol outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 39,830 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,030 acre-feet for flood control. The cost of project was $22,931,400 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project. The construction of the dam and appurtenances was completed in 1971. Local cooperation. Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16, 1966. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Work included reservoir operation and minor maintenance, stilling basin cleanup and inspection, evaluation of tower heat and humidity problems, tower inspection and repairs, operation of stream gages in cooperative stream gaging program, snow surveys, correcting electric problems, water quality data collection and monitoring, replacing 16-inch water line valve, instrumentation survey, updating O & M manual, and investigating concrete cores. Reimbursement received from sale of water to DRBC. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included reservoir operation and minor maintenance, annual safety inspection, water quality monitoring, instrumentation survey, testing and evaluating bubbler system, snow survey, operation of stream gages in cooperative stream gaging program, pre- and postimpoundment survey, updating O & M manual, sedimentation survey, engineering and design and supervision and administration. 3-12 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT 22. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA. Location. Damsite is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, Pa.) Existing project. This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Construction started in 1974 and was completed in 1980. The dam is 1,775 feet long and rises 98 feet above creekbed, with a spillway about 1,500 feet south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control. (For details see H. Doc 522 87th Cong., 2d Sess.) Cost of project (October 1984), $63,163,791 includes $16,132,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published maps.) Local cooperation. Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations during fiscal year. New Work, hired labor: District office supervision and administration. Maintenance, contract: Work included reservoir operation and minor maintenance, drilling well at recreation area, operation and maintenance of recreation area, inspection of stilling basin, updating of O & M manual, snow survey, operation of stream gages in cooperative stream gaging program, water quality testing and monitoring, mowing and fertilizing recreation area, janitorial services, barn repairs, trash removal, pre- and postimpoundment surveys, evaluation of bubbler system, and instrumentation survey. Cost incurred for Bern and Heidelberg Township police. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included reservoir operation and minor maintenance, annual safety inspection, water quality monitoring, instrumentation survey, testing and evaluating bubbler system, snow survey, operation of stream gages in cooperative stream gaging program, pre- and postimpoundment survey, updating O & M manual, sedimentation survey, and engineering and design and supervision and administration. 23. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, N.J. Location. The proposed project is located in Cape May County and extends along the beach front from the northern side of Cape May Inlet to the boundary of Lower Township, and Cape May City. Existing project. The proposed project consists of a sand bypassing system on the northeast side of Cape May Inlet consisting of a weir-breakwater and deposition basin, with construction of the weir-breakwater being deferred pending demonstration of need; The placement of sand on the beach to provide a berm having an elevation of 8 feet above NGVD and a maximum width of 180 feet between Cape May Inlet and Wilmington Avenue, hence a width of 25 feet to the Third Avenue groin in Cape May City; construction of two groin extensions in Cape May City; maintenance of two new and seven existing groins in Cape May City; periodic nourishment of the beaches to maintain the project cross-section during the life of the project. Estimated cost of the project (October 1984) is $61,100,000. The existing authority is for Phase I studies as provided by Section 101 (a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the provision of House Document 94-641. Planning and Engineering studies were initiated in FY 1978. The Phase I GDM was completed in September 1980 with release of Division Engineer's notice. Final action on the Phase I GDM taken by OCE in December 1981. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection in letter dated 20 April 1972. 24. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DEL. Location. The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware-Maryland border Existing project. Provides a plan of improvement which consists of the construction of dunes and beach fill; the construction of bulkheads at Rehoboth and Dewey beaches; periodic nourishment of the beaches; placement of sand fences; planting dune 3-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 grass and maintenance and replacement of existing structures. (For details, see S. Doc. 90, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1984) $313,000,000 includes $186,600,000 required non-Federal costs. The construction of the feeder beach north of Indian River Inlet was completed in 1973 and nourished in 1978, and 1984. Other work undertaken has been engineering and design associated with the rest of the project. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, January 13, 1981. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: included nourishment of Feeder Beach, study management, fish and wildlife study, aerial topography, surface exploration and testing, advance engineering and design, and beach surveys. New work, hired labor: Work included environmental studies, economic study, hydrology and hydrographic studies, study management, subsurface exploration, and design and cost estimates. 25. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Name of Project Reconnaissance Reports Mill Creek, Port Carbon, PA Cost to 30 Sept. 1984 Detailed Project Reports Pennypack Creek, Hatboro, PA 70,302 Poquessing Creek, Bucks County, PA 153,712 Plans and Specification Darby Creek, Darby Bourough, PA 159,349 Construction Wallkill River (Black Dirt Area), NJ 201,884 Also feasibility study pursuant to Emergency Bank Protection Authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Name of Project Reconnaissance Report White Clay Creek, Stanton, DEL Cost to 30 Sept 1984 Construction Equinunk Creek, Wayne County, PA 174,576 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $160,171 for advance preparation, and $93,407 for rehabilitation. 26. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA. Location. Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, Pa.) Existing project. Plan of improvement authorized by 1946 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 587, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.) provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway increasing height of dam, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 263 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 180,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 2,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1984) is $115,000,000 including $102,900,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. The advance engineering and design for the modified project is now underway. Local cooperation. None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission reiterated its sponsorship for the modified project in August 1982. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Work included reservoir operation and minor maintenance, fire protection, snow survey, operation of stream gages in cooperative stream gaging program, replacement and repair of stream gages, water quality testing, monitoring, instrumentation survey, and hydrologic reservoir regulation data collection. 3-14 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT Maintenance, hired labor: Work included reservoir operation and minor maintenance, instrumentation surveillance, minor maintenance of recreation facilities, periodic inspections, reservoir regulation data collection, operation of stream gages in cooperative stream gaging program, and general engineering and design and supervision and administration. 27. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA. Location. In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne County, Pa., between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek and Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, Pa.) Existing project. A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creek bed. It also has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, Pa. Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Federal cost of new work was $4,064,510. Non-Federal funds not required. Project completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. Assurances of compliance with requirements of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 1956. For details see page 251, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Work included reservoir operation and minor maintenance, stilling basin inspection, hydrology and hydraulic data collection, operation of stream gages in cooperative stream gaging program, and drainage of access road. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included inundation mapping, reservoir operation and minor maintenance, safety inspections, hydrology and hydraulic data collection, operation of stream gages in cooperative stream gaging program, instrumentation and surveillance analysis, and general engineering and design and supervision and administration. 28. HAY CREEK, BIRDSBORO, SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. The site of the authorized project is within the urban community of Birdsboro, Berks County, Pennsylvania, at the confluence of Hay Creek and Schuylkill River. The project as recommended by the most recent studies starts near the Armorcost Road Bridge in Hay Creek and extends upstream to the Conrail Railroad Bridge. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement includes a 3,750 foot combination earth levee and concrete flood wall beginning at a point just below East Main Street and proceeding upstream approximately 900 feet above First Street. Included also are 2 new raised bridges to replace those at East Main Street and First Street and modification to an existing railroad bridge, as well as interior drainage facilities. The project was authorized in 1976 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. However, the project as recommended by the findings of the advance engineering and design would consist of landfill placed in a redevelopment area along Hay Creek. A Post Authorization Change Report was submitted to the office of the Chief of Engineers for approval of the project as a component of an urban renewal program. Subsequently, the decision was reached that no further work would be done on the project because it could not be economically justified on its own merits without being combined with the urban renewal program. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were received from the Borough of Birdsboro, Pennsylvania, in a letter dated 16 January 1973 which was signed by the Borough Manager. Continued interest in the project had been re-established in letters dated 13 September 1977, and 26 August 1980. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed coordinating effort with local government regarding unfavorable AE&D report. 29. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as required, inspections were made as follows: PROJECT INSPECTION DATES Lehigh River at Allentown, PA Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA Delaware River at East Branch, NY Rancocas Creek at Mount Holly, NJ Chester River at Chester, PA 26 October 1983 3 May 1984 19 October 1983 16 May 1984 5 October 1983 22 May 1984 17 October 1983 2 April 1984 24 October 1983 2 April 1984 3-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $6,692. Total costs were $92,579. 30. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspection of non-Federal levees were conducted at a cost of $3,092, at the following sites: Port Jervis, N.Y. Stroudsburg/East Stroudsburg, PA Hawley, PA 29 November 1983 19 June 1984 20 June 1984 31. POTTSTOWN AND VICINITY, SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. The site of the authorized project is located in Pennsylvania along the Manatawny Creek and the Schuylkill River in the City of Pottstown, Montgomery County, and the communities of South Pottstown and Kenilworth, Chester County, Pennsylvania. Existing project. The physical construction as authorized would consist of channel improvements along the Schuylkill River and excavation of an area under an arch of the existing High Street bridge on the Manatawny Creek. The Schuylkill River channel would be widened to a width of 275 feet for a distance of about 7,600 feet. Stone protection would be provided along the channel where flow conditions require it. Excavated material would be utilized to develop open space areas along the river. Estimated cost of the project (October 1983) is $5,320,000. The project was authorized in 1974 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act. However the findings of the advance engineering and design in 1978 indicated that there were not enough benefits to justify any Federal project at Pottstown. Those findings were reevaluated in 1982 and the conclusion still remained that there were no economically justified projects. Congress will be apprised of this conclusion. Local cooperation. Local interests (the Borough of Pottstown, Pennsylvania) furnished assurances of local cooperation by letter dated 28 September 1970. The borough reaffirmed the assurances by a resolution dated 8 January 1973. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed Stage 2 study plan formulation and evaluation. 32. PROMPTON LAKE, PA. Location. In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne County, Pa., between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from Honesdale, Pa., and approximately 30 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, Pa.) Existing project. Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.) provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.) provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of a control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet; 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1984) is $41,300,000 including $36,300,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control Act was advance engineering and design. Local cooperation. Project modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply was not urgent at that time. However recent studies conducted by DRBC have determined that there is now a need for water supply. In August 1983, DRBC expressed their strong support for the project modification. Therefore resumption of planning will take place when funds are made available. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Work included reservoir operation and minor maintenance, subsurface exploration, instrumentation and surveillance analysis, dam safety plan, dam break modeling, seismic analysis, sedimentation survey, operation of stream gages in cooperative 3-16 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT stream gaging program, dam safety and stilling basin inspections, and water quality monitoring. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included reservoir operation and minor maintenance, emergency planning and damage inventory, instrumentation and surveillance analysis, seismic survey analysis, water quality monitoring, plans and specification on outlet works, dam break modeling, dam survey, and general engineering and design and supervision and administration. 33. TAMAQUA, PA. Location. The authorized project is located in Tamaqua Borough and Walker Township, Pennsylvania. Both municipalities are within Schuylkill County. Existing project. The project as authorized would provide a 2,930-foot long tunnel, 10 feet in diameter with appurtenant structures, through Sharp Mountain. It would extend from Wabash Creek on the west boundary of Tamaqua to the Little Schuylkill River just south of its confluence with Wabash Creek. The proposed improvement includes an intake structure, a stilling basin, and a 70-foot long highway bridge. Estimated cost of project (October 1984) is $8,900,000 including $250,000 required non-Federal costs. The Phase I portion of the advance engineering and design was completed in 1981. The findings from that phase resulted in the addition of a small dry detention dam to the project plan. Phase II AE&D conducted by Baltimore District. For further information see Baltimore District Annual Report. Operation during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Work included completion of AE&D public involvement and coordination, environmental studies and study management. Project Cedar Creek after dredging Cohansey River Mispillion River Murderkill River Date Survey Conducted 26-27 August 1982 14 April 1983 9 August 1983 29 September 1983 35. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $53,645. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 36. SURVEYS Costs for the period were $957,376 for navigation studies: $571,529 for flood control studies: $114,813 for special studies, a total of $1,643,718. 37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs and expenditures during the period for flood plain information studies were $159,718. 38. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN The total costs for this category amounted to- $61,716. Of that amount, $6,564 was for the Phase II advance engineering and design on the proposed Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, N.J. project (see paragraph 23 of this report for a full description of the project); $55,152 was for the studies associated with the Delaware River at Camden, N.J. project (see paragraph 6 of 1982 Annual Report for a full description). 3-17 34. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS TABLE 3-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 1. Absecon Inlet, N.J. (Regular Funds) 2. Barnegat Inlet, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Cohansey River, N.J. (Regular Funds) 4. Cold Spring Inlet, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Delaware River Between Philadelphia, Pa. and Trenton, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Delaware River Pa., N.J. and Del., Philadelphia to the Sea (Regular Funds)* 7. Harbor of Refuge Delaware Bay, Del. (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 9,000 10,908 201,000 210,550 -20,981 2,427 6,000 3,584 362,500 365,491 414 3,240,000 3,158,000 3,271,657 3,167,472 62,000 2,065 703,000 680,607 30,000 11,049 396,000 395,501 967,000 968,187 82,000 144,514 210,000 206,975 670,000 694,337 -3,000 15,951 112,000 112,554 298,125 298,476 13,908,163 13,794,188 16,782,000 21,533,300 13,957,353 13,743,314 16,775,510 21,639,776 13,000 201,354 -1,091 9,000 8,706 3-18 534,209' 534,2091 5 939,3622 5 939,3622 658,849 655,824 9,721,135 9,720,993 300,000 300,000 146,75630 146,75630 772,931 772,931 879,275 879,275 2,391,507 2,391,507 1,134,346 1,134,346 150,0003 150,0003 72,147,8004 72,147,8004 26,508,860 26,508,8576 15,000 15,000 57,879,8726 57,879,8726 284,583,8677 284,565,0487 508,324 508,324 5,162,23010 5,162,23010 1,147,36311 1,147,069" PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Inland Waterway Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del. and Md. (Regular Funds) 11. Manasquan River, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Mispillion River, Del. (Regular Funds) 13. Murderkill River, Del. (Regular Funds) 15. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Ap rop. Cost 403,000 442,491 81,400 80,925 26 8,508,000 9,472,669 -169 172 3,640,000 2,263,314 518,000 520,638 4,581 5,888 889,000 719,388 634 11,000 11,175 -16,000 697 114,000 112,228 4,000 4,171 30,000 32,572 - - 297 7,078,400 12,045,500 10,488,275 6,836,659 12,225,774 10,667,119 100,000 4,612 15,000 94,659 1,378,056 177,314 -4,020 1,400 170,000 163,484 1,446,100 1,554,708 5,235 818,000 849,876 25,000 40,081 1,028 11,000 11,000 159,000 160,280 1,121,000 1,152,487 3-19 511,2108 511,2108 2,741,923 2,741,923 1,323,775 1,323,775 210,000 210,000 561,514 561,514 1,304,978 1,304,978 60,000 60,000 132,535,59112 132,532,59812 136,367,70513 136,293,21913 557,24921 557,24921 3,121,55722 3,120,90922 7,410,60025 7,343,85825 300,000 300,000 377,84823 377,84823 1,253,12724* 1,253,12724* 253,491 253,491 37,630 37,630 1,115,355 1,115,354 71,54914 71,54914 18,603,57115 18,600,55415s 1,196,581 1,196,581 99,000 99,000 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 3-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 16. Salem, River, N.J. New Work (Regular Approp. - - - - 107,63428 Funds) Cost - - - - 107,63428 Maint. Approp. - - 35,000 992,000 1,317,77929 Cost - - 21,181 1,005,818 1,317,77829 (Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. - - - - 51,825 Cost - - - - 51,825 17. Schuylkill New Work River, Pa. Approp. - - - - 3,334,00716 (Regular Cost - - - - 3,334,00716 Funds) Maint. Approp. 1,225,000 108,000 770,100 1,241,000 24,303,03332 Cost 1,226,976 104,454 768,856 1,244,884 24,299,92032 18. Wilmington New Work Harbor, Del. Approp. - - - - 1,954,725'7 (Regular Cost - - - - 1,954,72517 Funds) Maint. Approp. 1,603,300 1,524,100 2,011,000 2,006,000 27,571,165 Cost 1,593,509 1,501,336 1,980,620 2,069,777 27,563,819 (Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. - - - - 60,000 Cost - - 60,000 21. Beltzville Lake, New Work Pa. Approp. - - - - 22,931,831 (Regular Cost - - - 22,931,130 Funds) Maint. Approp. 539,000 342,400 721,000 655,800 4,282,175 Cost 532,531 364,321 691,749 713,170 4,279,982 22. Blue Marsh New Work Lake, Pa. Approp. 169,000 - - - 63,180,300 (Regular Cost 179,688 -93,855 118,186 3,212 63.163,790 Funds) Maint. Approp. 674,000 794,200 787,000 1,002,200 4,323,200 Cost 673,539 836,190 742,145 1,068,725 4,296,996 23. Cape May Inlet New Work to Lower Township, Approp. - - - - 150,000 N.J. (Regular Funds) Cost - 27 -5 - 149,995* 24. Delaware Coast New Work Protection, Approp. - - 50,000 775,000 2,253,9533' (Regular Funds) Cost 1,457 - 43.580 455,165 1,927,6493' (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. - - 85,000 -921 84,079 Cost - - 69,557 11,538 81,095 26. Francis E. New Work Walter Dam, Pa. Approp. 376,000 - - - 11,503,43219 (Regular Cost 282,652 91,375 512 - 11,501,971'9 Funds) Maint. Approp. 320,000 423,300 331,000 383,700 4,111,521 Cost 299,741 446,749 330,420 388,882 4,100,678 27. General Edgar New Work Jadwin Dam and Approp. - - - - 4,073,105 Reservoir, Pa. Cost - - - - 4,073,105 (Regular Maint. Funds) Approp. 49,400 38,000 104,000 74,200 1,147,564 Cost 46,295 40,266 91,463 88,156 1,147,494 28. Hay Creek, New Work Birdsboro, Approp. 50,000 -1,000 - -29,000 335,305 Schuylkill Cost 22,178 13,622 4,680 1,701 335,299 River Basin, Pa. (Regular Funds) 3-20 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 31. Pottstown and New Work Vicinity,Schuylkll Approp. 125,000 - - - 487,336 River Basin Pa. Cost 118,140 5,133 1,487 239 487,336 (Regular Funds) 32. Prompton Lake New Work Pa. Approp. - - - - 4,609,48320 (Regular Cost - - - - 4,609,48320 Funds)* Maint. Approp. 116,000 149,300 167,000 298,000 2,060,162 Cost 121,186 147,927 173,611 306,608 2,053,524 33.*** Tamaqua, Pa. New Work ** (Regular Approp. - - - - 525,000 Funds) Cost 35,149 3,739 4,311 2,853 524,373 *Total adjusted to correct discrepancies in prior years. **For Construction, General funds only on legislative Phase I AE&D, or support work for Phase II AE&D. *** Transferred to Baltimore District fiscal year 1982. 1. Includes $226,497 for new work for previous projects. 2. Includes $235,786 for maintenance for previous projects. 3. Includes $50,000 Navy Department Funds. 4.Includes $2,489,173 for new work for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment (new work) to Delaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project under 1954 modification. 5. Includes $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects, and $685,000 Jobs Bill Funds. 6. Excludes $12,976,058 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustment from Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, N.J. under 1954 modification. 7. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects, and $8,000 Jobs Bill funds 8. Excludes $10,000 for previous project. 10. Includes $2,749,452 for new work for previous projects. 11. Excludes $1,089 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, fiscal year 1963. 12. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous projects. 13. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects, and $9,500 Jobs Bill funds. 14. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds. 15. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department funds expended for maintenance. 16. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 17. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project, and $206,177 emergency relief funds. 19.Includes $40,000 appropriated and expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 20. Includes $63,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities, excludes $23,600 preauthorization studies under 1948 modification. 21. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. 22. Includes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 23. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 24. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previous projects. 25. Includes $555,600 for previous project. 28. Includes $55,809 new work funds expended on previous project. 29. Includes $1,285 for reconnaissance and condition survey in fiscal year 1957, $1,792 operation and maintenance cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statement, and $48,000 expended for maintenance on previous project. 30. Includes $36,000 for new work for previous projects. 31. Includes $438,953 AE&D. 32. Includes $50,000 Jobs Bill Funds. 3-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 22, 1922 July 24, 1946 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 26, 1937 March 2, 1907 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30,19352 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Sept. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30,19353 June 20, 19384 Mar. 2, 19455 Mar. 2, 19456 Mar. 2, 19455 Sept. 3, 1954 ABSEWCON INLET, N.J. (See Section 1 of Text) An inlet entrance channel 20 feet deep. A channel 15 feet deep into Clam Creek and a turning basin. BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. (See Section 2 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. COHANSEY RIVER, N.J. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 feet deep over entire project. Channel 12 feet deep to Glass Street, thence 8 feet to Commerce Street, with turning basin. COLD SPRING INLET, N.J. (See Section 4 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA. AND TRENTON, N.J. (See Section 5 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, Pa. and Delair Bridge. Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to 'lenton, N.J., and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, N.J. Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, Pa., and upstream end of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, Pa. DELAWARE RIVER, PA., N.J., AND DEL., PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave. Philadelphia Pa., to Delaware Bay. Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantua dreek a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, N.J., and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, Pa. A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia - Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth channel from Allegheny Ave. Philadelphia, Pa. to Philadelphia - Camden Bridge and in anchorage at Port kichmond. A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. H. Doc. 375, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 504, 79th Cong., 2d seas. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 73d Cong., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 85, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 358, 79th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 645, 59th Cong., 1st sess.' Senate Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st seas. H. Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 262, 77th Cong., 1st seas. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 679, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 733, 61st Cong., 2d seas. H. Doc. 304, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 73d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong., 3d seas.' H. Doc. 580, 76th Cong., 3d seas.' H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' Specified in Act. H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2d sess.' 3-22 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 June 3, 1896 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 25, 1912 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 7, 1939 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200, 13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. HARBOR OF REFUGE, DELAWARE BAY, DEL. (See Section 7 of Text) Breakwater construction Construction of 10 ice piers Construction of 5 additional ice piers Channel 18 feet deep to Queen Anne pier at Lewes, Del. (No work has been done on this channel). Channel 15 feet deep to pier of Atlantic Fisheries Co. about 0.7 mile east of Queen Anne pier. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DEL. (See Section 8 of Text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DEL. (See Section 9 of Text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes, and basin. For a 10-foot depth from Delaware Bay to Lewes and in basin, and for extending jetties.6 INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DEL. AND MD. (See Section 10 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth, and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay at water of that depth in the bay, including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, with a minimum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high level fixed railroad bridge over cutoff; high level fixed highway bridge at Reedy Point and Summit; and an anchorage in Elk River 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, averaging 3,700 feet long. MANASQUAN RIVER, N.J. (See Section 11 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep and provision of works designed to secure channel. Widening channel on northerly side. Deepening channel to 12 and 14 feet, 10 and 12 foot anchorages.'7 H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 112.53d Cong., 2st sess. (subproject, approved by War Department, Apr. 23, 1900). (Subproject, approved by War Department, June 30, 1902.) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 70th 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 330, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3d seas. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 75th Cong., 1st seas.' H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., 1 st sess.' H. Doc. 201, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 18 and 24, 73d Cong., 2d sess.' Public Law 310, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 123, 83d Cong. 2d sess.' H. Doc. 482, 70th Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee Doc., 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 356, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' 3-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 26, 1937 Sept. 3, 1954 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 July 24, 1946 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19358 Oct. 17, 1940 July 14, 1960 MISPILLION RIVER, DEL. (See Section 12 of Text) A 6-foot depth and extension of south jetty. Extension of north jetty. A channel 9 feet deep, 80 feet wide from like depth in Delaware Bay to the landward end of the jetties and thence 60 feet wide to Milford, including 3 cutoffs, with a turning basin at Milford. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA. (See Section 17 of Text) Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point, thence 30 feet, 26, and 22 feet to University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the mouth and the conditional restoration and maintenance of the channel below Passyunk Ave., by the United States. A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DEL. (See Section 18 of Text) Depths of 21, 10 and 7 feet and jetties. Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of project. Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests of new south jetty. A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or removal of a portion of north jetty. Completion of new south jetty by the United States; subject to provision that city of Wilmington reimburse the United States for cost, without interest, of any part of structure that may subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of south jetty for city activities under revocable license, provided occupied portion of jetty is properly maintained without expense to the United States. A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lobdell Canal including turning basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington Marine Terminal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. H. Doc. 678, 62d Cong., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 83, 74th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 229, 81st Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 1270, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 66, 54th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1896, p. 973; Annual Report, 1897, p. 1250.1 H. oc. 359, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., 3d sess. S. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., 2d sess. 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Also Public Works Administration, September 6, 1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28, 1935. 3. Also Public Works Administration, September 6, 1933. 4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for restudy. 5. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Philadelphia- Camden Bridge to Allegheny Avenue, deferred for restudy. 6. Extension of jetties considered to be active. 7. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 8. Also May 28, 1935, under Emergency Relief Administration. 3-24 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Completed Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Absecon Creek, N.J.' COMPLETED 1969 11,935 167,682* Appoquinimink River, Del. COMPLETED 1931 36,973 41,270 Big Timber Creek, N.J.' COMPLETED 1962 58,6652 53,986* Broadkill River, Del. COMPLETED 1976 68,228 243,641 Cedar Creek, Sussex City, Del. COMPLETED - 256,100 - Cooper River, N.J.' COMPLETED 1962 33,102 379,244* Delaware River at Camden, N.J. COMPLETED 1982 464,906 362,79912 Delaware River, Pennsville, N.J. COMPLETED - 256,624 - Double Creek, N.J.' COMPLETED 1912 7,800 -5 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay COMPLETED 1981 168,41218 98,36019 Little River, Del. COMPLETED 1980 12,016 288,310 Mantua Creek, N.J. COMPLETED 1966 169,6878 339,340* Maurice River, N.J. 1948 - - Delaware Bay to Millville fixed bridge COMPLETED - 143,98410 147,050 Milville fixed bridge to upper end of project SEE TABLE 3-G ** Neshaminy State Park Harbor COMPLETED 1968 128,20321 54,601 Oldmans Creek, N.J. COMPLETED 1941 31,188 **Pepper 32,125 Creek, Del.' COMPLETED 1965 138,09422 1,797* Racoon Creek, N.J. COMPLETED 1981 83,66520 341,734 St. Jones River, Del. 1961 - - Delaware Bay to Lebanon," COMPLETED - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and new entrance at mouth9 - -- Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, Pa.' COMPLETED 1955 4,291,810 - Smyrna River, Del. 1949 - - Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing'5 COMPLETED - 198,844 197,327 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge9 SEE TABLE 3-G - - Toms River,N.J. 1950 - - Channel 5 feet deep' COMPLETED - 10,050 33,311 Channel 12 feet deep9 SEE TABLE 3-G - - Thckerton Creek, N.J. COMPLETED 1972 60,242 623,917* Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, Del. COMPLETED 1981 90,908 241,497 Woodbury Creek, N.J.' COMPLETED 1940 27,09316 56,474 For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Inactive Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alloway Creek, N.J.' INACTIVE 1931 21,398 35,761 Aquatic Plant Control 1975 87,594 - Chester River, Pa.' INACTIVE 1931 6,000 1,139 Dennis Creek, N.J.' INACTIVE 1897 4,701 - Goshen Creek, NJ.' INACTIVE 1905 15,359 870 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, Pa. L-6 INACTIVE 1928 208,964 14,336 Ice Harbor at New Castle, Del. -6 INACTIVE 1898 224,704 - Leipsic River, Del.' INACTIVE 1931 36,956 32,345 Little Egg Harbor, N.J. ',4 INACTIVE _7 15,048 - Maurice River, N.J. 1948 Channel 8 feet deep, Delaware Bay to mouth INACTIVE 3-25 TABLE 3-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Cont'd) For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Deferred Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance St. Jones River, Del. 1961 - - Delaware Bay to Lebanon'," - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and new entrance at mouth 9 DEFERRED - - - 1. Completed. 2. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 3. Includes $6,000 new work and $63 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 4. Abandonment recommended in House Document 467, 69th Congress, 1st Session. 5. Maintenance assumed by local interests. 6. Harbor not now required by commerce. 7. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand relative to work done. 8. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. 9. Deferred. 10. Includes $43,000 new work funds expended on previous projects. 11. Includes $54,590 new work and $28,935 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 12. Excludes $15,000 contributed funds.. 15. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 16. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. 18. Entire amount expended on previous project repealed in 1905. 19. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for maintenance for previous projects.. 20. Includes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 21. Excludes $327,957 contributed funds allotted expended for new work.. 22. Excludes $38,988 Non-Federal Funds. *Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. **Projects authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3-26 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, N.J. ACTIVE* 1978 314,400 - Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, N.J. ACTIVE* 1978 387,882 Townsend Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, N.J. ACTIVE* - - - Atlantic City, N.J. INACTIVE 1972 2,083,289 -1 Ocean City, N.J. INACTIVE 1969 395,8313 _1 Stone Harbor, N.J. INACTIVE 1961 - 1 Barnegat Light, N.J. DEFERRED 1964 70,908 -1 Cape May City, N.J. DEFERRED 1961 22,9572 -1 Long Beach Island, N.J. DEFERRED 1964 40,665 -1 North Wildwood, N.J. DEFERRED 1961 - Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, Del.4 1965 326,116 - Ventnor, Margate and Longport, N.J. DEFERRED 1961 - 1. Operation and maintenance required by law to be assumed Federal participation expended under Public Works by local interests. Acceleration Program for Extension of five existing groins 2. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public Works funds expended completed 11 May 1964. for extension to two groins. 4. This project was included in and modified by the Delaware 3. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests and $272,766 Coast project. *NO CURRENT YEAR FUNDS. TABLE 3-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allentown, Lehigh River, Pa. COMPLETED 1961 1,615,581 -1 Bethlehem, Lehigh River, Pa. COMPLETED 1966 4,520,995 _1 Mt. Holly, N.J. COMPLETED 1946 283,655 - Trexler Lake, Pa.3 INACTIVE 1981 Aquashicola Reservoir, Pa.2 DEFERRED 1963 - - Maiden Creek Reservoir, Pa.2 DEFERRED 1963 - -1 1. Maintenance assumed by local interest as required by authorizing project. 2. New project deferred. 3. $1,316,464 expended for preconstruction planning only. 3-27 TABLE 3-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Tocks Island Lake, Pa., N.J. and N.Y.2 1979 65,106,2601 - Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 1979 195,223 - only) Pa.2 1. Includes $3,489,088 for AE&D. Corps' authority to proceed with the project. Legislation 2. National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 terminated would be required to proceed with the project. TABLE 3-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Navigation Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended 3 Oct 78 Appoquinmink River, Dell 1931 HD 95-351 $ 78,243 5 Aug 77 Delaware River, Mouth of Neversink 1917 HD 94-192 - 2 Nov 79 Maurice River, N.J. 1948 Section 12 PL 93-251 Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project 2 2 Nov 79 Oldmans Creek, N.J.3 1941 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 63,313 2 Nov 79 Rancocas River, N.J.4 1942 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 57,590 2 Nov 79 Smyrna River, Del.5 1949 HD 95-157 $396,169 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge 2 Nov 79 Toms River, N.J.6 1950 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 43,361 Channel 12 feet deep Flood Control Projects 2 Nov 79 Lehigh River at Bethlehem, Pa.7 1966 Section 12 PL 93-251 $4,520,995 1. Includes $36,973 new work, and $41,270 for maintenance. 2. There is no need now for this portion of the project. 3. Includes $31,188 new work, and $32,125 for maintenance. 4. Includes $44,500 new work, and $13,090 for maintenance. 5. Includes $143,759 new work, $55,085 new work, previous project, $174,602 for maintenance, and $22,723 maintenance, previous project. 6. Includes $10,050 new work, and $33,311 for maintenance. 7. Maintenance assumed by local interest. 3-28 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT * This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, MD, on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA .............. 4-3 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection and Removal of Drift ......... 4-4 3. Cambridge Harbor, MD ................ 4-4 4. Chester River, MD .............. ..... 4-4 5. Fishing Bay, MD ....... ...... 4-5 6. Honga River and Tar Bay (Barren Island Gaps), MD .............. 4-5 7. Knapps Narrows, MD .................. 4-5 8. Lowes Wharf, MD .................... 4-5 9. Muddy Hook/Tyler Cove, MD ............ 4-6 10. Nanticoke River (Including Northwest Fork), DE & MD ............ 4-6 11. Northeast River, MD .......... . 4-6 12. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD . 4-7 13. Pocomoke River, MD .............. 4-7 14. Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA ......... 4-8 15. Potomac River below Washington, DC ................... 4-8 16. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift ......... 4-8 17. Prevention of Obstructions & Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD ............... 4-8 18. St. George Creek, MD ............. 4-9 19. Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD............ 4-9 20. Tred Avon, MD .................... 4-9 21. Warwick River, MD .......... 4-9 22. Washington Harbor, DC ............. 4-10 23. Wicomico River, MD......... ...... 4-10 24. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys . 4-11 25. Navigation work under special authorization........................ 4-11 Beach Erosion Control 26. Beach Erosion Control Work under special authorization ..... Page ...... 4-11 Flood Control 27. Black Walnut Point, MD ................ 28. Bloomington Lake, MD and WV .......... 29. BullRun, PA ........................ 30. Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV ....... 31. Fourmile Run, VA ..................... 32. Lackawanna River Basin, PA ............ 32A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA .............. 33. Latta Brook Rd., NY .................. 34. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA 35. Southern New York Flood Control Projects ..................... 35A. Addison, NY ....................... 35B. Almond Lake, NY ................... 35C. Arkport Dam, NY .................... 35D. Avoca, NY ................ ..... 35E. Binghamton, NY............... 35F. Canisteo, NY ...................... 35G. Corning,NY ....................... 35H. East Sidney Lake, NY................ 351. Elmira, NY ........................ 35J. Hornell, NY ....................... 35K. Lisle, NY ......................... 35L. Oxford, NY ........................... 35M. WhitneyPoint Lake, NY.............. 35N. Whitney Point Village, NY ............. 36. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA .... 37. Susquehanna River Flood Control Project, NY and PA ................... 37A. Cowanesque Lake, PA.................. 37B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA............ 38. West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA... 4-11 4-11 4-11 4-12 4-12 4-12 4-12 4-13 4-13 4-13 4-13 4-13 4-13 4-14 4-14 4-14 4-15 4-15 4-15 4-15 .4-16 4-16 4-16 4-17 4-17 4-17 4-17 4-18 4-18 4-1 II YI I - y l REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 38A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA................. 4-18 38B. Curwensville Lake, PA .................. 4-18 38C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA ........... 4-19 39. Wyoming Valley, PA ................. 4-19 40. York Indian Rock Dam, PA.............. 4-19 41. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................... 4-19 42. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ....................... 4-19 43. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ..................... 4-20 Water Supply 44. Potomac Estuary Pilot Water Treatment Plant, DC ................ 4-20 45. Washington Aqueduct ................. 4-20 General Investigations Page 46. Surveys .............................. 4-20 47. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 4-20 General Investigations (Cont'd) Page 48. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ................... 4-21 49. Advanced Engineering and Design ......................... 4-21 Tables Table 4-A Cost and Financial Statement ......... 4-22 Table 4-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 4-28 Table 4-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .............. 4-34 Table 4-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................ 4-36 Table 4-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................. 4-36 Table 4-F Not Applicable Table 4-G Deauthorized Projects ............... 4-37 Table 4-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ................ 4-38 Table 4-I Inspection of Completed Projects ............... 4-38 4-2 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT Navigation 1. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD AND VA Location. Baltimore Harbor is at the head of the navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near the town of Westminster in Carroll County, MD, and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278.) Existing Project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, VA, and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, MD, with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 2.3 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.2 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 8.9 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50-foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 19.9 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 13.0 miles long from the Cutoff-Brewerton Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Sections; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22-foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22-foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch: (a) Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.4 miles; (b) Ferry Bar West Section: a channel, 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide, from the Ferry Bar East Section to Ferry Bar, a distance of 0.8 mile; (c) Spring Garden Section: a channel, 27 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from Ferry Bar to and including a turning and anchorage basin immediately below the Western Maryland Railway Bridge, a distance of 1.0 mile; and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interests: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.0 mile long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.2 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. c. The following anchorages: (1) Quarantine Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 600 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 2:30 feet deep, 2,400 feet long, and 1,300 feet wide; (3) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (4) Fort McHenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost for new work is $428,931,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and Harbor Act of 1945; $50,601,000 (October 1984 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of which $46,301,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,240,000 is non- Federal; and $370,000,000 (October 1984 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $190,000 is U.S. Coast Guard, and $369,810,000 is Corps of Engineers and non-Federal. Widening 35-foot depth from Port Covington Channel from 150 to 400 feet to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at upper end is considered inactive and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $1,603,000. Local cooperations. Requirements are described in full on page 4-3 of Fiscal Year 1982 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The three grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 13 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1983)" on Port of Baltimore, MD, (issued by Board of 4-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging under the River and Harbor Act of 1958 is discussed below. Preconstruction planning under the River and Harbor Act of 1970 began October 1976 and continued in FY 1984. Maintenance, Baltimore District: Condition surveys of the project channel were made. Maintenance dredging of the Brewerton channel, Brewerton Angle, Ft. McHenry channel, and Curtis Bay channel, by contract, began on May 15, 1984 and was still in progress at the end of the fiscal year. An estimated 3,955,900 cubic yards of material were removed and deposited in the Hart-Miller Island containment facilities at a cost of $12,099,000 as of September 30, 1984. Maintenance, Norfolk District: Condition surveys of the Rappahannock shoal channel were performed during March to May 1984 at a cost of $40,000. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, MD, and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Secton 1 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 28,080 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 3. CAMBRIDGE HARBOR, MD Location. This harbor is a tidal estuary on the south side of Choptank River about 18 miles above its mouth. It is approximately 70 miles southeast of Baltimore Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Previous project. For details see page 1789 of Annual Report for 1915, page 424 of Annual Report for 1924, and page 373 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 150 feet wide and 25 feet deep at mean low water from that depth in the Choptank River for an approximate distance of 2,000 feet; then widen into a triangular shaped turning basin 25 feet deep, 1,400 feet long and 750 feet wide; then continue with a channel 150 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the Market Street Bridge over Cambridge Creek; then 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the head of the harbor with a turning basin of the same depth and irregular dimensions comprising approximately 2.4 acres; an anchorage basin 10 feet deep, 400 feet long and 175 feet wide on the west side of the channel; another basin of the same depth, 225 feet long, and 200 feet wide on the east side of the channel below the bridge; and a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the Choptank River to the municipal boat basin north of the harbor entrance. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. The waterfront of Cambridge is generally built of solid bulkhead wharves and pile and timber piers, only a few of which have mechanical freighthandling facilities. With the exception of a municipally owned terminal which is open to the public, the wharves are privately owned. There are town marine railways with boat-repair shops, five oil and gasoline terminals, two large fertilizer companies and one large packing house located on the shores of Cambridge Creek. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging contract from FY 1978 was settled at a cost of $23,800 after a lengthy dispute. 4. CHESTER RIVER, MD Location. Rises in Kent County, DE, flows 50 miles generally southwesterly and empties into the Chesapeake Bay. Kent Island Narrows is a passage connecting Chester River and Eastern Bay. Wells Cove is an indentation on the easterly side of Kent Island Narrows about 0.4 miles south of the highway bridge crossing the Narrows. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 548 and 1226.) Previous project. For details see page 262 of the 1960 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing, section included in project is about 5.5 miles long with the lower end of the section being about 37 miles above mouth of river; for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows; and a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from 7-foot deep curve in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of same depth and 300 feet square at head of channel. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $32,454, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Widening 7-foot deep channel from 75 to 100 feet from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows is considered inactive and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance of Wells Cove section of the project. Terminal facilities. There are two bulkhead wharves on Chester River section. Facilities on the Kent Island Narrows section of the existing project consist of about 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT 10,000 linear feet of timber pile bulkheaded wharf. About 1,350 linear feet of the wharf is owned and operated by the Queen Anne's County; the remainder is privately owned. The privately owned bulkheaded wharf is operated mostly by the 7 marinas located on the Narrows with the remainder being owned and operated by the seafood packing houses in the area. In addition, to the slips of the marinas, there are marine railways, launching ramps, and travel-lifts. All of these facilities are in good condition and are located adjacent to the proposed improvements. In Wells Cove there is a small wharf, a small marine railway, and a public landing. All facilities are privately owned except the public landing on Wells Cove. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was completed on September 5, 1984 at the Long Point section. 5. FISHING BAY, MD Location. McCreadys, Goose, and Farm Creeks are small tidal estuaries of Fishing Bay, a large estuary at head of Tangier Sound. Fishing Bay is connected by Hooper Strait with Chesapeake Bay to the west about 15 miles above mouth of Potomac River. Goose Creek enters the bay about 3.5 miles above the mouth. Farm Creek enters Fishing Bay about 6 miles above the mouth and approximately opposite mouth of McCreadys Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for channels 6 feet deep and generally 60 feet wide at mean low water, suitably widened where necessary to offer adequate sheltered anchorage space from deep water in Fishing Bay to vicinity of county or packing house wharves in McCreadys, Farm, and Goose Creeks. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $33,874. Terminal facilities. A public wharf built with aid of Federal funds is on McCreadys Creek about 200 feet above the mouth. There is a privately owned pile-andtimber pier about 1,500 feet above the mouth of Goose Creek. There are two privately owned wharves on Farm Creek and a public wharf owned by Dorchester County. Private wharves on each of the waterways are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 6. HONGA RIVER & TAR BAY (BARREN ISLAND GAPS), MD Location. Honga River is a tidal estuary of Chesapeake Bay and penetrates Dorchester County on Eastern Shore of Maryland between Hooper Islands and the mainlands; Tar Bay lies between Barren Island and the mainland and Hooper Islands. Fishing Creek connects Tar Bay and Honga River. Back Creek is a branch of Honga River extending into Hooper Islands; the mouth is about 2 miles south of Fishing Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay, through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River, 25,300 feet long, and a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek with a turning basin of the same depth 150 feet long and 200 feet wide at the head of channel, about 5,500 feet long. Mean range of tide is about 1.4 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $66,119. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Numerous small private wharves are scattered along Fishing Creek and Back Creek. A public wharf is on Fishing Creek. A public wharf, 4 oyster houses, and a marine railway are on Back Creek. Facilities are adequate for existing and reasonably prospective commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work in connection with proposed maintenance dredging was accomplished. 7. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD Location. A small channel separating Tilghman Island from mainland of eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay about 40 miles south of Baltimore, MD. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends from deep water in Chesapeake Bay to deep water in Harris Creek, MD. Mean range of tide is 1.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $46,121. Existing project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration, September 16, 1933, and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Complied with execpt local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf exists on each side of the southerly abutment of the bridge across the Narrows. There are several small-boat landings within the Narrows and several marine railways for repairing boats of a few feet in draft. A bulkhead landing is available for public use at the turning basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work in connection with proposed maintenance dredging was accomplished. 8. LOWES WHARF, MD Location. Lowes Wharf is in Ferry Cove, also known as Haddaway Cove, a small indentation on the eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay about 6 miles north of the Choptank River and 13 miles west of Easton, MD. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot depth 4-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 curve in Ferry Cove to and including a basin of the same depth, 200 feet wide and 300 feet long on the south side of Lowes Wharf. The mean tidal range is 1.4 feet; however, greater fluctuations frequently result from prolonged or high winds. The cost of new work for the completed project was $21,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Lowes Wharf, a solid-fill pier, with a seafood house located on the outer end, is the only terminal facility in Ferry Cove. The pier is public and is open to watermen at all times. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging contract was completed on March 19, 1984, approximately 27,759 cubic yards of material were removed. 9. MUDDY HOOK/TYLER COVE, MD Location. Muddy Hook Cove is a small indentation about 0.7 mile south of Hoopersville on the east side of Middle Hooper Island. Middle Hooper Island is one of a chain of islands separating Honga River from Tar Bay and Chesapeake Bay on the Eastern Shore of Maryland. Tyler Cove is a small tidal indentation on the north side of Fishing Creek which separates Hooper Islands from the mainland. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12230.) Existing project. An entrance channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in Honga River to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth, 160 feet wide and 400 feet long, in Muddy Hook Cove. Project also provides an entrance channel, 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep, from the existing channel in Fishing Creek (See Honga River and Tar Bay project) into Tyler Cove and includes an anchorage basin 200 feet wide, 250 feet long, and 6 feet deep. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $61,917. Existing project was approved for accomplishment under general authority provided by section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, pay for dike construction and provide rights-of-way for new work and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; build and maintain a suitable public landing with adequate approaches thereto at each location; accomplish alterations, relocations, and removal, as required, of sewer, water supply, drainage and other utility facilities, and piers and stakes. Terminal facilities. Local interests have, under terms of local cooperation, provided a public landing at Tyler Cove. A few privately owned piers are on Muddy Hook Cove. Local interests provided a public landing at Muddy Hook Cove, in accordance with the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of Muddy Hook Cove was completed on December 12, 1983. A total of 25,537 cubic yards of material were removed. 10. NANTICOKE RIVER (INCLUDING NORTHWEST FORK), DE & MD Location. Headwaters of Nanticoke River consist of numerous branches rising mainly in the northern portion of Sussex County, DE. The river is about 50 miles long and flows southwesterly from its source to Tangier Sound. Northwest Fork is a branch of Nanticoke River which rises in Kent County, DE, and flows past Federalsburg, MD, generally southerly through Dorchester County, MD, to its junction with the main river opposite Riverton, MD. It is about 30 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 77.) Existing project. Nanticoke River: Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot depth curve in Tangier Sound to the highway bridge at Seaford, DE, with a turning basin at the upper end. Disjointed sections included in the project is about 4 miles long, extending over 32 miles of river; lower end of the first section of the project is about 8 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 3.4 feet, and the extreme tidal range is 4.3 feet. Northwest Fork: Dredging a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide at mean low water from upper Browns wharf to within one-half mile of the southern boundary of town of Federalsburg, with a turning basin at the upper end. Section included in the project is about 4 miles long, and its lower end is 11.75 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.6 feet. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal facilities. Waterfront at Seaford consists largely of unconnected pile-and-timber bulkhead wharves with earthfills. One public wharf is used as a launching ramp. Remaining wharves are privately owned. A rail siding extends along a considerable portion of waterfront and offers facilities for interchange of rail and water traffic. Existing terminals are reasonably adequate for present and prospective commerce. Terminal facilities on Northwest Fork are all privately owned and open to general public use. They consist of one solid bulkhead wharf of 80-foot frontage and 3 landings each with 60-foot frontages. Depths of water are from 2 to 8 feet. Landings are log revetments backed by earthfill and are in poor condition. Operations and results during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was completed on October 27, 1983. A total of 27,591 cubic yards of material were removed. 11. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Location. A tidal waterway extending southwestward 5.5 miles from the junction of its branches in the town of North East to the head of Chesapeake Bay, 6 miles north of entrance to the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1226.) 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from that {depth in river to foot of Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. Mean range of tide is 2.25 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are a few lightly constructed landings for small boats scattered along the waterfront in the town of North East. There are two fish-packing plants, two marine railways, several bulkhead wharves, 11 marinas, and a number of small boathouses along the length of the waterway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded on September 1, 1983 for maintenance dredging of the project channel. Dredging was completed on January 31, 1983, approximately 116,130 cubic yards of material were removed. 12. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Location. Ocean city is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1220.) Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the 16-foot depth curve in Atlantic Ocean through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 8.8 feet above mean low water and a top width of 18 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the project harbor; a depth of 14 feet and 150 feet wide to the head of the harbor, a length of approximately 3,400 feet; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests and exclusive of $3,700,000 for rehabilitating the south jetty. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and-timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Continuing construction for the south jetty rehabilitation is 70% complete. Maintenance: Continuing construction for filling the scour hole at the northern oceanside of the south jetty is 75% complete. 13. POCOMOKE RIVER, MD Location. Pocomoke River is a tributary of Pocomoke Sound, a tidal estuary on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 40 miles north of Cape Charles, VA. Existing project. Provides for a channel 11 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide from the 11-foot depth in Pocomoke Sound to Tulls Point, thence 100 feet wide to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, and for construction of a dike along the offshore side of channel between Tulls Point and the end of the existing dike; and a channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 to 130 feet wide from Shad Landing to the bridge at Snow Hill. Length of project is about 8.7 miles from Pocomoke Sound to Williams Point, and about 4.5 miles from Shad Landing to Snow Hill, MD. Shad Landing is about 25.7 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet in Pocomoke Sound and 2.5 feet in the river at Snow Hill. Prolonged high winds on Chesapeake Bay frequently cause greater fluctuations. Estimated cost (1969) for new work is $1,071,458 exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Extension of channel above the bridge at Snow Hill, 100 feet wide, 9 feet deep and widened to 150 feet to form a turning basin at upper end, is considered inactive and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $22,000 (1956). Local cooperation. Complied with for section of project from Pocomoke Sound to Pocomoke River and from Shad Landing to the highway bridge at Snow Hill, authorized by acts of June 3, 1896, and August 30, 1935, except local interests must furnish releases from damage to oyster beds and spoil disposal areas as required for future maintenance. Terms for the section of the project above the highway bridge at Snow Hill, authorized by act of March 2, 1945, required local interests to furnish all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance, hold the United States free from damages resulting from the improvement; and contribute one-half the initial cost of that por- 4-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 tion of project, but not to exceed $4,250. This portion is considered inactive. Terms for the 11-foot depth channel from Pocomoke Sound to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, authorized by act of September 3, 1954, require local interests provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for construction and future maintenance of the project; and hold the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance, including such damages as may occur to the public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Waterfronts at Pocomoke City and Snow Hill are built up principally with earthfilled timber bulkheads, the majority of which are privately owned. A few of the warehouses and factories on the river at these communities have railroad sidings and mechanical freighthandling facilities. Any appreciable increase in commerce at Pocomoke City or Snow Hill would necessitate construction of new facilities and repair of existing structures. Adequate space is available for development of additional terminals. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and Design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 14. POTOMAC RIVER AT MOUNT VERNON, VA Location. Mount Vernon lies in Fairfax County, VA, about 141/2 miles below Washington, DC on the right bank of the Potomac River, which flows in a southeasterly direction into the Chesapeake Bay, 931/2 miles downstream from Mount Vernon. (See U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 560.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 200 feet wide and 9 to 10 feet deep, at mean low water, between the main channel of the Potomac River and the Mount Vernon wharf, a distance of about 2,200 feet, with a turning basin of the same depth and a radius of 200 feet at the wharf. Tidal ranges are: mean. 2.2 feet; irregular, 3 feet; and extreme, 9.7 feet. The cost estimate of the project to the Federal Government made in 1888 was $26,000. There is no approved estimate for annual cost of maintenance. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned and operated wharf on the Mount Vernon estate at the head of the channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was completed on February 6, 1984, approximately 27,000 cubic yards of material were removed. 15. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Location. Potomac River is formed 21 miles below Cumberland, MD, and flows southeasterly about 285 miles and enters Chesapeake Bay, about 80 miles from Atlantic Ocean. Washington, DC is 108 miles upstream of mouth, and head of tidewater is at mile 117. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 557, 558, 559, and 560.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between the mouth of the river and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC a distance of 108 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: mean, 1.3 feet at mouth, 2.9 feet at Washington; irregular, 2 feet at mouth, 4.5 feet at Washington; extreme, about 6 feet at mouth, 10.7 feet at Washington. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $153,836. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In general, the improvement is a main river channel, and terminal facilities are only served where the channel runs close to either bank of river. In all, 11 wharves are thus served. These wharves are of open and solid fill construction and bulkhead type. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design in connection with proposed maintenance dredging of the Potomac River below Washington, DC, was continuing. 16. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington Area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. Total length of project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 23 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 261,630 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 17. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE, MD Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters and to all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and in Maryland. Existing project. Patrol and inspection throughout the project location to detect violations of sections 13 and 15 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 and to investigate obstructions to navigation pursuant to Federal regulations (33 CFR 209.109). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by Supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore included inspections of approximately 75 Federal navigation channels within the project location to insure 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT channels are not obstructed to general navigation by debris, sunken vessels/wrecks and/or fishing appurtenance. There were 8 detailed investigations of sunken vessels/wrecks resulting in no declarations of "Hazards to Navigation" issued. 18. ST. GEORGE CREEK, MD Location. The project is on a tributary of the Potomac River located about 90 miles south of Baltimore, 60 miles southeast of Washington, DC, and approximately 10 miles from the mouth of the Potomac River. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12233.) Existing project. On April 29, 1983 the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized a channel 1,500 feet in length, 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water, from St. George Creek Island Bridge to deep water in the Potomac River. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-9 of Fiscal Year 1983 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Many of the shoreline community residents are commercial watermen and seafood processing establishments are located on St. George Island. Recreational boating is abundant and St. Marys County owns a public boat ramp on the north side of St. George Island. The Harry Lundeberg School of Seamanship, located at St. George Harbor is used to train individuals in the basic seamanship skills required by the United States Maritime Industry. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was physically completed on May 22, 1984. 19. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER ABOVE AND BELOW HAVRE DE GRACE, MD Location. The Susquehanna River flows generally southward 400 miles to the head of Chesapeake Bay at Havre de Grace, MD, 8 miles north of the entrance to the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, and 45 miles northeast of Baltimore, MD. Existing project. A channel 200 feet wide and 15 feet deep from that depth in Chesapeake Bay to Havre de Grace, for removal of a shoal opposite Garrett Island to a depth of 8 feet, and for maintenance of an existing boat basin 400 feet long, 380 feet wide, and 7 feet deep adjacent to the city park at Havre de Grace and the 75 feet wide approach channel to the same depth. The existing project also provides for improvement and maintenance of the boat basin for a width of 380 feet and length of 400 feet, with an approach channel 100 feet wide, all to a depth of 10 feet. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion (inactive) is $30,700. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for the active portion of the project. Terminal Facilities: A concrete bulkhead 500 feet long along north side of the harbor and a timber breakwater about 1,000 feet along the south side. There are no wharves within limits of the desired improvements. Yachts are charged a nominal fee for use of mooring stalls in the harbor. Space for construction of additional stalls at convenient locations is limited. Commercial wharves at Havre de Grace are on Susquehanna River upstream from Concord Point. Wharves are privately owned, but open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work in connection with proposed maintenance dredging was accomplished. 20. TRED AVON RIVER, MD Location. This stream, formerly called Treadhaven Creek, rises in Talbot County, MD, flows southerly and empties into Choptank River 10 miles above its mouth. It is about 10 miles long and is a tidal estuary with very little natural flow. Draining area is 36 square miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 78.) Previous project. For details see page 397 of Annual Report for 1951. Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Tred Avon River from that depth in river near Peach Blossom Creek to Easton Point, thence a channel of same depth and width and about 1,400 feet long in the North Fork, thence a channel of same width and 8 feet deep and about 700 feet deep long with a turning basin of same depth at upper end. Project also provides for a turning basin in South Fork 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide and 600 feet long on east side of main channel at Easton Point Section included in project is about 2 miles long, and its lower end is about 7.5 miles above mouth. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-11 of Fiscal Year 1979 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Five large terminals for receiving and distributing petroleum products, and a marina with stalls and ships, marine railway, a launching ramp, and a 6-ton travel-lift at Easton Point. These facilities are in good condition. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was initiated in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. Work was deferred because locals have been unable to provide suitable disposal areas. 21. WARWICK RIVER, MD Location. This river, formerly named Secretary Creek, is in Dorchester County, MD, and flows into the Choptank River about 25 miles above its mouth. It is a tidal estuary about one mile long with little fresh-water inflow and practically no drainage area. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide at mean low water from the 10-foot contour in Choptank River to Secretary Landing and a turning basin at the latter point. The length of the section included in the project is about 1.5 miles, the lower half 4-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 mile extending into Choptank River. The mean range of tide is 2 feet, and the extreme tidal range is 3.7 feet. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one canning house, one warehouse, and a petroleum products storage terminal. There is one solid bulkhead wharf with 450 feet of dockage space which is privately owned but open to general public use. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was continuing in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. Work was deferred because suitable spoil disposal areas could not be located. 22. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Location. Within District of Columbia at junction of Anacostia River with Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to Chesapeake Bay. It is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, MD, and northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, VA. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing projects. A combination and extension of latest projects for Potomac River at Washington, DC, and Anacostia River, DC. The Washington Harbor project provides for a channel in the Potomac River from Giesboro Point to Key Bridge, a second channel from Giesboro Point to the end of Washington Channel, and a third channel from the mouth of the Anacostia River to the foot of 15th Street, SE, with turning basins opposite the Naval Weapons Plant (800 feet wide and 2,400 feet long) and at the head of the Anacostia Channel (400 feet square). Channel dimensions are 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide except upstream from Anacostia Bridge where the width is reduced to 200 feet and from Giesboro Point to a point 3,000 feet downstream of Arlington Memorial Bridge and above Easby Point where channel dimensions are 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10.000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and operation and maintenance of the inlet gates and lock and the outlet gates of the Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is low-water datum which is 0.35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $162,006. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities.There are four wharves generally bulkhead of type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight governmental piers and slips. None of the piers are open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contract for repair of the tidal basin inlet gates which was completed in March 1984. Engineering and Design work in connection with proposed maintenance dredging was initiated. 23. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part of Wicomico County, MD, and flows generally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is site of improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, section included in project is 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on previous project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freight-handling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pile-andtimber wharf about 4 miles above mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-and-timber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-and-timber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. Fueling facilities are available at the T-shaped pier. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the Sharkfin Shoal cnannel was completed October 21, 1983. A total of 128,010 cubic yards of material was removed. A contract for maintenance dredging of Webster Cove was awarded 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT August 30, 1984, and the upland disposal area is under construction. 24. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 4-H at end of chapter.) 25. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $110,510 for Hull Creek, VA; $15,716 for Lower Thorofare, MD; and $36,557 for Coan River, VA. Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Sec. 111 of Public Law 90-483 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $16,696 for Herring Creek, Tall Timbers, MD. Aquatic Plant Control pursurant to Sec. 302 of Public Law 89-298, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $188,269 for Potomac River (Hydrilla), DC. Beach Erosion Control 26. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. Beach Erosion Control pursuant to Sec. 103 of Public Law 727, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $28,989 for Rocky Point Beach, MD. Flood Control 27. BLACK WALNUT POINT, MD Location. The southern end of Tilghman Island, about 17 miles south of the William P. Lane Jr. Memorial (Chesapeake Bay) Bridge eastern shore landing. (See National Ocean Survey Chart Numbers 12266 and 12263.) Existing project. On December 22, 1982 the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended, authorized construction for 375 linear feet of 43 foot wide stone revetment to stabilize existing shorebank. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-12 of Fiscal Year 1983 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was physically completed May 4, 1984. 28. BLOOMINGTON LAKE, MD & WV Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, MD, and Mineral County, WV. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, MD. It is also about 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, MD, and Piedmont, WV. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, "Kitzmiller" and "Westernport," MD.) Existing project. The improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam is 296 feet above streambed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, the reservoir will extend about 6.6 miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet is provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement is 92,000 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities are provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Estimated cost (October 1983) of new work is $174,480,300 of which $57,927,000 is required nonfederal reimbursement. Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A water supply contract between the Federal Government and the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission in concert with the Fairfax County Water Authority, VA, and the District of Columbia has been executed for repayment of all water supply costs. The first of 50 annual payments began in July 1981. Federally approved water quality standards put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The project became operational for water supply, flood control, and for water quality control in July 1981. Continuing construction for improving the spillway flow is 99% complete. Work on the operation and maintenance manual is complete. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 29. BULL RUN, PA Location. In Loyalsock Township which is located on the left or north bank of the West Branch of the Susquehanna River just downstream from Williamsport, PA. The proposed project would provide protection to Loyalsock Township from the limit of the Williamsport Project at Millers Run approximately one mile downstream along the West Branch of the Susquehanna River. Existing project. Provides for alteration of 4,100 linear feet of highway embankment by providing an impervious 4-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 core which will serve as a levee to provide protection from flood stages on the West Branch Susquehanna River, tie back levees from the highway embankment to high ground, and a pumping facility at Bull Run to provide protection from backwater from the West Branch and from interior drainage on Bull Run. Estimated Federal cost (October 1983) for new work is $2,902,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-13 of Fiscal Year 1983 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project was fiscally completed. 30. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Location. On North Branch of the Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junction with the South Branch of the Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flintstone, MD, WV, and PA.) Existing project. Channel improvements of North Branch of Potomac River from the Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to the mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along the left bank and levees along the right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV, to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from the highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and floodwall in West Cumberland, MD, on the left bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from the mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and floodwall in Ridgeley, WV, on the right bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near the upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV; removal of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a new industrial dam on the North Branch of the Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal costs of new work for the completed project were $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Removal of gravel deposits, grass cutting of areas channelward of levees, and removal of brush and debris from channel were accomplished as required in channel area. 31. FOURMILE RUN, VA Location. The project is located in the City of Alexandria and in Arlington County, VA, on Fourmile Run immediately above its confluence with the Potomac River at Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets for Alexandria, VA, Annandale, VA, Falls Church, VA, and Washington West, DC, MD, and VA.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a floodwall protection system, an improved channel, and replacement of two highway and four railroad bridges. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-17 of Fiscal Year 1977 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: All construction was fiscally completed. 32. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA, substantially as recommended by the Chief of Engineers (S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. 32A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, PA. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project controls a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provide flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87 acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interest include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under the recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. In September 1978 a cost sharing agreement for construction of bathhouse facilities was signed. The cost for the facilities which were completed in July 1979 was $104,400, of which $52,200 was Federal and $52,200 was non-Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT 33. LATTA BROOK ROAD, NY Location. On Newtown Creek is the town of Horseheads which is immediately north of the City of Elmira. Elmira is 6 miles north of the PA/NY border, about 60 miles east of Buffalo. (See Geological Survey maps for Horseheads and Elmira.) Existing project. On December 10, 1982 the Chief of Engineers under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended, authorized construction for 630 linear feet of 30 feet wide stone riprap stabilization on the streambank of Newtown Creek. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-14 of Fiscal Year 1983 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed March 12, 1984. 34. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Location. Damsite is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, PA.) Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, the reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: operation and maintenance of the project continued. Rothrock concession was let to RRP Corp. of Hollidaysburg, PA, a concessionaire, March 1984 and construction and operation of first year's facilities began. 35. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of towns in New York and Pennsylvania. The improvements are located in the upper watershed of the Susquehanna River to and including the Chemung River. 35A. ADDISON, NY Location. At confluence of Tuscarora Creek and Canisteo River in the City of Addison, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete floodwall on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to the mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from the channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at the southwest edge of the village to high ground at the southeast edge of the village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35B. ALMOND LAKE, NY Location: Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Hornell, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a draining area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, NY. Recreation facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 35C. ARKPORT DAM, NY Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle is placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 4-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35D. AVOCA, NY Location. On the Cohocton River at the Village of Avoca, NY, about 30 miles upstream from the confluence of the Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, NY.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realinement of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above the Erie Railroad to below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of the Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to the Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of the Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35E. BINGHAMTON, NY Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete floodwalls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on the right bank of the Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near the city limits to an existing floodwall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at the pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on the right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River north of the city limits in the Village of Port Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of the city line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete floodwalls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on the left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to the junction with the Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete floodwall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete flood. wall on the right bank of the Susquehanna River, extending from the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete floodwall and capping about 125 feet of concrete floodwall, on the right bank of the Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete floodwall and raising about 125 feet of existing floodwall on the left bank of the Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17; a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to the Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground along the right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete floodwall, and about 200 feet of new concrete floodwall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet above Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for the City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935 on the Chenango River and in March 1936 on the Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35F. CANISTEO, NY Location. On Purdy and Bennetts Creeks in the Town of Canisteo, NY, situated along the south side of the Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bennetts Creek and the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State Highway Route 21 above the Town to a point at the intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from the Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street; 1,000 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from the Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; alterations to existing timber check dams in Bennetts Creek; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35G. CORNING, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Corning, NY, about 44 miles upstream from the confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Corning, NY.) Existing project. Flood protection for this community was originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1936. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete floodwalls, consisting of: about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete floodwall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below the city; about 200 feet of concrete floodwalls; about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on the left bank of the Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge over Cohocton River to the mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realinement of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2,320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between the existing improved channel above Sixth Street and the Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street East. Modified improvement will provide protection for the City of Corning against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to the maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 3511. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, NY, on the Ouleout Creek, about five miles above the confluence of the creek with the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above the streambed and consists of a concrete gravity-type section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet by 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, NY, exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, NY, cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operates and maintains all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 351. ELMIRA, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Elmira, NY, about 27 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, NY.) Existing project. Provides for about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete floodwall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a poi it below the city near the upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on the left bank of the Chemung River extending from Durland Avenu- to the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at t mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth leve on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about the intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad and east Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 feet of concrete conduit inclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to the Chemung River; clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in the Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Seely Creek, extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35J. HORNELL, NY Location. On the Canisteo River in the City of Hornell, NY, about 42 miles upstream from the confluence of the Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) 4-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. Provides for channel realinement and earth levees, concrete floodwalls, and check dams consisting of: realinement of about 4,600 feet of the Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to the junction of the Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and the Erie Railroad; about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from the Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and the junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete floodwall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete floodwall, on the right bank of the Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete floodwall on the left bank of the Canisteo River extending from a point opposite Walnut Street to the Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around the sewage-disposal plant on the left bank of the Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realinement and improvement of the Canisteo River Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street dowristream to about 1,400 feet above East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete floodwall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of floodwalls and levees, and related work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the area, provides protection for the City of Hornell against a flood discharge approximately double the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A construction contract for repairing the concrete wall at Thatcher Street was completed August 1984. 35K. LISLE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River in the Village of Lisle, NY, about 12 miles upstream from the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realinement and construction of earth levees and concrete floodwalls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of the intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to the confluence with Tioughnioga River, realinement of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of the Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on the right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realinement of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to the railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860 feet of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35L. OXFORD, NY Location. On the Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, NY, about 40 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, NY.) Existing project. Provides for earth levees and clearing of Chenango River channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on the left bank of the Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along the railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over the levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. Improvement provides protection for the Village of Oxford on the left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, NY, on the Otselic River about 0.7 mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, NY. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT 35N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River at the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realinement and earth levees, consisting of realinement of about 1,800 feet of Tioughnioga River channel, above the confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along the right bank of the Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above the village to Collins Street just below the Village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36. STILLWATER LAKE LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Location. Dam is on the Lackawanna River, 39 miles from the mouth of the stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet: for Honesdale, PA.) Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in the left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acre-feet, of which 11,600 acre-feet is flood control storage and the remainder utilized to maintain the existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, PA, at this site. Reservoir area is 422 acres, and the pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of the watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 was for construction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 37. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Plan of improvement authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, PA, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA, local protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY, and channel improvements at Cortland, NY. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which included the Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. 37A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. The project constructed under the Flood Control Act of 1958 provides for an earth fill dam 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway in the right abutment, a gated conduit in the Valley floor, and flood control storage is 82,000 acre-feet. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Estimated Federal cost (October 1984) of this new work is $106,030,700 of which $61,743,600 is for construction and $44,287,100 is for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for relocation of the Town of Nelson). Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers the project was modified in March 1983 in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating 25,600 acre-feet of present flood control storage for water supply storage by raising the permanent pool from elevation 1045 to 1080 mean sea level. Other features include modifying the existing intake tower and two access ramps, stabilizing the reservoir slope near the relocated Town of Nelson, replacing existing day-use recreation facilities, and expanding both day-and overnight-use recreation facilities to accommodate an expected increase in annual visitation due to the larger pool. Estimated cost (October 1984) of the modification is $68,300,000 of which $1,400,000 is Federal (for expanded recreation facilities) and $66,900,000 is non-Federal (which includes $52,820,000 for reimbursement of the cost of existing flood control storage reallocated to water supply storage, $12,680,000 cash contribution for the water supply modification, and $1,400,000 cash contribution for expanded recreation facilities). Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite will be either occupied when available, will be replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractual agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on August 25, 1977. The March 1983 project modification (discussed above) requires non-Federal interests repay 100 percent of the investment cost of project modifications allocated to water supply, to terrestial wildlife habitat mitigation, and to in-kind replacement recreation, plus the allocated share of the project's original cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they are required to pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to water supply and to provide 50 percent of the cost of expanded recreation facilities as well as all operation, 4-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 maintenance, and replacement costs for the expanded facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preparation of the operation and maintenance manual was completed for the constructed project. Planning was initiated on the project modification with the preparation of the draft General Design Memorandum. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 37B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, PA, upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, and has a maximum height of 121.5 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams are of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls a total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Estimated Federal cost (October 1983) of new works is $192,870,000 of which $132,279,000 is for construction and $60,591,000 is for lands and damages and relocations. Local cooperation. None required. However, construction of the Mill Creek Area recreation facilities has been deferred indefinitely until such time local interests agree to bear one-half of the construction costs and all of the operation and maintenance costs for those facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Work on the operation and maintenance manual was completed. Joint re-development of the Mill Creek Recreation Area was initiated by the Baltimore District and Mansfield University. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 38. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA A system of three flood control reservoirs, in the headwaters of the West Branch Susquehanna River, PA, are known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, (formerly known as Kettle Creek), and Foster Joseph Sayers (formerly known as Blanchard), on the West Branch about 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, PA; on Kettle Creek 8.4 miles above the mouth and 17 miles upstream from Renovo, PA; and on Bald Eagle Creek about one mile upstream from Blanchard, PA, respectively. In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir, (formerly known as First Fork Reservoir), with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on the First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, PA, was constructed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 38A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA Location. Alvin R. Bush Dam (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and has a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract modifying a bypass valve in the outlet works was completed April 1984. 38B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the West Branch of the Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,850 feet long, rises 131 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete sill 1,750 feet from the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with 3 slide control gates 5.5 feet wide and 12. feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 124,200 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 365 square miles, or about 98 percent of the West Branch Susquehanna River at Curwensville and about 75 percent at Clearfield. Recreation facilties include a seasonal recreational pool of 790 acres, access roads, parking areas, beach area, boat dock, and launching ramp. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 4-18 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT 38C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, PA, about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with two hydraulically-operated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities include a summer recreation pool of 1,730 acres, a conservation pool of 630 acres for the preservation of fish life, access roads, parking areas, boat docks and launching ramps, and camping areas. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39. WYOMING VALLEY, PA Location. The project is located in Luzerne County, PA, on the Susquehanna River. The project area is limited to the four existing Federal flood control projects. These levee improvements are in Plymouth, Kingston-Edwardsville, Swoyersville-Forty Fort, and Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Township. Existing project. The four projects were constructed during the period 1935 through 1976 and consist of levee, sheet piling, floodwall, and associated interior drainage structures along both banks of the Susquehanna River which provide flood control benefits estimated at $46.1 million annually. Remedial measures to protect against levee failure under future high discharge conditions consist of: weighted filter drains on the landside of the levees to protect against erosion due to seepage in certain areas; stability berms and toe protection on the riverside of the levees in certain areas to stabilize the riverbank and protect against erosion due to river flows; stabilization of sheet piling in certain areas; and additional relief wells to control the underseepage in other areas. Local cooperation. Lands and relocations for construction of the existing projects at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 were provided by the Boroughs of Kingston, Edwardsville, Plymouth, the City of Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, and Luzerne County. These entities also operate and maintain the existing projects. Updated assurances were obtained during preparation of the General Design Memorandum. Additional local costs in connection with the proposed remedial work are expected to be minor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continuing construction for stabilizing sheet piling at Wilkens-Barre and Forty Fort is 94% complete and the stability berm and dug toe work at Wilkes-Barre is 77% complete. A contract for the dug toe work at Forty Fort was awarded June 29, 1984 and is 80% complete and a contract for the relief wells at Hanover Township was awarded on September 28, 1984. 40. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with the Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek has tributary branches in York County in the south and central parts of Pennsylvania (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets: Pennsylvania--York and Hanover.) Existing project. Indian Rock Dam, is an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at the top, rising 83 feet above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for control storage of 28,000 acre-feet. Dam is on the main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in the right abutment and the uncontrolled spillway is on the right bank. Reservoir will control entire drainage area of the main branch of Codorus Creek and 41 percent of the drainage area above York. Improvements in Codorus Creek in the vicinity of and through the City of York provide for 22,969 feet of channel extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from the Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening the channel, bank protection, removal of York Roller Mill Dam, and a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in the vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. Cost of new work for the completed project was $5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 41. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period by hired labor. See Table 4-I. 42. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, PA, was coordinated with the operation of Alvin it. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood 4-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 control benefits from the system operation. Costs during the period were $37,040. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, MD, were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. Costs during the period were $38,837. 43. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $168,283 for the Disaster Preparedness Program. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $39,834 for Conklin-Kirkwood, NY. Nonstructural study. Water Supply 44. POTOMAC ESTUARY PILOT WATER TREATMENT PLANT, DC Location. The project is located in Washington, DC, on the north side of the District of Columbia's Water Pollution Control Plant (Blue Plains), about 600 feet east of the Potomac River shoreline. Existing project. The project consists of a water treatment plant with a maximum capacity of one million gallons per day that includes advanced treatment processes and an evaluation laboratory. Local cooperation. On June 28, 1977 the Government of the District of Columbia issued a real estate permit for the construction of the pilot plant on 1.5 acres of land available at the Blue Plains wastewater treatment facility in Washington, DC. A review during preconstruction planning determined that cost sharing for the pilot plant by local governmental entities is not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Having completed the final feasability reports and plant deactivation, the facility was dismantled/salvaged and the plant shell and all real estate was returned to D.C. Government on June 11, 1984. 45. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station, and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water supply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federal owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in Chief of Engineers (See Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-19 of the Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year: New Work: The McMillan Water Treament Plant Replacement work authorized with "no year" funds is 90% complete. A contract for the new Chlarine Bldg. at Dalecarlia was awarded July 31, 1984 and construction is 15% complete. Maintenance (operation): An uninterrupted and adequate supply of purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, Virginia; and to Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, Virginia and Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland. Total consumption for Fiscal Year 1984 was 75,097 million gallons; the maximum daily consumption was 262 million gallons and average daily consumption was 205 million gallons. The amount furnished Arlington County and Falls Church, Virginia was 37.9 million gallons per day. The Corps of Engineers was reimbursed in the amount of $3,286,800 for water furnished to the Virginia communities by the Washington Aqueduct. The treated water delivered to the 1.1 million consumers served by the Washington Aqueduct met or surpassed all Water Quality standards promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Safe Drinking Water Act (P.L. 93-523). General Investigations 46. SURVEYS Costs for the period were $1,513,715 of which $78,271 was for flood damage prevention studies, $1,231,336 for special studies, $14,924 for comprehensive basin studies, and $189,184 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests. 47. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $227,736. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. 4-20 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT 48. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Susquehanna Basin at Harrisburg, PA-The plan of improvement for the South Harrisburg area recommended in an interim report on the Susquehanna River Basin study includes a floodwall 3800 feet long, a pump station and floodgates for interior drainage, a dry detention dam along Asylum Run (a small tributary of Paxton Creek), an enlarged earth and concrete channel for Paxton Creek about four miles long, and minor recreation and fish and wildlife facilities. Preparation of a General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $2,900,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $327,979. Lock Haven, PA-The plan of improvement recommended in the Phase I General Design Memorandum includes 24,500 feet of levee, 6,500 feet of floodwall, eight closure structures, four pumping stations, diversion of Lusk Run, and minor recreation facilities. Preparation of a Phase II General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $2,025,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $352,034. 49. ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Francis E. Walter Dam, PA--Modification-The authorized project would provide for modifying the existing single purpose flood control project by raising the existing dam 30 feet thereby adding water supply and recreation purposes. Preparation of the combined General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $5,855,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $1,101,613. Tamaqua, PA-The authorized project would provide for a 9-foot diameter diversion tunnel 2,930 feet long, that starts at Wabash Creek at the west boundary of Tamaqua and terminates at the Little Schuylkill River. The project also includes an intake structure, a stilling basin, a highway bridge, and a small dry detention reservoir on a tributary of Wabash Creek. The Phase II General Design Memorandum was completed and plans and specifications for project constructions were initiated during the fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,750,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $217,397. 4-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 4-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA 2. Baltimore Harbor MD Collection & Removal of Drift 3. Cambridge Harbor, MD 4. Chester River, MD 5. Fishing Bay, MD 6. Honga River and Tar Bay, (Barren Island Gaps), MD 7. Knapps Narrows, MD 8. Lowes Wharf, MD 9. Muddy Hook/ Tyler Cove, MD 10. Nanticoke River (Including Northwest Fork), DE & MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contrib. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5,879,000 5,892,023 2,795,1092 3,277,146$ 151,300 150,241 33,997 33,677 3,626,3494 2,657,4211 248,200 240,536 1,300,000 770,000 851,317 1,055,174 5,769,0006 12,865,0008 6,568,755 7 13,035,8148 177,000 186,916 202,000 2,846,210 202,323 2,846,209 24,000 24,000 5,000 5,000 228,000 1,339,473 227,999 1,339,472 36,000 36,000 57,881 1,397,000 55,917 882,730 35,707 35,707 11,600 11,600 213,500 68,123 28,750 28,750 -48,758 467,475 182,000 48,900 103,364 214,054 44,000 30,000 235,000 214,055 28,000 2,345,926 28,000 2,345,926 - 46,12114 - 46,121'" 35,000 1,315,325 35,000 1,315,325 - 21,000 - 21,000 30,000 151,790 26,000 59,722 14,000 2,000 22,944 4-22 46,396,712' 46,223,593' 50,339,86010 50,333,8451� 195,974" 195,974" 678,258 678,258 70,49512 70,495 ' 2 33,874 33,874 701,652 701,652 66,119's 66,119 3' 286,829 275,519 64,001 64,001 361,566 360,601 72,750 72,750 143,134" 143,134 '5 547,946 547,946 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 11. Northeast River, MD 12. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD 13. Pocomoke River, MD 14. Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA 15. Potomac River below Washington, DC 16. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection & Removal of Drift 17. Prevention of Obstructions & Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD 18. St. George Creek, MD 19. Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD 20. Tred Avon MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 28,489 ' 28,48916 10,500 10,500 801,000 797,873 468,300 452,506 306,300 306,191 33,391 33,390 557,500 480,186 459,800 467,292 284,000 243,179 9,000 694,000 131,173 39,000 905,044 601,828 905,044 - 350,193'" - 350,193'7 1,343,000 935,000 8,447,908 251,452 2,106,987 8,447,906 1,000,000 1,750,000 2,750,000 - 2,734,267 2,734,267 25,000 25,000 10,256 10,256 26,300 26,300 486,000 493,074 40,929 138,650 38,137 - 191,72618 - 191,726'" 32,000 1,225,035 32,000 1,225,035 - 17,00019 - 17,000'9 230,000 303,465 230,000 303,465 - 153,836 - 153,836 40,000 1,876,673 40,000 1,876,673 352,000 5,393,175 353,227 5,393,174 162,000 4,321,040 162,000 4,321,040 - 147,650 94,136 132,273 - 293,57020 - 293,57020 48,000 424,289 47,999 424,288 - 523,130 - 523,130 17,000 30,843 17,000 30,843 4-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 21. Warwick River, MD 22. Washington Harbor, DC 23. Wicomico River, MD 27. Black Walnut Point, MD 28. Bloomington Lake, MD & WV 29. Bull Run, PA 30. Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV 31. Fourmile Run, VA 32A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA 33. Latta Brook Rd., NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contrib. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contrib. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contrib. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 22,0412' 22,041" 14,739 14,739 31,000 28,444 844,000 .831,869 18,197,000 16,978,570 311,100 316,897 1,473,000 1,052,535 -260,000 -106,000 37,900 52,363 581,750 109,910 822,079 330,789 22,000 21,999 1,750,000 2,928,555 611,500 599,866 -60,000 317,073 54,000 54,281 -19,000 440,826 824,730 547,075 227,500 37,679 1,688,000 1,856,543 893,200 885,166 -73,000 15,110 64,600 66,856 666,000 2,735,000 -157,300 616,904 2,272,844 429,544 - - 208,074 67,299 - 208,074 49,700 119,729 55,400 48,757 67,000 71,631 135,50029 37,942 35,000 141,267 35,000 141,267 - 3,191,07722 - 3,191,07722 63,000 4,543,7142324 77,569 4,543,714224 - 471,60925 - 471,60925 134,000 5,232,737 915,074 5,232,735 - 22,000 1 22,000 - 227,500 163,294 200,973 -110,000 582,603 988,978 1,005,530 174,370,300 174,265,355 2,814,778 2,811,449 -27,000 2,742,000 -16,970 2,742,000 - 15,633,97026 - 15,633,97026 45,000 522,299 45,000 522,299 29,294 162,656 162,656 51,780,000 51,780,000 3,285,380 3,285,380 - 2,320,400 - 2,320,400 72,925 749,102 75,636 749,100 -20,000 115,500 77,558 115,500 4-24 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Se Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 34. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA 35A. Addison, NY 35B. Almond Lake, NY 35C. Arkport Dam, NY 35D. Avoca, NY 35E. Binghamton, NY 35F. Canisteo, NY 35G. Corning, NY 35H. East Sidney Lake, NY 35I. Elmira, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,503,300 1,934,238 2,423,056 1,348,765 2,053,846 2,447,276 21,377 14,814 122,600 124,646 165,700 151,227 23,100 22,911 27,900 25,193 41,100 38,538 43,900 43,881 151,500 153,272 -5,000 18,100 13,994 20,600 27,109 12,900 12,879 233,600 221,000 221,471 230,101 118,400 180,800 126,940 178,847 23,400 22,701 11,100 13,726 37,681 38,020 44,300 41,993 187,600 172,623 15,700 16,342 15,900 16,788 34,300 34,283 38,100 40,321 24,800 27,126 347,500 359,826 22,800 26,264 - 77,408,700 - 77,408,700 1,741,000 13,533,795 1,778,456 13,533,728 - 827,050 - 827,050 16,049 146,855 16,124 146,855 - 5,760,211 - 5,760,211 160,772 2,409,340 164,920 2,409,337 - 1,910,00027 - 1,910,000" 78,363 1,312,474 87,246 1,312,471 - 436,3742 - 436,37428 18,300 332,835 18,300 332,835 - 2,952,00029 - 2,952,00029 28,300 360,581 28,398 360,581 - 1,183,111so - 1,183,11180 25,800 538,761 25,802 538,761 - 3,322,00031 - 3,322,00031 25,600 549,158 25,600 549,158 - 6,049,504 - 6,049,504 300,118 2,855,219 302,918 2,855,213 - 6,883,305 - 6,883,305 20,400 210,349 20,400 210,349 4-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 35J. Hornell, NY 35K. Lisle, NY 35L. Oxford, NY 35M. Whitney Point Lake, NY 35N. Whitney Point Village, NY 36. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA 37A. Cowanesque Lake, PA 37B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA 38A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA 38B. Curwensville Lake, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 60,800 481,037 148,419 150,972 348,200 257,415 - 4,558,6982 - 4,558,69832 85,051 2,748,063 176,056 2,748,061 661,19933 661,19933 32,300 30,241 21,624 21,624 161,500 167,763 22,900 18,780 111,000 111,920 35,700 33,824 12,400 9,863 235,900 195,765 24,700 25,794 114,500 111,732 2,878,000 270,000 2,438,893 1,040,052 481,200 675,350 482,553 680,662 355,000 292,233 819,900 817,049 200,600 200,761 236,400 232,284 -30,000 286,038 1,095,864 1,019,593 330,300 237,872 543,000 546,095 22,500 26,382 11,200 13,737 259,500 300,269 26,300 29,273 158,600 161,139 168,891 851,200 833,587 -220,000 79,419 1,269,200 1,331,830 488,800 413,472 360,500 361,923 25,400 596,222 25,453 596,222 - 131,00034 - 131,000"4 15,900 171,832 15,900 171,832 - 5,421,539 - 5,421,539 265,843 3,146,340 266,070 3,146,332 - 424,096 - 424,096 33,200 284,761 33,253 284,761 - 5,725,700 - 5,725,700 201,340 1,630,509 201,680 1,630,503 670,000 106,700,700 722,340 106,685,782 743,904 2,842,354 754,305 2,833,352 -60,000 185,619,800 23,487 185,619,800 1,144,289 5,584,154 1,166,973 5,584,059 - 7,103,001 - 7,103,001 403,810 3,240,322 572,896 3,240,313 - 20,396,060 - 20,396,060 405,491 4,870,289 405,237 4,868,995 4-26 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 38C. Foster Joseph New Work Sayers Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 30,887,063 " Cost - - - - 30,887,063'3 Maint. Approp. 314,000 345,547 412,000 446,722 4,009,784 Cost 383,567 342,872 412,339 449,450 4,009,560 39. Wyoming Valley, New Work PA Approp. - 800,000 2,390,000 2,190,000 18,605,000 Cost - 667,635 1,388,786 3,205,348 18,516,769 40. York, Indian Rock New Work Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 5,061,167" Cost - - - - 5,061,16736 Maint. Approp. 248,100 290,700 294,800 373,344 3,785,217" Cost 248,152 267,909 312,558 379,530 3,785,209" 44. Potomac Estuary New Work Pilot Water Treat- Approp. 3,500,000 4,200,000 3,074,000 -770,000 20,500,000 ment Plant, DC Cost 3,193,963 4,570,942 2,780,850 124,155 20,339,586 1. Includes $8,764,003 for previous projects. 2. Includes $14,109 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 3. Includes $15,177 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 4. Includes $1,663,300 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 5. Includes $696,090 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 6. Includes $1,085,000 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 7. Includes $1,885,518 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 8. Includes $40,000 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 9. Includes $200,691 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 10. Includes $399,802 for previous projects. 11. Includes $61,321 for previous project. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. 12. Includes $38,041 for previous project. 13. Excludes $2,200 contributed and includes $27,668 emergency relief funds. 14. Includes $46,121 public works funds. 15. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 16. Includes $20,640 for previous projects. 17. Includes $283,008 public works funds and $67,185 emergency relief funds; excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 18. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. Includes $20,500 for previous project. 19. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 20. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. Includes $22,905 Works Progress Administration funds and $97,390 for previous project. 21. Includes $6,000 for previous project. 22. Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. 23. Includes $1,831,609 for previous project. 24. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provisions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. 25. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes $14,000 contributed funds. 26. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. 27. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. 28. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. 29. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 30. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. 31. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. 32. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and excludes $15,000 contributed funds. 33. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 34. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. 35. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance with the Tri-party Agreement for construction of sanitary system for public use. 36. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. 37. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. 4-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 4-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD and VA Aug. 8, Branch channel 35 feet deep to head of Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and 1917 400 feet wide from Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor.2 Jan. 21, Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Increased anchorage facilities. Jul. 3, For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot 1930 depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar Section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. Oct. 17, For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below 1940 Pennington Ave. Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordnance Depot. Mar. 2, Uniform main channel 39-feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section 1945 and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 400 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Ave. Bridge. Mar. 2, A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of 1945 Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Guard wharf. July. 3, Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at 1958 entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Dec. 31, Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1970 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch-East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch-West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. H. Doc. 799, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Adopted as a national defense project. (No printed report.) H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. In accordance with plans on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st sess. 4-28 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Proje&e and Work Authorized 2. 4. Mar 3, 1873 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 30, 1948 5. CHESTER RIVER, MD A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from the 7-foot depth in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of the same depth and 300 feet square at the head of the channel. FISHING BAY, MD Aug. 26, Provided for channels 6 feet deep and generally 60 feet wide at mean low 1937 water, suitably widened where necessary to offer adequate sheltered anchorage space from deep water and in Fishing Bay to vicinity of county or packing house wharves in McCreadys, Farm, and Goose Creeks. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY (BARREN ISLAND GAPS), MD Aug. 30, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake 1935 Bay through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River. Jun. 30, Modification providing for a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet 1948 wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek, with a turning basin of the same depth, 150 feet long and 200 feet wide. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD Aug. 30, A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends 1935 from deep water in Chesapeake Bay to deep water in Harris Creek, MD, with a turning basin west of the drawbridge, 7 feet deep at mean low water, about 320 feet long and 120 feet wide. Project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration September 16, 1933 and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Jun. 30, Collection and removal of drilt from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary 1948 waters. CAMBRIDGE HARBOR, MD Mar. 3, Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the drawbridge 10 feet deep and 1925 100 feet wide from the bridge to the upper end of the harobr with a turning basin. Aug. 26, Channel 14 feet deep from that depth in Choptank River to the head of the 1937 harbor with widths of 150 feet below the Market St. Bridge in Cambridge and 100 feet above, and a turning basin of the same depth at the head of the channel; for an anchorage basin 10 feet deep, 400 feet long, and 175 feet wide on the west side of the channel and a second basin of the same depth 225 feet long and 200 feet wide on the east side of the channel; and a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Choptank River to the municipal boat basin. Jun. 30, Modification providing for deepening of the channel in Choptank River and 1948 Cambridge Creek to 16 feet, with a turning basin of the same depth and of irregular dimensions comprising approximately 2.4 acres. Jun. 16, Modification providing for Federal maintenance of locally constructed 1978 channel 150 feet wide and 25 feet deep, from that depth in the Choptank River to and including a irregularly shaped turning basin of the same depth, with such modifications as in the discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advised at an added first cost to the United States presently estimated at $257,000. 4-29 3. River and Harbor Act of 1948. H. Doc. 210, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 381, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 355, 95th Cong., 2d sess.' E. Doc. 25, 42d. Cong., 3d sess. H. Ex. Doc. 65, 51st. Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 380, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 186, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 35, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 580, 80th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 308, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Documents 7. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents LOWES WHARF, MD Sep. 3, A channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot 1954 depth curve in Ferry Cove and to including a basin of the same depth, 200 feet wide and 300 feet long on the south side of Lowes Wharf. Dec. 4, 1964 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 25, 1910 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 MUDDY HOOK/TYLER COVE, MD An entrance channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in Honga River to and including an anchorage basin of same depth, 160 feet wide and 400 feet long, in Fishing Creek into Tyler Cove and includes an anchorage basin 200 feet wide, 250 feet long and 6 feet deep. NANTICOKE RIVER (INCLUDING NORTHWEST FORK), DE & MD A 9-foot channel, 100 feet wide up to Seaford, DE, with a turning basin. Slight widening between bridges in harbor at Seaford, DE. A channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide in Northwest Fork, together with turning basin. A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Tangier Sound to highway bridge at Seaford, DE. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Aug. 26, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the river to the foot 1937 of Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. OCEAN CITY HARBOR & INLET & SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Aug. 30, Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 19353 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. Aug. 30, Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the 1935' west side of the bay with 2 turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to opposite North 8th Street, Ocean City, and 75feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Sep. 3, Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet above 19456 mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum. 13. Jun. 3, 1896 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 POCOMOKE RIVER, MD A 9-foot channel from Shad Landing to Snow Hill. A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Pocomoke Sound to Pocomoke River. Extend channel above bridge at Snow Hill, 100 feet wide, 9 feet deep, widened to 150 feet to form a turning basin at upper end. Channel 11 feet deep by 150 feet wide from Pocomoke Sound to Tulls Point, thence a channel of the same depth and 100 feet wide to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, and dike construction along south side of channel from existing dike to Tulls Point. POTOMAC RIVER AT MT. VERNON, MD Mar. 3, Channel 6 to 7 feet deep, 150 feet wide, from Potomac River channel to Mount 1879 Vernon wharf, with turning basin at wharf. Channel increased to 9- to 10-foot depth, 200-foot width, turning basin to have 200-foot radius. H. Doc. 90, 82d Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report, May 1964 H. Doc. 323, 53d Cong., 3rd sess., and Annual Report, 1985, p. 1165. H. Doc. 674, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 869, 60th Cong., 1st sess.2 S. Doc. 69, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 248, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 444, 82d Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report for 1895, p. 1167. H. Doc. 227, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 429, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 486, 81st Cong., 2d sess.' Annual Report, 1879, vol. 1, p. 83. Annual Report, 1888, vol. 1, p. 814. 4-30 10. 11. 12. 14. BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION -See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Mar. 3, A channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between mouth at Chesapeake Bay 1899 and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC, a distance of 108 miles. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC-COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT Oct. 27, Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac and Anacostia 1965 Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington, DC area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon, Virginia. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD Aug. 28, Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, and 1958 its tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for transporting and depositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) Apr. 29, 1983 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 2, 1882 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 ST. GEORGE CREEK, MD A channel 1,500 feet in length, 60 feet wide, and 7 feet deep at mean low water, from the St. George Island Bridge to deep water in the Potomac River. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER ABOVE AND BELOW HAVRE DE GRACE, MD Channel 200 feet wide and 15 feet deep from Chesapeake Bay to Havre de Grace, and remove shoal opposite Watsons Island. Modifications to provide for maintenance of existing small boat harbor and approach channel below Concord Point. Modification to provide for improvement and maintenance of small boat harbor just below Concord Point for a width of 380 feet and length of 400 feet with an approach channel 100 feet wide, all to a depth of 10 feet. TRED AVON RIVER, MD Jul. 25, Restore the channel, formerly dredged from Peach Blossom Creek to Easton 1912 Point, to 8 feet deep at mean low water, and 150 feet wide, widening out at the upper end. Mar. 2, A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide up the North Fork, with a turning 1919 basin at the upper end. Oct. 27, A 12-foot channel from a point near Peach Blossom Creek to Easton Point, 1965 thence 1,400 feet in North Fork and a turning basin 12 feet and 250 feet wide and 600 feet long in the South Fork. WARWICK RIVER, MD Jul. 13, Provides for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 1.5 miles long, from 1892 the 10-foot depth curve in Choptank River to Secretary, MD, and a turning basin at the latter Point. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Aug. 30, Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 1935 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant; (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street S.E. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. 15. 16. 4-31 H. Doc. 33, 52nd Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 286, 89th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbor Act, June 29, 1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802, dated August 28, 1958. Expanded Reconnaissance Report, April 83 H. Doc. 322, 75th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 67, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 399, 62d Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 26, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 225, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' Annual Report 1891, p. 1219 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents WICOMICO RIVER, MD Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge tc Salisbury Dam and turning basin. Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathel including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of riv Monie Bay. A 12-foot channel below the Main Street Bridge. A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and E prongs and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach ch thereto of the same depth. Sep. 3, Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 1954 deep, 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing bas from a T-shaped harbor. BLACK WALNUT POINT, MD Construct stone revetment from north end of existing (state) shore tection to a point 375 feet north. BLOOMINGTON LAKE, MD & WV Construction of Bloomington Lake project. BULL RUN, PA Dec. 2, Consists of an impervious core incorporated in the proposed highway em 1976 ment of the Williamsport Beltway to utilize it as a levee, closure struc pumping stations and tie-back levees. Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 25, 1970 Jul. 17, 1970 CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumbei West Cumberland and South Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV Levees, wall, channel imp.ovement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio i Dam and construct new industrial dam. FOURMILE RUN, VA Construction of a levee and floodwall protection system with assoc interior drainage facilities, an improved channel, and replacement o highway and four railroad bridges. Mar. 7, Modification providing for channel capacity of 27,000 c.f.s.; increase ch 1974 bottom widths along Fourmile Run; deletion of pumping stations, po areas, and levees, except for a short levee on Long Branch; and the ad' of recreation as a project feature. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Oct. 23, Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protE 1962 works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania. LATTA BROOK ROAD, NY Construct 630 feet of rip rap stabilization on stream bank of Newtown C 23. 4-32 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 947. o the H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 11 St., H. Doc. 1509, rer in 63rd Cong., 3rd sess. south Senate Committee annel Print, 75th Cong., 3rd sess.' 6 feet H. Doc. 619, in to 81st Cong., 2d sess.' pro- Expanded Reconnaissance Report Sept. 1982 H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2d sess. bank- Detailed Project tures, Report October 1976. rland, H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Canal Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers. ciated H. Doc. 358, )f two 91st Cong., 2d sess. Lannel nding dition ection S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d sess. :reek. Expanded Reconnaissiance Report June 1982 27. Dec. 22, 1982 Sec. 14 Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. Dec. 10, 1982 Sec. 14 Jul. 24, 1946 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 34. 35. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, Corning and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Construction of a flood control reservoir. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Jul. 3, Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hammond reservoirs, local flood 1958 protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY and channel improvement at Cortland, NY Oct. 22, Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to 1976 relocate the Town of Nelson, PA, to a new townsite. Mar. 1, Modification of Cowanesque Lake to include water supply as provided by 1983 Section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (PL 78-534) and Section 301 of Water Supply Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). Sep. 3, 1954 WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA Construction of three flood control reservoirs. WYOMING VALLEY, PA Jun. 22, Construct of a levee and floodwall protection system with associated interior 1936 drainage facilities at Plymouth, Kingston -Edwardsville, Swoyersville - Forty Fort, and Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Township. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA June 22, Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on Codorus 1936 Creek. POTOMAC ESTUARY PILOT WATER TREATMENT PLANT, DC Mar. 7, To construct, operate, and evaluate a pilot project on the Potomac Estuary 1974 for the treatment of water at an estimated cost of $6,000,000. Oct. 23, 1962 June 22, 1936 modified by Acts of June 28, 1938; Aug. 18, 1941; Dec. 22, 1944; May 17, 1950; and Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 18, 1941 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive portion is widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet from Port Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at the upper end. 3. Included in Public Works Administration program September 16, 1933. The site chosen for the inlet under this authorization was that opened just south of Ocean City by natural forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This eliminated the necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to Ocean City. 4. Included in Emergency Relief program 1935. 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in 1956. 4-33 H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 394, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 29, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 308, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 2, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 44. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C Cost To September 30, 1984 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Accotink Creek, VA' Completed 1878 $ 5,000 $ - Anacostia River and Flats2 Deferred 1953 3,910,582 - Annapolis Harbor, MD Completed 1946 34,250' 15,623 Aquia Creek, VA Inactive 1928 52,4654 Back 11,770 Creek, MD Completed 1946 23,061 23,072 Betterton Harbor, MD Inactive 1960 3,482 - Black Walnut Harbor, MD Completed 1982 32,631 412,349 Bonum Creek, VA Completed 1982 202,0006 144,576 Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA Completed 1950 15,755 17,675 Breton Bay, MD' Inactive 1950 47,9247 12,621 Broad Creek River, DE Completed 1964 64,5108 114,373 Broad Creek, MD Completed 1962 28,227 81,219 Choptank River, MD9 Completed 1979 96,796 94,095 Claiborne Harbor, MD 2 Deferred 1978 42,974 95,604 Corsica River, MD Completed 1948 39,0711" 80,285 Crisfield Harbor, MD Completed 1980 349,154" 505,39312 Cypress Creek, MD Completed 1947 3,057 3,787 Duck Point Cove, MD Completed 1982 25,289 293,964 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD1" Completed 1932 90,121" 53,808"L Fishing Creek, MD Completed 1983 111,242 859,199 Goose Creek, MD"' Completed 1973 75,900 8,312 Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, MD Completed 1982 50,591 434,939 Herring Creek, MD Completed 1961 284,800" 24,252 Island Creek, MD Completed 1948 6,230 7,648 Island Creek, St. Georges Island, MD Completed 1981 23,836 328,110 La Trappe, MD Completed 1980 8,064 40,475 LittleCreek, Kent Island, MD Completed 1958 23,00018 7,327 Little Wicomico River, VA Completed 1983 81,885' Lower Machodoc Creek, VA 9 832,453 Completed 1904 9,916 16,485 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD Completed 1980 44,6582" 320,942 Madison Bay, MD '" Completed 1977 125,550 20,854 Manokin River, MD2" Completed 1919 34,788" 43,534 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD Completed 1947 38,715" 23,173 Monroe Bay and Creek, VA Completed 1982 12,460 197,741 Nan Cove, MD"6 Completed 1965 34,861" 22,498 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD"s Completed 1983 240,817 131,878 Nanticoke River, MD Completed 1971 73,243 76,895" Neabsco Creek, MD Inactive 1978 14,600 Neale Sound, MD Completed 1982 12,6002" 289,770 Neavitt Harbor, MD1" Completed 1968 36,500 7,548 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA 27 Completed 1946 78,446 42,063 Occoquan Creek, VA"3 Completed 1971 66,25328 176,920 Parish Creek, MD Completed 1963 19,170"' 62,856 Patuxent River, MD" Completed 1905 14,000 - Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut Completed 1977 - 184,394 Potomac River at Alexandria, VA Completed 1965 95,214 506,394 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD Completed 1920 10,234 6,216 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, DC' Completed 1956 1,744,692" 27,461" Queenstown Harbor, MD Completed 1958 72,858" 41,979 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD Completed 1983 304,000 231,424 Rock Hall Harbor, MD Completed 1982 1,072,500"3 77,113 Shad Landing State Park, MD Completed 1966 33.531" 6.719 iSlaugnter Ctreek, MD Completed 1982 4,140 389,484 St. Catherines Sound, MD Completed 1981 29,947" 253,578 St. George Creek, MD Inactive 1971 - 4-34 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C (Continued) Cost To September 30, 1984 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance St. Jeromes Creek, MD Completed 1982 44,357" 371,386 St. Michaels Harbor, MD1' Completed 1964 16,723"3 7,742 St. Patricks Creek, MD Completed 1983 15,752 23,248 St. Peters Creek, MD" Completed 1963 46,74067 17,084 Smith Creek, MD Completed 1936 5,252 3,894 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA1" Completed 1974 57,031' - Tilghman Island Harbor, MD Completed 1983 424,80039 368,306 Town Creek, MD Completed 1950 43,220 5,209 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD Completed 1982 193,175 1,855,242 Tuckahoe River, MD Completed 1980 9,727 23,489 Tyaskin Creek, MD Completed 1923 16,297' 45,215 Upper Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1971 20,281 34,777 Upper Thorofare, Deal Island, MD Completed 1980 62,446 337,471 1. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Project deferred for restudy. 3. Includes $8,476 for previous project. 4. Includes $31,065 for previous project. 5. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. 6. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. 7. Includes $37,500 for previous project. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous project. 9. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the project was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1979. 10. Includes $30,000 for previous project. 11. Includes $87,740 for previous project. 12. Includes $2,839 for previous project. 13. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 14. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes $8,414 contributed funds. 15. Includes $24,321 for previous project. 16. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 17. Excludes $10,306 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $1,100 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 20. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 21. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., Ist sess.) 22. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. 23. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department and $54,000 from contributed funds. 24. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 25. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds expended for waterchestnut removal. 26. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 27. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 28. Includes $25,000 for previous project. 29. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration funds. 30. Includes $10,617 for previous project. 31. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 32. Includes $19,000 for previous project. 33. Excludes $672,880 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. 35. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 36. Includes $26,500 for previous project. 37. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 38. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. 39. Excludes $16,409 contributed funds. 40. Includes $10,158 for previous project. 4-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH TABLE 4-D EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost To September 30, 1984 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Oxford, MD' Completed 1978 $ 97,7502 - Colonial Beach, VA Active 1983 504,000' - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 2. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $414,977 contributed funds. TABLE-4-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost To September 30, 1984 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Anacostia River and tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, DC and MD Completed 1980 $6,042,325 $ 1,497,466 Anacostia River and tributaries, Prince Georges Co., MD' Completed 1977 1,000,0003 - Bainbridge, NY' 4 Completed 1959 382,000 - Bath, NY' Completed 1970 638,332 - Bayard, WV4 Completed 1965 55,2186 - Bridgewater, VA' Completed 1953 136,500 - Conklin-Kirkwood, NY4 Completed 1955 71,000 - Cortland, NY7 Completed 1970 324,486 - Elkland, PA Completed 1971 1,297,850 - Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY Completed 1979 7,034,5348 - Forest Heights, MD' Completed 1964 430,0009 - Greene, NY4 Completed 1951 37,000 - Kingston-Edwardsville, PA Completed 1979 4,731,394's Kitzmiller, MD4 Completed 1965 501,500" - Lock Haven, PAL2 Active 1980 450,000" - Nichols, NY Completed 1974 1,487,800 - Norwich, NY' Completed 1950 94,500 - Painted Post, NY 5 Completed 1970 414,181 - Plymouth, PA Completed 1958 1,911,689" - Savage River Dam, MD Completed 1954 2,271,939"' 33,999 Scranton, PAl6 Completed 1971 2,006,800 - Sunbury, PA Completed 1953 6,063,000" - Swoyersville and Forty Fort, PA Completed 1968 2,728,113 - Tyrone, PA'8 Deferred 1980 6,401,016 - Unadilla, NY Completed 1970 1,000,0009 - Upper Marlboro, MD' Completed 1965 590,013 - Verona Lake, VA20 Deferred 1978 992,000 - Washington, DC and Vicinity Completed 1953 331,92721 Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA Completed 1958 3,853,457" - Williamsport, PA Completed 1979 12,964,89323 1. Local interests will not accept operation and maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 2. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 4. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 5. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds and $4,290 contributed funds. 6. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 7. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. 9. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to adoption of project. 10. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. 4-36 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 4-G For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Almond Village, NY 2 Broadwater Creek, MD Cadle Creek, MD2 Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, MD Coan River, VA Copes Corner Lakes, NY 2 Cuckold Creek, MD4 Cunninghill Cove, MD' Davenport Center Lake, NY 2 Fall Brook Lake, PA5 1970 1949 1949 1940 1937 1970 1978 1977 1970 1970 1954 1950 1937 1950 1950 1949 1941 1974 1953 1939 Genegantslet Lake, NY Governor's Run, MD Harpers Ferry, WV Hellens Creek, MD Lake Ogleton, MD Mill Creek, MD Moorefield, WV Sixes Bridge Lake, MD & PA6 South Plymouth Lake, NY Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, MD May 26, 1953 1941 Flood Control Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Oct. 3, 1978 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 29, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 4-37 $ 24,6223 212 112 106,7003 5,720 11,200 286,4003 46,100 214,5783 7,9283 100,0363 305 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 4-G (Continued) For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended May 6, 1981 West Oneonta Lake, NY' 1970 1974 Water 189,1003 - Res. Dev. Act 1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization ex- Engineers. pired May 26, 1953. 5. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 6. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of ad- 3. Cost for preliminary work only. vanced engineering and design. 4. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief of RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS TABLE 4-H Project Date Survey Completed DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Anacostia River and tributaries MARYLAND Elk and Little Elk Rivers Herring Creek Island Creek, St. George Island Nanticoke River Rhodes Point to Tylerton St. Catherine Sound St. Patricks Creek Tyaskin Creek Upper Thorofare, Deal Island VIRGINIA Lower Machodoc Creek Potomac River at Alexandria Occoquan Creek Upper Machodoc Creek July 1984 September 1984 April 1984 May 1984 July 1984 September 1984 August 1984 August 1984 November 1983 July 1984 October 1983 April 1984 November 1983 October 1983 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS TABLE 4-I Project Date Inspected DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Anacostia River Washington, DC & Vicinity MARYLAND Anacostia River Basin Cumberland Forest Heights Kitzmiller Savage Upper Marlboro November 1983 November 1983 October 1983 September 1984 October 1983 September 1984 September 1984 October 1983 4-38 I BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT TABLE 4-I (Continued) Project NEW YORK Bainbridge Bath Cincinnatus Conklin-Kirkwood Corning-Monkey Run Cortland Endicott-Johnson City & Vestal Greene Nichols Norwich Oneonta Oswego Painted Post Port Dickinson Sherburne Unadilla PENNSYLVANIA Elkland Kingston and Edwardsville Loyalsock Milton Plymouth Scranton Sunbury Swoyersville-Forty Fort Tyrone Wilkes-Barre-Hanover Tevp. Williamsport S. Williamsport VIRGINIA Bridgewater WEST VIRGINIA Bayard Ridgeley INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS Date Inspected October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 November 1983 September 1984 September 1984 4-39 - r. .,. .. ..... NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT * This district comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, Virginia, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, Virginia. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherrin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ................... 5-2 2. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) .................. 5-2 3. Broad Creek, VA ...................... .. 5-3 4. Cape Charles City Harbor, VA ................. 5-3 5. Chincoteague Bay, VA ........................ 5-4 6. Chincoteague Inlet, VA ........................ 5-4 7. Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, VA Collection and Removal of Drift ................................... 5-4 8 Hoskins Creek, VA............................5-5 9. James River, VA .......................... 5-5 10. Lynnhaven Inlet, VA ......................... 5-6 11. Norfolk Harbor, VA .......................... 12. Oyster Channel, VA 5-6 ........................ 5-7 13. Supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of obstructive and injurious deposits .................................... 5-7 14. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA ................... 5-8 15. Waterway on Coast of VA .................. 5-8 16. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 5-8 Beach Erosion Control Page 17. Virginia Beach, VA ......................... 5-9 18. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... 5-9 Flood Control Page 19. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA ................................... 5-9 20. Rapidan River, VA ............................ 5-10 21. Virginia Beach Streams, Canal Number 2, VA ......................... 5-10 22. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 5-10 23. Emergency Flood Control Activities ................................... 5-10 General Investigations 24. Surveys ..................................... 5-10 25. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................. ............. 26. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ............................. 5-10 Tables Table 5-A Cost and Financial Statement ........ 5-11 Table 5-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 5-14 Table 5-C Data Relative to the Completed Locks ................... 5-19 Table 5-D Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................... 5-20 Table 5-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control ................... 5-21 Table 5-F Other Authorized Flood Control ....................... 5-21 Table 5-G Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ......................... 5-22 5-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location. Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, VA between a point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, VA, 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia-North Carolina state line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, VA and mouth of Pasquotank River, NC. These routes are shown on National Ocean Survey. Chart 12206. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, VA. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and cutting certain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams and bridges, under maintenance. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. Remaining sections are nontidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Cost for new work for completed project was $3,396,276. Protection to canal property at Great Bridge portion is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $265,000. For details of previous projects, see page 476 of Annual Report for 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. See Annual Report for 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The following work was accomplished by contract: A five year contract to operate, maintain and repair facilities at the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway was awarded Feb 83 for $4,117,981. Work is 63% complete. Contractor's earnings this FY amounted to $861,170. Two bulkhead replacement contracts: (1) Bulkhead replacement at Great Bridge and North Landing, Chesapeake, VA. This contract was funded under the 1983 Jobs Bill Act. Contract awarded Aug 83 for $993,347 and completed Jul 84. Total contractor's earnings in FY 84 amounted to $925,955. (2) Bulkhead replacement at Great Bridge Reservation. Contract was awarded Aug 84 with completion scheduled in FY 85. Total contractor's earnings in FY 84 was $150,000. Lock gate anchorage repairs at Great Bridge were accomplished. Contract was awarded Jan. 84 and completed May 84. Contractor's earnings amounted to $204,791. Other work including engineering and design, supervision and administration, and ordinary operation and maintenance of the project was accomplished by Government plant and hired labor at a direct cost of $201,812. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Existing project. Provides for deep water approach channels in Baltimore Harbor. Northern portion including Baltimore Harbor is under jurisdiction of Baltimore District. Portion under jurisdiction of Norfolk District is more fully described below. 2A. CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA Location. A t mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12222.) Existing project. A channel about 2.3 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water through shoal at mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 2B. RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of Rappahannock River and about 50 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12225.) Existing project. A channel about 9.9 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay, opposite Rappahannock River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 5-2 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 2C. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of York River and about 20 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12221). Existingproject. A channel about 18.2 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay opposite York Spit. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. For details of previous projects see Annual Report for 1932. (See Table 5- B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. These three channels form the access between lower and upper Chesapeake Bay. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and disposal site designation studies were accomplished at a total direct cost of $200,690. 3. BROAD CREEK, VA Location. Broad Creek is a small tidal estuary in Middlesex County, VA, 1 mile long, flowing in a northerly direction into the Rappahannock River, which it enters on the right bank about 1 mile upstream of its mouth at Chesapeake Bay. The creek is 61 miles northerly of Norfolk, VA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12235). Existing project. This provides for a channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 4,100 feet long from deep water in the Rappahannock River to deep water in Broad Creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.2 feet; irregular, 2 feet; and extreme, approximately 7.5 feet. The cost to the Federal Government for new work for the completed project was$27,888. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 381, 76th Cong., 1st sess.). The latest published map is in the project document. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests shall furnish, free of cost to the United States, suitable spoil-disposal areas when and as required for subsequent maintenance, and hold and save the United States free from claims for damages that may result from dredging. Terminal facilities. There are privately and owned wharves landings on the creek, many of which are open to the public by special arrangements. There is one marine railway on the creek. The terminal facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was performed during the period June 15-28, 1984. There were 46,320 cubic yards of credited material removed at a cost of $301,136. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs amounted to $74,177. 4. CAPE CHARLES CITY HARBOR, VA Location. Town of Cape Charles, VA is on Chesapeake Bay on west side of peninsula separating the bay from Atlantic Ocean. It is about 11 miles north of southern extremity of peninsula and 45 miles south of Maryland- Virginia State line. Cape Charles City Harbor is an artificial land-locked harbor on south side of town. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12222). Existing project. A channel 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from that depth in Chesapeake Bay through Cherrystone Bar and inlet to the entrance to Cape Charles City Harbor, a distance of 2.71 miles; a basin in the harbor of the same depth 400 to 800f eet wide and 3,000 feet long; a channel 10 feet deep, 100 to 180 feet wide and 260 feet long connecting a basin of same depth 180 feet wide and 420 feet long at head of Mud Creek, and a harbor of refuge on the north side of Mud Creek, 7 feet deep, 200 to 250 feet wide, and 375 feet long connected to Mud Creek with an entrance channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide. Project also provides for protective works in form of a stone jetty on north side of harbor entrance and sand mole 1,350 feet long south of harbor entrance. All depths are referred to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.3 feet with extremes of 2.5 feet below and 8 feet above mean low water. Cost for new work for completed project was $628,644, including $6,000 from contributed funds. Widening the basin an additional 200 feet is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $207,000. Local cooperation. Conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1938 were fully complied with and approved by Chief of Engineers on March 30, 1940. The River and Harbor Act of 1945, in adopting existing project dimensions, imposed conditions that local interests provide all lands for initial construction and future maintenance; provide and maintain substantial bulkheads and other terminal facilities adequate to permit full utilization of improvement; and reserve at least 1,000 linear feet of berthing space along such bulkheads for general public use on equal and reasonable terms; and agree to hold the United States free from damages. Local interests furnished all lands necessary for dredging harbor to 800-foot width. Items of local cooperation in connection with Harbor of refuge have been complied with. 5-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Terminal facilities. The Pennsylvania Railroad owns a wooden pier 200 feet long and two transfer ships in the outer harbor. On the south side of the harbor, Bay Shore Concrete owns an 800-foot bulkhead. A bulkhead providing 200 feet of berthing space is on the south side of the main harbor and is owned by a fish plant. There are about 1400 feet of cityowned bulkhead open to the public. The Coast Guard owns a 100-foot pier on Mud Creek. The harbor of refuge should accomodate about 50 boats when berthing facilities are completed. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed at a cost of $1,203. 5. CHINCOTEAGUE BAY, VA Location. Chincoteague Bay is a shallow sound on the Atlantic coast of Maryland and Virginia. Greenbackville and Franklin City occupy low-lying ground on the westerly shore of the bay 4-1/2 miles from its southwest end. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12211.) Previous projects. For details, see page 244 of Annual Report for 1968. Existing project. This provides for an L-shaped harbor 5 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,500 feet long, with an approach channel of the same depth and width in Chincoteague Bay. The mean range of tide is about 2 feet. The cost of new work for the completed project was $25, 126. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of August 26, 1937 (H. Doc. 233, 75th Cong., 1st sess.) The latest published map is in the project document. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for construction. Local interests are to furnish spoil-disposal areas as required for maintenance. Terminal facilities. About 750 feet of public bulkhead has been built along the south side of the channel which is primarily used by commercial boats for berthing and unloading their catch. This facility is considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design was performed at a direct cost of $300.00. 6. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, VA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12211). Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteague, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was performed on Chincoteague Channel May 13 - June 24, 1984. There were 186,084 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $1,099,171. In addition, a dredging contract, awarded in FY 83 under the Jobs Bill Act, was completed Oct. 83. Final contractor payment was made in the amount of $101,805. Ordinary operation and maintenance of the project to include condition surveys, quantity surveys, engineering and design, and supervision and administration, were accomplished with government plant and hire labor at a direct cost of $283,429. 7. HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBOR OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, D.C. Its principal tributaries are James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, VA; Elizabeth River, with its Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, VA; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at Hampton, VA. (See National Ocean Survey Charts No. 12248, 12245 and 12253.) Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or from other available appropriations and that this work shall be carried on as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor, VA and Channel to Newport News, VA. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance to include collection and disposal of 73,700 cubic feet of a variety of floating refuse was performed this fiscal year. Total cost of the project operations amounted to $221, 568. 5-4 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 8. HOSKINS CREEK, VA Location. A tributary 2.5 miles long flowing easterly and entering right bank of Rappahannock River in Essex County, VA, 42 miles upstream from its mouth in Chesapeake Bay and one-half mile downstream from town of Tappahannock, VA. Creek is 102 miles northerly of Norfolk, VA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 535.) Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep from that depth in the Rappahannock River to the highway bridge three-quarters of a mile above the mouth with widths of 100 feet through the bar in Rappahannock River and 80 feet within the creek suitably widened at bends, and a turning basin of same depth 250 feet long and 200 feet wide at public landing one-half mile above the mouth of creek. Improved section is 1.1 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.6 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, about 7.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are two bulkhead landings and two wharves. S tate of VA operates a small boat launching ramp on the creek. Facilities considered adequate for navigation. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design was performed this fiscal year at a cost of $19,822. 9. JAMES RIVER, VA Location. The river is formed by junction of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, VA, flows easterly 340 miles and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, VA. (See National Ocean Survey Charts No. 12248 and 12251.) Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock; a mooring basin 35 feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long along side the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; enlargement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep; a turning basin in Richmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and training dikes. Depth of channels are referred to mean low water. Total length of channel included in the project is 87 miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown, 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, due to floods are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. The estimate (1971) total cost for new work is $71,145,940 including required non-Federal cost for conditions of local cooperation imposed by the River and Harbor Act of 1930, 1945, and 1950, estimated (1939) to be $1,949,700; and by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, estimated (1971) to be $2,950,000. For previous projects, see Annual Report for 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1930, 1945, and 1950. The conditions imposed by the River and Harbor Act of 1962 have not been complied with. Terminal facilities. River commerce at Richmond is handled by city-owned terminals, city wharves, Richmond dock, and 16 privately-owned wharves within or in the immediate vicinity of Richmond Harbor. The city's Upper Terminal, located on the north bank within the manufacturing section of Richmond, provides for 750 feet of concrete wharf and 80,000 square feet of warehouse and transit shed. The other terminal is located approximately 4 miles downstream from the Upper Terminal which provides about 1,250 feet of wharf and 2 concrete warehouses with about 190,000 square feet of floor space. This deepwater terminal at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel serves oceangoing vessels and larger ships engaged in coastwide trading. Below the deepwater terminals the improvement is served by 42 wharves. Richmond terminals and wharves together with wharves between Richmond and the river's mouth are adequate for river's commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was performed on Turkey Island to Hopewell Oct. 1-21, 1983. There were 157,918 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $235,535. In addition, maintenance dredging the Richmond Harbor and Deepwater Terminal was accomplished Jun 28 - Sep 9, 1984. A total of 259,628 cubic yards of credited material was removed at a direct cost of $507,664. Operation and ordinary maintenance of the project including engineering and design and supervision and administration amounted to $332,948. 5-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 10. LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA Location. On south shore of Chesapeake Bay, 5 miles west of Cape Henry, and 10 miles east of Norfolk, VA. Inlet connects Lynnhaven Roads, a part of Chesapeake Bay, with a network of inland waters in northern half of city of VA Beach. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 1222). Existing project. An entrance channel from Chesapeake Bay through Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide; a mooring and turning basin inside of Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep, 1,100 feet long, and 750 feet wide; a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide to extend from the mooring and turning basin into Broad Bay via Long Creek-Broad Bay Canal and a channel through the Narrows connecting Broad and Linkhorn Bays, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide. Depths are referred to mean low water. Mean ranges of tide in Lynnhaven Inlet is about 2 feet with extreme fluctuations of 1.5 feet below and 9.5 feet above mean low water. Range in Lynnhaven Bay is a little more than 2 feet, in Broad and Linkhorn Bays, fluctuations in water level are caused by local winds. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with, except local interests must furnish spoil-disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. For details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1965. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details, see Annual Report for 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging Long Creek was performed September 25-27, 1984. There were 14,273 cubic yards of credited material removed at a total direct cost of $65,999. Dredging is 28 percent complete with dredging remaining to be performed on the entrance channel and basin. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs amounted to $17,373. 11. NORFOLK HARBOR, VA Location. Norfolk, Virginia is 187 miles south of Baltimore, Maryland and 30miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 45-foot contour at Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge over Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 12245 and 12253.) Existing projects. A main channel 45 deep, 1,500 feet wide from that depth in Hampton Roads near Fort Wool to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal Piers; at the same depth 800 feet wide to Lamberts Point, 40 feet deep and 750 feet wide to mouth of Southern Branch of Elizabeth River; and 450 feet wide up this branch to the Belt Line Railroad bridge, including an approach in turning area to same depth and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard, extending downstream 3,250 feet from Belt Line Railroad bridge 40 feet deep, 375 feet wide and 1 mile longe to Norfolk and Western (formerly Virginia Railway bridge); 35 feet deep, 250 feet wide and 3.1 miles long to a point 1,900 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway (Gilmerton's Bridge); 35 feet deep, 250 feet to 500 feet wide to a point 1.6 miles above Interstate 64 high level bridge. A turning basin at the mouth of St. Julian's Creek, 35 feet deep and 400-600 feet square, and a turning basin at the mouth of Main's Creek 35 feet deep and 600 feet square, the upstream end of the project. A channel in Eastern Branch, 25 feet deep, 500f eet wide and 1.09 miles long from 40-foot channel to Norfolk and Western Railway bridge; 25 feet deep, 300 feet wide, 0.55 mile long to Campostella Bridge; 25 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 1.2 mile to Norfolk and Western Railway bridge (formerly Virginia Railway bridge); and for maintenance at a depth of 25 feet of existing turning basin and 5.5 acres in extent at head of existing project just below the Norfolk and Western (formerly Virginian) Railway bridge; a channel in Western Branch, 40 foot channel in Elizabeth River, 24 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.78 mile long; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for 0.37 mile to West Norfolk Highway bridge; 18 feet deep, 150 feet wide, 0.57 mile long. A channel in Scotts Creek between 40-foot channel at mouth and a point 100 feet above former location of Atlantic Coast Line Railroad bridge (about 0.73 miles upstream), 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Anchorage areas on west side of 40-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point and south of Craney Island aggregating 173 acres, consisting of 1 anchorage space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep; 1 anchorage space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep; and 1 anchorage 1,000 feet wide, 3,000 feet long and 20 feet deep. Another anchorage of 45 acres and 12 feet deep near Pinner Point. Two anchorage opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep over a swinging radius of 1,200 feet and a trapezoidal shaped disposal area of about 2,500 acres of flats adjacent to the north of Craney Island, enclosed by stonefaced levees, 3 sluiceways in west levee, and an access road. Facilities for unloading of hopper dredged material consisting of mooring dolphins; a mooring barge anchorage 100 by 600 feet, 21 feet deep, with approach channel 300 to 3,600 feet; 30-feet deep connecting anchorage with Norfolk Harbor 45-foot channel; and a 28-inch discharge pipe line to the leveed area. Facilities for contract rehandling of bucket dredged material consisting of a rehandling basin 1,000 by 1,200 feet, 40 feet deep, protected by a spur levee extending 2,350 feet from main levee and provided with approach exit channels, 200 feet wide by 18 feet deep to Norfolk Harbor 45 foot channel and a pipe line trestle from rehandling basin to leveed area. All depths are referred to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.7 feet, and extreme is 3.4 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations, due to combined effect of tides and winds referred to mean low water on -3.5 feet and +9.6 feet. Eastern Branch, 30-foot channel portion is considered inactive. For details of previous projects see Annual Report for 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 5-6 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Latest published description of terminal facilities is in Port Series No. 11 (revised 1971, part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for River and Harbors. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Sediment analysis was performed at a cost of $6,013. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the Craney Island portion of the project was accomplished at a total cost of $4,077,998, which included $201,395 for engineering and design and supervision and inspection. Other work performed this fiscal year included construction of division dikes, which is about 90 percent complete; bulkhead replacement, spillbox construction and South Division dike construction. Maintenance dredging the access channel was started April 1, 1984 and was still in progress at the end of the fiscal year. Operation of the Norfolk Harbor portion of the project including condition surveys, sediment analysis, budgeting and scheduling and care of buildings and grounds amounted to $476,591. Engineering and design and supervision and inspection amounted to $442,650. Maintenance dredging the Sewells Point anchorage was in progress at the end of the year. Dredging is 92 percent complete with completion scheduled for early FY 85. A total of 2,152,717 cubic yards of credited material was removed at a cost of $1,442,399. Maintenance dredging the 45-foot channel was also in operation at the end of the year. 2,239,643 cubic yards of credited material was removed at a cost of $2,479,999. Completion is scheduled for early FY 85. At the end of the fiscal year work was initiated on bulkhead replacement. Contractor's earnings amounted to $449,999. Completion is scheduled for FY 85. 12. OYSTER CHANNEL, VA Location. Oyster Channel is located on the lower eastern side of the Delmarva Peninsula which separates Chesapeake Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. The project serves the town of Oyster, VA, about 11 miles north of Cape Charles. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12224.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 80 feet wide from that depth in Liscombes Channel to the town of Oyster, VA, and a turning basin the same depth and about 8 acres in area. The mean range of tide is about 4.4 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for construction. For details see page 349 of Annual Report for 1956 and page 625 of Annual Report for 1948. Local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas as required for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see page 221 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was performed Apr 20-May 9, 1984. There were 57,000 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $264,042. Engineering and design and supervision and inspection amounted to $60,009. 13. SUPERVISION OF THE HARBOR OF HAMPTON ROADS (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) Laws enacted for the preservation of the Harbor of Hampton Roads, VA, is adjacent Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the State of Virginia and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States, within or to the east of the State of Virginia, are administered by the Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads. Laws relating to the supervision of waters are the New York Harbor Act of 1888, as amended, the River and Harbor Act of 189!. the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuary Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1974, and the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the harbor was exercised by means of two patrol vessels (372 patrols, 2,976 man-hours) involving debris removal, maintenance of buoys and fish stake limits, investigating reports of sunken vessels and navigational hazards, and providing support for Federal dredging projects. Surveillance of the harbor, the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries with respect to the regulatory permit program was conducted by means of three small outboards, 6-8 motor vehicles and commercial aircraft for aerial surveys. The outboards were involved in 20 patrols (80 man-hours) involving primarily compliance surveys of permitted dredging projects and evaluating navigational access to proposed pier projects. The motor vehicles were used to investigate 147 complaints of unauthorized activities. Commercial aircraft involved 36 flights (144 man-hours) for the purpose of photographing proposed project sites, scoping for pre-application meetings and confirmed violations. 5-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 An educational program continued in an effort to inform the public of the need and requirements for Department of the Army permits. This program was effectual through press releases, public notice, public talks and personal interviews with interested agencies, committees and private industries. Agreements and the monthly joint interagency meeting were continued with various Federal, State, and local agencies having related or similar responsibilities and functions to obtain maximum results with minimum costs by eliminating duplication of effort. The joint permit application and the joint public notice adopted between the Norfolk District and the State of Virginia have continued to result in decreases in the numerous forms of paperwork required to process a permit application. The Norfolk District's Regulatory Functions Branch continued to maintain the Northern Neck Project Office and the Eastern Shore Project Office in Accomac, VA. Each of these project's offices provide readily available Corps personnel to assist waterfront owners, contractors, and the general public with their questions and problems on waterfront construction and the permit requirements of the Corps Regulatory program. Disposition of legal actions during the fiscal year: Of the 147 complaints of unauthorized activities, 101 were determined to be valid violations of Federal law. When combined with the 55 carried over from last fiscal year, 156 unauthorized activities were investigated and monitored. Resolution of these violations were as follows: 52 through voluntary restoration; 24 through either the issuance of permit modifications or after-the-fact permits; 1 through permit suspension and subsequent restoration; 1 through litigation; 4 through consent decrees with civil penalties totaling $4,000, and 16 were referred to the Norfolk District's District Counsel or to the U.S. Attorney's Office for prosecution. The remaining 58 are in various stages of resolution or investigation. 14. THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower portion of Chesapeake Bay between Hampton Roads and the ocean, 20 miles northeast of center of Norfolk Harbor, extending southeasterly 12 miles from a point 1.25 miles east of Thimble Shoal Lighthouse toward entrance to Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 1222.) Existing project. Provides for dredging a channel 12 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 45 feet deep at mean low water with auxiliary channels 450 feet wide and 32 feet deep at mean low water adjoining each side of 1,000-foot channel. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.b feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined wind and tides referred to mean low water, and minus 3 feet and plus 7 feet. For details of previous projects see Annual Report for 1932. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Project serves as an entrance channel to Hampton Roads. See "Norfolk Harbor, VA", "Channel to Newport News, VA", etc. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work to include surveys, site designation studies and an offshore Bar Demonstration Project amounted to $69,860. 15. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA Location. Between barrier beach along Atlantic Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, thoroughfares, and bays to enter Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the peninsula. (See National Ocean Survey Chart Nos. 12211, 12210, and 12221.) Existing projects. An inland waterway 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Chincoteague Bay, VA. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. Greater fluctuations in water level are caused by high winds and storms. A modification of the project approved during 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 authorizes relocation of portions of the waterway and widening of 100 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed on 4 separate reaches of the project during Sep 16 - Oct 28, 1983. There were a total of 255,847 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $343,160. Routine operation and maintenance of the project including condition studies and maintenance analysis amounted to $127,150. Engineering and design and supervision and inspection costs amounted to $76,941. 16. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION There were three Detailed Project Studies in progress at the end of the year: Kings Creek, VA - $23,710; Bennett Creek, VA - $27,562; and Little Machipongo, VA - $39,163. A Detailed Project Study was terminated on Little Creek, Gloucester County, VA for lack of environmental acceptability. Total FY 84 cost amounted to $58,870. 5-8 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT An unfavorable Initial Appraisal Study was completed on Salters Creek, VA. Total cost in FY 84 amounted to $7,500. A Detailed Project Study was completed on Rudee Inlet, VA. Total cost in FY 84 amounted to $156,489. Beach Erosion Control 17. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA Location. On the Atlantic Seaboard, 22 miles north of Virginia-North Carolina State line, 3.5 miles south of Cape Henry, and 19 miles east of Norfolk, VA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12207.) Existing project. Federal participation in restoration and protection of shore of Virginia Beach between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street by artificial placement of sand to provide a minimum beach width of 100 feet at elevation 7 feet above mean low water, and maintenance of such beach by periodic replenishment of losses to insure continuous protection; including construction of a groin system to be undertaken at such times as estimated annual charges therewith would be less than the annual cost of beach replenishment alone. The United States shall participate in the first cost of the project to the full extent of its proportionate share of cost as a landowner, plus one third total first cost of restoring and protecting all publicly-owned sections of the shore. The 1962 modification provided that the United States shall further participate in periodic beach nourishment of the beach in the amount of one third the cost for 25 years from date of commencement of operations in placing an initial quantity of nourishment material equal to deficiency in the design beach at that time. Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act increased Federal participation to one-half of the cost incurred after October 23, 1962. Estimated Federal cost (1984) is $5,500,000. Estimated cost to local interests is $5,500,000. Construction of the groin system is not included in the above estimate. The 1962 estimate for this work was $549,000 Federal cost and $531,000 cost to local interests. The 1974 modification provides for structural and nonstructural improvements. Structural measures would be provided for the 6 mile reach of shoreline between Rudee Inlet and 89th street. This would include raising the beach to elevation 10 feet and a width of 100 feet, driving a sheet pile wall just seaward of the existing bulkhead from Rudee Inlet to 57th Street; and raising and strengthening sand dunes from 57th to 89th Streets. The estimated cost (1984) of the structural improvements are Federal $28,900,000 and non-Federal $12,800,000. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-11 of FY 81 Annual Report. Necessary changes in requirements will be made if the 1974 modification is constructed. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction Planning of the 1974 modification was continued at a cost of $92,598. Local interests were reimbursed $369,445 for the federal share of periodic nourishment of the beach, and federal costs pertinent thereto amounted to $14,884. Preconstruction planning is continuing on the 1974 modification and beach replenishment is continuing on the 1962 project. 18. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None this fiscal year. Flood Control 19. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA Location. Site of proposed Gathright Dam is on Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.4 and Allegheny County. Gathright Dam site is in reach of Jackson River known at the Gorge. About 19 miles upstream from Covington, VA at the elevation at the top fo the conservation pool. Gathright Reservoir will extend upstream about 9 miles (see Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia- West Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Existing project. Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172- foot long rolled rock fill dam with an impervious core, with a top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right bank 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam; a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel through the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 2,450-foot long fixed crest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch, about 2.5 miles south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation pool elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be 2,530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres. Last approved estimated Federal cost (1979) is $83,000,000. (See Table 5- B for Authorizing Legislation.) 5-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of the project to include utilities, roads, buildings, grounds, testings, and inspections were accomplished at a total cost of $786,755. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and inspection totalled $128,373. 20. RAPIDAN RIVER, VA Location. The project area is on the Rapidan River approximately 2 miles northwest of the town of Orange, which is located approximately 50 miles west of Fredericksburg and about 30 miles northeast of Charlottesville. Previous projects. None. Existing project. The project consists of reconstructing the eroded streambank above the intake structure to the town's water treatment plant. The length of restoration is 100 feet. Removal of an abandoned railroad bridge pier and debris jam is also included in the project. Total new work cost of project is $45,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-13 of FY 83 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Bank stabilization work was performed, by contract, this fiscal year. Total contractor's earnings amounted to $24,837. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $4,675. 21. VIRGINIA BEACH STREAMS CANAL NUMBER 2, VA Location. The canal number 2 watershed with a drainage area of about 37 square miles lies within the city of Virginia Beach. The city consists of 255 square miles of primarily low, flat terrain with about 75 percent of the area below elevation 15 feet, mean sea level. The existing canal, from the Easten Branch of the Lynnhaven River to the North Landing River is about 12 miles long and follows a northsouth alignment. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No.. 12205.) Existing project. The project will provide for construction of a new canal for a length of 2.6 miles and channelization of an existing canal for a length of 1.1 miles. The canal bottom width will range from 45 feet to 80 feet and a depth from -4 feet mean sea level to -8 feet mean sea level with a flow capacity great enough to carry a 100 year flood. Its construction will require dredgin 741,000 cubic yards of material. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-14 of FY 81 Annual Report. Requirements may change if legislation is enacted regarding new cost-sharing proposals. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design including real estate studies amounted to $10,864. 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION A Detailed Project Study was completed this fiscal year on Scottsville, VA. Total FY 84 costs were $47,345. 23. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES During FY 84, $64,970 was spent on the Emergency Preparedness Program. In addition $66,361 was spent on a continuing contract awarded in FY 83 to repair the Jamestown Island Seawall. Other costs associated with the project, including supervision and inspection and in-house design amounted to $36,518. General Investigations 24. SURVEYS Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $530,717 of which $92,598 was for Supplemental Preauthorized Studies, $62,000 for coordination studies with other agencies, $34,502 for FERC Licensing Review and Special Investigations, $210,930 for flood control studies, and $130,687 for Navigation studies. 25. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, cost of collection and study of Basic Data was $128,360, consisting of $58,360 for Management Service Unit and $70,000 for Technical Service. 26. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING During FY 84, work continued on the Norfolk Harbor Deepening Project. Work is continuing on the 55-foot channel and anchorage plan. $1,455,987 was expended this year which included work on environmental studies, surveys and channel design. Completion of the project is scheduled for Sep 86. Work on the Richmond (Local Protection) Flood Control Project also continued during the year. $789,602 was expended on structural engineering, design and cost estimating, surveys and other related engineering work. Completion of this CP & E is scheduled for Sep. 87. 5-10 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to In8 Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 In Text 30 Sep 1984 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, between Norfolk, VA and the St. John's River, FL (Norfolk Dist.) (Regular Funds) 2. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfok District) (Regular Funds) 3. Broad Creek, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Cape Charles City Harbor, VA (Regular Funds) 5. Chincoteague Bay, VA (Regular Funds) 6. Chincoteague Inlet, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost Recreation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 2,444,800 2,025,000 2,077,000 1,213,817 2,443,074 1,598,261 1,415,832 2,343,728 14,108 1,663,300 1,079,000 15,177 696,090 1,885,518 2,271 2,271 8,198 8,198 112,628 112,628 40,000 200,690 46,945 353,314 24,945 375,313 9,798 8,545 9,305 290,662 192,980 9,305 290,662 192,399 32,724 33,977 1,448 2,029 855,713 639,131 708,366 1,381,182 853,155 620,913 625,959 1,484,896 3,688,3721 3,688,3721 40,634,3122 40,630,2352 3,850 3,850 5-11 479,947 479,947 59,871 59,871 8,01 5,0703 8,015,0703 8,589,4863 8,589,4853 27,888 27,888 482,029 482,028 500 500 622,6444 622,6444 493,708 493,708 25,126 25,126 371,984 371,984 227,000 227,000 4,461,392 4,461,388 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 5-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Sect. Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 in Text FY 84 30 Sep 1984 7. Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, VA - Collection and Removal of Drift (Regular Funds) 8. Hoskins Creek, VA (Regular Funds) 9. James River, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Lynnhaven Inlet, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Norfolk Harbor, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Oyster Channel, VA (Regular Funds) Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 177,000 105,493 155,000 169,526 148,731 117,604 120,910 221,568 34,226 34,225 1,124,000 2,811,254 1,440,000 814,658 1,895,528 2,823,448 1,689,700 1,076,147 16,000 66,000 81,000 77,949 50,000 24,629 28,501 74,724 472,034 74,724 472,033 - 7,017 - 2,620 - 112,358 - 102,900 30,152 60,811 50,000 28,592 28,593 4,313 9,458 (-)2,548 56,000 19,755 83,414 83,372 94,000 84,000 6,013 2,836,562 6,310,744 7,305,699 4,627,375 2,315,198 4,777,927 4,648,737 9,369,636 125,544 - - - 27,988 27,988 30,169 30,169 32,666 302,059 10,673 324,051 5-12 2,577,638 5,577,612 44,100 44,100 611,541 611,540 7,639,9045 7,639,9045 24,672,709 24,672,453 350,456 314,211 445,354 445,354 1,587,579 1,587,537 98,664 98,580 233,158 223,158 36,399,1156 36,399,1156 65,711,3767 65,708,3747 179,480 179,480 119,117 119,117 630,354 630,353 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Sect. Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 In Text 30 Sep 1984 13. Supervision of Harbor of Hampton Roads, VA (Regular Funds) 14. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA (Regular Funds) 15. Waterway on the Coast of VA (Regular Funds) 17. Virginia Beach, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (Regular Funds) 20. Rapidan River, VA (Regular Funds) 21. Virginia Beach Streams, Canal Number 2, VA Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 235,000 192,000 212,000 230,912 228,949 190,547 176,835 274,501 1,117,000 4,211,000 312,346 4,791,677 58,731 252,826 39,979 69,860 460,000 1,696,000 1,354,300 175,000 461,065 1,678,264 1,001,236 547,251 326,000 364,000 380,000 430,000 344,457 352,585 363,513 384,330 1,846,000 (-)1 4,000 2,236,333 527,222 193,721 989,000 729,000 833,000 820,000 984,540 683,273 838,172 914,128 120,000 24,232 85,000 139,577 52,000 15,489 33,000 57,446 (-)7,000 29,511 10,864 'Includes $292,096 for previous projects. 2 lIncludes $52,804 for previous projects. 3Cost prior to 1942 are included in the project "Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD" (Baltimore District). Cost listed are for York Spit Channel, VA, Rappahannock Shoal Channel, VA and Cape Henry Channel, VA. 4 lncludes $445,291 military funds expended from new work dredging on existing project and $83,041 expended from military funds for construction of a wharf. 5Includes $763,000 for previous projects. 6lncludes $2,561,704 for previous projects and new work. 7Includes $72,039 for previous projects. 5-13 4,595,840 4,595,559 13,534,967 13,534,967 10,960,004 10,960,003 850,498 850,498 9,650,632 9,650,551 3,940,195 3,866,266 204,683 204,683 80,670,527 80,670,527 5,507,000 5,499,060 45,000 45,000 420,000 412,911 i i - - --- new -- - i REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 1 of Text) Existing project dimensions and original route, waterway from Norfolk, Va. to sounds of North Carolina Original route to Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section Purchase of Albemarle & Chesapeake Co. Canal Purchase of Lake Drummond Canal (Dismal Swamp Canal) July 3, 1930 Construct a tidal lock at Great Bridge at a cost not to exceed $500,000 June 26, 1934 Operating and care of works of improvement provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors Mar. 2, 1945 Construct dikes for protection of canal property against floodtides H. Doc. 317, 54th Cong., 1st sess. AR 1896 H. Doc. 131, 55th Congs., 3d sess. AR 1899 H. Doc. 391, 62d Congs., 2d sess. H. Doc. 589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 67th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 23. 71st Cong., 1st sess.' Not available H. Doc. 117, 76th Cong., 1st sess. July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 4, 1913 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 19, 1890 BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 2 of Text) CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 2 of Text) A channel 42 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide Channel depth increased to 50 feet RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet and depth increased to 50 feet. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet Channel depth increased to 37 feet Channel depth increased to 39 feet Channel depth increased to 42 feet Channel depth increased to 50 feet BROAD CREEK, VA. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide CAPE CHARLES CITY HARBOR (See Section 4 of Text) Dredging a channel through Cherrystone Inlet and bar H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report, Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 186, 57th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 190, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 29, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 381, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 5-14 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 16 feet deep and 100 and 200 feet wide, respectively, dredging an entrance channel 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep, dredging a harbor 11 acres in area, 14 feet deep; and construct stone jetties on each side of entrance to harbor. June 20, 1938 Modified to provide a basin 10 feet deep, 180 feet wide, and 420 feet long, at head of Mud Creek, with a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending to that depth in present harbor, flaring through its inner 250 feet to a width of 180 feet. Mar. 2, 1945 A channel 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from that depth in Chesapeake Bay to harbor entrance, thence a basin in harbor of same depth 600 to 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long. The harbor of refuge was approved in 1966 by the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. H. Doc.29 51st Cong. 1st sess. and Annual Report 1890, p. 971 H. Doc. 580, 75th Cong., 3d sess. (Contains latest published map.) H. Doc. 90, 79th Cong. 1st sess. (Contains latest published map.) Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) May 17, 1950 CHINCOTEAGUE BAY, VA. (See Section 5 of text) L-shaped harbor 5-feet deep, 60 feet wide and 1,500 feet long with approach channel of same depth and width. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA. (See Section 6 of Text) Existing project HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA. COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 7 of Text) Collection and removal of floating debris in Hampton roads and its tributary waters H. Doc. 23, 75th Cong., 1st sess.2 Approved in 1972 Specified in Act HOSKINS CREEK, VA. (See Section 8 of Text) Mar. 2, 1945 A channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Rappahannock River, 80 feet wide in creek with turning basin 250 feet long and 200 feet wide. A channel depth increased to 10 feet and width in creet to 80 feet. JAMES RIVER, VA. (See Section 9 of Text) July 5, 1884 Channel 22 feet deep from mouth of Richmond and construct spur and training dikes June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 Extension of improvement to Richmond lock gate Form a turning basin by widening channel at Richmond Channel 25 feet deep mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal Removal of Trigg cofferdam Turning basin at Richmond Harbor Maintaining turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal Channel depth increased to 35 feet to Richmond Deepwater Terminal Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1 st sess. H. Doc. 129, 77th Cong., 1 st sess. S. Ex. Doc. 714, 47th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 314, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 68 74th Cong., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 738, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 191, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 586, 87th Cong.,2d sess. 5-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 30, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 June 30, 1948 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA. (See Section 10 of Text) Existing project. Long Creek, Lynnhaven Inlet modification NORFOLK HARBOR, VA. (See Section 11 of Text) Hampton Roads and Elizabeth River Channel 30 feet deep to Navy Yard Depth of 35 feet to Navy Yard. Depth of 40 feet and width of 750 feet to mouth of Southern Branch. Widen 40-foot channel to 1,500 feet from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal. 45 feet deep Ft. Wool to Lambert Point, 800 feet wide Norfolk International Terminal to Lambert Point. SOUTHERN BRANCH Channel with a depth of 22 and 25 feet. Depth of 40 feet and width of 450 feet from mouth to Belt Line RR Bridge. Channel 30 feet deep and 375 feet wide to Virginia Ry. bridge: thence 25 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide to Norfolk & Western RR Bridge. Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to a point 2,500 feet above with a turning basin 500 feet square. Approach and turning area 40 feet deep and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard: thence a channel 35 feet deep and 375 and 250 feet wide to a point 1900 feet above Norfolk & Western RR bridge and a turning basin 35 feet deep and 600 feet at upstream end. 45 feet deep Belt Line bridge to Old Virginia bridge, 35-foot deep turning basin opposite St. Julians Creek. Extend existing 35-foot project to a channel 35 feet deep and 250 feet wide upstream 1.5 miles to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line RR bridge and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek 35 feet deep and 800 feet square. EASTERN BRANCH Width of 500 feet and depth of 25 and 22 feet. Removel of shoals at mouth. Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Virginia RR bridge. 30-foot channel to a point opposite terminal of Imperial Tobacco Co. in Berkley. H. Doc. 580, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Approved in 1982 H. Doc. 381, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 182, 73d Cong., 2d sess.2 H. Doc. 545, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 355, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 373, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 37, 71st Cong., 1st sess.3 5-16 TABLE 5-B (Cont.) NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Campostella bridge. WESTERN BRANCH Mar. 4, 1913 Channel 24 feet deep and 300 & 400 feet wide to West Norfolk highway bridge. July 3, 1930 For 18-foot channel to a point about 3,000 feet above West Norfolk highway bridge. SCOTTS CREEK July 3, 1930 Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a point 100 feet above the Atlantic Coast Line RR bridge. June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 ANCHORAGES 30-foot anchorage at Lambert Point 12-foot anchorage at Pinner Point An anchorage 38 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: anchorage 35 feet deep and 1,500 feet square; and an anchorage 20 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long. Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep with 1,200-foot swinging radius. H. Doc. 224, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 556, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 265, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 605, 63rd Cong., 2d sess.' S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2d sess.' H. Docs. 187 & 143, 89th Cong., 1st sess. OYSTER CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 12 of Text) Mar. 2, 1945 Channel 6 feet deep from Liscombes Channel to Oyster Channel including a turning basin of the same depth, 200 feet long and 125 feet wide. Sept. 3, 1954 Existing project dimensions Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 (Sec. 107) THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 14 of Text) A channel 40 feet deep and 750 feet wide. Channel width increased to 1,000 feet with side channels on either side 32 feet deep and 450 feet wide. Channel 45 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. WATERWAY ON TH E COAST OF VIRGINIA (See Section 15 of the Text) Existing project adopted. Project modified. Project widened to 100 feet, partially relocated, and incorporated in Delaware Bay-Chesapeake Bay Waterway in Delaware-Maryland-Virginia. H. Doc. 716, 76th Cong., 3d sess. S. Doc. 49, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83d Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 957, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 268, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1970. 5-17 -- --- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. (See Section 17 of Text) Sept. 3, 1954 Project authorized. H. Doc. 186, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Project modified. H. Doc. 382, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 7, 1974 Project modification authorized for Phase I Advanced H. Doc. 365, 92nd Cong., 2d sess. Engineering and Design. GATH RIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA. (See Section 19 of Text) July 24, 1946 Project authorized. H. Doc. 325, 61st Cong., 2d sess. RAPIDAN RIVER, VA. (See Section 20 of Text) July 24, 1946 Project authorized. Approved in 1983. (Sec. 14) VA. BEACH STREAMS, CANAL NO. 2, VA. BEACH, VA. (See Section 21 of Text) Oct. 27, 1965 Project authorized. H. Doc. 640, 94th Cong., 2d sess. (Sec. 201) i n Il I II I nIi Ii 'Contains latest published map. 2Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program ses: May 23, 1935. 3For latest published map, see H. Doc. 1246, 62d Cong., 3d 5-18 TABLE 5-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA: DATA RELATIVE TO THE COMPLETED LOCKS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Greatest Length Depth on Width Avail- Year of able Miter Sills Opened Miles Cham- for Full Character to from Location bher Width Lift Upper Lower of Navi- Cost Norfolk, Va. feet (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation gation 12.4 Albemarle and Chesa- 75 600 2.7 ' ' Piles in sand 1932 $499,913 peake Canal (Great and shells Bridge, Va.) 10.7 Dismal Swamp Canal 52 300 12 12 12 Natural earth 1940 $348,879 (Deep Creek) with cutoff walls 33.1 Dismal Swamp Canal 52 300 12 12 13 Natural earth 1941 $372,556 (South Mills, N.C.) with cutoff walls '16 feet at mean low water. 5-19 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1983 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds i -i n I Appomattox River, Va. Aberdeen Creek, Va.2 Blackwater River, Va. Active portion2 11 Deep Creek, Newport News, Va.2 Carters Creek, Va. Active portion2 3 Channel from Phoebus, Va. to deepwater in Hampton Roads 2 Channel connecting York River, Va. Back Creek to Slaights Wharf2 Channel to Newport News, Va.2 Chesconessex Creek, Va.2 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, Va. Chowan River, N.C. 2 Cockrells Creek, Va.4 Cranes Creek, Va. Davis Creek, Va& Deep Creek, Accomack Co., Va. Dymers Creek, Va.2 Greenvale Creek, Va 2 Hampton Creek, Va. Horn Harbor, Va2 Hoskins Creek, Va.2 Jackson Creek, Va.2 Jarvis Creek, Va.4 Kings Creek, Va.4 Lafayette River, Va.2 Little Machipongo River, Va.2 Little River (Creek), Va.2 13 Locklies Creek, Va.2 Meherrin River, N.C. 2 Milford Haven, Va.2 Mill Creek, Va.2 Mulberry Creek, Va.2 Nandua Creek, Va.2 Nansemond River, Va" Newport News Creek, Va.2 Nottoway River, Va.2 Occohannock Creek, Va. Active portion2 Onancock River, Va2 5 Pagan River, Va. 2 Pamunkey River, Va. Active portion2 Parker Creek, Va.2 Parrotts Creek, Va.2 Portsmouth Harbor, Va. Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot2 1980 1975 1975 1980 1951 1944 1950 1982 1968 1978 1975 1949 1978 1971 1974 1953 1980 1981 1964 1977 1971 1979 1957 1982 1972 1966 1928 1950 1950 1937 1950 1950 1978 1962 1981 1951 1963 1950 1964 1974 1957 1947 $870,341 $863,140 109,643 200,893 342,118 151,735 288,278 2,054,201 28,398 11,500 14,855 8,955,974 25,516 49,396 107,220 6,274 97,612 83,000 5,582 20,003 186,237 13,987 44,100 8,500 39,259 5,593 242,047 15,000 168,623 11,581 47,734 24,568 5,445 2,393 6,988 167,477 135,600 44,295 13,859 187,914 51,425 31,376 15,530 37,045 165,566 3,277 32,442 36,874 4,320,634 31,889 24,471 29,198 158,323 39,675 4,610 198,420 1,116,952 88,488 622,801 34,437 153,598 54,343 442,033 9,560 49,591 32,322 4,346 2,458 39,804 426,777 147,570 78,283 427,233 284,381 161,183 140,973 37,771 66,162 5-20 19,300 1,200 2,500 5,700 4,000 2,910 62,969 500 188,962 16,955 43,000 1,350 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Queens Creek 2 Quinby Creek, Va. Rappahannock River, Va.9 10 12 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, Va.4 Starlings Creek, Va.2 Tangier Channel, Va. 2 Taskinas Creek, Va. Totuskey Creek, Va. Tylers Beach, Va.2 Urbanna Creek, Va.2 7 Whitings Creek, Va. Winter Harbor, Va. 2 Willoughby Channel, Va.2 Wishart Point Channel, Va.2 York River, Va. Active portion2 1979 1983 198 1950 198' 1983 1975 1970 1982 1963 1971 1981 1953 1975 1958 'Includes $22,500 for previous projects. 2Completed. 31n addition, $700 for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. "Inactive. 5lncludes $33,549 for new work and $24,754 for maintenance for previous projects. 8lncludes $20,671 for new work for previous projects. TABLE 5-E 26,949 104,176 414,633 66,242 116,550 7,479 167,869 261,201 55,724 21,630 171,334 8,500 118,762 101,803 731,207 1,958,360 603,632 1,802,082 135 450,693 404,943 106,868 112,333 291,048 42,485 102,244 2,000 500 2,973 30,625 180,904 295,212 71n addition, $61,087 was expended for rehabilitation. 8lncludes $30,000 for new work and $7,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 91n addition, $168,091 was expended for rehabilitation. 10 lncludes $197,146 for previous new work projects. "Includes $15,000 for new work for previous projects. 12lncludes $113,500 for previous maintenance projects. '3 Federal funds expended by the U.S. Navy for new work. For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1984 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Anderson Park, 1979 $471,474 - $176,671 Newport News, Va. Hampton Institute 1976 $156,906 - $175,845 TABLE 5-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1984 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Buena Vista, Va. 1977 $ 417,9001 Newmarket Creek, Va. 1970 1,000,000 12,283 $550,097 Norfolk Floodwall, Va. 1973 1,851,933 32,877 516,256 Salem Church Lake, Va. 1976 1,896,7161 2 - - Richmond Filtration Plant, Va. 1982 476,820 - 'Preconstruction planning terminated. 2lncludes $144,785 for previous projects. 5-21 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* TABLE 5-G Name of Project RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Conducted CONDITION SURVEYS Cape Charles City Harbor Entrance Channel Mud Creek Nansemond River Western Branch Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Dismal Swamp Canal York River Entrance Channel James River Richmond Deepwater Terminal to Hopewell City Point Shoal Baltimore Harbor and Channels Rappahannock Shoal Channel Wolf Trap Disposal Area Waterway on the Coast of Virginia North Channel Sloop Channel Gargathy Inlet Goulds (or Gull) Marsh Flats Lewis Creek Broad Creek Chincoteague Inlet Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge Lynnhaven Inlet Starlings Creek Quinby Creek Tylers Beach Cranes Creek Queens Creek Tangier Channels Greenvale Creek Hoskins Creek Dam Neck Disposal Area Newport News Channel Norfolk Harbor 45' Channel Thimble Shoal Channel Oct - Nov 83 Nov 83 Sep 83 Dec 83 Feb 84 Jan 84 Jun -Aug 84 Aug 84 Apr - May 84 Mar 84 Aug 84 Jul 84 Jul 84 Aug 84 Aug - Sep 84 Mar 84 Feb 84 Apr 84 Jan 84 May 84 May 84 Apr - May 84 Jun 84 Jun 84 Aug 84 Sep 84 Sep 84 Nov 84 Sep 84 Sep - Oct 84 Aug 84 RECONNAISSANCE SURVEYS Little Machipongo River Sep 84 5-22 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT * This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries for navigation only. Also included are those portions of the Yadkin- Pee-Dee and Catawba River basins within the state of N. C. as well as a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Act of 1965).....................6-2 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (Wilmington District) ............. 6-2 3. Beaufort Harbor, N. C...................6-4 4. Cape Fear River, N. C. Above Wilmington....... 6-4 5. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C........................65 6. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C................. 6-5 7. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C.......... ... 6-5 8. Morehead City Harbor, N. C.................. 6-6 9. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C .... ............ ..6-7 10. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C..................6-7 11. Rollinson Channel, N. C.. ................ 6-7 12. Shallotte River, N. C................. ... 6-7 13. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C ..... ............. 6-8 14. Smiths Creek, Pamlico County, N. C......... . 6-8 15. Stumpy Point Bay, N. C.. . ..... 6-8 16. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N. C.................. 6-8 17. Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N. C....... ........... 6-9 18. Wilmington Harbor, N. C........ ........ 6-9 19. Wrights Creek, N. C .... ............. 6-10 Beach Erosion Control 20. Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C............. 6-10 Flood Control 21. Ararat River, Mount Airy, N. C.......... .6-11 22. Black River, Harnett County, N. C....... .....6. -11 23. Cape Fear River Basin, N. C..... 6-11 23A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake............ 6-11 Page 23B. Randleman Lake, N. C.. .................... 6-12 24. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C.. . . . ......... 6-12 25. Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C ................... 6-13 26. Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N. C.....................6-13 27. Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C.. .. ..... 6-14 28. Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C............ 6-14 29. Leesville, Va., Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo. Project......................6-14 30. Neuse River Basin, N. C. ................... 6-14 30A. Falls Lake, N. C............... .......... 6-14 31. Scuppernong River, N. C.................... 6-15 32. Yadkin River Basin, N. C. and S. C.............6-15 32A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C.............. .......... 6-15 33. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.......... .... .6-16 34. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................... 6-16 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 35. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N. C............6-16 35A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservior, Va. and N. C.. ........... ................. 6-16 35B. Philpott Lake, Va..........................6-16 36. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................... 6-17 General Investigations 37. Surveys............................... ...6-18 38. Collection and Study of Basic Data. ........... 6-18 39. Advance Engineering and Design............. 6-18 6-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1984 Page Tables (continued) Table 6-A Cost and Financial Statement. ......... 6-19 Table 6-B Authorizing Legislation ........ . 6-24 Table 6-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects..................6-27 Table 6-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects.............. ..... 6-28 Table 6-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................ 6-29 Page Table 6-F Not Applicable Table 6-G Deauthorized Projects................ 6-30 Table 6-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .................... 6-30 Table 6-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.................6-31 Table 6-J Dams and Reservoirs ................ 6-32 Table 6-K Special Authorization.................6-33 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Wilmington District. Existing project. The existing project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The project was authorized by Section 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 25, 89th Cong., 1st sess.). The Act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and participate to the extent of 30 percent of the cost of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Herbicides were applied to three lakes in William B. Umstead State Park, Wake County, North Carolina, to control hydrilla and in the Scuppernong River basin, in Washington and Tyrrell counties, for alligatorweed control. Ten acres of hydrilla were treated with Sonar in Big Lake, 2 acres were treated with Fenac, in Sycamore Lake and 16 acres were treated with Aquathol-K in Reedy Creek Lake. Rodeo was applied to 10 acres of alligatorweed along the Scuppernong River and Mauls Creek. Planning which included the preparation of an Environmental Assessment for alligatorweed control was accomplished at a Federal cost of $36,591. Control work was accomplished for $7,000. Conditions at end of fiscal year. It appears that Sonar application will provide long term hydrilla control in Big Lake. This lake will be monitored over the next few years to determine when future treatments are needed. Fenac and Aquathol-K provided hydrilla control throughout the growing season, although Aquathol-K sites required two applications. Hydrilla control, in Reedy Creek Lake and Sycamore Lake and alligatorweed control in the Scuppernong River basin, will be required in FY 85. Fred Bond Lake will be added to the program as a Hydrilla control site for FY 85; however, a treatment plan for that site has not been developed. Investigations of aquatic weed pro blems, in response to requests by county governments and municipalities may result in the addition of new treatment sites and species in future years. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwaterintrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet; a channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New 6-2 Tables WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from New Topsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein; a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Ports Authority Small-Boat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harbor-access channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Coinjock bridges was authorized in October 1976. Estimated Federal Cost is $45,100,000 (1984). The six mooring basins along the AIWW were deauthorized August 5, 1977 under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251.The south jetty at Masonboro Inlet has an estimated Federal cost of $9,010,000 (1984) and is complete except for the training wall. A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 and was completed in April 1981. A modification to provide for a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep extending from the seaward side of the ocean bar at Carolina Beach Inlet to the intersection of the inlet with the AIWW channel was approved by the Chief of Engineers on February 18, 1982, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. A modification to provide for a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep extending from the seaward side of the ocean bar at Bogue Inlet to the inlet gorge was approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 7, 1983, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Length of channels and basins total 347.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the uncompleted modifications. The State of North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Act of 1976 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete the non-Federal cost-sharing requirement for the Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Coinjock bridges. The three remaining bridges were not included in this modification and are awaiting additional authorization to reflect 100 percent Federal funding. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Government cost in connection with replacement of two highway bridges cost $3,931,327. Litigation on Walter B. Jones cost $9,002. Work in connection with a DM supplement on the Masonboro Inlet south jetty cost $37. Final adjustments in cost of the Bogue Inlet modification caused a decrease in Federal cost of $4,103 and an increase in non-Federal cost of $13,566. A refund of $13,934 was made to local interests. Final adjustments in cost of the Carolina Beach Inlet modification caused a decrease in Federal cost of $1,276 and an increase in non-Federal cost of $1,551. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. side casting dredge Merritt removed 100,975 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $235,519; 79,289 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $143,397; and 114,190 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $342,128. During intermittent periods the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 60,255 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $123,190; and 74,790 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $156,204. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 33,140 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $164,864. The Merritt incurred cost of $13,376 at New River Inlet. The Currituck incurred cost of $2,449 at Carolina Beach Inlet. The Fry incurred cost of $4 at New River Inlet and $1,373 at Topsail Inlet. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $277,745. Between September 4-30, 1984, the contract dredge Marion removed 26,126 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel between the Neuse River and the South Carolina line at a cost of $262,060. Between November 7, 1983, and January 16,1984, the contract dredge Cherokee removed 232,030 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel between the Neuse River and the South Carolina line at a cost of $594,141. Adjustments in prior year dredging cost caused a decrease of $13,802. Marking of easements 6-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1984 along the AIWW cost $19,353. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $31,180. Masonboro Inlet monitoring program cost $18,866. Inspection of highway bridges cost $2,014. Structural repairs to four remaining bridges cost $393,077. Preparation of a report on the Masonboro Inlet training wall cost $24,351. Archeological work at Carolina Beach Inlet, Bear Inlet and Brown Inlet cost $15,777. Divers in connection with pipeline dredging at Camp Lejuene cost $25,930. Archeological investigations of sounds and inlets cost $1,115. Installation of traffic signals at Hobucken and Fairfield and paving at Core Creek cost $51,551. Easement and boundary surveys in New Hanover County cost $114,913. Bridge repairs due to accidents cost $132,599. Condition and operation studies cost $322,255. Four highway bridges and utilities were operated and maintained at a cost of $555,631. Contributed funds of $14,000 were expended to deposit dredge material on Ocean Isle Beach. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1983 except for the training wall and three tieup dolphins at Masonboro Inlet and the bridge replacement program. A construction contract for Coinjock Bridge was awarded on September 15, 1983. Total cost for existing project to September 30, 1984 was $88,867,350, of which $30,241,773 was for new work including $86,851 in contributed funds and $58,625,577 was for maintenance. 3. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is just inside Beaufort Inlet, adjacent to Morehead City Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for stopping erosion at Beaufort Inlet by jetties and sand fences at Fort Macon and Shackleford points and other shore protection; channels 15 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels, except for a depth of 12 feet in the upper 5,000 feet of Gallants Channel; a harbor of refuge in Town Creek 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long; a basin 12 feet deep, 600 feet wide in front of the town of Beaufort except for a channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the basin; a stone bulkhead from Town Marsh across Bird Shoal to the west end of Carrot Island; and a channel in Taylors Creek 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide, extending about 2.6 miles easterly from about opposite Marsh Street in Beaufort to Lennoxville Point at North River, except for an 800-foot-long section at the east end which is 12 feet deep. Total length of channels is 7.3 miles. A modification to provide for a channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek was approved by the Chief of Engineers on August 12,1983, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Average tidal range is 2.5 feet at Beaufort and 3.5 feet at the inlet. (See Table 6-B for A uthorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are fifty waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,000 feet. These facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Between October 1 and November 12, 1983, the contract dredge Marion removed 61,433 cubic yards from shoals to construct a channel in Morgan Creek at a Federal cost of $168,771 and non-Federal cost of $34,000. Maintenance: Cost in connection with pipeline was $13,147. Condition and operation studies cost $31,197. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1965 except for the Morgan Creek modification which was placed under contract on September 27, 1983, and was completed November 12, 1983. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Costs under existing project to September 30, 1984, were $827,040 for new work,including $34,000 contributed funds and $2,927,293 for maintenance, including $168,833 contributed funds, a total of $3,754,333. 4. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 426.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing projects. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a Schannel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operaions and results during fiscal year. Maintenance:During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell snagged and cleared and maintained the buoy systems and made repairs to the locks at a cost of $205,898. Design of portages at the locks cost $369. Cost in connection with settling a claim on the lock gate sealing system was $100. Periodic inspections and evaluations of the three locks and dams cost $1,434. Condition and operation studies cost $39,446. Operation and maintenance of three locks and dams cost $176,267. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 6-4 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 1984, were $15,217,307 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for new work and $11,606,853 for maintenance. 5. CHANNEL FROM BACK SOUND TO LOOKOUT BIGHT, N. C. Location. The project is located on the coast of North Carolina, 8 miles east of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Back Sound, through Shackleford Banks to Lookout Bight. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 26, 1937, and March 2, 1945. For details see Annual Report for 1959. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between February 8 and March 18, 1984, the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 60,974 cubic yards from shoals in Bardens Inlet at a cost of $107,765. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell constructed mooring dolphins at a cost of $21,249. A cost adjustment for the Merritt caused a reduction of $136. Condition and operation studies cost $9,577. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in May 1965. 6. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location. The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassifipd to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and Harbor Act. (See Annual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for distance of 4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. During dredging operations it became apparent that establishment of the 12-foot project would not be possible with currently available equipment. Therefore, the Chief of Engineers, on December 20, 1983, approved the District's recommendation that further construction activity for the Lockwoods Folly Inlet project be suspended until suitable equipment becomes available and that the project be maintained at an &foot project depth in the interim. Local cooperation. For the new modification local interest must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, onehalf of the first costs of construction allocated to recreational boating, an amount presently estimated at $23,500; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in groundwater levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor, (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, and (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: An adjustment in construction cost caused a reduction of $78,833. Contributed funds of $23,505 were expended for construction. A refund of $69,145 was made to local interest. Maintenance: Between October 1, 1983, and February 7, 1984, the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 122,519 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $336,847. The Merritt incurred cost of $249 at Lockwoods Folly Inlet. Archeological investigations of the blockade runner Bendigo cost $12,071. Condition and operation studies cost $7,774. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the latest modification. Work was initiated on the latest modification on September 23,1982, with a depth of 8 feet being reached in October 1982. The project will be maintained at the 8-foot depth until suitable equipment for deepening to 12 feet becomes available. 7. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Albemarle Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach; a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12 foot deep channel in Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay 6-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1984 through Roanoke and Albemarle Sounds to deepwater near the northern end of Croatan Sound. The 12 foot Croatan Sound channel has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $101,000,000 (1984). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rightsof- way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; (f) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, or other utility facilities as well as their maintenance; (g) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (h) and establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Reasonable assurances have been received. The State of N. C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483. Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for the modification cost $407,323. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed 356,327 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $804,955. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 85,498 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $149,764. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 162,835 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $516,574. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell repaired dredging ranges and moorings at a cost of $38,754. Between October 1 and December 29, 1983, the contract dredge Mermentau removed 270,467 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $1,679,568. Between September 22-30, 1984, the contract dredge Mermentau removed 24,418 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $580,131. Cost for prior year pipeline dredging was $67,503. Design for pipeline dredging in Old House Channel cost $10,220. An environmental and economic assessment of dredging the channel from Wanchese to Manteo cost $7,785. Oregon Inlet model studies cost $154. Litigation cost on the lawsuit brought by the owners of the fishing vessels Brothers Pride and Lois Joyce was $17,762. Condition and operation studies cost $108,386. Contributed funds of $1,906 were expended for dredging the channel between Wanchese and Manteo for the State of North Carolina. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) 8. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous project. For details see page 470 of Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. The authorized project provides for deepening of the channel, from the 42-foot-depth contour in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar to the gorge in Beaufort Inlet, to 42 feet over a bottom width of 450 feet, thence to a depth of 40 feet in the east leg of the turning basin including the 1,200-foot diameter turning area, with widths of 600 feet in the cutoff channel, and 400 feet wide to the turning basin and connecting shallow-draft channels. Project deepening was completed on August 2, 1978. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. The estimated Federal cost is $53,500,000 (1984) for the jetties. In general the project as it now exists was authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st sess.) and the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for construction of the jetties which requires that all lands needed for construction be provided without cost to the United States. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provideV 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to facilities were completed in 1969. For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell repaired dredging ranges and moorings at a cost of $36,552. Between August 10 and September 21, 1984, the contract dredges Dodge Island and Sugar Island removed 1,098,259 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $3,348,362. Cost in connection with prior year dredging was $261. Environmental studies for designation of ocean dredged material site cost $12,975. Environmental assessment for beach disposal cost $3,505. Condition and operation studies cost $152,428. 6-6 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the jetties. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1984, was $39,160,939 of which $6,501,569 was for new work (including $553,477 public works funds) and $32,659,370 for maintenance, including $696,711 contributed funds. 9. OCRACOKE INLET, N. C. Location. The inlet connects Pamlico Sound with the Atlantic Ocean, about 30 miles southwest of Cape Hatteras and 48 miles northeast of Cape Lookout. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel across the ocean bar 18 feet deep and 400 feet wide, and construction of a jetty extending from Ocracoke Island to the Atlantic Ocean. Construction of the jetty has been deferred for restudy. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer incurred cost of $718. Condition and operation studies cost $4,717. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in August 1971. 10. PAMLICO AND TAR RIVERS, N. C. Location. The two names apply to the same river, known as the Tar above and as the Pamlico below Washington, N. C. This stream rises in Person County, flows southeasterly 180 miles to Washington, thence 38 miles to Pamlico Sound. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 537.) Previous project. For details see page 502 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from 12-foot contour in the river below Washington to Atlantic Coastline Railroad bridge at Washington; thence 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, 300 feet long, in Hardee Creek, 1,500 feet above its mouth; thence 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide to Greenville; thence 20 inches deep, 60 feet wide to Tarboro; and thence to clear the natural channel to Little Falls. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876; March 3, 1879; August 11, 1888; March 2, 1907; July 25, 1912; July 3,1930; and August 26, 1937. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 54 wharves on the portion of this river under improvement, of which 34 are along the waterfront at Washington, 19 between Washington and the mouth, and only 1 in usable condition above Washington. They have a frontage of 3,570 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: An environmental assessment and a report to determine the economic justification of the project cost $7,100. Project condition surveys cost $600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. (For details see Annual Report for 1962.) 11. ROLLINSON CHANNEL, N. C. Location. The project is located about 3.5 miles northeast of Hatteras Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 5.1 miles long from deep water in Pamlico Sound to and including a basin of the same depth, 80 to 150 feet wide, and 1,450 feet long at Hatteras; a rubble-mound breakwater on each side of the channel at the entrance to the basin; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from that depth in Hatteras Inlet gorge to Rollinson Channel, in the vicinity of the basin at Hatteras. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935; March 2, 1945; September 3, 1954; and October 23, 1962. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six waterfront faclities serve the channel, with a total frontage of 926 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between March 3-14, 1984, the contract dredge Marion removed 29,972 cubic yards from shoals in the channel from Hatteras to Hatteras Inlet at a cost of $178,550. A report to determine the economic justification of the project cost $1,230. Project condition surveys cost $1,206. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed August 22, 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 12. SHALLOTTE RIVER, N. C. Location. A small stream in Brunswick County, N. C., rising in the large swamp country between Cape Fear and Waccamaw Rivers, known as Green Swamp. Stream is about 30 miles long and flows southerly into Atlantic Ocean and 20 miles west of mouth of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 835.) Previous project. For details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. A channel 4 feet deep at mean low water and 36 feet wide from the mouth to town of Shallotte. Section under improvement is 9 miles long. River is tidal, range varying from 5 feet at mouth to 3 feet at Shallotte. Hurricane Hazel in 1954 caused a tide about 16 feet above mean sea level in the river at Shallotte Point. Project authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, and January 21, 1917. Local cooperation. None required. 6-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1984 Terminal facilities. A marine railway and shop at Shallotte Point and another in town of Shallotte with facilities for building and repairing boats up to about 60 feet long. On Shallotte River, there are 17 docks varying from 16 to 321 feet of frontage, providing 1,334 feet of wharf and docking space. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost adjustments for prior year dredging resulted in a cost reduction of $208. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in 1929. 13. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between October 1-17, 1983, the contract dredge Northwood removed 74,093 cubic yards from shoals in Big Foot Slough Channel at a cost of $135,513. Cost for prior year pipeline dredging were $981. Condition and operation studies cost $17,593. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 14. SMITHS CREEK (PAMLICO COUNTY), N. C. Location. Smiths Creek rises in Pamlico County, flows generally southerly, and empties into Neuse River at the town of Oriental, 25 miles southeast of New Bern, N. C. It is about 5 miles long but navigable for only 2 or 3 miles above its .mouth. (See U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 538.) Existing project. This project provides for a rubblemound breakwater starting at a point on the mainland in Oriental and extending 800 feet southwesterly; and an entrance channel in Smiths Creek, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from that depth in Neuse River to and including a basin, generally parallel to the breakwater 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 800 feet long at Oriental. The total length of the channel and basin is about 5,000 feet. Variations in water level due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Observations of 4 years duration show that the extreme range of wind tides is 8.3 feet. The existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910, and September 3, 1954. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facitilies. There are 16 wharves in this harbor, all of timber construction with pile foundations. They have a frontage varying from 6 to 40 feet, the total frontage being about 400 feet. None have rail connections. One wharf was built by the town and is to be maintained in perpetuity as a public wharf. The remaining wharves are all privately owned but are generally open to the public when not required by their owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No work was accomplished; however, a funds transfer of -$61 was made. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in March 1956. 15. STUMPY POINT, N. C. Location. On southeastern side of the mainland, Dare County, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. A channel 75 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Pamlico Sound to a basin in the harbor at Lake Worth, 75 to 100 feet wide, 550 feet long and 10 feet deep, plus an irregularly shaped area providing access to the public wharf, together with protective breakwaters at entrance to the harbor. Project was authorized by 1948 River and Ha;bor Act and under Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Bulkheads in existing basin provide about 550 linear feet of berthing space, and a wholesale fishhouse provides about 250 feet. Part of the space along the bulkheads is publicly owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, but any appreciable increase will require additional facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No work was accomplished; however, a funds transfer of -$286 was made. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed on September 20, 1967. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1966.) 16. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of the outer banks of eastern North Carolina. (See Coast and 6-8 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an alternative route of the same dimensions through Back Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar Island, including the authorized passage and future maintenance of a channel through the existing private basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, the same depth, at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide, from the existing side channel at Atlantic, N.C., to the mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point, running along the channel approximately 2,000 feet. The project is complete except for 7-foot modification to Dairis, N.C., which was deauthorized April 6, 1982, by the Chief of Engineers due to the inability of local interest to provide the terms of local cooperation. Plane of reference is mean low water. The length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles. (See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date for completed portion. Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the waterway. Additional facilities are needed along Core Sound. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost for prior year pipeline dredging was $15. Project condition surveys cost $8,209. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1972 except for the modification to Davis, N. C., which has been deauthorized. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 17. WATERWAY CONNECTING SWANQUARTER BAY WITH DEEP BAY, N. C. Location. On north side of Pamlico Sound, about 10 miles east of mouth of Pamlico River. (See U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1231.) Existing project. A channel 60 feet wide and 8 feet deep from Deep Bay through present waterway to Swanquarter Bay, and thence through Swanquarter Canal to a basin of the same depth, about 500 feet long and 60 to 300 feet wide, at head of canal. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910, and March 2, 1945. For further details see Annual Report for 1950. The existing project has been modified to provide a channel 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from the State ferry channel to the harbor entrance channel, a distance of approximately 4,850 feet; enlarge the harbor entrance channel from 8 to 10 feet deep and 60 to 80 feet wide to the harbor canal, approximately 1,400 feet; and enlarging the harbor canal from 8 to 10 feet deep with the existing width of 60 feet to the turning basin in Swanquarter Harbor, a distance of approximately 2,450 feet. The modification also includes Federal maintenance of the State ferry channel 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from the intersection of that channel with the Federal improvements to deep water in Swanquarter Bay, to be accomplished only if the State discontinues maintenance. This modification was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 10, 1983, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six waterway facilities serve the waterway, with a total frontage of 355 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Between October 4, 1983, and February 23, 1984, the contract dredge Marion removed 114,578 cubic yards from shoals in Swanquarter Bay to construct a channel at a Federal cost of $520,444 and non-Federal cost of $160,000. Maintenance: No work was accomplished; however, a funds adjustment of -$125 was made. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed January 24, 1964, except for the modification which was completed on February 23, 1984. 18. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast (Cape Fear) River; a 38-footdeep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-foot-deep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast (Cape Fear) River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; March 2, 1945; May 17, 1950; October 23, 1962; and March 10, 1964; under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. A modification to widen the existing anchorage basin by 100 feet 6-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1984 was authorized on July 13, 1982, under Sec. 5 of the Cong. Appro. Act of March 4, 1915. (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. For further details, see Port Series No. 12, revised 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell repaired survey and dredging ranges at a cost of $116,661. Between October 1-17, 1983, the contract dredge Dodge Island removed 531,588 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $751,065. Between September 20-30, 1984, the contract dredges Dodge Island and Sugar Island removed 208,986 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $549,396. Between December 9, 1983, and January 30, 1984, the contract dredge Arlington removed 708,533 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin at a cost of $779,400. Engineering and design for future year dredging cost $8,945. Adjustments in prior year dredging cost caused a reduction of $587. Dike construction cost $8,367. Investigations in connection with a ship grounding cost $7,200. Adjustments in the cost of the feasibility study for enlargement of the turning basin resulted in a decrease of $9. Mosquito control on Eagle Island cost $3. Condition and operation studies cost $293,206. Contributed funds of $31,429 were expended for diking on pipeline dredging. Contributed funds of $223,575 were expended for construction of dikes on Eagle Island. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project completed July 1973 except for latest modification which was completed on October 26, 1982,with maintenance funds. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1984, was $60,889,699 of which $14,089,612 was for new work and $46,800,087 was for maintenance, including $2,745,705 contributed funds. 19. WRIGHITS CREEK, N. C. Location. About 10 miles south of Belhaven, N. C., and is a small creek tributary to Pungo River. Creek flows generally east to Pungo River, is about 900 feet wide at mouth, and gradually narrows to 200 feet at head of navigation. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1231 and 1232.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from Pungo River to-and including a basin 8 feet deep and 150 by 400 feet in north prong of Wrights Creek. Length of channel and basin is about 1.3 miles. Existing project was authorized July 12, 1962, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil-disposal work areas for initial and maintenance; provide adequate terminal facilities; and hold the United States free from damages. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 17 commercial piers along the waterfront with a frontage of 1,400 feet, and a number of private piers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No work was accomplished; however, a funds transfer of -$31 was made. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed April 1965. Beach Erosion Control 20. FORT FISHER AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is located in New Hanover County about 20 miles south of Wilmington, North Carolina, on the peninsula which separates the lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See U. S. Geological Survey quadrangle sheet for Kure Beach, N. C.) Existing Project. The project involves construction of a stone revetment along the seaward face of the eroding upland bluff fronting the Fort Fisher Historic Site. The total length of the revetment is 3,200 feet. The revetment structure will be comprised of natural stone units. The crest of the revetment will be rimmed with a safety zone consisting of a pedestrian path, rails, and appropriate landscaping to prevent access to the sloping face of the structure. Three overlook, gazebo-type platforms will permit visitors to view the beach below the revetment, and three stairways integrated in the face of the structure will allow controlled access to the beach. Estimated Federal cost of construction is $4,320,000 (1984). The project was authorized under Section 201 of Public Law 89-298 on November 22, 1976. Local cooperation. The State of North Carolina is the project sponsor and prior to commencement of construction would: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable beach fill material borrow areas, as determined by the Chief of Engineers, necessary for the construction of the project. (b) Provide a cash contribution for the shore protection project equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost exclusive of lands, easements, rights-of-way, and alterations, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law, which contribution is presently estimated at $1,850,000, or 30 percent of project first costs. (c) Enter into a written agreement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army concerning accomplishment of the above preconstruction requirements and that the State will: (1) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works. (2) Maintain the revetment structure, walkway, overlooks, and stairways after completion of construction in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. (3) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain the site for continued public use during the life of the project. (4) Control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers. 6-10 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT (5) Adopt appropriate ordinances or provide other means to insure preservation of the beach areas and the dunes. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design under General Investigations cost $2,078. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is in the preconstruction planning stage with completion indefinite due to higher priority work by the State of N. C. Flood Control 21. ARARAT RIVER, MOUNT AIRY, N. C. Location. Ararat River is a tributary of the Yadkin River and is located in Surry County, N. C. The river flows through Mount Airy, N. C., to its confluence with the Yadkin River. The entire project borders Mt. Airy. (See USGS quadrangle sheets, Mount Airy, North, Va. and N. C. and Mount Airy, South, N. C.) Existing project. The project consists of approximately 5,100 feet of industrial area dike construction, approximately 6,700 feet of channel improvement, approximately 1,800 feet of floodwall/dike at the Pine Street commercial area, and a flood warning system. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on August 10, 1983, under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The estimated Federal construction cost is $4,000,000 (1984). Local cooperation. Local interest must: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and spoil disposal areas and suitable conservation lands to partially compensate for loss of fish and wildlife resources as determined by the Chief of Engineers, necessary for the construction of the project; (b) accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; (c) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, except damage due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (d) maintain and operate the project after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (e) prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction or encroachment on channels and interior ponding areas which would reduce their flood-carrying capacity or hinder maintenance and operation, and control development in the project area to prevent an undue increase in the flood damage potential; and (f) assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $4 million. Formal assurances have been received. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preauthorization studies cost $6,924. Preconstruction plannilng cost $219,822. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is in the preconstruction planning stage. Construction is scheduled to start in April 1985. 22. BLACK RIVER, HARNETT COUNTY, N. C. Location. The river rises near Angier in Harnett County, N. C., and flows in a southerly direction about 25 miles to its confluence with South River. (See Army Map Service quadrangle sheet 5254, Fayetteville, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for 5.5 miles of channel excavation on Black River, beginning at a point 8,000 feet below County Road 1780, with a 35-foot bottom width to the Durham and Southern Railroad. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers on February 9, 1968, under Section 205,1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: No work accomplished. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in December 1979. 23. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agencies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report is to be prepared and submitted in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87-639. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs). Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1984, and Howards Mill Lake in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in October 1980 due to the current lack of economic justification. The joint study, accomplished by the Departments of the Army and Agriculture was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. No further action will be taken. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 23A. B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Haw River, N. C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of Moncure, N.C. 6-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-foot diameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir will have a gross storage capacity of 778,000 acre-feet, of which 543,000 acre-feet will be for flood control and a conservation pool of 235,000 acre-feet for water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, and other purposes. Estimated cost for new work is $134,000,000 (1984), consisting of $75,811,900 for construction, and $58,188,100 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30, 1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,900,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $37,000 annually. Assurances that these obligations for water storage would be assumed have been received from the Department of Natural and Economic Resources, State of North Carolina. In addition, the State of N. C. has leased the project for public park, recreational, fish, wildlife, and other natural resource management purposes and the estimated cost to the State for O&M under this lease is $753,000 annually. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Claim settlement on N. C. Roads 1715 and 1941 cost $115,368. Claim settlement on reservoir clearing cost $1,485,543. Repairs to the dam cost $79,938. Recreation facilities at Parkers Creek were initiated at a cost of $1,376,777 and at Vista Point, Farrington and Forestry sites at a cost of $1,124,230. Status of plans and specs: Crosswinds Marina breakwater and slope repair, 100 percent; management center, 65 percent; and Poplar Point recreation area, 90 percent. Total Federal expenditures were $5,304,189. Maintenance: Normal operation and' maintenance on completed features cost $601,634. Condition at end of fiscal year. Relocations complete except for Public Service Gas Co. Recreation facilities are underway. Impoundment was completed in February 1982 with dedication on May 1, 1982. 23B. RANDLEMAN LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on Deep River, N. C., about 15 miles south of Greensboro and about 2 miles upstream from the town of Randleman. The damsite and about two-thirds of the reservoir would lie in Randolph County. The upper one-third of the reservoir would lie in Guilford County. Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of an earth dam 2,400 feet long with a maximum height of 110 feet above the streambed to create a reservoir with gross storage of 108,000 acre-feet, consisting of 46,000 acre-feet for flood control and a conservation pool of 62,000 acre-feet for water supply, water-quality control and sedimentation. Randleman Lake is the second project of the comprehensive plan of development for the Cape Fear River Basin, providing reservoir storage for flood control, water supply, and recreation. Estimated cost of new work is $109,000,000 (1984), consisting of $51,764,000 for construction and $57,236,000 for lands and damages, including relocations. The existing project was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (H.D. 343, 90th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must: (1) In accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act (P.L. 89-72): (a) Administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife and to assure access to such development to all on equal terms; (b) pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost allocated to recreation presently estimated at $8,502,000; and (c) bear all the costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities, presently estimated at $228,000 annually; (2) In accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, assure payment to the United States of all costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $48,747,000 for construction and $433,000 annually for operation, maintenance, and major replacement; (3) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to water-rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the project; (4) Prevent encroachment on downstream channels to the extent needed to provide effective reservoir operation; and (5) Exercise to the full extent of their legal capability control against removal of streamflow made available for preservation of downstream fishery habitat. These assurances are subject to the provision that Federal participation in measures required to safeguard the quality of water in Randleman Reservoir shall not be provided as a substitute for the responsiblity of local interests to provide adequate treatment in accordance with water quality standards established pursuant to the Water Quality Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-500). Reasonable assurances that the requirements will be fulfilled have been received. With the advent of innovative financing under the current administration, the terms of local cooperation may change. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design cost $298,513. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed in FY 1982. Currently awaiting a new construction start. 24. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast of Wilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of a dune with a base generally bordering at 6-12 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 25,800 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach; initial deposition of suffident material north of Carolina Beach to serve as a feeder beach; and Federal participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period not to exceed 10 years from the year of completion of initial placement. The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the inactive category, February 1975. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $9,383,000 (1984). The project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 418, 87th Cong. 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project only. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Adjustments in the cost-sharing for the beach nourishment project resulted in a decrease in Federal cost of $139,451 and an increase in non-Federal cost of $139,451. Supervision and inspection on the beach nourishment project cost $10. Engineering and design for the renourishment project cost $18,727. A refund of $128,345 was made to local interests. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was completed August 12, 1982, except for grassing which was completed in September 1983. Renourishment is scheduled for March, 1985. 25. DEEP CREEK, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, N. C. Location. The stream rises in Halifax County and flows southerly to its confluence with Fishing Creek, about 0.5 mile upstream of the Fishing Creek and Tar River confluence, which is about 8.0 miles above Tarboro. All of the project is in Edgecombe County, N. C. (See U.S. Geological Survey quadrangle sheets, Parmele and Tarboro, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for channel improvement and dike construction in the Deep Creek basin, consisting of the construction of a dike and drainage appurtenances on the north, west, and south sides of the town of Speed, for a distance of about 7,400 feet, to a maximum height of 9.5 feet, with a 10-foot-top-width; relocation and channel excavation of 3,100 feet of Knight Swamp along the northern dike segment and 1,800 feet of Longs Branch along the southern dike segment, to 20-foot and 15-foot-bottom widths, respectively, and enlarging 3,200 feet of Deep Creek to a 65-foot maximum bottom width along the western dike segment, utilizing excavated material for dike fill; Channel excavation of an additional 500 feet of both Knight Swamp and Longs Branch upstream of the dike to bottom widths of 10 feet have been deferred. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on February 18, 1977, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project construction cost $35,053. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for project construction was awarded September 13, 1982, and was completed on September 23, 1983, except for grassing. 26. GENOA SEWER FACILITY, WAYNE COUNTY, N. C. Location. The facility is located on the south bank of the Neuse River across from the City of Goldsboro, N. C., and about 1/2 mile downstream from the U. S. 117 bridge over the Neuse River. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Southwest Goldsboro, N. C.) Existing project. The purpose of the project is to provide emergency bank protection at the Genoa sewer facility. The project consists of grading the Neuse River bank to a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical slope along the 200 linear feet of eroded bank, filling the slope as necessary to achieve grade, filling the hole in the riverbed at the toe of the eroded bank to match existing river grade, placing a 6-inch-thick layer of crushed stone filter bed from the toe to the top of the slope, and providing a 11/2-foot-thick layer of riprap armor slope protection; at an estimated Federal construction cost of $190,000 (1984). The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on August 30, 1983, under Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide, without cost to the United States, all necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for construction and maintenance of the project (all acquisition will be in compliance with provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 [PL 91-646]); hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000; and comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (PL 88-352). Formal assurances have been received. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project construction cost $40,898. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded on November 22, 1983, with completion in November 1984. Contract has been delayed due to high water and other reasons. 6-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1984 27. GOLDSBORO, NEUSE RIVER, N. C. Location. On that portion of the Neuse River near Goldsboro, Wayne County, N. C., between points 94.8 and 102.5 miles above New Bern, N. C. Existing project. Provides for cutoff channel, 12 feet deep, 20 feet wide, about 6,400 feet long, across the bend in the Neuse River located about 95 miles above New Bern, N. C. Project authorized by Flood Control Act of 1941. (See H. Doc. 327, 77th Cong. 1st sess., which contains the latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Construction of bank stabilization measures along the cutoff cost $319,414. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 28. JOYCE CREEK, CAMDEN COUNTY, N. C. Location. Joyce Creek rises in the northeastern part of Camden County, N. C., and flows generally southward for about 10 miles to Turners Cut near South Mills, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1227 and Army Map Service quadrangle sheet, South Mills, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for excavating a channel 40 feet wide, from the confluence with Turners Cut to County Road 1235, 3.2 miles; thence a channel, 30 feet wide, to the uppermost crossing of SR 1224, 0.8 mile; thence a 20-foot-bottom-width channel to the confluence with Mill Run and Cypress Run, 1.7 miles; thence on Cypress Run, a channel, 10 feet wide, to County Road 1233, 1.6 miles; and on Mill Run, a 10-foot-wide channel from confluence with Joyce Creek to County Road 1232, 2.2 miles; a total of 9.5 miles. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on March 29, 1967, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project construction cost $16,225 Federal and $5,160 non- Federal. A refund of $1,057 was made to local interests. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for project construction was awarded September 23, 1982, and was completed on October 28, 1983. 29. LEESVILLE, VA., ROANOKE RIVER, SEC. 32, DEMO. PROJECT Location. The project is located on the Roanoke (Staunton) River in southwest Virginia near the Town of Leesville in Campbell and Pittsylvania counties. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Leesville, Va.) Existing project. The project provides for a total of about 2,200 linear feet of streambank protection on two separate sites along a 3-mile segment of the river between Leesville Dam and the town of Leesville. Three methods of erosion control were used, they were: stone rubble with vegetation, rubber tire mattress and rock windrow. The project was funded for construction by the Chief of Engineers in February 1978, under Section 32, P.L. 93-251. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Monitoring of Leesville and Little Rockfish Creek cost $1,654. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in March 1981. The project is functioning as designed. 30. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1984. 30A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dam 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 92 feet above streambed. The dam will have a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100-feet wide, will be located in the east abutment. The reservoir will have a gross storage capacity of 397,000 acre-feet, of which 243,000 acre-feet will be for flood control, 45,000 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 71,000 acre-feet for water-quality control, and 38,000 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Estimated cost of new work is $165,000,000, (1984) consisting of $74,045,100 for construction and $90,954,900 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $12,400,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $87,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; 6-14 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $20,600,000, and, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $1,192,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N. C. Department of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non- Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required by law. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for water-supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and facilities in accordance with P.L. 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of P.L. 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Land acquisition continued at a cost of $952,911. Construction of SR 2000 highway bridge was completed at a cost of $312,892. Litigation on the Servidone dam contract continued at a cost of $300,093. Recreation facilities continued at a cost of $1,747,448. Status of plans and specifications: All relocations, clearing and dam specifications are 100 percent complete. Total Federal expenditures for construction were $4,688,430. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance on completed features cost $584,999. Condition at end of fiscal year. Reservoir filling was completed on December 7, 1983. Dedication ceremonies were held on April 30, 1983. The management center and Sandling Beach recreation area are underway. The fish and wildlife facilities and remaining recreation facilities are the major items remaining to be constructed. 31. SCUPPERNONG RIVER, N.C. Location. The stream rises in the east-central portion of Washington County, N. C., flows east into Tyrrell County, and thence north into Albemarle Sound, a total distance of about 22 miles. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheet, Creswell, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for excavating a 70-foot-bottom-width channel, with depths ranging from 9 feet to 12 feet, along Scuppernong River from Spruills Bridge to the confluence with Mauls Creek, a distance of 2.0 miles, and excavating a 45-foot-bottom-width channel, with depths ranging from 6 feet to 8 feet, along Mauls Creek from Scuppernong River to County Road 1163, a distance of 1.8 miles. Total project length is 3.8 miles. Estimated Federal cost of construction is $624,000 (1984). Project was approved by the Chief of Engineers, October 31, 1966 (with modification adding Mauls Creek approved June 16, 1967), under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway-bridge construction and alterations necessary for construction; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate project after completion; contribute, in cash, 19.4 percent of construction costs, currently estimated at $90,000; and prevent future encroachment. Formal request has not been made. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project reanalysis cost $30,812. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project reanalysis and environmental studies are underway with completion scheduled in 1985. A smaller channel on Scuppernong River and deletion of Mauls Creek are anticipated. 32. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S. C. Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946, authorized construction of four flood control dams in the Upper Yadkin River Basin, two on the Yadkin River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made subsequent to authorization established the economic advantage of providing needed flood-control storage in only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the Yadkin. Present planning considers only the two-reservoir plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott was transferred to the Wilmington District from Charleston in fiscal year 1980. Any future work on Reddies River will also be done by the Wilmington District. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 32A. W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 1,107.5 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and outlet works consisting of an intake structure, control tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in diameter through the base of the dam near the south abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 acre-feet of which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water supply, and 8,000 acrefeet being contained in the minimum pool. Estimated cost is $9,110,000 (1983) for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act. 6-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1984 Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: General operation and maintenance cost $1,260,226 Recreation use fees of $8,444 were expended for operation, maintenance, and construction of recreation facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for flood control and water storage purposes in February 1963. 33. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made for the following projects during fiscal year 1984: Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.; Gapway Swamp, Columbus County, N. C.; Old Field Swamp, Robeson County, N. C.; Gardners Creek, Martin County, N. C.; New River, Onslow County, N. C.; Pungo Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; South Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Pungo River, Beaufort County, N. C.; and Filberts Creek, Edenton, N. C.; Pantego and Cucklers Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.; Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.; Pasquotank Dike, Pasquotank County, N. C.; Perquimans River, Perquimans County, N. C.; Core Creek, Craven County, N. C.; Princeville Dike, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Swift Creek, Pitt County, N. C.; Carolina Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Wrightsville Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Goldsboro, Neuse River, Wayne County, N. C.; Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.; Black River, Harnett County, N. C.; Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.; and Leith Creek, Scotland County, N. C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $31,000. Total cost to September 30, 1984, was $275,559, charged to operations. 34. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization. (See Table 6-K.) Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). National Emergency Preparedness Planning cost $52,602. Advance Measures were $139,239. Tornado disaster reconnaissance cost $10,000. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 35. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N.C. Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its tributaries in Virginia and North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved a general plan for the comprehensive development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control and other purposes, and authorized construction of John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Tables 6-J for a list of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been authorized for construction. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 35A. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on the right and left banks, with a total length of about 22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River Basin for control of floods, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Estimated cost is $67,529,000 (1983) for construction and $24,521,000 for lands and damages, including relocation of highways, railroads, and utilities, a total of $92,050,000 for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of two comfort stations at Palmer Point and Rudds Creek were completed at a cost of $14,200. Design of a washhouse at Longwood and a dump station and washhouse at Northbend Park cost $44,454. Adjustments in prior year contract cost caused a reduction of $5,600. Cost-sharing with the State of N.C. at various sites cost $23,027. Maintenance: General operation and maintenance was performed at a cost of $4,060,946. Recreation user fees of $67,850 were expendedfor operation and maintenance of recreation facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational facilities. Production of power and protection from floods are provided by project. 35B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. Location. On Smith River, Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, and 35 miles upstream from Virginia-North Carolina State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Roanoke River Basin, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation 6-16 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Federal cost estimate is $13,933,000 (1983) for construction and $1,157,000 for lands and damages, a total of $15,090,000. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of a washhouse at Goose Point and a comfort station at Salthouse were completed at a cost of $34,583. Construction of a comfort station at Philpott Park cost $83,466. Maintenance: General operation and maintenance of the project was performed at a cost of $1,204,739. Recreation user fees of $19,000 were expended for operation and maintenance of recreation facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for additional recreational facilities, and is providing power and flood protection. 36. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, located in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1984 at elevation 210.20 feet, MSL or 5.8 feet below normal pool. Below normal rainfall and inflows caused the lake to be drawndown to the minimum elevation of the fical year on October 23, which was 208.85 feet, MSL or 7.15 feet below normal pool. Jordan Lake gradually rose to normal pool until heavy rainfall produced five major lake level peaks, four of which were 222.30, 222.80, 222.00, and 221.65 feet, MSL on December 9, January 14, March 8, and March 31, respectively. The fifth lake level peak of 224.20 feet, MSL on February 17 was the maximum elevation for fiscal year 1984. Jordan Lake was gradually drawndown and remained near normal pool until rainfall caused the lake to rise to elevation 220.10 feet, MSL on May 31. Excessive summer rainfall produced the last major lake level peak of the fiscal year of 222.50 feet, MSL on August 2. The lake level was drawndown to normal pool by the end of August. Below normal rainfall and declining inflows in September caused Jordan Lake to be drawndown and ended the fiscal year at elevation 215.10 feet, MSL or 0.9 foot below normal pool. Flood damages prevented for fiscal year 1984 and since impoundment were equal to $1,480,000 and $2,725,000, respectively. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $70,001. Falls Lake located in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1984 at elevation 245.40 feet, MSL and was still in the initial filling process which began on January 13, 1983. The lake reached the normal pool elevation of 250.1 feet, MSL on December 7, 1983. Above normal rainfall from January to May produced several rises in lake levels with the maximum elevation of the fiscal year at 255.55 feet, MSL occurring on March 7. Falls Lake was gradually drawndown and remained near normal pool through mid-July. Heavy rainfall caused a rise in lake level to elevation 252.25 feet, MSL on July 31. Below normal rainfall and declining inflows then caused a gradual drawdown through the end of the fiscal year. On September 30, Falls Lake was at elevation 247.80 feet, MSL or 2.3 feet below normal pool. Flood damages prevented in FY 84, the first full year of impoundment and since impoundment were equal to $2,448,000 and $5,923,000, respectively. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $63,320. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservior, located in the Roanoke River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina, began fiscal year 1984 at 5.4 feet below rule curve or at elevation 294.12 feet, MSL. The reservoir level reached elevation 293.50 feet, MSL on October 12, which was the minimum elevation of the fiscal year. By mid-November the reservoir level was above rule curve and continued to climb until reaching the maximum elevation of the fiscal year on April 17, 1984, at 310.70 feet, MSL or 8.7 feet above rule curve. The reservoir level returned to rule curve by mid- May and with several fluctuations remained near rule curve through early September. Below normal rainfall during September caused the reservoir level to begin a gradual decline and ended the fiscal year 2.6 feet below rule curve or at elevation 296.89 feet, MSL. The 13-foot minimum stage required in the lower Roanoke River at Weldon for striped bass spawning was maintained during the entire period by both natural and augmentation flows from Kerr. All inflows to Kerr Reservoir were controlled without having to spill water over the spillway or through the sluices. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 600,540,200 kilowatt-hours and power revenue was $5,873,049 making a cumulative total since inception of $111,161,860. Flood damages prevented during the fiscal year amounted to $1,400,000 and the cumulative flood damages prevented since the project began amounts to $63,607,000. The total cost of functional operations for the fiscal year was $105,347. Philpott Lake, located on the Smith River in the Dan River Basin, Virginia, was 7.46 feet below rule curve or at elevation 964.04 feet, MSL at the beginning of fiscal year 1984. Below normal rainfall in October caused the lake level to be drawndown to 961.05 feet, MSL or 10.45 feet below rule curve on October 20 which was the minimum elevation of the fiscal year. Excessive rainfall during November and December produced a steady rise in lake level to elevation 973.11 feet, MSL on January 2. Philpott was gradually drawndown to rule curve at the end of January. Above normal rainfall during February and March caused a steady rise in lake levels to the maximum elevation of the fiscal year of 975.79 feet, MSL on March 30. During April through September, Philpott Lake remained near rule curve and ended the fiscal year at 971.50 feet, MSL or at rule curve. There were no flood damages prevented in FY 84 which makes the cumulative total since inception of the project equal to $18,970,000. Gross generation amounted to 29,016,240 Kilowatt-hours and power revenue was $1,036,421, making a total of $13,200,113 since inception. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $35,896. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, located in North 6-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1984 Carolina on the Yadkin River in the Pee Dee River Basin, N.C.-S.C., began fiscal year 1984 at elevation 1,026.55 feet, MSL, or 3.45 feet below the normal pool elevation of 1,030.0 feet, MSL. The reservoir level continued to decline until October 10 when the minimum elevation of the fiscal year occurred at 1,025.90 feet, MSL. Excessive rainfall on October 11 and 12 pushed the reservoir level back back to near elevation 1,030.00 feet, MSL. The reservoir level remained at or near normal pool until mid-December. Above normal rainfall during the month of December, February, April, and May created several respectable peaks in the reservoir level. The maximum reservoir level for the fiscal year occurred on February 15 at elevation 1,039.15 feet, MSL. With the exception of these peaks the reservoir level remained near the normal pool level until early September when below normal rainfall caused a gradual decline to occur. The fiscal year ended with the reservoir level at elevation 1,028.05 feet, MSL. Flood damages prevented during the fiscal year were $550,000, which makes the cumulative total since inception equal to $59,151,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $48,220. General Investigations 37. SURVEYS Cost for the period was $1,341,751, of which $42,887 was for navigation studies, $980,460 was for flood control studies, $140,226 was for beach erosion studies, $42,983 for review of completed projects, $71,786 for Special Investigations, $10,070 for FERC licenses review, $3,000 for soil conservation service, $4,014 for hydrologic studies, $45,494 for cooperation with states, and $831 for dam inspection and inventory. 38. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of Federal and non- Federal interests and agencies in the use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other Federal agencies and local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the period were $224,025. Total costs to September 30, 1984 were $3,365,822. 39. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Advance engineering and design for Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C., cost $2,078. Fiscal year 1982 was the first year of funding under the G. I. program. For additional information see the detailed write-up for Fort Fisher and Vicinity. 6-18 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A See Section in Text Project 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Contributed Funds) (Regular Funds) (Regular Funds) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. & St. Johns River, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 3. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Cape Fear River, N. C. above Wilmington 5. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C. 6. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost 15,000 2,564,000 ' 2,558,817 5,501,525 4,669,699 13,327 13,327 471,611 652,010 12,235 10,633 21,000 3,151 197,857 196,407 1,529,000 1,543,013 1,850,445 1,847,785 7,000 22,261 2,369 725,0003 545,577 ' 3,025,300 3,136,098 11,560 340,000 297,597 58,755 58,755 331,000 311,479 195,000 190,448 327,000 57,655 507,000 502,490 820,000 1,066,908 2,723,000 2,204,476 44,000 41,800 18,000 13,184 3,644,477 703,9516 3,783,937 3,914,751 73,740 57,800 243,500' 50,880 ' 10 32,000 73,559 34,000 414,000 434,800 7,000 11,069 -93,477 125,319 363,000 360,874 92,650 1,000,000 1,037,405 4,941,000 4,270,169 2,200 70,000 43,591 876,080 3,934,987 3,760,711 4,011,260 1,551 29,0514e 14,000 14,000 -23,849 168,771 43,500 44,344 34,000 424,400 423,514 136,200 138,455 - 156,545 -78,833 361,000 356,941 92,650" 500,000 407,323 3,004,500 3,981,556 10,000 1,906 6-19 207,400 175,130 31,809 31,8091 30,582,973' 30,353,629' 59,102,060' 58,733,211' 86,851 86,851 14,000 14,000 818,040 " 818,040 " 2,771,314" 2,771,3142 34,000 34,000 168,833 168,833 3,759,57313 3,759,57313 11,617,814" 11,615,031" 88,328 88,328 2,109,771 2,108,391 241,272 '" 241,272 '" 2,404,046 2,391,901 92,650 92,650 7,425,945 ' 7,195,884 ' 24,796,007 24,565,115 108,000 99,906 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project a 'RS---L__.] I1_t_ o. Moreneaa City Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C. 10. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C. 11. Rollinson Channel, N. C. 12. Shallotte River, N. C. 13. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Smiths Creek (Pamlico County, N.C.) 15. Stumpy Point Bay, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 3,097,000 3,307,415 60,962 221,540 16,000 13,740 3,418,000 3,347,194 40,080 40,080 18,000 20,420 3,459 3,554 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib: Cost - 6,546,053" - 6,546,053" ,011 32,247,273 20 ,083 32,247,21620 -- 696,711 - 696,711 - 346,240 - 346,240 ,000 883,044 ,435 879,764 7,700 7,700 1,429 180,206 7,036 180,986 16,707 -208 32,707 -208 309,000 40,000 407,288 154,087 -61 -286 6,259 8,224 674,651 674,651 778,378 778,378 589,105 589,105 943,102 943,102 18,181 18,181 169,768 169,768 184,284 184,284 3,091,218 3,091,218 75,000 75,000 113,273 113,273 36,387 36,387 268,381 268,381 612,815 612,815 124,000 124,000 502,567 502,567 1,957,756 1,957,752 2,452 2,452 3,548,007 3,335,094 490,112 329,534 29,000 25,457 1,700 1,700 5,023 5,023 804 804 345,526 364,956 75,000 11,985 5,598 18,633 2,633 645,000 433,285 400 339 1,900 1,614 10,826 12,346 287,921 72,810 52,608 265,750 6-20 55 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Se in Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 17. Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Wilmington Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Wrights Creek, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C. 21. Ararat River, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22.. Black River, N. C. 23A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23B. Randleman Lake, N. C. 24. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 25. Deep Creek, N. C. 26. Genoa Sewer Facility Wayne County, N. C. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 400 275 3,074,000 2,814,849 475,232 109,970 2,661,000 2,346,392 210,535 429,572 709,000 21 -68, 119,856 22 520, - 160, - 160 5,354,000 5,847,149 354,367 280,371 2,521 2,513 255 400 369 230,000 155,712 -5,000 3,784 3,562,000 3,849,535 409,828 370,046 200,000 199,508 118,661 548 3,384,941 2,087,925 559,000 561,223 27,000 147,365 530,761 5,128,000 236,332 5,247,893 12,601 3,951,800 - 3,136,513 6,000 211,000 3,578 17,252 2,228 450,000 26 418,484 "2 4,291 2,500,000 2,407,679 589,000 571,995 ,700 751,099 ,444 751,099 -125 182,725 - 182,725 ,000 160,000 ,000 160,000 - 18,715,226 2" - 18,715,226 23 ,850 44,755,320 24 ,647 44,656,996 24 - 2,749,701 ,004 2,745,705 '" - 64,825 -- 64,825 -31 144,714 - 144,714 - 3,500 -- 3,500 - 21,888 - 21,888 - 490,000 - 490,000 260,000 ' 2 226,746 28 12,300 -716 5,800, 5,304, 632, 601, 455,000 250, 276,193 298, - -295, 49,483 -120, 571,40829 267, - 6, 169,000 35, 115,800 31 63, 31,96032 40 710,000 645,230 12,300 475,574 475,574 000 100,007,641 189 96,985,920 900 2,689,556 634 2,595,438 - 1,721,389 - 1,721,389 000 4,170,588 513 4,030,635 ,000 7,095,533 ,714 7,054,014 - 4,755,389 ,796 ' 4,755,389 ,500 394,055 ,053 394,055 ,000 178,800 ,898 72,858 6-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. 8. ARMY 1984 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 27. Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. 28. Joyce Creek, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 29. Leesville, Va. - Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo Project 30A. Falls Lake, N. C. 31. Scuppernong River, N.C. 32A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C. 35A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. & N.C. 35B. Philpott Lake, Va. Total Cost to FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 1,400 273 251,000 3' 30,989 u 106,300 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 1,382 16,057,000 12,420,000 19,276,211 12,317,839 - 404,000 - 385,530 29,000 "3 21,739 "' 500 500 690,206 736,119 34,100 203,322 2,945,520 2,998,266 62,400 48,038 1,098,531 994,694 35,000 " 16,845 " 813,040 807,774 393,000 390,505 3,314,160 3,165,210 315,000 156,313 1,289,240 1,302,184 - - 103,500 283,000 68,213 319,414 - -5,260 206,312 16,225 100,083 1,279 6,217 35 1,654 7,700,000 1,450,000 6,189,542 4,688,430 605,000 601,000 576,848 584,999 -- 33,776 20,007 " 30,812 39 1,167,000 989,327 9,000 127,362 3,747,759 3,542,191 184,000 224,709 1,116,000 1,025,106 1,172,716 1,268,670 225,000 76,081 4,001,091 4,128,796 80,000 118,049 1,158,300 1,223,739 6-22 50,430 50,430 623,687 623,687 499,889 499,889 106,300 106,300 367,755" 364,080" 127,120,996 126,034,318 1,610,000 1,547,377 191,682 178,514 8,841,326 8,841,326 10,247,248'" 10,116,065" 89,847,527 89,619,573 48,947,842" 48,416,073" 14,851,784 14,743,392 15,488,206" 15,334,862" -. 10,000 316,424 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 1. Includes $2,369 refund to local interests in FY 82. 2. Includes $952 preauthorization cost on Masonboro Inlet Sec. 111. 3. Includes preauthorization study funds for Carolina Beach Inlet: FY 80, $10,000; FY 81, $4,275; and preconstruction and construction funds; FY 81, $2,725; FY 82, $133,000. 4. Includes preauthorization study costs for Carolina Beach Inlet: FY 80, $6,614; FY 81, $6,906; FY 82, $755; and preconstruction and construction costs: FY 82, $62,196. 5. Includes preauthorization study funds for Bogue Inlet: FY 82, $14,000; FY 83, $38,490; and preconstruction and construction funds: FY 83, $38,510. 6. Includes preauthorization study costs for Bogue Inlet: FY 82, $7,174; FY 83, $45,316; and preconstruction and construction costs: FY 83, $21,368. 7. Includes $198,707 for previous projects. 8. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. 9. Includes preauthorization study funds for Morgan Creek: FY 82, $15,000; FY 83, $18,822; and preconstruction and construction funds: FY 83, $209,678. 10. Includes preauthorization study costs for Morgan Creek: FY 82, $8,790; FY 83, $25,032; and preconstruction and construction costs: FY 83, $17,058. 11. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. 12. Includes $12,854 for previous projects. 13. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. 14. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. 15. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; FY 65, -$2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; FY 79, $3,000; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning funds: FY 80, $15,000 and FY 81, $19,320. 16. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 80, $5,686 and FY 81, $1,471. 17. Includes $69,145 refund to local interests. 18. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual cost. 19. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 20. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 21. Includes preauthorization study funds for Swanquarter Bay: FY 80, $5,000; FY 81, $78,000; FY 82, $8,514 and preconstruction and construction funds: FY 82, $7,486; FY 83, $610,000. 22. Includes preauthorization study costs for Swanquarter Bay: FY 80, $5,000; FY 81, $64,682; FY 82, $13,410; FY 83, $8,422 and preconstruction and construction costs: FY 83, $28,342. 23. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 24. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 25. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 78, $92,374; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $14,007; FY 81, $1,847; FY 82, $2,823. 26. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 81, $153,000; FY 82, $128,000; FY 83, $62,487 and preconstruction funds: FY 83, $106,513. 27. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 81, $116,322; FY 82, $162,793; FY 83, $64,372 and preconstruction costs: FY 83, $74,997. 28. Includes $6,924 preauthorization costs. 29. Includes $400,000 refund to local interests. 30. Includes $128,345 refund to local interests. 31. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 82, $12,500; FY 83, $3,291 and preconstruction and construction funds: FY 83, $100,009. 32. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 82, $12,500; FY 83, $3,291 and preconstruction costs: FY 83, $16,169. 33. Includes $9,706 preauthorization cost. 34. Includes $5,223 preauthorization cost. 35. Includes $1,057 refund to local interests. 36. Includes monitoring costs: FY 80, $7,414; FY 81, $10,842; FY 82, $1,382. 37. Includes $21,739 preauthorization cost. 38. Includes $16,845 preauthorization cost. 39. Preauthorization cost. 40. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $5,500; FY 76 & 76T, $3,600; FY 77, $5,800; FY 78, $7,200; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $10,000; FY 81, $10,000; FY 82, $11,040; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $9,000. 41. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $4,400; FY 76 & 76T, $4,666; FY 77, $5,193; FY 78, $6,824; FY 79, $7,506; FY 80, $11,312; FY 81, $9,688; FY 82, $9,727; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $8,444. 42. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $48,000; FY 77, $51,400; FY 78, $115,100; FY 79, $63,000; FY 80, $60,000; FY 81, $80,000; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $73,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 79, $167,646. 43. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $13,606; FY 77, $85,692; FY 78, $114,604; FY 79, $1,120; FY 80, $118,718; FY 81, $83,760; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83,$77,759; FY 84, $67,850; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 79, $167,350; FY 80, $296. 44. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 75, $47,000; FY 78, $40,400; FY 79, $22,000; FY 80, $25,000; FY 81, $20,000; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000. 45. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $13,741; FY 76 & 76T, $31,666; FY 77, $1,593; FY 78, $39,771; FY 79, $22,629; FY 80, $24,619; FY 81, $20,381; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000. 46. Includes $13,934 refund to local interests. 6-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 6-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts .Work Authorized Documents July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 July 18, 1918 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 4, 19332 June 26, 19343 August 26, 1937 August 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 Nov. 29, 1963, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 7, 1966, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 7, 1966 Dec. 31, 1970 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 2 of text) Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. Purchase of canal. Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary of War, April 14, 1919: Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from "Alligator River-Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River- Pungo River route." Pamlico Sound-Neuse River Section: Changed from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to "Goose Creek-Bay River route." Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock.4 An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay, S. C. Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. Operating and care of works of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide. A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to Inland Waterway. Six mooring basins. A 12-foot channel in New River.5 Vicinity of Fairfield, drainage. Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties at the inlet." A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek.7 A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue Inlet gorge. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence a 7-foot channel 80 ft. wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to Intracoastal Waterway. Maintenance of a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina Beach. Maintenance of general navigation features of N. C. State Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken, and Core Creek. H. D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 1478, 63d Cong., 3d sess. and H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 1 Approved by Secretary of War, May 15, 1919. H. D. 450, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 75th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 421, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 723, 80th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess.1 H. D. 379, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1963. Detailed Project Report July 1965 H. D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. 6-24 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 22, 1976 August 13, 1968 February 18, 1982, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 September 7,1983, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 March 3, 1881 March 2, 1907 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 May 21, 196,5. sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 12, 1983, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 July 3, 1930 Oct. 17, 1940 Feb. 7,1967, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 30, 19358 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro Inlet. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through Carolina Beach Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide from the gorge in Bogue Inlet through the ocean bar. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 3 of text) A 9-foot channel 200 feet wide through Bulkhead Channel to Beaufort; a 6-foot channel 100 feet wide to North River and Core Sound; and construct jetties on Shackleford Point. Repairs to Fort Macon jetties and additional jetties and shore protection. Bulkhead across Bird Shoal. Increase in depth to 12 feet in Bulkhead Channel, Gallants Channel, and in front of Beaufort. Increase in width and length of basin in front of Beaufort, all to 12 feet deep. Increase in depth to 12 feet and in width to 100 feet in Taylors Creek; transfer to Beaufort Harbor project. Channels 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide in Bulkhead, Gallants and Taylors Creek channels, and through turning basin in front of Beaufort; and harbor of refuge in Town Creek, 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long. A channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long, from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep 150 feet wide, and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 13 of text) Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from Pamlico Sound to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and training wall at entrance. Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, 100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in entrance. Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; channels 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big Foot Slough Channels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance channel, same depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side of entrance channel. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 16 of text) 7-foot channel 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor via Wainright Channel. A 7-foot channel 74 feet wide to Atlantic. Channels 7 feet deep, 75 feet wide, at east and west ends of Harkers Island and side channel 5 feet deep, 75 feet wide, with basin 150 by 130 feet, same depth, at Davis. A 7-foot side channel 75 feet wide, with basin 200 feet by 500 feet, same depth, at Sealevel. H. D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Approved by OCE Oct. 2, 1980 Detailed Project Report June 1980 Detailed Project Report May 1983 Annual Report, 1881, p. 1013 Specified in act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 68th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 776, 69th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 334, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 111, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1965 Detailed Project Report June 1983 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. No. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report July 9, 1965 H. D. 485, 72d Cong., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 92, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 99, 77th Cong., 1st sess.1 S. D. 247, 77th Cong., 2d sess.' 6-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 A 6-foot side channel 60 feet wide, with basin 100 feet by H. D. 68, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' about 600 feet, same depth, at Marshallberg. July 11, 1963, A side channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide to local harbor at Detailed Project Report sec. 107 Cedar Island and an access channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet Dec. 12, 1968 July 14, 1960 wide and about 400 feet long to a basin same depth, 60 by 100 feet. Sept. 22, 1967, An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, from Back Detailed Project Report sec. 107 Sound to harbor of refuge 120 by 250 feet, same depth, at March 13, 1967 July 14, 1960 west end of Harkers Island in Brook Creek. Feb. 24, 1969, A channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide, from existing side Detailed Project Report sec. 107 channel at Atlantic to a basin 600 by 180 feet, same depth, Dec. 21, 1967 July 14, 1960 with a breakwater, between mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point. April 3, 1975, Deepening the existing 5-foot channel and basin at Davis Detailed Project Report sec. 107 to 7 feet. Feb. 8, 1974 July 14, 1960' 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 4. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape Fear River. 5. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, N. C. 6. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 7. A 6- by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12 by 90-foot project classified as inactive. 8. Included in the Public Works Administration Program, Jan. 3, 1934. 9. Deauthorized by the Chief of Engineers March 31, 1982. 6-26 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Controls' (R & H Act of 1958 and 1962) 1969 70,664 - Atlantic Beach Channels, N. C. 1976 29,101' 66,630 Avon Harbor, N. C.' 1975 74,096 89,779 Bay River, N. C.' 1950 44,382 49,627 Belhaven Harbor, N. C.' 1982 126,687 39,500 Black River, N. C. 1969 12,358 124,846 Cashie River, N. C. 1950 40,403 15,905 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N. C.' 1975 69,610 25,615 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N. C.' 1975 42,029 5,685 Chowan River, N. C. 1950 - Contentnea Creek, N. C.1 1941 64,395 32,247 Drum Inlet, N. C.' 1979 166,119 1,050,579 Edenton Harbor, N. C.' 1960 73,750 47,642 Far Creek, N. C.' 1982 164,642 545,764 Fishing Creek, N. C.' 1922 22,715 8,633 Knobb's Creek, N. C.', 2 1961' 80,500 47,664 Mackay Creek, N. C. 1938' 13,375 6,273 Neuse River, N. C.1 1982 477,223 B 327,151 Newbegun Creek, N. C. 19283 4,802 247 Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N. C.' 1950 10,688 61,139 Pembroke Creek, N. C. 1976 60,000 - Perquimans River, N. C.1 1910' 13,750 414 Roanoke River, N. C.1 19833 404,584 550,364 Scuppernong River, N. C.1 1950 81,164 80,682 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.' 1950 8,507 18 South River, N. C.' 1936 12,452 23,686 Swift Creek, N. C.1 1940 1,600 5,422 Trent River, N. C.', 5 1968 115,199 143,579 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C. 1965 132,834 85,221 Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. 1976 751,196 2,893,812 1. Completed. 2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970); Meherrin River, N. C., Transferred to Norfolk District. 3. Report of Norfolk District. 4. Includes $2,055 refund to local interests. 5. 8-foot modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6. Includes $1,959 refund to local interests on Dawson Creek, N.C. 6-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 6-D For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Macon Park, N. C. 1973 620,000 6-28 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 6-E For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.' Brunswick County Beaches, N. C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina - South Carolina State Line)" Conetoe Creek, N. C.1 Contentnea Creek, N. C.1 Core Creek, N. C'. Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.' Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.' Filberts Creek, N. C.' Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C.', 10 Gardners Creek, N. C.' Howards Mill Lake, N. C.12 Leith's Creek, Scotland County, N. C.', 1* Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.' Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C. Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C.',10 New River, N. C.' New River, Onslow County, N. C.' Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N. C.' Ocracoke Island, N. C.'3 Old Field Swamp, N. C.1,1� Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. Pasquotank River, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C.' Pungo Creek, N. C.' Pungo River, N. C.' Reddies River Lake, N. C.' s Roaring River Lake, N. C.' S Simmqns Bay, N. C.1� South Creek, N. C.' Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C.' Tar River, N. C Tar River, N. C.' Tar River and tributaries, N. C.' Tar River, Princeville, N. C. Tranters Creek, N. C.' Trent River, N. C.' Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N.C. & S.C.',1� White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.' Wrightsville Beach, N.C. 1972 1976 1960 ' 1939-1943 & 1958 1965 1963 1971 1970 1969 1972 1980 1982 1974 1978 1979 1950 & 1956 1972 1961 1975 1969 1963 1960 1961 1972 1971 1980 1978 1963 1971 1966 1964 1947 1943 1967 1974 1953 1961 1963 1983 1. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under special continuing authority. 2. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. 3. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. 4. Includes $3,081 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. 7. Includes $387 refund to local interests. 8. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 9. Adjusted $3,000 to include preauthorization cost prior to FY 1960. 10. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980. 11. Reclassified to inactive category February 3, 1976. 12. Reclassified to deferred category October 2, 1980. 13. Reclassified to inactive category November 25, 1974. 14. Includes $61,585 refund to local interests. 15. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1984. 6-29 283,846 572,114" 29,867 50,889 236,223' 223,413 138,1178 37,7773 374,005 54,597' 698,400 430,951 1,280,317 113,657 763,022 51,896 580,977 95,873 129,592 86,600 517,948 80,931 6,366 582,270 296,6022,3 985,800 370,000 186,435 194,3677 611,096 81,266 18,624 22,660 390,249 139,339 64,769 67,821 214,286 3,013,18814 61,473 - - - - - - - - - -147 -- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1984 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 6-G For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Report Date Funds Funds Project For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adkin Branch, N. C. 1982 8 Sep. 812 219,477 - AIWW - Mooring Basins None 5 Aug. 771 Bodie Island, N. C. None 5 Aug. 77' Cape Lookout, N. C. None 5 Aug. 77' - - Conoho Creek, N. C. 1974 31 Mar. 782 79,782 - Contentnea Creek, N. C. 1972 31 Mar. 783 4,250 - Davis, N. C. 1982 31 Mar. 824 25,419 - Harbor of Refuge, N. C. 1934 1 Nov. 81' 1,396,653 - Hominy Swamp, N. C. 1973 31 Mar. 782 107,472 - Hyde County Dike, N. C. None 5 Aug. 77' - - MacKay Creek, N. C. 1976 31 Mar. 782 130,900 - Mann's Harbor, N. C. 1973 31 Mar. 78' 7,265 - Mill Creek, N. C. 1973 31 Mar. 782 116,395 - Mocassin Swamp, N. C. 1973 31 Mar. 782 36,680 - Moyock Creek, N. C. 1973 31 Mar. 782 64,416 - Nahunta Swamp, N. C. 1973 31 Mar. 782 65,673 - Neuse River, N. C. None 31 Mar. 78' 30,911 - Neuse River Barrier, N. C. None 5 Aug. 771 Neuse River, 300 ft.-wide None 5 Aug. 77' channel in front of New Bern North River Dike, N. C. None 5 Aug. 77' Rockfish Creek, N. C. 1976 31 Mar. 782 157,721 - Six Runs Creek, N. C. 1971 31 Mar. 782 64,977 - Sweetwater Creek, N. C. 1973 31 Mar. 782 64,584 - Thoroughfare Swamp, N. C. 1976 31 Mar. 782 132,767 - Topsail Beach and None 5 Aug. 771 - - Surf City, N. C. Trent River, Basins and None 5 Aug. 771 Access Channels at New Bern, N. C. 1. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. ed the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control 2. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provid- Act. ed the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 205 of the 1948 FC Act, as 4. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority providamended. ed the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 107 of the R&H Act of 1960 3. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provid- as amended. TABLE 6-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Date Survey Conducted Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C. November 1983 Rollinson Channel, N. C. March 1984 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N. C. February, June, July 1984 6-30 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) TABLE 6-I Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Atlantic Beach Channels, N. C. 15,916 Belhaven Harbor, N. C. 1,285 Harkers Island Harbor,N. C. 55,184 Walters Slough, N. C. 5,430 White Oak River, N. C.1 10,000 Wrights Creek, N. C. 91 1. Includes $7,495 reimbursement to revolving fund. 6-31 TABLE 6-J DAMS AND RESERVOIRS See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated Section Project Name Nearest City River Above of Type Capacity Development Construc- Cost Lands Total in Text Mouth Dam (ftl (acre-feet (kilowatts) tion and Damages 1 23. Cape Fear B Everett Jordan 2 River Basin, Howards Mill 2 , 1 4 N.C. Randleman 2 Small reservoirs 30. Neuse River Falls 2 Basin, N.C. Wilson Mills Beulahtown BakersM ills Little Buffalo Buckhorn Wiggins Mill Stantonsburg Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Hillsboro Orange 32. Yadkin River W. Kerr Scott, N.C. Basin, N.C.&S.C. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C. John H. Kerr, Va., and N.C. 2 Philpott, Va. 2 Gaston, Va. and N.C. 6 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. 7 Smith Mountain, Va. 8 Leesville, Va.9 Taber, Va. Melrose, Va. Randolph, Va. Stuart, Va. and N.C. Schoolfield, Va. and N.C. Moncure, N.C. Carthage, N.C. Randleman, N.C. Falls, N.C. Wilson Mills, N.C. Kenly, N.C. Princeton, N.C. Kenly, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Stantonsburg, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Durham. N.C. Durham, N.C. Wilkesboro, N.C. Boydton, Va. Bassett, Va. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Altavista, Va. Altavista, Va. Altavista, Va. Brookneal, Va. Chase City, Va. Spray. N.C. Danville, Va. Haw Deep Deep Various Neuse Neuse Little Little Little Buffalo Creek Contentnea Creek Contentnea Creek Tisnot Swamp Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Eno Little Yadkin-Pee Dee Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke 4.3 55.0 85.0 404.0 178.7 336.2 144.9 137.0 314.2 293.7 275.0 262.9 227.8 297.2 265.9 112 106 110 20 to 70 + 92 81 50 53 51 63 42 36 39 33 37 136 107 148 E E E E E CG,E E E E E E E E E E E E E 778,000 233,000 108,000 923,000 397,000 201,000 81,000 36,000 13,000 119,000 35,000 48,000 18,000 17,000 7,000 123,000 57,000 153,000 75,811,900 18,874,000 51,764,000 74,045,100 5,749,343 58,188,100 14,726.000 57,236,000 90,954,900 3,360,657 144 CG,E 2,808,000 204,000 67,529,000 24,521,000 220 108 75 244 95 54 110 147 138 126 CG 11 CG,E CG CG CG,E CG CG,E CG,E E CG,E 249,800 432,000 59,300 825,000 76,900 34,000 120,000 350,000 163,000 248,000 14,000 54,000 83,000 41,000 20,000 12,000 43,000 48,000 15,000 80,000 13.933,000 27,000,000 31,300,000 28,000,000 9,100,000 8,000,000 17,700,000 22,100,000 9,000,000 27,800,000 1,157,000 3,500.,000 800,000 3,800,000 1,000,000 1,700,000 6,000,000 4,700,000 1,100,000 6,400,000 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2. For details, see individual report. 3. Includes $3,900,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. 4. Includes $12,400,000 presently allocated to water supply and $20,600,000 recreation and fish and wildlife. 5. Exclusive of transmission lines. 6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949. Construction completed June 1955 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. 9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam constructed. 12. Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 13. Includes $48,747,000 presently allocated to water supply and $8,502,000 allocated to recreation. 14. Reclassified to the deferred category October 2, 1980. Key Earth Concrete Gravity 134,000,000' 33.600.000 " 109,000,000" 38.454,000 165,000,000' 13,000,000 9,300,000 6,600,000 1,100,000 17,300,000 6,700,000 5,100,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 550,000 8,100,000 3,500,000 9,110,000 92,050,000' 15,090,000 30,500,000 32,100,000 31,800,000 10,100,000 9,700,000 23,700,000 O 26,800,000 10,100,000 36,000,000 Lu, "e C 0 mO x P1 m C, C P CC 35. I E CG CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT* The district comprises all of South Carolina (except local watersheds draining into the Savannah River). Due to a recent realignment, work underway in western- central North Carolina, formerly in our district, will be carried through its current phase before being turned over to Wilmington. It embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except watersheds of Mackey and Skull Creeks, and excluding Hilton Head Island. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1 Aquatic Plant Control, SC................ 7-2 2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL...... 7-2 3 Charleston Harbor, SC.................. 7-2 4 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC........ 7-3 5 Cooper River Seismic Modification Charleston Harbor, SC .................. 7-4 6 Folly River, SC ........................ 7-4 7 Georgetown Harbor, SC. ................. 7-4 8 Jeremy Creek, SC.................. ... 7-5 9 Little River Inlet, NC & SC.. ............. 7-5 10 Murrells Inlet, SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6 11 Shipyard River, SC..................... 7-6 12 Town Creek, SC............ ....... 7-6 13 Village Creek, SC...................... 7-7 14 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys..... 7-7 15 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..... 7-7 16 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 7-7 Beach Erosion Control............ .......... Page 17 Hunting Island Beach, SC................. 7-7 Flood Control 18 Cow Castle Creek, SC ..................... 7-7 19 Eagle Creek, SC......................... 7-7 20 Wilson Branch, SC..................... . 7-8 21 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .............................. 7-8 22 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects..... 7-8 23 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .............. ........... 7-8 General Investigations 24 Active Investigations .................... *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 7-1 _ __ 7-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL; S.C. Location. The project areas include navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in the State of South Carolina. Existing project. The project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligator weed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other noxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers. The act provides that research and planning cost shall be borne fully by the United States. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 30 percent of the cost of field operations. The South Carolina Water Resources Commission is designated as the State's lead agency for aquatic plant management and meets the local interest requirement of paying 30 percent of the cost of field operations. The project provides for a comprehensive plan of chemical, biological, and integrated control measures for managing noxious aquatic plants within the state waters of South Carolina. Operations and results during fiscal year. Aquatic plants now infest approximately 40,000 acres, with the worst problems being in Lake Marion, Bushy Park Reservoir, and Goose Creek Reservoir. The FY 84 treatment program included 1,530 acres of Brazilian elodea, water primrose, water hyacinth, and hydrilla. Plea beetles were distributed around the coastal region in an effort to establish populations which would spread out from the release sites to provide seasonal control of alligator weed. Approximately 5,000 beetles were released at five sites supporting vigorous growths of alligator weed. Condition at end of fiscal year. The cost of field operations in FY 84 was $149,864 in Lake Marion, $25,248 in Bushy Park Reservoir, and $3,809 in Goose Creek Reservoir for a total of $178,921. The cost of planning and reconnaissance surveys was $14,710. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (CHARLESTON DISTRICT) Location. The project starts at Little River at the North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 11521, 11531, 11534, and 11535.) Previous projects. For further details see page 613 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The project provides for a water. way 12 feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch channel of the same dimensions to McClellan. ville and construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at Georgetown, Charleston, Johns Island and Port Royal and numerous open-pile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products, fish, oysters, pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Mainte nance: Contract maintenance dredging was performed by the pipeline dredge, Cherokee, during October 1983 - January 1984 between Winyah Bay and Little River, South Carolina, removing 239,234 cubic yards of material at a cost of $461,865. Maintenance dredging by the pipeline dredge, Cherokee, and dike repair from Charleston to Port Royal was also accomplished dur. ing April - July 1984 removing 844,320 cubic yards at a cost of $586,807. Mosquito abatement control con tract costs were $55,656. Costs of $407,275 were incurred for contract dike management. Condition and operation studies, water control management, engineering and design, and supervision and adminis" tration costs were $587,850. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1940; three bridges were completed in 1936. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $7,345,888 for new work and $38,653,507 for maintenance, for a total of $45,999,395. 3. CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, S.C.. and 80 miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Previous projects. For further details see page 7-2 CHARLESTON, S.C. DISTRICT 1808 of Annual Report for 1915; page 579 of Annual Report for 1926; and page 562 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 35 feet deep with varying widths from the Atlantic Ocean to the mouth of Goose Creek, a total of 26.3 miles, together with a 35-foot depth by 500-foot width channel via Town Creek. Also, a 10-foot depth by 110-foot width channel on the Mount Pleasant side of the harbor into Shem Creek to U.S. Highway 17 Bridge, and a 30-foot anchorage basin in the lower harbor between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. A 40-foot channel estimated to cost $6,060,000 (1960) was authorized to be executed when found necessary in the interests of national defense from the 40-foot contour in Atlantic Ocean to U.S. Naval Base. For further details see page 425 of Annual Report for 1962. The Phase I Design Memorandum stage of Advance Engineering and Design for deepening of the 35-foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42-foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a total distance of 26.9 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, and deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet have been authorized. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully come plied with their responsibility to date but are experiencing difficulty in securing disposal areas for dredged material for continued future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Piers and slips extend for about one mile along the eastern waterfront of the City of Charleston with an additional mile of marginal wharves. The South Carolina State Ports Authority operates eight piers for fruit, wood, cold storage facilities and general cargo, a grain elevator and a beltline railway which serves the entire Cooper River waterfront. Modern facilities are also at wharves of seven major petroleum companies including storage tank farms. Modern facilities for marine repairs and servicing are available at Detyens Shipyard, located approximately ten miles northeast of Charleston on the Wando River. The U.S. Navy Department has modern facilities for construction and maintenance of naval vessels including nuclear-powered submarines. Loading docks and storage areas for missile-carrying type vessels have also been constructed and are being operated by the U.S. Navy. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1970, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging was performed in (a) the Upper and Lower Harbor by pipeline dredge, Enterprise, during October 1983-May 1984 and July- September 1984 removing 2,962,373 cubic yards of material, (b) in the Anchorage Basin by the pipeline dredges, Enterprise and Pullen, during August- September 1984 removing 1,187,181 cubic yards of material, and (c) on the entrance bar by hopper dredge, Natco, during November - December 1983 removing 519,346 cubic yards resulting in an overall total dredging cost of $5,693,679. Government furnished materials for dike management cost $22,580. Contract dike management costs were $660,879. Costs of Riverine Utility Craft operation were $12,279. Condition and operation studies, water control management, engineering and design, supervision and administration costs were $605,059. Condition at end of fiscal year. Jetties protecting the entrance channel across the bar were completed in 1895. The existing project was completed in October 1962 except for the national defense portion. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $3,328,349 for new work and $80,937,031 for maintenance, a total cost of $84,265,380. 4. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, S.C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Existing project. The major cause of the shoaling problem in Charleston Harbor is the diversion of fresh water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the salt water of Charleston Harbor, causing density currents which trap sediments, resulting in a phenomenal rate of deposition. The most practical solution of the shoaling problem is to redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the Vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. The project for Cooper River as authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act provides that the discharge through the existing Pinopolis Hydro Plant be reduced to a weekly average of 3,000 cubic feet per second. This flow will not establish a density current in the harbor. The excess water then impounded in Lake Moultrie will be directed through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroelectric facility will be constructed on the new canal where the ground elevations decrease to become swampland adjacent to the Santee River. This plant will replace those features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment of flows. The average flow of 12,600 cfs at the new powerplant, plus the proposed 3,000 cfs average release planned for Pinopolis, will approximate the existing average Pinopolis flow. The three generators at the new plant will be rated at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the plan provides for construction of a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and a relocated fish hatchery. 7-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Estimated Cost of the Project (1982) is $181,973,000, all Federal. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Funds were received for initiation of construction during FY 75. Costs during FY 84 were $38,353 for lands and damages, $162,258 for relocations, $3,457,773 for power plant, $161,462 for turbines, $945,000 for generators, $14,070 for governors, $15,932 for main control switchboards, $55,509 for microwave facilities, $1,245 for 15 KV switchgear, $336,735 for cooling water facilities - towers, -$1,714 for cooling water facilities - pumps and motors, $2,049,594 for cooling water facilities - general construction, $7,673 for powerhouse crane, $963,053 for tailrace canal, $25,287 for cultural resources preservation, $10,724 for permanent operating equipment, and $3,750 for the fish lift, $429,225 for the fish hatchery, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $2,981,266. Maintenance: Funds of $511,898 were spent for maintenance of completed work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed at the end of FY 74. The General Design Memorandum was completed in January 1972 and work is proceeding on schedule on other phases of the project. Construction was initiated March 1977. The project is 95% complete. 5. COOPER RIVER SEISMIC MODIFICATION Location. The Cooper River Seismic Project is located in Berkeley County, South Carolina, about 50 miles north of Charleston, South Carolina. Existing project. The Santee-Cooper Project was constructed in the early 1940's using the latest stateof- the-art design for that time. The project is currently licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) as project No. 199. The FERC requires that the project receive independent inspections at least once every five years. It was during the 1977 inspection that the seismic deficiency of both the West and North Dams was noted. This was confirmed again in their 1982 inspection. As a result of studying the possible consequences of the loss of both dams, the S.C. Congressional Delegation introduced legislation which was approved in the 1983 Supplemental Appropriations Act to provide $2 million for design and $22 million for construction of remedial measures. The design and construction responsibility was assigned to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Corps began in August 1983 to study various alternatives to provide a closure structure in the canal between the two lakes of the project and to provide remedial measures for the liquifiable foundation of the West Dam. Current estimated cost of the project is $22,000,000, all Federal. Local cooperation. None required. Conditions at end of fiscal year. At the end of FY 84 the initial evaluation report had been submitted to SAD and OCE for approval and additional subsurface testing was ongoing at the West Dam. 6. FOLLY RIVER, S.C. Location. Folly River project begins in Folly River and Folly Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The project provides: an entrance channel, 11 feet deep by 100 feet wide extending from the Stono River one mile through the ocean bar; a channel within Folly River nine feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending three miles downstream from U.S. Highway 171 to the confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within Folly Creek nine feet deep by 80 feet wide extending three miles downstream from.Highway 171 to the confluence with Folly River. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed (a) in the entrance bar by the sidecaster dredge, Fry, removing 13,810 cubic yards at a cost of $115,000, (b) and on Folly River (inside) by contract, removing 55,281 cubic yards at a cost of $109,287. Condition and operations studies, water control management, engineering and design, and supervisions and administration costs were $25,886. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in FY 1979. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $337,736 for new work and $587,329 for maintenance, a total of $925,065. 7. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 50 miles northeast of Charleston Harbor and 90 miles southwest of the entrance to Cape Fear River, North Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report for 1938; and page 442 ofAnnual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorizations provide for a channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin at the U.S. Highway 17 bridge over Sampit River, with a side channel 2,400 feet long and not less than 200 feet wide leading to a turning basin at the 7-4 CHARLESTON, S.C. DISTRICT upper end of the built-up portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The project also provides for the continued maintenance to a depth of 18 feet and a width of 400 feet for the bypassed portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one marginal concrete pier and one of creosotedtimber construction. For intracoastal waterway traffic there are a number of smaller wharves and landings along the Georgetown waterfront on the old channel. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1970, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by the pipeline dredge, Clinton, in the Sampit River from October - November 1983 removing a total of 689,657 cubic yards of material at a cost of $398,687. Dredging was also performed by the hopper dredge, Mermenteau, on the entrance channel during April - May 1984 removing 294,195 cubic yards of material at a cost of $912,746. Dredging of Sampit River to Upper Winyah Bay was accomplished by the pipeline dredge, Hampton Roads, during the period July - September 1984 removing 521,243 cubic yards of material at a cost of $733,669. Condition surveys, water control management, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $450,510. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. The jetties were completed in 1903 -04. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $4,615,903 for new work and $37,753,076 for maintenance, a total of $42,368,979. 8. JEREMY CREEK, S.C. Location. Jeremy Creek is located at McClellanville, S.C. approximately 40 miles northeast of Charleston and 20 miles southwest of Georgetown. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11531 and 11518). Existing project. The dredging of Jeremy Creek or "Side Channel to McClellanville" was authorized as a part of the channel from Charleston to McClellanville (or part of what is now the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway) by the River and Harbor Act of 2 March 1907. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and a width of not less than 90 feet. Local cooperation. Local requirements have been met by the S.C. Coastal Council. Terminal facilities. There are three shrimping facilities, one oyster packing shed, a crabbing operation, an icehouse, a fuel dock, and a public launching ramp located on Jeremy Creek. The commercial facilities are privately owned, but are open to all on an equal basis. The existing facilities are considered adequate for present and near future commerce. There are areas along the east bluff shore available for the expansion of existing facilities or the construction of new ones. Operations and results during fiscal year. Natural resource studies, engineering and design costs, and supervision and administration costs were $1,809. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $49,297 for new work and $2,657 for maintenance for a total of $51,954. 9. LITTLE RIVER INLET, N.C. AND S.C. Location. The project is located near the North Carolina-South Carolina state line. Little River enters the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from Shalotte, N.C. to Georgetown, S.C. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence a 10 by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The entrance channel will be stabilized by jetties extending seaward 3,200 feet and 3,000 feet long on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Estimated costs of the project (1981) are $18,300,000 Federal cost and $2,790,000 non-Federal cost ($1,640,000 contributed funds and $1,150,000 for lands). (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. In a letter dated 28 December 1976, the Horry County (South Carolina) Planning Commission gave assurances of cooperation. Since certain lands to be furnished by non-Federal interests lie in North Carolina, a letter dated 18 April 1977 has been supplied by the Brunswick County (North Carolina) Commissioners, agreeing to provide to the United States the necessary project lands lying in North Carolina. Local interests have met their responsibilities to date. Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, numerous private docks, and sex eral public boat ramps located in or near Little River. It is expected that existing facilities will expand adl new ones will Ibe added as demands for services exceed current capac .y. Operations and results during fiscal year. N ew work dredging along with beach and jetty nourishmtnt of the entrance channel was accomplished by t he pipeline dredge, Savannah, during November 1983 7-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 -February 1984 removing 294,344 cubic yards of material at a cost of $834,877. Engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $28,150. Maintenance. Maintenance dredging was performed concurrently with new work dredging by the pipeline dredge, Savannah, during November 1983 -February 1984 removing 71,302 cubic yards of material at a cost of $307,483. Condition and operations studies, engineering and design, and water control management costs were $36,703. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The initial construction contract was awarded 14 January 1981. The project is complete. 10. MURRELLS INLET, S.C. Location. The project is located on the coast of South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles southwest of the City of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 300 feet across the seaward bar; thence a 10 by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crashboat dock. The entrance channel will be stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. The recreational project includes a walkway on the south jetty with access road and parking area. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Estimated cost of the project (1982) is $13,594,240 Federal cost and $2,380,000 non-Federal cost ($1,380,000 contributed funds and $1,000,000 for lands). (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A letter of intent to provide local cooperation dated 4 November 1975 has been received for the Georgetown County Board of Commissioners. Local interests have met their responsibilities to date. Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. Facilities are expected to be expanded and new ones added as demands for services outstrip capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No maintenance dredging performed. Condition and operation studies, water control management costs and engineering and design costs were 838,647. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The jetty construction contract was awarded 2 September 1977. The recreational facilities (comfort station and parking lot) contract was awarded 25 July 1980 and physically completed 7 August 1981. Federal costs for the ex. isting project to date have been $13,403,020 for new work and $901,446 for maintenance, a total of $14,304,466. 11. SHIPYARD RIVER, S.C. Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about one-half mile below the U.S. Naval Base, whence it flows southerly about three miles and empties into the Cooper River about three-fourths of a mile above Drum Island. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11524.) Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of An nual Report for 1932 and page 463 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 30 feet deep from Cooper River to MacAlloy, Inc.'s plant, including two turning basins, one opposite Gulf Oil Corporation Terminal and another at the upper end of project. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. In the lower three-quarters of a mile of the channel are large marginal wharves of the Gulf Oil Corporation and Shipyard River Terminal Company. These wharves accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling petroleum products and fertilizer materials. In the upper channel is MacAlloy, Inc.'s wharf for handling ores. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1970, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed to remove 501,651 cubic yards of material with the pipeline, Cherokee, during February - March 1984 at a cost of $306,633. Condition and operations studies, water control management, supervision and administration, and engineering and design costs were $113,594, Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. Federal costs under the ex" isting project to date have been $487,824 for new work and $8,072,045 for maintenance, a total of $8,559,869. 12. TOWN CREEK, S.C. Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW directly south of the Town of McClellanville in Charleston County, S.C. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11531.) Existing project. The project provides a channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The pro 7-6 CHARLESTON. S.C. DISTRICT ject includes an entrance channel 12 feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by the sidecaster dredge, Schweizer, during October- November 1983 and May - June 1984 removing 113,356 cubic yards of material at a cost of $401,410. Engineering and design, supervision and administration, condition and operation studies, and water control management costs were $19,329. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1975. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $219,521 for new work and $1,691,353 for maintenance, a total of $1,910,874. 13. VILLAGE CREEK, S.C. Location. Village Creek is located on the northeastern end of St. Helena in Beaufort County, approximately 12 miles from the Town of Beaufort. This creek, which is about 600 feet wide at its confluence with Morgan River and St. Helena Sound at a point seven miles from the Atlantic Ocean, extends in a southwesterly direction a distance of 6.8 miles to its headwaters. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11513.) Existing project. The authorized project provided for a channel eight feet deep and 80 feet wide from the mouth of Village Creek upstream to the Porpoise Fish Company Terminal for a distance of 2.2 miles. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation have been complied with except the present requirement that a diked disposal area be furnished. In the past, a deep water disposal area has been used and may be used in the future. An environmental assessment of these areas is being prepared. If this assessment supports a negative determination for both areas, all items of cooperation will be fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No maintenance dredging was performed. Condition operation studies costs and supervision and administration costs were $400. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in April 1966. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $26,500 for new work and $100,083 for maintenance, a total of $126,583. 14. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Costs of $19,326 were incurred for condition surveys. Adams Creek, S.C. $ 94 Ashley River, S.C. 4,751 Port Royal Harbor, S.C. 14,481 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION REPORTS (See Table 7-C.) 16. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATIONS Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization) and Section 111, Public Law 90-433, as amended. (See Table 7-G) Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1934 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Cong.) Beach Erosion Control 17. HUNTING ISLAND BEACH, S.C. Location. Hunting Island is a state park comprising about 1,850 acres of wooded land located along the southeastern shore of South Carolina in Beaufort County, 16 miles east of the Town of Beaufort, nine miles southwest of Edisto Beach, and 35 miles northeast of Tybee Roads at the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Chart Nos. 11513 and 11517.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for periodic nournishment of about 10,000 feet of beach on the northern part of the island with initial placement of 750,000 cubic yards of sand for advance nourishment, and construction of one pre-stressed concrete groin at the north end of the island. Federal participation in periodic nourishment is limited to a period of 15 years. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met by the State of South Carolina and accepted by the Chief of Engineers. The State has contributed 30 percent of construction costs. The initial construction was completed in June 1969, and two additional periodic nourishments (construction) were completed in August 1971 and June 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design costs were $4,036. Condition at end of fiscal year. The first three nourishments were designed to restore the feeder beach to the condition prevailing after the initial beach nourishment. The third nourishment was completed 30 April 1980. Flood Control 18. COW CASTLE CREEK, S.C. Location: Cow Castle Creek is located entirely within the limits of Orangeburg County, South 7-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Carolina. The creek flows from its headwaters in the City of Orangeburg to its confluence with Four Hole Swamp. Existing project. The authorized project consists of clearing and snagging approximately 8,000 feet of the channel located near Bowman, S.C. The project was authorized under general authority contained in Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interest must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; clean-out approximately 1.7 miles of the Even Branch tributary to Bowman; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain the project after completion; prevent future encroachments; notify affected interests annually that improvements will not provide complete flood protection; and prevent unwise future flood plain development. Operations and results during fiscal year: Contract was awarded on 22 September 1983 in the amount of $178,000. Funds in the amount of $188,720 were expended toward the Cow Castle Project this FY, of this, $174,000 was jobs bill money. Contract was completed on 2 May 1984. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project completed and added to Completed Flood Control Projects inventory for inspection. 19. EAGLE CREEK, S.C. Location: The Eagle Creek Project is located entirely within the limits of Dorchester County, South Carolina. The creek flows from its headwaters in the subdivisions near Summerville to Ashley River. Existing project: The authorized project consists of clearing and channel excavation of approximately four miles of Chandler Bridge Creek and Eagle Creek. The project was authorized under general authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation: Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations and highway bridge alterations necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; prevent future encroachments; notify affected interests annually that improvement will not provide complete flood protection; and prevent unwise future flood plain development. Operations and results during fiscal year: Contract was awarded on 28 September 1983 in the amount of $1,245,063. Construction period is 480 calendar days. Funds in the amount of $726,549 were expended toward the Eagle Creek Project, of this, $647,564 was jobs bill money. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction project is 52 percent complete. 20. WILSON BRANCH, S.C. Location: Wilson Branch is located almost entirely within the corporate limits of the Town of Cheraw in Chesterfield County, South Carolina. The creek flows from its headwaters in a residential area to its con. fluence with Huckleberry Branch, then to the Pee Dee River approximately 1% miles away. Existing project: The authorized project consists of a "non-structural" solution of removing six houses from the flood plain. The project was authorized under general authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation: Local interest must provide a cash or in-kind contribution equal to 20% of the pro ject first cost; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain the project after completion; prevent future encroachments; notify affected in. terests annually that improvements will not provide complete flood protection; and prevent unwise future flood plain development. Operations and results during fiscal year: The last two houses were purchased, residents relocated, and the houses were removed from the flood plain. Funds in the amount of $51,109 were expended during the fiscal year toward the Wilson Branch Project. Condition at end of fiscal year: All six houses have been purchased and relocated. The residents of the houses have been relocated. Final clean-up is progressing. 21. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approv. ed regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made of the following projects during the period: Cowpens Swamp, S.C., Crabtree Swamp, S.C., Gapway Swamp, S.C., Simpson Creek, S.C., Todd Swamp, S.C., Buck Creek, S.C. and N.C., Edisto River, S.C., Sawmill Branch, S.C., Shot Pouch, S.C., Turkey Creek, S.C., Kingstree Branch, S.C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works when ap propriate. Cost for the period was $24,242. 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-E.) 23. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sect. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). 7-8 CHARLESTON, S.C. DISTRICT (See Table 7-D) Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation). Federal costs for FY 1984 were $153,507 for the Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies and $97,296 for the National Emergency Preparedness Program. General Investigations 24. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 7-F which covers: Surveys, Collections, and Study of Basic Data, and Research and Development Activities. 7-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT DURING PERIOD See Sect. in Text Project 1 Aquatic Plant Control, SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and the St. Johns River, Fla. 3 Charleston Harbor, SC 4 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC 5 Cooper River Seismic Modification, Chas Hbr, SC 6 Folly River, SC 7 Georgetown Harbor, SC 8 Jeremy Creek McClellanville, SC 9 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10 Murrells Inlet, SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11 Shipyard River, SC Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Appprop. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: 'Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost A prop. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Netv Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 101,900 128,391 2,320,000 2,261,584 4,236,000 3,479,697 40,242,000 38,213,576 -1,191 176,000 54,012 -. 2,596,000 2,576,534 26,000 21,352 2,480,000 2,473,240 200,000 184,217 450,000 370,000 1,308,457 154,923 442,000 446,475 80,605 78,122 2,316,000 1,973,663 186,000 190,974 1,742,000 2,109,254 4,498,000 3,921,200 4,215,123 2,710,142 33,780,000 26,563,000 31,588,183 29,835,958 - 295,000 - 85,345 - 100,000 - 39,925 157,000 262,368 4,577,805 3,868,776 23,987 27,945 7,120,000 7,112,543 115,000 148,798 400,000 849,999 -175,000 27,346 279,000 128,593 430,000 254,613 152,000 20,776 196,000 193,631 -- --. 2,055,000 2,099,453 4,796,500 6,994,476 11,270,000 11,657,195 480,000 511,898 1,300,000 1,174,744 110,000 250,173 1,315,400 1,945,000 1,490,161 2,495,612 3,000 848 5,800,000 5,300,996 585,000 24,988 640,000 499,994 32,452 99,637 316,000 65,943 1,809 331,000 863,027 -180,000 344,186 140,000 140,000 12,758 104,225 -. 38,647 15,000 420,227 871,605 869,202 52,028 52,028 7,455,378' 7,455,378' 38,843,304' 38,722,929' 10,165,564' 10,165,564' 81.438.587' 81,339,021' 173,872,583 172,193,625 775,000 597,243 1,400,000 1,214,319 337,736 337,736 595,000 587,329 7,061,755' 7,061,755' 37,955,280' 37,867,633' 49,987 49,297 3,000 2,657 17,070,428 17,066,246 2,060,124 2,002,017 1,730,000 1,489,993 13,419,240 13,403,020 1,380,000 1,379,148 980,569' 968,446' 491,974' 491,974' 8,095,192 8.072,045 7-10 CHARLESTON, S.C. DISTRICT TABLE 7-A (Cont'd) see Sect. in Tort Prniet COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT DURING PERIOD Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 12 Town Creek, SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13 Village Creek, SC 17 Hunting Island Beach, SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18 Cow Castle Creek, SC 19 Eagle Creek, SC 20 Wilson Branch, SC 'Includes $109,490 for new work for previous project. Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous projects. 'Includes $6,586,455 for previous projects. $3,328,349 for the existing project, and $250.160 for Phase I to deepen harbor. 'Includes $401,989 for maintenance of previous projects. In addition, $600 for maintenance expended from contributed funds. "Includes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. 'Includes $114,556 for maintenance of previous projects. 'Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P.L. 79-11 incurred through FY 73. 'Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 'Excludes $3,000 in FY 69 for reconnaissance study to determine economic feasibility of modifying the existing project. '1Includes $174,000 jobs bill money. "Includes $647,564 jobs bill money. 7-11 FY 84 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1984 New Work: A prop. Cost A pprop. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: A pprop. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: A prop. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 253,000 235,056 -. 16,000 5,738 12,660 38,000 21,583 30,811 30,566 218,000 166,443 1 5,999 51,500 25,568 50,000 64,846 100,000 78,614 280,000 243,580 -6,300 3,171 .. 1,969 197,600 34,616 1,258,000 12,222 293,000 114,700 219,521 219,521 8,600 8,600 1,726,000 1,691,353 26,500' 26,500' 100,473 100,083 2,872,717 2,872,717 1,249,336 1,249,336 250,000 249,90410 1,589,372 949,06311 308,811 269,990 345,000 420,739 400 -8,400 4,036 900 188,720 's 114,000 726,549 "1 -115,000 51,109 as Awk Aa c1q a.aaA&- v .- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized R&H Act of Oct. 27, 1965 R&H Act of Sept. 19, 1890 R&H Act of June 13, 1902 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of March 2, 1919 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935' R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19352 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19352 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 1937 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of June 18, 1878 R&H Act of Aug. 8, 1917 R&H Act of July 18, 1918 R&H Act of Jan. 21, 1927 R&H Act of Oct. 17, 1940 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of Sep. 3, 1954 R&H Act of July 14, 1960 Water Resources Development Act of Oct. 22, 1976 R&H Act of Aug. 13, 1968 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of text.) Provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the U.S., in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL. (See Section 2 of text.) Channel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bay. Channel from Charleston to a point opposite McClellanville. Branch channel to McClellanville. Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence through the Esterville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. Widening and deepening the waterway from Charleston to Beaufort. A waterway 8 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay. Construction of bridges across the waterway in Horry County, S.C. Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers. Enlarging the channel from Winyah Bay to Charleston including the branch channel to McClellanville, to depth of 10 feet and bottom width of 90 feet. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep 90 feet wide' Anchorage Basin 125 feet wide, 335 feet long, 12 feet deep near Myrtle Beach, S.C. CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 3 of text.) Two jetties." Increase in depth to 30 feet width of 500 feet between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. The 40-foot channel to the Naval Base. Act provided that the 40- foot channel should not be undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water over the blocks, has been authorized." This dock was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act approved July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. L. 723). A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel through Town Creek for commercial purposes. The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be prosecuted only as found necessary for national defense. he 35-foot channel depth from the sea to the head of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, also a channel in Shem Creek to Mount Pleasant, 110 feet wide and 10 feet deep, including a turning basin at the upper end. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie.6 Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 1,150 feet upstream and downstream from mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Project is authorized for the Phase I design memorandum stage of Advance Engineering and Design. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON, S.C. (ST. STEPHEN PROJECT) (See Section 4 of text.) Redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis dam into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. COOPER RIVER SEISMIC MODIFICATION CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC (See Section 5 of text.) Install a closure structure in the diversion canal between Lake Marion and Lake Moultrie and construct such measures as necessary to improve the seismic stability of the Pinopolis West Dam on the Cooper River. Sec. 302,1965 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Annual Report, 1889, p. 1184. H.D. 84, 56th Cong., 1st seas. and Annual Report, 1900, p. 1908 Annual Report 1903, p. 1133. H.D. 178, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14, 72nd Cong. 1st sess. H.D. 129, 72nd Cong., I1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 11, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 327, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1878, pp. 553-572. H.D. 288, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2nd seas., pt. 1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58, and 61-63. H.D. 249, 69th Cong. 1st sess. H.D. 259, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 156, 77th Cong., let sess. S.D. 136, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.' H.D. 35, 86th Cong., 1st sees. H.D. 436, 94th Cong. 2nd sess. River and Harbor Act of 1968 S.D. 88, 90th Cong. H.D. 3069, 98th Cong., slets eas. 7-12 Acts Documents - - .. CHARLESTON, S.C. DISTRICT TABLE 7-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Authorized by Chief of Enrs. on Dec. 23, 1977 authority of Section 107 R&H Act of 1960, as amended. R&H Act of Aug. 5, 1886 R&H Act of June 25, 1910 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of June 30, 1948 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. by Senate Public Works Comm. and the House Public Works Comm. on Oct. 12, 1972, under auth. of Sec. 201, PL 89-298, 1965 PC Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1974 R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. b the House Committen on Public Works on Nov. 10, 1971, and the Senate Committe on public works on Nov. 18, 1971, under auth. of Sec. 201, PL 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1974. R&H Act of July 25, 1912 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 1937' R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 Auth. by Chief of Engrs. on eb. 12, 1974 under Auth. of Soc. 107 of R&H Act of 1960, as amended Auth. on Nov. 24, 1965 by Chief of Engrs. under the Auth. of Sec. 107 of R&H Act of 1960, as amended. Work Authorized FOLLY RIVER, S.C. (See Section 6 of text.) Consists of stable all-tide channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide in Folly River and an entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and 11 feet deep. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 7 of text.) Jetties and earthen dike to protect south jetty. Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. 27-foot channel from ocean, including a turning basin in Sampit River. Cutoff and side channel in Sampit River. JEREMY CREEK, McCLELLANVILLE, S.C. (See Section 8 of text.) To provide a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and a width of not less than 90 feet. LITTLE RIVER INLET, N.C. AND S.C. (See Section 9 of text.) Provides for an entrance channel 12 feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence 10 feet by 90-feet inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engneers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. MURRELLS INLET, S.C. (See Section 10 of text.) Provides for an entrance channel 12 feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar, thence 10-foot by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crash boat dock. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. SHIPYARD RIVER, S.C. (See Section 11 of text.) Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet. Deepening of channel to 18 feet from deep water in Cooper River upstream 1-1/16 miles. Channel depths of 12 and 20 feet. 28-foot from Cooper River to Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, and the deepening of the channel above that point to 20 feet from the depth of 12 feet previously authorized without local cooperation. Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, with a turning basin 30 feet deep at the latter point. Extension of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity of the Pitteburg Metallurgical Co. plant, with a turning basin at the upper end. TOWN CREEK, S.C. (See Section 12 of text.) An entrance channel 12 feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles and a channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide from the mouth of Five Fathom Creek to the AIW, a distance of 6.2 miles. VILLAGE CREEK, S.C. (See Section 13 of text.) A channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from the mouth of Villae Creak upstream to Porpoise Fish Company terminal for a distance of 2.2 miles. _ 7-13 _ __ Documents Detailed Project Report H. Ex. Doc. 258 48th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1885, pp. 1154-1170, and H. Ex. Doc. 117, 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1889, pp. 1110-1111. H.D. 3956, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1904, pp. 1591-1605. H.D. 211, 76th Cong., 1st ses. S.D. 21, 81st Cong., eIst sess. Detailed Project Report P.L. 79-14 H.D. 382, 92nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong. 2nd sees. P.L. 79-14 H.D. 137, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong. 2nd sess. S.C. 350, 62nd Cong., 2nd ,ess. H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., let sess. H.D. 93, 79th Cong., let sees. Detailed Project Report Detailed Project Report REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 7-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents HUNTING ISLAND BEACH, S.C. (See Section 17 of text.) R&H Act of Oct. 27, 1965 Provides for periodic nourishment for about 10,000 feet of beach H.D. 323, 88th Cong., 2nd sess. 3 on the northern part of the island with initial placement of 750,00b cubic yards of sand for advance nourishment, and construction of one prestressed concrete groin at the north end of the island. Water Resources Develop- Extended length of periodic nourishment from 10 to 15 years. P.L. 94-587 ment Act of Oct. 22, 1976 COW CASTLE CREEK, S.C. (See Section 18 of text.) Auth. under Sec. 208 of the Provides for clearing and snagging approximately 8,000 feet of Reconnaissance Report 1954 Flood Control Act, as channel. amended. EAGLE CREEK, S.C. (See Section 19 of text.) Auth. under Sec. 205 of the Provides for clearing and channel excavation of 4 miles of Detailed Project Report 1948 Flood Control Act, as Chandler Bridge Creek and Eagle Creek. amended. WILSON BRANCH, S.C. (See Section 20 of text.) Auth. under Sec. 205 of the Provides for nonstructural solution of removing Detailed Project Report 1948 Flood Control Act, as 6 homes from the flood plain. amended. 'Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. zIncluded in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 28, 1935. 'Contains latest published maps. 'Inactive. 'Completed under previous projects. "For national defense. 7-14 CHARLESTON, S.C. DISTRICT TABLE 7-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Project Adams Creek, S.C.' Aquatic Plant Control, N.C. and S.C.' s Archers Creek, S.C. Ashley River, S.C.' Edisto River, S.C.' 2 Great Pee Dee River, S.C.' Lynches River and Clark Creek, S.C.' Mingo Creek, S.C.' 2 Port Royal Harbor, S.C.' Salkahatchie River, S.C.' t4 Santee River, N.C. & S.C.' Waccamaw River, N.C. & S.C.' Wateree River, S.C.' 'Completed. 'No commerce reported. 3Curtailment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st session). 'Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st session). SPilot Program. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER TABLE 7-D SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization studies (See Section 23 of Text) Study Identification Section Fiscal Year Costs Bear Swamp, Lakeview, S.C. 205 $ 37,878 Camp Branch/Lynches Lake, Lake City, S.C. 205 7,500 Congaree River, Cayce, S.C. 205 20,340 Crabtree Swamp Canal, S.C. 205 21,248 Cramerton, S;. ork, Catawba, N.C. 205 561 Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, S.C. 205 14,259 Goose Creek, Berkeley County, S.C. 205 95,235 Devils Ditch, Richland County, S.C. 205 7,500 Kinley Creek, Lexington County, S.C. 205 7,500 Rawls Creek, Lexington County, S.C. 205 7,500 Scotts Creek, S.C. 205 47,272 Smiths Branch, S.C. 205 40,088 Socastee Creek, Horry County, S.C. 205 45,850 Stoop Creek, S.C. 205 24,468 7-15 For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1978 1968 1914 1955 1938 1950 1982 1950 1982 1896 1950 1978 1940 Construction $125,697 379,680 20,646 260,996 33,103 183,712 9,500 29,050 1,706,100 15,841 99,750 262,814 60,000 Operation & Maintenance 8 14,002 529,893 900 269,673 84,170 7,150 5,906,408 178,544 277,700 151,784 TABLE 7-E REPORT OF TfE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Buck Creek, N.C. & S.C.' 2 Cowpens Swamp, S.C."' Crabtree Swamp, S.C.' ' Edisto River, S.C.' ' Edisto River, North Fork, S.C.' ' Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, S.C.' 2 Leith's Creek, S.C.' 2 Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, S.C.' Reddies River Lake, N.C. Reedy River, S.C.' ' Roanng River, Wilkes County, N.C.' ' Saluda River, S.C.' " Sawmill Branch. S.C.' Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter County, S.C.' 2 Simpson Creek, S.C.' Todd Swamp, S.C.' 2 Turkey Creek, Sumter County, S.C.' ' 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers 'Completed. 'Discontinued due to lack of interest. For Last Full Report See Annual Report Fer 1970 1980 1969 1947 1969 1958 1982 1978 1980 1974 1978 1963 1971 1971 1957 1904 1974 4Phase I only. "Revised. Construction $298,167 18,679 97,000 6,379 127,660 3,160 430,951 247,242 985,800 4,500 370,000 99,000 248,605 77,400 81,000 29,000 319,669 Operation & Maintenance -. 7-16 --- -- --- --- .. -- - - CHARLESTON, S.C. DISTRICT TABLE 7-F Item ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal Year Costs NAVIGATION (110) Charleston Harbor, S.C. FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 120) Gills Creek, S.C. Little Pee Dee & Pee Dee Rivers, N.C. & S.C. Lumber River, N.C. & S.C. Sugar Creek Basin, N.C. & S.C. SHORELINE PROTECTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 130) Myrtle Beach, S.C. COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES (CATEGORY 180) Department of Agriculture, SCS Planning Assistance to States SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-AUTHORIZATION STUDIES (CATEGORY 190) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (CATEGORY 200) Inspection of Dams (Category 230) FLOOD PLAIN MGMT SERVICES (CATEGORY 250) HYDROLOGIC STUDIES (CATEGORY 260) Hydrologic Studies TOTAL (CATEGORY 100) TOTAL (CATEGORY 200) TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $760,801 TABLE 7-G NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZAt'!ONS Study Identifications Section Fiscal Year Costs Calabash Creek, N.C. 107 $12,986 Charleston Harbor, S.C. 111 81,595 7-17 $ 51,513 $295,001 24,294 13,941 25,067 $103,981 $ 3,000 55,209 $572,006 $ 1,682 $183,985 3,128 188,795 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT * The District comprises drainage basins that flow into the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL, including the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between these points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah River in southwestern North Carolina, a considerable portion of western South Carolina, eastern Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, .......................... 2. Aquatic Plant Control ............. 3. Atlantic Intracostal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA, and St. Johns River, FL (Savannah District) . . . . . . 4. Brunswick Harbor, GA ........... 5. Savannah Harbor, GA ............. 6. Savannah River Below Augusta, GA .................... 7. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ......................... 8. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......................... 9. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................. .. Beach Erosion Control 10. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ...... 11. Tybee Island, GA ................. Flood Control 12. Broadway Lake, Anderson County, SC ............................. 13. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................. 14. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................... 15. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................... Page Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 8-1 16. Savannah River Basin, GA 8-2 and SC ........................ 16A. Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC ....... 16B. Hartwell Lake, GA and SC ......... 8-2 16C. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, 8-3 GA and SC (Formerly Trotters 8-4 Shoals Lake, GA and SC) .......... 17. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee 8-5 River Basin, GA and AL ........... 8-6 General Investigations 18. Surveys ......................... 8-6 19. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...................... 8-6 20. Research and Development ..... :. 21. Continuation of Planning and Engineering . . . . . . .. . . . . . 8-6 Tables 8-6 Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement ..... Table 8-B Authorizing Legislation . . . . . . Table 8-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................... 8-7 Table 8-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................... 8-7 Table 8-E Savannah River Basin, GA and SC Dams and Lakes ........ 8-7 8-7 Navigation 1. ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA Location. These Rivers are entirely within the State of Georgia. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Survey Map of Georgia, formerly U.S. Geological Survey map of Georgia.) For full description of these rivers, see page 636, Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. Prior projects for the Altamaha River have been adopted, and expenditures made under them, by River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1881, and September 19, 1890; for the Oconee River by River and Harbor Acts of June 18, 1878, September 19, 1890, and March 3, 1905; for the Ocmulgee River, by River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876, and September 19, 1890. For further details, see page 1815, Annual Report for 1915, and page 589, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an appropriation of $40,000 annually for the Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, to maintain a 3-foot depth 8-1 Page 8-8 8-8 8-8 8-9 8-10 8-10 8-10 8-10 8-10 8-11 8-12 8-16 8-16 8-17 .....r REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 during ordinary summer low water and to gradually increase channel depth, so far as practicable without sacrificing the maintenance work. This project covers the entire Altamaha River (including a channel between the river and Darien, GA), a length of 137 miles, the lower 139 miles of the Oconee River, and the lower 199 miles of the Ocmulgee River. The Altamaha River has a mean tidal range of 6.4 feet at its mouth which gradually decreases to mile 33 above, where there is no perceptible tidal effect. At Doctortown, mile 59, ordinary floods attain a height of about 10 feet above low water, and at extreme floods, a height of about 15 feet above low water. On the Oconee River at Dublin the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 22 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 32 feet, above low water. On the Ocmulgee River at Macon the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 15 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 25 feet, above low water. There is no approved estimated cost for improvement or for maintenance. Published maps of these rivers are in the following documents: Altamaha River, House Executive Document 283, Fifty-first Congress, second session; Oconee River, House Executive Document 211, Fifty-first Congress, first session; Ocmulgee River, House Executive Document 215, Fifty-first Congress, first session; and Lower Altamaha River and Darien Harbor, GA, House Document 610, Seventy-seventh Congress, second session. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along these rivers there are numerous natural shore landings which are considered ample for existing commerce. Facilities for recreational boats have been constructed in recent years at several points. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No maintenance was performed during the fiscal year. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is such that the percentage of completion cannot be stated. Channel depths have been increased by excavating rock shoals and sandbars, by constructing contraction and bank-protection works, and by closing cutoffs. Navigation has been rendered safer by removing obstructions. Many of the closing dams and contractions and bankprotection works need repairs. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 21, 1977. To September 30, 1984, costs under the existing project were $60,847 for new work and 1,871,388 for maintenance, of which $69,356 were contributed funds, a total of $1,932,235. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Savannah District. Existing project. The project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plants from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes. The project provides for continued research for developing the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, House Document 251,89th Congress, 1st session. The authorizing act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 8-C for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and participate to the extent of 30 percent of the cost of the ,program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Georgia Game and Fish Division, Department of Natural Resources, who maintain surveillance of potential aquatic plant problem areas, reported aquatic plant infestation in the Satilla River and in other river basins in the State of Georgia. Actual control work under the Aquatic Plant Control Cost Sharing Program with the Georgia Game and Fish Division was not accomplished in FY 84. Certain parts of a proposed new contract were not acceptable to the State. Savannah District pursued the possibilitiy of contracting with counties under the program. Advice from SAD was that the District had authority to contract only with the State. The District assisted the public in FY 84 by answering inquiries about the program and providing contacts with the State. Cost during the fiscal year was $11,488. The Final Environmental Statement was filed with EPA on August 6, 1979, and its notice of availabilitiy .appeared in the Federal Register August 17, 1979. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Location. This 161-mile section of waterway connects Port Royal Sound; SC, with Cumberland Sound, GA and FL (See NOAA charts 11489 - 11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 838 - 841, inclusive.) Previous project. (Between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL.) For details see pages 1814, 1821-1823of Annual Report for 1915 and page 585 of Annual Report for 1938. 8-2 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Savannah, GA; 12 feet deep at mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open waters between Savannah, GA, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL; and a suitable anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, GA. Mean tidal range between Port Royal, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL, is from 6 to 8 feet with fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet, due to winds and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Exclusive of adequate terminal facilities at ports of entry, this improvement serves numerous wharves, some of which are open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are considered ample for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway was awarded March 6, 1984. The contract dredge Clinton removed 82,633 cubic yards from Fields Cut from July 6, 1984 to July 19,1984. From July 26, 1984 to August 2, 1984 the dredge Cherokee removed 111,884 cubic yards from Buttermilk Sound and from June 30, 1984 through July 23, 1984 removed 467,713 cubic yards from Jekyll Creek. The dredge Dauntless worked in four areas. From April 29, 1984 through May 4, 1984 it removed 64,331 cubic yards from Hell Gate; from May 8, 1984 through May 19, 1984 it removed 146,679 cubic yards from Little Mud River; from May 6, 1984 through May 7, 1984 it removed 27,687 cubic yards from South River; from May 20, 1984 through May 25, 1984 it removed 62,790 cubic yards from Altamaha Sound. Total cost including inspection, administration, and other government cost was $783,138. The government cost for surveys and inspection reports, and condition and operation studies amounted to $131,566. Real estate inspection cost and administration activities cost amounted to $197. Total cost for the fiscal year amounted to $914,900. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The main channel of the existing project, completed in 1941, is maintained at 12 feet. The former main channel, now an alternate route through the westerly end of the south channel and northerly end of Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north and south of Savannah Harbor. Relocation of the main channel from the Frederica to Mackay River near St. Simons Island, GA, will be accomplished after construction of the new bridges for the Torras Causeway are completed. The notice on the Final Environ-mental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 29, 1976 Costs of the existing completed project to September 30, 1983, were $763,599 for new work and $14,94,763 for maintenance, a total of $15,458,362. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 4. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Location. The harbor entrance is 70 statute miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, GA, and 25 statute miles north of the entrance to Fernandina Harbor, FL. (See NOAA Chart 11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 447.) Previous projects. For details see page 1818 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 591 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to East River and the following channels: 32 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide through St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, and East River to the foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical Co. wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining Co.; 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide in East River from Second Avenue to its confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Academy Creek; a channel in Back River 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately above the wharf of Glynn Canning Company. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at the city of Brunswick 7.3, and 7.6 feet at the upper end of the harbor. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Eighteen wharves and piers, almost all privately owned, have a berthing space of 7,530 linear feet. The Port of Brunswick and the State of Georgia have a transit shed and modern docks with 1,640 feet of berthing space (three general cargo berths) on East River. For further details see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging of the bar channel was awarded January 13, 1984. The contract dredge Dodge Island removed 1,328,255 cubic yards of material from the sound and bar channel (sta 25 + 00B to 46 + 00B) during the period of January 8, 1984, through April 4, 1984. The contract dredge Mermantau removed 286,929 cubic yards of material from the bar channel (sta 31 + 00B to 35 + 00B) during the period of January 27, 1984, through March 8, 1984. The total cost was 6,724,900 including inspection, administration, and other government cost. The maintenance dredging contract for East River was awarded March 14, 1984. The contract dredge Cherokee removed 456,255 cubic yards of material from East River (sta 70 + 000 to 133 + 000) during June 7, 1984, to June 28, 1984, at a total cost of $309,554 including inspection, administration, and other government costs. Rock dredging continued with an additional 25,404 cubic yards of material being removed. The cost for this work plus payment in FY 84 for work performed in FY 83 totaled $464,408. Expenditures for Andrew island Dike were $610,716. Expenditures for Brunswick Ocean Disposal 8-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Dump Study were $10,926. A contract for Emergency Dredging of the Bar Channel was awarded August 21, 1984. The contract dredge Atchagaloya removed 103,984 cubic yards of material from the bar channel (sta 16 + 000 to 21 + 000) during the period of August 23, 1984, through September 4, 1984. The total cost was $663,815 including inspection, administration, and other government cost. The contract to raise the dikes in the Terry Creek disposal area was completed September 14, 1982. During FY 84 an additional cost of $237,523 for engineering and design was expended. Routine condition surveys, water, air, and environmental studies, inspection and reports, and other essential activities amounted to $582,484. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost amounted to $53,879. Engineering and design costs totaled $237,523. We received a $17,006 credit on one East River Dredging contract. Total operation and maintenance cost amounted to $9,641,199. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in December 1960. General condition of the harbor works is satisfactory, providing maintenance dredging continues. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 3; 1975. Costs for existing completed project to September 30, 1984, were $48,803,026, of which $3,929,968 was for new work and $44,873,058 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 5. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles south of Charleston Harbor, SC, and 70 statute miles north of Brunswick Harbor, GA (See NOAA Chart 11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 440.) Previous projects. For details see page 1810 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 578 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide across the ocean bar about 7.0 miles; 38 feet deep and 500 feet wide to the Seaboard Coast Line terminal; 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of Garden City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal); and 36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of Savannah Sugar Refinery of Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc. about 22.6 miles; and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway bridge, about 1.5 miles, a total length of 31.1 miles; Fig Island and Marsh Island Turning Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long in the vicinity of the Seaboard Coast Line terminal, and American Oil Company terminal; Kings Island Turning basin 38 feet deep by 1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the vicinity of Garden City terminal of the Georgia Ports Authority; Argyle Island and Port Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 feet wide by 600 feet long near Savannah Sugar Refinery terminal and at the extreme upper limit of the project near Continental Can Company terminal; and Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority LASH facility. The project also provides for sediment control works consisting of a tide gate structure across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, about 2 miles long, with an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Mean range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7 feet, respectively. Latest (FY 82) estimate of total Federal cost for new work modification is $34,219,000 ($11,932,000 for Sediment Basin and Appurtenant Works, $8,660,000 for LASH and Kings Island Turning Basins, $13,400,000 for the Widening and Deepening of Channels and Turning Basin and $227,000 U.S. Coast Guard costs). Estimated local cost for LASH and Kings Island Turning Basins is $2,102,000 and $367,000 for Widening and Deepening of Channels and Turning Basin, and $455,000 for Sediment Basin and Appurtenant Works. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide suitable spoil areas and retaining dikes for construction and future maintenance of the project. The Chatham County Commissioners, as local assurers, have met all requirements to date. Terminal facilities. Sixty-one piers and wharves adequately serve existing waterborne commerce of the port. These facilities, with use of dolphins, have a combined berthing space of 46,930 linear feet with water depths alongside ranging up to 38 feet at mean low water. Included in the berthing space are six container berths with 271 acres of handling area. All have railway and highway connections. LASH facilities are located at the entrance to the harbor and have depths ranging up to 38 feet mean low water. The berthing space of LASH facilities is included in the above combined berthing space. For further details, see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982) and Annual Report for 1962. Maintenance: A contract for the removal of material from the bar channel was awarded September 30, 1983. During the period of November 10, 1984, through December 19, 1984, the dredge Dodge Island removed 789,754 cubic yards of material between sta 0 + 000B and 60 + 000B at a cost of $2,964,139 including inspection, overhead and other government costs. A construction contract for Savannah Harbor was awarded August 23, 1983. The dredge Clinton removed 773,226 cubic yards of material from the Savannah Harbor (sta 0 + 000 to 24 + 160) during the period of April 15, 1984 to August 15, 1984; and from May 6, 1984 to July 5, 1984, it removed 475,612 cubic yards of material from the harbor (sta 0 + 000 to 24 + 16). Then from September 26, 1984 through September 30, 1984, it removed 3,196 cubic yards of material from the sediment basin (sta 0 + 500 to 4 + 000). The dredge Dauntless removed 305,707 cubic yards of material from the harbor (sta 70 + 000 to 112 + 500) during the period of October 16, 1983 to February 20, 1984. During the period January 21, 1984 through April 17, 1984, it removed 8-4 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 565,330 cubic yards of material from the harbor (sta 24 + 160 to 40 + 000); and from the sediment basin (sta 6 + 000 to 13 + 500), it removed 1,432,646 cubic yards of material during the period July 30, 1984 through September 14, 1984. Dauntless also removed 95,634 cubic yards of material from the harbor (sta 70 + 000 to 79 + 000) during the period January 22, 1984 through February 29, 1984. The dredge Cherokee removed 840,422 cubic yards of material from the Sediment Basin (sta 4 + 000 to 6 + 000) during the period of September 3, 1984 to September 26, 1984. Total cost including inspection, administration, and other government costs was $2,229,702. A contract for the removal of material from the Inner channel was awarded June 28, 1984 at a cost of $49,999, including inspection, administration, and other government costs. The dredge Enterprise removed 297,570 cubic yards of material from sta 40 + 000 to 79 + 000 during the period of September 2, 1984 to September 30, 1984. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $275,077. (Credits received from agitation dredging of private shipping interest slips amounted to $111,375.) Distribution of Engineer Yard cost amounted to $72,997. Condition surveys, water quality monitoring, water and air pollution studies, environmental studies, testing, inspection and reports, and government supervision and administration costs were $166,642. Miscellaneous operation and maintenance cost amounted to $179,776. Total operation and maintenance costs for the fiscal year amounted to $559,734. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is incomplete. Training walls, jetties, and other structures are in fair condition. Authorized channels are maintained by a planned dredging program with work at critical areas when necessary. The notice on the Final Environmental impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register June 25, 1976. Notices of availability on two Final Supplements to the Environmental impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register September 25, 1978, and January 8, 1980. Costs of existing project to September 30, 1984, were $167,749,915, of which $38,925,359 was for new work and $128,824,556 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 6. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA Location. Savannah River is formed by the confluence of the Tugaloo and Seneca Rivers on the boundary line between South Carolina and Georgia. It flows southeast 314 miles, forming the boundary line between the two states, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below Savannah, GA (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of South Carolina and Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 1813 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 581 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 second-feet at Augusta, GA) from the upper end of Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at Augusta, 3 miles above Fifth Street Bridge, a total distance of about 181 miles. A lock and dam is located approximately 15 miles below the upper limit of the project at New Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained by construction of contraction works, closure of cutoffs, bank protection, dredging, removal of snags, overhanging trees and wrecks, and open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at the mouth of the river is 7 feet. Freshet variation above the normal pool level (elevation 114.5 mean sea level) of New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam at miles 187 is ordinarily about 13 feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Latest approved project cost estimate for providing a 9-foot channel (September 1963) is $6,576,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Recreation facilities at New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam cost $17,000. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. The only water terminals served by this improvement are at Augusta, Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a State port at Augusta, GA, costing about $418,000. These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an additional cost of about $250,000. In addition, Koch Refining Company maintains a terminal below Augusta and Allied Chemical Co. maintains a terminal at Sylvania. These are supplemented by natural landings along the river and extensive facilities at Savannah. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance and operation of the New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam and its recreational area, which accommodated 198,977 visitors, amounted to $349,235. Routine condition surveys, water pollution and environmental studies, inspection and reports and other administrative costs amounted to $71,179. District office support and depreciation reservation totaled $14,036. The cleaning services contract, purchase of fill material, plus engineering and design costs for the water system totaled $137,098. Miscellaneous cost including service facilities and the radio system microwave equipment amounted to $277,568. Credits received for housing of lock employees amounted to $3,246. Total operation and maintenance cost for the fiscal year amounted to $51,315. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. In general, openchannel works are in good condition. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register February 18, 1977. Costs of the existing project to September 30, 1984, were $21,366,304 of which $6,646,551 was for new work and $14,719,753 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 8-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS No reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted during the FY. 8. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 8-C.) 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorlzatlon Studies.) FY costs for preauthorization studies were $21,466. A Detailed Project Report was completed on Bellville Point, GA, at a FY 84 cost of $2,442. We submitted the DPR in April, 1984. The Valona, GA, detailed project study was also continued and the fiscal year cost was $7,752. The Torras Causeway, Brunswick, GA, project was approved in early FY 82. It provides for the main channel of the AIWW, in the vicinity of Torras Causeway, to be relocated from Frederica River to Mackay River. This relocation is to take place when the new Torras Causeway bridges, now under construction, are completed. We began plans and specifications preparations and spent $11,272. Beach Erosion Control 10. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874, as amended (Preauthorization Studies). An initial appraisal was conducted and detailed project studies were begun on erosion along Gould's Inlet, GA. The total FY 84 cost for preauthorization studies was $17,946. 11. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Location. Tybee Island is located directly south of Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles east of the City of Savannah, GA (See NOAA Charts 11512, 11513 and 11509, formerly U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 440, 1240, and 1241, and on maps included in H.D. 92-105, 92d Cong.) The only portion of the island that has been developed is bounded on the north by the south channel of the Savannah River, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and on the south and west by Tybee Oreek and other small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter referred to as "Tybee Island," is occupied by the City of Tybee Island. The ocean face of this area has had a wide sandy beach. Tybee Island is about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of about 0.5 mile. Behind the beach lies a line of sand dunes, a number of which have been removed during the years to make room for improvements and for various other reasons. Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt marsh. Existing project. The approved project plan of improvement provides for an 800-foot rock groin at the north end of the island, with a 225-foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200-foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are two additional, intermediate groins (480 feet long); these will be added at a later date, if needed. Plans now call for the addition of a groin at the south end and modification and rehabilitation of the north rock groin. The plan also provides for the initial restoration of approximately 13,300 feet of beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the terminal groin located at the northern end of the island. Periodic nourishment will be provided as needed to maintain suitable beach dimensions. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentage of the first cost, including costs for construction, engineering, and design, and administration; and excluding the cost of lands, easements, rights-of way; and relocations; of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers, presently estimated at 51.0 percent or $6,070,000 (FY 82 estimate) to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the.Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after the actual costs have been determined; (b) provide maintenance and repair of the groins, and provide, after the first 15 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach as may be required to serve the intended purpose during the life of the project; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; (d) hold and save the United States free from claims for damages that may result from construction, maintenance, and nourishment of the project; (e) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (f) provide without cost to the United States access and facilities necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and maintain continued public use of the beach and administer it for public use during the life of the project; and provided further, that construction on the project shall not be started until local interests furnish lands for beach access and parking, satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the reach from 1st Street to the terminal groin. To date, local cooperation is being provided as required. No federal or non-federal contributions were expended in FY 84. Condition at end of fiscalyear. The Final Environmental impact Statement was filed with CEQ on November 13, 1973. The initial construction contract for the terminal 8-6 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT groin was awarded September 13, 1974 in the amount of $980,642. The groin was completed and formally accepted on June 17, 1975. The second contract, for initial beach fill and advance nourishment, was awarded June 18, 1975 in the amount of $2,175,000. This resulted in the placement of 2.3 million cubic yards of sandfill along most of the entire length (13,300 feet) of ocean beach front. The sand was removed by hydraulic pipeline dredge from a massive sandbar borrow area off the south end of Tybee Island. Completed in March 1976, the project provides approximately 124 feet of beach seaward of the seawall (accessible at average high tide), doubling the public beach area. Erosion has occurred along the beach front. Results of prior years beach monitoring indicate a decreasing or stabilizing erosion rate. The southernmost section south of 13th Street has experienced the most critical erosion. However, the available beach surface for recreation purposes has increased since project completion. Total project cost is estimated to be $10,600,000, which includes $5,400,000 in non-Federal, contributed funds. Costs to date of existing project were $2,527,095 (Federal funds) and $2,032,856 (contributed funds). (See Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement.) Flood Control 12. BROADWAY LAKE, ANDERSON COUNTY, SC Location. The Broadway Lake is located about 4 miles southeast of Anderson, South Carolina. It is formed at the junction of Broadway Creek and Neals Creek in the headwaters of Rocky River, a tributary of the Savannah River. Existing project. The authorization provides for the Corps of Engineers to undertake a demonstration project for the removal of silt and aquatic growth from an existing lake known as Broadway Lake, owned by Anderson County, South Carolina. This lake has a surface area of about 1 square mile and a tributary area of about 44 square miles with an existing dam and concrete spillway. The spillway is 50 feet wide, about 19 feet high, and flanked by an earth embankment on the west side. The total length of the dam is about 610 feet. The National Dam Safety Inspection Program determined that the dam did not meet the safety criteria. Since the repairs of the dam, spillway, and low-level outlet are not within the authority of the demonstration project, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will withhold implementation of the project pending repairs to the dam by State or local authorities. Local cooperation. The local interests are now making the necessary repairs to the dam. Local interests have expressed a willingness to provide necessary easements, and rights-of-way for removal of silt and aquatic weeds, as well as provide lands for disposal areas. They will be required to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works other than damages due to the fault or negligence of the United 8-7 States or its contractors. The United States should be relieved of any liability due to dam failure from construction activity in the lake. The local assurer is Anderson County. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is inactive, pending completion of repairs to the dam by local interest. The Office of the Chief of Engineers is preparing a Significant Post Authorization Change Report for submittal to Congress. Draft Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register August 29, 1977. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 13. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Physical inspections of Dunn Branch, Augusta and Macon levees, and Peacock Creek were not completed during the fiscal year. The total cost of the fiscal year amounted to $59,775 which was for an update of the Augusta O&M manual. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 8-D) 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization studies). Preauthorization studies continued through FY 84 on Casey Canal, GA, at a cost of $9,327; Federal Prison Creek, GA ($46,560); Placentia Canal, GA ($73,631); and Springfield Canal, GA ($62,591). The study on Conley Creek, GA was terminated in FY 82, but additional costs reported in FY 84 were $18. Negative reconnaissance reports completed in FY 83 but reimbursed in FY 84 were Jefferson, GA ($2,612); Red Bluff Creek ($4,973); Rocky River, GA ($6,447); Toccoa, GA ($2,802); and Yellow River ($1,986). The total cost for preauthorization studies for the fiscal year was $210,947. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work, (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Revisions to emergency manuals, emergency planning, inspection, supplies, emergency operations, and other expenditures costs for coastal emergencies were $173,522. National emergency preparedness cost amounted to $93,065. Stream Bank Erosion Control activities under section 14, Public Law 79-526, as amended (preauthorization studies). Prepared a negative reconnaissance report on Turtle Creek, GA for $2,662. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 16. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of 11 dams and lakes on Savannah River and its tributaries in Georgia and South Carolina. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved the general plan for comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin for flood control and other purposes (H.D. 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and authorized construction of the Clarks Hill Project on the Savannah River in Georgia and South Carolina as the initial step of this development. The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of Hartwell Lake under the general plan. Trotters Shoals which will replace Goat Island and Middleton Shoals was authorized for construction by the Flood Control Act of 1966 at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. Clarks Hill and Hartwell Lakes are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been constructed. (See Table 8-E on Dams and Lakes at end of chapter.) Duke Power Company has completed construction on the Keowee-Toxaway power complex on the Keowee River in the headwaters of Hartwell Lake and construction of the Jocassee pump-storage power project in the headwaters of the Keowee-Toxaway project. The Keowee-Toxaway power complex is located on the Newry - Old Pickens site identified in the approved comprehensive plan. Individual reports on Clarks Hill, Hartwell, and Richard B. Russell (formerly Trotters Shoals) Lake follow. Local cooperation. None required. 16A. CLARKS HILL LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Clarks Hill Lake is located at mile 237.7 on Savannah River about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, GA (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and South Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Clarks Hill Dam and Lake, the final cost of which was $79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet, and a controlled spillway 1,096 feet long. The concrete section is flanked on the west side by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet, and on the east side by a similar embankment of 1,329 feet. Total length of the dam is 5,680 feet. At maximum power pool elevation 330, the lake covers 70,000 acres. It provides a total storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated as follows: flood control 390,000 acre-feet; hydroelectric power 1,045,000 acrefeet; and dead storage 1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000- kilowatt generators have a combined generating capacity of 280,000 kilowatts, with an average annual output of 700 million kilowatt-hours of electrical energy. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost of recreational activities during the period from Construction General funds (Code 710) amounted to $65,956. Under the 1983 Job Bill Act $866,887 was expended for temporary employment. The total fiscal year cost for new work amounted to $932,843. Gross generations of electric energy for the period was 853,170,000 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Flood damages prevented amounted to $4,451,400. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $7,407,766 of which $367,251 was expended for temporary employment under the 1983 Job Bill Act. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on Clarks Hill Lake Operation and Maintenance appeared in the December 18, 1981 Federal Register. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 16B. HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Hartwell Lake is on the Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 89 miles upstream from Augusta, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The dam is a concrete gravity-type structure, 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 568 feet in length. The concrete section is flanked on the east and west abutments by earth embankments totaling 13,390 feet in length and by a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west side. Total length of the dam is 17,880 feet. At maximum power pool elevation of 660 feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity of the lake is 2,843,000 acrefeet of storage allocated as follows: flood control 293,000 acre-feet; hydroelectric power 1,416,000 acre-feet; and dead storage 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 66,000-kilowatt generators having generating capacity of 264,000 kilowatts were installed initially with provisions for a future unit. A fifth 80,000-kilowatt generating unit has been installed which will increase the rated capactiy to 344,000 kilowatts. The general construction contract was awarded April 30, 1981. The fifth unit was put into commercial service on November 29, 1983. Remaining work consists of final acceptance of new equipment and settlement of contracts. Total estimated cost is $17,650,000. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost of activities during the fiscal year amounted to $8,777,294. Of this amount $77,457 was expended from Construction General funds (Code 710) for the construction of miscellaneous recreational facilities and $68,989 (Code 713) for cost sharing at the 1-85 Destination Park. Under the 1983 Job Bill Act $35,586 was expended for temporary employment. Also $1,169,772 was ex- 8-8 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT pended for construction for the additional fifth unit to the power dam. Major rehabilitation of the lower diversion dam at Clemson University was completed in FY 83 with the upper dam work scheduled for completion in November 1984. The fiscal year rehabilitation cost amounted to $2,463,415. Gross generation of electrical energy for the period amounted to 571,718,000 kilowatthours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Flood damages prevented during the fiscal year amounted to $2,295,600. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $5,031,064. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the operation and maintenance of Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal Register August 21, 1978. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 16C. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC, (FORMERLY TROTTERS SHOALS LAKE, GA AND SC) Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is on the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam and about 37.4 miles above Clarks Hill Dam. (See NOAA Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake substantially in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Engineers at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. The latest approved (FY 84) cost estimate for the project is $528,000,000, of which $423,090,000 is for construction, $28,127,000 for lands and damages, $4,683,000 is for cultural resources, and $72,100,000 for engineering and design and supervision and administration. Approval was received January 1977 to include minimum provisions for pumped storage. A notice of availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement covering pumped storage was published in the Federal Register February 18, 1977, and October 26, 1979. A notice of availability on the Final Supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement on Fish and Wildlife Mitigation for the Russell project appeared in the Federal Register on December 11, 1981. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Contracts were awarded during the fiscal year as follows: General Construction Oxygen Storage Facility awarded August 22, 1984; Oxygen Storage Facility Support Equipment awarded August 29, 1984; Concrete Dam Grout Downstream Circumference of Penstock awarded November 15, 1984; Pump Storage Turbines awarded May 22, 1984; and Elbert County Roads Repair and Reconstruction awarded May 4, 1984. Fiscal year cost for land acquisition and associated cost amounted to $156,100. Relocation of Georgia State roads amounted to $23,000. Relocation agreements amounted to $24,000. Acquisition expense for relocations amounted to $9,000. Seaboard Coast Line relocation agreement amounted to $58,500. Electrical and telephone relocation agreements amounted to $91,500. Relocation of Abbeville Pump Station amounted to $418,700. Relocation of Calhoun Falls Permanent Pump Station amounted to $178,700. Relocation of Abbeville Dewatering Facilities amounted to $520,000. Other relocation cost amounted to $10,900. Group II reservoir clearing amounted to $23,200. Reservoir topping and floatation removal amounted to $3,336,000. Oxygenation Distribution and Diffusing System amounted to $1,520,200. General Construction Oxygen Storage Facility amounted to $154,000. Oxygen Storage Facility Support Equipment amounted to $200,000. Other oxygenation supplied amounted to $14,500. Concrete Dam amounted to $236,400. Concrete dam contraction joint end seals amounted to $56,200. Concrete dam contraction joint waterstops amounted to $238,500. Concrete dam grout downstream circumference of penstock amounted to $239,500. Earth embankment amounted to $467,200. Instrumentation amounted to $185,900. Powerhouse construction amounted to $14,210,400. Conventional turbines amounted to $853,000. Pump storage turbines amounted to $300,000. Generators amounted to $500,000. Governors amounted to $214,000. Switchgear and phase bus amounted to $807,000. Main control switchboard amounted to $30,800. Four hundred and eighty KV station service switchgear and transformer amounted to $140,000. CO2 equipment amounted to $18,100. Draft tube gantry amounted to -$92,700. Conventional and pump storage SCADA equipment amounted to $500,000. Auxiliary power distribution was $18,500. Oil circuit breakers and disconnect amounted to $45,500. Transformers amounted to -$136,000. Elbert County roads repair and reconstruction amounted to $700,000. Initial recreation in South Carolina amounted to $1,058,300. South Carolina access roads to boat ramps amounted to $320,500. South Carolina access roads to boat ramps amounted to $320,500. Initial recreation facilities in Georgia amounted to $1,053,000. Cultural resources amounted to $354,800. Breakwater and shoreline protection amounted to $222,800. Permanent operation equipment amounted to $81,955. Engineering and design amounted to $3,493,900. Supervision and administration amounted to $2,635,800. Total cost for the fiscal year amounted to $35,491,655. Maintenance: The operation and maintenance cost for the fiscal year amounted to $1,005,621. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 73.7 percent complete. Costs of project to September 30, 1984, were $395,967,064 of which $394,291,607 is for new work and $1,675,457 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 8-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 17. WEST POINT LAKE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER The West Point Lake located on the Chattahoochee River, 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, GA, was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962 (H. D. 570, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The project was designed and constructed for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. Design and construction was accomplished by Savannah District for Mobile District. For complete information see Mobile District. General Investigation 18. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $1,494,188, of which $446,714 was for navigation studies; $924,981 for flood control studies; $70,612 for special investigations; and $51,881 for coordination with other agencies. 19. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information of floods, potential flood damages, and identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities were as follows: guides, pamphlets, and supporting studies, $3,718; flood plain management services, $87,042; and technical services, $98,445. Flood plain management services included responses to other Federal agencies to aide them in fulfilling the requirements of Executive Order 11988 (Management of Base Flood Area). Through the Technical Services Program, flood problems in several areas were analyzed and possible improvements were identified. A major effort during the year was the review and consolidation of existing flood plain data for the Savannah River near the Augusta, GA-North Augusta, SC area. During the fiscal year, the Flood Plain Management Services Branch continued the Atlanta, Georgia, Flood Insurance Study for the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The estimated cost of the study is $313,000 and is expected to take 18 months to complete. The national program for inspection of non-Federal dams cost $3,129. The cost for hydrologic studies was $5,563. The total fiscal year cost for collection and study of basic data was $197,897. 20. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No funds were expended for research and development during the fiscal year. 21. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING The Savannah Harbor Widening Study under Continuation of Planning and Engineering was continued during the fiscal year and the cost amounted to $363,089. The recommended plan provides for modification of the harbor by widening the navigation channel between the present upstream limit of the 500-foot channel (Fig Island Turning Basin) and the Kings Island Turning Basin from 400 to 500 feet. This will decrease the hazard of handling large vessels and reduce shipping transit time. Cost of the study to September 30, 1984, was $674,229. In FY 84, the Lake Lanier Reregulation Dam Study began under Continuation of Planning and Engineering. The cost amounted to $546,741. The recommended project is the construction of a reregulation dam on the Chattahoochee River, 6.3 miles downriver of Buford Dam. Project benefits are hydropower and water supply. Oates Creek is a major drainage outlet for flood waters from an urban area of Augusta, Georgia. A flood control study of Oates Creek was authorized and completed as part of the Savannah River Basin study. The Oates Creek study area is located just south of Augusta in Richmond County. The recommended plan is a channel and bridge modification flood control plan and has received support from Federal, State and local governmental agencies with no environmental opposition. The local sponsor, Richmond County, expressed support for the project and intent to participate financially. The plant consists of improvements to approximately 12,300 feet of channel and consists of concrete-lined channels, grass-lined channels, a low levee, modifications of bridges and culverts, and relocation of utilities. The CP&E effort began in October 1983 and consists of preparation of a General Design Memorandum estimated to cost about $780,000 and is scheduled for completion in September 1986. FY 84 expenditures were $182,553. 8-10 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT see Section Total Cost to in Text Project 1. Altamaha, Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers, GA 2. Aquatic Plant Control (1965 R&H ACT) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA, and the St. Johns River, FL 4. Brunswick Harbor, GA 5. Savannah Harbor, GA 6. Savannah River below Augusta, GA 11. Tybee Island, GA 12. Broadway Lake, SC 13. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 16.A Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 43,000 69,207 207,200 203,626 849 1,261,000 731,353 2,748,000 1,963,949 8,107,000 8,108,330 542,000 677,332 15,000 85,433 15,000 13,414 200,000 350,856 6,000 5,821 18,800 64,801 894,000 493,921 5,691,000 3,339,781 1,100,000 1,938,034 6,636,000 5,642,853 404,000 362,725 1,000 1,838 727,000 332,011 4,841,500 4,885,360 4,573,710 5,397,853 191 40,000 36,731 75,000 481,164 3,491,000 5,221,253 -319,000 -112,480 9,418,000 6,986,914 348,000 171,452 4,542 85,000 4,731 1,050,000 593,200 9,000 11,488 934,000 914,900 8,636,350 9,605,206 4,207,000 8,049,868 672,000 884,597 13,000 59,775 932,843 6,397,700 6,673,800 5,629,293 7,040,063 821,4571 821,4571 1,913,98223 1,913,9822'3 261,159 257,124 958,096' 958,096 14,860,9215 14,829,5615 4,573,6086 4,573,4336 45,135,4517 44,927,4727 46,187,721' 46,185,7436 129,217,9409 129,123,4509 6,740,03110 6,740,03110 14,773,492 14,719,753 2,530,300'3 2,527,09513 99,000 99,000 180,518 146,698 84,841,290" 84,834,65111 55,155,35415 54,283,90015 8-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 16B. Hartwell Lake, GA New Work: and SC Approp. 3,865,000 8,950,000 5,334,000 -450,000 115,636,3071214 Cost 4,448,634 8,232,445 4,489,519 1,213,846 114,705,5621214 Maint. Approp. 4,826,500 4,768,760 4,411,359 4,803,000 48,905,626 Cost 5,267,740 4,471,416 4,938,210 5,031,036 48,467,797 Major Rehab. Approp. - 3,500,000 1,700,000 1,450,000 6,650,000 Cost - 1,974,609 1,893,576 2,463,415 6,331,600 16C. Richard B. Russell New Work: Dam and Lake, GA Approp. 67,717,000 75,030,000 78,469,000 36,300,000 396,089,509 and SC (Formerly Cost 68,346,895 75,048,353 77,939,501 35,491,655 394,291,607 Trotters Shoals) Maint. Approp. - 328,000 396,000 1,231,300 1,955,300 Cost - 298,132 371,704 1,005,621 1,675,457 1. Includes $760,610 for previous projects. Funds. Includes $4,558,613 appropriated under Code 710 of 2. Includes $111,950 for previous projects. which $4,551,509 has been expended. Also includes 3. Does not include $69,356 contributed funds. $1,000,000 appropriated and $999,835 expended under the '83 4. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. Job Bill Act. 5. Includes $134,798 for previous projects. 12. Does not include $276,200 accelerated Public Works 6. Includes $643,465 for previous projects and includes Funds. Includes $4,511,000 appropriated under Code 710 of $97,521 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. which $4,462,086 has been expended. Also includes $545,000 Does not include $10,000 contributed funds. appropriated and $543,902 expended under the '83 Job Bill 7. Includes $54,414 for previous projects. Includes Act. $4,995 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. 13. Does not include $2,032,856 contributed funds. Excludes $288,550 contributed by Brunswick and Ga. Port 14. Includes $210,000 appropriated for AE&D for 5th unit Authorities. Also includes $2,150,000 appropriated and of which $210,000 has been expended and $17,630,000 $2,149,999 expended under'83 Job Bill Act. appropriated for construction of 5th Unit of which 8. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does not $17,286,400 has been expended. include $46,847 for removal of sunken vessles and $1,886,413 15. Includes $316,760 appropriated and $315,509 contributed funds. expended under special recreation use fees. Also includes 9. Includes $298,894 for previous projects. Does not $736,000 appropriated and $736,000 expended under the '83 include $852,858 contributed funds. Job Bill Act. 10. Includes $93,480 for previous projects. Includes 16. Includes $575,019 appropriated and $550,122 $1,634,562 from Public Works Fund. expended special recreation use fees. Also includes $93,000 11. Does not include $395,634 accelerated Public Works appropriated and $93,000 expended under the '83 Job Bill Act. TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. July 25, 1912 and March 2, 1945 2. Oct. 27, 1965 Section 302 ALTAMAHA, OCONEE AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA. Channel 3 feet deep and 60 to 100 feet wide. Provides for control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths. HD 443, 62d Cong., 2d sess. HD,610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. HD 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 8-12 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized 3. June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 July 13, 1892 Mar. 3, 1905 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 15, 1981 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Section from Beaufort, S.C. to Savannah, Ga. Route No. 2 adopted. Route No. 1 adopted. Section from Savannah, Ga. to Fernandina, Fla. Original 7-foot channel. Provided for Skidaway Narrows. Incorporated alternative routes previously improved as separate projects and the auxiliary channels. Section fromm Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla. to St. Johns River, Fla. Consolidation of the 3 sections shown above, into "Waterway between Beaufort, S.C. and St. Johns River, Fla." Section from Beaufort, S.C. to Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla. Removing logs and snags from Generals Cut. Improving Back River to provide a channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, S.C., and Savannah, Ga. Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek. A 7-foot protected channel around St. Andrews Sound. A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, S.C., and Savannah, Ga. via Beaufort River and Port Royal Sound. A 12-foot channel between Savannah, Ga., and Fernandina, Fla., various cutoffs; and anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, Ga. An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in that part of Frederica River, Ga., not now traversed by the main route, at no additional cost to the United States. Main channel relocated from Frederica River to Mackay River in the vicinity of Torras Causeway. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA 4. Mar. 3, 1879 Construction of East River jetty. Mar. 2, 1907 Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot depth at mean high water, with widths varying from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet across the outer bar, extension of training wall in East River and construction of two spurdikes. Mar. 2, 1919 Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over the bar and at Brunswick point; and 24 feet deet at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides for a cut from Academy Creek to Turtle River, if deemed advisable. July 3, 1930 A channel in Back River 230 feet deep and 150 feet wide. July 3, 1930 Increased Channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the then existing project. June 20, 1938 A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek. May 17, 1950 Increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the existing project. Oct. 22, 1976 Provides for Phase 1 AE&D studies for deepening portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance Channel) and for provision of a navigation channel to Colonels island. HD 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. HD 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. HD 41, 52d Cong., 1st sess. HD 450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. HD 1236, 60th Cong., 2d sess. HD 581, 63d Cong., 2d sess. HD 1391, 62d Cong., 3d sess.1 SD 178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. SD 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' Senate committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess. HD 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD 114, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under the Small Navigation Project Authority, Sec. 107, PL 86-645 as amended. Annual Report, 1880, p. 959 HD 407, 59th Cong., 1st sess. HD 393,64th Cong., 1st sess. SD 57, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' SD 132, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' HD 690, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' HD 110, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 18, 1976. 8-13 See Section in Text . .. ... - --- Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 8-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 5. Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 7, 1945 July 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct 27, 1965 SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA. Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from the HD 181, 59th cong., 1st sess. Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge Definite provision for the 26-foot channel. A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge HD 563, 62d Cong., 2d sess. to the foot of Kings Island. A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine Station. HD 1471, 64th Cong., 2d sess. A 21-foot channel above Kings Island. HD 261, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Channel 30 feet deep, with general width 50 feet, from the HD 262, 69th Cong., 1st sess. ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 26 feet deep, general width 400 feet, to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge, thence 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at West Broad and Barnard Streets; anchorage basin; mooring dolphins; regulating dam across South Channel; relocation of the Inland Waterway; dredging Drakies Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Consolidation of projects relating to Savannah Harbor. Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the Seaboard SD 39, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. Authorized the 30-foot project and eliminated from the proj- HD 276, 73d Cong., 2d sess. ect (a) the relating dam across South Channel; (b) the relocation of the Inland Waterway; and (c) the further extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Deepening the channel and turning basin above the Sea- HD 283, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' board Air Line Ry. Bridge from 26 to 30 feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 feet for a length of 5,000 feet. Deepening the channels to 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide HD 227, 79th Cong., 1st sess.1 across the ocean bar; 34 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide, increased to 550 feet opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum Corp. Refinery; and with such modifications thereof as the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may consider desirable. Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide, upstream HD 678, 79th Cong., 2d sess.' from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet deep at upper end. Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 400 feet HD 110, 83d Cong., 1st sess.1 from the upper end of the presently authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the American Oil Company Refinery wharf, to the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. with a turning basin at the upper end of the proposed improvement, made by widening the channel to 600 feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. Enlargement of turning basin near Kings Island to a width SD 115, 87th of 900 Cong., 2d sess. feet and a length of 1,000 feet, with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 feet, the HD 226, 89th Cong., 1st sess. channel between the bar channel and Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet, and the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between Fort Pulaski and Atlantic Coast Line Terminal from 400 feet to 500 feet, and the channel between Garden City Terminal and'the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. from 200 feet to 400 feet; providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long by 34 feet deep opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of existing turning basin at the American Oil Company Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. 8-14 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B (continued) See Section n Text AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 SPWC Resolution June 15, 1976 and HPWTC of June 9, 1976 under authority of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 6. Sep. 19, 1890 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 10. SPWC Resolution June 22, 1971 and HPWC of June 23, 1972 under authority of Sec. 201 of FC Act of 1965 11. Water Resources Development Act of March 7, 1974. 15A. Flood Control Act of Dec. 22, 1944 15B. Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950. Flood Control Act of July 3, 1958. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. 15C. Flood Control Act of Nov. 7, 1966. Providing sediment control works consiting of tide gate structure across Back River; sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide about 2 miles long, with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Provided for modification of the existing project to include (1) incorporation of the LASH Turning Basin as an element of the existing Federal navigation project for maintenance purposes, (2) enlargement of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 feet by 1,600 feet by 38 feet. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA. For a 5-foot channel. Special improvement by bank protection work of 20 or 25 miles of the river immediately below Augusta. The present 6-foot channel project and Lock and Dam. Provision made for locating the lock and dam at New Savannah Bluff. Conditions of local cooperation modified. Provides for a 9-foot channel. TYBEE ISLAND, GA. Project will provide for beach erosion control, consisting of beach restoration, groin system, and periodic beach nourishment. BROADWAY LAKE, S.C. Provided for undertaking a demonstration project for the removal of silt and aquatic growth from Broadway Lake. CLARKS HILL LAKE, GA. AND S.C. Approved the general plan for the comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin and provided for construction of the Clarks Hill Project HARTWELL LAKE, GA. AND S.C. Provided for construction of Hartwell Project. Provided for the completion of the Hartwell Project. Provides for installation of 5th unit. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA. Provided for construction of the Trotters Shoals Project. HD 223, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD 94-520, 94th Cong. dated June 8, 1976. HD 255, 51st Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report. 1890; p. 1328 HD 962, 60th Cong., 1st sess. HD 101, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Senate Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Com., Doc. 39, 75th Cong., 1st sess. SD 6, 81st Cong., 1st sess. HD 105, 92d Cong. PL 93-251, 93d Cong. HD 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. PL 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. HD 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. PL 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. PL 85-500, 85th Cong., 2d sess. PL 94-587, Sec. 182b. 85th Cong. SD 52, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published maps. 8-15 -- TABLE 8-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 8 in text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act 1962) Completed 1968 25,700 Cedar Point, GA Completed 1982 656,233 Darien Harbor, GA Completed 1975 199,723 185,433 Fancy Bluff Creek, GA' Completed 1935 8,000 7,200 St. Marys River, GA and FL, and Completed 1951 15,688 69,936 North River, GA Sapelo Harbor, GA2,3 Completed 1929 17,906 19,594 Satilla River, GA' Completed 1951 9,452 57,172 Savannah River above Augusta, GA2'3'4 See Notes 1929 69,600 5,870 Savannah River at Augusta, GA2'3', See Notes 1929 200,556 17,444 1. Channel adequate for commerce. of two power dams which submerged much of the work 2. Project recommended for abandonment in H.D. 467, under the present and former projects, this improvement 69th COng., 1st sess. cannot be completed as originally planned. 3. No commerce reported. 5. Excludes $185,000 contributed funds ($172,151 for 4. About 84 percent completed. Owing to construction construction and $12,849 for operation and maintenance). TABLE 8-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 in text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Augusta, Savannah River, GA Completed 1941 643,016 38,242 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA' See Note 1974 - Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden Completed 1977 132,640 5,219 County, GA Macon, GA Completed 1955 380,043 38,243 Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA Completed 1976 582,163 5,219 1. Feasibility report completed. Project not authorized for construction. 8-16 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-E SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC DAMS AND LAKES (See Section 16 in text) Estimated Cost Name River Federal Non-Federal Total Clarks Hill, GA and SC Savannah $79,156,000' $79,156,00014 Hartwell, GA and SC Savannah 89,240,000 89,240,0002 Goat Island, GA and SC5 Savannah 36,400,000 36,400,0003 Middleton Shoals, GA and SCS Savannah 16,500,000 16,500,0003 Chattooga Units (4), GA and SC Chattoga 41,700,000 41,700,0003 Tallow Hill, GA Broad 39,000,000 39,000,0003 Anthony Shoals, GA Broad 18,100,000 18,100,0003 Newry-Old Pickens, SC' Keowee 29,500,000 29,500,0003 1. Final cost. (Excludes $127,000 for preauthorization study.) 2. Approved Aug. 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for preauthorization study.) 3. Approved July 1954. 4. Exludes Code 710 funds. 5. Replaced by Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake (formerly Trotters Shoals Lake). 6. Site of Duke Power Co. Keowee-Toxaway Project. 8-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT With the exception of a small area in the northeastern section of Florida, his district comprises a portion of south-central Georgia and all of peninsular Florida, embracing the watersheds tributary to the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico from, and including the harbor at Fernandina, Florida, to and including the Aucilla River. It also includes Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation P 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) ........................... 2. Arecibo Harbor, P.R .................. 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla ...................... 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. .......... 5. Canaveral Harbor, Fla. ............... 6. Charlotte Harbor, Fla. .............. 7. Cross Florida Barge Canal............. 8. Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla. ............ 9. Fernandina Harbor, Fla................ 10. Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla................ 11. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla............. 12. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla...................... 13. Jacksonville Harbor, Fla ............ 14. John's Pass, Fla ................... 15. Mayaguez Harbor, P.R ............. 16. Melbourne Harbor, Fla .............. 17. Miami Harbor, Fla .................. 18. Okeechobee Waterway, Fla ........... 19. Oklawaha River, Fla .................. 20. Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. .............. 21. Ponce de Leon Inlet, Fla. .............. 22. Ponce Harbor, P.R. ................... 23. Port Everglades Harbor, Fla............ 24. Removal of Aquatic Growth From Navigable Waters in the State of Florida. 25. St. Augustine Harbor, Fla ............. 26. St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, Fla .................... 27. St. Lucie Inlet, Fla .......... ....... 28. San Juan Harbor, P.R. ................ 29. Tampa Harbor, Fla ................... 30. Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period ..... 'age 22 23 3 444 5 5 5 677 8 889 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 13 14 15 16 Navigation (cont.) Page 31. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................... 16 32. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ........................ 16 Beach Erosion Control 33. Brevard County, Fla. .................. 16 34. Broward County, Fla. Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project ................... 17 35. Dade County, Fla. .................. 17 36. Duval County, Fla. .................. 18 37. El 'hque Beach, P.R ................ 18 38. Fort Pierce, Fla. .... ................ 19 39. Palm Beach County, Fla. from Martin Country line to Lake Worth Inlet and from South Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County line .................. 19 40. Pinellas County, Fla. .................. 20 41. Punta Salinas, P.R. ................... 20 42. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ..................... 21 43. Beach Erosion Control Activities under Special Authorization ........... 21 Flood Control 44. Central and Southrn Florida ........... 21 45. Four River Basins, Fla................ 23 46. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, P.R....... 23 47. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................... 24 48. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................... 24 49. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ....................... 24 General Investigations 50. Surveys ............................ 24 51. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 24 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 9-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economical control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The authorizing act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 30 percent of cost of operations. Compliance with requirements of local cooperation is on schedule. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: There were 14,136 acres of hyacinth and/or water lettuce, 4,667 acres of hydrilla and 648 acres of minor plant controlled during the period. Costs incurred were $131,690 for engineering and $2,003,080 for operations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the Corps and the State of Florida are in progress, water hyacinths within Florida are under maintenance control. Hydrilla is continuing to spread throughout the state and is causing major problems in some areas. 2. ARECIBO HARBOR, P. R. Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Puerto Rico about 40 miles west of San Juan Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 903.) Previous project. For details see page 504 of 1956 Annual Report. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area, and a stone breakwater 1,200 feet long. Place of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non Federal contribution for new work was $288,000. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf 688 by 220 feet providing a deep water berthing space of approximately 500 feet, and a 300 by 100 foot transit shed. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for the year cost $1,446. Jetty repair by contract amounted to $1,684,449. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $125,724 and $104,613 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1944. Breakwater was repaired in 1952. Wave action has since caused damage. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1984 were $1,128,075 for new work and $3,730,203 for maintenance, a total of $4,858,278. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) Location. That part of Intracostal Waterway between southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, Florida, at junction of Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St. Johns River, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 841-SC.) Previous project. For Details see page 605 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. Channel 12, 90 to 150 feet wide from Fernandina Harbor to St. Johns River about 22 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 6 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of 1913 (HD 898/62/2) and 1938 (HD 618/75/3). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along this section of the waterway and none are currently required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for the year cost $18,611. Dredging by contract amounted to $408,462. Engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $1,762 and $24,967, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1941. Total costs under the existing project to September 30, 1984, have been $263,659 for 9-2 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT * new work and $5,285,456 for maintenance, a total of $5,549,115. 4. BAKERS HAULOVER INLET, FLA. Location. The Harbor connects the Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean and is located 2 miles north of Miami Beach in Dade County, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 11x200 feet, thence 8x100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and a marina basin 8x200 feet. The length of the project is 1.02 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging cost $73,639. Condition and operation studies cost $5,329. Engineering and Design & Supervision and Administration costs were $33,402 and $9,643, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in December 1964. Project depths have been restored. 5. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 456 and 1245.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the 44-foot-deep entrance channel and 35-foot-depth turning basin; construction and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and extension of the harbor westward; two entrance jetties 100 feet long (constructed of native stone core and granite sides and cap); a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water (ocean) for harbor dike and lock, and mean low water (Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian Rivers. (See Table 9-C for Data Relative to Lock.) Estimated cost (Oct. 1983 price levels) of the 1962 modification to the project is $22,700,000 Federal cost and $5,967,000 non-Federal cost ($2,122,000 contributed funds and $3,845,000 other costs); $700,000 costs to NASA and $47,000 costs to U.S. Coast Guard. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: provide all lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of constructing roadway; provide public terminal and transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in berthing facilities. For further details see Senate Document 140, 87th Congress, 2d session. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $2,122,000. Terminal facilities. Canaveral Harbor has 27 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 1,900 feet of usable berthing space and 5 transit sheds with a total shed storage space capacity of 168,000 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities operate with 3,760 feet of usable berthing space and 22 storage tanks providing a total of 1,195,260 barrels of tank storage. Available wharehouse storage includes 28,000 square feet of dry storage and 2,500,000 cubic feet of cold storage. Two hundred sixty-six acres of open storage is also available. Two cruise ship berths totaling 1200 feet long by 41-foot depth and two 8800 square foot cruise terminals are also located on the south side. The western cruise ship berth is equiped with a roll on/off ramp and is adjacent to 20 acres of trailer storage area. Hoisting facilities consist of one 45-ton floating crane and crawler and mobile cranes, with capacities from 70 to 200 tons, available from local crane rental services There are two water-front marine repair facilities with the nearest drydock facilities located at Port Everglades and Jacksonville. Two tugs with ratings of 1,600 and 2,250 horsepower are also available There is no rail service available at the port. The nearest rail service is the Florida East Coast Railway located 9 miles away. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $233,017 and $13,710, respectively, for the harbor extension. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of locks amounted to $226,831 for the fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $28,584. Condition and operation studies for the year cost $112,788. Dredging of the Canaveral Harbor Entrance Channel by hopper dredge amounted to $501,602. Costs for the Sea Turtle task force were $3,319. Cost for operation of service facilities amounted to $4,720. Real estate management costs were $1,072. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $150,049 and $85,632, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is about 80 percent completed. The perimeter dike and jetties are in good condition. Work remaining to complete the project is completion of the harbor extension and construction of the sand transfer plant. 9-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 6. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The Harbor is located on the west coast of Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1255.) Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 32 by 300 feet, increased to 700 feet at the bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande, thence 10 by 100 feet from deep water at Port Boca Grande to and including a turning basin 200 feet square at the municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. Strong southwesterly winds raise water level about 1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower it about one foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $15,563. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda, both open to the public. Railway connections are available at Port Boca Grande, and highway and railway connections are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging amounted to $986,851. Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $3,483. Condition and operation studies cost $11,080. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $8,033 and $38,625, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1959. Total costs under existing project through September 30, 1984, have been $533,169 for new work and $9,574,932 for maintenance, a total of $10,108,101. In addition, $15,563 was expended from contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande entrance channel. 7. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9-D for Locks and Dams.) Operation and maintenance of the locks and dams is a Federal responsibility. Estimated cost of new work (1970) is $179,000,000 Federal, and $19,500,000 non-Federal for lands, rights-of-way, and other costs. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction of canal; hold the United States free from damages; and operate and maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in connection with project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-E for work accomplished.) Regulation. a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period the lake continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Rodman spillway. b. Lake Rousseau. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 27.5 ft., NGVD by discharging through the Inglis Main and Bypass Spillways. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of project commenced February 25, 1964, and is 36 percent completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman Dam and Spillway, Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and environmental impact statement were completed in February 1977. 8. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The Harbor is located on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 176 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 174 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 x 100 feet from Indian River to and including a 300- x 600-foot turning basin in Eau Gallie. The project is about 2,700 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost non-tidal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A privately owned boatyard in Eau Gallie Harbor provides more than 600 feet of 9-4 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT docking space used chiefly by pleasure boats. There are also two marine railways and repair and storage facilities available. The facilities are considered adequate for the present needs of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Condition and operation studies cost $370. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $69,368 and $3,334, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year.The project was completed in 1939. In December 1982, the controlling depth of the channel was 5 feet. 9. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 453.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 32-foot-depth channel (maximum channel in active status: 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek with Amelia River; an 800-foot-wide turning basin at the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and two jetties, 19,150 and 11,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is 7 miles long. Mean tidal range is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are two large wharves operated by industrial plants; twelve wharves serving fishing boats, recreational craft, and other vessels; three oil handling wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marina and Sportsman's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. Ibtal berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most terminals are served by rail, and all have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Supervision and administration of recreational facilities at Fort Clinch incurred costs of -$116. Maintenance: Dredging cost $4,207,305. Condition and operation studies cost $57,275. Operation and maintenance of district communications net work cost $4,113. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $66,806 and $33,005, respectively. Condition at end offiscal year. The active portion of the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 1950 authorization is reactivated. The entrance channel has been deepened to 40 feet for the Kings Bay project. 10. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. Location. On east coast of Florida, about 218 miles south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 582.) Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27-foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 feet at Sta. 100 + 00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 30+ 00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130+00 and thence 25 feet deep to and including the turning basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is about 3.5 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet at the entrance and 0.7 foot at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1961 Annual Report. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $18,574. Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 200 feet by 300 feet, with bulkhead wharf at inner end, affording berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. Facilities also include a cooling plant, a warehouse and a fruit packing house. The north pier is served by railway and both piers by highway connnections. North of the turning basin local interests have provided deep-draft berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a bulkhead wharf with a depth of 25 feet with ample room for open storage and with tank storage for petroleum in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $23,117. Dredging by contract cost $88,169. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $11,055 and $3,608, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938 except for the fishing walkway atop the south jetty which was completed by local interest in 1968. Local interests installed lighting atop the jetty in 1969. The south jetty and revetments are in good condition. The north jetty is scheduled for repair in FY. 85. 12. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth 9-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 of the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to the mouth of Anclote River, Florida, following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 856-SC, 857-SC, and 858.) Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties built at Caseys Pass under previous project; and improvement and maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project includes about 160 miles of channels. Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, 1 foot at Port Boca Grande, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, about 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grande and Corey Causeway over Boca Ciega Bay, and about 5.5 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the area generally raise water level by 1 to 1.5 feet; northerly winds lower water level by 1 to 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for constructing Cats Point and Sunshine Skyway Channels was $9,707 and $4,766, respectively. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal island, and eleven privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. All piers have highway connections. There are six wharves along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small privately owned piers and wharves at various points along waterway for use of commercial fishing boats and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance of channel slopes and berms was performed by hired labor for $8,021. Maintenance of breakwaters costs $730,382. Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $16,407. Real estate management costs were $426. Condition and operation studies cost $12,697. Supervision and administration costs were $42,668. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. A contract to maintain the jetties at Casey's Pass was completed in F.Y. 83. Thtal Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1984 were $7,597,078 for new work and $5,189,101 for maintenance, a total of $12,786,179. In addition, $14,473 contributed funds were expended for Sunshine Skyway and Boca Ciega Bay channels. 12. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. Location. The waterway extends from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 841-SC, 843-SC, 845-SC, and 847-SC.) Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, modified to 10-foot-depth from Fort Pierce to Miami by Chief of Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; side channels at Sebastian and Daytona Beach and turning basins at Sebastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8-foot-depth; and operation and maintenance of the Palm Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range of the tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in the Indian River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme range is about 7 feet at St. Johns River, 1.5 feet at Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is imperceptible at points along waterway distant from inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points along waterway. Terminals with railway connections. are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, Melbourne, and Vero Beach for handling general freight and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce (For further details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami, see Port Series Na 16, Revised 1972.) 9-6 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The cost of dredging was $485,799. Operation and maintenance of the district communications network cost $24,588. Condition and operation studies cost $83,694. Real estate management cost $47,447. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $163,089 and $25,914, respectively. Operation and care: The highway bridge near Palm Valley was operated and maintained at a cost of $105,608. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project as modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete except for construction of the channel and turning basin at Sebastian, Florida, which is in an inactive status. Ibtal Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1984, were $19,251,597 for new work: $727,550 for maintenance and $208,588 for operation and care, a total of $44,319,721, regular funds. In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 13. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The authorized project comprises the lower 24.9 miles of St. Johns River which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 636-SC.) Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual Report, 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 by 400-1,200 feet from the ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the F.E.C. Railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30-foot channel in Arlington Cut and in the Old Danie Point-Fulton Channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40-foot-depth entrance channel; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; and construction of training walls and revetments. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 26.8 miles long. Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and 1.1 feet at Jacksonville The extreme range varies from about 9 feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville. (See Thble 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements of local cooperation for work performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus supervision and administration for work provided by the Corps; provide all lands and rights-of-way; save the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. Assurances of local cooperation for this work were accepted February 11, 1966. Terminal facilities. Jacksonville Harbor has 84 waterfront facilities. Available at the General Cargo Facilities are 11,140 feet of usable berthing space and 12 transit sheds with a total storage space of 1,009,800 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 7,843 feet of usable berthing space and 179 storage tanks providing a total of 8,478,900 barrels of tank storage. Wharehouse storage at the port includes 3,266,900 square feet of dry storage and 4,071,100 cubic feet of cold storage. Available open storage is 223 acres. Four fixed cranes with capacities from 40 to 100 tons are located at the port. Available locally are crawler and truck cranes with capacities up to 100 tones. Various phases of marine repair work are accomplished by 7 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other companies located offwater. Drydock Facilities consist of 6 floating drydocks with capacities from 800 to 33,000 tons. Floating equipment includes 25 tugs with up to 3,300 horsepower and 16 tank barges with capacities up to 20,700 barrels. Three major railroads furnish rail service from port docks to all points outside of Jacksonville. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #15, Rev. 1978.) Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $26,622. Real estate management costs amounted to $457. Condition and operation studies cost $64,988. Maintenance dredging costs were $7,418,427. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $330,875 and $207,443, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act, is completed. The north jetty is in fair condition and partially submerged at high tide. The south jetty is in need of repair to prevent further damage to the Mayport Naval Station. Revetments and retaining walls are in poor condition. 'btal Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1984, were $43,786,128 for new work, $46,813,399 for maintenance, a total of $90,599,527 regular funds. In addition $290,013 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 14. JOHNS PASS, FLA. Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 8 miles northwest of lower Tampa Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1257.) 9-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the gulf, thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective measures over a frontage of approximately one thousand linear feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. Project was authorized December 2, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $53,732. Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair yards for recreational craft in the general vicinity. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Conditions and operation studies amounted to $37,419. Engineering and design costs were $342. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1968. 15. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, P.R. Location. The project is on the west cost of Puerto Rico about 110 miles by water from San Juan Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 931.). Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 30-by 1,000 foot approach channel to the deep water terminal, decreasing to a 500 foot width opposite westerly end of terminal, thence the same width to easterly end of terminal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A modern deep water terminal is located in the northeast section of the harbor consisting of a bulkhead wharf about 1,270 feet long with a storage transit shed 800 by 60 feet immediately shoreward. The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, owns a bulk-head wharf of about 200 feet in line with the existing deep water terminal plant located within the industrial harbor area. In addition, Bumble Bee Packing Company, Inc., owns and operates a dock of about 200 feet for docking tuna fish boats. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $25. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $32,964 and $534, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. 16. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The project is on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 179 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 171 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 x 100 feet from Indian River to a 400- x 800-foot turning basin in Crane Creek. Project is about 3,150 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost non-tidal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date Terminal facilities. The Municipal Marina on the north end of the turning basin has a 350-foot steel bulkhead with eleven finger piers about 40 feet long each. There are also two privately owned storage and repair facilities and several privately owned boathouses and docks. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $65,787 and $3,795, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938. As of September 1984 channel depths as authorized were available throughout the project. 17. MIAMI HARBOR, FLA. Location. Miami is near the northern end of Biscayne Bay, about 71 miles south of the entrance to Palm Beach Harbor. Miami River has its source in the Everglades and flows southeasterly to enter Biscayne Bay at Miami. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 547 and 1248.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 38 by 500-foot channel from the ocean to the outer end of the north jetty, thence 36 by 400 feet through the entrance and across Biscayne Bay to and including a turning basin at the municipal terminals; a 36-foot depth turning basin at Fisher Island; two rubblestone jetties at the entrance; a channel 15 by 200 feet from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin at the municipal teiminals; a channel 8 by 200 feet from the mouth of Miami River to the Intracoastal Waterway and thence 100 feet wide to Government Cut; a channel 15 deep in Miami River varying in width from 250 feet at mouth to 90 feet inland; and a channel 12 by 100 feet from Miami to a harbor of refuge in Palmer Lake. Plane of reference is mean low water, except for 15-foot channel in Miami River where depths are based on flood conditions. 'ITotal length of the project is about 15.3 miles. Mean tidal variation is 2.5 feet at entrance and 2 feet in the bay. Extreme variation is about 4.5 feet at entrance and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Strong easterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet at en- 9-8 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT trance and 1 foot in the bay. Strong westerly winds lower water level about 1 foot at entrance and about 0.5 foot in the bay. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirments. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1968 modification to the project were accepted December 18, 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 91 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 21,373 feet of usable berthing space, 13 transit sheds with a total capacity of 474,300 square feet, and 9 freight stations with a total storage capacity of 270,400 square feet. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 2,714 feet of usable berthing space and 36 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 744,475 barrels. Available sharehouse storage includes dry storage at 1,450,500 square feet and cold storage at 11,204,000 cubic feet. There are 117.1 acres of open storage at the port. Hoisting Facilities located at the port include two 40-ton cranes and cranes with capacities up to 200 tons available thru local rental. Twelve waterfront repair yards and two offwater yards serve the port. Drydock facilities available include 7 marine railways and 4 boat lifts with haulout capacities ranging from 40 to 1,000 tons and lifting capacities ranging from 70 to 500 tons. Nine tugs, with ratings up to 3,000 horsepower, and thirteen tank barges, with capacities up to 35,000 barrels, are also available. Rail Facilities at the port are served by the Seaboard Coast Line and the Florida East Coast Railway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs preparatory to constuction of recreation facilities at Bay Front Park were $82,793 and $10,746, respectively. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $57,259 for the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1968, is complete. South and north jetties are in good condition. 18. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, Lake Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Canal, connecting coastal waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 11428 and 11427.) Previous projects. For details, see page 785 of 1949 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for replacing the old locks on the St. Lucie Canal by a single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. Myers for about 5 miles upstream, thence 8 by 80 to 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami; near Stuart; an 8-foot depth basin at Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and maintenance of features completed under previous projects as follows: a 12 by 200-foot channel from the Gulf to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Fort Myers with a 10-foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6 by 80-foot channel along the south shore of Lake Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6 by 60-foot channel in Thylor Creek from the town of Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $503,700. Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, 1 municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, launching ramp, and a 120-foot wharf on the Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile below Ortona Lock. There are tie-up dolphins above and below all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/municipal yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. Lucie Canal at Indiantown. There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along the Caloosahatchee River on St. Lucie Canal, and on the St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, a municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek immediately landward of Hurricane Gate No. 6 and 150 feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has been provided on the west side of the creek immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The installations of Taylor Creek are privately owned, but are open to the public A breakwater protected harbor is available at Pahokee. There is a 440-foot marginal wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125-foot wharf at LaBelle; a 150-foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 125-foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50-foot wharf at Alva; and a 30-foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near Belle Glade. 9-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 All have highway and/or railway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-F for work accomplished.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing the 8-foot depth basin at Stuart, which is inactive. 'btal Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1984, were $5,178,053 for new work, $10,990,124 for maintenance, and $9,088,022 ($67,558 excluded which represents services rendered without reimbursement) for operation and care, a total of $25,256,199. 19. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FLA. Location. The river has its source in a system of large lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into St. Johns River 22 miles above Palatka. The extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 6 feet deep from the river mouth to the head of Silver Springs Run; clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The project length is about 85.7 miles in the river and 5.4 miles in Silver Springs Run. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several private and public landings and boat-launching ramps are located along the river. Public recreation-craft basins and boat launching ramps are near Silver Springs and State Road 40 and 316 bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffin at Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing, and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the dam is at the Oklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Snagging and clearing cost $14,766. Real estate management costs were $498. Supervision and administration costs were $2,842. Condition at end offiscal year. The project is complete except for providing a 6-foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to the head of Silver Springs run, which is in an inactive status. The Moss Bluff lock and dam structure was replaced under the Four River Basins, Fla., flood control project. Tobtal Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1984 have been $311,352 for new work and $1,977,399 for maintenance (excluding $11,414 under provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation), a total of $2,288,751. 20. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. Location. The authorized project is located on the east coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 291 and 1248). Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 feet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the terminals. Seven-foot tidal ranges have occurred during storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date For requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $509,506. Terminal facilities. The port has 13 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities include 5,156 feet of usable berthing space and 6 transit sheds with a total of 118,030 square feet storage capacity. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 10 storage tanks with a total capacity of 2,029,600 barrels. Usable berthing space in not available at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 150,500 square feet, cold storage at 19,200 cubic feet and open storage at 27.1 acres. Seven cranes with capacities from 15 to 230 tons are located at the port. There are no floating cranes, repair facilities or drydock facilities located at the port. A 100 ton vertical boat lift is located on the Intercoastal Waterway south of the port for heavy lifts. Two tugs with ratings of 900 and 100 horsepower are available. The Palm Beach Belt Line which connects with the Florida East Coast Railway serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging cost $41,437. Condition and operation studies for the project totaled $37,399. Engineering and design and supervision and ad- 9-10 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT ministration costs were $122,934 and $7,035, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Project was completed in 1967. Jetties and revetment are in need of repair. The south jetty is scheduled for repair in F.Y. 85. 21. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor and 57 miles north of Canaveral Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1245.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 2,700 feet long, respectively, and a weir in the north jetty with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet. The project is about 5 miles long. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,415,600. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance of breakwaters cost $1,499,999. Dredging cost $904,989. Condition and operation studies cost $11,840. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $228,304 and $96,885, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Repair of the north jetty should be completed in F.Y. 85. 22. PONCE HARBOR, P. R. Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart Nos. 927 and 902.) Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a seawall 362 feet long extending northwesterly across the rock reef from near the landward end of the municipal pier; dredging an area off the municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 acres; a breakwater 2400 feet long extending southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a channel 36 feet deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a channel 400 feet wide by 36 feet deep into the harbor, and a 36-foot-deep, irregularly shaped turning basin with a diameter of 950 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies between about 1 foot below and 2 feet above mean low water. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1983 price levels) is $4,838,000 Federal ($4,828,000 Corps and $10,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $5,377,000 non-Federal ($4,827,000 contributed funds and $550,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold United States free from any damages resulting from construction and maintenance of the project; relocate without cost to the United States all cables, sewer mains, water supply, drainage and other utility installations as required; provide adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms. A letter has been received from local interests, assuring compliance with local requirements. Further assurances are not required until completion of Phase I GDM. No contribution is required from locals. Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 3,811 feet long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of freight. A 72.5 ton container lift shore crane is available for the handling of loaded containers. The municipal pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The bulkhead wharf has four steel transit sheds totaling over 103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel warehouses are available providing 800,000 square feet for general storage. Open storage areas for structural steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded into cement cargo ships by the use of a private pipeline loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning factory is located on the premises, with direct access to the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the public Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $31,447 and $1,299, respectively. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies were $25. Engineering and design and supervision and administration were $34,331 and $690, respectively. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of the 9-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS. U.S. ARMY 1984 1976 modification of the project has not commenced. South and north jetties are in fair condition. 23. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 546.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an ocean bar tapering to 42 by 450 feet between rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 feet for distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 36 feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths of 200 to 150 feet; construction of a south jetty fishing walkway; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range is about 4.5 feet with storm tides of about 6.5 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1980 price levels) of the 1974 authorization is $33,800,000 Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost and $7,062,000 non-Federal cost, $160,000 contributed funds and $6,902,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local Cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. For work under House Document 144/93/1, local interest must: provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; save United States free from damages; accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; provide depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as authorized at time of construction; provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 percent of total first costs of recreational jetty fishing facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 authorization have been furnished by the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. There are 22 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 13,807 feet of usable berthing space, 7 transit sheds with a total capacity of 393,870 square feet, and 6 container yards with space for 3,965 containers. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 232 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 9,564, 800 barrels. There is no usable berthing space located at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 225,000 square feet, cold storage at 2,098,000 cubic feet and open storage at 100.3 acres. Hoisting facilities available from a local firm include 5 cranes with capacities from 20 to 155 tons. No floating cranes or derricks for heavy lifts are available at the port. There are 2 marine repair yards. Drydock facilities include 2 drydocks with capacities of 2,200 and 3,200 tons and a 4,270-ton vertical boat lift. Three tugs with ratings up to 4,290 horsepower serve the port. The Port Everglades Belt Line connects with the Seaboard Coast Line railroad to serve the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982,) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Dredging for Section 2 was performed by contract at a cost of $1,185,567. Recreation facilities were constructed at a cost of $90,287. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $30,547 and $227,014, respectively. Maintenance: Maintenance of breakwaters cost $299,000. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $2,193 and $2,986, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in House Document 144/93/1. 24. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Location. Waterhyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce are found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts of the district. Existing project. The authorized project provides for destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable waters of the State so far as they constitute an obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any mechanical, chemical or other means not injurious to cattle, and use of log booms to close sloughs and backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the final cost of work has been made (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations continued during the year. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) (See Table 9-G for spraying operations.) Condition at end offiscal year. The project is for maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 30,414 acres of floating vegetation (water hyacinths and/or water lettuce), 1,747 acres of hydrilla and 639 acres of minor plants were control- 9-12 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT led in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. Hyacinths in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River Watershed are under maintenance control. 25. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR FLA. Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1243 and 1244.) Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 16 feet by 200 feet along the best natural alinement as may exist from time to time across the new inlet bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sand-tight jetty on the south side of the channel extending seaward from the shore of Conch Island parallel to and coextensive with the groin, future landward extension of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in San Sebastian River from the Intracoastal Waterway to King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper end. Length of the inlet channel is about 1.5 miles, and length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work amounted to $137,500. Terminal facilities. There are several timber docks on the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area of the harbor is a concrete dock which serves as a municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and accommodates boats up to 60 ft. in length. A large public boat ramp is also available. The principal terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San Sebastian River which flows southward through the city into the Matanzas River south of the bridge; these consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and several boat yards. The present terminals have highway connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail connections. They are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $69,655 and $4,631, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is completed except for the North Jetty which is in a deferred status. The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is submerged at high tide. Tbtal Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1984 were $1,405,131 for new work and $4,251,343 for maintenance, a total of $5,656,474. 26. ST. JOHN'S RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY Location. Rises in marshes of Brevard County, Fla., near east coast, and flows northwesterly to Jacksonville, thence easterly into the Atlantic Ocean, 122 miles south of Savannah River. River is about 285 miles long, of which 161.5 miles are included in project. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 685-688.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880 and July 5, 1884. For further details, see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Florida East Coast Railway bridge at Jacksonville to Palatka, thence 12 by 100 feet to Sanford, and thence 5 by 10( feet to Lake Harney, with side channel to Enterpi ,se and maintenance of two jetties. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and July 24, 1946 (S. Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess.). For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Terminal facilities. There are 36 piers and wharves along project, including municipal piers and wharves at Green Cove Springs and Palatka, 12 Navy piers at Green Cove Springs, a municipal recreational pier at Sanford, and 19 privately owned piers, 5 of which have nearby tank storage facilities for petroleum projects. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $13,615. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $17,466 and $2,508, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion is complete. Condition of project as a whole is adequate for present needs of navigation. (For more detailed information refer to Annual Report for F.Y. 1963). 27. ST. LUCIE INLET, FLA. Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 19 miles south of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor, Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance 9-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 to Miami Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1247.) Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section about 500 feet long;, excavation of a sand impoundment basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; construction of a south jetty consisting of a rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel between existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two year maintenance period. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tobtal project length is about 1.9 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about 1 foot on the land side of the inlet. The estimated cost of the 1974 modification (Oct. 1979 price levels) to the project is $6,290,000 Federal cost and $2,525,000 non-Federal cost ($2,260,000 contributed funds and $265,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to navigation in the combined project, 23.2 percent allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of construction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 39.8 percent of the annual maintenance cost allocated to navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control for periodic beach nourishment and 100 percent of the annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach erosion control; maintain jetty fishing walkway; agree that each five years the amount of local cost sharing for maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold United States free from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing area and local access and feeder channels commensurate with the depths provided in the project; accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations which will protect the water quality for the authorized uses of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 modification have not yet been requested from the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities for docking and servicing charter fishing and small recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling bulk petroleum products and several marinas which provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A dredging and jetty construction contract underway at a cost of $507,127. Recreation contract cost $2,808. Supervision and administration costs were $4,753. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $70,789. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $188,020 and $14,523, respectively. Condition at end offiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in House Document 294/93/1. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1984 were $10,430,420 for new work (including $2,629,362 contributed funds) and $2,566,027, for maintenance, a total of $12,996,447. 28. SAN JUAN HARBOR, P. R. Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of Puerto Rico about 35 miles from the island's east end and 1100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 908.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1916, 1938. Existing project. Provides for a bar channel 48 by 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing its width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400 foot width; an advance maintenance area 500 feet wide, 1,200 feet long and 44 feet deep at the mouth of Cano de Martin Pena.; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 by 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width and six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Thble 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access and feeder channels; provide alterations as required in sewer water supply, and other utility facilities. It is further recommended that local interests be reimbursed for work performed by them on the project subsequent to project authorization. Local interests have complied with authorization requirements to date. There is no non- Federal contribution required. Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and 9-14 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT bulkhead wharves in the harbor capable of docking deep-draft vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and bulkhead wharves are on the north shore, two piers and a three-level ramp facility for roll-on/roll-off operations at Front Graving Dock turning basin and channel, nine at the eastern side and three at the western side of the Army Terminal basin and channel, and three on the south shore of San Antonio Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately owned, seven are U.S. Government property, and 24 owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical crane transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a special crane for the handling of loaded containers. Twenty-four are open to general public. There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet of berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small vessels within the 18-foot draft range. This space is also open to the public. In addition, there are 10 piers and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of berthing space owned and operated by different agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $86. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $146,641 and $3,998, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Remaining work to complete project is modification authorized in 1976. Tobtal Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1984 were $13,027,284 for new work and $11,769,537 for maintenance, a total of $24,796,821 regular funds. In addition, $747,684 was expended for new work and $44,730 for maintenance from public works funds and $100,000 for new work from contributed funds. Existing project includes the entrance channel and turning basin to Army T'rminal which cost $1,543,712; this expenditure was made from military appropriations and is not included in above costs. 29. TAMPA HARBOR, FLA. Location. Tmpa Harbor is in a large natural indentation of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key West and about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 586, 587, and 1257.) Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and Tampa; 46 by 700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Mullet Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 44 by 500 feet in Tampa Bay from Mullet Key Cut to Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44 by 500 feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 feet in Port Sutton entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in East Bay approach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Alfia River; 9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater, turning basins at Port Sutton, Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River, and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in Hillsborough River, and 44 by 200 feet in Port Sutton terminal channel. (The 46-foot and 44-foot depth portions of the project include a 5-foot underkeel clearance Special studies on the project concluded that a 4-foot underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a 1-foot overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet, respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 67 miles long, including 10 miles in Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. Extreme range is about 3.8 feet at the lower end of the bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet. Strong northerly winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the water level about 2 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1983 price levels) of the 1970 modification to the project is $233,675,000. Federal ($226,000,000 Corps and $2,020,000 U.S. Coast Guard) cost and $5,655,000 non-Federal cost ($1,500,000 contributed funds and $4,155,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, HD 401/91/2 and HD 150/91/1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1970 authorization were approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 10, 1973. Terminal facilities. There are 96 commercial waterfront facilities serving Tampa Harbor. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 7,132 feet of 9-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 usable berthing space and 12 transit sheds with a total of 422,400 square feet of shed storage space. The Oil Handling Facilities include 16,440 feet of usable berthing space and 317 storage tanks for a total capacity of 10,972,550 barrels. Dry storage is available at 1,289,650 square feet, cold storage at 12,371,000 cubic feet, and open storage at 40 acres. There are 2 wharves available for coal storage at 750,000 tons total storage and grain elevators with a 3,400,000 bushel total capacity. Hoisting Facilities include 13 cranes, fixed and mobile, with capacities from 45 to 150 tons and other crawler and mobile craces available locally. Marine repair yards include 5 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other offwater companies engaged in various phases or marine repair. There are 2 floating and 2 graving docks available at the port with capacities ranging from 1,000 to 3,000 long tons. Floating equipment includes 12 tugs with up to 3,350 horsepower and 3 companies with tank barges of capacities up to 14,000 barrels. The Seaboard Coast Line railroad serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #17 revised 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Purchase a transponder for offshore disposal positioning at a cost of $60,318. Construction of the 43-foot project from Mangrove Point to Alafia River continued at a cost of $6,035. Construction of the 43-foot project Tampa Bay Cut B (Remainder) continued at a cost of $230,949. Contract for Tampa Bay Cut F (Part) continued at a cost of $84,065. Construction of 43-foot project cuts C, D, and E and Section 2C (Part) at a cost of $8,222,835. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $279,081 and $468,567, respectively. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $23,368. Real estate management costs were $426. Condition and operation studies cost $143,153. Contract dredging costs amounted to $271,379. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $5,505 and $19,402, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (HD 401/91/2 is 57 percent complete) 'ITotal Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1984 were: Main project: $174,426,169 for new work and $18,773,221 for maintenance, a total of $193,199,390 regular funds. In addition, $853,050 was expended for new work from public works funds, $1,463,000 from emergency relief funds, and $906,156 from contributed funds. On Hillsborough River $270,466 was expended for new work. 30. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING PERIOD. (See Table 9-H.) 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 9-I.) 32. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal year costs for Aguadilla Harbor, PR, $70,210; Benner Bay - Mangrove Lagoon, V.I., $67,601; Cedar Island-Keaton Beach Channel, Florida, $20,094; Crystal River, Florida, $7,500; Dunedin Pass, Florida, $576; Homosassa River, Florida, $7,500; North Lake Channel, Hollywood, Florida, $31,182; Pahokee Harbor, Florida, $4,901; and Pasco County, Small Boat Channel, Florida, $19,349. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) No costs incurred. Beach Erosion Control 33. BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at approximately the midpoint of the peninsula. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1245 and 1246.) Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape Canaveral and 10,600 feet of beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the restored beach at "Indialantic and Melbourne Beach limited initially to a period of 10 years. Nourishment of the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would be provided by the authorized sand-transfer plant for construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores for beach erosion control or hurricane protection to be accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject to their own determination of economic justification. The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. Estimated 9-16 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT cost of the project (Oct. 1983 price levels) is $8,200,000 Federal costs and $8,290,000 non-Federal cost ($8,200,000 cash contribution and $90,000 for lands). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of the nourishment cost at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide lands and rights-of-way; provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach during project life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 9, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration for the fiscal year cost $142 and -$3,456, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill has been provided at Indialantic and Melbourne beaches. 34. BROWARD COUNTY, FLA. BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT Location. Broward County is on lower east coast of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet is in northern part of Broward County. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1248.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project and a project to provide and maintain a channel adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for restoration of a protective and recreational beach at four locations generally 100 feet wide with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, a navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestle-mounted sand-transfer plant, if needed. Navigation portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1983 price levels) is $13,800,000 Federal and $20,100,000 non-Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 percent of the first cost of beach restoration in the reach between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 percent of beach restoration in reach between Port Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications if local interests construct beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf at Hillsboro Inlet, establish a public body to cooperate financially and to provide and operate local facilities for navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership of publicly owned shores, and maintain all project works except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert to the United States if sandtransfer plant is constructed). Assurances of local cooperation were accepted November 22, 1968. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Reinbursement for renourishment of Pompano Beach was made at a cost of $4,769,344. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the fiscal year were $305 and $4,001, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was constructed by local interests and is complete 35. DADE COUNTY, FLA. Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline of the county from Government Cut north to Bakers Haulover Inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey chart No. 1248.) Existing project. Project provides for a protective and recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet and a level berm 50 feet wide at elevation 9 feet, mean low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane protection between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide in the area is 2.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1983 price levels) is $43,300,000 Federal cost and $38,480,000 non-Federal cost $36,700,000 cash contribution and $1,780,000 other costs). Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 (HD 335/90/2). Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of the cost of fill required landward 9-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 of the project limit; and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for lands, easements, rightsof- way, relocations, and preproject work, but including credit for preproject work; (b) contribute in cost for the first 10 years of project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the nourishment cost for the beach, with existing ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownership, and the entire maintenance cost for the dune, all between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (f) assure maintenance of the groin, and after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from the beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of barriers to the littoral movement of material that would interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal participation a zone that excludes permanent human habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide complete protection from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; and (1) establish in public ownership for public use the beaches within project limits as a requirement for Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion control costs of improvement of shores presently in private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation have been requested from the local sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for sand tightening of the North Jetty at Government Cut was completed at a cost for this fiscal year of $36,843. Engineering and design and superivision and administration costs were $181,891 and $27,465, respectively. 36. DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. Location. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 16 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1243.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward cost of constructing with artificial fill, a beach 60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Mean tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1983 price levels) $12,900,000 Federal and $11,302,000 non-Federal ($9,100,000 contributed funds and $2,202,000 for other costs). Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (HD 273/89/1). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly owned shores; contribute 44.5 percent of periodic nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold the United States free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on November 29, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $163,259 and $95,711, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill and four year advance nourishment has been completed. 37. EL TUQUE BEACH, P.R. Location. The project area is located at El 'hlique Beach on the south coast of Puerto Rico about 5 miles west of the city of Ponce. Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach by the placement of about 60,000 cubic yards of fill material along the eroded shoreline of El hque Beach. The new fill will be stabilized by the construction of a shore-connected rubble breakwater at the south end of the beach fill and by an offshore breakwater parallel to the northerly section of shore under consideration. The shore-connected breakwater would extend seaward a distance of about 900 feet from a point on the shore 300 feet north of the south-west corner of the park. The offshore breakwater would be located about 500 feet offshore, be 1,000 feet in length, and run generally parallel to the northwestern shore. Estimated cost of the project (Jul. 1981 price level) is $968,800 Federal costs and $415,200 non-Federal constribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, rights of way, and relocations required for construction and subsequent mainenance of the project. (b) Hold and save the United States free from all claims for damanges which may result from construction and subsequent mainenance of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the 9-18 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT United States or its contractors. (c) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain the beach for continued public use during the economic life of the project. (d) Assume maintenance and repair during the economic life of the project as required to serve the intended purpose. (e) Provide a cash contribution for beach erosion control equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost allocated. This function exclusive of lands, easements, rights-of:way, alterations, and relocations. The percentage to be in accordance with existing law and based on shore ownership and existing at the time of construction, which contribution is presently estimated at $415,200 (30 percent). (f) Assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitations of $1,000,000 for the Corps of Engineers portion of the work. (g) Comply with the provisons of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for beach restoration, groin and breakwater was in March 1983. Costs this fiscal year were $493,233. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the year were $748 and - $10,895, respectively. 38. FORT PIERCE, FLA. Location. Fort Pierce Beach erosion project fronts the Atlantic Ocean and is on coastal barrier island in St. Lucie County which separates Indian River from the ocean. Area is 120 miles north of Miami and about 225 miles south of Jacksonville (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 582.) .Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the cost of a shore restoration and protection project which involves construction and periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation amounts to one-half such costs for that part of the ocean shoreline extending 1.2 miles southward of Fort Pierce navigation inlet, and 70 percent of such costs for the adjacent 0.1 mile shoreline known as Lions Club Beach Park. Mean range of tide in area is 2.6 feet. Cost estimate (Oct. 1982 price levels) is $3,230,000 Federal and $3,020,000 non-Federal. Project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (HD 84/89/1) as modified by section 102 of 1968 River and Harbor Act. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute one-half the costs of protecting and periodically nourishing for 10 years the reach of shoreline starting at and extending 1.2 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet and 30 percent of cost of protecting and periodically nourishing 0.1 mile of shoreline known as Lions Club Beach Park; obtain approval by Chief of Engineers of detailed plans and specifications for the project; establish in public ownership and beach within project limits prior to reimbursement; furnish all lands and rights-of-way; furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores; exclude permanent human habitation and provide full park facilities at the Lions Club Beach Park; provide periodic nourishment of the beach; control water pollution; hold United States free from damages; and execute such further assurances and agreements as may be necessary to carry out the intent of Congress expressed in the acts authorizing or modifying the project. River and Harbor Act of 1965 authorized construction of the project by local interests. Section 102 of 1968 River and Harbor Act modified the project to provide for construction by Secretary of Army and section 215 of the same act permitted construction by local interests. Local interests have elected to construct the project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted January 2, 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $4,086 and $883, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach nourishment has been completed. 39. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA., FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE OF LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE. Location. Palm Beach County is on east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. Northerly reach of the project is separated from the southerly reach by Palm Beach Island. Project consists of about 12.2 miles of ocean coastline. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1247 and 1248.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward the cost of local shore project for restoration of beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of initial nourishment, as follows: 4.8 percent of the cost for the Martin County line-Jupiter Inlet segment; 11.6 percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet-Lake Worth Inlet segment; and 5.1 percent for South Lake Worth Inlet-Boca Raton Inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (Oct. 1983 price levels) is $7,300,000 Federal and $21,900,000 cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must obtain approval by Chief of Engineers of plans and specifica- 9-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 tions prior to commencement of work and furnish assurances that they will maintain public ownership of publicly owned shores, maintain protective measures and provide periodic nourishment of protective beaches, and control water pollution. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $44,103 and $4,840, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Local interests provided initial beach fill at Delray Beach which was completed in August 1973. A periodic nourishment contract at Delray Beach was awarded in FY1978 by local interests and the contract has been completed. 40. PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote river. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts Nos. 858 and 1257.) Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in preserving and protecting the shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key; and advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic nourishment of each island. Estimated cost (Oct. 1983 price levels) is $13,100,000 Federal funds and $14,462,000 non-Federal funds. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentages of the first costs of work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute in cash an amount computed in accordance with the cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th Congress as amended by P.L. 87-874, for beach nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project life; (c) provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway; (d) assure maintenance and repair of the stone revetment of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; (f) assure public ownership of beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted March 22, 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Treasure Island 4th periodic beach nourishment and groin extension was awarded September 1982. Costs for this fiscal year were $4,689. A contract for the rehabilitation of the Pass- A-Grille Groin was awarded in February 1984. Costs for this fiscal year were $180,314. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the fiscal year were $77,237 and $37,643, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in 1969 and is 22 percent completed. 'Ibtal costs under existing project through September 30, 1984 were $2,355,223 Federal funds and $2,529,152 contributed funds for new work and $5,625 for maintenance. 41. PUNTA SALINAS, P.R. Location. The project is located on the north coast of Puerto Rico on the Punta Salinas Peninsula about five miles west of San Juan, Puerto Rico. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 903.) Existing project Provides for Federal participation in the cost of shore restoration of the east and west shores of the Punta Salinas Recreation Area. The selected plan consists of beach fill (about 58,000 cubic yards) which will provide an average 140,foot protective and recreational beach at MHW for the west peninsula shoreline; two anchor groins 225-feet long and both consisting of 10,500 tons of stone at each end of the west shore to anchor and retard the movement of the fill material and; a stone revetment for 2,500 feet of the east peninsula shore consisting of 5,500 tons of stone and 25,000 square feet of filter cloth to eliminate shoreline recession along this sector. The Federal share for initial construction cost is 70%. The project cost is $1,008,000, including engineering and design and supervision and administration. (See Table 9-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights of way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance and nourishment of the project. (b) accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and locations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures, and improvements made necessary by the contruction. (c) Hold and save the United States free from all claims for damages due to constuction and subsequent maintenance of the project, except damages due to the fault of negligence of the United States or its contractors. (d) Provide a cash contribution for beach erosion control equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost allocated to this function exclusive of lands, easements, rights of way, alterations, and relocations. The percentage to be in accordance with shore ownership. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 9-20 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT has contributed $300,000 which represents 30 percent of the project cost. (e) Provide an additional cash contribution for the cost of periodic beach nourishment every 5 years, presently estimated at $11,900. (30.0 percent) annually, until the $1,000,000 limitation of the Section 103A Small Projects Authority is reached. These percentages also to be revised in accordance with shore ownership and use at the time of construction. (f) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain the beach for continued public use during the life of the project. (g) Adopt appropriate ordinances or provide other means to insure preservation of the beach fill areas, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers, maintain and operate all structures after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army and comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for beach nourishment was awarded 15 April 1981 and incurred costs of - $70 for the fiscal year. Supervision and administration costs were $876. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was essentially completed in March 1982. Restoration of storm damage to the stone revetment was completed in September 1983. 42. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-J.) 43. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization) Reports incurring costs during the fiscal year were Boca de Congrejos, P.R., $422; Dorado Public Beach, P.R., $91; El Tuque Beach, P.R., $498; Guanica Public Beach, P.R., $162; Isla de Cabras, P.R., $1,428; Key Biscayne, Fla., $268; and Puerto Nuevo Beach, P.R., $2,807. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section III, Public Law 90-483 Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline Erosion Control Act of 1974, Public Law 93-251. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Flood Control 44. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA Location. The project is located generally within the southeastern eighteen counties of Florida covering an area of about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of project, Kissimmee River basin in central section above the Lake Okeechobee- Everglades area in the central and southwestern section, and the east coast Everglades area in southeastern section. Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee drainage area, Fla.) and under provisions of River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and August 30, 1935. For further information, see Annual Reports, 1948 and 1949. Existing project. The authorized project is for flood relief and water conservation and provides principally for: an east coast protective levee extending from the Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three conservation areas for water impoundment in the Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee with control structures to effect transfer of water as necessary; local protective works along the lower east coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area by levees and canals; enlargment of portions of Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on the northeast and northwest shore of the lake; increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River basin, with suitable control structures to prevent over-drainage; an interrelated system of canals, levees, pumping stations, and structures in southwest Dade County to control water levels; and facilities for regulating floods in the Upper St. Johns River basin; a system of canals and control structures for gravity drainage of Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in central and southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other related areas. The project will provide water control and protection from recurrence of the devastating floodwaters from the Everglades and local sources, for the highly developed urban area along the lower east coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural 9-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 areas around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins, and in South Dade County. Project also provides for navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft, consisting of locks and channel dredging in the upper Kissimmee and St. Johns basins. The project includes a total of 990 miles of levees, 978 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 212 floodway control and diversion structures, 56 railroad bridge relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. The project also provides that upon completion, local interests assume operation and maintenance of all completed works except levees, channels, locks, and control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas, which will be operated and maintained by the United States. The principal features of the hurricane gates, constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee Waterway and maintained under existing project since July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-K. See also Table 9-L for principal features of locks and dams. Estimate of cost for new work (Oct. 1983 price levels) is $760,153,000 Federal funds ($758,000,000 Corps and $2,153,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $204,000,000 contributed funds, exclusive of river and harbor funds expended on previous projects. Local interests' costs in reviewing plans and specifications are expected to be $663,000. In addition, estimated cost to local interests of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations is $195,179,000. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (See Thble 9-M for local cash contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; bear the cost of maintenance and operation of all works except those having to do with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas; construct and maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to utilities incident to construction of the project. In addition, for small boat navigation channels, local interests must provide, maintain, and operate adequate public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the locks and channels by users thereof. Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to date except those for the Small Boat navigation feature added in 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Thble 9-N for work accomplished.) Operations and care. a. Features completed under previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway and being maintained under this project are: a levee about 70 miles long following in general the south shore of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles long; spillways at Ortona and St. Lucie locks; 5 hurricane gates; 20 gated drainage culverts through the levee; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. b. Features completed under existing project that are to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds are: (1) Levees 47, 48, 49 and 50 - total length 63 miles and enlargement of existing levees L-D1, L-D2, L-D3, L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S-10, S-11, S-12, S-18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Sec. 4 (Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W. P. Franklin Lock and Dam. In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is necessary under operation and maintenance to continue meteorological studies, water level records, stream gaging stations, etc, for proper regulation of the level of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. REGULATION Corps of Engineers - The Corps of Engineers operates and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee and Water Conservation Area Nos. 1, 2A and 3A in central and southern Florida. During the period, Lake Okeechobee continued to be regulated under a regulation schedule ranging from 15.5 feet to 17.5 feet, NGVD. Regulatory discharges were made from January 21 to May 13 through the Caloosahatchee River and from January 31 to May 12 through the St. Lucie Canal. Culvert 10A was also used between April 6 and 26. The Conservation Areas were regulated under the following regulation schedules: a. WCA #1: from 14.0 to 17.0 feet, NGVD., b. WCA #2A: from 9.5 to 12.5 feet, NGVD., c. WCA #3A: from 9.5 to 10.5 feet, NGVD. The Water Conservation Area 2A drawdown was suspended during the year due to heavy rains in the area. As a consequence, the drawdown period was extended to two years. South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is responsible for operation and maintenance of the remainder of the project facilities, including major pumping stations, spillways, locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and culverts. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was about 45 percent complete. Planning for the entire project began in November 1948 and has been con- 9-22 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT tinued. For construction completed prior to Fiscal Year 1980 see Annual Reports for 1960-1979. Construction completed under existing project during the fiscal year is set forth in Table 9-0. All Federally maintained features of the project were generally in good condition at the end of the fiscal year. (For status of work under contract at end of fiscal year see Table 9-P.) 'Ibtal Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1984 were $275,876,393 for new work, $42,009,225 for maintenance, a total of $317,885,618. In addition, $50,717,702 has been expended from contributed funds for new work. 45. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part of the four main stream basins-the Hillsborough, Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers-and all of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and Lake Tarpon. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvements for control of floods and drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More specifically, the project provides for: Green Swamp Area-a conservation area and three storage reservoirs with necessary canals and control structures; Hillsborough River-four flood-storage reservoirs, with necessary channels, control structures, and levees; Oklawaha River-a levee on the north shore of Lake Apopka, improvement of part of the river channel and a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River-one flood-storage reservoir with outlet canals and control structures; Peace River-Peace Creek canal and control structures and improvements to the existing water control and drainage features; Gulf Coastal Areas--Lake Thrpon: outlet canal and control structure; Anclote River: control structure and channel improvement; Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and control structures. (See ITable 9-Q on Moss Bluff Lock.) Estimated cost for new work (Oct. 1983 price level) is $203,000,000 Federal funds and $123,000,000 non- Federal cost. $42,000,000 contributed funds; $50,500,000 for lands and damages; and $35,500,000 for relocations. (See Thble 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or replacements of public and private utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), etc; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; construct and maintain such associated works as are necessary to realize benefits made available by the project works; and contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of recreation area, Morris Bridge and Flint Creek sites was awarded December 6, 1982. Contract costs for the year were $334,983. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $307,587 and $98,624, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 18, 1966 and is 38 percent complete. See Table 9-R for construction of major features of the project completed to date. 46. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS P.R. (This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, Lago de Portugues, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto Rico and flow from this central ridge of the island to the Carribean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22.6 and 31.4 square miles, respectively. Ponce, the second largest city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area along Portugues River and is the only urban community in the two basins. Existing project. The authorized project provides for two multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water supply, general recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement-one on Portugues River and the other on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River, with an additional 0.2-mile tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1983 price level) is $284,000,000 Federal cost and $79,400,000 non-Federal cost ($54,067,000 for lands and damages; $14,956,000 for relocations; and $10,377,000 for highway bridges). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; repay construction cost allocated to water supply in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; prohibit discharge of inadequately treated sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and prevent encroachment on downstream channels. Assurances of local cooperation have not been completed. 9-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract work for improvement on the Upper Portuguas Channel, Section 6B, Section 6C, and Section 7 at a cost for the year of -$80, $332,071 and $482, respectively. A contract for shoal removal in the Lower Channels was completed at a cost for this fiscal year of $523,447. Contract for landscape development and fencing of lower channel improvements completeed with costs for the year of -$11. Contract for Upper Bucana Channel improvement Bucana debris basin control structure was awarded September 20, 1982. Costs incurred during the fiscal year were $382,329. Contract for Cerrillos Dam River Diversion and foundation preparation was awarded September 22, 1982. Costs incurred during the fiscal year were $7,766,473. Cultural resource investigations at a cost of $164,123. Ponce resident office was completed at a cost of -$41,712. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $3,648,989 and $1,609,777, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in September 1975 and is 32 percent complete. 47. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Features transferred to the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District and Southwest Florida Water Management District were inspected quarterly during the fiscal year at a total cost of $37,446. 48. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-S.) 49. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 9-T.) Emergency flood control activities-repairf,l ood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $172,309 for the Disaster Preparedness Program, $137,605 for national emergency preparedness program, $3,942 for emergency operations, and $57,326 for a rehabilitation report for the Antilles School, Virgin Islands project for a total of $371,182. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (preauthorization.) Federal costs for the fiscal year were $25,030 for Barrio Barrero, Rincon, Puerto Rico; $3,038 for Black Point Hill, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands; and $15,080 for Highway 187, El Terraplan, Puerto Rico General Investigations 50. SURVEYS Hired labor costs during the fiscal year (all Federal funds) were: navigation studies, $493,168, flood damage prevention studies $1,787,170, shoreline protection studies, $119,356 and special studies $228,584 for a total of $2,628,278. 51. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. FPMS Unit Jacksonville, Fla., $48,641. Gold coast hurricane evacuation study, $56,110. Technical services, $89,119. 9-24 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Tlbtal Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 I1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Federal Funds) 2. Arecibo Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. John's River, Fla. (Federal Funds) 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) 5. Canaveral Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 6. Charlotte Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 7. Cross-Florida Barge Canal (Federal Funds) 8. Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 9. Fernandina Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 10. Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2,028,100 1,415,400 1,991,000 2,106,000 16,868,670 2,077,761 1,329,420 2,074,745 2,134,771 16,801,273 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 571,742 31,172 126,784 126,804 1,447,700 3,468,328 788,200 757,998 1,262,308 1,313,848 20,494 4,040,000 4,037,075 72,130 173,015 169,816 48,153 586,784 2,642,645 63,907 80,000 79,956 554,990 445,286 2,613,000 2,642,802 20,000 1,655 1,655,000 1,407,447 325 2,323,000 1,474,260 7,116 92,262 58,026 451,914 42,308 1,073,000 3,121,103 200,000 132,655 4,924,000 5,014,000 82,438 6,884 20,685 2,240,347 1,995,672 7,141 716,000 965,781 7,000 7,141 1,215,646 985,514 1,564,000 1,960,302 -70,000 453,802 149,329 122,033 500,000 246,727 1,120,000 1,114,598 972,087 1,048,073 858 1,531,000 1,949,141 76,370 73,073 -2,000 4,147,8167 - 116 4,094,9667 3,768,928 19,895,367 4,368,503 19,893,045 - 812,000 116 811,019 -134,834 125,783 356,056 356,056 3,576,946 3,570,092 18,574 18,574 9-25 1,128,0751 1,128,075' 3,745,446 3,730,203 361,2252 361,2252 5,292,313 5,285,456 243,2358 243,235s 186,453 159,157 8,121,9104 7,801,248' 26,997,821 26,963,645 533,1695 533,1695 9,582,051 9,582,019 62,862,473 62,861,668 16,288,4636 16,199,3446 9,627 9,627 161,284 157,987 e JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Tebxt Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 11. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla. (Federal Funds) 12. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla. (Federal Funds) 13. Jacksonville Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 14. Johns Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) 15. Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) 16. Melbourne Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 17. Miami Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 21. Oklawaha River, Fla. (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 52,500 55,625 688,908 759,084 2,441,000 3,471,235 41,184 35,128 266,900 24,865 150,000 24,282 25,047 25,047 -72,000 398,921 1,469,000 1,318,044 1,293 22,000 20,690 69,127 60,139 761,000 668,579 1,923,000 2,754,261 338,000 342,621 54,205 294,822 150,000 123,913 32,663 32,663 18,805 1,953,000 1,792,820 41,000 32,912 773,000 115,111 1,207,620 1,284,573 3,007,099 339,545 6,657 8,136 -708 711 130,000 271,416 29,868 29,868 80,000 77,577 1,387,000 1,690,333 40,000 31,430 170,300 810,601 708 939,046 936,138 5,365,700 8,048,812 342 37,419 37,419 41,025 33,523 76,000 69,581 100,000 93,539 57,259 57,259 2,439 1,746,300 1,720,400 10,000 18,107 8,112,5578 8,112,5578 5,666,5389 5,639,8509 19,251,598 ' 0 19,251,59710 25,104,46911 25,068,12411 47,596,27812 47,596,27812 47,375,38513 47,356,79813 102,813 102,813 927,65414 927,65414 82,09815 82,097 s 796,976 796,976 168,187 168,187 1,025,504 1,018,003 17,696 17,696 153,532 147,113 24,796,06616 24,779,21616 2,266,102 2,266,102 2,262,71017 2,262,71017 21,400,59018 21,400,32818 27,777,96619 27,659,29619 503,700 503,700 315,26420 315,26420 1,998,6862" 1,988,81521 9-26 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text in Ikext Project Tobtal Cost to FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 20. Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 21. Ponce de Leon Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 22. Ponce Harbor, P. R. (Federal Funds) 23. Port Everglades Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 24. Removal of Aquatic Growth (Federal Funds) 25. St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 26. St. Johns River, Fla. Jacksonville to Lake Harney (Federal Funds) 27. St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 28. San Juan Harbor, P. R. (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work; Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 256,900 447,000 256,842 431,138 253,700 214,089 37,887 20,629 -20,000 19,850 261,300 19,636 6,245,000 7,863,324 35,906 35,906 110,084 139,086 15,624 -8,000 16,029 62,000 281,654 13,982,000 10,733,178 11 11 875,000 702,717 323,000 161,230 50,000 5,977 -21,388 622 3,641,995 212 212 45,697 208,803 2,600,000 2,742,016 25,025 32,771 38,000 35,020 1,533,415 350,000 304,179 6,904,02122 6,904,02122 4,799,90623 4,774,76823 1,953,277 1,953,277 8,662,548 8,632,159 2,415,600 2,415,600 1,379,000 612,663 457,90724 420,71624 1,304,233 1,301,253 40,755,77325 39,797,60725 1,390,781 1,344,960 2,646,000 2,022,000 2,092,000 2,622,000 23,072,370 2,569,449 1,981,456 2,192,273 2,803,286 23,048,878 48,100 48,122 21,000 20,949 3,110,000 3,897,422 66,400 42,425 1,200,000 1,266,817 1,457,000 24,139 24,431 24,431 17,329 17,371 700,000 864,477 62,262 46,604 507,000 386,512 -220,000 1,129,302 8,112 8,128 9,968 9,977 900,000 758,819 32,094 71,798 136,000 250,909 -60,159 23,539 80,000 74,285 33,615 33,589 514,688 286,610 273,332 394,043 176,942 168,086 150,725 1,476,43426 1,476,43426 4,257,058 4,251,343 1,171,24327 1,171,24327 959,26928 959,24328 7,863,60229 7,827,74729 2,580,915 2,567,637 2,852,043 2,629,362 13,774,96830 13,774,96830 11,831,71131 11,814,35131 9-27 Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 . Project JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section TIbtal Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 29. Tampa Harbor, Fla. (Main Project) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 33. Brevard County, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 34. Broward County. Fla. Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 35. Dade County, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 36. Duval County. Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 37. El Thque Beach Ponce, Puerto Rico Federal Funds) Contrib. Funds) 38. Ft. Pierce, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 43. Palm Beach County, Fla. from Martin County line to Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County line (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 14,171,000 13,377,011 2,818,200 356,616 84,224 1,521,026 184 184 -65,000 1,697,918 550,000 495,094 66 9,300,000 9,323,362 7,661,454 7,094,928 90,000 107,293 -300,000 152,123 29,899,000 31,755,233 2,656,000 5,113,608 165,000 187,912 3,109 308 308 19,990 13,347 7,974 7,974 8,195,000 7,509,369 5,050,000 4,707,158 200,000 -1,331 23,132 21,502,000 19,855,010 1,290,000 1,036,867 135,000 116,418 1,321 9,870,000 9,352,559 210,700 463,233 60,000 63,490 -3,315 576 3,637 4,334 614 614 510,000 -487,351 230,000 1,221,775 177,489,64332 175,279,21932 18,797,5223 18,790,32833 929,962 906,156 2,346,492 2,253,206 29,001 29,001 2,262,000 2,258,878 4,730,000 10,983,100 4,773,650 10,982,868 - 26,884 - 26,884 - 1,758,84134 - 1,758,84134 246,200 50,000 59,751 100,000 1,000,000 55,449 258,970 - 200,000 29,159 23,089 -7,000 360,000 330,000 27,110 -19,246 378,703 -3,469 850 850 -135,000 23,780 36,252 520,000 40,364 -333 6,012 16,950 96,620 158,500 483,920 270,610 69 4,969 7,107 40,000 44,904 300,000 48,942 32,643,95636 31,159,50635 22,474,08536 22,469,80036 7,068,900 6,064,066 4,342,400 4,137,519 1,000,000 994,693 520,000 407,594 1,175,44837 1,151,43637 31,734 31,734 773,000 768,997 2,170,834 1,919,776 13,621 13,621 9-28 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section ITotal Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 40. Pinellas County, New Work: Fla. Approp. - 1,000,000 - 700,000 3,239,693 (Federal Funds) Cost 32,235 54,950 542,817 290,475 2,355,223 Maint: Approp. - 69 - - 5,625 Cost - 69 - - 5,625 (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. -77,428 900,000 - -140,706 2,185,049 Cost 19,221 - 505,218 217,566 2,147,346 41. Punta Salinas New Work: Puerto Rico Approp. 150,000 - 42,000 -28,489 855,511 (Federal Funds) Cost 250,376 420,520 35,392 806 855,511 (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. 330,000 - 30,000 - 360,000 Cost 111,391 212,663 14,690 21,256 360,000 44. Central and New Work: Southern Florida Approp. 6,040,000 6,780,000 9,000,000 8,600,000 277,656,39788 (Federal Funds) Cost 5,721,682 4,859,723 6,865,717 11,422,711 275,876,39388 Maint: Approp. 2,910,600 3,774,000 3,980,000 4,292,000 42,427,961 Cost 3,353,047 3,213,709 3,953,714 4,550,595 42,009,225 (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. 900,500 200,000 1,271,700 2,179,837 52,281,112 Cost 992,533 622,179 756,016 1,652,885 50,717,702 45. Four River New Work: Basins, Fla. Approp. 6,015,000 1,420,000 3,595,000 -1,600,000 70,427,09589 (Federal Funds) Cost 6,037,006 1,332,526 1,076,456 764,489 69,962,336 89 (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. 1,182,970 115,000 352,148 335,412 11,739,860 Cost 1,148,446 191,461 389,206 335,379 11,663,966 46. Portugues and New Work: Bucana Rivers, Approp. 11,600,000 14,600,000 18,990,000 18,700,000 97,825,568 P. R. Cost 10,694,703 13,535,452 19,476,203 16,702,794 94,253,474 (Federal Funds) 9-29 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT 1. Excludes $288,000 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $97,566 for previous project. 3. Excludes $243,235 contributed funds for new work. 4. Excludes $700,000 contributed by NASA in connection with construction of lock and $1,003,000 contributed funds for new work. 5. Includes $113,000 for new work on previous project; excludes $15,563 expended for new work on existing project from contributed funds. 6. Excludes $113,744 for maintenance and operation of dams. 7. Includes $142,827 expended for recreation facilities. 8. Includes $515,479 for new work for previous projects: $8,472 for new work on Sunshine Skyway Channel; and $9,707 for new work for Cats Point Channel. Excludes $14,473 contributed funds for new work. 9. Includes $450,749 for maintenance for previous project. 10. Includes $94,776 for work for previous projects. 11. Includes $213,222 for maintenance on previous projects and $3,179 operating and care under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. 12. Includes $3,520,137 new work on previous project and $290,013 for new work expended from public works funds. 13. Includes $543,399 maintenance on previous projects. 14. Includes unused contributed funds of $64,136 returned to local interests. 15. Project authorized December 2, 1964, by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 R&H Act. Cost of new work excludes $53,732 contributed funds. 16. Includes $2,202,126 expended from public work funds for new work. Includes costs of $817,455 for recreation facilities. 17. Includes $343,479 work-in-kind and $160,429 in costs for north jetty recreation facility. 18. Includes $16,222,275 for new work under previous project, $626,925 for recreational facilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. 19. Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $1,000 for maintenance from contributed funds on previous projects, $67,558 which represents services rendered without reimbursement, and $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. 20. Includes $3,912 for new work for previous projects. 21. Includes $11,414 for operating and care under provisions for the permanent indefinite appropriation. 22. Includes $80,000 new work from public works funds. Excludes $509,506 contributed funds. 23. Includes $30,000 for maintenance from public works funds. 24. Includes $11,588 expended for restudy, but excludes $21,960 expended for new work from contributed funds. 25. Excludes $723,456 contributed funds. 26. Includes $71,303 for new work on previous project. Excludes $137,500 contributed funds. 27. Baresford cutoff and completion of cutoffs and easing of bends in Putnam Lake and Volusia Counties in inactive status. Includes $29,566 for new work under previous project. 28. Includes $25,838 under previous project. 29. Includes $26,689 for new work under previous project. 30. Includes $747,684 for new work under previous project. Excludes $100,000 expended for new work from contributed funds. 31. Includes $44,730 in maintenance under previous project. 32. Includes $853,050 for new work under previous project. Excludes $270,466 for new work for Hillsborough River and $13,939 for new work from contributed funds. 33. Includes $17,107 for maintenance under previous project. 34. Excludes work-in-kind. 35. Includes $2,299,526 for reimbursement costs to Bal Harbor. 36. Excludes unused contributed funds of $17,969 returned to local interests. 37. Excludes $300,083 in property for services furnished by local interests in lieu of cash contribution. 38. Excludes $15,543 for property received without reimbursement and R&H Funds, expended on previous projects (see cost and financial statement for Okeechobee Waterway, Fla., project for these costs). Excludes $100,000 advanced by local interests toward federal costs. 39. Includes costs of $93,966 for recreation facilities at Moss Bluff and $2,638,272 at Lake Tarpon. 9-30 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 9-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 27, 1965 August 26, 1937 March 4, 1913 June 20, 1939 March 2, 1945 October 23, 1962 June 20, 1938 July 14, 1960 July 25, 1912 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 P.L. 675/77 July 23, 1942 June 14, 1880 July 13, 1892 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 June 20, 1938 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, and continued research to develop best method of control ARECIBO HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 2 of Text) Construction of breakwater 1,200 feet long and dredging channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 3 of 'IText) Channel 7 x 100 feet Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cut-offs CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 4 of Text) Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, and a barge canal with a lock Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west of 35-foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FLA. (See Section 5 of Text) Interior channel 6 x 70 feet Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at the bend Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel CLEARWATER PASS, FLA. (See Section 7 of Text) Entrance channel 10 x 150 feet, inside channel 8 x 100 feet, and a turning basin CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL (See Section 8 of Text) Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 9 of Text) Entrance jetties Raising and extending jetties to provide 19-foot depth Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20- to 24-foot depth and 400- to 600-foot channel width Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland Sound under the general heading of Fernandina Harbor Provided for a 26-foot channel Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin H. Doc 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 898, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc 367, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 1, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 95, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc 186, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc 293, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc 109, 79th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1879 Annual Report 1891 & 1896 H.Doc 388, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 227, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 284, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 9-31 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 6, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act. Def. Act of March 4, 1931 War Dept. Approp. Act, March 4, 1933 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 May 10-16, 1957 Auth. March 1, 1962 By Senate and House Public Works Committee Auth. by Chief of Engineers March 1, 1963, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Do. Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from 1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin FORT MYERS BEACH, FLA. (See Section 10 of Text) 12- x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals Extension of 11- x 125-foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in Matanzas Pass FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 11 of T'xt) Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local interests Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. (See Section 12 of Text) 9- x 100-foot channel; deepening channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet and construction of highway bridge at Venice Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U. S. Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used Use of alternate Route C-1 in Venice-Lemon Bay area Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and any other necessary crossing over Route C-1 Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to 9 x 100 feet H.Doc 284, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 662, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act H. Doc 252, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 371, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 6- x 80-foot channel in Boca Ciega Bay INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. (See Section 13 of T'xt) Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami Channel width of 100 feet Operation and care of Palm Valley Bridge Thrning basin at Jacksonville Beach Channel 12 x 125 feet Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian H.Doc. 586, 69th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc 71, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 740, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 9-32 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Thrning basin at Vero Beach July 3, 1958 Chief of Engineers Report of July 22, 1960, Mod. 12-foot channel March 2, 1907 June 14, 1880 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 June 5, 1920 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 Do. Do. October 27, 1965 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 2, 1964 Under Sec 107 of 1960 R&H Act and Sec 110 of 1966 R&H Act. Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1976 under Sec 107 of 1960 R&H Act, as amended August 30, 1935 Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 14 of Text) ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad bridge ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. Jetties at entrance (maintenance only) Extension of jetties, etc (maintenance only) Main channel 30 by 300-600 feet; anchorage basin at Mayport; and training walls and revetments ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO THE OCEAN Consolidation of above projects Widening bend at Dames Point to 900 feet Widening Drummond, Trout, and Six Mile (now Long Branch) Creeks Cut to 400 feet; and T'lerminal Channel 30 by 400 feet Maintenance of existing channel widths; widening Terminal Channel to 590 feet; the 28-foot area between Laura St. and St. Elmo W. Acosta Bridge; channel along south side of Commodore Point; and basin at Naval Reserve Armory Main channel 34 feet deep via Terminal Channel Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff 34 by 500 feet Maintain existing entrance channel depths of 40 and 42 feet; deepen main ship channel to 38 feet to Mile 20 and widen channel near Mile 5 and near Mile 7 JOHN'S PASS, FLA. (See Section 15 of Text) Channel 10 x 150 feet in the gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, 6 x 100 feet to IWW-2.6 miles long LONGBOAT PASS, FLA. (See Section 16 of IText) 12- x 150-foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mexico to Longboat Bridge; 10- x 100-foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge MAYAGUEZ HARBOR P.R. (See Section 17 of Text) Approach channel 30 feet deep to and along deep water terminal H.Doc 261, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 663, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1879, p. 767 H.Ex.Doc. 346, 53rd Cong., 3d sess., and Annual Report 1895, p. 1586 H.Doc. 611, 61st Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc 483, 70th Cong. 2d sess. S.Comm. print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 322, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc 230, 78th Cong. 2d sess. S.Doc 179, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 214, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 215, 72nd Cong. 1st sess. & River and Harbor Committee Doc 1, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. 9-33 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 PWA Program September 6, 1933 June 13, 1902 March 2, 1907 March 4, 1913 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March Z, 1945 July 14, 1960 August 13, 1968 Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Do. March 2, 1945 Do. MIAMI HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 18 of Text) MIAMI RIVER The 15-foot channel in Miami River, 150 feet wide at the mouth The channel at the Dinner Key Airport An 18-foot channel in a landcut across the peninsula and construction of the north jetty Construction of the south jetty and increase of channel width to 100 feet Modification of local cooperation requirements imposed by the Act of July 25, 1912 A channel 25 feet deep with present widths from the ocean to Biscayne Bay, thence 200 feet wide across the bay to but not including the municipal turning basin, and extension of both jetties A channel width of 300 feet across the bay and enlarging the municipal turning basin, with expenditures thereon limited to $200,000 A depth of 30 feet from the ocean to and in the turning basin, with the existing authorized project widths, including the 300-foot width in the channel across the bay Extending the turning basin 200 feet to the southward The Virginia Key improvement For incorporation of the project for Miami River in that for Miami Harbor, the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project widths; the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin and to Government Cut; and the channel from Miami River to the harbor of refuge, provided that local interest contribute one-third of the cost Deletion of Virginia Key development and the Dinner Key approach channel, widening the existing ship channel by easing the ocean bend and increasing the width of the 300-foot-wide section to 400 feet, enlarging the existing turning basin 300 feet along both the south and northeasterly sides, and dredging a turning basin along the north side of Fisher Island about 39 acres in extent and 30 feet in depth Enlarging existing entrance channel to 38 x 500 feet, deepening existing 400-foot-wide channel across Biscayne Bay to 36 feet; deepening existing turning basins at Biscayne Blvd. terminal and Fisher Island to 36 feet NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FLA. (See Section 19 of Text) 10- x 150-foot entrance channel; 8- x 100-foot inner channels; and 8-foot-deep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. (See Section 20 of Text) Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from R&H appropriations New lock and weir structure in St. Lucie Canal Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart Specified in Act S.Doc 95, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and specified in Act H.Doc. 622, 56th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report 1900, p. 1987) Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 516, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 15, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 86, 74th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 251, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc 91, 79th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 71, 85th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 93, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 28, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 736, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc 736, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 9-34 TABLE 9-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Auth. by Chief of Engineers November 5, 1968, under Sec 107 of 1960 R&H Act September 19, 1890 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 PARA June 26, 1934 March 13, 1934 December 10, 1934 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 October 27, 1965 March 3, 1925 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 H.R. September 23, 1976 S.R. October 1, 1976 Enlarge existing 8- x 90-foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet OKLAWAHA RIVER, FLA. (See Section 21 of Text) Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of natural river bed Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from appropriations for rivers and harbors PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 22 of Text) Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local interests Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local interests, to 20 feet Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration, and widening the channels to existing project dimensions, enlarging the 700-foot-square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point on south side of the inlet, revetting the banks of the inlet, and restoring existing jetties Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed not to exceed $305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1, 1949 An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long, merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.3 mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet north-south by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. (See Section 23 of Text) Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south side of inlet; a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment basin inside the weir PONCE HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 24 of Text) Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local interests Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided for dredging 30-foot-depth area and 18 acres off the municipal pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion of the adjacent to the municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin. Annual Report 1889, p. 1360 H.Doc. 782, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Acts Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 185, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Recommended by Chief of Engineers to Public Works Administration October 17, 1934 H.Doc. 185. 73d Cong., 2d sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc 530, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 704, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map) H.Doc 74, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc 745, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 9-35 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 H.R. Ma 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 March 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 March 3, 1905 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 March 3, 1899 March 2, 1919 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 March 2, 1945 November 7, 1966 PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 25 of Text) Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet square Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side and enlarge flare at entrance channel Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alinement and increase turning basin in size and depth Dee pen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed postauthorization studies REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section 26 of Text) Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms for removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State Extermination and removal of water hyacinths by any mechanical, chemical, or other means Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 27 of Tebxt) Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to Intracoastal Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward extension of groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY (See Section 28 of Text) A channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Jacksonville to Palatka The improvement of Deep Creek Two jetties at Volusia Bar (Maintenance only; new work completed under previous project.) A channel 100 feet wide, 8 feet deep from Palatka to Sanford with a side channel to Enterprise, and thence 5 feet deep to Lake Harney Cutoffs at Butcher Bend, Shake Creek, and Starks Landing, and easing bends at other points A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, with a side channelto Enterprise and with cutoffs and easing of bends Combining the two projects above into a single project for St. Johns River, Fla., Jacksonville to Lake Harney, and for a cutoff 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide between Lake Monroe and the vicinity of Osteen Bridge (Woodruff Creek Cutoff) A channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, and in the branch to Enterprise ST. LUCIE INLET, FLA. (See Section 29 of Txt) Channel 10 x 200 feet Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet H.Doc 357, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Dot 25, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doa 545, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doa 768, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc 346, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 144, 93d. Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1899 Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Dot 555, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc 133, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc 523, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report for 1989, p. 1343 H.Doc 699, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report for 1879, pp. 795-798 H.Doc 1111, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc 691, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc 603, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Do 391, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Dot 508, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 9-36 TABLE 9-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 Def. Act of March 4, 1929 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 August 8, 1917 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 August 4, 1976 March 3, 1899 March 3, 1905 Extending north jetty and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; construction of south jetty with walkway for recreational fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet thru bar cut, tapering to 150 feet thru the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period ST. PETERSBURG HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 30 of Text) Dredging Point Pinellas Channel 16 x 200 feet Channel 19 x 250 feet westward from Tampa Bay into and including the basin at the port of St. Petersburg Channel 20 x 200 feet leading southward from previous authorization to Tampa Bay Entrance channel 24 x 300 feet from Tampa Bay to and including a 12-foot basin in Bayboro Harbor; Maritime Service channel 15 x 100 x 300 feet; channel 12 x 75 x 300 feet in mouth of Salt Creek SAN JUAN HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 31 of Text) Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel to 30-foot depth Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel Modified condition of local cooperation Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage area to 329 acres Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to the Graving Dock Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin to the Army Terminal Deepening portions of entrance and approach channels and basins to Army Terminal and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32-foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage A bar channel 48 by 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing width to 800 feet; deepening Army Thrminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400-foot width; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 by 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. TAMPA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 32 of Text) TAMPA BAY For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, 500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act S.Doc 229, 70th Cong., 2d sess. R.&H. Committee Doc. 71, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 70, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc 865, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 2d sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 74th Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc 364, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act H.Doc 38, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc 574, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Also printed in Annual Report 1899, p. 1640) Channel dimensions specified in Act Specified in Act 9-37 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 August 8, 1917 March 3, 1899 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 Do. March 2, 1945 Do. Do. May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 Do. TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the bar, 300 feet in Tmpa Ba, Ybor, and Garrison Channels, and 200 feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary HILLSBOROUGH RIVER For a 12-foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a previous project under Lhe title Improving Hillsborough Bay, Fla.) TAMPA HARBOR Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tahmpa Harbor Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of Sparkman Channel to 300 feet For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough River) easterly for 300 feet For construction of a breakwater at Peter O. Knight Field, Davis Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and Ybor Channel to 500 feet; widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly; and widening the bend between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough Bay channel to and including a turning basin in the Alafia River (Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950) For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and including a turning basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long (in lieu of the improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at entrance, bends, and turns Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works Dam. Maintenance of cleared channe to be assumed by local interests Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel 34 x 400 feet For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and an irregularly shaped turning basin both to a depth of 34 feet Enlarge entrance channel across Egmont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the Gulf to Mullet Key Enlarge Mullet Key Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet H.Doc 634, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, pp. 1357-1360 Specified in Act H.Doc 100, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc 22, 72d Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc 164, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 76th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc 183, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc 119, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Do 16, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc 258, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc 567, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc 529, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc 150, 91st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc 401, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Do. 9-38 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 December 19, 1979 By Chief of Engineers under section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act October 27, 1965 Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut through Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the existing width of 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Sparkman Channels Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a turning diameter of 1,200 feet Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 feet and an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning diameter of 1,200 feet An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a distance of 4,000 feet BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 36 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project BROWARD COUNTY, FLA., BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT (See Section 37 of Text) Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, Fla. and a combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to Hillsborough Inlet and the shore south thereof to Port Everglades DADE COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 38 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricane-flood control project DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 39 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project EL TUQUE BEACH, PONCE, P. R. (See Section 40 of Text) Placement of about 60,000 cubic yards of fill material along eroded shoreline. Build a shore connected rubble breakwater and offshore breakwater to stabilize the fill material FORT PIERCE, FLA. (See Section 41 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection projects Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 84, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 9-39 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents S.R. May 31, 1974 H.R. November 20, 1975 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 September 4, 1979 By Chief of Engineers under Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS June 30, 1948 September 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 October 23, 1962 Do. Do Do. Do October 27, 1965 Do. August 13, 1968 Do. Approved December 17, 1970 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 MANATEE COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 42 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA., FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE (See Section 43 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and sand-transfer plant PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 44 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project PUNTA SALINAS RECREATION AREA, P.R. (See Section 45 of T'xt) Shore restoration of the east and west shores of the Punta Salinas Recreation Area CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA (See Section 48 of lText) First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire comprehensive plan of improvement Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County Project for Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tohopekaliga for flood control and major drainage, including development of Reedy Creek Swamp Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood control and major drainage Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry County Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties Improvement of supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park and other related areas. Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft S.Doc 93, 37th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. (Contains latest published map) H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong. 1st sess. S.Doc. 125, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc 123, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 138, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc 20, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., 2d sess. 9-40 TABLE 9-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. (See Section 49 of 'Ixt) Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, P.R. (See Section 50 of Text) LAGO de CERRILLOS, P.R. Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply, and recreation LAGO de PORTUGUES, P.R. Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation PONCE, P.R. Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control Documents H.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 2d sess. 9-41 Acts October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. PROJECT DATA RELATIVE TO LOCK (See Section 5 of Tlext) Distance to nearest town 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and Intracoastal Waterway Name of nearest town Cocoa, Fla. Distance from Intracoastal Waterway 6.5 miles Lock Dimensions 90' wide; 600' long' Lift Varies with tide Depth of sills (mlw, ocean) 14 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Year completed and opened to navigation 1965 Contract cost $2,966,539 1 56 x 400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was constructed increased to 600 feet to be compatible with increased width. Opera- 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost ($700,000). Length tion and maintenance of lock is a Federal responsibility. TABLE 9-D CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 7 of Text) R. N. Henry H. Buckman Eureka Lock Bert Dosh Dunnellon Inglis Lock Lock and Dam Lock Lock and Dam Nearest town Palatka, Sparr, Ocala, Dunnellon, Inglis, (miles) 11.2 15.8 8.9 2.5 3.2 Miles from Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 90.4 111.4 127.7 156.5 168.6 Lock dimensions (ft.)' 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 Normal lift (ft.) 20 20 0-152 12-272 28 Depth over sills at normal pool levels: Upper (ft.) 14 17 16-312 16-312 18 Lower (ft.) 15 14 16 18 15 Character of Piles in Piles in Piles in Rock Rock foundation sand sand sand Kind of dam Movable Movable None None Movable Type const. Earth3 Earths - - Earths Percent complete 100 100 0 0 100 Estimated contract cost $6,094,000 $7,975,000 $7,430,000 $9,500,000 $7,800,000 'Clear width and greatest available length. 2Pool level varies with natural ground water profile from minimum elevation of 40 feet to maximum elevation of 55 feet. 3With concrete spillway and movable gates. 9-42 TABLE 9-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 9-E CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 7 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Engineering and Design $ 858 Maintenance: Operations of locks, operations and maintenance of dams, spillways reservoirs and bypasses, debris removal, performance monitoring system 399,892 Contract maintenance of locks, grounds maintenance, trash removal, potable water testing and operation and maintenance of District communications network 113,738 Visitor Assistance 12,177 Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, sanitary facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters and contract mainenance of grounds 299,376 Condition and operations studies and periodic inspections 75,344 Water quality studies, data collection and processing, reimbursement to USGS, water control analysis, Lake Oklawaha and Inglis Bypass, and water management control 130,526 Supervision and Administration 12,823 Sub-ToIbtal 1,063,874 Maintenante: Maintenance of dams and spillways, contracts for dewatering Buckman Lock and Inglis Spillway Gate Repair 370,667 Maintenance of roads 17,698 Maintenance of permanent operating equipment (other than recreation) 186,629 Bank stabilization-maintenance of slopes and berms, Rodman and Inglis dams, and bank stabilization contract. 135,818 Maintenance of buildings, grounds and utilities, clearing and snagging 141,358 Engineering and Design 1,253 Supervision and Inspection 32,852 Real Estate 3,146 Sub-Tbtal 889,420 Collection for quarters -4,234 Tobtal $1,949,918 Income from Recreation Fees $ 25,292 Maintenance and Operation of Dams $ 71,700 9-43 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-F OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 18 of Tebxt) Work Performed Cost Operations: Operations of Locks, Real Estate Management and Performance Monitoring System $ 412,963 Contract maintenance buildings grounds, potable water testing, repair and replacement of project signs, operation and maintenance of District communications network 292,744 Visitor Assistance, operation of recreation facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters 90,379 Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, slope protection, St. Lucie Lock 261,624 Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections, NOAA 42,049 Supervision and Administration 47,308 Sub-Ibtal 1,147,069 Maintenance: Maintenance of locks, contract maintenance of locks, repair of fender system at Moore Haven Lock, maintenance of downstream safety barriers, S-77 and 78, St. Lucie Spillway 1,266 Natural Resource Facilities 9,203 Maintenance of permanent operating equipment 90,535 Bank Stabilization, St. Lucie Lock 325,461 Snagging and Clearing 107,862 Engineering and Design 4,277 Supervision and Inspection 15,253 Real Estate administrative activities 40,468 Sub-Ibtal 591,796 Collection for quarters 20,511 T'tal $1,718,354 Income from Recreation Fees 8,459 Maintenance and Operation of Dams 71,700 9-44 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 9-G REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONTROL OPERATIONS (See Section 24 of Text) Locality Acres Controlled Cost St. John's River and tributaries and Withlacoohee, Kissimmee and Crystal Rivers 15,945 $1,777,945 Okeechobee Waterway and tributaries 16,855 748,793 Acquisition and maintenance of airboats, engines, and work tools 27,857 Rodman Dam Drawdown Study 11,030 Operation of communications network 11,480 Engineering design 130,505 Supervision and Administration 95,676 Ibtal 32,800 2,803,286 TABLE 9-H NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 30 of Text) Date Cost Incurred Survey During Project Conducted Period Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. June 1984 $ 5,329 Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla. November 1983 11,026 Charlotte Harbor, Fla. February 1984 7,087 Christiansted Harbor, V.I. August 1984 11,981 Clearwater Pass, Fla. February 1984 17,034 Courtenay Challen, Fla October 1984 554 Crystal River, Fla July 1984 12,410 Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla. December 1982 370 Everglades Harbor, Fla. July 1984 1,813 Fernandina Harbor, Fla April 1984 6,988 Fort Myers Beach, Fla. April 1984 17,320 Fort Pierce Harbor July 1984 166 Homosassa River, Fla. July 1984 12,658 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. March 1984 13,961 Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami August 1984 46 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West March 1984 12,559 Johns Pass August 1984 37,419 Key West Harbor, Fla. August 1984 12,137 Kissimmee River, Fla. September 1983 92 Longboat Pass August 1984 3,930 Manatee River June 1983 14 Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. July 1984 25 Miami Harbor, Fla August 1984 57,259 Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. September 1984 16,438 New Pass May 1984 11,983 New River, Fla. September 1983 26 Pam Beach Harbor, Fla. March 1984 19,697 Pass-A-Grille Pass, Fla. July 1984 3,092 Ponce Harbor, P.R. July 1984 25 St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. February 1984 1,610 St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, Fla. March 1984 13,615 St. Petersburg, Fla. March 1984 13,615 San Juan Harbor, P.R. August 1984 86 Steinhatchee River, Fla. January 1984 2,873 Suwannee River, Fla. March 1980 13 Supervision and Administration 29,400 9-45 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 31 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1984 Full Report See annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anclote River, Fla. 1974 267,427 Aquatic 607,465 Plant Control, Fla. (R&H Acts of 1958 & 1962) 1968 2,619,7002 - Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, Fla. 1939 5,099,153 - Bayport, Fla3 1972 58,495 - Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla 1977 168,5698 60,362 Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. 1983 305,2906 938,136 Christiansted Harbor. St. Croix. V.I.,' 1964 303,317 50,872 Clearwater Pass, Fla.21 1980 46,3498 1,209,505 Courtenay Channel, Fla. 1940 22,846 18,808 Crystal River, Fla? 1941 25,000 103,309 Everglades Harbor, Fla. 1964 221,5098 50,919 Fajardo Harbor, P.R.3 1945 Fort Myers Beach, Fla. 1983 158,14010 679,741 Guayanes Harbor, P.R.3 1945 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Thmpa Bay, Fla.3 1974 38,850 Homosassa River, Fla. 1937 3,99911 23,248 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. 1977 347,521 136,808 Hudson River, Fla.3 1974 9,889 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, Fla.s 1963 243,079 27,752 Key West Harbor, Fla. 1972 1,548,89212 531,366 Kissimmee River, Fla.' 1931 23,479 89,113 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, Fla." 1931 10,276 9,035 Largo Sound Channel, Fla. ',1 1966 117,44318 41,340 Little Manatee River, Fla.3,1 3 1949 11,90316 Longboat Pass, Fla. 1983 1,020,2331' 831,892 Manatee River, FlaY. s 1970 123,350 184,221 New Pass Sarasota, Fla. 1983 45,811'19 2,150,394 New River Fla.' 1956 36,518 23,582 Orange River, Fla.' 1962 2,000 23,567 Ozona, Fla., channel and turning basin' 1963 105,527 14,783 Palm Beach, Fla., side channel and basin' 1946 Pass-A-Grille Pass, Fla. 1, 20 1966 41,2972 53,669 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. 1973 400,00022 253,516 Rice Creek, Fla.' 1957 85,20823 17,777 St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla. 1983 255,60824 1,536,60625 St. Thomas Harbor. V.I.3 1949 1,989 - Steinhatchee River, Fla.' 1940 135,053 43,329 Suwannee River, Fla.' 1977 76,41826 195,972 Withlacoochee River, Fla.' 8 1969 614,91227 365,858 1. Complete. 2. Excludes $918,205 contributed funds. 3. Inactive. 4. Includes $41,222 for reconnaissance and detailed project reports under Section 107 of the R&H Act of 1960. 5. Includes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes $1,473 contributed funds. 6. Excludes $159,975 for contributed funds. 7. Project as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in inactive status. 8. Excludes $42,783 contributed funds. 9. Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. 10. Excludes $1,095 contributed funds. Includes $10,128 cost for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Sec. 107. 11. In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. 12. Includes $27,500 for new work under previous project. Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. 13. Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 14. Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act. 15. Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes $86,716 expended from contributed funds. 16. Expended on restudy. 17. Excludes $172,324 contributed funds. 18. Inactive portion of project deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 19. Excludes $45,811 contributed funds. 20. Authorized November 19, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Sections 107 of R&H Act of 1960. 21. Excludes $41,297 contributed funds. 22. Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. 23. Excludes $93,000 contributed funds. 24. Includes $32,689 under previous project. 25. Includes $20,532 under previous project. 26. Includes $10,154 expended under previous project. 27. Includes $30,000 expended under previous project. 9-46 TABLE 9-I REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 9-J OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 42 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1984 Full Report See annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cape Florida State Park 1969 34,8621 Key West, Fla. 1963 96,3402 3,794 Lee County, Fla. 1971 - Lido Key, Fla. 1971 - Mullet Key, Fla. 1973 436,2013 1,656 Manatee County, Fla. 1983 217,600 - Palm Beach County, Fla., from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,1404 6,257 San Juan, Puerto Rico 1965 - Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, Fla. 1978 1,667,2206 1,022 1. Includes $2,462 cost of reconnaissance and detailed project 4. Excludes $781,188 in property or services furnished by local reports but excludes $13,818 contributed funds. interests in lieu of cash contribution. 2. Excludes $192,168 contributed funds. 5. Excludes $714,522 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $187,133 contributed funds. TABLE 9-K CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES (See Section 44 of Text) Depth Character Over of Year Gate' Nearest Ibwn Distance Sills Founda- Com- Actual No. Name (miles) (ft.) tion pleted Cost 2. Clewiston, Fla. 0.5 10 Pile 1935 $309,748 3. Lake Harbor, Fla. 0.5 10 Rock 1935 316,938 4. Belle Glade, Fla. 4.0 10 Rock 1935 350,025 5. Canal Point, Fla. 0.0 10 Rock 1935 262,465 6. Okeechobee, Fla. 0.5 7 Pile 1936 373,273 'All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are constructed of concrete with steel sector gates and have no lift. Gate No. 6 has an auxiliary culvert spillway with automatic control. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. 9-47 Miles Elevation From Lock Normal of Normal Character Kind Kind Nearest Nearest Dimensions lift Pool Depth of of of of Percent Contract Town 'Ibwn (ft.) (ft.) surface (ft.) sills (ft.) foundation Dam Construction Complete Cost W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam1 S-65 Lock S-65A Lock S-65B Lock S-65C Lock S-65D Lock 9 S-65E Lock Oo Moore Haven Lock (HGS-1 Mod.) S-310 (HGS-2 Mod.) S-193 (HGS-6 Mod.) S-308B (Port Mayaca) S-57 S-58 S-59 S-60 S-61 S-62 S-63 S-63A S-96 S-96A S-53 S-55 S-157 S-158 At Olga 0 56 x 400 2.5 3.0 14 Piles in Frostproof Avon Park Sebring Sebring Okeechobee Okeechobee Hoore Haven Clewiston Okeechobee Pahokee Ashton Ashton Kissirlmee Ashton St. Cloud Ashton Ashton Ashton Sebastian Sebastian Eau Gallie Christmas Sebastian Titusville 23 26 20 25 14 10 0.5 0.5 0.5 11 9 5666 10 12 14 14 16 8 12 4 15 30 x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 50 x 250 50 x 60 50 x 60 56 x 400 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 30 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 4.2 6.3 6.0 7.2 5.8 4.6 9.4 5.0 7.5 4.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 7.5 3.5 10.0 20.0 4.5 48.5-52.33 46.3 40.0 34.0 26.8 21.0 15.5-17.53 15.5-17.53 15.5-17.53 15.5-17.53 62.0 64.0 58.0 64.0 55.0 61.0 62.0 57.0 24.0 25.0 17.5 14.0 20.0 4.0 'OFpreantikn lnad Lcrcek f WndP arn(S-7) i a edeal espnsiblit. 3 he orml pol lvelvares easnaly bewee th tw elvatons 'Operation and care of W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam (S-79) is a Federal responsibility. 2Estimated. TABLE 9-L CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 44 of 'Txt) 6 6 6 6 6 6 11 12.9 7.5 18 6 66666666666 6 6 clay Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Piles in sand Slab on sand Piles in sand and slab on sand Slab on sand Earth foundation, sand Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Movable Reinforced concrete None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete None Steel sheet pile lockwalls None Reinforced concrete None Reinforced concrete Fixed Reinforced concrete None Concrete and steel sheet pile None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 0 100 0 00 0 100 00 00 000 00 $1,191,574.70 $1,513,693.91 $1,050,600.69 C- $1,326,073.12 $1,213,248.51 I- $1,320,039.84 r $360,0002 $3,448,406 $511,300.002 $8,308,700.00 $1,957,000.002 $1,957,000.002 $1,953,000.002 $1,957,000.002 $689,217.00 $1,957,000.002 $1,957,000.002 $1,916,000.002 $1,716,000.002 $1,633,000.002 $1,585,000.002 $1,625,000.002 $2,066,000.002 $1,868,000.002 3The normal pool level varies seasonally between the two elevations. 100 $3,803,55.00 --- TABLE 9-M REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT LOCAL COOPERATION (See Section 44 of TIxt) Flood Control Act Work Authorized /Cash Contributions' June 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan 15.0 Sept. 3, 1954 Second phase of comprehensive plan 20.0 July 14, 1960 Nicodemus Slough area 31.5 Oct. 23, 1962 West Palm Beach Canal 12.8 Boggy Creek Basin 29.7 Shingle Creek Basin 25.9 South Dade County area 19.2 Reedy Creek Swamp 50.0 Oct. 27, 1965 Southwest Dade County 46.0 Hendry County area 19.5 Aug. 13, 1968 Martin County Flood Control Features 34.0 Irrigation Features 49.0 Backflow Features 20.0 PL 89-72 Recreation Features 50.0 Water Resources - St. Lucie 20.0 Recreation Features 50.0 Approved Dec 17, 1970 Navigation improvements suitable for 50.0 under Provisions of recreational craft Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act 'Computed on total contract cost and supervision and administration except for Reedy Creek Swamp and Recreation Features which are computed on all costs, including engineering and design and land. 9-49 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-N CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 44 of 'IText) Work Performed Cost New Work: Construction of: Channels and canals $ 696,592 Levees 4,593,304 Floodway control and diversion structures 1,409,099 Building, Grounds and Utilities 1,990,936 Cultural Resource Preservation 25,606 Depreciation -830 Engineering and design 2,048,134 Supervision and administration 659,869 Total applied cost 11,422,710 Operations: Operation of locks, real estate management, performance monitoring system 421,315 Maintenance of buildings and grounds, operation and maintenance of District communications network, repair and replacement of project signs 267,749 Patrol, inspection and maintenance of Herbert Hoover Dike, HGS 3, 4, and 5, operation and maintenance of drainage ditches, colverts and 16 spillways, mowing of levees 792,570 Visitor Assistance 46,687 Operation and Maintenance of recreation facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters, master planning 237,241 Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections, NOAA 196,453 Regulation of Lake Okeeshobee and three conservation areas, water control analysis, water quality studies, and data collection 654,509 Supervision and Administration 36,625 Sub-Total 1,901,413 Maintenance: Dewatering, sandblasting and painting S-11 A, B, and C 197,759 Contract maintenance of roads 30,000 Repair and stabilization of Crown Road, Herbert Hoover Dike, removal of weeds, rebuilding and regrading of levee slopes, modification and maintenance of safety barriers, HGS 3, 4 and 5, cleaning landslide toe ditches, repair of culverts, replacement of fences, removal of trees, topping of trees, control of Melaleuca, rip rapping of slopes and berms 796,656 Maintenance of hydrometrological network, maintenance of permanent operating equipment 717,600 Maintenance of berms, fences and shrubs 3,088 Clear landslide entrance channel to culverts, approach channels, hurricane gate structures and floodway channels 83,411 Supervision and Inspection 64,849 Read estate administration 5,122 Sub-Total 2,653,149 Collection for quarters - 3,968 Total 4,550,594 Income from recreation fees 11,448.95 9-50 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 44 of Text) Date transferred to Flood Control District Construction for Operation and Feature Period Maintenance Channels and Canals: C-103 March 1979 - February 1983 Pending Structures: S-343A, S-343B & S-344 June 1983 - April 1984 June 1984 Pumping Plants: S-331 March 1979 - February 1983 Pending Levees: L-28 Modification June 1983 - April 1984 June 1984 TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 44 of Text) Construction Approx. % Feature Started Complete Bridges: B-127 (C-51) April 1983 100 Channels and Canals: C-51 May 1982 100 Levees: L-28 Modification June 1983 100 Herbert Hoover Dike Revetment 1st Contract (4 miles) March 1983 50 2nd Contract (4.5 miles) September 1983 80 Structures: S-343A & B June 1983 100 S-155 May 1982 100 S-65 A, B, C & D Baffle Blocks & Riprap Repair September 1983 0 9-51 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT MOSS BLUFF LOCK (See Section 45 of 'Txt) Nearest town Name of nearest town Distance above mouth of River Lock dimensions Normal lift Elevation of normal pool surface Depth of sills Character of foundation Kind of dam Type of construction Percent complete Estimated Cost (including dam and spillway) 20 miles Ocala, Fla. 65.5 miles 30 x 125 feet 18.0 feet 58 feet 12 feet Piles in sand None Reinforced concrete 100 $1,990,138 TABLE 9-R FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 45 of Text) Date transferred to Construction Southwest Florida Feature Period for Operation and Maintenance Bridges: B-194 July 1968 - Mar. 1970 Not transferred Alteration of Facilities B-195 May 1971 - Jan. 1973 Do. B-594 Jan. 1973 - Jan. 1974 Do. Alteration of Facilities B-196 Oct. 1972 - Jan. 1975 Do. SCL RR Br., B-196 Dec. 1972 - July 1975 July 1975 Channels and Canals: C-135 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Dec 1968 C-135, Sec 1A July 1966 - Aug. 1967 Oct. 1967 C-135, Sec. lB May 1968 - Sep. 1972 Not transferred C-135, Sec 1C & 2 Jan. 1971 - Dec. 1973 Not transferred C-135, Sec 3A Dec. 1972 - Apr. 1975 Oct. 1977 C-135, Sec. 3B Feb. 1975 - Aug. 1977 Not transferred C-135, Sec 4A Apr. 1976 - Jan. 1979 Not transferred C-136 Aug. 1975 - May 1977 Nov. 1977 C-231, Phase I July 1973 - Apr. 1975 Dec. 1975 C-231, Phase II July 1973 - Jan. 1974 Dec. 1975 C-331 July 1967 - Sep. 1968 Sep. 1968 C-531 Apr. 1966 - Jan. 1969 Apr. 1969 C-534 June 1970 - July 1971 Nov. 1971 C-135 March 1977 - Oct. 1980 Structures: S-160 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Dec 1968 S-161 Aug. 1975 - May 1977 Nov. 1977 S-162 Apr. 1975 - June 1977 Apr. 1977 S-353 July 1967 - Sep. 1968 Nov. 1968 Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway Apr. 1967 - Mar. 1969 Dec 1975 S-551 July 1970 - Feb. 1972 Not transferred Levees: L-212, Sec. 1 June 1968 - July 1970 Dec. 1975 L-212, Sec 2 July 1970 - Sep. 1971 Dec. 1975 L-112 March 1977 - Oct. 1980 Oct. 1980 L-112 & Floodway May 1978 - July 1981 Jan. 1983 S-155 May 1978 - July 1981 Jan. 1983 S-163 May 1978 - July 1981 Jan. 1983 S-159 Middle & Lower April 1979 - Aug. 1981 Oct. 1981 S-159 Upper June 1979 - Sep. 1981 Recreation: Morris Bridge & Flint Creek Sites December 1982 - August 1984 Pending 9-52 TABLE 9-Q TABLE 9-S REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 48 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arch Creek, Dade County, Fla. 1960 $66,4851 Biscayne Bay, Fla., Hurricane Protection 1966 Hillsborough Bay, Fla. 2 1969 Phillippi Creek Basin, Fla.2 1966 � 1. Excludes $11,734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project was 2. Inactive authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as Modified by P.L. 685, 84th Congress. TABLE 9-T FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 49 of TeIbxt) Study Identification Period Costs Detailed Project Report: Alligator Creek Basin, CL Fla. $ 4,931 Bear Creek, Pinellas County, Fla. 457 Estate Mon Bijou, V.I. 931 Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR. 3,778 Sabana Grande, P.R. -833 Whitaker Bayou, Sarasota, Fla. 7,223 9-53 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT * This district comprises a small portion of southeastern Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of Alabama south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern Louisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River Basin, to and including the Pascagoula River Basin. The Pearl River Basin, Mississippi was included as part of the Mobile District until 1 October 1981, when responsibilities were transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. A section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from St. Marks, Florida, to Lake Borgne Light No. 29, Louisiana is also within Mobile District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Apalachicola Bay, FL ................. 2. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) .. ..........:. ..........:.:.. 3. BayouCoden, AL .................. 4. Bayou La Batre, AL ................... 5. Biloxi Harbor, MS .................... 6.. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ..................... 7. Bon Secour River, AL ................. 8. Cadet Bayou, MS ..................... 9. Dauphin Island Bay, AL ....... ....... 10. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL .............. II. East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL ........... 12. Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL ............... 13. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border (Mobile District) ............................. 14. Gulfport Harbor, MS .................. 15. Mobile Harbor, AL ................... 16. Panama City Harbor, FL .............. 17. Pascagoula Harbor, MS .............. 18. Pensacola Harbor, FL ................ 19. Perdido Pass Channel, AL ........... 20. Port St. Joe Harbor, FL .............. 21. Removing Water Hyacinths, Mobile District ...................... 22. Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, AL and MS ........................ 23. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ...................... ....... 24. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .............. ............ 25. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....................... Page 10-2 10-3 10-3 10-3 10-4 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-6 10-6 10-7 10-7 10-7 10-8 10-9 10-9 10-10 10-10 10-11 10-11 10-11 Beach Erosion Control 26. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project ........................... Deauthorized Projects 27. Deauthorized Projects ................ Flood Control 28. Okatibbee Lake, MS ................. 29. Tallahala Creek Lake, Pascagoula River, MS ............... ........ 30. Burketts Creek, Amory, M S ......................... 31. Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS ................... 32. Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL .................... 33. Sun Creek, Oktibbeha County, MS ............... 34. Tombigbee River Tributaries, MS and AL ......................... 35. Trim Cane Creek, Oktibbeha County, MS .............. 36. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................... 37. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................. 38. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......................... Page 10-13 10-13 10-13 10-13 10-13 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-15 10-15 10-15 Multiple Purpose Projects 10-12 Including Power 10-12 39. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA ............................. 10-12 39A. Carters Lake, GA .................... 39B. Claiborne Lock and Dam, 10-12 AL ................................ 10-15 10-16 10-16 10-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Page 39C. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL .................. 10-17 39D. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL ................................ 10-17 39E. Coosa River Navigation ............... 10-17 40. Allatoona Lake, Coosa River Basin, GA ........................... 10-18 41. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, GA, and FL .................... 10-18 41A. Buford Dam, GA .................. 10-19 41B. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL and GA ..................... 10-20 41C. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, GA and FL .......................... 41D. Spewrell Bluff Lake, GA .............. 41E. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL and GA ....................... 41F. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA and AL .............. 42. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................. General Investigations 43. Surveys ........................... 44. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........................ ....... Tables Table 10-A Table 10-B Table 10-C Table 10-D Table 10-E Table 10-F Table 10-G Table 10-H Table 10-I Cost & Financial Statement .................. Authorizing Legislation ....... Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, AL ........ Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys ............ Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................... Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ......... Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project ....... Deauthorized Projects ......... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............. 10-23 10-28 Table 10-J Table 10-K 10-37 10-37 Table 10-L 10-38 10-38 10-39 10-39 10-39 Table 10-M Page 10-20 10-20 10-21 10-21 10-22 10-22 10-22 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ......... 1040 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA Development Proposed Under Existing Project ...................... 10-41 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, GA and FL, Locks and Dams and Multiple-Purpose Development Included in Existing Project . .10-42 Project ...................... 10-42 Completed Flood Insurance Studies and Flood Hazard Information Reports ..................... 10-43 Navigation 1. APALACHICOLA BAY, FL. Location. The project is on the coast of northwest Florida 160 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) Previous project. For details, see page 1833, Annual Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; (b) an inner bar channel, 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (c) a boat basin 200 feet by 880 feet and nine feet deep at Apalachicola, Florida, with a connecting channel nine feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to Apalachicola River; (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a channel generally parallel to the shore at Eastpoint, Florida, six feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, with a connecting channel six feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at the same depth in St. George Sound; (f) a channel ten feet deep and 100 feet wide through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, Florida, with a 6-foot by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. (See Table 10-B for authorized modifications of Two Mile project.) Mean range of tide throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 10-2 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pile-and-timer wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Work on channels and canals and miscellaneous costs amounted to $455,263. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for approved work, as authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. Construction of the breakwater and channel improvements authorized in 1975 at Two Mile was completed in September 1977. Construction of breakwaters at Eastpoint authorized in 1983 was completed in March 1984. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $1,898,848 for new work and $2,650,147 for maintenance, a total of $4,548,995. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. Existing project. The authorized project provides for management and control of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economical control measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and save the United States free from claims that may occur from control operations and to participate to the extent of 30 percent of such operations. Requirements are being met in the state of Alabama. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning, engineering and design, and contract administration cost $41,048. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal costs Under the existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $450,606. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 3. BAYOU CODEN, AL Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 843. Existing project. The project provides for a channel eight feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle Avenue bridge south for about 3,000 feet through the bayou to Portersville Bay, thence eight feet deep by 100 feet wide extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a turning basin eight feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-andtimber piers used in connection with fishing industry in this locality are adequate for existing commerce. A marina which will accommodate about 12 small recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster shells are located near the mouth of the bayou, and are maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 38,880 cubic yards of material at a cost of $45,146. Surveys and miscellaneous costs amounted to $51,639. Condition at end of fiscal year. That portion of the project authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated 31 March 1975 and completed 26 March 1976. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $325,051 for new work and $381,631 for maintenance, a total of $706,682. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $100,000 and $50,000 for maintenance. 4. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southern coast of Mobile County, Al., about 10 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 844. 10-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the 12-foot depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet, with the channel widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a turning basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 180,635 cubic yards of material from the Mississippi Sound Channel at a cost of $189,868. Condition surveys, contract administration, water control management and other costs amounted to $34,702. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The project was completed in March 1967. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $311,095 for new work and $2,666,614 for maintenance, a total of $2,977,709. Contributed funds from local interests for new work amount to $10,500. 5. BILOXI HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Mississippi Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500-foot by 2,600-foot basin in the lake, thence a 12-foot deep by 100-foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot basin; a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the main channel in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12-foot by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south waterfront; a 10-foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects to the 12-foot by 150-foot waterfront. Construction for the modifications lateral channel at Biloxi's authorized by River and Harbor south Act of Nov. 7, 1966 was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in Feb. 1975. Further modifications to the project were authorized by the Chief of Engineers on 28 March 1979, which provided for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and into a rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet. Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the project providing for an entrance channel six feet deep, 50 feet wide, and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act, is inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-andtimber piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 79,998 cubic yards of material at a cost of $330,670. Condition and operation studies amounted to $134,666. Engineering and design and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $49,549. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to the modification authorized in 1966, was corned menced in 1931 and completed in 1962. This 1966 authorizmodification was completed in FY 1975. The 1979 modification was completed in FY 1980. Total Federal costs under existing project as of 30 September 1984 were $1,171,054 for new work and $5,427,049 for maintenance, a total of $6,598,103. Contributed funds for new work amount to $102,600. 6. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL Location. Black Warrior River rises in northern Alabama above Birmingham and flows generally southwesterly to unite with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence, the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River to form the Mobile River 45 miles above the head of Mobile Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to the vicinity of Birmingham is about415 miles. Previous project. For details see page 732, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides essentially for a canalized channel nine feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork and mile 10-4 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams with 18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original structures with new locks and dams, under the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 7; Warrior replaced locks 8 and 9; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks 1, 2, and 3; and Holt replaced locks 13, 14, 15, and 16. Thus,16 of the original locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock and Dam (Lock 17) rehabilitation to replace the original double lift lock with a single lift lock was completed in 1980. The Jackson Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along its boundaries. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles to the old lock 1, where tidal effect is apparent only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other points are 40 feet at lock 1,100.6 miles from Mobile; 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 13 feet at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations at these points are at old lock 1, 20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling equipment have been provided as required at most loading and unloading points along the waterway. These include facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufactures, and various other commodities. While most terminal facilities are privately owned, many are available for use by the general public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 10-C for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for replacement span on Franklin Ferry Bridge across navigation channel cost $64,430. Recreation facilities cost $38,625 at Demopolis Lock and Dam and engineering and design of recreational facilities at Bankhead Lock and Dam cost $50,550. Maintenance: Contractors' dredges removed 2,480,400 cubic yards of material from the river system at a cost of $8,489,600. Other general charges for the overall river project totaled $3,674,831. Other maintenance costs for the system include: Coffeeville Lock and Dam, $537,833; Demopolis Lock and Dam, $354,042; Warrior Lock and Dam, $711,834; Oliver Lock and Dam, $389,315; Bankhead Lock and Dam, $339,749; Holt Lock and Dam, $443,269; and reservoir operation, $1,882,197. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the project, commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11 and 12) were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; four original locks and dams (4, 5, 6 and 7) were replaced by Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in October 1957; three original locks and dams (1, 2 and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original locks and dams (13, 14, 15, and 16) were replaced by Holt Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed 6 February 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in April 1970 and was completed in 1980. The cost to September 30, 1984 for replacement of the lock was $49,828,672. The power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam was built and is operated by the Alabama Power Co. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $153,278,008 for new work and $154,967,591 for maintenance, a total of $308,245,599. 7. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL Location. Rises 2 miles south of Foley, Ala., and flows southerly about 8 miles, emptying into Bon Secour Bay, an arm of Mobile Bay in southwest Alabama. Existing project. A 10- by 80-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swifts Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point about 600 feet above Oak Landing with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swifts Landing and ice loading dock. Plane of reference is mean low water. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. Mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 16, 1963, under authority in Section 187, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of pile-and-timber marginal, wharves used by seafood industry and a marine ways located along existing project. These, together with numerous privately owned piers, are con- 10-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 sidered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation studies, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $16,632. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in July and completed in October 1964. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $118,615 for new work and $148,586 for maintenance, a total of $267,201. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $9,700. 8. CADET BAYOU, MS Location. Cadet Bayou (also known as Bayou Caddy) is a small tidal stream in southwest Hancock County, Mississippi, which flows easterly through marshland and empties into Mississippi Sound about 10 miles southwest of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11371). Existing project. The existing project provides for an 8- by 100-foot channel from the 8-foot depth in Mississippi Sound for about 7,800 feet to the mouth of Cadet Bayou, thence an 8- by 80-foot channel extending 700 feet into the bayou to a 6- by 60-foot turning basin (in addition to the 80-foot channel width) 130 feet long, thence a 6- by 60-foot channel continuing upstream for 8,800 feet to a second turning basin 110 feet wide (in addition to the 60-foot channel width) and 100 feet long thence a 6- by 60-foot channel approximately 870 feet to the end of the project. The total length of improved channel is about 18,400 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.6 feet in the vicinity of Cadet Bayou. Extreme range, except during storms is about 3.5 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned pile-andtimber wharves, a boatyard, marine ways near the mouth, and several natural landings are located along the bayou. A fishing camp at mile 2 provides necessary facilities for recreational boating needs, including about 250 feet of marginal wharf. Local interests will be required to provide, maintain, and operate a public wharf for commercial boating interests near the mouth of the bayou, and another for recreational boating interests near the mouth of the bayou, and another for recreational boating interests in the upper reaches. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Supervision and administration costs amounted to $694. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced and completed in December 1970. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $87,921 for new work and $705,118 for maintenance, a total of $793,039. Contributed funds for new work amount to $31,000. 9. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL Location. The project is located between Dauphin and Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel seven feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of the same depth, and about seven acres in area, in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel four feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin seven feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to the 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and extreme, except during storms is about four feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 11,898 cubic yards of material at a cost of $63,123. Condition and operation studies and supervision and administration cost $30,549. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in July 1959. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $292,864 for new work and $1,109,215 for maintenance, a total of $1,402,079. 10. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, respectively, south of central Mobile. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376). Existing project. The Dog River project provides for an 8-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel from about 3,000 feet east of the Mobile Bay ship channel to and up Dog River, a total distance of 26,200 feet, thence six feet by 100 feet for 12,300 feet to a point about 2,400 feet above the mouth of Halls Mill Creek, and a 6-foot by 100-foot spur channel from the main channel to the mouths of Perch and Halls Mill Creeks. Overall length of the proposed improvement is about 7.8 miles. This portion of the project has not been constructed due to local interest's inability to comply with cost-sharing responsibilities. The Fowl River project provides for a channel eight 10-6 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT feet deep and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River to deep water about 6,700 feet above its mouth. Total length of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment of the project was completed in November, 1973. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 'Local cooperation. Fully complied with for the Fowl River portion. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a boatyard for fabricating steel vessel hulls, nine marinas, four marine ways, a yacht basin on Dog River; two marinas on Fowl River, and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance costs amounted to $2,037. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in August 1973 and completed in Ndvember 1973. Total Federal costs on the existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $882,474; $190,695 or new work and $691,779 for maintenance. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $114,100. 11. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11388.) Previous project. For details see page 672 of Annual Report for 1937. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 12-foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 100-foot channel from East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the seaward end. The west Jetty is provided with a low weir section 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 500 feet by 1,500 feet located between the west Jetty and the navigation channel. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-andtimber piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this locality are considered adequate for existing COmmerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contractors dredges operating in the entrance channel to Old Pass Lagoon and East Pass removed 100,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $270,000. Other work on channels and canals cost $177,452. Hired labor costs for condition studies, contract administration, engineering, design, supervision, administration and other costs amounted to $163,162. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1965 modification was commenced October 1967 and completed January 1969. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $916,715 for new work and $5,573,266 for maintenance, a total of $6,489,981. Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount to $398,000. 12. FLY CREEK, AL Location. Fly Creek (Volanta Bayou) is a small stream about 4.5 miles long rising in Baldwin County, Ala., 3 miles east of town of Fairhope, from whence it flows northerly, thence westerly and southerly, to form an estuary on eastern shore of Mobile Bay just north of Fairhope and about 13 miles southeast of Mobile, Ala. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11376.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. Mean tidal range in vicinity of project is about 1.3 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, (H. Doc 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.). The project document contains the latest published map. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Fairhope Yacht Club has facilities for small recreational craft on both banks near mouth of creek, consisting of a small pile-and timber service wharf, several sheet metal boat sheds, boat slips, and other mooring facilities. There is also a marginal timber wharf and shed for commercial fishing boats on right bank of creek immediately above first bend. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 14,100 cubic yards (net) of material at a cost of $40,400. Project condition surveys cost $544 and supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $65,606. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in August and completed in October, 1957. Total project costs as of September 30, 1984 amounted to $334,171 of which $29,000 was for new work and $305,171 for maintenance. 13. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) 10-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land cuts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama to Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been fully complied with for the work authorized prior to 1966. For modification of the Gulf County Canal which was authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-ofway required in connection with disposal of spoil, or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from all damages due to construction and maintenance of the project including damages to wharves, piers, bridges, and other structures; provide and maintain at local expense adequate terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas commensurate with depths provided in related project area; and accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other facilities as well as their maintenance. Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, Florida; Mobile and Bayou LaBatre, Alabama; and Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christian, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Carrabelle-Apalachicola Bay section: Condition and operation studies cost $442,374; work on channels and canals, $684,349; supervision and administration, $77,046 and $34,308 for miscellaneous work. Apalachicola Bay - St. Andrew Bay section: Engineering and design cost $63,971; condition and operation studies, $13,561 and $13,292 for miscellaneous work. St. Andrew Bay - Choctawhatchee Bay section: Hired labor cost for the year included: bank stabilization, $800,148; engineering and design, $34,077; supervision and administration, $62,776 and $63,056 for miscel. laneous costs. Choctawhatchee Bay - Pensacola Bay section: Costs for the year include condition and operation studies and miscellaneous work of $34,141. Pensacola Bay - Mobile Bay section: Costs for the year included condition and operation studies, $105,129; channels and canals, $1,182,655; engineering and design, $39,357; supervision and administration, $55,855 and bank stabilization, $10,536. Mobile Bay - Rigolets section: Hired labor costs included $59,192 for condition and operation studies and supervision and administration, and $283,000 for channels and canals. In addition, compliance inspections cost $334,899; direct charges to Mobile Area Office cost $117,694: and direct charges to Panama City Area Office were $24,955. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the portion between Apalachicola Bay and St. Marks, Florida, which is deferred for restudy. Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12-foot by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed June 1969. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1984 were $42,897,868, of which $6,434,694 was for new work and $36,463,174 for maintenance. 14. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, about 44 and 90 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and Mobile Harbor, Alabama, respectively, and 78 miles east of New Orleans (via Gulf Intracoastal Waterway). (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 747, Annual Report for 1938, and page 995, Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel 32 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about eight miles long across Ship Island Bar, a channel 30 feet deep, 220 feet wide, and about 11 miles long through Mississippi Sound, and an anchorage basin at Gulfport 30 feet deep, 1,320 feet wide, and 2,640 feet long; and (b) maintenance of the existing commercial smallboat harbor about 26 acres in area, and a straight-approach channel, 100 feet wide and about 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Mississippi Sound to a small-boat basin, all at a depth of eight feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet, and extreme range, except during storms, is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing modern rail-connected -,terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate 10-8 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT forexisting commerce. (See Port Series 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Mainte- nance: Contract dredging removed a total of 4,355,596 cubic yards of material from the harbor channel at a cost of$3,065,361. Hired labor included condition and operation studies, and engineering, design, supervision and administration, all at a cost of $216,155. Condition at end of fiscal year. The main harbor was commenced 1932 and completed April 1950. Maintenance for small boat harbor and approach channel, co; tructed by local interests in 1950, was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $635,758 for new work and $26,826,282 for maintenance, a total of.$27,462,040. It MOBILE HARBOR, AL L cation. The project is located along the lower five mile of Mobile River, in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 miles by water northeast of mouth of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A 42-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile Bar; (b) a 40-foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth of Mobile River; (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile River to highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25-foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet in Chickasaw Creek; (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 1000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet 2 long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 7-foot by 150-foot channel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley Air Force Base ocean terminal, and continuing thence to a turning basin 250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, thence a 22-foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie Island to the mainland; (h) a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 12-by 100-feet, extending 6500 feet and terminating in a 300-by 300-foot turning basin; and (i) maintenance of Three Mile Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long opposite site formerly occupied by the U. S. Quarantine Station at McDuffie (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total length of the bay and river channels i4La bout 41.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low witer. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Work on Theodore Channel cost $31,404. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 750,587 cubic yards of material from Mobile River Channel, 341,802 cubic yards of material from Outer Bar Channel and 823,200 cubic yards of material from Mobile Bay and Theodore Channel, all at a cost of $4,205,756. Hired labor cost for surveys, engineering, design, supervision and administration and miscellaneous work amount to $967,117. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in 1931 and completed in July 1965 except for the Theodore Channel portion, which was essentially completed in August 1982. For details see Annual Report for 1965. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $61,398,932 for new work and $64,755,684 for maintenance, a total of $126,154,616. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $4,164,969. 16. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11389.) Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project (as modified) provides for a channel about 3.7 miles long extending from deep water in the bay (intersection of Bay Harbor and Dyers Point Channel) across Lands End to the Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 40 feet deep in the bay and across Lands End, and 450 feet wide, 42 feet deep and about 1.1 miles long in the approach channel in the Gulf, protected by two jetties, each about 700 feet long; branch channels 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 3.4 and 10-9 REPORT TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 1.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type intermodal carriers, 40 feet deep and containing about 177 acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance channel; a channel in Watson Bayou, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge, about 1.75 miles; channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392 Bridge, with branches to serve terminal facilities. The east and west jetties have been reworked and are presently about 2,075 and 2.896 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal range 1.3 feet and extreme 3.0 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Work on channels and canals amounted to $700,507. Condition and operation studies; supervision and administration; and, other miscellaneous costs amounted to $61,161. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon were completed in January 1972. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $1,434,485 for new work and $5,521,036 for maintenance, a total of $6,955,521. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $80,000. 17. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of Pascagoula River), in southeastern Mississippi, about 61 miles by water west of Mobile Harbor, Alabama, and about 44 miles by water east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for (a) An entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impounding area for littoral drift, 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long adjacent to the channel at the west end of Petit Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide for about one mile to a turning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to the mouth of Dog River, thence up Dog River to Highway 63 bridge; and (e) a 12-foot by 125-foot channel from the highway bridge, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Dog River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 228,505 cubic yards of material from Horn Island Bar; 2,400,900 cubic yards from the Sound and Channel, and 37,500 cubic yards from Krebs Lake at a total cost of $4,068,992. Hired labor costs for surveys, supervision and administration and other miscellaneous work amounted to $518,976. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1965. Total Federal costs of existing project to September 30, 1984 were $5,668,543 for new work and $29,607,582 for maintenance, a total of $35,276,125. Contributed funds expended for maintenance amounted to $945,139. 18. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance to Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 and 11382.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A 35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) a 33-foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33-foot by 300-foot parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel; (d) an innerharbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet deep, and 3,950 feet long; (e) a 30-foot by 250-foot approach channel to the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf; and (f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4,400 feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel to 21 by 100 feet, the 10-10 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT bayou channel to 20 feet by 100 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred for restudy. (S e Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existingcommerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenmace: Contract dredging removed 568,195 cubic yards of material from the entrance channel at a cost of $1,860,583. Condition and operation studies and miscellaneous costs amounted to $107,010. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed except those features which are deferred for restudy. The modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in March and completed in May 1965. Total Federal costs of the existing project to September 30, 1984 were $875,005 for new work and $5,883,396 for maintenance, a total of $6,758,401. 1$. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL Location. The project is located about midway between Pensacola, Florida and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11378.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence nine feet deep and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, where the channel branches into two arms, each having dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into the southern arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The east jetty has a low weir section, 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet and extreme is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber Piers, docks, and several launching ramps are available. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Mainte- "ance: The contractors dredges operating north of the highway, removed 442,200 cubic yards of material at a cost of $698,985. Cost of surveys, supervision and administration and miscellaneous work amounted to $44,616. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project Was commenced in May 1968 and completed in March 1969. Total Federal costs of the existing project to September 30, 1984 were $629,860 for new work and $4,951,134 for maintenance, a total of $5,580,994. Contributions from local interest amount to $510,000 for new work and $10,325 for maintenance. 20. PORT ST. JOE, FL Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 115 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11389.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) An entrance channel 37 feet deep, 500 feet wide at its outer end and diminishing progressively in width to 400 feet at the first bend, a distance of 3.6 miles, thence continuing at a depth of 37 feet and a width of 400 feet, through the second and third bend for 3.3 miles, thence continuing at a depth of 35 feet and a width of 300 feet 2.4 miles to a point in St. Joseph Bay where the entrance channel joins the north channel, a total overall distance of 9.3 miles, thence continuing in the north channel at a depth of 35 feet and a width of 300 feet to the north end of the turning basin at Port St. Joe, a distance of about 4.7 miles; (b) a turning basin 32 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long, and a harbor channel therein 35 feet deep, 250 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long, adjacent to the waterfront at Port St. Joe; and (c) a channel 27 feet deep, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long leading from the south end of the turning basin to deep water in St. Joseph Bay. Average tidal variation is 1.4 feet and extreme, except during storms, is about 4 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Rail and highway-connected terminal facilities available at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and care amounted to $20,893. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in July 1962. Total Federal costs for the project as of September 30, 1984 were $1,960,862 for new work and $2,215,089 for maintenance, a total of $4,175,951. Contributed funds for new work amount to $20,000. 21. REMOVING WATER HYACINTHS, MOBILE DISTRICT Location. The project is for all streams tributary to the Gulf Coast in Mobile District. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extermination or removal of plants from navigable waters of Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, so far as they are or may become an obstruction to commerce, by any mechanical, chemical, or other means whatsoever; for construction and operation of boats equipped with suitable machinery for such removal, and construction and operation of log booms to prevent plants drifting from one stream to another. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 10-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, which is for maintenance, was commenced about 1899, and work has been carried on since that time. Total Federal costs for the project through September 30, 1984 amount to $1,100,471. 22. WATERWAY CONNECTING TOMBIGBEE AND TENNESSEE RIVERS, AL AND MS Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 234 miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. Location. For details see Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway 234 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. The plan of improvement consists of three sections. (1) the river section, a 9-foot by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; (2) the lateral canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot by 300-foot channel (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which the bottom width would be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River; the total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Estimated (1984) Federal cost for new work is $1,839,000,000, including $9,600,000 for work by the U.S. Coast Guard, and $9,400,000 for National Park Service; plus, $153,000,000 non-Federal cost for relocations. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must make and maintain alterations in highways and highway bridges and in sewer, water-supply, and drainage facilities and provide and maintain suitable and adequate river and carlal terminals. Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials of the State of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties concerned to enter into agreements with the United States relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Florida has been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority. During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District. The District was organized in accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered to fulfill the requirements of local cooperation for the portion of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama Legislature authorized formation of a public corporation to be named the Tombigbee Valley Development Authority for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum held 5 December 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a bond issue not to exceed $10,000,000 to finance participation in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Total cost of new work during the fiscal year was $88,011,301 of which $233,762 was for work on Demopolis Lake; $1,759,970 for Gainesville Lock and Dam; $7,947,712 for Aliceville Lock and Dam; $15,156,656 for Columbus Lock and Dam; $12,946,418 for Aberdeen Lock and Dam. Canal section cost included: Lock A, $15,699,591; Lock B, $6,555,523; Lock C, $3,352,316; Lock D, $9,139,030; Lock E, $11,007,568. Engineering, design, supervision, administration and other costs associated with the overall project amounted to $4,207,435. Contributed funds aounted to $5,320. Maintenance: Cost for operation of the completed portion of the project during the year amounted to $7,447,345, which included general charges of $3,614,490; Gainesville Lock and Dam, $297,608; Aliceville Lock and Dam, $366,954; Columbus Lock and Dam, $226,152; Aberdeen Lock and Dam, $210,280; Lock A, $89,709; Lock B, $106,024; Lock C, $51,476; Lock D, $29,305; Lock E, $5,929; Bay Springs, $233,445; lake charges of $2,144,271 and navigation charges of $71,700. Recreation attendance for CY 1983 totaled 1,549,200 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal costs under the existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $905,282,491 for new work, and $22,721,879 for maintenance for a total of $928,004,370. Construction formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is about 88 percent complete. The facilities required for opening the Waterway for navigation are 97 percent complete. 23. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 10-D.) 24. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.) 25. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public 10-12 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization), Studies conducted under this authority amounted to $115,877. (See Table 10-F.) Studies conducted under Section 103,1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended, amounted to S39,619. (See Table 10-F.) BMeh Erosion Control 26. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Table 10-G.) 27. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Projects deauthorized under Section 12, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress, as amended. (See Table 10-H) FlOod Control I2 OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Missisippi, seven miles northwest of Meridian. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists ofa compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 18 feet. The spillway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type, 1,500 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water quality control varies seasonally from 21,400 acre-feet to 34,300 acre-feet between a minimum elevation of 328 and topof- conservation-pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. Storage varying from 46,500 acre-feet to 59,500 feet between the top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design of public use facilities cost $86,839. Maintenance: Costs for the year for ordinary maintenance and recreational management amount to $1,184,145. Benefits attributed to flood control storage and regulation amounted to $80,500. Recreation attendance at the reservoir during CY 1983 totaled 1,862,400 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1984 were $9,197,918 for new work and $6,581,739 for maintenance, a total of $15,779,657. 29. TALLAHALA CREEK LAKE, PASCAGOULA RIVER, MS Location. The project is on Tallahala Creek, 81.1 miles above its mouth, in Jasper County, Mississippi, 13 miles north of Laurel. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. The dam will consist of a compacted earth fill 8,000 feet long, with top elevation 343.5 feet above national geodetic datum, or a maximum 71.5 feet above streambed elevation, with a top width of 18 feet, and a 300-foot long saddle dike with maximum height of 15 feet in the left abutment. The spillway which is 6,000 feet northeast of the left abutment, will consist of an unpaved, freeoverflow type, 500 feet long, with fixed crest at elevation 335.0. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam will serve an 8-foot diameter, horseshoeshaped concrete conduit. The reservoir at maximum pool elevation 306.5 will have an area of 4,000 acres and a total capacity of 63,000 acre-feet of which 35,900 acre-feet between elevations 288.5 and 302.0 will be used for water supply, 20,000 acre-feet between elevations 302.0 and 306.5 will be used for water quality improvement, and 7,100 acre-feet below elevation 288.5 will consist of dead storage. A volume varying seasonally from 50,000 to 70,000 acre-feet between elevations 306.5 and 315.0 will be reserved for flood storage. Estimated Federal cost (1984) is $120,000,000. (See Table-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to reimburse the United States for all costs allocated to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended; and one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to general recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. In addition, local interests are required to reimburse the United States for the annual operation, maintenance and replacement cost allocated to water supply, and bear all cost of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife areas and facilities for initial development. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Land and damages and engineering and design cost $1,809. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not been initiated. 30. BURKETTS CREEK, AMORY, MS Location. The project is located in the northeast portion of the city of Amory and lies between Burketts Creek and the Tennessee-Tombigbee Canal Section near Lock A. Existing project. The project provides for an earthfilled diversion structure and a 60 foot wide bottom width diversion canal to intercept Burketts Creek at station 100+55 and direct flow in a northerly direction for about 4,000 feet to enter Lock A pool at canal station 2+00. Side slopes will be one vertical on three horizontal. In addition, provisions are made for a concrete baffled chute as an energy dissipator and a riprap blanket at the toe. 10-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Project has been turned over to local interests to maintain. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs amounted to $26,400. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the project was initiated in September 1982 and completed in February 1984. Total cost to date is $1,366,454 for new work. 31. GORDONS CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS Location. The project is located along the lower 12,320 feet of Gordons Creek between its mouth at Leaf River and Broad Street Bridge, within the city limits of Hattiesburg, Ms. Existing project. The authorized project provides for flood damage reduction along and upstream of the project limits by clearing, snagging, widening and the removal of debris. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Project has been turned over to local interest to maintain. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs amounted to $25,061. Flood control benefits attributed to the project through FY 1984 amounted to $2,085,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in June 1979 and was essentially completed in June 1980. Total Federal costs for the project as of September 30, 1984 were $800,699 all for new work. 32. MURDER CREEK, EAST BREWTON, AL Location. The project is located in the city of East Brewton along the left bank of Murder Creek in the vicinity of Forrest and Snowden Avenues. Existing project. The project consists of non-structural measures of flood plain evacuation and flood proofing of selected buildings for the reduction of flood damages. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs amounted to $108,490. Condition at end of fiscal year. This non-structural plan is essentially complete. Total costs to date have amounted to $906,855. 33. SUN CREEK, OKTIBBEHA COUNTY, MS Location:The project is located in the northwest part of Oktibbeha County about 3 miles northwest of the city of Starkville, Mississippi. Existing project. The project consists of the removal of accumulated logs, debris, and sediment which obstructs normal stream flow along a 0.6 mile reach of the Sun Creek Channel. Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Project has been turned over to local interests to maintain. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the project during fiscal year cost $34,311. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in April 1984. Total cost for the project as of September 30, 1984 was $55,569. The construction funds were provided under the FY 1983 Jobs Bill, Productive Employment Appropriations Act, 1983. (PL 98-8). 34. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast Mississippi and flows southerly through eastern Mississippi and western Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of the Tombigbee River by means of channel clearing and snagging. Approved estimate of cost (1984) for new work is $52,446,900; consisting of $50,000,000 Federal funds, and $2,446,900 non-Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the improved channels; maintain all works after completion; and contribute $12,146,600 in cash or equivalent work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design costs for Luxapalila and Twenty Mile Creeks, and Tibbee River Basin were $746,916; work on channels and canals cost $1,225,662; land and damages, $475,047 and miscellaneous, $46,511. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in July 1965, and is proceeding stream by stream as funds are made available. Federal cost of existing project as of September 30, 1984 was $13,940,444 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $62,917. 35. TRIM CANE CREEK, OKTIBBEHA COUNTY, MS Location: The project is located in the northwest part of Oktibbeha County about 3 miles northwest of the city of Starkville, Mississippi. Existing project. The project consists of the removal of accumulated logs, debris, and sediment which obstructs normal stream flow along a 1.0 mile reach of the Trim Cane Creek Channel. 10-14 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Project has been turned over to local interests to maintain. Operations and results during fiscal year: New work: Construction of the project during fiscal year cost $131,956. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in April 1984. Total cost for the project as of September 30, 1984 was $145,519. The construction funds were provided under the FY 1983 Jobs Bill, Productive Employment Appropriations Act, 1983. (PL 98-8). 36. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Local flood protection works for which inspection is performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West Point, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River; Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and Geneva, Alabama, in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, Georgia, and Collinsville, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin. Channel rectification projects include Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama, Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama, and Armuchee Creek, Floyd and Chattooga Counties, Georgia in the Alabama- Coosa River Basin; Big Brown Creek, Donovan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek and Mantachie Creek, near Fulton, Mississippi, Burkett's Creek and Stanifer Creek near Amory, Mississippi, Houlka Creek and Sakatonchee Creek in Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Mississippi, James Creek in Monroe County, Mississippi, and Sun and Trim Cane Creeks, Oktibbeha County, Mississippi, all in the Tombigbee River Basin; Gordon's Creek, Hattiesburg, Mississippi and Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin; Burnt Corn and Murder Creeks, Brewton, Alabama in the Conecuh River Basin; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; Goose Pond, Walnut and Poley Creeks, Clanton, Alabama; Pinchgut Creek, Trussville, Alabama; Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, Georgia; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas in Bainbridge, Georgia. Shore protection and erosion control projects include Valparaiso, Florida; Harrison County, Missis- Sippi; Lorraine Road, Biloxi, Mississippi; Leaf River, Mahned, Mississippi; and Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, Georgia. A local drainage project in Jackson County, Florida is also inspected under this program. The project at Rome and Montezuma, Georgia and Collinsville, Alabama include pumping stations. Inspections were made during FY 84 to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of the project. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in the maintenance and operation of the local flood protection works under theirjurisdiction where appropriate. Follow- UP for compliance of the deficient projects continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $11,955. Total cost to September 30, 1984, was $325,709 charged to maintenance. 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-1) 38. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Pre-authorization). Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. (See Table 10-J) Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work under Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, and disaster relief and assistace under Public Law 288, 93d Congress. (See Table 10-J) Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 39. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above Montgomery, Alabama, by the junction of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestern Alabama, to form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest Georgia.) Previous project. Projects for Alabama River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 594, Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for full development of the Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 10-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1964 83rd Congress, suspended authorization of the comprehensive plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric power for Coosa River, to permit non- Federal interests to develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public law. The present phase of improvement provides for construction of Robert F. Henry and Millers Ferry multiplepurpose improvements, Claiborne Lock and Dam, and supplemental channel work providing for a nine-foot deep navigation channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, Alabama, and for construction of Carters Dam, a multiple-purpose improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will be determined as formulation of plans for development of projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation has been initiated. Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the river a natural landing connects with city streets at Montgomery. Wofford Oil Company has a small wharf about 10 miles below Montgomery equipped for handling petroleum products. There are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Recreation facilities and engineering, design, supervision and administration at Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam cost $239,173. Public use areas at Millers Ferry Lock and Dam cost $306,625. Engineering and design for Coosa River navigation segment amounted to $62,560. Miscellaneous administrative costs at Carters amounted to $312. Total cost of new work amounted to $608,670. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 1,497,200 yards cubic of material from the river system at a cost of $2,528,007. General charges for recreation, supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs amounted to $947,739. Coosa River Reservoir operations cost $780,567 and lock operations $344,752. In addition, operation of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam cost $1,994,862, Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, $3,774,011; Carters Lake, $2,806,966; all for a total maintenance cost of $13,176,904. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on Carters Dam in April 1962 on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1963, Claiborne Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam in March 1966. Carters Dam was essentially completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in January 1972. Overall construction is essentially complete at Millers Ferry Lock and Dam. Construction of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam is essentially complete. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1984 are $392,282,037, including $305,602,698 for new work and $86,679,339 for mainte. nance. (See Table 10-K.) 39A. CARTERS LAKE, GA Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the Alabama-Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near the town of Carters, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray and Gilmer Counties. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,950-foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on the left bank, a 258-foot long high-level, gated spillway on the left bank, a power house on the right bank having two conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 kilowatts each and two pumpgenerating units of the same size, and a regulating dam 2,855 feet long with a gated spillway 208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum power pool elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acrefeet reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Total cost of new work amounted to $312 for supervision and administration. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities and administration incidental thereto cost $2,806,966. Gross power generation amounted to 598,165,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1984, of which 563,017,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during CY 1983 totaled 749,200 recreational user days. Reduced flood damages attributed to the Carters project and to the joint operation with Allatoona were $9,519,500 during FY 1984. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which commenced in April 1962 was essentially completed in September 1980. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1984 are $127,621,394, including $111,139,474 for new work and $16,481,920 for maintenance. 39B. CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, AL Location.The site is in Monroe County at mile 81.8 on the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroeville and 5.7 miles upstream from the U. S. Highway 84 bridge. Existing project. The authorized project consists ofa short earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest and gated spillway extending across the river channel and into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending 10-16 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT across the left overbank to high ground. Normal upper pool is at elevation 35 and the minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60-mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: none. Maintenance: none. Recreation attendance during CY 1983 totaled 566,700 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of $27,997,450. 39C. ROBERT F. HENRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at mile 245.4 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of Montgomery. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located at mile 245.4. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry Lock and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway of Alabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 feet with maximum height above the foundation at the power plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four 17,000-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower miter sill. The approved estimated (1984) cost is $83,700,000. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Total cost of new work amounted to $239,173 for recreation facilities and engineering, design, supervision and administration. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost amounted to $1,994,862. Gross power generation amounted to 388,081,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1984, of which 381,528,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at R.E. "Bob" Woodruff Lake during CY 1983 totaled 2,177,300 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966 and is essentially complete. The first powerhouse unit was placed in operation in June 1975, with the last unit on line in November 1975. Total Federal costs of the project as of September 30, 1984 were $96,543,070, including $83,347,857 for new work and $13,195,213 for maintenance. 39D. MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, and 30 miles southwest of Selma. Existing project. The project consists of an earth dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravity-gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth dike extending downstream paralleling the lock, to the powerhouse intake structure; a powerhouse, and an earth dike extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains three 25,000 kilowatt units. The 103-mile long reservoir has an area of 17,200 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 13-foot depth over the miter sills. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Total cost of new work amounted to $306,625 for public use facilities. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, powerhouse, reservoir, and administration incidental thereto cost $3,774,011. Gross power generation amounted to 405,242,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1984, of which 403,350,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir during CY 1983 totaled 2,382,100 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operation in June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 1970. The project was essentially completed in 1980. Total Federal costs of the project as of September 30, 1984 were $63,031,925 for new work and $23,889,972 for maintenance, a total of $86,921,897. 39E. COOSA RIVER NAVIGATION Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the juncture of the Etowah and Oostanaula Rivers in northwest Georgia, it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama- Coosa River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in House Document 320, transmitted to Congress on 27 January 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished after the waterway to Montgomery was assured. The plan of improvement identified in House Document 320 provided for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The 10-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 water-way to Montgomery has essentially been completed. The estimated 1984 cost for the waterway from Montgomery to Gadsden is $1,353,300,000 of which $1,298,680,000 is Federal and $54,620,000 non-Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funding was initiated in FY 1978 for preconstruction planning. FY 1984 costs were $62,560 for engineering, design, supervision and administration. In addition, general investigations funds expended amounted to $52,090 for advanced engineering and design. 40. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of streamflow for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height above the river bottom of the concrete, gravity-type dam is about 190 feet, from elevation 690 feet to 880 feet national geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twenty-six feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twenty-six feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3. One 48-inch diameter sluicing conduit with a free discharge valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a total of 74,000 kilowatts. Ultimate installed capacity will be 110,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres at elevation 860, has a storage capacity of 670,000 acre-feet. The initial construction cost was $31,424,738, excluding the addition of recreation facilities at the completed project. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required (Sec. 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Additional recreational facilities cost $169,716. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration incidental thereto cost $5,666,044. Gross power generation at Allatoona Reservoir amounted to 244,309,300 kilowatt-hours during FY 1984 of which 235,109,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Allatoona Lake during CY 1983 totaled 8,198,300 recreational user days. Benefits attributed to flood control storage and regulation amounted to $1,206,200. In addition, joint flood control operation with Carters Dams resulted in reduced damages of $9,472,000 in the vicinity of Rome, Georgia. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in October 1955. Total Federal costs under exist. ing project as of September 30, 1984 were $35,636,024 for new work and $42,271,136 for maintenance, a total of $77,907,160. 41. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the southwest corner of the State of Georgia by the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers and flows south 108 miles emptying into Apalachicola Bay. Florida River enters the Apalachicola River from the east at mile 45.4 and the River Styx also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters from the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises in northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, and thence southerly to join the Flint River at the southwest corner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint River, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows generally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to the southwest corner of the State, where it joins the Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 484 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist of a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola River from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, 104 miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the Flint River from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence a channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage to Montezuma, Georgia, 79 miles, to be accomplished by dredging, contraction works, and construction of three locks and dams (Jim Woodruff. George W.Andrews, and Walter F. George) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose dams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River, three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the Flint River, and minor improvements of certain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River, including a nine by 100-foot side channel, approximately 2,000 feet long, from Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park at Blountstown, Fla. Plane of reference is mean low water. 10-18 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Hydropower and flood control storage is provided at Sidney Lanier, Walter F. George, and West Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. The authorized but unconstructed projects of Lazer Creek, Lower Auchumpkee Creek and Spewrell Bluff would have storage for hydropower and flood control. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 1.6 feet. At the point where the river is formed the variation between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high water is about 20 feet, and extreme fluctuation is 65.3 feet at Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low and high water is about 21.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings along the entire system for launching small craft. For details of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See also Table 10-L on locks and dams and multiple-purpose development included in existing project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of cut off wall under Walter F. George Dam to correct seepage cost $4,439,449. Recreation facilities for various reservoirs cost $1,959,105 including $1,784,140 to improve and resurface roads at West Point Dam. Maintenance: The contractor's dredge removed 1,578,700 cubic yards (net) of material from the river system at a cost of $1,863,900. Other costs incidental to the overall project amounted to $3,960,750. Operation of George W. Andrews Lock and Dam cost $286,162. Operations and maintenance locks and dams:Buford Dam cost $6,298,978; Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, $4,057,310; Walter F. George Lock and Dam, $4,544,658; and West Point Lake, $3,130,304. Total FY 1984 cost for entire project was $30,540,617, of which $6,398,554 was for new work and $24,142,063 was for operation and maintenance. Detailed information on operations and costs applicable to the individual dam projects is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Condition at end of fiscal year. Improvement of Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide pro- Ject dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction on Lake Sidney Lanier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, and Walter F. George Lock and Dam, is complete. West Point is essentially complete with the exception of adding recreation facilities. Channel rectification in Apalachicola River was completed Decembei 1970. More detailed information concerning conditior at the end of fiscal year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose developments comprising the system is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Work remaining to complete the project consists of completion of recreational facilities at Lake Sidney Lanier, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, and Walter F. George Lock and Dam; design and construction of Lazer Creek, Spewrell Bluff and Lower Auchumpkee Creek Dam; and completion of construction of West Point Dam. (See Tables 10-A and 10-L for fiscal year costs and summaries of overall project. 41A. BUFORD DAM, GA Location. Buford Dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir, Lake Sidney Lanier, extends about 47 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the Chestatee River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above the dam. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest at elevation 1,106 feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 feet; a chute spillway with crest at elevation 1,085; a powerhouse in a deep cut with steel penstocks-in tunnels, and concrete intake structure at the upstream end of the tunnels; and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power tunnels. The Lake Sidney Lanier reservoir has a gross capacity of 2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is reserved for flood control storage. The power installations consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units of 40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of recreational facilities at the completed project cost $166,190, including engineering, design, supervision, and administration. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $6,298,978. Gross power generation amounted to 247,525,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1984, of which 243,692,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during CY 1983 totaled 14,333,110 recreational user days. Flood control benefits attributed to the project for FY 1984 amounted to $1,952,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 19, 1957: the second on July 26, 1957: and the third on October 10, 1957. The project is 10-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 essentially complete except for adding additional recreational facilities. 41B. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL. AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast Alabama.) The pool extends up the navigation channel about 28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 19 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The project provides for maintenance and care. The House Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and hold the United States free from damages. These conditions are being complied with. Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Recreational attendance at George W. Andrews Lock and Dam during CY 1983 totaled 260,500 recreational user days. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost included under overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in November 1963. Work remaining consists of construction of recreational facilities. 41C. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola River 107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest of Chattahoochee, Florida, Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of Columbia, Ala. bama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 feet long on the right bank, with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 feet; a gated spillway 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet long to accommodate the switchyard and substation; and an overflow dike section 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total capacity of 406,160 acre-feet. The power installation consists of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 kilowatts. Project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. Easements for rights-of-way and spoildisposal areas were provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate public terminals were constructed by local interests at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River; and at Columbia, Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being planned for other localities on the project. Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs at completed project amounted to $292. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $4,057,310. Gross power generation amounted to 205,388,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1984, of which 201,372,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Seminole during CY 1983 totaled 4.258,000 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957 The lock was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was raised to project level in January 1957. The first power-generating unit was placed on-the-line on February I, the second on March 1, and the third on April 26, 1957. 41D. SPEWRELL BLUFF LAKE, GA. Location. The dam site is on the Flint River in Talbot 10-20 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT and Upson Counties, Georgia, about nine miles west of Thomaston. The lake will extend into Meriwether, Pike, and Spalding Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: a dam 2,475 feet long with maximum height of 211.0 feet, a 326-foot long gated spillway with six tainter gates 38 feet high and 45 feet wide, concrete non-overflow abutments 1,149 feet across the main channel including 268 feet for the power intake, with an earth-rock fill dike 580 feet long to high ground on the left bank, a 420-foot saddle dike on the left bank, and a power plant with three 50,000-kw units located in the left bank. The reservoir would have an area of 13,330 acres at maximum power pool elevation of 695 national geodedic datum. Usable storage of 241,510 acre-feet would be provided for power generation between elevations 665 and 695 and 195,010 acre-feet would be reserved between elevations 695 and 706.5 for flood storage. Approved estimated (1984) cost is $424,500,000, of which $301,420,000 is for construction and design, and $123,080,000 for lands, damages, and relocations. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interest must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not been initiated. 41E. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL. AND GA. Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, of almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 feet. The nonoverflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal Upper pool elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 18 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 acre-feet, with 244,400 acre-feet reserved for power. The power installation consists of four units of 32,500 kilowatts each, or a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. The approved (1984) cost of rehabilitation work to control seepage is estimated to be $15,000,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Terminal facilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing work on construction of cutoff wall under dam to correct seepage cost $4,439,449. Recreation facilities cost $8,482. Maintenance of the project for operation and care was $4,544,658. Gross power generation amounted to 587,389,000 during FY 1984, of which 581,795,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1983 totaled 7,434,700 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed on-the-line in March, the second in May, the third in September, and the fourth in November 1963. 41F. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles above the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 309.2 miles above the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project provides for a gravitytype concrete dam 896 feet long with earth embankments at either end 1,11 1 feet long on the east end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west side and an earth embankment retaining wall on the east side; a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A monolith intake-powerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. At the full 10-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acrefeet is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 1, 2 and 3 were placed in operation in March and April, 1975. The ultimate installation is 108,375 killowatts. Approved estimated cost of new work (1984) is $133,900,000, of which $91,755,000 is for construction and design; $19,420,000 for lands and damages; and $22,725,000 for relocations. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost to improve and resurface roads, $1,784,140. Maintenance: Operation and care of the project cost $3,130,304. Gross power generation amounted to 294,547,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1984 of which 290,160,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1983 totaled 5,190,400 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in June 1966, was essentially complete at the end of FY 1984. 42. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Mobile District monitors flood control operations of Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation plans prepared in accordance with Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal year cost for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and maintenance costs for the Alabama-Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall operation and maintenance costs for the Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers System. General Investigations 43. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $3,025,234 of which $1,107,072 was for navigation studies, $369,379 for flood control studies, $966,255 for special studies, $19,391 for special investigations, $19,529 for coordination with the Fed. eral Energy Regulatory Commission, $96 for coastal zone management, and $543,512 for supplemental preauthorization studies (Dalton, Georgia and Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Missirppi). Continuation of planning and engineering included $947,493 for Mobile Harbor; $384,199 for Oliver Lock and Dam; $452,626 for Panama City Beaches; $548,942 for Three Mile Creek and $211,737 for Village Creek, for a total of $2,44,997. Advance engineering and design for the Montgomery to Gadsden, Coosa River Channel navigation project cost $52,090. 44. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal year with the initiation of Flood Insurance studies, the cost of which was reimbursable by FEMA. In addition, Flood Plain Management services were performed at a cost of $180,260. (See Table 10-M for listings of studies completed during FY 1984.) For listing o previous reports see page 10-50 Annual Report for 1974, page 10-44 of FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-46 of FY 1977 Annual Report, and page 10-48 of FY 1978 Annual Report. The National Program for inspection of non-Federal dams cost $219. 10-22 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 1. Apalachicola Bay Fl. 2. Aquatic Plant Control (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Bayou Coden, Al. (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds 4. Bayou La Batre, Al. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Biloxi Harbor, Ms. (Contributed Funds) 6. Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, Al. 7. Bon Secour River, Al. (Contributed Funds) 8. Cadet Bayou, Ms. (Regular Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp: Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 26,000 7,436 17,000 14,217 13,000 8,088 51,000 48,810 20,400 26,938 214,155 205,111 32,000 55,370 44,000 -3,884 25,000 15,357 455,000 455,263 5,000 41,048 -_ 75,00 96,78 50,000 50,000 2,000 12,690 987,577 994,121 84,171 124,729 13,014,800 13,113,823 28,048 18,796 21,000 6,400 1,300,466 550,156 84,000 81,142 265,000 152,622 10,277,901 9,534,333 39,000 16,837 182,101 175,872 4,000 753,896 52,000 50,089 220,00 224,57 501,00 514,88 2,033,461' 2,033,461' 2,819,8072 2,818,9132 472,687 450,606 21,225 21,225 330,7013 330,7013 0 384,533 15 381,631 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 - 311,095 - 311,095 )0 2,666,852 O 2,666,614 - 10,5004 10,5004 1,215,4365 - 1,215,4365 )0 5,524,1066 5 5,523,5586 - - 102,600 102,600 704,505 3,605,000 158,121,2427 195,823 153,605 153,884,9397 14,137,473 15,962,000 155,572,4978 13,862,619 16,904,377 155,017,8918 - - 118,615 -11-8,615 17,891 12,000 32,145 10,000 155,478 16,632 148,586 9,700 9,700 - 87,921 - 87,921 - 705,118 694 705,118 10-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 194 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 9. Dauphin Island, Bay,New Work: Al. Approp. Cost 10. Dog and Fowl Rivers, Al. (Regular Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - 31,000 - 31,000 - 292,864 - 292,864 60,000 56,245 54,000 26,852 38,000 66,153 96,000 93,672 1, 16,026, 1,109,215 190,695 190,695 Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 11. East Pass Channel New Work: From Gulf of Approp. Mexico into Chocta- Cost whatchee Bay, Fl. (Regular Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 12. Fly Creek, Al. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 13. Gulf Intracoastal New Work: Waterway between Approp. Apalachee Bay, Fl. Cost and Mexican Border Maint: Approp. Cost 14. Gulfport Harbor, New Work: Ms. Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 15. Mobile Harbor, Al. New Work: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost (Regular Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost 12,000 2,914 44,000 1,385 -32,000 16,930 2,037 692,593 691,779 - 114,100 - 114,100 916,715 916,715 363,000 362,586 926,000 854,843 625,000 606,764 626,000 5,686,160 610,614 5,573,266 398,000 398,000 - 29,000 - 29,000 263 1,687 - 109,000 - 106,550 307,621 305,171 6,480,299' 6,480,2999 1,268,000 1,320,430 1,673,000 1,663,687 2,914,000 1,400,841 3,009,000 36,585,722'� 4,536,371 36,528,3110 - 904,775" - 904,7751" 2,981,000 2,651,941 23,600,000 23,730,997 1,150,000 1,161,761 2,053,000 3,088,041 1,465,000 1,126,519 230,000 843,794 850,000 235,456 6,294,000 6,422,224 1,418,000 982,529 84,000 723,834 280,000 553,146 4,793,000 2,941,782 (Contributed Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost 2,293,300 29,260,80812 3,281,516 29,138,5791 - 68,102,93713 31,404 68,082,03613 485,000 4,332,500 717,401 4,164,969 2,908,700 69,075,183" 5,172,873 68,852,355" - 12,000 - 12,000 10-24 MOBIIE, AIABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FYSI FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 16. Panama City Harbor, I:1. New Work: Approp. SCost 1,638,045's 1,638,045s Maint: Approp. Cost (Contrihuted Funds) New Work: ('ontrib. Cost Pascagoula larbor, New Work: Ms. Approp. Cost (Regular Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) Maint: Contrib. Cost Pensacola Harbor, New Work: Fl. Approp. Cost 19. Perdido Pass Channel, Al. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost 20. Port St. Joe New Work: Harbor, Fl. Approp. Cost (Contributing Funds)New Work: Contrib. Cost. (Regular Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost 21. Removing Water Maint: Hyacinths Approp. (Mobile District) Cost 22. Waterway Con- New Work: necting Tombigbee Approp. and Tennessee Rivers Cost Al., and Ms. Maint: Approp. Cost 28. Okatibbee Lake, Ms. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 29. Tallahala Creek New Work; Lake, Pascagoula Approp. River, Ms. Cost 118,717 110,334 1,323,000 979,049 2,186,000 2,203,174 1,451,652 2,555,403 25,000 25,000 -8,000 343,829 4,143,000 1,986,816 196,590 565 761,000 6,035,33416 761,668 6,034,640'6 - 80,000 - 80,000 - 6,572,985" - 6,572,985"' 2,066,000 29,860,420"8 4,587,968 29,820,20618 300,000 496,024 965,940 945,139 1,469,69319 1,469,69319 338,268 315,114 67,000 33,226 42,145 2,032,000 6,090,2382o 1,967,593 6,010,04520 629,860 - 629,860 192,000 300,028 53,994 51,795 7,000 972 108,185,000 117,448,766 3,228,000 3,368,455 65,000 31,020 602,000 570,387 190,000 147,694 427,000 413,904 50,253 22,315 49,000 118,490,000 118,990,981 4,624,000 3,598,169 14,000 39,926 691,000 573,918 100,313 1,271,000 484,340 20,501 -54,000 120,684,000 103,645,625 5,474,000 5,430,959 20,000 22,505 874,000 825,795 -62,000 4,952,217 743,601 4,951,134 - 510,000 - 510,000 - 10,325 - 10,325 - 1,960,862 - 1,960,862 - 20,000 - 20,000 3,000 2,215,090 20,893 2,215,089 155,10 88,01 7,45 7,44 62 1,00 1,18 60,967 1,205 17,000 1,301 1,100,471 1,100,471 993,532,2002 905,282,4912 i6,000 24,232,33122 17,345 22,956,21022 !0,000 9,739,628 36,839 9,197,918 )8,000 6,635,892 34,145 6,581,739 - 3,945,757 1,809 3,922,102 10-25 17. 18. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section SeScteieon Total Cost to FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 37 0 17,53 19,11 -15,00 10,83 in Text Project Funding 30. Burketts Creek, New Work: Amory, Ms. Approp. Cost 31. Gordon's Creek, New Work: Ms. Approp. Cost 32. Murder Creek, New Work: East Biewton, Al. Approp. Cost 33. Sun Creek, New Work: Oktibbeha County, Approp. Ms. Cost 34. Tombigbee River New Work: Tributaries Approp. Ms. and Al. Cost (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 35. Trim Cane Creek, New Work: Oktibbeha County, Approp. Ms. Cost 39. Alabama-Coosa New Work: Rivers, Al. and Ga. Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 39A. Carters Dam and New Work: Reservoir, Ga. Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 39B. Claiborne Lock and New Work: Dam, Al. Approp. Cost 39C. Robert F. Henry New Work: Lock and Dam, Al. Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 39D. Millers Ferry Lock New Work: and Dam, Al. Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 39E. Coosa River, New Work: Montgomery to Approp. Gadsden, Al. - Cost 40. Allatoona Lake, New Work: Coosa River Basin, Approp. Ga. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 41. Apalachicola, New Work: Chattahoochee, Approp. and Flint Rivers, Cost Al. and Ga. 650,000 98,578 IV- 6 670 - 215,000 - 207,920 - 25,000 - 15,095 10 800,000 2 1,669,031 - - a0 2,651,400 -5 5,261,664 )0 9,898,480 78 9,549,915 0 - 28 37,053 )0 2,010,000 69 1,991,853 00 2,660,000 75 2,703,377 00 1,876,000 92 1,693,988 00 6,000 30 4,422 00 2,687,480 13 2,615,655 00 -14,600 88 2,516,812 31 972,000 20 836,857 00 3,813,480 48 3,070,212 99 917,000 73 1,101,493 700,000 1,074,914 9,000 1,713 542,500 404,471 55,000 6,163 1,495,000 1,289,170 120,000 13,563 514,522 474,340 9,775,000 9,034,561 -84,000 43,083 2,235,000 1,952,950 600,000 164,544 1,891,000 1,843,208 -1,478 22,500 2,302,000 2,364,854 244,213 201,000 668,140 4,298,000 3,996,293 5,008,973 2,158,234 -156,099 26,400 17,402 25,061 -31,089 108,490 -24,431 34,311 1,400,000 2,494,136 1,366,454 1,366,454 802,025 800,699 912,385 906,855 55,569 55,569 14,309,225 13,940,444 2,350,00 649,35 12,190,00 10,209,32 10,003,10 9,565,37 1,050,0 1,201,5 1,860,6( 1,735,2( 1,900,0( 2,127,3' 1,835,0( 1,828,6 40,0( 18,1: 2,453,0 2,024,0 9,200,0( 6,862,21 582,9: 175,4: 4,006,01 3,881,0 1,677,8 1,471,1' 10-26 14,000 94,700 13,165 62,917 25,519 145,519 131,956 145,519 100,000 309,790,63023 608,670 309,315,18123 11,741,500 90,073,9542 13,176,904 89,453,66924 - 111,246,340 312 111,139,474 2,522,500 16,708,300 2,806,966 16,481,920 - 27,997,450 - 27,997,450 -300,000 83,547,800 239,173 83,347,857 1,755,000 13,320,778 1,994,862 13,195,213 400,000 63,125,300 306,625 63,031,925 3,450,000 24,101,965 3,774,011 23,889,972 - 15,035,400 62,560 14,960,135 70,000 35,716,08525 169,716 35,636,02425 4,776,000 42,662,523 5,666,044 42,271,136 8,102,000 350,295,5932 6,398,554 344,638,26626 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 Maint. Approp. 20,918,300 20,870,960 19,006,000 22,362,000 221,052,36427 Cost 20,154,974 20,440,078 18,162,136 24,142,063 219,191,46327 41A. Lake Sidney New Work: Lanier, Ga. Approp. 337,000 386,000 155,782 3,000 53,031,53828 Cost 452,439 502,277 471,532 166,190 53,027,01828 Maint: Approp. 4,956,000 5,009,480 5,078,500 5,342,000 48,743,907 Cost 4,560,430 4,685,414 4,553,188 6,298,978 48,404,285 41B. George W. Andrews New Work: Lock and Dam, Approp. - - - - 13,038,42729 Al. and Ga. Cost - - - - 13,038,42729 Maint: Approp. 3 30 30 3o 30 Cost 30 o 0 3o 30 41C. Jim Woodruff Lock New Work: and Dam, Ga. and Approp. 81,348 -3,000 -1,500 -1,000 48,017,8583' Fl. Cost 48,661 19,902 40,247 292 47,974,44831 Maint: Approp. 3,099,000 3,049,000 3,062,000 3,810,000 41,365,081 Cost 3,210,277 2,707,678 3,205,787 4,057,310 41,054,168 41D. Spewrell Bluff Lake New Work: Ga.. Approp. - - - - 2,169,600 Cost 177 - - - 2,158,652 41E. Walter F. George New Work: Lock and Dam, Approp. 532,551 527,000 4,854,691 6,400,000 99,495,77932 Al. and Ga. Cost 216,672 508,510 1,636,942 4,447,932 93,955,79632 Maint: Approp. 5,407,700 6,825,440 3,583,000 4,620,000 49,327,564 Cost 4,445,259 7,440,475 3,561,801 4,544,659 48,672,920 41F. West Point Lake, New Work: Chattahoochee River Approp. 500,000 - 1,700,000 131,546,411 Basin, Ga. and Al. Cost 541,721 51,922 9,513 1,784,140 131,499,928 Maint: Approp. 2,620,000 2,573,000 3,040,500 3,103,000 20,431,300 Cost 2,596,982 2,452,152 2,952,188 3,130,304 20,119,827 I. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR ject and $48,001 for Grand Lagoon modification. on Two-Mile. 2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 3. Includes $5,650 for previous projects. 4. Cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act. 5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was contributed funds. 6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10,200 was contributed funds. 7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $814,605 for recreational facilities on completed projects. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 9. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 10. Includes $65,137 for previous projects. II. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 12. Includes 2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 Oand Special M funds. 13. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects, $14,000 Public Work funds, and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 14. Includes $4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 Special 0O and M funds. W1o5.r kIsn cludes $203,560 for previous projects, $581,959 Public funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing pro- 16. Includes $513,604 for previous projects. 17. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 18. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124,565 Special O and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 19. Includes $594,688 for previous projects. 20. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 21. Includes $2,100,000 transferred to National Park Service; $210,249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thru FY 1961. Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 22. Includes $234,331 for previous projects. 23. Includes $3,692,483 for previous projects. 24. Includes $2,978,050 for previous projects. 25. Includes $3,274,429 for recreational facilities. 26. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds, $1,924 contributed funds for previous projects; and $809,553 for Lazer Creek design Rysco Channel. 27. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 28. Includes $8,222,924 for recreational facilities. 29. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 30. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers project. 31. Includes $1,511,521 for recreational facilities. 32. Includes $2,426,748 for recreational facilities. 10-27 i REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 10-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 Nov. 21, 1963' Feb. 5, 19751 Aug. 11, 1983' July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 June 2, 1969' Oct. 27, 1965 APALACHICOLA BAY, FL. (See Section I of Text) Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels, 10 feet deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep through Bulkhead Shoals. Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth of inner bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, and 10-foot depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel. At Eastpoint, Fl., a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to St. George Sound, and at Apalachicola, Fl., a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to the Apalachicola River. Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across St. George Island to within 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf, with two jetties extending from the dune line on St. George Island to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass Channel upon completion of channel through St. George Island. Modify improvement of Apalachicola Bay, Fl., authorized by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests for such approved work as they may have done based upon the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be removed to provide project dimensions at such time as Federal dredging of the channels is undertaken. A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and about I mile long, parallel to shore at Two Mile, Fl., with a 6-by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. The total length of the breakwater would be about 6,150 including two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. Modify Eastpoint project to include breakwaters with a total length of 5,300 feet. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text) Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., Fl., Al., Ms., and La. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BAYOU CODEN, AL. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 4 by 40 feet. Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre channel. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL. (See Section 4 of Text) A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 106, 69th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 156, 82d Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR(Sec. 107) DPR(Sec. 107) DPR(Sec. 107) H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 87-874 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong.. Ist Sess. H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 327, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-28 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 28, 1979' July 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Sept. 19, 1890 Sept. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Aug. 22, 1911 bridge, thence a channel 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet. BILOXI HARBOR, MS. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi Sound west and north of Deer Island to deep water in Back Bay of Biloxi. Relocation of channel. Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old Fort Bayou. Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi Harbor to Ott Bayou. Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Back Bay and Cranes Neck. A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through: Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island), Back Bay, Big Lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500- by 2,600-foot turning basin in the lake, thence, a channel 12 by 100 feet from the western end of Gulfport Lake for about 2 miles to a 300- by 500-foot turning basin; adoption for maintenance of a 12- by 150- foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about I mile to a 400- by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and abandonment of the existing 6- by 40-foot channel into Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; continuation of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and, into a rectangular basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL. (See Section 6 of Text) Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887. Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. (Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below lock I to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) Construction of locks and dams 1, 2, and 3. Merging of the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopolis. Construction of locks and dams 14, 15, 16, and 17. Provides for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical maintenance and operation. Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet, and construction of locks and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project. Extension of slack-water improvement to Sanders Ferry on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. 10-29 H. Doc. 754, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 639, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 258, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 326, 76th Cong., ist Sess. H. Doc. 256, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) Annual Report, 1887, pt. 2, p 1302. H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858 H. Doc. 165, 57th Cong., Ist Sess., and Annual Report, 1902, p. 1293 Public Law 317 H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., Ist Sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1919 Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 Annual Rennrt 1IQ1 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 June 26, 1934 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Dec. 21, 1982 July 30, 1983 May 16, 1963' May 20, 19691 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 May 19, 19691 feet at lock I to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where practicable. For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers. Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace original locks and dams 10, I I, and 12 Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Recreation facilities. Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace existing dams 4, 5, 6, and 7. Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. Provides for a wider navigation opening at the Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Authorized to widen, as necessary for safe passage, the navigation opening of Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL. (See Section 7 of Text) A 10- by 100-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swift's Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point 600 feet above Oak Landing, with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swift's Landing and ice loading dock. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. CADET BAYOU, MS. (See Section 8 of Text) An 8- by 100-foot entrance channel extending from the 8-foot depth contour in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of the bayou, thence an 8- by 80-foot channel for a distance of about 1,900 feet into the bayou to a turning basin 8 feet deep, and a channel continuing therefrom 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide upstream for 8,750 feet with a second turning basin 6 feet deep located 900 feet downstream from the upper limit of the improvement. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL. (See Section 9 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL. (See Section 10 of Text) To provide small craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. p. 876 H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 56, 73d Cong., Ist Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.45, 73d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 97-377 Public Law 98-63 DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 333, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 394, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) 10-30 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 Oct. 24, 1951 Oct. 27, 1965 May 17, 1950 Aug. 26, 1937 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 July 23, 1942 June 17, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL. (See Section 11 of Text) Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. Construction of twin jetties. (Present project dimensions.) FLY CREEK, FAIRHOPE, AL (See Section 12 of Text) A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL., AND MEXICAN BORDER (Mobile District) (See Section 13 of Text) APALACHICOLA BAY TO ST. MARKS RIVER, FL. A channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachicola Bay' Fl., via St. George Sound, Carrabelle, Crooked, and Ochlockonee Rivers and Ochlockonee and Apalachee Bays to St. Marks River, Fl. APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FL. A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FL. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no reference to width. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FL. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. PENSACOLA BAY, FL., TO MOBILE BAY, AL. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. MOBILE BAY, AL., TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour in Mississippi Sound. A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. APALACHEE BAY, FL., TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water, except in the section between Mobile, Al., and New Orleans, La., where the width is to be 150 feet. Conditional acquisition of Gulf County Canal, Fl. and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Construction of a movable span in the Georgia, Florida & Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River. Abandonment and closure of original channel between Big Lagoon and Pensacola Bay and construction of a new channel to enter the bay north of original entrance. Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by 125 feet. 10-31 H. Doc. 209, 70th Congress 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 194, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 291, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 670, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 71st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., 2d Sess., and H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., 1st Sess., and Public Law 75, 78th Cong. Ist Sess. H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. Public Law 89-789, 89th Cong. 2d Sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 194 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Jan. 21, 1927 July 23, 1930 June 30, 1948 July 3, 1958 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 26, 1970 (SR) Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) GULFPORT HARBOR, MS. (See Section 14 of Text) A channel 19 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the anchorage basin at Ship Island to Gulfport, Ms., and an anchorage basin next to the shore end 19 feet deep and not less than 2,640 feet by 1,320 feet in area. Combined Ship Island Pass with Gulfport Harbor project. Increased depth to 26 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar and depth to 19 feet in channel from anchorage basin at Ship Island to anchorage basin at Gulfport. Authorized relocation of channel across Ship Island Bar. Increased depth to 27 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar, 26 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and depth of 26 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Increased depth of 32 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar, 30 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound, and a depth of 30 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Maintenance of the existing commerccial small-boat harbor and an approach channel 100 feet wide and 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Ms. Sound to the small-boat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. MOBILE HARBOR, AL. (See Section 15 of Text) For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from Choctaw Point to Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide, with 2 turning basins. Adoption of the existing channel alongside Arlington pier from the Mobile Bay Channel to turning basin at the inner end of Garrows Bend Channel, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. Enlarging Mobile Bar Channel to 42 by 600 feet, Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridge to 40 feet over present widths, including existing turning basins and anchorage areas. Widening river channel opposite Magazine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further modified for maintenance by SAD letter of 27 November 1973 under authority contained in ER-1130-2-307 to increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' x 1600'. Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and operation of an earth-filled causeway across said channel (work to be done by local interests). To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning basin 40 feet deep and approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; a barge channel 12- by 100-feet extending 6500-feet and terminating in a 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin. H. Doc. 120, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 2, 60th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 692, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 112, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 123, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. (Under provision of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) 10-32 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Mar. 23, 19671 June 14, 1972 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 4, 1915 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1967 Oct. 23, 1962 June 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL. (See Section 16 of Text) Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted by act of June 25, 1910. Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge. Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagoon from St. Andrew Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities which terminate at the bridge. Channels 38, 40, 42 feet deep. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS. (See Section 17 of Text) Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on Dog River, 25 by 300 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 22 by 225 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, thence 22 by 150 feet in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests. Cutoff channel, 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, and a turning basin just below the bridge. Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River cutoff ($44,000). Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30- by 225-foot side channel from main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 30 by 300 feet in Bayou Casotte to a turning basin of the same depth I mile above the mouth. Deepening the Horn Island Pass channel to 38 feet and deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound, the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning basin all to 33 feet. Enlarging Horn Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long, enlarging main channel in Mississippi Sound and river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte channels and basin to 38 feet. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL. (See Section 18 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. Modified the existing project for the present inner channels and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. Improvement of Bayou Chico. 10-33 H. Doc. 33, 73d Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 555, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 559, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 196, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Chief of Engineers Report dated Nov. 3, 1960. H. Doc. 560, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 72d Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 96, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2. 1945 Modified improvement of Bayou Chico, Fl. Aug. 27. 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 July 25, 1912 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 July 27, 1916 July 24, 1946 Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay, a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions of 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along the south side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of about 2.5 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel, about 1.3 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL. (See Section 19 of Text) A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemound jetties, from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the same dimensions into Terry Cove. PORT ST. JOE, FL. (See Section 20 of Text) A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide across the bar at the entrance to the bay. An entrance channel 300 feet wide and 29 feet deep, and a bay channel 200 feet wide and 27 feet deep, with a turning basin at the proposed municipal pier at Port St. Joe. Adoption of south channel 27 feet deep and 200 feet wide from bay to turning basin, provision of a 32- by 300-foot entrance channel, a 32- by 200-foot north bay (inner) channel, and a 32- by 1,000-by 2,000-foot turning basin. Enlargement of the channel to provide for a depth of 37 feet and a width of 500 feet at the Gulf end, diminishing in width to 400 feet over a distance of 3.6 miles, thence 37 by 400 feet over a distance of 3.3 miles thence 35 by 300 feet in St. Joseph Bay to the turning basin, a distance of 7.1 miles, and a harbor channel in the basin 35 feet deep, 250 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long. REMOVING WATER HYACINTHS, MOBILE DISTRICT (See Section 21 of Text) Appropriations made for the States of Florida and Louisiana and provided for the extermination or removal of plants, the building of boats, and the establishment of booms. Appropriation made for Florida, provided that no chemical process injurious to cattle shall be used. And also made available for use in that State the operating plan pertaining to the work of Louisiana. Appropriation made available for the State of Alabama. WATERWAY CONNECTING TOMBIGBEE AND TENNESSEE RIVERS, AL. AND MS. (See Section 22 of Text) A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section, 9- by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Ms.; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section 12 by 300 feet (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width would be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through dividing ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Total length of project is 234 miles. 10-34 H. Doc. 743, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 528, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 94, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 660, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 6th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 17, 77th Cong., 1st Sess., and report of Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 595, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 91, 55th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 June 7, 1968 Nov. 6, 1981 Feb. 20, 19772 February 17, 19823 Oct. 22, 19823 July 23, 1958 July 8, 1980 Oct. 22, 19822 Mar. 2, 1945 June 28, 1954 May 25, 1982 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS. (See Section 28 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control. water supply, water quality control, and recreation. TALLAHALA CREEK LAKE, PASCAGOULA RIVER, MS. (See Section 29 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. BURKETTS CREEK, AMORY, MS. (See Section 30 of Text) Provides for an earth filled diversion structure with side slopes of one vertical on three horizontal, and, a 60 foot bottom width canal about 4,000 feet long to connect Burketts Creek to Lock A pool of the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. In addition, provisions were made for a concrete baffled chute with a rip rap blanket along its toe. GORDON'S CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS. (See Section 31 of Text) Flood control improvements along Gordon's Creek consisting of channel enlargement by excavation to a bottom width of 40 feet for a distance of 6,489 feet, and, clearing and snagging of an additional 5,831 feet for a total project length of 12,320 feet. MURDER CREEK, EAST BREWTON, AL. (See Section 32 of Text) Provides for nonstructural measures for the reduction of flood damages by flood plain evacuation and flood proofing of selected buildings along the left bank of Murder Creek. SUN CREEK, OKTIBBEHA COUNTY, MS. (See Section 33 of Text) Provides for removal of accumulated logs, debris, and sediment. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS. AND AL. (See Section 34 of Text) Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee River. Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. TRIM CANE CREEK, OKTIBBEHA COUNTY, MS. (See Section 35 of Text) Provides for removal of accumulated logs, debris, and sediment. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL. AND GA. (See Section 39 of Text) Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes. Authorized construction of Carters Lake, Ga. Claiborne Lock and Dam, Al., Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, Al., and Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Al. Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. Designated change of name from Jones Bluff to Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA. (See Section 40 of Text) Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of stream flow for navigation, development of hydroelectric power and recreation. H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 143, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 208) H. Doc. 167, 84th Cong., Ist Sess. PL (96-304) DPR (Sec. 205) H. Doc. 414, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 436, 83rd Cong. S.2034 97th Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 228, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 674, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. 10-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL., GA. AND FL. (See Section 41 of Text) Mar. 2, 1945 Development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint H. Doc. 342, 76th Cong., Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and 1st Sess. recreation. July 24, 1946 Modified general plan for full development of H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River System Ist Sess. and authorized construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. Dec. 22, 1944 Authorized recreation facilities. Jan. 27, 1981' Modified the existing project to provide for DPR (Sec. 107) nine foot deep by 100-foot wide side channel into the Apalachicola River Industrial Park, Blountstown, Fl. LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA. (See Section 41A of Text) July 24, 1944 Provision of recreation facilities. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL. AND GA. (See Section 41 B of Text) July 24, 1946 Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., and low dam at George W. Andrews site. 1st Sess. Dec. 22, 1944 Provided recreation facilities. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA. AND FL. (See Section 41C of Text) Dec. 22, 1944 Provided recreation facilities. SPEWRELL BLUFF LAKE, GA. (See Section 41D of Text) Dec. 30, 1965 Authorized construction. H. Doc. 567, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL., AND GA. (See Section 41E of Text) May 19, 1953 Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George H. Comm. on site and low dam at Columbia site. Public Works WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA. AND AL. (See Section 41F of Text) October 23, 1963 Authorized construction for flood control, power H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., recreation, fish and wildlife development, and 2d Sess. streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 Control Act of 1948. River and Harbor Act. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 of Flood 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1954. 10-36 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-C BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 6 of Text) William John Hollis Coffeeville Demopolis Warrior Bacon Oliver Holt Bankhead - Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock and Dnd d Dam ad DDamm and Dam and Dam and Dam' Miles above Mobile 2 116.7 213.2 261.1 338.2 347.0 365.5 Nearest town (Alabama) Coffeeville Demopolis Eutaw Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Oak Grove Distance (miles) 3)within city) 6 15 Lock: Greatest length available for full width (feet) 600.0 600.0 600.0 450.0 600.0 600.0 Width of chamber (feet) 110 110 110 95 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 34 40 22 28 64 68 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13.0 13.0 13.2 12.0 13.0 14.0 Character of foundation Rock Rock Sand, clay Hard shale Shale, Sandstone sandstone Kind of spillway Fixed-Gated Fixed Gated Fixed Gated Gated Type construction Lock Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Dam Concrete Concrete Earth- Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Year completed 1965 1962 1962 1940 1969 1985 Year opened to navigation 1960 1954 1957 1939 1966 1975 Actual cost of lock and dam $21,597,2643 $19,774,5833 $13,295,553 $54 ,450,874 $28,100,0003 $49,828,6724 I. Single lift lock. 4. Cost to date (FY 84) for replacement of single lift lock which 2. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, was essentially completed in FY 80. Excludes $1,435,636 cost of land Al. submerged, damage to structures, and cost of spillway. Also 3. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. excludes $3,824,859 cost of original double lift lock. TABLE 10-D RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 23 of Text) Cost During Proect Date of Survey Fiscal Year Biloxi Harbor, MS Blackwater River, FL Cadet Bayou, MS Carrabelle, FL Dauphin Island, AL Escambia and Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL Fly Creek, AL Fowl River, AL LaGrange Bayou, FL Panacea Harbor, FL Pascagoula River, MS Pass Christian, MS Pensacola Harbor, FL Port St. Joe Harbor, FL St. Marks River, FL Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS June, 1984 July, 1984 August, 1984 February, 1984 March, 1984 August, 1984 March, 1984 March, 1984 January, 1984 August, 1984 June, 1984 September, 1984 May, 1984 August, 1984 August, 1984 September, 1984 Total 10-37 152 14,585 9,718 3,360 9,552 24,982 544 2,543 3,058 5,644 25 14,656 5,778 8,400 2,744 997 $106,738 TABLE 10-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 24 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Blackwater River, Fl. 1981 $41,650 $266,368 Bluff Creek, Ms.' 1963 1,000 6,883 Bon Secour River, AI.2 1979 118,615 148,586 Cahaba River, A1.2 1894 45,000 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, Fl. 1979 481,627 379,413 Choctawhatchee River, Fl. and Al. 1973 171,885 291,694 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, Al. and Fl. 1981 208,499 1,092,223 Holmes Creek, Fl. 1931 8,562 36,800 LaGrange Bayou, Fl. 1972 289,496 78,974 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, Ms.2 1919 23,090 42,676 Noxubee River, Ms.' 1902 47,528 14,472 Ochlockonee (Ochlockney) River, Ga. and Fl.I 2 1900 5,000 Old Town Creek, Ms.' 2 1887 3,000 Oostanaula and Coosawattee River, Ga.' 2 1907 32,656 Panacea Harbor, Fl. 1979 122,383 92,352 Pascagoula River, Ms. 1956 15,000 Pass 179,535 Christian Harbor, Ms. 1976 59,313 139,653 St. Marks River, Fl. 1965 1,710,809 84,115 Tallapoosa River, Al.2 1893 43,972 Upper Chipola River, Fl., from Marianna to its mouth' 2 1941 36,781 63,193 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, Ms. 1979 29,195 481,515 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 96-157, Ist Session. 2. Uncompleted portion of project deauthorized by H. Doc. TABLE 10-F NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 25 of Text) Study Fiscal Year Authority 1984 Costs Bayou Cumbest, Jackson County, MS 107 $21,162 Biloxi Harbor, East Harrison County Canal, MS 107 14,354 Carrabelle Harbor, FL 107 19,935 Dog River Channel, AL 107 12,430 East Point, FL 107 17,616 Epes Harbor, Tombigbee River, AL 107 54 Lake Krebs, MS 107 22 Old Pass Lagoon, FL 107 2,355 Shell Point, Wakulla County, FL 107 27,949 Boggy Bayou Shoreline, Valparaiso, FL 103 34,162 Liza Jackson State Park, Ft. Walton, FL 103 5,457 Total $155,4961 1. Excludes construction costs of $1SI,064,748 for East Point $18,082 contributed funds under Section 107 authority. Break-water, FL; and $199,016 for Lake Krebs, MS including 10-38 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-G OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Section 26 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Harrison County, Ms., shore protection' 1953 51,133,000 I. Completed. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. TABLE 10-H DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 27 of Text) Year of Last Deauthorization Date Project Type Full Report Document' Deauthorized Bayou Galere, Miss. Navigation 1946 H. Doc. 192, 94th Cong., 5 Aug. 1977 1st Seas., as amended. 1. H. Doc. 96-157 deauthorized uncompleted portions of certain projects as shown in Table 10-E. TABLE 10-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Fll Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Alabama River at Montgomery, Al.' Armuchee Creek, Ga. Beaver Creek, Montezuma, Ga. Black Creek, Gadsden, Al. Clanton, Al. Collinsville, Al. Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties, Ms. Jackson and East Jackson, Ms. Lake Douglas, Decatur County, Ga. Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Al. Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, Al. Prattville, Autauga Creek, Al. Rome, Coosa River, Ga. Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Ms. Tombigbee River, Ms. and Al. Town Creek, Americus, Ga. Trussville, Al. West Point, Chattahoochee River, Ga. Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, Ga. 1. Engineering, design, supervision, and administration struction (no con- work has been done. Includes $17,000 for preauthorization studies. 1965 1966 1958 1953 1964 1940 1982 1979 1970 1965 1980 1946 1955 1956 1982 1965 1965 1955 1966 $144,194 115,547 149,815 125,389 274,024 71,119 238,219 7,190,200 164,998 113,849 190,974 649,280 384,550 142,637 134,801 340,409 141,334 599,637 330,734 .2 .2 .2 .2 .22 ..2 .2 .2 .-22 -2 -2 1,226,086 -2 -2 -2 -2 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 10-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 38 of Text) Study Authority Fiscal Year Costs Bayou Sara, Saraland, AL 205 Cnbbs Mill Creek, $20,731 Tuscaloosa, AL 205 113,026 Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL 205 37,106 Gap Creek and Cinco Bayou, Okaloosa Co., FL 205 1,110 Greens Creek, Petal, MS 205 79,381 Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS 205 21,209 Magby Creek, Columbus, MS 205 7,432 Mill Creek, Dalton, GA 205 41,972 Murder Creek, Brewton, AL 205 10,439 Orange Grove Community, MS 205 72,963 Sellers Creek, Mendenhall, MS 205 6,047 Silver Creek. Rome, GA 205 64,474 Sope Creek, Marietta, GA 205 9,921 Upper Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS 205 106,547 Utoy Creek, Atlanta, GA 205 7,118 Hwy. 39 Bridge, Tombigbee River, AL 14 7,469 Sewerline Protection, Valley, AL 14 8,516 Airport Road Bridge, 20 Mile Creek, MS 14 19,691 Old Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS 14 18,564 Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Noxubee Co., MS 14 10,341 U.S. Hwy. 45 Bridge, Wolf Creek, MS 14 15,430 Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL 208 13,624 Total $693, 1111 10-40 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-K ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Sections 39 and 40 of Text) Claiborne Millers Ferry Robert F. Henry Carters Allatoona Proposed Structures Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lake Dam3 Dam Miles above mouth of river 81.1' 42.2' 245.4' 26.82 47.84 Nearest town Claiborne, Ala. Camden, Ala. Benton, Ala. Carters, Ga. Cartersville, Ga Distance (miles) 7 10 3 2 4 Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 Width of lock chamber (feet) 84 84 84 Maximum lift (feet) 30 48 47 Elevation of normal pool surface (mean sea level) 35 80 125 1072 Varies seasonally Depth over sills at low water 13 upper 15 Upper 15 - (feet) Lower 13 Lower 12 Character of foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Gated and Gated Gated Gated Gated Fixed Crest Height of dam (feet) 95.5 99.5 94 451 190 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Rock-fill Concrete Earth Core Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) 96,360 331,800 234,200 472,800 670,050 Power development (kw) - 75,00,000 000 500,000 74,000 Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 Cost to date:s 527,997,450 $63,031,925 $83,347,857 $111,139,474 $35,636,024 I. Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). 3. Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 4. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). 5. Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 10-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 10-L APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., GA., AND FLA., LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 41 of Text) Existing Projects Authorized Projects Jim George W. Walter F. Buford Dam Lower Woodruff Andrews George Lake Aucbhumpkee Lazer Spewrell Lock Lock Lock West Point Sidney Creek Creek Bluff Miles above mouth 107.61 46.52 750020 1 42 348 32 7 3433 255, 2638 Nearest town Distance (miles) Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) Maximum lift (feet) Elevation of normal pool surface (msl) Depth over sills at low water (feet) Character of foundation Kind of spillway Height of dam (feet) Type of construction Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) Power development (kilowatts) Percent complete Chattahoochee, Fl. I 450 82 33 77 14 Limestone Fixed--gated 67 Concrete and Earth 367.300 30.000 100 Year opened to navigation 1954 Estimated cost: Cost to date:4 Columbia, Al. Ft. Gaines. Ga. I 2 450 450 82 25 102 13 Limestone Fixed-gated 62 Concrete 18,180 100 1962 82 88 190(Summer) 185(Winter) 13 Limestone Gated 114 Concrete and Earth 934.400 130,000 100 1963 West Point. Ga. 2.8 635(Summer) 625(Winter) Rock Gated 95 Concrete and Earth 604,500 73.875 100 Buford, Ga. Roberta. Ga. Ga. 5 7 1070 417 Rock Rock Fixed Gated 192 130 Earth Concrete and Earth 2.554.000 548,000 86.000 81.000 Thomaston, Ga. 8 543 Rock Gated 142 Concrete and Earth 342,000 87.000 Manchester, Ga. 8 700 Rock Gated 180 Concrete and Earth 486,200 150,000 100 $47.974,448 $13.038,427 593,955,796 $131.499,928 $53,027,018 $222.000,000 5258,000,000 $360,000,000 $2,158.652 1. Above the mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). 3. Above mouth of Flint River (river miles). 4. Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 5. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge. 10-42 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-M COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1979 THRU FY 1984' (See Section 44 of Text) Date Federal Study Requesting Agency Completed Cost FInlosuorndce-- Sudie Flood Insurance Studies Kennesaw, Georgia Powder Springs, Georgia Montgomery, Alabama Fulton Co., Georgia Montgomery Co., Alabama Roanoke, Alabama Wedowee, Alabama Heflin, Alabama Randolph County, Alabama Hobson City, Alabama Oxford, Alabama Weaver, Alabama Flood Insurance Studies Anniston, Alabama Calhoun County, Alabama Cave Springs, Georgia Spedal Flood Hazard Information Chattahoochee River, Walter F. George to West Pt. Dam, Ga. Mulberry Fork and Cane Creek, Ala. Coldwater Creek, Ala. Yellowjacket Creek & Hogansville Branch, Ga. Dowling Branch, Ala. Gum Creek, Ga. Choctawhatchee River, Fla. Chattahoochee River, Supplefor Buford to Whitesburg Report Oothcalooga Creek Canton Creek, Ga. Oktasasi Creek, Ala. Cordele Creek & Malcolm Branch, Ga. Hull Branch, MS Percosin Creek & Tribs., GA I. For list of reports completed by Mobile Di thru FY 1974, see FY 1974 Annual Report, pa complted in FY 1975 see FY 1975 Annual Repor (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) FEMA FEMA FEMA Lower Chattahoochee Area Planning and Development Commission Birmingham Regional Planning Commission Coldwater United Methodist Church City of Hogansville, Ga. City of Hartford, Ala. Housing Authority, Cordele, Ga. Board of County Commissioners Holmes County, Fla. Atlanta Reg. Planning Commission Gordon Co., GA Board of Commissioners City of Canton, Ga. Alexander City, Ala. City of Cordele, Ga. East Central Planning and Development District City of Albany, GA istrict for FY 1965 ige 10-50; reports t, page 10-44; and Jan 79 Jan 79 Feb 79 Sep 79 Apr 80 Feb 81 Feb 81 Mar 81 Mar 81 Sep 81 Sep 81 Sep 81 Apr 82 Apr 82 Jan 84 Apr 79 July 79 July 79 July 79 Jan 80 Sep 80 Jan 81 Mar 82 Jun 82 Dec 82 Jan 83 May 83 Jun 84 Nov 84 4,100 5,500 186,500 209,000 104,600 19,400 21,900 20,700 34,400 14,200 30,000 6,400 80,900 61,200 22,500 133,000 50,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 10,000 3,000 3,000 4,000 7,000 14,000 for reports completed in FY 1976 and FY 1977, see FY 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. See page 10-48 FY 1978 Annual Report for FY 1978 reports. 10-43 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT * District comprises a portion of Louisiana, including dtinage area of Red River south of Fulton, AR, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River above mile 325.5 above Head of Passes, drainage area of Ouchita-Black River Basin, and small eastern and western portions of Louisiana tributary to Pearl River and Sabine River and Lake. It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth of Pearl River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the Mississippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood control work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 AHP to Gulf of Mexico; Atchafalaya River; and in Atchafalaya Basin; and maintenance of project navigation channel of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 AHP, under supervision of President, Mississippi River Commission (MRC), and Division Engineer, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA ......................... 11-2 2. Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, LA ............ 11-2 3. Barataria Bay Waterway, LA ........... 11-3 4. Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche- Jump Waterway, LA .................... 11-3 5. Bayou Teche, LA ...................... 11-4 6. Calcasieu River and Pass, LA ............ 11-5 7. Freshwater Bayou, LA ................. 11-6 8. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.) ............. 11-6 9. Houma Navigation Canal, LA ........... 11-9 10. Leland Bowman Lock, LA (Replacement of Lock) (Formerly Vermilion Lock, LA .......... 11-9 11. Mermentau River, LA ................. 11-10 12. Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA .................. 11-10 13. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA ....... 11-12 14. Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA ........... .............. 11-13 15. Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA ......... 11-13 16. Tangipahoa River, LA .................. 11-13 17. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA .................... 11-14 18. Navigation work under special authorization .................. 11-14 Flood Control Page 19. Grand Isle & vicinity, LA ............... 11-14 20. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA, (hurricane protection) ............. 11-15 21. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (hurricane protection) ................. 11-16 22. McKinney Bayou, AR and TX ............ 11-17 23. Morgan City and vicinity, LA (hurricane protection) ................... 11-17 24. New Orleans to Venice, LA, (hurricane protection) ................. 11-18 25. Inspection of completed flood control projects ....................... 11-19 26. Flood control work under special authorization ....................... 11-19 General Investivations 27. Active Investigations .................. 11-19 Tables Table 11-A Table 11-B Table 11-C Table 11-D Table 11-E Table 11-F Table 11-G Cost and Financial Statement .... 11-20 Authorizing Legislation ......... 11-23 Bayou Teche, LA, Locks .......... 11-27 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.)-Locks ................... 11-28 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......................... 11-30 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............... 11-31 Active General Investigations .... 11-33 11-1 __ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM, LA Location. Lakes and streams in State of Louisiana. Existing project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growth from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, in combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures. The modification of the 1965 Act provides for comprehensive program for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious plant growths from navigable waterways, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures. Research and planning costs undertaken pursuant to 1965 Act shall be borne fully by the United States and shall not be included in costs to be shared by local interests. Local cooperation. Local interests must hold and save the United States free from claims and participate in project to extent of 30 percent of cost of operations. State of Louisiana, Office of Public Works, and Louisiana Department of Wild Life and Fisheries furnished a joint assurance of local cooperation, which was approved Apr. 29 and accepted May 4, 1959. Under provisions of continuing contract, local agencies are performing work in kind, exceeding 30 percent of cost of program. The State treated 47,602 acres in FY 84. Operations and results during fiscal year. Combined efforts by Corps of Engineers crews and crews of the State of Louisiana, Department of Wild Life and Fisheries, continued against aquatic vegetation problems throughout the State. Water-hyacinth control maintenance requires work in all areas, and waterhyacinth persists as the most serious aquatic pest. Control maintenance by the Corps of cleared areas continued in the Mermentau River, Bayou Lacassine, Bayou Queue de Tortue, in the Bayou Teche Basin south of U.S. Highway 190, including the lakes west of the Atchafalaya Floodway, in the feeder areas of the Port Allen-Morgan City Route of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, and in the feeder areas to the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in Coastal Louisiana. Louisiana Department of Wild Life and Fisheries maintenance crews continued efforts in the major lakes and streams of north Louisiana, in the Atchafalaya Floodway, in the Louisiana portion of the Toledo Bend Reservoir, and the Pearl River Basin within Louisiana. During the fiscal year, 18,743 acres of water-hyacinths were'de. stroyed in the State of Louisiana under this funding. Louisiana Department of Wild Life and Fisheries crews destroyed 9,125 acres and Corps of Engineers crews destroyed 9,618 acres primarily by herbicide treat. ment. The alligatorweed flea beetle (Agasicles hygr phila) population has increased to the point that they are again exercising significant control of this plant in many areas of the state. In addition, the stem boring moth (Vogtia malloi) has spread to such an extent that it is found associated with alligatorweed in all locations. The water-hyacinth weevils (Neochetina eichhorniae and Neochetina bruchi) have been spread throughout all areas of the state that water-hyacinth infest and adult feeding scars are more prevalent everywhere, Submersed weed problems in Toledo Bend Reservoir have reached serious proportions and Caddo Lake is also experiencing interference with boating and fishing. Hydrilla verticillata, an introduced exotic submersed weed species, continues to spread along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and poses a threat to water-related activities. Condition as of Sep. 30. Operations under 1958 River and Harbor Act, initiated May 1959, are complete. Operations under 1965 Act were initiated in FY 1968. Waterways are being cleared, then maintained as required. 2. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, LA. Location. The improvement is located in the parishes of Assumption, Terrebonne, and St. Mary, LA, in the vicinity of Morgan City, along Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, and the Lower Atchafalaya River to the Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to MRC alluvial maps, Morgan City, Belle Isle, and Point au Fer quadrangles, NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11351 and 11355 of Intracoastal Waterway, and Coast Chart No. 11354 for the Atchafalaya River system.) Existing project. Provides for enlargement and extension of project, Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to the Gulf of Mexico, LA, to obtain navigation channels 20 feet deep over a bottom width of 400 feet from vicinity of U.S. Highway 90 crossing over Bayou Boeuf to the Gulf of Mexico via Bayou Boeuf, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Bayou Chene, Avoca Island Cutoff, the lower Atchafalaya River, Atchafalaya Bay to the Gulf of Mexico, and from near U.S. Highway 90 to Bayou Chene via Bayou Black and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The 400-foot channel extends into the Gulf of Mexico to the 20-foot contour, and the width in Bayou Boeuf would be reduced to 300 feet where necessary because of industrial development on both sides of the bayou. Estimated cost for new work (October 1984) is $30,850,000 Federal and $2,000,000 non-Federal, including $1,000,000 contributed funds In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $220,000. 11-2 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT A s1 cooperation. For details see page 11-3, Annual jotfor FY 1980. igring Agency: Morgan City Harbor and Terminal sic assurance was approved on behalf of United t on Dec. 10, 1973, and amended assurance con- Tping the applicable provisions of Public Law 91-646 id Public Law 91-611 was approved on behalf of IUnited States on Feb. 25, 1974. an effort to expedite the project, local interests 4 accomplished the surveys, soil borings, testing, ,i Ithe basic mapping at an estimated cost of $250,000, Which they will not be reimbursed. As a convenience tocal interests and to avoid confusion in 25 percent lad 75 percent acquisition cost, the New Orleans iict agreed to acquire all lands, with local interests qbursing the Government for their 25 percent portion. An escrow agreement has been executed tween the local interests and the Government, wherethey will advance funds in a sufficient amount to provide for their portion of the acquisition and diking iht. To date original advance of $518,000 has been lithdrawn; however, local interests will be required to deposit in escrow an additional $456,000. Right-of-way Is 66 percent (3,034 acres) acquired with 1,549 acres left to be acquired. Morgan City Harbor and Terminal District appears reluctant to complete acquisition in accordance with the Act of Assurance. It had asked the Government to invoke the Navigation Servitude pro- Vision of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, thereby requiring no additional right-of-way costs. The Government feels the Navigation Servitude is not applicable to the right-of-way left to be acquired. Terminal facilities. Two large and three small public wharves at Morgan City are open for use by all without charge. In addition, there are numerous privately owned facilities on both banks of the lower Atchafalaya River in Morgan City and Berwick, LA, and along Bayou Boeuf and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. abrication and repair facilities are located on Bayous Boeuf and Black. Adequate acreage is available for expansion of existing terminals and construction of hew terminals along Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Public and private terminals in the project area are adequately connected with rail, water, and highway transportation facilities. So additional public wharves are required. SOperations and results during fiscal year. Two contracts for maintenance dredging of the bar and bar Channel, were completed with the removal of 10,210,809 cbic yards of material. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated oh the Atchafalaya Bay and gulf reach in April 1974. The project is 100 percent complete. 3. BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA Location. In Jefferson Parish, LA, and extends about 37 miles southerly from junction of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and Bayou Barataria near Lafitte Post Office. From its origin it extends southerly through Bay Barataria, Bayou Dupont, a land cut (known as Dupre Cut) through marsh area, Bayou Cutler, Bayou St. Denis, and Barataria Bay to east end of Bayou Rigaud. At its southerly terminus it also connects with Barataria Pass and through that pass with the Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11352, 11340, and 11535 and Geological Survey quadrangles, Barataria, Bay Dogris, Wilkinson Bay, and Barataria Pass.) Previous project. For details see page 562 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A channel about 37 miles long with a 12-foot depth and 125-foot width from its beginning at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Grand Isle, LA, following route of previous project to mile 15.5 in Bayou St. Denis; thence by a relocated channel along western shore of Barataria Bay and through Barataria Pass to 12-foot-depth contour in the gulf, with an extension of project to include westerly 4.3 miles of Bayou Rigaud. Normal range of tide is 30 inches at mouth and 6 inches at head. Elevation of water surface near mouth, due to hurricanes, has been over 6 feet. Existing project was completed at a cost of $1,499,648. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 563, Annual Report FY 1963. Terminal facilities. Six privately-owned wharves at Lafitte; three privately owned facilities at Grand Isle; and wharfage in Bayou Rigaud at Grand Isle constructed by shrimping industry are available to all boats without charge. About 7 miles below Lafitte there is a large oil terminal for transferring production of Lafitte field to barges. Adjacent to Bayou Barataria and along Bayou Rigaud adequate sites are available for future use. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and water quality studies. Maintenance by contract: Dredging under two contracts included removing 2,114,256 cubic yards from mile 14.5 to mile 2.5 and 1,176,713 cubic yards from Bayou Rigaud and bar channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in May 1960 and completed in November 1963. 4. BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE-JUMP WATERWAY, LA Location. Prior to 1902, Bayou Lafourche was an outlet of Mississippi River, its head being at Donaldsonville, LA, 80 miles above New Orleans. It flows southerly 107 miles to Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340 and 11357; MRC alluvial valley maps; Donaldsonville, White Castle, Napoleonville. Thibodaux, and Lac des Allemands quadrangles; and Geological Survey maps, Houma, Cutoff, Lake Felicity, Mink Bayou, Leeville, and Belle Pass quadrangles.) 11-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Previous projects. For details see page 564 of 1963 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for permanent closure of head of bayou without a lock, a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Canal Boulevard in Thibodaux to Lockport, and from Larose to Gulf of Mexico with a jettied entrance at Belle Pass, and the closure of Pass Fourchon. These improvements are about 50.5 miles long, and the modification of Jul. 14, 1960, provides for an additional 66 miles of improvement as follows: a 12-by 125-foot channel, extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at mile 37.2 west of Harvey Lock to enter Bayou Lafourche below highway bridge at Leeville at about mile 12; a 12- by 125-foot channel in Bayou Lafourche from point of junction with proposed 12- by 125-foot channel to 12-foot-depth contour in gulf; modification and extension of existing jetties from 6-by 12-foot contour, if found advisable to reduce maintenance dredging in the gulf; and a channel 9 by 100 feet in Bayou Lafourche from Leeville to jicinity of lower limits of Golden Meadow; and a 12- by 125-foot channel from Bayou Lafourche at Leeville from point where auxiliary channel connects with Bayou Lafourche through Southwestern Louisiana Canal to and through Bayou Rigaud to connect with enlargement of Bayou Rigaud recommended under project "Barataria Bay Waterway, LA." Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth and 3 inches at head; from severe rains, 3 to 10 feet at head; from hurricanes, up to 10 feet at mouth. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $10,500,000 Federal and $6,050,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $43,000. Excavation of a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Thibodaux to Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Lockport is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion (July 1974) is $733,000. Local cooperation. Original assurances received and accepted on all items of work in the project. Provisions of Public Law 91-611 are not applicable; however, provisions of Public Law 91-646 are applicable. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been executed by the Jefferson Parish Council and Lafourche Parish Police Jury; however, the Louisiana Office of Public Works has not executed supplemental assurances. Golden Meadow to gulf: Local agency has acquired all rights-of-way and furnished rights-of-entry. Leeville to Grand Isle: No action is apparent on this stretch by either the Lafourche Parish Police Jury, the Jefferson Parish Council, the local assurers, or the State of Louisiana, Office of Public Works. Rights-ofway are not available due to multiplicity and other complications of ownership. The "Jump" portion of the project was classified as inactive on May 4, 1977. The Jefferson Parish Council and the Lafourche Parish Police Jury were requested to provide information as to whether they still favor construction on this part. If reactivation is favored, it should be with the understanding that they would have to provide required rights-of-way when requested. The Greater Lafourche Port Commission stated that they may provide assurances for that portion of the project located in Lafourche Parish. These assurances were forwarded to the Greater Lafourche Port Commission on Jan 22, 1979. On Mar. 9, 1979, we requested information as to the status of their execution of the assurances. The Greater Lafourche Port Commission appears to be reluctant to execute the required assurances. Terminal facilities. There are numerous private warehouses, wharves, and stiff-leg derricks for handling cane along bayou. At Lockport, Barker Barge Line has a barge wharf with covered shed, and Southern Pacific Railroad maintains a large wharf with covered shed. At Golden Meadow each of the seafood canneries has docking facilities suitable for its needs. Four oil companies have docks at Leeville for transferring production of Leeville oil fields to barges. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project is in deferred category. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of existing projects was initiated in FY 1939 and is 10 percent complete. Dredging between Larose, LA, and Gulf of Mexico was completed in 1939, and that segment between Lockport and Napoleonville, LA, is in an inactive status due to lack of right-of-way and spoil area. Jetties at mouth of Belle Pass were completed in 1939, and later damaged by storm action, which required placement of additional stone adjacent to both sides of steel sheet pile jetties in 1940, and repair and extension of jetties in 1941. During FY 1948, stone jetties were repaired and extended inland about 700 feet from shoreline; and steel sheet pile section was strengthened for about 250 feet gulfward of stone jetties, by placement of stone on both gulf and bayou sides. On May 31, 1949, an automatic tide gage for recording hurricane and storm tides was installed. Modification of Jul. 14, 1960, was initiated in February 1963 and is 10 percent complete, with 12- by 125-foot channel completed in September 1963 from Leeville to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico, the 9- by 100-foot channel completed in August 1966 from Golden Meadow to Leeville, and the 9- by 100-foot channel from Golden Meadow to Leeville completed in August 1966. The Greater Lafourche Port Commission requested, and was granted, a permit to dredge a new channel 20 by 300 feet wide west of the existing channel from mile 0.76 in Bayou Lafourche to the 20-foot depth in the gulf, and to close the existing jettied channel after completion of the new channel. This work was cornpleted in March 1968 and the Port Commission must maintain the channel at no less than 12 by 125 feet. 5. BAYOU TECHE, LA. Location. Has its source in Bayou Courtableau, in St. Landry Parish, flow southeasterly for 125 miles, and joins lower Atchafalaya River about 10.5 miles 11-4 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Morgan City, LA (Refer to NOAA Sailing Chart , and MRC alluvial valley maps, and Palmetto, 18sas, Carencro, Arnaudville, St. Martinville, . tville, Derouen, Jeanerette, Foster, and Belle padrangles.) :evious projects. For details see page 569, 1963 Ananal Report. 4sti'ng project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep feet wide on the bottom from mouth of stream to K Iberia, LA, mile 54.5, thence 6 feet deep and 60 feqwide on the bottom to Keystone Lock, 18 miles, and tht*e feet deep and 50 feet wide on the bottom from Keystone Lock to Arnaudville, LA, 34 miles, to be secured by dredging, removing snags and overhanging tres,and construction of a lock and dam and regulating works.(See Table 11-C on Keystone Lock.) Raising pool level by 1.5 feet above Keystone Dam by inllation of a fixed crest spillway on dam is provided fbin flood control project for Bayou Teche and Vnlion River, LA. Under project, flood control, Ehsippi River and tributaries, East and West Clinet floodgates, with a width of 45 feet and sill elevation of minus 9.02 feet, mean low gulf level, were (cOtructed in Bayou Teche at east and west approaches WtNWax Lake Outlet from February 1949 to September 19, and a lock was constructed in lower Atchafalaya Ri er in vicinity of Berwick, LA, from November 1948 .to September 1951. (See Table 11-C on Berwick Lock.) Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth; 4 inches just below Keystone Lock; extreme, 12 inches at mouth; 6 inches just below Keystone Lock; and zero above lock; due to freshets 4 to 5 feet at mouth; 12 to 15 feet just below Keystone Lock, and 2 to 7 feet above Keystone Lock. Estimated cost for new work (1954) is $1,080,000, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects and estimated cost (1954), $371,400 for widening and deepening channel between miles 50.06 and 72, Key- Stone Lock and Dam, which is inactive. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details epage 687, Annual Report FY 1944. Terminal facilities. Small, privately-owned wharves art available at all towns along bayou; public landing is permitted without charge. There are privatelyowned terminals for transferring crude oil to barges near towns of Charenton, Jeanerette, Oliver, and St. Matinville. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal labor year. Hired continued operation and maintenance of Keystone Lock and facilities, condition and operation studies, and stream gaging. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in 1891 and completed July 1928, except widening hannel to bottom width of 80 feet from mile 50.06 to .wIb eria, and to bottom width of 60 feet from New 'uera to Keystone Lock, which is inactive. For further etals see Annual Report for 1966. 6. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA Location. Calcasieu River has its source in southwestern Louisiana, and flows southerly to the gulf. About 25 miles from the gulf it debouches into Calcasieu Lake, which is about 18 miles long. Connection between lake and gulf, about 7 miles long, is known as Calcasieu Pass. (See Geological Survey maps, Edna, Thompson Bluff, Hecker, Moss Bluff, Lake Charles, West Lake, Moss Lake, Hackberry, Sweet Lake, Brown's Lake, Holly Beach, Grand Bayou, and Cameron quadrangles; and NOAA Small-Craft Charts Nos. 11341 and 11348 of Intracoastal Waterway and NOAA Small-Craft Chart No. 11347 of Calcasieu River and Lake.) Previous project. For details see 1936 and 1938 Annual Reports, pages 719 and 819, respectively. Existing project. Provides for a channel 40 by 400 feet (35.9 miles long) from Lake Charles to sea end of jetties in Gulf of Mexico; an approach channel 42 by 800 feet from sea end of jetties to 42 feet deep in the gulf; extension of 35- by 250-foot channel from its present upsteam limit at mile 34 to vicinity of U.S. Highway 90 Bridge (mile 36.2); a 750- by 1,000-foot turning basin at upper end with a 35-foot depth; improvement of river from Lake Charles to Phillips Bluff (52.6 miles) by removing logs, snags, overhanging trees, and by dredging; maintenance of existing 12- by 200-foot channel in old channel of Calcasieu River at Cameron, LA, which connects with project at mile 2.25; and reconstruction and extension of existing jetties initially to seaward end of east jetty, and further extension to 15-foot-depth contour if found advisable to reduce maintenance dredging costs. Improvement is 113.6 miles long. Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth, diminishing to zero at Phillips Bluff; extremes range from 14 inches to zero. Estimated cost for new work (July 1975) is $19,518,000 Federal, and $1,409,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $404,700. Local cooperation. Local interest furnished all rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas for completed features. For construction and future maintenance of modification authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, local interests must furnish lands, rights-of-ways, and spoil-disposal areas; alter pipelines, cables, wharves, oil wells, and any other facilities and hold and save the United States free from damages. Assurances were accepted and right-of-entry was furnished for the modification. The local agency is presently finalizing transfer to the United States of the few remaining tracts with acceptable title evidence. Assurance Agency: Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District. Terminal facilities. Facilities at Port of Lake Charles are owned by Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District and operated by a board of commissioners. In addition to municipally-owned terminals, there are several privately-owned and operated wharf structures 11-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 on existing ship channel. (For further details, see Port Series No. 19, vol. 1, "Port St. Joe, FL, Pensacola, FL, Baton Rouge, LA, Panama City, FL, Pascagoula, MS, Lake Charles, LA, Gulfport, MS," revised 1957, and Folio of Navigation Maps Intracoastal Waterway, New Orleans to Port Arthur, 1968, 13th edition, published by the MRC.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued operation and maintenance of the saltwater barrier, stream gaging, and condition and operation studies. Maintenance by contract: Dredging under three contracts included removing from the channel 13,612,747 cubic yards and 5,200,000 cubic yards of material from mile 22.1 to mile 36.0. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction under the existing project was initiated in FY 1939 and completed October 1968, except extension of the jetties to 15-footdepth contour, which has been deferred until found advisable to accomplish same. Construction of modifications, described in Table 11-B, was as follows: Work authorized by Mar. 2, 1945, R&H Act was initiated in September 1948 and completed in June 1949; Work authorized by Jul. 24, 1946, FC Act was initiated in September 1948 and completed in April 1953; and Work authorized by Jul. 14, 1960, R&H Act was initiated in April 1962 and completed in October 1968. A turning basin or ship anchorage for vessels using waterway was constructed from April to June 1952, between St. Johns Island and vicinity of Cameron, LA, about 1.1 miles. Calcasieu Pass jetties, initiated under previous project and completed in May 1942, extended to 10-foot-depth contour. East jetty about 8,620 feet long, was built to about 6 feet above mean low gulf and extends seaward from existing gulf shoreline for 6,820 feet. West jetty, 8,050 feet long was built to about 4 feet above mean low gulf and extends seaward from existing gulf shoreline for 6,795 feet. 7. FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA Location. In Vermilion Parish, LA, between Atchafalaya and Calcasieu Rivers, from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 161.2 west of Harvey Lock, to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico near Freshwater Bayou. Waterway is routed 22.6 miles along Schooner Bayou Cutoff, Schooner Bayou, Six Mile Canal, Belle Isle Canal, and Freshwater Bayou. (Refer to NOAA Small- Craft Chart No. 11350 of Intracoastal Waterway.) Existing project. Provides for dredging a new 12-by 125-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 161.2 west of Harvey Lock, to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico near Freshwater Bayou, construction of an 84- by 600-foot lock with a depth of 16 feet over sill near Gulf of Mexico; and construction of jetties from shoreline to 6-foot-depth contour in Gulf of Mexico, if maintenance dredging of channel without jetties proves to be more expensive than construction and maintenance of jetties. Until such determination has been made, offshore channel should be dredged and maintained to provide a 12- by 250-foot channel. In event jetties are provided, offshore section should then be maintained to 12- by 125-foot project in jettied reach, and 250 feet beyond. Existing project was completed in 1968, except for construction of jetties at a later date, if necessary. Estimated cost of construction of jetties (July 1971) is $3,118,100. Estimated total Federal cost is $10,400,000 (1971) and the total non-Federal cost for the existing project is $171,000. In addition, the Coast Guard is to provide navigational aids at an estimated cost of $19,100. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 649, Annual Report FY 1962. Terminal facilities. Extensive public and private terminal and transfer facilities do not exist in area, and none would be required for improved channel. Private terminals exist at site of oil and gas operations in area and sufficient private and public wharf facilties are along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and its connecting waterways. Sites are available along proposed improve ment for construction of any additional private and public terminals that might be required for utilization of channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and ordinary repairs to lock, condition and operation studies, reconnaissance surveys, water quality studies, and channel patrol. Conditions as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated April 1963 and completed August 1968, except for construction of jetties at a later date, if required to reduce the cost of maintenance dredging. 8. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (NEW ORLEANS DIST.) Location. Section of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway within New Orleans District extends from Lake Borgne Light 29 near mouth of Rigolets, to Sabine River, LA, and TX. Section from Lake Borgne Light 29 to Mississippi River follows Rigolets and Lake Pontchartrainto lake end of State-owned Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, thence via this canal to Mississippi River, a distance of 40.5 miles. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., modified project to provide for a land cut through marsh from Rigolets to a point on Inner Harbor Navi gation Canal about 22.5 miles from Mississippi River, eliminating passage through Lake Pontchartrain and five drawbridges, a distance of 30.8 miles to Mississippi River by this route. From Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to entrance of Harvey Lock, route follows Mississippi River for 5.5 miles. Section from Mississipp! River to Atchafalaya River, LA, leaves MississipP' River through Harvey Lock about 3.3 miles above Canal Street and follows Harvey Canal No. 1 and Bayou Barataria to Bayou Villars, a land cut south of Lake Salvador to Harvey Canal No. 2, Harvey Canal 11-6 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT to Larose, LA, and a land cut to Houma, LA, 1 over a land cut south of Bayous Black and rie, thence through Bayou Cocodrie and a land cut to Bayou Black; thence through Bayous Black, Qtlne, and Boeuf to Atchafalaya River, about 0.5 mile ufof Morgan City, LA, a total of 95.5 miles. Alternat{ connection with Mississippi River near Algiers, A#bout 10.3 miles below Harvey Lock, consisting of ab'ck and land cut about 9 miles long intersecting iaoastal Waterway at about mile 6 is complete. An .. rnative route from Mississippi River follows Bayou quemine passing Indian Village, LA, and continuing on through lower Grand River to and through a lock at B ou Sorrel in East Atchafalaya Basin protection levee, thence through levee borrow pit to Berwick Bay; and thence through Berwick Bay to Morgan City, LA, ,A ttal of 56 miles. This alternative route was enlarged .fn vicinity of Morgan City to Indian Village, LA, e*xtended from Indian Village, LA, through Bayou Q~ Tete and a new land cut to and through a new inal lock and entrance channel to Mississippi Me~near Port Allen, LA, a total of 65 miles. Section omAtchafalaya River to Vermilion River, LA, begins a western end of Mississippi-Atchafalaya section and follows Atchafalaya River about 2.5 miles, portions of Little Wax Bayou, Possum Bayou, cutoffs, a land cut passing through North Bend Plantation to Bayou Bartholomew, Bayou Bartholomew to Little Bay, a land cut skirting north edge of Cote Blanche Island and west edge of Weeks Island to Vermilion River, about 24 miles below Abbeville, LA, a total of about 63.6 miles. Franklin Canal, St. Mary Parish, LA, extends southwesterly from Franklin, LA, on Bayou Teche, for 5.5 miles to Bayou Portage, a section of "The Inland Waterway from Franklin to the Mermentau River, LA," and through bayou for 0.75 mile to Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, 121 miles west of Harvey Lock. Section from Vermilion River to Mermentau River, LA, begins at western end of Atchafalaya-Vermilion section and follows Vermilion River 1.3 miles, a part of Schooner Bayou Cutoff canal, and a land cut running generally northwesterly to Mermentau River at a point about 0.5 mile above its entrance into Grand Lake and about 16 miles below town of Lake Arthur, LA, a total of about 42.7 miles. Vermilion Lock was constructed about 1.75 miles west of Vermilion River to prevent ingress of saltwater from Vermilion Bay. Section from Mermentau River to Calcasieu River, LA, begins at western end of Vermilion-Mermentau section and follows Mermentau River upstream for about 1.5 miles, a land cut running west-southwesterly to Lake Misere, ing north of lake and Bayou Misere, westerly to weet Lake, south and west of Sweet Lake, northesterly to Bayou Tete Bois, through Bayou Tete Bois, lack Bayou, and cutoffs to a point on Calcasieu River about 16.6 miles below city of Lake Charles, LA, a total of about 37.1 miles. Calcasieu Lock was constructed r intersection of Calcasieu River and Intracoastal 'aterway, mile 238 west of Harvey Lock, Calcasieu Parish, about 16.6 miles below Lake Charles, LA. ion from Calcasieu River to Sabine River, LA and T, begins at western end of Mermentau-Calcasieu section, and follows Calcasieu River upstream about 1.6 miles, a land cut running southwesterly 2.8 miles, thence west 22 miles to Sabine River at a point about 3 miles below Orange, TX, a total of about 27.1 miles. (Refer to MRC alluvial valley map and Rigolets, Chef Menteur, St. Bernard, New Orleans, Barataria, Baton Rouge, Grosse Tete, Chicot Lake, Foster, Napoleonville, Morgan City, Belle Isle, Bayou Sale, Jeanerette, and Derouen quadrangles; Geological Survey maps, Cutoff, Houma, Gibson, Abbeville, Forked Island, Grand Lake East, Grand Lake West, Lake Charles, Sulphur, and Orange quadrangles; and NOAA Small-Craft Charts of Intracoastal Waterway, gulf section, Galveston Bay, TX, to Waveland, MS) Previous projects. For details see page 544 of 1963 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for a waterway, within the district, from Lake Borgne to Sabine River by the following improvements; a channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from Mississippi River to Atchafalaya River, except in vicinity of Houma, miles 50.5 to 63.5, which is to be maintained at 12 by 125 feet; a channel 16 by 150 feet through bypass route around Houma, LA, miles 50.5 to 63.5, and through alternative connection in Mississippi River below Algiers, LA, about 9 miles long, a channel 16 by 200 feet from Atchafalaya River to Sabine River; a channel 12 by 150 feet in section between Lake Borgne Light 29 and New Orleans (via land cut through marsh and Inner Harbor Navigation Canal), 33.1 miles long; an alternative route 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide between Lake Borgne Light 29 and New Orleans (via Rigolets, Lake Pontchartrain, and Inner Harbor Navigation Canal), 40.5 miles long; a channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide for Plaquemine- Morgan City alternative route from Mississippi- Atchafalaya section of waterway, in vicinity of Morgan City, through lower Atchafalaya River (Berwick Bay) and borrow pit of East Atchafalaya protection levee to and through Bayou Sorrel Lock which was constructed under existing project "Flood Contol, Mississippi River and Tributaries," thence through Lower Grand River to Indian Village, and thence by way of Bayou Grosse Tete and a new land cut to and through a new terminal lock and entrance channel to Mississippi River near Port Allen, LA, opposite lower limit of Port Baton Rouge; a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Indian Village on Plaquemine-Morgan City alternative route through Bayou Plaquemine and Plaquemine Lock to Mississippi River at Plaquemine, LA, improvement of Franklin Canal as a connecting channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (mile 121) to Franklin, LA, to afford a channel 8 feet deep and generally 60 feet wide with a width of 100 feet in its upper 300 feet; and a saltwater guard lock (Calcasieu Lock) in waterway at mile 238 west of Harvey Lock. Project also provides for: widening at bends; passing places, mooring basins; locks or guard locks; such railroad bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary; purchase of pipeline dredge; construction and operation of new drainage canals and pumping facilities to restore parish drainage systems where intercepted; construction of movable 11-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 bridges at Missouri Pacific Railroad and State Highways 31 and 996 (in lieu of State Highway Bridge 31, a tunnel was constructed, and additional cost over estimated cost of bridge was borne by local interest); fixedtrestle bridges for crossing proposed landside drainage canals; lift bridges at Louisiana Highway 168, Port Allen, LA, at Texas & Pacific Railway, Port Allen, LA, and at Texas & Pacific Railway, Morley, LA; and for annual payments to Board of Commissioners of Port of New Orleans for use of a portion of Inner Harbor Navigation Canal. Length of waterway within district is 384.1 miles via northerly or Port Allen route, and 299.4 miles via southerly or Harvey Canal route. Normal range of tide, 10 inches; extreme range, 14 inches. A severe storm may cause a high tide of from 6 to 9 feet. Estimated cost for new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, is $157,833,827 Federal and $27,535,000 non-Federal, divided as follows; Algiers Lock and canal, completed June 1961, $15,895,924 Federal and $2,185,000 non-Federal; Plaquemine- Morgan City route, completed October 1963, $26,869,372 Federal and $2,250,000 non-Federal; and remainder of waterway (October 1980), $115,068,531 Federal and $23,100,000 non-Federal, including $73,700,000 Federal and $21,500,000 non-Federal for modification (authorized by Public Law 87-874), October 1962. In addition, the Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $32,000. Construction of bulkheads and jetties at Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur, LA, is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (1956) of this item is $440,000. Construction of a doubleleaf bascule, four-lane highway bridge provided for under this project has become unnecessary because portion of project over which bridge was to be constructed was incorporated in project "Mississippi River- Gulf Outlet" which provides for a larger bridge. Bayou Sorrel and Bayou Boeuf Locks were constructed and are being maintained and operated with "Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries" funds. Therefore, construction, maintenance, and operation costs are not included in approved estimates referred to heretofore. (See Table 11-D for locks on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in New Orleans District.) Local cooperation. Algiers Lock and Canal: All assurances required for construction were furnished. Local agency has failed to convey all fee and easement tracts with acceptable title evidence to the United States. However, authority has been received to accept the interests conveyed as best available from local agency with the understanding that the United States rely upon assurances of local cooperation should any claims against the United States occur as a result of failure of local agency to complete transfer of title. Plaquemine-Morgan City alternative route: All assurances required for construction were furnished. Title by United States has been acquired to all but 35 tracts, for which local agency failed to comply fully with curative requirements in title certificate. Authority was given to accept the tracts conveyed as best available from local interests and to rely upon assurances of local cooperation furnished by local agency should any claims against the United States occur as a result of failureof local agency to complete transfer of title. Louisiana Office of Public Works has furnished assurances for maintenance and improvement. Modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1962: Local interests must furnish lands, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas for enlargement and future maintenance of project, make alterations to utilities; construct, maintain, and operate all bridges desired in connection with bypass channel around Houma, LA, and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances were requested in April 1963; however, none of the 11 local agencies involved has furnished assurances requested. Main objection to participation is requirement that local interests be responsible for alteration of utilities. Replacement of Vermilion Lock: The Vermilion Parish Police Jury was requested to execute an Agreement of Local Cooperation on Oct. 26, 1972, agreeing to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the replacement lock and approach channels thereto, and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of the project, including erosion of the channel beyond the rights-of-way furnished for the replacement lock and the approach channels thereto and comply with the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Sec. 221 of Public Law 91-611. They furnished formal assurances covering all requirements of local cooperation, including Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646, on Mar. 19, 1975. These assurances were in the process of being accepted by the United States, when the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 was enacted authorizing the 110-foot-wide lock. The assurances were executed by the Police Jury on Dec. 6 1976, and were accepted by the District Engineer on behalf of the United States on Feb. 8, 1977. The Acting Director of Real Estate for the Secretary of the Army approved the assurances on Jul. 5, 1977. The project was renamed "Leland Bowman Lock (Replacement)' by House Resolution 4284 dated Sep. 21, 1981 (House Report 97-234). Terminal facilities. Large terminal and transfer facilities, suitable for receiving and shipping commodities by barge, are available at principal cities in Louisiana; namely, New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Harvey, Morgan City, and Lake Charles. Facilities at New' Orleans are on Inner Harbor Navigation Canal. Canal and facilities were leased from Board of Commissioners Port of New Orleans, Apr. 1, 1944, and are noW operated by the United States, toll free, 24 hours per day. The Board of Commissioners has stated that it is willing to negotiate the transfer of the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and Lock to the United States on a date earlier than that of the lease termination. The Government is considering their proposal. At Morgan City, on Atchafalaya River, there are two large and three small wharves open to all without charge. Other wise, facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 11-8 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT r ations and results during fiscal year. Main- t~fknee by hired labor: Real estate activities, condition udoperation studies, condition surveys, stream gaging, and',channel patrol. Locks, bridges, and waterways were operated and maintained. Fender systems were repaired at Algiers, Calcasieu, Hifrvey, Port Allen, and Vermilion Locks. Work by hired labor consisted of major repairs to the Algiers Ic. Miscellaneous repairs were made to the Florida A eue Bridge, Vermilion, Harvey, and Port Allen .Ick Construction was initiated on Oct. 15, 1981 for replacement of Leland Bowman Lock (Vermilion) and is 98 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated July 1929 and project, as modified, is 55 percent complete. For information on completion of segments of waterway, see 1965 Annual Report, pages 523 and Work remaining to complete the project consists of tirging waterway as provided by 1962 River and Ikhbor Act. Construction of bulkheads at Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur are inactive features as this work has not been necessary. President Carter, as a result of his review of water resource projects in April 1977, changed the site of the proposed new shiplock to the Industrial Canal in Orleans Parish and recommended that the existing lock be replaced and expanded at the existing site. This is a new concept and requires reinstitution of General Design planning with attendant slips in the schedule components. 9. HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA Location. Extends from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at mile 59.5 west of Harvey Lock southerly about 16 miles, thence southeasterly 10.5 miles to Terrebonne Bay, and 9.5 miles across bay to deep water in Cat Island Pass. At mile 11.3 above Cat Island Pass, Houma Navigation Canal crosses Bayou Petit Caillou, and 20 rMiles above Cat Island Pass it crosses Bayou Grand Caillou. No other major waterways are crossed by Houma Navigation Canal. (See Army Engineer and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, NOAA Nos. 11352 and 11340 Sailing Charts; and NOAA Nos. 11356 11357 and Small-Craft Charts on the Intracoastal Waterway. Existing project. Provides that United States assume maintenance and operation of Houma Navigation Canal, Constructed by Parish of Terrebonne, to dimensions of 15 by 150 feet. Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth and 4 inches at Houma; extreme range is 14 inches at mouth and 6 inches at Houma; wind and tide, 1to3 feet at mouth; flood, 3 to 4 feet in upper section. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details seepage 11-13, Annual Report FY 1980. Terminal facilities. Privately-owned and operated facilities are adequate for existing commerce which is mainly seafood plants; oil companies and oil company supplies; sugar refining; and marine repair shops and towing. Southern Pacific Lines has dock facilities in Houma, LA. Ample space exists for expansion of existing facilities, or for the construction of new wharves and appurtenances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of reconnaissance surveys, stream gaging, and condition and operation studies. Maintenance dredging under two contracts was completed with the removal of 1,405,047 cubic yards of material from stations 1373+00 to 2141+00 and the removal of 3,212,314 cubic yards of material from stations 1435+00 to 2141+00. Condition as of Sep. 30. Maintenance by the United States commenced in November 1964. 10. LELAND BOWMAN LOCK, LA (REPLACEMENT OF LOCK) (FORMERLY VERMILION LOCK, LA) Location. In the Louisiana section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway near Abbeville, Vermilion Parish, LA, about 163 miles west of Harvey Lock. Existing project. The present Leland Bowman Lock, located in the most heavily utilized section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, is the controlling structure in both width and depth. The lock is used for navigation and flood control (prevention of salt water intrusion). The tumbler-type gates are unsatisfactory for the dual purpose. (Flood Control-Navigation) operation required, since once the gates are lowered to pass flood flows, they cannot be safely raised until the differential stage across the lock is reduced to about 0.5 foot. The replacement lock also will provide a larger and more efficient outlet for floodwaters. Estimated cost for new work (October 1982) is $32,200,000 Federal and $240,000 non-Federal. The project was renamed "Leland Bowman Lock (Replacement)" by House Resolution 4284 dated Sep. 21, 1981 (House Report 97-234.) Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction of the project and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance works. The Vermilion Parish Police Jury furnished assurances covering all requirements of local cooperation, including PL 91-611 and PL 91-646, on Mar. 19, 1975. These assurances were in the process of being accepted by the United States, when the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 was enacted authorizing the 110-foot-wide lock. Amended assurances of local cooperation were accepted on behalf of the United States by the Secretary of the Army on Jul. 5, 1977. The Vermilion Parish Police Jury on May 26, 1981 granted right of entry for construction of project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was initiated Oct. 15, 1981. 11-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 93 percent complete. 11. MERMENTAU RIVER, LA Location. Work covered by this project is 35 to 70 miles southeast of Lake Charles, LA, along lower Mermentau River below Grand Lake, mile 25, to Gulf of Mexico; Inland Waterway from Vermilion Bay to White Lake, White Lake to Grand Lake, and from Schooner Bayou to Intracoastal Waterway-Gulf section (Schooner Bayou Cutoff); North Prong of Schooner Bayou; and waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA, and artificial canal, extending from 5-foot-depth contour in White Lake, almost due south for about 1.8 miles to Pecan Island. (Refer to Coast Charts Nos. 11344 and 11349, NOAA Small-Craft Chart No. 11348 on the Intracoastal Waterway, Geological Survey maps, Sweet Lake, Hog Bayou, Grand Lake West, Grand Lake East, Constance Bayou, Forked Island, Pecan Island, and Abbeville quadrangles.) Existing project. Flood control, navigation, irrigation, and salinity control in coastal marsh of lower Mermentau River Basin and channel enlargement of lower Mermentau River below Grand Lake, mile 25, to a minimum section of 3,000 square feet below mean low gulf level for discharge of flood flows; construction of a sector-gated control structure at Catfish Point, mile 24 above mouth of Mermentau River, for discharge of flood flows and control of tidal flows and saltwater intrusion in Mermentau River; channel enlargement and realinement of Inland Waterway from Vermilion Bay to White Lake, 12.04 miles, and from White Lake to Grand Lake, 6.14 miles, to a minimum section of 3,000 square feet below mean low gulf level or interflow between lakes and discharge of flood flows; construction of a sector-gated control structure in enlarged channel immediately north of abandoned Schooner Bayou Lock reservation for discharge of flood flows and control of tidal flows and saltwater intrusion; channel enlargement of North Prong of Schooner Bayou and Schooner Bayou Cutoff, 6.69 miles, to 6 by 60 feet, mean low gulf level, for navigation purposes; and maintenance of existing 5- by 40-foot, mean low gulf level, waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA, 1.8 miles long, for navigation. In addition, project provides for incorporation of that section of project, "Inland Waterway from Franklin, LA, to Mermentau River," west of Vermilion Bay, a waterway that includes Schooner Bayou Lock. Project was reclassified as an "Operation and Maintenance, General" project under category, "Navigation (Locks, Dams, Reservoirs, and Canals)" by authority of Chief of Engineers, Apr. 23, 1956. Because of failure of both east and west gates, Schooner Bayou Lock was closed by a dike across east approach channel and traffic routed through new control structure. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide on Mermentau River near mouth is 1.6 feet and near head about 3 inches. Variation of water surface near the mouth may be as much as 7 or 8 feet, due to hurricanes on the gulf, and near head from 8 to 12 feet, due to freshets. New work was completed in 1956. Estimated cost for new work (October 1982) is $6,570,000 Federal and $840,000 non-Federal, including $250,000 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 1022, Annual Report FY 1948. Terminal facilities. Privately-owned and operated facilities are adequate along the Mermentau River and Bayous Nezpique and des Cannes for the principal commodities transported, which are petroleum and its products. A public wharf is located at Lake Arthur, LA, but due to insufficient use it has not been maintained and in its present condition is not usable. Sites for future expansion of these facilities are available and will be provided by non-Federal interests as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued operation and maintenance of Schooner Bayou and Catfish Point Control Structures, condition and operation studies, reconnaissance surveys, channel patrol, and water quality studies. Other work by hired labor forces during the fiscal year: Schooner Bayou Control Structures; construction of a new boat landing, and maintenance repairs to the guidewalls. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of project began April 1947 and completed July 1952. New work dredging was accomplished from April 1947 to June 1952. Catfish Point Control Structure was constructed from November 1948 to August 1951. Reservation comprises 9.7 acres. Schooner Bayou Lock and Control Structures: Schooner Bayou Lock and Dam were completed in 1913 and 1914, respectively, and the Lockmaster's house in 1917. Lock was closed to navigation May 7, 1951, and abandoned by authority of Chief of Engineers on Oct. 9, 1951. Permanent closure of lock channel and tie-in dikes was completed September 1951. Construction of control structures was accomplished from August 1949 to May 1951. Reservation comprises 6.9 acres. 12. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA Location. This reach of the river flows southeasterly through southeastern portion of Louisiana. At Head of Passes, approximately 233.1 miles below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge, river branches into three main passes: Southwest Pass, South Pass, and Pass a Loutre, two of which, Southwest Pass and South Pass, are improved under existing project. Head of Passes to mouths of Southwest and South Passes are 20.1 and 13.5 miles, respectively. Mouth of Southwest Pass is 141 miles west of Mobile, AL, and 349 miles east of Galveston, TX. Mouth of South Pass is 18.5 miles northeast of mouth of Southwest Pass. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11361, 11364, and 11369: MRC alluvial valley map, and Zachary, Baton Rouge, White Castle, Donaldsonville, Thibodaux, Mount Airy, Bonnet Carre, Hahnville, New Orleans, St. Bernard. 11-10 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT BuMaria, Pointe a la Hache, Black Bay, Empire, Fott ,West Delta, East Delta, and Southwest Pass quWangles and 1980 (48th edition) folio of flood control aduavigation maps, Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulfof Mexico, LA, published by the MRC.) Pievious projects. For details see page 552 of Annual Report for 1963. :sting project. Provides for channel dimensions asfollows: Between a line one-tenth mile below Louisia. iHighway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge 129.3 misto upper port limits of New Orleans, 40 by 500 feet mean low water; within limits of port of New Ormiens, where that authority has jurisdiction over both banks of river, a distance of 17.8 miles, 35 by 1,500 feet, measured from a line generally 100 feet from face of left bank wharves, but not closer than 100 feet to wh4rves on right bank; within 35- by 1,500-foot channel iniort limits of New Orleans, 40 by 500 feet; from lower limits of port of New Orleans 86.7 miles to Head of sses, 40 by 1,000 feet; Southwest Pass, 17.5 miles frqmdead of Passes to jetty channel, 40 by 800 feet; 4.1 miles in the Southwest Pass bar and jetty channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass from Head of Passes to outer ehds of jetties, 13.5 miles, 30 by 450 feet; and 1.2 miles in the South Pass bar channel, 30 by 600 feet. Plane of reference below New Orleans is mean low gulf. Plane of reference above and through New Orleans is low water reference plane. General plan of improvement of Southwest Pass provides for constructing pass to uniform cross section with about 1,420-foot surface width by means of jetties, spur dikes, and bulkheads; for channel maintenance by dredging from Cubits Gap, mile 3.5 AHP through the gulf entrance channel, mile 21.5 BHP; for construction of small revetted openings through narrow portions of banks of pass for purpose of strengthening and nourishment of banks; for closure of minor outlets not required for maintenance of banks; for construction of sills to prevent enlargement of the Venice Jump and Cubits Gap; for repairs to sill across Pass a Loutre and bank revetment at Head of Passes; for construction of dikes with a view to reducing width of river above Head of Passes; for construction of a submerged deflecting dike above Head of Passes; and for other minor work. East jetty is about 24,950 feet long and west jetty 19,699 feet. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses, orginally built to about elevation of mean low gulf, surmounted with a superstructure of concrete blocks and large riprap and/or stone rubble mound of core and cover stone. Spur dikes are constructed of round timber piles and/or triangular prestressed concrete piles, with riprap at the landward ends to connect the dikes to the bank line. General plan of improvement of South Pass provides for construction and maintenance of jetties and spur dikes; for channel maintenance by dredging from Head of Passes through the Gulf Entrance Channel beyond mile 13.5 BHP; maintenance of a sill across Pass a Loutre, and for seaward extension of east jetty at tuouth of pass; removal of west dike and construction of SUr dikes and bank revetment at Head of Passes; removal of false point at head of South Pass to bottom elevation of minus 45 feet and revetment of new bank line and construction and maintenance of east and west headland structure at Head of Passes. East jetty foundation is 12, 070 feet long; inner east jetty is 11,170 feet long; west jetty is 7,820 feet long; and inner west jetty is 4,710 feet long. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses surmounted by a superstructure of stone and/or concrete blocks and large riprap. Plane of reference is mean low gulf. Variation of water surface is 16 inches at mouths and 10 inches at head of the passes, due to tides. Extreme range of tides at mouths of passes due to hurricanes in about 10 feet. At New Orleans extreme range of water surface is about 20 feet due to floods. At Baton Rouge extreme range is about 45 feet due to floods. Estimated cost of existing project (October 1984) is $291,700,000 Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $1,222,800. Local cooperation. None required, except for modification of project in connection with Mississippi River- Gulf Outlet, which is reported separately. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, or docks serve the Port of New Orleans. Most wharves on east or left bank parallel riverbank forming nearly a continuous covered quay about 10 miles long. Public wharves controlled by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans (the Dock Board), cover 62 percent of improved waterfront. These facilities include a shipside grain elevator, general cargo an( cotton wharves, fruit landings, bunkering facilities, terminal warehouses, railroad terminals, marine railways, and drydocks. (For further details see Port Series No. 20, "The Port of New Orleans, LA" revised 1977.) A foreign trade zone is located in Port of New Orleans. City of Baton Rouge has a reinforced concrete dock for deep-sea vessels with mechanical-handling facility. Attached to downstream end of wharf is a floating wharf boat 231 by 40.5 feet, of 2,000-ton capacity. Facilities are served by a transfer boat and municipal terminal having a capacity of 40 cars per day. Private terminals for handling oil, grain, bauxite ore, and other products are at points on both sides of river between New Orleans and Baton Rouge. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details, see "Port Facilities" included in "Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico, LA," published annually by the MRC, and Port Series No. 19, vol. 1, "Port St. Joe, FL, Pensacola, FL, Baton Rouge, LA, and Lake Charles, LA," revised 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. The Supplement II to the GDM and the environmental impact statement (EIS) for this supplement are scheduled to be completed in January 1985. Maintenance: (a) Baton Rouge to New Orleans: Two dustpan dredges and three hopper dredges removed 12,949,766 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $26,447,100. (b) New Orleans Harbor: One leased dredge contract removed 1,750,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,466,700. 11-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 (c) Head of Passes and Southwest Pass: Five hopper dredges and three cutterhead dredges removed 20,285,959 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $26,477,100. (d) Southwest Pass: Work was completed on one contract for repairs to the east and west jetties at a cost of $715,900. A contract for construction of a rock pile dike between mile 7.5 and 8.6 below Head of Passes on the right descending bank was completed at a total cost of $1,875,000. Hired labor units repaired spur dikes between mile 1.8 and mile 10.0 below Head of Passes on the right descending bank at a cost of $549,000 and also dredging targets in Southwest Pass at a cost of $47,600. (e) Wheeler Wharf at Venice: Modification and repairs to the wharf were performed by hired labor units at a cost of $440,800. Condition as of Sep. 30. The existing project is 50 percent complete. Deepening Southwest Pass to 40 feet mean low gulf, as authorized by the modification of Mar. 2, 1945, was completed in September 1963. Deepening the channel to 40 feet mean low water from Baton Rouge to New Orleans and to 40 feet mean low gulf in New Orleans Harbor, as authorized by the modifications of Oct. 23, 1962, was completed in August 1963. 13. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA Location. In State of Louisiana and extends from existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 7,500 feet north of existing lock and about 11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning basin south of Michoud, LA, and then as a land and water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, LA, southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340, 11360, 11363, 11369, 11371, and 11373. Also see MRC 1980 (48th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA.) Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along islands as required. It also provides for an inner tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet wide extending westerly along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from turning basin to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, including construction of a suitable highway bridge with approaches to carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over channel. Plan further provides for future construction of a channel and lock in the vicinity of Meraux to furnish an additional connection between tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. Estimated cost for new work (October 1983) is $499,000,000 Federal and $208,000,000 non-Federal. This does not include modification for Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, which is reported separately. The Federal cost excludes $45,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Original assurances furnished and accepted. Local agency has furnished Supplemental Assurance covering Public Law 91-646. Rights-of-entry for entire project were furnished by local agency which is in process of conveying to the United States title to remaining tracts. Supplemental assurances reflecting the changes made necessary by enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 were requested on Jan. 12, 1977. The Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, by letter dated Sep. 18, 1978, stated that they are unable to provide the required supplemental assurances at this time. They are concerned about the possible effects of the proposed new Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock on this project and pending legislation concerning local assurances for the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal project. Local interests have provided right of entry for construction for the Baptiste Collette Bayou portion of this project. Terminal facilities. The only facility on the waterway is the Public Bulk Terminal of New Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at mile 63. Two newcontainer ship berths have begun operation at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Engineering environmental and economic studies were completed for the new lock and connecting channels feature. One contract for foreshore protection test section, south bank, Chalmette Area, station 475 to 501 was completed December 1982. A second contract for additional test sections was completed on January 24, 1984. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Mach 1958 and entire project is 75 percent complete. The channel was opened to navigation Jul. 25, 1963, and completed Jan. 20, 1968. Paris Road Bridge was opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 1967. Approximately 3 miles of first- and second-lift stone dikes have been constructed on north side of channel and approximately 8.27 miles of first-lift and 7.34 miles of second-lift stone dikes have been constructed on south side of channel in Breton Sound. Principal work required to complete project, construction of new ship lock, raising and extending dikes, is in a deferred status and construction of foreshore protection is scheduled to be initiated in June 1985. The site for the lock remained the major problem. President Carter, as a result of his review of water resource projects in April 1977, changed the site for the proposed shiplock to the Industrial Canal in Orleans Parish and recom" mended that, if justified, the existing lock should be replaced and expanded in place and that care should be taken to minimize dislocation of residents living adjacent to the site. These recommendations are being addressed in an Evaluation Report scheduled for corn pletion in FY 1985. 11-12 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT : MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS, VENICE, LA cation. In the coastal marsh area and in the vlity of the Mississippi River at about miles 10 to 11 aove the Head of Passes. (Refer to NOAA Coast Chart No 1361.) Existing project. Provides for additional navigation outlets in the vicinity of Venice, LA, by enlargement of th existing channels of Baptiste Collette Bayou and Orand-Tiger Passes to 14 by 150 feet with entrance e hnels in open water 16 by 250 feet and jetties to the Wt-depth contour, if and when justified, to reduce ~ost of maintenance dredging. Existing project was wnupleted at a cost of $10,008,400. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-17, Annual Report, FY 1980. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Commission Cdancil. Basic assurances for the project have been furnished. Amended assurances covering Public Laws 91 646 and 91-611 were received on Aug. 5, 1977. Terminal facilities. In the Venice area, each operator di a construction, repair, or supply facility provides dbk and transfer facilities to meet his own needs or aranges to use those of another. These facilities are considered adequate for the anticipated traffic. If new industry or supply facilities are established, they would provide any needed terminal facilities for their use. Ample areas for future expansion are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of reconnaisance surveys, condition and operation, stream gaging and engineering studies. Contract work for maintenance dredging at Baptiste Collette Bar Channel, was completed Aug. 18, 1984, with a total of 1,065,818 cubic yards of material removed. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 100 percent complete. 15. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA Location. Lakes and streams tributary to the gulf coast. Existing project. Removal of plants from navigable Waters of Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, so far as they are or may become an obstruction to navigation, by any mechanical, chemical, or other means whatsoever; for construction and operation of boats equipped with suitable machinery for such removal; and construction and operation of booms to prevent plants drifting from one stream to another. I cal cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maximum use of funds available was made by using chemical methods of destruction. Maintenance continued in main Waterways and principal tributaries to prevent waterhacinth obstructions and damage to navigation. Preventive maintenance work was carried out in secondary streams and feeder areas whenever possible. In some cases where alligatorweed has previously kept waterhyacinth fringes confined along the banks, attack of the alligatorweed flea beetles (Agasicles) has reduced its competitiveness and water-hyacinths are multiplying and spreading in the waterways. A total of 28,626 acres of water-hyacinth were treated by chemical in Bayou Black, Lake Cataouatche and feeder streams, Lake des Allemands area, the Port Allen-Morgan City Route and Alternate Route of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Lake Dauterive and Grand Lake areas, Bayou Penchant- Bayou Copasaw area, the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Bayou Lafourche, Bayou Lacassine, and Bayou Teche. Aerial spraying by helicopter controlled an additional 5,105 acres. A mild winter, excessive rainfall, and extreme summer temperatures prevented additional areas from being placed in a maintenance status. The introduction of the water-hyacinth weevil (Neochetina eichhorniae) has been made and populations are increasing. A large scale operations management test using the water-hyacinth weevil and the most promising plant pathogen (Cercospora rodmanii) has begun and will be monitored for effectiveness of control. A moth (Samoedes albiguttalis) has recently been introduced to assist in the control of water-hyacinth. Condition as of Sep. 30. From 1900 to 1902 a boat with suitable machinery for destroying hyacinth by crushing was operated. From that time until 1937 hyacinths were destroyed through use of a solution of arsenic and caustic soda which was sprayed on vegetation. The vegetation was removed by hand crews, and vegetation movement was controlled by booms and barricades. Use of arsenic was discontinued and hand removal supplanted by use of mechanical equipment in conjunction with chemical spray (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid). Use of booms and barricades has been discontinued. Use of the quarterboat Tambour was discontinued in September 1981. Present methods of control are by means of chemical spraying supplemented by the use of insects and pathogens for biological control. Waterways Experiment Station is conducting a large-scale operations management test of insects and pathogens for control of water-hyacinth in Louisiana. 16. TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA Location. The river originates in the State of Mississippi and flows southerly to Lake Pontchartrain, LA, about 119 miles. (Refer to NOAA Coast Chart No. 11369 and MRC alluvial valley map, Ponchatoula quadrangle.) Existing project. Improvement by removing overhanging trees, snags, and obstructions to navigation for 53.5 miles above mouth, and provide an 8- by 100- foot entrance channel from the 8-foot depth contour in the lake to the 8-foot depth in the river. Variation in water surface is from 3 to 20 feet in the upper reaches due to freshets and from 2 to 5 feet in the lower reach due to winds and tides. The cost of existing project was $61,211, Federal (including $11,500 for previously completed portion and $49,711 for preauthorization 11-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 studies and modification adopted under Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended) and $29,346 contributed funds for the modification. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces conducted reconnaissance surveys and prepared plans and specifications. 17. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) Location. Bayou LeCarpe is a tidal stream which rises about 1.5 miles southeast of Houma in Terrebonne Parish and flows southerly into Bayou Pelton, thence into Bayou Grand Caillou, which flows southwesterly into Caillou Bay, a total distance of about 40 miles. (Refer to Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart, No. 1116 and Geological Survey maps of Houma, Dulac, Bayou DuLarge, and Dog Lake quadrangles.) Existing project. As modified, provides for a 10- by 45-foot channel in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 2.6 miles to Houma navigation canal; a 5- by 40-foot channel through Bayou Pelton and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, a distance of about 13.7 miles. Between miles 2.6 and 5, this project coincides with or is adjacent to 15- by 150-foot Houma navigation canal. Normal range of tide is 3 to 10 inches; from winds, 1 to 3 feet. Cost of new work, completed in August 1964, was $129,662. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for enlargement and subsequent maintenance of Bayou LeCarpe and of aids to navigation, and provide alterations to facilities, and hold the United States free from damage. Assurances were furnished and accepted. Local agency made available spoil areas for maintenance dredging of Bayou LeCarpe. None of these areas will be transferred to the United States. Meeting are continuing with local interests to resolve problems with their required cash contribution on total project cost. Terminal facilities. Many terminal and transfer facilities are in Houma and along waterways which flow through area between Houma and Gulf of Mexico. All facilities are privately owned and operated. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce and for reasonably prospective commerce. Ample space exists for expansion of existing facilities or for construction of new wharves and appurtenances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor consisted of real estate activities, reconnaissance surveys, water quality studies and maintenance dredging. Maintenance contract dredge Cape Fear removed 70,900 cubic yards from Bayou LeCarpe. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 5- by 40-foot channel was constructed from January 1938 to August 1938, and modification of October 23, 1962, for enlargement of 2.54 miles of Bayou LeCarpe to 10 feet by 45 feet was initiated in May and completed August 1964. 18. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization.) Preauthorization studies costs as of Sep. 30, 1984, were $278,921 for Bayou Grand Caillou. Flood Control 19. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA Location. In south Jefferson Parish, LA, along the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New Orleans and 45 miles northwest of southwest pass (Mississippi River). Existing project. The project provides protection from waves driven by hurricanes that have a frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. The dune would have a 10-foot-wide crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet mean sea level, 1 on 5 side slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm would slope from an elevation of 8.5 feet mean sea level at the toe of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 feet mean sea level and, from this point, would assume its natural slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by the plan has a top width of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side slopes, and extends approximately 2,600 feet along the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of project (October 1984) is $8,400,000 Federal and $5,410,000 non-Federal, including $2,000,000 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction of the project, currently estimated to cost $4,410,000; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of buildings, streets, utilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages due to the construction works; assure maintenance, repairs, and periodic beach nourishment of the project after completion as may be required to serve the intended purposes in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, except that the Federal Government will contribute, for an initial period of 15 years, a sum currently estimated at $44,000 annually toward the cost of beach nourishment 11-14 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT associated with beach erosion prevention, subject to a final determination on the basis of conditions of public ust and ownership at the time of construction; provide aash contribution for the hurricane protection function in'an amount sufficient to insure that local investment in cash, equivalent work, and fair market value of lands and relocations are at least equal to 30 percent of all first costs allocated to that function, which cash contribution is presently estimated at $2,000,000; contribute cash or equivalent work an amount sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of construction costs allocated to beach erosion control, that amount presently estimated at $3,954,000 less $1,000,000 credit for completed work, west end jetty, or $2,954,000, the final amount to be determined at the time of project construction in accordance with cost-sharing procedures for beach erosion control as defined in the report; obtain approval by the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of any work on shore and beach protection phases of the project if undertaken separately from the recommended combined project, of detailed plans and specifications for the work contemplated and also the arrangements of prosecuting such work, excluding the preauthorization jetty construction; assure continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation in the beach protection phase is based, and its administration for public use during the life of the project, and assure continued availability for public use of privately owned shores; assure that water pollution which would endanger the health of bathers will not be permitted; adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for the preservation of the improvement and its protective vegetation; at least annually, inform interests affected that the project will not provide any substantial protection from hurricane flooding on the bay side, or from hurricane surges higher in elevation than those of Hurricane Betsy of Sep. 9, 1965; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies of 1970, Public Law 91-646; agree to the requirements of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611. Comply with section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of or subjected to discrimination in connection with the project on the grounds of race, creed, or national origin. Formal assurances requested of Jefferson Parish Council, and the Mayor, Town of Grand Isle, LA, on Aug. 12, 1981. The Town of Grand Isle is not financially capable to be the sole local assurer. The Louisiana Office of Public Works co-signed an agreement with the town of Grand Isle to assure complete financial responsibility on Jun. 1, 1983. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The dredging contract for beach erosion was awarded Jul. 25, 1983, but construction was not initiated during FY 84. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 98 percent Complete. 20. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson. Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising lower land and water area between Mississippi River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment to north and west. The dominant topographic feature is Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow landlocked tidal basin, about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi Sound to the gulf to the east. The lake drains about 4,700 square miles of tributary area. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield. Denham Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet Carre. Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts No. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides for control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units; the Lake Pontchartrain barrier plan involves construction of a barrier levee along eastern boundary of the lake with navigation and hurricane flood control structures in Chef Menteur Pass, the Rigolets, and at Seabrook. These protective works, together with strengthening and extension of existing protective works and the construction of the Seabrook Lock, will afford full protection to the south shore of Lake Pontchartrain from Bonnet Carre Spillway to the eastern limit of Orleans Parish levee along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal. The Chalmette area plan consists of improving existing protection along east bank Inner Harbor Navigation Canal from the lock to Florida Avenue. then constructing a new levee to Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, thence along south bank of gulf outlet to Bayou Lawler, then turning south and tieing into Mississippi River levee at Violet, LA. The approved Chalmette area plan was modified, under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers, to provide for enlargement of the protected area by construction of a levee from the Mississippi River levee near Caernarvon, LA, to the vicinity of Verret, LA, thence to and along the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet to a junction with the approved levee at the Bayou Lawler crossing of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, and elimination of the levee in the approved plan from the Bayou Lawler and Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet to Violet, LA. Navigable drainage structures will be provided at Bayous Bienvenue and Dupre. Strengthening existing seawall at Mandeville on the north shore will insure that future hurricanes will not seriously damage this resort community. Estimated cost for new work (October 1984) is $619,000,000 Federal and $201,000,000 non-Federal, including cash contribution of $201,000,000 which includes $23,500,000 11-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 estimated to be capitalized value of operation and maintenance of Rigolets navigation lock and appurtenant channel. Local cooperation. Provide all rights-of-way; bear 30 percent of the first cost, consisting of fair market value of providing all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including borrow and spoil disposal areas for construction, accomplish alteration and relocation of roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, wharves, drainage structures, and other facilities; maintain and operate all works after completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages. See H. Doc. No. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. for more detailed requirements of local cooperation. Assuring Agency: The Orleans Levee District, Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, St. Bernard Parish Police Jury, Louisiana Office of Public Works, and Pontchartrain Levee District. Basic assurances were received from the following: Orleans Levee District for the entire barrier plan and that portion of the Chalmette area plan in Orleans Parish; Pontchartrain Levee District for the barrier plan; Lake Borgne Levee District and St. Bernard Parish Police Jury for the Chalmette area plan in St. Bernard Parish. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been received from the Orleans Levee District and the Pontchartrain Levee District. Lake Borgne Basin Levee District and St. Bernard Parish Police Jury have executed the supplemental assurance. The St. Tammany Parish portion of the project has been placed in an inactive status since the local sponsors have not provided acceptable assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of design memorandums and plans and specifications continued by hired labor. Citrus Lakefront GDM was submitted to higher authority in July 1984. Preparation of three design memorandums is underway. All are scheduled for completion in FY 85. A Draft Reevaluation Report (including Draft Environmental Impact Statement) recommending the tentatively selected high level plan (lieu of Barrier Plan) was submitted by New Orleans District to the Lower Mississippi Valley Division in December 1983. The final Reevaluation Report was submitted to LMVD on Aug. 8, 1984. A Record of Decision is expected to be signed in the 2nd Quarter of FY 85 by the Office, Chief of Engineers. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started May 1967 and is 67 percent complete. Contract work continued on six contracts. Construction was initiated on four more contracts: Bayou Bienvenue to Bayou Dupre levee closures; Chalmette area, second enlargement; Inner Harbor Canal, east and west levee and Citrus Back levee to Paris road, capping floodwall; Chalmette extension, first enlargement. 21. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks of the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden Meadow. (Refer to Geological survey quadrangles Cut-off, Lke Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, Hahnville, Point-a-la-Hache, Barataria, and Fort Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116 Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. Estimated cost for new work (October 1984) is $61,000,000 Federal and $26,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas, and accomplish alterations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, oil wells, and any other facilities necessary for the construction of the project; all at an estimated cost of $10,430,000; bear 30 percent of the total project cost, a sum presently estimated at $26,300,000 consisting of the items listed above, and a cash contribution presently estimated at $15,870,000 or equivalent work specifically undertaken as an integral part of the project after authorization and in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity is provided promptly without cost to the United States; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611) in acquiring real property. The Board of Commissioners of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District executed the required Agreement of Local Cooperation on Nov. 13, 1972, which was executed by the United States on Jul. 10, 1973 and approved on behalf of the Secretary of the Army on Aug. 29, 1973. Section 38, Paragraph 1051 et seq., Louisiana Revised Statutes created the South Lafourche Levee District. The South Lafourche Levee District assumed the rights and obligations of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District with respect to this project. Local interests have requested and received funds from the State of Louisiana 11-16 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT for right-of-way acquisition and relocations required to support construction work. Operations and results during fiscal year. One design memorandum was submitted to LMVD for Section F review during the year. One contract for Section F was awarded Jun. 29, 1984. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction commenced in February 1975 and is 48 percent complete. 22. MCKINNEY BAYOU, AR AND TX Location. The McKinney Bayou watershed covers approximately 360 square miles and is located in southwestern Arkansas and northeastern Texas in the vicinity of the city of Texarkana, AR and TX, within the flood plain of the Red River. Existing project. Provides improvements for three major elements; improvement of the McKinney Bayou channel, construction of a diversion channel into Red River and control structure at Buzzard Bluff, and construction of a diversion channel into Red River and control structure about one-half mile west of the Arkansas-Texas state line. Mitigation of project-induced wildlife losses are included in the project. Estimated cost of new work (October 1983) is $6,570,000 Federal and $4,520,000 non-Federal, including cash contribution of $728,000. Local cooperation. For details see pages 11-29 and 30, Annual Report for FY 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. A draft General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Impact Statement was distributed for review by Federal and State agencies and others on Jul. 28, 1983. The reevaluation disclosed changed conditions and attitudes to modify the authorized plan. The portion of the project located west of the Arkansas-Texas state line was deleted because of lack of support by local interests. This portion of the project was reclassified to inactive in November 1982. The Buzzard Bluff portion was deleted for economic reasons. All alternative investigations of the Buzzard Bluff portion of the project had benefit-cost ratios less than unity. The tentatively selected plan now consists of channel improvements of McKinney Bayou to the same dimension as authorized and a reduced mitigation plan of 2,550 acres of greentree reservoir along the periphery of the Bois d'Arc Wildlife Management Area near Fulton, Arkansas. Condition as of Sep. 30. Landowners of Miller County were consulted through the five drainage districts in the county to determine their willingness to provide the items of local cooperation for the plan presented in the draft reevaluation report. The five districts stated in late October 1983 that while they agreed with the formulation of the tentatively selected plan, they found the local cost to be excessive and tated they could not provide the items of local cooperation. Because of the lack of local support for the IVicKinney Bayou channel improvements, and lack of economic justification for the Buzzard Bluff segment, both portions of the project were reclassified from "active" to "inactive" in January 1984. 23. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In south-central Louisiana, Morgan City proper, and the adjacent areas. It includes the land south of Grand Lake, Six Mile Lake, and Lake Palourde extending from Morgan City westward to Charenton drainage and navigation canal. Lower Atchafalaya River and Wax Lake Outlet, the principal outlets for Atchafalaya Basin Floodway, traverse the area. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway crosses the area in an east-west direction. Numerous bayous and artificial canals excavated for drainage purposes or for access to oil developments exist throughout the area. (See Engineer quadrangles Bayou Sale, Jeanerette, Foster, Belle Isle, Point Au Fer, Morgan City, and Lake Decade; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1116.) Existing project. Morgan City: Construction of about 5.6 miles of new levees along shore of Lake Palourde and west bank of Bayou Ramos and about 0.5 mile of new levee from Southern Pacific railroad embankment near Wyandotte to tie in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee, and construction of three gravity drainage structures. Franklin and vicinity: Enlargement of about 21.6 miles of back levee and construction of about 3.5 miles of new levees to effect a complete closure of area to be protected, construction of one floodgate and eight gravity drainage structures, and alteration of existing drainage facilities where necessary. Normal range of tide is 1.6 feet. Storm and hurricane tide have produced elevations up to 10 feet while northerly storms during winter depress the gulf level as much as 3 feet below mean sea level. During low water periods on Atchafalaya River, generally September through November, the effect of tide extends about 35 miles above Morgan City. Estimated cost for total project (October 1984) is $27,000,000 Federal and $14,650,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interest must furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, provide relocations and alterations required for project; provide all interior drainage and pumping plants required for reclamation and development of protected areas; maintain and operate all project works after completion including levees, drainage structures, floodgates and drainage ditches or canals, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide assurances that encroachment on existing ponding areas will be prevented unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity is provided promptly, without cost to the United States; contribute in cash or equivalent work not less than 30 percent of project cost, the final 11-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 determination to be made after construction is complete; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works. Assuring Agency: The act of assurance and supporting resolution from the St. Mary Parish Police Jury were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Jul. 18, 1968. Supplemental assurances were furnished by the St. Mary Parish Police Jury for the Morgan City Area separable feature of the project. These supplemental assurances include the additional items of local cooperation required by PL 91-611 and PL 91-646 and were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jul. 23, 1980. The Franklin Area feature was specifically excluded in the supplemental assurances. Operations and results during period. General engineering only was accomplished by hired labor forces during the fiscal year. The GDM for the Morgan City area progressed approximately 70 percent in FY 1984. The remainder of work on the GDM will be accomplished in FY 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not commenced. 24. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. Includes land subject to inundation by hurricane tides extending along both banks of the Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity of Phoenix to Venice, LA. Existing project. Provides for improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank from City Price to Empire, 15 miles, 4,340 acres protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Empire to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia (construction recently completed by local agency with credit given as equivalent work), 16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and construction of a barrier levee on the east bank of the Mississippi River from Bohemia to mile 10 AHP with enlargement of the west bank Mississippi River levee from Fort Jackson to Venice, generally called the East Bank Barrier Levee plan. Reach B was later divided into two units, Reach B-1 from Empire to Fort Jackson and Reach B-2 from Fort Jackson to Venice, LA, as a result of a request made by the local agency. Estimated cost of new work (October 1983) is $132,300,000 Federal and $56,700,000 non-Federal, including $45,481,000 cash contributions or equivalent work. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction of the project, at costs presently estimated at $4,427,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves and other facilities required by the construction of the project at costs presently estimated at $6,792,000; bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently estimated at $56,700,000, and cash contribu. tion presently estimated at $45,481,000 to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items, in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, or as a substitute for any part of the cash contribution, accomplish in accordance with approved construction schedules items of work of equivalent value as determined by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of costs to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping is provided promptly; and at least annually, notify those affected that the project will not provide complete protection from tidal flooding and that further local actions must be taken during hurricane emergencies. Local interests are also required to comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (PL 91- 646), in acquiring real property. PL 91-611. Not applicable. Construction started prior to Jan. 1, 1972. PL 91-646. A constitutional amendment was provided by the Louisiana legislature on Feb. 1, 1972 allowing local interests to comply. The estimated cost to local interests is $48,000. Assurances of local cooperation for Reaches A, B-l, B-2 and C, requested on Jan. 7, 1963, were furnished by the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council on Mar. 6, 1964. Required supporting papers were furnished on Mar. 16, 1965 and accepted. Supplemental assurances covering the requirements of PL 91-646 were received from Plaquemines Parish Commission Council on May 23, 1973 and accepted on Jun. 20, 1973. Assurances for the entire project have been furnished and accepted, although they do not specifically mention the East Bank Barrier Levee Plan. The scope of the project has not changed; however, local interests were requested to furnish separate assurances for the East Bank Barrier Levee. These assurances have not yet been received. There was a delay of approximately 26 months in the furnishing of assurances by local interests primarily because they desired that agreement on levee alignment be consummated as fully as possible before giving their assurance. Problems of assurance of local cooperation have been resolved and rights-of-way were furnished for the first two Reach B-1 items of work on Aug. 23, 1968 and May 20, 1970, respectively. All negotiations for relocations are the responsibility of local interests. These mainly consist of raising several petroleum and natural gas pipelines to the levee con- 11-18 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT figuration and relocation of privately owned frame structures used as fishing and boating camps. To assure that there will be no delay in construction of levees, local interests are notified well in advance so thatthe owners of the pipelines can be advised. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Commission Council. Assurances for all reaches of the project, except the East Bank Barrier levee, have been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Planning for this project and engineering studies continued. Reach B-2, Sta. 244+000 to Sta. 473+58, second enlargement, was completed Jan. 14, 1984. Grand Liard floodwall Reach B-1, was completed Sep. 13, 1984. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on the project in September 1968 and the total project is approximately 40 percent complete. First lift construction is complete on Reaches B-1 and B-2 and the first enlargement is completed for a portion of Reach B-1. Second lift construction is complete on Reach C. Initial construction on Reach A is scheduled to begin in FY 1985. Initial construction on the East Bank Barrier is not scheduled, pending the furnishing of assurances by local interest. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Various hurricane protection projects, as well as small flood control projects, were inspected during FY 1984. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures was conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an as-needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $225,493. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1984, were $1,486,471. 26. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Disaster preparedness, FY costs for the period were $141,541. Emergency Operations: Total costs to Sep. 30, 1984 were $441,165. General Investigations 27. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 11-J which covers: Surveys, Collections and study of basic data, and Research and Development activities. 11-19 TABLE 11-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 1. Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA 2. Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, LA (Contrib. Funds) 3. Barataria Bay 4. Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche- Jump Waterway, LA 5. Bayou Teche, LA 6. Calcasieu River and Pass, LA (Contrib. Funds) 7. Freshwater Bayou, LA 8. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL & Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.) 9. Houma Navigation Canal, LA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ 450,000 424,684 $ 300,000 $ 487,000 312,947 499,145 15,500,000 1,150,000 15,644,334 704,955 3,565,000 3,576,990 628,000 630,835 2,053,000 1,994,623 148,750 150,540 43,957 $ 500,000 502,228 21,417 4,592,000 4,576,000 4,633,396 4,598,600 305,000 2,320,000 490,000 1,752,000 307,580 224,389 2,598,462 1,775,345 2,817 - - $ 9,869,460 9,869,100 30,850,000 30,343,8581 33,442,9812 33,441,4392 1,483,8123 1,483,8124 1,572,6855 1,572,6856 15,588,8566 15,577,8116 1,624,4247 1,624,4247 829,7568 829,7568 754,3309 754,3309 137,000 128,135 8,285,000 11,262,008 155,000 437,774 202,000 110,272 152,130 240,600 221,000 200,354 1,885,000 9,125,130 11,275,800 914,539 10,066,491 9,434,458 - - 36,000 -- 36,000 814,000 1,670,000 1,392,685 1,693,519 320,000 777,000 598,300 773,965 3,972,715 3,933,923 27,807,310" 27,807,310" 85,847,67912 83,906,59512 437,774 437,774 7,116,22413 7,116,224'3 13,290,765 13,287,671 63,654,5354' 151. 6 63,284,47014'1 4,875,000 15,876,100 10,524,486 9,269,000 6,837,829 13,242,263 12,391,442 8,796,692 2,540,000 2,888,000 2,505,334 284,901 1,744,900 4,181,328 637,000 809,616 157,331,7321 19 156,002,2491819 16,103,634 16,063,142 11-20 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 10. Leland Bowman Lock, LA (Replacement of lock) 11. Mermentau River, LA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 12. Mississippi New Work River, Baton Approp. Rouge to the Cost Gulf of Mexico, LA Maint. Approp. Cost 13. Mississippi New Work River-Gulf Approp. Outlet, LA Cost (Regular Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 14. Mississippi New Work River Outlets, Approp. Venice, LA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 15. Removal of Aquatic Maint. Growth, LA Approp. Cost 16. Tangipahoa Maint. River, LA Approp. Cost 17. Waterway from New Work Intracoastal Approp. Waterways to Cost Bayou Dulac, LA (Bayou Maint. Grand Caillou & Approp. LeCarpe, LA) Cost 19. Grand Isle New Work and Vicinity, Approp. LA Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 20. Lake Pontchar- New Work train and vicinity, Approp. LA (Hurricane Cost Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 495,200 6,029,800 14,000,000 10,325,000 544,814 6,058,840 12,697,628 8,341,621 3,766 700,000 743,669 884,800 977,150 1,050,900 1,013,415 555,000 562,024 900,000 1,545,117 600,000 623,870 800,000 878,037 32,200,01020 28,871,26520 4,561,91021 4,672,57921 12,934,31222 12,916,87322 40,911,79723 41,409,44323 24,122,100 30,268,000 45,611,260 48,510,600 404,006,92424, 26 24,581,150 29,826,943 43,786,783 47,713,135 400,772,60125, 26 1,780,000 1,758,067 7,109,200 7,134,791 16,900 196,000 190,910 1,235,200 1,472,670 8,754,000 4,349,480 -578 926,000 863,216 2,005,000 1,027,035 11,048,000 14,717,186 -2,900 340 2,196,000 2,227,642 500,000 1,664,718 9,705,000 10,169,620 1,423,000 1,394,421 976,000 1,158,000 1,387,200 1,239,200 1,177,002 1,084,984 1,440,032 1,259,960 159,000 158,404 35,000 37,242 135,000 295,526 100,000 111,558 130,000 86,341 200,000 201,472 75,000 111,102 40,000 43,223 105,000 3,000,000 4,161,000 41,937 226,231 6,714,791 - - 2,110,000 - - 2,000,000 79,140,200 79,095,885 91,221,580 90,915,432 1,118,97727 1,118,97727 10,008,093 10,008,100 5,818,800 5,750,551 20,362,008 20,361,074 568,154 567,551 409,622 407,530 888,762 888,762 7,910,500 7,616,881 2,110,000 2,000,000 8,800,000 13,000,000 13,716,000 8,800,000 150,080,000 8,811,248 13,720,371 13,510,392 7,937,422 148,017,865 140,950 205,564 166,000 186,400 313,124 356,602 325,000 260,000 3,615,184 3,591,676 11-21 TABLE 11-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Total Funds to Sep. 30, 1984 21. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Contrib. Funds) 22. McKinney Bayou, AR, and TX 23. Morgan City and vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) 24. Mississippi River Delta at and below New Orleans, LA (New Orleans to Venice, LA, Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 815,000 2,100,000 9,870,000 5,700,000 1,075,688 1,407,390 7,734,710 6,901,800 1,101,000 1,146,938 255.000 284,162 200,000 198,700 6,139 13,482 250,000 71,500 384,000 541,000 387,000 367,606 1,830,000 1,535,000 3,450,000 2,830,000 1,994,914 1,864,215 2,515,286 3,581,564 New Work Contrib. Cost 3,050,000 2,600,000 450,000 1. Includes $37,348 for advance engineering and design. 2. Includes any maintenance costs on Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA. 3. Includes allotment of $340,000 for Code 300. 4. Includes expenditures of $335,375 for Code 300. 5. Includes $73,037 for previous project. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds expended. 6. Includes $47,551 for previous project. 7. Includes $252,935 for previous projects; excludes $75,563 expended for rehabilitation (Code 820) in Fiscal Year 1961. 8. Includes $15,445 for previous projects. 9. Includes $45,704 for previous projects. 10. Includes $91,389 permanent indefinite appropriation. 11. Includes $495,914 for previous project; excludes $107,837 expended for minor rehabilitation in Fiscal Year 1963. 12. Includes $194,851 for previous project. 13. Excludes $16,060 contributed funds. 14. Includes $4,320,698 for new work on previous project. Included in these totals are $353,541 N.I.R.A. funds (new work); and $1,070,433 permanent indefinite appropriation. Included is repayment of advance funds for construction of Franklin Canal in the amount of $35,103. In addition, $1,413,133 was expended for transfer to drainage district of ownership of Plaquemines Parish pumping station, and drainage canals and all drainage responsibility and obligations vested in the United States by Public Law 14, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 15. Excludes contributed funds of $340,159. 16. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock was constructed at a cost of $8,648,492 (non-Federal). 17. Does not include allotment of $60,000 (9613123). 18. Does not include expenditures of $36,630 (9613123). 19. Includes $454,259 for maintenance and $548,948 for operation and care for previous project, including $75,000 from appropriation for maintenance and operation of darn and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $7,005 contributed funds. 20. Includes AE&D funds for replacement of Vermilion Lock. 21. Excludes $10,904 for new work on White Lake to Pecan Island section of existing project. 22. Excludes $10,742 for maintenance on White Lake to Pecan Island section of existing project. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds. Includes $13,163 of R&H funds and $109,714 accelerated Public Works Act funds. 23. Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. 24. Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). 25. Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). 26. Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. 27. Contributed by Board of Commissioners. Port of New Orleans, for providing fill for future industrial sites adjacent to turning basin and for dredging cable and pipeline crossings. 11-22 See Section in Text Project 32,102,000 29,238,754 2,089,721 2,061,268 1,622,263 1,631,263 1,752,000 1,732,606 51,469,000 51,239,510 3,416,430 3,416,430 I NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 Water Resources Development Act, Mar. 7, 1974 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 22, 1967 Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 June. 26, 19343 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM, LA (See Sec. 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth alligator weed, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growth from navigable waters in tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in southeastern United States. Research and planning costs prior to construction to be borne fully by the United States and not included in costs shared by local interests. Provides for comprehensive program for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious plant growths from navigable waterways, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER, BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, LA (See Sec. 2 of Text) 20- by 400-foot navigation channels connecting Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Gulf of Mexico, and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black. The non-Federal interests shall contribute 25 percentum of the costs of areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and of necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor. This requirement shall be waived if applicable waste treatment facilities are constructed and water quality standards are not being violated. BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA (See Sec. 3 of Text) A channel about 37 miles long with a 12-foot depth and 125-foot width from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Grand Isle, LA, to mile 15.5 in Bayou St. Denis; a channel along western shore of Barataria Bay and through Barataria Pass to 12-foot depth contour in the gulf, with an extension of project to include westerly 4.3 miles of Bayou Rigaud. BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE-JUMP WATERWAY, LA (See Sec. 4 of Text) Permanent closure of head of bayou, without a lock; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Larose to Gulf of Mexico by Belle Pass; closure of Pass Fourchon; and a jettied entrance at mouth of Bell Pass. Auxiliary channel 12 by 125 feet from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (mile 37.2) to Bayou Lafourche vicinity Leeville 12-by 125-foot channel improvement in Bayou Lafourche from Leeville to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico; 9- by 100-foot channel improvement in Bayou Lafourche from Leeville to Golden Meadow; 12- by 125-foot channel from Leeville through Southwestern Louisiana Canal to and through Bayou Rigaud; and restore and extend jetties from 6- by 12-foot contour when justified to effect reduction in maintenance dredging. Bayou Lafourche, between Canal Boulevard in Thibodaux, Lafourche Parish, LA, and the head of the bayou at its junction with the Mississippi River levee and Donaldsonville, Ascension Parish, LA, is declared nonnavigable. BAYOU TECHE, LA (See Sec. 5 of Text) Improve stream from its mouth to St. Martinville by removing obstructions and dredging. Construct lock and dam and extend improvement to Arnaudville, LA. Increase channel dimensions from mouth to Keystone Lock. Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 874, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 298, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 155, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 93-251. Sec. 58, 93rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 82, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 45, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 112, 8th Cong. 1st sess.' S. Doc 93, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' Annual Report, 1889, p. 1532. H. Doc. 527, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1329, 62d Cong., 3d sess 2 11-23 Documents _ ___ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 19343 Jul. 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA (See Sec. 6 of Text) Channel 30 by 250 feet from Lake Charles docks to gulf, repair and extend existing jetties to about 10-foot-depth contour, with a channel 30 by 250 feet between jetties; dredging approach channel 32 by 400 feet in gulf from sea ends of jetties to 32-footdepth contour; and provision for extension of jetties to 15-footdepth contour, if such action would be more economical than maintenance of approach channel by dredging. Channel 30 by 250 feet around Clooney Island. Channel depth of 35 feet from wharves of Lake Charles Harbor and terminal district, including Clooney Island Loop, to jetty channel, a uniformly increasing depth of 35 to 37 feet in jetty channel, and a depth of 37 feet in approach channel in Gulf of Mexico. An approach channel 42 by 800 feet from end of jetty to 42-foot contour in gulf; a jetty channel 400 feet wide, varying from 40 feet deep at shoreline to 42 feet deep at seaward end of jetty; a channel 40 by 400 feet from shoreline (mile 0) to Port of Lake Charles (mile 34.4); enlarge existing turning basin at mile 29.6 to 40 feet deep; a mooring basin (mile 3) 350 by 2,000 by 40 feet; a 35- by 250-foot extension of existing ship channel from Port of Lake Charles (mile 34.4) to vicinity of U.S. Highway 90 Bridge; a turning basin at upper terminus, 750 by 1,000 by 35 feet; and maintenance of 12- by 200-foot channel from ship channel to Cameron, LA. FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA (See Sec. 7 of Text) A new 12- by 125-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 161.2 west of Harvey Lock to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico near Freshwater Bayou; construction of an 84- by 600- foot lock with a depth of 16 feet over sill near Gulf of Mexico; and construction of jetties from shoreline to 6-foot-depth contour in Gulf of Mexico, if maintenance dredging of channel without jetties proves to be more expensive than construction and maintenance of jetties. Until such determination has been made, offshore channel should be dredged and maintained to provide a 12- by 250-foot channel. In event jetties are provided, offshore section should then be maintained to 12- by 125-foot project in jettied reach, and 250 feet beyond. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT) (See Sec. 8 of Text) Construct waterway from New Orleans, LA, to Galveston Bay, TX Extension of waterway to Corpus Christi, TX A channel 9 by 100 feet from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Enlarge waterway from 9 by 100 feet to 12 by 125 feet from Apalachee Bay, FL, to Corpus Christi, TX, and its extension to vicinity of Mexican border, except between Mobile Bay, AL, and New Orleans, LA, where width shall be 150 feet; and rental of Inner Harbor Navigation Canal facilities. Alternative connection with Mississippi River in vicinity of Algiers at New Orleans. Enlarge and extend Plaquemine-Morgan City route from Mississippi-Atchafalaya section of waterway, in vicinity of Morgan City, to and through a new terminal lock and entrance channel to Mississippi River in vicinity of Port Allen, opposite lower limit of Port of Baton Rouge. Restore, improve, and maintain Franklin Canal as a terminal branch channel, 8 by 60 feet, from its confluence with Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Franklin, LA. 11-24 H. Doc. 299, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 465, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 190, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 436, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 435, 86th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., 1st sess.; H. Doc 230, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 5 S. Doc. 188, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 242, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 189, 79th Cong., 2d sess. NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 23, 1962 WRD Act of 1976, dated Oct. 22, 1976 (PL 94-587) Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar.29, 1956 A salt-water guard lock in waterway at mile 238 west of Harvey Lock. Enlarge waterway to 16 by 150 feet from Mississippi River to Atchafalaya River, except in vicinity of Houma (mile 50.5 to 63.5); of Houma bypass (mile 50.5 to 63.5) and of Algiers alternative canal; and enlarge waterway from Atchafalaya River to Sabine River to 16 by 200 feet. Replacement of Vermilion Lock, in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Engineers in the report dated Aug. 3, 1976, recommending a lock size of 110 feet wide by 1,200 feet long by 15 feet deep. HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA (See Sec. 9 of Text) Assumption of maintenance and operation of Houma Navigation Canal, constructed by Terrebonne Parish, to dimensions of 15 by 150 feet. LELAND BOWMAN LOCK, LA (REPLACEMENT OF LOCK) (FORMERLY VERMILION LOCK) (See Sec. 10 of Text) A replacement lock, 110 feet wide and 1,200 feet long, to accommodate present and projected marine traffic. MERMENTAU RIVER, LA (See Sec. 11 of Text) Channel enlargement, lower Mermentau River, from mile 15 to Gulf of Mexico, and construction of a lock and control spillway at Catfish Point, mile 24. Channel enlargement; lower Mermentau River below Grand Lake, mile 25; construct a gated-control structure at or near Grand Cheniere, mile 7; enlarge and realine Inland Waterway from Franklin, LA, to Mermentau River, LA, from Vermilion Bay to White Lake, via new channel, and from White Lake to Grand Lake; enlarge channel of North Prong of Schooner Bayou; construct a gated-control structure in new channel near Schooner Bayou lock; and include project "Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA," and portion of project "Inland Waterway from Franklin, LA, to Mermentau River," west of Vermilion Bay in modified project "Mermentau River, LA." MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA (See Sec. 12 of Text) Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass, and Southwest Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River from New Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, "Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet, Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar Channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South Pass Bar Channel 30 by 600 feet. Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet within presently authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA (See Sec. 13 of Te x t) Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and provides, when economically justified, for construction of a lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, LA. 11-25 Documents S. Doc. 231, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 114 Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. H. Doc. 583, 87th Cong., 2d sess.1 Approved by Secretary of the Army, May 1967, under authority of the R&H Act of 1909. S. Doc. 94, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 231, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 215, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' S. Doc. 36, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 82d Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 22, 1976 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Jul. 25, 1912 Jun. 10, 1872 Jun. 14, 1880 Jun. 14, 1960 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23, 1976, and Oct. 1, 19763 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Amends above Act making the construction of bridge relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet channel. MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS, VENICE, LA (See Sec. 14 of Text) Enlargement of existing channels of Baptiste Collette Bayou and Grand-Tiger Passes to 14 by 150 feet with 16 by 250-foot entrance channels in open water and jetties, if justified. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA (See Sec. 15 of Text) Appropriations for Florida and Louisiana for extermination or removal of plants, building of boats, and establishment of booms. Authorized use of mechanical, chemical, or other means whatsoever. Made appropriation available for State of Mississippi and also made available for use in that State operating plant pertaining to work in Louisiana. TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA (See Sec. 16 of Text) Improvement, without dredging, by removing overhanging trees, snags, and obstructions to navigation from Wells to mouth. Present project above entrance channel. 8- by 100-foot entrance channel from 8-foot depth contour in Lake Pontchartrain to 8-foot depth in River. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) (See Sec. 17 of Text) Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Houma through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16,3 miles. Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Houma navigation canal. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA (See Sec. 19 of Text) To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See. Sec.20 of Text) Control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the Chalmette Area plan. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 21 of Text) A loop levee about 36 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. MCKINNEY BAYOU, AR AND TX (See Sec. 22 of Text) Provides channel enlargement of McKinney Bayou; outlet channels to Red River; interior drainage channels; and four flood flow structures by USDA. Sec. 186, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 91, 55th Cong., 3d sess. H. Ex. Doc. 54, 46th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1871, p. 553. Annual Report, 1879, p.946. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jul. 28, 1967, under Sec. 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. H. Doc. 206, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doe. 639, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 184, 89th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 647, 94th Cong.. 2d sess. 11-26 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 23 of Text) Oct. 27, 1965 Construction of new levees along Lake Palourde and Bayou H. Doc. 167, 89th Cong., 1st Ramos, levee to tie-in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee and three sess. gravity drainage structures in Morgan City unit and enlargement of bank levee, construction of new levee, and construction of one floodgate and five gravity drainage structures in Franklin and vicinity unit. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 24 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, H. Doc. 550, 87th Cong., 2d for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing sess. heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in five separate reaches. 1. Contains latest published map. 4. Authorized under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood 2. For latest published map, see H. Doc. 288, 66th Cong., Control Act of 1965. lstsess. 5. Not mentioned in authorizing act. 3. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. BAYOU TECHE, LA, LOCKS (See Sec. 5 of Text) Pertinent Data Miles from Miles from Width of chamber Length available for full width Lift Depth on miter sill at mean low gulf level Character of foundation Kind of dam Type of construction Completed Open to navigation Cost Keystone Lock 18 (New Iberia) 82.5 (Intracoastal Waterway) 36 feet 160 feet 8 feet 8 feet Timber piles Timber, rockfill Concrete 1913 $257,720 Berwick Lock 1.7 (Berwick, LA) 9 (Below mouth of Bayou Teche) 45 feet 300 feet 0-14.5 feet 9 Timber piles Reinforced concrete September 1951 November 1950 $2,100,000 11-27 --- --- TABLE 11-C TABLE l-D GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (NEW ORLEANS DIST.)-LOCKS (See Sec. 8 of Text) Pertinent Data Pertinent Data Inner Bayou Bayou Harbor Plaque- Algiers Boeuf Sorrel Calcasieu Harvey Navigation mine Port Allen Vermilion Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock Canal Lock Lock Lock Lock Miles from New Orleans, LA (Canal St.) Miles below Lake Charles, LA Miles from Abbeville, LA Miles from Mississippi River Miles from Calcasieu River 96.6 (via Har- 135 (via Harvey Lock) vey Lock) 16.6 26 0.38 56.7 (via Plaquemine Lock) 18 (via Plaquemine Lock) Miles from Vermilion River Width of chamber Width between abutments Length available for full width Lift 75 feet 56 feet 75 feet 800 feet 1,156 feet 797 feet 0-18 feet 0-11.3 feet 0-21 feet D)epth on sill at 13 feet mean low gulf level Character of foundation Timber piles 13 feet Concrete slab on medium of stiff clay 14 feet Timber piles 75 feet 75 feet 84 feet 75 feet 56 feet 1,206 feet 425 feet 0-4 feet 13 feet Concrete slab on preconstructed stiff clay 640 feet 0-19.6 feet 0-17.4 feet 12 feet 13.5 feet (miter sill) (miter sill) Timber piles Timber piles 1,202 feet 1,182 feet 0-45 feet 0-5 feet (either direction) 13.75 feet (miter sill) Concrete slab on clay 11.3 feet Timber piles 3.3 2.9 132.5 0.13 0.6 0.5 0.23 til 0 yC tEl z z tt'll r2 Co 1.75 Type of construction Kind of dam Opened to April navigation 1956 Cost Completed Reinforced Reinforced concrete concrete gate bays and earth chamber Reinforced concrete gate bays and earth chamber September June 1954 1951 Reinforced concrete gate bays and earth chamber December 1950 $5,215,700 $2,754,000 $4,700,948 $2,133,527 (Flood Control (Flood Control MR&T Funds) MR&T Funds) - - October 1952 - Reinforced Reinforced concrete concrete 1934 February 1923 $1,775,132 $8,648,492 (non- Federal) 1935 - - Reinforced Reinforced - concrete concrete 19091 July 1961 $1,302,006 $13,902,222 1909 July 1961 Reinforced concrete spillway dam, vertical cast steel gates, timber pile foundation 1933 $330,7652 19343 1. Closed permanently September 29,1961. 2. Replacement of lock approved by the Secretary of Army, May 16, 1967; estimated Federal cost $25,900,000. 3. Transferred to project status. Contruction of replacement lock, scheduled for January 1980. 1-- z 0 rt Y a) H TABLE 11-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1984 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge' Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA Baton Rouge Harbor, Segment between Mi. 2.5 and 5.02 Bayou Bonfouca, LA Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA3' 4 5 6 Bayou Dupre, LA7 Bayou Grosse Tete, LA8 Bayou Lacombe, LA Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, LA Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, LA Bayou Terrebonne, LA4' 9 Bayou Vermilion, LA4 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA3 Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA' � Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA Cascasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA" Cane River, LA3' 6 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA'2 Grand Bayou Pass, LA Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA" 13 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA'4 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur- Bulkheads and Jetties Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA'5 Little Caillou Bayou, LA Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, LA Navigation work under special authorization (Calcasieu Pass channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, LA)'7 Pass Manchac, LA Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA Sulphur River, AR and TX' 6 Tickfaw. Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA< Vinton Waterway. LA2' Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Deauthorized 1967 1978 1981 19462 1974 1887 1968 1967 1970 1950 1970 1958 1983 1961 1947 1936 1976 1981 1973 1910 1967 1971 1950 1960 1956 19422 1950 1973 1977 1976 1957 1950 1981 1919 1973 1950 28,234 501,963 30,997 5,000 38,915 1969 4,716 96,916 33,410 33,355 238,828 2,891,822 120,089 34,900 1,015,81410 5,856,200 4,197,262 2,500 58,342 202,817 7,676 249,052 77,761 5,197,97516 2,499,555 1,374 45,989 8,115 69,087 290,192 104,1877 123,454 92,276 223,616 36,780 28,315 213,455 1,627,724 251,691 200,169 37,169 2,000 192,011 452,611 14,48012 552,780 11,699 241,896 751,485 114,519 139,755 10,039 811,172 92,163 1928 1914 Nov. 1979 1931 1939 May 1981 1938 May 1956 1915 March 1923 March 1957 1916 1896 April 1974 Sep. 1978 Jan. 1968 1959 Dec. 1914 1939 Nov. 1979 1929 Nov. 1974 1912 Nov. 1980 1921 Nov. 1979 11-30 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-E OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) Cost to Sep. 1984 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA'3 1948 10,904 0,742 Waterway from Empire, LA, to Gulf of Mexico Complete 1981 1,068,142 835,252 Jun. 1950 1. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized south bank of said stream was declared nonnavigable. under Truman-Hobbs Act. 10. Includes $66,000 contributed funds. 2. Date authorized. 11. Operation and maintenance of the structure reported 3. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. under project "Calcasieu River and Pass, LA." 4. Includes previous project costs. 12. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 5. No commerce reported. 13. Not completed; incorporated in navigation project 6. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th "Mermentau River, LA." Cong., 1st sess. 14. Not completed; superseded for most of its length by 7. Includes $56 cost incurred in 1969. present 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which 8. Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 coincides with or parallels it. providing for widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is 15. Maintenance project; no future work schedules. inactive. 16. Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public 9. By Public Law 88-404, that portion of Bayou Terre- Works funds) for new work on previous project. Includes bonne between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream $114,519 for maintenance of previous project. and a line determined by prolonging and extending eastern 17. Work is under continuing authority. right-of-way line of New Orleans Boulevard southerly to TABLE 11-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1984 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA' Amite River and Tributaries, LA Bayou Bodcau Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA 12 Bayou Choupique, LA3 Bayou Nicholas, Coushatta, LA3 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA' , 12 Bayou Rapides, LA3 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA ' 1, '12 Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, LA3 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA' 7'" 1956 1964 1948 1954 1964 1951 1952 1945 1963 1978 1977 $ 1,653,189 3,034,2552 319,200 129,930 70,717 243,3362 95,179 336,063 1,655,700 741,892 - Apr. 1955 - Feb. 1964 Jan. 1948 Mar. 1954 Jun. 1964 Jun. 1939 Dec. 1951 May 1963 Jul. 1978 Apr. 1976 11-31 TABLE 11-F (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized For Last Full Report See Annual Report For: Cost to Sep. 1984 Operation and Mo. and Yr, Construction Maintenance Completed Colfax, Grant Parishes, LA Cooper Lake and Channels, TX8 East Point, LA Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake 0' the Pines, TX8 + Garland City, AR.'" Grant Parish below Colfax, LA' " Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR.' " Maniece Bayou, AR.' 2, 12 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, AR."' 12 Natchitoches Parish, LA 2 Pineville, Red River, LA"' 31 Posten Bayou, AR. ' 12 Red River Parish, LA " ' 12 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA', ' Saline Point, LA' " Twelvemile Bayou, LA 1 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries .............. $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA .............. .......... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA ...... 170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ............................ 425.209 Maniece Bayou, AR. ..................... 39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA ................. 250,000 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. (Sec. 205. 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended.) 4. Construction not initiated. 5. Inactive. 6. Includes $92,000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7, Flood Control Act 1928, as amended by Sec. 9. Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President. Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. These projects transferred to the Fort Worth District. Southwestern Division, during FY 1979. 9. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. 10. Date authorized. 11. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 12. These projects transferred to the Vicksburg District during FY 1983. 11-32 1938 1979 1969 1979 1976 1941 1979 1941 1970 8,301,021 Aug. 1968 Jul. 1974 Aug. 1977 70,348 20,839,300 486,069 14,175,197 1,335,842 38,809 1,018,005 88,006 970,9322 1,529,478 232,426 149,435 3.908,000 124,111 335,433 35,659,176 1963'" 1956 1953 1973 1939 1953 1945 1966 1979 Aug. 1969 Aug. 1955 Dec. 1951 Mar. 1953 May 1965 11.195,021 __ __ __ __ NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-G ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 84 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation (110) GIWW LA & TX Section -10032 Flood Control Studies (120) Aloha-Rigolette Area, LA -12123 Amite River & Tributaries, LA -50100 Lake Pontchartrain-West Shore, LA -79700 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA -61610 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Land Loss & Marsh Creation -12348 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Shore & Barrier Island Erosion -12354 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Water Supply -12355 Mermentau, Vermilion & Calcasieu Rivers & Bayou Teche, LA -34014 West Bank of Miss. River in vicinity of New Orleans, LA -59360 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations -17250 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Planning Assistance to States (186) -51850 TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies -53820 TOTAL (Category 200) CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING (Category 400) Lake Pontchartrain-North Shore, LA -12349 Mississippi River-Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA (55270) TOTAL (Category 400) ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Flood Control Projects (650) McKinney Bayou, AR and TX (75353) West Agurs Levee, LA (75345) TOTAL (Category 600) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $ 101,738 101,738 146,704 384,386 59,996 38,342 321,507 256,400 360,282 303,430 1 1,871,048 16,952 8,485 8,485 $1,998,223 174,476 1,085 175,561 0 2,239,489 2,239,489 18,851 17,258 36,109 $4,449,382 11-33 -- VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT * This district comprises western and Central Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northern Louisiana, and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to and including Buffalo River; Pearl River Basin in Mississippi; independent tributaries of the Gulf of Mexico south of the Buffalo River Basin to the Mississippi- Louisiana state line; western tributaries of Mississippi River between White and Atchafalaya Rivers including Arkansas River Basin below a point 3 miles upstream from Pine Bluff and Arkansas River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton, Arkansas; Ouachita and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana; and Red River in Louisiana and Arkansas to the Texas-Louisiana state line. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Claiborne County, MS ............. 2. Lake Providence Harbor, LA ....... 3. Madison Parish Port, LA ........... 4. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR ................... . 5. Overton-Red River Waterway, LA . .. 6. Pearl River, MS and LA .......... 7. Red River emergency bank protection ....................... 8. Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA ........... 9. Rosedale Harbor, MS......... . .... 10. Yazoo River, MS .................. 11. Navigation work under special authorization .................... Flood Control 12. Bayou Bartholomew and tributaries, AR and LA ............ 13. Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ..................... 14. Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA ........ 15. Bayou Pierre, LA ................. 16. Blakely Mountain Dam-Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, AR ....... 17. Caddo Lake, LA .................. 18. DeGray Lake, Caddo River, AR ..... 19. Lead Bayou, MS ................ . 20. Monroe Floodwall, LA ............. 21. Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, AR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22. Ouachita River Levees, LA ......... 23. Ouachita River and tributaries AR and LA .................... 24. Pearl River Basin, MS and LA ...... 25. Porter Bayou, MS ................ Page Flood Control (cont) 12-2 26. Red River Below Denison Dam 12-2 (Vicksburg Dist.) ................. 12-2 27. Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization 12-2 (Vicksburg District) .............. 12-3 28. Red River Waterway-Shreveport, 12-3 LA, to Index, AR ................. 29. Wallace Lake, AR ................ 12-4 30. Inspection of completed Flood Control Projects ................... 12-4 31. Flood control work under 12-5 special authorization .............. 12-5 12-5 Tables Table 12-A Cost and Financial Statement .................. Table 12-B Authorizing Legislation ....... Table 12-C Ouachita and Black Rivers, 12-5 AR and LA (9-Foot Project), Locks and Dams ............. 12-6 Table 12-D Locks in Pearl River Project .... 12-6 Table 12-E Other Authorized Navigation 12-7 Projects ................... Table 12-F Ouachita River and Tributaries 12-7 Existing Project ............. 12-7 Table 12-G Reservoir Operations 12-8 Fiscal Year 1984 ............ 12-8 Table 12-H Red River Below Denison Dam 12-8 (Vicksburg Dist.) New Projects ............... 12-8 Table 12-I Red River Below Denison Dam 12-9 (Vicksburg Dist.) Incorporated Projects ......... 12-9 Table 12-J Other Authorized Flood 12-9 Control Projects ............. 12-10 Table 12-K Active General Investigations ... L 12-1 Page 12-10 12-10 12-11 12-12 12-12 12-12 12-14 12-17 12-20 12-21 12-22 12-23 12-23 12-24 12-25 12-26 12-27 12-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. CLAIBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS. Location. A slack-water harbor on the east bank of the Mississippi River at mile 405 above Head of Passes, and about 4 miles west of Port Gibson, MS. Existing project. A dredged access channel 800 feet long and 150 feet wide with a 400- by 800-foot turning basin and an additional 50 feet of fleeting and berthing on the north and south bank. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Provided a diked disposal area for placement of dredged material for industrial development. Operations and results during fiscal year. The contract dredge Lewis James completed construction in November 1983. Condition as of Sep. 30. No major navigation problems exist at the present time. 2. LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA Location. In Hagaman Chute, a secondary channel of the Mississippi River at mile 483.4 above Head of Passes, and about 3 miles south of Lake Providence, LA. Existing project. A dredged harbor channel about 0.7 mile long and 150 feet wide with a project depth of 9 feet in Hagaman Chute from the Mississippi River. Channel was widened to 400 feet in front of and upstream from port area, a distance of 800 feet, to provide a turning basin. Local interests constructed retaining dikes to provide the disposal area for material excavated from channel and turning basin. Resulting hydraulic fill provides a raised port area. Federal cost of completed work was $198,859, excluding preauthorization study costs of $9,678. Total non-Federal cost was $233,400, including cost of retaining dikes, and a cash contribution of $35,000. In addition, local interests have spent $1,022,000 for port facilities. Restudy of port for expansion, completed under continuing authority program. No further expansion is recommended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Local interests provided port facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. The contract dredge Lewis James removed 103,000 cubic yards of material during FY 84. Condition as of Sep. 30. No major navigation problems exist at the present time. 3. MADISON PARISH PORT, LA Location. A "fast-water" dredged channel located near the right descending bank of the Mississippi River at mile 457.2 above Head of Passes, and about 6 miles north of Tallulah, Louisiana. Existing project. A dredged harbor channel about 0.5 mile long and 150 feet wide with a project depth of 9 feet. A turning basin within this channel was constructed by widening the harbor channel to 350 feetfor a distance of 1,000 feet. Dredged material was used in construction of two hydraulic fills on property ownedby the Madison Parish Port Commission for future development. Channel construction was completed in October 1980. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Madison Parish Port Commis. sion has constructed a multipurpose loading dock, rail facilities, and storage building on hydraulic fill. Two private interests are engaged in grain handling facilities on adjacent properties. Operations and results during fiscal year. The contract dredge Lewis James removed 61,400 cubic yards of material during FY 84. Condition as of Sep. 30. No major navigation problems exist at the present time. 4. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR Location. Ouachita River rises in Polk County, AR, and flows southeasterly and southerly about 600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and Little Rivers at Jonesville, LA, it is called Black River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the Mississippi River. Previous projects. See page 683 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. See page 684 of Annual Report for 1962 for details of existing 6.5-foot navigation project. New work for completed project costs $4,574,551, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Modified project and project for Red River below Fulton, AR, provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to Camden, AR. This is being accomplished by construction of four new locks, 84 feet by 600 feet; new dams; channel realignment to accommodate the 9-foot draft tow; and measures to preserve Catahoula Lake for migratory waterfowl. Jonesville Lock and Dam replaced Lock and Dam No. 2; Columbia Lock and Dam and Dams Nos. 3, 4, and 5; Felsenthal Lock and Dam replaced Lock and Dam No. 6; and Calion Lock and Dam replaced Lock and Dam No. 8. The Felsenthal Canal was deauthorized as of Aug. 5, 1977, in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized establishment of wildlife refuges along Bayou D'Arbonne (14,700 acres) in connection with Columbia Lock and Dam and at Felsenthal Lock and Dam (65,000 acres). The BayOU D'Arbonne refuge was increased to 18,000 acres at the request of the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Approved (1984) estimated cost for new work for 9-foot navigation project is $266,852,000 including $257,000,000 Federal and $9,852,000 non-Federal for lands, damages, and relocations. 12-2 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT al cooperation. Local cooperation for all comwork in Louisiana has been furnished in a timely ii. It is anticipated that local interests in Louiswiiill be able to supply the necessary rights-of-way fo'icnstruction of the cutoffs and bend widenings. Loa interests in Arkansas have furnished the rightsof. wry for the Felsenthal and Calion Locks and Dams and it is anticipated that the remaining rights-of-way will befurnished when needed. The city of Camden, AR, he, rnished land for the Sandy Beach recreation area. surances from local interests including supplesttl assurances (Public Law 91-646) have been acted. Terminal facilities. Public loading docks are at Columbia, LA, and Camden and Crossetts, AR. Privately owned docks and loading and unloading facilitiesare at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington, LA, and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, AR. Two grainhandling facilities and a petroleum-loading facility are in the vicinity of Jonesville, LA, and a grain-handling haciity is in the vicinity of Acme, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of Felsenthal and Calion Locks and Dams is complete. Contracts were awarded for construction of both the Felsenthal and Calion Access Channels and Closure Dams in FY 82. Completion is scheduled in late FY 85. Demolition contracts for removal of Lock 6 and Lock 8 were awarded. A construction contract was also awarded for Crossett Harbor, AR, on Sep. 30, 1982. Dedication ceremonies were held January 13, 1984. During FY 81 a channel alignment review was conducted in response to public opposition to the chanul realignment features of the project. As a result of the alignment review, an amendment was included in 1982 Appropriations Act directing the Chief of Engileers to restudy the navigation options above Crossett, AR with a view of reducing the realignment features. The restudy is complete and was submitted to the APpropriations Committees of Congress in July 1983. The leased dredge, Lewis James, removed 1,125,441 cubic yards of material from the Ouachita-Black aterway between October 1983 and September 1984. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 6.5-foot project was alnpleted and has been maintained to Camden, AR, siace 1925. Planning and design for the 9-foot navigation project started in FY 62 are continuing. Construction at Columbia Lock and Dam started in February 1964. The dam was completed in November 1968, and the lock was completed in January 1970 and Was placed in service in May 1972. Construction at Jonesville Lock and Dam started in May 1967. The lock and dam were completed in January 1972 and were Pced in service in March 1972. A 9-foot navigation channel along the existing project alignment was stablished from the Red River to Sterlington, LA, in June 1972.(See Table 12-C on locks and dams, Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA). Demolition of Lock and Dn No. 6 is under way and Lock and Dam No. 8 will bhein soon. The contract for removal of four abandoned locks and d4rns which proved hazardous to navigation in the Columbia and Jonesville pools is completed. Construction of Felsenthal Lock and Dam is substantially complete. Calion Lock and Dam has opened for limited navigation but one more year of construction remains before it will be functioning at maximum capability. There have been 17,421 acres acquired for the Bayou D'Arbonne Wildlife Refuge and 64,976 acres acquired for the Felsenthal Wildlife Refuge. Acquisition of the lands for both refuges is complete. Acquisition of mineral interests and relocations assistance in the Felsenthal Wildlife Refuge are continuing. 5. OVERTON-RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA Location. In the State of Louisiana between junction of the Old and Mississippi Rivers and Shreveport, LA, along the Old and Red Rivers, through land cuts and natural channels on the south bank of Red River. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and the MRC alluvial valley quadrangle maps.) Existing project. Provides for a navigation route from the Mississippi River at its junction with Old River, through Old River to mile 31 of the Red River; developing a channel about 31 miles long, 200 feet wide, and 9 feet deep. Improvements consist of revetments, dikes, and dredging designed to preserve favorable and correct unfavorable channel alignment and depth. In addition to the existing project, the authorized work included a navigation route from mile 31 of the Red River to Shreveport, LA, via a lateral canal excavated along the south bank of the Red River. However, the portion of the authorized project above mile 31 was reclassified to inactive status as approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers, letter dated Oct. 18, 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 11-18, Annual Report FY 80. Terminal facilities. None. Will be furnished if necessary. Operations and results during fiscal year. The contract dredge Lewis James removed 22,303 cubic yards of material in FY 84. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the lower 31 miles was initiated Nov. 12, 1968, and is 100 percent complete with 68,923 linear feet of bank protected. 6. PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA Location. Pearl River rises in east central Mississippi and flows southwest about 172 miles to Jackson, MS, thence southeast about 269 miles to the head of its delta, where it divides into West Pearl and East Pearl Rivers. West Pearl River flows about 34 miles to the Rigolets, a tidal pass connecting Lake Pontchartrain with Lake Borgne, an arm of the Gulf of Mexico. Previous project. For details see page 750, Annual Report for 1938 and page 463, Annual Report for 1965. 12-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the mouth of West Pearl River for 58 miles to the mouth of Bogalusa Creek at Bogalusa, LA, 7 feet deep at low water with a bottom width of 100 feet in the river sections and 80 feet in the canal section, with locks 65 by 310 feet clear inside dimensions. The plan of improvement may be divided into three sections as follows: the river section from the mouth of West Pearl River to mile 28.5 at Holmes Bayou with a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide to be obtained by dredging, snagging, and construction of cutoffs and easement of critical bends at eight locations below Lock One along Pearl River in its reach from its mouth to mile 26, all at a depth of 7 feet; the canal section from mile 28.5 to 48.7 at Pools Bluff with a channel 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide to be obtained by construction of three locks in the canal with sills across Bogue Chitto at mile 44 and across the river at mile 48.7; the river section from mile 48.7 to 58 at the mouth of Bogalusa Creek to be obtained by dredging, snagging, and easing of bends. At Bogalusa the mean variation of water surface is 10 feet and extreme, 23 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 12-D for features of locks included in existing projects.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The city of Bogalusa provides a barge terminal consisting of a wharf, transit shed, and access road at Richardson's Landing at the head of the project. Only natural landings exist at various locations on the river. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance was performed at each of the three lock sites during the year. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to adoption of modifications authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act, was begun in October 1938 and completed in January 1956. All locks were opened to navigation in November 1953. No work has been initiated on modifications (cutoffs and easements of bends below Lock 1) authorized by the 1966 Act. Total Federal costs under existing project as of Sep. 30, 1984, were $8,562, 908 for new work and $5,489,140 for maintenance, a total of $14,052,048. Contributed funds for new work amount to $65,000. The responsibility of this project was transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division, on Oct. 1, 1981. 7. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the head of the levee system above Index, TX. Existing project. Provides for realigning the banks by means of cutoffs and training works and for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods as emergency conditions may require in advance of developing the design for the entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1984) is $63,846,000 Federal and $220,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $25,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see pages 11-19 to 11-20, Annual Report FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of preparing plans and specifications, surveys, and general engineering. Stabilization work was completed at Little River Phase II, mile 405.5L; Boyd Revetment, mile 383L; Clipper Revetment, mile 406R; and Mo-Pac Revetment, mile 403R. Work was initiated and completed at Kuykendall Revetment, mile 398.2R and Swan Lake, mile 356.4L. A construction contract for Goose Lake Realignment, miles 348-352, was awarded September 1984. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1972 and is 90 percent complete. 8. RED RIVER WATERWAYMISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA Location. From east central to northwest Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and Shreveport, LA. Existing project. Provide a navigation route from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old River via Old and Red River to Shreveport, LA, developing a channel approximately 236 miles long, 9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development will include five locks and dams, realignment and contraction of the river as necessary to develop an efficient channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to hold the newly developed channel in position. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1984) is $1,512,000,000 Federal and $66,260,000 non-Federal, including $35,000,000 contributed funds. The Federal cost excludes $286,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-21, Annual Report FY 80. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 on May 23, 1973, for the portion of the project within Louisiana which were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. Terminal facilities. Local interests are to provide adequate terminal facilities along the waterway. The 12-4 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT %entered into an agreement with the City of Airia, LA, whereby material excavated from the d Philip Bayou Realignment will be used as fill ,fport construction at mile 109. Construction is ~ued to begin in FY 85. orations and results during fiscal year. Hired l wcontinued work on Design Memoranda, preparatof Plans and Specifications, Surveys, General �$ineering, and Model Studies. Phase III constructi: tLock and Dam 1 reached 99 percent completion, eonstruction on the John H. Overton Lock and aI reached 45 percent completion with scheduled contract completion date of Mar. 25, 1987. Construction of hannel realignment and stabilization works in Pls 1 and 2 consisted of the continuation of six wotracts, the completion of two contracts, and the initiation of three new contracts. The contract dredge IeMis James removed 22,303 cubic yards of material itn84t. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated iily 1973, and project is 32 percent complete. 9. ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS Location. In Log Loader Chute, a secondary channel of the Mississippi River at mile 584.5 above Head of Passes, and about 2 miles south of Rosedale, MS. Existing project. A dredged harbor channel about 2.4 miles long and 150 feet wide with a project depth of 9 feet. A turning basin consists of a dredged channel 1,000 feet long and 400 feet wide. Local interests contructed retaining dikes to provide the disposal area for material excavated from the channel and turning min. Resulting hydraulic fill provides a 20-acre port ties. Channel construction was completed in February 1978 at a cost of $2 million. Local interests are continuing construction on port terminal, dock facilities, and additional dredging. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Local interests provided port filities. Operations and results during fiscal year. The eontract dredge, Lewis James, removed 180,000 cubic Yards of material during FY 84. Condition as of Sep. 30. No major problems were experienced with navigation. 10. YAZOO RIVER, MS Location. Formed by junction of Tallahatchie and Ylobusha Rivers in Leflore County, MS, flows about 19 miles southerly and southwesterly, and enters bi5issippi River at Vicksburg, MS. (See Mississippi ialluvial valley quadrangle maps.) Previous projects. See page 681 of Annual Report f' 1961 for details. Authorized project. The Yazoo River Navigation project consists of a 9-foot channel from its mouth to Greenwood, MS, mile 164.9 (present mileage), with a minimum width of 150 feet. The project includes a single lock (84 feet by 600 feet) and a dam located near Vicksburg, dredging and channel realignment; 600,000 acre-feet of additional storage in Sardis Lake to augment low flows in the Yazoo River, and recreation features. Total estimated (1984) Federal cost of 9-foot project is $225,000,000 which includes $425,000 for the U.S. Coast Guard. Total estimated non-Federal cost is $2,786,000. These figures do not include the total estimated (1984) Federal cost of Belzoni Bridge relocation which is $8,570,000 and the total estimated non- Federal cost which is $252,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-3 of FY 80 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Greenwood there is a privately owned dock and a grain-loading facility. There are privately owned facilities for loading grain at Belzoni and Satartia. At Yazoo City there is a privately owned grain-loading facility, a private log-loading facility, a private dock to handle dry and liquid fertilizer, and a public terminal. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction of Belzoni Bridge was about 99 percent complete at the end of the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Entire river is navigable. No work done on new authorization, except for construction work connected with the relocation of State Highway No. 12 Bridge at Belzoni, MS. Phase I studies are continuing on the 9-foot project. 11. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended (preauthorization). During FY 84 Reconnaissance studies continued on Yellow Bend Port, AR, at a cost of $31,013.31; Union County Port, AR, at a cost of $110,164.12; Port Gibson, MS, at a cost of $34,870; Two Bayou Port, AR, at a cost of $41,658; and Greenwood Port, MS, at a cost of $24,107.55. Flood Control 12. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Bayou Bartholomew rises in Jefferson County, AR, about 10 miles northwest of Pine Bluff and flows southerly about 370 miles to join the Ouachita River upstream from Sterlington, LA. 12-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Authorized project. Project includes ten waterretention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and six local levee units along the main stem of Bayou Bartholomew in Louisiana. However, because of public opposition to construction of the loop levees, preconstruction planning of the six loop levees has been deferred until such time as there is sufficient support for such levees by local interests. Channel improvements previously authorized are deferred until it is determined that the quality and quantity of water downstream will not be adversely affected. Latest approved (1979) estimated cost of new work is $46,913,000 including $44,800,000 Federal and $2,113,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-5 of FY 80 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning and design have been deferred pending favorable benefit-cost ratios. Condition as of Sep. 30. Preparation of general design memorandum has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. 13. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. In east bank flood plain of Red River. Bayou Bodcau rises in vicinity of Hope, AR, and flows southerly through Bayou Bodcau Reservoir and Bodcau Lake to join Cypress Bayou and form Red Chute Bayou, continues through Red Chute Bayou, Flat River, and Loggy Bayou to Red River, about 40 miles below Shreveport, LA. Authorized project. Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee: Extend existing levee from about 8 miles southeast of Benton, LA, proceeding southerly to junction of Cross and Red Chute Bayous, and then parallel to Red Chute Bayou on the right descending bank to its junction with Cutoff Bayou for a total distance of approximately 25 miles; construct landside drainage channel and several culverts with flap gates to Red Chute Bayou; construct cutoff on Red Chute Bayou just south of Louisiana Highway 527; construct approximately 5 miles of levee on left descending bank of Red Chute Bayou extending south from Louisiana Highway 612, and relocate utility lines as needed. Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee: Extend from lower end of existing Red River levee in vicinity of Ninock, LA, along high (left descending) bank of Red River to a point on right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, about 1 mile above its mouth, thence generally along right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, Red Chute, Cutoff Bayou, and Flat River to Taylortown to tie into existing Red River levee; close Flat River near its junction with Cutoff Bayou and install one 36-inch round corrugated metal pipe with automatic flap gate to drain isolated pockets and provide uninterrupted drainage; construct drainage structures on Flat River near its junction with Red Chute Bayou and along alignment of the Loggy Bayou in the vicinity of Grassy Lake; and make necessary utility relocations. Flat River channel improvement: Enlarge to average bottom width of 50 feet with flat side slopes and deepen by 2 to 6 feet from the confluence with Cutoff Bayou to junction with Cooper Bayou, 11.6 miles, including required relocations and modifications of utilities. Estimated cost for new work (October 1984) is $25,100,000 Federal and $7,600,000 non-Federal; however, this is subject to change pending outcome of the reevaluation study currently under way. The subject project was one of the Water Resources projects reviewed in March 1977 in accordance with the President's request. As a result of this review, the President recommended to deauthorize this project. Congress subsequently directed the Corps to take the following two actions: Construct levees on Red Chute Bayou below Cutoff Bayou that are required to prevent induced flood damage that would otherwise result from the abandonment of partly completed project. Initiate studies to determine if modifications to the authorized project would permit its completion in a form consistent with the current executive policy. Engineering and design work for the induced flood prevention plan below Cutoff Bayou and project modi. fication studies were being conducted when President Reagan signed, on Dec. 4, 1981, the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill of 1982, which contained language that "reconfirmed without further study and analysis" the plan for flood control for the project as approved by the Flood Control Act of 1965. Additional documents concerning environmental and socioeconomic impacts are currently being prepared and will be available to the public prior to further construction. There is clear evidence of a marked shift in land use within the project area over the past several years, from rural to urban-suburban. Because of this shift, we now find it necessary to expand our studies beyond those initially envisioned. The expanded studies will cover the areas of alternatives and economics, in addition to the natural environment. We are presently assessing the impacts of the expanded studies on the scheduled date for resuming construction on the project. Local cooperation. For details see pages 11-24 and 25, Annual Report for FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor forces consisted of preparation of plans and specifications, for design deficiency, and engineering studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1974 and is 17 percent complete. 14. BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA Location. In Red River Basin on Bayou Bodcau in Bossier Parish, LA, 72 miles above mouth of Loggy' 12-6 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT o and 35 miles northeast of Shreveport, LA. (Refer teological Survey State map, scale 1:500,000.) ikisting project. An earthfill dam rising 76 feet above streambed with a reservoir providing a flood dage prevention storage capacity of 357,000 acre- Ut. Outlet works are in south abutment, and an u eontrolled spillway is on north abutment. Reservoir controls 656 square miles, or 53 percent, of entire ~rainage area of Bayou Bodcau. Construction of a dway for diversion of Bayou Bodcau and Cypress BAyou to improve flood protection was authorized by t936 Flood Damage Prevention Act. This authorization We modified by 1938 Flood Control Act, which authorised construction of a reservoir and other flood damage prevention works in lieu of construction of a floodway frdiversion of Bayou Bodcau and Cypress Bayou, LA te improve protection, and further modified by War ment Civil Appropriation Act of 1939 which ided that reservoir and other flood control works ou Bodcau and Cypress Bayou, LA, authorized Food Control Act of 1938 shall be constructed in a ordance with revised plans and cost estimates in 0[ice, Chief of Engineers. New work was completed in 1 61. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam and reservoir, real estate activities, stream gaging, surveys and economic studies. Number of visitor-days of recreational use, 218,405 (FY 84.) Maximum pool elevation was 167.5 feet NGVD on April 7-10, 1984, when storage in the flood control pool was 15,085 acre-feet. On September 30, 1984, the pool elevation was 159.2 feet NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 613 acre-feet. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated April 1947 and completed April 1961. 15. BAYOU PIERRE, LA Location. In Red River Basin below Shreveport, LA, along channel of Bayou Pierre from its mouth at Grand score, LA, upstream 30 miles to its confluence with Bayou Wincy. (Refer to Geological Survey State map, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. Provides for widening channel at Intervals, totaling 12.9 miles and snagging of 29.7 miles, to reduce flood damage and improve sanitary and living conditions over a wide area. Cost of new Work, completed in 1939, was $299,529. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued willow control and drift removal activities as required. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in FY 38 and completed in FY 39. 16. BLAKELY MOUNTAIN DAMLAKE OUACHITA, OUACHITA RIVER, AR Location. This project is on Ouachita River, AR, at head of Lake Hamilton (pool of Carpenter Dam), 486 miles above mouth of Black River, and approximately 10 miles northwest of Hot Springs, AR. Previous project. See page 693 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. A lake of 2,768,500-acre-feet storage capacity for flood control and other purposes with an installed power capacity of 75,000 kilowatts. Latest approved (1983) estimated project cost is $44,100,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Power production totaled 155,907,000 kilowatt-hours of which 154,082,000 kilowatt-hours was delivered to Arkansas Power and Light Co., under contract between that company and Southwestern Power Administration. The maximum pool elevation of 578.48 feet above NGVD, or 0.48 feet above the maximum power pool, occurred on March 29, 1984. Storage in the flood control pool at this time amounted to 29,300 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow of 18,852 cubic feet per second occurred on Mar. 28, 1984. On Sep. 30, 1984, the pool elevation was 572.07 feet NGVD and storage in the power pool was 1,058,500 acre-feet. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was started in August 1947 and was completed for beneficial use in October 1955, except for public-use facilities. Remote control equipment has been installed and is operating the power plants at DeGray Lake and Narrows Dam- Lake Greeson. Power generation, operation, and maintenance activities are continuing. 17. CADDO LAKE DAM, LA Location. In Caddo Parish, about 19 miles northwest of Shreveport, LA, at the eastern end of Caddo Lake and at head of Twelve Mile Bayou. Existing project. Replacement of the original dam was completed in June 1971, having same flow characteristics and located as near as practicable downstream of the old dam, built under navigation project "Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA." New dam will be capable of being raised in the future if desirable and justified. Estimated cost of new work (October 1976) was $3,587,800 Federal and $28,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Public Law 94-587, Section 174, amended the Flood Control Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-298) to provide that operation and maintenance of Caddo Lake Dam be the responsibility of the Secretary of the Army, acting 12-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 through the Chief of Engineers. Conveyance of title to the United States from the Caddo Levee District is being reviewed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and water quality studies. Maximum pool elevation was 156.9 feet NGVD on Feb. 17, 1984, when storage in the flood control pool was 0 acre-foot. On Sep. 30, 1984, the pool elevation was 140.30 feet NGVD and storage in flood control pool was 0 acre-foot. A feasibility study investigating enlarging the lake for M&I water supply is currently under way. proximately 30 miles from the Mississippi River near Cleveland, MS. Existing project. The plan of improvement calls for enlarging the existing Lead Bayou channel to providea 1.5-year degree of protection to agricultural areas anda 10-year degree of protection to the small developed area near Cleveland, MS. Total estimated Federal cost is $1,526,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Condition as of Sep. 30. The construction contract was completed Sep. 14, 1983. The stabilization of(1) bridge remains and will be accomplished under separate contract. 18. DEGRAY LAKE, CADDORIVER, AR 20. MONROE FLOODWALL, LA Location. On Caddo River (mile 8), a tributary of Ouachita River, in a narrow, rocky gorge in Clark and Hot Spring Counties, approximately 7 miles north of Arkadelphia, AR. Existing project. Provides for a lake of 881,900 acrefeet storage capacity for flood control, water supply, pollution abatement, and power with an installed power capacity of 68,000 kilowatts (one conventional 40,000- kilowatt generating unit and one 28,000-kilowatt generating unit with reversible pump-type turbine). Latest approved (1980) estimated first cost is $72,034,000, including $5,800,000 for water supply, to be reimbursed by local interests, exclusive of interest. Local cooperation. None required for flood control and power features. Fully complied with for water supply feature. Operations and results during fiscal year. Power production totaled 82,420,000 kilowatt-hours, of which 81,175,000 kilowatt-hours was delivered to Arkansas Power and Light Co., under contract between that company and Southwestern Power Administration. The maximum pool elevation of 409.89 feet NGVD, or 1.89 feet above the maximum power pool, occurred on May 5, 1984. Storage in the flood control pool at this time amounted to 25,800 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow of 15,264 cubic feet per second occurred on May 3, 1984. On Sep. 30, 1984, the pool elevation was 403.77 feet NGVD and storage in the power pool was 599,800 acre-feet. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started in June 1962 and was essentially complete in December 1971. All major construction is complete including the remote control for the power plant from Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita. Power generation, operation, and maintenance are continuing. 19. LEAD BAYOU, MS Location. Lead Bayou is a tributary of the Sunflower River in Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, MS, ap- Location. Monroe, LA, lies within the alluvial valley of the Mississippi River and on the east bank of the Ouachita River. The city is located in the north-central part of Louisiana, in Ouachita Parish. Existing project. Provides for construction of floodwall to close the 1,750-foot opening extending from Bry Avenue to Grammont Street. Floodwall will provide complete flood protection to the city of Monroe. Total Federal cost of new work was $2,561,000. Non- Federal cost was $206,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of FY 80 Annual Annual Report. Condition as of Sep. 30. Work on the floodwall is complete. 21. NARROWS DAM-LAKE GREESON, LITTLE MISSOURI RIVER, AR Location. Narrows Dam is on the Little Missouri River, AR, 105 miles above the mouth and 5 miles northwest of Murfreesboro, AR. Existing project. Provides a lake of 407,900 acrefeet storage capacity for flood control and other purposes with power installation of 25,500 kilowatts in three units of 8,500 kilowatts each. Latest approved (1983) estimated cost of $20,900,000, excluding $1,738,700 for third generating unit and remote control equipment. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Power production totaled 31,759,540 kilowatt-hours, of which 31,046,110 kilowatt-hours was delivered to Texas- Louisiana Electric Cooperative, Inc., under contract between that company and Southwestern Power Administration. The maximum pool elevation of 547.05 feet NGVD, or 0.95 foot below the maximum power pool, occurred on May 6, 1984. Storage in the flood control pool at this time amounted to 0 foot. Peak 24- hour inflow of 10,606 cubic feet per second occurred on May 3, 1984. On Sep. 30, 1984, the pool elevation was 12-8 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT M*( feet NGVD and storage in the power pool was 11a000 acre-feet. .q,ndition as of Sep. 30. Project was started in May 947 and was completed for beneficial use in May 1491 The third power generating unit was completed in January 1970. Installation of remote control equipment was completed in June 1972. .Power generation, operation, and maintenance are continuing. t. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA Location. East bank of Ouachita River between Bastrop, LA, and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the west bank at West Monroe, Columbia, and Bawcomville. Existing project. There are 105.9 miles of levee on t t bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three loops on 4.West bank. A letter report, approved by the Chief of gineers, authorized gravel surfacing 37.8 miles of sloee,n largement of 40.4 miles of levee, and a 5.7-mile iiuthward extension of the east bank levee. Approved 0979) estimated Federal cost is $9,400,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $25,000. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of FY 80 Annual Report. Condition as of Sep. 30. Completion of the authorized work would not correct all project deficiencies. Enlargement of the Bawcomville levee, enlargement of the east bank levee above Monroe, and replacement of numerous drainage structures are not authorized. Therefore the construction of the present Ouachita River levee project has been deferred. A complete study of the Ouachita River levee system is being accomplished as an interim study of the ongoing comprehensive Ouachita River Basin study. Item I of the Monroe to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed July 7, 1978; additional work is being deferred. 23. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Improvements comprising comprehensive projects are on main stem Ouachita River, AR and LA, onitstributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, AR. Description of Ouachita River Basin is Presented in greater detail on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized general plan for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 12-F. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA, project to incelude ten water-retention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and six local levee units along the main stem of the bayou in Louisiana. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed features of comprehensive project. (See individual statements for further details.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Monroe Floodwall, and Ouachita River Levees are shown in individual reports herein. Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on those features which are complete or not started are in Table 12-F. Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the individual reports. An overall basin study including interim studies of the Monroe-West Monroe area, the Ouachita River Levees, and the Arkansas Lakes is ongoing. 24. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MS AND LA Location. Jackson, MS, is located in Hinds County along the west bank of the Pearl River in central Mississippi. Communities adjacent to Jackson (i.e., Pearl, Flowood, and Richlar 1 are located in Rankin County along the east bank of the Pearl River. Existing Projects. The Jackson-East Jackson Flood Control Project provides for improvements of the Pearl River at Jackson, MS. This project includes two levee systems totaling 13.1 miles in length, with two pumping stations, four gated outlets, and 5.34 miles of channel rectification including three cutoffs with a total length of 2.2 miles in the Pearl River. This project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960. Construction began in July 1964 and work was completed in FY 68. Total Federal cost of the project was $7,190.200. Authorized projects. Public Law 98-63, dated July 29, 1983, authorized design and construction of additional measures to prevent recurring flood damages along the Pearl River at Jackson. Under the Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson, MS, Project, the 4 Point Plan for interim flood control included clearing approximately 3.3 miles of floodway, enlarging the opening at the Highway 25 Bridge, modifying the Ross Barnett Reservoir to allow operation for interim flood control purposes and cutting off a channel bendway downstream of 1-20. The modification of the Ross Barnett Reservoir and the bendway cutoff have been eliminated from the final plan. A construction contract on the clearing work was awarded in August 1984 and is scheduled to be completed in FY 85. Improvements at the Highway 25 Bridge were made by the local sponsor in 1982, and the Corps is reimbursing the local sponsors to cover the Federal cost of this project. Total Federal cost of this project is estimated at $1.6 million. 12-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Also included in the authorized improvements in the Jackson area is the extension of the west bank levee at Fortification Street under the Jackson-East Jackson Flood Control Project. The Fortification Street Levee Extension was initiated and completed in FY 84. Local cooperation. Requirements are provided as prescribed in Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended. Section 3 of that Act stipulates easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; and maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. The local sponsors for these projects are as follows: -Jackson-East Jackson Flood Control Project including the Fortification Street Levee Extension - Rankin-Hinds Pearl River Flood Control and Drainage District -Vicinity of Jackson including Clearing the Floodway and Highway 25 Bridge - Pearl River Basin Development District. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has been completed on the Jackson-East Jackson Flood Control Project and the Highway 25 Bridge improvements. A construction contract was awarded in September 1984 for the 3.3-mile clearing of the Pearl River floodway in Jackson, MS. This work should be completed in early 1985. An overall comprehensive basin study which includes studies of the flooding problems at Jackson, Carthage- Upper Pearl River Basin, Pearlington, Columbia, and Monticello, MS; Slidell and Bogalusa, LA; and other communities is under way. Navigation studies on the Lower Pearl River are also under way as a part of the comprehensive study. 25. PORTER BAYOU, MS Location. Porter Bayou is located in Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, MS. It lies approximately 25 miles east of the Mississippi River, is approximately 5 miles south of Cleveland, MS, and travels through the town of Shaw, MS. Existing project. The plan of improvement calls for selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3. This plan provides a 0.5-year frequency protection for the Porter Bayou area. All construction is being performed from one side of the stream, leaving the other side undisturbed. The total estimated Federal cost of the project is $1,214,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Condition as of Sep. 30. The construction contract was completed Nov. 16, 1983. A separate contract is to be let to biologically remove alligatorweed at Shaw, Mississippi. 26. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and folio "Maps of Red River"-1958 edition.) Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1946 approved general plan for flood control on Red River below Denison Dam, TX and OK, which provides for construction of six flood control reservoirs in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non-Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act further authorized incorporation of several separate existing projects for flood damage prevention along Red River below Deni. son, above jurisdiction of the MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83d Cong., 2d sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 84th Cong., 1st sess., and Public Law 645, 86th Cong., 1st sess., plan of improvement was amended to include additional projects as indicated in following lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered in general flood control plan for the Red River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control projects incorporated into project in Vicksburg District. (See Table 12-H for new projects and Table 12-I for incorporated projects.) Local cooperation. See individual reports herein. 27. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. Along the main stem of the Red River from the head of the levee system immediately above Index, AR, through the southwest corner of Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, LA, on the right bank, and Pineville, LA, on the left bank. Existing project. Raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide protection against flooding and bank protection works at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide against a flood approximately 20 percent greater than the flood of 1945, the flood of record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank protection works are to be constructed at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. Estimated cost for new work (October 1984) is $59,650,000 Federal and $1,560,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; and maintain and 12-10 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT operate works after completion. Local interests have been prompt in furnishing rights-of-way upon request, except for the Belcher Realignment. Assuring Agencies: Red River Levee and Drainage District, Bayou Pierre Levee and Drainage District, North Bossier Levee District, Red River Water Commission, Bossier Levee District, Caddo Levee District, Cane River Levee and Drainage District, Garland Levee District, Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, Miller County Levee District No. 2, Red River Levee District No. 1, Nineteenth Louisiana Levee District, and Long Prairie Levee District. All basic assurances received. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been received from all agencies except the North Bossier Levee District. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, and preparation of plans and specifications. .,Bank stabilization was completed at Lucas Bend, LA, mile 266-R. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in February 1948 and the levees are complete and bank stabilization is 94 percent complete. 28. RED RIVER WATERWAYSHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red River between Shreveport, LA, and Index, AR. Existing project. To provide for realigning the channels of Red River from Shreveport, LA, to the levee system near Index, AR, by means of dredging, cutoffs, and training works and for stabilizing its banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1984) is $199,000,000 Federal and $26,200,000 non- Federal. Local cooperation. Provide prior to construction and without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for disposal of spoil, and provide necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works and also including all additional lands, or rights in land, required to insure public control of the recreational development; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, maintain all the project works upstream of the navigation improvement at Shreveport. LA. after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Provide without cost to the United States all relocations of utilities, bridges (except railroads), sewers, pipelines, and any other alterations of existing improvements which may be required for construction of the project; where the appraised value of the land provided for recreation development amounts to less than 50 percent of the total first cost of recreational development, make additional contributions sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to at least that level; which additional contribution may consist of the actual cost of carrying out an agreed-upon portion of the development, or a cash contribution, or a combination of both; operate and maintain for the life of the Federal project the recreational areas and all facilities installed pursuant to the agreement, except that facilities which are integral parts of a structure operated and maintained by the Federal Government shall be operated and maintained under whatever cost-sharing arrangement applies to the operation and maintenance of the basic structure; and assure access to recreational developments to all on equal terms. Local interests are required to comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and with the provisions of Sec. 221 of the Flood "Control" Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611), in acquiring real property. Section 187 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (Public Law 94-587) modifies the requirement of local cooperation to provide that non-Federal interests shall contribute 25 percent of the construction costs of retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments required for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material. Assuring Agencies: Louisiana: Formal assurances for the project in Louisiana were executed by the Red River Waterway Commission on Feb. 26, 1969, and accepted on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. Amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 were executed by the commission on May 23, 1973, and accepted on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. The Red River Waterway Commission was formed expressly to provide the local cooperation for the project and has an adequate tax base to fulfill its objectives. Arkansas: On Oct. 16, 1969, the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission furnished a statement of willingness to provide local cooperation on the proposed plan. In July 1976, the Soil and Water Resources Division of the Arkansas Department of Commerce stated that they would approach the Arkansas Legislature to obtain funds on a recurring yearly basis sufficient to insure its portion of the project funds by start of construction in Arkansas. By letter dated Jun. 20, 1977, the Director of the Soil and Water Resources Division advised that the Arkansas General Assembly appropriated $750,000 in the 1977 session to be held as a trust fund for payment of local cost sharing on this project. Further, they anticipated that additional funding will be added in future years to enable them to 12-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 have on hand the required funds at the time construction begins. Texas: On Dec. 17, 1969, the Governor of Texas furnished a statement of willingness to provide local cooperation for bank stabilization. A meeting was held in Austin, TX, on Mar. 1, 1977, concerning sponsors of the Texas portion of the project. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the status of the waterway project and the type of organization needed to accomplish project assurances, the powers required by such an organization may be established. The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) stated that they would take the lead in obtaining an organization with the ability to provide the local cooperation requirements. In the third quarter of 1980 the State of Texas moved closer to achieving that goal by action taken by the three Texas counties of Bowie, Lamar, and Red River, who have petitioned the State to enact legislation permitting them to join the Red River Authority of Texas. By this action, the Red River Authority of Texas will become legally empowered to act as sponsor for the Waterway. Operations and results during fiscal year. Advanced engineering and design work was accomplished by hired labor forces. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not been initiated. 29. WALLACE LAKE, LA Location. In Red River Basin on Cypress Bayou, Caddo and De Soto Parishes, LA, 66 miles above mouth of Bayou Pierre and about 14 miles southeast of Shreveport, LA. (Refer to Geological Survey map, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam 4,940 feet long at top, including 644 feet of spillway and outlet works, rising 48 feet above streambed, with a reservoir providing storage of 96,100 acre-feet, including a conservation pool of 7,800 acre-feet. Outlet works and uncontrolled spillway are centered about 1,250 feet north of south abutment. Reservoir controls 260 square miles, or about 20 percent of total drainage area of Bayou Pierre, Cypress Bayou, and tributaries combined, and affords protection against floods for an area of about 90,000 acres of valley below dam. Cost for new work completed in 1946 was $1,219,371, including $17,164 for Code 711. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 1024, Annual Report FY 1946. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and operation and maintenance of the dam as required. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 150.8 feet NGVD on Mar. 8, 1984, when storage in the flood control pool was 42,988 acre feet. On Sep. 30, 1984, the pool elevation was 141.80 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 7,260 acre-feet. Condition as of Sep. 30. All construction work on project was completed in December 1946. Main portion of dam was constructed during Fiscal Year 1943; stabilization of railroad embankment was accomplished from June to November 1946; and placing of fill in closure section of dam was accomplished from November to December 1946. Recreational facilitiesat the lake were closed in May 1972. 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished ata cost of $311,311 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1984, is $1,446,780. 31. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disaster preparedness, FY costs for the period were $181,540. Emergency operations, total expenditures during FY 84 were $182,117 which covered flooding in the Yazoo Basin in December 1983 and post flood reports of 1983 floods. Rehabilitation, total expenditures during FY 84 amounted to $880,835 which included work on the following: Ascalmore Creek, $6,500; Red River, mile 120.OL, Lower Urania, $246,815; Red River, mile 123.OL, Upper Urania, $546,180; Red River, mile 232.0R, Robinson Place, $81,340. Advance measures, total expenditures in FY 84 amounted to $265,476 which included work on the following: Ouachita River, Rilla and Columbia, LA, $89,083; Red River, mile 211.OR, Red Oak, $176,393. Total Public Law 99 costs through Sep. 30, 1984, were $1,509,968. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 7 8 0,83d Cong.). No activity during the period. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1956 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780 ,83d Cong.). An investigation was conducted to protect the Black Creek Bridge at Howard, MS. The Soil Conservation Service, USDA, agreed to extend some nearby stabi lization being planned to protect the bridge and the Corps' study was terminated. Corps expenditure for the project was $1,900. Construction was completed to protect the Count)' Hwy. 1265 Bridge at White Sand Creek, MS, at a cost of $165,082. 12-12 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Construction is scheduled in FY 84 to protect a museum at the Poverty Point State Commemorative Area at Epps, LA, which is one of the finest archaeological sites in North America. Total allocated amount for this project is $47,500. FY 84 expenditure was $8,879. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). During FY 1984, initial appraisal studies were completed on Batupan Bogue, Grenada, MS, at a cost of $7,500; and Piney Creek, Pine Bluff, AR, at a cost of $7,500. Detailed studies on Canal 43, Desha and Lincoln Counties, AR, at a cost of $46,465.37. Detailed studies were terminated on Little Mound Bayou, Bolivar County, MS, in August 1984. Expenditures for FY 84 were $52,168.89. Reconnaissance studies on Calion Lake, Union County, AR, at a cost of $44,650.91; and Pearl-Flowood, Pearl, MS, at a cost of $20,732.13. Construction continued on Lead Bayou, MS, FY 84 expenditure of $162,003.80; and Porter Bayou, MS, FY 84 expenditure of $270,363.69. 12-13 TABLE 12-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Total Funds to Sep. 30, 1984 1. Claiborne County Port, MS 2. Lake Providence Harbor, LA 3. Madison Parish Port, LA 4. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (6.5-foot navigation project) Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (9-foot navigation project) 5. Overton-Red River Waterway, LA 6. Pearl River MS 7. Red River Emergency Bank Protection (Contrib. Funds) 8. Red River Waterway- Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (Contrib. Funds) 9. Rosedale Harbor, MS New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ 30,000 39,730 268,800 154,377 -24,000 36,372 250,000 208,977 $ 480,000 $1,305,000 33,297 1,717,787 160,000 252,518 -29,000 66,247 -111,000 -10,579 -129,000 44,500 $ 0 34,870 50,000 50,000 86,000 105,800 66,000 69,600 19,200,000 18,211,000 20,406,000 12,700,000 21,665,779 13,939,425 13,638,600 14,599,659 3,362,700 2,849,000 4,232,756 4,486,300 3,217,854 3,211,608 4,035,654 4,962,300 -350,500 161,000 182,196 587,000 209,676 38,400 414,600 3,362,000 5,630,000 2,942,895 3,779,352 60,736,000 91,313,000 - 58,456,160 91,266,477 545,000 510,042 164,273 103,139 296,900 164,589 97,000 101,815 78,000 212,185 -122,000 169,900 133,400 183,800 $ 2,000,000 2,000,000 50,000 50,000 208,5371 208,537' 1,706,500 1,706,391 656,000 655,999 408,000 407,224 5,248,6192 5,248,6192 206,524,000 196,514,506 60,801,467 60,713,680 0 -350,5005 786,4003 756,472 8,992,0006 6,722,247 6,825 6,825 152,049,000 149,722,637" 423,000 679,942 647,734; 586,600' 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,095,500 1,062,162 12-14 See Section in Text Project I _ VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 10. Yazoo River, MS New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,760,000 3,900,000 3,073,265 4,000,402 34,000 32,967 50,000 26,624 145,000 49,017 2,828,000 3,806,951 1,725 25,256 87,524 916,000 465,295 48,000 7,700 80,000 80,927 -66,000 12. Bayou Bartholomew New Work and Tributaries Approp. AK and LA Cost 13. Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR & LA 14. Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA 15. Bayou Pierre, LA 16. Blakely Mt. Dam- Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, AK Code 713 Funds 17. Caddo Lake, LA 18. DeGray Lake Caddo River, AK 19. Lead Bayou, MS 20. Monroe Floodwall, LA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 21. Narrows Dam-Lake New Work Greeson, Little Mis- Approp. souri River, AK Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 489,000 982 231,000 11,815 19,400 13,434 652,300 404,300 30,000 14,257 870,000 890,722 105,484 2,958,000 3,309,000 3,188,349 3,290,852 470 - 1,798 - 321,800 56,955 400,000 331,125 217,300 653,100 -5,300 367 -5,500 147 2,969,100 3,068,800 29,000 132,200 -144,400 231,437 48,200 12,611 2,210,000 2,254,000 2,608,000 2,597,500 2,316,783 2,351,889 2,457,043 2,783,500 - 1,000,000 56,083 436,009 145,000 32,741 625,000 579,042 358,000 685,325 147,786 15,000 162,003 -12,000 193 2,128,000 1,660,000 2,433,700 2,055,200 2,145,519 1,986,615 2,284,608 2,205,600 9,669,661 9,202,300 1,128,315 1,128,102 974,000 974,000 889,0007 332,1077 1,100,6007 1,069,2157 00 44,1007 28,0917 34,039,444 34,023,862 36,959,192 36,921,473 474,095 474,046 309,600 279,637 72,033,992 72,033,992 22,678,183 22,607,004 1,745,685 1,515,616 2,560,500 2,560,500 16,545,229 16,516,679 26,712,637 26,663,046 12-15 TABLE 12-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 Code 713 Funds 22. Ouachita River Levees, LA 24. Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson Jackson-East Jackson 25. Porter Bayou, MS 27. Red River below Denison Dam, Levees and Bank Stabilization 28. Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR 29. Wallace Lake, LA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -1,725 -470 54,000 19,803 355,000 52,273 -9,000 -6,000 48,000 500,000 506,187 710,000 43,737 350,000 290,515 -15,000 270,363 5,110,700 550,000 1,600,000 - 1,505,639 1,356,651 4,335 22,200 142,300 44,113 90,000 88,730 -64,200 46,600 1. Actual costs include $198,859 Public Works Acceleration Act funds and $9,678 expended for planning and design; excludes $35,000 contributed funds, $198,400 cost of retaining dikes, and $1,022,000 local interests' costs for port facilities. 2. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 3. Excludes $21,884 carryover from Mobile District. 4. Includes $359,661 for previous projects. Present appropriations include funds for Advance Participation on Belzoni Bridge. 5. $350,500 cost credit from Memphis on New Orleans District expenditures. 6. Includes $3,312,000 PL 98-8 Jobs Bill. Excludes $47,828,000 previously allocated to New Orleans District. 7. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. 12-16 331,505 308,088 2,682,000 2,682,000 710,000 43,737 350,000 290,515 1,035,278 1,023,866 7,260,700, 2,862,290' 90,000, 93,065 100,300' 90,713 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul14., 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec.31, 1970 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Aug. 13, 1968 June 14, 1880 Apr. 21, 1900 Aug.30, 1935 Nov. 7, 1966 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 CLAIBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS (See Section 1 of Text) A dredged slack-water harbor 800 feet long and 150 feet wide with a 400 by 800 foot turning basin. LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA (See Section 2 of Text) Dredging 0.7-mile channel and turning basin in an old chute of the Mississippi River, with the dredged material used to fill in a port area provided by local interests. MADISON PARISH PORT, LA (See Section 3 of Text) The project consists of constructing a navigation channel 150 feet wide and 1,000 feet long, transitioning into a 200-foot-wide channel 400 feet long with a 350- by 1,100-foot turning basin adjacent to the port area. Dredged material will be disposed into lands furnished by local interests. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR (See Section 4 of Text) Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel and deepening canal to Felsenthal, AR. Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and dams and channel improvements. Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D'Arbonne in connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam. OVERTON-RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA (See Sec. 5 of Text) Construct 9- by 100-foot channel for 206 miles from Mississippi River, mile 301 AHP, through Old and Red Rivers to mile 31, thence by lateral canal through land cuts and existing waterways across Mississippi-Red River backwater area along south bank of Red River floodplain to Shreveport, and construct nine locks and pumping plant on Red River near Shreveport. Extend Overton-Red River Waterway 9- by 100-foot channel from Mississippi River to north bank of Black River, mile 35.5. Provides for the navigation channel to be 200 feet wide. PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA (See Section 6 of Text) Provided for a 5-foot channel. Legalized construction of a fixed highway bridge at Rockport A channel from the mouth of West Pearl River for 58 miles to the mouth of Bogalusa Creek at Bogal usa, LA, 7 feet deep at low water with a bottom width of 100 feet in the river sections and 80 feet in the canal section; with locks 65 by 310 feet clear inside dimensions. Construction of cut-offs and easement of critical bends at eight locations below lock 1 with no increase in project depth. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See Sec. 7 of Text) Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA (See Sec. 8 of Text) Develop a 9 by 200 feet, approximately 236 miles long from Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River and Red River to Shreveport, LA, consisting of realinement, bank stabilization, and construction five locks and dams. Approved Sep. 11, 1978, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended Approved Sep. 12, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended Approved Sep. 12, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 25, 1970, and H. Doc. 92-109, 92d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 320, 80th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. l H. Doc. 98, 45th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 145, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 408, 75th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 482, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 12-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 12-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Mar. 3, 1875 Aug. 13, 1968 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 28, 1938 Jun. 22, 1936 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended May 17, 1950 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 7, 1966 ROSEDALE HARBOR, MISS. (See Section 9 of Text) The harbor channel is 150 feet wide and 2.7 miles long with a turning basin 1,000 feet long and 400 feet wide. A minimum operating depth of 9 feet below the lowest water of record (102.5 feet, NGVD) was maintained in both the channel and turning basin and provided a 20-acre landfill to a net elevation of 162.9, NGVD. The landfill is 1,250 feet long and 700 feet wide. An access roadfill was constructed from Mississippi Highway 1 to the port site. YAZOO RIVER, MS (See Section 10 of Text) Removal of obstructions to navigation from mouth to Greenwood, MS, 189 miles. Nine-foot channel from mouth to Greenwood, mile 154.9 (present mileage), with a lock and dam near Vicksburg, channel improvements, alteration of bridges, additional storage space in Sardis Lake to augment low river flows, and recreation features. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW, AR AND LA (See Section 12 of Text) Authorized channel improvements on Bayou and Tributaries (see above). Modified 1950 authorization to include 10 lakes in the west escarpment in Arkansas and 6 local levees in Louisiana, and acquisition of lands for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. The previously authorized channel improvement was deferred until it is determined that the quality and quantity of water downstream will not be adversely affected. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Sec. 13 of Text) Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee, construct stream closure landside drainage channel and three culverts on Red Chute Bayou, and clearing and snagging channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat River near junction with Cutoff Bayou, and construct control structures on Flat River near junction with Red Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA (See Sec. 14 of Text) Provides for construction of a reservoir and other flood control works. BAYOU PIERRE, LA (See Sec. 15 of Text) Widening channel at intervals totaling 12.9 miles, and snagging of 29.7 miles. CADDO LAKE, LA (See Sec. 17 of Text) Maintenance Work. LEAD BAYOU, MS (See Section 19 of Text) Channel enlargement. MONROE FLOODWALL, LA (See Section 20 of Text) Partial closure of gap in floodwall. Closure of gap in floodwall (Plan C). Closure of gap in floodwall (Plan B). Approved Sep. 12, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. H. Doc. 342, 90th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doec. 506, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 203, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 378, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 378, 74th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc 39, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended, Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jun. 10, 1980. S. Doec. 117, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 328, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 328, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 12-18 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 13, 1983 Jul. 29, 1983 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jul. 24, 1946 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13,1968 Jun. 22, 1936 OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 23 of Text) Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; local protection at Bawcomville, LA (subsequently constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at Calion, AR; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work on the levees. PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA (See Section 24 of Text) Construction of levee system and channel rectification, Pearl River, vicinity of Jackson, MS Accomplish the 4-PT plan improvements on the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS. Design and construct protection to prevent flooding along the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS. PORTER BAYOU, MS (See Section 25 of Text) Selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou, MS from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DIST.) (See Sec. 27 of Text) Levee and bank stabilization. Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on Cypress Creek; realining and stabilizing the banks of the Red River; and recreational facilities from the Mississippi River to Denison Dam, OK and TX. RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR (See Sec. 28 of Text) Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River from Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR. WALLACE LAKE, LA (See Sec. 29 of Text) Construction of an earth-fill dam and a reservoir. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 441, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 153, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 98-63, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 18, 1982. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 378, 74th Cong. 2d sess. 1. Portion of existing project above fied to mile 31 was reclassi- inactive status as approved by Office, Chief of Engineers, letter dated Oct. 18, 1971. 12-19 TABLE 12-C OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA (9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 4 of Text) Min. Depth Greatest on Available Lower Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter Above Width for Full Lift Normal Sill at Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal Perfrom of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Character cent Nearest Black Chamber Chamber Water (feet Level or Kind of Type of Com- Estimated Location Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost Jonesville, LA 10 25 84 600 30 34 14 Piling Movable Taintergated dam; 99 $ 51,100,000' bascule gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Columbia, LA 5 117 84 600 18 52 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 953 44,900,000 fixed crest navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Felsenthal, 1 227 84 600 18 702 13 Earth do Taintergated dam; 85 93,100,000 AR navigation pass with inflatable dam on crest; steel mitering lock gates C(alion, AR 7 283 84 600 12 77 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 85 67,900,000 hinged crest gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Total $257,000,000 I-A aa 1. Includes $6,113,700 for Catahoula Lake diversion channel and control structure. 2. Fish and wildlife impoundment level. 3. The percent complete last shown reflects only Lock and Dam construction. The new percent complete reflects all work within the pool. This now corresponds to estimated costs. Tj C 0 C tel z tl 92 0a VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-D LOCKS IN PEARL RIVER PROJECT (See Section 6 of Text) Lock Miles above mouth Nearest town Miles to nearest town Width of Chamber Greatest length available for full width (feet) Lift (feet) Depth over sills at low water (feet) Character of foundation Type of construction Year completed Date opened for navigation Actual cost of lock Pearl River Lock No. 1 29.7 Pearl River, LA Pearl River Lock No. 2 40.8 Bush, LA 65 310 65 310 26.7 10 14 10 Sand, gravel, silt, clay Concrete and steel 1949 November 1958 $2,119,100 Sand, gravel, silt, clay Concrete and steel 1950 November 1958 $1,967,537 Pearl River Lock No. 3 44.0 Sun, LA 2 65 310 11 10 Sand, gravel, silt, clay Concrete and steel 1950 November 1958 $1,497,539 Note: The responsibility of maintaining this project was transferred to the Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division on Oct. 1, 1981. District boundaries have been changed. 12-21 .-W-.Mmpp --- TABLE 12-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Bayou Bartholomew, LA and AR -' '3 4 - 1931 $ 45,874 $ 42,857 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA ' 2' 4 - 1941 19,000 37,804 Big Black River, MS 4,5 - 1895 15,000 - Big Sunflower River, MS' , 4, 6, 7 - 1942 560,027 459,328 Boeuf River, LA 43'�' , - 1949 30,000 103,737 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA' 5 Complete 1971 202,817 452,611 Dec. 1914 Homochitto River, MS4 - 1910 15,482 8,518 Little Missouri River, AR" 44' - 1873 19,992 - Little River, LA, 4.5 ,' - 1890 1,500 - Little Tallahatchie River, MS" 7 - 1913 19,000 - Mouth of Yazoo River, MS" 7' - 1953 1,179,211 145,217 Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA, Felsenthal Canal - 193712 Red River below Fulton, AR, 16, 17, 18 - 1978 1,963,806 2,147,890 Red River Waterway LA, AR, OK, and TX' 17, 18 - 1969 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX' - 1976 70,000 Removing snags and wrecks from - 1948 - 272,500 Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers" Saline River, AR ' 4.' - 1931 26,900 12,792 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS ', 4, - 1939 43,481 173,066 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA ' 8.12 - 1949 38,367 85,352 Yalobusha River, MS' 4 5,14 - 1937 7,000 15,936 1. Status and Date unavailable. 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 1962, 64th Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 4. Inactive project. No commerce. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. (Abandonment of entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin. 8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work above Girard, LA (Abandonment of entire project recommended erroneously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 11. No additional funds available under this project. Work is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries. 12. Year authorized. 13. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 14. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control project including channel clearing and rectification and Grenada Lake on Yalobusha River. 15. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 16. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. 17. Incorporated in the project "Red River WaterwaY' Mississippi River Shreveport, LA" Sept. 30, 1976. 18. Emergency bank protection on this project is re ported separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection' Two reaches, "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River tO Shreveport, LA" and "Red River Waterway-Shreveport. LA Daingerfield, TX," are also reported separately. 12-22 r VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-F OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 23 of Text) For Last Estimated Full Report Federal See Annual New Work Project Report for: Cost Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR (1) $ 44,100,000 DeGray Lake, AR (1) 72,034,0002 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR (1) 20,900,000 Calion, AR 1960 970,9963 Columbia, LA 1941 204,7403 Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA, to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, LA 1961 3,025,1813 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR 1957 354,8023 Ozan Creek, AR 1957 57,7423 Terre Noire Creek, AR 1948 123,7003 Pine Bluff, AR, local protection 1954 172,5823 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) (1) 2,561,0003 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA (') 44,800,000 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (1) 9,400,000 Total $198,704,7434 1. See individual reports herein. 4. Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, AR, 2. Includes $5,800,000 for water supply, to be reimbursed project, which is inactive. The latest estimated cost (1954) by local interests. was $4,190,000. 3. Actual cost of completed project. RESERVOIR OPERATIONS FISCAL YEAR 1984 Project Bayou Bodcau 2 Bayou Bodcau Z Reservoir, LA Wallace Lake, LA Storage (acre feet) Oct. 1, 1981 Sep. 30, 1982 Jul. 2, 1982 (Max) Jun. 29, 1982 (Max) Jul. 2, 1982 (Max) Oct. 1, 1981 Sep. 30, 1982 Apr. 24, 1982 (Max) Apr. 23, 1982 (Max) Apr. 24, 1982 (Max) 249 310 11,340 7,655 7,319 11,739 Inflow' Outflow' 1,664 1,013 1,125 634 1. Cubic feet per second. 12-23 See Section in Text 24. 36. TABLE 12-G TABLE 12-H REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS (See Sec. 26 of Text) Drainage Conserva- Flood Area tion Control Estimated (square Storage (acre- Federal Project Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR' and LA - 1,158 - - $ 25,100,003 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA - - - - 70,717+ Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA5 - - - - 243,3363 Caddo Lake, LA' Caddo Lake - - - 3,587,8002 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Red River - - - 1,950,003 Garland City, AR' 6 - - - - 1,450,0003 Maniece Bayou, AR - - - - 970,0323 McKinney Bayou, AR 7 - - - - 5,610,0003 Posten Bayou, AR and LA 6. - - - - 560,000 Red River below Denison Dam levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA' - 59,650,0003 Total 99,191,885 1. Details presented in individual report herein. 2. Construction on this project not started. 3. In addition, non-Federal funds are: Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ............................................... $5,300,000 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA (cash contribution) .................................... 89,047 Caddo Lake, LA ............................................................................ 28,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA ............................................... 480,000 E ast Point ..................................................................................... 67,000 G arland C ity, A rk .......... ................................................... ............ 6,000 Maniece Bayou, AR (cash contribution)... ................................................. 18,000 McKinney Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ................... .............................. 508,000 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA ...................... 1,560,000 4. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. 5. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. 6. Inactive. 7. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. 8. Joint-use pool (sediment). 9. Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, AR," under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 12-24 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-I RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): INCORPORATED PROJECTS (See Sec. 26 of Text) For Last Flood Estimated Full Report Control Federal See Annual Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 $ 1,653,237' 1956 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA2 Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,74013 4 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA Channel improvement 1941 319,2001 1948 Bayou Pierre, LA Channel enlargement 1936 299,529' 4 Black Bayou Lake, LA 5 6 Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA Cutoff 1938 70,3481' 7 1938 Grant Parish, below Colfax, LA Levees 1938 38,809' 1941 Hempstead County levee district No. 1, AR Levee enlargement 1938 88,006' 1941 Natchitoches Parish, LA Levee and appurtenances 1936 1,529,9271 8 1956 Pineville, Red River, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,426' 1953 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA Bank protection 1944 3,908,000' 1953 Red River Parish, LA Levee enlargement 1936 149,435' 1939 Saline Point, LA Cutoff 1936 124,1111 1945 Wallace Lake, LA Flood-control reservoir 1936 1,219,371" 4 Total $15,467,134 1. Actual cost. 2. Project transferred to Vicksburg District August, 1982. 3. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA, $1,027,000; Wallace Lake, LA, $17,164. 4. Included in this report. 5. Work not started. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control Act of 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. In addition, $25,000 was expended from contributed funds. 12-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 12-J OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Mo. and Yr. If Deauthorized For Last Full Report See Annual Report For: Cost to Sep. 1984 Operation and Construction Maintenance Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA' Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA' Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA1 2 Big Black River, MS3 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA3' 4 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA1 5, 6 - Buffalo River, MS 7 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Colfax, Grant Parishes, LA1' - East Point, LA Garland City, AR Grant Parish below Colfax, LA 3- Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR ' 3 Homochitto River, MS3 Maniece Bayou, AR" 2 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, AR9 Aug. 1977 Murfreesboro Dam and Lake4 - Natchez Port Area, MS3' 4 Natchitoches Parish, LA1 2 Pineville, Red River, LA3 ' 4 Posten Bayou, AR'o Red River Parish, LA1, 3 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA' Saline Point, LA1 3 Twelvemile Bayou, LA4 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ........... $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA ..... .... ..... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA ... 170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ............................... 425,209 Maniece Bayou, AR ................... 39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA .............. 250,000 3. Completion Date Unavailable. 1956 1948 1951 1956 1966 1945 1940 1978 1938 1969 1976 1941 1941 1956 1970 19639 1951 1969 1956 1953 1973 1939 1 1 1 $1,653,189 319,200 243,3362 910,185 248,823 1,655,700 70,348 286,069 1,335,841 38,809 88,006 205,000 970,9322 Apr. 1955 Jan. 1948 Jun. 1939 670,750 Jul. 1978 Aug. 1968 Jul. 1974 144,650 Aug. 1969 538,000 1,529,478 232,426 149,435 Aug. 1955 Dec. 1951 953 3,908,000 - Mar. 1953 945 124,111 966 335,433 - May 1965 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 205. Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 5. Construction not initiated. 6. Inactive. 7. Deferred indefinitely because of insufficient justification under present conditions. 8. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7, Flood Control Act 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 9. Date authorized. 10. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 12-26 Project Mo. and Yr, If Completed VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-K ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 84 Categories ($) ($) SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Control Studies (120) Ouachita River Basin, AR & LA -12046 808,427 Pearl River Basin, MS and LA - 12234 1,539,546 Pine Bluff Metro Area, AR - 12015 35,536 Subtotal 2,383,509 Comprehensive Studies (150) Red River Below Denison Dam (153)- 81129 395,783 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) - 17250 23,637 Review of FERC Licenses (172)- 53857 931 Subtotal 24,568 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (181) -51840 1,986 Planning Assistance to States (186) - 51850 5,320 Technical and Engineering Assistance on Shoreline and Streambank (188) - 51731 0 Subtotal 7,306 TOTAL (Category 100) 2,811,166 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Inspection of Dams (230) Inventory of Dams 0 Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 169,902 Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies (260) - 53820 9,136 Subtotal 179,038 TOTAL (Category 200) 179,038 ADVANCE E&D (Category 600) Navigation Projects (620) Locks and Dams, Yazoo River, MS (622) 00083 80,928 Flood Control Projects (650) Local Protection, Red River Waterway, Shreveport to Index (651) - 75023 88,730 Local Protection, Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson, MS (651)- 75426 436,233 Subtotal 605,891 TOTAL (Category 600) 605.891 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 3,596.095 12-27 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois, western portions of Kentucky and Tennessee, a small portion of northern Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries south of Little River diversion channel and Commerce, MO, including St. Francis River Basin and White River and tributaries below Peach Orchard Bluff, AR, on the right bank and below Augusta, AR, on the left bank; also includes left bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank levees from Cape Girardeau, MO, to about mile 605. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Caruthersville Harbor, MO ......... 2. Helena Harbor, AR ................. 3. Hickman Harbor, KY ................. 4. New Madrid Harbor, MO ............. 5. Osceola Harbor, AR .................. 6. White River, AR (below Newport) ..... 7. Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN .... 8. Navigation work under special authorization ....................... Flood Control 9. Bradford, TN .................. 10. Drinkwater Sewer, MO .............. 11. Humboldt, TN........................ 12. Sandy Creek, Jackson, TN ........... 13. St. Francis River-Highway No. 90, Arkansas ............................. Page Flood Control (cont.) 13-1 13-1 13-2 13-2 13-2 13-2 14. US Hwy 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN .... 15. Inspection of completed flood control projects ... ........................ 16. Flood control work under special authorization .................... 13-3 Tables Table 13-A 13-3 Table 13-B Table 13-C 13-3 13-4 13-4 13-5 13-5 Table 13-D Table 13-E Cost & Financial Statement .... Authorizing Legislation ....... Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................... Active General Investigations ................ Page 13-5 13-6 13-6 13-7 13-9 13-10 13-10 13-11 Navigation 1. CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO Location. In Pemiscot, MO, in an old river chute 3 miles north of the town of Caruthersville, MO, on the right bank of the Mississippi River, 349.5 miles above Head of Passes, LA. Existing Project. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers Nov. 4, 1980, under the authority of the Sec. 107 of River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Harbor channel construction consisted of removal of 600,000 cubic yards of material from a 300- by 300-foot turning basin and provision of a 9- by 150-foot navigation channel, 4,680 feet long. The excavated material was placed Stop bank, between retainer dikes and the mainline Mississippi River levee to form a flood-free fill to be eveloped as an industrial park by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities are being provided by the Pemiscot County Port Authority. Operation and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Natchez, removed 176,327 cubic yards of material at a cost of $154,201 in August 1984 in maintaining project channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. Federal participation in the project is complete except for expected future maintenance dredging. 2. HELENA HARBOR, AR Location. In Phillips County, AR, on right bank of Mississippi River about 663 miles above Head of Passes, LA (AHP). 13-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Sep. 20, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Provides for maintenance of access channel with a depth of 9 feet below low water, between miles 659 and 663 APH, by dredging, and for enlarging the upstream 0.6 mile to dimensions of 9 feet deep by approximatly 450 feet wide. Remainder of channel conforms to project width of the main channel of Mississippi River. River stages recorded at Helena gage (zero is 141.70 feet msl) since 1871 have ranged between minus 3.0 and plus 60.21 feet with an average annual fluctuation of 40.6 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are ten terminals within the harbor, two of which are publicly owned. Others are a rail incline, a small boat dock, grain terminals, a petroleum products terminal, a midstream grocery and refueling service, a fuel unloading facility, and a fertilizer-loading facility. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Natchez, removed 636,104 cubic yards of material in October 1983 and September 1984. Expenditure was $536,716. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is complete and is being maintained to dimensions. 3. HICKMAN HARBOR, KY Location. In Fulton County, KY, on left bank of Mississippi River about 922 miles APH. Existing project. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Jul. 12, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Provides for dredging and maintaining harbor channel 250 feet wide with depth of 9 feet below low water, from main channel of Mississippi River at mile 922 AHP along former city waterfront about 1.1 miles, with the upper 600 feet forming a turning basin 500 feet wide. New work was completed in Fiscal Year 1963. River stages recorded since 1929 at Hickman gage (zero is 264.73 feet msl) have ranged between minus 0.4 and plus 51.5 feet with average annual fluctuation of 38 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Within harbor are terminals for handling petroleum products, sand and gravel, and timber and grain, which are publicly and privately owned; there is about 0.2 mile of surfaced, public mooring and launching area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Natchez, removed 421,006 cubic yards of material in July 1984 in maintaining project channel. Expenditure was $352,479. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was completed Jan. 20, 1961, and is being maintained to project dimensions. 4. NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO Existing project. Construction and subsequent main. tenance of a harbor channel 150 feet wide with a depth of 9 feet below low water from the head of New Madrid Bar, about mile 889 AHP, along the city waterfront downstream for a distance of about 9,400 feet, with a 250-foot-radius turning basin at the downstream end. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, Feb. 21, 1968, under Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Within the harbor are privately owned terminals for handling petroleum products, logs and lumber, and soybeans and grain. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for present and immediately foreseeable commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Expended $19,688 for Construction and Operation studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was completed Oct. 2, 1970, and is being maintained to project dimensions. 5. OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR Location. Mississippi County, AR, on the right bank of the Mississippi River at about 784 miles AHP. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, Sep. 30, 1971, under Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Harbor channel construction consisted of removal of 689,705 cubic yards of material from the harbor channel to provide a navigation channel 250 feet wide and 9 feet deep from the Mississippi River navigation channel at the downstream end of the old chute of Island 30, upstream along the old bendway channel for a line distance of 6,500 feet. A 250-foot-radius turning basin is provided at the upstream end of the harbor channel. The excavated material removed from the channel was placed on the top bank between the old bendway channel and the main line Mississippi River levee to form a flood-free industrial park to be developed by local interests. Latest published map is in 1980-48th edition, Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, prepared under the direction of President, Mississippi River Commission. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public terminal facilities have been provided by Osceola Riverport Authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Natchez, removed 580,205 cubic yards of material for channel maintenance during August 1984. Total expenditure was $511,871. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project, begun Sep. 30, 1970. was completed Nov. 13, 1974, and is being maintained to project dimensions. 6. WHITE RIVER, AR (BELOW NEWPORT) Location. New Madrid County, MO, on right bank of Location. Rises in northwestern the Mississippi Arkansas and flows River about 889 miles AHP. 686 miles first north into Missouri, thence southeasterly 13-2 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT through Arkansas to the Mississippi River 64 miles below Helena, AR. (See Mississippi River Commission alluvial valley maps, scales 1:62,500 and 1:500,000 and map folio, May 1973, of White River, vicinity of Batesville, AR, to Mississippi River, scale 1:24,000.) White River enters Memphis District at foot of Peach Orchard Bluff, AR, 165 miles above its mouth; but Memphis District is responsible for maintenance of navigation channel from mile 10.0 to mile 254.0, Newport, AR. Previous projects. For details, see page 1874, Annual Report for 1915, and page 938, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Maintenance of a channel 4.5 feet deep by 100 feet wide between mouth of river and Batesville, 296 miles, by snagging, dredging, and contraction works. Maintenance discontinued after Fiscal Year 1951 due to negligible traffic; dredging and snagging resumed in 1962. White River channel from mouth to mile 10 has been improved and is being maintained as part of the Arkansas River Project. The existing project was modified by OCE, Mar. 11, 1968, under authority of Sec. 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, to provide a 125-foot-wide channel with minimum depth of 5 feet and a depth of 8 feet at a stage of 12 feet on the Clarendon gage. This modification has been completed and increased dimensions extend from the mouth to Augusta, at mile 199. In February 1971, OCE authorized resumption of maintenance from Augusta to Newport. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of terminals for handling riprap stone, sand and gravel, logs, soybeans, wheat, and rice at Augusta (mile 198); logs, soybeans, wheat, and rice at Des Arc (mile 143); logs, lumber, soybeans, and rice at Clarendon (mile 99); soybeans at Crocketts Bluff (mile 68); soybeans, rice, sand, gravel, and crushed stone at St. Charles (mile 57); riprap stone at Benzal (mile 7.5); and public launching ramp at 1-40 bridge. Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging was performed at various locations between mile 10 and mile 255 to provide project width and depth. Leased dredging operations removed 999,572 cubic yards of material in maintaining project channel. Snagging operations were resumed July 1984 by hired labor. Total project Fiscal Year 1984 cost was $812,038. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is complete and is being maintained to project dimensions. 7. WOLF RIVER (MEMPHIS HARBOR), TN Location. Rises near western edge of Tippah County, MS, and flows generally northwesterly through Shelby County, TN, entering the Mississippi River above emphis TN (mile 738.7 AHP). The lower 3.5 miles of Lnannel, parallel to the Mississippi River along the Memphis waterfront, became a slack-water harbor when Wolf River was diverted through Mud Island to the Mississippi River by a flood control project, Wolf River and tributaries, under the Flood Control Act of 1958. (See Mississippi River Commission alluvial valley maps, scales 1:62,500 and 1:500,000, and folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, scale 1:62,500., revised annually.) Previous projects. For details see pages 701 and 702, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The project provides a channel 9 feet deep at low water from mouth to mile 3, with bottom widths of 250 feet from mouth of Keel Avenue (mile 1.75) and 200 feet from Keel Avenue to mile 3. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twenty terminals along project channel. One terminal is operated by Coast Guard, two by contract carriers, and 17 are operated privately. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Natchez, removed 847,786 cubic yards of material in October 1983, and September 1984, in maintaining the channel. Total Fiscal Year 1984 expenditure was $740,576. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project began May 15, 1928, and is maintained to project dimensions. 8. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). No work done under this authorization. Flood Control 9. BRADFORD, TN Location. Bradford is located in Gibson County, TN. Existing project. Authorized July 18, 1983, under the authority of Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, as amended. Construction of the project was completed on December 5,1983, at a total Federal cost of $95,061.00. The flood control project consisted of clearing and snagging approximately 5,500 feet of Bradford Creek and riprap protection for two street bridges and one railroad bridge. The project provides at least some protection from all storms investigated for approximately 88 structures including residences, businesses and schools. It has been determined that no adverse environmental impacts will result from construction of the project. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, and all necessary modifications or relocations of roads, bridges, and utilities other than 13-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 railroad bridges and bridge approaches; to the extent of the legal authority of the City of Bradford, Tennessee, hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from the construction, operation, and maintenance of the completed works, except those damages due to the sole fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; to the extent of the legal authority of the City of Bradford, maintain and operate the completed works without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project for flood control after project construction; pay all costs associated with project features designated to be local interest responsibilities; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646; comply with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611; at least annually, inform affected interests that the project does not provide complete protection from all floods; adopt, enforce, and adhere to a comprehensive plan for flood plain management for overflow areas of communities involved; comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of or subjected to discrimination in connection with the project on the grounds of race, creed, or national origin. The Mayor of Bradford, Tennessee, executed the required Agreement of Local Cooperation on June 6, 1983, which was approved for the United States on July 29, 1983, by the Memphis District Engineer. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was completed in December 1983. 10. DRINKWATER SEWER, MO Location. The Big Lake Basin is located immediately north of Charleston in Scott and Mississippi Counties, MO, and approximately 4.5 miles west of Cairo, IL. Existing project. Authorized under authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Construction of a 150-cubic-feet-per-second pumping plant just north of the existing gravity outlet, with an 855-foot inlet channel to connect the pumping plant with the existing Big Lake Ditch, and an energy dissipator (baffled outlet) at the pumping plant outfall. This will provide relief during the Mississippi River flood stages, for 8.5 square miles of agricultural land from a watershed totaling 27.6 square miles. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. The design of the vacuum breaker valve was modified to allow pump operation at low tailwater conditions. Construction on this modification is complete. 11. HUMBOLDT, TN Location. Humboldt is located in Gibson County, TN. Existing project. Authorized July 23. 1984, under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The project consists of clearing and snagging approximately 2,200 feet of existing channel and the construction of 2,600 feet of enlarged channel. The project will provide a 10-year level of protection for area residents and is expected to reduce average annual flood damages by 64 percent. The current estimated construction cost for the project is $1,110.000. Plans and specifications for the project have been completed and the assurances of local cooperation have been furnished. The construction contract is scheduled to be awarded in March 1985. It has been d(etermined that no adverse environmental impacts will result from construction of the project. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and operation and maintenance of the project, and all necessary modifications or relocations of bridges and utilities except bridge relocations or alterations, which are a Federal responsibility: to the extent of the legal authority of the City of Humboldt, Tennessee, hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed work, except those damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; to the extent of the legal authority of the City of Humboldt, Tennessee, maintain and operate at its own expense the completed works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army: prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioningof the project for flood control after project construction: pay all costs associated with project features designated to be local interest responsibilities: assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $4,0000,000: comply with provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-64(: comply with provisions of Section 221, Public Law 91- 611; at least annually, inform affected interests that the project does not provide complete protection from all floods: adopt, enforce, and adhere to a comprehensive plan for flood plain management for overflow areas of communities involved comply with the provisions of Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Public Law 88-352. The Mayor of Humboldt, Tennessee, executed the required Agreement of Local Cooperation on July 24, 1984 which was approved for the United States o August 10, 1984, by the Memphis District Engineer Condition as of Sep. 30. The local slponsor i currently acquiring necessary project easements and relocating utilities and expects to be completed with these tasks by January 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Complete June 30, 1980. 13-4 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT 12. SANDY CREEK, JACKSON, TN Location. The project site is located along the left descending bank of Sandy Creek immediately downstream from the Westwood Avenue bridge. Existing project. Authorized under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946. This project will provide protection for public facilities adjacent to the stream which consists of a city fire station and a Boys and Girls Club with attendant swimming pool. The improvements consist of filling and grading the bank and providing protection for the bank via rock-filled gabions. Local Cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the Project; provide without cost to the United States all necessary relocations and alterations of buildings and utilities, sewers, related and special facilities; to the extent of the legal authority of the City of Jackson, Tennessee, hold and save the United States free from all damage due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the Project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; to the extent of the legal authority of the City of Jackson, Tennessee, maintain and operate the Project works after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; comply with provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646; comply with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611; assume any construction costs in excess of $250,000, the monetary limit established in Section 27, Public Law 93-251; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the Project; if applicable, adjust a claims covering water rights; and, comply with the provisions of Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88-352. The Mayor of Jackson, Tennessee, executed the required Local Cooperation Agreement on June 15, 1984. The Agreement was approved for the United States on July 2, 1984, by the Memphis District Engineer. Condition as of Sep. 30. A contract for construction of the project was awarded in September 1984. 13. ST. FRANCIS RIVERHIGHWAY NO. 90 ARKANSAS Location. The project site is located approximately three miles west of Kennett, MO, along the right descending bank of a channel in the St. Francis floodway on the south side of the Arkansas Highway 90 approach embankment to the St. Francis River bridge. Existing project. Authorized under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946. This Project will provide protection for the Arkansas Highway 90 approach from streambank caving. The improvements consist of placing stone along approximately 500 linear feet of the approach embankment. Local Cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the Project; provide without cost to the United States all necessary relocations and alterations of buildings and utilities, sewers, related and special facilities; to the extent of the legal authority of the Arkansas State Highway Commission, hold and save the United States free from all damages due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the Project except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; to the extent of the legal authority of the Arkansas State Highway Commission maintain and operate the Project works after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; comply with provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646; comply with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611; assume any construction costs in excess of $250,000.00 the monetary limit established in Section 27, Public Law 93-251; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the Project; if applicable, adjust all claims covering water rights; comply with the provisions of Section 601 of the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88-352. The Arkansas State Highway Commission executed the required Agreement of Local Cooperation on October 9, 1984, which was approved for the United States by the Memphis District Engineer on October 9, 1984. Condition as of Sep. 30. A contract for construction of the project is scheduled to be awarded in December 1984. 14. US HWY 51, NONCONNAH CREEK, TN Location. The project site is on the left bank of Nonconnah Creek in a reach extending from the US Hwy 51 bridge upstream about 500 feet, in Shelby County, Memphis, TN. Existing project. Authorized under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946. This project provides protection for the US Hwy 51 bridge from streambank caving. The improvements consist of filling and grading the bank and providing protection for the bank via rock-filled gabions. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. Condition as of Sep. 30. A contract for construction of the project was awarded on Sep. 30, 1982, and work was completed in March 1983. 13-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspected completed projects at a cost of $120,044 in the period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1984, was $967,154. This included in-depth inspection of projects. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). During the period $24,640 was expended for detailed studies on Caney Creek, AR; $51,566 on Martin Branch, Clarendon, AR; $21,601 on Tuscumbia River, MS; $63,161 on Laconia Circle, AR; $5,142 on Hatchie and Kise Creek, TN; and $7,500 on Cane Creek, Martin, TN. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1956 Flood Control Act. Public Law 526 79th Cong). During FY 1984 $8,843 was expended for detailed studies on Grays Creek Canal, Memphis, TN; and $3,650 on Nonconnah Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN. 13-6 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT T LE 13-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Funds to a Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 1. Caruthersville Harbor, MO 2. Helena Harbor, AR 3. Hickman Harbor, KY 4. New Madrid Harbor, MO 5. Osceola Harbor AR 6. White River, AR (below Newport) 7. Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN 9. Bradford, TN 10. Drinkwater Sewer, MO 11. Humboldt, TN 12. Sandy Creek, Jackson, TN 13. St. Francis River Hwy #90, AR $ 618,500 $ $ - 53,017 280,000 278,311 303,000 283,522 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 252,000 229,758 362,000 360,390 252,000 249,585 318,000 277,765 214,000 15,861 419,000 407,961 $ 184,000 246,567 455,000 679,295 394,000 411,661 513 11,000 1,366 282,000 277,569 $ 748,500 768,992 1,034,000 1,032,401 90,847 90,847 2,700,400 2,699,130 149,827 149,827 2,591.748 2,591,310 196,373 196.373 387,500 385,509 269,115 269,115 4,245,000 4,243,871 169,994' 169,9942 13,126,603 13,120,393 586,500 586.500 7,016,488 7,016.487 170,000 60,073 1,991.000 1,494,828 155,000 124.150 196,.00 ) 41.694 35,000 24,223 555,000 694,079 878,200 1.258.,457 630,000 783,129 37,000 60,581 541,000 554,773 1,933,000 1,871,545 441,000 410,893 37,500 36,790 47,000 39,975 717,000 649,006 875,000 944,596 473,000 151,407 132,500 23,283 23,818 557,000 630,474 962,000 1,263,107 541,000 904,271 0 109.927 2,937 155,000 124,150 196,000) 41.694 35,00() 24,223 13-7 TABLE 13-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 14. US Hwy 51, New Work Nonconnah Approp. 7,000 230,000 -25,000 - 212,000 Creek, TN Cost 6,224 169,403 192.,905 668 369,200 1. Excludes $25,000 expenditures for early construction: includes $20,245 for preauthorization studies on Sec. 107 Project. 2. Excludes $17,500 contributed funds expended. 13-8 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1958 Sep. 3, 1954, as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended June 30, 1984, as amended Jul. 24, 1946, as amended Jul. 24, 1946, as amended Jul. 24, 1946 as amended CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO (See Sec. 1 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 150 feet wide, 4,680 feet long in a right bank chute at mile 849.5 AHP HELENA HARBOR, AR (See Sec. 2 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water between miles 659 and 663 AHP. HICKMAN HARBOR, KY (See Sec. 3 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 250 feet wide at mile 922 AHP along former city waterfront 1.1 miles, with upper 600 feet forming turning basin 500 feet wide. NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO (See Sec. 4 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 150 feet wide at mile 889 AHP, along city waterfront 9,400 feet with a turning basin 250 feet wide. OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR (See Sec. 5 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 250 feet wide, 6,500 feet upstream along the old bendway channel. WHITE RIVER, ARK (below Newport) (See Sec. 6 of Text) Open channel work, mouth to Batesville. Channel enlargement, mile 10 to Augusta. WOLF RIVER (Memphis Harbor), TN (See Sec. 7 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 250 feet wide to mile 1.75; 200 feet wide to mile 3.5; thence 125 feet wide to mile 5.5. Flood control work in lieu of navigation improvements above mile 3. BRADFORD, TN (See Sec. 9 of Text) Channel improvement within the City of Bradford. DRINKWATER SEWER, MO (See Sec. 10 of Text) Pumping station. HUMBOLDT, TN (See Sec. 11 of Text) Channel improvement within the city of Humboldt. SANDY CREEK (See Sec. 12 of Text) Stabilization - stream bank caving. ST. FRANCIS RIVER-HIGHWAY 90, ARKANSAS (See Sec. 13 of Text) Stabilization - stream bank caving. U.S. HWY 51 NONCONNAH CREEK, TN (See Sec. 14 of Text) Stabilization of stream bank caving. 1. Authorized under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act, as amended. Fl 2. Authorized under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 3. Contains latest published map. 4. Authorized under authority of Sec. 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. 13-9 Acts Documents Approved Nov. 4, 19801 Approved Sep. 20, 1962.1 Approved Jul. 12, 1962.' Approved Feb. 21, 1968.' Approved Sep. 30, 1971.' Annual Report, 1893, page 2112. Approved Mar. 11, 1968.1 H. Does. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess., and 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doe. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Approved July 18, 19835 Approved Jan. 5, 1977.2 Approved Jul. 23, 1984.2 Approved Nov. 3, 1983.4 Approved Aug. 29, 1984.1 Appoved Nov. 10, 1980 - TABLE 13-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1984 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Forked Deer River, TN, including South Fork' 2 - 1912 $25,000 $ 12,818 Obion River, Tenn." - 1911 28,716 - Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers' , 5 - 1948 - 318,833 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, AR ' - 1942 92,000 300,449 1. No commerce. 4. Completion date not available. 2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 5. No funds available under this project. Work being 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 69th carried on under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi Cong., 1st sess. River and tributaries." TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1984 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN - 1977 $ 70,363 $ - Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR' Clarendon to Laconia Circle, White River Basin, AR' Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL 2 Dyersburg, TN2 Dyersburg, TN (SW) Huntingdon, TN Long Lake Area Helena, AR Memphis, Wolf River. and Nonconnah Creek, TN Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL 4 Nixon Creek, TN2 Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, TN N. Second St., Memphis, TN (Wolf River Bridge) Treasure Island, MO W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY 6 May 81 6 May 81 Sep 1980 Jul 1983 1. Inactive, awaiting local cooperation. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. 1937 1964 1962 1981 1983 1983 1960 1955 1952 1983 1983 1981 1983 147,000 229,6493 1,820,869 2,900,281 Feb 1964 Jun 1962 Oct 1976 61,281 11,141,199 1,132,704 62,821 249,999 249,999 861,528 1,674,280 4. Work being completed May 1959 Oct 1959� Dec 1951 - Nov. 1981 - Sep 1980 - Mar 1978 - Oct 1976 under Mississippi River and Tributaries project. 5. Exclusive of Cache River Pumping Station. 13-10 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-E ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 84 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation (110) St. Francis River Navigation, AR -10036 $ 311 White River Navigation to Batesville, AR -60740 396 707 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Water Quality Mgmt (184) - 51860 1,812 1,812 $ 2,519 COLLECTIONS AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 168,044 TOTAL (Category 200) $168,044 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $170,563 13-11 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT * This district comprises those portions of southwestern Illinois and eastern Missouri embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on left bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. District also includes drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the Little River diversion channel. Report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and mile 300 is included in separate report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. Report on the portion of the Illinois River downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is included in report of the Chicago District on the Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Illinois Waterway, IL (St. Louis Dist.) .................. 2. Kaskaskia River, IL .............. 3. Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (St. Louis Dist.) (Includes L&D 26 Replacement) ..... 4. Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO, and IL .... Flood Control 5. East St. Louis and vicinity, IL ....... 6. Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, IL ................ 7. Hartwell Drainage and Levee District, IL ..................... 8. Hillview Drainage and Levee District, IL ..................... 9. Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL ................ 10. Meramec River Basin, MO ......... 10A. Meramec Park Lake, MO .......... 10B. Pine Ford Lake, MO .............. 11. McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL ..................... 12. Meredosia, IL, and Meredosia, Willow Creek, and Coon Run Drainage and Levee District, IL ..... 13. Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL ..... 14. Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, MO ..................... 15. Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL ..................... Page Flood Control (cont.) 16. Perry County Drainage and Creek 14-2 Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 3, MO....... 14-2 17. Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL .... 18. Wood River Drainage a:nd Levee District, IL .............. 14-2 19. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................. 14-2 20. Navigation work under special authorization .............. 21. Flood control work under 14-3 special authorization .............. 14-3 Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 14-3 22. Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Salt River, MO .................. 14-4 14-4 14-4 14-4 14-5 General Investigations 23. Active investigations ................ Tables Table 14-A Cost and Financial Statement ................. Authorizing Legislation ...... Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......... Lakes, Levees, and Recreational Facilities ....... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ Active General Investigations (96X3121)..... 14-5 Table 14-B Table 14-C 14-5 14-5 14-6 14-6 Table 14-D Table 14-E Table 14-F Page 14-6 14-6 14-7 14-7 14-7 14-7 14-7 14-8 14-9 14-11 14-13 14-13 14-14 14-16 14-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL (ST. LOUIS DIST.) See report on Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, under Chicago District. 2. KASKASKIA RIVER, IL Location. The river rises in Champaign County, IL, about 5 miles northwest of Urbana, in east-central part of State. It flows southwesterly about 325 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 8 miles above Chester, IL, or about 118 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Cincinnati sheet of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1896, page 171. Existing project. Improvement for navigation provides a channel 9 feet deep and 225 feet wide from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. Improvement consists of enlarging present channel where required, making overbank cutoffs to eliminate sharp bends, and construction of a dam at mile 0.8 with a single lock 84 feet wide and 600 feet long, at an estimated total Federal project cost (1984) of $145,060,000. Non-Federal project cost is $7,665,000, of which $1,500,000 is local contribution. Local cooperation. State of Illinois passed legislation authorizing Illinois Department of Public Works and Buildings to enter into assurances of local cooperation with the United States. These assurances have been furnished and were accepted Nov. 23, 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work is complete on the lock and dam, railroad relocations, and the grade control structure. Engineering and design continued on remaining construction items. Project is about 87 percent complete. Maintenance. Hired labor performed operation and maintenance of the project. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN. (ST. LOUIS DIST.) (INCLUDES L&D 26 REPLACEMENT) See separate section entitled "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN," printed in the Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO AND IL Location. Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 miles and empties into the Gulfof Mexico. Portion included in this report embraces the 195-mile section known as middle Mississippi, between tributary Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles from the gulf. See folder by Corps of Engineers of Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN. Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 974 miles from gulf)to northern boundary of city of St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for closing secondary channels, contracting river by building new banks where river width is excessive and protecting new and old banks from erosion where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated total Federal cost (1984) of $183,000,000; (2) by dredging to maintain project channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, which approved a comprehensive plan for development of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for construction of a lateral canal at a cost of $59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixed-crest rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chainof Rocks Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast Guard for aids to navigation. Estimated total Federal project cost (1984) is $247,073,600. A small boat harbor opposite Chester, IL, was deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th Cong., 3d sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and needs of irrigation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regulating Works: Contract was continued on stone dike and revetment construction as was engineering and design and supervision and administration. Construe' tion on existing project began in 1881 and project has been in beneficial use practically from its inception Projects on Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete Work on the project is about 67 percent complete Channel as a whole has been greatly improved by the work completed to date. Dredging is required at low stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain required channel depths. River is generally above 10-foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter part of February to the latter part of August, during which time project channel depths generally prevail without dredging Maintenance. Work consisted of 1,565 feet of dike and 17,422 feet of revetment repair. U.S. plant and hired labor performed channel dredging removing 14-2 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT 2,421,000 cubic yards of material from main channel. Condition and operation studies, recreation planning, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock and Dam 27 continued. Flood Control 5. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 175 and 195 above the Ohio River. Project includes all bottomlands between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie du Pont Creek on the south. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together with necessary appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. Work under this authorization provides the area protection against a flood of about 200-year frequency. The completed 10 miles of levee along Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection on the landward side integral with and to the same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Final cost of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. The Flood Control Act of 1965 modified existing project to provide for channel improvements, diversion ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on Little Canteen Creek, and a pumping plant to considerably reduce damages resulting from interior flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel to provide protection to adjacent levees and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Estimated total Federal project cost of work under this authorization is $32,709,000 $22,020,000 for Cahokia-Harding (1984), Ditch Area, and $10,680,000 for Blue Waters Ditch. Non-Federal cost is $20,650,000. Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with the requirements of local cooperation for Work under the 1936 authorization. For work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 requirements of local Cooperation are fully described on page 14-4 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances were accepted on the Blue Waters Ditch area on Jun. 25. 1981. Formal assurances for the Cahokia-Harding Areas will be requested upon approval of the plan of improvement currently scheduled after FY 89, due to lack of funding or FY 85 through FY 89. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning was continued on project modifications authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 and construction was continued on ditching contracts and was initiated on the pumping station. Work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1936 is complete. 6. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE, AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Greene County, II, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 23.8 and 32.3 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, ILMO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for raising and enlarging 15.9 miles of levees, altering discharge line of pumping station, and construction of two highway closure structures and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 10,470 acres of land, 9,735 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1984) is $6,250,000. Non-Federal cost is $950,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-4 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 7. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Greene County on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 38.2 and 43.1 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 12.3 miles of new or enlarged levees, altering discharge line of pumping station and construction of seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 9,630 acres of land, 8,955 of which are highly productive agricultural lands against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1984) is $12,100,000. Non-Federal cost is $1,120,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-5 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 14-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 8. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Greene and Scott Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 43.2 and 50.0 above the Mississippi River. (See Qunicy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 14.3 miles of levee, alteration of discharge lines for three existing pumping stations, construction of a railroad closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection the the Village of Hillview and to 13,070 acres of agricultural land against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1984) is $12,000,000. Non-Federal cost is $1,220,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-6 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begu'n. 9. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. In Randolph County, IL, on the right bank of the Mississippi River between miles 111 and 116 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, KY, IL, MO, IN, map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 1375 of Annual Report for 1950. Existing project. Project area contains about 9,460 acres only partially protected against flood stage of 38.5 feet on the Chester, IL, gage. Flooding occurs about once in every 7.3 years with an average duration of 26 days, causing substantial damage. The 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) provides for enlarging and raising the existing levee about 8 feet to provide protection against a flood having a frequency of once in 50 years. Estimated total Federal project cost (1984) is $13,200,000. Non-Federal cost is $2,100,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-6 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances from the Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jan. 23, 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. Construction was completed on the gravity drains. Plans and specifications for raising and enlarging the levee are complete and construction was initiated on this item. 10. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO Location. The basin lies within the State of Missouri and comprises 3,980 square miles. The river is a west bank tributary of the Mississippi River at mile 161 above mouth of Ohio River. Major streams in the basin include the Meramec, Big, and Bourbeuse Rivers. The basin extends about 100 miles southwesterly from St. Louis into the Ozark Highlands. (See St. Louis, MO, and Rolla sheets of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. The project provides for the construction of Meramec Park and Union Lakes, authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act; and Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 Lake projects, and 19 angler-use sites, authorized by the 1966 Flood Control Act. Under the plan, Irondale and 1-38 Lakes will reduce flood damages in the upper Big and Bourbeuse Rivers. Meramec Park, Union, and Pine Ford Lakes will substantially reduce flooding in the lower basin area and will lower flood crests on the Mississippi River. Project will also provide water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife conservation. (See Table 14-D for additional data on this comprehensive project.) 10A. MERAMEC PARK LAKE, MO Location. Dam will be at mile 108.7 on Meramec River in Franklin County near Sullivan, MO. Reservoir will be mainly in Crawford, Franklin, and Washington counties, MO. (See St. Louis, MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project as authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act provides for construction of an earth dam about 167 feet high with a crest length of 3,000 feet. Reservoir will provide 1 million acre-feet of storage and provide flood protection for 11,862 acres of flood plain in the Meramec River valley above the mouth of Bourbeuse River, and partial protection for 20,209 acres of land below the Bourbeuse. Project will also provide water supply, water quality control, storage, and recreation, and fish and wildlife benefits. Estimated total project cost (1981) is $220,000,000, including $22,506,000 local reimbursement for water supply. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocated to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. State of Missouri, acting through its State Water Resources Board and under authority of the General Assembly of State of Missouri, executed assurances for water supply on Aug 23, 1967. The assurances were reviewed by the Office of the Attorney General, Stateo Missouri, and it is his opinion that the State of Missouri has the legal authority and financial capability to execute said assurances. These assurances have been approved by the Chief of Engineers. A water-supp'y contract will be entered into with the sponsor before andY use of the water-supply storage provided under this contract. 14-4 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Project was deauthorized by Public Law 97-128. Land is being disposed of in accordance with deauthorizing act. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operations and maintenance of existing facilities. 10B. PINE FORD LAKE, MO Location. Dam is on Big River at mile 43.8, about 45 miles southwest of St. Louis. The Big River is a tributaryofthe Meramec. Lake will extend about 34 miles up Big River. (See St. Louis, MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of a compacted earth-fill dam with a concrete chute spillway. Dam will be 141 feet high and 2,070 feet long. Construction of new roads, improvements of existing roads, alterations to pipeline, power and telephone lines, and construction of recreational facilities are included. Maximum storage capacity will be 285,000 acre-feet. Estimated total project cost (1984) is $147,000,000, of which $8,173,200 and $22,900,000 are local reimbursements for water supply and recreation and fish and wildlife respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocation to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning previously funded but not completed. 11. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Brown and Pike Counties, IL, on the right bank of Illinois River between miles 67.2 and 75.1 above the Mississippi River. (See Kansas City sheet of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. Project provides for reconstruction of 14.7 miles of levee, construction of a new pumping plant, closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to about 12,080 acres of agricultural land against a flood of about 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1983) is $25,500,000. Non-Federal cost is $930,000. Project Was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-9 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have executed assurances in compliance with Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Pumping station, the riverfront levee and the lower part of the lower flank levee are under construction. Construction is complete on the upper flank levee. The project is 86 percent complete. 12. MEREDOSIA, IL, AND MEREDOSIA, WILLOW CREEK, AND COON RUN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL Location. The levee district is in Morgan and Scott Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 67.0 and 72.2 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 11.0 miles of new or enlarged levee, a pumping plant, closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 8,215 acres of land, 7,640 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, and 575 acres of noncrop and farmsteads against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1984) is $11,800,000. Non-Federal cost is $1,030,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-9of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 13. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The project is in Cass and Morgan Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 72.2 and 79.0 above the Mississippi River. (See Qunicy, IL-MO sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Maps Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 15.9 miles of new or enlarged levee, closure structure, drainage facilities, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 7,510 acres of land, 6,980 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, and 530 acres of noncrop and farmsteads against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1984) is $9,800,000. Non-Federal cost is $560,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-10 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 14-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 14. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA 8, MO Location. Area 8 is in Lincoln and Pike Counties, MO, on west bank of Mississippi River between river miles 249 and 261 above the Ohio River. Small community of Elsberry lies within the area. (See Quincy sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. The 1966 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 510, 89th Cong., 2d sess.) authorized the raising and enlarging of existing levees to provide 24.4 miles of riverfront, flank, and back levees and construction of appurtenant works consisting of drainage structure, highway and railroad closure structures, and alterations to existing pumping plants. The project has been reduced in scope to consist of replacing one existing drainage structure, replacing an obsolete stream driven pump unit with a new one of 150 cubic feet per second capacity, and rehabilitation of the pump station. Project will afford protection to the area against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $2,400,000. Non-Federal cost is $20,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 14-10 of FY 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project is complete. Operation and maintenance manual is being prepared. 15. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Greene and Jersey Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 15.2 and 23.7 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for raising and enlarging 11.4 miles of levee, construction of 1.0 mile of new levee, altering discharge line of pumping station, and construction of seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 10,360 acres of land, 9,635 of which are highly productive agricultural lands against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1984) is $10,240,000. Non-Federal cost is $840,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-11 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 16. PERRY COUNTY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, & 3, MO Location. Districts are in Perry County, MO, and Randolph County, IL, on the right bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 95 and 111 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, KY, IL, MO, IN, map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 475 of Annual Report for 1968. Existing project. Project area contains about 26,881 acres protected from floods of the Mississippi River by levees. However, when Mississippi River stage exceeds 13 feet on the Chester, IL, gage, substantial damage results from impoundment of precipitation or seepage, or a combination thereof. Authorized project provides for construction of four pumping stations to reduce interior flooding. Estimated total Federal project cost (1982) is $8,812,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-11 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurances were furnished by local interests (presently, Boil Brule Levee District, MO). on Nov. 16, 1978, and were accepted Nov. 27,1978, by the District Engineer under delegated authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was continued on Missouri Chute and Bois Brule pumping stations and is complete on the Cinque Hommes and Jones Cutoff stations. 17. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL Location. The lake is in Franklin and Jefferson Counties in southern Illinois. The dam is on Big Muddy River, 103.7 miles upstream from its confluence with the Mississippi River, and about 3 miles northwest of Benton, IL. (See Belleville sheet of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:62,500.) Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earth dam, ungated concrete spillway, reo!cation of roads and utilities, recreational facilities, access roads, and service facilities. In addition, two subimpoundment dams were constructed on upper arms of reservoir to enhance fish and wildlife value of project. Reservoir has an area of 24,800 acres, and a storage capacity of 294,000 acre-feet. Project provides flood control, water supply, low-flow regulations, cOe servation of fish and wildlife, recreation, and area development. Estimated total Federal project cost (1983) is $43,100,900, of which $12,197,700 is for lands and damages. Non-Federal local contribution for water supply is $9,941,300. Federal cost for code 711 recreation facilities is $1,060,900. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooper a tion are fully described on page 14-12 of Fiscal year 14-6 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT 1980 Annual Report. Assurance of local cooperation and water supply contract have been executed and approved by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Real estate activities in connection with project completion were performed. Lands acquired to date are 39,819 acres in fee and 906 acres in easements. Project is essentially complete. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operation and maintenance of Rend Lake Reservoir. 18. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. In Madison County, IL, on left bank of Mississippi River between river miles 195 and 203 above Ohio River. District includes bottom lands between river and bluffs and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the south to opposite lock and dam No. 26 at Alton, IL, on the north. Small industrial cities of Hartford, Wood River, Roxana, and East Alton and part of Alton riverfront, lie within the district. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1938 Flood Control Act authorized raising, enlarging, and extending existing levee system to provide 20.8 miles of levees and construction of appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations to existing or construction of new pumping plants; surfacing service road on levee crown, making necessary alterations to railroad tracks and bridges at levee crossings, seepage corrective measures and construction of a low-water dam at mouth of Wood River. Project will afford protection to this district against a flood of about 200-year frequency. Estimated total construction cost (1982) is $18,600,000 (excluding $23,000 contributed funds). Flood Control Act of 1965 modified 1938 Flood Control Act to provide for construction of a pumping station with collector ditches and necessary appurtenant facilities for removal of water impounded by existing levee. This portion of the project has been declared inactive. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act is complete except for 1200 feet of levee and two closure structures. Construction was initiated on these items. 19. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD PROJECTS CONTROL Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a costof $202,219 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of end of fiscal period is $4,757,307. 20. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization studies cost for fiscal year were $23,784 for Southeast Missouri Port study. 21. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization study costs for fiscal year were $6,936 for Crooked Creek, Bollinger County, MO; $12,149 for E. Cape Girardeau Main Ditch, IL; $7,479 for Meramec River, Jefferson County, MO; and $28,810 for St. Peters, MO. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Costs for fiscal year for Illinois River, Hardin, IL, were $18,802. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $151,976 for disaster preparedness, $79,066 for emergency operations, and $861,007 for rehabilitation. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 22. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO Location. Salt River rises in Schuyler County, about 12 miles south of Missouri-Iowa State line. It flows southeasterly about 192 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 2 miles above Louisiana, MO, or about 284 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Kansas City and Quincy sheets of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 645 of Annual Report for 1968. Existing project. Project provides for construction of a multiple-purpose reservoir, including power, flood control, water supply, navigation storage, pollution abatement, fish and wildlife conservation, and recreation. Dam consists of a compacted earth embankment with a concrete spillway controlled by tainter gates. Dam and spillway are about 1,700 feet long. Spillway structure consists of an ogee overflow section surmounted by four 50- by 30-foot tainter gates. Reservoir will have a storage capacity of 1,428,000 acre-feet for use of flood control, future domestic and industrial 14-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 water supply, sediment storage, and power generation. Project plan provides for installation of one 27,000 KW conventional unit and one 31,000 KW reversible unit for pumped storage operations. Total Federal project cost estimate (1984) is $330,000,000 of which $22,420,000 is for lands and damages; $14,300,000 for water supply; $76,000,000 for hydropower. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-13 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurances have been received from the State of Missouri and approved by the Chief of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major items of work completed during the fiscal year consisted of completion of state highway relocation across main dam; completion of contract work for county highway relocations; and performance testing of hydropower units. Remaining work consists of completion of water supply facilities for Village of Hunnewell, minor con. tract work on downstream right abutment of main dam, pumpback tests for hydropower unit, performance testing of microwave system to Harry S. Truman project, final cost allocations to determine reimbursements of costs for water supply and hydropower, Lands acquired to date are 55,277 acres in fee and 10,068 acres in easements. Project is 98 percent complete. General Investigations 23. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 14-F which covers: Surveys, Collection and study of basic data, and Research and development activities. 14-8 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 2. Kaskaskia River IL (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Includes Chain of Rocks) 5. East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL 6. Eldred & Spankey Drainage and Levee District, IL 7. Hartwell Drainage & Levee District, IL 8. Hillview Drainage & Levee District IL 9. Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Levee District, IL 10A. Meramec Park Lake, MO 10B. Pine Ford Lake, MO 11. McGee Creek Drainage & Levee District, IL 12. Meredosia, IL, and Meredosia, Willow Creek and Coon Run Drainage & Levee Districts, IL 13. Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage & Levee District, IL 14. Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 8, IL New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $3,635,000 $1,800,000 $400,000 $5,209,000 $127,800,0001 3,478,872 1,883,090 388,140 3,885,032 126,365,1311 929,000 1,200,000 1,131,856 1,025,322 973,968 1,036,248 0 0 0 42,000 00 -587,000 911,518 -104,348 0 3,075,000 2,000,000 2,437,000 2,610,000 3,051,785 1,759,811 1,574,639 3,440,369 9,121,000 9,269,000 8,010,656 7,490,000 8,919,608 8,443,093 10,191,370 7,157,647 725,000 432,485 400,000 369,419 250,000 156,347 183,000 147,733 1,363,000 1,160,083 0 63,796 287,000 271,948 545,000 521,842 275,000 950,000 2,597,000 515,776 1,011,724 2,167,981 0 64,620 0 137,251 0 58,771 725,000 797,320 0 28,285 567,000 415.026 15,000 120,033 00 0 10,021 0 572 00 00 0 0 500,000 1,057,000 375,659 451,595 0 -42,325 595,000 670.277 0 -5,815 0 16,897 326,000 412,597 0 366 5,600,000 2,285,000 8,012,900 5,420,000 5,110,855 1,134,848 8,793,102 5,366,819 180,000 151,945 140,000 67,865 760,000 763,571 0 70,166 -15,000 121,430 172,000 173.441 0 1,408 0 845 0 6,190 0 0 00 0 5,634 8,989,256 8,962,507 1,139,730 1,118,160 166,766,600 166,279,912 193,147,1332 192,472,2702 34,169,3881 33,651,7055 875,000 875,000 622,000 622,000 433,000 433,000 5,000,000 4,013,876 30,568,0006 30,479,5616 2,710,600 2,684,753 3,680,001 3,642,939 23,140,300 21,995,378 370,000 370,000 345,000 345,000 2,137,000 2,132,768 14-9 TABLE 14-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Fundsto in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 15. Nutwood Drainage & Levee District, IL 16. Perry County Drainage & Levee District Nos. 1, 2, & 3, MO 17. Rend Lake, Big Muddy, IL (Regular Funds) Code 711 Funds (Contrib. Funds) 18. Wood River Drainage & Levee District, IL 22. Clarence Cannon Dam and Reservoir, Salt River, MO New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 295,000 267,610 0 50,079 0 8,993 1,944,000 1,558,000 1,503,000 1,845,151 943,491 1,807,562 0 2,104 0 19,141 0 81,753 0 120 -270,300 266,200 0 35,976 1,500,000 2,203,000 2,537,900 1,958,000 1,656,264 2,107,010 2,533,327 2,072,978 0 16,375 0 2 400,000 416,656 225,000 93,322 00 00 0 140 285,000 354,171 670,000 670,000 8,493,3007 7,920,6957 43,700,9008 43,629,7428 19,954,700 19,842,152 1,060,900 1,060,900 0 9,941,2789 0 9,941,2789 2,886,303 2,875,440 450,000 1,000,000 386,143 424,513 20,950,000 23,500,000 33,849,700 10,240,300 19,196,644 24,029,076 34,463,424 8,922,842 917,000 1,426,000 1,891,100 2,074,000 1,080,977 1,285,921 1,937,491 2,127,691 16,589,82111 15,887,97210 307,577,02811 304,919,63011 8,890,560 8,764,600 1. Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. 2. Excludes previous project cost of $1,416,620. 3. In addition $3,109 was expended for rehabilitation. 4. Includes $8,072,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 5. Includes $7,921,939 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 6. Includes $200,000 for definite project under 1938 Flood Control Act. 7. Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. 8. Excludes $550,000 Area Development Administration Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds allotted to the Corps. 9. Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. 10. Funds are for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. 11. Includes $216,628 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. 14-10 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907' Mar. 3, 19051 Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 19543 Jul. 3, 19584 Jun. 22, 1936 Oct.27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun.28, 1938 Nov. 7, 1966 KASKASKIA RIVER, IL (See Section 2 of Text) Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation channel from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (See Section 4 of Text) Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum depth of 8 feet.) Dredging introduced as part of the project. These acts practically abrogated that part of project for middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. Regulating works restored to project and appropriations begun with a view to completion of improvement between Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously expended. For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern Rivers and Harbors boundary of city of St. Louis. Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton (mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional width around bends. Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock at Chain of Rocks. Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor opposite Chester, IL. Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL (See Section 5 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. Construct Blue Waters Ditch as independent section. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 6 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 7 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 8 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 9 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO (See Section 10 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection project. Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and I-38 dams and 19 Angler-use sites. 14-11 S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 1536. Committee Doc. 9, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 230, 83d Cong., 1st sess. Special report on record in OCE. H. Doc. 329, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 94-587, 94th Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 525, 89th Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 14-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 23, 1962 Adopted by Senate and House Committee resolutions, Oct. 12, 19725 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 11 of Text) Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to reduce flooding. MEREDOSIA, IL, AND MEREDOSIA, WILLOW CREEK AND COON RUN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL (See Section 12 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 13 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA 8, MO (See Section 14 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and alter pumping plant to reduce flooding. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 15 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. PERRY COUNTY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, & 3, MO (See Section 16 of Text) Construct pumping plants and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL (See Section 17 of Text) Construct dam at Benton, Ill., and subimpoundment dams on upper arms of reservoir. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 18 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO (See Section 22 of Text) Modified act of 28 Jun. 1938 by deleting the reservoir therefrom and reauthorizing it as a separate multiple-purpose project. Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to present designation. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 360, 92nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 541, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doec. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess H. Doc. 507, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-298, 89th Cong. 1. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Inactive. 4. All work completed. 5. Authorized under provision of Sec. 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. 14-12 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1984 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cuivre River, MO' - 1883 $ 12,000 $ - Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL Nov. 1977 19622 - Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor Nov. 1977 19582: Moccasin Springs, MO - 1969 76,436:' Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL Nov. 1977 19542 - Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL Nov. 1977 19502 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL - 1961 2,653,194 1961 1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 23, 1900. TABLE 14-D 2. Year authorized. 3. Excludes $56.605 contributed funds. LAKES, LEVEES, AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES See Section in Text Project Estimated Federal Cost Estimated Required Non-Federal Cost Total Estimated Cost (Date to Revision) Meramec River Basin, MO Lakes: Meramec Park' 197,494,000 22,506,000 220,000,000 (1981) Union 101,305,000 11,695,000 113,000,000 (1982) Pine Ford' 115,926,800 31,073,200 147,000,000 (1984) Irondale3 8,744,370 66,700,000 (1982) 1-382 27,294,000 2,306,000 29,600,000 (1982) Recreation facilities: Angler-use sites2 2,140,000 2,140,000 4,280,000 (1982) 1. Separate reports are included herein. 2. See 1979 Annual Report for details. 3. See 1967 Annual Report for details. 14-13 10. Name REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 14-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1984 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, IL 1 Cache River Diversion, IL Cape Girardeau, MO, reaches Nos. 1, 3, and 4 Cape Girardeau, MO, No. 2 Carlyle Lake, IL Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, IL Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL2 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL Dively Drainage & Levee District, IL East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, IL Eldrid, IL Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, MO (see Flood Control Act of 1944) 4 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended)4 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, IL, bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District IL Indian Creek Area, Illinois River, IL' Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL' Lake Shelbyville, IL Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 2, 5, 6, and 7 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10, and 13 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, IL Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Miller Pond Drainage District, IL 1967 $ 1953 2,837,114 Oct. 1978 Nov. 1979 Nov. 1979 Nov. 1979 Oct. 1978 1959 1965 1981 1955 1964 1981 1959 1976 1963 19623 1950 1953 1952 1946 1970 1971 1959 1981 1959 1981 1979 1979 1978 1944 1955 22,000 5,157,805 42,819,400 185,700 4,984,500 2,818,000 5,889,500 1,720,000 1,920,600 55,415 50,000 25,000 1,154,800 4,677,900 5,829,000 297,460 44,000,000 496,000 249,738 164,183 14-14 1953 31,684,444 1964 Oct. 1976 1955 1963 Aug. 1981 1959 1976 1963 Oct. 1949 1951 Jan. 1952 Aug. 1945 1958 1959 Mar. 1981 1949 Sep. 1978 1,033,279 29,396,938 1944 1955 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1984 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10,MO Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL, underseepage measures North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL 5 Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, IL Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL Richland Creek, IL Riverland Levee District, MO Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, IL 1 Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Strington, Ft. Chartres and Ivy Landing, IL Union Lake, M06 Urban areas at Alton, IL Village of New Athens, IL Valley City Drainage & Levee District, IL7 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO 1980 79,265,166 Nov. 1979 Aug. 1977 Nov. 1977 Nov. 1977 Nov. 1977 1967 1967 1957 1970 1959 1959 1969 19363 19363 19363 1957 1979 1960 1981 1967 85,422 939,569 6,005,127 3,882,600 1,866,910 401,000 2,123,700 4,917,359 192,000 1,983,000 91,952 19363- 1. Projects authorized or modified by Flood Control Act of Oct. 23, 1962 (see H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess., for details). 2. Completed except for seepage control measures, which are inactive. 3. Year authorized. 4. Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. 5. Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. 6. Includes $183,638 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. Includes Highway 185 funds. 7. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended). 14-15 Jan. 1980 Oct. 1962 1957 1970 1959 1959 Aug. 1956 Sep. 1981 1967 19363 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 14-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 84 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation (110) St. Louis Harbor, MO & IL -58330 $ 19,235 Flood Control Studies (120) Alexander and Pulaski Counties, IL -12217 25,765 Cape Girardeau-Jackson Metropolitan Area, MO -12053 36,175 St. Louis Metropolitan Area, MO & IL -55040 1,109,241 Ste. Genevieve, MO -80061 80,732 Richland Creek, IL -12174 77,453 Sub-total 1,329,366 Special Studies (140) Great River Resource Mgmt Study -14028 825 Carlyle Lake - Shelbyville Lake, Ill. -12160 264 Meramac R. Basin Water Supply, Mo. -14056 35,851 Sub-total 36,940 Review of Authorized Projects (160) Mauvaise Terre, Ill, -14709 25,000 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations -17250 27,696 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Dept. of Agric. - Soil Cons. Service -51840 2,245 Tech. & Engrg. Asst. - Shore & Streambank Eros. -51731 55 Sub-total 2,300 TOTAL (Category 100) $1,440,537 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) -82030, 83400, and 82040 120,917 Hydrology Studies (260) -53820 10,071 TOTAL (Category 200) $ 130,988 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) None ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Eldred & Spankey D&LD, IL -00071 23,264 Hartwell D&LD, IL -00073 29,275 Hillview D&LD, IL- 00075 203,441 Meredosia Lake & Willow Creek D&LD, IL -00079 61,222 Meredosia, IL, and Meredosia, Willow Creek & Coon Run D&LD, IL -00069 77,092 Meremac River Basin, MO -75412 680,852 Nutwood D&LD, IL -00623 10,413 TOTAL (Category 600) $1,085,559 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $2,657,084 14-16 GALVESTON, TX DISTRICT * Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including the entire basin of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek Basins draining into Baffin Bay, and coastal area south thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary of Starr County, Texas. It includes lower basins of major streams flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from northern boundary of Fayette County; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) ................ 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX ............. 3. Cedar Bayou, TX ..................... 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ........ 5. Freeport Harbor, TX .................. 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX ...... 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and the Mexican Border .............................. 8. Houston Ship Channel TX .............. 9. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX ........... . 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX ........... 11. Texas City Channel, TX ................ 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX ....... 12A. Anahuac Channel, TX ................. 12B. Channel to Liberty, TX ................ 12C. Wallisville Lake, TX .................. 13. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ... 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........................ Beach Erosion Control 15. Corpus Christi Beach TX ............... Flood Control 16. Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, TX ......... 17. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX ...... 18. Freeport and Vicinity, TX, Hurricane-Flood Protection ............. 19. Highland Bayou, TX .................. Page Flood Control (cont) Page 20. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX 15-2 Hurricane-Flood Protection ............. 15-10 15-2 21. Taylors Bayou, TX .................... 15-10 15-2 22. Texas City and Vicinity, TX, 15-2 Hurricane-Flood Protection ............. 15-10 15-3 23. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX ...... 15-10 15-4 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control W orks ............................. 15-11 25. Flood Control Work Under Special 15-4 Authorization ........................ 15-11 15-5 15-6 15-6 15-7 15-7 15-7 15-7 General Investigations 26. Surveys .......................... 27. Advance Engineering and Design .. 28. Planning and Engineering ....... 29. Collection and Study of Basic Data . 15-8 Tables 15-8 Table 15-A Table 15-B 15-8 Table 15-C 15-8 Table 15-D Table 15-E 15-9 Table 15-F 15-9 Table 15-G 15-9 Table 15-H 15-9 Table 15-I ...... 15-11 ...... 15-11 ...... 15-11 ...... 15-12 Cost and Financial Statement ... 15-13 Authorizing Legislation ........ 15-16 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 15-27 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 15-27 Total Cost of Existing Projects .................... 15-28 Channel Dimensions ........... 15-29 Channel Dimensions, GIWW Tributary Channels ............ 15-32 Dredging Operations ........... 15-34 Jobs Act ..................... 15-36 15-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 ACT Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas and the Sabine River Watershed of Louisiana. Previous project. For details see page 699 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildwife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. Eradication work continues in the Nueces River Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto River Basin and Rio Grande Basin. Planning, to include hydrilla control in the existing program, is underway. Estimated cost for new work is $2,019,000 Federal (Corps) and $693,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Reimbursement to State of Texas for Government's share of cost was $69,594. In addition, the State performed $19,296 of eradication work for which credit as work-in-kind was given. A draft report and environmental assessment for the inclusion of submerged species, hydrilla and Eurasian watermilfoil, were substantially completed. Monitoring of the biological control nursery areas was continued during the year. 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 miles east of Brownsville, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11301.) Previous project. For details see page 1017 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 15F. Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet or more above mean low tide in the gulf. Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to to Corpus Christi, Texas. Aransas Pass is on southern portion of Texas Coast, 180 miles southwest of Galveston and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas Pass 15-2 Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in April 1980. The 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty was placed in the inactive category in 1980. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1984.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 3. CEDAR BAYOU, TX Location. The bayou is about 30 miles long. It flows to the south and empties into northwest corner of upper Galveston Bay, about 1.5 miles below mouth of San Jacinto River and about 28.5 miles north of Galveston, T'exas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Project provides for a channel 10 feet by 100 feet from Houston Ship Channel to Bayou Mile 11.0. Channel was completed from Houston Ship Channel to first bend in Cedar Bayou above the mouth in 1931. Channel from Mile -0.1 to Mile 3.0 was completed in March 1975. Channel from Mile 3.0 to Mile 11.0 is in the "inactive" category. Project also includes jetties at mouth of bayou provided for under previous project. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 0.6 feet and extreme range 1.2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is $643,000 Federal (Corps) and $135,000 non- Federal, consisting of $25,000 cash contribution and $110,000 lands and damages. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1984.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for the inactive portion. Terminal facilities. U.S. Steel Company has a barge dock at bayou mile 2.8, and there are a few small wharves, privately owned, for local use at various places along Cedar Bayou. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Adjustment of a prior year dredging contract cost $55,984. 4. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This project, formerly known as the Port Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, TIxas, was changed to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, 'Tebxas, by 1968 River and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements of Port Aransas, Texas, and channel from Aransas Pass GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT connects Corpus Christi Bay with the gulf. Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 miles to and including a turning basin at Corpus Christi, thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to and including turning basin at Avery Point, thence westerly 4.25 miles to and including a turning basin near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and including a turning basin at Viola, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) Previous project. For details see page 1861 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. (See Table 15-F for existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins comprising this waterway.) Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and extending up this island to prevent a channel being cut around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, and for the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel to Port Araneas. The breakwater consists of two overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and the second, located on the west side of the entrance channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port Aransas was relocated in the 3 00-foot clear distance between the overlapping sections. The portion of the channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range at Aransas Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below mean low tide Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $88,924,515, including $456,515 for lrt Aransas Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous projects; and non-Federal $17,409,068 (includes $768 for Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $6,076,840 contributed funds and value of useful work performed, $3,320,228 lands, $6,027,000 relocations and $1,985,000 other cost. (October 1, 1984 base price.) The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was completed in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed in July 1973. Work remaining consists of deepening deepdraft channels to 45 feet from Beacon 82 through Viola ?Runhg Basin; widening of channels and basins; and constructing a mooring area at Port Ingleside with olphins. Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged Sproject depth and width, and dredging of channel from arbor Island to Beacon 82 at 45-foot depth has been completed. Initial mooring dolphins were completed in M 1979. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1984.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Sec. 101 of 1968 River and Harbor Act and Sec. 124 of Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Terminal facilities. Tebrminal facilities on Harbor Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 1979, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Erosion control on Brown Pelican Island was completed at a cost of $111,857. Construction of disposal area levees, Area 1 and Rincon, cost $2,066,187. Construction of disposal area levees, South Shore, cost $3,500,000. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 5. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River, Texas, from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 11322.) Previous projects. For details see page 1860 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for various channels and basins are shown in Table 15-F on channel dimensions at end of chapter. Existing project also provides for: Dual jetties and a diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer Chemical Plant, including the turning basin, was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered inactive. The 38-36 foot project was completed in 1962. Work remaining consists of realigning, deepening and widening the Outer Bar and Jetty Channels; relocating the northeast jetty; rehabilitating the southwest jetty; realigning and deepening the harbor channel between the jetty channel and the Upper Turning Basin; relocating and enlarging the Upper Turning Basin; constructing a turning point near the northwesterly end of the jetty channel; enlarging Brazosport Turning Basin; deepening Brazos Harbor Channel; and enlarging and deepening Brazos Harbor Turning Basin. Preconstruction planning on this remaining work is complete. (See Thble 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1984.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion channel do not cause greater variations in water surface than those caused by tidal action. Estimated cost of new work is: $82,170,000 Federal (Corps); and $10,753,000 non- Federal, including $1,113,303 contributed funds, $360,249 contributed work, $6,125,448 lands, $2,629,000 levees and spillways, and $525,000 relocations. (October 1, 1984 base price.). 15-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970. River and Harbor Act of 1970 requires local interests provide necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for public use facilities; and when the appraised value of land, easements, and rights-of-way amounts to less than 50 percent of the total first cost of the development, make additional contributions sufficient to bring the non- Federal share to at least that level. The cash contribution is presently estimated at $355,000 which combined with land, estimated at $685,000 is 50 percent of the cost of public use facilities. Cash contribution at time of authorization estimated at $95,000 in addition to providing land estimated at $70,000. Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks and one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail facilities permitting all-weather work. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980, for additional facilities.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning continued on the 45-foot project. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 6. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements at Galveston, Texas, which includes projects formerly identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, Texas; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf front of Galveston, Texas, and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 15-F. Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south one extending from Galveston Island and the north one extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, into the Gulf of Mexico; a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 feet on outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean range in Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely on the vind, and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston channel to 36 foot depth was completed in November 1966. Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1970. Dredging of Galveston channel to 40 feet was completed in March 1976. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1984.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. None on Galveston Harbor, which is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels. Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port Series No. 23, revised 1979). A containership terminal equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers three units high on the deck of any normal containership has been completed and placed into operation by the city of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35-ton and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 7. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (GALVESTON DIST.) Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River about 3 miles below Orange, Texas, to Brownsville, Texas, about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, Texas, to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary channel in San Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5 miles; a tributary channel extending about 14 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Palacios, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 2 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Rockport, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway near Port Aransas, Texas, to town of Aransas Pass, Texas; a tributary channel about onefourth mile long extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, Texas; a harbor of refuge for small craft at Seadrift; a channel extending from gulf to Podrt Mansfield, Texas, about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo, Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a point near Harlingen, Texas, about 31 miles; side channels in vicinity of Port Isabel, Texas, and a small boat basin at Port Isabel, Texas, and a tributary channel 15-4 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT extending from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles with a west turnout (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide between Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 11315, 11317, 11319, 11322, 11326, and 11331.) Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River Canal, Tbxas.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine River to Brownsville, T'Iexas. Relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage is west of Harvey Lock, Louisiana); and alternate channel, 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel and the 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide channel from mile 8.2 to mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou are inactive. (See Table 15-G on existing project dimensions provided for in tributary channels.) Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972, Offatts Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation of main channel across Corpus Christi Bay was completed in September 1976. The 14 foot by 175 foot Channel to Aransas Pass was completed in April 1979. Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel was completed in January 1981. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate Bayou was completed in February 1981. The 12 foot by 125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has been placed in the inactive category. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. Active authorized work remaining consists of the following: construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River; dredging a navigation channel from gulf to the GIWW; constructing a turning basin at Matagorda, Thxas; construction of a diversion dam and channel; construction of an oyster cultch; and recreation facilities. (See Thble 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1984.) Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at rLOWnsville. Extreme ranges of tide under ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at Corpus Christi, 2 Feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Height of tides is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $76,364,000, Federal (Corps), including $8,414 for Port Isabel Side Channel, $46,559 for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin, $356,466 for Offatts Bayou, and $658,573 for Channel to Aransas Pass and excluding expenditures on previous projects; non-Federal $17,926,174 ($395,000 voluntarily expended on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 contributed funds for Port Isabel, $49,665 contributed funds for Offatts Bayou, $347,950 contributed funds for channel to Aransas Pass, $3,558,000 contributed funds for Mouth of Colorado River, $6,039,000 lands for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $11,000 lands for Port Isabel, $4,242,000 relocations for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and $3,237,000 other costs Gulf Intracoastal Waterway). (October 1, 1984 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for inactive portions, and provisions of Section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act. Non-Federal contributions are $395,000 for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 for Port Isabel, Texas, $49,665 for Offatts Bayou, Texas, $347,950 for Channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, and $3,558,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, Texas. Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities at Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Port Series No. 25 (revised 1979) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, a 770-foot private dock and a 760-foot private timber trestle have recently been completed at the upper end of the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of jetties at the Mouth of the Colorado River was awarded in December 1983. Fiscal year cost was $2,427,910. Maintenance: The Brazos River Floodgates were operated and maintained at a cost of $557,258, including engineering and design, supervision and administration, and real estate activities. In addition, rehabilitation of of guidewalls and mooring facilities cost $558,318. The Colorado River Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $623,302, including engineering and design and supervision and administration. In addition, repairs of the guidewalls cost $115,909. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 8. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 7 miles long from turning basin to Main Street, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. 15-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 15-F. Also provides for certain cut-offs, for easing sharp bends, an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey Bend, and for off-channel silting basins as deemed necessary by the Chief of Engineers. Construction of 26,000 linear feet of pile dike to protect the channel in upper Galveston Bay was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. The 40-foot project was completed in March 1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou to Mile 1.57 was completed in 1970. Only work remaining is dredging Greens Bayou, Mile 1.57 to Mile 2.73, which is in the inactive category. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1984.) Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet and 1 foot, respectively. Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; however, this condition has not occurred since completion of Addicks and Barker Dams for flood control on upper watershed of Buffalo Bayou. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Complied with except for inactive portions of Greens Bayou. Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of Houston Authority operate modern terminals which supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, as described in Port Series No. 24 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. Rehabilitation of disposal area levees cost $528,510. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 9. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cavallo to Part Lavaca, Texas," and deep draft channel improvements authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas" Bar at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11316.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are listed in 'able 15-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24-foot depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1 foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $18,058,777 Federal (Corps), and $12,859,000 non-Federal, including $12,259,619 contributed funds, $182,000 for lands, $220,000 for relocations, and $196,581 other costs. The project was completed in March 1967 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at Point Comfort, Texas. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Company of America; and a wharf built by local interest at Point Comfort turning basin. Operations during fiscal year Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 10. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and "Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange and Neches River to Beaumont, Texas." Sabine Pass is on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends 7 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper end, Sabine-Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341, 11342, and 11343.) Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Thable 15-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal, construction of suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, and relocation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal variation at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean low tide while tropical disturbances have caused heights as much as 8 feet above mean low tide. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. Removal of obstructive bridge at Port Arthur was completed May 1969. The high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was completed October 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet was completed April 1972. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1984.) Local cooperation. Complied with except for inactive portions. 15-6 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Tlhble 15-H for dredging operations.) 11. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX. Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide and about 6.75 miles long, from Bolivar Roads to a turning basin at Texas City, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet wide and 4,253 feet long; and an Industrial Canal, 40 feet deep and 300-400 feet wide extending a distance of 1.7 miles southwestward from the south end of lbxas City Turning Basin, and a turning basin, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,150 feet long. Project also provides for easing the approach to the turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to and north of the channel; and a rubble-mound dike, 27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. Widening the Texas City Turning Basin; realigning the 'Ibxas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly from its present position; and enlargement through widening and deepening of the Industrial Canal and basins was initiated in July 1980 and completed in June 1982. The only work remaining is deferred construction consisting of widening the Industrial Canal from 250 feet to 300 feet at 40 foot depth. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1984.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is $14,300,000 Federal (Corps), excluding expenditures on previous projects, and $1,793,700 non-Federal, including $127,741 Contributed funds, $248,000 work contribution, $427,959 lands, $984,000 levees and spillways and $6,000 for removal of barge mooring facilities from Snake Island. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deep-draft channel and turning basin extend about 1.9 miles southwestward from south end of TIxas City Turning Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Corps of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Construction of levees for contract for dredging Texas City Channel cost $291,290. 12. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is formed at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5. The mouth of the Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1984.) Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. There is no local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. Tlerminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. 12A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TX Location. Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston Bay to Anahuac, Texas, opposite mouth of Trinity River 38 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. No project dimensions authorized by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6- by 80-foot channel, 16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Latest published map is in House Document 440, 56th Congress, 1st Session. Project was completed in 1911. Local cooperation. None required. Tlerminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance including mosquito control spraying. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 12. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TX Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, Texas.) Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from Anahuac to Liberty which was completed in 1925. A navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Thxas, with depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a turning basin at Liberty,'l Txas, and a protective embankment along the west side of the channel in Trinity Bay. The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one 15-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF milejunction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of "Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and 1 mile below Anahuac, Texas, as required by 1946 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess.), but not complied with for remaining portion of "Channel to Liberty" as required by River and Harbor Act of 1945 (H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.) at an estimated total cost of $550,000, of which $460,000 is for lands and rights-ofway and $90,000 for pipeline relocations for 9- by 150-foot channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co's slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance including mosquito control spraying. 12C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles northwest of Anahuac, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a dam and overflow spillway approximately 8 miles long to prevent salinity intrusion and create a 5,600-acre reservoir. The maximum pool elevation will be 4 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project provides for an 84 foot by 600-foot navigation lock to facilitate navigation on Channel to Liberty. The sill has a depth of minus 16 feet below National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project also provides for two recreational areas. Dam controls a drainage area of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non-Federal project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity of 58,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. 'Total estimated cost of authorized project is $63,300,000 Federal (Corps). (October 1, 1984 base price.) A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was completed in October 1968. Work started in July 1970 on construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, and navigation channel. Work was suspended in February 1973 because of an injunction halting construction. Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and was completed in April 1973. An exception to the injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed in April 1973. In August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the case with directions that a revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged anew. Final supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement for the modified project authorized in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1983 (PL 98-63) was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on September 21, 1983. The schedule for the completion of Brazos Island Harbor Cedar Bayou Clear Creek Galveston Harbor and Channel Houston Ship Channel Sep 1984 Jul, Aug, Sep 1984 Jul-Aug 1984 Sep 1984 Sep 1984 $6,424 4,199 413 3,096 2,097 Total $16,229 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Reconnaissance study to investigate dredging the mouth of the Brazos River Diversion Channel for use by commercial navigation was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $11,131. Beach Erosion 15. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 11311.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic nourishment as required. Construction was completed in March 1978; however, erosion and/or littoral movement of the beach will be monitored during ten years following completion to determine periodic nourishment requirements. Estimated cost of new work is $2,150,000 Federal (Corps) and $2,265,000 non-Federal consisting of $2,150,000 contributed funds, $43,000 relocations, and $72,000 lands. (October 1,1984 base price.) 15-8 ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 construction for the modified project is dependent on the time required to coordinate with the courts to lift the injunction, and the availability of construction funds. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, one-half of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 percent of total project cost. Local interest contribution is estimated at $8,557,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Planning for the non-overflow dam, Interstate 10 to the Lock site, is underway. Maintenance: Ranger surveillance, administration of project, and administration of duck blind permit program was conducted. 13. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys were conducted on the following projects: Fiscal Year Project Date of Survey Cost GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for periodic nourishment. Operations during fiscal year. Planning for periodic nourishment and sand retention groin is underway. Flood Control 16. ARROYO COLORADO, RIO HONDO, TX Location. The project is located on Arroyo Colorado at Rio Hondo, 'Texas which is approximately ten miles northeast of Harlingen, TIxas and 30 miles north northwest of Brownsville, Texas. Existing project. The project provides for bank protection to 400 feet of the east bank of Arroyo Colorado downstream of Farm-to-Market Road 106. Estimated cost for new work is $201,300 Federal (Corps) and $7,000 non- Federal. Project was completed in 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for bank protection was completed in May 1984 at a cost of $147,739. Project was turned over to local interest in September 1984. 17. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, Texas. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris County.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin of Houston Ship Channel to control floods for protection of city of Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, enlargement and rectification of channels and construction of control works. Estimated cost of new work is $137,730,000 Federal (Corps) including $11,730,000 for recreational facilities at completed projects (Code 713 funds), and $97,800,000 non-Federal, consisting of $86,070,000 for lands and relocations, and $11,730,000 contributions for recreational facilities. (October 1, 1984 base price.) Construction of Barker Dam was completed in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 1948. Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams consisting of gating of two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was COmpleted in 1969. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou was completed in 1976. Major rehabilitation of Addicks and Barker Dams to prevent seepage through the embankment was completed in 1982. Work remaining consists of rectification of approximately 22 miles of main stem of Buffalo Bayou. A contract with the City of Houston for cost-sharing in the construction of recreation facilities at Cullen Park was entered into in November 1981. The lease for approximately 10,534 acres of land and water areas was approved in February 1983. Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of the required utility relocations have been accomplished. Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad Company for bridge alterations at Brays Bayou. Non-Federal contributions totaled $63,661 for project betterments. Recreation development is subject to conditions of non-Federal costsharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Recreation: The City of Houston awarded a contract in August 1984 for construction of the Community Park West (Phase 1A) consisting of picnic areas, ball fields, access roads, and parking areas. The Federal portion of this contract will be $200,000. Fiscal year Federal cost for administering the contract was $2,953. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance at Addicks and Barker Dams. 18. FREEPORT AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Freeport is in southern part of Brazoria County on Gulf of Mexico at mouth of Brazos River, about 43 miles southwest of Galveston, Texas. Existing project. Authorized project provides for hurricane-flood protection for a highly industrialized area and community of about 39,000 persons. Major features of project consist of improvements to 42.8 miles of existing levees, two interior drainage pumping plants and 2.1 miles of new levee. The project was completed in February 1982. Estimated cost of new work is $29,285,000 Federal (Corps) and non-Federal $12,548,000 consisting of $8,695,000 cash, $1,127,000 lands, and $2,726,000 relocations. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. No work was performed during the fiscal year. 19. HIGHLAND BAYOU, TX Location. Rises near Arcadia, in Galveston County, Texas, and flows into Jones Bay, an arm of West Bay. The watershed, with an area of about 38 square miles lies entirely within Galveston County and is about 14 miles long and varies in width from about 0.3 miles at its lower end to a maximum of about 5 miles near its midpoint. Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for enlargement and rectification of Highland Bayou Channel and construction of a diversion dam in Highland Bayou, with a diversion channel extending southerly from the diversion dam and emptying into Jones Bay, which lies 15-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 on the north side of West Bay. Initial construction contract was awarded in June 1974. Work completed consists of a diversion dam, 8.2 miles of diversion channel, a railroad bridge crossing the diversion channel, and 3.1 miles of upper Highland Bayou Channel. The lower 8.6 miles of channel rectification in Highland Bayou will be placed in the "inactive" category. Estimated cost of new work is $20,500,000 Federal (Corps) and $6,120,000 non-Federal consisting of $3,020,000 lands and $3,100,000 for relocations. (October 1, 1984 base price.) Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act applies. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for construction of drainage structures, Mile 9.3 and 9.4, was completed in December 1983 at a fiscal year cost of $163,711. 20. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX, (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Port Arthur is on west shore of Sabine Lake in extreme southeast part of Texas, about 14 miles from the gulf. Area under consideration is comprised of about 38,500 acres, and includes cities of Port Arthur and Groves, towns of Griffing Park, Pearl Ridge, and Lakeview, and adjacent industrial areas. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing concrete and steel sheet-pile seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new concrete and sheet-pile seawall; raising and improving 3.0 miles of existing earth levees; constructing 20.3 miles of new earth levees and constructing five interior drainage pumping plants. Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir was placed in the "inactive" category in December 1980. The project was initiated in March 1966 and the active portion of the project was completed in 1984. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $59,703,000 Federal (Corps) and $26,036,000 non-Federal consisting of $16,016,000 cash contributions, $3,403,000 for lands, $6,168,000 for relocations, and $449,000 for pumping station betterments and levee realignment betterments. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. A contract for levee repairs cost $128,790. A study of modifying the operation of Alligator Bayou Pumping Plant was completed and recommended no change in operation. 21. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Location. Watershed of Thylors Bayou is in extreme southeast corner of Texas adjoining basins of Neches River and Sabine Lake on the east. City of Port Arthur is about 8 miles from the main stream of Thylors Bayou. Existing project. Improvement consists of enlarging and rectifying approximately 53 miles of natural and artificial channels on Taylors Bayou and tributary water courses. Phase I consists of constructing a gated structure to prevent saltwater intrusion and 2.9 miles of new diversion channel and enlarging 1.8 miles of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and a 1.9 mile section of the Outfall Canal. Phase II consists of enlarging 6.0 miles of Thaylors Bayou, 14.3 miles of Hillebrandt Bayou, 1.5 miles of Pivotot Bayou, 2.3 miles of Bayou Din, and 3.5 miles of Willow Marsh Bayou. Phase III consists of enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Thaylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou. The Phase III portion of the project was placed in the "inactive" category in November 1980. Initial contract on the "active" portion of the project was awarded in August 1982. Estimated cost for new work, excluding inactive portion, is $51,000,000 Federal (Corps) and $25,378,000 non-Federal, including $17,390,000 cash contribution, $4,310,000 lands, and $3,678,000 for relocations. (October 1, 1984 base price.) Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act, applies. Operation during fiscal year. A contract for construction of the Salt Water Gate was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $1,188,502. Dredging of the Thylors Bayou Diversion Channel, Station -1+40 to 135+00, was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $231,000. 22. TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. On the west and southwest shore of Galveston Bay, about 9 miles northwest of Galveston, Texas. Project fronts on the west side of Galveston Bay and protects a land area of about 36 square miles. Existing project. Plan provides for construction of improvements for control of storm tides. Improvements consist of 15.9 miles of new levees, 1.3 miles of concrete floodwall, related drainage and stoplog structures, one tide control structure, and two pumping plants. The project was initiated in 1962. All work is complete except for the La Marque Pumping Plant and drainage structures. Construction of the La Marque Pumping Plant was initiated in September 1982. Estimated cost for new work is $37,560,000 Federal (Corps) and $16,338,000 non- Federal, including $13,648,000 cash contribution, $1,071,000 work contribution, and $1,363,000 for lands, and $256,000 for ramps in lieu of closure structures and increased low flow pumping capacity for La Marque Pumping Plant. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for construction of levee and closure structures, Southwest Leg, was completed at a fiscal year cost of $15,010. Supply contract for the La Marque Pumping Plant cost $49,400. Contract for construction of La Marque Pumping Plant was continued at a fiscal year cost of $1,668,660. 23. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX Location. Watershed of Vince Bayou and tributary, Little Vince Bayou, has an area of about 17 square miles and lies entirely within Harris County. Vince Bayou is a minor tributary of Buffalo Bayou in San Jacinto River Basin on upper gulf coast of Texas. Existing project. Project provides for enlarging and 15-10 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT ctifying channel of Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 7.3 miles upstream and Little Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 4.2 miles upstream, a total distance in both streams of about 11.5 miles. The project was initiated in 1968. All work on Vince Bayou is complete. Planning is in progress on Little Vince Bayou. Estimated cost for new work is $19,300,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,205,000 non-Federal, consisting of $5,065,000 for lands and $12,140,000 for relocations. (October 1, 1984 base price.) Local cooperation. Sec. 203, 1962 Flood Control Act, applies. Local interests have acquired all real estate and accomplished all required relocations on Vince Bayou. On Little Vince Bayou, local interests have acquired 80 percent of the real estate and accomplished 10 percent of the required relocations. Operations during fiscal year. Channel rectification on Little Vince Bayou, mile 0.7 to 2.7, cost $2,040,610. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS A study to evaluate the effects of wave overtopping of the levee system at Texas City and Vicinity, Hurricane- Flood Protection project was initiated in Fiscal Year 1984. Inspections of completed projects operated and maintained by local interests were made on the following projects. Fiscal year cost was $96,248. Project Date of Inspection Port Arthur and Vicinity, Hurricane-Flood Protection Project Freeport and Vicinity, Hurricane-Flood Protection Project San Diego Creek Floodway, Alice, TX Tranquitas Creek Floodway, Kingsville, TX December 1983 January 1984 November 1983 November 1983 25. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of 1970 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Detailed project reports on flood problems at East and West Edinburg, Texas were completed at fiscal year costs Of $50,220 and $377, respectively. Both studies were terminated in Fiscal Year 1984. Detailed project report for flood problems at Kirbyville, Teas was completed at a fiscal year cost of $2,305. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Costs were $97,294 for disaster preparedness and $74,766 for emergency operations. Rehabilitation work for Brays and White Oak Floodways was $175,073 and for Texas City Hurricane Flood protection project $1,247. 26. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $2,102,679 of which $412,638 was for navigation studies, $1,507,775 was for flood damage prevention studies, $120,839 was for shoreline protection studies, $3,800 was for coordination with other agencies, $20,528 was for Special Investigations, $36,596 was for Deauthorization review, and $503 for preauthorization studies Phase I (Lower Rio Grande Basin). General Investigations 27. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, Texas -The project will provide for an overflow dam in the Neches River, a gated salt water barrier consisting of five 56 feet by 24.5 feet tainter gates; a gated navigation bypass channel with a clear opening of 56 feet and a depth of 16 feet; an access road and levee; and an auxiliary dam across a canal which drains an adjacent bayou. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,655,000. Preconstruction planning was initiated in 1978. The Phase I General Design Memorandum was completed in 1982. A Feature Design Memorandum for the access road and levee was completed in 1983. Plans and specifications were approved in May 1984. Fiscal year costs were $59,635. Clear Creek, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement and rectification of the existing Clear Creek channel from the upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 26.05, a distance of approximately 22 miles; and an additional outlet with a gated structure from Clear Lake to Galveston Bay. A number of bridges, pipelines and other structures which now obstruct flood flows will require relocation or alteration. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,830,000. Preconstruction planning was initiated in 1972. The Combined General Design Memorandum and the Final Environmental Impact Statement were completed in 1982. A Feature Design Memorandum for channel rectification between mile 3.8 and 7.3 is being prepared. Fiscal year costs were $226,687. 28. PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Upper White Oak Bayou and Tributaries, vicinity of Houston, Texas - The project will provide for channel improvements on White Oak Bayou from Mile 10.7 to Mile 19.9; on Cole Creek from Mile 0 to Mile 4.9; and on Vogel Creek from Mile 0 to Mile 4.5, for a total of 18.6 miles. Project also provides for flood plain zoning and regulation on the residual 100-year flood plains on White Oak Bayou from Mile 19.9 to near Mile 25.5; on Cole Creek form Mile 4.9 to near Mile 6.9; and on Vogel Creek from Mile 4.5 to near Mile 6.5; and includes recreational development along White Oak Bayou from near Mile 14.6 to near Mile 18.3. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $3,710,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in 1982. Fiscal year costs were $375,068. 15-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 29. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management and technical services were performed at a cost of $20,691 and $91,638, respectively. Anticipated studies cost $4,308. Hydrologic studies cost $8,587. 15-12 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-A See Section in Text Project 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 1965 Act 2, Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Cedar Bayou, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston Dist.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost To FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 198427 140,000 60,000 145,705 97,972 - (-)3,877 - (-)3,877 2,017,038 1,518,000 2,013,558 1,510,837 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work; Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost 1,145,000 1,080,913 2,191,491 1,441,665 7,300,000 7,372,185 2,0E 2,0' 6,735 19,853 80,000 70,483 3,000 2,565 1,100,000 1,099,502 9,084,000 9,666,964 (-)127,433 (-)152,346 25,000 44,816 2,528,000 2,539,513 695,000 921,444 1,530,000 1,327,915 13,853,956 14,378,786 140,000 180,000 1,337,1001 95,390 130,816 1,240,3401 - - 11,857,5022 - - 11,857,5022 4,593,000 448,100 34,761,4853 2,961,443 2,091,003 34,761,0323 - - 2,170,080 - - 2,170,080 - - 681,2634 - - 681,263' - (-)6,300 2,089,3165 2,181 55,987 2,089,2595 3,500,000 3,100,000 50,472,3598 2,081,707 4,943,296 50,128,6446 3,306,300 5,514,200 76,033,228' 1,972,610 6,826,376 75,986,3537 - - 3,576,684 - - 3,576,684 400,000 1,300,000 3,192,088 682 1,397,580 2,872,172 100,000 (-)25,000 2,842,1528 8,628 29,224 2,795,6278 4,243,200 1,891,650 35,697,1158 3,742,067 2,061,605 35,355,9178 - - 8,935 - - 8,935 - - 29,096,39210 - - 29,096,39210 381,000 12,061,900 71,510,90311 105,968 12,337,285 71,504,81611 - - 7,969,329 - - 7,969,329 600,000 2,300,000 52,888,30312 114,177 2,218,220 52,218,28312 17,523,000 9,878,800 171,358,23013 16,141,134 13,015,122 170,466,27013 - - 434,638 - - 434,638 - - 835,873 - - 835,873 15-13 6,165,000 6,708,009 (-)1,491 125,098 12,081,000 9,693,675 TABLE 15-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 8 Houston Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 9. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway,TX (Regular Funds) 11. Texas City Channel, TX 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Includes Wallisville) 15. Corpus Christi Beach, TX (Restoration Project) (Contributed Funds) 16. Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, TX 17. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX 18. Freeport and Vicinity, TX Hurricane Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Recreation Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib Cost 79,052 4,080 - (-)19,562 4,675 (-)21 8,695,43824 8,695,43824 15-14 Total Cost To FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 198427 - - - - 35,760,38214 - - - - 35,760,3821" 6,701,900 1,150,000 6,945,000 6,640,880 90,960,02315 7,335,604 1,100,243 5,090,215 8,161,017 90,538,85715 - - - - 18,058,77716 - - - - 18,058,77718 4,465,000 1,770,000 1,677,000 2,745,800 32,925,043 2,282,888 3,958,543 1,360,493 3,055,463 32,913,258 - - - - 56,136,81517 - - - - 56,136,81517 8,590,000 5,873,000 4,560,200 13,419,700 119,012,12016 8,326,011 6,191,822 3,267,663 14,438,456 118,722,05118 6,875,000 282,000 - - 13,325,4721" 6,313,649 843,251 7,733 - 13,325,47219 1,834,000 3,260,000 - 583,700 17,899,36120 1,182,621 3,867,333 25,864 393,238 17,690,13220 - - - - 726,158 - - - - 726,158 210,000 255,000 300,000 640,000 28,839,67621 185,244 212,946 156,232 564,548 28,546,45321 95,460 903,000 165,000 399,500 7,401,80322 88,068 902,018 138,496 430,108 7,396,74922 - - - 595,000 2,150,641 2,921 - 5 53,377 1,608,412 - - - 50,000 1,623,345 2,921 - 5 53,377 1,608,413 - - 201,300 - 201,300 - - 24,712 169,132 193,844 200,000 - - - 57,206,32423 203,409 - - - 57,206,32423 (-)785,000 115,600 250,204 - 377,804 2,326 413 4,160 2,953 18,361 981,000 1,461,000 1,702,000 1,924,600 14,748,113 907,545 1,304,922 1,566,899 1,966,162 14,371,775 50,000 - - - 12,475,000 388,262 17,137 (-)91 127 12,475,000 180,000 - - (-)25,000 29,285,042 268,718 13,912 10,910 93 29,285,042 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-A See Section in Text Project 19. Highland Bayou, TX 20. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX Hurricane Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Taylors Bayou, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Texas City and Vicinity, TX Hurricane- Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 Total Cost To FY 84 Sep. 30, 198427 3,300,000 703,877 300,000 116,000 12,254,390 3,304,700 637,183 207,696 289,617 12,254,390 2,230,000 1,600,000 - (-)276,000 59,702,509 1,645,839 1,937,833 (-)8,648 151,068 59,673,737 450,000 430,000 230,000 - 16,291,97525 494,712 668,456 130,069 64,957 16,233,83425 215,000 1,175,000 1,900,000 2,650,000 210,011 400,587 2,574,097 1,943,612 - 400,000 600,000 500,000 - 55,872 614,494 425,850 4,183,000 2,960,000 2,870,000 4,073,009 1,703,584 1,419,324 7,393,198 6,577,835 1,500,000 1,096,216 - 37,560,400 1,558,750 36,229,996 1,250,000 700,000 700,000 900,000 13,835,10026 1,620,725 729,981 608,280 669,567 13,280,90228 117,000 450,000 1,500,000 1,300,000 143,669 274,907 420,002 2,499,132 9,668,100 9,607,310 1 Excludes $305,676 credit for contributed work. 2 Includes $675,855 for previous projects. In addition, $1,806,619 expended from contributed funds, of which $123,361 was for previous projects. In addition, $14,692 expended from contributed funds. * Includes $39,087 for previous projects. In addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 5 Includes $69,784 for previous projects. S Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes $456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Port Aransas Breakwaters. In addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port Aransas Breakwaters. ' Includes $62,452 for previous projects. In addition, $434,611. expended from contributed funds. a Includes $147,098 for previous projects. In addition, $758,303 expended from contributed funds. O In addition, $229,311 expended from contributed funds. '0 Includes $8,421,996 for previous projects. In addition, $3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. 1 Includes $86,126 for previous projects. In addition, $2,044,519 expended from contributed funds. 12 Includes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); and Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). In addition contributed funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Ofatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass ($347,950); Chocolate Bayou ($658,310); and Mouth of Colorado River ($485,582). 13 Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition, $22,672 14 expended from contributed funds. Includes $4,105,157 for previous projects. In addition, $2,591,939 expended from contributed funds, of which $1,209,179 was for previous projects. 15 Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects. In addition, $363,360 expended from contributed funds, of which $200,000 was for previous projects. 16 In addition $12,259,619 expended from contributed funds and $182,800 for contributed lands. '7 Includes $5,180,832 for previous projects. In addition, $2,680,942 expended from contributed funds, of which $577,507 was for previous projects. 18 Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects. In addition, $2,401,418 expended from contributed funds. 19 Includes $366,823 for previous projects. In addition, $1,023,819 expended from contributed funds, of which $99,000 was for mitigation measures. 20 Includes $195,083 for previous projects. 21 Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. In addition, $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 22 Includes $543,662 for previous projects. 23 Includes $4,400,000 of advanced funds repaid to Harris County Flood Control District. In addition, $63,661 contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou and $12,900 Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for enlargement of Clodine Ditch. 24 Excludes $1,126,905 estimated value of contributed lands and $2,726,446 for relocations. 25 Excludes $3,402,588 estimated value of contributed lands, $6,168,360 for relocations, and $217,000 credit given local sponsor for work-in-kind. 26 Excludes $1,349,069 estimated value of contributed lands and $1,070,959 credit given local sponsor for work-inkind. 27 Includes funds provided by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 15-I. 15-15 _ __ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. 2. Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 3, 1930 May 24, 1934 (PWA) Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 19132 Sep. 23, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930* AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic plant growth from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution of funds to cover cost of original dredging of all inside channels and basins. Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. Deepen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and Brownsville channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels at Port Isabel to GIWW. Deepen to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel next to Brownsville ship channel Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning basin extension, thence at a width of 500 feet and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet.z7 CEDAR BAYOU, TX Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Houston Ship Channel to a point on bayou 11 miles above mouth. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Acquisition of old curved portion of north jetty previously constructed by private parties. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct south jetty. Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. Joseph Island. Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend dike on St. Joseph Island 9,100 feet, and dredge approach channel 12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom width. Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced area ut greater depth. 15-16 H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 347, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 192, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess.' S. Doc 107, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess.1 Specified in Act. Specified in Acts. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1094, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 3. GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19354 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954s Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel with depth 30 feet. Enlarge all channels from gulf to western end of basin dredged by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks on Harbor Island. Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater and western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning basin at Avery Point. Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin at Corpus Christi. Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 feet long near Tule Lake. Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and basins from Port Aransas to and including Tule Lake turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port Aransas to breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and widen Avery Point turning basin to 1,000 feet. Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep water channels and basins except 2,000-foot undredged part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering basin at Corpus Christi. An anchorage basin 12 feet deep, from 300 to 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long in Turtle Cove at Port Aransas, Texas. Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet square near plant in general vicinity of LaQuinta, Texas. An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alignment from 400-foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, near Corpus Christi breakwater, to flared approach channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at curves. Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels and basins except undredged northward extension to inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to LaQuinta; and widen Industrial Canal to 400 feet with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery Point turning basins. Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption of maintenance by United States. 15-17 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 35, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 40, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 130, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 63, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 574, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 544, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 560, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 654, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 89, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 487, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended by Dec. 31, 1970) Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 19256 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19357 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 5, 1961 Dec. 31, 1970 Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel. Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing deep-draft channels and basins, for construction of a new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a deepdraft mooring area and mooring facilities and for widening of the channels and basins at certain locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel of the waterway. Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal responsibility. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Dredging and other work necessary in judgment of Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. Examination authorized. Work later confined to maintenance of jetties. Repairs to jetties and dredging. Construct seagoing hopper dredge. Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, its operation of 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge one-half time for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary works. Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local interest. Deepening channels and basins. Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels and basins at Federal expense. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Modification of HD 1469. Revoking certain provisions of local cooperation. Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to 45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 S. Doc. 99, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 124, PL 94-587 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 68th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 29, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong. 2nd Sess. PL 394, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 289, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess.' 15-18 See Section in Text 5. Project and Work Authorized Documents GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-B See Date Section Auth in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION )rizing Project and Work Authorized Aug. 5, 1886 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 19109 Jul. 27, 1916 Jul. 18, 1918 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 4, 1938 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 23, 1971 (House Res.) (Nov. 18, 1971 (Sen. Res.) Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston Harbor. A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer end of old inner bar near Fort Point) at 51st Street. 8 Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. Extension of jetties to present project length and construction and operation of a dredge. Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., with depth of 30 feet and width of 700 feet. Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 51st and 57th Sts., 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St. and Broadway to vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of Fort Crockett reservation. Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep in inner bar.'o Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to dimensions of 12 by 100 feet. Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 (10 groins constructed). Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 43rd St.). Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. Deepen Glaveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 feet deep from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. Construct extension of Galveston Seawall from 61st Street, southwesterly 16,300 feet along gulf shore. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 42 feet from gulf to point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty and 40 feet thence to Bolivar Roads. Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER1 2 Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across Chocolate Bay to 4 feet of water in Chocolate Bay. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Sabine River to Galveston Bay, and a 20-inch pipeline dredge. Such passing places, widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1311. H. Doc. 264, 56th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 758, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 400, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 61, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 57, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 463, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 173, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 121, 92nd Cong., 1st Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 445, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. 15-19 Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 15-B See Section in Text AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193813 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 23, 1939 Jul. 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 194 5 9 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 194514 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Jul. 12, 1952 Sep. 3, 195415 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 9, 1959 Project and Work Authorized Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado River. Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios and Matagorda Bays. Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at Rockport and improve harbor to 9-foot depth.' Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas. Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet from Sabine River to Corpus Christi. Enlarge waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity of Mexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet throughout. Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate Bayou near Liverpool. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay. Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, providing a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet. Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish Landing, Texas, with basin. Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main channel to vicinity of Harlingen, Texas, via Arroyo Colorado with basin. Fill a portion of shallow-draft channel adjacent to Port Isabel Turning Basin, construct a channel to connect shallow-draft channel with main channel near shoreline of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel west of this connection, all to 12-foot depth and bottom width of 125 feet. Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay between Aransas Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen tributary channel from Port Aransas to Aransas Pass, Texas, 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou and reauthorized the 4 by 100-foot channel. Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between Port Bolivar and Galveston causeway. "Red Fish Landing" changed to "Port Mansfield, Texas." Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 by 100 feet from main channel via Seadrift to point on Guadalupe River 3 miles above Victoria, Texas, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift with an entrance channel 9 by 100 feet. Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and Aransas Pass, Texas, to 125 feet; straighten and widen to 125 feet connecting channel to Conn Brown Harbor, and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal expense, all to 12 feet deep. Improve channels and basins comprising channel to Port Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government and in part by local interest; constructing turnout curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance of small craft basin. 15-20 I~L Documents S. Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 564, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 641, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 675, 77th Cong. H. Doc. 337, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 383, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 248, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 402, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. (See Public Law 14, 79th Cong.) H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 700, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 196, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. PL516, 81st Cong. PL 527, 82nd Cong., 2nd Seas. H. Doc. 478, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 376, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Oct. 23, 196216 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 196517 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 5, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port Isabel, Texas, an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep having a surface area of about 7 acres. Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 feet and removing the submerged bars at each end of the island to a depth of -12 feet MLT. Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and extend southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet from mile 0 at Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 feet between miles 3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown Harbor and turning basin. Improve main channel 16 feet deep and '350 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel; with two relocations; relocate main channel in Matagorda Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing Lydia Ann Channel. Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two protective breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing basins; and deepen, enlarge and maintain existing approach channel to basin No. 2. Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct bridge at mile 29.2 turning basin at Victoria, and maintain turning basins at Victoria and Seadrift; provide: Federal construction of vertical-lift railroad bridge at Missouri- Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Texas. Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a channel extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Chocolate Bay and Chocolate Bayou to project channel mile 8.2, thence to a turning basin near channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel mile 16.9). Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the mouth of Colorado River Channel protected by an east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf shore to Matagorda, including recreation facility, a turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a closure dam across the present river channel. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a pile dike." A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and enlarge turning basin. A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White Oak Bayou. 1' Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. Sec. 107, PL 645, 86th Cong. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 504, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 288, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 217, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. 15-21 8. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 195820 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Sep. 22, 1922 Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, and a 400-foot width through Galveston Bay. Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from Morgan Point to turning basin. Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to Houston turning basin and dredge off-channel silting basins. Deepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallow-draft channel at Turkey Bend. Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou. 21 MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet bottom width. Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at mouth of Lynns Bayou. Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via Lavaca Bay, Lavaca and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, a distance of 20 miles. A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an approach channel 100 feet wide and equal depth. Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge; deepen to 12 feet Port Lavaca turning basin and basins at harbor of refuge. An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep and 1,000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual jetties at entrance from gulf. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with increased widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Deepen Port Arthur east and west turning basins and approach channel to 30 feet. Take over and deepen to 30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with Taylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in Sabine River near Orange. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 58, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 256, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 737, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 R. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 314, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 731, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 773, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 975, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong. 2nd Sess. 15-22 9. 10. TABLE 15-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193822 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 194623 Jul. 24, 194624 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, and Sabine-Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing places in Sabine-Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin, including all turning basins at Port Arthur. Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from gulf to Beaumont turning basin. Construct suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake. Maintain Taylors Bayou turning basin. Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal wharf. Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island and abandonment of channel south and west of Harbor Island. Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity of Pennsylvania Shipyard. Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west turning basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches River channel from mouth to Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; and widen Sabine-Neches Canal between Neches and Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. Improve Cow Bayou, Texas, by construction of a channel 100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation Channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a turning basin. Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge across bayou. Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine- Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field office. Documents H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 287, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 14, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 60, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 158, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 15-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Sep. 3, 195425 Oct. 23, 196226 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 12, 1972 (Sen. Res.) Oct. 12, 1972 (House Res.) Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 2, 1945 Project and Work Authorized Rectification of certain reaches of existing Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine-Neches Canal, and Neches River and Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper end of existing project at Orange, except for channel around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange municipal slip to upper end of project, except around Harbor Island; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in Neches River; a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge at Port Arthur, Texas. Deauthorization of uncompleted portion of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement of entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 28,200 feet long north to channel. A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a rubblemound dike. Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name of project to "TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS." Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 16-foot Industrial Barge Canal. Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet including relocation of the basin 85 feet to the east; providing a 40-foot deep channel in the Industrial Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin at the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, and 1,000 feet wide, and easing of the bend at the entrance to the canal, and deauthorization of shallow-draft Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the plan of improvement above. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Anahuac Channel. Six-foot channel to Liberty. Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all improvements by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel from Liberty to mouth. Provides for a navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep and See Section in Text 15-24 TABLE 15-B 11. 12. Documents S. Doc. 80, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 107, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 62, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 427, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 199, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 989, 66th Cong., 3rd. Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 30, 1983 15. Dec. 15, 1970 (House Res.) Dec. 17, 1970 (Sen. Res.) 16. Jul. 24, 1946 (As amended) 17. Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 18. Oct 923 19i 19. Oct. 27, 1965 20. Oct. 23, 1962 21. Oct. 27, 1965 22. Jul. 3, 1958 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning basin at Liberty. Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in lieu of the 9 by 200-foot channel in Galveston and Trinity Bays. Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, including a navigation lock in the Wallisville Dam at Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River projects. Reevaluation of navigation benefits. Modified Wallisville Reservoir by reducing the size to 5,600 acres and confining the reservoir to east side of Trinity River. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of beach. ARROYO COLORADO, RIO HONDO, TX Bank protection of 400 feet of east bank of Arroyo Colorado downstream of Farm-to-Market Road 106. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Barker and Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo Bayou, Brays, and White Oak Bayous. Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. FREEPORT AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Improvements to 42.8 miles of existing levees, 2.1 miles of new levees and 2 interior drainage pumping plants. HIGHLAND BAYOU, TX Enlargement and rectification of Highland Bayou Channel, construction of diversion dam, and diversion channel. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new seawall, 20.3 miles new levees and five pumping plants; and raising and improving 7.5 miles of existing levees. 2 8 TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Enlarging and rectifying channels; construction of diversion channel; a salt water gate; enlargement of GIWW 1.3 miles and alteration of State Highway 87 bridge.29 TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Construction of improvements for control of storm tides, consisting of new and enlarged levees and floodwalls approximately 14.1 and 2.1 miles in length; related drainage and stoplog structures; a navigation opening and pumping plants. H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st. Sess. PL 98-63 H. Doc. 415, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) Sec. 14, PL 79-526 H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 250, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 495, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 168, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 505, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 206, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 347, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.' 15-25 TABLE 15-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX 23. Oct. 23, 1962 Enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou and H. Doc. 441, 87th Cong., Little Vince Bayou upstream for a total of 11.5 miles 2nd Sess. 1 for both streams. * Contains latest published maps. 2 Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south jetty 1,265 feet 3co nsidered inactive Dredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of inner basin deauthorized. * Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933 and February 16, 1935. S West leg of Wye junction with main channel deauthorized. S Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense considered inactive. 7 Dredging upper .5 mile of channel to vicinity of Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933. a Dredging 43rd to 51st Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. ' Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 10 Deepening 43rd to 57th Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251 1 Previously authorized September 6, 1933 by Public Works Administration. 12 H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. and project documents contain latest published maps. 13 Dredging upper 3.5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 14 Dredging upper 5 miles is inactive. 15 Inactive. 1"Po rtion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel and relocation of channel in Matagorda Bay are in inactive category. 17 The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou is inactive. 18 Construction of pile dike was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 1O Hill Street Bridge to mouth of White Oak Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 20 Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern Pacific Slip to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec 12 of PL 93-251. 21 The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 is inactive. 22 Complete widening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin authorized by 1962 R&H Act. 23 Complete deepening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 24 Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 25 Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 26 The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange to Echo, Texas is inactive. 27 Jetty extension inactive. 28 Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir is inactive. 29 Enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou are inactive. 15-26 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 15-C Project Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts)6 Bastrop Bayou, TX2 3 Brazos River, TX, Velasco to Old Washington3 Channel to Port Bolivar, TX Double Bayou, TX Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX Corpus Christi, TX, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal Peninsula6 Dickinson Bayou, TX' East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX9 Johnson Bayou, LA 0 Little Bay, TX 1 Oyster Creek, TX 12 Sabine River and Tributaries, TX (Echo to Morgan Bluff) ' Excludes $1,672 work contributions. 2 Widening from 60 feet to 100 feet at 4-foot depth was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 3 Inactive. 4 Includes $48,711 for previous projects. SIncludes $123,676 for previous projects. ' Completed. 'Includes $46,101 for previous projects. ' In addition, $5,366 expended from contributed funds. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1967 1931 1924 1983 1983 1982 1968 1954 1922 1933 1979 1922 1971 Cost To September 30, 1984 Operation and Construction Maintenance 38,252' 9,920 216,9895 133,9254 226,558 66,934 1,194,344 33,942 2,476 2,261 6,942 27,129 223,010 1,071,6947 1,121,9788 537,139 26,467 57,553 847 54,042 252,728 7,556 9 In inactive category for maintenance. 10 Channel adequate for existing commerce. " Aransas County Navigation District, Rockport, TX, constructed project as authorized by 1950 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 114, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.) in 1955 under Department of Army permit. 12 No commerce reported. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 15-D Project Baytown, Texas' Colorado River, Matagorda, Texas 2 Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Texas 2 Lavaca-Navidad River, Texas: Hallettsville Project General channel project Liberty Local Protection Project, Texas Mill Creek, Texas1 Peyton Creek, Texas1 San Diego Creek, Alice, Texas 2 Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Texas 2 1 Inactive. 2 Completed. For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance 1980 1963 1978 1961 1952 1971 1952 1975 1963 1956 245,400 273,757 505,749 256,043 21,086 98,517 24,753 66,377 135,175 130,239 15-27 -- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 TABLE 15-E See Section in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Cedar Bayou, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston District) 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 11. Texas City Channel, Tx 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Total cost of project Regular Channel Seawall Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project $ 8,333,087 2,848,560 1,683,258 12,864,905 642,176 25,000 667,176 48,431,823 324,287 2,872,940 51,629,050 1,716,695 276,720 53,622,465 2,531,954 116,575 758,303 3,406,832 360,249 3,767,081 11,920,187 8,754,209 3,648,932 24,323,328 51,045,097 466,477 1,588,066 53,099,640 395,000 139,776 53,634,416 29,042,293 2,612,932 1,382,760 33,037,985 49,592,331 1,363,652 2,103,435 53,059,418 32,000 116,760 53,208,178 12,822,353 136,296 1,023,819 13,982,468 26,580,147 66,000 26,646,147 $ 34,761,032 14,692 34,775,724 2,019,475 2,019,475 75,923,901 434,611 76,358,512 76,358,512 35,355,917 229,311 35,585,228 35,585,228 70,966,032 439,537 13,121 2,044,519 73,463,209 168,939,706 22,672 168,962,378 168,962,378 89,325,715 163,360 89,489,075 116,342,374 2,401,418 118,743,792 118,743,792 17,495,049 17,495,049 6,853,087 6,853,087 $ 2,17 2,17 3,57 3,57 3,5 7,3' 51 7,9 1 ,2 ' 1,2' 70,080 $ 45,264,199 - 2,848,560 - 1,697,950 10,080 49,810,709 - 2,661,651 - 25,000 - 2,686,651 76,684 127,932,408 - 324,287 - 3,307,551 76,684 131,564,246 - 1,716,695 - 276,720 76,684 133,557,661 8,935 37,896,806 - 116,575 - 987,614 8,935 39,000,995 - 360,249 8,935 39,361,244 73,356 90,259,575 95,973 9,789,719 - 13,121 - 5,693,451 69,329 105,755,866 70,51i 221,255,314 - 466,477 - 1,610,738 70,511 223,332,529 o - 1,270,511 726,158 726,158 395,000 139,776 223,867,305 118,368,008 2,612,932 1,546,120 122,527,060 165,934,705 1,363,652 4,504,853 171,803,210 32,000 116,760 171,951,970 31,043,560 136,296 1,023,819 32,203,675 33,433,234 66,000 33,499,234 15-28 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 5. reeport Harbor, Tx 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Padre Island to Long Island Long Island to Goose Island Goose Island to Turning Basin Extension Turning Basin Extension Brownsville Turning Basin Port Isabel Channel via East Turnout West Wye, from Brownsville Channel Port Isabel Turning Basin Fishing Boat Harbor: West Basin Middle Basin East Basin Connecting Channel Entrance Channel Aransas Pass Outer Bar Channel Aransas Pass Jetty Channel Inner Basin at Harbor Island Channel to Port Aransas Port Aransas Turning Basin Anchorage Basin at Port Aransas Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta Junction LaQuinta Junction to Corpus Christi Turning Basin Corpus Christi Turning Basin Industrial Canal Avery Point Turning Basin Channel to Chemical Turning Basin Chemical Turning Basin Tule Lake Channel Tule Lake Turning Basin Viola Channel Viola Turning Basin Channel to LaQuinta LaQuinta Turning Basin Turning Point at LaQuinta Channel Junction Jewel Fulton Canal Jewel Fulton Turning Basin Mooring Area at Ingleside: Mooring Area (a) Mooring Area (b) Outer Bar Channel Jetty Channel Quintana Turning Basin Channel to Brazosport Turning Basin Brazosport Turning Basin Channel to Upper Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Channel to Stauffer Chemical Plant Stauffer Turning Basin Brazos Harbor Channel Brazos Harbor Turning Basin Entrance Channel Outer Bar Channel Inner Bar Channel Anchorage Basin Bolivar Roads Channel 38-36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 12 12 45 45 47 45 45 45 45 45 45 30 30 36 36 42 42 40 36 40 300 200 200 300 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 270 100 700 600-730 730-1,720 100-150 200-4002 300-400 600-500 500 400 800 400 975 400 1,2005 300 1,200 300-350 1,200 300-400 1,200 1,2503 100 200 150 150 400 400 750' 400 1,0004 375 1,200' 200 500 200 750' 800 800 800 2,8751 800 38-36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 40-45 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 45 45 45 12 12 45 38 36 36 36 36 36 30 25 30 30 42 42 40 36 40 300 200 200 200 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 265 100 700 600 Irregular 100 2002 300-400 600-500 500 400 1,000 400 1,000 350 1,0505 200 900 200-250 700-900 300-400 1,200 1,2503 100 200 150 300 200 200-350 744-800 350-375 600 200 500 200 525-675 800 800 800 2,875 800 2.5 2.1 9.6 3.2 1.3 2,670 0.5 1.4 0.8 1,300 0.2 1,470 0.3 1,200 0.2 1,470 .03 1,230 0.2 770 0.1 1.8 1.0 1,550 - 0.1 200 - 900 0.2 8.5 3.6 8.6 5,423 1.0 1.1 1,150 0.2 0.6 1,690 0.3 3.1 1,000 0.2 1.8 1,000 0.2 5.6 800 0.1 1,250 0.2 - 0.8 400 0.1 - 0.8 - 3.0 - 0.8 - 1.2 667 0.1 - 1.4 600 0.1 - 1.1 500 0.1 - 0.5 675 0.1 - 4.7 - 1.7 - 3.2 - 1.81 - 1.0 15-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 15-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Mil Bolivar Roads Channel to 43rd St. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (cont'd) 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX 9. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX Bolivar Roads to Morgan Point Morgan Point to Boggy Bayou Boggy Bayou to Greens Bayou Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou Hunting Bayou Turning Point Clinton Island Turning Basin Sims Bayou to Southern Pacific Slip Southern Pacific Slip to Houston Turning Basin Houston Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Brady Island Channel Barbour Terminal Channel Turning Basin Five-Mile Cut Channel Light-Draft Channel: Upper Turning Basin to Jensen Drive Turkey Bend Channel Greens Bayou Channel: Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Channel to Point Comfort Approach Channel to Turning Basin Turning Basin Channel to Port Lavaca Lynn Bayou Turning Basin Channel to Harbor of Refuge North-South Basin East-West Basin Channel to Red Bluff Sabine Bank Channel Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel Sabine Pass Jetty Channel Sabine Pass Anchorage Basin Sabine Pass Channel Port Arthur Canal Entrance to Port Arthur Turning Basins Port Arthur East Turning Basin Port Arthur West Turning Basin Channel connecting Port Arthur West Turning Basin and Taylors Bayou Turning Basin Taylors Bayou Turning Basin Sabine-Neches Canal, Port Arthur Canal to Neches River Turning Point at Mile 19.5 Neches River, Mouth to Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin Turning Point, Mile 31.1 Turning Point, Mile 36.6 Turning Point, Mile 40.3 Channel Extension, Mile 40.3 es 40 40 1,125 - 3.9 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 16 16 8 10 10 36 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 400 1,0004 1,0004 1,0004 350 1,125 400 400 300 300 900-1,000' 800' 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 100 1,100 125 60 60 175 100 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 420 600 200-250 150-1,000 400 900* 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 16 16 8 10 10 36 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 15-30 400 400 300 300 948-1,000' 965-1,070' 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 100 1,100 125 60 60 175 100 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 370-547 350-550 200-250 90-1,233 400 900' 400 1,000 1,000 1,300 350 - 26.2 - 12.8 - 2.4 - 5.3 1,375 - 1,592 - - 0.6 - 2.9 3,100 0.6 1,000 0.2 - 0.9 - 1.5 1,000 0.2 - 1.9 - 4.1 - 0.8 - 0.3 - 1.3 - 3.2 - 20.9 - 1.1 1,000 0.2 - 4.1 532 0.1 - 1.9 1,682 0.3 1,750 0.3 - 20.2 - 14.7 - 3.4 - 4.1 3,000 - - 5.6 - 6.2 - 0.3 1,765 0.3 1,610 0.3 0.6 3,470 0.7 S11.2 - 18.3 700 930 1,530 1,265 0.2 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles Sabine-Neches Maneuvering Area at Waterway, Beaumont Turning Basin 40 Irregular 40 Irregular 1,300 0.2 TX (cont) Beaumont Turning Basin 34 500 34 160-535 1,500 0.3 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension 34 350 34 300 - 0.4 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension to End of Project Channel Vicinity Bethlehem Steel Company 30 200 30 200 - 0.7 Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Sabine River 30 200 30 200 - 4.4 Sabine River Channel, Mouth to Foot of Green Ave. 30 200 30 200 - 9.5 Orange Turning Basin 30 Irregular 30 Irregular 1,550 0.3 Orange Municipal Slip 30 200 30 150-200 2,435 0.5 Old Channel Around Harbor Island 25 150-200 25 150-200 - 2.4 Channel to Echo7 12 125 - - - - Adams Bayou 12 100 12 100 - 1.7 Cow Bayou 13 100 13 100 - 7.0 Orangefield Turning Basin 13 300 13 300 500 0.1 I Average. 'Includes 100-foot channel width. 3 Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. 4 Diameter. ' Includes 350-foot channel width. o 300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. 7 Inactive Category. * Included in channel length. * Includes 300-foot channel width. 15-31 TABLE 15-F TABLE 15-G REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Authorized Improved Project Dimensions Project Dimensions Depth Depth (Feet Below Bottom (Feet Below Bottom Mean Width Mean Width Length Tributary Channel Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Miles Feet Offats Bayou Main Channel West Wye Chocolate Bayou Channel 12-Foot Channel via East Turnout West Turnout 9-Foot Channel Turning Basin San Bernard River Channel Colorado River Channel Turning Basin Silting Basin Mouth of Colorado River Navigation Channel, GIWW to Gulf Turning Basin at Matagorda Channel to Palacios Turning Basin No. 1 Turning Basin No. 2 Connecting Channel Channel to Barroom Bay Channel to Victoria Main Channel via east Turnout Turning Basin West Turnout Channel Channel to Seadrift via South Turnout Turning Basin North Turnout from Channel to Victoria Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift Channel Basin Channel to Rockport Turning Basin Channel to Aransas Pass Turning Basin Channel to Conn Brown Harbor Conn Brown Harbor Channel to Port Mansfield Entrance Channel Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Channel Across Padre Island and Laguna Madre Turnout Channels, East Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel West Side of Main Channel, GIWW, to P.T. of Turnout Channels Turnout Channels, West Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout 12 12 12 12 9 999 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 99 9 9 99 125 125 125 125 100 600 100 100 400 150 200-100 350 125 200 300 150-480 60 100 600(avg) 100 100 250 100 100 200 200 475 175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 125 125 125 125 100 100 400 150 125 200 300 130-400 100 500(avg) 100 100 200 100 - 200 342(avg) 125-175 300 125 300 99 14 14 14 14 15-12 12 12 12 12 12 6 999 99 9 99 99 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 12 2.3 0.4 8.2 0.8 26.0 15.5 0.1 1.0 16.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 34.8 0.1 0.8 2.0 0.5 2.1 0.2 6.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.4 0.1 7.7 999 99 9 2,200 500 635 1,130 800(avg) 230 1,225 2,212 1,800 300 2613 2613 2613 14 12 12 14 12 12 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 0.6 - 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.6 - 15-32 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-G GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Authorized Improved Project Dimensions Project Dimensions Depth Depth (Feet Below Bottom (Feet Below Bottom Mean Width Mean Width Length Tributary Channel Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Miles Feet Channel from P.T. of Turnout Channels to Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Main Turning Basin Turning Basin Extension Small Craft Basin Shrimp Basin Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout from Main Channel, GIWW Turning Basin near Rio Hondo North Turnout from Main Channel Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel Main Channel South Leg Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel Harbor Channel Boat Basin 14 14 14 14 8 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 766 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 125 400 200 125 233-60 125 75 50 Variable 14 14 14 14 8 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 76 6 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 12511 400 200 125-90 233-60 125 75 50 72-501 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 25.812 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 1.4 0.3 0.2 - 1,250 580 860 1,450 500 1,308 1 Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at Mile 16.9. 2 Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. a Constructed by local interests. 4 Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 is in inactive category. 5 Authorized to Mile 31 above mouth (channel mile 29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Section 12 of PL 93-251. Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, to the gulf which was dredged by local interests in 1939. (Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of munprovements authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) 7 Authorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot wide by 20 to 23-feet deep discharge channel into Matagorda Bay, and a 15-foot by 200-foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East jetty to be 3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long. s Includes two protective breakwaters at entrance to turning basins. 9 In the inactive category for maintenance. 10 Also provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 feet long and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) 11 South turnout is 200 feet wide. 12 Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to Mile 31 is in inactive category. 13 Dredged 26 feet deep to accommodate U.S. Hopper Dredge A. MACKENZIE. 15-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 15-H DREDGING OPERATIONS Brazos Island Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Brownsville Channel and Port Isabel Channel October 1, 1983 to April 18, 1984 3,998,484 1,609,853 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Bay Channel and Main Turning Basin October 1, 1983 to April 13, 1984 1,471,644 2,767,016 Entrance Channel (U.S. Hopper Dredge WHEELER) August 22, 1984 to September 30, 1984 1,069,456 3,800,000 Freeport Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Entrance Channel (U.S. Hopper Dredge WHEELER) October 1, 1983 to October 25, 1983 115,784 364,441 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (Maintenance) Entrance Channel March 5, 1984 to July 25, 1984 4,487,405 11,703,135 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and Mexican Border (Galveston District) (Maintenance) Cedar Lakes to Colorado River October 1, 1983 to December 6, 1983 864,342 192,213 Corpus Christi Bay to Mud Flats October 1, 1983 to April 10, 1984 1,874,210 1,244,782 Turnstake Island to Oak Point October 1, 1983 to January 14, 1984 863,268 377,435 Redfish Bay, Corpus Christi Bay Channel and Channel thru Lydia Ann October 3, 1983 to May 10, 1984 889,884 815,244 Mile 297 to High Island October 12, 1983 to September 30, 1984 437,266 547,900 Freeport Harbor to Cedar Lakes and San Bernard River Channel October 1, 1983 to April 18, 1984 1,921,582 2,471,940 Emergency Dredging in Matagorda Bay April 10, 1984 to May 7, 1984 157,326 256,982 Carpenter Bayou to Greens Bayou October 1, 1983 to October 18, 1983 102,844 166,368 Houston Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Redfish Reef to Morgan Point and Shallow Draft Channels October 27, 1983 to September 30, 1984 4,630,922 3,891,400 Sims Bayou to and including Turning Basin May 17, 1984 to September 30, 1984 1,656,567 1,813,510 Bolivar Roads to Redfish Reef June 13, 1984 to September 5, 1984 1,923,078 988,462 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Matagorda Peninsula to Point Comfort October 1, 1983 to June 15, 1984 2,320,742 477,854 Entrance Channel January 26, 1984 to March 7, 1984 908,933 2,356,439 Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Lower Reach Neches River Channel and Sabine Neches Canal (Section B) February 17, 1984 to September 9, 1984 3,068,437 2,454,471 15-34 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Upper Reach Sabine Pass Channel and Port Arthur Canal April 30, 1984 to September 30, 1984 2,422,366 1,169,378 Sabine Pass Outer Bar and Sabine Bank Channels July 22, 1984 to September 30, 1984 5,835,135 8,934,000 Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Maintenance) Anahuac Channel February 18, 1984 to April 5, 1984 267,810 197,203 15-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 JOBS ACT (P. L. 98-8, March 24, 1983) TABLE 15-I Total Cost to Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 Arroyo Colorado River, Rio Hondo, TX Brazos Island Harbor, TX Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX Freeport Harbor, TX Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX Sabine Neches Waterway, TX Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX Matagordo Ship Channel, TX New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $170,000 0 2,800,000 2,473,028 254,000 42,132 31,000 27,308 2,516,200 2,030,076 281,000 30,219 1,547,200 324,325 4,940,000 3,498,040 5,000 3,205 $ 0 162,545 (-)500 326,472 (-)1,400 210,468 (-)3,600 92 (-)300 465,528 (-)100 250,681 (-)489,600 733,275 497,200 1,911,401 (-)1,700 95 $170,000 162,545 2,799,500 2,799,500 252,600 252,600 27,400 27,400 2,515,900 2,495,604 280,900 280,900 1,057,600 1,057,600 5,437,200 5,409,441 3,300 3,300 15-36 FORT WORTH, TX DISTRICT * District includes that portion of Texas south of Red River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River; exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including entire basins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers; and exclusive of Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffins Bay and coastal area south thereof to Rio Grande and east of western boundary of Starr County, Texas. District also includes those portions of the Sulphur River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Trinity River Project, TX .............. Flood Control 2. Aquilla Lake, TX ....... .......... 3. Bardwell Lake, TX .................... 4. Belton Lake, TX .. ..... ........ 5. Benbrook Lake, TX .................... 6. Big Sandy Lake, TX ......... ..... 7. Boggy Creek, TX ............. ........ 8. Canyon Lake, TX ............... 9. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX .......... 10. Elm Fork Floodway, TX ................ 11. Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O'The Pines, TX 12. Grand Prairie, TX (Landfill) ........... 13. Grand Prairie, TX (Meyers Road) . ..... 14. Grapevine Lake, TX ....... ..... 15. Hords Creek Lake, TX ................. 16. Joe Pool Lake, TX (formerly Lakeview Lake) 17. Lavon Lake, TX ....... ...... 18. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fort Channel Improvement, TX ............. 19. Lewisville Dam, TX ..... ............ 20. Millican Lake, TX . . . .......... 21. Navarro Mills Lake, TX ............ ... 22. O. C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX ........ 23. Proctor Lake, TX .......... ......... 24. Ray Roberts Lake, TX (Aubrey) ....... 25. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX .. 26. San Gabriel River, TX ................. 27. Somerville Lake, TX ................. 28. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX ............. 29. Waco Lake, TX.................... Page Flood Control (cont) Page 16-2 30. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX ...... 16-11 31. Inspection of completed flood control projects .............................. 16-12 16-2 32. Scheduling flood control reservoir 16-3 operations ............................ 16-12 16-3 33. Other authorized flood control projects .... 16-12 16-3 34. Flood control work under special 16-3 authorization ........................ 16-12 16-4 16-4 16-4 16-5 16-5 16-6 16-6 16-6 16-7 16-7 16-8 16-8 16-8 16-9 16-9 16-9 16-9 16-9 16-10 16-10 16-11 16-11 16-11 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 35. Belton Lake Modification, TX ........... 36. Dam "A" Lake, TX ................... 37. Rockland Lake, TX .................... 38. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX .... 39. Town Bluff Dam-B .A. Steinhagen Lake, TX 40. Whitney Lake, TX .................. General Investigations 41. Surveys ........................... 42. Collection and study of basic data ........ Tables Table 16-A Table 16-B Table 16-C Table 16-D Table 16-E Table 16-F 16-12 16-12 16-13 16-13 16-13 16-13 16-13 16-13 Cost and Financial Statement .... 16-14 Authorizing Legislation ......... 16-18 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 16-21 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................ 16-21 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........... 16-22 Jobs Act, Special Authorization PL 98-8 ....................... 16-23 16-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) consists of five major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tennessee Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork Floodway, and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last full report on the project as authorized, see Annual Report of 1978. The project information present herein is based on the tentatively selected project plan presented in the Draft General Design Memorandum. The plan consists of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, Tennessee Colony Lake, and a Channel to Liberty in the lower basin. The estimated cost of the improvements is $1,225,000,000 including $81,000,000 non-Federal cost for land acquisition and relocation required for the local protection features (Oct. 1, 1984, base price). Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY: Location. The Channel to Liberty begins at the Houston ship channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou channel turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake and then continues northward through the lake area along the course of the Trinity River to RM 45 above Liberty, Texas. Existing project. The navigation portion of the channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 feet and will extend from the Houston ship channel in Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Texas. The flood control portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 200 feet with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville Lake to RM 45 above Liberty, Texas. Estimated Federal cost of the improvements is $163,000,000 and estimated non- Federal cost is $18,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $181,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1984, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations and alterations to existing improvements, other than highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the channel upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $245,000, exclusive of interest. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: Location. The Tennessee Colony dam site is located at River Mile 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles west of Palestine, Texas. The lake would extend into Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties, and would control a drainage area of 12,302 square miles. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete spillway. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 2,269,500 acre-feet for flood control, 1,040,000 acre-feet for conservation, and 145,500 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the improvement is $913,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price), Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $461,754,000 for water supply and $9,533,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities), for a total cost of $471,287,000, exclusive of interest. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION: Location. Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity River in the City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for extending the existing Floodway downstream about 9 miles to the confluence of the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The plan consists of a leveed floodway and flood conveyance improvement (channel) along the main stem, Five Mile Creek and White Rock Creek. Maintained free of encroachments, the levees and channels would provide Standard Project Flood protection for approximately 7,300 acres of urban lands currently subject to flooding. The estimated Federal cost is $68,000,000 and estimated non- Federal cost is $63,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $131,000,000 for the improvement (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, maintenance and operation of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all alterations to existing improvements, other than railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the project after completion, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $1,878,000 (excluding future recreation) exclusive of interest. Flood Control 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TX Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Texas, with the dam at River Mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas, and about 24.0 miles north of Waco, Texas. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps, Aquilla and Peoria, Texas, quadrangle scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam 104.5 feet high and 11,800 feet long with an uncontrolled concrete spillway 1,200 feet long on the left abutment, creating a lake with a total storage capacity of 146,000 acre-feet, including 86,700 acre-feet for flood control, 33,600 acre-feet for water supply, and 25,700 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Drainage area above 16-2 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT damsite is 294 square miles. Estimated cost is $46,100,000. Construction was started March 1977, and project was ready for beneficial use April 29, 1983. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. A contract with the Brazos River Authority for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, June 29, 1976. To date, the Authority has paid $61,764 toward principal and $5,035 to operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continue. 3. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek, 5 river miles upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of Ennis, Ellis County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started August 1963 and completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Estimated cost of project is $12,941,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. A Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1963, and the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. To date the authority has paid $241,268 toward principal and $368,469 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Bardwell project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1984 were $8,659,700. 4. BELTON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, scale 1:500,000 and Geological Survey, Belton sheet, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water supply pool: Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is complete. lal cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a Otate agency, for remaining water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 15, 1958, at an estimated cost of $1,602,822. To date $967,143 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. bTdoa te $832,707 has been paid. An interim contract with Brazos River Authority for emergency use of water supply storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 2, 1957. Amount of $152,435 paid by authority on March 21, 1957 for use of these facilities was credited to interest and principal payable under formal water supply contract. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular remain. Benefits accrued to Belton project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1984 were $105,983,100. 5. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, T'Ixas, on Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $14,544,000. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. In 1956, Congress passed legislation enabling the city of Fort Worth to purchase conservation storage space in Benbrook lake. Contracts have been negotiated with the city of Fort Worth and the Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority for the use of portions of the navigation storage for water supply purposes until such storage is required for Trinity River Navigation. To date $65,639 has been paid by the city of Fort Worth and $50,356 by Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority. A cost sharing contract with the city of Benbrook for Recreation Development was approved by the Secretary of the Army May 20, 1977. To date, $14,994 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook Lake, Clear Fork and West Fork Floodways: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1984 are estimated at $48,303,500. 6. BIG SANDY LAKE, TX Location. The project is located on Big Sandy Creek, a tributary of the Sabine River, and is virtually contained in Wood County, with a small area extending into Upshur County. The damsite is located at River Mile 15.3 about 6 miles northwest of Big Sandy, TIxas. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earth and rock fill dam with a maximum height of 94.5 feet above streambed and a total length of 6,200 feet, including the concrete spillway. Big Sandy Lake would have a total controlled storage of 418,200 acre-feet and a water surface area of 16,580 acres at elevation 382.0, top of flood control pool. At elevation 367.5, top of 16-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 conservation pool, the lake would have an area of 10,810 acres and a storage capacity of 221,200 acre-feet. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1970 (PL 91-611) and is a unit in the comprehensive basin-wide plan of water resource development. Estimated cost of project is $99,100,000. Local cooperation. Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. The Sabine River Authority of Texas and the Texas Water Development Board are the local project sponsors. Operations during fiscal year. March 25, 1982, Ph I GDM was recommended for termination due to lack of present Federal interest in the project. Project was recommended to be reclassified to inactive status December 29, 1982, based on the infeasibility of the project. 7. BOGGY CREEK, TX - COLORADO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES Location. In southeast portion of the city of Austin, Texas, which is about 160 miles north of Houston and approximately 200 miles south of Dallas-Fort Worth area. Existing project. The recommended plan consists of concrete trapezoidal channel on Boggy Creek beginning just above Webberville Road and extending downstream about 2.2 miles to just below Jain Lane. From there, a grass lined channel would extend further downstream and transition into the natural channel at Ed Bluestein Boulevard, a distance of about 0.7 miles. New bridges would be required at four street crossings and two railroad crossings. The plan calls for acquisition of 54 acres of land adjacent to the lower end of the channel to mitigate habitat losses and also to provide for environmental quality enhancement. About 3.25 miles of trails along the channel and 0.95 miles in the EQ/mitigation area will also be provided. Estimated Federal cost is $14,600,000 and $6,700,000 non-Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1984, base price). The proposed flood control channel will provide capacities for the 100 year flood. Design will provide for containment of flows within the banks of the improved channels. Bottom widths for the concrete channel will vary from 60 feet to 90 feet, and top widths from 80 feet to 120 feet. Local cooperation. In accordance with the President's 1978 Cost Sharing Policy and the recommendations contained in the reporting document, the State of Texas is required to make a cash contribution of 5 percent of construction costs associated nonvendible outputs. The city of Austin is required to provide a cash or in-kind contribution equal to 20 percent of the project first costs associated with flood control benefits and 20 percent of the associated mitigation lands. The city is also required to provide 50 percent of the recreational development cost and 25 percent of the EQ enhancement lands. The city will also be required to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction work, operate and maintain all works after completion, prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flow capacity of the project, provide and maintain adequate lateral drains and channels, publicize flood plain information for all streams in the watershed and adopt and enforce regulations to minimize damages to future developments within the 100-year flood plain, and administer and assure access to the recreational facilities and lands to all on an equal basis. Operations during fiscal year. A reevaluation of the Interim Survey Report was submitted May 5, 1982, and approved May 18, 1982. The Phase II GDM was submitted in January 1984. Specific authorization for construction of Boggy Creek is pending. Preconstruction planning continued. 8. CANYON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Guadalupe River, 303 miles above its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started April 1958 and project completed for beneficial use June 1964. Estimated cost of project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water .supply and streamflow regulation for development of electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of Engineers on October 24, 1957, Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. The estimated cost of the Water Storage contract is about $9,000,000. To date $1,004,129 has been paid. In addition, $22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $783,535 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Canyon project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1984 were $49,624,100. 9. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Location. Cooper Dam and Reservoir is located in northeast 'ITxas about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13 miles north of Sulphur Springs, and is at river mile 23.2 on the South Sulphur River. The South Sulphur River rises in Fannin County, Texas, and flows generally east for about 80 miles to its confluence with the North Sulphur River to form the Sulphur River Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of a multipurpose reservoir with levee anc channel improvements on the Sulphur River The reservoir consists of a rolled earthfill dam with a maximum height of about 73 feet, 15,882 feet long at its crest, one controlled (service) spillway, and an emergenCY uncontrolled spillway. The reservoir surface area will be 16-4 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 22,740 acres at the top of the flood control pool, 19,305 acres at the top of the water supply pool, and 5,084 acres atthe top of the sediment pool. The reservoir will contain 131,400 acre-feet of flood control storage, 273,030 acre-feet of municipal and industrial water supply storage, and 37,000 acre-feet of sediment storage. Construction of the project began in July 1958 and, to date, approximately 98 percent of the lands required for project construction have been acquired and 64 percent dthe levees and 85 percent of the channel work have been completed. Approximately 14.8 miles of the South Sulphur River and 6.3 miles of the Middle Sulphur River channels have been excavated. Approximately 3.4 miles oflevee embankment on the South Sulphur River and 7.3 miles on the Middle Sulphur River have been constructed upstream of the Cooper Reservoir. About 10.5 miles of levee on the North Sulphur River, 8.2 miles of levee on the Sulphur River, 14 miles of levee on Cuthand Creek, and 4.2 miles of levee on Brushy Creek were strengthened; 0.5 mile of levee on Kickapoo Creek was enlarged; and 15.3 miles of new channel in Cuthand Creek, 0.8 mile of new channel in Brushy Creek, and 0.2 mile of cutoff channel in Kickapoo Creek were excavated; all downstream from Cooper Reservoir. Lack of funds and spending limitations prevented construction of the levees and channel work between April 1964 and February 1971. Construction was started again, however, in May 1971. The Thxas Committee on Natural Resources, et al, secured an injunction to halt construction on the project pending preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. A statement was prepared and filed on June 24, 1977. The plan recommended, in the Final EIS, minimized further construction of the authorized channels and provided for construction of the reservoir and downstream levees. The sufficiency of the Final EIS was challenged in the court and in December 1978 the U.S District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled the statement inadequate, citing five deficiencies and halting all further construction. A Supplemental EIS to comply with the court's decision was prepared and filed with the Environmental Protection Agency in March 1981. The recommended plan of improvement consists of the multipurpose lake, 0.9 mile of levee, and the acquisition f 25,500 acres of wildlife mitigation lands. All remaining channel and levee work was deleted from the recommended plan. The Supplemental EIS was filed with the court in July 1981 and numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were subsequently filed. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1984 base price) is $127,000,000, non- Federal cost for land for the levees is $227,000 and in addition $50,425,000 is to be reimbursed by water supply Sers over a 50-year period. The project was transferred to the Fort Worth District at the end of FY 1979. local cooperation. Except for Cooper Reservoir, local 'terest must furnish lands and rights-of-way and alter ald relocate highways and related facilities and utilities, ept railroads, for construction; hold and save the Ualted States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion, and preserve channel capacities by preventing encroachment. Local agencies hkrfriigshhtes-do f-way for the first two phases of work on the levees and channel downstream from Cooper Dam. Right-of-way acquisition for the second phase was also essentially complete when construction was halted. Assuring agencies are the following counties in Texas: Delta, Hunt, Franklin, Lamar, Morris, Hopkins, Titus, and Red River. Basic assurances have been received. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have not been received from Delta, Lamar, Morris, or Hunt Counties. Operations during fiscal year. After the Supplemental EIS was filed in July 1981, numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were filed through October 1982. On December 30, 1982, the U.S. District Court issued a 95-page order continuing the permanent injunction. On March 22, 1983, the order was revised and Judge William Wayne Justice issued an Amended Memorandum Opinion and a Permanent Injunction against the construction of Cooper Lake. The Government filed a Notice of Appeal with the court in May 1983. Since that time, several briefs have been filed with the New Orleans Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Current action centers on the Appeal and resolution of the litigation. On July 16, 1984, litigation was resolved and the injunction was released. 10. ELM FORK FLOODWAY, TX Location. The project is located in Dallas and Denton Counties, Texas. A portion of the improvement will be in and adjacent to the Cities of Dallas, Irving and Farmers Branch, Texas. Existing project. Improvement of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth to Lewisville Dam and along Denton Creek, a tributary of the Elm Fork to Grapevine Dam. The plan of improvement provides for enlargement and realignment of about 22 miles of the Elm Fork, enlargement and realignment of about 20 miles of tributary channels, construction of about 39 miles of new levee, rehabilitation of about 2 miles of existing levees, modification of 14 street and highway bridges, 4 railroad bridges and alteration of utilities. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $60,700,000, and non-Federal estimated cost is $88,600,000, a total of $149,300,000 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide (without cost to the Federal Government) except for the main channel thereof, all lands, easements, utilities and bridge relocations (except railroad bridges) necessary for construction and operation of the project. Assurances were signed March 20, 1969 by the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, that they would provide items required of local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was suspended in 1973. Further studies have been delayed until a definite plan has been accepted by local interests. 11. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES, TX Location. On Cypress Creek in Marion, Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties, T'Ixas, 8 miles west of Jefferson, Texas. 16-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. An earth-fill dam 10,600 feet long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a capacity of 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet, including 587,200 acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation storage, and 251,100 acre-feet for municipal and industrial water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. Project affords substantial flood protection of Cypress Creek Valley from damsite to confluence with Red River and, together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red River Basin, will provide flood protection along main stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Construction commenced in January 1955 and was completed in June 1960. Estimated Federal cost of project is $17,231,700 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price), including $4,349,200 for Code 711 and $399,739 accelerated Public Works fund. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular remain. Benefits accrued to Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1984 were $6,139,000. 12. GRAND PRAIRIE, TX, SANITARY LANDFILL Location. The project is located at a bend of the West Fork of the Trinity River, Texas, approximately 19,500 feet upstream of the confluence of the West Fork and Elm Fork of the Trinity River. This bend in the river is adjacent and north of the city of Grand Prairie sanitary landfill which lies within Dallas County and is located in northeast Grand Prairie. Existing project. The project provides for the construction of a cutoff channel which will eliminate an oxbow in the river, and prevent future damage to the city's sanitary landfill. The cutoff channel will have a bottom width of 30 feet with side slopes of 1 vertical to 3 horizontal. Excavated material from the cutoff channel will be used to plug each end of the oxbow and to restore the damaged levee at the sanitary landfill. Culverts placed through the plugs will allow for minor flows through the oxbow thus maintaining the water quality. The total Federal and non-Federal cost of the project is $595,000 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. In accordance with Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 as amended, the city of Grand Prairie is required to assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000. In addition, the city is required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and maintenance; bear the cost of all alteration and relocations of utilities, storm drains, roads, highway bridges, and community services; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction work; operate and maintain all works after completion and prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flow capacity of the project; publicize and notify all interested parties that the project will not provide protection from the occurrence of storms greater than the project design flood; comply with Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, and with the requirementsof Section 221, Public Law 91,611, approved December 31, 1970, as amended. Operation during fiscal year. Contract for Channel Realignment and Fence Restoration at Sanitary Landfill was awarded September 29, 1983. Construction for the project has been completed except for turfing requirements which are scheduled for completion in the spring of 1985. 13. GRAND PRAIRIE, TX, STREAMBANK EROSION AT MEYERS ROAD Location. The project is located at a bend of the West Fork of the Trinity River approximately 6.1 miles upstream of the confluence of the West Fork and Elm Fork of the Trinity River. This bend in the river is adjacent to Meyers Road which lies within Dallas County and is located in northeast Grand Prairie. More specifically Meyers Road is north of Interstate Highway 30 and west of the city's sanitary landfill. Existing project. The project consists of slope restoration with riprap sideslopes, one vertical on two horizontal, and a riprap toe. The improvement will extend a distance of approximately 500 feet along the streambank adjacent to Meyers Road. This improvement will maintain the natural course of the river and will ensure the integrity of the roadway. The total Federal and non-Federal estimated cost of the project is $300,000 (Dec 1, 1983, price level). Local cooperation. In accordance with Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 as amended, the city of Grand Prairie is required to assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000. In addition, the city if required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and maintenance; bear the cost of all alteration and relocations of utilities, storm drains, roads, highway bridges, and community services; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction work; operate and maintain all works after completion and prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flow capacity of the project; publicize and notify all interested parties that the project will not provide protection from the occurrence of storms greater than the project design flood; comply with Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, and with the requirements of Section 221, Public Law 91-611, approved December 31, 1970, as amended. Operation during fiscal year. Contract for Streambank Erosion at Meyers Road was awarded January 25, 1984. 14. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its confluence with 16-6 I FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Ela Fork of Trinity River and about 20 miles northwest doCfi ty of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 contributed by local interests. Construction of project was started December 1947 and ready for beneficial use in July 1952. Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County Pirk Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 21, 1955. Park Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with City of Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 17, 1954. Dallas paid the required $1,433,026. A contract with City of Grapevine, Texas, for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on September 14, 1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. A contract for Interim Use of Navigation Storage with city of Grapevine was approved by Secretary of the Army on February 27, 1981, at an estimated cost of $684,000. To date, $58,195 has been paid. Above contracts include payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, which part to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3,000; Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, its pro rata part of actual annual cost (estimated at $79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). Following operation and maintenance payments have been made: Park Cities $96,939, Dallas $434,337, and Grapevine $47,172. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for modification of Embankment and Spillway was awarded September 30, 1983 and continues. The proposed plan of improvement provides for spillway modification by construction of spillway chute and stilling basin and a berm on the downstream side of the main embankment. Also, contract for Park Road Paving was awarded August 6, 1984, and a contract for Maintenance Painting and Repair of Outlet Works was awarded June 15, 1984. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain . Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake, Grapevine Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1984 were $801,008,400. 15. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman, Texas, and about 27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hords Creek. (See Geological Survey sheets, Grosvenor and Zephyr, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed unprovement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed by local interests. Construction of ojecwt as started January 1947 and completed for fleficial use in April 1948. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Hords Creek project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1984 were $937,200. 16. JOE POOL LAKE, TX (formerly Lakeview Lake) Location. Dam site is located at River Mile 11.2 on Mountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, which is one of the rapid growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan area. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 108.5 feet above the streambed and a total length of 24,200 feet, including 50-foot uncontrolled ogee type spillway, which will control 232 square miles of drainage area. The reservoir will have a total controlled storage of 304,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 10,940 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 7,470 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 123,100 acre-feet for flood control, 142,900 acre-feet for conservation and 38,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of the project is $193,900,000 (Oct. 1, 1984, base price) including $8,900,000 non-Federal first cost. Project is a unit in the general comprehensive plan for development and control of the water resources of the Trinity River basin. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. Contracts for water supply storage and recreation with the Trinity River Authority were approved by the Acting Secretary of the Army, June 15, 1977. The recreation contract with Trinity Valley Authority was modified March 28, 1979, to allow the Corps to participate with the State of Texas and approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Recreation development contract with the State of Texas was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $46,636,000 for supply and $9,512,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities) for a total of $56,148,000 exclusive of interest. Operations during fiscal year. The project has been under construction since FY 1975 and through FY 1984 is approximately 71 percent complete overall. Contracts awarded during FY 1984 include the following: Reloc, Rearrange/Alter Railroad Track, awarded January 24, 1984; Relocation of City Streets and County Roads, Pt. III, awarded March 15, 1984; Alter/Abandon. of Elec. Lines, awarded March 27, 1984; Relocate Southern Pacific Railroad, awarded March 26, 1984; Reservoir Clearing and Buoy Markers, awarded July 9, 1984; and Recreation Facilities, Pt. I, awarded September 28, 1984. Land Acquisition and Engineering and Design continue. Public Law 97-400, H.R. 7377, 97th Congress, effective December 31, 1982, changed the name of Lakeview Lake to Joe Pool Lake. 16-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 17. LAVON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $15,470,000. For information concerning Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement project, see individual project. Construction of project was started January 1948 and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water District for water supply storage, including cost of intake structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army July 8, 1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is $1,445,261.67. To date the district has paid $647,778. Under the contract North Texas Municipal Water District must pay annually 13.6 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the district has paid $539,505. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Lavon project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1984 were $81,704,300. 18. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Existing dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Channel improvement of East Fork extends from its mouth to River Mile 31.8. Existing project. Reservoir modification provides for raising top of existing dam from elevation 502.0 to 514.0 and lengthening existing dam from about 9,499 feet to about 19,493 feet; modification of existing concrete spillway structure; enlargement of existing reservoir area, involving acquisition of additional rights-of-way; relocation and alteration of highways, county roads, railroads and utilities; and provision of recreational facilities. East Fork Channel and floodway improvements consist of 25 miles of channel enlargement and straightening of the East Fork between River Mile 0.0 and 31.8; replacement of inadequate levee-sluice structures; rehabilitation of existing levees; acquisition and clearing of land areas as required for rights-of-way along improved channel and existing levees; alteration of existing railroad, highway and county road bridges crossing the improved channel as well as relocation of existing utility lines; and strengthening and raising about 202,400 linear feet of levees of seven existing levee districts. Reservoir will provide a total storage capacity of 748,200 acre-feet (275,600 are for flood control, 380,000 for water supply storage, and 92,600 for sedimentation reserve.) Estimated Federal cost of the modification and improvement is $69,750,000 and estimated cost to local interests is $220,000 for lands and damages and relocations, a total of $69,970,000. Construction was initiated in May 1970 and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. The North Texas Municipal Water District has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply (approved September 22, 1967, by the Secretary of the Army) and to date $1,247,268 has been paid. North Texas Municipal Water Supply District has submitted assurance to contract for the 57 percent for future water supply. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $37,511,047. Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 on January 28, 1972 and have furnished all necessary construction easements. Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have declined to provide the necessary assurances. On December 8, 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from "active" to "inactive" category. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract for Levee Improvement, Increment I, East Fork was awarded May 1, 1981, and continues. Improvement of the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel and Levees and total project are 99 percent complete. 19. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Location. In Denton County, Texas, on Elm Fork of Trinity River 30 river miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Texas at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $25,902,000 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price), including $3,677,000 contributed by local interests. Construction of project was started November 1948 and ready for beneficial use in November 1954. Local cooperation. A contract with City of Dallas for 415,000 acre-feet of water supply storage land rights and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 16, 1953. Local contributions have been made in full. A contract with city of Denton, 'ITexas, for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 20, 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. TOb date Denton has paid $250,064. Under above contracts, cities of Dallas and Denton must pay annually 21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. 'Tob date Dallas has paid $2,431,282 and Denton $105,944. Operations during fiscal year. Major rehabilitation of embankment was completed. Estimated Federal cost is $5,330,000. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 16-8 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake, Grapevine Lake, and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1984 were $801,008,400. 20. MILLICAN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on the Navasota River at mile 24.1, approximately 7 miles north of Navasota, Tbxas in Grimes and Brazos Counties, T'Ixas. This project would be the first of a two-stage development consisting of Millican and Navasota Dams, both of which would be units in the overall plan of improvement for the Brazos River Basin. Existing Project. The project provides for construction ofa concrete and earthfill dam 25,300 feet long including a 472-foot gate-controlled spillway, rising 83 feet above the streambed. Without Navasota Lake in operation, the top of flood control pool (elevation 234.0) would provide 1,557,400 acre-feet of storage space and cover a surface area of 66,000 acres. There would be 784,800 acre-feet of flood control; 680,200 acre-feet for water supply (surface area 42,400 acres), and 92,400 acre-feet for sediment reserve. With Navasota Lake in operation, the top of flood control elevation and total storage would remain the same. The flood control pool would be 359,600 acre-feet, water supply storage would be 1,125,800 acre-feet (surface area 55,500 acres) and sediment reserve would be 72,000 acre-feet. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $336,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1984, base price). Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. By letter dated December 9, 1974, the Brazos River Authority stated that they would be the state agency to cost share for both water supply and recreation. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued, and is scheduled to complete in October 1987. The final EIS is scheduled to be filed in the second quarter of 1985. 21. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Texas, at River Mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary of Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report for 1965. Estimated cost of project is $13,154,000 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price), including $300,000 contributed by local terest Construction started December 1959 and project completed for beneficial use March 1963. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended applies. A formal contract with the Trinity River Authority was approved March 3, 1966, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. Tob date the Authority has paid $587,297 for water supply and $587,284 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1984 were $25,576,900. 22. O. C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North Concho River near city of San Angelo, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000, and sheet Wall, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and Reservoir January 3, 1975 by Public Law 93-634. Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A water-supply contract with Upper Colorado River Authority for water-supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on October 11, 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 toward cost of project and $64,324 toward operation and maintenance for a 50-year period. The Authority must pay additional consideration of $1 a year for useful life of project, beginning January 1, 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routing operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to O. C. Fisher Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1984 were $2,375,600. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 23. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at River Mile 238.9 on Leon River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8 miles northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authoriation act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $16,249,000. Construction of project was started July 1960 and completed for beneficial use 1963. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, July 1, 1960, and was modified and was approved May 9, 1966, at an estimated cost of $1,707,900. To date the Authority has paid $268,201 for water supply and $221,175 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance were continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Proctor project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1984 were $5,166,700. 24. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX (formerly Aubrey Lake) Location. Damsite is located at River Mile 60.0 on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas and 30 miles upstream from Lewisville Dam. 16-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 100 feet long, controlling 682 square miles of drainage area. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 acre-feet. with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for flood control, 749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $274,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1984, base price). Public Law 96-384, 96th Congress, H.R. 8024, effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of Aubrey Lake to Ray Roberts Lake. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for water supply storage and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army September 16, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. The project is about 43 percent complete overall. Acquisition of real estate continues. FY 1984 funds were used to award the following contracts: Relocation of US Highway 377 was awarded July 27, 1984; Relocation of Denton County Roads, April 6, 1984; Relocate Grayson County Roads, September 13, 1984; Relocate Cooke County Roads, Drainage Structure Removal, September 12, 1984. Improve and reconstruct Bolivar Road, Sanger, TX, July 13, 1984; Relocate Lone Star Gas Facility FM Rd. 3002 and FM Rd. 455, Pt. II awarded August 31, 1984; and Cemetery Relocation Pt. II, September 4, 1984. At the request of the city of Denton and the approval of the Secretary of the Army, the penstock was added to the embankment as a minimum facility for future hydropower. Engineering and design continue. 25. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Floodway is in city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, on San Antonio River and San Pedro, Apache, Alazan, Martinez Creeks, and Espada Acequia Aqueduct located in vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Existing project. Provides for clearing, widening, deepening, and straightening about 34.9 miles of river and creek channels to carry standard project flood discharges, construction of channel walls, and paving, conduit, and construction and alteration of railroad bridges. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $82,900,000 (Oct. 1, 1984, base price), and estimated cost to local interests is $65,700,000 which includes $2,200,000 cash contributions and $63,500,000 for lands, damages, and construction, a total of $148,600,000. Existing project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act. Latest published map is in project document. The Water Resources Act of 1976 added authorization to the existing project for construction of flood control measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada Acequia Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Construction was started in October 1957 and the project is about 46 percent complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction, including purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), channel dams where applicable, and utility lines; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; and provide a cash contribution for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal construction cost. San Antonio River Authority furnished assurances that it will comply with all requirements of local cooperation. These assurances were accepted by the District Engineer on April 15, 1957. Tob date $999,525 has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio channel. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Benefits accrued to San Antonio project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1984 were $44,055,500. 26. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TX Location. System of three reservoirs in Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River Basin. Granger Dam at River Mile 31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas; North San Gabriel Dam at River Mile 4.3 on North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas; and South Fork Dam at River Mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, and North (North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown) and South Fork Lakes were authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of project is $158,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1984, base price). Plan of improvement provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 16,320 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acre-feet are for flood control, 37,900 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 44,100 acrefeet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $61,990,000. North San Gabriel Dam: A rockfill dam 6,700 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acre-feet of which 87,600 acre-feet are for flood control, 29,200 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $38,765,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 152 feet above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 82,600 acre-feet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve) Estimated cost of project is $57,245,000. Public Law 96-575, 96th Congress, H.R. 4941 effective January ' 1981, changed the name of North Fork Lake to North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown. 16-10 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Local cooperation. Construction is subject to condition that local interests reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, Lake Georgetown, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement currently estimated at $13,447,000 for Granger, $6,404,000 for Lake Georgetown, and $16,836,000 for South Fork, for a total of $36,687,000 exclusive of interest. Brazos River Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor of project, and by letter dated April 18, 1966, indicated its acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply assurances for Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes were approved May 24, 1968 as satisfactory in accordance with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake will be deferred until the need for water supply develops and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. Operations during fiscal year. Through 1983 all work has been completed. Deliberate impoundment of water commenced at Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes on January 21, 1980 and March 3, 1980, respectively. In FY 1982, studies on South Fork Lake were resumed in preparation of General Design Memorandum to provide reaffirmation prior to construction. This reaffirmation is currently scheduled for submission in May 1985 and to be fully coordinated by September 1985. Benefits accrued to project consisting of Granger and Lake Georgetown: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1984 were $10,186,700. 27. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $30,227,000. Construction started in June 1962 and project was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage approved May 10, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, to date, $736,435 has been paid. Also under the contract, the authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Somerville project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1984 were $30,436,700. 28. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $23,670,000. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved April 13, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $903,271. Also under the contract the Authority must pay annually 27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $333,199. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular were constructed. Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Project: Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through FY 1984 is $20,596,800. 29. WACO LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles above its confluence with Brazos River, at City of Waco, McLennan County. T'Iexas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including $250,000 contributed by local interests and $2,500,000 other non-Federal cost. Construction was started in July 1958, and project was ready for beneficial use in February 1965. Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage and the contract with the City of Waco transferring the existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1958. Ib date the Authority for their portion of the water supply storage has paid $1,350,306. Also under the contract the Authority and the City must pay 14.706 and 2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $556,732 and the City has paid $91,451. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, for additional storage for municipal and industrial water supply, was approved by the Acting Assistant of the Army, September 28, 1984. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operations and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Waco project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1984 were $58,731,900. 30. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. On Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie Counties, Thxas. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur River, and about 8 miles southwest of Thxarkana, T'Ixas. Existing project. An earth-fill dam 18,500 feet long and 100 feet high, including a spillway 200 feet wide and 16-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 outlet works with a capacity of 27,600 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 3,400 square miles of drainage area, and has a storage capacity of 2,654,300 acre-feet, of which 145,300 acre-feet are for conservation and remainder for flood control. Estimated cost for work (October 1978) is $51,945,000 which includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by local interests, over a period not to exceed 50 years, for water supply storage, and including $2,092,040 for pro rata share of original reservoir cost. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real estate activities, construction under Code 711, and conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage after completion of Cooper Reservoir. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. A contract with the city of Texarkana, Texas, for Reserving Water Supply Storage Space was approved by the Secretary of the Army December 17, 1968. To date the City has paid $290,596. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Wright Patman project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1984 were $13,697,000. 31. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is made periodically in compliance with section 208.10, of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local floodprotection works approved by Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in section 3. Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. See 'Iable 16-D for inspections made this fiscal year. Inspection costs for FY from regular funds for maintenance were $28,185. Total costs to September 30, 1984 were $513,768. 32. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944 expenditures were made for scheduling flood control reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Marshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, near City of Austin, Texas, and for preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and South Concho Rivers near City of San Angelo, Texas. Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was completed during FY 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was authorized for construction by Department of Interior by Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; deliberate impoundment was started January 23, 1963. Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford Reservoir through FY 1984 were $178,550,600 and by Twin Buttes through FY 1984 were $417,500. Twin Buttes Reservoir consists of two separate pools, one on South Concho River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at elevation 1925.0. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for operation of both reservoirs were $59,504. 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 16-C.) 34. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 16-E.) Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization); emergency streambank protection under section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. Emergency flood control, hurricane-flood, and shore protection activities (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $191,407 for disaster preparedness and levee repair $38,174. Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power 35. BELTON LAKE MODIFICATION, TX Location. For location of completed dam see Belton Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. The modification of Belton Lake to provide installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1954 (H.Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess.). The plan of improvement provides for reallocation of the gross storage capacity in Belton Lake to provide a power pool and the installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities. Operations during fiscal year. The modification is classified as deferred until the Chief of Engineers determines it is advisable 36. DAM A LAKE, TX Location. The dam would be located approximately 18 miles west of Jasper and about 4 miles west of Horger, Texas. Existing project. The project is designed to be used as a run-of-river plant for the generation of power and to reregulate power surges from the proposed Rockland Lake. The last estimate of project cost was $3,220,000 in 1954. For last full report see Annual Report of 1952. Operations during fiscal year. The project is classified as deferred. 16-12 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 37. ROCKLAND LAKE, TX Location. The dam would be located approximately 3 miles west of Rockland, Texas, on the Neches River. Existing project. The project would control floods, generate hydroelectric power, and provide water supply for various uses. The last estimate of project cost was $734,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1984 base price). For the last full report see Annual Report of 1952. Operations during fiscal year. The project was reclassified to active status December 2, 1982. 38. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Location. Dam is on Angelina River 25.2 miles upstream from its confluence with Neches River and about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report 1969. Estimated cost of project is $68,863,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local interests. Construction was started August 1956 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1965. Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute $3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional $200,000 annually for 50 years after completion of the project was approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 22, 1957. Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in full and annual payments to date of $3,800,000 have been made by the Authority. A contract with the City of Lufkin for water supply storage was approved May 27, 1969 by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date the City has paid $96,914. Also under the contract the City of Lufkin must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of operation and maintenance. Tob date the City has paid $97,650. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Recreation facilities under Code 710 continued. Benefits accrued to Sam Rayburn project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1984 were $74,533,000. 39. TOWN BLUFF DAM - B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles below mouth of Angelina River, one-half mile north of Town Bluff, Texas, and 93 river miles north of Beaumont, Ibxas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $9,888,000, including $2 million contribution by local interests. Construction started March 1947 and project was ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Local cooperation. Completed as required. facilities under Code 710 remain. Studies began in FY 1982 to determine the feasibility of modifying the existing project to incorporate hydropower, and continue. 40. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Location Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest of Whitney, Texas, and about 38 miles upstream from City of Waco, Texas. (See Geological Survey sheets: Waco, Cleburne, and Granbury scale 1:125,000, and Whitney, Blum, and Morgan scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. Construction of project was started June 1946 and ready for flood control use in December 1951. First power was placed on-the-line in June 1953. Raise power pool is complete. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State Agency, for Water Supply Storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 3, 1982. To date the authority has paid $109,804. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Whitney project: Accumulated damages prevented throuth FY 1984 were $131,516,200. General Investigations 41. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $869,253 for flood damage prevention studies, $124,367 for coordination with other agencies, and $25,425 for preauthorization studies Phase I for a total of $1,019,045. 42. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities totaled $262,141. Fiscal year costs were $4,860 for hydrologic studies. The national program of inspection of dams, authorized by Public Law 92-367, was continued in FY 1984. Expenditures under this program for inventory of dams were $178. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine Operation and maintenance continued. Recreation 16-13 TABLE 16-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Trinity River Project, TX Includes Channel to Liberty, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Dallas Floodway Extension 2. Aquilla Lake, TX 3. Bardwell Lake, TX 4. Belton Lake, TX 5. Benbrook Lake, TX 6. Big Sandy Lake, TX 7. Boggy Creek, TX 8. Canyon Lake, TX (Federal Funds) 9. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX 10. Elm Fork Floodway, TX 11. Ferrells Bridge Dam Lake O' The Pines, TX 12. Grand Prarie, TX Landfill (Contributed Funds) 13. Grand Prairie, TX Myers Road I FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 700,000 500,000 248,000 680,184 678,572 94,078 8,425,000 13,300,000 3,049,000 7,226,026 12,441,014 5,261,404 - - 136,000 - - 75,109 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 624,400 620,445 400,000 288,535 732,800 716,764 700,000 205,401 1,483,100 950,4 975,229 1,756,3; 1,054,000 661,574 20,904 55,035 1,148,000 1,017,894 13,647 1,781,500 1,463,197 1,000 1,792 350,000 373,933 1,141,600 701,592 1,000,000 95,448 00 2,876,684 38 1,825,991 - 250,000 - 25,826 - 345,000 Total Cost To FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984" 120,000 22,307,866 120,040 21,989,170 0 325,0 249,0 287,8 549,0 959,9 57,0 63,6 1,209,0 1,484,8 (-)5,1 2,4 2,322,9 2,063,1 00 100,0 79,8 596,4 1,015,9 175,0 319,4 1,347,0 2,391,0 218,8 .11 1 - 38,400 211,( - 12,603 234, 45,506,300 69 45,424,810 00 385,000 59 362,968 - 10,934,505 - 10,934,505 00 8,262,687 37 8,215,242 00 16,969,549 61 16,959,946' 00 12,279,003 65 12,123,450 60 13,144,126 57 13,069,9912 90 13,675,445 45 12,972,422 741,000 741,000 )00 720,000 358 699,243 - 19,088,5243 - 19,088,524 100 9,197,084 )68 9,153,503 )00 23,828,000 158 22,425,966 - 662,400 - 662,400 - 14,175,197' - 14,175,1975 )00 16,431,451 )28 16,273,586 - 250,000 300 244,626 - 345,000 164 311,164 300 250,000 i87 247,190 16-14 - - 666,800 624,600 704,472 600,648 7,010 60,000 6,850 9,765 702,200 1,140,900 750,667 864,927 13,000 92,000 17,813 15,649 767,400 994,600 784,450 880,233 250,000 65,000 275,431 77,041 - 270,000 - 245,452 TABLE 16-A FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project (Contributed Funds) 14. Grapevine Lake, TX 15. Hords Creek Lake, TX 16. Joe Pool Lake, TX 17. Lavon Lake, TX 18. Lavon Lake Modification & East Fork Channel Improvement, TX 19. Lewisville Dam, TX 20. Millican Lake, TX 21. Navarro Mills Lake, TX 22. 0. C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX 23. Proctor Lake, TX 24. Ray Roberts Lake, TX 38. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 Total Cost To FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 17 - 40,000 - - 1,400,0, - - 333,8 814,700 1,141,800 2,019,6 807,839 1,091,786 1,308,3 328,300 347,437 19,689,000 18,677,800 309,000 276,544 962,900 883,200 2,601,000 2,716,402 1,775,000 1,989,569 991,100 1,171,036 490,000 418,158 53 621,500 659,377 420,800 469,500 7,000 7,000 514,700 518,437 5,500,000 5,363,835 3,000 2,557 3,838,500 1,706,868 495,800 426,750 17,324,000 14,890,100 64,096 38,949 1,241,800 1,130,811 2,413,000 1,729,262 1,409,000 226,286 1,535,600 1,295,291 315,000 375,026 5,904 5,891 696,800 665,859 471,900 447,689 30,000 11,556 706,500 659,991 18,600,000 17,530,776 89,000 39,529 1,714,400 3,181,584 1,122,6 587,2 27,800,0 29,007,0 (-)23,0 19,7 2,454,3 1,547,2 76,C 709,2 00 5,500,00( 95 5,165,51 00 2,014,55 82 2,719,86; - 20,00 - 18,07 50 1,345,00 77 1,763,33 )00 17,200,00 )40 14,842,70 )00 (-)14,00 91 81 119 1,639,15 ?75 2,677,39 )00 220,00 ?86 221,83 (-)13,663 498,732 2,556,547 1,790,064 232,000 234,715 767 300 1,001,500 611,806 954,776 496,706 23,000 27,335 1,406,300 733,946 37,700,000 37,414,850 (-)1,300 48,471 2,405,500 2,249,197 755,16 1,151,61 2,918,0( 3,829,7( 70,0( 24,5( 41 735,4( 1,076,5 ( 695,1! 1,132,2: 765,0 1,446,4 46,000,0 44,353,8 1 3,049,8 3,704,1 40,000 0 16,867,790 0 15,467,1957 0 15,122,568 5 15,044,414 0 2,731,0898 6 2,729,165 1 7,253,710 3 7,049,312 0 142,288,000 2 137,280,310 0 12,864,796 2 12,864,796 i0 15,000,778 30 14,925,111 )0 69,796,862 19 69,690,739 o0 25,515,076 5 25,207,9909 )0 18,350,848 07 18,183,22610 00 3,627,000 56 3,566,999 - 9,846,759 30 9,846,75911 00 8,304,306 97 8,183,640 - 16,027,467 - 16,027,467 00 8,396,931 50 8,346,070 - 14,469,585 - 14,455,476 00 8,505,472 22 8,407,440 00 112,094,700 54 108,616,269 - 60,670,956 43 60,670,95612 00 26,508,694 03 26,293,109 16-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 16-A COST AND. FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 Total Cost To FY 84 Sep. 30, 198411 25. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 26. San Gabriel River, TX Granger Lake Georgetown 27. Somerville Lake, TX 28. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX 39. Town Bluff Dam- B. A. Steinhagen Lake, TX 29. Waco Lake, TX 40. Whitney Lake, TX 30. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,150,000 4,750,000 937,593 4,212,286 96,450 141,775 65,250 172,975 1,607,000 2,080,000 1,758,823 2,158,550 668,100 615,900 621,982 609,162 591,300 667,000 567,067 620,044 134,990 146,313 990,700 1 978,203 1 768,800 742,189 3,300,000 2,631,768 71,550 71,550 2,150,000 2,216,366 1,269,600 656,793 1,042,436 764,840 151,000 (-)1,337 137,380 4,588 ,315,200 1,969,109 ,003,973 1,136,743 20,000 (-)1,960 12,319 5,721 993,100 820,500 789,229 777,758 (-)425,000 989,645 37,293,048 37,258,355 - 999,525 - 999,525 (-)20,0 72,5 700,4 1,344,5 441,0 749,3 110,0 102,1 2,127,8 3,174,0 732,8 1,013,9 541,700 594,900 1,045,315 996,1 528,612 582,686 570,170 1,448,3 778,200 782,059 1 9R Afl 11 1,074,300 1,010,122 103,337 7,723 ,434,400 1,760,400 ,447,788 1,667,889 - 41,000 - 41,000 808,000 1,466,000 854,738 1,328,404 00 101,382,100 40 101,238,826 00 3,676,596 19 3,638,886 00 3,105,532 64 3,055,242 00 27,790,438 84 27,723,179 00 13,808,656 00 13,694,253 - 20,522,08413 - 20,510,642 00 8,498,126 20 8,420,783 - 6,602,737 - 6,602,73714 00 9,750,229 57 9,683,177 - - 49,521,12115 - - 49,521,121 1,889,200 1,774,300 12,675,226 1,219,886 2,387,938 12,547,013 (-)18,411 - 42,952,938 (-)588 - 4 2 ,9 5 2 ,9 3 81' 2,558,300 2,003,000 24,434,780 1,897,542 2,732,220 24,324,306 - - 35,731,626 - - 35,731,626 1,781,000 827,600 17,242,390 1,432,024 1,321,377 17,120,496 I Excludes $47,309 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 2 Excludes $322,346 receipts from reconveyance of land deposted to miscellaneous receipts. 3 Excludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. 4 Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $1,711,200 contributed funds. 5 Includes $1,376,322 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1973. 6 Claim Northeast Texas Municipal Water District $16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real estate charges of $1,325, making a total of $2,811 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1974. ' Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new work expended from contributed funds. 6 Excludes $105,079 expended from contributed funds. g Excludes receipts from reconveyance of land of $426,606 which were deposted to miscellaneous receipts, and $3,676,661 for new work expended from contributed funds. 10 Includes $130,000 under appropriation 96X5125. 16-16 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 11 Excludes $300,000 expended from contributed funds. 15 Excludes $2,750,000 expended for contributed funds. 12 Excludes $3 million expended from contributed funds. 16 Excludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of lands 13 Includes receipts from disposals and revocation of funds deposited to miscellaneous receipts. related thereto. 17 Includes funds provided by the Jobs Act (PL 98-8, dated 14 Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 16-F. 16-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section in Text Project and Work Authorized 2. Documents 3. 4. 16-18 Date Authorizing Act Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 31, 1960 Jul. 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 31, 1970 Jun. 22, 1936 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 3, 1955 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 2, 1945 AQUILLA LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north of Waco, Texas. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 miles south of Ennis, Texas. BELTON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Modification (see Sec. 36 of Text) of the dam to provide for generation of hydroelectric power. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. BIG SANDY LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Big Sandy Creek about six miles northwest of Big Sandy, Texas. BOGGY CREEK, TX Interim Survey Report. CANYON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Construction of earth-fill dam and reservoir area; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement; enlargement and extension of existing levees; construction of appurtenant drainage works along main stem of Sulphur River above mile 126; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement and levee enlargement and modification of appurtenant drainage works on Cuthand Creek below mile 24, on Sulphur River below mile 70, except in proposed Cooper Reservoir, miles 29 to 42, and on Middle Sulphur River below mile 8; channel clearing and realignment of Brushy Creek below mile 5; and levee enlargement on North Sulphur River between miles 1 and 5. DAM "A" LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River about 18 miles west of Jasper, Texas. ELM FORK FLOODWAY, TX Realignment and enlargement of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River and Denton Creek, and a parallel levee system from the existing Dallas levee system upstream to near the Dallas and Denton county lines. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES, TX Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. GRAND PRAIRIE LANDFILL, TX Construction of a cutoff channel to eliminate an oxbow in the West Fork of the Trinity River. GRAND PRAIRIE, MEYERS RD, TX Slope Restoration with riprap side slopes along streambank of West Fork Trinity River, adjacent to Meyers Road. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Denton Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas, Texas. S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 424, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 429, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Act of 1936 (PL 738) H. Doc. 247, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 488, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Act of 1946 Flood Control Act of 1946 H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong 1st Sess. 5. 8. 36. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. TABLE 16-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 15. Aug. 18, 1941 16. Oct. 27, 1965 17. Mar. 2, 1945 18. Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 19. Mar. 2, 1945 20. Aug. 13, 1968 21. Sep. 3, 1954 Dec. 31, 1970 22. Aug. 18, 1941 23. Sep. 3, 1954 24. Oct. 27, 1965 37. Mar. 2, 1945 38. Mar. 2, 1945 25. Sep. 3, 1954 26. Sep. 3, 1954 Jan. 3, 1975 27. Sep. 3, 1954 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. LAVON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the East Fork of the Trinity River about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Enlarge Lavon Dam and enlargement and realignment of the lower 25 miles of the East Fork of the Trinity River, including rehabilitation of existing levees. Improvement of Collin County Road 115. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River near the city of Lewisville, Texas. MILLICAN LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Navasota River about seven miles north of Navasota, Texas. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Richland Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. O. C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just above San Angelo, Texas. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 8 miles northeast of Comanche, Texas. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas, about 30 miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Dam. ROCKLAND LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River approximately three miles west of Rockland. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and tributaries in and near the city of San Antonio, Texas. SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of: (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on the San Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the north Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Yegua Creek about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. Documents H. Doc. 370, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 341, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 498, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess., and H. Doc. 591, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 16-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Act Project Work Authorized Documents 28. Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 24, 1946 STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. TOWN BLUFF DAM-B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, Texas. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel from the Houston, Texas ship channel to Fort Worth, Texas; a distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Fort Worth, Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; and water conveyance facilities involving construction of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. WACO LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, Texas, below the confluence of the North, South, and Middle Bosque Rivers. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Brazos River, about 19 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas. Raise the power pool 13.0 feet. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir. 16-20 See Section in Text H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., and H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 390, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 39. 1. 29. 40. 30. FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 16-C OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 33 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Big Fossil Creek, TX3 1969 - - Big Spring, TX2 1979 - - Brownwood Channel Improvement, TX' - - - Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX2 1979 -- -- Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX' 1983 - - Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX3 1971 - - Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX3 1971 - - Greenville, TX3 1983 - - Lake Brownwood Modification, TX' 1983 - - Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX' - - - Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX' - - - Pecan Bayou Lake, Pecan Bayou, TX' - - - Plainview Local Flood Protection Project, TX4 1979 - - Roanoak Lake, TX' 1979 - - Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, TX3 1969 - - Three Rivers, TX3 1983 - - Zacate Creek Channel, TX3 1983 - - ' Deauthorized 1 Nov 81. 2 Inactive. 3 Completed. 4 Recommended for deauthorization, H.R. 3678, August 23, 1983, 98th Congress, 1st Session. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 16-D (See Section 31 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Big Fossil Creek Dallas Floodway East Fork Fort Worth Floodway Greenville Munday Pleasanton Poteet San Antonio Floodway Sulphur River Levees Three Rivers Zacate Creek Nov. 29, 1983 Jun. 12, 1984 Jun. 29, 1984 Dec. 1, 1983 Oct. 10, 1984 Nov. 30, 1983 Jul. 16, 1984 Jul. 16, 1984 Jul. 18, 1984 Aug. 13, 1984 Jul. 17, 1984 Jul. 20, 1984 16-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 16-E (See Section 34 of Text) Project Cost Burton Creek, Bryan, TX $ 54,452 California Creek, Hamlin, TX 79,693 Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX 133,843 Chacon Creek, Laredo, TX 460 Elm Fork, Gainsville, TX 52,987 Five Mile Creek, Dallas, TX 7,500 Hickory Creek, Balch Springs, TX 124,834 Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie, TX 7,379 Lake Creek, Round Rock, TX 53,049 Lorean Branch, Hurst, TX 158,650 Lower Peaks Branch, Dallas, TX 6,479 Munday, TX 14,505 N. F. Leon River, Eastland, TX 1,560 Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX 46,545 Roscoe, TX 3,810 Swisher Creek, Corinth, TX 4,572 Walker Branch, Richland Hills, TX 7,500 Walnut Creek, Sequin, TX 5,235 Wheeler Creek, Gainsville, TX 222,000 16-22 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT JOBS ACT (PL 98.8 March 24, 1983) TABLE 16-F Project Bardwell Lake, TX Belton Lake, TX Benbrook Lake, TX Canyon Lake, TX San Gabriel, Granger Lake, TX Grapevine Lake, TX Hords Creek, TX San Gabriel, Lake Georgetown, TX Lake O' The Pines, TX Lavon Lake, TX Lewisville Lake, TX Navarro Mills Lake, TX 0. C. Fisher Dam & Lake, TX Proctor Lake, TX Sam Rayburn Dam & Reservoir, TX Somerville Lake, TX Stillhouse Hollow Dam Town Bluff Dam, TX Waco Lake, TX Total Cost to Funding FY 1983 FY 1984 Sep. 30, 1984 Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 407,700 2,329 292,100 59,074 741,000 552,298 245,500 5,402 518,600 29,218 1,400,000 333,895 724,740 43,441 579,650 32,205 84,436 76,070 622,000 22,208 1,079,250 164,652 951,300 71,800 308,500 2,420 395,000 4,065 679,300 48,840 893,500 122,641 887,100 92,971 149,000 32,141 451,100 12,529 624,300 44,684 (-)54,220 351,151 (-)17,985 215,041 (-)34,135 154,567 (-)5,323 234,775 (-)3,778 485,604 1,400,000 1,066,105 (-)44,604 617,293 (-)11,960 535,485 (-)8,366 0 (-)1,143 598,649 98,416 1,013,015 (-)61 879,439 (-)3,844 302,236 (-)51 390,884 (-)101 630,259 (-)323 770,536 (-)2,035 792,094 (-)10,550 106,309 (-)412 438,160 (-)949 578,617 16-23 353,480 353,480 274,115 274,115 706,856 706,856 240,177 240,177 514,822 514,822 1,400,000 1,400,000 680,136 660,734 567,690 567,690 76,070 76,070 620,857 620,857 1,177,666 1,177,666 951,239 951,239 304,656 304,656 394,949 394,949 679,199 679,099 893,177 893,177 885,065 885,065 138,450 138,450 450,688 450,688 623,351 623,351 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 JOBS ACT (PL 98.8 March 24, 1983) TABLE 16-F Project Whitney Lake, TX Wright Patman Lake, TX Grand Prairie Lake, TX Funding Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost FY 1983 524,717 84,137 316,000 12,638 250,000 25,826 FY 1984 (-)3,025 437,555 (-)216 303,147 0 218,800 Total Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 521,692 521,692 315,784 315,784 250,000 244,626 16-24 ~--~- ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* The district comprises watershed of Canadian River and tributaries and the watershed of Arkansas River and tributaries in Colorado and New Mexico; the watershed of Rio Grande and tributaries including Pecos River and its tributaries upstream of Amistad Lake; and watershed of Mimbres River and its tributaries in New Mexico. Note: The district watershed boundaries were revised in July 1982 to include all of New Mexico west of the Texas state line and the southwest corner of Colorado west of the Kansas state line. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control 1. Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM .... 2. Conchas Lake, NM ................. 3. El Paso, TX ....................... 4. Highway 12, CO ............ ...... 5. Holly, CO................ ....... 6. John Martin Reservoir, CO................ 7. Lamed, Pawnee River, KS ................ 8. Rio Grande Basin, NM ................... 8A. Abiquiu Dam, NM ....................... 8B. Cochiti Lake, NM .................. 8C. Galisteo Dam, NM ....................... SD. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM ................ 8E. Rio Grande Floodway, NM ................ 8F. Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) Unit, NM .................. Page 17-1 17-2 17-2 17-2 17-3 17-3 17-3 17-3 17-4 17-4 17-4 17-5 9. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM ........... 17-6 10. Smith Creek, CO ................... 17-6 11. Trinidad Lake, CO ...................... 17-6 12. Two Rivers Dam, NM ................. 17-7 13. Inspection of completed flood control projects ........................ 17-7 14. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations ..................... 17-7 15. Other authorized flood control projects ...................... 17-8 16. Flood control work under special authorizations. . ................. 17-8 17-5 General Investigations 17. Surveys........ ........................ 17-8 17-5 18. Collection and study of basic data ......... 17-8 Flood Control 1. ALBUQUERQUE DIVERSION CHANNELS, NM Location. In an area ephemeral which comprises watersheds of streams entering a 15-mile reach of Rio Grande from the east at Albuquerque, NM, and vicinity. Combined drainage area of tributaries is about 276 square miles. Sandia range of the Rocky Mountains, which is about 12 miles east of Rio Grande, forms eastern border f watersheds. Crest of mountain range rises more than a ile over river to elevation of 10,692 feet above mean sea level. (See Geological Survey Map, Albuquerque, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.). Exting project. Plans of improvement consists of north and south diversion channels on high ground east of and parallel to valley. Channels are designed to carry floods equal in magnitude to standard project flood from all tributaries. For description of complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-15 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. For details of local cooperation requirements see page 17-2 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. The North Diversion Channels prevented $2,682,800 in flood damages during FY 1984. The estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented were $39,746,800. Peak flood flows recorded during FY 1984 were North Diversion Channel near Alameda, 6,800 c.f.s. on August 22, 1984, AU cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the d ofthis chapter. 17-1 __ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 and for South Diversion Channel 520 c.f.s. on August 7, 1984. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the north and south diversion channels began in March 1965, and was completed in March 1972. Channels are in good condition and well maintained by local interests. 2. CONCHAS LAKE, NM Location. Dam is in San Miguel County, NM, on Canadian River, about one-fourth mile downstream from confluence of Canadian and Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State map of New Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic map. Tucumcari quadrangle, scale 1: 125,000). Existing project. A concrete gravity main dam section 1,250 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed located in Canadian River Canyon together with earth dikes on each side having an overall length of about 3.7 miles. Main section contains conduits in its base for release of water to maintain low flows and for drainage of reservoir, and an overflow, ungated spillway 300 feet long. Earth dikes vary in height up to 100 feet and north dike contains a concrete ogee-type emergency spillway 3,000 feet long. Reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 529,000 acre-feet (198,900 for flood control, 259,600 for water conservation and irrigation, and 70,500 dead storage). Dam controls 7,409 square miles of drainage area. (See page 17-16 of Annual Report of 1973 for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of reservoir continued. Reservoir was operated for storage of floodwaters and releases for irrigation purposes. $105,400 in sediment damages were prevented during FY 1984 while no flood damages were prevented. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by project through FY 1984 were $2,208,800. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1984 were $284,600. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits through FY 1984 were $8,545,700. Pool elevation at start of FY 1984 was 4,190.21 feet with corresponding storage of 238,654 acre-feet. Total releases for reporting period were 81,304 acre-feet. Releases of 78,782 acre-feet were made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 2,522 acre-feet to Bell Ranch. Pool elevation on September 30, 1984, was 4,184.37 feet with corresponding storage of 199,392 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 941 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was essentially complete in 1940. Reservoir and appurtenances are in good condition and in operation. Irrigation of some lands under project was begun in November 1945. A cost sharing agreement between the Government and the State of New Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake was approved in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978 and completed in FY 1983. 3. EL PASO, TX Location. At El Paso, El Paso County, TX, which is on left bank of Rio Grande in the reach that forms part of international boundary between United States and Repub. lic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for El Paso, TX; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Consists of a single-purpose flood con. trol system of detention dams, diversion dikes, conduits and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo run. off into Rio Grande. Runoff from tributary arroyos on eastern, southern, and western slopes of adjacent Frank lin Mountains often inundates sections of city and its out. lying suburban developments. Project is divided into three independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control dams in operation during FY 1984 and dates of completion of construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams (February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion Channel (November 1978); Oxidation Pond and Buena Vista Diversion and Oxidation Pond Outlet Conduit (November 1980); Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams (June 1982); Mesa Dam (September 1982); McKelligon Canyon Dam (October 1982) Keystone Dam (September 1983) and Keystone Outlet Conduit was completed in March 1984.. During FY 1984 flood flows and flood control storage were minimal; however, damages which would have resulted from these flows were prevented. The estimated total flood damages prevented since completion of Northgate and Range Dams in 1973 through FY 1984 were $22,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has temporarily ended in the Central Area. Remaining projects include the Fillmore-Van Buren Dams System and Dam Safety Assurance Program modifications to the existing Range and Northgate Dams. The Central Area of the project is about 79 percent complete. In the Northwest Area, construction of Keystone Dam Outlet Conduit was awarded in March 1983 and was 100 percent complete at the end of the FY 1984. Remaining works consist of the Borderland Diversion and Highway Diversion projects. The Northwest Area is approximately 67 percent complete. The Reconnaissance Report on the Southwest Area was completed in December 1982 and the preparation of the General Design Memorandum is approximately 75 percent complete. 4. HIGHWAY 12, CO Location. Highway 12, along the Purgatoire River, Las Animas County, CO approximately 7 miles above Trinidad, CO to Weston, CO. (See Geological Survey Map Madrid CO quadrangle scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Three locations on the left bank o0 the Purgatoire River are protected from bank erosion dur 17-2 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT ing flood flows by an approximate total of 1950 feet of Kelnerjacks spaced at 12.5 feet on centers. Local cooperation. Section 3 of FC Act of Jun 22, 1936 applies. Local interests are in compliance with Section 221 1970 FC Act and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Actef 1970. Operation and results. N/A Condition of the end of the year. Construction was started in September 1982 and was completed in January 1983. 5. HOLLY, CO Location. Holly, CO, Cheyenne County, is situated on the north bank of the Arkansas River at the confluence of Wild Horse Creek, a north bank tributary and Two Butte Creek a south bank tributary and the Arkansas River at river mile 1,105. (See Geological Survey map Holly East CO & KS quadrangle, scale 1:24,000). Existing project. A levee 4.3 miles in length begins at a high point north of Holly extending south along the left bank of Wild Horse Creek to its junction with the Arkansas River then east 4,300 feet below the confluence. Appurtences consist of 2 gravity flow drainage structures for interior ditches and ponding areas with closure structures at the railroad and highway crossings. Contributing drainage area is 5,508 square miles with design flows of 62,000 c.f.s. for Wild Horse Creek and a peak flow of 160,000 c.f.s. for the combined flows on the Arkansas River at Holly, CO. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Local interests are in compliance with Section 221, 1970 FC Act and Public Law 91-646 Uniform Relocation Act of 1970. Operations and results. Operations by local interests. Condition at the end of the year. Construction was started in June 1979 and placed in operation in 1982. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 6* JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO Location. On Arkansas River 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles downstream from its source, in Bent County, about 18 miles upstream from city of Lamar, CO. (See Geological Survey maps for Lamar and La Animas, CO quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. A concrete and earthfill structure about 2.6 miles long with a maximum height above of 106 feet streambed and an overflow, gated spillway 1,174 feet long. Ibtal capacity of reservoir at spillway crest is 615,500 acN-fet (270,200 for flood control and 345,300 for conser- vation and recreation storage). Reservoir controls a contributing drainage area of 18,130 square miles and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for flood fontrol in Arkansas River Basin. Public Law 89-298 modi- fied the act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570) to authorize 10,0 acre-feet of reservoir flood control storage space or fish and wildlife and recreation purposes. For detail completed improvement and authorizing legislation see g8e 17-16 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Regulation of conservation storage continued under rules and regulations of Arkansas River Compact. No flood damages were prevented during FY 1984; however, $230,900 sediment damages were prevented. Estimated total flood and sediment damages prevented by project through FY 1984 were $75,003,600. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1984 were $418,800. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were $21,592,400. Maximum pool elevation of 3,837.48 feet with corresponding storage of 211,123 acre-feet occurred on June 7, 1984. ToIbtal releases for FY 1984 were 303,980 acrefeet. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 106,557 acre-feet. Sediment depositions was 2,062 acrefeet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. Resevoir and appurtenances are in good condition and in operation. 7. LARNED, KS Location. Larned KS, Pawnee County at river mile 896 on the Arkansas River at the confluence of the Pawnee River, a major tributary that enters the Arkansas River from the west. (See Geological Survey Map, Larned quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of a levee about 1.9 miles long beginning on the left bank of the Pawnee River, extending east past the confluence of the Arkansas River to a point below the municipal sewage treatment plant, a sufficient distance to prevent backwater from entering the urban area behind the levee. Appurtenent works include an interior drainage system with 3 gravity drainage outlet structures. Stop-log structures are located where the levee intersects the US Highway 56 and AT & SF Railroad and at Kansas Highway 19. The project design is to protect Larned, KS from a peak flow of 46,000 c.f.s. in the Arkansas River. Contributing drainage area of the Arkansas River is 7,887 square miles, while the Pawnee River watershed contains 2,549 square miles. Local cooperation. Section 3 FC Act of June, 22, 1936 applies. Local interests are in compliance with Section 221, 1970 FC Act and Public Law 91-646. Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Operations and results. Operations are by local interests. Condition at the end of the year. Construction was started in December 1980 and placed in operation in May 1982. 8. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Location. Improvements are on Rio Grande and tributaries in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual reports by projects. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized flood control phase of comprehensive plan of development of water resources of Rio Grande basin in New Mexico (H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) with exception of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate struc- 17-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 ture at Chamita Dam. Although recommended Chiflo Dam and Reservoir was deleted from authorized plan, it was excluded without prejudice to future consideration by Congress. It was requested at that time, by States of Colorado and Texas, that project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and methods of operation. By same act, Congress also authorized for construction irrigation phase of comprehensive plan as recommended by Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.). The act also stipulated that work should be prosecuted in accordance with joint agreement approved by Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, and drainage rehabilitation and extension phases of unified plan of improvement. Authority for Chamita Dam and Reservoir was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation and Table 17-C for existing projects.) All operations and costs for projects in authorized plan are in individual reports on the following pages. 8A. ABIQUIU DAM, NM Location. Project is one unit of flood control phase of comprehensive plan for Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is on Rio Chama near town of Abiquiu, NM, about 32 miles upstream from confluence of Rio Chama and Rio Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of Rio Chama, NM, from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army Map Service, Aztec, NM; Colorado NJ 13-10, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam 1,540 feet long, 325 feet high, with a 12-foot diameter controlled outlet, and an uncontrolled spillway in a natural saddle about one mile north of left abutment. Reservoir provides 565,000 acre-feet of flood control and sediment storage. Total capacity at spillway crest is 1,212,000 acre-feet. For detail description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1973. A major rehabilitation project was completed in September, 1980 and the recreation facilities were completed in FY 1981. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Storage and flows were regulated in accordance with Section 203, Flood Control Act of 1960. On October 1, 1984, the pool elevation was 6,193.52 feet. The maximum pool (6,228.09 feet) and storage (234,960 acre-feet) occurred on May 29, 1983. On September 30, 1984, the pool elevation was 6,206.69 feet with a corresponding storage of 148,660 acre-feet. There was 1,884 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1984. There were $55,281,000 in flood damages prevented during FY 1984. Sediment damages prevented were $211,000. Accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since completion were $111,507,300 through FY 1984. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in February 1963. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8B. COCHITI LAKE, NM Location. Dam is at river mile 340 on Rio Grande (river mile 0 being at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, TX), near Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from Albuquerque, NM. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam, NM, quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above streambed. Project extends generally in an east-west line across Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of Rio Grande and then southward across Santa Fe River. An uncontrolled spillway with a 460-foot-long ogee-weir and a 160-foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is at the embankment on south side of Santa Fe River. Operational releases for flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gated conduit in left abutment on Rio Grande. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 492,500 acre-feet for flood control, 103,800 acre-feet for sediment and 45,700 acre-feet for recreation within the sediment space, for a total of 596,300 acre-feet. The project controls flood waters from a 11,695 square mile drainage area. For more improvements details see page 17-7 of Annual Report for 1980. See page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1975. On October 1, 1983, the pool elevation was 5,326.41 feet with a corresponding storage of 45,957 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,347.61 feet with a storage of 76,668 acre-feet on May 28, 1984. On September 30, 1984, the pool elevation was 5,327.63 feet with a corresponding storage of 47,395 acrefeet. There was 1,374 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1984. There were $36,692,800 in flood damages prevented during FY 1984. Sediment damages prevented were $153,900. Accrued total damages prevented are $72,510,900 Conditions at end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances were placed in operation in 1975. The Cochiti Recreation area was completed in 1976, with the Visitors Center completion in 1977. The Tetilla Peak Recreation area was re-advertised and awarded in 1980 and completed in 1981. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8C. GALISTEO DAM, NM Location. Dam is at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek. a tributary of Rio Grande. Definite project site is about 8 miles upstream of project document site. Reservoir will extend upstream from dam for about 4 miles to near village of Waldo, NM. (See Geological Survey Map, San Pedro 1, NM quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam 2,820 feet long with a maximum height of 158 feet above stream bed. The outlet works consist of a 10-foot diameter uncontrolled outlet with a discharge capacity of 4,980 cubic feet per second with pool at spillway crest elevation. The spillway is a broad crested weir 250 feet long in right abutment. 17-4 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT The flood control storage is 89,000 acre-feet. For more details ofcompleted improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Operation of the project began on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1984. Maximum storage of 49 acrebet with elevation of 5,504.53 feet occurred on May 19, 1984. Peak inflow was 236 c.f.s. and maximum outflow was 211 c.f.s. There was 32 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the reservoir was empty on September 30, 1984. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1984 were $3,600 totaling $99,600 through FY 1984. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in October 1970. Project structures are in pod condition and in operation. 8D. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM Location. in Sandoval County, NM, on Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from confluence of Jemez River and Rio Grande, about 5 miles northwest of Bernalillo, NM (See Geological Survey map for Bernalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam 780 feet long with amaximum height of 135 feet above streambed, and offchannel uncontrolled saddle spillway 400 feet wide, and a 13 -foot diameter gated outlet in left abutment with discharge capacity of 8,340 cubic feet per second with pool at spillway crest elevation. Reservoir has a capacity of 106,100 acre-feet (73,000 acre-feet for flood control and 33,100 acre-feet for sediment control). For more detailed description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. On October1, 1983, the pool elevation was 5,162.37 feet with coaresponding a storage of 2,723 acre-feet. The maximum Pool elevation was 5,166.45 feet with a storage of 4,327 cre.feet on May 17, 1984. On September 30, 1984 the Pool elevation was 5,161.33 feet with a corresponding store of 2 ,383,acre-feet. The reservoir was regulated for sedi- mentcontrol during FY 1984. Sediment deposition during FY 1984 was 597 acre-feet. There were $2,401,800 in flood dages prevented during FY 1984. Sediment benefits uring FY 1984 were $66,900. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project trough FY 1984 were $6,615,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed ia operation in October 1953. Project structures are in d condition and in operation. 8E. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM oation. Project is one unit of flood control phase of ?nprehensive plan of improvement for Rio Grande Basin SNeMwe xico. It is on the Rio Grande and covers a sec- (-u te river commencing near Truth or Consequences rly Hot Springs) at about river mile 123 and extends upstream to Espanola, NM, about river mile 394. (See Table 17-D on Rio Grande Floodway.) Existing project. Consists of flood protection and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work where needed to protect levees. Construction of project is a joint undertaking by Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. Portions to be done by Corps will consist of levee enlargement, construction, and bank protection work, with channel-rectification and drainage-rehabilitation work the responsibility of Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed by local interests exist through reach of river involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard of construction, and in many places are threatened by meandering river. (See Thble 17-D on existing project and Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to usual requirements, local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and public utility relocations or replacements required in construction of project. Local interests will also be required to comply with requirements of Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. 'Ibtal costs for all requirements for completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project authorization were $75,000. There were no non-Federal costs in connection with construction of Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit of floodway. Espanola Valley unit is in the deferred category. The city of Espanola or Santa Clara Pueblo has not given indication they plan positive action to solve the flooding problem. For more details see page 17-8 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. There were $416,900 in flood damages prevented by the completed floodway project during FY 1984. Estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 1984 amounted to $40,885,900. The peak flow of the Rio Grande through the middle valley was 8,560 c.f.s. at Albuquerque on May 28,1984. The peak at San Acacia was 6,140 c.f.s. on June 3, 1984. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Albuquerque unit and Cochiti to Rio Puerco units of Rio Grande Floodway project is complete. San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit is deferred for restudy. The Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) unit was reclassified to the active category on July 18, 1973, based on a letter of intent to cooperate from the city of Truth or Consequences dated May 31, 1973. The Espanola Valley unit was reclassified to deferred category on 17 October 1973. 8F. TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM Location. Vicinity City of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. Existing project. Plan of improvement will include 4 miles of 20-foot-high levees with positive seepage control, an interior drainage system, and 5 miles of diversion channels. The diversion channels would be required for control of floods on tributary arroyos at and in the vicinity of Truth or Consequences. Estimated Federal cost is not available pending project reformulation. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) 17-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Location cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Letters of intent have been received from the City of Truth or Consequences (dated June 8, 1983) and the County of Sierra (dated June 8, 1983). Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was initiated in FY 1979 and continued during FY 1984. 9. SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM Location. Lake is in Guadalupe County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, NM (See U.S. Geological Survey map, Corazon, NM, sheet, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Project operation began in November 1979. Authorized plan of improvement consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long and 212 feet maximum height above the streambed. Project purposes are flood control, irrigation and sediment retention. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete lined tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipater. Storage capacity at the spillway crest is 447,100 acre-feet which includes 80,100 acre-feet sediment reserve, 200,000 acre-feet irrigation and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. Surface area of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,685 acres. Contributing drainage area at the dam site is 2,434 square miles. For a more detailed report of the authorized project including the modification to existing Summer Lake see page 17-8 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and maintenance of both reservoirs will be responsibility of Federal Government; however, Carlsbad Irrigation District will be required to contribute to operation and maintenance costs an annual amount equal to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. Carlsbad Irrigation District also has agreed to use Sumner Lake for floodcontrol. Because they will realize equivalent benefits from storage capacity in Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, they will continue to fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division of Parks to manage Santa Rosa Dam and Lake. Activities include camping, picnicking, boating and hiking. For more requirements and details on final approval in 1974, for transfer of irrigation storage from Sumner Lake to Santa Rosa Dam and Lake (formerly Los Esteros Lake) see page 17-5 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed in late 1979 and reservoir operation for irrigation was started in March 1980. $6,600 in flood damages were prevented during FY 1984. Pool elevation at start of fiscal year was 4,695.74 feet with storage of 8,798 acre-feet. Total releases for the fiscal year were 49,591 acre-feet. Pool elevation on September 30, 1984 was 4,706.25 feet with a storage of 16,672 acre-feet. The maxi. mum elevation was 4,716.40 feet with a storage of 28,915 acre-feet on July 20, 1984. There was 425 acre-feet of sedi. ment deposition during the fiscal year. Sediment damages prevented during the fiscal year were $47,600. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits were 38,866 acre-feet. Irri. gation benefits for the fiscal year were $136,000 with an accumulative total of $806,800 through FY 1984. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract for the recreation area was awarded in September 1979 and completed in October 1980. Design studies for spill. way modification were initiated in FY 1979 and construce tion was completed in FY 1982. 10. SMITH CREEK, CO Location. Smith Creek, Pleasant View Estates, El Paso County, CO is located 15 miles north of Colorado Springs, CO. (See Geological Survey Map, Monument CO quadrangle scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The construction of 8 gabion weirs in the channel on Smith Creek to protect existing sewage lagoons for the Pleasant View Estates during flood flows. The upper most gabion weir 35 feet in width, would act as a collection structure, the remaining 7 weirs, 15 feet in width would reduce flood flows to about 3 feet per second during flood design stage. Local cooperation. Section 3 FC Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Local Interests are in compliance with Section 221, 1970 FC Act and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Act of 1970. Operations and results. N/A Condition at the end of the year. Construction was started in June 1982 and was completed in December 1982. 11. TRINIDAD LAKE, CO Location. On Purgatoire River about 161 miles above its junction with Arkansas River. Project is about 4 miles upstream from city of Trinidad, CO. (See Geological Survey map. Trinidad, CO, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam 6,610 feet long, with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in left abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gate-controlled conduit in right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,870 c.f.s. with water surface at top of flood control pool. Reservoir prvides for storage of 60,000 acre-feet for flood control, 39,000 acre-feet for sediment, 20,000 acre-feet irrigation, and 4,500 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 123,500 acre-feet. Reservoir controls a drainage area of 671 square miles and will be operated for flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. For authorizing legisla' tion see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation received from City of Trinidad and Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of irrigation repayment contract. For complete details of requirements and costs pertaining tO 17-6 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT the execution of the irrigation repayment contract and the addition of permanent storage for recreation facilities see page 17-9 of fiscal year 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. The reserir was operated for flood control and irrigation releases during the fiscal year. On October 1, 1983 the pool elevation was 6,204.19 feet with a corresponding storage of 40,820 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,210.13 fet with a corresponding storage of 46,949 acre-feet on May 13, 1984. On September 30, 1984, the pool elevation was 6,183.02 feet with a corresponding storage of 23,163 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during FY 1984 was 489 acre-feet. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1984 was $182,900. Accrued sediment benefits are $1,335,200. Irrigation benefits for FY 1984 were $151,300. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 1984 were $816,100. Irrigation releases for the year were 38,495 acre-feet. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in 1977. The recreation facilities were completed in 1980. The Dam Safety Assurance Contract was awarded in September 1982. Project features are in good condition and in operation. 12. TWO RIVERS DAM, NM Location. About 14 miles southwest of Roswell, NM, on Rio Hondo and Rocky Arroyo. Rio Hondo is formed at confluence of Rio Ruidoso and Rio Bonito, near village of Hondo, NM, in foothills region of Sierra Blanca in southeastern part of Lincoln County, NM, and flows generally easterly to its confluence with Pecos River near Roswell, NM (See Geological Survey map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Diamond "A" Dam is an earthfill Structure, 4,885 feet long and 98 feet high, with a gated outlet. Rocky Dam is an earthfill structure 2,940 feet long and 118 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet. No provision is made for storage except for flood control. Flood releases will be controlled, so that flows through Roswell will not exceed Rio Hondo channel capacity which is about 1,000 c.f.s. Capacity of Two Rivers Reservoir at spillway cret is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 18,000 acre-feet are Provided for sediment reserve. Together these dams regulate runoff from 1,027 square miles of drainage area. For details of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-18 of Annual Report for 1973. Iocal cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies and compliance is satisfactory. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. The reservoir was eOpty on October 1, 1983. The maximum pool elevation o3f ,985.44 feet with a corresponding storage of714 acrehot occurred on 13 August 1984. There were $443,300 flood damages prevented during 1984. Sediment damf prevented were $35,100. Estimated total accumulated anodd sediment damages prevented through FY 1984 Wt $6,391,800. There were 313 acre-feet of sediment dePition during FY 1984. The accrued sediment bene- S h^rough FY 1984 are $468,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete and was placed in operation July 1963. Project features are in good condition and in operation. 13. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood control projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Projects in Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico were inspected. Federal costs for the fiscal year were $186,964. An appropriation of $250,000 was provided through the Inspection of Completed Works program in FY 1984 to evaluate the performance of the Albuquerque North Diversion Channel project. 14. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, three projects are operated by others for flood control. These projects are Platoro, Pueblo, and Sumner. Platoro Dam on Conejos River above the town of Platoro, Conejos County, CO controls runoff from 40 square miles of high mountain area. Authorized purposes are irrigation storage and flood control. Total storage is 60,000 acrefeet with the top 6,000 acre-feet for flood control. The 54,000 acre-feet is joint use storage with flood-control on a forecast basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by Interior Appropriation Act of 1941, (see H Doc 693, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.) Construction of project was completed by Water and Power Resources Service (Bureau of Reclamation) in FY 1952. On October 1, 1983, storage in Platoro reservoir was 14,591 acre-feet; elevation 9,972.8 feet. There was no flood control releases during FY 1984. Maximum storage of 34,324 acre-feet, elevation 9,982.9 feet occurred on June 3, 1984. On September 30, 1984, storage was 34,025 acrefeet, elevation 10,004.2 feet. Peak flow at Mogote gage was 2,820 c.f.s. on May 25, 1984. $494,100 in flood damages were prevented by the project during FY 1984. Total flood damages prevented to date are at $3,208,500. Total cost for activity during FY 1984 was $13,428. Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which was authorized under Public Law 87-590, 87th Congress, HR 2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 1975. Pueblo is operated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and is located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo County Colorado. Pueblo reservoir has 27,000 acre-feet exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint use space. Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. Storage on October 1, 1983 was 221,181 acre-feet, elev. 4,870.61 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 283,207 acre-feet, elev. 4,884.45 feet on March 14, 1984. Storage on September 30, 1984 was 242,549 acre-feet, elev. 4875.64 feet. There were $1,038,500 in flood damages prevented in FY 1984. Total cost for FY 1984 activity was $10,071. Total flood damages prevented to date are $2,528,400. 17-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 710.8 in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sumner Dam was authorized as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior under a Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the service spillway floor to 56,000 c.f.s. was completed in 1957. A twenty-four inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass flows less than 100 c.f.s. Storage on October 1, 1983 was 5,575 acre-feet, elevation 4,231.4 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1984 was 28,969 acre-feet, elevation 4,251.6 feet on March 6,1984. Storage on September 30, 1984 was 21,044 acre-feet, elevation 4,247.0 feet. Total cost for FY 1984 activity was $10,071. 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 17-E. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Costs during FY 1984 were: Belen, NM, Rio Grande, $1,862; Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM, $4,459. Emergency flood control activities repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for fiscal year 1984 were $118,885 for advance preparation, and $79,162 for flood emergency operations, and $449,809 for repair and restoration. TABLE 17-A Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal costs during FY 1984 were: Rio Grande, Alamosa, CO, $108,219; Fountain Creek, Pinon Bridge, Pueblo, CO, $4,322; Fountain Creek, Fountain, CO, $136,733; HWY 1-25, Fountain Creek, CO, $926; King Arroyo, La Junta, CO, $438; HWY 9, Canon City, CO, $73,711; Fountain Creek, El Paso County, CO, $1,097; Fountain Creek, Security, CO, $152,188; HWY 101, Las Animas, CO, $79,998; Stratmoor Hills, Colorado Springs, CO, $10,546; Truchas Creek, Fort Sumner, NM, $101,214; US HWY 25, Colorado Springs, CO, $217,502. General Investigations 17. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year were $559,487 for flood damage prevention studies, $21,670 for special studies (coordination studies with other agencies), and $264,193 for pre-authorization studies, Phase I (Arkansas River and Tributaries above John Martin Dam, Colorado, $226,868 and Rio Grande and Tributaries (Rio Puerco/Rio Salado), New Mexico, $37,325). 18. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $137,598 for flood plain management and technical services. Hydrologic studies involving collection and study of basic data, such as stream flow data, collection of suspended sediment samples, recording rain gage data, hy- .drometeorological studies, and sedimentation studies continued. Costs during the fiscal year were $11,622. lee Section In Text Project Albuquerque Diversion Channels Project, NM (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 2. Conchas Lake, NM 3. El Paso, TX 4. Highway 12, CO 5. Holly, CO Funding New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost FY "1 FY 2 ._V a4 1 0 r1 O4t Sept. 3U, Total Cost5 to 503 32,976 - rojects. 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 26-N. For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Table 26-N. For Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974 (Sec. 32, Public Law 251, 93rd Cong.) See Table 26-N. For Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Act of 1974 (Sec. 54, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress) See Table 26-N. Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Advance preparation $118,852 Rehabilitation - Brookville, PA. $78,957 Total cost for fiscal year: General Investigations 33. SURVEYS Flood control studies Review of authorized projects Coordination with other agencies Inventory of dams (P.L. 92-367) Supplemental Preauthorization Studies Total cost for fiscal year: $197,809 $1,639,250 7 190 205,725 48 $1,845,220 34. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs this fiscal year were $138,714 for flood plain management services and $13,568 for related hydrologic studies. 35. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT $21 was expended this fiscal year for water resourc planning study of Sewickley Creek Watershed. 26-12 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section Sep 30, L Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 1984 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. Allegheny River New Work PA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3 'Monongahela New Work River, PA and Approp. WV Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 5. Tart Lake, New Work WV Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Allegheny River New Work Oil City, PA Approp. Cost 8. Chartiers New Work Creek, PA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost New Work (Contributed Contrib. Funds) Cost 9. Elkins, WV New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 10. Girty's Run, New Work Millvale, PA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost New Work (Contributed Contrib. Funds) Cost 11. Johnstown, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 12. Cost Pnxsutawney, New Work Ohio River Approp. Basin, PA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 13. Root Creek, New Work Bolivar, NY Approp. Cost. io4.d Control - Reservoirs Berlin Lake Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3,419,700 3,096,229 2,180,000 2,718,722 6,194,000 6,207,403 2,180,000 2,712,043 514,588 129,285 502,800 507,623 55,000 39,365 1,602,983 1,524,356 -17,846 2,693,000 3,100,425 2,657 6,290,000 5,968,529 115,139 489,000 584,004 583,500 583,113 3,270,300 3,248,945 80 7,665,440 7,260,530 66,402 103,046 710,000 642,587 620,000 349,000 215,428 620,143 82,727 1,329 25,000 6,000 60,324 6,597 - -470,000 28,586 -451,892 417 47,000 43,525 5,000 4,856 251,000 428,012 -2,889 15,827 1,015,300 984,740 83,000 74,974 6,000 5,081 100,000 157,472 2,708 -18,376 5,221 5,221 5,488 19 376,000 127,912 308,000 28,711 -5,000 102,047 -2,500 56 902,600 1,048,000 1 897,342 1,110,833 1 3,788,000 3,762,006 8,496,900 8,375,983 -120,000 44,567 -417,500 -195,337 689,500 700,570 18,157,860' 18,157,860' 49,389,862' 49,287,8242 129,203,0859 129,203,046' 127,474,554' 126,367,245" 15,857,000 15,855,074 19,077,932' 19,077,9207 7,394,8398 7,291,1999 98,000 1,122,000 244,784 1,119,720 - 26,586,186 26,508 26,513,289 - 4,225,188 4,204,498 -- 1,772,627 -- 1,772,627 6,000 220,487 4,181 218,342 -3,000 2,662,000 - 2,648,849 -- 701,722 701,722 - 8,865,388 ' 0 - 8,865,3880 131,000 3,859,796 314,450 3,783,626 -- 3,586,107" 3,586,107" -6,000 1,012,90012 263,795 1,002,330 ' s -- 1,597,385 18,426 1,588,477 -- 8,739,978" - 8,739,978" ,259,000 12,096,783'" ,025,185 11,814,996 6 26-13 TABLE 26-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section Se30, In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 15. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 16. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 17. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 18. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY 19. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 20. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 21. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, OH 22. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 23. Ohio River Basin, Pittsburgh, PA District Consolidated 24. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 52,000 51,566 514,600 508,659 -1,748 803 753,800 552,917 280,000 78,631 529,000 519,823 190,398 476,000 529,107 - 33,500 - 1,041 1,166,300 1,125,000 1,221,024 1,217,561 -4,000 7,405 670,100 460,055 63,000 68,849 1,236,200 1,186,299 -16 - - -- 409,700 574,700 892,617 804,423 455,494 560,055 703,184 915,649 -1,735 5,135 795,600 785,849 15,000 11,422 643,600 705,277 273,706 400,112 487,800 453,571 17,374 480,600 492,385 -50 958,600 951,570 185,000 104,826 175,000 52,647 1,031,500 809,831 -8,238 99,952 662,900 705,652 21,000 3,584 506,100 498,645 -5,162 1,129,000 1,120,473 1,050,000 948,001 -20,000 100,519 1,131,100 1,146,746 84,066 531,000 540,383 42 765,000 455,236 1,214 1,203,000 1,163,944 2,000,000 1,399,020 -5,000 411 826,577 1,001,587 -190,000 -95,443 584,000 546,449 659,100 808,210 421,800 394,400 536,000 523,000 404,245 385,562 513,256 531,555 46,012,411 '1 46,012,4118 5,806,813 5,586,317 4,431,523" 4,404,913" 8,035,921'9 7,915,963" 9,539,585" 9,539,585" 6,245,87521 6,096,60622 109,309,07623 109,289,91923 12,346,778 12,219,107 3,235,000 2,451,847 5,727,531" 5,727,531" 8,377,851" 8,322,902" 7,114,81327 7,108,654"8 5,947,816 5,877,368 47,033 47,033 17,376,097" 17,376,097" 5,748,989" 5,543,695" 4,253,029" 4,253,029" 5,247,364 5,194,309 985,197" 985,197'" 8,529 1,632,600 1,551,254 72 1,411,400 1,357,000 1,367,677 1,391,237 - 40,227,201" - 40,220,394" 1,239,000 12,532,617" 1,270,706 12,390,820" 26-14 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost to Seedon Sep 30, h Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 1984 I Stonewall New Work Jackson Lake Approp. 15,505,000 20,455,000 21,500,000 22,300,000 110,310,200 WV Cost 15,585,738 20,917,297 20,229,662 21,414,527 107,151,253 . Tionesta Lake New Work Ohio River Approp. 18,701 350,000 278,000 17,000 7,841,707j" Basin, PA Cost 25,377 106,733 436,326 218,519 7,747,331" Maint. Approp. 647,600 729,120 898,000 1,025,000 9,392,95389 Cost 676,637 698,626 785,005 895,102 9,102,130'~ 27.U nion City New Work Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 14,559,800 Cost - - - 14,559,800 Maint. Approp. 204,200 215,000 246,000 345,000 2,093,668 Cost 197,002 209,590 244,224 288,948 2,018,790 28 Woodcock Creek New Work Lake, PA Approp. - 1,068,000 - 540,000 20,524,7004 Cost 6,061 583,988 313,216 194,349 20,007,90242 Maint. Approp. 383,700 454,100 538,500 582,900 3,837,271 '3 Cost 377,938 435,069 537,291 555,237 3,774,829 ' 29. Youghiogheny New Work River Lake, Approp. 80,000 - 277,000 5,000 12,538,238" Ohio River Cost 263,134 18,679 27,096 279,125 12,511,437" Basin, PA and Maint. MD Approp. 1,004,200 1,239,100 1,527,500 1,229,200 12,677,3894" Cost 1,050,372 1,224,065 1,119,522 1,561,741 12,553,6784 1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and $1.250,049 from public works funds. 2. Includes $64,365 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963) and $191,400 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 3. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous ojects. 4. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive fUnds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and 582,000 provided from the Productive Employment Popriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 5. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive fnd (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and 294,323 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 6. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds. 0,000,000 public works funds, $234,000 Code 711 funds and j2,o88 Code 713 funds; excludes $409,622 contributed by minterest. 7. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, 10 '000,000 public works funds, $234,000 Code 711 funds and 4 2i.,067 Code 713 funds; excludes $409,622 contributed by interest. EloE8y mInecnlutd es $89,000 provided from the Productive Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 9. Includes $88,513 provided from the Productive 0mployment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 10. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. nt. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from ontributed funds. E12. Includes $292,000 provided from the Productive EYment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. E 13. Includes $281,692 provided from the Productive moy.mInencltu dAeps p$r1o5p4r2ia,5ti0o0n s Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 cuntdand 99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 uted by local interest. 15. Includes $40,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 16. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $328,000 Code 711 funds. 17. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds and $226,634 Code 711 funds. 18. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds and $200,024 Code 711 funds. 19. Includes $45,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 20. Includes $156,812 Code 711 funds. 21. Includes $322,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 22. Includes $230,023 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 23. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 Code 711 funds and $568,265 Code 713 funds; excludes $389,370 contributed by local interest. 24. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $274,669 Code 711 funds. 25. Includes $256,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 26. Includes $253,785 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 27. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $132,221 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $462,211 contributed by local interests. 28. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $132,221 Code 711 funds and $555,088 Code 713 funds; excludes $456,611 contributed by local interests. 29. Includes $74,900 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,337,406.40 for new work contributed by local interest. 30. Includes $315,500 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 31. Includes $243,754 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 26-15 TABLE 26-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 32. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 funds. 33. Includes $8,914 from emergency relief funds. 34. Includes $1,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 35. Includes $152,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 36. Includes $151,861 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 37. Includes $2,352,405 Code 711 funds ($273,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 38. Includes $2,258,029 Code 711 funds, ($214,720 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 39. Includes $203,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 40. Includes $202,747 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 41. Includes $1,651,000 Code 711 funds. 42. Includes $1,134,203 Code 711 funds. 43. Includes $85,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 44. Includes $2,863,334 Code 711 funds ($293,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 45. Includes $2,836,5613 Code 711 funds ($288,365 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 46. Includes $591,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 47. Includes $516,511 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 26-16 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935' Aug 30, 1935' June 26, 19342 Mar 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 4, 1913 Sep 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 Jan 31, 19313 June 26, 19342 May 17, 1950 Jan 11, 1934 Aug 30, 1935 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (See Section 1 of Text) For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sep 29, 1891 Secretary of War authorized change to a movable dam.) For locks and dams 2 and 3. For locks and dams 4 to 8, inclusive. For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide up to lock 2, and construct new locks and dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging a navigable channel to head of pool 8. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; all at an estimated cost of $185,556. Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate increased in 1910 to $698,961.) Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at a cost of $7,850. Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. H. Doc. 1217, 62d Cong., (Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) 3d sess. Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., Guide walls and guard walls, 1 to 6, $1,255,130; 2d sess. Lengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; Lock and dam 8 (second chamber), $504,465; Reconstruct dam 4, $397,211; Marine ways, repair plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total of $6,640,439. Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing Rivers and Harbors structure, at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work Committee, Doc 22, authorized at old lock and dam 4. 70th Cong., 2d sess. Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 above existing structure and on such site as they may deem most desirable. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Modification of existing project as folldws: S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong., Provide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock 1st sess. and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15, inclusive. Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing pool-full elevation 4 feet. Provide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom width and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. Provide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela River, into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a maximum bottom width of 200 feet and a 9-foot project depth. TYGART RIVER LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservior for low water regulation H. Doc. 1792, 64th Cong. and flood control 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 106, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. 26-17 Annual Report 1886, p. 1545, Annual Report 1891, p. 2366 H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2212 H. Doc. 540, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 16, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 3d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2423 Annual Report 1909, p. 1756 Annual Report 1904, p. 460 H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 28, 1938 11. Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun. 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun. 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 modified by Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 as amended ELKINS, WV For construction of local flood protection projects. JOHNSTOWN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenances of recreation facilities. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation and recreation. Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, pollution abatement, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act. of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 26-18 12. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, low water, regulation and recreation. To define cost-sharing arrangement for municipal & industrial water supply & water for pollution abatement purposes. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and water supply storage. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st Sess. Pub. Law 86-645 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 OHIO RIVER BASIN - Pittsburgh District Aug 28, 1937 Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection Flood Control Committee, of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Jun 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other Flood Control Committee, purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Aug 18, 1941 Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. Ohio River Basin. 1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in 2d sess. tributary basins. Jul 24, 1946 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., plan including additional projects in tributary basins. 1st sess. May 17, 1950 Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for S. Doc. 20, 81st Cong. Ohio River Basin. 1st Sess. Dec 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive Public Law 88-253, plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. 88th Cong., 1st sess. Jun 18, 1965 Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive H. Doc., 6755, 89th Cong., plan for Ohio River Basin. 1st sess. May 12, 1967 Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive Public Law 90-17, plan for Ohio River Basin. 90th Cong., 1st sess. Aug 13, 1968 Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive Public Law 90-483, plan for Ohio River Basin. 90th Cong., 2d sess. Jun 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., plan for Ohio River Basin. 2d sess. Mar 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong., plan for Ohio River Basin. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. 26-19 TABLE 26-B (Continued) 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. J REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced Water Resources Development engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine Act of 1976; Public Law drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. 94-587, Sec. 101(a). SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Jun 28, 1938 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. regulation and recreation. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act as amended of 1944 STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, S. Doc. 109, 89th Cong. water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. 2nd Sess. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. UNION CITY DAM, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, recreation and storage for water quality control. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Public Res. 117, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. 1. Included in the Emergency Relief Administration program April 8, 1935. 26-20 Oct 22, 1976 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. Nov 7, 1966 Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION (See Section 6 of Text) PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allegheny River, PA, open-channel work Completed 1934 197,000 133,940 Beaver and Mahoning Rivers, PA and OH'" Inactive 1938 - - Buckhannon River, WV' S Completed 1893 5,500 - Cheat River, WV2 S Completed 1895 12,997 - Pittsburgh Harbor, PA Completed 1922 110,663 81,613 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD Inactive 1971 47,1954 185,668" 1. January 23, 1939, Chief of Engineers recommended constructing a waterway from Ohio River through Beaver, Mahoning, and Grand River Valleys to Lake Erie (H. Doc. 178, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1stS ess. 3. No Commerce reported. 4. Previous project data. 5. Includes $1,700 expended under previous project. 6. Eligible for deauthorization. 26-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 26-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allegany, NY, unit I (Allegheny River) Deferred - 4,100 - Allegany, NY, unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) Deferred 1975 64,851 - Amsterdam, OH' Completed 1964 183,072 - Benwood, WV2 Deferred 1954 81,028 - Big Run, PA' Completed 1965 364,208 - Black Fork at Hendricks, WV' s Inactive 1972 6,800 - Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA Inactive - - - Bradford, PA Completed 1962 7,601,763 - Brookville, PA Completed 1963 964,976 - Buckhannon, WV Completed 1972 1,568,661 - Burgettstown, PA' Completed - 83,129 - Butler, PA Completed 1970 1,556,181 - Dubois, PA Completed 1979 4,464,607 - Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH 2 Inactive - 100,000 - Empire-Stratton, OH2 Inactive - 33,031 - Friendsville, MD' Completed - 41,529 - Granville, PA' Completed - 75,908 - Johnsonburg, PA Completed 1958 674,664 - Kittanning, PA, part I Completed 1949 130,317 - Latrobe, PA Completed 1951 207,659 - Latrobe, PA Completed 1970 2,556,652 - Leetonia, OH' Completed - 89,299 - Leetsdale, PA Inactive - - - Martins Ferry, OH2 inactive 1941 25,164 - Moundsville, WV2 Inactive - - - Muddy Creek Dam, PA' Inactive 1977 402,459 - Neville Island, PA Inactive - - - New Kensington and Parnassus, PA Inactive - - - Oakdale, PA' Inactive - 14,127 - Oil City, PA' Completed - 43,595 - Olean, NY Completed 1954 3,217,531 - Portage, PA Completed 1965 150,386 - Portville, NY Completed 1954 2,070,484 - Powhatan Point, OH2 Inactive -- -- - Proctor, WV2 Inactive - - Reynoldsville, PA Completed 1959 385,494 - Ridgway, PA (Elk Creek) Completed 1964 628,888 - Ridgway and vicinity, PA (on Clarion River) ' Active 1979 132,464 - Rochester, PA Inactive - - - Rouseville, PA' Inactive - 1,642 - Rowlesburg Lake, WV' Inactive 1977 2,857,575 - Salamanca, NY Completed 1972 2,880,535 - Slovan, PA' Completed - 57,811 - Sykesville, PA' Completed - 184,246 - Tarentum, PA' Completed 1964 136,591 - Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA' Completed 1981 1,554,428 - Turtle Creek, PA Completed 1972 15,350,552 - Uniontown, PA2 Inactive 1956 - - Wallace, WV' ' Inactive - 11,035 - Warwood, WV'2 Inactive - - - Washington, PA Completed 1964 789,093 - Wellsville, OH, Sec. I Completed 1956 483,910 - Wellsville, OH, Sec. II Completed 1956 157,633 - Weston Mills, Olean, NY' ' Active - 50,100 - Weston Mills, Portville, NY'' Active - 52,100 - Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling)' Inactive - - - Wheeling, WV (Wheeling Island)' Inactive - 21,700 - Wheeling, WV2 Inactive 1954 189,067 - Wilmore, PA' Completed - 96,853 - Woodlands, WV' Inactive - - - Youngstown, OH Completed 1976 3,621,134 - 26-22 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Lacks local support. 2. Eligible for deauthorization. 4. No longer economically justified. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adena, OH (Short Creek) Bellaire, OH Brilliant, OH Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Buckhannon, WV' Clarington, OH Coraopolis, PA Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) Follansbee, WV Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) Industry, PA Kittanning, PA, part II (Allegheny River) Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY2 Lake Erie,-Ohio Canal, OH and PA McKees Rocks, PA Mingo Junction, OH New Cumberland, WV Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) Pittsburgh, PA (The Strip) Redbank Creek Lake, PA St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Smith Ferry, PA Wellsburg, WV West Bridgewater, PA Wilcox, PA3 1965 1972 Aug 5, 1977 May 6, 1981 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Feb 20, 1951 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 6, 1977 Mar 2, 1970 May 6, 1981 Oct 3, 1978 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Mar 5, 1955 13,452 76,487 194 37,488 16,884 190,722 1,342,000 156,337 13,529 6,387 16,761 1. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Feb. 20, 1951. 2. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 2, 1970. 3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 5, 1955. 26-23 TABLE 26-G ,._._. TABLE 26-H ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depths on Miter Width able Lift at Pool Sills at Normal Character of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Pool Level- Foundation Construction Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind of Com- Navi- No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actual Cost 2 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 56 360 11.0 721.0 12.0 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 $ 1,763,485 3 14.5 Cheswick, PA 56 360 13.5 734.5 10.8 11.8 Rock Pile-rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 1,875,665 4 24.2 Natrona, PA 56 360 10.5 745.0 10.0 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,707,690 5 30.4 Freeport, PA 56 360 11.8 756.8 10.5 10.3 Piling Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,940,537 6 36.3 Clinton, PA 56 360 12.2 769.0 10.6 10.8 Rock Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1928 1,523,959 7 45.7 Kittanning, PA 56 360 13.1 782.1 9.8 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1930 1,460,008 Piling 8 52.6 Templeton, PA 56 360 17.9 800.0 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1931 2,848,920 9 62.2 Rimer, PA 56 360 22.0 822.0 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1938 2,510,373 Total $15,630,637 Abandoned lock and dam 1 591,187 Abandoned lock and dam 2 544,929 Abandoned lock and dam 3 310,103 Demolishing old dam 1 26,001 Dredging channel 1,055,003 Total $18,157,860 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and 2. Dates shown represent replacement structures. are controlling depth. ao [V Q7 C CO to y � 0 0Co ti) p TABLE 26-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depths on Miter Width able Lift at Pool Sills at Normal Character of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Pool Level- Foundation Construction Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind of Com- Navi- No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actual Cost 2 11.2 Braddock, PA 56 360 8.7 718.7 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19532 $17,872,2125 110 720 3 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 563 360 8.2 726.9 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19533 17,536,6106 720 4 41.5 Monessen, PA 563 360 16.6 743.5 10.7 20.0 Piles Piles Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19322 17,254,071 720 61.2 Maxwell locks and dam. 843 720 19.5 763.0 15.0 20.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1964 30,110,8896 Maxwell, PA 82.2 Grays Landing lock 84 720 15.0 778.0 15.0 26.0 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete - 802,9959 and dam, Grays Landing, PA 7 85.0 Greensboro, PA 56 360 15.0 778.0 10.0 10.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19252 2,639,8045 8 90.8 Point Marion, PA 56 360 19.0 797.0 10.0 14.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19252 6,027,219' 102.0 Morgantown lock and 84 600 17.0 814.0 14.5 17.8 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1950 8,778,0005 dam, Morgantown, WV 108.0 Hildebrand lock and 84 600 21.0 835.0 15.0 14.0 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1959 12,506,829' dam, 6 miles above Morgantown, WV 115.4 Opekiska lock and dam, 84 600 22.0 857.0 14.0 17.75 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1964 25,179,622' 13.4 miles above Morgantown, WV Marine ways, etc. 250,0005 Abandoned lock and dam 1 1,019,907' Abandoned lock and dam 4 780,8165 Abandoned lock and dam 5 1,074,812' Abandoned lock and dam 6 770,449' Abandoned lock and dam 7 213,776' Abandoned lock and dam 8 245,900' Abandoned lock and dam 9 191,0005 Abandoned lock and dam 10 210,445' Abandoned lock and dam 11 227,668' Abandoned lock and dam 12 200,550 Abandoned lock and dam 13 190,691' Abandoned lock and dam 14 210,1275 Abandoned lock and dam 15 175,8296 Dredging 587,8995 Total 145,058,1205 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depths. 2. Dates shown for locks and dams No. 2 to 8, inclusive, represent reconstruction. 3. 2 Chambers 4. Includes $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam, (1958-9), $2,086,438 for original reconstruction (1923-1926) and $618,724 AE&D costs for replacement of lock. 5. Actual cost; may include estimated costs which have been footnoted as necessary. 6. Includes $2,173,767 for original reconstruction (1931-2), and $15,080,304 for reconstruction of dam (1977). 7. Includes $16,967,114 for reconstruction of locks. 8. Includes $15,855,074 for major rehabilitation. 9. AE&D costs for proposed lock. c-n 7 S fi 5 Cd Ca '-5 d on yI REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 26-J MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV: TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 3 of Text) Operation and Maintenance, Funds New Work General Total Regular $139,637,579 ' 3 $105,444,7442 $245,082,323' 3 Maintenance and operation - 452,623 452,623 Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) - 22,549 22,549 Total $139,637,579"' $105,919,9162 $245,557,495' 2 1. Excludes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects. 2. Excludes $20,446,587 expended between July 7, 1897 and June 30, 1937, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent appropriation for such purposes and excludes $742 for maintenance of previous projects. 3. Includes $15,855,074 for major rehabilitation TABLE 26-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) Estimated Cost8 Type of Location' Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Allegany, NY, unit I (Allegheny River)2 Allegany, NY, unit II (Five Mile Creek area)2 Benwood, W V2 7 14 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA (Allegheny (River)2 Elkins, W V (Monongahela River Basin)4' Empire-Stratton, OH 14" Johnsonburg, PA (Allegheny River Basin)2' Johnstown, PA (Allegheny River Basin)2 ' Kittanning, PA, part I (Allegheny River)2 ' Latrobe, PA (Allegheny River Basin)2 ' Leetsdale, PA2 Martins Ferry, OH 6 1" Moundsville, WV 2 " Neville Island, PA 2 New Kensington and Parnassus, PA (Allegheny River)2 Olean, NY (Allegheny River)2 5 Portville, NY (Allegheny River)2 5 Powhatan Point, OH2 u4 Proctor, WV "14 Punxsutawney, PA (Allegheny River Basin)4' Ridgway, PA (Allegheny River Basin)" 5 Rochester, PA2 Uniontown, PA (Monongahela River Basin)2 14 Warwood, WV' "1 Wellsville, OH, sec. I" 5 Wellsville, OH, sec. III" Wheeling, WV 7 14 Levee Channel and levee Wall Wall Channel diversion Internal drainage facilities Wall Channel Wall Channel Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Levee Levee Channel and levee Channel Wall Channel and wall Wall Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee 697,000 980,000 8,500,000 11,800,000 1,772,627' 933,000 674,664' 8,865,388' 130,3173 207,659 1,270,000 8,630,000 3,070,000 3,210,000 7,900,000 3,217,5313 2,070,4843 4,720,000 334,000 3,586,1073 628,888' 3,350,000 5,820,000 1,740,000 483,9103 157,6333 19,700,000 65,000 133,000 3,180,000 3,08Q,000 1 1 E 1,1 762,0001' 1,113,000" 11,680,000' 14,880,000 40,000 1,812,627 28,000 961,000s3 [30,000 804,664 - 8,865,388' 2,000 132,317 44,400 252,059 L41,000 1,411,000 336,000 9,466,000 305,000 3,675,000 330,000 5,040,000 148,000 8,048,000 597,000 353,000 397,000 121,000 180,4853 72,000 622,000 980,000 376,000 113,000 3,460,000 3,814,531 2,423,484 5,117,000 455,000 3,766,5923 700,888 3,972,000 6,800,0001 2,116,000 596,910 157,633 23,160,000 26-26 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-K (Continued) OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 2 3of Text) Estimated Cost Type of Location- Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling)2 14 Wall 11,700,000 2,700,000 14,400,000 Wheeling, WV (Wheeling Island)2 " Wall and levee 13,300,000 2,470,000 15,770,000 Woodlands, WV2 14 Levee 206,000 28,000 234,000 1. All projects are on the Ohio River unless otherwise 9. Latest cost estimate revision 1960. noted. 10. Latest cost estimate revision 1966. 2. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 11. Latest cost estimate revision 1974. 3. Actual cost. 12. Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 4. Reported in detail in an individual report. 13. Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 5. Completed. 14. Eligible for deauthorization. 6. Reported in detail in Annual Report for 1941. 7. Reported in detail in Annual Report for 1954. 8. Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise noted. TABLE 26-L OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 23 of Text) Total Estimated Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Allegheny: Conemaugh River, PA' Crooked Creek, PA' East Branch Clarion River, PA' Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA and NY' Loyalhanna, PA' Mahoning Creek, PA' Tionesta, PA' Union City, PA' Woodcock Creek, PA' Beaver: Berlin, OH' Eagle Creek, OH2 Michael J. Kirwan, M OH' osquito Creek, OH' Shenango River, PA and OH' M onogahela: Youghiogheny River, PA and MD' Conemaugh River Crooked Creek Clarion River Allegheny River Loyalhanna Creek Mahoning Creek Tionesta Creek French Creek Woodcock Creek Mahoning River Eagle Creek Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Shenango River Youghiogheny River $ 46,012,411 3 7,594,900 7 9,769,600 112,109,200 ' 8,328,900 7,343,300 8,055,100 7 14,559,800 ' 3 20,684,700 9,320,400' 12,700,000 2 4 21,754,000 5 6,208,000< 41,528,000 'S 13,973,300 ' 1. Reported in detail in an individual report. 2. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 3. Actual cost. 4. Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 5. Latest cost estimate revision 1982. 6. Latest cost estimate revision 1983. 7. Latest cost estimate revision in 1984. 8. Includes $2,800,000 cost estimate for Dam Rehabilitation plus $583,000 for total recreational and sanitary facilities to upgrade area and comply with sanitary codes. 26-27 - --- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 26-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 30 of Text) Project Dates of Inspection Project Dates of Inspection Amsterdam, OH October 1982 Leetonia, OH May 1984 Big Run, PA April 1984 Oil City, PA April 1983 Bradford, PA June 1984 Olean, NY September 1984 Brookville, PA May 1984 Portage, PA August 1982 Buckhannon, WV October 1983 Portvile, NY September 1984 Burgettstown-Slovan, PA March 1976 Reynoldsville, PA May 1984 Butler, PA May 1983 Ridgway, PA May 1984 Chartiers Creek, PA Salamanca, NY September 1984 Cannonsburg-Houston Reach March 1976 Stonewood-Nutter Fort, James G. Fulton Reach October 1983 WV July 1983 Colliers, WV October 1982 Sykesville, PA April 1984 Dubois, PA May 1984 Tarentum, PA November 1976 Eldred, PA June 1983 Turtle Creek, PA August 1983 Friendsville, MD June 1984 Washington, PA March 1976 Granville, PA March 1982 Wellsville, OH April 1984 Johnsonburg, PA May 1984 Weston, WV May 1984 Kittanning, PA August 1983 Wilmore, PA August 1982 Latrobe, PA July 1984 Youngstown, PA April 1983 26-28 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 32 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Allegheny River, Oil City, PA (plans, specifications and construction) $244,784 Catfish Creek, Washington Co., PA (detailed project work) 90,862 Elk Run, Punxsutawney, PA (reconnaissance report) 7,500 Gray Fork, Graysville, PA (reconnaissance report) 7,500 Root Creek, Bolivar, NY (construction) 18,426 West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA (detailed project report) 15 059 Total cost for current fiscal year: $384,131 Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Allegheny River, Tionesta, PA (construction) $179,923 Mahoning River, Highway 139A, Trumbull Co., OH plans and specifications) 8,302 Ohio River, Chester, WV (construction) 116,542 Ohio River, McMechen, WV (real estate investigation) 521 Plum Creek, Penn Hills, PA (construction) 117,471 Roberto Clemente Park, PA (construction) 72,491 Trout Run, Portage, PA (construction) 79 600 Total cost for current fiscal year: $574,850 Streambank Erosion Control, Evaluation and Demonstration - Section 32, of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress Project/Study Identification No Expenditures Ohio River Main Stem Demonstration Projects this Rehabilitation of Streambank Demonstration Projects, Fiscal Year Ohio River Total cost for current fiscal year: Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration - Section 54, of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress Activity Architect/En gneer Contract for Preparation of Three Reports for the rpose of Disseminating Information on the Section 54 Program. Three Gutoid eLso w Cost Shore Protection for: 1. Engineers and Contractors 32. Local government officials .Property owners Fiscal Year Costs $ 9,406 26-29 - _ ST. PAUL, MN DISTRICT * District comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of northeastern South Dakota and northern and northeastern Iowa embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River; Red River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Minnesota River, MN. .................... 27-2 2. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN .... 27-2 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN ................... 27-2 4. St. Croix River, MN & WI ............... 27-3 5. Warroad Harbor and River, MN ......... 27-3 Flood Control 6. Bassett Creek, MN .......... ...... 27-3 7. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD .................. 27-4 8. Chaska, MN ........................ . 27-4 9. Devils Lake, ND . ................... 27-5 10. Eau Galle River, WI ................. .27-5 II. Enderlin, Maple River, ND .............. 27-5 12. Homme Lake and Dam, ND ............. 27-6 13. Irving Township, Jackson County, WI...27-6 14. Lac qui Parle Lake, Minnesota River, M N .. ....................... 27-6 15. La Farge Lake and channel improvement, W I ........................ 27-7 16. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND ..................... 27-7 17. Lake Darling, Souris River, ND ......... 27-7 18. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN ...................... 19. 27-8 Mankato and North Mankato, MN ...... 27-8 20. Prairie du Chien, WI ................. .27-9 21. Red Lake River at Huot, MN ............ 27-9 22. Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN . 27-9 23. Red Lake River, MN, including Clearwater River, MN ................. 27-9 24. Red River of the North drainage basin, MN, SD & ND....................27-10 25. Red River of the North at Halstad, MN .27-10 26. Red River of the North at Oslo, MN.....27-11 27. Redwood River at Marshall, MN ........ 27-11 28. Rochester, MN .......... . .27-12 29. Roseau River, MN ....................... 27-12 30. Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN ........................... 27-12 31. Sheyenne River, ND ..................... 27-13 32. State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI ...... 27-13 33. Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, MN .27-13 34. Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN.....................27-14 35. Wild Rice River-South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN........................27-14 36. Winona, MN ............................. 27-15 37. Inspection of completed flood control projects ..................... 27-15 Miscellaneous 38. Other work under special authority ...... 27-15 General Investigations 39. Surveys .............. ............ 27-16 40. Collection and study of basic data... .. 27-16 41. Continuation of planning and engineering ............................. 27-16 42. Advance engineering and design ........ 27-16 Tables Table 27-A Table 27-B Table 27-C Table 27-D Table 27-E Table Table Table 27-F 27-G 27-H Table 27-I Table 27-J Table 27-K Table 27-L Cost & Financial Statement .................. 27-17 Authorizing Legislation ......... 27-20 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............. 27-21 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......... 27-22 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects .......... 27-23 Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River ............ 27-24 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........... 27-25 Red River of the North Drainage Basin: Active Units in Comprehensive Basin Plan ........................... 27-25 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .......... 27-26 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......... 27-27 27-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Rises in Big Stone Lake, MN and SD, and flows southeasterly about 224 miles to Mankato, MN, thence northeasterly about 106 miles to join the Mississippi River opposite St. Paul, MN. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous projects. For details see page 1890 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1105 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides 9-foot depth below flat pool level of Mississippi River lock and dam 2 from mouth to mile 14.7, one-half mile above the railway bridge at Savage, MN, and 4-foot depth from mile 14.7 to 25.6 at Shakopee, MN. For details see page 1018 of Annual Report for 1965. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See also page 1074 of Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. There are privately owned terminals at miles 9, 13.1, 14.5, and two at mile 14.7. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $5,788. Dredging by contract cost $424,726, with 120,000 cubic yards removed. Dredging and berming cost $1,799. Engineering and administrative costs amounted to $6,785. Condition at end of fiscal year: Work on project for 4-foot depth was completed in 1931. The United States owns 10 acres of land in fee 2 miles east of Savage, MN and easements on 123.08 acres of land. 46.20 acres have been transferred from the Department of the Army and Department of the Air Force to the project. Navigation from mouth to Shakopee was practicable for drafts not in excess of 3 feet. A contract for work under 1958 authorization for a 9-foot channel started in May 1966 was terminated in January 1967 when 56 percent complete. A channel dredging contract awarded in June 1967 was completed in August 1968. Total costs for existing project to September 30, 1984 were $4,203,876, of which $1,940,180 was for new work and $2,263,696 for maintenance. In addition, cost from contributed funds was $139,671 for dredging to 9-foot depth under provisions of section 4, River and Harbor Act of 1915, and $219,531 for work done for the State of Minnesota relative to modification of the project. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, Cass and Crow Wing Counties, MN. (See table 27-H on reservoirs.) Previous projects. For details see page 1888 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1098 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for reconstruction from timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was converted to use as a spillway. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Reservoirs were operated as required, recreation facilities were maintained, and surveys, repairs, and reports were made by hired labor at a cost of $842,165. Reservoirs were operated by contract at a cost of $29,183. Periodic inspection and dam safety costs were $16,065. A cultural resource investigation cost $6,410 and environmental review, $1,565. Discharge observation, gage reading and pool regulation cost $58,732 by hired labor. Miscellaneous engineering and design cost $5,715. Construction of recreation facilities at Gull Lake including a boat ramp, access roads, beach and support facilities cost $26,551. Archeological site protection and survey contracts cost $31,675 and $12,943, respectively, a paving contract, $51,027 and discharge observation contracts, $1,302. Work by other Corps of Engineer districts for a recreation use workshop, a centennial celebration and dam stability and safety analysis cost $792, $17,769 and $32,883, respectively, Real estate was managed by other Corps of Engineers at a cost of $42,197. Cooperative stream gaging with U.S. Geological Survey cost $36,320. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $194,202. Condition at end of fiscal year: Existing project was completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all lands affected by construction, maintenance and operation of reservoirs. A total of 1,672.26 acres in fee are owned by the United States. The United States has easements, flowage rights, and other rights of use on another 296,334.44 acres. Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for public use are being constructed intermittently at all reser voir areas. (See table 27-H for capacities and costs bY reservoir.) 27-2 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT 4. ST. CROIX RIVER, MN & WI Location. From source in northwestern Wisconsin, flows southwesterly and then southerly about 164 miles to Mississippi River at Prescott, WI, about 41.7 miles below lower Burlington Northern railway bridge, Minneapolis, MN. For its greater part, forms boundary between Minnesota and Wisconsin. (See Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for maintenance of a channel, 9 feet in depth and of suitable width from mouth to Stillwater, MN, 24.5 miles, created by improvement of upper Mississippi River; a channel 3 feet deep at mean low water between Stillwater and Taylors Falls (27.3 miles); improvement of harbor and waterfront at Stillwater; and a small-boat harbor at Hudson, WI currently classified "inactive." Estimated (1981) Federal cost of new work is $820,400. Latest authorization (1954) for maintenance work on reach between Stillwater and Taylors Falls is limited to an expenditure not exceeding $5,000 per year. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion. For Hudson Harbor, see the annual report of 1970 for requirements. Terminal facilities. At Stillwater there is a concrete paved levee and a piling-and-timber trestle wharf on right bank. At other points along river, landing may be made on banks. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Sounding surveys cost $139, miscellaneous and administrative costs were $7,246. Condition at end of fiscal year: All new work was completed in 1930, except subsequently authorized harbor at Hudson which was reclassified to "inactive" on April 20, 1982. The United States owns 2.75 acres of land in fee at Taylors Falls and has easements over 7.57 acres of land at Bayport, MN. Extenaion to provide a 9-foot channel from mouth to Stillwater was completed August 12, 1938 when full pool at dam 3 of Mississippi River canalization project was reached. Minimum draft from Stillwater to Taylors Falls is about 1 foot at extreme low water, and from mouth to Stillwater, 9 feet. Maintenance of the 3 foot channel is limited to requests by the National Park Service which manages this reach under the Wild and Scenic Waterways classification. 5. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MN Lothcation. At southwestern extremity of Lake of the Woods, 36 miles west of mouth of Rainy River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14999.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep from landing at Warroad to deep water in lake, channel being 9,200 feet long, 200 feet wide within harbor, and 300 feet wide out in lake; for a turning a8in 500 by 900 feet to a denth of 8 feet; and for a pue-brush stone jetty on north side of channel etending from shore 700 feet into the lake. For additional details see page 1027 of Annual Report of 1965. Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements, and classified inactive was deauthorized on August 5, 1977 under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $355,200. (See table 27-B for authorization legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one publicly owned wharf. There are two commercial fish wharves, one of which is served by a spur track, and a number of minor wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $13,413. Environmental review cost $8,168 by hired labor. Other engineering and administrative costs were $8,922. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project is complete. Prospective jetty completed in 1910 and reconstructed as a rubble mound in 1929 is in good condition. Turning basin at Warroad wharves was completed in 1911, and a channel 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep in 1915. Controlling depth in river channel and lake approach channel was 6 feet below low-water datum for a minimum width of 100 feet. A walkway on the jetty is provided for public use. A revetment wall, constructed under Section 2 of Public Law 269, 69th Congress, in accordance with Article VIII of the Lake of the Woods Treaty, has deteriorated and will require future maintenance. Flood Control 6. BASSETT CREEK, MN Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The proposed project consists of nonstructural and structural flood control measures. Nonstructural measures include continuation of existing floodplain regulations, flood insurance and forecasting, and flood warning. Principal structural measures consist of six small control structures in the upper watershed to temporarily impound floodwaters and a new tunnel (part of which is being constructed on a cooperative basis with the Minnesota Department of Transportation) in a highly urbanized area of Minneapolis to replace the existing tunnel outletting Bassett Creek to the Mississippi River. Also included in the plan are a limited reach of channel widening, bridge removals, culvert replacements, a weir structure, a flood storage area, and a railroad bridge replacement. Estimated Federal cost (1984) for new work is $20,500,000 and $6,122,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. 27-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Local cooperation. See annual report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required after determination of cost sharing policies. By resolutions approved September 12, 1974, October 31, 1975, and December 11, 1981, the city of Minneapolis has indicated its willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. By letter dated October 29, 1982 the city of Minneapolis indicated its intent to participate in innovative project financing. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $41,949. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. 7. BIG STONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MN AND SD Location. On Minnesota River near Ortonville and Odessa, MN, and Big Stone City, SD, at the outlet of Big Stone Lake and in Big Stone and Lac qui Parle Counties, MN, and Grant County, SD. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and reservoir on Minnesota River above U.S. Highway 75, modification of Big Stone Lake outlet dam and silt barrier, bank stabilization along lower reach of Whetstone River, channel improvement on Minnesota River for 3 miles below outlet control dam at Big Stone Lake along with necessary relocations and acquisition of lands. These improvements would be made for wildlife conservation and development, flood control, and recreation. For additional details see Annual Report for 1970. Estimated Federal cost (1983) for new work is $12,300,000 and $153,000 to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 579, 87th Cong., 2d seas., contains latest map; and H. Doc. 193, 88th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. The project requires sponsorship from both the States of Minnesota and South Dakota. Formal resolution of assurances adopted by the Upper Minnesota River Watershed District on June 10, 1969 and accepted by the District Engineer on November 3, 1969. Formal resolution of assurances adopted by the East Dakota Conservancy Sub- District for South Dakota on October 23, 1969 was furnished on November 18, 1969 and accepted by the District Engineer on November 19, 1969. Supplemental assurances covering the requirements of Public Law 91-646 were provided by the Upper Minnesota Watershed District on August 13, 1974 and by the East Dakota Conservancy Sub-District on April 15, 1976. Rights-of way for construction on the Whetstone River and the entire cash contribution of $153,000 for the project were furnished by the local sponsors on December 21, 1981. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Minnesota River channel construction contract costs were $745,889. Engineering and design, supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $158,661. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained and inspec. tions and evaluations performed at a cost of $40,494 by hired labor and $10,074 by contract. Discharge observation gages and pool regulation cost $15,837. Coop stream gaging and pool regulation by other government agencies cost $35,240 and $12,000, respectively. Real estate management by the North Central Division cost $5,793. Periodic inspection cost $1,400 by other districts. Supervision and administration cost $26,409. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the new dam above Highway 75 and roads are completed. Surveys for land lines are complete, and the land acquisition program is complete. The first land payment was made on November 28, 1969 and 128 tracts have been purchased. A general plan between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior for administering the use of waters, land, or interests therein has been consummated, and a cooperative agreement between the Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was approved. On March 31, 1975 the Secretary of the Army trans. ferred lands in the project not required for Corps of Engineers operation and maintenance to the Department of the Interior. The transfer of property was accepted by the Department of the Interior on May 21, 1975. Construction on the Whetstone River portion of the upstream works is nearing completion. A construction contract for the Minnesota River work was awarded in May 1983 and work is in progress. 8. CHASKA, MN Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a levee and interior drainage works along the Minnesota River, flood diversion and bypass channels on Chaska Creek and East Creek, and appropri ate floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include: approximately 1.1 miles of upgraded levee, 0.6 mile of new levee, and one pumping station on the Minnesota River; 0.9 mile of diversion channel on Chaska Creek; and 0.5 mile of flood bypass channel, 0.3 mile of channel improvement, and a 1,500- foot conduit on East Creek. Approximately 1.6 miles of paved recreation trails on top of the levee and around Courthouse Lake are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost (1984) for new work is $20,100,000 and $43,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 644, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map) Local cooperation. See annual report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required after completion of the design memonI dum. By letter of August 19, 1982 the city of Chasks 27-4 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT indicated its willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. By letter of February 21, 1984, the city of Chaska indicated its intent to participate voluntarily in project financing as proposed in legislation being considered by Congress. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $364,914. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. 9. DEVILS LAKE, ND Location. In Ramsey County in north central North Dakota about 80 miles west of Grand Forks, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey Map of North Dakota.) Existing Project. Provides for a system of levees and interior flood control facilities at the head of Creel Bay. The main embankment across Creel Bay will be 1,810 feet long and vary from 0 to 27 feet high. The south Creel Bay tieback embankment will be 1,030 feet long and vary from 0 to 3 feet high. The north Creel Bay tieback embankment will be 2,400 feet long and would vary from 0 to 8.5 feet high. The south embankment will be 3,100 feet long and vary from 0 to 9.5 feet high. The interior flood control system will consist of large holding ponds immediately north and south of the city's sewage lagoons, a 16,000 gallon per minute pumping station and a system of ditches and culverts linking the ponds to the pumping station. Total Federal cost (1984) for the proposed project is estimated at $2,130,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction August 15, 1983, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the City of Devils Lake in August 1983. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Stage I and II construction contracts cost $95,525 and $193,800, respectively. Engineering and design cost $153,106 by hired labor, $91,943 by contract, and $2,000 by other Corps. North Central Division real estate management cost $5,378. Supervision and administration costs were $28,869. Condition at end of fiscal year: A first feature construction contract for the access road and lakeside cofferdam at the head of Creel Bay was completed. The plans and specifications were completed and Construction for the remaining features of the project was also initiated. 10. EAU GALLE RIVER, WI Location. At and in vicinity of Spring Valley, WI, on Eau Galle River 30 miles above its mouth at Chippewa River, and its tributary, Mines Creek, which flows through the village. Spring Valley is about 45 miles east of St. Paul, MN, and 36 miles west of Eau Claire, WI. (See Geological Survey map for Wisconsin for general location.) Existing project. Authorized plan of improvement as modified by further studies includes a retarding dam and reservoir on Eau Galle River immediately upstream from Spring Valley, and remedial works on Mines Creek including channel enlargement, a low levee, and a drop structure. Project provides for earth and rock-fill dam, an uncontrolled outlet and an uncontrolled spillway emerging above Mines Creek. See page 1030 of Annual Report for 1965 for further details. Proposed improvements on Burghardt Creek were eliminated. Improvements provide complete protection near Spring Valley for standard project flood, and below that point in decreasing value in proportion to distance from reservoir. Permanent conservation pool will serve a local need for a recreational area. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 52, 84th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 1083 of Annual Report for 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure and recreation facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections, investigations and evaluations were performed at a cost of $196,753 by hired labor and $1,138 by contract. Real estate management by the North Central Division cost $10,794 and dam failure planning by other Corps districts, $-798. Discharge observation and pool regulation cost $9,421. Cooperative stream gaging cost $6,900. Administrative and other miscellaneous engineering costs were $60,886. Condition at end of fiscal year: Mines Creek improvements were substantially completed in 1964; minor work was accomplished in 1966. A contract for dam, spillway, and discharge channel, started July 1, 1965, was completed in October 1968. Recreational facilities have been provided. Remedial work to repair eroded gutters and road ditches was completed in September 1973. Repair of failing discharge conduit by installing a steel liner was completed in April 1982. 11. ENDERLIN, MAPLE RIVER, ND Location. In Ransom County in southeastern North Dakota on the Maple River about 45 miles southwest of Fargo, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey Map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The proposed project at Enderlin provides for a system of levees along the right bank of the main stem and the left bank of the South Branch of the Maple River. The total levee system would be about 1.2 miles long and would have an average height of about 8 feet. Other features of the project include channel improvements on the 27-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 south branch, replacement of the Soo Line railroad bridge, and interior drainage facilities consisting of three ponding areas with gated outlet conduits. To prevent failure of the channel and levee by erosion, rip-rapping would be provided in selected reaches. Total Federal cost (1984) for the proposed project is estimated at $4,000,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction August 11, 1982 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See page 27-5 of Annual Report for 1982 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the City of Enderlin in July 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year: New work: A main stem Phase II levee contract cost $611,405. A Phase III Highway 46 frontage road levee contract cost $158,887. Engineering and design by contract and hired labor cost $5,255. North Central Division real estate costs were $4,391. Supervision and administration cost $81,651. Condition at end of fiscal year: Work on Phase II is nearing completion. A contract for Phase III involving floodbarrier facilities in the northern sector of the city was awarded in July 1984. Work on Phase III is in progress. A contract for Phase IV, the final phase, was awarded in September 1984. Phase IV includes all of the facilities on the south branch of the Maple River. 12. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River about 4 miles upstream from Park River, ND, and 62.1 miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, and North Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier County in northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an almost common confluence near Grafton, ND, forming main stream which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of the North about 35 miles south of the international boundary. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See page 1285 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.), and redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 80th Congress, 2d session. Latest published map is in project document. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions, were $62,800. In addition, local interests contributed $16,220 for construction of a water supply outlet through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $108,738. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project completed in June 1956 except for additional recreational facil. ities which have been done intermittently since that time. Construction began in April 1948 and major structures completed in May 1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the project. 13. IRVING TOWNSHIP, JACKSON COUNTY, WI Location. In Jackson County in west central Wisconsin on the Black River about 9 miles southwest of Black River Falls, Wisconsin. Existing Project. Provides for erosion control along a 1,100 foot reach on the right bank of the Black River. The site lies along Sunnyvale Road 0.3 mile south of its junction with State Highway 54. The protection consists of rock riprap placed on a 1 vertical on 2 horizontal slope with a 10-foot wide berm at the top of the riprap. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction August 11, 1981, under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the town of Irving in May 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design costs were $5,203 and supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $607. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. The project was completed during the summer of 1983 and was officially turned over to the local sponsor for operation and maintenance in October 1983. 14. LAC QUI PARLE LAKE, MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Marsh Lake and Lac qui Parle and the Minnesota River between head of Marsh Lake and Granil Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geologica Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1291 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and mai nt itedo and inspections and evaluation performed atacos" 1 $312,230. 27-6 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year: Project has been operated by the Government since transfer from State of Minnesota to the United States in September 1950. The United States owns fee title to 517.62 acres of land and easements on 19,859.47 acres of land. In 1957, 60.1 acres were withdrawn from public lands for use by the Department of the Army. Land acquisition is complete. Construction under present plan of improvement was started in September 1941 and completed in December 1951 except for recreational facilities. All structures are in good condition. 15. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WI Location. Rises in Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and Crawford Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and impoundment of the Kickapoo River about 1 mile upstream from village of La Farge, operated for flood control, fish and wildlife conservation, general recreation, and a reduction of aggradation downstream from the dam, and supplemental protection at Soldiers Grove and at Gays Mills by means of levees, supplementary channel improvement, and interior drainage facilities. See Annual Report for 1975 for details. Estimated Federal cost (1976) for new work is $55,400,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 557, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. None required for construction of La Farge Lake. See page 1087 of Annual Report for 1967 for requirements for local protection works. Local interests have not been requested to frnish assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design by hired labor cost $148,523 and by contract, $6,662. Buffalo District r1ePppeocrtti vaenlyd. NCD real estate cost $8,014 and $650, Administrative and miscellaneous costs were $11,765. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained at a cost of $25,439. Condition at end of fiscal year: General and Real Estate design memorandums and detailed plans for the La Farge Dam and spillway and for relocations have been completed. Land acquisition negotiations began in December 1968. The first land payment was made on January 15, 1969 and the land acquisition Pplram is 80 percent complete. Contracts for Ucavation of the left abutment, for test wells, and for e4truction of the outlet works and right abutment have been completed. A study of alternatives has Sconmpleted. Funds to complete the authorized e.ct have been withheld and all further construc- -' has been indefinitely suspended. Work has been accomplished to provide for completion of relocation work left partially completed when construction was suspended. Soldiers Grove has relocated out of the floodplain area after receiving funds from other agencies. A study of a modified dry dam is in progress and a report will be completed early FY 1985. 16. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 miles upstream from Valley City, ND, and about 271 miles above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, ND. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See page 1287 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. Doc. 193, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d session. Local cooperation. See page 1288 of Annual Report for 1962. Complied with except for construction of Fargo diversion dam and ditch for which assurances furnished by city of Fargo were approved by the Secretary of War on June 26, 1947. Necessity for this feature will be reviewed. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Administrative and engineering costs were $180. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections, investigations, monitoring and evaluations were performed at a cost of $300,865 by hired labor and $101,343 by contract. Dam instrumentation, stability and safety assurance cost $235,443. Real Estate Management by the North Central Division cost $25,996. Dam failure, planning and periodic inspection by other Corps districts cost $915. Missouri River Division soils testing cost $57,094. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service coordination and cooperative stream gaging with U.S. Geological Survey cost $13,236 and $73,440, respectively. Administrative and other miscellaneous costs were $87,112. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project completed in March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities which is being accomplished intermittently. United States owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in good condition. 17. LAKE DARLING, SOURIS RIVER, ND Location. On the Souris River in Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties in northwestern North Dakota. The existing Lake Darling Dam, which is to be raised, is located about 20 miles north- 27-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 west of Minot, North Dakota. The project also includes features at the communities of Sawyer and Velva and at various locations along the 358-mile U.S. portion of the Souris River. (For general location see Geological Survey Map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The Lake Darling project provides for raising Lake Darling design pool by approximately 4 feet. The project also provides for other work on the Souris River such as levee improvements at Velva, Sawyer, and six subdivision areas between Burlington and Minot, floodproofing of rural residences, modification of refuge structures in the Upper Souris and J. Clark Salyer Refuges, and bridge relocations in the reservoir. The work is a portion of the Burlington Dam project which required postauthorization approval prior to construction. However, Congress has directed the Corps not to take further actions to construct the Burlington Dam until expressly directed to do so. Estimated Federal Cost (1984) for new work is $65,300,000. Project was authorized by 1982 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public Law 97-88 approved December 4, 1981. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. Representatives of the water resource districts from Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties and the Oak Creek drainage area agreed to become members of a Souris River Joint Board for flood control, which would serve as local sponsor for the project. A local cooperation agreement for construction at Velva is scheduled to be completed in November 1984 and another local cooperation agreement will be prepared for the remainder of the Lake Darling project after a decision has been made on cost sharing for the entire project. A letter of commitment to be a party to the Velva local cooperation agreement was signed by all four counties on September 20, 1984. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $1,113,594. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. 18. LAKE TRAVERSE AND BOIS DE SIOUX RIVER, SD AND MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River between upper end of Lake Traverse at Browns Valley, MN, and the mouth of Bois de Sioux River at Breckenridge, MN. Lake drains through river to Red River of the North, and the two waters form a portion of boundary between State of Minnesota and States of North and South Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1289 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project was authorized by Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year: Maintenance: Project and related facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections and evalu. ations performed at a cost of $210,966. Condition at end of fiscal year: Existing project was completed in June 1948, except for minor recrea. tion facilities. Fee title to 1,144.13 acres and ease. ments on 6,172.25 acres of land have been acquired, White Rock Dam and Reservation control structures are in operation, and structures and appurtenances are in good condition. Remedial work for repair of apron at White Rock Dam was completed in November 1968. Roadways across structures are open to public travel. 19. MANKATO AND NORTH MANKATO, MN Location. Along Minnesota River between miles 103.5 and 109.5 near Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier, in south-central Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. As modified as a result of severe 1965 flood, provides for protection of communities of Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier by means of levees and floodwalls with pumping plants and interior drainage facilities. See page 1090 of Annual Report for 1967 for further details. Additional channel improvement, levees, pumping, and interior drainage features have been included in the Mankato unit of the project for protection from the high flows of Indian Creek. Expansion of Indian Creek improvements were made during detailed studies as a result of updated hydrologic data. Highway bridge relocations made necessary by the project have been authorized at Federal expense. Estimated Federal cost (1984) for new work is $96,000,000. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 437, 84th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Project was modified by 1965 Flood Control Act, and by the Water Resources Development Acts of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work under contract. See Annual Report for 1973 for requirements. Resolutions agreeing to provide formal assurances of local cooperation, when requested, were passed by the city council of North Mankato, Mankato, and South Bend Township (Le Hillier), respectively, on November 12, 1968. Operations and results during fiscal year: New work: Construction of the T.H. 60/Main Street bridge relocation was initiated. Construction costs for improvements at Mankato were $4,079,075, at North Mankato were $2,264,960 and at Le Hillier were $225. Engineering and design by contract cost $609,321 and by hired labor cost $546,004. Supervl' sion and administration cost $238,287 by hired labor, $91,485 by contract, and $6,211 by other Corpse Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the downstream reach of floor barrier in Mankato is 27-8 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT underway. Construction of the bridge replacing the Main Street bridge is underway. Detailed design for the T.H. 169 Highway Bridge and C & NW Railroad Bridge relocations is underway. Remaining work consists of relocating the T.H. 169 bridge and the C & NW RR bridge over the Blue Earth River and levee parallelling the C & NW RR in LeHillier. 20. PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WI Location. In Crawford County in southwestern Wisconsin on the left bank of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Combines total evacuation with flood proofing and land use control measures to provide the desired reduction of potential flood damages within design limits. Evacuation was accomplished by purchase and relocation of structures in the lowest portions of the floodplain. Estimated cost to the United States for new work is $3,700,000. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local assurance agreement in accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 was entered into with the city of Prairie du Chien on May 2, 1978 and signed by the Chief of Engineers on September 11, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Costs for property acquisition and relocation activities were $-237,238. A contract for site restoration cost $-20,350. Engineering and design cost $33,651 by hired labor, and supervision and administration cost $5,124. Contributions in lieu of cash were $46,923. Condition at end of fiscal year: Property acquisitions and relocations are in progress with the overall project nearing completion. 21. RED LAKE RIVER AT HUOT, MN Location. In Red Lake County in northwestern Minnesota on the Red Lake River about 30 miles east of East Grand Forks, Minnesota (for general location, see Geological Survey Map of Minnesota). Exiating Project. The project at Huot involves the Placement of rock revetment along approximately 400 feet of the eroding Red Lake River channel bank to protect adjacent County-State-Aid Highway (CSAH) 17. The total Federal cost of the project amounted to $64o. The project was approved by the Chief of agier mfor construction April 12, 1983 under the ority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood urOl Act, as amended. I 4jal Cooperation. Fully complied with. See eal Report for 1983 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the Red Lake County Board of Commissioners in May 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for bank protection cost $40,554. Real estate management cost $500. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $4,662 and $7,158, respectively. Condition at the end of the fiscal year: A construction contract was awarded in August 1983 and construction was completed in October 1983. 22. RED LAKE RIVER AT RED LAKE FALLS, MN Location. In Red Lake County in northwestern Minnesota on the Red Lake River. (For general location, see Geological Survey Map of Minnesota.) Existing Project. The project at Red Lake Falls involves the protection of the County-State-Aid Highway (CSAH) 13 bridge where erosion along the right bank of the Red Lake River threatens the abutment and approach to the bridge. Protective measures include the placement of rock revetment along the right bank of the river within a 630 foot reach. Total Federal cost of the project amounted to $131,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction June 6, 1983 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act as amended. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the Red Lake County Board of Commissioners in June 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A bank protection construction contract cost $94,587. Real estate management cost $500. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $18,331. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract was awarded in September 1983 and construction was completed November 1983. 23. RED LAKE RIVER, MN, INCLUDING CLEARWATER RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along upper reach of Red Lake River and also along Clearwater River, a tributary of Red Lake River, between a point near Plummer, MN, and a point just above the mouth of Ruffy Brook. Red Lake River, principal tributary of Red River of the North, has its source at the outlet of Lower Red Lake in northwestern portion of Minnesota and flows westerly about 196 miles to its junction with Red River of the North at East Grand Forks, MN. Clearwater River has a general westerly course from its source near Ebro, MN, about 205 miles to its junction with Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) 27-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 345, 78th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structures were operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $52,072. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of major improvements on Red Lake River initiated in February and the Clearwater River initiated in October 1948 were completed in June 1956. Replacement of a rock and brush dam on Red Lake River at Indian boundary with a concrete structure and appurtenant work was completed in June 1959 to restore marshes in the area to better wildlife conditions. Construction of a bridge on Clearwater Road was completed by the Indian Service in July 1965. A contract for improvements on Red Lake River was completed in November 1966, and a contract for restoration of water levels in Red Lake River marshes was completed in July 1967. Increased slope protection downstream of the control structure was completed in November 1968. Operation of Red Lake Dam was assumed by the Corps on April 1, 1951. Channels are in good condition and indicate effectiveness of project as a flood control measure. 24. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN, MN, SD & ND Location. Red River of the North basin, within the United States, includes northeastern corner of South Dakota and much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. Red River of the North, formed by confluence of Otter Tail and Bois de Sioux Rivers, flows northward through this region, forming boundary between North Dakota and Minnesota. (For general location of basin, see Geological Survey maps of Minnesota and South Dakota.) Previous project. See page 1278 of Annual Report for 1962 for navigation and flood control projects in the basin, not part of this project. Existing project. Project includes improvements for local protection in interests of flood control and major drainage accomplished by channel improvement, levees, etc., in addition to construction of a multiple purpose reservoir on Otter Tail River to control floods and, in conjunction with previously authorized Federal reservoir project at Baldhill site of Sheyenne River and at Red Lake, to increase low flows for water supply and pollution abatement. (See table 27-J for active units in comprehensive basin plan.) Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Public Works Authorization Act, 1957, authorized Chief of Engineers to acquire such lands as were beyond legal authority of city of Grand Forks to acquire. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 provided for extension of the expiration date for the East Grand Forks project. Authorization of the Sheyenne River (Kindred Lake) project by the 1970 Flood Control Act provided for the deletion of channel improvement on the lower 48.8 miles of the Sheyenne River authorized under the Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Latest published map is in House Document 185, 81st Congress, 1st session. Local cooperation. See page 1039 of Annual Report for 1965. Following the flood of 1965, the city of East Grand Forks requested reactivation of the project and furnished a resolution adopted May 11, 1965, indicating its willingness to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Expiration date for the East Grand Forks project was extended to April 17, 1975 permitting local interests additional time to furnish assurances of local cooperation. A local assurance agreement was passed by the city on March 27, 1975 and accepted by the acting Director of Real Estate, OCE for the Secretary of the Army on April 9, 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued for the East Grand Forks project at a cost of $250,178. Maintenance: Orwell Lake and Dam were operated as required and miscellaneous inspections, reports, and repairs were made at a cost of $111,921 by hired labor, and $12,250 by contract. Dam failure planning and periodic inspection by other Corps districts cost $2,087. Real estate management by the North Central Division cost $8,769. Discharge observation and gages and pool regulation cost $18,859. Cooperative stream gaging with the U.S. Geological Survey cost $12,740. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $17,196. Condition at end of fiscal year: Major construction for all active units except for East Grand Forks, MN, is complete. Preconstruction planning is underway at East Grand Forks. A total of 1,985 acres of land for Orwell Lake and Dam is owned in fee by the United States. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962 for periods of completion at active units of project other than Fargo. Work at Fargo, ND, started in May 1959, was completed in July 1963. (See table 27-J at end of chapter for total costs of new work to date.) Costs to date for operation and maintenance of Orwell Lake and Dam are $2,494,833. Total costs for active portion of project are $9,762,054. In addition, $350,034 was expended from contributed funds for work done for local interests. 25. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT HALSTAD, MN Location. In Norman County in western Minne sota on the Red River of the North about 36 mniles north of Moorhead, Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey Map of Minnesota.) Existing Project. Provides for a system of levees and interior flood control facilities along the right 27-10 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT bank of the Red River of the North. The total levee system is about 2.4 miles long and varies from 0 to over 20 feet high. Most of the levee is 5 to 12 feet high. The levee rings the city except for about 0.6 mile of high ground. Other features include 4 ponding areas and a system of gatewells, pipes and ditches to provide interior flood control. Total Federal cost (1984) for the proposed project is estimated at $2,302,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction April 5, 1983, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the city of Halstad in April 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contracts cost $742,856. Engineering and design cost $101,206 by hired labor and $3,665 by contract. NCD real estate management cost $3,155. Supervision and administration costs were $39,596. Condition at end of fiscal year. A first feature construction contract involving a storm water outlet and sanitary sewer modifications was completed. The plans and specifications for the balance of the project was completed and construction of the remaining features of the project was initiated. 26. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT OSLO, MN Location. In Marshall County in northwestern Minnesota on the Red River of the North about 20 miles north of Grand Forks, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for a levee encircling the city of Oslo and an agricultural tract north of the city. Wherever possible, the levee has been constructed contiguously with an existing emergency levee, and is about 10 feet high and 3.2 miles long with a top width of from 10 to 12 feet. The project also provides interior drainage facilities, including a Pumping station, two ponding areas, interceptor and Outfall sewers, and drainage ditches; street ramps; highway and temporary sandbag closures; and landacape measures. Total Federal costs for new work amounted to $1,960,200. Project was approved by the C ief of Engineers for construction on August 2, 1972 under the authority contained in section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. fLocal cooperation. See Annual Report for 1973 r requirements. A local assurance agreement equired by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the illage of Oslo on October 15, 1972. Uperations and results during fiscal year. ew work: A bank stabilization contract cost "39E0n gineering and design, supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $18,072. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract was awarded in June 1974. Project is complete and was transferred to Oslo in March 1984. 27. REDWOOD RIVER AT MARSHALL, MN Location. In Lyon County in southwestern Minnesota along the Redwood River about 68 miles above its confluence with the Minnesota River at the city of Marshall, Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Minnesota.) Existing Project. See page 1059 of Annual Report for 1964 for completed channel improvement project authorized by 1960 Flood Control Act. Federal costs amounted to $1,802,866. The plan contained in June 1979 feasibility report provides for improvements upstream and downstream of the existing channel project at Marshall which is affected by limited channel capacity in both reaches. The upstream measures would include 1.9 miles of levee, 0.7 mile of channel improvement, an overflow structure, and 71 acres of floodway acquisition. The downstream improvements would consist of 1.5 miles of levee, 0.3 mile of channel improvement, and interior drainage facilities. Recreation facilities would include multi-use trails and limited picnic facilities. The project would provide protection against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 133 years. Estimated Federal cost (1984) for new work is $3,830,000 and $350,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. See page 1150 of Annual Report for 1963 for requirements. Project was transferred to local interests on December 23, 1963. For new work, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including relocations, and to operate and maintain the project. In addition, local interests are to provide the necessary lands for recreation development, subject to the condition that, where the appraised value of those lands is less than 50 percent of the total first cost of recreation development, a cash contribution will be made to bring the non-Federal share to at least 50 percent of the total first cost of recreation development. By resolution approved April 2, 1979, the city of Marshall agreed to assume non-Federal responsibilities for the proposed project. By letter dated July 8, 1982, the city of Marshall indicated its willingness to financially participate in construction of a project consistent with the current administration's proposed upfront financial and cost sharing policies. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was initiated at a cost of $149,998. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of completed work was initiated in August 1962 and 27-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 completed in December 1963. Preconstruction planning for the new work is in progress.The project is not yet authorized for construction. 28. ROCHESTER, MN Location. In Olmstead County in southeastern Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for stream channel modifications and levees functioning in combination with a system of seven headwaters reservoirs. Principal features, in addition to the reservoirs, include 0.5 mile of grass sloped channels, 6.1 miles of riprapped or gabion-lined channels, 0.9 mile of architecturally- treated concrete channels, 0.5 mile of dredged channel, six drop structures, 2.4 miles of levee, and hiking and biking trails. Estimated cost (1984) to the United States for new work is $51,400,000. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. By resolution approved on September 29, 1981 the city of Rochester, the local sponsor, indicated its willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation for flood control and recreation. Formal assurances will be requested prior to initiation of construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $149,589. Condition at end of fiscal year: Phase I design memorandum stage of preconstruction planning was completed and forwarded to Congress on April 27, 1979 which was the basis for authority to proceed with the Phase II design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design. Phase II studies and plans and specifications for the first stage of project construction (stage 1A) have been completed. 29. ROSEAU RIVER, MN Location. In Roseau County and northeastern Kittson County, in northwestern Minnesota, and in south-central Manitoba, Canada. (For general location of the works in United States see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Roseau River for flood control consisting of 44.4 miles of channel improvement, two sections of earth levees with lengths of 1.9 and 5.9 miles, respectively, 76 side ditch inlet transitions; remedial works along 16.6 miles of channel in Canada or an acceptable alternative therefor; one new bridge; and alteration of the existing dam in Roseau Village. Remedial works will be constructed in Canada at the expense of the United States. Estimated cost (1984) to the United States for new work is $29,200,000 including $6,494,000 for cost of work in Canada to be accomplished with United States funds. Project was author. ized by Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 282, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. Local interests have formed a Roseau River Watershed District to provide local co. operation requirements and acquire rights-of-way. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning activities were continued relative to coordination of the project plan with Canadian interests. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $53,911. Condition at end of fiscal year: Planning is in progress and coordination with Canadian interests is underway. The general design memorandum was submitted in October 1971 and approved in March 1972. Design memorandum supplements which contain dimensions of environmental features added to the project were submitted in October 1975 and June 1980 and approved in November 1975 and July 1980, respectively. An EIS supplement was filed with the EPA in October 1981. 30. SHEPARD ROAD, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, ST. PAUL, MN Location. In Ramsey County along the Mississippi River in downtown St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing Project. The proposed project to protect the streambank from erosion which threatens Shepard Road is authorized under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. A reconnaissance report dated March 1983 recommended breaking existing grouted slope protection, placing approximately 6,700 cubic yards of rock fill and modifying existing storm sewer outfalls along the left bank of the Mississippi River from Wabasha Street to 300 feet above Robert Street, a distance of about 900 linear feet. The project was modified during the summer of 1984 to include 300 additional feet of bank protection upstream from Wabasha Street. Total Federal cost for the project is estimated at $250,000 (1984) which is the maximum permissible under Section 14. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction on June 6, 1983, The city of St. Paul has contributed $85,000 to the project. Final adjustment of the city's share will be made upon completion of the project. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement required by public Law 91-611 was adopted by the city of St. Paul in July 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year: New work: Engineering and design and study coss were $170,173. Condition at end of fiscal year: The construction contract for the erosion protection work w awarded in September 1983. Work on the sectio between Robert and Wabasha Streets was substan tially completed during FY 1984. 27-12 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT 31. SHEYENNE RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, ND (Formerly Kindred Lake) Location. The Sheyenne River basin is included in 16 counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area of flood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within Cass County and the city of West Fargo. The authorized Kindred Lake project is in Richland County, ND, on the Sheyenne River, about 70 miles above its mouth and 5 miles above Kindred, ND. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a multiple-purpose impoundment for flood control, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes to control the runoff from 3,014 square miles. The improvements would be coupled with a revised operating plan for the existing Baldhill Dam and with appropriate flood plain management measures at communities along the river. See Annual Report for 1973 for details. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 330, 91st Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Due to local concerns, a changed set of planning criteria, and potential changed conditions, a complete reformulation and reevaluation of alternatives was undertaken during preconstruction planning. The reevaluation studies showed that another alternative plan is more favorable than the authorized project. The General Reevaluation Report, completed in 1982, recommends implementation of a plan other than the authorized plan. The plan recommended in the General Reevaluation Report includes levees and diversions at West Fargo/Riverside, a flood diversion channel from Horace to West Fargo, and a five foot raise of the flood control pool at Baldhill Dam. Other actions are also identified that could be taken by non- Federal interests to enhance the degree of flood damage reduction provided by the overall plan. This new plan represents a significant change from the authorized project and recommends deauthorization of the Kindred Lake project and reauthorization of the new plan. The estimated Federal cost (1984) of the pi8la n, based on traditional cost-sharing requirements, $26,2o0,000. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of the project as authorized. On July 7, 1982 and May 20, 1983, the North Dakota State Water Commission furnished a letter of support for the recommended plan for flood control in the lower Sheyenne River basin and also expressed its lingness to act as a non-Federal sponsor. On AUgust 2, 1982 and July 30, 1982, respectively, the eity of West Fargo and the Southeast Cass Water Rurce District furnished letters of support and dicated their willingness to cooperate with the 0rth Dakota State Water Commission. The Southas Cass Water Resource District reiterated its "PPOrt of the project by letter dated March 30, 1984. FOnal assurances of local cooperation will be requested after completion of the General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $152,862. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. The General Reevaluation Report was forwarded to the Secretary of the Army (CW) on August 25, 1984 and should be ready for recommendation to Congress for authorization FY 1985. 32. STATE ROAD AND EBNER COULEES, WI Location. In La Crosse County in west-central Wisconsin, on the south side of the city of La Crosse. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. The plan of improvements for flood control consists of channel deepening and enlarging Pammel Creek which drains State Road Coulee and includes 12,300 feet of concrete-lined, trapezoidal-shaped channel, 700 feet of riprap channel, a stilling basin, three new street bridges, and a new railroad bridge. The city recently replaced a fourth bridge, previously included in the authorized plan. Estimated cost (1984) to the United States for new work, exclusive of the Ebner Coulee portion of the project which was deleted due to lack of economic feasibility, is $25,300,000. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 360, 90th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. See page 826 of Annual Report for 1969. The local sponsor withdrew support for the project in 1976 citing increased non-Federal costs and lack of agreement on local cost sharing between three local units of government located within the project area. The project was reclassified as inactive on April 7, 1977 but was reactivated on November 8, 1978 after the La Crosse County Board of Supervisors, the La Crosse City Council, and the Town of Shelby passed separate resolutions on September 17, 1978, July 13, 1978, and July 10, 1978, respectively, which requested continuance of the project. All three groups reaffirmed their support by letter in July 1981. On October 4, 1982 the city of LaCrosse furnished a letter in further support for the project and acknowledged that it would serve as the local sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $344,756. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. Ebner Coulee has been recommended for reclassification to "inactive" due to lack of economic feasibility. 33. TWIN VALLEY LAKE, WILD RICE RIVER, MN Location. In Norman County in west-central 27-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Minnesota, northeast of the city of Moorhead, on the Wild Rice River about 2 miles east of Twin Valley, MN. The Wild Rice River is a tributary of the Red River of the North. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project authorization provides for reservoir development on the Wild Rice River near Twin Valley, Minnesota, for flood damage reduction, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. The principal features include an 84 foot high, 7,700 foot long, earthen dam, a gated concrete spillway with concrete chute and stilling basin, a 10 foot diameter gated circular conduit for low flow outlet works, and recreation development on the created 540 acre reservoir. Storage capacity would provide 7,500 acre-feet for recreation and sedimentation and 44,700 acre-feet for flood control. The proposed works include development of three recreation areas along the margin of the lake for public use. The Federal Government would acquire about 3,500 acres of land necessary for carrying out the purposes of the project. Approximately 2,200 additional acres will be acquired to offset fish and wildlife habitat losses associated with project construction. Estimated Federal cost (1984) for new work is $29,700,000. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 366, 90th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1971 for requirements. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. The Norman County Board of Commissioners, by resolutions dated November 7, 1974, September 19, 1978, and August 26, 1981, has declared its intention to provide local cooperation for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. By letter dated August 17, 1982, the Wild Rice Watershed Board expressed their intent to provide local cooperation requirements and participate in innovative financing for flood control. The Norman County Board of Commissioners has also indicated the capability to provide assurances of local cooperation relating to flood control improvements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $2,646. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. Project requires further authorization for mitigation lands. 34. VETERAN'S MEMORIAL LEVEE, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, HASTINGS, MN Location. In Dakota County on the Mississippi River approximately 20 miles southeast of St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing Project. A section of bank along the Mississippi River between Highway 61 and Milwaukee Railroad bridges in Hastings is being threatened by erosion. Located within this 1,300 foot reach is a park (Veteran's Memorial Levee) which is historically significant because of the role the area played during the riverboat era. Part of the park is occupied by a road which is an alternate route for emergency vehicles. The proposed project consists of placement of a 15 inch thick layer of riprap over 9 inches of bedding for a distance of 1030 feet. Total Federal cost (1984) for the proposed projectis estimated at $182,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction June 29,1983 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the city of Hastings in August 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year: New work: Contract costs for construction of bank protection measures cost $104,632. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $42,567. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract was awarded in September 1983. Project is substantially complete. After preparation of an operation and maintenance manual, responsibility will be transferred to the city of Hastings, the local sponsor. 35. WILD RICE RIVER-SOUTH BRANCH AND FELTON DITCH, MN Location. In Clay and Norman Counties in westcentral Minnesota northeast of the city of Moorhead, MN. The South Branch of the Wild Rice River and Felton Ditch drain areas of 253 and 122 square miles and enter the Wild Rice River at points 29.5 and 20.5 miles, respectively, above its confluence with the Red River of the North. (For general locations, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for increasing the capacities of the South Branch and Felton Ditch channels by widening the existing channels through the floodplain. Debris removal would be accomplished in the lower reaches of both streams. In addition, short reaches of low dikes would be constructed on both banks of Felton Ditch near the upper limit of improvement. The plan also includes bridge and culvert structure alterations, new bridges, multiplate pipe arches, side ditch inlet and lateral ditch entry modifications, and a drop inlet structure. The project would provide flood protection in both watersheds for a 6-percent chance flood and outlets necessary for removal of crop-damaging surface waters from lateral and on-farm drainage systems. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood ControlAct(. Doc. 98, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See page 826 of Annual Report for 1969 for requirements. A local assurance agreement in accordance with Section 221 of the 27-14 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT Flood Control Act of 1970 was executed by the Wild Rice Watershed District on October 18, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for channel modification cost $16,595. Engineering and design cost $8,482 and supervision and administration cost $3,429. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the project is substantially complete. 36, WINONA, MN Location. At Winona County in southeastern Minnesota on the right bank of the Mississippi River about 725 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 833 of Annual Report for 1968 for completed upstream improvements authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958 providing for a continuous flood barrier about 6.1 miles long with related pumping and interior drainage facilities. Federal costs amounted to $2,147,131 of which $111,500 was expended for the portion then deferred for restudy and $17,316 was contributed by local interests. Improvement authorized in 1971 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 152, 92d Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map) provides for levee and floodwall protection with necessary interior drainage works for the riverfront and the Lake Winona closure reaches, as well as a sound floodplain management program to prevent unwise development of the area bordered by U.S. Highway 61 and Burns Valley and Pleasant Valley Creeks. The plan would also provide the downstream flood barrier needed to prevent Mississippi River ibnaucknudpa tifnlgo ws from entering Lake Winona and the area now only partially protected by the completed segment of the project authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act. The selected plan would also provide control of Burns Valley Creek by means of channel improvement, raising and extending the e iSting levee system, a drop structure, an erosion control structure, alteration of two highway bridges, and a sewer line modification. Earth levees averagg 10 feet in height total approximately 3.1 miles in lenath. Concrete floodwalls, also averaging about 10 et in height, total about 2,025 feet in length. Estilated Federal cost (1984) for new work is $30,000,000 Sd$570,000 is to be contributed by local interests. letions authorizing the project were adopted by the Public Works Committees of the House on y 29, 1971, and the Senate on November 18, 1971. pl al cooperation. Fully complied with for comfod work. See page 833 of Annual Report for 1968 requirements. R1eorr ti mprovements authorized in 1971 see Annual for 1972 for requirements. A local cooperation a neenent required under Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act was executed by the city of Winona on October 6, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contracts for Reaches B, C, D and E cost $625,387, $604, $105,612, and $18,285, respectively. A dredge fill contract cost $972,947. Engineering and design cost $47,297 by contract and $412,467 by hired labor. OCE support and real estate management by NCD cost $2,312. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $169,469. Condition at end of fiscal year: The upstream improvement except for a portion of the project raising and extending the existing levee downstream from the Lake Winona outlet was completed in August 1967. At the request of local interests, the uncompleted portion of the project authorized in 1958 was not constructed in order that the scope of the project could be reconsidered to allow for the protection of additional lands needed by the city for industrial expansion. This work was deferred for restudy and now has been deauthorized by approval and authorization in 1971 of additional protection for Winona. Preconstruction planning for the improvement authorized in 1971 is complete. Construction on Reaches A, B-1, B-2, C, D, E-1 and E-2 is completed. Construction on Reaches, B-3 and E-3 is in progress. 37. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood control projects turned over to local interests were inspected to determine that project channels are kept clean and unobstructed, dikes and revetments are in good condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted. (See table 27-K on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Cost for the period was $77,224. Total cost to September 30, 1984 is $714,511. Miscellaneous 38. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY In the Aquatic Plant Control program (Section 302, Public Law 298, 89th Congress) a contract with the Waterways Experiment Station to evaluate mechanical methods of plant control operations in Buffalo Lake, WI cost $5,708, coordination with the state of Wisconsin and aerial photography cost $1,021 and administrative costs were $56. In the Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration program (Section 54, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress) costs amounted to $78. 27-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 General Investigations 39. SURVEYS Navigation studies continued at a cost of $84. Flood control studies continued at a cost of $2,544,651. Coordination studies with other agencies, miscellaneous activities, and Phase I preauthorization studies at Pembina River, ND and Grafton, ND were conducted at a cost of $215,051. Review for deauthorization, Warroad River at Bulldog Creek, cost $13,495. Total cost of surveys for the period was $2,773,280. 40. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs during the period were $35,222 for International Water Studies and $145,292 for Flood Plain Management Services. Costs were $49,927 for stream flow data obtained by Corps gaging beyond cooperative stream-gaging program, and for hydraulic lab. oratory work in measurement and analysis of sedi. ment load in streams. Costs were $34 for inventory of dams in conjunction with the national program of inspection of non-Federal dams. Total cost for collection and study of basic data was $230,476. 41. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Cost during the period was $149,998 for Redwood River at Marshall, MN. For detail of the individual project see section 27 in text. 42. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs during the period were $1,304,246 for advance engineering and design projects. For details of individual projects see sections 6, 8, 24, 28, 31, and 32 in text. 27-16 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Secton September 30 In Text Project Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 1984 1. Minnesota River, MN 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN 4. St. Croix River MN and WI 5. Warroad Harbor and River, MN 6. Bassett Creek, MN 7. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD 8. Chaska, MN 9. Devils Lake, ND 10. Eau Galle River, WI 11. Enderlin, Maple River, ND 12. Homme Lake and Dam, ND New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost - $2,057,7221 - 2,057,7221 143,000 142,178 -14,200 7,649 434,000 420,000 37,251 419,039 44,000 439,098 4,000 4,218 2,267,186 2,263,696 4,398,6282 4,398,6282 1,203,000 1,172,600 1,600,588 1,361,800 19,773,6463 1,185,300 1,131,104 1,544,335 1,485,496 19,724,7203 - - - 425,000 - - - 425,000 - - - 150,410 - -.- 150,410 1,000 7,938 15,000 17,249 106,000 9,025 221,020 48,225 -97,000 -7,956 44,000 199,906 250,000 425,000 435,000 300,621 415,765 416,333 7,385 17,0004 30,5034 25,000 41,949 947,255 946,709 86,105 86,105 1,062,400 1,058,108 1,700,000 1,682,915 125,000 490,000 575,000 1,450,000 11,840,000 108,599 365,467 473,040 904,550 11,048,4215 100,500 803,000 208,000 128,000 97,295 189,512 800,572 147,247 240,000 200,000 225,000 373,000 248.430 183.115 242,018 364,914 100,000 102,911 60,000 275,000 1,767,000 54,547 159,656 570,621 773,800 219,000 263,000 545,148 468,855 261,079 331,000 285,094 40,000 160,000 910,000 2,600,000 68,804 33,900 386,927 861,589 268,000 113,000 267,360 133,026 97,000 102,000 57,991 108,738 1,702,200 1,696,825 1,482,000 1,472,134 2,257,000 920,956 9,039,250 9,039,250 3,780,105 3,707,805 4,072,000 1,682,200 1,396,0976 1,396,0976 2,052,421 2,018,236 27-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 1984 13. Irving Township, Jackson County, WI 14. Lac qui Parle Lakes, MN 15. La Farge Lake and Channel Imp., WI 16. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND 17. Lake Darling, Souris River, ND 18. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN 19. Mankato and North Mankato, MN 20. Prairie du Chien, WI 21. Red Lake River at Huot, MN 22. Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN 23. Red Lake River, MN, including Clearwater River, MN 24. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD and ND 25. Red River of the North at Halstad, MN New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 8,993 70,000 110,600 10,708 164,089 5,810 203,000 203,000 184,000 263,000 187,895 176,117 168,297 312,230 120,000 339,802 200 200 - 550,000 12,810 336,849 18,000 15,864 18,000 1,551 22,000 17,656 16,268 189,600 189,600 964,873 964,873 3,471,163 3,460,302 - 18,642,000 175,614 18,603,628 21,000 25,439 180 61,000 58,959 3,325,638" 3,325,638 369,000 514,840 845,000 881,200 10,733,152 1,011,810 933,197 788,978 898,714 10,615,683 - 800,000 1,150,000 1,100,000 - 660,376 1,176,694 1,113,594 174,000 196,171 180,000 190,000 179,000 143,241 186,053 210,966 3,050,000 2,950,664 1,339,727 1,339,727 2,644,619 2,630,765 4,150,000 6,016,000 5,950,000 7,645,000 56,794,500 4,293,918 6,316,353 5,169,491 7,835,568 56,037,739 1,000,000 1,050,000 992,811 888,843 161,000 -140,000 29,549 -171,891 - 64,500 - 11,626 - 131,000 - 17,582 52,874 113,418 3,880,000 3,527,724 64,500 64,500 131,000 131,000 3,120,079" 3,120,079' 48,100 48,009 50,000 41,747 54,000 34,383 26,000 52,072 161,000 124,000 175,000 255,000 196,973 121,593 174,255 250,178 172,000 139,000 152,000 200,000 164,830 159,738 152,388 183,822 60,000 75,000 296,000 1,273,000 109,998 67,370 156,373 890,478 717,802 715,913 7,353,984 7,345,351 2,518,534 2,494,833 1,789,000 1.258,046 27-18 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 1984 26. Red River of the North at Oslo, MN 27. Redwood River at Marshall, MN 28. Rochester, MN 29. Roseau River, MN 30. Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN 31. Sheyenne River, ND (formerly Kindred Lake) 32. State Road & Ebner Coulees, WI 33. Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, MN '4. Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN 35. Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN 36. Winona, MN New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 17,517 450,000 -25,000 35,321 366,059 24,462 - 150,000 - 149,998 330,000 535,000 316,000 487,806 515,705 259,351 100,000 500,000 82,644 354,867 100,000 149,589 - 250,000 114,116 53,911 - 250,000 - 33,132 250,000 178,000 271,488 142,475 170,173 - 165,000 34,565 152,862 254,000 195,000 202,000 350,000 220,423 238,956 178,742 344,756 8,721 887 S- 182,000 - - 27,548 1,815,000 1,859,000 225,000 1,331,793 1,826,389 706,144 30,000 2,646 147,199 28,506 1,960,200 1,960,200 1,952,86610 1,952,86410 2,480,000 2,450,897 2,128,000 1,881,319 250,00011 203,305"' 2,440,000 2,426,442 1,457,000 1,428,447 1,941,700 1,913,380 182,000 174,747 4,534,700 4,526,885 4,345,000 7,844,000 6,850,000 2,210,000 29,804,131 4,368,053 7,858,873 6,470,128 2,354,380 29,540,18312 'Includes $117,542 for new work for previous project. Excludes $359,202 contributed funds. 2Includes $681,805 for new work for previous projects. 'Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. 4Includes $17,000 appropriated and $16,451 FY expended in 1984 for condition surveys. 'Excludes $152,223 contributed funds. In addition, $18,879 in other contributed funds have been expended for Work under Government contract paid for by the Ottertail Power Company. "Excludes $56,220 contributed funds. 'Excludes $208,000 contributed funds. MExcludes $30,020 contributed funds. "Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit, $11,239, which is classed as "inactive" and'the units on which authorization has expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorhead, $27,700; Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 'OIncludes $1,802,866 for new work for previous project. "'Excludes $4,834 contributed funds. "Excludes $497,547 contributed funds. In addition, $69,540 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 27-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sec. Date of in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MINNESOTA RIVER, MN 1. July 13, 1892 July 3, 1958 3. Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 June 26, 19342 4. June 18, 1878 June 3, 1896 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 5. Mar. 3, 1899 June 6, 1900 June 13, 19023 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Open-channel improvement from mouth to Shakopee to obtain a channel of 4-foot depth to accommodate vessels with 3-foot draft. Dredging to provide channel of 9-foot depth from mouth to mile 14.7 RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915.) Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and Gull Lake. Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. ST. CROIX RIVER, MN AND WI Dredging, etc., for a 3-foot channel between mouth and Taylors Falls. Harbor and waterfront at Stillwater. A 6-foot channel to Stillwater. The 9-foot channel from mouth to Stillwater. Small-boat harbor at Hudson. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MN Dredging bar at mouth of Warroad River. Entrance channel 300 feet wide and 7 feet deep. Enlarging turning basin Deepening to 8 feet. 'Contains latest published map. 2Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3Appropriation. 4See H. Doc. 462, 71st Annual Report 1891. p. 2209 S. Doc. 144. 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 363, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 413, 64th Cong.,lst sess. H. Ex. Doc. 75, pt. 6, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess;4 Annual Report 1875, p. 372. H. Doc. 378, 69th Cong., lst ses8. 4 H. Doc. 184, 72nd Cong.,lst sess. 4 H. Doc. 184, 81st Cong., Ist sess. 4 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 92, 56th Cong., 2d sess885 . H. Doc. 703, 61st Cong.,2d sess. 5 Congress, 2d sess., for lats published map. 5Latest published map is opposite p. 1984 in Ann Report for 1911. 27-20 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 27-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30,1984 Full Report See Annual Operation And Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Baudette Harbor, MN Completed 1961 $36,415 $57,768 Black River, WI 1 1950 67,585 - Lake Traverse, MN and SD 3,4 1921 92 Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN Completed3 1929 277,615 40,251 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, MN 5 1925 47,794 3,891 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN Completed 1978 38,700 102,196 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN Completed 3 1923 9,070 - Red River of the North, MN and ND 3,6 1921 293,344 76,209 Wisconsin River, WI 2.3 1888 - - Zippel Bay Harbor, MN Inactive 5 1928 27,941 11,139 'Existing channel adequate for commerce (see table 27- G for deauthorized portion of project). 2Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin River by channel contraction works recommended in 1886 and 1887 (H. Ex. Doc. 65, 49th Cong., 2d sess.). Expenditures included under 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. No breakdown available. 3No commerce reported. 4Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, 64th Cong., 1st sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.). 5Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.). 6Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, 63d Cong., 3d sess.). 27-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30,1984 Full Report See Annual Operation And Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND Deferred 1983 $5,568,500' Dry Run, IA Completed 1966 1,790,7592 Elk River, MN Completed 1970 259,7003 Grafton, ND Active4 1983 - Guttenberg, IA Completed 1974 2,361,915 - LaCrosse, WI Active5 1983 -- - Lost River, MN Completed 1967 517,5196 Lower Branch Rush River, ND7 Completed 1974 1,000,0008 Minneota, MN7 Completed 1963 161,545 Minot, ND Completed 1983 21,479,5009 Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN Completed 1957 1,675,835 Pembina River, ND Active'0 1983 - Pembina River Lake, ND Inactive" 1950 50,000 Red River of the North at Pembina, ND 7 Completed 1979 2,000,000 Redwood River below Marshall, MN7 Completed 1960 202,400 Rushford, MN Completed 1980 3,192,333 St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN Completed 1974 8,476,01212 Tongue River Lake, ND Inactive"1 1950 23,695 Upper Iowa River, IA Completed 1964 888,445 Velva, ND 7 Completed 1970 334,628 Vermillion River, Hastings, MN 7 Completed 1980 999,900 Warroad River and Bull Dog Creek, MN Inactive' 3 1974 182,000 Zumbro River, MN Completed 1975 1,284,100 'Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Lake Darling project. Additional authorization required for implementation of recommended plan. The Senate Report 97-256 states that the Corps is to take no further action to construct Burlington Dam until directed to do so by Congress. 2Excludes $42,766 contributed funds. 3In addition $87,878 was expended from Public Law 99 funds in the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and incorporation into the permanent project. 4Preconstruction planning has not started. During FY84 $50 was expended under General Investigations for Phase I. 5Preconstruction planning has not started. 6Excludes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which authorization expired in April 1966 (see table 27-G). Excludes $246,911 contributed funds. 7Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. "Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. 9Excludes $4,167 contributed funds. 'OPreconstruction planning has not started. During FY84 $3,734 was expended under General Investigations for Phase I. "Further work deferred pending review of project document (inactive). 12Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new workand $38,000 expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of required cash contribution. Excludes an additional $206,62 expended for work done at request of local interests. '3Preconstruction planning suspended. Local interests requested the project be reclassified to inactive due to a limitation of their funding capability. The project was claes sified inactive on April 5, 1974. 27-22 TABLE 27-G ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Black River, WI' 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 - - Black River Lake, WI 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 - - Maple River, ND2 1981 Oct. 26, 1961 $1,241 Moorhead, MN2 1981 Oct. 30, 1961 27,700 Ruffy Brook, MN 1967 Apr. 1966 46,034 - Sheyenne River, ND2 1981 Dec. 31, 1970 37,956 - Warroad Harbor and River, MN3 1981 Aug. 5, 1977 - - 'Portion of project for removal of obstructions at Section 24 in text and table 27-J for costs for active units of various points outside the dredged area to clear channel to the project). full project width (see table 27-C for costs for completed 3Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning portion of project). basin to complete project width and depth (see table 27-A for 2Part of Red River of the North Drainage Basin (see costs for completed portion of project). 27-23 TABLE 27-H RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER (See Section 3 of Text) Outlet Watershed Area (square miles) Capacity Previous Projects Existing Projects at Minimum Above Watershed Maximum Stages St. Paul (square Original Stage Com- Com- Total Reservoir (feet)' River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) pleted Cost pleted Cost Cost Winnibigoshish 6 Mississippi 408 1,442 117 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387,470 Leech Lake 0 Leech 410 1,163 173 250.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,380 256,185 Pokegama 6 Mississippi 344 6602 24 35.0 120,750 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211,030 Sandy Lake 7 Sandy 267 421 8 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231,020 Pine River 9 Pine 199 562 18 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230,320 Gull Lake 5 Gull 168 287 20 20.5 70,820 - - 1913 86,826 86,826 Surveys and flowage rights - - - 160,939 10,939 Recreational facilities - - - 2,834,838 2,834,838 Total new work - - 681,805 - 3,716,823 4,398,628 Total operating and care - - 100,857 - 18,195,878 18,296,735 Permanent indefinite appropriation for operating and care,Feb. 1, 1895 to end of fiscal year 1936 - - - 967,197 967,197 Rehabilitation - - - 425,000 425,000 Total 2,152,840 - $782,662 - $23,304,898 $24,087,560 'Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29, 1944. 2Exclusive of area controlled by "Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. '-1 to z z Co � Co O1 0 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 27-I NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 (preauthorization) AUTHORIZATION Public Law 86-645 Study identification Fiscal Year Costs Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods Co., MN $52,669 TABLE 27-J RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN (See Section 29 of Text) Total Cost to Estimated Name of Unit State Type September 30, 1984 Federal Cost Orwell Reservoir (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,700' Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,000 Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,788 440,800 Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and floodwall 948,895 948,900 Red River at East Grand Forks Minnesota Levees, floodwall, pumping plants 904,573 19,600,000 Red River at Fargo North Dakota Channel improvement, levees 1.639,924 1,639,9002 Total cost to date 7,267,2213 Total estimated cost 25,962,0004 'Includes $178,000 for lands and $25,000 for recreation facilities. 2Includes $67,900 for lands. 'Costs of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridge inactive unit not included. Authorization of the Sheyenne River, Moorhead, and Maple River units has expired. Cost of these units also not included total $66,897. 4The Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is classed as 'inactive' and is excluded from the estimate. The cost of this unit, last revised in 1955, was estimated to be $996,000. The Flood Control Act approved December 31, 1970 (H. Doc. 330-91-2) provided for deletion of the Sheyenne River unit, and authorization of the Maple River and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 5-year period within which local interests were required to furnish assurances of local cooperation. Authorization of these units, not included, expired on the dates indicated in table 27-G. 27-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 27-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Text) Project Date Inspected Aitkin, MN .......................... .... .. ........................ August 1984 Arcadia, WI ............. ... ..... .. ................................... October 1983 Black River (North Bend), WI .................................................. October 1983 Clearwater River, MN ........... .................. ................ November 1983 Cochrane, WI .................................................... October 1983 Decorah, IA ............................................................ September 1984 Elk River, MN ........................................ November 1983 Enderlin, ND ......................... .................. .. September 1984 Fargo, ND ................... ..... ... . ................. September 1984 Forest River, ND .................................. .................... November 1983 Grand Forks, ND ........................................... September 1984 Guttenberg, IA ........... ................ ...... ...... September 1984 Hastings, MN .................................... ................... September 1984 Lost River, MN ................................................................ November 1983 Lower Branch Rush River, ND. ................... ................... November 1983 Marshall, MN ................................................... September 1984 Marsh River, MN ................ ... ...... ......................... November 1983 Mines Creek, WI ............................ .................... September 1984 Minneota, MN ................................... ..................... September 1984 Minot, ND ............................... ......................... August 1984 Mustinka River, MN ................................. .................. November 1983 Oslo, MN ......... ........... .......................... . ........ September 1984 Park River, ND .................................................... November 1983 Pembina, ND ... ..... ............................................... September 1984 Plum Creek, MN ...................... ..... ................. September 1984 Red Lake Falls, MN ............. ............................. September 1984 Red Lake River, MN ................................... ..... November 1983 Redwood River, MN.................................................. November 1983 Rushford, MN............ ...................................... September 1984 Rush River, ND .................. ......... ................... November 1983 Sand Hill River, MN ................................................. November 1983 Sheyenne River, ND ............................ .......... ..... November 1983 South St. Paul, MN ............ ............... ..... ............... September 1984 St. Paul, MN ................... ............. ...................... September 1984 Upper Iowa River, IA ................ ................................. September 1984 Velva, ND ................. ..................................... ........... August 1984 Wild Rice River, MN .............. .................................. November 1983 Zumbro River, MN .............. ...... ..................... September 1984 27-26 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 27-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Black Bear and Miller Lakes, MN Ditch 3 Sauk Rapids, MN Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, MN English Ccoulee, Grand Forks, ND Lake Pulaski, Buffalo-Wright County, MN Little Fork River at Cook, MN McGregor, IA Middle River at Argyle, MN Minnesota River, Carver, MN Minnesota River, Henderson, MN New Albin, IA Red River of the North at Argusville, ND Root River, Hokah, MN Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI South Fork Crow River, Watertown, MN Snake River below Warren, MN Wild Rice River, Ada, MN Fiscal Year Costs $32,045 10,000 12,677 22,367 7,500 10,000 10,000 52,937 10,000 24,324 7,500 44,994 26,941 7,500 7,500 944 7,500 Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND $18,122 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN 7,027 Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Plum Creek, New Haven Township, MN $3,557 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Project Disaster preparedness Fiscal Year Costs $187,900 27-27 -- Immmmm ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT* This district comprises most of the northern half of Illinois, portions of southern Wisconsin, southern and southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin ef Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries between mile 300 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage basins. The section of the Mississippi River between river miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN ............... 28-2 2. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL ......... 28-3 3. Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, IL... 28-3 4. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ...................... 28-3 5. Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL ........... 28-3 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...... 28-3 Flood Control 7. Bettendorf, IA ............................. 28-3 8. Burlington, IA ................. ...... 28-4 9. Coralville Lake, IA... ................... 28-4 10. Davenport, IA ... ....................... 28-4 11. East Moline, IL ... ...................... 28-4 12. Farm Creek, IL .. ....................... 28-4 13. Fulton, IL ... ........................... 28-5 14. Hannibal, MO ... ....................... 28-5 15. Milan, IL .... ........................... 28-5 16 Moline, IL .............................. 28-5 17. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA ...... 28-5 18, Rockford, IL ... ......................... 28-6 19. Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL ......... 28-6 20 Saylorville Lake, IA.....................28-6 21. Waterloo,IA ........................... 28-7 22. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .... ..................... 28-7 23. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .... 28-7 24. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .............................. 28-7 General Investigations 25. Surveys.................................... 28-7 26. Collection and Study of Basic Data ......... 28-7 Tables Table 28-A Table 28-B Table 28-C Table 28-D Table 28-E Table 28-F Table 28-G Table 28-H Table 28-I Table 28-J Table 28-K Table 28-L Table 28-M Table 28-N Cost and Financial Statement ..... 28-8 Authorizing Legislation .......... 28-10 Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 28-13 Not applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................. 28-14 Not applicable Deauthorized Projects ............. 28-16 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................. 28-16 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 28-18 Illinois Waterway: Existing Locks and Dams .................. 28-19 Illinois Waterway: Lock and Dam Construction, Foundations, Cost .. 28-20 Illinois Waterway: Additional Features Entering into Cost ....... 28-21 Illinois Waterway: Existing Project ........................ 28-21 Illinois Waterway: Total Cost of Existing Project .................. 28-22 28-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, IL, about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises Illinois River from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles); Des Plaines River to Lockport (18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). Also from a point 12.4 miles above Lockport, IL, waterway comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near entrance to Lake Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and to Clark Street, Gary, IN (4.2 miles). Previous Projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See table 28-K and page 1255 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of new work is $124,041,436 and includes $445,000 for Recreation Facilities under Code 711. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, placed in the inactive category in June 1973, cost of $132,000,000 (July 1972) Federal and $16,300,000 (July 1972) non-Federal; Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferred-forrestudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non- Federal; widen Pekin Bend, a portion of work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1935, placed in the inactive category, cost of $1,360,700 (July 1972) Federal; and widen Marseilles Canal to 300 feet, a portion of work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1935, placed in the deferred category, cost of $1,859,300 (July 1972) Federal, are all excluded from present cost estimate. (See also tables 28-J through 28-N on authorizing legislation; existing locks and dams; lock and dam construction, foundations, cost and additional features entering into cost of project.) Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications and Part I of Calumet-Sag Modification. All pools above Alton Pool: Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government cutterhead dredge ST. GENEVIEVE was performed at various locations in LaGrange pool at a cost of $504,000, with a total of 285,135 cubic yards of material being removed. Channel dredging by the dredge DUBUQUE was also performed at various locations in LaGrange pool at a cost of $1,022,200, with a total of 120,000 cubic yards of material being removed. Environmental concerns in connection with dredging activities cost $33,700. Strike removal and snagging was accomplished with hired labor at a cost of $505,000. Contract and S&I expenditures at the Lucas- Berg Disposal Area, a containment area for contaminated dredged material from the Calumet-Sag Chan. nel, were $30,600, and this disposal area was turned over from Chicago District, who administered the con. tract, to Rock Island District. Maintenance for the Lucas-Berg Disposal Area cost $25,300. Structural repairs to locks and dams were performed by hired labor at a cost of $936,100. Contractor earned $490,500 for modification of miter gate machinery at Marseilles Lock. Repair and replacement of mooring cells by con. tractor was completed at Dresden and Marseilles Locks and Dams at a cost of $479,300. Contractor earned $81,800 for installation of standby generators at Dresden and Starved Rock Locks. Energy rehabilitation at the central control stations at Peoria and LaGrange Locks was completed by contractor at a cost of $219,400. High pressure sodium vapor lighting and protective piers were installed by contractor at Peoria and LaGrange Locks at a cost of $201,100. Dresden Island access road resurfacing was completed by contractor at a cost of $39,100. A steel maintenance and shop building was moved from the closed Joliet Project Office location to the Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria at a cost of $164,700, which amount included both contract and hired labor costs. Other buildings, grounds and utility maintenance at the locks and dams totaled $58,700. Permanent operating equipment costs were $75,900. Engineering and design work totaled $401,100, and other maintenance work items cost $30,700. Supervision and administration and district overhead for the maintenance features totaled $364,600. Total maintenance costs were $5,663,800. Net credits to the project for miscellaneous receipts were $19,200. Operation and Care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were made at a cost of $4,245,300. Operationof the Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria was continued at a cost of $491,200. Real estate manage ment services were provided at a cost of $58,300. Visitors' Center at Starved Rock Lock and Dam was operated at a cost of $126,900; surveys, studies, and structural and other inspections were performed at a cost of $201,600; and water control management costs were $715,500. Supervision and administration and district overhead for the operations features totaled $836,300. Total operations costs were $6,675,100. Total operation and maintenance costs were $12,319,741 for all pools above Alton pool. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation work at Dresden Island, Brandon Road, Starved Rock, and Lockport Locks and Dams was in progress. Costs at Dresden Island were $304,300, at Brandon Road $7,875, 807,at Starved Rock $1,088,465, and at Lockport $8,979,11 a total of $18,248,289. Alton Pool Operation: Costs by hired labor for condition and operation studies were $157,226; water control management $109,645; and supervision administration $19,453. Alton Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $1,181,083 for dredging and $22,631 for supervision 28-2 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT and administration. Total cost for work in Alton Pool was $1,490,038. 2. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, IL Location. This canal extends for 75 miles from the Illinois River near LaSalle, IL, to the Mississippi River at Rock Island, IL. A feeder canal, 29 miles in length, extends from the summit level of the canal to the Rock River at Rock Falls, IL. Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report for 1962 for details regarding project. The canal was constructed in the period 1892-1918. The canal has not been operated for navigation since June 1951 in accordance with Corps policy to discontinue operation of waterways affording little or no benefit to navigation. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorized the appropriation of $2,000,000 for the purpose of placing the canal in proper condition for public recreational use and to convey and transfer the canal to the State of Illinois as part of the State park system. The repair and modification program was initiated in 1961, and a number of canal features have been repaired or modified. In connection with this program, fee title to 1,062 acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of land in Rock River at Rock Falls, formerly under navigation flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the additional appropriation of $6,528,000 to be expended for the repair, modification, and maintenance of bridges, title transfer, modification or rehabilitation of hydraulic structures, fencing, clearing auxiliary ditches, and for the repair and modification of other canal property appurtenances. During fiscal year 1982, a judgment of the Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit, directed that a fund of $2,812,658 plus interest at 12 percent per annum computed from Feb. 23, 1979, be established by the United States in the District Court from which payments are to be made to plaintiffs for required repairs to Illinois and Missippi Canal bridges. Actual payment for the Judgment award was $3,722,572, which included Interest at 12 percent through Nov. 4, 1981. Engineering and design work in connection with this matter cost $57,049 during the fiscal year. 3. MILL CREEK AND SOUTH SLOUGH AT MILAN, IL Location. Mill Creek and South Slough are small Streams, tributary to the Rock River, at Milan, Rock Island County, IL. flExisting project. The existing project provided for td protection at the village of Milan necessitated by Qeconstruction of the Illinois and Mississippi Canal. 'ne project consisted of diversion of Mill Creek into South Slough, flood gates in the walls of the Illinois ah dississippi Canal to carry Mill Creek flood waters across the canal right-of-way into Rock River, levees, and other works for flood protection. The project was constructed in 1931-1932. In 1962-1963, $73,366 was expended from Illinois and Mississippi Canal maintenance funds for restoration of the Mill Creek outlet into Rock River. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Minor channel maintenance was performed at a cost of $24,184. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement see chapter on "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN." 5. MUSCOOTEN BAY, ILLINOIS RIVER Location. Muscooten Bay is located along the left bank of the Illinois River at the northeast edge of the city of Beardstown, Ill. The Beardstown Community Boat Harbor occupies part of the bay. Existing project. Sedimentation in the bay restricted the use of the boat harbor, particularly at the entrance. The existing project provided for the construction of a bedload diversion rock dike to reduce sedimentation and the dredging of a 1,700-foot navigation channel. Local cooperation. Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 applies. In addition, local interests must comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; contribute all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $2,000,000; provide and maintain berthing areas, floats, piers, slips, and similar facilities and provide utilities, relocations, and alterations, and grant the Federal Government the right to enter upon project lands. Local interests must also bear one-half the first cost of the general navigation features. Assurances of local cooperation were approved on August 18, 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Construction of the project was accomplished. Costs during the year were $111,466. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 28-C. 7. BETTENDORF, IA Location. The city of Bettendorf is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River, 485.7 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Scott County, IA. Existing project. Local flood protection from the Mississippi River to be provided by construction of 3 miles of earth levee, railroad raises, closure structures, 28-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 and street raises and ramps. Construction was started in July 1982. Estimated project cost is $15,210,000, including $1,510,000 non-Federal cost for lands and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued. The project is 49 percent completed. Costs were $3,701,200. 8. BURLINGTON, IA Location. The project site is an industrial area at the confluence of Flint Creek with the Mississippi River at the city of Burlington, Des Moines County, IA, 405 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River. Existing project. Local protection from floods on the Mississippi River and Flint Creek to be provided the industrial area by construction of earth levees, a concrete floodwall, interior drainage facilities, and two railroad closure structures. Construction was started in July 1982. The estimated project cost is $2,687,000, including $477,000 non-Federal cost for lands and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued, the principal work item being placing levee fill. The project was completed. in September 1984. Costs were $208,173. 9. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Location. Coralville Lake is formed by the Coralville Dam on the Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, Johnson County, IA, about 83 miles above the confluence of the Iowa River with the Mississippi River. Existing project. See page 28-4, Annual Report for 1981, for project details. Construction began in July 1949 and project has been in operation since February 1958. About 24,265 acres of land were acquired in fee, and flowage easements obtained for 9,489 acres. The project was modified to provide for construction of a highway bridge crossing the lake at the Mehaffey site, which was begun in June 1964 and completed in October 1966. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required, except in connection with the Mehaffey Bridge, which has been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Additional land acquisition to provide for the present plan of reservoir operation and damage payments to Johnson County, IA, for past and future damages to certain flowage easement roads in the upper limits of the reservoir and construction of additional recreation facilities were performed at a cost of $2,086,884. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $2,329,708. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees: $34,897. 10. DAVENPORT, IA Location. The city of Davenport is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River, 482.4 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Scott County, IA. Existing project. Local protection to the city from floods on the Mississippi River to be provided by con. struction of levees, floodwall, interior drainage facili. ties and pump plants, closure structures, and recreational facilities. The project also provides for the enhancement and preservation of Nahant Marsh at the downstream edge of the city as a wetland area with important contribution to environmental quality. Estimated project cost is $39,800,000, including $14,800,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests also to bear the cost of relocations, bear not less than one-half of the separable first cost for recreational development, obtain legal control to prevent encroachment on project features, and provide pressurized sewers at three locations. The city has withdrawn support for the project because of high costs and public opposition. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning and engineering were discontinued. Costs during the year were $95,717. 11. EAST MOLINE, IL Location. East Moline is located on the left bank of the Mississippi River, 489.3 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Rock Island County, IL. Existing project. Local protection from Mississippi River and Rock River floods to be provided by construction of 4.8 miles of levee, 960 linear feet of floodwall, a closure structure, a pumping station, two railroad raises, and three street raises. Construction was initiated in July 1979. The estimated project cost is $11,170,000, including $1,490,000 non-Federal cost for lands, relocations, and alterations of buildings and utilities. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction was continued with the placing of levee fill, railroad track raises, and the pumping station at a cost of $198,278. The project was completed in May 1984. 12. FARM CREEK, IL Location. Farm Creek watershed in Tazewell County, IL, is 60 square miles in extent. Stream emP ties into Illinois Waterway at Mile 162 above mouth Existing project. See page 28-5, Annual RepotfO! 1983 for description of project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at3 cost of $70,314. 28-4 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT 13. FULTON, IL Location. The city of Fulton is located on the left bank of the Mississippi River, 520.1 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Whiteside County, IL. Existing project. Local protection from Mississippi River floods to be provided by construction of 12 miles of earth levee, railroad raises, road ramps, closure structures, gravity drainage outlets, ponding areas, storm sewer interceptors, and pumping plants. The improvements will also protect an adjacent rural area in the Cat Tail Drainage District, thereby providing access for the city to high ground. Construction was initiated in January 1978. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued at a cost of $223,513. The project was completed in February 1984. 14. HANNIBAL, MO Location. The project area is on the right bank of the Mississippi River at the city of Hannibal, MO, 309 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River. Existing project. The project would provide flood protection to the business and industrial area of the city of Hannibal by the construction of a system of levees and floodwalls. The plan also included a pumping plant, closure structures for railroads and streets, alteration of the existing sewage system, and a tainter gate closure at the mouth of Bear Creek. Advance planning on the project was begun in 1962; however, in 1965 further work was discontinued because of lack of local support. Local interest revived in 1979, and the project was reclassified from "Inactive" to the "Active" category. A study has been undertaken to reformulate the project to meet existing needs of the project area and to reflect current Federal and State criteria for water resources projects. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests would also be required to modify or relocate buildings, utilities, and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project. No action toward the fulfillment of local cooperation requirements has been taken. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Detailed studies for reformulation of the project and evaluation of alternatives were continued at a cost of $134,787. 15. MILAN, IL Location. The village of Milan is located on the south bank of the Rock River several miles upstream from the confluence of that stream with the Mississippi River at mile 479.1 above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Rock Island County, IL. LExisting project. Local protection against direct loding from Rock River and Mill Creek and against backwater flooding from the Mississippi River to be provided the community by construction of levees, flood walls, closure structure, bridges, pumping stations, drainage facilities, and street ramps. Construction was initiated in March 1981. The estimated project cost is $17,820,000, including $3,420,000 non- Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the project continued at a cost of $3,263,505. The principal work items were levee construction and utilities relocations. The project is about 69 percent completed. 16. MOLINE, IL Location. The city of Moline is located on the left bank of the Mississippi River, 485.7 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Rock Island County, IL. Existing project. Local protection at Moline from Mississippi River floods to be provided by construction of 4 miles of earth levee and flood wall, closure structures, aesthetic and recreational development, and interior drainage facilities consisting of gravity outlets, storm sewer interceptors, and pumping plants. Construction has not yet been initiated. The estimated project cost is $21,610,000, including $1,210,000 for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests will also provide relocations, bear not less than one-half of the separable first cost for recreational development, and prevent encroachment on ponding areas. Local interests will be requested to furnish assurances after a firm project plan is established. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $106,759. 17. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Location. The site of this project is on the Des Moines River, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, Warren, and Polk Counties. The dam is 142.9 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River, which empties into the Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above the mouth of the Ohio River. The city of Des Moines lies northwesterly from the site, about 60 miles upstream. Existing project. See page 28-6, Annual Report for 1981 for description of the project. Construction began in May 1960, and the dam was placed in beneficial use for storage of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for the project consisted of 47,610 acres in fee and 28,214 acres in flowage easement. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a 28-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 cost of $2,518,900. Expenditures from the return of recreation use fees were $27,964. 18. ROCKFORD, IL Location. The city of Rockford is located along both banks of the Rock River, in Winnebago County, IL. Kent Creek is a small stream, tributary to the Rock River, which flows through the right-bank portion of the city. Existing project. The project provides flood protection for the right-bank portion of the city from floods on Kent Creek. It consists of a rolled earth dam with outlet works and spillway on North Branch Kent Creek in Page Park; 12,000 feet of channel cleanout and straightening on North Branch Kent Creek; raise of Levings Lake Dam on South Branch Kent Creek and construction of spillway and diversion channel; 10,800 feet of channel cleanout and straightening on South Branch Kent Creek; and relocations. Construction was initiated in October 1978. The estimated project cost is $16,870,000, including $6,410,000 for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the project was continued at a cost of $1,309,129. The principal work items were channel cleanout and straightening on North Branch Kent Creek and construction of the diversion channel on South Branch Kent Creek. The project is about 69 percent completed. 19. ROCK RIVER AGRICULTURAL LEVEES, IL Location. The project area lies along both banks of the Rock River in Rock Island, Henry, and Whiteside Counties, IL. Existing project. The project provides for construction of levees and appurtenant works with incidental channel improvements for flood control in five areas along the lower Rock River, mainly agricultural in character, as follows: Area 1, Carbon Cliff to Canoe Creek, right bank, 15.8 miles Area 2, Canoe Creek to Rock Creek, right bank, 16.2 miles Area 3, Rock Creek to Lyndon, right bank, 15 miles Area 4, Near Spring Hill to Prophetstown, left bank, 10.2 miles Area 5, Penny Slough Levee and Drainage District, left bank, 9.1 miles Estimated project cost is $41,270,000, including $8,170,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. No construction has been performed. The project was authorized in 1958, but remained unfunded until FY 1979 when local interest in the project developed. A study has been undertaken to reformulate the project to meet existing needs of the project area and to reflect current Federal and State criteria for water resources projects. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests would also bear the cost of relocations, except railroad bridges, and contribute in cash. No action toward ful. filling the requirements of local cooperation has been taken. Operations during fiscal year. New work: De tailed studies for reformulation of the project and evaluation of alternatives were discontinued because of economic infeasibility. Costs during the year were $100,459. 20. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Location. The project site is chiefly in Polk County, IA, but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Coun. ties. The dam is about 213.7 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River and about 5 miles upstream from the city of Des Moines, IA. Existing project. The dam is an earth embankment 6,750 feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located at the toe of the west bluff. Control structure is at upstream end of conduit and houses three gates. A stilling basin is provided to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. Spillway is in west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing over the spillway weir discharges into a paved chute and thence into an excavated earth channel to the Des Moines River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth embankment section, and flow over weiris uncontrolled when water in reservoir reaches its crest. Watershed area above dam site is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum flows at downstream points). Lake supplements capacity of downstream Lake Red Rock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes provide a high degree of flood protection to the lower Des Moines River Valley Reaches along the Mississippi River downstream from the mouth of the Des Moines River are also benefited A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream from the dam, was authorized in 1976. The project modification includes relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition of additional park land. and the development of a floodway corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam downstream tO Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Construction began in June 1965, and the dam Was placed in operation for the storage of flood water in April 1977. Remedial work in Big Creek Valley, coer sisting of a diversion dam and channel and a barrier dam, for the protection of the town of Polk City waS completed in December 1974. The land acquisition program involved 25,919 acres acquired in fee, flowaer easements for 1,809 acres, and roadway easementsfr 40 acres. The estimated project cost is $125,85,6,p~] including $2,660,000 non-Federal cost as a case "' 28-6 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT tribution from the State of Iowa toward recreational development. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The principal work item was the construction of recreational facilities. Work was also continued on the archeological program and on engineering and design work for the downstream floodway corridor. New work costs were $1,590,361. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $4,451,959. Expenditures from return of recreition use fees were $34,135. The project is about 79 percent completed. 21. WATERLOO, IA Location. The city of Waterloo is located along both banks of the Cedar River in Black Hawk County, IA. Existing project. The project provides local protection to the city of Waterloo from floods on the Cedar River, Black Hawk Creek, Virden Creek, and Blowers Creek. It consists of 15.4 miles of earth levee, 2 miles of flood wall, 11,330 feet of channel improvement, an impounding dam on Virden Creek, and interior drainage facilities including 8 pumping plants. Extensive urban renewal, undertaken by the city, has been coordinated with the flood control project. Construction was initiated in August 1972. The estimated project cost is $64,100,000, including $15,000,000 non-Federal costfor land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the project was continued at a cost of $2,149,558. The principal work items were continuation ofconstruction of levees and flood walls along the Cedar River. The project is about 97 percent completed. 22. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal flood-control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations) provide that the structures and facilities constructed by the United States for local flood protection shall be continuously maintained in such a manner and operated at such times and for such periods as may be necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Costs during the period for inspections of proj i turned over to local interests to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were $109,168. (See Table 28-H for list of completed flood control projects inspected.) 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 28-E. 24. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities, Section 205, Public Law 84-685. See Table 28-I. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. See Table 28-I. Emergency Flood Control Activities, Public Law 99, 84th Congress. See Table 28-I. General Investigations 25. SURVEYS Flood control studies in progress included the Fox River and Tributaries, WI; the Mississippi River, Coon Rapids to Ohio River; the Illinois River from Henry to Naples, IL; the Mackinaw River Basin, IL; and the Vermilion River Basin, IL. Total cost of flood control studies was $1,356,590. Review of completed projects cost $119,338. Inventory of dams cost $26,158. Coordination studies with other agencies on soil conservation, water quality management, planning assistance to States, and technical assistance on shore and streambank erosion cost $175,298. Total cost of surveys was $1,677,384. 26. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services cost $213,200. Hydrologic studies, including general studies, sedimentation studies, steamflow studies, and rainfall studies cost $4,588. Total cost for collection and study of basic data was $217,788. 28-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 Total Cost to FY 84 September 1984 1. Illinois Waterway, New Work: IL and IN Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost 2. Illinois and New Work: Mississippi Canal, Approp. IL Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 3. Mill Creek and New Work: South Slough at Approp. Milan, IL Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 5. Muscooten Bay, New Work: Illinois River Approp. Cost 7. Bettendorf, IA New Work: Approp. Cost 8. Burlington, IA New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost 9. Coralville Lake, IA New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 10. Davenport, IA New Work: Approp. Cost 11. East Moline, IL New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost 12. Farm Creek, IL New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 13. Fulton, IL New Work: Approp. Cost 12,979,500 10,867,623 5,490,000 4,356,755 10,709,000 12,686,905 9,520,000 5,094,245 10,402,185 11,471,710 1,735,000 5,681,952 - 3,722,572 1,100,000 - 3,724,915 2,423 9,000 9,101 95,000 83,772 2,900 3,509 27,500 36,610 1,000 1,500 143,000 15,238 13,673,299 13,738,078 17,025,000 18,248,288 -800,000 57,049 35,000 24,184 111,465 280,000 620,000 2,440,000 3,315,000 267,248 539,682 1,859,754 3,701,200 15,000 18,591 277,000 193,756 1,307,000 1,172,257 1,397,000 1,791,140 200,000 126,707 1,456,600 978,757 7,950 50,150 2,183,000 2,056,279 1,653,000 1,579,421 1,400,000 1,667,175 1,169 3,491,700 1,199,040 2,715,000 2,420,201 -200,000 89,162 100,458 1,870,000 4,030,000 1,230,000 1,882,196 3,283,610 1,769,692 208,173 67 1,965,000 2,086,884 2,101,000 2,329,008 95,717 198,278 21,909 58,600 81,991 66,000 98,838 107,000 109,008 2,803,000 6,070,000 1,375,000 3,091,254 3,759,499 3,473,034 142,000 70,314 -30,000 223,513 28-8 TABLE 28-A 126,707,7511 126,706,419' 204,425,396' 200,859,9972 46,439,625 45,937,536 7,605,143' 7,605,1431 17,096,810' 16,853,685' 63,719:' 63,719' 384,553 374,979 256,500 247,085 7,081,980 6,781,862 3,116,100 3,113,033 284,950 245,142 27,932,4886 25,413,426 18,667,005 18,473,229 1,689,717 1,685,593 9,680,300 9,668,570 328,090 328,090 9 859,020. 9,859,020 2,553,421 2,479,205 18,020,200 18,015,378 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 September 1984 14. Hannibal, MO New Work: Approp. Cost 15. Milan, IL New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost 16. Moline, IL New Work: Approp. Cost 17. Red Rock Dam and New Work: Lake Red Rock, IA Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 18. Rockford, IL New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost 19. Rock River New Work: Agricultural Approp. Levees, IL Cost 20. Saylorville Lake, New Work: IA Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 21. Waterloo, IA New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost 50,000 41,217 150,000 150,000 153,304 134,787 935,000 1,500,000 3,400,000 805,074 1,527,638 3,522,286 - - 12,000 34,180 - 281,000 209 172,217 843,000 1,750,000 761,068 1,397,449 3,530,000 3,263,505 213,950 106,759 50,000 489,056 2,145,400 1,633,000 2,968,500 2,712,000 1,750,624 1,966,265 2,927,214 2,518,900 246,000 1,400,000 202,876 117,433 - 229,032 - 85,125 245,000 175,000 245,669 167,998 400,000 866,122 -84,262 40,448 68,000 70,815 475,000 1,309,129 104,200 117,606 100,000 100,459 2,896,000 2,499,000 1,960,000 2,500,000 3,250,480 2,305,398 491,088 1,590,361 2,547,000 1,788,000 3,953,837 3,173,000 2,619,103 1,632,312 2,703,132 4,451,959 4,530,000 5,060,000 1,253,000 1,750,000 4,693,230 4,664,103 1,124,975 2,149,558 1. Includes $2,569,102 for previous projects. 2. Includes $1,028,468 for previous projects. 3. Includes $25,000 Emergency Relief Funds. 4. Includes $4,143,282 for Operating and Care under the "Permanent Indefinite Appropriation." 5. Includes $85 for previous project. 6. Includes cost of Mehaffey Bridge, $1,365,074 (excluding $100,000 contributed funds). 7. Excludes $161,813 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $950,000 non-Federal cost. 9. Refunded $21,909 to City of East Moline. 28-9 460,933 440,241 10,245,400 9,721,903 225,950 1,350,000 1,346,490 95,302,484 95,302,484 19,190,193 18,755,080 7,303,736 7,261,801 248,970 243,179 798,000 794,672 100,882,200 98,287,368' 16,648,538 16,438,385 47,950,000 47,821,941 83,300 83,300 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 1. Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 1934' Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935; June 14, 1937 June 20, 1938 Oct. 23, 1943 Mar. 2 1945 Project and Work Authorized ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth of Illinois River to Utica, 2:31 miles, modification of 2 U.S. locks and dams, removal of 2 State dams. (Act authorized appropriation of not to exceed $3,500,000 for carrying on work.) Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, IL to heads of present Federal projects on Chicago and Calumet Rivers, 94.6 miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with present plans of state for that work. Act adopting project authorized appropriation of not to exceed $7,500,000 for carrying on work. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and Peoria and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide below Lockport, exact location and details of design of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of Engineers, and, for time being, that no change be made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois River by act of July 3, 1930. Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag Channel and authorized channel in Calumet-Sag route to turning basin 5, and dredging at entrance of Lake Calumet. Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment of bypassed section of Calumet River. Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to seepage and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and a usable depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 feet wide with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana Harbor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., East Chicago, IN. Construct in Little Calumet River a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to provide suitable clearance, except that no Federal funds shall be expended for removal or alteration of Illinois Central R.R. bridge at mile 11.20 of Little Calumet River. Documents Rivers and Harbors Committee l)oc. 69th Cong., 1st sess., and S. D0c. 130, 69th Cong., Ist sess. S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 28-10 _._~__ ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 17, 1953 July 3, 1958 Aug. 18, 1968 July 3, 1930 July 14, 1960 (Section 107) August 13, 1968 June 30, 1948 (Section 205) Substitute following work for that authorized by act of Mar. 2, 1945; replace emergency dam in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal; enlargement of that canal thence to Sag Junction and of Calumet-Sag Channel to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet to 225 feet wide between Little Calumet River and junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide thence to Clark St., Gary, IN with a turning basin at Clark St., enlarge Indiana Harbor Canal to 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet between Grand Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control works in Calumet River near its head, and similar structures in proposed Grand Calumet Channel west of Indiana Harbor Canal; alter or eliminate railroad bridges across three channels lakeward of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct new railroad bridges to provide suitable clearance. A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, IL, by construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged to 7 feet deep. $48,933 to reimburse Nutwood Drainage and Levee District for additional pumping operation; supplementing $58,750 authorized in Oct. 1943 act. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which constitutes unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Congress as amended. MILL CREEK AND SOUTH SLOUGH AT MILAN, IL Channel diversion, flood gates, and other work for flood protection. MUSCOOTEN BAY, ILLINOIS RIVER, IL Rock dike and dredging for navigation. BETTENDORF, IA Levees, railroad raises, closure structures, and street raises and ramps for flood control. BURLINGTON, IA Levee, floodwall, interior drainage, and railroad closures for flood control. H. Doc. 677, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 698, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 144, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess.4 Specified in Act. Also H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. None H. Doc. 348, 89th Cong., 2nd sess. None 28-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 * TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 9. June 28, 1938 July 14, 1960 10. December 31, 1970 CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the Mehaffey site. DAVENPORT, IA Levee, floodwall and pumping plants. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st seas. None H. Doc. 161, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. 11. August 13, 1968 12. 1944 Flood Control Act 13. August 13, 1968 14. October 23, 1962 15. August 13, 1968 16. October 27, 1965 (Section 201) Approved by Committees on Public Works of House of Representatives and Senate June 14, 1972, and June 21, 1972, respectively. 17. June 28, 1938 18. October 23, 1962 EAST MOLINE, IL Levee, railroad raises, street raises, closure H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., structure, gravity drainage outlets, open ditches, 2nd sess. ponding areas, and pumping plants for flood control. FARM CREEK, IL Two flood detention dams and channel H. Doc. 802, 78th Cong., improvements. 2nd sess. FULTON, IL Levee, railroad raises, road ramps, closure structures, H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., gravity drainage outlets, ponding areas, storm 2nd sess. sewer interceptors, and pumping plants for flood control. HANNIBAL, MO Levee, floodwall, closure structures, and H. Doc. 564, 87th Cong., pumping plant for flood control. 2nd sess. MILAN, IL Levee closure structures, gravity drainage outlets H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., ditches, ponding areas, and pumping plants for 2nd sess. flood control. MOLINE, IL Levee, closure structures, and interior H. Doc. 161, 92nd Cong., drainage facilities for flood control, and 1st sess. aesthetic and recreational development. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. ROCKFORD, IL Channel enlargement and realignment, levees, and S. Doc. 142, 87th Cong., appurtenant works for flood control. 2nd sess. 28-12 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents ROCK RIVER AGRICULTURAL LEVEES, IL 19. July 3, 1958 Levees and appurtenant works for flood control. H. Doc. 173, 85th Cong. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA 20. July 3, 1958 Reservoir for flood control and recreation. S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., 1st sess. October 22, 1976 Modification to minimize adverse project impact H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., on Ledges State Park. 2nd sess. WATERLOO, IA 21. October 27, 1965 Levees, floodwalls, pumping plants, and closure H. Doc. 166, 89th Cong., structures for flood control. 1st sess. 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. Program Oct. 31, 1934, and Feb. 28, 1935. 2. Contains latest published map of Illinois and Des 4. Contains latest published maps of Calumet-Sag Plaines Rivers. portion. 3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administration TABLE 28-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel Completed Completed 1967 1970 70,9791 35,4772 9,345 37,700 1. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. 28-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1984 Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Projects Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL 1943 274,822 - Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, MO) 1962 1,679,056 - Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 144,910 - Canton, MO' 1964 1,496,555 - Clinton, IA 1981 26,001,996 - 761,050 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,923,145 - Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 68,898 - Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO 1969 1,492,016 - Des Moines, IA 1972 4,993,224 - 23,323 Drury Drainage District, IL 1964 1,144,875 - Dubuque, IA 1974 10,861,170 - 145,415 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 207,826 - East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL 1946 279,963 - Elkport, IA 1951 34,200 - Evansdale, IA 1983 4,409,088 - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1941 60,500 - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1963 1,621,841 - Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL 1942 155,562 - Galena, IL 1952 844,100 - 118,000 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1949 299,000 - Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1967 1,727,711 Gregory Drainage District, MO 1940 77,100 - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1972 1,538,963 - 20,626 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL 1968 1,453,217 - Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL 1968 1,043,902 - Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL 1949 42,700 - Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 109,593 - Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL 1972 4,772,498 - Indian Grave Drainage District, IL 1972 3,551,961 - Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA 1972 6,044,693 - Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL' 1957 123,300 - Lacey, Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,290,000 - Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 117,731 - Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1938 152,000 - Marengo, IA' 1981 2,447,001 - Marion County Drainage District, MO 1967 873,748 - Marshalltown, IA 1978 8,437,511 252,136 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL 1940 93,808 - Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL' 1977 1,995,322 269,739 Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA' 1983 1,129,800 - Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine- Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, IA 1970 3,293,276 220,00 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL 1941 - - Oakford Special Drainage District, IL 1940 38,417 - Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN' 1957 72,432 - 28-14 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) Project FL S R+ Ottumwa, IA Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL Penny Slough, Rock River, IL Rock Island, IL Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL Sabula, IA Sangamon River (mouth) IL Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, II, Sid Simpson Project, IL, Sny Basin, IL Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, ILI South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL South River Drainage District, MO South River Drainage District, MO Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL Union Township Drainage District, MO Van Meter, IA' Authorized Projects Not Constructed Ames Lake, IA2 :; Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL Freeport, IL Peoria, IL South Beloit, IL William L. Springer Lake, IL 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. For Last ull Report ee Annual eport For 1977 1955 1940 1979 1941 1958 1980 1945 1968 1972 1942 1968 1942 1942 1940 1968 1941 1966 1941 1967 1947 1965 1974 1979 1973 1979 1979 Cost To September 30, 1984 Operation Contributed and Funds Construction Maintenance Expended 233,145 158,383 85,800 7,582,373 108,797 411,915 1,048,990 32,281 5,789,800 14,003,560 61,400 4,956,749 220,729 171,839 61,200 1,231,243 55,300 1,106,056 185,980 3,306,695 116,576 113,842 1,791,800 286,000 534,580 270,000 4,911,310 272,848 15,122 2. Includes $885,000 for disbursement in connection with realignment of Interstate Highway 35. 3. Reclassified "Active" in July 1984. 28-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 28-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Campbells Island, Mississippi River, IL 1969 1979 $ 76,664 Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA 1970 1977 55,664 Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA 1938 1977 -- Henderson River, IL 1964 1977 102,310 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks 1982 1981 Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI 1938 1977 Keithsburg Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI - 1977 Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA 1977 TABLE 28-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 22 of Text) Date Project Inspected Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL Banner Special Drainage and Levee District Bear Creek Reservoir, Hannibal, MO Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Canton, MO Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL DeKalb, IL Des Moines, IA Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL East Moline, IL East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL East Peoria Sanitary District, IL Elkport, IA Evansdale, IA Fabius River Drainage District, MO Farmers Drainage and Levee District Fulton, IL October 1983 October 1983 December 1983 January 1984 December 1983 September 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 December 1983 October 1983 September 1983 November 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 September 1983 October 1983 December 1983 October 1983 October 1983 28-16 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-H (Continued) Project INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 22 of Text) Date Inspected Galena, IL Green Bay Levee and Drainage District, No. 2, IA Gregory Drainage District, MO Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL Hennepin Drainage and Levee District Hergot Drainage and Levee District Hunt Drainage District & Lima Lake Drainage District, IL Indian Grave Drainage District, IL Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA Marengo, IA Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL Marion County Drainage District, MO Marshalltown, IA Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL Milan, IL' Muscatine Island L&DD, & Louisa DD No. 13, IA Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, IL Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL Rock Island, IL Sabula, IA Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL South River Drainage District, MO SPring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1, and Bay Island Levee and Drainage District No. 1, IL The Sny Basin, IL Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Van Meter, IA Waterloo, IA' West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL Worthington, MN 1. Project partially completed. September 1983 November 1983 December 1983 November 1983 November 1983 October 1983 November 1983 May 1984 May 1984 December 1983 December 1983 December 1983 December 1983 November 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 May 1984 October 1983 September 1983 October 1983 October 1983 December 1983 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 September 1983 October 1983 December 1983 December 1983 October 1983 May 1984 December 1983 December 1983 October 1983 May 1984 October 1983 October 1983 October 1983 December 1983 September 1983 28-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 28-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) (See Section 24 of Text) Study Identification Cedar River, Waverly, IA Couler Valley, Dubuque County, IA Duck Creek, Bettendorf, IA Hunt Drainage District, Hancock County, IL Liverpool, Illinois River, IL Snicarte, Illinois River, IL Pekin, IL Watseka, IL Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA Oelwein, IA Chandlerville, IL Des Moines, Raccoon River, IA Decatur, IL Sycamore, IL Tama, IA Pontiac, IL Fiscal Year Costs $13,871 10,476 7,500 7,500 19,606 7,500 29,624 18,335 499 41,323 15,637 7,396 7,500 7,500 7,500 79,144 TABLE 28-I Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and Tributaries in the Interest of Flood Control (preauthorization) (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780, 83rd Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Davey Creek, Ashippun, WI Partridge Creek, Woodford County, IL Pope Creek, Keithsburg, IL $ 7,500 20,077 6,500 TABLE 28-I Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Appanoose Township, Hancock County, IL Canal Bridge, North Fabius River, MO County Road, Mahaska County, IA County Road, Knox County, MO South Fabius River, Knox County, MO DePue, IL Wolf Creek, Traer, IA $ 2,844 58,453 24,677 9,415 42,694 995 4,400 28-18 -- - ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-I (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) (See Section 24 of Text) Project and Location Advance Preparation Emergency Operations Rehabilitation: Big Lake Drainage District, IL Brennan-Wheeler-Bash Levee, MO Carl Spurgeon Levee, MO John Reiff Levee, MO Simmons-Eckler Levee, IL Steffenville Drainage District, MO Federal Cost $ 140,559 28,625 375,037 26,908 8,000 128,316 39,920 23,969 ILLINOIS WATERWAY: EXISTING LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Miles to Nearest Town Width of Chamber (feet) Available Length for Full Width (feet) Lift at Low Water' (feet) Depth on Miter Sills at Low Water Lower Upper (feet) (feet) LaGrange Lock 80.2 7.8 belo Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 belo Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Marseilles Utica, I Lock 244.6 Marseil Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Brandon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, I Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockpol T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicagc w Beardstown, IL w Peoria, IL L les, IL Morris, IL L rt, IL o, IL 1. Lifts and depth on miter sills are those obtained with flat pools. 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at Lockport is due to fluctuation of water surface in the sanitary district canal. 28-19 Lock Miles Above Mouth 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 1,000 10.0 11.0 18.5 24.45 21.75 34.0 30.5-39.52 13.0 12.0 14.0 14.0 12.25 13.8 15.0 14.0 15.5 15.5 16.8 18.6 16.85 17.85 11.0-20.02 14.0 -- -- - -- --- -- TABLE 28-J TABLE 28-K REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Type of Character of Construction Foundation Dam Type of Character of Year Kind Construction Foundation Complete Illinois River, mouth to Utica; channel improvement by dredging in Illinois River below Starved Rock, modification of two U.S. locks and dams, and removal of two State dams. LaGrange Peoria Starved Rock Marseilles Dresden Island Brandon Road Lockport T.J. O'Brien Lock and dam equipment Total Locks and dams - $ 2,733,499' Concrete Piles in sand Concrete Piles in sand Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete and sheet piling Piles in clay Movable (wicket with Aframe- crest) Movable (wicket type) Concrete and timber Concrete and timber Movable Concrete and (tainter structural gates) steel Movable Concrete and (tainter structural gates) steel Movable Concrete and (tainter structural gates) steel Movable Concrete and (tainter structural gates) steel Movable Concrete and (Bear trap) structural steel Fixed Concrete and sheet piling Piles in sand Piles in sand Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Piles in clay 1939 1939 1933 1933 1933 1933 1933 1960 1,250,304' $ 24,471,832 1. Actual cost. 28-20 Name Estimated Federal Cost Under Existing Project 2,744,592' 3,381,0301 885,3151 1,853,7251 2,503,3761 2,031,683' 133,608' 6,954,7001 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-L ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 1 of Text) Dredging: Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places Starved Rock to Lockport Starved Rock to Grafton Calumet-Sag Channel Peoria small boat harbor Protection piers at all locks Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration Rebuild highway bridges Rebuild railway bridges: Calumet-Sag Channel Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Recreation Facilities, Code 711 Removal of Blue Island lock Grand Calumet River controlling works 2 St. Louis District Total additional features Total existing project 1. Actual cost. TABLE 28-M $ 2,135,3581 813,4181 3,650,635 2,686,307 19,238,200 24,9371 77,613' 5,141,474 5,466,804 19,327,850 20,828,4351 18,362,0411 445,000 288,600' 1,081,6001 $ 99,569,604 $124,041,436 2. Placed in inactive status 19 November 1974. EXISTING PROJECT Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) 1. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Nine locks and six dams Grafton to Lockport, IL Lockport to controlling works Controlling works to junction with Calumet-Sag Channel Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue Island Calumet and Little Calumet Channel, from Blue Island to turning basin 5 Grand Calumet River Channel from junction with Little Calumet River to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 141st, East Chicago, IN Also, Grand Calumet River Channel from junction of Indiana Harbor Canal and Grand Calumet River to Clark St. in Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St. A channel in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch Chicago River from Sag-Junction to Lake St. in Chicago, IL 28-21 See Section in Text Project Item 300 200-300 225 225 300 291.1 miles 2.0 miles 10.0 miles 16.0 miles 7.7 miles 9.0 miles 4.2 miles 22.1 miles 160 175-300 9 9 1 _ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 28-N ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 (See Section I of Text) New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total Regular Funds Public Works Funds Emergency Relief Funds Total $118,317,646 3,960,735 1,858,936 $124,137,317 $199,831,529 $199,831,529 1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriaon the operation and care of the works of improvement tion for such purposes. 28-22 $45,937,536 $45,937,536 $364,086,711 3,960,735 1,858,936 ~---~-~ $369,906,382 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN * Section of river covered in this report is divided into three reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Mis- Location. Mississippi River rises in northern part of Minnesota, flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. Latest map and profile showing this section of river is in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts (Bellevue, Iowa, to Missouri River) is in Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, 1st session. Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for a channel of 9-foot depth and adequate width between mouth of Missouri River (1,179 miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements at St. Paul to provide a basin extending downstream from Robert Street Bridge for 2.7 miles, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost of project, and authorizing legislation are given in Tables 29-C, 29-D, 29-E and 29-G. All dams are concrete. Three dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, 1 and 19) are fixed, remainder are movable. Estimated cost for new work (1982) is $894,157,300 exclu- Sive of amounts expended on previous projects. See House document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers dated February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for pur- Poses of navigation, power development, flood control, and irrigation needs. Local cooperation. Small-boat harbors authorized in the River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction (except in case of Quincy Harbor which in volves maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for transient small boats; accomplish all necessary relocations and alterations; and establish public souri River to mile 300 above Ohio River; Rock Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis (mile 857.6). bodies empowered to regulate use, growth, and development of the harbors. Rectification of seepage damages to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, is subject to the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; accept, operate, and maintain the project upon its completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed project; provided further that the local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real estate and for payments required under Public Law 91-646 if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved by the Government. Local cooperation requirements for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; for improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Hannibal, MO; Fort Madison, IA, Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA (including freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Moline, IL; Clinton, IA; and Savanna, IL, have been complied with. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the United States for use of government dams for generation of hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. Treasury. (See table at end of chapter for license fees collected through the end of the fiscal year.) Terminal facilities. Considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. St. Paul District. New Work: Studies were continued under Section 107, small navigation project authority, for establishment of a small-boat harbor at Pike Island, Minnesota at a cost of $21,601. Construction of the Lake City small-boat harbor was initiated at a cost of $822,311, of which $806,316 was accomplished by contract and $15,995 by hired labor. In addition, $774,696 was expended from funds contributed by Lake City. Total Federal cost of new work was $843,912. Maintenance: Channel dredging to remove shoal areas 29-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 was performed. Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM A THOMPSON removed 561,967 cubic yards of material at 10 locations at a cost of $1,502,888. Government derrick barge HAUSER removed 99,686 cubic yards of material at 9 locations for $450,228. Mechanical dredging contract costs were $515,099. Contracts for dredging at Reads Landing, for removal of dredged material from historic disposal site at Wilds Bend, and for the Lansing wing dam modification, cost $1,822,311, $839,001 and $910,799, respectively. Culvert construction at Blackhawk Park by hired labor cost $237,780. Other dredging and snagging cost $120,726. Water quality testing for dredging cost $97,857. In addition, $33,000 was expended from funds contributed by the city of Winona on a contract for relocating dredge material from an area near Fountain City, Wisconsin to an area near Winona, Minnesota. Painting at locks and dams cost $1,503,266. Scour repair contracts at Locks and Dams 3, 4, 5, 5A, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 cost $-17,088, $727,318, $1,445,784, $398,003, $40,532, $785,837, $1,438,000, $720,503 and $-11,048, respectively. Contracts for bridge rehabilitation and roads at Lock and Dam No. 1 cost $13,872 and $2,244, respectively. Contracts for spot dike repair at Lock and Dam No. 3, for general lock maintenance, for construction of a new communications center at Lock and Dam No. 2, for modification of incoming power at Lock and Dam No. 5, for installation of high mast lighting at Locks and Dams 2-10, for rebuilding esplanade road at Lock and Dam No. 4 and for equipment replacement cost $424,895, $11,660, $232,883, $135,000, $405,821, $100,388 and $27,690, respectively. Engineering work and miscellaneous surveys, reports, and other work were carried on by hired labor for $795,667 and by contract for $68,581. Contracts for rehabilitation of auxiliary gates at Locks and Dams 6 and 8, modification of the upper approach at Lock and Dam No. 5, and construction of loading docks at Locks and Dams 2, 6, 8, and 9 cost $156,753, $79,403, $260,566, $185,887, $109,817, $159,645 and $209,978, respectively. Total cost of maintenance was $19,311,065. Rehabilitation: Miscellaneous construction for rehabilitation of Lock and Dam No. 1 was accomplished by contract at a cost of $66,162 and by hired labor at a cost of $1,480. Engineering and design cost $8,876 by contract and $11,045 by hired labor. Supervision and administration cost $12,060. Total rehabilitation costs were $99,623. Operating and care: Locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made to those and appurtenant structures. Other studies, reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. Total cost of operating and care was $10,371,689. Costs to St. Paul District were $843,912 for new work, $29,682,754 for operation and maintenance, and $99,623 for rehabilitation, for a total of $30,626,289. Rock Island District. New Work: Recreational improvements at public use areas along the Mississippi River cost $279,771. Costs in connection with small-boat harbor at Savanna, IL, were $1,300. Total new work costs were $281,071. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government Cutterhead pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed at various locations in pools 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 at a cost of $1,451,200 with 479,952 cubic yards of material being removed. Emergency channel dredging was performed by Government cutterhead dredge ST. GENEVIEVE in pool 18 at a cost of $201,600, with 25,000 cubic yards of material removed. Snagging, clearing and excavation was performed by hired labor at various locations at a cost of $381,600. Dredged material disposal activities and other environmental concerns in connection with dredging and channel maintenance cost $675,200. Hired labor repair of regulating works structures was performed at a cost of $797,400. A contract for repair of regulating works structures in Pool 11 cost $857,900. Structural repairs, including sandblasting and painting, were performed by hired labor at locks and dams at a cost of $1,515,200. Contractor earned $720,800 on completion of contract for replacing service bridge cranes on the dams at eleven locations, and another contractor earned $214,900 for installation of machinery enclosures at Locks 11, 12, 16, and 18. New high pressure sodium vapor lighting for Locks 11 through 22 was completed by contract at a cost of $533,900. Contractor completed construction of a mooring cell at Lock and Dam 13 at a cost of $298,600, and another contractor earned $177,500 for construction of a protection cell at Lock 19. Contractor installed bubbler systems at Locks 20, 21 and 22 at a cost of $169,400. Construction began on a new crane barge on which contractor earned $1,900,100. Contractor earned $202,200 for painting dam roller gates at Lock and Dam 15, and another contractor earned $188,000 for painting dam roller and tainter gates and service bridge at Lock and Dam 17. Contractor earned $184,600 for construction of a maintenance and shop building at Lock and Dam 14. Other buildings, grounds, and utility maintenance totaled $72,200. Permanent oper ating equipment costs were $85,200. Maintenance of roads and bridges was performed at a cost of $13,400. Maintenance of public use areas was performed at a cost of $605,900. Maintenance of levees cost $31,800. Engineering and design work totaled $376,500. Supervision and administration and district overhead for the maintenance features totaled $695,600. Total maintenance costs were $12,350,700. Net credits to the project were $532,000, primarily as a result of collection of damages from towboat companies to lock and dam structures. Operating and care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were performed at a cost of $6,425,900. Real estate manage ment services were performed at a cost of $142,000. Natu ral resources activities cost $294,500, and operation of public use areas cost $747,100, with contract law enforce ment provided at a cost of $102,600. Surveys, various studies and structural inspections cost $543,200. The sui of $110,100 was expended on Master Plans; water control management costs were $804,200; and other operation ac. tivities cost $12,700. Supervision and administration and district overhead for operation features totaled $1,243,600. Total operation costs were $10,425,900. Total operation and maintenance costs were $22,244,608. Costs to Rock Island District were $281,071 for ne' work and $22,244,608 for operation and maintenance for 29-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN a total of $22,525,679. St. Louis District. New work: Costs incurred for new Lock and Dam 26 were $101,896 for real estate acquisition, $164,514 for relocations, $30,603,279 for dams, $141,127 for locks, $19,823 for channels and canals, $247,474 for levess and floodwalls, $4,621 for buildings, grounds, and utilities, $71,963 for permanent operating equipment, $6,962,734 for engineering, and $2,715,183 for supervision and administration. Total cost of new work was $41,032,614. Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made thereto and to appurtenant structures at a cost of $3,527,972. Costs to St. Louis District were $41,032,614 for new work and $8,609,007 for operation and maintenance for a total of $49,641,621. Condition at end of fiscal year. For information pertaining to locks, dams and harbors, see tables at end of chapter. St. Paul district. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. Anthony Falls and Nos. 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; commercial harbors at Lake City, Red Wing, and Winona, MN; and Prairie du Chien, WI; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red Wing, Wabasha, and Winona, MN; Lansing, IA; and Bay City, Pepin, and Prarie du Chien, WI; a remedial drainage ditch at Cochrane, WI; miscellaneous channel dredging and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction of various facilities for recreation use. Seepage damages totalling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Approximately 50,293.54 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of $15,549.63 acres of land are owned and controlled in pools 1 to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. In addition, fee title to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 2.98 acres of land for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department of the Army holds special rights Over 62,954.74 acres owned by Department of the Interior in pool Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. Land acquisition is complete. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul District: Guidewall extension at Lock No. 3 (the Uncompleted guidewall extensions at Lock Nos. 4, 5, 5A, : 8, 9, and 10 were reclassified from the "active" to the Inactive, category on April 13, 1973); realignment of channel at Wilds Bend; construction of small-boat harbor at St. Paul (Harriet Island), MN; and construction of additional recreational facilities. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year was such that cntrolling depths of 9 feet at low water and minimum idths for long-haul common carrier service were available in all pools. Structures are in good condition. Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction items, including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation. The following related work has also been completed: Construction of small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Moline, IL; Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA; Clinton, IA; and Hannibal, MO; improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; rehabilitation of Locks and Dams 11 through 14; rehabilitation of old auxiliary lock at Lock and Dam 14; permanent closure of old Lock 19 and drydock; rock and conglomerate excavation in Pool 16; rectification of seepage damage in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL; recreational facilities; and construction of visitor center at Lock 15. Work remaining to complete portion of project in Rock Island District: construction of guidewall extension at 16, 18, and 21: mooring facilities at 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 22; upper approach improvement at 19; upper approach dike at 20: removal of remainder of lateral dam in Pool 14; rock and/or conglomerate excavation in Pools 14, 15, 18, and 21; and construction of small-boat harbors at Keokuk, IA, and New Boston, IL, and commercial harbor at Fort Madison, IA. Planning for the smallboat harbor at Savanna, IL, is currently under way. Small-boat harbors at Bellevue, IA, Cassville, WI, and Davenport (Credit Island), IA, are inactive or have been deauthorized. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisition of land in Pools 11 to 22, inclusive, consisting of 93,601 acres in fee and 10,541 acres :n flowage easement, has been completed. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year, was such that controlling depths of 9 feet at low water and widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were being maintained in all pools. St. Louis District. Work completed: Locks and Dams Nos. 24, 25, and 26 (Henry T. Rainey Dam), except for guidewall extensions at Locks Nos. 24 and 25, have been completed as have recreation facilities at the three pools. Payments for rectification of damages have been completed. Other work remaining consists of construction guidewall extensions at Locks Nos. 24 and 25. Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 is under construction. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisitions of lands in Pools Nos. 24, 25, and 26, involving 41,448 acres of land in fee and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total of 1,742 acres have been acquired for Lock and Dam No. 26 replacement project. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year was such that controlling depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable widths for long-haul common carrier services were maintained in all pools and between Locks and Dam, No. 26 and Missouri River. Total Federal cost of existing project to end of fiscal year for the three Districts was $1,130,356,074 of which $468,584,862 was for new work, ($393,838,558 regular funds, $51,895,959 public works funds and $22,850,345 emergency relief funds), $604,239,812 regular funds for maintenance and $57,531,400 regular funds for rehabilitation. 29-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Project Funding FY 81 Fy 82 Fy 83 Fy 84 Sept. 30, 1984 Mississippi River New work' between Missouri Approp.) 24,347,000 79,335,000 70,105,398 38,441,000 510,986,407 River and Cost' 21,018,662 81,990,422 67,081,730 42,157,597 510,054,814 Minnepolis, Maint. Minnesota Approp. 37,196,200 43,504,800 58,960,456 51,692,401 616,039,287 (Federal Funds) Cost 37,840,349 41,302,359 50,986,450 60,514,185 606,189,113 Rehab. Approp. 17,867,000 8,040,000 0 0 57,533,187 Cost 18,943,007 6,927,351 1,214,556 99,623 57,531,400 (Contributed New Work funds) Approp. 0 0 400,000 512,160 2,199,701 Cost 0 0 0 774,696 2,062,236 1. Includes $41,469,956 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes replacement Lock and Dam 26 funds $215,207,000 appropriation. 3. Includes replacement Lock and Dam 26 funds $211,152,168 cost. 4. Includes $6,554,725 for maintenance on previous project. TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TABLE 29-B TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Regular Public Work Emergency District Cost Funds Funds Relief Funds Total St. Paul New Work' $ 60,121,491 $ 24,210,071 $ 9,071,214 $ 93,402,776 Maintpnanrr' 24106 0R - - 241 106.380 Rehabilitation Total New Work' Maintenance Rehabilitation Total New Work7268,639,227 Maintenance Total 44,598,203 345,826,074 65,077,840' 215,350,425 12,933,197 293,361,462 10,282,566" 147,783,007 416,422,234 1. Exlcudes $2,003,237 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 expended in pool No. 11. 2. Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 3. Includes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on operating and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. Excludes $33,000 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. 24,210,071 17,403,322 17,403,322 9 AAfl 9 9,071,214 11,338,865 11,338,865 9 1 ~9 ni r 44,598,203 379,107,359 93,820,027 215,350,425 2,933,197 322,103,649 147,783,007 10,282,566 2,440,266 429,145,066 5. $687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal year 1958. Excludes $201,167 transferred to St. Paul and St. Louis Districst covering their pro rata shares of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 6. Includes $47,800 transfereed from Rock Island District covering pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and $687,709 transferred from Rock Island District. 7. Includes $211,152,168 for replacement of Lock and Dam. 29-4 Rock Island St. Louis a TABLE 29-C Miles Lock Above Miles from and Ohio Nearest Dam River Town St. Anthony 853.9 In city of Falls, upper Minneapolis, Lock MN St. Anthony 853.3 In city of Falls, lower Minneapolis, Lock and dam MN Lock and dam 847.6 Minneapolis- 1 St. Paul Lock and dam 815.2 1.3 above 2 Hastings, MN Lock and dam 796.9 6.1 above Red 3 Wing, MN Lock and dam 752.8 Alma, WI 4 Lock and dam 738.1 Minneiska, MN 5 Lock and dam 728.5 3 above 5A Winona, MN Lock and dam 714.3 Trempealeau, 6 WI Lock and dam 702.5 Dresbach, MN 7 Lock and dam 679.2 Genoa, WI 8 Lock and dam 647.9 3.3 below 9 Lynxville, WI Lock and dam 615.1 Guttenberg, 10 IA Lock and dam 583.0 3.7 above 11 Dubuque, IA Lock and dam 556.7 Bellevue, IA 12 Lock and dam 522.5 4.3 above 13 Clinton, IA Lock and dam 493.3 3.7 below 14 Le Claire, IA Le Claire lock 493.1 3.9 below (Canal) Le Claire, IA Lock and dam 482.9 Foot of Arsenal 15 Island Rock Island, IL Lock and dam 457.2 1.8 above 16 Muscatine, IA LOCKS ANID D1AMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Estimated Length Percent Cost of Width Avail- Upper Depth on Character of Foundation Complete Year Each Lock of able for Normal Miter Sill Locks, Opened and Dam Cham- Full Pool Dams, to Including ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower and Work Navi- Work (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam in Pool gation in Pool 56 400 49.2 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some lime- Limestone. 1002 - $18,203,0003 56 400 26.94 750.0 56 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 80 110 110 110 400 35.94 725.1 400 35.9 - 500 12.2 - 6008 12.2 687.2 600 8.0 675.0 600 7.0 667.0 600 9.0 660.0 600 5.5 651.0 600 6.5 645.5 600 8.0 639.0 600 11.0 631.0 600 600 600 9.0 620.0 8.0 611.0 11.0 603.0 600 9.0 592.0 600 11.0 583.0 600 320 600 360 600 11.0 527.0 11.0 - 16.0 561.0 16.0 - 9.0 545.0 stone, mainly sandstone. No piles 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No piles. 13.54 10.1 Rock and piles 12.57 7.6 in gravel. 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, 22.2 13.0 silt and clay. 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, silt and clay. 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, gravel and silt. 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, gravel, and broken rock. 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, gravel and silt. 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand, clay and gravel. 20.5 13.5 Rock. 17.6 10.9 Rock. 24.0" 11.0 Rock. 17.01 11.0 17.0 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. Sandstone. Piles in gravel. Piles in sand, silt and clay. Piles in sand. Piles in sand and gravel. Piles in sand. Piles in sand. Piles in sand and clay. Piles in sand. Piles in sand and gravel. Piles in sand. Piles in sand. Piles in sand. Piles in sand and gravel. Piles in sand and gravel. Rock. Rock. Rock. Piles in sand and gravel. 100 1959 100 100 100 64 100 100 57 100 1917 1930 1948 1938 1935 1935 1936 1936 100 1937 100 1937 100 100 99 99 100 92 100 95 1938 1936 1937 1938 1938 1939 1922 1934 98 1937 ctlan 1c,,)) PON C, M cll s r r z 12,382,000s 2,358,0006 6,492,0009 8,706,000 4,865,000* 5,081,000* 8,009,000* 4,874,000 5,574,000* 6,061,000* 6,539, 000* 4,750,000* 7,428,000 5,580,000 7,502,000 6,284,000 _10 10,525,000 9,788,000 TABLE 29-C (Cont'd) LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Estimated Length Percent Cost of Width Avail- Upper Depth on Character of Foundation Complete Year Each Lock Miles of able for Normal Miter Sill Locks, Opened and Dam Lock Above Miles from Cham- Full Pool Dams, to Including and Ohio Nearest ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower and Work Navi- Work Dam River Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion ' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam in Pool gation in Pool Lock and dam 437.1 4.2 above New 110 600 8.0 536.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 99 1939 5,843,000 17 Boston, IL and gravel. Lock and dam 410.5 6.5 above 110 600 9.8 528.0 16.5 13.7 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 90 1937 10,308,000 18 Burlington, IA Lock and dam 364.2 Keokuk, IA 110 358 38.2 518.2 4.5 9.2 Rock. Rock. 100 1913 19 110 1,200 5.0 13.0 99 1957 14,813,000 Lock and dam 343.2 0.9 above 110 600 10.0 480.0 15.0 12.0 Rock. Rock and piles 97 1936 6,281,000 20 Canton, MO in sand and gravel. Lock and dam 324.9 2.1 below 110 600 10.5 470.0 16.5 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 95 1938 8,065,000 21 Quincy, IL and gravel. and gravel. Lock and dam 301.2 1.5 below 110 600 10.2 459.5 18.0 13.8 Rock. Rock. 99 1938 5,275,000 22 Saverton, MO Lock and dam 273.4 Clarksville, MO 110 600 15.0 449.0 19.0 12.0 Rock and piles. Piles in sand. 9914 1940 10,337,000 24 Lock and dam 241.4 Cap Au Gris, 110 600 15.0 434.0 19.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 9914 1939 13,694,000 25 MO and gravel. and gravel. Lock and dam 202.9 Alton, IL 110 600 24.0 419.0 19.0 10.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 100 1938 12,824,000 26 (Henry T. 110 360 24.0 - 16.0 10.0 Rainey Dam) New Lock and 200.8 Alton, IL 110 1,200 24.0 419.0 23.0 18.0 Piles in Piles in 33 756,950,000 dam 26 bedrock. bedrock. Total, Locks $985,391,000 and dams t.o rD 00 4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 29-E ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST OF PROJECT Facilities for public use, convenience and safety Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater Regulating works between lock and dam 26 (Henry T. Rainey Dam) and Missouri River Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation Miscellaneous Total additional features Total existing project (new work) $ 3,359,600 8,046,000 545,000 193,600 1,312,9002 13,457,100 $468,584,858 1. Includes a lump-sum payment of $2,146,800 (O&M appropriation) paid to the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, for rectification of seepage damages. Also includes $140,000 Construction General funds for project studies, evaluation, and report preparation. 2. Includes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch bridge, Minneapoli, MN. (FY 1969) 3. Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy Slough, MO. LICENSE FEES COLLECTED TABLE 29-F THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1984 Annual Collections to Dam Licensee Charge Sept. 30, 1984 St. Anthony Falls Northern States $ 3,300 $ 73,477 Lower Lock and Dam Power Co. (No. 2056) Lock and Dam No. 1 Ford Motor Co. 95,400 5,630,640 Total project (No. 362) $5,704,117 29-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 29-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 as amended by P.R. No. 10, Feb. 24, 1932 June 26, 1934 Aug. 30., 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 None Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17. 1950 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Dredging channels to landing places. Project adopted from Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such modification in plan as may be deemed advisable. Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams to be provided for with funds from Department of the Army appropriations for rivers and harbors. Missouri River established as lower limit of project. Extension of 9-foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, MN, including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, MN St. Paul, MN, harbor. Determine damages to drainage and levee districts caused by seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof. Public park and recreational facilities. Red Wing., MN, harbor. Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and backwater at Cochrane, WI Such changes or additions to payments, remedial works, or land acquisitions authorized by River and Harbor Act of Aug. 26, 1937 (River and Harbor Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. St. Paul, MN, channel enlargements small boat harbor, and roadway. Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above estimated stage for discharge of 40,000 c.f.s. Winona, MN, basin. Future modification of lock and dam No. 2 for power development. Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. Anthony Falls project. Lake City, MN harbor. Wabasha, MN harbor. Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, pools 3 to 11. Hastings, MN, harbor. Lansing, IA, harbor. Fort Madison, IA, harbors. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, IA Davenport, IA, harbor. Muscatine, IA, harbor. Alma, WI, harbor. Hannibal, MO, harbor. Prairie du Chien, WI, harbors. Opposite Hamburg, IL, harbor.' Permits such change in location of Winona, MN, Small boat basin authorized by River and harbor Act of Mar. 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, MN, in lieu of previously authorized commercial harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, MO. Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes completion of St. Anthony Falls project. Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, IL.l None H. Doc. 290, 71st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Co. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and harbors Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 103, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 76th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 547, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 54, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 432, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 449, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 511, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 514, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 515, 79th Cong., 2d sess H. Doc. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess S. Doc. 192, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 661, 80th Cong., 2d sess S. Doc. 197, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 642, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 66., 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 67, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 71, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 254, 81st Cong. 1stse ss None H. Doc. 347, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 251, 82nd Cong., 1st sess H. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 136, 84th Cong., 1st sess 29-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 29-G (Cont'd) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee districts caused by operation of navigation pools Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA. Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide adequate facilities for existing navigation. Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing., MN. Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna,' Moline, Andalusia, New Boston,'Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, IL; Bellevue,' Clinton, Davenport, and Keokuk, IA; St. Paul (Harriet Island), MN; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville,' WI. Payment of damages caused by pool 24 at Clarksville, MO. Remedial works at Sandy Slough, MO. Repair of Stone Arch bridge at Minneapolis, MN. Commercial Harbor facilities at Fort Madison, IA. Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 513, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 507, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 95-502 1. Deffered. 2. Inactive. 29-11 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 Mar. 3, 1909 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 21, 1978 Documents _ CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT * This district comprises Cook, McHenry, Lake, Kane, DuPage and Will Counties in Illinois, and Lake and Porter Counties in Indiana, including a portion of LaPorte County along Lake Michigan. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN............... .30-2 2. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN........30-2 3. Chicago Harbor, IL ....................... 30-2 4. Chicago River, IL .. ..................... 30-3 5. Indiana Harbor, IN ....................... 30-3 6. Michigan City Harbor, IN..................... 30-4 7. Waukegan Harbor, IL ..................... 30-4 8. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ...... 30-5 9. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 30-5 Alteration of Bridges 10. Other Authorized Bridge Alteration......... .30-5 Beach Erosion Control 11. Mount Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN ................. 30-5 12. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Bank Protection Beverly Shores, IN .................... 30-5 Page 13. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............................ . 30-6 14. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization ............... ......... 30-6 Flood Control 15. Chicago River, IL (North Branch) ........... 30-6 16. Little Calumet River, IL .................. .30-6 17. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..... 30-6 18. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 30-7 General Investigations 19. Surveys ................................. 30-7 20. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......... 30-7 21. Research and Development .............. . .30-7 22. National Emergency Preparedness .......... 30-7 30-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 28 miles south-east of Chicago harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14905 and 14926). Existing Project. Provides for (a) north breakwater 4,646 feet long; (b)an outer west bulkhead 1,176 feet long; (c) a west bulkhead shore connection 2,300 feet long; (d) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (e) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; (f) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide; (g)a west harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 27 October 1965 (Public Law 89- 298; House Document Number 160, 88th Congress, 1st Session). The authorizing act also provided the Secretary of the Army to reimburse The State of Indiana for expenditure of funds used to construct such portions of the project as approved by the Chief of Engineers and constructed under supervision of the Chief of Engineers. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Seven berths and docks are available, three on the west harbor arm, one on the harbor basin, and three on the east harbor arm. One dock on the west harbor arm is used for shipment and receipt of steel products. One dock on the east harbor arm is used for receipt of iron ore pellets and limestone and shipment of steel products. Five facilities are administered by the Indiana Port Commission and are used for handling general cargo. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: A project map is being updated at a cost of $4,732. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to 30 September 1984 were $17,314,783, of which $13,599,990 was for new work ($13,584,000 Federal and $15,990 non-Federal), and $3,714,793 for maintenance. 2. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, 15 miles south of Chicago Harbor, within corporate limits of the city of Chicago, except for breakwaters, an approach channel, and an anchorage area which are in Illinois and Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926 and 14929). Previous projects. For details see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone filled timber crib breakwater 6,714 feet long; (b) a stone filled double ow steel sheet pile detached breakwater 5,007 feet long; c) a north pier 2,450 feet long; (d) an approach channel 29 fVet deep and 3,200 feet wide; (e) an outer harbor anchorge area 28 feet deep and 3,000 wide; (f) an entrance chanel 27 feet deep and 230 to 290 feet wide; (g) a channel in he Calumet River 27 feet deep and at least 200 feet wide to the north side of 130th street; (h) three turning basins designated as numbers 1, 3 and 5; (i) a channel extending into Lake Calumet at a width of about 1,000 feet. The pro. ject was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 3 March 1899, 13 June 1902, 30 August 1935, 14 July 1960, 23 October 1962, and 27 October 1965. See table 30-C. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Thirty six docks, wharves, and terminals are available. The Chicago Regional Port District owns four wharves, two grain elevators, one dock, and one terminal. The United States Government owns one stone dock. The most important cargoes handled are iron ores and concentrates, coal, and lignite. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: A project map is being updated at a cost of $7,502. Engi. neering and design was performed for a dredging project at a cost of $71,421. A water quality contract was performed for the dredging project at a cost of $30,000. A contract was awarded to dredge a portion of the river, and work was performed at a cost of $99,999 with removal of 13,000 cubic yards of shoal material. Supervision and contract administration was performed for the dredging project at a cost of $5,180. Engineering and design was performed for a damaged section of the Southerly Exterior Breakwater at a cost of $10,587. A Detroit District survey was performed for the damaged breakwater at a cost of $3,028. Supervision and inspection of these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $3,422. Under the dike disposal program, engineering services were continued at a cost of $159,093. A design engineering contract was performed at a cost of $11,645. Construction of the Chicago Area Confined Disposal Facility was continued at a cost of $1,888,552. A separate contract for the dike facility (to place a sand blanket along the stone dike) was initiated at a cost of $65,790. A ground water study was performed by hired labor at a cost of $11,468. A ground water contract was performed at a cost of $4,878. A drilling contract was performed at a cost of $3,790. Supervision and contract administration of these activities were performed at a cost of $101,717. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is 79% complete. Work remaining to be accomplished consists of widening and straightening the Calumet River in the vicinity of 106th Street, and the inactive portion which consists of closing the gap between the breakwaters, and dredging minor shoals in the outer harbor. Total costs of existing project to 30 September 1984 were $43,347,226, of which $21,722,594 was for new work ($18,685,991 regular funds and $3,036,603 public works funds), $20,098,984 regular funds for maintenance, $836,667 non-Federal funds for maintenance, and $689,001 regular funds for rehabilation. 3. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928). 30-2 rn CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT evious projects. See page 1396 of Annual Report for lsting Project. Provides for (a) a stone filled timber 4shore arm extension breakwater 2,250 feet long; (b) a nape filled timber crib exterior breakwater 5,421 feet lijg; (c) a rubble-mound and stone filled concrete caisson southerly extension to the exterior breakwater 4,944 feet long, exclusive of 582 foot entrance gap inclosing an outer basin of about 970 acres; (d) a stone filled timber crib Anrth pier 960 feet long; (e) a stone filled timber crib north dner breakwater 4,034 feet long with a 304 foot shore return, and a 754 foot gap; (f) a stone filled timber crib south inner breakwater 2,544 feet long inclosing an inner basin Ofapproximately 224 acres; (g) a lake approach channel 29 M deep and 800 feet wide; (h) a channel and maneuver aea inside the exterior breakwater and exterior breakwater southerly extension 28 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,300 feet; (i) an inner basin 21 feet deep; (j) an entrance channel 21 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 11 July 1870, 14 June 1880, 3 March 1899, 25 July 1912, 2 March 1919 and 23 October 1962. See table 30-C. The Chicago Lock was constructed in 1938 by the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago. The deep draft lock is 600 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 23 feet deep and uses a steel cellular design. Operation and maintenance responsibilities in the interests of navigation were transferred to the Federal Government, pursuant to Public Law 98-63, approved 30 July 1983, Section 107 of the Public Law 97-88, and Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of the Army and the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are three docks, two for passenger excursion boats and one for cargo. The most important cargoes handled are sugar and non-metallic minerals. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Aproject map is being updated at a cost of $11,934. Preparation of contract documents to operate and maintain the lock were performed by hired labor at a cost of $51,909. A Support Agreement was entered into with MSDGC to operate and maintain the lock at a cost of $469,049. Supervision and inspection of these activities was performed by hired labor at a cost of $14,915. Operations and care of lock: A contract was awarded on 1 August 1984 for operation and maintenance of the lock. Work commenced on 1 September 1984 at a cost of $49,000. Supervision and administration of these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $6,670. Under the dike disposal program, engineering services were continued at a cost of $54,324. Construction of the Chicago Area Confined Disposal Facility at Calumet Harbor and River was continued at a cost of $623,278. A separate contract for the dike facility (to place a sand blanket along the stone dikel was initiated at a cost of $105,137. A ground water study was performed by hired labor at a cost of $3,747. A ground water program was performed at a cost of $20,200. Supervision and contract administration of these activities were performed at a cost of $36,812. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to 30 September 1984 were $13,713,336, of which $4,342,822 was for new work, $8,043,914 for maintenance, and $1,326,600 for rehabilitation. 4. CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, in Cook County within the corporate limits of the city of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926, 14927 and 14928). Previous projects. See page 1394 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a channel in the main branch of the Chicago River 21 feet deep from Rush Street to Wolf Point; (b) a channel in the North Branch of the Chicago River 21 feet deep from Wolf Point to North Avenue; (c) a channel in the North Branch Canal 21 feet deep; (d) a turning basin 21 feet deep. All dredging to within 20 feet of existing docks. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 3 March 1899, 13 June 1902 and 2 March 1907. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Six docks are available. The most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel and crushed rock. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: A project map is being updated at a cost of $21,904. Condition surveys were completed at a cost of $24,579. Under the Lake Michigan Water Diversion Monitoring Program, engineering work was performed at a cost of $295,380. Supervision and inspection of these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $8,780. Under the dike disposal program, engineering services were continued at a cost of $64,779. Construction of the Chicago Area Confined Disposal Facility at Calumet Harbor and River was continued at a cost of $589,014. A separate contract for the dike facility (to place a sand blanket along the stone dike) was initiated at a cost of $154,206. A ground water study was performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,243. Engineering services for a special confined disposal facility for the North Branch were performed at a cost of $5,664. A sediment analysis contract was completed for the North Branch at a cost of $800. Engineering services studying the sediment analysis of the North Branch were continued at a cost of $20,062. Supervision and contract administration of these activities were performed at a cost of $38,404. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to 30 September 1984 were $7,762,220, of which $544,679 was for new work and $7,217,541 was for maintenance. 5. INDIANA HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 19 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Num- 30-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 bers 14926 and 14929). Previous projects. For details see page 1943 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for (a) northerly rubblemound breakwater 1,120 feet long; (b) an easterly concrete capped concrete caisson breakwater 201 feet long with a rubble mound extension 2,324 feet long; (c) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (d) an anchorage and maneuver basin 28 feet deep; (e) a canal entrance channel 27 feet deep and 280 feet wide; (f) a main canal 22 feet deep; (g) a turning basin 22 feet deep; (h) the Forks Turning Basin 22 feet deep; (i) the Lake George Branch 22 feet deep; (j) the Calumet River Branch 22 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 4 March 1913, 2 March 1919, 20 March 1922, 3 July 1930, 30 August 1935, 26 August 1937, and 14 July 1960. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Fifteen docks and wharves are available. Six docks for handling iron ore and limestone. Six docks for handling petroleum products. Three docks for handling gypsum, scrap metal and steel, and bulk products. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: A project map is being updated at a cost of $2,459. Engineering services to study a hazard to navigation at Canal Street and the Indiana Harbor Canal were performed at a cost of $13,532. Engineering services for an Environmental Impact Statement associated with a confined disposal facility were performed at a cost of $332. Under the dike disposal program, site selection studies and engineering and design were continued at a cost of $330,936. A sediment sampling contract was performed at a cost of $46,804. An aquatic study contract was performed at a cost of $40,004. Supervision and inspection of these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $416_ Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to 30 September 1984 were $10,765,657, of which $9,135,116 was Regular Funds, $1,618,041 was Public Works Funds, and $12,500 was Contributed Funds. Of the total cost, $4,848,980 was for new work and $5,916,677 was for maintenance. 6. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in La Porte County, 38 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14905 and 14926). Previous projects. See page 1407 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone filled timber crib detached breakwater 1,304 feet long; (b) a pile and steel sheeting west pier 835 feet long; (c) a stone filled timber crib, pile and steel sheeting east pier 2,276 feet long; (d) a stone filled timber crib east breakwater 1,000 feet long; (e) an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 425 feet wide; (f) a turning basin 18 feet deep; (g) a channel in Trail Creek 18 feet deep; (h) a turning basin 18 feet deep; (i)a n outer basin 12 feet deep; j) an outer basin 8 feet deep; (k) a channel in Trail Creek 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 3 March 1889, 3 March 1905, 21 January 1927, 30 August 1935, and Section 107 of 14 July 1960 approved on 30 September 1966. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas in the lower mile of Trail Creek. The commodity handled at this harbor is fresh fish. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys were completed at a cost of $14,685. An economic analysis was completed at a cost of $3,471. Supervision and inspection of these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $529. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to 30 September 1984 were $7,544,924, of which $1,287,057 was for new work ($1,256,257 Federal and $30,800 non-Federal funds), $4,639,197 for maintenance, and $1,618,670 for rehabilitation. 7. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 38 miles north of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14904 and 14905). Previous projects. See page 1392 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly stone filled timber crib breakwater 588 feet long; (b) a stone filled reinforced concrete caisson shore connection 270 feet long; (c) a stone filled double row steel sheeting shore connection 640 feet long; (d) a single row steel sheeting shore connection 398 feet long; (e) a stone filled timber crib north pier 998 feet long; (f) a single row steel sheet piling north pier 444 feet long; (g) a steel piling revetment 632 feet long; (h) a stone filled timber crib south pier 1,399 feet long; (i) a stone filled double row pile and sheeting south pier 1,712 feet long; (j) an entrance channel 22 feet deep and 390 feet wide; (k) a channel between the piers 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide; (1) an inner basin 18 feet deep; (m) an anchorage area in the southwest corner of the inner basin 8 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 13 June 1902, 3 July 1930, and 2 March 1945. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Four docks are available. The commodities handled at this harbor are gypsum and building cement. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: A project map is being updated at a cost of $2,417. Condi tion surveys were completed at a cost of $24,514. Engi neering and design was performed for the north pier at a cost of $30,254. Engineering and design was performe for the north breakwater at a cost of $28,137. A water quality study was completed at a cost of $7,077. A waLr 30-4 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT quality testing contract was performed at a cost of $217. Dredging plans and specifications were prepared by hired labor at a cost of $11,373. A contract was awarded to repair the north breakwater, and work was performed at a cost of $72,674. Supervision and contract administration for the north breakwater contract was performed at a cost of $4,848. A contract was awarded to dredge the entrance channel, and work was performed at a cost of $170,695, with removal of 8,745 cubic yards of shoal material. Supervision and contract administration for the dredging contract was performed at a cost of $6,000. Supervision and inspection of these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $14,931. Under the dike disposal program, site selection studies and engineering and design were continued at a cost of $130,558. Supervision and inspection of the activity was performed by hired labor at a cost of $649. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to 30 September 1984 were $5,300,168, of which $604,793 was for new work and $4,695,375 was for maintenance. 8. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS A project map is being updated for Michigan City Harbor, Indiana at a cost of $1,699. Condition surveys were performed by the Detroit District at a cost of $61,009 (see table 30-G for projects and cost). A project survey was performed by real estate at a cost of $4,633. Supervision and inspection of these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $104,437. 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). Project and Fiscal Year Costs Location to September 30, 1984 SBH Burns Waterway, IN $656,193 IL Beach State Park, SBH, IL 54,739 Lake Calumet SBH, IL 7,500 Michigan City Harbor, IN 91,328 Skokie Marina, Skokie, IL 7,500 Investigation and Removal of Sunken Vessels and Other Obstctions to Navigation Under Authority of Sections 19 and 20 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899, the following work Was undertaken: A contract for removal of a sunken vessel, ST.S. AMERI CAN, which sank in Turning Basin No. 5 of the Calumet River and Harbor project in 1982, was completed at a cost of $275,000. Engineering and design were performed at a Costof $3,658. Supervision and contract administration 'CL pertformed at a cost of $21,378. Alteration of Bridges 10. OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION See table 30-D. Beach Erosion Control 11. MT. BALDY, INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, IN Location. On the south end of Lake Michigan shoreline, approximately two miles west of Michigan City, Indiana. Existing Project. The Corps of Engineers was funded under the Energy and Water Development Appropiation Act 1981, dated 1 October 1980, Public Law 96-367, to provide beach nourishment along approximately 3,000 feet of shore at the toe of Mt. Baldy in the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Local Cooperation. The work is within the National Park Service property and the National Park Service, acting through its Superintendent of the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, issued to the Corps of Engineers on 28 April 1981 a right-of-way permit to do the work. Access to the project was made possible through the cooperation of the Northern Indiana Public Service Company. On 28 August 1973, the State of Indiana granted a 10-year license to the National Park Service for the installation and maintenance of beach nourishment material and stone revetment in this area, which was still valid for this project. Operations and results during period. No work was performed in FY 1984. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was completed in FY82. Total costs of existing project to 30 September 1984 were $1,500,000. 12. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE BANK PROTECTION, BEVERLY SHORES, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, approximately 35 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14905 and 14926). Existing Project. Provides for 13,000 feet of stone revetment and periodic repair of rip rap to maintain the full length of beach front at Beverly Shores, Indiana. The current project was authorized by Public Law 97-88 and Public Law 98-63. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. No work was performed in FY 84. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total costs of existing project to 30 September 1984 were $660,000 for new work. 30-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 13. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 30-E. 14. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended. Project and Fiscal Year Costs Location to September 30, 1984 Greenwood Beach, Evanston, IL $56,546 Langdon Park, Wilmette, IL 5,004 Lloyd Park, Winnetka, IL 30,089 Flood Control 15. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (NORTH BRANCH) Location Northern Illinois, in Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. Provides for clearing the channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois, of fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects which contribute to the flooding, unsightliness, and pollution of the river. The project extends from Wolf Point in Chicago Illinois, to its source just south of Rockland Road east of Libertyville, Illinois. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 31 December 1970 (Section 116) and amended by the River and Harbor Act of 7 March 1974. Local Cooperation. The 1970 Act provided that local interests furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction; maintain and operate all works after completion without cost to the United States; and agree to bear all cost in excess of $200,000 for completing construction. Assurance of local cooperation for this act was approved on 31 July 1972. The 1974 Act provided that the United States will maintain the channel free of trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed $150,000 per year with non- Federal interests paying 25 per centum of the cost of maintenance. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Federal funds in the amount of $3,000 were expended for the 1981 debris removal contract. A contract was awarded and Federal funds in the amount of $20,000 were expended for the 1983 debris removal contract for snag. ging and clearing at the bridges along the main stem of the North Branch Chicago River between the junction with the North Shore Channel north to golf Road in Morton Grove, the middle fork between Winnetka Road to 2,000 feet north of Old Willow Road in Northbrook, and the west fork from the confluence with the middle fork northward to Lake-Cook County Line Road in Morton Grove, Glenview, and Northbrook. Engineering and design for the 1983 work was performed at a cost of $37,191. Engineering and design for the 1984 work was performed at a cost of $17,663. Supervision and contract administration of these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $313. The local sponsor, the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago, expended $5,956 for these activi. ties. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of existing project to 30 September 1984 were $1,445,266, of which $231, 884 was for new work ($191,884 regular funds and $40,000 contributed funds) and $1,213,382 was for maintenance ($925,266 Federal funds and $288,116 contributed funds). 16. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IL Location. Rises in western LaPorte County, Indiana, near Michigan City and flows generally westerly through Porter and Lake County, Indiana, into Cook County, Illinois, to its junction with the Calumet-Sag Channel in Calumet Park, Illinois. Approximately 12 miles of the Little Calumet River lies within the State of Illinois. Existing project. Provides for clearing the channel of the Little Calumet River, Illinois, from its confluence with the Calumet-Sag Channel eastward to the Indiana State Line, of fallen trees, roots, silt, and other debris and ob jects which contribute to flooding, unsightliness and pol lution of the river. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1974, Section 66, approved 7 March 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. No work was performed during FY 1984. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of existing project to 30 September 1984 was $582,965, all new work. 17. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 30-F. 30-6 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT 18. FLOOD CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong. and antecedent legislation. Project and Location Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Emergency bank protection (Sec. Act Public Law 526, 79th Cong). Project and Location 12th St. Beach Meigs Fld., Chgo., IL Illinois Beach State Park Lake Co., IL Lincoln Park Gun Club, Chgo., IL Rosewood Beach, Highland Park, IL Fiscal Year Costs to September 30, 1984 $100,234 0 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Fiscal Year Costs to September 30, 1984 $ 0 220,088 218,638 210,350 General Investigations 19. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,348,765 itemized as follows: Navigation Studies $ 0 Flood Damage Prevention Studies 203,231 Shoreline Protection Studies 51,783 Special Studies 1,264 Special Investigation 20,000 Coordination Studies 16,104 Supplemental Pre-authorization 1,039,305 Review for Deauthorization 17,078 20. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs of $93,524 were for: Flood Plain Management Services $93,524 21. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Cost for hydrologic studies during the fiscal year was $2,000. Flood control activities pursuant to section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1945, as amended. 22. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Project and Location Blackberry Creek, Aurora, IL Fiscal Year Costs to September 30, 1984 $7,500 Fiscal year costs of $129,000 were for: Training and Exercises Management and Mobilization Planning 30-7 $29,945 99,005 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 September 30, 1984 30-8 1. Burns Waterway New Work: Harbor, IN Approp. 13,584,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 13,584,000 Maint.: Approp. 455,000 325,000 -64,000 0 3,714,793 Cost 463,466 300,624 -44,353 4,732 3,714,793 (Contributed New Work: Funds) Contrib. 15,900 Cost 15,900 2. Calumet Harbor New Work: and River, IL Approp. 22,578,567' and IN Cost 22,578,567' (Federal Funds) Maint.: Approp. 320,000 1,519,000 4,431,000 639,000 20,201,7741 Cost 315,735 683,175 3,340,642 2,478,072 20,098,9841 Rehab.: Approp. 689,001' Cost 689,001' (Contributed Maint.: Funds) Contrib. 836,667 Cost 836,667 3. Chicago Harbor, New Work: IL Approp. 4,788,827 (Federal Funds) Cost 4,788,827' Maint.: Approp. 260,000 793,000 1,499,000 842,500 8,088,286 Cost 261,291 563,031 1,080,124 1,446,975 8,043,914 Rehab: Approp. 1,326,600 Cost 1,326,600 4. Chicago River, New Work: IL Approp. 1,500,565' Cost 1,500,565' Maint.: Approp. 290,000 545,000 1,994,000 530,000 7,234,757" Cost 289,920 339,980 1,486,071 1,225,815 7,217,541" 5. Indiana Harbor, New Work: IN Approp. 4,897,148 4 Cost 4,897,148"' Maint.: Approp. 30,000 80,000 510,000 236,123 5,923,788' Cost 34,361 81,383 304,630 434,483 5,916,677' 6. Michigan City New Work: Harbor, IN Approp. 1,543,646"' Cost 1,543,646'" Maint.: Approp. 83,000 15,000 -13,000 20,000 4,640,512 Cost 76,277 17,299 -7,573 18,685 4,639,197 Rehab.: Approp. 1,618,670 Cost 1,618,670 (Contributed New Work: Funds) Contrib. 30,800 Cost 30,800 7. Waukegan Harbor, New Work: IL Approp. 823,026 Cost 823,026 Maint.: Approp. 200,000 765,000 90,000 566,671 4,880,980 Cost 144,131 606,698 182,567 504,344 4,695,375 11. Mount Baldy, IN New Work: Dunes National Approp. 1,500,000 - - 1,500,000 Lakeshore, IN Cost 227,305 1,272,608 87 1,500,000 TABLE 30-A (Cont'd) CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT IT ext Project 12. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Beverly Shores, IN 15. Chicago River, IL North Branch (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Little Calumet River, IL In FY 81 FY 82 660,000 88,514 571,486 571,486 150,000 150,000 150,000 195,188 107,010 133,907 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 60,000 47,344 100,000 125,000 112,909 103,687 0 63,367 37,547 1. Includes $855,973 for previous projects. 2. Excludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant to decree [No. 54-C-1608J regarding removal of flue-dust and includes $45,230 for previous projects. 3. In settlement pursuant to decree [No. 54-C-1608] rearding removal of flue-dust. 4. Includes $446,005 for previous projects. 5. Includes $955,886 for previous projects. 6. Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 7. Includes $60,668 for previous projects. 8. Includes $2,509 for previous projects. 9. Excludes $12,500 contributed funds. 10. Includes $287,389 for previous projects. 11. Includes $218,233 on previous projects. 12. Includes $15,711 on previous projects. 30-9 See Section 60,000 50,842 Total to FY 83 FY 84 September 30, 1984 50,000 78,167 0 63,367 660,000 660,000 191,884 191,884 1,047,000 925,266 40,000 40,000 300,000 282,160 583,000 582,965 I -- TABLE 30-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13,1902 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935' ' Aug. 30, 1935 ' 2 Mar. 2, 1945' July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 July 11, 1870 June 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1931 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 4, 1981 July 30, 1983 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Work Authorized BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN (See Section 1 of Text) Provides for breakwater and channel to present dimensions and depths: North Breakwater, West Bulkhead, Approach Channel and Outer Harbor, East and West Harbor Arms. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN (See Section 2 of Text) Outer harbor protected by breakwaters. Five turning basins. Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins. Consolidated the 2 projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth and dimensions; deepen river-entrance channel and river to existing project depths; widen and straighten river channel; 5 turning basins to same depth as adjacent channel. Dredging area A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance channel 300 feet wide to 21 feet deep. An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep through shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between breakwaters. Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to 28 feet in outer harbor; and 27 feet in river entrance up to E.J.&E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen, widen, and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J.&E. Ry. Bridge. to an including turning basin 5, to a depth of 27 feet in earth and 28 feet in rock; deepen turning basins 1, 3 and 5 to 27 feet; enlarge turning basins 3 and 5; a channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 from project. Modification of Act of Oct. 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to full width of the south draw to depth of 27 feet, and temporary protection for center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad Bridge [Nickel Plate] to permit dredging of full width of south bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL (See Section 3 of Text) Inner breakwaters and inner basin. Exterior Breakwater. Present project depth in basin, and entrance to Chicago River. Shore-arm and southerly extension of exterior breakwater. Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park Commissioners. Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern part of outer harbor. Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; and deepen a channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 1,300 feet wide. Provides for lock operations and maintenance responsibilities in the interests of navigation. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Section 4 of Text) For project depth of 21 feet in lieu of that fixed by act of June 3, 1896. Turning basins. 30-10 Documents Public Law 89-298, H. Doc. 160, 88th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1896 pp. 2584 et seq., and H. Doc. 277, H. 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 172, 54th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 349, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 494, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 233, 76th Cong., 1st sess H. Doc. 149, 86th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 581, 87th Cong., 2d sess, H. Report No. 973, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Ex. Doc. 114, 41st Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1879 pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report, 1870, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report 1897, pp. 2790-2791 H. Doc. 710, Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1303, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 797, 71st Cong. Public Law 14, 79th Cong. H. Doc. 485, 87th Cong. 2d sess Section 107 of Public Law 97-88 Public Law 98-63 Specified in act. Specified in act. CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Mar. 2, 1907 Interpreted by Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908 as adopting new work of the then existing project for 21-foot depth. Mar. 2, 1919 July 24, 1946'" June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 20, 1922 Mar.3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1929 July 3, 1930'" June 30, 1932 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 26, 1937 Jul14y, 1960 Oct27., 1965" Mar. 3, 1889 Mar. 3, 1905 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 jt. 30 1966 OVC. 107 July 14, 1960 June 14, 1880 Aug. 3, 1882 Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. Dredging channel 9 feet deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Addison St. INDIANA HARBOR, IN (see Section 5 of Text) Maintenance of outer harbor. Maintenance of inner harbor channel when deeded free of cost to and accepted by the United States. Breakwaters. Lighthouse crib, present length and alignment easterly and northerly breakwaters. Reduce length of channel to be maintained in extension to Lake George. Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length and alignment of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Sheet and Tibe Co. about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. Accept 2.3 acres of land for construction of the Forks Turning Basin. Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and turning basin at the Forks. Authorized Secretary of War to sell Inland Steel Co. about 1,903 linear feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer harbor, deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of canal and portion of Calumet River Branch to 141st St. Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. Increase authorized depths to 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel; 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E.J.&E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 feet, except through bridge openings. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN (See Section 6 of Text) East breakwater and old east pier inclosing the outer basin. Extension of east pier. Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. Lower turning basin. Rebuild west pier as at present located. Present project dimensions of entrance channel. Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east breakwater and old east pier inclosing outer basin. Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, dredging outer basin, and enlarging entrance to basin through east pier. Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper turning basin to E Street bridge. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL (See Section 7 of Text) Parallel piers and basins. - Modified location of harbor entrance. Documents H. Doc. 95, 56th Cong., 1st sess. [Annual Report, 1900, p. 3863 and Annual Report, 1909, p. 709]. H. Doc. 1294, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 767, 78th Cong., 2d sess.6 H. Doc. 1113, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 690, 62d Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 65th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 176, 67th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 219, 72d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Do. 13, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 195, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 227, 89th Cong., 1st sess." Recommendation of a Board of Engineers, Annual Report, 1870, p. 123. Reports of Boards of Engineers, Annual Report, 1851, pp. 2187-2189; Annual Report 1882, pp. 2264-2266. Annual Report, 1897, pp. 2903-2904. Joint resolution of Congress approved May 13, 1908. Public Law 23. H. Doc. 279, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report June 1965. Annual Report, 1880, p. 1942. Annual Report, 1882, pp. 277, 2162 30-11 TABLE 30-B (Cont'd) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 30-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 13, 1902 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 17, 1970 Sec. 201 Oct. 27, 1965" Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at inner end of north pier, and dredge channel and basin to depth of 20 feet. Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of north pier, and enlarging inner basin. Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from outer end of north pier to project depth in lake, and dredge an anchorage area in southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer harbor to 25 feet and extending it to the depth in Lake Michigan, at widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth of 23 feet at a width of 180 feet, and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. H. Doc. 343, 56th Cong., 1st sess, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 116, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 368, 90th Cong., 2d sess: MOUNT BALDY, INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, IN (See Section 11 of Text) Provides for emergency beach nourishment. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, IN, BEVERLY SHORES, IN Provides for emergency shore protection repairs to stone revetment initially constructed in 1973. Provides for operations and maintenance of the shore protection measures. Public Law 96-367. Public Law 97-88. Public Law 98-63. 1. Included in Public Works Administration Program Sept. 6, 1943, and Dec. 16., 1933. 2. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.]. 3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 Ibreakwater closure.] 4. Contains latest map of harbor. Uricompleted portion is inactive. 5. Contains latest map of river. 6. Latest published map is in Annual Report for 1914, opposite p. 2928. 7. Contains latest published map of North Branch above North Ave. 8. Contains latest published map. 9. Completed under previous project. 10. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [widen and deepen Lake George Branch.] 11. Included in Public Works Administration Program Sept. 6, 1933, and July 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [widen and deepen main canal and Calumet River Branch.] 12. Project deauthorized in 1977. 13. Project deauthorized in 1983. 30-12 Oct. 1, 1980 Dec. 4, 1981 July 30, 1983 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 30-C EXISTING PROJECTS See Section Length Width Depth in Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 30-13 1. Burns Waterway North Breakwater 4,646 Harbor, IN Outer West Bulkhead 3,476 Approach Channel 2,200 400 30 Outer Harbor 3,700 Varies 28 East Harbor Arm 2,100 620 27 West Harbor Arm 3,800 620 27 2. Calumet Harbor and Northerly Crib Breakewater 6,714 River, IL and IN Southerly Steel Breakwater 5,007 - - North Pier 2,450 Approach channel 9,700 3,200 29 Outer harbor 10,500 3,000 28 River entrance 3,000 290 27 Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge 21,100 200 27 to turning basin No. 3 and variable earth 28 rock Turning basin No. 3 to turning basin 8,000 Variable 27 No.5 Approach into Lake Calumet 4,000 400 27 Extension into Lake Calumet 3,000 1,000 27 Turning basins 1, 3, and 5 - - 27 3. Chicago Harbor, IL Shore arm extension 2,250 Exterior breakwater 5,421 - Exterior breakwater southerly ext. 4,944 North inner breakwater 4,034 - - South inner breakwater 2,544 - - North pier 960 Approach channel 6,600 800 29 Channel and maneuver area 2,200 1,300 28 Lock 600 80 23 Inner basin 1,270 740 21 Entrance channel 7,300 190-470 21 4. Chicago River, IL Main Branch of Chicago River 3,800 190-390 21 North Branch of Chicago River 11,100 91-390 21 North Branch Canal 5,500 56-210 21 North Branch Turning Basin - - 21 5. Indiana Harbor, IN Northerly Breakwater 1,120 - - Easterly Breakwater 2,525 Approach Channel 7,200 800 29 Outer Harbor 4,200 Varies 28 Entrance Channel 3,600 65-280 27 Main Canal 7,400 61-210 22 Turning Basin - - 22 Lake George Branch 3,700 64-160 22 Calumet River Branch 2,500 160-260 22 6. Michigan City Detached breakwater 1,304 Harbor, IN West pier 835 - East Pier 2,276 - - East breakwater 1,000 - - Entrance channel 1,900 150-425 18 Main channel 2,400 120-150 18 Outer basin 900 900 8-12 Trail Creek 3,000 50-100 8 Trail Creek 2,300 50 6 Waukegan Harbor, North breakwater and Shore Connection 1,896 - - IL North pier and North Revetment 2,074 - South pier 3,111 - - Entrance Channel 3,250 390 22 Channel to inner basin 1,700 200 18 Inner basin 1,650 375-500 18 Anchorage Area - - 8 Area of about 6 acres. TABLE 30-D REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION (See Section 10 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Calumet River Bridges 1967 $1,625,068 1Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6[g] of the Act of October 15, 1966, P.L. 89-670. TABLE 30-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 13 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Hollywood--Ardmore Beach Chicago, IL Evanston, IL Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL' Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1954. 1982 1979 1976 1975 $237,271 766,052 244,889 65,611 TABLE 30-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 17 of Text) Project KANKAKEE RIVER, IL AND IN Levee between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in IN LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IL AND IN Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN' 'Classified inactive in November 1971. TABLE 30-G For Last Full Report See Annual Report For Cost to September 30, 1984 Operation and Construction Maintenance 1938 1968 53,136 Date Reconnaissance or Condition Survey Project Conducte Burns Waterway Harbor, IN Aug, Sept, 1984 Calumet Harbor & River, IL and IN March, April, Aul Chicago Harbor, IL March 1984 Indiana Harbor, IN Sept. 1984 Michigan City Harbor, IN July 1984 Waukegan Harbor, IL May 1984 'Cost reflects an adjustment as a result of condition surveys performed in 1983. edg1,9 84 g, 1984 30-14 RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 8 of Text) Cost $ 6,002 50,060 -6,999' 8,446 3,000 5001 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT * The district is composed of the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota, which border the lakes. It includes U. S. waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated, all depths stated in this report are referred to low water datum as follows: Lake Superior, 600 feet; Lake Michigan-Huron, 576.8 feet; Lake Erie, 568.6 feet; and Lake St. Clair, 571.7 feet. Elevations in feet are above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum--1955). IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Arcadia Harbor, MI ........................ 31-2 2. Ashland Harbor WI ....................... 31-2 3. Au Sable Harbor, (Oscoda) MI .............. 31-3 4. Big Bay Harbor, MI ........................ 31-3 5. Black River (Port Huron) MI ................ 31-3 6. Black River, (U. P.) MI .................... 31-4 7. Channels in the Straits of Mackinac, MI ............................ 31-4 8. Charlevoix Harbor, MI ..................... 31-4 9. Cheboygan Harbor, MI ....... ...... 31-5 10. Clinton River, MI.... .................... 31-5 11. Detour Harbor, MI ... .................. 31-5 12. Detroit River, MI.........................31-6 18. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI ....... 31-6 14. Eagle Harbor, MI ...................... 31-7 15. Fox River, WI...........................31-7 16. Frankfort Harbor, MI .................. 31-8 17. Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, MI ... .................... 31-9 18. Grand Marais Harbor, MN ................. 31-9 19, Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI ............ 31-9 20. Green Bay Harbor, WI....................31-10 21. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI ............... 31-10 22. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI.............31-11 23. Harrisville Harbor, MI ............... 31-11 24. Holland Harbor, MI .................. 31-11 25. The Inland Route, MI ..................... 31-12 26. Kenosha Harbor, WI...................... 31-12 27. Kewaunee Harbor, WI.................... 31-13 28. Keweenaw Waterway, MI ................. 31-13 29. Knife River Harbor, MN............... 31-14 30. LaPointe Harbor, WI..................... 31-14 1. Lac La Belle Harbor, MI .............. 31-14 32 Lake St. Clair, MI Channels............... 31-15 3 Leland Harbor, MI ........... ...... 31-15 34. Lexington Harbor, MI ................. 31-15 . Little Lake Harbor, MI 36. Ludington Harbor, ............... 31-16 MI...............31-16 387 ' MMaanniisstteiqe uHe aHrbaorbr,o rM, IM .I. ............................ ..... 3311--1176 Navigation (cont.) Page 39. Manitowoc Harbor, WI ................... 31-17 40. Marquette Harbor, MI.................... 31-18 41. Menominee Harbor and River, MI and WI ............................... 31-18 42. Milwaukee Harbor, WI ................... 31-19 43. Monroe Harbor, MI....................... 31-19 44. Muskegon Harbor, MI .................... 31-20 45. New Buffalo Harbor, MI .................. 31-20 46. Oconto Harbor, WI ....................... 31-21 47. Ontonagon Harbor, MI ................... 31-21 48. Pentwater Harbor, MI .................... 31-21 49. Point Lookout Harbor, (Au Gres River) MI....................... 31-22 50. Port Austin Harbor, MI................... 31-22 51. Portage Lake Harbor, MI ................. 31-22 52. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI .................. 31-22 53. Port Washington Harbor, WI ............. 31-23 54. Port Wing Harbor, WI................. 31-23 55. Presque Isle Harbor, MI .................. 31-23 56. Racine Harbor, WI ....................... 31-24 57. Rouge River, MI.......................... 31-24 58. Saginaw River, MI ....................... 31-25 59. St. Clair River, MI ....................... 31-25 60. St. Joseph Harbor, MI .................... 31-26 61. St. Marys River, MI ...................... 31-26 62. Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI ................................ 31-27 63. Saxon Harbor, WI ........................ 31-28 64. Sheboygan Harbor, WI ................... 31-28 65. South Haven Harbor, MI ................. 31-28 66. Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI........................... 31-29 67. Two Harbors, MN ........................ 31-29 68. Two Rivers Harbor, WI ................... 31-29 69. White Lake Harbor, MI................... 31-30 70. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys................................ . 31-30 71. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..... 31-30 72. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........................... 31-30 31-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Beach Erosion Control Page 73. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects......................... 31-30 74. Emergency Shore Protection ............. 31-31 75. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ........................... 31-31 76. Mitigation of Shore Damages ............ 31-31 Flood Control 77. Saginaw River, MI ...................... 31-31 78. Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI.......... 31-32 79. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects......................... 31-33 80. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................................ 31-33 81. Flood Control Under Special Authorization ........................... 31-33 82. Surveillance of Northern Boundary W aters ................................. 31-34 General Investigations Page 83. Surveys................................. 31-36 Navigation 1. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 15 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14907). Existing project. Provided for maintenance dredging of the existing harbor built by private interests for a period of five years. The five years covered by this project were the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were also appropriated and maintenance was performed in calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915, inclusive. There is at present no approved project for the improvement of this harbor. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing recreational traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,904. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $33,267, removing approximately 10,770 cubic yards of shoal material by hydraulic dredge. Engineering and design for repair to breakwater was continued at a cost of $9,409. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $18,668. General Investigations (cont.) Page 84. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ......................... 31-36 85. Advanced Engineering and Design ........ 31-36 86. Collection and Study of Basic D ata.................................... 31-36 Tables Table 31-A Cost & Financial Statement ...... 31-37 Table 31-B Authorizing Legislation .......... 31-53 Table 31-C Features of Existing Project......................... 31-71 Table 31-D St. Marys River, MI: Existing Project ................ 31-72 Table 31-E Fox River, WI: Locks & Dams .... 31-73 Table 31-F Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys ........................ 31-74 Table 31-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects............. 31-75 Table 31-H Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 31-76 Table 31-I Deauthorized Projects........... 31-77 Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths of 5-12 feet exist in the channel at present. Future maintenance of the harbor will be based on providing a 9-foot depth. Piers and revetments are in good condition with some sections in need of major repair. Total cost at the end of FY for existing project was $846,636. 2. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) Existing project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both all protected by an 8,000-foot breakwater. For additional details see page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet of waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling coal, ore, limestone, logs, and pulpwood are served by railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been discontinued for the present. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Co" dition surveys, environmental studies and miscellane ous reports and services were performed by Govern' ment forces at a cost of $18,151. Repairs to breakwaters and seawalls were performed by hired labor at a cos tof 31-2 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT $201,154. Engineering, supervision and administration cost $27,616. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 1950. Work authorized by 1960 Act was completed in November 1962. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $4,160,703, of which $1,695,645 was for new work and $2,465,058 for maintenance. 3. AU SABLE HARBOR AT AU SABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI Location. Au Sable River and Village of Oscoda, MI, are on west shore of Lake Huron, 8 miles north of Au Sable Point, northeast limit of Saginaw Bay. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project. For details see pages 336 and 2453 of Annual Report for 1892. Existing project. Riprapping outer 200 feet of north pier at mouth of Au Sable River, dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and dredging between piers and upstream to State highway bridge 10 feet deep. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small timber pile wharves used primarily by commercial fishermen and pleasure craft operators; also a private marina basin east of U.S. Highway 23 Bridge. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,173. Existing project was completed in 1962. Controlling depths are 10.0 feet in entrance channel, 8.0 feet Itween the jetties, and 6 feet in river to upstream limits of project. Total costs to end of FY for existing Project were $2,667,376, of which $209,776 was for new Work (including $16,400 contributed funds) and $2,457,600 for maintenance. 4. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 33 miles northwesterly from Marquette, MI, and 38 miles estrly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) .Existing project. Provides for two converging i extending from shore, an entrance channel een piers and rectangular harbor basin. Project alaDrteh s1 2 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in or basin. For details see page 1009 of Annual ;1,tfor 1965 and page 1261 of Annual Report for ". (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) LOal Cooperation. Fully complied with. Oerations during fiscal year. Maintenance: dtion surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $11,603. An adjustment of $-1,597 was made on repairs to navigation structures completed last FY. Engineering and design cost $702. Project was completed in June 1961 except for protection at inner end of east breakwater, completed in November 1961. A contract for repair of breakwater, damaged by storms, was completed in August 1969. Total cost to end of FY was $1,395,192, of which $390,432 was for new work and $1,004,760 for maintenance. 5. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI Location. This river has its source in the northern part of Sanilac County, MI, is about 60 miles long, and flows in a southeasterly direction into the St. Clair River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Previous project. For details see page 1441 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 1554 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. This provides for a channel 20 feet deep from deep water in St. Clair River to the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge, 160 feet wide at the mouth, decreasing to 100 feet, about 800 feet from the mouth, thence 100 feet wide for 2,600 feet, decreasing to 75 feet for a distance of 4,800 feet; widening two bends to 100 feet, one at the foot of 12th Street, and the other below the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge; for a settling basin 75 feet wide and 20 feet deep, beginning at the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge in Port Huron and extending upstream a distance of about 2,300 feet; and then for a distance of 2.6 miles as a 100-foot wide river channel, 8 feet deep to the 1-94 bridge where it decreases to 6 feet deep and continues to the vicinity of the Black River Drainage Canal with suitable widening where required at bends in the channel. The project modification authorized by the Act of August 30, 1935 is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost for new work. The cost of this modification was last revised in 1954 and was estimated to be $194,000 exclusive of $194,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are docks on both sides of Black River, near its mouth, and between these docks and the upper limit of improvement there are 5 other docks varying in length from 100 to 500 feet. All docks are privately owned and are restricted to the use of the owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are available as are privately owned and operated marinas. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost 31-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 of $10,203. All work, except that authorized by Act of August 30, 1935 and the latest modification, has been completed. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $1,336,065, of which $830,165 was for new work (includes $349,921 contributed funds) and $505,900 for maintenance. 6. BLACK RIVER HARBOR (UPPER PENINSULA), MI Location. At mouth of Black River on south shore of Lake Superior 39 miles westerly from Ontonagon, MI, and 47 miles easterly from Ashland, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Existing project. Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. For additional details see page 1092 of Annual Report for 1966. Project depths are 12 feet in the approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 0.85 acre of land. Terminal facilities. Wharves constructed on both sides of river. Wharf on east bank has frontage of 400 feet; on west bank, a frontage of 750 feet. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $10,912. Project was completed in June 1958. A triangularshaped rock shoal 50 feet wide at easterly end extends along southerly side of channel. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $886,685, of which $383,350 was for new work and $503,335 for maintenance. 7. CHANNELS IN THE STRAITS OF MACKINAC, MI Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel, joins Lakes Michigan and Huron at their upper ends and is about 7 miles northeasterly from Mackinaw City, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14881.) Existing project. Provides for a channel between Mackinac Island and Round Island, MI, 1,250 feet wide, 30 feet deep, and 3,500 feet long; and for removal of Poe Reef Shoal to a depth of 30 feet over an area of about 120,000 square yards to permit navigation through Straits of Mackinac by vessels drawing 25.5 feet at low water datum. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Environmental studies, inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,093. The existing project is complete. Total costs to end of FY were $2,977,947, of which $2,832,629 was for new work and $145,318 for maintenance. 8. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 276 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 75 miles northerly from Frankfort, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) Existing project. A channel 24 feet deep in Lake Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected where needed by piers and revetments. For additional details see page 1476 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required except the latest project modification is subject to the following: Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the modified project upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of excavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embank" ments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the modified project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; accomplish without cost to the United States, such alterations of submarine utility crossing as are required by the modified project; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution preven tion and control; if acquiring lands, easements an1 rights-of-way for construction of the project, local interests will comply with the applicable provisons o the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Propety Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; Public Law 91646, approved January 2,1971; contribute all costs in exces of $1,000,000 should the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities exceed that amount in accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of construction is presently estimated at $652,000. Terminal facilities. Several small landing plac in Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish ant 31-4 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum products at west end of Lake Charlevoix, and coal wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne City, and East Jordan provide public docks for small craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $24,169. Repairs to S. Pier were performed by hired labor at a cost of $227,646. A contract was awarded for maintenance dredging. Approximately 900 cubic yards of material was dredged at a cost of $7,865. Engineering and design for revetment repair at Park Island wuas performed at a cost of $15,629. Engineering, design, and supervision cost $12,911. Existing project was completed in 1939 except for the latest modification. A controlling depth of 18 feet is available throughout the entire project, except for minor shoaling along the channel limits. Total costs to end of FY were $6,116,712, of which $180,623 was for new work, $4,806,693 for maintenance (Bank Stabilization $46,352), and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation. 9. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Cheboygan River which empties into Western Lake Huron about 16 miles southeast of the Straits of Mackinac Bridge. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14881 and 14886.) Previous project. For details see page 1956 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1546 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 21 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 21-foot contour in Lake Huron to outer endofwest pier; thence, between lines parallel to and 25 feet from the docks, 21 feet deep from this point to East First Street and thence 18.5 feet deep and 60 feet wide fromthni s bridge to the lock in Cheboygan River; a tning basin 21 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 420 to 770 t long on east side of existing project channel just el w E ast r b e a n b e k a e bEealoswt First Street; and rubblemound breakwater about 775 feet long on the site of existing west pier at mouth of river. Improvement is 12,000 feet long, of Which about 6,000 feet are in Straits of Mackinac. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned Wharves used for receiving coal, stone and petroleum neluts. Public recreational boating facilities coneted by the State and local agencies are available. facilities satisfy existing commerce and vessel di0rations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Conon surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and r t were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,586t. Total costs to end of FY were $1,377,016, of which $504,236 was for new work and $872,780 for maintenance. 10. CLINTON RIVER, MI Location. Has its source in Oakland County, MI, flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in the bay, gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing Catfish Channel; construction of revetments as needed in the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in area at entrance along bay channel, protected by breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. River is used exclusively by recreational craft. There are numerous public and private piers and wharves along the river below the City. They are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $16,001. Engineering and design for a confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $88,419. Existing project was completed in 1966. Total costs to end of FY were $1,877,527, of which $549,798 (including $289,752 contributed funds) was for new work, and $1,327,729 for maintenance. 11. DETOUR HARBOR, MI Location. On the west side of DeTour Passage, about 2 miles upstream from Lake Huron. The passage forms the mouth of the St. Marys River which connects Lakes Huron and Superior. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14882.) Existing project. Provides for small boat harbor and harbor of refuge by dredging a 10-foot deep entrance channel and providing an 8-foot deep access channel protected by a 1,305-foot breakwater. The total estimated (October 1981) project cost is $2,650,000; the Federal cost is $1,400,000 and the non-Federal cost is $1,250,000 which is a cash contribution. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 31-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Terminal facilities. Public docking, landing, parking and sanitary facilities will be provided by the State of Michigan. Operations during fiscal year. New work: An adjustment was made on federal project at a cost of $1,455 and -$975 contributed funds. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,478. Existing project is complete. Total cost to end of FY is $2,555,130, of which $1,758 was for maintenance and $2,553,372 for new work. 12. DETROIT RIVER, MI Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 31 miles long and flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Improving Detroit River main channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving certain auxiliary and side channels; and construction of various water level and crosscurrent control structures. Details are in accompanying Table 31-C. Project depths are referred to local low water datum planes which correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and Erie, 571.7 and 568.6 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum-1955.) (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated 1978 Federal cost for new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, is $159,300,- 000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. No local cooperation is required for modifications authorized by Acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The Trenton Channel modification approved August 13, 1968 is considered inactive. Terminal facilities. Numerous commercial installations used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, petroleum products, and other items such as overseas general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1972) prepared and published as part 2 by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port and steamship services is prepared and published as part I by Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, support of water control center, Hi-Fix surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,217,219. Studies continued for construction of a wetland marsh under section 150 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1967 at a cost of $16,457. Studies continued under extended navigation season at a cost of $441,318. The U.S. Hopper Dredge HAINS performed maintenance dredging removing 26,438 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material ata cost of $137,454. Operation of booster pump in connection with the Dredge HAINS cost $21,693. Charges in connection with severence pay and laying-up the U.S. Hopper Dredge HAINS cost $109,388. Maintenance of disposal areas by hired labor cost $126,947. Location and removal of obstructions cost $1,009,535. A judgment was made against the Corps of Engineers for settlement of the contract for repair of Stoney Island Compensating Works. The amount of the settlement was $250,111. An adjustment of -$32,526 was made in the contract completed last FY for repair of Sugar Island Compensating Works. Hired labor repair to Compensating Works was continued at a cost $105,658. The contract awarded last FY for dredging East Outer Channel, Lower Livingstone and Pte. Mouillee Access Channel and Pte. Mouillee North Interior Channel was completed. Approximately 84,080 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material was removed at a cost of $838,981. Two additional dredging contracts were awarded this FY. The contract for dredging the East Outer Channel was awarded in the amount of $3,171,240. No dredging was performed this FY, however, cost incurred for mobilization was $100,174. The contract for dredging Pointe Mouillee Access Channel, N & S Interior Channel and N & S Turning Basin was awarded in the amount of $862,940. No work was performed this FY. Surveys and layouts in connection with this contract cost $11,293. Engineering, design surveys, supervision and administration cost $192,578 Under the dike disposal program, approximately $5,459 was expended for review of claims. Latest modification of connecting channels project in the Detroit River is complete except for compensating works. All work in Trenton Channel is complete. Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at end of FY are set forth in Table 31-C. Costs for existing project were $175,633,354, of which $74,780,103 was for new work ($72,969,197 regular funds and $1,530,688 Public Work Funds) and $100,853,251 for maintenance. 13. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI Location. At extreme western end of Lake Sup" rior. Cities of Duluth, MN, and Superior, WI, are on north and south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) Previous projects. See page 1246 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for rebuilding can piers at Duluth entry, replacement or constructiolG piers and breakwater at Superior entry and dreds 31-6 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT approaches and channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and are from 20 to 23 feet in inner channels. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) For details of authorized channel dimensions and dimensions of structures, see pages 1246 and 1247 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report for 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first Avenue West channel is inactive. Estimated cost (1967) of this portion was $577,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for active portion of project. Terminal facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals including some 54 major ones; all but one are privately owned. Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, and grain are believed adequate for most existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of Water Control Center, co-operative stream gaging, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $255,024. The General Design Memorandum for major rehabilitation of N. Pier Sections O, N-1, N and M and S. Pier Sections O, N-1, N and M was completed this FY at a cost of $231,929. Operation and maintenance of the museum was performed by Government forces at a cost of $262,781. Maintenance of service facilities and pier was Performed at a cost of $58,141. Repairs to breakwater and seawalls were performed by the COLEMAN and MARKUS at a cost of $356,286. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $30,314. Channel work was performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,118. Two contracts awarded last FY for maintenance dredging were completed. The first contract was completed with 88,085 cubic yards removed at a cost of $475,194. The second contract was completed with 24,344 cubic yards removed at a cost of $161,347. A maintenance dredging contract was a- Warded this FY in the amount of $1,166,058 for dredging within existing navigation channels. Contract is approximately 51% complete with 73,260 cubic yards rSeUmpoevrveids ioant a cost of $600,000. Engineering, design, and administration was performed at a cost of $254,534. A master plan of the area office facilities was initiated. JWork authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in un5 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer pleor, included in House Document 150, was com- Pleted in June 1965. Work on the inner harbor, included in House Document 196, started in May 1963, was completed in November 1968 except for the 21st Avenue West channel portion which is inactive. Tb5 United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in 4'lesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for a vessel yard. Total cost of existing project was $47,471,969, of which $16,109,158 was for new work and $31,362,811 was for maintenance. 14. EAGLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior on the North Face of Keweenaw Point, 31 miles northeasterly from the Upper Entrance to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for a short entrance channel, a guide pier marking the entrance on the west side, and a harbor basin. Project depths are 14 feet in the entrance channel and 12 feet in the harbor basin. For additional details see page 1182 of Annual Report for 1959. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. An old L-shaped timber wharf is available but is in poor condition. A dock and launching ramp constructed by the State is located on the north side of the Harbor Basin. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed at a cost of $7,402. The original project was completed in 1879. The modification for a small boat harbor was completed in 1959. Total cost to end of FY was $280,271, of which $205,164 was for new work and $75,107 for maintenance. 15. FOX RIVER, WI Location. Rises in Columbia County, WI, and flows about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, physically a main river but by designation a tributary of Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, WI, and flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) Previous projects. See page 1368 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Deepening and widening channel of Fox River from DePere 7 miles above mouth to confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to 6 feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below DePere lock and 7 feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 dams; a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction and maintenance of harbors having depths of 6 feet on Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, snagging, and otherwise improving Wolf River 47 miles from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. Cost of completed portion of project is $513,424 for the lower river exclusive of previous projects. River and Harbor Act of 1925 portion of project is considered inactive and excluded from cost estimate. Estimated cost (1924) of this portion is $2,886,000. (See Table 31-B 31-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are, in general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 31-E on locks and dams, Fox River, WI.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, boundary monumentation, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $30,217. Plans for flood emergencies and safety training at Federal dams were performed at a cost of $25,887. Water Control studies, monitoring and regulation of water levels were performed at a cost of $192,110. Miter gates and valve systems at Little Chute 2nd Lock and Combined Locks were reconditioned at a cost of $142,518. Tainter gates and seals were reconditioned at Cedars Dam at a cost of $49,972. Federal canal banks at various locations were repaired at a cost of $98,165. Seventeen locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $395,994. Nine dams and ten overflow weirs were operated and maintained at a cost of $486,619. Engineering and design costs were $84,703. Supervision and administration cost $97,435. Existing project is complete except for the inactive portion. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams have been rebuilt. (See Table 31-E for year of completion of each.) Structures and dredging in pools have increased original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion of Wolf River, and rock removal and deepening of Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer considered necessary. Existing lock and dams are generally in fair to good condition. Costs for existing project to end of FY were $3,753,334 for new work and $34,543,143 for operation and maintenance; a total of $38,296,477. Funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were expended between July 5, 1884, and June 30, 1935, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 16. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 28 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907). Existing project. Provides for constructing an exterior basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 feet apart at the outer ends, diverging at an angle of about 90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 feet of north and 1,172 feet of south pier; dredging basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, dredging approach and entrance channel through outer basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan to a point 500 feet landward of opening between breakwaters, over the entire width outside the breakwaters and to a maximum width of 500 feet inside the breakwaters; thenceto 23 feet deep through inner portion of outer basin to outer end of north pier, over widths decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; dredging an 18-foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward of the east limit of the interior basin, with its north side in line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling capped with concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore and several docks along north shore of Lake Betsie. The City and State provide a recreational docking facility on north side of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $51,199. The reconnaissance report for major rehabilitation of N. & S. Breakwater Sections A, B, C, D & E was continued ata cost of $16,794. Repairs to North and South Breakwater by the MANITOWOC were completed at a cost of $231,715. An adjustment of -$14,131 was made on contract completed last FY for rehabilitation of North and South Piers. Charges in connection with severence pay and laying up the Dredge HAINS cost $11,999 Engineering, design, soils work, supervision and administration was performed at a cost of $69,577. Existing project was completed in 1939, withex" ception of the latest modification which was completed in 1969. Navigation structures that are not in generallY good condition are programmed for major repair as needed. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $9,585,889 of which $1,955,159 (including $31,709 contributed funds) was for new work, $7,355,954 for maintenance. 31-8 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT and $274,776 for rehabilitation. 17. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles northerly from Holland, MI. River rises in Jackson County, MI, and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle.) Previous project. For details see page 1949 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1481 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and channel to Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $38,600. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves exist for handling coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum Products, fish and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all on equal terms. Facilities are onsidered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, safety studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $102,172. A wave monitoring study was performed at a cost of $27,908. An adjustment was made for repairs to the North and uthPier and North and South Revetment for -$3,161. Repairs to safety railings were performed by hired labor at a cost of $132. A contract was awarded last FY to repair North Revetment Sections C-1 and D, and South Revetment Sections L, M, N, and 0. The contract SaPproximately 91% complete at a cost this FY of $2,891,003, of which $15,334 was contributed by the City of Grand Haven. Charges in connection with everence pay and laying-up the Dredge HAINS were %,970. Two maintenance dredging contracts were awarded. The first contract for dredging Outer Portion Wj completed removing approximately 25,422 cubic fards of shoal material at a cost of $64,619. The second Cotract for dredging Upper Portion was completed 1 tnoving approximately 67,988 cubic yards at a cost of $228,506. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $234,988. Cost for mitigation under Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was $70,860. A master plan of the project office was initiated. Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1463 of Annual Report for 1962. Structures are generally in good condition; repairs are made on an as needed basis. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $21,624,278, of which $1,458,469 was for new work, $19,352,196 for maintenance, and $813,613 for rehabilitation. 18. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN Location. On north shore of Lake Superior, 106 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14967.) Existing project. Provides breakwater piers to narrow the entrance; concrete seawalls across ledge at southeast corner of harbor; an anchorage area and a small-boat basin protected by a rubblemound breakwater. Project depths are 16 feet in anchorage area increasing to 20 feet near entrance and 8 feet in smallboat basin. For additional details see page 1014 of Annual Report for 1965. (SeE Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two inactive pulpwood wharves and several fish wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Monitoring was continued on the Section 111 project at a cost of $16,984. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $3,817. Engineering and design for repairs to West Breakwater was initiated at a cost of $40,382. Existing project is complete. Concrete seawalls and both breakwaters are in good condition. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $2,303,314. 19. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Traverse River on eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula about 20 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing projects: Provides two parallel piers, an entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. For additional details see page 1015 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 5.1 acres of land. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned fish- 31-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 ing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design for the authorized Section 111 project was accomplished at a cost of $31,167, of which $4,552 was for a contract. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,062. A contract for repair of the South Revetment was completed at a cost of $187,846. Engineering and design work cost $401, and supervision and administration cost $31,877. Existing project was completed in 1950 except for extension of north pier completed in 1964. Steel cells and piers are in good condition. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $1,797,266. 20. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee Harbor, MI, and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14918.) Previous projects. See page 1366 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-30. For more detailed description of project see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of completed portion of project is $9,335,000, Federal, and non-Federal cost is $490,000 including $100,000 contributed funds. Local interests requested that the inactive portion of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be reactivated and the authorization modified to include deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to provide increased horizontal clearance. Estimated cost of this portion (1983) is $4,910,000 Federal and $110,000 non-Federal. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 16 wharves for handling coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general overseas cargo and miscelleneous commodities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Advanced engineering and design work continued at a cost of $47,086. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of Water Control Center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $167,754. The U.S. Hopper Dredge MARKHAM performed maintenance dredging, removing approximately 53,273 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material, at a cost of $213,276. Charges in connection with severence pay and laying up the Dredge MARKHAM were $42,150. Additional handling of the dredged material cost $30,874. A contract was awarded to perform maintenance dredging. The contractor removed 77,000 cubic yards at a cost of $450,854. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed by Government forces at a cost of $11,295. An adjustment of -$28,104 was made in contract dredging cost reported last FY. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $73,693. Engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal facility was continued at a cost of $211,613. Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification was started in November 1966 and completed in September 1973. Dredging turning basin above Chicago & Northwestern Railways Bridge was commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the River and Harbor Act of March 4, 1915, in order to provide sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract in September and October 1973. East revetment at Grassy Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox River and entrance channel to Tail Point Light was completed in September 1967. The total costs of the existing project were $28,994,160, of which $18,005,884 were regular funds and $940,800 Public Works funds; $10,016,806 for new work and $18,977,354 for maintenance. The new work costs do not include $100,000 contributed funds. 21. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On northwest shore of Lake Huron, 35 miles southeast of Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14881.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge, pr tected by breakwater structures, extending to 12-foot depth contour in the lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; and for dredging an entrance channel12 feet deep. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public facilities being planned by State and local agencies. Plans and specifications are complete, but construction has not started. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: An adjustment of $3,244 was made in cost for beach nourishment. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environ mental studies, miscellaneous inspections and repoW were performed at a cost of $3,683. Environmenere studies in connection with the Section 111 project were performed at a cost of $19,202. The existing project was completed in 1965. Tot'3 costs of existing project to end of FY were$1,468,31 31-10 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT which $1,092,366 was for new work and $375,947 for maintenance. 22. HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Harbor of refuge protected by three breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Coal and limestone are received at a private wharf. In addition, there is a public recreational craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $17,863. The contract awarded in FY 83 for repair of a concrete cap on the North Breakwater was completed at a cost of $32,516. A reconnaissance report for major rehabilitation of the main breakwater was continued at a cost of $35,314. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $28,073. Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs to end of FY were $6,828,949, of which $1,200,598 was for new work, $5,433,847 for maintenance, and $194,504 for rehabilitation. 28. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the west shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Oscoda and 30 miles south of Alpena. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures, and dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and a harbor basin 10 feet deep. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Dockage facilities built by State and local agencies for recreational craft; con- Sidered adequate for existing commerce. OPerations during fiscal year. New Work. The Maract awarded last FY for construction of small boat hbor was completed at a cost of $456,909. Engi- "eering, design, supervision and administration in M"nection with this contract cost $34,904. The State of MIchigan contributed $259,445 of the above cost. The contract awarded last FY for beach nourishment was completed at a cost of $274,091. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $46,722. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,239. Total costs of project to end of FY were $3,414,940, of which $2,666,877 was for new work (includes $263,239 contributed funds) and $748,063 for maintenance. 24. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles southerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical chart 14932.) Previous project. For details see page 1948 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1478 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An outer breakwater protected approach channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of Annual Report for 1962. Widening bend of entrance channel into Lake Macatawa is in an active category as a result of a reclassification recommendation approved by the Office of the Chief of Engineers on August 20, 1981. Estimated cost of this portion (1983) is $3,290,000 Federal and $95,000 non-Federal. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Work authorized by Act of 1954 is subject to condition that work on either or both proposed modifications may be undertaken by the United States provided local interests furnish all lands except 1.5 acres of Federal lands, easements, rights-ofway, and suitable spoil disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance; remove buildings and other structures, except existing revetments, from lands to be furnished; and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal facilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake Macatawa, and used for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. Two shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental and safety studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $90,670. The contract awarded last FY for rehabilitation of the North & South 31-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Breakwaters and the North Pier was completed at a cost of $1,191,118. Two contracts were awarded for maintenance dredging of the outer and inner harbor. The contract for the outer harbor was terminated because of lack of shoal material. The cost was $20,000. Dredging of the inner harbor was completed at a cost of $216,675, removing 58,583 cubic yards of shoal material. Charges in connection with severence pay and laying up the dredge HAINS were $22,598. Maintenance of the confined disposal area was performed by Government forces at a cost of $883. Structure repairs were performed by the cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $129,273. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $86,978. A total of $33,713 was spent on surveys, environmental studies and engineering for Section 111, mitigation of shore damage. Existing project, with exception of widening bend in revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on completion of existing project, see page 1460 of Annual Report for 1962. Costs of existing project to end of FY were $1,392,827 for new work ($1,180,502 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project and $35,705 contributed funds), $12,828,745 regular funds for maintenance, and $502,452 regular funds for rehabilitation, for a total of $14,724,024. 25. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 2, 1964, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None exist for commercial cargo-handling along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some equipped with covered boat wells for serving and storing recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the public for transfer of passengers. Public docks are at Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the Village of Indian River, Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 highways dead end at the water's edge, permitting public access for various marine activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The navigation lock was operated and maintained by the Village of Alanson, at a cost of $49,039. An adjustment of -$21,388 was made in the cost of operating the lock during the 1983 season by the State of Michigan. In 1984, the lock was operated only on week-ends from April 21 through April 29 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; from May 5 through September 30 it was open from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Condition surveys, cooperative stream gaging, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $17,304. An adjustment of -$33,860 was made for contract dredging performed last FY. Dredging surveys, supervision and administration cost $1,839. The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock and dam was completed in FY 1968. For additional details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total costs to end of FY were $3,372,967, of which $770,222 was for new work and $2,454,745 for maintenance, with $148,000 contributed by local interests. 26. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 miles south of Milwaukee and about 54 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous projects. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. For detailed description see page 1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1983) Federal cost is $688,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $43,000 non-Federal which includes $3,000 local contribution. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves used for miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, and also several fishing wharves. While these facilities are considered generally adequate for existing commerce, more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of available frontage for development of additional terminals should be made. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneos inspections and reports were performed by Govert ment forces at a cost of $20,506. Repairs to the bort and South Breakwater were performed by hired labor at a cost of $125,969. Minor repairs to the dike disPoSS' area were performed by hired labor at a cost of $6,418 Two contracts were awarded for maintenance dredt ing. The first was awarded and completed at a cost0o 31-12 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT $46,423, removing approximately 5,059 cubic yards of shoal material. The second was awarded and completed at a cost of $132,533, removing approximately 50,348 cubic yards of shoal material. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $48,155. Existing project is complete except for dredging 25- foot strips adjacent to the north and south piers which will be completed after rehabilitation of the piers. The north and south piers were completed in 1900 and the breakwater in 1909. The north pier is in excellent condition. The south pier and breakwater are in generally good condition. The total costs of the existing project to end of FY were $8,817,979, of which $7,907,899 were regular funds and $27,658 Emergency Relief funds; $519,255 being for new work, $7,000,791 formaintenance, and $1,270,275 for rehabilitation. The new work costs do not include $3,000 contributed funds. 27. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 78 miles from Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous projects. See page 1375of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-31. Costs of completed project are $603,021, Federal, and $9,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated $200,000-July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive, and excluded from present cost estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and several fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condritionp suroveysr, entvirsonm ental studies, inspections and were performed by Government forces at a cost of $23,323. Minor repairs to dike disposal were performed by hired labor at a cost of $5,362. Charges in connection with severence pay and laying-up the Dredge HAINS cost $29,809. A contract was awarded d completed for repairs to the confined disposal ility at a cost of $155,704. A contract was awarded ad completed for maintenance dredging, removing aDroximately 13,863 cubic yards of shoal material at a t $85,652. Engineering and design for repairs to It476zent was performed by hired labor at a cost of ,4?6. Engineering and design for repair to disposal area cost $28,214. Other engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $63,340. A master plan of the project office was initiated. Active portion of existing project is complete. The north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection, except for a gap of 150 feet about 830 feet from shoreward end, and removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier was commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in April/ May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in October 1973 and a 24-foot section at outer end was subsequently removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 feet. Dredging entrance channel in interior basin to existing project depth was commenced in April and completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable to about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $7,423,267, of which $752,333 was for new work ($183,021 regular and $420,000 Emergency Relief funds) $6,053,634 regular funds for maintenance, and $617,300 regular funds for rehabilitation. 28. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula in upper peninsula of Michigan. The west entrance is 169 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14972.) Existing project. A navigable channel, minimum width 300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially artificial, across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed cost for new work is $5,967,700. Portion of project providing for extension of lower entrance breakwater and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels is inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost (1957) of this portion was $3,315,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, and several general merchandise and miscellaneous wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a government constructed recreational area with facilities to include a picnic area and small boat landing range. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental and safety studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $30,676. Boundary monumentation was performed by contract and hired 31-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 labor at a cost of $9,762. A reconnaissance report was completed and a design analysis for major repair of the upper entry revetment was initiated at a cost of $127,893. The derrickbarge COLEMAN performed breakwater repairs, at a cost of $145,814. An adjustment of -$6,176 was made in the inventory cost of the rock stock-pile. The cost of engineering, design, supervision and administration was $21,119. Active portion of the project is complete. Breakwaters are in generally good condition except for a weakness occurring in about 300 feet of substructure of breakwater lower entrance, and major storm damage repairs needed for stone-covered portions of breakwater at upper entrance. Mooring pier at Lily Pond requires repairs to halt movement and permit dredging to project depth adjacent thereto. The flared revetment at the upper entry should be modified to restrict wave action from the stilling basin entrance. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $16,564,611, of which $5,974,141 was for new work, and $10,590,470 for maintenance. 29. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MN Location. Near mouth of Knife River on north shore of Lake Superior, 19 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN, and 7 miles southwest of Two Harbors, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel with a system of overlapping breakwaters, using the existing breakwater and a new breakwater constructed of 731 feet of rock rubblemound. The entrance channel is 9 feet deep and an inner straight channel is 8 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 600 feet long with a public marina and side channel at its inner end. For additional details see page 1110 of Annual Report for 1963. A modification to correct a design deficiency was authorized in 1974. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Total estimated approved Federal cost (1983) is $1,981,700 and $21,700 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Local interests are to furnish easements on 15.08 acres of land. Terminal facilities. Local interests have installed pile-and-timber docks on both sides of straight channel. Lake County has completed construction by contract of a marina along the east wing of the inner harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,654. Project was completed in June 1958. Breakwater and spending beach are in good condition. The existing breakwater does not effectively prevent waves caused by northeasterly winds from entering the entrance channel. This results in unsatisfactory and unsafe harbor entrance conditions during storms. Mooring conditions in the main channel and Y-branches of the inner harbor are also adversely affected. Plans and specifications for the construction of a breakwater to correct a design deficiency to reduce wave damage and improve navigation conditions were completed and approved by NCD in 1982. Total project costs to endof FY were $663,035, of which $412,944 was for new work and $250,091 for maintenance. 30. LA POINTE HARBOR, WI Location. At westerly end of Madeline Island in the Apostle Island group off the south shore of Lake Superior. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) Existing project. Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet deep in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. Project was authorized by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act (Public Law 645, 86th Cong., as amended.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A 400-foot L-shaped dock was constructed and rehabilitated by local interests, not asa part of the Federal project. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,807. The town of La Pointe, WI, contracted for maintenance dredging, and, at our request, removed approximately 700 cubic yards of shoaling from the Federal channel, at a cost of $3,861. The existing project was completed in 1967. Total cost of existing project at end of FY is $205,287. 31. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior on eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula, 41 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway Lac La Belle, Bete Grise Bay, and Mendota Ship Canal combine to form the harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for construction of two parallel piers at the entrance having lengths of 584 and 682 feet for north and south piers, respectively; for an entrance channel between the piers 50 feet wide and 12 feet deep, about 820 feet long with a flared approach; and for an inner canal 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep, about 730 feet long. For additional details see page 1039, Annual Report for 1964. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small, privately owfl wharves are available in the harbor for use of sinai craft engaged in fishing and recreational activities. A state owned dock for small craft is located at northwet corner of Lac La Belle Bay. 31-14 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $11,158. Structure repairs were performed by hired labor at a cost of $185,117. Supervision and administration cost $8,505. The existing project was completed in 1960. Controlling depths are about 11 feet in the approach channel and 10 feet in the inner channel. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $736,911, of which $269,270 was for new work and $467,641 for maintenance. 82. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI CHANNELS Location. Lake St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes connecting channels, is an expansive shallow basin having a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 2882, Annual Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An improved channel through Lake St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River Channel. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, support of Water Control Center, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $161,836. Environmental studies in connection with the extended naviation season cost $195,890. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $210,230. Charges in connection with severence pay and layingup the Dredge HAINS cost $49,999. Approximately 30,730 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material was removed by Hopper Dredge MARKHAM at a cost of $189,999. Supervision and administration cost $10,000. Total costs for existing project at end of FY were $19,370,191, of which $7,675,357 was for new work ($6,010,582 regular funds and $1,008,595 public works ids) and $11,694,834 for maintenance. 33. LELAND HARBOR, MI ation. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of e Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles ih of Frankfort, MI, and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge imting of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a rlted anchorage and maneuver area about 3 acres in extent and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide extending to mouth of Carp River, and for elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves on each side of river below the dam which is 400 feet above the river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are operated by the State and local agencies. All available dockage space is utilized. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $11,313. Repairs to breakwater were performed by hired labor at a cost of $150,664. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging, removing approximately 7,100 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $58,069. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $31,732. The existing project was completed in 1932 except for the 1962 authorization which was completed in 1967. The total costs to end of FY were $2,443,738, of which $1,027,089 was for new work, $1,345,971 for maintenance, and $70,678 for rehabilitation. 33. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for two offshore breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared approach channel 10 feet deep, decreasing to 160 feet in width through the breakwaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost for new work is $1,647,306 excluding $1,088,888 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash contribution was $1,088,888. Terminal facilities. An existing public fishing pier of open pile construction is not adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Con- 31-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 dition surveys, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $11,033. Monitoring, inspection and reports under Section 111 were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,127. Engineering and design under Section 111 was performed at a cost of $15,662. The existing project was completed during FY 1977. Total costs of existing project were $3,426,900, of which $3,107,192 (includes $1,088,888 contributed funds) was for new work and $319,708 for maintenance. 35. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for asmall-craft harbor of refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep from Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Only terminal facility at project site consists of a public dock built by State of Michigan for light-draft craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,351. The design deficiency study continued at a cost of $600. An adjustment of -$15,896 was made in cost for maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY for $109,583 with approximately 18,490 cubic yards of shoal material removed. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $33,615. This project is considered complete; however, because of shifting sand, the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with the result that full project depth is not usually available. An analysis for the Design Deficiency Report was submitted to North Central Division in March 1978 and approved. Total cost at end of FY is $2,824,378. 36. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI Locaton. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 156 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 67 miles northerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14937.) Previous project. For details see page 1951 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1491 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake Michigan protected by north and south breakwater, north breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin to 18 feet deep with a maxi. mum width of 1,500 feet; for a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan decreasing to27 feet at the west end of the north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette Lake; and for inner piers and revetments 1,649 feet long on north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere Marquette Lake. The estimated (1977) Federal cost for new work is $8,250,000. Estimated total costs for local interests is $147,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Has been complied with. Terminal facilities. In addition to main terminalof Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., consisting of three car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $32,342. Study of wave monitoring was continued at a cost of $6,029. Repairs to the North and South Breakwater were performed by the cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $118,934. Financial close-out for the contract completed last FY for emergency repairs to South Breakwater cost $123,836. Charges in connection with severence pay and laying-up the Dredge HAINS cost $8,104. A dredging contract was awarded and completed, removing approximately 43,825 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $157,725. Engineering and design for repair of South Breakwater, Sections D, E and North Breakwater, Section K, was initiated at a cost of $19,073. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $78,139. Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $16,524,022, of which $8,532,202 was for new work, $7,633,907 for mainte nance, and $357,913 for rehabilitation. 37. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 179 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 26 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) Previous project. For details see page 1952 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Lake Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revet ments; a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; 31-16 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 23 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Installations are on both sides of river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is a Government wharf and a State and City owned recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, safety studies, inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $30,218. Repairs to navigation structure were performed by hired labor at a cost of $269,133. Charges in connection with severence pay and laying-up the Dredge MARKHAM cost $11,999. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed with approximately 26,550 cubic yards of shoal material removed at a cost of $93,750. Engineering, design, Supervision and administration cost $34,877. Engineeringand design for repair of N. revetment, Sec. F, G and II were performed at a cost of $26,689. Existing project was completed in August 1967. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project from regular funds to end of FY were $8,369,785, of which $2,696,522 was for new work, $4,299,099 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for rehabilitation. 38. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI Location. On north shore of Lake Michigan, 135 mniles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and 220 miles northerly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous project. For details see page 1933 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1422 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected entrance Channel in Lake Michigan, a channel in Manistique River, and a pier at river mouth. Project depths are 19 feetinouter portion of entrance channel, 18 feet in inner portion of entrance channel, and 18 feet in river Channel. Foradditional details see page 1451ofAnnual port lefslatiofno.r) 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing Loal cooperation. Fully complied with. Terniinal facilities. A car ferry slip, two coal and idiang material wharves, two fishing wharves, and ""'erous lumberyard slips. Facilities are considered eqUate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,784. Total costs to end of FY were $3,472,333, of which $1,299,355 was for new work, $1,856,645 for maintenance and $316,333 for rehabilitation. 39. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 miles north of Milwaukee and about 106 miles from Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous projects. See page 1379 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The total estimated (Oct 1981) project cost is $3,080,000; the Federal cost is $1,085,000 and the non-Federal cost is $1,995,000, which is a cash contribution. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non- Federal which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on the 1968 modification was postponed until 1982. The portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1970) at $1,150,- 000, Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. (See Table 31- B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 1979, and 720-foot channel extension reaffirmed in July 1982, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for complete modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must make an annual cash contribution equivalent to 50% of the annual costs associated with construction and maintenance of the channel extension until such time that a second user utilizes the channel extension. Such a contribution is presently estimated at $14,200; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged materials, and the necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the 31-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 United States adequate berthing areas at the docks adjacent to the improvement; accomplish at no cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of utilities necessary for the project; assume full responsibility for all project first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; and comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. Terminal facilities. Three car-ferry slips, a grain elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, it is believed the City should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse and railway connection open to the general public. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $25,150. Minor repairs to navigation structures cost $6,202. The contract awarded last FY for repair to South Breakwater was completed at a cost of $534,880. Hired labor repairs to disposal area were performed at a cost of $44,242. Charges in connection with severence pay and layingup the Dredge HAINS cost $5,648. A contract was awarded and completed for dredging. Approximately 19,000 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $56,353. Engineering and design for repair of Inner S. Breakwater, Sections F, F-1 and B was initiated at a cost of $11,427. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $52,375. Existing project is completed except for the 1962 and 1968 modifications. The 1962 modification is inactive. Work on the 1968 modification was essentially completed in FY 83. The breakwater, completed in 1910, is in generally fair condition. Dredging a channel through outer basin to existing project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub pier at the river entrance were completed in December 1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 1942. Cost of existing project was $3,983,025 for new work (includes $1,796,937 contributed funds) and $7,556,764 for maintenance, a total of $11,539,789. 40. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI Location. In Marquette Bay on south shore of Lake Superior, 160 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 265 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. Provides for a breakwater, and a harbor basin 26.5 feet deep, giving a protected area of 350 acres. Project was modified in 1960 to provide a 27-foot depth in harbor area. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required for earlier authorizations. Fully complied with for the 1960 Act. Terminal facilities. One ore dock, unused at present; two coal docks; one petroleum dock; and three other unused docks. There are also several small fish wharves without railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $16,496. Repairs to navigation structures were performed by hired labor at a cost of $55,225. Supervision and administration cost $1,856. Projects authorized by earlier Acts were completed in 1935. The 1960 Act was completed in 1966. Rehabilitation of rubblemound portion of breakwater was completed in November 1965. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $3,329,099. 41. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI Location. On west shore of Green Bay, about 49 miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, and about 155 miles from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14917.) Previous projects. See page 1361 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000 Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. Costs of completed new work exclusive of inactive work and amount expended on previous projects are $221,053 Federal and $50,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $36,762. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 9 wharves for hand' ling coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous commodir ties. City of Marinette, WI, provided a public wharf Facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, except that there is need for a public wharf owned by City of Menominee, with warehouse and railway connection. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Con' dition surveys, inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,458. Engineering and design for repair of South Pier Section D continued at a cost of $27,062. Engineering and design for confined disposal facility continued at a cost of $64,43 . The project in effect prior to the modification of March 2, 1945 was completed in 1938. No additions work was necessary under the modification of March2 1945 to provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension oft th channel to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club 31-18 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT project depth or more was available. The entrance piers were completed in 1884, were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in May 1938. Modification of the project authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive. Construction for the 1967 modifications was started August 17, 1968 and completed in October 1968. The costs of the existing project were $570,238 for new work (includes $36,762 contributed funds), $2,052,498 for maintenance and $1,351,852 for rehabilitation, a total of $3,974,588. 42. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 miles north of Chicago, IL, and about 83 miles west of Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) Previous projects. See page 1385 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed new work costs are $6,937,804 Federal and $478,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. The uncompleted portion authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act was placed in the inactive category in June 1973. Estimated costs are $119,000 (July 1972) Federal and $1,170,000 (July 1972) non-Federal for this portion. Uncompleted portion 1945 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for Acts of March 2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14, 1960, except inactive portion of 1945 Act. Act of August 30, 1935, provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be done by City of Milwaukee and City of Milwaukee be reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done subsequent to authorization of Work by Congress. Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary of Way, February 23, 1934, after this work was originally authorized as part of public Works program. City was reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. Terminal facilities. Four car-ferry slips, and 57 other wharves, private and municipal, used for handliag coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum Products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in inner harbor were inadequate for existing comnerce, Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constructed nine docks in the outer harbor for handling general Cargo. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $81,972. Preparation of a General Design Memorandum for major rehabilitation of the Inner North Revetment and the detached North Breakwater cost $253,479. A total of $620,000 was allocated for contract costs for repair of the South Breakwater, which was damaged in an accident. A case has been filed in District Court to be reimbursed for repair costs by the Scindia Steam Navigation Company, Ltd. Other structure repairs performed by hired labor cost $3,678. Maintenance of the dike disposal facility cost $20,808. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $47,553. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. North breakwater and shore connection, 9,954 feet long, was completed in August 1925. North pier was completed in 1905 and construction of south pier was completed in November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before modification of August 30, 1935, City of Milwaukee also dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of inner entrance piers and lakeward of pierhead line to more than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the area of the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto pier opposite East Claybourn Street. Work on the 1945 modification was completed in August 1957, except for the inactive portion which consists of dredging the Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to upper limit of the project at Humbolt Avenue. In recent years, some repairs were completed on the north shore breakwater; however, additional repairs are required. South breakwater and shore connections are in generally good condition. Costs of existing project were $8,231,024 for new work, $30,365,681 for maintenance, and $1,891,810 for rehabilitation; a total of $40,488,515. 43. MONROE HARBOR, MI Location. On lower reach of River Raisin, which empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) Existing project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie and River Raisin to City of Monroe, for a turning basin, and for riprapping protecting dikes at river mouth. Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 1' feet in turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end c project. For additional details see page 1490 of Annua Report for 1962. Project feature for riprapping pro tecting dikes is considered inactive. Estimated costs ot this feature (1954) is $90,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 31-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Terminal facilities. Several privately owned docks and a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $63,005. The U.S. Hopper Dredge HAINS performed maintenance dredging removing 83,944 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $281,259. Operation of the booster pump and maintenance of the disposal area, in conjunction with the dredging, cost $112,463. A contract was awarded for maintenance dredging. It is approximately 40% complete, at a cost of $150,000. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $49,959. The contract for construction of a confined disposal facility is approximately 97% complete, at a cost this FY of $5,677,474, which includes $610 contributed funds. Other costs in conjunction with the contract totaled $32,206. Engineering, design and value engineering cost $46,835. Supervision and administration cost $396,655. Total costs to end of FY were $47,751,396, of which $987,340 was for new work (including $300,000 contributed by the Port Commission of Monroe), and $46,764,056 for maintenance including $166,667 contributed funds. ($125,000 by Consolidated Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company.) 44. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 80 miles easterly from Milwaukee, WI (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14934.) Previous project. For details see page 1950 of Annual Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected outer basin in Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the lakeward portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For additional details see page 1303 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned iarves primarily for commercial use. Details on tual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series, No. (revised 1973) prepared and published as part 2 by ard of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Informa- ,n on port terminal services and charges, and steamp services is prepared and published as part I by the 't Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation: A contract awarded last FY for major rehabilitation of the South Breakwater was completed at a cost of $3,075,885. Real estate leases cost $44,799. Supervision and administration cost $81,452. Engineering and design for major rehabilitation of North Breakwater and South Revetment was completed at a cost of $111,722. A contract in the amount of $5,841,215 was awarded for this rehabilitation, however, no work was performed this FY. Other costs in conjunction with the contract were $1,736. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $54,738. The cranebarge MANITOWOC repaired the North Inner Pier at a cost of $142,982. A contract to perform maintenance dredging was awarded and completed at a cost of $171,284, with removal of 12,462 cubic yards. Charges in connection with severence pay and laying up the Dredge MARKHAM were $11,999. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $46,925. Engineering and design for major re habilitation of North Breakwater and South Revetment were performed at a cost of $146,257. Condition surveys and environmental monitoring was performed in conjunction with the authorized Section 111 projectata cost of $16,028. Existing project, including latest project modification, was completed in 1965. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs to end of FY were $15,798,800, of which $3,017,110 was for new work, $5,514,845 for maintenance, and $7,266,845 for rehabilitation. 45. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles easterly from Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. One village owned boat ramp and three privately operated marinas, and a private boat club facility. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cons dition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneoUS inspections and reports were performed at a cost or $28,455. The cranebarge MANITOWOC was used for repair of the North and South Piers at a cost of $76,961' 31-20 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $506. Existing project is complete. Total costs at end of FY were $3,420,906, of which $1,285,716 was for new work and $2,135,190 for maintenance. Contributed funds were in the amount of $1,186,467. 46. OCONTO HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Green Bay, about 31 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and about25 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI, at mouth of Oconto River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) Previous project. For details see page 1187 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1187, Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two municipally owned wharves of 400 and 100 foot frontage, respectively, for miscellaneous freight, open to general public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies cost $10,207. Existing project was completed in 1912. Piers were completed in 1885. Dredging channel and turning basin to existing project depth was commenced in July 1911 and completed in May 1912. The north pier was rebuilt as a rubblemound by local interests in 1967. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $130,754 for new Work and $1,060,348 for maintenance, for a total of $1,191,102. 47. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior. It consists of improvement of mouth of Ontonagon River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1931 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1406 of Annual RePort for 1938. 16E xisting project. Provides for approach channel feet deep, a channel between piers with 17 and 15- ot depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenanceof channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed rojeCt cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report for for details. A modification authorized by 1962 dh aenrn aenlsd, cHoanrsbtrourc Atiocnt porfo avnid iensn feorr b ianscirne aasnidn ga sdeedpitmhse no-f tation basin. This portion of project is inactive. (Esticost (1965) of this work is $6,040,000. (See Table - for authorizing legislation.) al cooperation. None required for earlier authorization. See page 1020 of Annual Report for 1965 for requirements of 1962 Act. Terminal facilities. There are no publicly owned wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving facility, and a few small fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $36,297. A reconnaissance report was continued for major rehabilitation of the East Pier and revetment at a cost of $1,254. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging, removing approximately 27,889 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $134,060. An adjustment of -$5,547 was made to the cost of contract dredging performed last FY. The derrickbarge COLEMAN was used for repair of the North and South Piers, at a cost of $70,397. A total of $116,983 was spent for engineering, design, surveys, soils work, supervision and administration. All work authorized under previous Acts was completed in 1938. Work authorized under the 1962 Act is in an inactive status. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $6,625,529, of which $396,903 was for new work and $6,228,626 for maintenance. 48. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 146 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 14 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provides for widening old entrance channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling and capped with concrete. The 200-foot extension to south pier portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $65,100. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned wharves on west end of Pentwater Lake. The City and Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,825. A reconnaissance report was continued for major rehabilitation of North and South Piers and Revetments at a cost of $2,702. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 20,166 cubic yards of shoal material 31-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 at a cost of $60,402. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $26,768. Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 200-foot extension to the south pier which is not considered necessary under present conditions. For additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project at end of FY were $2,835,421, of which $179,899 was for new work, and $2,655,522 for maintenance. 49. POINTE LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI Location. At Au Gres River on westerly shore of Lake Huron at entrance to Saginaw Bay, about 17 miles northeast of mouth of Saginaw River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a small boat harbor having a 12-foot deep, 100-foot wide, 2,800-foot long outer entrance channel; a 5,600-foot long, 100-foot wide inner entrance channel having a 10-foot depth; an 8,270-foot long 6-foot deep river channel ending just downstream from U.S. 23 highway bridge and having a width of 60 feet; a 4,000-foot long north breakwater and a 3,800-foot long south breakwater. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small boat marina facilities are under construction by the State of Michigan. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,285. Repairs to W. Pier were performed by the cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $113,967. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging was completed. Approximately 15,407 cubic yards of material was removed this FY at a cost of $95,107 of which $8,651 was contributed by local interests. Engineering and design for repairs to the East and West Breakwater was continued at a cost of $34,585. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $23,580. Existing project was completed in 1974. Total costs to end of FY were $3,532,362, of which $2,642,584 was for new work and $889,778 for maintenance. 50. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron at extreme southeastern limit of Saginaw Bay, and 29 miles south of Au Sable River (Oscoda). (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge at the mouth of Bird Creek, consisting of a harbor basin dredged to a depth of 10 feet protected by a breakwater structure, and for dredging an entrance channel to the harbor basin to a depth of 12 feet. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of docks near mouth of Bird Creek and a State-owned dock inside breakwater. Facilities accommodate recreational craft and are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,795. Existing project was completed in 1959. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $2,313,441, of which $1,128,334 was for new work (includes $172,100 contributed funds) and $1,185,107 for maintenance. 51. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan about 186 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and about 37 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14939.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge with an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Portage Lake protected by piers and revetments Project depth is 18 feet. For additional details see page 1297 of Annual Report for 1958. Latest published map is in H. Doc. 588, 64th Congress, 1st session. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are landing places and marinas at inner end of Portage Lake. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination was completed on the Section 111 study at a cost of $2,000. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,584. Existing project was substantially completed in 1912 For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1298 of Annual Report for 1958. The structures are generally in fair condition. Total cost of existing project to end of FY is $1,672,495. 52. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures extending to 12- foot depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor baset 10 feet deep; for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep; a 70-foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm added to the north breakwater; and ripraP placed at the lakeward side of the breakwater additions. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 31-22 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned dock used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a municipally owned pier for recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $16,065. Inspection and reports under Section 111 Mitigation were performed at a cost of $19,126. A contract for beach nourishment was awarded and completed this FY placing approximately 42,815 tons of sand at a cost of $175,889. Engineering and design, supervision and inspection of this contract cost $27,320. The project was completed in 1951 except for latest modification which was completed in FY 76. The breakwaters are in good condition. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $3,925,017 (includes $2,120,593 contributed funds). 53. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Lake Michigan, about 53 miles south of Manitowoc and about 29 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. For details, see page 1938 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1459 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 30-14 of Chicago District Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 12, 1975, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one coal wharf, a petroleum tank farm and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf which is open to public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $10,869; repairs to navigation structures by hired labor at a cost of $142,447. Engineering, design, SUpervision and administration cost $3,684. The existing project was completed in 1936. The 1958 modification was deauthorized in 1977. Total costs to end of Fy were $6,415,275, of which $4,017,709 was for new Work, and $2,397,566 for maintenance. 54. PORT WING HARBOR, WI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 34 miles easterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Provides for two parallel piers at entrance, 835 and 1,017 feet long, respectively, 200 feet apart; an entrance channel between piers 150 feet wide with 15-foot depth; an irregular-shaped turning basin 15 feet deep at inner end of piers from which two inner channels with 8-foot depth extend. One of these is 60 feet wide extending southerly for 340 feet and one 70 feet wide extending easterly 1,170 feet. Portion of dredging of entrance channel to complete project width and depth is considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four privately owned fishing wharves which are considered adequate for existing conditions. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,001. Existing project is complete except channel between piers has been dredged to only a 100-foot width. Widening the channel an additional 50 feet was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. That work was classified inactive and deauthorized on August 5, 1977 under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Piers are in good condition. At end of FY controlling depth was 12 feet in lake approach, and 10 feet between piers and in northerly portion of turning basin, and 8 feet in easterly inner channel. Lands owned by the United States total 7.80 acres. Total cost to end of FY is $657,422. 55. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior at Marquette, MI. It is an indentation about 1.5 miles long and one-half mile wide in shore behind Presque Isle Point. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. A breakwater off Presque Isle Point and dredging harbor to depth of 28 feet at inner portion with 30 feet at entrance. For details see page 1021 of 1965 Annual Report. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One merchandise and petroleum receiving wharf and one ore dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications were completed on the authorized Section 111 project at a cost of $32,626. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a 31-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 cost of $5,867. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed with approximately 6,280 cubic yards of shoal material removed at a cost of $88,000. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $40,496. Project authorized by earlier Acts was completed in 1939. A contract for harbor deepening authorized by 1960 Act was completed in April 1962 except for a section where rocks were encountered in southeast portion of harbor. Rock removal has been accomplished intermittently by hired labor and the project is completed. Breakwater is in good condition. A Section 111 project was approved by Chief of Engineers in October 1981 providing a rock groin, beach restoration and nourishment program at vicinity of Shiras Park and 3,000 feet west of park. Total cost of existing project to end of FY is $2,042,963. 56. RACINE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Milwaukee, WI, and about 64 miles north of Chicago, IL, (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14925.) Previous project. See page 1389 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1235, Annual Report for 1963. New work for project as completed cost $777,775, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and exclusive of inner 300 linear feet of pile pier and 450 linear feet of rubblemound originally part of south breakwater but no longer considered necessary. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 1979, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended; however has not been constructed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Five wharves used for handling coal, limestone, petroleum products, and fish. City provided a public wharf. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $13,830. Repair to navigation structures was performed by hired labor at a cost of $73,809. Engineering, design, miscellaneous reports, supervision and inspection cost $5,372. A contract for dredging in connection with Section 111 was awarded and completed at a cost of $26,377. Engineering and supervision in connection with Section 111 cost $1,801. Existing project substantially completed in 1946. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection was completed in November 1918. Removal of old north pier was completed in 1913. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection and removal of old south pier were commenced in June 1916 and completed in December 1924. Removal of outer shoals, widening and deepening channel through outer basinto existing project depth and width, and dredging river channel began in July and completed in November 1946.Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $8,244,382, of which $1,332,315 was for new work and $6,912,067 for maintenance. 57. ROUGE RIVER, MI Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, MI, 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of City of Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) Previous project. For details see page 1530 of Annual Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation channel, 21 feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of project. (b) Old channel from Detroit River extendingto junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was reclassified from the active to inactive category. Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in Act of August 30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by Act of July 3, 1958 is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Act of October 23, 1962, requires local interests to provide lands and rights-of-WaY for construction upon request of the Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; provide terminal facilities to accommodate prospective com" merce considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and maintain areas between the Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths com mensurate with improved Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and other structUrS, and take such other measures as may be necessary a assure stability of banks adjacent to channel; and provide bridge protection. The assurances of local cooperation for the River and Harbor Act of 1962 were furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Comif'all sion and accepted on January 7, 1965. Fulfillment of a, 1 items of local cooperation has not been accomplished. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial 31-24 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT docks for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 45 (revised 1972) prepared and published as part 2 by the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port and terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as part 1 by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $134,203. Charges in connection with severence pay and laying-up the Dredge HAINS cost $34,758. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $32,102. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging with approximately 50,848 cubic yards of shoal material removed at acostof $547,378. Engineering, design, supervision and administration was performed at a cost of $87,361. Engineering, design, supervision and administration for dike disposal cost $24,085. Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $29,371,608, of which $675,251 was for new work and $28,696,357 for maintenance. In addition, $29,563 was expended for new work from Emergency Relief Act Funds. 58. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Previous project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1550 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet Wtdoe C &O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 16.5 feet deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Pint. Project also provides for five turning basins; one 2 feet deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a siaximum length of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel about 1 mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one20 feet deep at Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and ,feet long; one 20 feet deep just downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet ongt and one 15 feet deep between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1972) prepared and published as part 2 by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port and terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as part 1 by Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, environmental studies, support of Water Control Center, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $283,037. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $5,282. An adjustment was made on Dredge HAINS at a cost of $370. Charges in connection with severence pay and laying-up the Dredge MARKHAM cost $145,380. A contract awarded last fiscal year for dredging the Bay Section was completed at a cost of $3,719,614, removing approximately 745,277 cubic yards of shoal material. A contract for removing dredged material from within the confined disposal area was completed at a cost of $379,508. A contract for dredging the River Section was awarded and completed at a cost of $729,012. Approximately 157,471 cubic yards of shoal material was removed. A contract was awarded for repair to dike disposal facility. The contract is approximately 87% complete at a cost of $210,443. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $256,958. Engineering and design for construction of a diked disposal area for upper Saginaw was continued at a cost of $184,873. Existing project is complete except for small part of the work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is complete except for the channel portion, which is pending modification. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $61,891,953, of which $13,968,171 was for new work and $47,923,782 for maintenance. 59. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Existing project. Provides for channels through St. Clair River, which, at low water datum, are suitable for vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for improvement of North Channel outlet, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths 31-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 are referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. Clair, 576.8 and 571.7 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec; International Great Lakes Datum 1955. (See Tables 31-B and 31-C for authorizing legislation and features of existing project.) Act of July 24, 1946 provides for widening and deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet of north channel. Estimated cost (1983) is $825,000. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce, between upper and lower Great Lakes, and has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, MI, which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, woodpulp, salt and general cargo. These installations satisfy present commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $259,043. Environmental studies done in connection with the extended navigation season cost $587,139. The U.S. Hopper Dredge MARKHAM performed maintenance dredging at the foot of Lake Huron, removing approximately 71,795 cubic yards bin measure, of shoal material, at a cost of $193,942. Charges in connection with severence pay and laying up the Dredge HAINS were $13,545. Location and removal of obstructions cost $177,620. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $28,155. Existing project is complete. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $31,692,647, of which $19,213,246 was for new work and $12,479,401 for maintenance. 60. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 60 miles easterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles southerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14930.) Previous project. For details see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1470 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for protecting mouth of St. Joseph River by two piers, 250 to 325 feet apart at their inner and outer ends, respectively, having lengths of 2,758 feet on north side and 2,603 feet on south side; for a channel 21 feet deep from Lake Michigan to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal, a length of about 6,900 feet with widths of 265 feet at outer end of piers, 190 feet at inner end of piers and revetments, thence generally 215 feet to lower end of turning basin, increasing to 250 feet above the turning basin to mouth of Paw Paw River, thence generally 110 feet in Paw Paw River to mouth of Benton Harbor canal; for dredging channel in Benton Harbor canal up to west line of Riverview Drive extended northerly, to 18 feet deep and 80 feet wide; and a turning basin 18 feet deep on north side of channel above mouth of Morrison Channel and a turning basin 18 feet deep near mouth of Paw Paw River. Public Law 88-88th Congress declared a portion of Benton Harbor Canal a non-navigable stream. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several commercial wharves for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. A package freight terminal and a public docking facility is also available. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $68,771. A contract was awarded and completed for trucking dredged material from disposal area at a cost of $75,911. Hired labor cost for maintenance of disposal area cost $8,636. Charges in connection with lay-up of Dredge HAINS cost $23,615. A contract for dredging contaminated material in the inner harbor was awarded and completed, removing approximately 18,910 cubic yards of material at a cost of $98,174. A contract for dredging clean material was awarded. This contract is divided between the regular and mitigation program. The contract is approximately 75% complete, removing 68,533 cu. yds. at a cost to the regular program of $99,999. (See mitigation for balance of cost). Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $48,050. Under the Section 111 program, $197,000 was expended on a dredging contract to place dredged material on beach. Monitoring, surveys, engineering, supervision and administration for the mitigation program cost $52,072. Charges for laying-up the Dredge HAINS were $9,276. Engineer ing and design for confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $51,533. Existing project was completed in 1956. The structures are in generally good condition. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $12,208,683, of which $1,301,372 was for new work, $9,945,095 for maintenance and $962,216 for rehabilitation. 61. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan and Province of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, alns 14884.) At. Sault Ste. Marie, MI, about 14 miles 31-26 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT downstream from Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a hydroelectric powerplant. Previous project. For details see page 1955, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channels permitting 25.5-foot draft navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake Huron approaches thereto; constructing and operating four locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river above and below locks; and constructing various other works in conjunction with project. Subsequently, in 1932, the Unit 10 powerhouse was installed raising the capacity to 18,400 kilowatts (45,000 ultimate capacity). Original State locks were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite appropriation from June 9, 1881, to November 2, 1886, after which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock in 1896. Weitzel Lock, destroyed in 1942 by excavation for MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from September 1, 1881, to June 30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from August 3, 1896, Davis Lock from October 21, 1914, and Sabin Lock from September 18,1919, to end of FY 1935. The 1,200 foot by 110 foot new Poe Lock was authorized in 1962 and put into operation in 1968. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 31-D. Project depths are referred to low water datum corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at elevation 600 feet and at upstream side of locks is 577.8 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum 1955). Estimated (1973) cost for new work is $164,630.(See Table 31-B for authrizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves trough commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive coal and petroleum products. irestone is shipped from a pier at Drummond Island. efel refueling j etour; stations are at Lime Island and Village they receive coal and petroleum products. esentterminals satisfy current traffic requirements. 00Perations during fiscal year. Maintenance: an oulre rla tmioani,nn ttennaan-c ee aannd care of locks: Two canals and our locks were operated as required. Necessary prs and improvements were made thereto and to aPpurtenant structures and equipment. Canals were Pe to navigation 282 days from October 1, 1983 of g51h0 Sveespsteelsm, baegr g3r0e, g1a9t8i4n.g D 8u5r,i9n7g2 ,t2h2a3t period, a total short tons of freight and 171,685 passengers passed through the MacArthur, Poe, Davis, and Sabin Locks. Cost for operation, maintenance, and care of the locks for the FY was $5,118,092, including $106,490 for extended season operation and maintenance. Powerhouse and Equipment: Two hydroelectric powerhouses were operated and maintained. Cost of hired labor during the FY was $501,785, less a deduction of $35,078 for interdepartmental electricity sold. Other operation and care items: Buildings and grounds were maintained, condition surveys, operation studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $645,710. Environmental studies were made at a cost of $14,186. Security measures were performed at a cost of $522,558, including a contract for $510,533. Janitorial service of the Administration and Davis Buildings was done by contract at a cost of $33,421. A study on winter and extended navigation season, ice measurements, and weather monitoring was performed at a cost of $1,050,367. An ice boom was installed and removed and work on the ice stabilization islands was performed at a cost of $84,864. Compensating Works: An engineering study and cost of work contracted on the compensating works was performed at a cost of $185,518. Channels and canals: St. Marys River channels and canal approaches were examined by sweeping. Removal of shoals in St. Marys River channels and canal approaches was accomplished by hired labor and U.S. Derrickboats NICOLET and HARVEY at a cost of $1,333,109, including engineering and design. A total of $787,067 has been expended in the procurement of an electronic survey system. Recreational facilities: Information center, comfort stations, park fountain, observation and overlook platforms were maintained at a cost of $81,610, including a janitorial contract for the information center at a cost of $14,809. A total of 505,926 visitors used the observation and overlook platforms and the information center during the FY. (Total costs: $10,323,209). Project in effect prior to modification of March 21, 1956 is complete and work authorized by 1956 modification to provide a safe draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. Public Works Acceleration Funds used for maintenance were $118,000. Total costs to end of FY were $160,657,070 for new work and $157,289,526 for maintenance, for a grand total of $317,946,596. 62. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 22 miles northerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual 31-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Report for 1938. Existing project. Entrance channel protected by parallel piers at mouth of Kalamazoo River and a river channel to Village of Saugatuck, MI. Project depths: 16 feet in entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional details on page 1456, 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Village of Saugatuck, MI, there are several landing places for recreational craft and one for small commercial vessels. At Village of Douglas, MI, there is a landing pier. Facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, safety studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,925. A reconnaissance report for major rehabilitation of North and South Piers and revetments was initiated at a cost of $15,368. An adjustment was made for repairs to the North and South Piers at a cost of -$324. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total costs to end of FY were $3,021,537, of which $364,527 was for new work and $2,657,010 for maintenance. 63. SAXON HARBOR, WI Location.On south shore of Lake Superior in Wisconsin at mouth of Oronto Creek, 27 miles southeast of harbor at Bayfield, WI, and 21 miles westerly of harbor at Black River, MI; 99 miles east of Duluth-Superior Harbor and 60 miles west of Ontonagon Harbor, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project: For details see page 1254 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. For detailed dimensions of features see page 1025 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One wharf 300 feet long on east side of present harbor basin constructed by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Detailed project study for the authorized Section 111 project continued at a cost of $39,200. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies and inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,649. The project was fully completed in March 1968. A reconnaissance report was completed in August 1971 concerning erosion of the shoreline west of the harbor. A detailed project report is being prepared to develop an acceptable plan for mitigation measures. Total costof existing project to end of FY is $1,493,476. 64. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about26 miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous project. See page 1381 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1230, Annual Report for 1963. New Work for project as completed cost $648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous reports were performed at a cost of $44,986. The contract awarded in FY 83 to repair the North Revetment and South Pier was completed this FY at a cost of $853,121. The cranebarge MANITOWOC was used for other structure repairs, at a cost of $93,347. A contract was awarded for maintenance dredging and completed this FY at a cost of $330,834. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $127,338. Engineering and design leading to construction of a Confined Disposal Facility cost $200,475. Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 and completed in October 1915. Dredging turning basin was commenced in October 1928 and completed in September 1931. Dredging entrance channel to existing project depth was commenced in June and completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was completed in December 1956. Piers and breakwaters are in generally good condition. Inner 260 feet of south pier replaced with revetment by private interests under permit granted July 16, 1931, by the Secretary of War. Piers, therefore, are maintained only for a length of about 2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is navigable abou t 2.4 miles above its mouth for craft drawing not more than 2 feet. Costs of existing project are $5,152,116 fo maintenance, $609,028 for rehabilitation and $1,136,S for new work: a total of $6,897,232. 65. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles northerly 31-28 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT from St. Joseph, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and turning basin. For additional details see page 1455 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves for handling coal, building materials, woodpulp, fish, and miscellaneous commodities will have warehouses. Facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, safety studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $15,372. Surveys and environmental studies were also done to monitor shore erosion, under the Section 111 project, at a cost of $12,403. Engineering and design associated with mitigation cost $2,338. Existing project was completed in 1960. Project now being maintained to 14-foot and 12-foot depths, respectively, in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized, which is adequate for current usage. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to the end of FY were $6,246,692, of which $797,193 was for new work, $3,630,190 for maintenance, and $1,632,076 for rehabilitation. 68. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) Previous projects. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Rport for 1979, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed cription, see page 1223, Annual Report for 1963. (ee Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) al cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. As the canal and connecting chahnel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are in City of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of 'etted portion of canal. These facilities consist of two "?aes for handling coal, petroleum products and Cicellaneous commodities and four shipbuilding yards. C. of Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf about 5 mles northwesterly from City of Sturgeon Bay. Two major shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair facilities are available including dry docks, marine railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $56,552. Minor repairs to navigation structures were performed by hired labor at a cost of $3,695. Supervision and administration cost $7,822. Engineering and design for construction of diked disposal facility was continued at a cost of $9,057. Total cost of existing project is $1,059,722 for new work, $6,785,911 for maintenance and $884,899 for rehabilitation: a total of $8,730,532. In addition, $235,940 was expended between April 25, 1893 and June 30, 1917 on operating and care of works of improvements under provision of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 67. TWO HARBORS, MN Location. Harbor is on north shore of Lake Superior, 27 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Narrowing natural entrance by construction of two breakwaters, 1,628 and 900 feet long, from eastern and western points of bay, respectively; and dredging a maneuvering area on north side of harbor to 28 and 30 feet deep. A walkway on east breakwater is provided for public recreational use. For details see page 1026 of Annual Report for 1965. Dredging to deepen areas along easterly and northerly edges of channel was completed in 1980. This portion of project was reclassified from the "inactive" to "active" category in 1973. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. A section 221 local cooperation agreement was entered into with the City of Two Harbors on August 14, 1978. Terminal facilities. No publicly owned wharves. Three ore docks, tug wharf, an unused coal dock, and merchandise wharf are privately owned. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,144. Breakwater repairs were performed by Government forces at a cost of $50,549. The existing project is complete. Total cost to end of FY was $4,170,152 for new work and $1,876,640 for maintenance, a total of $6,046,792. 68. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from 31-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Green Bay, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous projects. See page 1377, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463, exclusive of the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 River and Harbor Act portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $14,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum products and public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $26,891. Existing project is complete except for inactive portion of project which consists of dredging a 10-foot width along east side of lakeward portion of entrance channel between the piers. This dredging was omitted to avoid removal of necessary riprap along entrance piers. Present width of channel is considered adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. South pier was completed in 1883 and is in generally good condition. North pier was completed in 1908. North revetment, completed in 1917, was rebuilt in May to August 1962. Dredging entrance channel and inner basin to existing project depth was commenced in March and substantially completed in May 1937. Total costs of existing project were $147,463 for new work and $6,376,351 for maintenance; a total of $6,523,814. In addition, $58,057 was expended for minor rehabilitation. 69. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 120 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 45 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14935.) Existing project. Parallel piers, revetments, and a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, 1,950 feet long, extending from Lake Michigan to White Lake. For additional details see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A privately owned chemical hipping dock on north side of lake about 3 miles from nruer end of revetted entrance channel. Across lake, at Xillage of Whitehall, there are several installations serving light draft vessels. These terminals satisfy present recreational and commercial traffic require. ments. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Operation and Maintenance Manuals for Beach Nourishment cost $1,678. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,702. A reconnaissance report for major rehabilitation of North and South piers and revetments was continued at a cost of $4,989. Existing project was completed in 1908. Stone was placed on the north and south revetments in FY 1972. The structures that are not in generally good condition are programmed for major repair as needed. Project now being maintained to 14-foot depth authorized, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost to endof FY is $2,324,226, of which $457,563 was for new work and $1,866,663 for maintenance. 70. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 31-F. 71. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 31-G. 72. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (pre-authorization.) Expanded reconnaissance studies were initiated for Douglas County, WI ($44,712) and Two Harbors, MN ($44,442). Detailed project studies were continued for Bayfield, WI ($9,936) to respond to OCE comments on final report, and continued for Kenosha, WI ($38,658). A special monitoring study of wave heights in Manitow0c Harbor was initiated ($5,244). The Harrisville Harbor, MI, breakwater extension project was constructed and completed by funds authorized in the 1983 Emergeny Jobs Bill (H.R. 1718, Public Law 98-8, 1st Session, 98th Congress, March 24, 1983) - $232,368. Financial close out was accomplished on Detour Harbor, MI ($1,455) and Manitowoc River Channel Extension, WI ($5,527), and initiated on Manitowoc Small Boat Harbor ($11,383). Beach Erosion Control 73. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Beach erosion control projects are authorized at Berrien County Shore (St. Joseph) MI, and the Shore o Manitowoc County, WI. For last full report see Annu9 Report for 1963 (Berrien County). Both projects arei the inactive category. 31-30 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT 74. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline protection of public works and non-profit public services. (Section 14 Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended.) Charlevoix Harbor, MI - A contract for Erosion Protection, Section 14, was awarded this FY in the amount of $195,349. Approximately 88 percent of the work was completed on contract at a cost of $171,305. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $25,874. Eagle Harbor, MI- A contract awarded last FY with funds authorized in the 1983 Emergency Jobs Bill (H.R. 1718, Public Law 98-8, 1st Session, 98th Congress, March24, 1983) for Erosion Protection, Section 14, was completed at a cost of $66,012. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $10,898. Elkhart River, Elkhart, IN - A contract for Erosion Protection, Section 14, was awarded for $176,770. No work performed this FY. Survey and layouts for the 0&M Manual cost $4,759. Engineering and design cost $23,791. Manistee, MI - Plans, specifications for surveys and soils, construction advertisement, award and appraisal report ($7,500) were performed at a total cost of $34,480. Meridian Township, MI - Miscellaneous inspections and reports, supervision and administration for Erosion Protection, Section 14, were completed at a cost of $3,697. Thunder Bay, MI - Miscellaneous inspections and reports were completed for Erosion Protection, Section 14, at a cost of $1,492. Zoological Gardens, Racine, WI- A contract awarded last FY for Emergency Bank Protection, Section 14, was completed at a cost of $183,629. Contributed funds by the City of Racine for Section 14 were $3,346. Plans, specifications, inspections, reports, supervision and administration cost $22,442. Negative appraisal reports were completed and reimbursed for Two Rivers, WI ($5,000); Arnheim Rad, Sturgeon River, MI ($146); and LakeshoreDrive, Allegan County, MI ($6,500). iPitive appraisal reports were completed and renibursed for Bridgeport Township, Saginaw County, 8,315); Bayshore Drive, N. Shoemaker Road (Door Onty), WI - Plans and specifications were completed dProject advertised ($17,161). 75. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of 1962 River and Harbor Act. Plans and speciettions Were substantially completed for Ashland, WI ($28,398). Detailed project studies were continued at Escanaba, MI ($48,141) and at Ontonagon, MI ($99,171). 76. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. Coordination completed on Portage Lake Harbor, MI ($2,000). Detailed project study continued at Saxon, WI ($39,200). Plans and specifications were completed on Grand Traverse Harbor, MI ($31,167) and Presque Isle Harbor, MI ($32,626). Monitoring was continued at Grand Marais Harbor, MI ($16,984). The Harrisville Harbor, MI, beach nourishment project was constructed and completed by funds authorized in the 1983 Emergency Jobs Bill (H.R. 1718, Public Law 98-8, 1st Session, 98th Congress, March 24, 1983) - $320,813. Financial closeout was accomplished on Hammond Bay, MI ($3,244) and White Lake Harbor, MI ($1,678). Flood Control 77. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Saginaw River basin including its tributaries, Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 miles upstream from mouth, are on Federally improved deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel. (See Saginaw and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Existing project. Provides for improvements in Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: (a) at Middle Branch and South Branch, Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, including a short reach of East Branch, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) for construction of $1,448,000 for Middle and South Branches; provided local interests contribute in cash 42 percent of first cost of major drainage project on Middle Branch, and 38 percent of first cost of major drainage project on South Branch, exclusive of cost of rights-of-way and other work required as local cooperation, and give assurances satisfactory to Secretary of the Army they will construct and maintain local drainage work required to fully and effectively utilize improvements to be provided under the Federal projects; (b) at Vassar on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee construction, floodwalls, modification of Moore Drain, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct 1983) of $8,455,000 and non-Federal cost of $567,000 for construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river by channel improvement, levee construction related work, 31-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 at an estimated U.S. cost (Jul 1974) of $410,900 for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct 1983) of $18,110,300 and non-Federal cost of $2,579,000 for construction; provided local interests contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, exclusive of costs of rights-of-ways (e) at Corunna on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) of $48,000 for construction; provided local interests modify spillway of mill dam at Corunna at their own expense, substantially in accordance with plan of District Engineer and subject to approval of Chief of Engineers, or in lieu thereof, contribute to the United States actual cost of modification to be performed by the United States; (f) at Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) of $425,000 for construction; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, to provide for flood protection through non-structural (permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. cost (Apr 1982) of $5,125,000 and non-Federal cost of $1,611,500 for implementation; however, project was reclassified to the "inactive" category on December 15, 1982; (h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control structures and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct 1983) of $23,023,000 Federal, and a non- Federal cost of $2,648,000 which includes a cash contribution of $1,211,000; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 percent of cost of rights-of-way for flood control and other work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom one-half cost of lands for conservation; and provided further that before starting works for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, Chief of Engineers and Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled storage of flood-waters while preserving the maximum fish and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, for active portion (1983) is $50,000,000 Federal and $1,394,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total estimated cost (1983) to local interests is $5,800,000. Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, and rights-of-way, including removal of buildings, for construction; hold the United States free from damage; maintain and operate all works after completions; establish and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and existing highway bridges (except underpinning and bridge raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint River at Flint were furnished by City of Flint and accepted by the United States on November 23, 1962. Estimated required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was furnished February 20, 1963. An additional $117,000 was furnished by the City to cover increased construction costs. Required assurances for Cass River at Frankenmuth were accepted on September 8,1964. All necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been provided. The Midland City Council adopted a resolution on June 7, 1982 declaring its intent not to sponsor the Flood Control project on the Tittabawassee River at Midland. The Vassar City Council, in a letter dated January 26, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Vassar Flood Control Project. Saginaw County, in a resolution dated August 11, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurancesof local cooperation for the Shiawassee Flats Flood Control Project. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Shiawassee: Work on preparing a General Design Memorandum was initiated in FY 83 and continued in FY 84. Total cost for Shiawassee for new work this FY is $585,595. Flint: Investigations of claims for contract completed in FY 80 cost $259,365 in FY 84. Vassar: Work on preparing a General Design Memo randum was initiated in FY 83 and continued in FY 84 Total cost for new work for Vassar this FY is $112,467. The Frankenmuth and Flint portions of the project are complete. Total costs for this project in FY 84 were $957,427. 78. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 15 square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on the westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Enlarging present channel of Sebewaing River through Village of 5ebewaing, Mt a capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junctil 31-32 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; and removal of present dike on south sideof channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to provide protection for Village of Sebewaing from floods with a frequency of once in 15 years and with a magnitude greater than the maximum flood of record. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except for furnishing easements and rights-of-way for removal of remaining portion of dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $11,411. 79. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS The listed projects were inspected during this period. Battle Creek, Kalamazoo River, MI; Kawkawlin, Kawkawlin River, MI; Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI; Flint, Flint River, MI; Frankenmuth, Cass River, MI; Mount Clemens Spillway and Cutoff Canal, Clinton River, MI; Red Run, Clinton River, MI; Estral Beach, Lake Erie, MI; Fort Wayne Mechanic St. Dike, St. Marys River, IN; Rouge River, MI; Burr Oak, Prairie River, MI. Fiscal year costs were $99,923. Total costs to end of FY year were $900,592. 80. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 31-H. 81. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION IfEl(mPuerbgleicn cy Flood Control Activities, Flood Fight- Law 84-99 and P.L. 93-288 and Antece- dent Legislation). 1. Winter descended early on the upper Great Lakes' areas with severe low temperatures and significant Snofalls occurring from early November on. Ice jam flooding caused minor flood problems in some areas: LWt olf River, Menominee County, WI, caused flood problems for the Indian Reservation and town of Ishena. Local highways and roads were closed to raffi by flood waters on November 29-30, 1983 and rin on December 22-23, 1983. b. River Raisin, Monroe Co., MI, in the town of Monroe, February 13, 1984. Minor flooding caused by 'Jants is an almost annual occurrence at this locality. Sahe families were evacuated and the Coast Guard broke iee in the lower river to release backed-up flow at the Corps request. c. Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron, Bay Co., MI, February 27-28, 1984. Wind-driven ice floes caused property damage to homes along the shoreline of lower Saginaw Bay. d. St. Clair River, St. Clair Co., MI, for the period of April 6-9, 1984. Ice packs from Lake Huron were driven into the St. Clair River by unusually prolonged northerly winds, jamming up in the lower part of the River and backing upriver some 20 miles. Lowland areas, dwellings, and commercial enterprises experienced flooding. The District's Emergency Management Branch provided communication liaison between the county emergency services director and Coast Guard icebreaker group. Although the flooding was alleviated, deep-draft navigation through this connecting channel was stymied until April 25th. 2. In late April, on the 27-28th, sixteen counties in eastern and northeastern Wisconsin were swept by tornadoes. The Kewaunee Area Office remained on alert for possible assistance to tornado damaged areas, but was not requested to provide aid. FEMA damage assessments (P.L. 93-288) were coordinated through the St. Paul District since more significant damages occurred in Wisconsin areas under NCS jurisdiction. 3. Dam distress on the St. Joseph River, Berrien County, MI, caused by loss of fill from behind a retaining wall along the tailwater zone, was investigated by the Grand Haven Area Flood Engineer. It was determined that downstream evacuation was not warranted and repairs were effected by dam owner (non-Federal). 4. In response to Division Commander's request, the District conducted a condition survey of the flood protection structures built during the Operation Foresight Program of 1973-74. Results of the inspections, cost estimates for required restoration, and recommendations for similar measures were forwarded to NCD on March 5, 1984. 5. In response to an EPA Region V request thru NCDEM, the Chief, Emergency Management Branch, as NCE POC, attended an activation meeting of the Regional Response Team (RRT) at Flat Rock, Wayne Co., MI, on March 29, 1984. RRT activated to discuss an impending environmental emergency (waste) oil overflows), that existed at a privately-owned waste disposal site. 6. The District EOC was not activated during the emergency events outlined in the paragraphs above. Expenditures associated with the Corps' response were relatively minor and were allocated to normal budget allowances established for the fiscal year operations. Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. Negative appraisal reports were completed and funds reimbursed for Decatur, Adams County, IN ($7,500), Laporte, IN 31-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 ($7,000), and Rogers Memorial Park, Goshen, IN ($7,500). Coordination was completed on Birdland Subdivision, Genessee Township, MI ($750). Positive appraisal reports were completed and funds reimbursed for LaCrosse, IN ($7,500) and Pigeon Creek, Steuben County, IN ($7,500). Expanded reconnaissance studies were initiated at LaCrosse, IN ($4,992) and Thread River, Burton, MI ($34,914), and were initiated and substantially completed at Ontonagon, MI ($63,462). Detailed project studies were completed in April 1984 at Paw Paw Lake, MI ($15,000), and a Feature Design Memorandum was initiated and substantially completed ($62,031). At Kawkawlin River, MI, an additional $250,000 appropriation was granted in FY 84 for one-time maintenance. Environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,680. A contract was awarded and completed for dredging upstream and downstream, removing approximately 33,027 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $184,404. Engineering, design, surveys, inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $44,805. Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Negative appraisal reports were completed and funds reimbursed for Augusta Township, MI ($11,000) and Noble County, IN ($7,500). A positive appraisal report was completed and funds reimbursed for Maple River, MI ($7,500), and plans and specifications, advertisements, award, and construction were completed ($137,614). 82. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS Field Operations. The following field operations, which were complemented by office activities in support of basic mission, were conducted during the current period: In support of the development and calibration of Detroit District mathematical models of the Connecting Channels, soundings and discharge measurements were conducted on the St. Clair and Detroit Rivers. Discharge measurements were made in the Welland Canal and analyzed, in support of Water Survey of Canada. During the winter months, the District observes the presence of ice in the St. Marys, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers as an ongoing mission. The District monitors key water level gages in these Rivers for continuous updating of the hydrograph for detection of possible ice jams and associated potential for flooding. This provides advance warning to area residents and other governmental agencies (in support of respective Flood Alert Plans). In the past, this monitoring was accomplished utilizing telemark gaging. The District is in the process of updating these gages by adding Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) transmission equipment to provide round-the-clock real time water level data monitoring. It is expected that this work will be completed in FY 85. International Activities. The following activities were conducted specifically for the International Joint Commission (IJC) Boards and Committees: Members of the Detroit District staff attended the spring and fall semi-annual appearances of the Inter. national Great Lakes Boards before the Commission in Washington, DC, and Ottawa, Ontario, respectively. a. International Lake Superior Board of Control. The Detroit District Engineer is the United States Regulation Representative for the Board of Control. In support of the U.S. Section of the Board, the District provided monthly Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a review of the hydrologic factors which influence the future regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations were based on the use of probability forecasts of water supplies routed through the lakes, rendering outflows under Plan 1977, the currently approved operating rule. On February 21, 1984, the Board was informed by Great Lakes Power Limited (GLPL) that problems had been discovered in all three units of the Clergue Generating Station at Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. The problem resulted in the equivalent of one unit being shut down while repairs were made. To ensure that the approved monthly outflow from Lake Superior was discharged during March, Edison Sault Electric Conmpany, upon agreement with GLPL, was assigned the excess power water. The Board had previously requested guidance from the IJC on the distribution of Lake Superior outflows during periods whenever GLPL is unable to use its entire monthly allocation of water and U.S. power interests have insufficient water to satisfy their needs. The answer to the above question has yet to be provided. The Board forwarded to the Commission a Scope of Work for a topographic and hydrographic survey of the St. Marys Rapids to aid in the design and location of proposed remedial measures for the Rapids fishery. The final report of the Water Quality Monitoring Program for the Great Lakes Power Limited Redeve lopment Project (1979-1983) was furnished to the Board in March. Remedial repairs to the Compensating Works are continuing. All remaining remedial workon this structure is expected to be completed by 1986. The Board documented its long-term inspection and main tenance program for the Compensating Works ina publication entitled, "St. Marys River 0 Compensating Works Inspection and Maintenance Manual," which was provided to the structure's owners in November 1983. b. International Niagara Boord of Control ard International Niagara Working Committee. A member of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrologt staff is on the U.S. Section of the Working Committee The District was recently involved in the engineer and development of a revised rating curve for the 31-34 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT Ashland Avenue gage. In October 1984, a series of discharge measurements will be made in the American Falls Channel by personnel from the Detroit District. These measurements are part of the on-going program to periodically verify the stage-discharge relationship for the American Falls Channel flow. c. International St. Lawrence River Board of Control. When requested, the Detroit District supported the Buffalo District in its activities. d. International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board. The Detroit District Engineer is Chairman of the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. Personnel from the District hold membership on the Diversions and Environmental Evaluation Subcommittees and on the Public Involvement Ad Hoc Group. The Board completed its study and filed a report on its findings with the IJC in September 1981. Detroit District staff attended public hearings of the IJC on the study results and have since reviewed and provided comments on the IJC's draft report to the governments of the United States and Canada. The District is also actively involved in recovering and documenting procedures and computer programs used to determine consumptive uses in the U.S. portion of the Great Lakes Basin. e. International Lake Erie Regulation Study Board. The Chief of the Detroit District's Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is Chairman of the I.FS. Section of the Regulation Subcommittee. Staff members also provided input to the other subcommittees. The Board completed its report in July 1981 and submitted it to the IJC. The IJC submitted its recommendations, based on the Board's report and subsequent public hearings, to the governments of the United States and Canada, in a report dated November 1983. f. International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board. The Chief of the Detroit District's Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is Chairman of the U.S. Section of this Board. The Detroit District also provides the U.S. Secretary to the Board as well as membership on the Hydraulics and Hydrology Committees. A "Directive" concerning the future activities of the Board was sent to the IJC in June 1984. The Board provided the Commission with an advance copy of the main report, including executive Summary, findings, conclusions and recommendations, io July. Published copies of the main report and PDendices are expected to be completed by December 1984., Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Ydraulic and Hydrologic Data. The Great Lakes ydraulics and Hydrology Branch of the District prOvides the U.S. Secretary to this committee, as well as 1 (embership on its subcommittees. Operations a'tiued pertaining to the coordination of basic draulic and hydrologic data with Canada. A Coordinating Committee report, being worked on in the Branch, documents the discharge measurements made on the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River during the period 1900-1978. Through the auspices of the Coordinating Committee, the Corps of Engineers provided funds to Canada, in the amount of $215,000, to aid in completion of precise leveling in the International Section of the St. Lawrence River. This survey, as well as similar surveys conducted in the U.S. by NOAA, are part of a program to update the International Great Lakes Datum (IGLD). The new IGLD will evolve around the epic year 1980. Field surveys were completed in 1983, and the datum is expected to be published in 1985. NCD Master Plan for Water Control Data System. The District completed its input for presentation to OCE. The District's plan calls for an annual average charge of $376,000 for updating the Great Lakes gaging network for fiscal years 1983-1987. In addition, $370,000 has been requested in FY 85 for a dedicated in-house mini-computer for real-time water control activities. Great Lakes Information Management. The District purchased a stand-alone image processing system to process and display satellite and aircraft derived data. This minicomputer system will eventually be the cornerstone of a fully automated mapping and analysis facility within the District. Besides processing remotely- sensed data, the system will provide capabilities for generating multiparameter data bases and thematic maps for basin-wide hydrologic models, and for generating high-resolution graphics and drafting products. The image processing facility will be integrated with the water control minicomputer in FY 1985 to promote information transfer within NCD for the Great Lakes. Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes water level forecasting system, including investigations into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance relationship (i.e. runoff, precipitation over water, evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use of real-time hydrologic data were continued by Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch staff members. Several conceptual hydrologic models have been studied and are being calibrated for eventual use in future forecasts of lake levels and outflows. District personnel are participating in the second year of a five-year program to assess water supplies on the Lake Superior Basin through use of automated hydromet stations, airborne snow and soil moisture surveys, and satellite imagery. Levels of the Great Lakes. The Branch provided technical information and expertise regarding lake levels and long range still water forecasts to many interested parties such as Congressmen, State and local officials, news media, navigation and power interests, 31-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 and concerned property owners. Explanation of the water levels was supplied to the public in the form of direct answers to numerous inquiries, addresses to various civic groups, and interviews with news media. The publication of an international (U.S. and Canada) forecast of Great Lakes water levels, under the auspices of the Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data was continued during the period. In support of these forecasts and to assist in lake regulation, funds have been provided to the Department of Commerce for maintenance of eleven telemetric water level gages at selected sites throughout the Great Lakes to obtain more real-time data. Costs for FY 84 are $1,281,669. General Investigations 83. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,258,098 for navigation studies and $676,921 for flood control studies. A reconnaissance study at Fort Wayne, IN, was completed at a cost of $80,000. Funds in the amount of $334,332 were spent on the continuation of the Ecorse Creek Basin, Wayne Co., Flood Protection Study. Continuation of planning on the Saginaw River, MI, Basin Study was accomplished at a cost of $262,589. 84. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING FY 84 costs for the continuation of planning and engineering for Monroe Harbor, MI, were $198,319. A Final Survey Report recommending structural modifications was completed in February 1980. The report recommendations are: to deepen the River Raisin portion of the project to 27 feet; to widen to 500 feet and deepen to 28 feet the entrance channel from Lake Erie; to provide a new turning basin able to accommodate 1,000 foot vessels; and to construct a confined disposal facility that would create a 700 acre marsh and provide shoreline protection behind the disposal facility. Although the project has not been authorized by Congress, the Monroe Harbor Study was included in the FY 1984 and FY 1985 budgets under the category "Continuation of Planning and Engineering" for the purpose of collecting updated and detailed project data, reevaluating project channel dimensions and dredged material disposal requirements, reaffirming project economic and environmental feasibility, and preparing preliminary project design. Although no major change in the scope of the recommended plan is anticipated at this time, a reduction in recommended channel width and alternative dredge material disposal options are under consideration. 85. ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Continuing AE&D costs for Green Bay Harbor were $47,086. 86. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA a. Coordination Studies with Other Agen. cies. These studies include Special Investigations $15,000; F.E.R.C. $3,000; Soil Conservation Service $2,000; Coordination with States (Section 22) $69,990; International Water Studies $24,000; and Flood Plain Management Services $119,787. A special hydrologic study to develop a regional flood frequency study for the Saginaw River Basin was initiated in FY 80, and adraft report completed in FY 84. Costs for this project in FY 84 were $2,000. Also, an investigation of levee works along the Kankakee-Yellow Rivers, IN, was completed in FY 84 at an additional cost of $13,000. b. Flood Insurance Studies. Two Michigan Flood Insurance Studies were completed in FY 84. They were for Woodhaven City of Wayne County; and Corunna City of Shiawassee County. The studies were completed at a total cost of $51,896. FY 84 costs were $10,395; $2,926 for Corunna and $7,469 for Woodhaven. A Flood Insurance Study for the City of Taylor continued in FY 84 at a cost of $36,554, and will e completed in FY 85 at a total cost of $88,516. An additional six studies were initiated in FY 84 for the communities of: Huron Township, Wayne County, at cost of $24,352; City of Litchfield, Hillsdale County, $20,522; City of Manistee, Manistee County, $18,708; Hamlin Township, Mason County, $1,022; Summit Township, Mason County, $1,609; and City of Saultste Marie, Chippewa County, $811; for total expenditures of $67,024 in FY 84. 31-36 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Secton to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 1. Arcadia Harbor, New Work MI 2. Ashland Harbor, WI 3. AuSable Harbor, MI 4. Big Bay Harbor, MI Section 111 5. Black River Harbor, MI (P.H.) Contributed Funds 6. Black River Harbor, MI (U.P.) 7. Chnls in the Straits of Mackinac, MI Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 66,000 56,800 153,800 65,992 48,350 155,998 62,514 67,248 448,000 193,000 88,000 238,000 448,000 211,002 77,490 246,921 31,318 30,292 3,000 15,000 10,575 12,045 6,856 7,173 847,362 846,636 1,695,645 1,695,645 2,467,796 2,465,058 209,7761 209,7761 2,458,309 2,457,600 340,4332 340,4332 50,000 2,975 50,000 58,000 -38,942 75,092 11,231 9,863 74,384 3,846 13,192 - 2,900 654 2,900 11,000 - 11,000 60,000 53,907 1,004,760 1,004,760 480,2443 480,2443 349,921 349,921 506,7944 505,8994 383,350 383,350 503,423 503,335 2,832,629 2,832,629 145,318 145,318 10,000 10,708 11,098 10,203 11,000 10,912 -5,000 1,093 31-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 8. Charlevoix New Work 9. Cheboygan Harbor, MI 10. Clinton River MI 11. Detour Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 12. Detroit River, MI 13. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI Harbor, MI 891,200 1,329,000 887,546 1,320,896 314,000 310,454 20,460 357,455 15,000 21,460 358,180 12,608 Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 797,000 250,000 824,952 214,981 -864 500,000 250,000 -45,564 916,961 312,101 -30,626 - - 280 - - 280 11,797,500 5,515,500 8,675,000 11,799,911 4,798,059 8,530,302 7,993,700 982,000 8,004,553 964,292 3,610 1,940,000 1,581,000 2,348,000 1,930,938 1,584,912 1,886,071 272,000 288,220 10,000 10,585 16,001 16,001 115,000 88,419 -34,600 1,455 -975 180,623 180,623 4,808,900 4,806,693 1,129,396 1,129,396 504,236 504,236 874,862 872,780 549,7985 549,7986 1,008,258 1,008,258 350,200 319,471 1,354,910 1,354,910 1,204,436 1,198,461 1,478 1,478 3,894,546 4,546,281 -14,000 5,459 2,431,000 2,687,668 -1,900 -1,898 1,758 1,758 76,877,3576 76,877,3576 59,708,124 59,479,280 41,375,694 41,373,971 16,109,258" 16,109,158' 30,031,170 29,806,562 1,556,249 1,556,249 31-38 31,827 26,881 12,660 31,879 26,898 12,660 2,000 25,000 33,000 2,884 20,444 33,412 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 14. Eagle Harbor, New Work MI 15. Fox River, WI 16. Frankfort Harbor MI 17. Grand Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 Contributed Funds 18. Grand Marais Harbor, MN Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 14,348 13,353 1,628,000 1,571,000 1,780,000 1,555,877 1,582,634 1,752,331 136,000 1,891,000 138,797 415,288 -476,000 994,733 7,000 7,402 1,782,000 1,603,620 372,500 367,153 76,254 736,000 35,000 64,778 699,539 82,950 1,614,000 983,000 3,747,000 1,595,885 1,007,378 1,024,174 -60,000 15,000 145,000 -60,000 15,000 139,860 - - 27,200 887,546 3,551,803 125,000 70,860 15,334 205,1648 205,1641 75,700 75,107 3,753,3349 3,753,3349 34,814,67310 34,543,1431� 1,955,15911 1,955,15911 6,161,897 6,151,477 274,776 274,776 1,204,500 1,204,477 1,283,46912 1,283,46912 175,000 175,000 18,325,8391s 18,266,74213 813,613 813,613 780,400 780,400 349,000 289,720 27,200 15,334 450,972 450,972 31-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30,1984 19. Grand Traverse, MI Section 111 20. Green Bay Harbor, WI 21. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 22. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI 23. Harrisville Harbor, MI Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 4,000 4,000 34,910 19,174 3,200 3,000 5,000 8,354 2,717 5,153 57,000 113,000 253,800 24,135 135,611 52,038 55,000 10,000 75,000 72,097 1,909 78,574 1,171,000 1,066,500 1,605,000 1,181,114 656,535 1,904,126 50,000 44,199 37,200 37,048 18,000 229,186 917,350 961,792 -250,000 10,000 104,000 230,000 -236,094 9,740 101,122 211,613 - 87,000 -10,000 - 63,513 10,243 4,148 200,000 -9,180 4,148 139,629 51,191 40,000 634,000 130,000 40,002 634,000 73,791 49,000 49,183 3,244 4,000 3,683 25,000 19,202 60,000 113,766 - 340,000 -90,000 40 17,633 232,368 31-40 643,879 622,342 1,230,000 1,230,000 197,771 197,771 1,563,283",11 1,562,45314, 1 10,021,3958 10,016,80616 13,166,563 13,100,072 5,898,807 5,877,282 1,015,366 1,015,366 77,000 77,000 357,062 356,745 25,000 19,202 1,200,598 1,200,598 5,193,190 5,190,747 194,504 194,504 243,100 243,100 1,901,638 1,901,638 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 Contributed Funds New Work Section 111 24. Holland Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 25. Inland Route, MI 26. Kenosha Harbor, WI Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost - - 250,000 - - 3,794 5,000 45,000 430,000 3,813 25,246 152,128 1,050 1,054 136,097 131,724 567,000 437,000 3,021,100 561,194 448,559 2,320,232 7,200 25,000 39,000 6,325 25,875 36,665 - - - - - - - - - - - -. _ - - 160,000 399,000 333,000 159,213 367,917 349,018 26,000 245,000 27,013 195,901 -44,000 5,330 100,000 90,467 70,000 259,445 22,000 320,813 4,000 8,239 1,422,760 1,758,195 35 000 33,713 2,400 12,934 30,000 38,658 67,000 267,000 100,000 368,000 61,995 265,840 79,795 380,004 320,000 263,239 502,000 502,000 748,197 748,063 771,82717, 1s8 771,82717,1is 621,000 621,000 11,327,992 10,960,867 208,200 204,578 502,452 502,452 1,663,300 1,663,300 918,22219 918,22219 2,055,888 2,050,444 404,300 404,300 976,9692,21 976,0942,21 2,658,37722 2,644,00922 1,270,275 1,270,275 4,378,600 4,378,600 31-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 27. Kewaunee New Work Harbor, WI 28. Keweenaw Waterway, MI 29. Knife River Harbor, MN 30. LaPointe Harbor, WI 31. Lac La Belle Harbor, MI 32. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 8,000 359,000 625,400 406,250 6,951 354,382 607,019 400,880 1,769,000 781,000 1,770,999 786,462 747 7,000 7,000 511,000 393,000 410,000 309,000 506,487 400,985 345,687 329,088 7,000 101,000 7,000 78,172 60,000 44,466 70,000 90,863 17,233 4,048 4,203 24,638 4,048 4,203 23,808 1,899 - - 1,899 - - 824 1,654 9,794 9,669 - 40,000 75,000 170,000 - 29,475 50,745 204,780 90,000 701,000 346,000 745,400 74,942 697,332 323,961 767,954 1,000 - - - 1,321 - - - 752,3331 752,3331 3,121,59111 3,092,173' 617,300 617,300 2,961,461 2,961,461 5,974,141 5,974,141 10,460,68425 10,414,43526 178,000 176,035 412,945 412,945 250,091 250,091 130,874 130,874 74,538 74,413 269,270 269,270 467,641 467,641 7,675,35726 7,675,35726 6,595,48427 6,575,034 17 5,119,800 5,119,800 31-42 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 33. Leland Harbor, New Work MI 34. Lexington Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Section 111 35. Little Lake Harbor, MI 36. Ludington Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 37. Manistee Harbor, MI Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 37,000 75,000 189,000 236,466 39,783 70,671 177,087 251,778 -25,000 177.156 -7,000 541 4,860 35,000 25,000 4,860 35,000 24,973 180,000 135,425 44,575 168,000 168,000 129,000 168,122 168,012 106,875 12,000 11,033 20,000 19,789 165,283 135,253 - 85,000 - - 40,214 89,058 - - 1,355 - - - 204,000 618,000 549,500 564,366 279,859 432,231 726,766 544,182 - 15,000 - - - 15,000 -- 54,000 402,000 190,000 474,300 58,280 393,114 195,904 466,666 31-43 1,027,0892 1,027,0892 1,346,911 1,345,971 70,678 70,678 1,646,304 1,646,304 1,088,888 1,088,888 372,000 372,000 120,913 119,919 200,000 199,789 600,4782 600,478" 2,276,057 2,223,900 7,912,2023� 7,912,2023� 620,000 620,000 7,649,66631 7,618,90731 357,913 357,913 15,000 15,000 2,696,52232 2,696,52232 4,309,7333 4,299,0993 1,374,164 1,374,164 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 38. Manistique Harbor, MI 39. Manitowoc Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 40. Marquette Harbor, MI 41. Menominee Harbor & River MI & WI Contributed Funds 42. Milwaukee Harbor, WI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 99,000 176,279 169,000 99,000 165,758 147,738 -27,000 4,784 1,299,355' 1,299,355k 1,856,645 1,856,645 316,333 316,333 97,000 745,000 250,000 120,470 664,971 324,112 10,000 22,154 316,000 468,000 753,000 309,690 315,982 463,988 297,937 736,277 200,000 1,423,000 - 995,914 120,000 119,105 381,800 799,140 477 987 24,850 57,367 33,000 24,850 53,835 33,898 - - -. 51,700 40,000 46,000 60,076 37,653 24,427 9,206 1,883 73,192 73,577 113,000 35,520 47,000 64,434 2,190,86431 2,186,08831 4,507,51536 4,475,00836 3,081,756 3,081,756 2,014,006 1,796,937 1,282,893 1,282,893 1,580,449 1,580,449 465,757 465,757 533,47637 533,47637 1,625,4543 1,545,340' 1,351,852 1,351,852 493,660 487,158 36,762 36,762 8,231,024s" 8,231,024$ 1,446,000 1,243,000 1,445,281 1,237,384 410,000 412,327 1,106,700 24,082,27440 1,027,490 23,984,756'o 31-44 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 43. Monroe Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 44. Muskegon Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 New Buffalo Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 533,000 872,000 398,000 777,450 522,194 864,138 380,264 656,686 319,000 11,599,000 22,268,000 326,309 11,508,018 19,021,218 - - 85,000 - - 77,130 2,850,000 6,152,561 661100 170,000 409,000 207,000 579,000 172,835 396,535 209,364 574,185 -115,000 20,000 40,000 -115,000 20,000 33,785 4,874 20,000 16,028 - 3,800,000 -350,000 - 74,251 3,315,594 1,200,000 10,650 204,870 1,203,832 12,650 204,085 96,500 5,000 97,845 6,419 112,000 105,922 31-45 1,891,810 1,891,810 6,380,925 6,380,925 987,34041 987,34041 9,264,22041 9,106,69241 37,643,900 37,579,624 85,000 77,740 2,912,11042 2,912,11042 105,000 105,000 5,277,1154 5,262,0324 263,000 252,813 7,327,000 7,266,845 1,285,716 1,285,716 1,186,467 1,186,467 1,960,553 1,953,690 181,500 181,500 45. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 46. Oconto Harbor, WI 47. Ontonagon Harbor, MI 48. Pentwater Harbor, MI 49. Point Lookout Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 50. Port Austin Harbor, MI 51. Portage Lake, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 12,278 12,278 11,018 10,207 687,000 556,000 215,000 359,300 724,698 552,932 211,013 353,444 15,000 6,000 - - 15,000 6,000 - - 92,000 131,000 82,000 94,019 128,583 81,223 97,533 99,697 10,000 26,528 419,721 124,734 8,197 28,633 244,539 263,875 -7,400 - - - 372 - - - 12,000 540 15,658 540 15,658 194,001 -6,000 4,185 194,812 -8,258 5,102 8,651 17,272 9,795 1,340 1,584 31-46 130,75441 130,75414 1,061,15946 1,060,348" 396,90341 396,90346 6,220,55347 6,207,6264' 21,000 21,000 179,899 179,899 2,656,585 2,655,522 2,642,584 2,642,584 795,568 759,527 121,600 121,600 12,000 8,651 1,128,3344 1,128,33448 1,033,548 1,026,107 159,000 159,000 256,129 256,129 1,417,496 1,416,366 i DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 51. Port Sanilac New Work Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Contributed Funds Section 111 53. Port Washington Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 54. Port Wing Harbor, WI 55' Presque Isle Harbor, MI Section 111 Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 49,000 52,000 3,738 26,596 74,219 6,476 16,522 16,065 95,000 177,000 15,000 230,000 120,041 147,833 41,228 222,335 -313,000 56,529 -21,000 806 243,000 106,000 10,000 336,358 103,856 12,147 157,000 157,000 909,963 909,963 487,108 487,108 336,000 336,000 1,557,412 1,556,955 115,000 83,527 9,158 9,158 553,000 542,396 2,582,20449 2,582,20449 2,402,0685 2,402,0685" 10,621 10,621 25,000 248,087 9,000 8,999 4,210 - 5,000 30 2,474 10,849 4,999 34,830 10,849 4,999 33,128 4,000 4,001 30,700 32,626 203,347 134,363 1,624,000 1,624,000 63,393 63,393 594,029 594,029 1,190,492 1,190,492 61,700 61,100 769,057 698,371 31-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 56. Racine Harbor, WI Section 111 Section 111 57. Rouge River, MI 58. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 5,500 11,000 5,470 10,333 697 -1,000 5,020 33,000 2,000 33,000 1,999 260,338 168,000 16,636 260,312 168,026 16,636 - - 35,000 - - 26,698 593,000 568,000 394,000 592,382 236,548 675,053 3,033,200 420,000 3,032,905 395,630 -1,210 95,011 93,011 20,000 28,178 859,615 835,802 24,085 2,371,000 2,305,000 2,333,400 5,531,140 2,396,906 2,303,739 2,030,316 5,729,604 2,770,000 570,000 90,000 223,000 2,770,177 560,815 89,284 184,873 31-48 76,500 76,500 16,500 16,500 1,297,31551 1,297,31551 35,000 35,000 2,910,43752 2,908,43752 1,253,645 1,253,645 3,948,754 3,948,754 55,000 54,876 675,251" 675,251" 14,259,403" 14 ,184,541" 14,513,823 14,511,816 14,917,1275 14,917,1275 13,600 13,600 29,341,420 29,228,490 18,743,400 18,695,292 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 59. St. Clair River, MI 60. St. Joseph Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 61. St. Marys River, MI 62. Saugatuck Harbor, MI and Kalamazoo River, MI 63. Saxon Harbor, WI Section 111 isow Work App'op. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 392,900 895,000 1,781,000 389,001 839,687 1,792,998 366,000 272,000 448,000 365,898 270,089 434,728 80,400 42,000 58,000 80,761 41,801 19,428 1,224,256 1,259,444 413,616 423,156 21,000 51,533 -45,000 481,000 361,000 333,000 -45,000 480,999 323,946 258,348 -30,000 - - - -24,718 - - - 7,972,400 8,394,000 8,818,256 7.881,832 8,368,270 8,329,035 70,601 180,000 182,000 70,411 173,866 151,739 -14,200 1,317 54,000 53,999 31-49 45,000 44,008 7,767 7,767 10,006,700 10,323,209 -15,000 19,969 41,500 39,200 6,649 6,649 19,213,246 19,213,246< 12,494,813 12,479,401 976,48557 976,48557 828,000 828,000 7,061,565 7,054,973 962,216 962,216 508,776 500,530 2,501,300 2,389,592 160,657,0715 160,657,07068 157,641,308 157,276,426 13,100 13,100 364,52759 364,52759 2,658,62760 2,657,0100 426,5076r 426,46961 666,000 662,708 354,106 354,106 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30,_1984 64. Sheboygan Harbor, WI 65. South Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 66. Sturgeon Bay, WI & Lake MI Ship Canal, WI 67. Two Harbors, MN New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 375,000 54,000 843,000 208,742 216,036 167,298 47,000 66,000 203,000 33,557 71,290 200,475 76,000 257,000 121,881 75,976 252,484 100,849 324,000 -15,000 - 320,670 -11,670 - 88,000 160,000 93,000 72,993 161,681 105,873 -7,100 7,000 28,000 2,000 5,716 10,823 - 85,000 - 386 90,086 - 7,000 86,000 155,000 7,041 79,143 155,166 31-50 775,000 1,449,627 1,136,0880 1,136,0880 4,327,392" 4,322,0950 609,028 609,028 840,792 830,021 452,426" 452,426" 532,000 532,000 3,248,598" 3,248,3989 1,632,076 1,632,076 42,381 42,381 349,000 339,411 1,059,7220 1,059,7220 6,516,61567 6,512,23167 274,119 273,680 884,899 884,899 4,170,710" 4,170,152 1,876,640 1,876,640 -10,000 15,372 25,000 14,741 72,000 68,069 -9,000 9,057 45,000 44,442 50,000 56,693 1 I M j DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 68. Two Rivers Harbor, WI 69. White Lake Harbor, MI Section 111 77. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 78. Sebewaing River, MI 82. Surveillance of North Boundary Waters New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Appro. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 346,000 -40,191 10,987 1,334,920 25,313 10,987 -3,000 100,000 45,000 456 98,292 39,731 - 129,000 96,000 - 127,145 63,364 530,000 686,000 1,855,000 545,638 689,949 1,523,178 - 26,000 32,000 1,109 26,000 9,533 934,000 1,091,700 1,165,000 951,549 1,104,894 1,092,046 18,889 for previous projects. 556,500 Contributed Funds. 85,849 for previous projects. 12,008 for maintenance previous projects. p25,500 for previous projects and $289,752 nds for existing projects. 2,097,254 for previous projects. 1,547,195 for new work for previous projects. )27,800 for previous projects. 3,239,910 for previous projects. $89,309 for previous projects. 31,709 Contributed Funds. 311,329 for previous projects. 13,437 for previous projects. 396,974 for previous projects. '1Includes 109,463 for previous projects. 16lncludes 8,918 for previous projects. '7Includes $176,620 for new work, $127.598 for maintenance. 'Includes $35,705 Contributed Funds. '9Includes $148,000 Contributed Funds for existing project. 220lncludes $453,839 for previous projects. 1Excludes $3,000 Contributed Funds. 22Includes $21,818 for previous projects. 23Includes $149,312 for previous projects. 2 Includes $88,364 for previous projects. 25Includes $402,242 for previous projects. 26Includes $656,000 for previous projects. 2Includes $235,346 for previous projects. 31-51 27,000 26,890 -5.300 1,678 -20,000 13,691 658,400 957,427 -10,500 11,411 1,234,000 1,281,669 360,32069 360,3206t 5,233,08870 5,232,97870 1,187,472 1,187,472 58,057 58,057 207,862 207,863 249,700 249,700 1,867,463 1,866,663 24,373,359 24,336,233 173,000 172,997 365,64271 365,6421 365,644 365,088 37,298,3347" 37,246,10472 I I A 1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding F 28Includes $354,139 Contributed Funds. Includes $57,670 Contributed Funds. "Includes $491,416 for previous projects. 3"Includes $126,451 for previous projects. "Includes $354,999 for previous projects. 'Includes 150,910 for previous projects. 1Includes 3,955 for previous projects. ,"IInncclluuddeess 400,126 for previous projects. 54,288 for previous projects. 37Includes 312,423 for previous projects. 8Includes 36,194 for previous projects. 39 "Includes 1,293,220 for previous projects. solncludes 459,305 for previous projects. "Includes Contributed Funds of $300,000 for new wor and $166,667 for maintenance Contributed by: Port Corn mission of Monroe, $300,000; Consolidated Paper Co. $125,00( and River Raisin Paper Co., $41,667. 42Includes 613,408 for previous projects. aIncludes 446,183 for previous projects. "Includes 84,569 for previous projects. 45Includes 8,161 for previous projects. "Includes 284,802 for previous projects. 47Includes $113,326 for previous projects. 4Includes $172,100 Contributed Funds. "Includes $188,495 for previous projects. Total Cost to Y 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 50lncludes $15,123 for previous projects. 51lIncludes $427,240 for previous projects. Includes $79,537 for previous projects. "Includes $50,084 for previous projects. 5 Includes $56,608 for previous projects. "Includes $962,556 for previous projects. 6 6LIncludes $1,671,660 Public Works Funds and $49,419 Emergency Relief Funds. "5'7IInncclluuddeess $503,113 for previous projects. $2,904,807 for previous projects. "'Includes $90,232 for previous projects. 60 lncludes $117,554 for previous projects. 6'Excludes $50,193 Contributed Funds. k 62Includes $487,817 for previous projects. - @Includes $87,131 for previous projects. 0 "Includes $187,233 for previous projects. "Includes $131,239 for previous projects. 66Includes $323,419 for previous projects. 67 lIncludes $219,730 for previous projects. "Includes $48,404 National Industrial Recovery Act for new work funds. 69Includes $212,857 for previous projects. T7 0lncludes $33,113 for previous projects. 7"Includes $15,000 for previous projects. 72 lIncludes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 31-52 TABLE 31-B DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 H. Doc. 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI (See Section 1 of Text) Maintenance of existing 12-foot channel. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI (See Section 2 of Text) Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a shoal. Appropriation of $60,000 for 'Continuing improvement on enlarged project.' (On completion of Poe Lock in 1896, with available depth of 20 feet, dredging at Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from shore at a point 2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth and extent of channel to be dredged. Widening part of present channel for entrance channel and for basin in eastern part of harbor. Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far as 8th Ave. West extended to 21 feet. Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end. Deepening portions of East Basin and West Channel to 27 and 21 feet, respectively. AU SABLE HARBOR AT AU SABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI (See Section 3 of Text) Dredging channels 12 and 10 feet deep and riprapping North Pier. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 4 of Text) Provides for converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and a rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI (See Section 5 of Text) Channel from mouth of Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Channel from Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge to Washington Ave. Consolidation of projects for Black River at Port Huron and Mouth of Black River. Settling Basin. 31-53 H. Doc. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 165, 86th Cong.,lst Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1889, p. 2291 No Printed Report H. Doc. 436, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 162, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 6, 1900 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 TMar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 TMar. 2, 1945 TMar. 2, 1945 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 SP. 22, 1922 Jul. 3,1930 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 23, 1970 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 21, 1956 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 2, 1882 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 29, 1977 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 Oct. 21, 1964 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 19, 1963 Deepening channel and settling basin to 20 feet, and widening to 100 feet 2 bends; 1 at the foot of 12th St., the other below the Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Extension of existing channel. BLACK RIVER HARBOR, MI (UPPER PENISULA) (See Section 6 of Text) Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. Project depths 12 feet in approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. CHANNELS IN THE STRAITS OF MACKINAC, MI (See Section 7 of Text) Dredging channel between Round Island and Mackinac Island, 1,250 feet wide, 27 feet deep and 3,250 feet long. Removal of Poe Reef Shoal to a depth of 27 feet over an area of about 22,000 square yards. Deepening channel between Round Island and Mackinac Island and removing Poe Reef Shoal to depths of 30 feet. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI (See Section 8 of Text) Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake protected where needed by piers and revetments. Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. Project depth increased to 15 feet. Project depth increased to 18 feet. Project depth increased to 24 and 23 feet, and construction of revetment upstream of Highway Bridge. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI (See Section 9 of Text) 184 foot channel. 8% foot channel. Turning Basin. 21-foot channel to East 1st St., Enlarge Turning Basin, deepen to 21 feet. Breakwater. CLINTON RIVER, MI (See Section 10 of Text) Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing channels and making Cutoff, and revetments as needed. Widening entrance channel and constructing protected harbor basin Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' River and Harbor Committee Doc. 2, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Committee Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 16, 44th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1876, p. 523 No Prior Survey of Estimates. No Prior Survey of Estimates. S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Annual Report, 1895, p. 2823 H. Doc. 357, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 134, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 269, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Doc. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1880, p. 2062 and H. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1886, p. 219 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. 31-54 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents DETOUR HARBOR, MI (See Section 11 of Text) Small boat harbor and harbor of refuge, 10-foot channel, 8-foot deep access channel protected by 1,000-foot breakwater. DETROIT RIVER, MI (See Section 12 of Text) Amherstburg Channel and Removal of Grosse Ile Shoal. Fighting Island Channel. Livingstone Channel. Jul. 3, 1930 Channel Depths of 26 and 25 Feet. Aug. 30, 19353 Channel to Wyandotte 21 Feet Deep and 300 Feet Wide Through Middle Ground Opposite Head of Fighting Island. Aug. 26, 1937 Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse Ile). Mar. 2, 1945 American Channel North of Belle Isle Between Windmill Point and Fairway Slip, Detroit. Jul. 24, 1946 Deepen Westerly 300 Feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef Channel Below Livingstone Channel to 27 Feet to Provide Depths Adequate for 24-Foot Draft Navigation When Governing Lakes are at Datum, with Necessary Widening at Approaches and Bends and Construction of Necessary Compensating Works. Detroit River. May 17, 19504 Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 Feet. Dredge Through East Draw of Lower Grosse Ile Bridge, and Extend 300-Foot Width of Channel North of Lower Grosse Ile Bridge. Mar. 21, 1956 Channel Depth of 28.5 Feet Throughout Downbound and Two-Way Channels, Except in Upper (27.7-Foot Depth) and Lower, (29-Foot Depth) Livingstone Channel, and in Upbound Channel; 27-Foot Depth in Ballards Reef Channel Below Junction with Livingstone Channel. 27.5-Foot Depth in Westerly 300-Foot Width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg Reaches, and 28.5- Foot Depth in Westerly 300-Foot Width of Hackett Beach, with Necessary Compensation Works. Also 28.5-Foot Depth in Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal. Inclusive. Jul. 14, 1960 Trenton Channel; Deepen to 27 Feet, Where Necessary, Wyandotte Reach from Detroit River to Upper Grosse Ile Bridge, About 5.5 Miles, Deepen to 28 Feet and Widen to 300 Feet Below Upper Grosse Ile Bridge to Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 712, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 17, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 266, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. 676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess, and 32, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 205, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 335. 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess.' 31-55 Jun. 3, 1969 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1910 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 13, 1968 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 May 28, 19081 Jul. 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 30, 19303 Aug. 30, 19303 Jul. 16, 19526 Jul. 14, 19607 Oct. 4, 1961 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 2, 1945 and Including a Turning Basin 28 Feet Deep and 15 Across in Area Outside Project Limits. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 Feet and Widen to 300 Feet from the Upper Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 Feet Downstream: Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a Depth of 28 Feet. Width of 830 Feet, and Length of 1,500 Feet: Build Compensating Works to Maintain Water Levels. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI (See Section 13 of Text) Dredging. Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw span of Burlington Northern railway bridge. Dredging additional area for basin inside Duluth entrance to 22-foot depth. Enlarging Superior Harbor Basin. Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. Deepening and widening channels and basins. Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 25 feet. Present project dimensions of channels and basin. Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. EAGLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 14 of Text) Breakwater and dredging of entrance channel 130 feet wide to depth of 14 feet. Project modified by reduction of channel width from 130 feet to 80 feet. Project modified by increasing width of breakwater from 20 feet to 30 feet and increasing the channel from 80 to 130 feet. Project modified by omitting breakwater and constructing guide piers. Inner harbor basin and breakwaters and removal of east guide pier. FOX RIVER, WI (See Section 15 of Text) Improvement of Fox River Annual Report, 1885, pp. 2041-2045 [plan of a 31-56 H. Doc. 338. 90th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 59, 53d Cong., 3d Sess. and Annual Report. 1895, p. 2538. H. Doc. 82. 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 651. 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1018, 64th Cong., 1st Sess H. Doc. 145, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 32, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 374, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 150. 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 196, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report for 1868. p. 89. Annual Report for 1874, pp. 36, 135, and 136. Annual Report for 1877. p. 98. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Aug. 5, 1886 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 19, 1890 Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. Jun. 3, 1896 Improvement of Wolf River Jun. 3, 1896 Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calumet Jun. 13, 1902 and Miller Bay, and of Brothertown Mar. 2, 1907 Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. Mar. 3, 19258 Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. Jun. 26, 19349 Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Jul. 3, 195810 Sec. 108. That Federal project structure, appurtenances, and real property of Upper Fox River, WI, be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. Jun. 23, 186611 Mar.3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct 27, 1965 FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 16 of Text) A New Outlet 12 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. Exterior Breakwaters, Removal of Portions of Piers, Project Dimensions of Outer Basin. Dredge the Area in Lake Betsie Deepen Approach and Entrance Channels, Extend Inner Basin, and Dredge Recreational Anchorage Area. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 17 of Text) Jun. 23, 1866 Piers and Revetments. Jun. 14, 1880 Piers and Revetments. Sep.19, 1890 Piers and Revetments. Jul. 13, 1892 Piers and Revetments. Jul. 3, 1930 Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry Slip and River Channel, Eliminating all of that portion of Grand River above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and River. Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Channel to Spring Lake Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin board approach Dec. 10, 1884, as modified by Corps of Engineers, May 14, 1886]. H. Ex. Doc. 24, 51st Cong. 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Bill 3910, 85th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 55th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 208, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 16, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 661, 76th Cong., 3d Sess.1 31-57 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1879 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 23, 1866 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 26, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1871 GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN (See Section 18 of Text) Breakwaters and dredging of anchorage area of 26 acres to 16 feet. Seawalls across ledge in southeast corner of harbor, enlarging anchorage basin and deepening of entrance. Small-boat basin with breakwater. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 19 of Text) Two Parallel piers, and entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. GREEN BAY HARBOR WI (See Section 20 of Text) Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Islands.12 Inner channel. 12 Turning basin at DePere. Maintenance of turning basin at DePere. Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through city of Green Bay to 22 feet. Turning basin above Chicago & North Western Ry. Bridge. Turning basin at mouth of East River. Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to 26 by 500 feet; 3.6 miles of entrance channel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of existing Fox River to 24 feet deep. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 21 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, breakwaters 10-foot depth in harbor basin 12-foot depth in entrance channel. HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MI (See Section 22 of Text) Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. H. Ex. Doc. 75, 43d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1875, p. 184. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 187, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. Unpublished report approved Aug. 3, 1892. H. Doc. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1017, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 95, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess ' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1873, p. 292 31-58 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Closing North Entrance and Dredging Main Entrance and Anchorage Area. Removal of Portion of Breakwater in interest of sanitation. Deepen the waterway within the Marina facility. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 23 of Text) Mar. 2, 1945 Harbor of Refuge, Breakwaters, 12-foot depth entrance channel 10-foot depth in harbor basin. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 24 of Text) Aug. 30, 1852 Artificial channel between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan.12 Mar. 2, 1867 Piers and Revetments. 12 Mar. 3, 1899 Extending Inner Piers. Mar. 3, 1905 Converging Breakwater. Jul. 3, 1930 Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland. Aug. 30, 1935 Present Project Dimensions of Channels Sep. and Turning Basin. 3, 1954 Widen Bend in Reveted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 2, 1964 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug, 30, 19352 MA1Y7, 1950 e t2, 1962 THE INLAND ROUTE, MI (See Section 25 of Text) Channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep through Lakes and Rivers with suitable jetties. Lock and Dam. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI (See Section 26 of Text) Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater. 2 Extending breakwater 200 feet. Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. Channel northwesterly from basin. Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess., P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 105. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report 1866, p. 106. H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950. Annual Report 1905, p. 2176. H. Doc. 588, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 48, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 142, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess.' Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1897, p. 2772, H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. Annual Report, 1899, p. 1817. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' 31-59 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 16, 1984 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1881 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19352, 14 Jul. 14, 1960 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 193616 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 7, 1974 KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 27 of Text) Entrance piers. Turning basin. North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a maximum width of 500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (See Section 28 of Text) Acquisition of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase in width and depth of channel approved Mar. 15, 1898). Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about one-half mile long, 800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, and for purchase of necessary land. Princess Point Cutoff channel. General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at entrances, extend lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MN (See Section 29 of Text) Dredging. Breakwater and modified channels. Construction of measures to correct the design deficiencies which results in unsatisfactory entrance and mooring conditions. LA POINTE HARBOR, WI (See Section 30 of Text) Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feetdeep in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082. H. Doc. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 105 49th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1887, p. 1977. H. Doc. 325, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 686, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report for 1949. H. Doc. 463, 83d Cong., 2d Seas. ' Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. P.L. 645, 86th Cong., as amended. 31-60 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19333 Mar. 21, 1956 LAC LA BELLE HAPBOR, MI (See Section 31 of Text) Two parallel piers at the entrance, 584 and 682 feet: an entrance channel between the piers 50 feet wide and 12 feet deep, 820 feet long with a flared approach and inner canal 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep and 730 feet long. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS(See Section 32 of Text) Two Dikes. Deepening Canal and Dredging Channel at Grosse Point. Second Canal for Downbound Vessels. 21-Foot Depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for About 5.25 miles. 25-Foot Depth Through Canals and Channel Through Lake St. Clair. Removal of Center Dike and Widening Channel to 700 Feet. Deepening Channel to 27.5 Feet and Abandonment of Channel above Mouth of Southeast Bend Cutoff Channel. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1961, p. 1039. Annual Report 1885. p. 2150. H. Doc. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 234. 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3. 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' LELAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 33 of Text) Entrance Channel Protected by Piers. Outer Breakwater. Anchorage Area. Approach Channel and Removal of North Pier. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 34 of Text) Oct. 27, 1965 Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.' LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 35 of Text) Mar. 2, 1945 12-Foot Deep Channel From Lake Superior into Little Lake Breakwaters and Revetments. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 36 of Text) M ar. 2, 1867 Entrance Piers. Mar. 3, 1899 Pier Extension Reconstruction and Repairs to Existing Structures and Present Project Dimensions of Channel. Mar. 2, 1907 Breakwaters, Shore Connections. and Removal of Outer Ends of the Two Inner piers. Dec 31, 1970 Deepen Channels and Widen Opening Between Breakwaters. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI (See Section 37 of Text) Mar. 2, 1867 Entrance Piers. 19, 1890 Extending Channel 8,000 Feet to Connect with Manistee Lake, and Further Pier Extension. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1867, p. 11416 H. Doc. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1897, p. 2951. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess.'6 H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1867, p. 115. Annual Report 1891, p. 2678. 31-61 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 3, 1920 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 193517 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1968 (Sec. 107 of 1960 R & H) Mar. 2, 1867 Aug. 11, 1888 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19351 Jul. 11, 1960 Depth of 20 Feet in Outer Harbor 570 Feet Wide to Outer End of South Pier 18 Feet Deep in River, South Breakwater with Shore Connection, and Extend North Pier if Required. 23-Foot Depths in Entrance Channel and 21-Foot Depths in River Channel. Remove Old South Revetment, Construct New South Pier and Revetment, and Widen River Entrance Channel. Present Project Dimensions of Channel Through Outer Basin and River and Federal Participation in Cost of Replacing Maple Street Bridge. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI (See Section 38 of Text) Breakwaters and Outer Harbor. Present Location of West Breakwater and Pier at River Mouth. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI (See Section 39 of Text) Breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal south of shore end of south breakwater. Channel in river. Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor to 25 feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th St., and Upper River Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI (See Section 40 of Text) Breakwaters, 2,000 feet long. Extending the breakwater 1,000 feet. Additional 1,500-foot extension to breakwater and and removing a shoal in northerly part of harbor. Deepening harbor to 25 feet. Deepening harbor to 27 feet. 31-62 H. Doc. 599, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 429, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1908, p. 648, and Unpublished Report of Mar. 13, 1908. Approved by Secretary of War, Apr. 3, 1908. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 80, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Jun 1967 Detailed Project Report; Apr 1982 Supplement 1 . H. Ex. Doc. 56, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. pts. 1 and 2, and Annual Report, 1866, pp. 8 and 77. Annual Report, 1889, pp. 272 and 2021. H. Doc. 573, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 154, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.1 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 27, 1967 Sec. 107 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 3, 1883 Mar. 2,1907 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945's Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Feb. 24, 183519 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 14, 193221 MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI (See Section 41 of Text) Entrance piers. Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by act of May 3, 1905. 20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. 21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge turning basin. Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. facilities to 19 feet. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 42 of Text) North pier.12 Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater.12 South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. Extend north breakwater; a south breakwater; present project dimensions of inner entrance channel. Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21-foot depth. Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide through breakwater; deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo St., and in Kinnickinnic River to Chicago & North Western Ry. bridges. MONROE HARBOR, MI (See Section 43 of Text) 9-foot channel, Protecting Revetments and Piers. 21-foot channel, dikes and Turning Basin.20 Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation Imposed by Act of Jul. 3, 1930 Annual Report, 1867, P. 132. H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 171, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 228, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report Dec. 1960. S. Doc. 175, 25th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1881, p. 2122. Annual Report 1906, p. 1752. [No prior survey or estimate affecting breakwater extensions.] H. Doc. 804, 66th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 289, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 29, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 134, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report 1872, p. 237. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 22, 71st Cong., 1st Sess., Rivers and Harbor Comm. Doc. 12, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 45, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' 31-63 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 2, 1882 Jun. 25, 1910 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1881 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 25, 1907 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 16, 1984 MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 44 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Breakwaters. Repairing Revetments around Car Ferry Slip. Channel deepening and present project dimensions of channel. Piers and Revetments. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI (See Section 45 of Text) Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long to mouth of Galien River, new no. and so. breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet, respectively, deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. OCONTO HARBOR, WI (See Section 46 of Text) Piers, except for inner 300 feet of south pier and 250 feet of north pier built by city.2 Present project dimensions of channel and turning basin. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 47 of Text) Channel 17 feet deep and 150 feet wide through bar and 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. Modified project widths and provide inner basin. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI (See Section 48 of Text) Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Present project depth of channel POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI (See Section 49 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Channel Dredging. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI (See Section 50 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Basin, Channel Dredging. Construct a breakwater access for recreation purposes. H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 494, 67th Cong., 4th Seas. Rivers and Harbor Comm. Doc. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.) H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1881, p. 2066. H. Doc. 538, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Plan C.' H. Doc. 602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 181, 39th Cong., 2d Sss H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Ste H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Se- H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d St" P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 106. 31-64 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 51 of Text) Entrance Channel 18 Feet Deep Protected by Piers and Revetments. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI (See Section 52 of Text) Entrance Channel 12 Feet Deep, Anchorage Basin, Breakwater. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI (See Section 53 of Text) North pier and south basin. 12 North basin. North breakwater, removal of 650 feet of north pier, outer turning basin, present project dimensions of channel and basin and extension of south breakwater. Extending and raising of north breakwater and placing rubble along sides; removing 456 feet of south breakwater and dredging in outer basin. PORT WING HARBOR, WI (See Section 54 of Text) Jun. 13, 1902 Construction of parallel piers and dredging. Jun. 30,1948 Dredging inner channels and abandonment of certain revetments and channels. Aug. 5, 1977 Deauthorization of 50 feet of entrance channel widening. Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 26, 1937 Ms. 2, 1945 Aug-. 8, 1917 PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 55 of Text) Breakwater, 1,000 feet long. Shore extension, 216 feet long. For dredging and rubblemound extension to breakwater 1,600 feet long. Changed designation of project. Deepening harbor from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. RACINE HARBOR, WI (See Section 56 of Text) Breakwaters. Remove shoals lakeward of harbor entrance, enlarge 19-foot channel through outer basin and 19-foot channel in river. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin and in river. ROUGE RIVER, MI(See Section 57 of Text) 21-foot channel via the Shortcut Canal. Annual Report 1879, p. 163422 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 28, 41st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 119. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, p. 379 H. Doc. 168, 72d Cong., 1st Seas. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 446, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 114, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 668, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 318, 54th Cong., 1st Sess., Annual Report for 1903, pp. 474, 1823. H. Doc. 473, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 145, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1909, p. 1973. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 816, 77th Cong., 2d Sess., and H. Doc. 255, 78th Cong., 1st Seas. 1 H. Doc. 1063, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 31-65 Mar. 3, 1879 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 30, 193523 Jul. 3, 195824 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 19352,26,27 Jul. 3, 19582 Oct. 23, 19622 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 8, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 25-foot channel at mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 feet long and adjacent to latter, and 21-foot channel extending from junction of Old Channel and Shortcut Canal into Old Channel.to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Bridge. Old Channel; 100 feet wide from Peerless Cement Corp. to Junction with Shortcut Canal widened to 150 feet at 2 bends. 25-foot channel over modified limits from Detroit River to Jefferson Ave. (via Shortcut Canal). SAGINAW RIVER, MI (See Section 58 of Text) Channel 200 feet wide, with depth of 18.5 Feet in Bay and 16.5 Feet in River. Project Depth of 18.5 Feet Extended Up River to Saginaw Turning Basin. Present Project Channel Dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge in Saginaw. New Channel in Bay, 350 Feet Wide and 24 Feet Deep from 24-Foot Contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 Feet in River Channel Up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 Feet in River Channel Up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at Essexville and Carrollton, and Elimination of Present Channel in Bay. Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac Bridge, Extend 22-Foot Project Above 6th St. Bridge, Deepen Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 New Turning Basin.3 Deepen River Channel to 25 Feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge to New York Central Railroad Bridge. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (See Section 59 of Text) 20-Foot Channel in the River. Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 Feet, and Compensating Works. Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 Feet. Widen and Deepen Southeast Bend and Improve Outlet of North Channel, St. Clair River. Deepen and Further Improve Channels in St. Clair River Between Limits of 27.1 to 30 Feet to Provide Safe Navigation by H. Doc. 125, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 30, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm Doc. 21, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 500, 83rd Cong.. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 554. 87th Cong.. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 240. 89th Cong.,1st Sess.' H. Doc. 207, 51st Cong.. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253. 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 309, 77th Cong.. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-66 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Vessels with Drafts of 25.5 Feet. A Cutoff Channel in Canada of Southeast Bend and Abandon Old Southeast Bend Channels. Mar. 3, 1875 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 2,1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 4, 1915 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI (See Section 60 of Text) Interior Revetments.28 Benton Harbor Canal. 28 Present Project Dimensions of Piers and a Turning Basin. Present Project Dimensions of Paw Paw River. Abandon Easterly 1,000 Feet of Channel Above West Line of 9th St. Turning Basin Above Mouth of Morrison Channel and Eliminate Turning Basin Near Mouth of Paw Paw River. Maintenance of Turning Basin Near Mouth of Paw Paw River. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (See Section 61 of Text) Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by Mac Arthur Lock), Widen and Deepen Existing State Channel.28 Poe Lock. 1 Dredging Through Shoals Above Falls and Shoals Below Falls Between Lower End of Canal and Upper Entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet (Formerly Hay Lake). Enlarging the Old Channel. Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels Work in that Section of River Below Locks. David Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. Lease of Waterpower at Falls. Lease Entered Into with Michigan Northern Power Co. Provided for Construction of Remedial and Compensating Works. Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. Widen Upper Approach to Canals Through Vidal Shoals, Extend Anchorage and Maneuver Area Below Locks. Remove Round Island, Middle Ground Extension of Northwest Canal Pier, and Widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. Deepen Channels Throughout Downbound Route. 31-67 H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1875, pt. 1, p. 162. Annual Report 1880, pp. 2030, 2031 and 2049, 2055. H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2496. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 52, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Report by Maj. O. M. Poe, Corps of Engineers, Not Published. H. Ex. Doc. 72, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1891, p. 2810 H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and 215, 58th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. (Plan 3) H. Doc. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. District Engineer Report, Oct. 29, 1920. H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 26, 19349 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 7, 1942 Jun. 15, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 9, 1956 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1907 Operation and Care of Canal and Locks Provided from War Department Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. Construct New (Mac Arthur) Lock on Site of Former Weitzel Lock, Deepen Approach Channels to 27 Feet, and Reconstruct Approach Piers. Name 'Mac Arthur' Lock and Changed Name of 'Fourth' Lock to 'Sabin' Lock. Remove Bridge Island and Construct New Hydroelectric Power Plant. Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a New Structure 800 Feet Long, 100 Feet Wide and 32 Feet Deep, with Necessary Construction of Nose and Center Piers, and Widen and Deepen Channel Across Point Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to Provide Wider Anchorage and Maneuver Areas in St. Marys River. Deepen to Provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 Feet Over Full Width to Downbound and 2-Way Channels (Including Anchorage Areas) and Over Westerly 300-Foot Width of Upbound Middle Neebish Channel, When Levels of Lake Superior and Huron are at Their Respective Low-Water Datum. Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a Part of Project, Authorize Alteration With Cost to be Apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, June 21, 1940. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI (See Section 62 of Text) Entrance Channel, Piers and Revetments. Deepening Entrance to 16 feet. Deepening Channel in River to 14 feet. SAXON HARBOR, WI (See Section 63 of Text) Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI (See Section 64 of Text) North breakwater. River and Harbor Comm. Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. and H. Doc. 339, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess,' None H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., 1st Sep Annual Report 1896, Vol. 2. Pt. 5, p. 2739 Annual Report 1907, p. 6416 H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess River and Harbor Act H. Doc. 169, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.,' Annual Report for 1965, p. 1025. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-68 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jan. 21, 1927 Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and elimination of proposed south breakwaters. Aug.30, 1935 Present project dimensions of channel. Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 30, 1935 Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and deepen river channel from present project limit to north side of Jefferson Ave. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 65 of Text) Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge.' 2 Present Dimensions of Piers and for a Turning Basin. Present Project Dimensions of Channel and Turning Basin STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI (See Section 66 of Text) Mar. 3, 1873 Breakwaters.12 Jul. 13,1892 Acquisition of the canal. TWO HARBORS, MN (See Section 67 of Text) Aug. 5, 1886 Breakwater and dredging. Aug. 5, 1886 Construction of two breakwater piers. Aug. 30, 1935 Shore connection to east breakwater and dredging maneuvering area. Nov. 7, 1945 Construct new east breakwater and Jul 14 enlargement of maneuvering basin. ul.141960 Deepen harbor project depths from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively Mar. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI (See Section 68 of Text) ar3, 1871 South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north revetment.12 Mar. 2, 1907 Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. Aug. 30, 1935 Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. Jul 3, 1958 Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22d Street Bridge. 31-69 H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.' No Prior Survey or Estimate. H. Doc. 119, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 9, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' and Unpublished review Report of Chief of Engineers, Dated Dec. 21, 1934. H. Ex. Doc. 34, 42d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1872. p. 171. H. Ex. Doc. 106, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H.Ex.Doc. 94, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report for 1887, p. 1952. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 17, 72d Cong., 1st Sess H.Doc.805, 78th Cong.,2d Sess. H.Doc.146, 86th Cong., 1st Sess' Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 [as modified by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 27, 1897]. H. Doc. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Modification of Plan A. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 69 of Text) Mar. 2, 1867 New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Mar. 3, 1873 New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Jul. 5,1884 New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Jul. 13, 1892 New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. No Prior Survey or Estimate.2 Mar. 2, 1907 Present Project Depth of Channel. SAGINAW RIVER, MI FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 77 of Text) Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Improvements to Saginaw River H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.1 and its Tributaries Including Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 78 of Text) Aug. 18, 1941 Enlarging Present Channel of Sebewaing River, H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong., 1st Sess Altering Railroad and Highway Bridges, Removal of Dike. 'Contains latest published map. 2Including Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized May 28, 1935. 3Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 4This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 5Administrative Act, Section 4. 6Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 7Public Law 388, 87th Congress. 8This portion inactive. 9Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 'Transfer completed June 1962. "Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. 'Completed under previous project. 13Included in Public Works Administration Program January 3, 1934. "Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, widening inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. '5Latest published map is in Annual Report 1914, p. 2974. '6Latest published map in Annual Report 1914, p. 2914. 17Superceded by Act of October 23, 1962. "Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredg" ing Milwaukee River from Buffalo St. Bridge to North Humboldt Ave. Bridge). '9Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. 20Riprapping of protecting dikes portion of project is inactive. 2 'War Department Appropriations Act. 22Latest published map is in House Document 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 23Work recommended in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 24Deauthorized in 1977. 25Contains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 26Except for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of mouth in old channel, work authorized in this Act is considered inactive. 27This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 28Completed under previous projects. Public Law 13. 75th Cong., 1st Sess.2d 29Latest published map is in H. Doc. 2053, 64th Cong ' 2 Sess. 31-70 TABLE 31-C DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT Project Datum Planes Length Miles Used by Above Mean of from Upbound Water Level Channel Mouth or Down- Project Project at Father of bound Width Depth Point, Quebec Year Name of Channel (Feet) River Vessels (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) Complete DETROIT RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 12 OF TEXT) Channel North of Belle Isle' 2 2 Channel at Head of Detroit River Miscellaneous Shoals and Obstructions, Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel Fighting Island Channel Ballards Reef Channel North of Junction with Livingstone Channel Livingstone Channel Upper Livingstone Channel Lower: CS 260+00 to 368+87 CS 368+87 to 492+00 East Outer Channel Misc., Shoals and Obstructions, Detroit River to Pelee Passage Pelee Passage Shoal Amherstburg Channel: Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel Middle Section Lower Section, Hackett Range West Outer Channel Trenton Channel: Wyandotte Reach Trenton Reach (Upper) Trenton Reach (Lower) Grosse Ile Shoal .30 38,800 32 44,500 25 Both Both Both 24,800 17 Both 12,200 12 Both 26,000 10 Down 10,887 12,313 42,000 5 Down - Both - Both 200 800 800 600 21.0 571.3 28.5 571.5-570.9 28.5 570.9-570.3 28.5 28.5 569.8 1962 569.8 1963 450 27.7 569.8-568.6 1964 450,800 800-1,2(00 1,200 Both Both 6,500 12,000 24,000 21,000 31,500 5,100 600 600 10 Up - Up - Up - Down 17 Local - Local 14 Local 14 Local 600 600 6000 800 300 300 250-300 29.() 29.0 38.5 28.5-29.5, 29.5 27.5 21.27.51 21.28.55 22.0) 27.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 568.6 568.6 568.6 568.6 1962 568.6 1964 569.8-569.5 569.5-568.9 568.9-568.6 568.6 569.9-569.7 569.7-569.6 569.6-568.8 569.8 ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 59 OF TEXT) Channel at Foot of Lake Huron 26,500 44 Both 800 30.0 576.8-576.5 1961 Channel North of Blue Water Bridge 4,100 39 Both 800 30.0 576.4-576.1 1962 Port Huron to Stag Island Widening at Upper and Lower 38.000 39 Both 800 30.0 576.4-576.1 1961 Ends of Stage Island 37,600 31 Both 900-1,000 27.4 574.9-573.8 1962 St. Clair to Russel Island 77,000 24 Both 1,000 27.3 573.8-572.4 1962 Russel Island to Southeast Bend 20,600 11 Both 700-1.000 17.2 572.4-572.1 1962 Southeast Bend CS 324+00 to 250+00 7,400 5 Both 700 27.1 573.1-572.0 1962 Cutoff Channel 30,300 - Both 700 27.1 572.1-571.7 1962 North Channel Outlet 8,000 - Small Craft 100 10.0 571.7 1962 'This is a Side Channel. This is a Side Channel Xtends from Deep Water Near Windmill Point to a Point Opposite Fairview Slip, about 3.000 Feet. 0ect Depth 29.5 Feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 Feet over other than Rock Shoals. ' ro ect Depth 21 Feet in Easterly 300-Foot Width of Channel and 27.5 Feet in Westerly 300-Foot Width. ect Depth 21 Feet in Easterly 300-Foot Width of Channel and 28.5 Feet in Westerly 300-Foot Width. OJect Cornmplete Except for Work Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1950. 31-71 1964 1964 1964 1961 1961 1964 1960 1960 1960 1929 19644 1964 1941 1904 TABLE 31-D REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 ST. MARYS RIVER, MI: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 61 of Text) Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe Miles Above Mouth Clear Width of Chamber Feet Length Between Gate Quoins Feet Lifts Feet Depth Over Upper Breast Walls' Feet Depth Over Lower Breast Walls' Feet Foundation Type of Construction Estimated Cost Actual Cost Completed (Open to Commerce) Emergency Dam for Miles Above Mouth Estimated Cost Type Cost Completed Year Completed 47 80 1,350 21.7 24.3 23.1 Rock Concrete $6,200,002 $2,200,0001 Oct. 21, 1914 South Canal 47 -9 Steel Stoplogs Recessed Into Lock Masonry -9 1943 47 47 80 80 1,350 800 21.7 21.7 24.3 31 23.1 31 Rock Rock Concrete Concrete $3,275,0001 $12,909,440 $1,750,0006 $12,718,8064, 7 Sep. 18, 1919 Jul. 11, 1943 North Canal 47 $300,000 Steel Stoplogs Recessed Into Lock Masonry $169,2241 1922 (Modified 1963) 'At low water datum 599.5 above and 577.8 below. 2Includes Cost of North Canal. Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 4Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, $1,653,378. 5Excludes cost of North Canal, $2,572,611. 6Excludes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 7Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. 'Including engineering office, and inspection. 9Not separable from cost of locks. Note: Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls. 31-72 47 110 1,200 21.7 32 32 Rock Concrete $39,000,000 $34,813,066 Jun. 26,1969 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT FOX RIVER WI: LOCKS AND DAMS TABLE 31-E (See Section 15 of Text) Depth At Normal Pool Miles Avail- Lower from Dis- Clear able Breast Miter Character Kind Yea Green Nearest tance Width Length Lift Wall' Sill of of Type of Con Name of Lock and Dam Bay Town (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plet r i- Actual e Cost DePere lock2 DePere dam2 Little Kaukauna lock 2 Little Kaukauna dam2 Rapide Croche lock 2 Rapide Croche Dam2 Kaukauna fifth lock 2 Kaukauna fourth lock2 Kaukauna third lock2 Kaukauna second lock 2 Kaukauna first lock 2 co Kaukauna Dam2 SKaukauna guard lock cE Little Chute combined lock: 7.1 7.2 13.0 13.1 19.2 19.3 22.8 23.1 23.3 23.4 23.6 24.0 24.0 Lower 24.4 Upper 25.4 Little Chute second lock2 26.4 Little Chute first (guard) lock' 26.5 Little Chute Dam2 26.6 Cedars lock2 27.3 Cedars Dam2 27.4 Appleton fourth lock2 30.7 Appleton lower dam2 30.9 Appleton third lock2 31.3 Appleton second lock2 31.6 Appleton first lock2 31.9 Appleton upper dam 32.2 Menasha lock2 37.0 Menasha Dam 2 37.8 DePere - DePere - DePere 6 DePere 6 Wrightstown 2 Wrightstown 2 Kaukauna - Kaukauna - Kaukauna - Kaukauna - Kaukauna - Kaukauna - Kaukauna - Little Chute 1 Little Chute I Little Chute - Little Chute - Little Chute - Little Chute 1 Little Chute 1 Appleton 1 Appleton 1 Appleton - Appleton - Appleton - Appleton - Menasha - Menasha - 36.0 146.0 8.9 36.0 146.0 7.2 36.0 146.0 8.3 35.6 144.0 9.1 36.6 144.1 10.2 30.6 144.0 10.2 35.0 144.0 9.6 35.1 144.4 11.0 40.0 - - 35.4 146.5 10.9 36.3 144.1 10.6 35.0 144.2 13.8 35.4 - - 35.0 144.0 9.8 35.0 144.0 7.6 35.0 144.0 8.7 35.1 144.6 9.6 35.0 144.7 10.0 35.4 144.0 8.5 10.3 12.0 8.0 9.5 8.8 9.3 6.7 9.3 6.9 6.0 6.9 6.3 6.0 6.0 6.9 6.0 9.4 - 6.0 7.6 8.0 6.6 6.8 8.1 6.0 6.9 6.6 7.2 8.6 6.0 6.1 7.3 7.9 8.6 6.0 6.0 8.0 Rock - Concrete 1936 $229,308 Rock Fixed3 ' Concrete 1929 209,536 Clay - Concrete 1938 362,427 Clay and gravel Fixed" 4 Piers and concrete 1926 179,398 Rock - Concrete 1934 228,738 Rock Fixed3 4 Concrete 1930 118,975 Rock - Composite 1898 13,310, Rock - Stone masonry 1879 37,536 Rock - Stone masonry 1879 39,948 Rock - Stone masonry 1903 24,313 Rock - Stone masonry 1883 38,704 Rock Fixed 4 Concrete 1931 123,763 Rock - Stone masonry 1891 12,630 Rock Hardpan Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Clay Rock Rock Clay Hardpan - Stone masonry 1879 102,304 - Stone masonry 1879 - - Stone masonry 1881 48,555 - Stone masonry 1904 7,8171 Fixed3 4 Concrete 1932 82,554 - Stone masonry 1888 34,972 Fixed s 4 Concrete 1933 84,973 - Stone masonry 1907 40,893 Fixed3 4 Concrete 1934 73,903 - Stone masonry 1900 32,238 - Stone masonry 1901 22,940 - Stone masonry 1884 36,004 Fixed3 Concrete 1940 151,558 - Composite 1899 19,3266 Fixed' Concrete 1937 84,686 'Depth shown is on breast wall, which is controlling depth for upper pool. 2Original structure built prior to assumption of control by United States on Sep. 18, 1872. 3Provided with sluices. 4Flash boards used. Partially rebuilt. TABLE 31-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Algoma Harbor, MI Alpena Harbor, MI Bayfield Harbor, MI Bayport Harbor, MI Beaver Bay, MN Belle River, MI Big Suamico River, WI Bolles Harbor, MI Caseville Harbor, MI Chippewa Harbor, MI Cornucopia Harbor, WI Grand Marais Harbor, MI Grays Reef Passage, MI Little Bay DeNoc, Gladstone Harbor, MI Pensaukee Harbor, WI Petoskey Harbor, MI Pine River, MI St. James Harbor, MI Sebewaing River, MI Tawas Bay Harbor, MI Traverse City Harbor, MI Whitefish Pointe, MI July 1984 September 1984 August 1984 February 1984 June 1984 April 1984 February 1984 April 1984 February 1984 May 1984 May 1984 April 1984 August 1984 January 1984 February 1984 September 1984 April 1984 February 1984 January 1984 November 1983 September 1984 May 1984 31-74 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Algoma Harbor, MI 1981 205,0101 896,807 Alpena Harbor, MI 1980 337,3942 411,113 Bayport Harbor, MI 1975 93,597 43,278 Bayfield Harbor, WI 1979 183,855 66,312 Belle River, MI 1980 24,301 72,210 Beaver Bay, MN 1982 293,000 2,818 Big Suamico River, WI 1975 20,243 148,259 Black River (Alcona Co.), MI 1907 - - Bolles Harbor, MI 1982 426,4133 2,067,015 Caseville Harbor, MI 1981 587,314 98,777 Cedar River Harbor, MI 1982 215,000- Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, MI 1959 125,629 8,871 Cornucopia Harbor, WI 1982 462,653 707,874 Forestville, MI 1969 - - Grand Marais Harbor, MI 1980 1,055,871 1,678,292 Grays Reef Passage, MI 1970 190,521 647,987 Lea Cheneaux Islands Channels MI 1980 399,478 284,533 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, MI 1966 332,832 64,869 Lutsen Harbor, MN 1982 357,000- Mackinac Island Harbor, MI 1969 229,0584 71,469 Mackinaw City Harbor, MI 1969 136,2865 43,085 Northport Harbor, MI - - Pensaukee Harbor, WI 1983 34,035 167,993 Petoskey Harbor, MI 1979 118,239 323,346 Pine River, MI 1980 13,649 31,545 St James, Beaver Island, MI 1957 49,1716 50,292 St. Joseph River, MI 1975 54,555 19,185 Sebewaing River, MI 1982 35,573 2,280,526 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI 1978 1,954,821 14,867 Traverse City Harbor, MI 1976 366,579 114,763 Washington Island, WI 1950 62,838 43,917 Whitefish Pointe, MI 1981 771,639 217,890 'Includes 92,774 for previous projects. 'Includes 18,889 for previous projects. 'Includes $255,000 Contributed Funds. 'Excludes Contributed Funds of $105,004. Excludes Contributed Funds of $136,286. 'Excludes Contributed Funds of $7,500. 31-75 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 31-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Grand River, Grandville, MI' 1966 Grand River, Lansing, MI 1971 7,300 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) MI2 1975 4,471,235 Kalamazoo River (Kalamazoo) MI 1975 421,466 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, MIP 1953 1,136,008' Upper River Rouge, MI 6 1968 7,935 Red Run Drain-Lower Clinton River, MI 1983 3,823,000 River Rouge, MI 1981 31,960,332 'Awaiting Appropriation of Funds. 2lncludes $108,335 Contributed Funds. Completed. 4lncludes $202,996 Contributed Funds. Planning indefinitely suspended due to lack of local cooperation. 31-76 TABLE 31-I D Project Black River Harbor, MI (Aug 30, 1935 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI (May 17, 1950 R&H Act) Grand Haven Harbor, MI (Mar 2, 1945 R&H Act) Grand River at Grandville, MI (Oct 27, 1965 Flood Control Act) Kewaunee River, WI (1960 R&H Act) Lansing, (Grand River), MI (Jul 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Pentwater Harbor, MI (Jul 13, 1892 R&H Act) Rogers City Harbor, MI (Jun 25, 1910 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI (Oct 23, 1962 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI (Jul 3, 1958 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI (Aug 30, 1935 R&H Act) St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI (Jul 3, 1930 R&H Act) South Milwaukee Harbor, WI (1836 Flood Control Act) St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates), MI (Mar 7, 1942 R&H Act) DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT EAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Date Report For Deauthorized 1976 Nov 1977 1976 Aug 1977 1976 Nov 1977 1966 Nov 1977 1976 Aug 1977 1971 Jun 1981 1976 Nov 1977 1926 Aug 1977 1976 Aug 1977 1976 Aug 1977 1976 Aug 1977 1976 Aug 1977 1906 Aug 1977 1977 Oct 1978 31-77 mmommo. m I Federal Funds Expended 0 0 0 0 0 7,000 0 5,892 22,000 12,000 0 0 0 0 Contributed Funds Expended 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT * The district comprises northern Ohio, northwestern Pennsylvania and western and northern New York, embracing U.S. waters of Lake Erie exclusive of small portion of western end, Lake Ontario, and St. Lawrence River, with their tributary drainage basins from boundary between the states of Ohio and Michigan to international boundary line east of Frontier, New York. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio ................... 32-2 2. Barcelona Harbor, N.Y..................32-2 3. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y................. 32-3 4. Buffalo Harbor, N.Y....................32-3 5. Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y..................32-3 6. Cleveland Harbor, Ohio ................... 32-4 7. Conneaut Harbor, Ohio .................... 32-5 8. Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y...................... 32-5 9. Erie Harbor, Pa.......................32-5 10. Fairport Harbor, Ohio..................32-6 11. Geneva-on-the-Lake, Ohio ................. 32-6 12. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y..............32-6 13. Huron Harbor, Ohio ...................... 32-7 14. Irondequoit Bay, N.Y...................32-7 15. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y...............32-7 16. Lorain Harbor, Ohio ...................... 32-8 17. Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y................32-8 18. Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y................32-8 19. Oswego Harbor, N.Y.....................32-9 20. Port Clinton Harbor, Ohio ................. 32-9 21. Rochester Harbor, N.Y.................32-9 22. Rocky River Harbor, Ohio ............... 32-9 23. Sandusky Harbor, Ohio ................. 32-10 24. Toledo Harbor, Ohio .................... 32-10 25. Vermilion Harbor, Ohio ................. 32-10 26. West Harbor, Ohio ..................... 32-11 27. Reconnaissance and condition surveys ...... 32-11 28. Other authorized navigation projects ....... 32-11 29. Navigation work under special authorization ..................... 32-11 each Erosion Control 30. Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio .............. 32-11 31. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa..........32-11 32. Other authorized beach erosion control projects ......................... 32-12 33. Beach erosion work under special authorization ..................... 32-12 Flood Control 34. Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, N.Y ......... 32-12 35. Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio ............. 32-13 36. Dansville and vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, N.Y...............32-13 37. Ellicott Creek, N.Y.... ............ 32-13 38. Euclid Creek, Cleveland, Ohio ............ 32-13 39. Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y., Genesee River ...................... 32-14 40. Point Place, Toledo, Ohio ............. 32-14 41. Reno Beach - Howard Farms Area, Ohio ..... ...... 32-14 42. Scajaquada Creek, N.Y...............32-15 43. Inspection of completed flood control projects .......... ..... 32-15 44. National Emergency Preparedness ......... 32-15 45. Other authorized flood control projects ...................... 32-15 46. Flood control work under special authorization ................ 32-15 Deauthorized Projects 47. Deauthorized projects..................32-15 General Investigations 48. Surveys ............................ 32-15 49. Collection and study of basic data .......... 32-15 50. Advance Engineering & Design ............ 32-15 51. Continuation of Planning and Engineering... 32-15 32-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1593 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pages 1297-99 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of $5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were for construction of access roads, docks, storage and handling facilities and dockside dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 1936 and 1970 acts. Terminal facilities. There are 16 piers and wharves. One facility is owned by city of Ashtabula and one is owned by Coast Guard. Ten facilities are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on southside of outer harbor. Eleven terminals have railroad connections and six have mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Major Rehabilitation: Contract operations, initiated in June 1981, for rehabilitation of approximately 3,692 feet of the east breakwater and 3,888 feet of the west breakwater, were completed in August 1982. The rehabilitation consisted of placing over 205,000 tons of armor, underlayer, and bedding stone on the slopes and rebuilding the structures to their design height. Total construction cost was $5,770,717. Finalization of project costs resulted in an expenditure of $ in FY84. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $29,496. Finalization of contract for dredging work begun in summer of 1983 resulted in cost of $132,889. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $18,017. Engineering efforts cost $503. Subsurface exploration at Diked Disposal facility, by contract, cost $12,188. Adjustment of costs for contract for aerial photographs of diked disposal area resulted in credit of $2,000. Contracts for environmental testing and an environmental report were finalized at costs of $5,369 and $5,720, respectively. In-house engineering costs for administering contracts and accomplishing plans and specifications for new dike construction were $233,014. 2. BARCELONA HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Erie about 17 miles southwesterly of Dunkirk, N.Y., and 29 miles northeasterly of Erie, Pa. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. Adopted by July 4, 1936, River and Harbor Act. Only information available is in index to report of Chief of Engineers under title "Portland Harbor, N.Y." Existing Project. For description of existing project see page 1506 of Annual Report for 1961. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $1,124,286. Non-Federal costs of $60,000 were incurred by local interests. Of this amount, $7,500 was a cash contribution and remainder was for providing necessary lands and construction of public wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $7,500 for existing project. Local cooperation assurances for project modification were provided as follows: (a) Provide necessary lands, easements and rights-ofway required for the project without cost to the United States; (b) Hold and save the Government free from all claims for damages attributable to the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its Contractors'; (c) Provide necessary funds for construction of the East Breakwater extension estimated to cost $178,000 by September 1, 1984. (d) Comply with the applicable provisions of the "Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971 in the acquisition of lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and inform affected persons of pertinent policies, regulations, and procedures in connection therewith. (e) Comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the construction and operation of the project. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $3,144. Project modification to improve the harbor to its authorized standards by constructing a 250-foot long extension of the west breakwater, a series of four 100-foot long rubblemound wave absorbers on the harbor side of the west breakwater, and a 150-foot long landward extension of the east breakwater, was initi ated in August 1984. Construction, by contract, cost $1,280,400. Federal funds and $15,000 non-Federal funds. In-house engineering effort cost $205,183 for finalization of project modification study and plans and specifications for construction. 32-2 BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT 3. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Improvement is essentially that of upper 13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake Erie, Buffalo, N.Y., to and including Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. It comprises improvements formerly designated by three titles; viz, Lake Erie entrance to Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, N.Y., Black Rock Harbor and Channel, N.Y., and Tonawanda Harbor and Niagara River, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14832.) Previous projects. For details see items 5 and 7, page 1970 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1612 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and Federally owned Black Rock ship lock, see page 1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock, as authorized by 1935 act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Cost for completed portion of new work is $10,457,093. Enlarging of existing 21-foot turning basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 1954 act, was deauthorized by Congress in May 1981, and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost (1961) of this portion is $339,000. Non- Federal costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by New York State for construction of Erie Basin and protecting breakwater, and construction and extension of Bird Island Pier, and by other local interests for relocation of utilities. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two facilities are along upstream end of channel. Below Black Rock Lock and at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned terinals. There are two State-owned barge canal ter- Iinals at Tonawanda, N.Y., and several marine service and supply docks for recreational and other small craft. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black Rock Lock Which is private. Ten tions terminals have railroad connec- and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year: Operation and care (Black Rock Lock): Lock was in operation 220 daYs and closed for underwater cleaning and repairs from December 6, 1983 through April 30, 1984. Ordinary maintenance and repair of structures and grounds were accomplished throughout the year by Government plant and hired labor. Total costs of $1,688,268 were distributed as follows: Operation and Le: operation of lock, ordinary maintenance and repair 409,863; security service by contract and maintenance of grounds $57,099; miscellaneous inspection and condition surveys, project supervision, real estate, and sup- Port of Water Control Center $163,906; maintenance (structure repairs) by U.S. derrickboat McCauley at Bird Island Pier, fenderings, and lock gates cost ,18,354. Rehabilitation of the miter gate by U.S. derguard gate was initiated at a cost of $60,920. Clearing and snagging in project channels by Government plant and hired labor cost $130,935. Photogrammetry contract at Bird Island Pier cost $15,000. Economic study, by contract, cost $3,997. Costs of Co-Operative Stream Gaging program were $62,100. In-house engineering effort on rehabilitation of miter and lower guard gates cost $100,865. 4. BUFFALO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) Previous projects. For details see page 1967 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1606 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing projects. For description see page 1368 of Annual Report for 1963. In addition, on 15 December 1980, OCE authorized the removal of bridge abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge. New work for completed project cost $18,837,601. Estimated non-Federal costs were $9,188,000 for deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and dikes and performing dockside dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 45 wharves and piers of which 4 piers, owned by Niagara Frontier Port Authority, and 9 privately owned and operated facilities are on outer harbor and along sides of Lackawanna and Union ship canal, 4 are along banks of Buffalo ship canal, and 26 along Buffalo River. Coast Guard facilities are at mouth of Buffalo River along left bank. City of Buffalo owns a slip on right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring city fireboat. Thirty-four terminals have railroad connections and 29 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor, water control management, and real estate activities cost $103,762. Repairs to about 100 l.f. of the Dike No. 4 by U.S. derrickboats McCauley and Ohio cost $89,938. Expenditure of $5,715 was attributed to the permanent layup of the U.S. hopper dredge Hoffman. Removal of 253,000 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, cost $651,174. Costs of Co-Operative Stream Gaging program was $12,600. Environmental study, by contract, cost $5,096. In-house engineering costs for preparation of plans and specifications for all harbor work were $79,136. 5. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At mouth of Cattaraugus Creek on south 32-3 1boat Ohio cost $545,229; rehabilitation of the lower REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 shore of Lake Erie about 12 miles northeasterly from Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. and 24 miles southwesterly from Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Existing project. For details of the existing project, see page 32-4 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in January 1983. Federal cost for new work was $4,797,821 (Oct. 1981). Non-Federal cost for new work was $2,566,529 (Oct. 1981). Existing project was authorized by 1968 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. The cash contribution paid was $2,566,529. The State of New York executed local cooperation agreement in July 1981. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Net credit of $192,556 was due to an adjustment made to balance Federal and non-Federal shares. Non-Federal funds expended in FY 84 amounted to $26,000 for inhouse engineering effort and $216,593 for contract finalization. Maintenance: Project condition surveys were conducted at a cost of $956. 6. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839.) Previous projects. For details see page 1962, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1585, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project, as authorized thru the 1966 modification, see page 1269 of Annual Report for 1967. Further improvements were recommended by 1976 WRD Act which authorized preparation of Phase I design memorandum for proposed new work comprising of: (a) extension of lake approach and entrance channel at arrowhead entrance and deepening of those areas to 32 feet; (b) incremental removal, as required, of 500 feet of existing west breakwater spur and 400 feet of existing east breakwater spur to facilitate turning movements; (c) construction of a 1,200-foot rubblemound breakwater extension at east end of east breakwater; (d) deepening of fan shaped approach channel and a 1,000-foot wide entrance channel extending 2,900 feet into east basin, to a depth of 32 feet; (e) deepening of existing 500-foot wide east basin channel to 28 feet; (f) construction of a diked disposal area; and, (g) recreational facilities, for fishing on west breakwater, including pedestrian handrail, pedestrian bridge and public parking. Estimated total Federal cost of new work is $65,215,000 (Oct. 1981) of which $29,315,100 is for completed work and balance of $35,900,000 (Oct. 1981) is for new work proposed by 1976 WRD Act. Estimated non-Federal cost is $10,263,000 (Oct. 1981) of which $9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and balance of $1,060,000 is required cash contribution for work authorized by 1976 WRD Act. Remaining work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act consisting of widening and deepening right bank of Cuyahoga River at downstream end of Cut 4 is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this por. tion is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) is $5,000,000. Remaining work authorized by 1958 R & H Act consisting of planning and replacement of bridges number 19 (E.L.R.R.) and 32 (B.&O.R.R.) and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels and remaining work authorized by 1960 R&H Act consisting of deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including Old River to a depth of 27 feet has been classified as deferred and is also excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1976) of this portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) is $21,251,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1977 for details of requirements of local cooperation for work recommended by 1976 WRD Act. Assurances will be requested upon completion of Phase 11 General Design Memorandum. Terminal facilities. There are 65 piers and wharves. Thirteen are on outer harbor, 11 on banks of Old River and 41 along deep-draft section of Cuyahoga River. Forty-one terminals have both railroad connections and mechanical-handling facilities. The Corps owns a wharf at foot of East 9th Street. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1981, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of Phase I General Design Memorandum, as authorized by 1976 WRD Act, was continued under the General Investigation Appropriation at a cost of $124,281. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection serd vices and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $203,552. Repairs to 375 1.f. of the west breakwater and the west arrowhead breakwater by U.S. derrickboat Tonawanda cost $1,276,029. Maintenance of building and grounds, by contract, cost $31,150. Removal of shoaled material: 343,670 cubic yards from Cuyahoga River, 133,876 cubic yards from the West Basin, and 12,181 cubic yards from the east entrance respectively, cost $4,305,452. Costs for Co-Operative Stream Gaging Program were $18,240. Environmento testing, by contract, cost $2,517. Adjustment in cost of contract for environmental sediment study resulte in credit of $1,580. In-house engineering costs for prep9 tion of plans and specifications on contract drental major repairs to east breakwater, environmen testing, and structure inspections were $221,806. 32-4 BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT 7. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) Previous projects. For details see page 1964, Annual Report for 1915. Existing Project. For description see page 1274 of Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. See page 1274, Annual Report 1967, for complete description of project modification authorized by 1966 R&H Act. Estimated cost (1970) of this modification is $717,000. For completed work non-Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside dredging and removal of existing dolphins. Estimated non-Federal cost of $2,877,000 (1970) includes cash contribution of $717,000 and the remainder is for construction of service facilities for the 1966 project modification. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. See page 32-6 of Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of local cooperation for project modification as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1966. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers and wharves. Six are privately owned and operated and located in inner harbor. Remaining facility is city owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys were done by Government plant and hired labor at a cost of $20,464. Repairs to 215 1.f. of the west breakwater by U.S. derrickboats Tonawanda, Ohio, and Mc- Cauley cost $688,142. Removal of 49,051 cubic yards of shoaled material from the outer harbor and 14,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from the Municipal Dock Access Channel, by contract, cost $246,955. In-house engineering effort cost $24,168. 8. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 37 miles southwesterly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. For details see page 1966 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1604 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1976. For description of small boat harbor project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, e page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1978. Actual costs for completed work are $3,010,024. Actual non-Federal costs are $1,961,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $3,161. Dredging contract for FY83 work was finalized at a cost of $9,185. Economic study cost $7,778. 9. ERIE HARBOR, PA. Location. On southerly side of bay formed by Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles westerly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14835.) Previous projects. For details see page 1965 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1600 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1363-64 of Annual Report for 1963. Entire project modification authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of harbor, was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of north pier portion as authorized by 1899 act was deauthorized in November 1981. Estimated cost (1955) of this portion is $1,071,000. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers, was deauthorized in August 1982. Estimated cost (July 1962) of this portion is $78,000. Non-Federal costs for completed work were $51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip adjacent thereto. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of which 12 are privately owned and operated. Erie International Marine Terminal No. 1 owned by Port Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on south side of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard facilities are on north side. Two off-shore oil docks are on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical- handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $60,492. Expenditure of $42,944 was attributed to the permanent lay-up of U.S. hopper dredge Hoffman Adjustment in cost of contract for particle size and specific gravity testing resulted in a credit of $1,000. Repairs to 1,450 1.f. of north pier, by contract, cost $1,869,330. In-house engineering costs for rehabilitation of north pier were $48,427. 32-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 10. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837). Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1590 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized thru the 1960 modification, see page 1526 of Annual Report for 1962; for description of small boat harbor as authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1977. Estimated total Federal cost of new work is$4,931,000 (Oct. 1980) of which $2,591,000 is actual cost for completed portion of project and the balance of $2,340,000 is for proposed work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 FC Act. Entire project modification authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening lake approach channel, 800-foot wide channel through outer harbor and channel in Grand River, and enlargement of turning basin, is classified inactive and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this modification is $3,170,000 (1963). Estimated non-Federal cost is $4,991,000 of which $101,000 were for bulkheads and dockside dredging for completed portion of project and $2,560,000 which includes cash contribution of $2,330,000, is for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 FC Act. For the inactive 1960 project modification, estimated non-Federal cost of $3,821,000 (1963) is for lands, relocations, utility changes, dock dredging and dock and bulkhead modifications. See Table 32B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1976 Annual Report regarding assurances of local cooperation for work authorized by R&H Acts of 1927 and 1960 and page 32-11 of 1977 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all along banks of Grand River. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Nine terminals have railroad connections and ten mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $107,597. Expenditure of $23,784 and $24,875 were attributed to the permanent lay-up of U.S. hopper dredges Hoffman and Markham, respectively. U.S. derrickboat Ohio repaired 20 l.f. of the west breakwater at a :ost of $108,118. Removal of 93,955 cubic yards of hoaled material from the river and 38,441 cubic yards f shoaled material from the harbor cost $501,921. Inouse engineering effort cost $17,074. 1. GENEVA-ON-THE-LAKE, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, about 17 miles east of Fairport Harbor, Ohio and 12 miles west of Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. Small boat harbor project provides for: (a) breakwaters in Lake Erie aggregating about 1,450 feet in length; (b) entrance channel about 770 feet long, 100 feet in width, 8 feet deep; (c) inner channels, 100 feet wide totaling 1,680 feet in length and 6 feet deep; (d) a mooring area 0.9 acres in area with depths varying from 6 to 8 feet, (e)de velopment of recreational facilities, and (f) development of wetland mitigation features. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $4,710,000 (Oct. 1983). Non-Federal cost estimate of $5,070,000 (Oct. 1983) is cash contribution toward first cost of construction. Existing project was authorized under provision of Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. (H.D. 402, 91st Cong. 2 sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. By letters dated November 10, 1977, April 15, 1981, and September 10, 1982 the State of Ohio Department of Natural Resources, the responsible agency, has indicated its willingness and ability to furnish the assurances. Assurances of local cooperation will be requested upon approval of a draft Local Cooperation Agreement in FY85. Terminal facilities. There are no commercial or recreational facilities at the harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The supplement to the Phase II General Design Memorandum was completed and further comments and issues were addressed at a cost of $100,600. Total costs including Construction, General, funds are $961,089. 12. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On Sodus Bay, which is a nearly landlocked indentation on south shore of Lake Ontario, 29 miles westerly from Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14814.) Previous projects. For details see page 1972 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1526 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1380 of Annual Report for 1963. Improvements authorized by 1962 act, consisting of deepening lake approach channel, entrance channel and inner approach channel were deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs of new work for completed portion of project were $249,187. Costs incurred by local interests are not available. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and con- 32-6 BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT dition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $925. Economic study cost $6,575. 13. HURON HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14843.) Previous project. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1576 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1347 of Annual Report for 1963 and page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H act is deferred. Estimated cost of construction of breakwater is $12,970,000 (July 1972). Non- Federal costs of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 for dockside dredging of areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 32B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Six privately owned wharves and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and remainder along right bank. Four terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $100,175. Maintenance dredging, by contract, cost $821,919, for removal of 239,339 cubic yards from lake approach, river entrance channel, and turning basin. Expenditure of $12,523 was attributed to the permanent lay.up of U.S. hopper dredge Hoffman. Sediment sampling, by contract, cost $2,840. In-house engineering effort cost $58,989. 14. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, 4 miles east of Rochester, N.Y. at mouth of Irondequoit Creek, Monroe County, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14804 and 14815.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) entrance channel located at easterly end of bay, 9 feet deep and 100 feet Wide, extending from 9-foot depth in Lake Ontario to Junction with inner bay channels a distance of about 1,350 feet; (b) inner channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet Wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,035 feet; (c) access channel, 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 500 feet in length from the inner bay channel to the site of a proposed State marina; (d)two Stone rubblemound structures 1,350 feet and 750 feet in length at the natural entrance; and (e) recreational facilities of 0.63 acre parking area, two comfort stations, concrete walkways and hand railings on the breakwater and jetty. Estimated Federal cost based on the project presented in the Phase II General Design Memorandum for new work is $4,300,000 (includes COE and USCG, October 1983). Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $12,280,000 (October 1983) including cash contribution of $3,160,000 (October 1983) and remainder for lands, damages, and highway bridge relocation. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc 332, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.) The local sponsor (New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation) requested that the comfort stations and parking areas be constructed under a separate contract from that for the navigation features. A contract for construction of the breakwaters, jetty, navigation channel and highway bridge removal was awarded in June 1984 for $3,333,000. Local cooperation. By letters dated June 13, 1980, December 24, 1981, and June 19, 1982, New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation reaffirmed its intent to provide assurances of cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed April 20, 1983. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning for the project was completed at a cost of $224,091. The railroad bridge abutments were removed in August 1984 and construction of the breakwater and jetty was initiated in July 1984 at a cost of $614,860. Non-Federal funds expended for in-house engineering effort were $3,013 and $4,624 were contract costs. 15. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Little Sodus Bay, on south shore of Lake Ontario, 15 miles west of Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1628 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1378 of Annual Report for 1958. New work for completed project cost $69,066. Non-Federal costs of $6,000 were incurred for channel dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $289. Economic study was initiated at cost of $1,019. ik 32-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 16. LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Black River, 28 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1580 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1319-22 of Annual Report for 1966. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $26,246,000 (Oct. 1976). Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 and construction of bank stabilization as authorized by 1960 act and modified by 1965 act is classified deferred. The estimated cost of $5,317,000 for this work is included in the above estimate. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15- to 25-foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West piers is also deferred and estimated cost of $60,200 (July 1966) is excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Total non-Federal cost estimate is $8,853,000 (Oct. 1976) including $3,000 contributed by local interests toward construction of west breakwater shorearm. For work authorized by 1960 act, including deferred portion, non-Federal costs are estimated to be $8,805,000 for lands, relocations of utilities, modifications of existing dock and bulkheads, construction of new bulkheads and dockside dredging. For work authorized by 1965 act, classified as deferred, local interests must make a cash contribution presently estimated at $45,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. For completed work, local interests contributed $3,000. Work authorized by 1960 act (and modified by 1965 act) is deferred. All other conditions fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 23 piers and wharves, of which three are on outer harbor and remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad connections and 15 mechanicalhandling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $85,378. Repairs to 202 1.f. of the east breakwater by the U.S. derrickboat Ohio cost $438,661. Removal of 120,428 cubic yards of shoaled material from Black River Channel and upper turning basin, by contract, cost $701,852. Costs for Co-Operative Stream Gaging Program were $5,640. Dike repairs by hired labor cost $1,068. Economic study, by contract, cost $13,780. Inhouse engineering costs were $25,326. 17. OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Oak Orchard Creek, 33 miles westerly of Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14805.) Previous project. For details see page 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing project. For description of completed existing project see page 32-14 of 1975 Annual Report. Actual Federal cost for completed project was $1,613,500. Estimated non-Federal cost is $270,000 (July 1971) including cash contribution of $170,700 and $54,002 for recreational facilities and remainder for lands and construction of wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $224,702. Terminal facilities. There is no commercial navigation at Oak Orchard Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition surveys cost $1,331. Environmental study contract was finalized at a cost of $105 after contractor's default to comply with specifications. 18. OGDENSBURG HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of St. Lawrence River, 62 miles by water from Lake Ontario. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14764.) Previous projects. For details see page 1975 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1635 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1568 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed portion of project was $375,086. Removal of hard material shoals from lower basin portion of project as authorized by 1935 act, at an estimated cost of $183,000 (1954) is classified inactive. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. On April 20, 1983, the Chief of Engineers under authority provided by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized an extension of Lower East Entrance Channel, 600 feet west of the existing pier to a depth of 27 feet below LWD. Dredged material is to be disposed of in dredged disposal area Site 5, owned by Ogdensburg Bridge and Port Authority and previously used for this purpose. Estimated costs for this work (Aug. 82) are $870,000 Federal and $4,280,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Relocation of approximately 400 l.f. of sewer line from Disposal Site 5, by contract, cost $184,459 Federal funds and $44,999 non-Federal funds. Upon completion of sewer line relocation, dredging to depth authorized by Section 107 was initiated. Contract costs for dredging were $102,177 Federal funds. In-house engineering effort cost $31,011 Federal funds and $5,586 non.Federal funds. 32-8 BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT 19. OSWEGO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oswego River, 59 miles easterly from Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14813.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1630 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1383-84 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed portion of project cost $7,242,039 and non-Federal costs for completed work were $4,440,000 for lands, dockside dredging, construction of terminal, wharves and cargo handling facilities. Deepening a 200-foot wide strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River, remaining feature of work authorized by the 1930 act, is classified as inactive. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip along harbor line in west outer harbor, remaining feature of work authorized by 1940 act, was deauthorized in May 1981. Estimated Federal costs for this work are $246,000 (July 1957) and $2,419,000 (July 1966) respectively, and estimated non-Federal costs are $500,000 (July 1966) for dockside dredging for work authorized by 1940 act. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Seven piers and wharves in harbor and along river channel. In addition, Port of Oswego Authority owns two public terminals, one of which is west of river and includes a grain elevator and warehouse for miscellaneous freight. Other terminal is east of river and used for handling aluminum and general cargo. State of New York owns a river terminal used for mooring vessels. City of Oswego owns one dock and shore facilities for recreational craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $4,410. Removal of 12,000 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, cost $90,296. Finalization of costs for structure repairs for FY 83 were $4,621. In-house engineering effort cost $11,910. 20. PORT CLINTON HARBOR, OHIO Location. Comprises lower half-mile of Portage River. River empties into Lake Erie 72 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14820). Existing project. Provides for parallel jetties at river mouth and a channel in Lake Erie and Portage River Wth a project depth of 10 feet. For additional details see Page 1899 of Annual Report for 1951. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. terminal facilities. There is one public fish dock, one Private sand dock, one private fuel, lumber and coal dock, and five additional private docks. A dock at foot of Madison Avenue is owned by village of Port Clinton and open to the public. A shipyard builds small boats. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and project condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $5,686. Repairs to east and west jetties, by contract, cost $140,833. Environmental testing of sediments and bioassays, by contract, cost $21,759. Inhouse engineering effort cost $5,352. 21. ROCHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) Previous project. For details see page 1471 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1623 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1556 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed project is $21,191,514. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 1960 act, for lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside dredging, structure modifications, and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio coal loader. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Complied with except provision for replacement of coal loading facility as required by River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. Terminal facilities. One terminal facility at mouth of Genesee River has been leased to the Great Lakes Division of Pittston Stevedoring Corp. Facilities also consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $31,750. Maintenance dredging, by contract, removed 259,000 cubic yards of shoaled material at a cost of $822,529. Repairs to the west breakwater, by contract, cost $1,134,488. In-house engineering effort cost $80,373. 22. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHIO Location. At mouth of Rocky River which empties into Lake Erie 7 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description see page 1329 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost for completed project was $343,494 and non-Federal cost was a cash contribution of $249,346. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $249,346 for new work. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks 32-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 for recreational craft and privately-owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and project condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $1,004. Economic study cost $13,428. 23. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, in southeasterly portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14845.) Previous projects. For details see page 1960 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1574 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1511-12 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding $325,000 contributed by local interests. Non-Federal costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000 including $325,000 cash contribution and the remaining $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent to deepened channels authorized by 1960 act. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $325,000 for new work. Terminal facilities. Fourteen piers and wharves, three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately owned are used for mooring fishing boats and recreational craft and for ferry service. Five terminals have railroad connections and five mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $112,538. Expenditure of $136,240 was attributed to the permanent lay-up of the U.S. hopper dredge Markham. Maintenance dredging, by contract, removed 142,010 cubic yards of shoaled material and cost $407,132. Specific gravity analysis, by contract, cost $2,840. Finalization of contract for FY 83 stone purchase cost $960. Costs for Co-Operative Stream Gaging Program were $4,750. In-house engineering effort cost $19,063. 24. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Previous projects. For details see page 1959 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1565 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-18 and -19 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed existing project was $15,567,147. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Maumee River through city of Toledo has been developed extensively for deep-draft navigation. Detailed information on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 44 (revised 1972) prepared and published as Part 2, by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port and terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as Part I by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $139,052. Expenditure of $256,188 was attributed to the permanent lay-up of the U.S. hopper dredge Markham. Removal of 480,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from the Bay Channel and 465,828 cubic yards of shoaled material from the Maumee River Channel, by contract, cost $3,474,761. Repairs to Diked Disposal facility by hired labor cost $12,743. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $22,080. Costs for Co-Operative Stream Gaging Program were $23,890. In-house engineering effort cost $109,013. 25. VERMILION HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Vermilion River, 37 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description of existing projeCt see pages 32-17 and 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $1,156,118. Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $754,679 including cash contribution of $740,679 and remainder for relocation of submarine cable and construction of public wharf. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $740,679. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Mainte nance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $7,839. Economic study cost $10,000. 32-10 BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT 26. WEST HARBOR, OHIO Location. On southwest shore of Lake Erie, 13 miles northeast of Port Clinton, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Existing Project. For description of existing project, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1983. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $3,150,000 (Oct. 1980). Estimated non-Federal cost is $4,330,000 (Oct. 1980), including cash contribution of $3,570,000. Existing project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2nd sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-20 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. By letter dated January 31, 1978, State of Ohio stated its intent to furnish assurances of local cooperation, and executed LCA was received on March 9, 1981. Terminal facilities. Commerce at the harbor presently consists of recreational boating and affiliated activities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Net credit of $88,787 was due to an adjustment made to balance Federal and non-Federal shares. Non-Federal funds in the amount of $141,747 were expended for finalization of construction contract. Maintenance: Project condition surveys were conducted at a cost of $20,364. 27. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Niagara River, N.Y. Sackets Harbor, N.Y. Olcott Harbor, N.Y. Wilson Harbor, N.Y. Date of Survey Nov 1983 Jun 1984 May 1984 May 1984 FY Cost $18,702 346 321 2,038 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 32-C. 29. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 32-D. Navigation work pursuant to Section 302, Public Law 89-298. Lake Neatahwanta, Fulton, NY - Costs of $4,964 were incurred for preparation of Reconnaissance Report. Beach Erosion Control 30. LAKEVIEW PARK, LORAIN, OHIO Location. In the city of Lorain, Lorain County, Ohio, on south shore of Lake Erie between 1,500 and 3,000 feet west of Lorain Harbor west breakwater. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Existing project. For description of existing project see page 32-19 of Annual Report for 1977. The Federal cost of the completed project was $1,360,986 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) was $50,000 for relocation. In addition, local interests contributed $583,280. Annual cost of 5-year program for beach replenishment and monitoring was approximately $75,000. Existing project authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc. 224, 83rd Cong. 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Five year monitoring program was completed in 1982. Cooperative beach nourishment was conducted in FY80 and FY81, during which time a total of 9,000 cubic yards of sand was placed within the project limits. The Federal cost for nourishment has totalled approximately $73,000 and costs to local interests totalled approximately $30,000, annually. An agreement has been made between the city of Lorain and the Federal government to continue cost sharing, 70% Federal and 30% local, the costs associated with annual beach nourishment until September 30, 1992. Beach nourishment is scheduled to be accomplished again in Fall 1984. FY84 costs amounted to $7,108 for in-house engineering efforts. 31. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA. Location. At Erie, Pa., on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles southwest of Buffalo, N.Y. and 102 miles eastnortheast of Cleveland, Ohio, (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835.) Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 1393 of Annual Report for 1963. The Water Resources Development (WRD)A ct of March 7, 1974, reinstated and extended authorization for beach erosion control project, as provided in 1960 R&H Act, for a period of five years from date of enactment of 1974 WRD Act, or if the review study of such project is not completed prior to end of such period, until such study is completed and a report thereon submitted to Congress. Work authorized by the 1974 WRD Act was completed in 1979. The 1976 Water Resources Development Act provides for continued annual nourishment by stating: "At expiration of authorization provided in Section 57 of Water Resources Development Act of 1974, the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, may provide periodic beach nourishment in accordance with cost sharing provisions of Section 103(a) (2) of Act of October 23, 1962." The act also authorized preparation of a Phase I General Design Memorandum. The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum was completed in June 1980 and the recommended plan provides for construction of 58 offshore rubblemound breakwater segments, beach restoration by placement of sand fill, and annual beach replenishment for shore protection. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 32-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 1983) is $33,046,000 which includes $5,646,000 for completed work authorized by the 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $4,062,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. Estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1983) is $17,763,000 which includes $3,983,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $1,552,300 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act. An agreement between the United States of America and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through the Department of Environmental Resources, was entered into on February 21, 1979 for the annual nourishment which was extended by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. The plan recommended in the Final Phase I General Design Memorandum is contingent upon local sponsor, namely the Department of Environmental Resources of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, agreeing in writing to provide without cost to United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas for excavated material as determined by the Chief of Engineers and necessary for implementation and for periodic nourishment of the project; provide a cash contribution based on the appropriate percentage of final construction cost, exclusive of lands, easements, and rights-of-way, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law based on shore ownership and use existing at time of construction, and the President's proposed cost-sharing policy, which contribution is presently estimated at $9,800,000 or 35 percent; pay 30 percent of the cost for annual beach redistribution and replenishment work for the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works, except for damages due to fault or negligence of Government or its contractors; maintain and operate all the works, including breakwaters and periodic sand replenishment and redistribution as needed, after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and assure continued public ownership and continued public use, without cost to United States, of appropriate access and facilities including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain beach for continued public use during life of project. Formal assurances of local cooperation will be requested and executed prior to initiation of construction of improvements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Beach nourishment as authorized by the 1976 WRD Act was continued. A contract for providing beach nourishment was awarded in FY84. However, contract operations were not initiated until after the Labor Day holiday. During the year a total of $426,294 was expended for beach nourishment operations, which are continuing and scheduled to be completed during the first quarter of FY85. Of this total, $308,451 were contract costs and $117,843 were for the in-house engineering effort. For its share of the 1984 beach nourishment cost, the Comnmonwealth of Pennsylvania contributed $373,254 of which $1,653 was expended on in-house engineering effort and $3 was expended for the contract for a cumulative total project share of $5,916,254. The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum was submitted to the Secretary of the Army in October 1981 for his review and transmittal to Congress. In FY84, a total of $130,411 was expended to investigate whether other plans for reducing the cost of the combined beach and Erie Harbor annual costs, exists in lieu of the project recommended in the Phase I General Design Memorandum. Maintenance: Project condition surveys were conducted at a cost of $1,092. 32. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-E. Beach Erosion Work under Special Authorization 33. LAKESHORE PARK ASHTABULA, OHIO Location. Lakeshore Park is located in Ashtabula, Ashtabula County, Ohio, about 40 miles southwest of Erie, Pennsylvania, and about 50 miles northeast of Cleveland, Ohio. Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in July 1983. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements, see page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Total FY84 expenditure was $939 Federal funds for inhouse engineering effort and $3,187 non-Federal funds. Beach erosion activity pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Century Park, Lorain, OH - Costs of $35,447 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Mentor Beach Park, Mentor, OH - Costs of $52,607 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Port Clinton, OH - Costs of $4,590 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Simms Park, Euclid, OH - Costs of $42,812 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Flood Control 34. CAYUGA CREEK, CHEEKTOWAGA, N.Y. Location. Project area of Cayuga Creek is located in vicinity of Union Road and William Street in town of Cheektowaga, N.Y. Existing project. For description of existing project see page 32-13 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. See page 32-16 of FY81 Annual Re- 32-12 BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT port for requirements of local cooperation. On Setember 3,1980, the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation signed the formal cooperation agreement. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: In'house engineering effort for finalization of project cost $258. 35. CUYAHOGA RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. The project is located in northeastern Ohio, in Cuyahoga and Summit Counties, in the Cuyahoga River watershed. (See Geological Survey Map of Cleveland- South.) Existing project. For details of existing project, see page 32-13 of Annual Report for 1983. Estimated cost (Oct. 1982) for new work is Federal $23,000,000 and non- Federal $1,080,000 for lands, damages and relocations. Existing project was authorized by Section 108 of 1970 River and Harbor act, and Section 102 of PL 97-88. Local cooperation. See page 32-17 of 1981 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. These items were adopted and agreed to by the Cleveland Metro Park System on January 20, 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $3,163 for in-house enginering effort. 36. DANSVILLE AND VICINITY, CANASERAGA CREEK, N.Y. Location. In towns of North Dansville and West Sparta, Livingston County, New York (See Geological Survey Map Dansville, N.Y. 1942.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 32-13 of Annual Report for 1983. Federal cost for new work is $1,150,000 (October 1983). Non-Federal cost estimate of $37,000 (October 1983) is for lands. Existing project was authorized by Sec. 203 of 1948 Flood Control Act (H.D. 206, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-17 of 1981 Annual Re- Port for requirements of local cooperation. Formal assurances of local cooperation will be requested upon solution of innovative financing discussions. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: xpenditure of $9,659 was attributed to in-house engineering efforts and continued coordination with local co- Operator. 37. ELLICOTT CREEK, N.Y. Location. The proposed channel improvement is ted on the downstream portion of Ellicott Creek in {lt5 towns of Amherst and Tonawanda, Erie County. BufGeological Survey maps of Tonawanda East and lo Northeast, N.Y.) Existing project. For detailed description of the o al project as authorized by Section 201 of the 1970 Flood Control Act, see page 32-24 of Annual Report for 1973. The basic authorization, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 provides authority to undertake flood control measures to alleviate flooding that is compatible with authorized project and any alternatives currently under restudy pursuant to Flood Control Act of 1970. As a result of restudy of alternatives, the project provides for: (a) widening, straightening and deepening about 2.5 miles of existing creek channel including the existing by-pass channel in Ellicott Creek Park; (b) construction of a diversion channel about 5,850 feet long between Maple Road and Millersport Highway; (c) construction of a diversion channel about 1,950 feet long through Pfohl Park; (d) construction of a diversion channel about 9,150 feet long from Niagara Falls Boulevard upstream to about Pfohl Park; (e) construction of 2 highway bridges; (f) modification of culverts at Tonawanda Creek Road; (g) foundation protection of 1 highway bridge; (h) modification of utilities and drainage outlets; and, (i) recreation facilities consisting of a bike and hike path about 5.4 miles long, with open space park areas. The estimated Federal cost of existing project is $13,600,000 (Oct. 1983). The estimated non-Federal cost is $9,000,000 (Oct. 1983) which includes a cash contribution of $470,000 (Oct. 1983). Completion of preconstruction planning and construction was authorized December 29, 1981, under Section 5, P.L. 97-128. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see page 32-22 of Annual Report for 1976. On October 25, 1976, the New York State Department of Conservation furnished a letter of intent to cooperate toward construction of project. On June 22, 1983, a formal Local Cooperation Agreement was requested from N.Y. State. On January 20, 1984 this agreement was fully executed. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $21,494 for continued coordination with the local cooperator, and in-house engineering efforts. 38. EUCLID CREEK, CLEVELAND, OH Location. Euclid Creek has a drainage area of approximately 25 square miles and is located east of Cleveland in Cuyahoga County and a small portion in Lake County, Ohio. Existing project. For details of existing project, see page 32-14 of the Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. On August 10, 1983, the city of Cleveland and the Board of Cuyahoga Commissioners agreed to: (a) provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, spoil disposal, and borrow areas necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, as required; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project except for damages resulting from negligence by the United States Government or its Contractors; (c) maintain and operate, without cost to the United States, the completed works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Ar- 32-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 my; (d) provide, without cost to the United States, all alterations and relocations of existing improvements including bridges, highways, buildings, utilities, sewers, and other facilities, except as otherwise provided; (e) in acquiring lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project works, the project sponsor will comply with the applicable provisions of the "Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971; (f) prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction or encroachment upon the project works detrimental to the flood control purpose of the project; (g) consider the adoption of flood plain regulations as necessary to assure compatibility between future developments within the flood plain and the protection afforded by the proposed improvements; (h) consider the adoption of land use and zoning ordinances which would require onsite detention of increased peak discharge from any future major land developments in the watershed, particularly those developments predicted for the Highland Heights and Richmond Heights areas; (i) at least annually, publicize andnotify all interested parties that the project will not provide protection against floods greater than the 100-year event, nor will the flood control project eliminate the relatively frequent basement flooding that occurs in the floodprone area due to an inadequate sewer system servicing the area; (j) consider replacement of the inadequate sewer system to reduce or eliminate basement flooding; or as an alternative action, floodproof the affected homes by installing one-way check valves in basement drains and sump pumps and providing emergency generators for use during power failure; (k) assume all construction costs in excess of the Federal limitation of $4,000,000 under Section 205. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of project is 75% complete. Scheduled completion date is May 1985. Contract costs in FY84 amounted to $1,472,061. In-house engineering effort cost $69,419. 39. MT. MORRIS LAKE, N.Y., GENESEE RIVER Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of Rochester, N.Y. Reservoir is in Livingston and Wyoming Counties, N.Y. (See Geological Survey maps of Nunda and Portage, N.Y.) Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act see page 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New work for completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition $5,000 contributed funds expended for new work. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests contributed $5,000 for new work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of dam, reservoir, and service facilities, condition and operation studies and miscellaneous reports were accomplished by hired labor for $323,183. Contract for debris removal cost $218,790. Access roadway paving contract was finalized at cost of $2,115. Co-Operative Stream Gaging Program accomplished by U.S. Geological Survey and National Weather Service reporting and hydroclimatic networks cost $69,265. Contract for heating access roadway was finalized at cost of $2,088. Operation of the Water Control Center cost $157,828. Engineering and design costs of $268,872 were incurred for the preparation of specifications for debris removal, annual facility inspection, dam safety study, seismic study by Waterways Experiment Station, and borings project. 40. POINT PLACE, TOLEDO, OHIO Location. Point Place is located on a peninsula in northeast portion of city of Toledo, Ohio. Its shores are bounded on the east by Maumee Bay of Lake Erie and on the west by Ottawa River. The peninsula extends in a northeasterly direction immediately north of mouth of Maumee River. Existing project. Existing project, as recommended in Phase II General Design Memorandum, provides for: (a) combination of protective structures consisting of 4,400 feet of steel sheet pile wall and 13,700 feet of levee; (b) three new pumping stations and 3,800 feet of new storm sewer facilities; and, (c) facilities for fishing and related recreational activities. Estimated costs (Oct. 1984) are $9,560,000 Federal and $4,140,000 non-Federal including a cash contribution of $1,810,000. Existing project was authorized by 1972 Flood Control Act (H.D. 363, 92nd Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see pages 32-24 and -25 of Annual Report for 1978. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed by city of Toledo on January 27, 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Stage 2A for constructing 6,070 l.f. of stone dike, a drainage interceptor system and pump station was awarded in June 1983 and is 93% complete. Stage 2B for construction of 3,850 l.f. of riprap-faced dikes, 4,800 l.f. of steel sheet pile wall, two pumping stations along with related drainage interceptor systems and outfalls, was awarded in June 1984 and is 26% complete. Total Federal costs for FY 84 were $2,883,847 contract costs, and $265,836 for in-house engineering efforts. Non-Fed" eral funds expended were $151,074 for contract costs and $139,821 for in-house engineering effort. 41. RENO BEACH-HOWARD FARMS AREA, OHIO Location. Area is located in Lucas County, on the south shore of Lake Erie about 15 miles east of ToledO Ohio. Existing project. The project, as authorized, provides for construction of 8,200 feet of roadway seawall co 32-14 BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT sisting of an earth dike, faced on the lakeward side with a quarry-run stone fill; and a steel sheet pile floodwall connecting the easterly end of this seawall at Wards Canal to the existing inland dike paralleling the canal. Estimated Federal cost of new work consisting of reconstructing to a permanent project the "Operation Foresight" work which was completed in 1973, is $5,870,000 (Oct. 1983). Non-Federal cost estimate of $1,960,000 (Oct. 1983) is a cash contribution toward first cost of construction plus all lands, easements, and rights-of-way. Project was authorized under Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948. (H.D. 554, 80th Congress, 2nd Sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-16 of 1982 Annual Report for full requirements of local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement will be requested upon approval of the General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: In FY84 the General Reevaluation Report was completed at a cost of $143,715, for in-house engineering effort. Total costs including Construction, General, funds are $493,603. 42. SCAJAQUADA CREEK, N.Y. Location. Scajaquada Creek is a small stream drain- ing to the Black Rock Canal and thence to Niagara River at Buffalo, New York. It flows from east to west and its drainage area is all in Erie County. About 65 percent of the watershed is upstream from the city of Buffalo, mostly in the towns of Cheektowaga and Lancaster, and the village of Depew. (See Geological Survey Maps of Buffalo-Northeast, N.Y. and Lancaster, N.Y.) Existing project. For description of existing project e page 32-23 of Annual Report for 1977. Estimated costs (Oct. 1980) are $5,065,000 Federal and $4,060,000 01n-Federal. Existing project was authorized by Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. The project was completed in August 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: FY 84 costs were $88 for in-house engineering effort. 43 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed flood control works for compliance with Federal requirements were made during the Period at a cost of $97,477. Total cost to Sept. 30, 1984 Was $445,698. Inspection of non-Federal levees were made at a cost of $85,060. 44 NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Py84 costs were $118,495. 45. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-F. 46. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 32-G. 47. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS See Table 32-H. 48. SURVEYS During FY 1984, costs of $1,160,389 were incurred as shown below: Navigation Studies ............ Flood Damage Prevention Studies Shoreline Protection Studies .... Special Studies ............... Miscellaneous Investigations .... Coordination Studies ........... Phase I GDM Studies .......... 49. COLLECTION AND BASIC DATA Sr ........ $627,166 .. . 365,164 0 ................. 0 ....... 6,253 ............ 35,564 .. . . . . . . . . . .1 ,9 6 0 ......1.2 4,282 TUDY OF During the period, costs of $19,522 were incurred in connection with International Water Studies under the General Investigations appropriation and $230,415 incurred under the Operation and Maintenance appropriation for total costs of $249,937. Flood plain management services were performed during the year at a cost of $239,838. During the year, flood hazard evaluation studies were completed for two NASA bases in Ohio. Also studies were completed for Tonawanda Creek in New York, for the town and village of Attica and Alexander. Flood hazard evaluations were initiated along the Sandusky River, in Tiffin, OH, and Spring Brook, for the town of Concord and village of Springville, New York. Costs for general hydrologic studies were $1,839. 50. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs during the period were $244,315 for advance engineering and design projects. For details of individual projects, see sections 11 and 41 in text. 51. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Costs during the period were $130,411, for continuation of planning and engineering. For details of individual project, see section 31 in text. 32-15 TABLE 32-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY83 FY84 Sept. 30, 1984 1. Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio 2. Barcelona Harbor, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. 4. Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. 5. Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y. (Contrib. Funds) 6. Cleveland Harbor Ohio 7. Conneaut Harbor, Ohio 8. Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 780,000 780,753 3,665,000 3,663,962 305,506 292,147 112,000 -34,614 2,512,000 2,357,273 -3,239 11,087 1,170,000 1,408,000 990,594 1,624,585 253,7 435,1 770,000 673,834 -100,000 55,760 232,1 105,0 - 174,0 - 15,(0 68 1,430,C 51 1,488,7 1,065,000 820,815 1,370,000 3,042,000 470,000 1,356,667 2,452,622 1,033,360 382,500 208,323 450,000 268 3,643,182 4,201,154 1,380,000 1,363,651 3,050,000 951,560 3,217,467 954,186 - 192,500 5,067,801 6,169,500 4,777,586 4,477,275 16,967 9,492 - 12,805,339' - 12,805,339' 62 8,818,428 96 8,752,341 - 6,077,000 5 6,077,000 - 1,185,853' - 1,185,853' )00 174,000 )00 15,000 )42 2,024,376 727 1,955,944 - 10,515,120' - 10,515,120' 1,502,215 28,441,563' 1,688,268 28,359,350' - 23,115,187' - 23,115,187' 980,715 47,267,515' 947,421 47,194,305' - 295,457 - 295,457 -197,000 -192,556 50,029 242,593 956 956 4,804,060 4,803,481 2,566,529 2,566,529 956 956 - 31,653,299? - 31,653,299 4,472,125 133,354,485' 6,057,166 132,924,431 - 10,294,903 - 10,294,903 8,346,641' _ 8,346,641' 474,400 511,609 630,000 1,165,000 604,527 1,074,711 901,700 979,729 8,419,10210 8,375,378 - 651,850 - 651,850 _ 3,010,024" 3,010,024" -19,400 -16,483 32-16 BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 (Contrib. Funds) 9. Erie Harbor, Pa. 10. Fairport Harbor, Ohio 12. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 13. Huron Harbor, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 14. Irondequoit Bay N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. 16. Lorain Harbor, Ohio Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 20,000 18,485 450,593 256,000 253,772 445,000 407,162 23,000 22,786 509,000 546,850 125,000 137,817 18,000 15,469 -27,000 -22,990 525,000 519,884 5,439 8,633 190,000 187,272 580,000 604,849 184 639 660,000 633,426 125,000 113,752 4,004 59 1,004,000 1,005,970 229,335 216,150 2,588,000 332,770 675,500 595,053 447,000 444,078 135,800 65,534 1,397,000 1,377,008 11,161 1,668,437 20,124 1,664,215 - 1,950,000 1,950,00012 - 3,597,873's - 3,597,873'3 72,944 14,509,163" 2,020,193 14,192,462" - 1,154 - 1,154 - 2,959,611"5 - 2,959,611' 692,469 12,010,172 783,369 12,004,363 - 610,959i - 610,959' 10,925 2,366,197 7,500 2,362,772 - 713,544 - 713,544 - 5,103,795"7 - 5,103,795" 1,047,523 13,761,926 996,446 13,678,996 - 247,030 - 247,030 - 63,079 - 63,079 1,060,000 838,951 1,200,000 7,637 12,289 1,308 2,060,800 1,756,617 1,200,000 7,637 301,3948 301,3948 3,044,507 3,033,526 742,822 742,822 - 20,739,558' - 20,739,558" 1,421,000 21,206,429 1,271,705 21,034,163 32-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 17. Oak Orchard New Work Harbor, N.Y. 18. Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19. Oswego Harbor, N.Y. 20. Port Clinton, Ohio 21. Rochester Harbor, N.Y. 22. Rocky River, Ohio 23. Sandusky Harbor, Ohio 24. Toledo Harbor, Ohio 25. Vermilion Harbor, Ohio 7,897 10,998 849 2,590 - 924,000 - 54,403 - 35,000 Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6,424 23,818 620,000 625,113 260,000 26,781 1,4 1,4 317,6 22,0 50,5 788 1,017 115,0 111,2 559,000 558,442 120,005 236,517 595,000 1,721,000 598,867 1,106,232 45,007 34,913 80,000 70,010 37,000 36,654 365,000 854,160 840,000 833,557 1,040,300 1,157,595 6,298 7,237 919,000 916,506 2,388,000 4,315,000 3,482,500 2,377,534 4,101,546 3,540,127 67,000 57,656 42,404 51,950 64,( 173, - 1,586,9960 - 1,586,99620 36 82,159 36 82,054 - 1,570,4662 47 1,018,51621 )00 57,000 85 50,585 - 1,326,38322 - 1,326,38322 - 8,430,01623 - 8,430,01623 )00 5,962,81524 237 5,953,23924 - 307,590 - 307,590 - 71,950 - 71,950 394 914,748 630 897,624 - 2,439,3082 - 2,439,308 5 1,795,000 14,716,816 2,069,140 14,370,5506 -- 343,494 - 343,494 25,004 1,598,317 14,432 1,587,745 - 6,727,27027 - 6,7270" 716,240 11,963,439 683,523 11,916,008 - 675,606 - 675,606 - 17,191,842" - 17,191,842" 4,586,188 68,042, 052243, 4,037,727 65,772,043 g3o - 1,156, 1183 S 1,156,118 17,839 1,408,452 17,839 1,408,452 32-18 4,208 12,584 525,000 518,185 BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 26. West Harbor, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 30. Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 31. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 33. Lakeshore Park Ashtabula, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 34. Cayuga Creek Cheektowaga, NY 35. Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio 36. Dansville and Vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, N.Y. 37. Ellicott Creek, N.Y. 38. Euclid Creek N.Y. 39. Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y. Genesee River 40. Point Place, Toledo Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 42. NSaquada Cr., Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 800,000 808,224 800,000 764,079 80,000 61,911 850,000 850,115 364,286 364,611 7,000 51,605 53,000 30,116 100,000 72,615 70,000 61,164 150,000 151,067 60,000 50,696 890,300 864,402 250,000 250,855 680,000 623,276 1,840,000 1,838,914 54,655 61,797 1,000,000 994,477 428,571 429,914 410,000 404,205 262,000 150,337 1,249,000 1,233,558 50,000 81,750 13,355 150,000 116,912 140,000 100,497 905,000 919,439 800,000 587,705 40,345 92,343 318,898 319,694 628,000 486,266 22,737 740,000 741,242 368,175 307,785 195,000 199,957 81,438 -55,000 -17,273 10,000 17,903 25,000 16,053 61,000 73,709 2,220,000 78,324 1,035,000 784,649 2,300,000 1,348,602 300,000 15,150 -30,800 -6,831 -90,0 -88,7 141,7 20,3 20,3 25,0 7,1 990,0 426,2 373,2 1,6 1,0 1,0 9 3,1 -2,5 2 3,1 9,6 21,4 1,541,9 965,C 1,042,1 2,000,C 3,149,E 690,( 290, - 139,775 - 139,775 00 3,303,797 87 3,302,826 - 3,795,000 47 3,795,000 64 20,364 64 20,364 00 1,741,125 08 1,716,125 - 729,000 - 729,000 )00 10,425,562 794 9,857,562 754 4,811,426 56 4,379,436 )92 4,934 )92 4,934 - 786,444 )39 786,843 - 262,006 87 234,962 500 1,459,500 58 1,404,499 - 1,117,000 63 1,116,492 - 490,300 359 489,233 - 1,880,000 494 1,788,106 - 2,772,000 480 2,120,715 - 23,365,55931 - 23,365,55931 )00 9,045,309 141 8,849,823 )00 5,499,000 683 6,283,496 )00 990,000 895 306,045 - 4,944,852 88 4,943,684 32-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes $565,192 for previous projects. Excludes $47,000 contributed funds. 2. Includes $56,616 for previous projects. Excludes $7,500 contributed funds. 3. Includes $58,027 for previous projects. 4. Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority administrative costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operation and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 5. Includes $4,277,586 for previous projects. Excludes expenditures of $239,305 for work authorized by Section 107. 6. Includes $1,883,647 for previous projects. Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 7. Includes $1,564,154 for previous project and appropriations and costs of $16,596 for modification authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R&H Act. 8. Includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operation and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed funds. 9. Includes $805,272 for previous projects. 10. Includes $39,784 for previous projects. 11. Includes $811,250 for previous projects. Excludes $11,000 contributed funds. TABLE 32-B Acts Work Authorized 12. Includes $176,520 for previous projects. 13. Includes $736,967 for previous projects. 14. Includes $104,900 for previous projects. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 15. Includes $368,940 for previous projects. 16. Includes $361,772 for previous projects. 17. Includes $269,789 for previous projects. 18. Includes $232,328 for previous projects. 19. Includes $292,203 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also excludes appropriation and cost of $29,570 under authority of Section 107, 1960 R&H Act. 20. Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 21. Includes $271,380 for previous projects. 22. Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 23. Includes $1,187,977 for previous projects. 24. Includes $945,684 for previous projects. 25. Includes $247,794 for previous projects. 26. Includes $617,529 for previous projects and $478 emergency relief authority administration costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system, July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. 27. Includes $477,149 for previous projects. Excludes $325,000 contributed funds. 28. Includes $1,624,695 for previous projects. 29. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 30. Excludes $740,679 contributed funds. 31. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. Documents ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 1 of Text) June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Construction of breakwater. Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and constructing new east breakwater; pierheads on lakeward ends of breakwaters; and remove part of old east breakwater. Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a depth of 20 feet. Remove portion of east breakwater, extend breakwaters to present project dimensions, and dredging restrictions in portion of west basin. Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to Penn Central Co. slip, channel in Ashtabula River, to and in turning basin, all to present project dimensions; remove portion of old east inner breakwater; and maintenance to 24-foot depth of portion of outer harbor. Extend river channel to present project limit. Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outerharbor to 25-foot depth. A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in entrance channel to just inside outer ends of breakwaters; thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a channel to inner breakwater; thence 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in a channel extending to Penn Central Co. slip and extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River; 22 feet in hard material in turning area; and 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of inner breakwater when that section is removed as now authorized. Annual Report, 1895, p. 2132. H. Doc. 654, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 997, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 43, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Commit tee Doc. 78, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 486, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 148, 86th Cong.. 1st sess. 32-20 AUTHORIZIN-G LEGISLATION BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1905 July 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 June 26, 1934'5 Aug. 30, 1935' Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 May 20, 1826 June 23, 1866 June 23, 1874 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1909 June 6, 1900 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Dredging channel through Horseshoe Reef at outlet of Lake Erie and Tonawanda Inner Harbor, to 16 feet. Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to 21 feet. Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to natural deepwater pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair of Bird Island pier and towpath wall. Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north entrance channel. Widening channel at foot of Maryland St., Buffalo. Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; enlargement of North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island pier; improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of upper 150 feet of Tonawanda Creek channel from the project.' Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and enlarge turning basin. BUFFALO HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) Construction of south pier (extended in 1868)' Construction of old breakwater." Extension of old breakwater." Stony Point and south breakwater.' North breakwater.' Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing rock shoal therein. Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer harbor.' H. Doc. 269, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 83, 50th Cong., 1st sess., Annual Report, 1888, p. 2066, and Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3116- 3120. H. Doc. 143, 56 Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1900, p. 4152. H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1901, p. 3343. H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong., 2d sess, and H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 289, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 28, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 423, 83rd Cong., 2d sess."' Annual Report, 1868, pp. 222 and 232. Annual Report, 1868, pp. 232-236. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, pp. 569 and 573. Annual Report, 1895, p. 3153. H. Doc. 72, 55th Cong., 1st. sess., and Annual Report, 1897, p. 3245. Specified in acts. Specified in act. 32-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 '0 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945" July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 15, 1980 Mar. 3, 1875 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 South entrance breakwater.' Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and removal of Watson elevator siteY. Deepening areas A, B, and D in outer harbor to 21 feet, and area C in north entrance to 23 feet. Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to 21 feet. Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River and Erie Basin to 21 feet. Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor to 21 feet. Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to 21 feet, in cooperation with city of Buffalo. Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to present project dimensions. Deepening approach to south entrance channel to 30 feet; deepen to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of south entrance channel; and deepen to 28 feet southerly part of outer harbor. Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet northward from 28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet from harbor line and continuing within these limits for 7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging limits. Elimination of easterly 50-foot wide undredged strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending northerly from 27-foot depth area to Buffalo River entrance channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions of work authorized by 1935 act, combined with this act as a single improvement. Removal of abandoned abutments of South Michigan Avenue bridge. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 6 of Text) West breakwater Part of east breakwater.' Extension of east breakwater.' Reconstruction of piers.' Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor in discretion of Secretary of War. Arrowhead breakwater and extension of east breakwater. H. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 298, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 550, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 481, 68th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 46, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 151, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc., 451, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Annual Report, 1876, p. 558. H. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1865. H. Ex. Doc. 189, 50th Cong. 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1888, p. 2005. H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., 1st. sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2949. H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 3d sess., and Annual Report, 1899, pp. 3075 and 3078. H. Doc. 118, 56th Cong, 2d sess. 32-22 BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 29, 1937 Aug. 30, 193512 Aug. 30, 193511 Mar. 2, 1945" July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 6,1966 Oct. 22, 1976 (Se. 175) Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and closure of gap between old and new east breakwaters. Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet upstream from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to present project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur breakwater at gap in shore arm of west breakwater; removal of easterly 150 feet of west main breakwater; elimination from project of a 298-foot southerly extension of west pier; and abandonment of inner 932 feet of shore arm of west breakwater. Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as an emergency measure. Maintenance of extension of Cuyahoga River channel. Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit. l'5s1 Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad bridges.2 Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; replacement of Erie - Lackawanna Railroad bridge over Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth and widening channel at four locations along lower 2,000 feet of river.3 Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to and 75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet in westerly 800 feet of east basin." An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending about 3,800 feet easterly of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from east breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet lakeward of and parallel'to harbor line. A dock channel to Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared toward the lake. Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 to 27 feet. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of removal of portions of entrance breakwater; construction of breakwater extension at east entrance; deepening approach and entrance channels; construction of diked disposal area; and, installation of recreational fishing facilities on west breakwater. No printed report. H. Doc. 891, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 707, 63d Cong., 2d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 84, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 477, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st. sess. H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. 32-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 7 of Text) June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 7 Aug. 30, 1935" Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966' Mar. 2, 1827 Mar. 2, 1867 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 June 30, 1948 Dec. 15, 1970 (House Public Works Comm.) June 22, 1971 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 May 26, 1824 Mar. 3, 1899 Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west breakwater; removal of portion of old west breakwater; and dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. Realinement of west breakwater; removal of remainder of old west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. Removal by Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet of west pier. Removal of a portion of west breakwater; extension of breakwaters to present project dimensions; construction of pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters; deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255-foot shoreward extension of west breakwater. Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft material and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material; removal of east pier; extension of east breakwater to shore; and an access channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act for accomplishment as a single improvement. Recreational small-boat harbor provided by: a stone dike about 2,200 feet long; access channels 6 feet deep, 2,800 feet long and 100 feet wide; closing of 100-foot gap in existing west breakwater; and personnel guard rail on west breakwater. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 8 of Text) Construction of west pier.' ,' Breakwater and excavation of entrance channel to 13 feet.' Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a depth suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. Deepening outer entrance channel to present project depths; removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the inner entrance channel and basin to present project dimensions. Construction of small boat harbor. ERIE HARBOR, PA. (See Section 9 of Text) Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle Peninsula.' Deepening channel and harbor basin to 18 feet; repair and extension of piers; and plant growth and emergency protection work on peninsula. H. Doc. 653, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 983, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 48, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 415, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 89th Cong.. 2d sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1866, pt. IV, p. 155 Annual Report, 1871, p. 214. H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., 1st. sess. H. Doc. 720, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1915, p. 1965. H. Doc. 70, 55th Cong. 1st sess. and Annual,, Report, 1896, p.3237. 32-24 Acts Documents BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts June 15, 1910 Nov. 28, 192220 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 1825" June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193522 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 14, 196030 Work Authorized Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet. Reconveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of Pennsylvania for park purposes. Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, deepening a portion of harbor basin, all to present project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length of 1,200 feet. Protection of the peninsula south of the waterworks settling basin. Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the inner end of the north pier; thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in the remainder of the entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area along the easterly side; and a depth of 28 feet over a 300-foot westward extension of the 25-foot basin."' Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material in approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1935 act is combined with this act as a single improvement. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 10 of Text) Construction of piers. Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. 1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project dimension of east pier; and deepening of harbor to 19 feet. 4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to the United States of $715,000. Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present project dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal of west pier; and construction of bulkhead on west side of river channel. Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turning basin in Grand River to present project dimensions. Dredging of 8-foot river channel. Depth of 29 feet in the approach channel from the lake; a depth of 28 feet over a width of 800 feet in the outer harbor; a depth of 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in Grand River, over a width of 200 feet to the upstream limit of the turning basin, with suitable widening at the bends, thence over widths reducing from 200 to 100 feet to the upstream limit of the existing Federal project, except in the 8-foot channel; enlargement of the turning basin, including deepening of the entire basin to 21 feet; and minor modification of the existing project limits in the outer harbor. Documents Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 61st Cong., 2d sess.. H. Doc. 52, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 345, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 199, 86th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2d sess.4 Annual Report, 1889, pp. 2147-2153 H. Doc. 347, 54th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Reports, 1896, p. 2956; 1903, p. 2084; 1905, p. 2349. H. Doc. 206, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2d sess., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 472, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 79, 74th Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc. 706, 79th Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc. 347, 86th Cong., 2d sess.' 32-25 __ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 10, 1977 (House Public Works Comm.) Oct. 1, 1976 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 193511 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 30, 1852 June 23, 1866 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 3, 1881 June 13, 1902 Construction of small boat harbor. H. Doc. 627, 94th Cong., 2d sess. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 12 of Text) Construction of piers and breakwater.' Extension of piers to 15-foot contour in the lake. Deepening and widening of channel to 18-foot depth and 150-foot width. Widening channel lakeward of piers to 250 feet. Dredging channel to present project dimensions. HURON HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 13 of Text) Extension of west pier; construction of east breakwater; removal of part of old east pier; deepening of channel to 19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east pier; construction of new spur pier; enlargement of sheltered area; and closure of breach at shore end of west pier. Extension of west pier with pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer end of east breakwater and constructing pierhead on new outer end; widening and deepening channel to present project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of channel; shore protection west of west pier; and elimination from project construction of spur pier and dredging sheltered area outside channel linumits. Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin, a detached breakwater, 1,575 feet long 2,000 feet lakeward of outer end of existing west pier; and, abandonment of lakeward end of existing approach channel.3 1 LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 15 of Text) West entrance pier.' Extension of west pier and construction of west breakwater, and dredging channel 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide.' East pier and east breakwater.' Extension of piers lakeward to 15.5-foot contour, and dredging channel to 15.5 feet. Extension of east pier 300 feet lakeward. Annual Report, 1876, pt. II p. 589. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2442. H. Doc. 192, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 72d Cong., 1st sess H. Doc. 122, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., 1st sess.4 Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. Annual Report, 1871, p. 234 Annual Report, 1881, pP 2444 and 2446. Annual Report, 1901, p. 3364. 32-26 TABLE 32-B (Contir Acts Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 na Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 193511 Apr. 20, 1983 July 11, 1870 Mar. 2, 1907 BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT ued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 16 of Text) Breakwaters and extensions of piers to present dimensions. Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue Bridge. Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in outer harbor. Extend breakwaters to present project dimensions. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to Erie Avenue Bridge to 20 feet. Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2. Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock. 12 Approach channel to municipal pier. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 to present project dimensions and extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. Maintenance dredging in Black River from American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 upper end of National Tube Co. dock was authorized Apr. 7, 1934, by Public Works Administration. Enlarging turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock to present project dimensions. Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct extension of east breakwater to shore; remove 300 feet of lakeward end of west breakwater; remove outer 1,100 feet of east pier; deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel to 28 feet, southwesterly portion of outer harbor to 25 feet and river channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near upstream limit of existing project.3 Construct bank of stabilization works at cut numbered 1 along left bank of river channel above Erie Avenue Bridge.' OGDENSBURG HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 18 of Text) Deepening the several channels to 19 feet. Widening upper entrance channel to 400 feet, and city front to 350 feet. Enlarging and deepening lower basin to 21 feet, and removal of elevator wharf. Extend Lower East Entrance Channel, 600 feet west of existing pier to a depth of 27 feet below LWD. Dredged material to be disposed of in dredged disposal area site 5, owned by Ogdensburg Bridge and Port Authority. OSWEGO HARBOR (See Section 19 of Text) Construction of outer west breakwater.' Repair of outer west breakwater under Plan (A).' Documents H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2718. H. Doc. 560, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 644, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 980, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 985, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 587, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 469, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 1st sess.' PL 89-298. H. Doc. 920, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 663, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 266, 72d Cong., 1st sess., 24 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act Annual Report, 1870, pp. 54, 220. and 221. H. Doc. 55, 58th Cong., 2d sess. 32-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17, 1940 June 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 June 10, 1872 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935' Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 June 10, 1872 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Construction of arrowhead breakwaters; deepening outer harbor between arrowhead breakwaters, west outer harbor east of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, and Oswego River north of Seneca St., to 21 feet; and deepening west outer harbor, west of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to 16 feet.26 Widening channel to harbor lines in Oswego River north of Seneca St. Closing gap in west breakwater; deepening west outer harbor, west of east line of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to project depth."3 Construction of east outer breakwater; removal of inner end of east arrowhead breakwater; and dredging channel and basin in east outer harbor.2 7 Construction of detached breakwater at harbor entrance and removal of shoals in approach to harbor entrance to 25 feet deep. Depth of 27 feet in lake approach channel; 25 feet deep in outer harbor channel 800 feet wide from entrance gap to a turning basin 25 feet deep about 750 by 1,100 feet, at mouth of Oswego River; depth of 24 feet in earth and 25 feet in hard material in river channel from turning basin to upstream end of Port of Oswego Authority's east side terminal, a distance of about 1,600 feet; relocation of Federal project limits in Oswego River upstream of 24-foot channel to Federal project limit at north line of West Seneca St., on lines parallel to 50 feet channel ward of established harbor lines; elimination of maintenance of inner west breakwater; and, elimination of modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1948. PORT CLINTON HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 20 of Text) Parallel stone and pile jetties at mouth of river, east jetty 2,200 feet long and west jetty 1,980 feet long extending to 10-foot contour in lake. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide for outer 4,200-foot length and 200 feet wide for inner 800-foot length to Highway Bridge. ROCHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 21 of Text) Construction of piers.' Extension of piers to 15 foot contour in the lake. Concrete superstructure on piers.' Deepening channel to 20 feet. Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to present project dimensions. Maintenance of the existing channel upstream of the Penn Central Co. bridge. Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west pier; a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the ower river to the Penn Central Co. bridge, including the existing turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, an upstream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feet wide adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 22 of Text) East pier and dredging of channel. Extension of east pier and deepening channel to present project dimensions. Realign and extend channel and construct an anchorage basin. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 96, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 722, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 487, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 471, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1875, p. 295 Annual Report, 1874, p. 247. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2437. Annual Report, 1905, p. 2383. H. Doc. 342, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 139, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2d sess.4 Annual Report, 1871, p. 211. H. Doc. 70, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 88th Cong., 2d sess.' 32-28 BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 23 of Text) Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 19352' Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 sept. 3,1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 July 4, 1836 Construction of channel protection works. Widening of straight and dock channels and deepening to 19 feet. Extension of east jetty to total length of 6,000 feet, with pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and easterly portion of dock channels to 21 feet, and westerly portion of dock channel to 20 feet. Deepening of dock channel to 22 feet. Enlargement of turning basin and construction of rock dike. Maintenance of bay channel to 22 feet; and elimination from project of portion of turning basin and rock dike. Extending Moseley channel and deepening that channel and the outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels and deepening to 26 feet; deepening the Straight Channel to 25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to junction with Bay channel; deepening the Bay channel from junction with the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania coal dock No. 3 to 25 feet, thence from outer end of the coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard, with no Federal dredging within 50 feet of the dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 24 of Text) A Channel 400 Feet Wide and 21 Feet Deep from 25-Foot Contour in Maumee Bay to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 Feet Wide and 19 Feet Deep Above that Point and a 500-Foot Turning Basin at Upper End. A stone Revetted Earth Dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Act 1899 Modified to Insure a Navigable Channel to 21 Feet from Fassett Street Bridge to Lake. Channel 25 Feet Deep and 500 Feet Wide from 25- Foot Contour to Mouth of Maumee River (300 Feet Wide on Each Side of Center Dike in Bay Channel), Thence 400 Feet Wide to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 Feet Wide Above That Point and a Turning Basin at Upper End 18 Feet Deep. Widening at Bend of Mouth of River Opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Dock. Removal of Center Dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Enlarge Widening at Bend Opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Dock and Turnmg Basin Opposite American Shipbuilding Co. Dock. Deepen Bay Channel Including Widenings to 28 Feet, Deepen River Channels to New York Central Railroad Bridge to 27 Feet and Construct New Turning Basin Below Anthony Wayne Bridge." VERMILION HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 25 of Text) Parallel piers and dredging channel to 8 feet deep. H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1898, p. 2708. H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2d sees. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 328, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 144, 86th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 198, 55th Cong., 2d Sees. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2693. H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 620, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 436, 84th Cong., 2d sees. H. Doc. 153, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1880, p. 2122. 32-29 Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 32-B (Contib Acts Mar. 3, 1875 Mar. 3, 1905 July 3, 1958 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 (Sec. 101) nued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Deepening of channel to 12 feet. Reconstruction of piers. New entrance formed by two overlapping arrowhead breakwaters and extension of existing river channel upstream to Liberty St. Bridge. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA. (See Section 31 of Text) Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of beach material at waterworks reservation and along remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing structures. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 10-year period. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 5-year period. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of construction of five sections of spaced off-shore breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sandfill. 1. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Widening Cuyahoga River at downstream and of Cut 4 classified inactive. 3. Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. 4. Contains latest published map. 5. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 6. Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief Administration Act of 1935. 7. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock lock was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 8. Classified deferred. 9. Completed under previous projects. 10. Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar. 3, 1905. 11. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 12. Authorized by Public Works Administration Sept. 6, 1933. 13. Previously authorized by Public Works Administration. 14. First Deficiency Appropriation Act approved April 1, 1944. 15. Authorized by Defense Plant Corp., May 19, 1942. 16. Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated from project by 1962 R&H Act. 17. Permit of Secretary of War, Aug. 5, 1927. 18. Modified 1828 and 1852. 19. Extension of north pier portion of this modification was deauthorized Nov. 81. 20. Public 366. 21. Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed under previous projects. 22. Partly included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 23. First supplemental National Defense Appropriation Act, 1944, approved Dec. 23, 1943. 24. Removal of remaining hard-material shoals in lower basin is classified inactive. 25. Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge 1 to and including Old River, classified deferred. 26. Deepening a 200-foot strip alon harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River is classified inactive. 27. Modification eliminated by River and Harbor Act of Oct. 26, 1962. 28. Included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 29. Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers was deauthorized Aug. 82. 30. Modification classified inactive. 31. Construction of breakwater classified deferred. 32. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River channel at Cut 1 classified deferred. 33. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip in west outer harbor deauthorized in May 1981. 34. The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet and turning basin relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. 32-30 Documents Annual Report, 1874, p. 219. H. Doc. 252, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 397, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 796, 93d Cong., 2d sess. -- ____ BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 32-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) Cost to September 30, 1984 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Big (Cunningham) Creek, Ohio' -2 19,763' - Black River Harbor, N.Y.4 -2 42,401 - Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y. 1962 275,082 1,562,206 Cattaraugus Creek, N.Y.5 2 57,410 - Elk Creek Harbor. Pa.6 1978 101,500 - Geneva-on-the-Lake, OH 1983 662,000 - Grasse River (Massena), N.Y.'" 1891 9,0003 - Hamlin Beach Harbor, N.Y.' 1973 72,052 - Kelleys Island, Ohio 1974 '" 129,874 - Little River at Cayuga Island, N.Y.' 1969 46,8043 42,355 Morristown Harbor, N.Y.' 1949 6,221 9,65612 Niagara Remedial Works, N.Y.' 0 1966 6,069,395 510,819 Olcott Harbor, N.Y. 1982 154,687 462,229 Ottawa River Harbor, Michigan and Ohio" 1977 '" 99,000 - Port Bay, N.Y. -- -- - Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y. 1982 810,000 - Pultneyville Harbor, N.Y." 1934 68,219 20,087 Put in Bay, Ohio 19511" 51,609 12,600 Sackets Harbor, N.Y. 1982 25,010 23,985 Sandusky River, Ohio' 1894 58,000' 557 Wilson Harbor, N.Y. 1982 535,246 221,709 1. No commerce reported. 10. Costs of operation and maintenance of this project 2. Only information available is in index to reports of will be settled directly by concerned power agencies. No fur- Chief of Engineers. ther appropriations will be made to this project. 3. Amount includes maintenance; not separable. 11. Includes local interests contribution of $27,563. 4. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th 12. Includes local interests contribution of $5,000. Cong., 1st Sess. 13. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 375, 64th 5. Abandonment recommended in Ex. Doc. 16, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. Cong., 1st Sess. 14. Project classified inactive. 6. Project classified deferred. 15. Annual Report for Detroit District. 7. Channel improved by local interests. 16. Construction of compensating works as authorized 8. Includes local interests' contribution of $25,742. by 1930 R&H Act was deauthorized by Congress in August 9. Completed. 1977. TABLE 32-D NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 29 of Text) Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Study Identification Cooley Canal, Lucas Cty., OH Edgewater Marina, Cleveland, OH Huron Harbor, OH Lake Erie, Sturgeon Point, NY Lorain Small Boat Harbor, OH NFTA -Sm Boat Hbr, Buffalo, NY Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. South Michigan Ave. Bridge, Buffalo, N.Y. Toussaint River, Carrol Twsp, OH Fiscal Year Cost $104,817 59,938 20,409 44,730 9,560 51,763 317,647 2,305 7,787 32-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 32-D (Continued) NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects (Section 111, Public Law 90-483) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost Cleveland Harbor, OH $5,677 Conneaut Harbor, OH 3,584 Harbor Island Beach, West Harbor, OH 5,613 Huron Harbor, OH 1,786 TABLE 32-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 32 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cleveland and Lakewood, Ohio: Edgewater Park' White City Park' Fair Haven Beach State Park, Lake Ontario, N.Y.2 Fort Niagara State Park, N.Y.3 Hamlin Beach State Park, N.Y.' Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, N.Y." 1976 1963 $1,769,600 58,978 $2,946 1. Project authorized by River and Harbor Act of September 3, 1954 is classified as deferred. 2. Project authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1958 is classified as deferred. 3. Project authorized under provisions of Section 201, 1965 Flood Control Act has been reclassified to active. 4. Federal participation was limited to one-third of first cost when project was authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act. Federal participation was changed from one-third to 70 percent of remaining work under Public Law 87-874. Uncompleted portion of project is classified as deferred. 5. Project completed. 32-32 BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 32-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 45 of Text) For Last Full Report Project See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Auburn, N.Y. Owasco Outlet' Batavia and vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, N.Y.' Caledonia, Genesee River, N.Y. Cainp Perry, Ohio' Chittenango Creek and tributaries, N.Y. 2,3 Eastlake, Ohio, Chagrin River3 Fremont, Ohio, Sandusky River' Ithaca, N.Y., Cayuga Inlet' Lackawanna, N.Y., Smokes Creek' Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, N.Y.' Marsh Creek, Geneva, N.Y.5 Montour Falls, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.' Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, N.Y." 5 Ottawa, Ohio Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, N.Y.' Red Creek, N.Y.3 Reno Beach-Howard Farms, Lucas County, Ohio Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.' Warsaw, N.Y., Oatka Creek'"5 Wellsville, N.Y., Genesee River' 1962 1957 1950 196712 1948 1976 1976 1978 1971 1954 1954 1964 196712 1950 1975 195312 1954 1969 1978 371,9858 335,385 275,000"11 12,464 506,344 8,589,824'1 3,929,330" 3,542,0688 797,300 226,429 1,681,785 330,231 281,559 361,241 154,467 3,349,248 558,3173" 3,145,303' 1. Completed. 2. Local interests required to contribute $25,000. 3. Project not considered economically justified and is inactive. 4. Inactive portion of work for State ditch has been done by local interests and work on Crane Brook has been deferred at the request of local interests. 5. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 6. Excludes costs of $188,732 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to Storm Agnes, June 1972. 7. Excludes costs of $6,766 under Public Law 84-99, red Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incur- red for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to Storm Agnes, June 1972. 8. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. 9. Excludes costs of $26,807 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 10. Includes local interests contribution of $6,944. Excludes costs of $383,786 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency restoration of levees damaged during 1973. 11. Includes local interests contribution of $125,000. 12. Annual Report for Detroit District. 13. Includes local interests contribution of $99,000. Excludes costs of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 14. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. Excludes costs of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storms. 32-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 32-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 46 of Text) Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, NY ........ Butternut Creek, Dewitt, NY ........... Cazenovia Creek, Buffalo, NY ........... Chagrin River, Willoughby Hills, OH ..... Conesus Lake,Livonia, NY ............. Euclid Creek, OH ..................... Glen Brook Flume, Hammondsport, NY.. Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, NY ...... Maumee River, Defiance, OH .......... Oneida Creek, Oneida, NY .............. St. Regis River, Hogansburg, NY ....... Swan Creek, Toledo, OH ................ W. Br. Limestone Creek, Manlius,NY ... Whites Landing and Crystal Rock, OH... Fiscal Year Cost ........ ...$ 258 46,722 205,700 68,022 59,834 .. . 1,541,480 5,254 116,237 56,029 . .10,138 4 63,899 4,930 13,000 Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., as amended by Sec. 206 of Flood Control Act of 1962) Project Federal Cost D isaster preparedness ............. .............. ................. ................... .. $170,252 Emergency operations ..................... ............ .. .......... ........... 55,.9..0..1...... TOTAL .................................................... ................ 176,153 Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control. (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, PL. 780, 83rd Cong. Project and location Eighteen-Mile Creek, Hamburg, NY. Fiscal Year Cost $24,564 Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Study Identification Blanchard River, Ottawa, OH ........ Chagrin River, Gates Mills, OH ..... CR 48, Amity, NY ................. Cuyahoga River, Akron, OH (Bridge). Cuyahoga River, Akron, OH (Sewer).. Euclid General Hospital, OH ....... Genesee River, Amity, NY .......... Genesee River, E. River Rd., NY ...... Genesee River, Lattice Rd. Bridge, NY State Route 163, Marblehead, OH ... Lk Ontario State Pkwy, Kendall, NY.. Little Elk Creek, Girard, PA ......... St. Joseph HS, Euclid, OH ........... Wendt Beach Pk, Evans, NY ......... Fiscal Year Cost $ 73,930 31,167 .7,500 .33,658 S44,723 S27,634 . 1,579 ....7,500 ..... 8 11,749 .231,931 163,021 182,503' .14,007 'Does not include $119.667 in contributed funds 32-34 BUFFALO, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 32-H DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 47 of Text) For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act' 1962 Aug 1977 - - Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1954 R&H Act 1962 May 1981 - - Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&H Act 1968' Nov 1979 - - Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1977 - - Erie Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act 1963 Nov 1981 - - Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1982 -- - Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 Aug 1977 $ 1,524- Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1962 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1977 -- Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 FC Act 1951 Nov 1983 29,000- Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug 1977 8,159- Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug 1977 12,300- Maumee River, Above Toledo, OH 1872 Act 19711 Nov 1977 12,000- Niagara River, Compensating Works, NY 1930 R&H Act 1964 Aug 1977 - - Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act 2 1963 May 1981 - - Sackets Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 May 1981 19,010- Sheffield Lake Community Park, OH 1962 R&H Act - Aug 1977 - - Watkins Glen, NY 1941 FC Act 1958 Aug 1977 43,182 - Extension of guide pier only; other improvements completed. Deepening of west outer harbor; other improvements completed. Annual Report for Detroit District. 32-35 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT * This district (total area, about 226,000 square miles) mprises those drainage basins tributary to the Pacific fean that are in California between the Mexican hundary and Cape San Martin (about 265 miles north f entrance to Los Angeles Harbor); lower Colorado iverdrainage basin (below Lee Ferry, AZ), which is in mitheastern California, southeastern Nevada, southwestern Utah, western New Mexico, and all of Arizona, except the northeastern corner; that part of the Great Basin that is in southern Nevada and southeastern California; and the United States parts of those small drainage basins in southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico west of the Continental Divide that drain southward into Mexico. IMPROVEMENTS ligation 1, Channel Islands Harbor, CA .......... . Dana Point Harbor, CA ............... SLos Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, CA .......................... 4 Morro Bay Harbor, CA ................ 5 Oceanside Harbor, CA ................ SPort Hueneme, CA ................... SPort San Luis, CA ............ . L Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA .......................... SSan Diego Harbor, CA ....... . 10 San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA ............................. iL Santa Barbara Harbor, CA ............ SVentura Marina (Ventura Harbor), CA ......................... 1 Reconnaissance and condition surveys ............................... Page 33-2 33-2 33-3 33-3 33-3 33-4 33-4 33-5 33-5 33-5 33-5 33-6 33-6 each Erosion Control SImperial Beach, San Diego County, CA ........................... 33-6 SSan Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA.......................33-6 1od Control SAlamo Lake, Bill Williams SRiver, AZ ............................ 33-6 1 Allenville, AZ ........................ 33-7 Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA ..................... 33-7 Gila River Basin, AZ: ................ 33-7 AIndian Bend Wash, AZ ............... 33-7 *Painted Rock Dam (Gila SRiver), AZ ............................ 33-7 .hoenlixA,NZ, Randivicinity (including New River) ................ 33-8 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 19D. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ ........................... 33-8 20. Los Angeles County drainage area, CA ............................ 33-8 21. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA ..................... 33-9 22. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV ............. 33-9 23. San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel, Santa Ana River Basin, CA ................. 33-9 24. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA ................... 33-9 25. Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, CA ......... 33-10 26. Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, CA ................. 33-10 27. Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, CA ...................... 33-10 28. Inspection of completed flood control projects ....................... 33-10 29. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations ............................ 33-10 30. Flood control work under special authorization .................. 33-11 General Investigations 31. Surveys ............................. 33-11 32. Collection and study of basic data ................................. 33-11 33. Research and development ........... 33-11 34. Continuation of planning and engineering ...................... 33-11 34A. Holbrook levee, Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ ....... 33-11 34B. Santa Ana River main stemincluding Santiago Creek and Oak Street Drain, Santa Ana River Basin, CA ........................... 33-11 33-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 General Investigations (Cont'd) Page 35. Advance engineering and design ................................ 33-12 35A. Goleta, CA, and vicinity, Santa Barbara County ............... 33-12 35B. San Luis Rey River, San Luis River Basin, CA ..................... 33-12 Tables Table 33-A Table 33-B Table 33-C Table 33-D Table 33-E Cost and financial statement .................... 33-13 Authorizing legislation ................. 33-18 Other authorized navigation projects ........... 33-24 Other authorized beach erosion control projects ............... 33-24 Other authorized flood control projects .............. 33-25 Tables (Cont'd) Page Table 33-F Not applicable Table 33-G Deauthorized projects ........ 33-26 Table 33-H Reconnaissance and condition surveys ............ 33-27 Table 33-I Los Angeles County drainage area, CA: Latest approved estimated first costs for all units of improvement under existing project ............. 33-27 Table 33-J Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA: Lasted approved estimated Federal first cost for all units ......................... 33-29 Table 33-K Flood control work under special authorization ........... 33-29 Navigation 1. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California about a mile northwest of existing harbor of Port Hueneme, 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor, and 345 miles south of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5007 and 5202.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two thousand and six hundred boat slips in 9 marinas, with restroom and shower facilities; dry storage area for 300 boats with 3-ton and 1-ton hoist facilities; 2 marine construction and repair yards with 5-ton travel lift and 35-ton hoist to 70-ton boatway haulout capacities; a fuel dock facility; a sportfishing complex; 6 restaurants; 2 coffee shops; 800 waterfront apartments-many with adjoining slips; 300 motel units; 4 yacht club buildings; 3 public convenience docks; a 66-slip guest boat complex; a harbor administration building/harbor patrol office and dock complex; a marine emporium complex, housing a chandlery store, a sail loft, a delicatessen, a fishing tackle shop, yacht sales, an underwater repair service, and an adjacent dock complex; a 7-lane free access public launch ramp, with paved pay parking for cars and trailers; a boaters' convenience center; a commercial fishing pier and hoist; 2 large public parks; a fire station; and a U.S. Coast Guard station. Waterwayconnected and north of the harbor is Mandalay Bay, a private keys-type waterfront homes development with an area for about 500 homes and connected dockage for boats. Transition from harbor to Mandalay Bay is restricted by a 4-lane high-rise bridge with a clearance height of 29 feet at high tide. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated and completed maintenance dredging of sand trap and entrance channel in May 1984 at a cost of $1,780,726 regula' funds and $445,799 Navy funds. 2. DANA POINT HARBOR, CA Location. On Pacific coast in southern part of Orange County, about 40 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, 60 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and 17 miles southeast of Newport Beach Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5101.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1972. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1972. Terminal facilities. Since 1956, Orange County Harbor District has acquired all necessary rightsof way and has constructed or caused to be constructed the following terminal facilities, with 102 acres of level land support area and utilities: a fuel dock, with sWll craft sanitary holding tank pump-out station; dry stor age for about 400 boats; a concrete launching ramp with 15 lanes for trailered boats and 546 paved parking spaces for cars and trailers; sport-fishing landin restaurants; marine hardware and ship stores; ahotel' concrete trestle pier; boat slips for about 2,500 perms. nently moored boats and for visitors; a picnic area public beach; a harbor patrol office, with emerges d helicopter landing pad, guest docking faciliti' aP small craft sanitary holding tank pump-out stati coffee shops; specialty stores; a boat repair yard; ublic Studies Institute; a boat rental concession; and aP ub youth group center, with docking facilities, classroom and meeting rooms. 33-2 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Initiated and completed maintenance repair of west breakwater in January 1984 at a cost of $420,793 regular funds. 8. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA Location. On coast of southern California in San Pedro Bay about 25 miles south of City of Los Angeles, about 96 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and about 410 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5147.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A stone breakwater 11,152 feet long (San Pedro breakwater) extending eastward from Point Fermin; a stone-and-earth detached breakwater 18,500 feet long (middle breakwater); a stone-and-earth detached breakwater 13,350 feet long (Long Beach treakwater); maintenance of original Long Beach breakwater south of outer end of pier A (now an integral part opier A as extended); an entrance channel 1,000 feet wide and 45 feet deep to outer Los Angeles Harbor, with Sturning basin 3,500 feet long and 1,500 feet wide of amne depth opposite end of pier 1, and enlargement of entrance to inner harbor by dredging to a depth of 45 feet a triangular area at junction of inner harbor with this turning basin; irregular anchorage areas (areas A and B) 40 feet deep adjacent to 45-foot-depth entrance Channel; an inner harbor channel (Los Angeles channel) feet deep and 1,000 feet wide, with a turning basin at Snorth extremity 45 feet deep; a channel (East Basin nel) 45 feet deep and 650 feet wide extending from ning basin to slip 5; a channel (Cerritos channel) 45 deep and 400 feet wide from slip 5 to a turning basin 1lng Beach inner harbor; a turning basin 35 feet p in Long Beach inner harbor; tLong an entrance channel Beach inner harbor 35 feet deep and 300 to 500 Bfwai dsee; ttling basin at mouth of Los Angeles River dVersion channel, dredged material to be deposited on besaersciohn es eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; a silt- channel (Los Angeles River) for protection of Angeles and Long Beach Harbors; and maintenance Vtire project, except silt-diversion channel. Dredging a depth of 35 feet in East Basin was authorized as a ification of existing project in 1954. Dredging to a Sof 35 feet in West Basin was authorized as a r modification of existing project in 1960. As ized in 1976, existing project was further modified PrOVide for depths of 45 feet in all inner harbor 4 nels and basins of Los Angeles Harbor and in the Angeles entrance channel, and to provide mainte- 4e for the new dimensions. Plane of reference is lower low water. Range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 5.5 feet. Extreme is about 10 feet. Latest approved estimated (1981) cost for project as modified is $65,316,000, com- ,b:5 $30,545,000 Federal (including $45,000 for uuard costs) and $34,771,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. See page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981 for requirements under the terms of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Terminal facilities. In Los Angeles Harbor, 83,978 feet of wharves, of which 76,971 feet are owned by the city and 7,007 feet are owned by private interests. In Long Beach Harbor, 58,560 feet of wharves, of which 51,350 feet are owned by the city and 7,210 feet are owned by private interests. In Long Beach Harbor, Federal Government owns 19,700 feet of waterfront inside the Navy mole, exclusive of finger piers. Operations during fiscal year. Completed contract payment for channel and basin dredging (1976 modification of existing project) at a cost of $80,057 required contributed funds and $92,341 other contributed funds. Initiated and completed maintenance repair (phase 1) of San Pedro breakwater in December 1983 at a cost of $1,785,027 regular funds. Awarded contract in September 1984 for maintenance repair (phase 2) of San Pedro breakwater. 4. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 110 miles south of Monterey Bay, 120 miles northwest of Santa Barbara Harbor, and nearly midway between San Francisco and Los Angeles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5387.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. None required under rehabilitation plan. Terminal facilities. Facilities, which are adequate for existing commerce, comprise 640 feet of existing piers constructed by Navy; 550 feet of piers and 150 feet of floating docks constructed by San Luis Obispo County; 263 feet of floating docks constructed by California Department of Parks and Recreation; 1,396 feet of floating docks constructed by City of Morro Bay; 1,398 feet of privately owned piers; and 5,435 feet of privately owned floating docks. Operations during fiscal year. Awarded contract for and initiated maintenance repair of north and south breakwaters, which is about 86 percent complete, at a cost of $1,524,988 regular funds. Awarded contract in September 1984 for maintenance dredging. 5. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California at Oceanside, about 30 miles north of City of San Diego. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5101.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for maintenance to date. 33-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Terminal facilities. Berthing for 875 boats (735 slips, 77 side-ties, 47 visitors slips, and 6 dry storage spaces at Oceanside Marine Center); a fuel dock; a boat hoist; a launching ramp, which can accommodate 4 launchings at the same time; parking for 1,732 cars, with temporary parking for about 141 boat trailers; a boat-repair facility; a pump-out facility; a Coast Guard cutter; restaurants; retail stores; yacht brokers; a boatel/- motel; condominiums; and a sport-fishing facility. Operations during fiscal year. Awarded contract for, initiated, and completed maintenance dredging in January 1984 at a cost of $746,074 regular funds and $608,973 Navy funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $1,867. 6. PORT HUENEME, CA Location. On coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, about 1 mile southeast of Channel Islands Harbor, immediately west of the City of Port Hueneme, 4 miles southwest of the City of Oxnard, and 10 miles southeast of the City of Ventura. Existing project. Plan provides for adoption and maintenance of existing harbor for deep-draft vessels at Port Hueneme, constructed by local interests and subsequently acquired by the U.S. Navy, consisting of a west jetty about 800 feet long; an east jetty about 1,000 feet long; an approach channel about 800 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 40 feet deep; an entrance channel about 1,550 feet long, 330 feet wide, and 36 feet deep; a central basin 1,080 feet long, 1,025 feet wide, and 32 feet deep; and a channel (channel A) 1,850 feet long, 150 feet wide, and 32 feet deep. It further provides that the central basin be deepened to 35 feet and that channel A be improved by lengthening it to 2,830 feet, widening it to 275 feet, and deepening it to 35 feet. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.4 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Approved estimated (1984) first cost for project is $4,801,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $3,561,000 Federal and $1,240,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1976. Terminal facilities. Oxnard Harbor District owns and operates terminal facilities known as the Port of H ueneme. Two commercial deep-water concrete wharves provide berthing space for vessels of 35-foot draft at mean lower low water; and two wood utility wharves provide 250 feet of berthing space for vessels of 18-foot draft at mean lower low water. Ancillary facilities include extensive paved and unpaved open storage areas; two clear span transit sheds and a warehouse provide 125,000 square feet of covered storage area, with ample rail and truck loading capability; and an administration building. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated and com. pleted maintenance dredging in May 1984 at a costaf $1,030,458 regular funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $343 7. PORT SAN LUIS, CA Location. On coast of southern California at San Lois Obispo, 190 miles northwest of Los Angeles and 245 miles southeast of San Francisco. (See Coast and G detic Survey Chart 5386.) Existing project. A rubblemound breakwater with top elevation of 6 feet above mean high water, a top width of 20 feet, extending 336 feet from Point San Lois to Whaler Island and 1,820 feet southeast from the island, a total distance, including the island, of 2,401 feet. The authorized project, as modified in 1893and 1898, was completed in August 1913. As authorizedin 1965, existing project was renamed Port San Luis, CA and modified to provide for rehabilitation of existinS breakwater and construction of a 1,500-foot extension; construction of a detached breakwater 4,000 feet long removal of rock pinnacles; and dredging. Modification of existing project was authorized by Chief of Engine in August 1970 and further modification was authoris in October 1976, as follows: a south breakwater 750feet long; a detached breakwater 3,615 feet long; a mna~ channel 200 to 300 feet wide, 4,100 feet long, and 15f0 deep; a southern entrance channel 200 feet wide, 40 feet long, and 15 feet deep; a northern entrance channel 200 feet wide, 700 feet long, and 15 feet deep; anchor* area A 15 feet deep; anchorage area B 12 to 15 feetdeeP refuge area A 15 feet deep; and refuge area B 12f deep. Plane of reference is mean lower low wat Range between mean lower low water and mean high high water is 5.3 feet. Extreme range is about 10f. Approved estimated (1984) first cost for the modifi project is $20,942,000, comprising $11,442,000 Fede (including $42,000 for U.S. Coast Guard expenses)d $9,500,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan Is "Supplement No. 1 to Design MemorandumNoN General Design for Port San Luis, California,"prep by Los Angeles District in April 1976. Local cooperation. Requirements are described 1 full on page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1977. Terminal facilities. A commercial and recreati0o pier (Hartford), and a recreational pier (Avila), o operated by Port San Luis Harbor District; an ld handling pier operated by Union Oil Co.; a duIalr 7-ton limit, small-craft launcher; a 90-foot floatei work dock (seasonal), with electricity and wat6 12,000 gallon diesel facility (Hartford pier); Elea capacity mobile boat hoist; a Pacific Gas and Eor Co. barge landing (nuclear reactor loading plato _, 5-acre parking area; marine supply; a restaurant boat and maintenance yard; and a harbor office. Operations during fiscal year. Completed U'a nance repair of breakwater in January 1984 at a $406,720 regular funds. 33-4 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 8. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Location. On coast of southern California in sout :rn (downcoast) part of Santa Monica Bay about 18 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors and about 417 miles southeast of San Francisco Bay. gee Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5101 and 5144.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of 3 boat basins containing 1,500 small boat slips; outer harbor containing 120 moorings; fuel docks; sewage pump-out station; 3 boat hoists; launching ramp for hand carried boats; boat repair facilities; marine hardware stores; sport-fishing pier, with facilities for the on- and off-loading of lssengers from vessels for hire; and a commercial/ recreational/fishing pier adjacent to the harbor facili- ~Operations during fiscal year. Initiated and commaintenance repair of north breakwater in _eember 1983 at a cost of $218,382 regular funds. SSAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California just north OUnited States-Mexico boundary line, about 109 miles CMatht east of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. (See and Geodetic Survey Chart 5107.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1976 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1642 of Annual port for 1938. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual R0rt for 1980. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in 6on page 33-5 of Annual Report for 1980. Terminal facilities. Consist of 45,070 feet of wharves, exesive of Government-owned wharves, of which 1,070 feet are Port District owned and 24,000 feet are rivately owned. Government-owned wharves at North and are restricted to military use only. Operations during fiscal year. Awarded contract Sinitated, and completed maintenance repair of leound jetty on Zuniga Shoal in March 1984 at a n$s 401,230 regular funds. In addition, a reconand condition survey was conducted at a cost 10. AN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAy, CA an The San Diego River has its source on the in the Cuyamaca Mountains near Santa P ,. iCAa, nd flows southwestward 52 miles to the a, r oisu acedajna caetn tt hteo tChiet yo uotfl eSt aonf tDheie Sgaon. MDiiesgsioo n Bay River, 77 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors and 8 miles north of San Diego Harbor. Existing project. A leveed flood channel 800 feet wide, with a capacity of 115,000 cubic feet per second, from 0.4 mile above Morena Boulevard, 3.3 miles directly to the ocean; an altered railroad bridge over the leveed river flood channel; an entrance channel about 5,200 feet long, 670 feet wide, and 20 to 25 feet deep into Mission Bay; in the bay, a main channel and turning basin about 2,700 feet long, 1,000 feet wide, and 20 feet deep, and two anchorage basins, one about 3,200 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 15 feet deep, and the other about 1,600 feet long, ranging from 800 to 1,800 feet wide, and 20 feet deep; three jetties at the entrance; and stone revetment for the banks of the entrance and main channels and turning basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 4.4 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Approved estimated (1984) first cost is $37,300,000 ($19,800,000 Federal and $17,500,000 non- Federal). This project modified the flood control project: "San Diego River Basin, California." (See H. Doc. 635, 77th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None, with the exception of mooring facilities for recreational craft and commercial sport-fishing boats only. Operations during fiscal year. Continued preparation of supplemental project plan, which is about 98 percent complete. Continued preparation of environmental assessment, which is about 98 percent complete. Awarded contract for, initiated, and completed maintenance dredging in April 1984 at a cost of $944,291 regular funds. Awarded contract for, initiated, and completed maintenance repair of rock revetment in Mariners Basin in September 1984 at a cost of $1,984,846 regular funds. 11. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 320 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5261.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. See page 1015 of Annual Report for 1969 for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized modification of existing project. Terminal facilities. A wharf 2,000 feet long; a pier 325 feet long in harbor for tie-up mooring for Coast Guard cutter; a landing float; an open mooring and slip anchorage for small craft; and a launching ramp for small craft. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated maintenance dredging, which is about 70 percent complete, at a cost of $583,375 regular funds. 33-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 12. VENTURA MARINA (VENTURA HARBOR), CA Location. On coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of the City of Los Angeles, about 70 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, and about 6 miles northwest of Channel Islands Harbor. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two fuel docks; guest berthing docks; 3 boat-repair facilities, 1 full service with a 60- ton travelift, 1 full service with a 150-ton marine elevator, and 1 do-it-yourself boatyard with a 20-ton travelift; Fisherman's Pier, with 3 50-ton jib cranes for off-loading commercial fishing vessels; flake ice manufacturing and distribution system; 3 wholesale fish buying stations; a retail fish market and seafood restaurant; offshore oil industry crew transportation; 1,800 boat slips; a mast up dry storage area for 112 trailerable boats; a 6-lane deluxe launch ramp; 2 yacht clubs; restaurants; cocktail lounges; sport-fishing facilities; harbor and offshore islands excursion boats; 3 yacht sales; marine communications sales and services; 3 marine chandleries; 2 public restroom buildings; a harbor administration building/harbor master's office; a headquarters/visitor's center for Channel Islands National Park; marine related ancillary businesses, including a convenience grocery store, a marine bookstore, a dive shop, gift shops, and a jewelry store; and a 230-room resort and time-share hotel. Operations during fiscal year. Awarded contract for, initiated, and completed emergency maintenance dredging of entrance channel and sand trap in July 1984 at a cost of $681,268 regular funds. Awarded contract in September 1984 for maintenance dredging of entrance channel and sand trap. 13. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See table 33-H. Beach Erosion Control 14. IMPERIAL BEACH, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA Location. On coast of southern California at Imperial Beach in San Diego County. Existing project. Plan as modified by Chief of Engineers in August 1979 provides for a submerged offshore breakwater about 5,000 feet long, extending southward from northern groin; extension of northern groin about 100 feet to connect with breakwater; and a groin about 600 feet long from shoreline to southern end of breakwater. Latest approved estimated (1983) first cost for project as modified is $5,880,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $3,340,000 Federal and $2,540,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 4, General Design Memorandum, Imperial Beach Erosion Control Project, San Diego County, California," prepared by Los Angeles District in Sep tember 1978. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-6 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed prepara. tion of plans and specifications in March 1984. 15. SAN GABRIEL RIVER TO NEWPORT BAY (SURFSIDE-SUNSET AND NEWPORT BEACH), ORANGE COUNTY, CA Location. Along the coast of southern California for about 17 miles from Anaheim Bay Harbor downcoastto Newport Bay Harbor. Existing project. Original authorized project provided for a single detached offshore rubblemound breakwater, located along the minus 24-foot contour just upcoast from the Newport Beach fishing pier, and the deposition of about 3,000,000 cubic yards of suitable beach-building material along the shoreline in the vicinity of Surfside-Sunset Beach to provide a protective beach. Existing project was modified in September 1963 by Chief of Engineers, as follows: (a) Consider south limit of project to be west jetty at entrance to Newport Harbor; (b) construct offshore breakwater, for entrapping sand in littoral movement, near mouthof the Santa Ana River. Periodically transport this en trapped sand to Surfside area to replenish that beach and (c) construct a groin as an extension of south jettyof the Santa Ana River to compartmentalize beach from this area to Newport pier. Construct additional struc tures and fills in this area at such time and in such locations, as required, to retain existing beach. ApprOv estimated (1984) first cost for modified project I $43,700,000 ($29,200,000 Federal and $14 ,500,000n0r Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1979. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated and co0m pleted stage 8 construction, which consisted of placement of beach fill on Surfside-Sunset Beach, in May 1984,_j cost of $2,968,405 regular funds and $1,447,577 reqUim contributed funds. Flood Control 16. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Location. About 70 miles southeast of Kin i'lli in a narrow gorge at river mile 39 on Bill River, AZ, a tributary of Colorado River. Existing project. For details, see page 33-7 ofA Report for 1981. 33-6 - -- I~ - LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. 17. ALLENVILLE, AZ Location. On Gila River 1.5 miles south of Buckeye and 35 miles west of Phoenix, Maricopa County, AZ. Existing project. A 60-acre tract near intersection of Interstate 10 and Palo Verde Road, about 8 miles northwest of Buckeye, AZ, with streets, utilities, community center, park, and houses. First cost of new work forcompleted project was $3,187,965 ($3,000,000 Federal and $187,965 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-7 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed contract payment for construction of buildings, grounds, and utilities at a cost of $53,039 regular funds. 18. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Location. In and near the Cities of Upland, Rancho CUcamonga, and Ontario, and the communities of Alta Lana and San Antonio Heights, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, CA. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a debris basin on Cucamonga Creek and a concrete cmnnel along Cucamonga Creek from the debris basin to Prado Dam; an improved San Antonio Heights diversion system that would include 6 debris basins and 'Concrete diversion channel to divert West Cucamonga Creek headwaters into Cucamonga Creek; a collection hwee and a debris basin downstream from Demens, Torpe, and Angalls Canyons and a concrete outlet anel from the debris basin to Cucamonga Creek; a debris basin in Deer Canyon and a channel along Deer Creek from the debris basin to Cucamonga Creek; the Hillside debris basin in a canyon just west of Deer P"aPnryoovn emweitnht an outlet channel to Deer Creek channel; of an existing levee system along the west bnk of Day Creek to assure that flows from Day Cln yon do not enter Deer Creek channel; turnouts to tiate ground water basin recharge losses; landscap- .aPropriate for esthetic treatment; and recreational CIltied in the project area. Subdrainage woul e provided along specific reaches of the channels. Latest .117,gestimated (1983) first cost for modified project tiothr,000 (includes allowance for estimated infla- 1ithnrough construction period), comprising of ,000 Federal and $23,956,000 non-Federal. Map 0etier.d plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 2, al Design for Flood Control and Recreation, onga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, San dino and Riverside Counties, California, preby L~os Angeles District in June 1973. fraon lp aCgeo o3p3e-7r aotfio An.n nRueaql uRireepmoertn tfso r a1re9 8d1e. scribed in Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of eleventh contract, erosion control of Cucamonga and Demens Creeks channels (part 1), in May 1984. Continued construction of twelfth contract, erosion control of Deer Creek and Hillside channels, which is about 99 percent complete. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for thirteenth contract, erosion control of Cucamonga and Demens Creeks channels (part 2), in July 1984. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for fourteenth contract, erosion control of Cucamonga and Deer Creeks, which are about 95 percent complete. Administered rights-ofway acquisition continued by local interests. Costs for construction of channels were $783,222 regular funds and $5,252 other contributed funds. 19. GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ 19A. INDIAN BEND WASH, AZ Location. On Indian Bend Wash in Scottsdale and Tempe, AZ. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a greenbelt floodway with an unlined inlet channel, including an unlined interceptor channel, a siphon to carry Arizona Canal irrigation waters under Indian Bend Wash, and a wasteway structure to discharge floodwaters from the canal into the inlet channel; an unlined outlet channel to discharge floodwaters into the Salt River; a collector and side channels system to relieve ponding west of the Arizona Canal; beautification; and recreational facilities. Design flood of 30,000 cubic feet per second would be controlled by improvements. Latest approved estimated (1982) first cost for modified project is $45,130,000 ($34,400,000 Federal and $10,730,000 non-Federal). Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design Memorandum Phase II, Project Design for Indian Bend Wash, Arizona," prepared by Los Angeles District in May 1975. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Continued construction of tenth contract, reach 4 of side channels system, which is about 95 percent complete. Initiated and completed construction of eleventh contract, esthetic treatment of inlet channel, in April 1984. Costs for construction of channels were $1,749,012 regular funds and $435,971 other contributed funds; and cost for construction of recreational facilities was $6,564 regular fpulentdesd. bAy dlmocianl isintetreerdes tsr.ights-of-way acquisition com- 19B. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), AZ Location. On Gila River (mile 126) about 20 miles downstream from Gila Bend, AZ, in Gila River Basin, which is a part of Colorado River Basin. 33-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. For details, see page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. 19C. PHOENIX, AZ, AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER) Location. On Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, Dreamy Draw, New River, and Agua Fria River in and adjacent to metropolitan Phoenix, AZ. Existing project. Plan as modified by Division Engineer, South Pacific Division, in July 1977, provides for four dams and detention basins, one each on Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; Arizona Canal diversion channel; channel improvements on Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; flowage easements with some floodproofing along Skunk Creek and New and Agua Fria Rivers; flood plain management along Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; and recreational facilities. Approved estimated (1984) first cost for modified project is $462,488,000 (full funding estimate and includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $269,298,000 Federal and $193,190,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 3, General Design Memorandum-Phase I, Plan Formulation for New River and Phoenix City Streams, Arizona," prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1976. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of Skunk Creek channels and levees in October 1983. Initiated construction of New River Dam, which is about 85 percent complete. Awarded contract for and initiated construction of recreational facilities at Dreamy Draw Dam, which is about 89 percent complete. Cost for construction of channels was $6,446 regular funds. Cost for construction of levees was $40,000 regular funds. Costs for construction of dam were $7,519,532 regular funds and $152,120 required contributed funds; for reservoir, $656,544 regular funds and $15,456 required contributed funds; for roads, railroads, and bridges, $172,715 regular funds and $28,636 required contributed funds; for buildings, grounds, and utilities, $40,448 regular funds and $952 required contributed funds; and for recreational facilities, $266,382 regular funds and $266,382 required contributed funds. Continued preparation of part 4 of project plan, phase II, Skunk Creek and New and Agua Fria Rivers, which is about 50 percent complete. Continued preparation of part 5 of project plan, phase II, Arizona Canal diversion channel, which is about 90 percent complete. Completed preparation of master plan for Adobe Dam. Administered rights-of-way acquisition continued by local interests. 19D. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, AZ Location. On Queen Creek, AZ, a tributary of Gila River, about 10 miles west of Superior, AZ. Existing project. For details, see page 33-10 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated preparation of water control manual. Maintained dam in goot operating condition; continued acquisition of rights-of. way; and administered real estate. 20. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Location. Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek, and tributaries thereof in Los Angeles County, CA. Previous project. For details, see pages 1768 to1772 of Annual Report for 1941; page 1602 of Annual Repod for 1942; and page 1535 of Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Plan provides for flood control improvements in four stream basins in Los Angels County, CA, as follows: Los Angeles River Basin, San Gabriel River Basin, Rio Hondo Basin, and Ballons Creek Basin. Provides for protection of about 325,0 acres in densely populated Los Angeles County, includ ing areas in Los Angeles, Pasadena, Glendale, Burbank and other cities. Plan provides for construction of5 flood control dams (Hansen, Lopez, Santa Fe, Sepulved and Whittier Narrows); debris basins at mouths of25 canyons; channel improvements along 101.3 mileOf Los Angeles River, San Gabriel River, Rio Hondo,ando Ballona Creek; and channel improvements along 1938 miles of tributary channels. All units of improvement are physically completed in those four stream basi except the one listed below, and are described in An Report for 1962. A rehabilitation plan was approved in May 1984r rehabilitation plan provides for restoring deteriorB portions of the Los Angeles River channel along a' mile reach from Lankershim Boulevard to Stewat Gray Road, and for repairing and improving theL Angeles River channel along a 1-mile reach up.strId from Sepulveda Dam in the vicinity of Balboa BlouDV A map of the rehabilitation plan is in "General on' Memorandum, Los Angeles River Rehabilitation the Major Rehabilitation Program," dated Janhl: 1984 and revised in March 1984. Unit of improvement not physically completed i Hondo Basin is Sierra Madre Wash. Plan provil t the construction of about 0.8 mile of concrete chaniti Sierra Madre Wash extending from inlet to e iS Santa Anita Wash channel. (See table 33-I forit approved estimated (1976) first costs for all uJfl improvement under existing project.) 33-8 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-11 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Operations for units in Los Angeles River Basin: (a) Compton Creek: Maintained channel in good operating condition from Alameda Street to Hooper Avenue storm drain. (b) Haines Canyon: Maintained debris basin and channel upstream from Plainview Avenue in good operating condition and administered real estate. (c) Hansen Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (d) Lopez Dam: Initiated preparation of water control manual. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (e) Los Angeles River channel, Lankershim Boulevard to Stewart and Gray Road: Administered real estate. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for first rehabilitation contract, low flow channel (SP&UP RR. to 4th St.); awarded contract; and initiated construction, which is about 77 percent complete, at a cost of$1,157,690 regular funds. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for second rehabilitation contract, channel invert and sideslope toe (losFeliz Blvd. to Dayton Ave.); and awarded contract. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for third rehabilitation contract, low flow hannel (Lankershim Blvd. to Niagara St.); and awarded "tract. (f) Sepulveda Dam: Initiated preparation of water control manual. Maintained dam in good operatiM condition and administered real estate. Operations for units in San Gabriel River Basin: (a) dtiFe Dam: Maintained dam in good operating radition and administered real estate. Awarded con- tract for and initiated construction of phase 5 recreatinal facilities, which is about 81 percent complete, at a rest of $635,592 regular funds and $228,920 other Wtributed funds. (b) San Gabriel River channel, San tGaCbanryioenl to Santa Fe Dam, Approach channel to tta Fe Dam (remedial work): Maintained channel in good operating condition. (c) Whittier Narrows Dam: Awarded contract for, initiated, and completed confetion of fourteenth contract for recreational facilitir, iparian stream development, in June 1984 at a ,tof$144,761 required contributed funds. Maintained tttn good operating condition and administered real %erations for units in Rio Hondo Basin: Alhambra ash Maintained channel upstream from Valley Boulen good operating condition. 0ok rations for unit in Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona %i channel and jetties: Maintained channel downffr om Washington Boulevard to La Salle Avenue downstream from Los Angeles city boundary to 4h.S.nJts; and Pacific Avenue bridge in good operattaZ iofdseitcioonn.d C coomnptlreatcedt fcoorn rtreaccrte pataiyomnaeln tf afocirl ictoienss trautc -a ;116%,50t 0 regular funds and $16,502 required bted funds. 21. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Location. On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream from mouth of Deep Creek and about 14 miles upstream from Victorville, in Mojave River Basin, CA. Existing project. For details, see page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. 22. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Location. In Lincoln County, NV, about 100 miles north of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, east of Caliente, NV. Existing project. For details, see page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Completed preparation of water control manual. Maintained dams in good operating condition and administered real estate. 23. SAN JACINTO RIVER LEVEE AND BAUTISTA CREEK CHANNEL, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Location. In Riverside County, CA, near San Jacinto, Hemet, and Valle Vista, CA. Existing project. A 3.9-mile-long levee on the left side of the San Jacinto River and about 3 miles of concrete-lined channel on Bautista Creek upstream from California State Highway 74. Latest approved estimated (1982) first cost is $15,630,000 ($13,600,000 Federal and $2,030,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of 48 rock groins to correct project deficiency on San Jacinto River in February 1984 at a cost of $636,734 regular funds. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for construction of a 1.3-mile extension of concrete-lined channel on Bautista Creek; awarded contract; and initiated construction, which is about 74 percent complete, at a cost of $2,931,797 regular funds and $176,203 other contributed funds. 24. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Location. On Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. 33-9 blL REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 General plan of improvement. For details, see page 33-14 of Annual Report for 1981. Existing project. For details on active units, see Annual Report for 1968. For other pertinent information, see table 33-E, "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects," and table 33-G, "Deauthorized Projects." (See table 33-J for latest approved estimated Federal first cost for all units.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operations for units in existing project: (a) Brea Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (b) Carbon Canyon Dam and channel: Maintained project in good operating condition; administered real estate; and continued acquisition of rights-of-way. (c) Fullerton Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (d) Prado Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Awarded contract for, initiated, and completed construction of fourth contract for recreational facilities in August 1984; and awarded contract for and initiated construction of fifth contract for recreational facilities, which is about 99 percent complete, both at a cost of $667,856 regular funds. (e) San Antonio Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (f) San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel: Maintained project in good operating condition and administered real estate. 25. SANTA MARIA VALLEY LEVEES, SANTA MARIA RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Along Santa Maria River and Bradley Canyon in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties, CA, about 60 miles northwest of City of Santa Barbara. Improvements along Santa Maria River extend about 21.9 miles from Fugler Point (at junction of Cuyama and Sisquoc Rivers) to Pacific Ocean. Improvements along Bradley Canyon extend from Canyon mouth to Santa Maria River. Existing project. For details, see page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Completed contract payment for construction to correct project deficiencies at a cost of $29,358 regular funds. 26. SESPE CREEK AT FILLMORE, VENTURA COUNTY, CA Location. In and near the City of Fillmore, Ventura County, CA. Existing project. A 2-mile long rock-revetted single levee on the east bank of Sespe Creek; 25 rock groins that divert flows away from levee toe; floodgates in levee at Southern Pacific Railroad crossing; a new east span for Old Telegraph Road bridge; reinforced spans of railroad bridge; and 2 floodproofed homes on west bank. Latest approved estimated (1980) first cost for project is $6,600,000 ($4,000,000 Federal and $2,600,(0 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-15 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed contract payment for construction at a cost of $381 regular funds. Completed preparation of operation and mainte nance manual. 27. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Lower Sweetwater River Valley, along Sweetwater River from Interstate Freeway 805 to So Diego Bay, San Diego County, CA. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for about 3.2 miles of improved trapezoidal channel along Sweetwater River from Interstate Freeway 805 to San Diego Bay as part of a combined flood control and highway project. Approved estimated (1984) first cost for project is $33,100,000 (includes allowance for esti. mated inflation through construction period), compre ing $16,500,000 Federal and $16,600,000 non-Federal Map of modified plan is in "General Design Menm randum No. 1, for Sweetwater River Flood Contro Channel, San Diego County, California," prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1982 and revised in May 1984. Local cooperation. Requirements are described iD full on page 33-16 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed prepay tion of project plan and final environmental statement Initiated preparation of plans and specifications, which are about 95 percent complete. 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Los Angeles County drainage area, CA, chann were inspected in October and November 198.3 April, May, June, and August 1984; Rose Creek chan improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA, in June 1 and San Diego River channel and levees, San DiO River Basin, CA, in June 1984. Inspection costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance We $302,635. 29. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with section 7, Flood Control Act4 1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood or were conducted; and preparation of regulations , use of storage allocated for flood control was conl for the following Bureau of Reclamation projects: Dam and Twitchell Dam. Costs for fiscal year regular funds for maintenance were $43,344. 33-10 LOS ANGELES. CA, DISTRICT 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization) See table 33-K on flood control work under special authorization. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $4,813 for Rillito River, Pima County, AZ. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (sec. 208 of lO4Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $2,236 for Tonto Creek, Gila County, AZ. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th 0Cg., and antecedent legislation) Federal cost for fiscal year was $1,466,939, of which $164,782 were for advance preparation; $838,908 were forflood emergency operations; and $463,249 were for rhbilitation. Flood insurance activities (sections 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448, as amended) In coordination with flood control activities, flood turance studies were continued in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreements at fiscal year cost of $160,138 under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable order. General Investigations 31, SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $5,217,289 regular funds, of hieh $466,378 were for navigation studies; $2,507 Wre for beach erosion control studies; $3,208,828 were iflood control studies; $1,154,412 were for surveys; wwheree for special studies involving coordination ltother agencies; $297,286 were for review of authorprojects; and $93,956 were for miscellaneous activi- 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA i4l Year costs were $164,594 for technical services, udng $48 for Southeast, and $357 for Salt and Gila " both in Maricopa County, AZ; and $167 for itra River, Ventura County, CA; $57,359 for flood management; and $355 for inspection of dams. . RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT F'ial Year cost was $4,938 for hydrologic studies. 34. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING 34A. HOLBROOK LEVEE, LITTLE COLORADO RIVER, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, AZ Holbrook levee is on Little Colorado River at Holbrook, Navajo County, AZ, in northeastern Arizona, about 200 miles northeast of Phoenix. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, dated December 31, 1970. Plan of improvement provides for raising existing north bank levee and adding a new south bank levee, a low flow channel, recreational facilities, and mitigation features. Existing levee (north) would be raised to a height ranging from 23 feet high upstream from Apache Railroad bridge to about 12 feet high downstream from bridge, and would be about 18,000 feet long. South side levee would be about 5,000 feet long and would have a maximum height of 23 feet. Continued preparation of project plan during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $970,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $344,066. 34B. SANTA ANA RIVER MAIN STEM -INCLUDING SANTIAGO CREEK AND OAK STREET DRAIN, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Santa Ana River main stem-including Santiago Creek and Oak Street Drain, Santa Ana River Basin, CA, is on Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, dated October 22, 1976. Plan of improvement provides for construction of Mentone Dam near community of Mentone, San Bernardino County; management of flood plain between Mentone Dam and Prado Reservoir; improvement of Oak Street Drain in Corona, Riverside County; enlargement of existing Prado Dam and reservoir, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties; improvement of lower Santa Ana River channel from Prado Dam to Pacific Ocean; and improvement of lower reach of Santiago Creek channel in Orange County; recreational development along project length; purchase of 8 acres of salt marsh for mitigation of project effects; purchase of 84 acres of tidal lands at mouth of Santa Ana River for preservation of endangered least tern habitat; landscaping; and recreational features. Continued preparation of project plan, phase II, during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $21,000,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $2,790,949. 33-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 35. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 35A. GOLETA, CA, AND VICINITY, SANTA BARBARA COUNTY Goleta, CA, and vicinity is in Goleta Valley along Atascadero Creek and its tributaries, including Tecolotito, Carneros, San Pedro, Las Vegas, San Jose, and Maria Ygnacio Creeks, from the Santa Ynez Mountains in Santa Barbara County to Pacific Ocean near Goleta, CA. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, dated December 31, 1970. Plan of improvement provides for about 12.5 miles of channel improvement, comprising about 1.3 miles of channel clearing and about 11.2 miles of channel construction. Channel clearing would be required on Maria Ygnacio, San Jose, Las Vegas, San Pedro, and Carneros Creeks. Channel construction would include the improvement of Atascadero Creek from San Marcos Road to ocean; Maria Ygnacio Creek from Hollister Avenue to Atascadero Creek; San Jose Creek from 0.2 mile north of U.S. Highway No. 101 to San Pedro Creek; Las Vegas Creek from Cathedral Oaks Road to San Pedro Creek; San Pedro Creek from a point 0.1 mile downstream from Stow Canyon Road to Atascadero Creek; Carneros Creek from 0.6 mile upstream from U.S. Highway No. 101, by means of a diversion route, to Tecolotito Creek; and Tecolotito Creek from U.S. Highway No. 101 to Atascadero Creek. Plan also provides for beautification and recreation features. Continued preparation of project plan, phase I, during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning costis $2,650,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $216,973. 35B. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, CA,is in the lower San Luis Rey River Valley, along San Lub Rey River from Murray Road (river mile 7.2) to Pacific Ocean, San Diego County, CA. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965, Public Law 89-298, dated October 27, 1965. Final date of approval by House and Senate Public Works Committees resolution was Decen. ber 17, 1970. Plan of improvement provides for about 5.7 miles of earth-bottom trapezoidal channel along San Luis ley River from Murray Road to about 1 mile upstream fron U.S. Highway No. 101; about 1.5 miles of chandel grading, which would generally be limited to remove of spoil banks, from about 1 mile upstream from U.S Highway No. 101 to ocean; and about 800 feet of stont revetted levee on the left (south) bank from the Atches Topeka and Santa Fe railroad to ocean. Plan alW provides for beautification features. Completed preparation of project plan, phase II during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,949,000. Total costs during fiscal year wer $62,254. 33-12 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A See Section inT ext Project 1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA t Dana Point Harbor, CA 3. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, CA (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. Funds) Other Contrib. Funds) 4. Morro Bay Harbor, CA 5 Oceanside Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) Other Contrib. unds) 6. Port Hueneme, CA (Regular Funds) Other Contrib. unds) 7 Port San Luis, CA COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT I Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 33-13 Total Cost to FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 - - - - $5,123,3451 -- - - 5,123,3451 $135,000 $2,212,577 $2,441,000 -$164,000 17,715,5062 120,000 2,226,683 109,904 2,157,690 17,697,2632 - - - - 4,737,5501 - - - - 4,737,5506 - 22,996 534,000 -46,000 528,3964 - 22,996 34,373 453,588 528,3574 9,525,000 12,968,000 5,323,000 -340,000 64,779,7191 9,208,416 13,626,683 5,721,814 -268,794 64,281,5376 80,322 980,000 2,768,600 704,000 8,846,0596 131,664 972,371 358,760 3,062,364 8,786,9546 599,000 390,000 214,180 - 1,203,180 365,188 548,526 175,655 80,057 1,169,426 18,688,000 11,294,000 4,220,130 147,000 38,521,7057 15,661,607 14,893,514 4,777,401 801,586 37,932,0367 - - - - 87,1208 - - - - 87,1208 .- - 2,612,0939 - - - 2,612,0939 60,000 1,580 1,573,052 165,000 6,643,93910 39,583 22,890 60,846 1,676,263 6,692,63310 - - - 2,128,411 - - - 2,128,411 1,063,000 692,825 5,081,782 -1,970,133 8,065,53911 998,795 649,198 642,862 2,411,303 7,898,72111 - - - - 491,28612 -- - 491,28612 1,200,000 - - - 1,200,000 1,160,000 20,000 7,500 - 1,187,500 - 240,000 - 200,000 1,881,400 24,970 260,105 6,504 28,704 1,307,865 - 22,931 1,510,569 -305,657 1,245,068s13 - 22,931 81,256 1,110,676 1,232,0881s - 119,610 177,698 - - 57,609 - - 1,138,1174 -.- 1,137,75914 - 682,084 -13,000 738,6731s - - 222,780 446,304 738,673,5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 8. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA 9. San Diego Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. unds) 10. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. unds) 11. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA 12. Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), CA 14. Imperial Beach, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds 15. San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA Regular Funds) Required Contrib. unds) 16. Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 75,000 336,277 46,524 354,908 191 - 2,255 - 2,263 - 250,000 285,000 222,763 269,031 7,701 7,701 - - 4,766,89816 - - 4,766,89816 448,000 -150,000 1,272,39617 61,699 245,700 1,271,794" - - 28,094,09518 423 - 28,092,19918 558,390 202,656 2,267,338's 37,114 662,437 2,205,9871 - - 717,910 - - 715,215 - - 1,926,563w - - 1,900,063� - 35,000 11,905,0991 122,034 58,373 11,893,70721 - 3,627,000 -107,000 - 289,324 3,154,990 - 192,125 -192,125 4,767,4732 4,691,787 557,832 557,832 172,000 172,000 819,088 855,169 945,543 341,000 8,260,119" 820,922 855,755 555,992 729,914 8,259,350 - - - 1,711,539" - - - - 1, 711,539" 1,119,489 1,047,100 2,488,000 653,000 12,293,437 1,124,735 1,046,894 2,329,024 818,882 12 ,2 77 ,15 0 246,900 -28,000 - 2,000,000 2,849,757 58,135 38,174 74,623 103,226 802,097 - - - - 25,601 - - - - 25,584 - - 255,000 3,425,000 9,894,100 -31,826 33,321 153,690 3,227,871 9,585,055 - 10 - 2,577,000 5,843,010 103,738 90,107 4,229 1,496,156 4,483,406 - - - - 16,934, 0 6 0" 51 - - - 16,934,060 272,000 424,000 487,000 494,000 3,882,799 266,153 411,266 372,021 580,299 3,822,466 33-14 LOS ANGELES, CA. DISTRICT TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT soee Section i Text Project 17. Allenville, AZ (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. unds) 18. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. unds) Other Contrib. unds) 19A. Gila River Basin, AZ, Indian Bend Wash (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. Funds) Other Contrib. Funds) 19B8. Gila River Basin, AZ, Painted Rock Dam (Gila River) 19C. Gila River Basin, AZ, Phoenix, Z, and vicinity includin New River) Regular Funds) Required Contrib. unds) jother Contrib. unds) 19), Gila River Basin, AZ, Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek 20. Los Angeles County drainage area, CA (Regular Funds) tRuenqdusi)red Contrib. Total Cost to FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 2,780,000 2,335,961 200,000 159,196 23,754,000 23,239,439 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: CCoosnttrib. 390,474 28,769 17,256,000 15,700,133 758,083 1,645,662 2,515,000 1,869,796 - 46,190 - 4,089 - 359,000 20,275 8,345 208 325,500 309,586 11,400,000 11,008,053 202,521 240,960 33,000 36,566 2,697,000 1,990,086 3,234,600 2,773,217 616,467 760,513 592,000 629,289 6,198,000 5,399,656 127,000 47,262 38,700 77,223 47,000 42,645 815,000 1,337,870 3,044,000 2,719,160 -50,000 50,143 3,000,000 8,322 57,039 3,000,000 - -12,035 187,965 - - 187,965 3,950,000 100,000 91,646,900 4,057,329 1,041,150 90,208,770 -270,893 400,965 6,000,000 5,006,159 37,118 668,979 386,307 594,000 551,293 4,680,000 5,621,403 95 - 127,500 527,013 -39,526 6,823 1,324,000 2,126,292 85,512 72,264 9,383,332 9,257,170 31,920,480 30,839,261 - 384,754 - 304,720 273,000 3,576,361 458,952 3,039,137 - 19,980,564w - 19,980,5645 472,000 6,782,148 479,419 6,742,102 12,860,000 62,755,297 11,998,004 61,058,077 346,000 500,000 1,714,214 81,743 624,923 1,378,601 - - 459,700 - - 396,562 - - 1,867,9633� - - 1,867,96330 145,000 143,000 766,413 84,911 206,863 765,832 967,700 -23,800 377,026,88531 2 367,925 858,698 376,812,5193' ,107,000 3,084,000 47,916,020' ,723,627 6,864,570 47,445,470' - 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 1,800,240 1,800,240 286,818 - 13,933,341u 378,256 166,382 13,867,962m 33-15 1,264,509 1,596,452 3,243,000 3,198,191 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section SSeecetion Total Cost to in Text Project FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 Other Contrib. unds) 21. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA (Regular Funds) Other Contrib. unds) 22. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV 23. San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel, Santa Ana River Basin, CA (Regular Funds) Other Contrib. unds) 24. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. unds) 25. Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, CA 26. Sespe Creek at Fillmore Ventura County, dA (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. unds) 27. Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, CA Funding New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - 308,007 36,952,872N - 228,946 36,868,83411 - - 17,838,198 - - 17,838,198 653,000 342,000 2,753,548 244,816 588,335 2,572,277 - - 286,300 - - 284,501 - - 1,401,248 - - 1,401,248 63,000 43,070 2,631,000 1,008,903 9,927 241,000 240,158 28,000 30,760 92,000 154,058 1,606,000 1,744,626 45,000 118,891 1,600,000 1,475,037 40,000 46,769 15,100 72,395 240,000 261,434 3,553,000 3,984,060 244 773,000 754,707 44,000 39,883 239,000 212,270 -1,367 1,291,700 1,224,904 44,056 2,405,000 2,466,494 2,630,00 1,784,599 - 75,776 1,080,000 1,930,193 185,542 297,983 - 482,442 50,000 145,000 53.603 136.413 856,356 853,743 9,449,974 8,232,207 86,868 714,591 76,203 503,926 23,800 47,994,738" 70,398 4 7 ,9 7 5,216r 377,000 20,231,810 ' !75,951 19,890,905 -17,394 3,122,762" -432 3,099,190 - 10,080,134" 31,378 10,080,03 S 4,000,000 2,773 3,999,086 1,074 1,500,000 467,244 483,525 483,516 3,124,503 2,083,158 1. Excludes $1,361,668 Navy funds; Coast Guard costs; and $210,748 other contributed funds. 2. Includes $7,178 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $4,080,349 for maintenance accomplished with Navy funds. 3. Excludes $4,777,000 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 4. Includes $40,396 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 5. Includes $2,187,047 for new work for previous project; $1,593,667 public works funds; a credit of $33,050 for transfer v v, ..... r creliC of land at Reservation Point; and $996,792 emergenfr n funds. Excludes Federal funds spent by the Navy work on middle breakwater, and Coast Guard cos. 6. Includes $139,347 for maintenance for previoUSPo and $121,523 for reconnaissance and condition survey since FY 1958. tsdesi 7. Includes $1,672,575 for new work betterments by local interests prior to 1976 modification. ndi 8. Includes $87,120 for maintenance betterments by local interests prior to 1976 modification. 9. Navy funds. 33-16 8 2,2 1,6 - 3 - 1 19,300 83,204 7 k66,000 1,3 86,767 1,7 21,149 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 10. Includes $263,024 for reconnaissance and condition surveys since FY 1958 and $307,945 Navy funds. Excludes $124,578 other contributed funds. 11. Includes $69,804 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $4,554,490 for maintenance accomplished with Navy funds. 1132.. IFnocrlj uedtteys and groin extensions desired by local interests. $61,068 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 14. Includes $568,417 for new work prior to modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 15. Includes $54,715 for maintenance for project prior to modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act and $18,958 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 16. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 17. Includes $20,517 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. 18. Includes $154,704 for new work for previous projects: $86,352 public works funds; and $1,226,793 emergency relief funds. Excludes $254,795 Navy funds for dredging entrance channel in FY 1961 to depth of-42 feet mean lower low water (or 2 feet below project depth); and Coast Guard costs. 19. Includes $59,904 for maintenance for previous projects and $188,945 for reconnaissance and condition surveys since FY 1958. In addition, includes $144 for retroactive pay increase shown in "cost" figure only, as reported in 1958 Annual Report, page 1430. 20. Includes $4,441 for betterments desired by local interests prior to modification by 1968 River and Harbor Act. 21. Includes $2,610,000 regular funds and excludes L2,9 10000 required contributed funds, both for new work on control project, "San Diego River Basin, Calif." 22. Includes $81,941 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 23. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 24. Includes $29,198 public works funds; $11,000 working funds for work performed in addition to existing project; and 19,741 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Exclud e 62,986 other contributed funds spent by the Corps for maintenance-dredging betterments desired by local interest!. 25. Excludes $1,708,836 required contributed funds arn Coast Guard costs. 26. Includes $53,899 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 27. Excludes $66,124 other contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 28. Includes 57,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1975. 29. Includes 357,469 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 30. Includes 3,758 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 31. Includes $11,008,935 emergency relief funds for new ork. Excludes $16,726,888 emergency relief funds spent by Corps in connection with emergency relief (previous) project and $107,939 for minor rehabilitation. 32. Includes $23,763,900 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 1,226,100 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,290,000 for Whittier roews Dam; $22,000 for LACDA prototype; $535,000 for 5nen Dam; $10,422,100 for Santa Fe Dam; $215,000 for T UnUa Wash channel; $8,500 for Lopez Dam; $3,562,200 for for Angeles River and io Hondo channels; and $1,483,000 Balsona Creek channel). 33. Includes $23,549,533 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 223226 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,289,995 for Whittier 33-17 Narrows Dam; $22,000 for LACDA prototype; $535,000 for Hansen Dam; $10,214,862 for Santa Fe Dam; $215,000 for Tujunga Wash channel; $8,500 for Lopez Dam; $3,557,950 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $1,483,000 for Ballona Creek channel). 34. Includes $13,933,341 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($992,650 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,797,556 for Whittier Narrows am; $199,541 for Tujunga Wash channel; $460,500 for Hansen Dam; $2,824,056 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; $1,467,538 for Santa Fe Dam; and $1,191,500 for Ballona Creek channel). 35. Includes $13,867,962 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 $992,545 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,737,904 for Whittier Narrows am; $199,083 for Tujunga Wash channel; $460,180 for Hansen Dam; $2,824,054 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; $1,467,538 for Santa Fe Dam; and $1,186,658 for Ballona Creek channel). 36. Non-Federal funds spent by the Federal Government to September 30, 1984, for replacements required as part of local cooperation and betterments desired by local interests. Excludes $4,238,000 other contributed funds spent by the Corps in connection with emergency relief (previous) project. 37. Includes $308,007 Code 710 funds or Santa Fe Dam since FY 1984. 38. Includes $228,946 Code 710 funds for Santa Fe Dam since FY 1984. 39. Comprises funds for Brea, Fullerton, Prado, and San Antonio Dams, Carbon Canyon Dam and channel, Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, and San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel (active units). 40. Includes $5,000 working funds for San Antonio Dam; $67,361 for San Juan Dam (inactive unit) (lso reported under "Other Authorized Flood Control Projec "); and $85,310 undistributed funds. Excludes other contributed funds spent by the Corps, as follows: $124,105 for water conservation betterments desired by local interests at Prado Dam; $8,500 for betterments desired by local interests at San Antonio Dam; $234,709 for betterments desired by local interests on San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel; and 601,762 for required items of local cooperation on Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements. Excludes $290,000 spent direct by local interests on San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel for local cooperation items not required. 41. Includes $5,920,831 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,058,731 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,264,300 or Fullerton Dam; and $3,597,800 for Prado Dam). 42. Includes $5,901,309 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 $1,040,558 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,264,300 or Fullerton Dam; and $3,596,451 for Prado Dam). 43. Excludes maintenance for Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, which are operated and maintained by local interests. 44. Includes $3,122,762 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 $1,426,973 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,269,789 or Fullerton Dam; and $426,000 for Prado Dam). 45. Includes $3,099,190 Code 710 funds since FY 1975 $1,426,973 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,248,082 or Fullerton Dam; and $424,135 for Prado Dam). 46. Excludes $106,364 other contributed funds. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Sep. 3, 1954 2. Oct. 23, 1962 3. June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Do. Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17, 1940 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels and shore protection works. DANA POINT HARBOR, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels and of refuge. H. Doc. 362, 83d Cong, 2d sess. H. Doc. 532, 87th Cong. 2d sess. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA A breakwater 8,500 feet long, east of Point Fermin. S. Doc. 18, 55th Cong., 1st sess. Extend said breakwater to shore, making a total length H. Doc. 969, 60th Cong. of 11,152 feet from Point Fermin. 1st sess. Dredge Los Angeles outer harbor west of entrance Rivers and Harbors channel. Committee Doc. 8, 62d Cong., 2d sess. For silt-diversion works. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 64th Cong., 2d sess. Triangular area approach to Los Angeles inner harbor H. Doc. 1013, 66th Cong, entrance channel. 3d sess. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor main channel and entrance H. Doc. 349, 68th 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; dredge inner harbor Cong., 1st sess. turning basin 35 feet deep; and reclamation of Reservation Point. A detached breakwater 12,500 feet long in prolongation Rivers and Harbors of existing breakwater (authorized by act of 1896). Committee Doc. 33, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Widen fairway on east side of entrance to Los Angeles S. Doc. 130, 71st Cong,, inner harbor; dredge a channel 35 feet deep and 650 2d sess. feet wide in East Basin from turning basin to U.S. station 406; dredge 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Cerritos channel from U.S. station 406 to Long Beach turning basin; a turning basin 35 feet deep at Long Beach; entrance channel to Long Beach Harbor 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; and maintenance of the Long Beach breakwater south of outer end pier A. This act provides that in no case shall dredging obfe edxoinseti nwgi thin 50 feet of established pierheadlines piers and wharves. Dredge 1,000-foot-wide entrance channel to Los Angeles S. Committee print, outer harbor to 40-foot depth and a turning basin 3,500 74th Cong., 1st sess. feet long and 1,500 feet wide to same depth; and enlarge entrance to inner harbor by dredging to 35-foot depth a triangular area at its junction with turning basin. Dredge to a depth of 40 feet areas A and B adjacent to H. Doc. 843, 76th Cong. 40-foot-depth entrance channel; construct and maintain a 3d sess. rubblemound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in eastward direction from northeast end of existing detached breakwater; dredge about 4 million cubic yards initially for a settling basin at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel, and deposit material on beaches eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance dredging of areas A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. 33-18 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 July 14,1960 Oct. 22, 1976 4. Mar. 2, 1945 5. Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 7. Aug. 11, 1888 Sept. 19, 1890 July 13, 1892 Aug. 18, 1894 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin as a modifi- H. Doc. 161, 83d Cong., cation of existing project. This act provides that the Secre- 1st sess. tary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interests for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefor and shall not take precedence over other pending projects of higher priority for harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a H. Doc. 401, 86th Cong., modification of existing project. 2d sess. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet H. Doc 94-594, 94th deep, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feet long; Los Cong., 2d sess.i Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Adoption and improvement of existing entrance channel to H. Doc, 283, 77th Cong., bay, a breakwater extending south by west from Morro 1st sess. Rock, and bay channels and basins at locations and of dimensions substantially as shown on the Navy Department map on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar H. Doc. 76, 89th Cong., Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. 1st sess. PORT HUENEME, CA Adoption and maintenance of existing harbor for H. Doc. 362, 90th Cong., deep-draft vessels; dredge central basin to 35 feet 2d sess. deep; and widen, dredge to 35 feet deep, and extend southernmost interior channel. PORT SAN LUIS, CA Breakwater. S. Doc. 81, 49th Cong., 2d sess. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $40,000 for None continuing improvement Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30,000 for None continuing improvement. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $40,000 for None continuing improvement. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $40,000 for None continuing improvement. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $55,000 for None continuing improvement. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $50,000 for None continuing improvement. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25,000 for None continuing improvement. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $63,660 for None continuing improvement. 33-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 27, 1908 Mar. 4, 1909 Mar. 4, 1911 June 23, 1913 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 8. May 17, 1950 9. Mar. 3, 1875 Sept. 19, 1890 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $60,000 for continuing improvement. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30,000 for continuing improvement. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $64,000 for continuing improvement. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $46,000 for continuing improvement. Renamed from San Luis Obispo Harbor to Port San Luis; rehabilitation of existing breakwater and construction of an extension; construction of a detached breakwater; removal of rock pinnacles; and dredging. Construction of a south breakwater 750 feet long, and of a detached breakwater 3,615 feet long; dredge a southern entrance channel 200 feet wide, 400 feet long, and 15 feet deep; a northern entrance channel 200 feet wide; 700 feet long, and 15 feet deep; a main channel 200 to 300 feet wide, 4,100 feet long, and 15 feet deep; anchorage area A 15 feet deep; anchorage area B 12 to 15 feet deep; refuge area A 15 feet deep; and refuge area B 12 feet deep; and removal of rock pinnacles. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Reconstruction of part of original breakwater and construction of extension; construction of south breakwater; and maintenance of breakwaters. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Diversion dike. Jetty on Zuniga Shoal. Dredge channel through outer bar 30 feet deep and 600 feet wide, and a channel through middle ground to 30 feet deep. Dredge channel through outer bar 570 feet wide and 35 feet deep, and a channel Widen through middle ground 32 feet deep. approach (area B) to San Diego municipal pier by dredging area C (north of area B). Dredging area A (south of area B). Dredge 35-foot channel through middle ground. Dredging areas D and E. Widen approach (area C) to San Diego municipal pier 1 by dredging a portion of area F (north of area C). Deepen to 40 feet channel through outer bar; along south and north banks, main channel; dredge turning basin, widen area H, and dredge a channel to National City and Chula Vista. Widen bay channel to 2,200 feet with depth of 35 feet from the vicinity of Whalers Bight in lower bay to naval air station opposite turning basin. Dredging areas Q, Q-1, M, N, and O. Dredge a seaplane basin (area S) of about 3,000 acres, 10 feet deep, and fill an area of about 110 acres adjacent to southern end of basin. None None None None H. Doc. 148, 88th Cong., 1st sess.' None H. Doc. 303, 81st Cong, 1st sess. Annual Report, 1873; p. 1142 H. Ex. Doc. 177, 50th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report, 1888; p. 2114) H. Doc. 961, 60th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 1309, 62d Cong, 3d sess. H. Doc. 648, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8,64th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong 1st sess. H. Doc. 1000, 66th Cong. 3d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2,68th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 81, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 223, 73d Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 89 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 844, 76th Cong 3d sess. 33-20 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 10. July 24, 1946 11. Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1970 12. Aug. 13, 1968 14. July 3, 1958 15. Oct. 23, 1962 16. Dec. 22, 1944 17. July 15, 19803 18. Aug. 13, 1968 19A. Oct. 27, 1965 Dredge triangular approaches to 26- and 35-foot anchorages, area M. Deepen and extend existing navigation channels, delete uncompleted parts, and extend maintenance. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Modification of existing flood control project for San Diego River, CA, to include a multiple-purpose project for flood control on San Diego River and small-boat navigation on Mission Bay. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Maintenance dredging present depths into harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. Permits maintenance by means of a fixed sand-intercepting plant to be provided and operated by and at expense of local interests. United States to contribute to operating expense an amount not to exceed $30,000 annually, whenever funds are allotted therefor; funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual cost of harbor maintenance if and when intercepting plant has been installed. Modification of existing project. Dredging and maintenance by United States. VENTURA MARINA (VENTURA HARBOR), CA Adoption and maintenance of existing general navigation features of harbor, excluding interior basins; construction of an offshore breakwater; dredging a sand trap in lee of breakwater; repairing existing north and middle jetties; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on jetty crests. IMPERIAL BEACH, CA Federal participation by contribution of Federal funds toward cost of five groins. SAN GABRIEL RIVER TO NEWPORT BAY (SURFSIDE-SUNSET AND NEWPORT BEACH), ORANGE COUNTY, CA Modification of authorized project at Anaheim Bay Harbor, CA, to provide for an offshore breakwater at Newport Beach and a protective and feeder beach in the vicinity of Surfside-Sunset Beach. Federal participation by contribution of Federal funds toward first costs and costs of periodic nourishment and maintenance. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. ALLENVILLE, AZ Relocate community, streets, utilities, community center, and park; and replace houses. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Debris-collection facilities, with a system of channels, and a diversion system. INDIAN BEND WASH, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Channel, levees, a siphon system, and transition works. H. Doc. 390, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 365, 90th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 760, 79th Cong., 2d sess.' S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 348, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 518, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' None H. Doc. 356, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H . Doc. 399, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 602, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 625, 78th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 323, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 303, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 33-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 7, 1974 19B. May 17, 1950 19C. Oct. 27, 1965 19D. July 24, 1946 20. June 22, 1936 May 15, 1937 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep., 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 21. July 14, 1960 Cost of siphon system borne by United States. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. PHOENIX AZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER), ?ILA RIVER BASIN Detention basins, diversion channels, and channel improvements. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes at an estimated construction cost not to exceed 70 million. Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and tributaries to project. Provision of lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations by Federal Government instead of by local interests. (Resultant additional cost to the United States, $12,541,000.) Project extended to include additional flood control reservoirs, flood control channels, and debris basins for flood control and related purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated $25 million for further accomplishment of plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug 18, 1941. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier Narrows Reservoir to Los Angeles River (in lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San Gabriel River downstream from reservoir). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $40 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $12,500,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $44 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $32 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $3,700,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. In addition to all previous authorizations, completion of improvements under the comprehensive plan for flood control in the Los Angeles River Basin at a presently estimated cost of $31 million for completion. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. None H. Doc. 331, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 216, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 220, 80th Cong., 1st sess. None None None H. Doc. 838, 76th Cong., 3d sess. None None None None None None None None None H. Doc. 164, 86th Cong. 1st sess. 33-22 LOS ANGELES, CA. DISTRICT TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 22. May 17, 1950 23. May 17, 1950 24. June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 3, 1958 25. 26. 27. Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 11, 1980 Aug. 13, 1968 PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Dams and flood control basins. SAN JACINTO RIVER LEVEE AND BAUTISTA CREEK CHANNEL, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Levees along Mill Creek in zone 1; a system including levees and channel improvements generally along Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks in zone 5; levees along Santa Ana River near Riverside in zone 7; and levees along Bautista Creek and San Jacinto River in zone 9, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $17,577,000. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 million. San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion of improvement. Authorized to be appropriated $6,500,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment of plans for those creeks. Rescinded provisions of Flood Control Act of 1936, providing that local interests pay for relocations, lands, easements, and rights-of-way. (Estimated resultant additional cost to United States, $3,500,000.) Authorized to be appropriated an additional $2,500,000 for prosecution of projects approved in above flood control acts. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $10 million for prosecution of projects adopted in above-mentioned flood control acts, including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks for local flood protection at San Bernardino and Colton, CA. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $8 million for prosecution of projects approved in abovementioned flood control acts. SANTA MARIA VALLEY LEVEES, SANTA MARIA RIVER BASIN, CA Levee and channel improvements. SESPE CREEK AT FILLMORE, VENTURA COUNTY, CA Levee, rock groins, floodgates, bridge span, and floodproofed homes. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood control and highway project. H. Doe. 530, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doe. 135, 81st Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 688, 75th Cong., 3d sess. None H. Doc. 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 1 None H. Doe. 400, 83d Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 148, 90th Cong., 1st sess. 1 Contains latest published map. l. Included in the emergency relief program, May 28, 3. Date approved by Chief of Engineers under provisions of section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 33-23 I TABLE 33-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Marina del Rey, Los Angeles County, CA Completed 1981 4,238,7521 1,323,0372 Newport Bay Harbor, CA Inactive 1982 796,8978 608,9974 1. Excludes $4,238,752 required contributed funds; 4. Includes $125,085 for reconnaissance and condition $1,843,146other contributed funds; and Coast Guard costs. survey costs since FY 1958. Excludes $7,000 other contributed 2. Includes $76,282 for reconnaissance and condition funds. Includes $237 expended in FY 1984. surveys. Excludes $114,000 required contributed funds. 3. Public Works Administration funds. Excludes $796,897 required contributed funds and $1,100 preauthorization costs. TABLE 33-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anaheim Bay Harbor, Orange County, CA1' Bird Rock area, La Jolla, San Diego County, CA2 Coast of California, Point Mugu to San Pedro breakwater, CA Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), CA Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, CA Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA' Oceanside, San Diego County, CA San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA Ventura-Pierpont area, CA Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Active Completed (part) & Deferred (part) 1. The project authorized by the Act of Congress of October 23, 1962, H. Doc. 602, 87th Cong., 2d sess., in lieu of part of the original Anaheim Bay Harbor project is covered under San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA. 2. Authorized by Chie of Engineers under authority of section 103, Public Law 87-874. 3. Excludes $75,614 required contributed funds. 4. Excludes $1,238,418 required contributed funds. 5. Excludes $431,260 required contributed funds. 6. Plant in service. 7. Excludes $604,817 other contributed funds. Include $701 expended in FY 1984. 8. Excludes $180,438 required contributed funds. 9. Excludes $117,406 other contributed funds for bet nourishment betterments and $618,949 required contribu funds. 33-24 1967 1967 1972 1968 1976 1960 1982 1979 1969 $89,119 25,8818 1,253,5944 578,7176 107,484 7,912 4,351,2487 365,0008 715,819$ . LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance City Creek levee, San Bernardino County, CA' Gila River Basin, AZ: Camelsback Dam (Gila River) Gilas and Salt Rivers levee and channel improvements Lower Gila River levee and channel improvements (Gila River and tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) Middle Gila River channel improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) Pinal Creek channel improvements (Globe) Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair) Tucson diversion channel Goleta, CA, and vicinity Holbrook levee, Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ ltle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, CA Needles, San Bernardino County, CA' OrGor ande Wash channel improveinents, Mojave River Basin, CA' quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino County, CA' Ridgecrest, Kern County, CA' Rs Creek channel improvements, San Diego, CA' SanD iego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, CA j Luis Re River, San SL uis Rey River Basin, CA ta Ana River Basin, CA: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements id Lytle Creek levee ra River levee improve- Santa Clara River , CA la Creek channel and Sbasins (including reek), Santa Clara Basin, CA iver Basin, CA Wash and Spring Brook, leC, A Completed Deferred Active (part) & Deferred (part) Inactive Active Deferred Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Terminated Completed Inactive Active Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Inactive Completed Active Completed Inactive $400,0002 1963 1966 73,2013 1975 1970 1968 1982 1982 1982 1950 1981 1973 1970 1973 1972 1978 1982 1962 1961 1959 1950 1961 1983 1979 1975 2,413,051 402,867 121,5098 10,218,640 6,191,1884 500,000 335,000 35,016,0681 1,000,0006 1,000,0007 212,745 195,194 982,4326 1,708,437 1,364,000 7,753,9379 617,89010 2,104,478 67,361 2,126,672 4,599,27311 1,703,03112 213,313 33-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 33-E (Cont') OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction aintenance Ventura River Basin, CA: Stewart Canyon debris basin and channel Completed 1964 939,908's Ventura River levee Completed 1950 1,349,638 ' - Whitewater River Basin, CA: Banning levee-San Gorgonio River, Riverside County' Completed 1966 97,868 Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Springs' Completed 1973 819,87816 Tahchevah Creek detention basin and channel improvements Completed 1967 1,420,55216 - Tahquitz Creek Inactive 1974 1,063,600 - Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, AZ Completed (part) 1973 1,831,300 & Deferred (part) 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of 9. Excludes $200,000 required contributed funds and section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. $1,641,668 other contributed funds. 2. Excludes $371,058 other contributed funds. 10. Excludes $35,830 other contributed funds. 3. Advance planning only. 11. Excludes non-Federal costs of $295,000 for local coope 4. Excludes $394,364 other contributed funds. Includes ation items not required and $49,458 other contributed fund $426,563 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. 12. International Boundary and Water Commission fund 5. Excludes $5,499,193 other contributed funds. Includes 13. Excludes $179,148 other contributed funds. -$6,210 expended in FY 1984. 14. Includes $6,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. Excludi 6. Excludes $619,912 required contributed funds and $17,006 other contributed funds. $91,160 other contributed funds. 15. Excludes $8 718 required contributed funds and $534 7. Excludes $514,806 required contributed funds and other contributed funds. $176,295 other contributed funds. 16. Excludes $74,718 required contributed funds. 8. Excludes $251,000 required contributed funds and $154,733 other contributed funds. TABLE 33-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Project For Last Full Report See Annual Report For Date and Authority Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA 1958 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 Las Vegas Wash tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV 1964 1977 $295,191 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 Villa Park Dam, Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 33-26 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 13 of Text) Project Date Newport Bay Harbor, CA September 1984 TABLE 33-I LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA CA: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FIRST COSTS FOR ALL UNITS OF IMPROVEMENT UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 20 of Text) Latest Approved Estimated Cost 1976' Project Units Federal Local2 Total UNITS IN $70 MILLION PROJECT LosAngeles River Basin: Compton Creek, Los Angeles River to Hooper Ave. storm drain $2,510,500 - $2,510,500 Haines Canyon 524,000 - 524,000 Hansen Dam 11,343,000 - 11,343,000 Los Angeles River channel: Lankershim Blvd. to Steward and Gray Rd. 40,807,300 - 40,807,300 Los Angeles River channel, Long Beach Blvd. 34,200 - 34,200 Sepulveda Dam 6,657,000 - 6,657,000 Camore Wash 24,000 - 24,000 erdugo Wash, Concord St. to upper Canada bridge 1,087,000 - 1,087,000 n Gabriel River Basin: San Gabriel River channel: San Gabriel Canyon to Santa Fe Dam 810,800 - 810,800 Approach channel to Santa Fe Dam (remedial work) 951,900 - 951,900 Santa Fe Dam to Walnut Creek 32,300 - 32,300 Santa Fe Dam 12,647,000 - 12,647,000 Rio Hondo Basin: Alhambra Wash 1,109,000 - 1,109,000 Ballona Creek Basin:1,800 Ballona Creek channel and jetties 1,280,000 - 1,280,000 Subtotal 79,818,000 - 79,818,000 ITS OUTSIDE $70 MILLION PROJECT e Angeles River Basin: lanchard Canyon 682,000 $476,000 1,158,000 Blue Gum Canyon 533,000 233,000 766,000 uurrbbaannkk--EWasetseternrn system 7,149,000 1,850,000 8,999,000 system lower) 1,279,000 268,000 1,547,000 Burbank-Western system uper) 4,930,000 2,959,000 7,889,000 Caballero Creekp 1,484,200 493,000 1,977,200 Compton Creek rto HooperAe. storm drain 149,000 -149,000 'ifiorsAe vCe.a nsytoornm a nddr aPiRno tyoaI MBalvind . Scth. annel 1,606542,,000000 316,000 1,590890,,000000 Pe ayndvrin743,500 665,000 1,408,500 Lpez Darn d 729,000 - 729,000 S utRiver Chan kersh d 8,135,800 4,247,000 12,382,800 Stkershim Blvd. to Stewart and Gray Rd. 900i, Elaeertdr iacn rda iGlwraay Rbdri. dtgoe S anta Ana Branch, Pacific 5,860,900 81,000 5,941,900 bridgeitoy41785000 PAP' a Branch ,Pacific Electric railway 32,612,000 9,173,000 41,785,000 Ina Wa can 3,178,100 1,306,000 4,484,100 ga WW ash channel 7,322,900 2,557,000 9,879,900 Verduga channel d b o 635,000 363,000 998,000 Wil aWnyaoshn, aunpd Mr aCnsafniaedlda Sbtr.i dcghea ntnoe dl ebris basin 3,917,500 857,000 4,774,500 33-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 33-I (Cont'd) LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA CA: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FIRST COSTS FOR ALL UNITS OF IMPROVEMENT UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 20 of Text) Latest Approved Estimated Cost 19761 Project Units Federal Local2 Total Winery Canyon San Gabriel River Basin: Coyote Creek (including North Fork) Emerald Wash and Live Oak Wash Marshall Creek San Gabriel River channel: Santa Fe Dam to Whittier Narrows Dam Whittier Narrows Dam to Pacific Ocean Thompson Creek and San Jose Wash (including San Jose Creek) Walnut Creek inlet channel Walnut Creek system Whittier Narrows Dam Rio Hondo Basin: Arcadia Wash system Eaton Wash Rio Hondo channel: Peck Rd. to Rosemead Blvd. (upper) Whittier Narrows Dam to Los Angeles River (lower) Rubio Canyon diversion Santa Anita Wash Sawpit Wash Sierra Madre Villa channel Sierra Madre Wash Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel Benedict Canyon system Centinela Creek Sawtelle-Westwood system (including Sepulveda channel) Subtotal Grand total for comprehensive plan 413,000 18,802,300 1,658,600 2,577,900 5,748,800 20,887,200 21,274,600 2,879,000 17,232,600 32,254,000 5,236,800 4,225,100 4,412,000 8,165,000 1,066,400 3,045,700 2,348,600 781,400 1,732,000 746,600 15,284,900 4,083,800 9,620,700 274,736,000 354,554,000 265,000 8,426,000 1,182,000 968,000 1,797,000 3,108,000 6,095,000 1,091,000 8,715,000 38,000 1,893,000 1,194,000 550,000 2,565,000 254,000 434,000 745,000 366,000 248,000 3,785,000 4,788,000 1,492,000 76,300,000 678,000 27,228,300 2,840,600 3,545,900 7,545,800 23,995,200 27,369,600 3,970,000 25,947,600 32,292,000 7,129,800 5,419,100 4,962,000 10,730,00 1,320,400 3,479,700 3,093,600 1,147,40 1,980,00 746,600 19,069,90 8,871,800 11,112,70 351,036,00 76,300,000 430,854,0 1. Excludes estimated cost for Code 710 funds and estimated cost for minor rehabilitation. 2. Approved by Los Angeles County Flood Control District as of September 30, 1976, except for Walnut Creek system channel estimate, which was increased by $42,000 to peril rounding of overall non-Federal estimate to three signifiC, figures. 33-28 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-J SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST FOR ALL UNITS (See Section 24 of Text) Estimated Cost Project Total Latest Revision Date ACTIVE UNIT' Completed: Brea Dam $1,189,0682 3 Fullerton Dam 411,0762 3 Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements 7,612,000 3 Prado Dam 9,473,2732 3 San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel 10,924,170 3 San Antonio Dam 7,001,1764 3 Completed Except for Minor Completion Items: Carbon Canyon Dam and channel 5,150,0002 1961 INACTIVE UNITS6 Aliso Creek Dam 340,000 1954 SanJuan Dam 5,960,000 1954 Trabuco Dam 2,190,000 1954 DEAUTHORIZED UNIT Villa Park Dam 2,270,000 1954 1. For details, see section 24 of text. 2. Not including estimated cost of Code 710 funds. 3. Plant in service. 4. Includes $5,000 working funds. 5. For additional information, see "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, As Amended (Preauthorization) TABLE 33-K (See Section 32 of Text) Project Fiscal Year Costs Ephriam Canyon Wash, Nogales, AZ Los Coches Creek, San Diego County, CA Mission Zanja Creek, CA Newhall Creek, Newhall, CA South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Valley, CA Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA West Magnesia Canyon channel, Rancho Mirage, CA $102,272 10,054 11,286 37,168 65,056 114,039 84,040 33-29 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises the Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern and western California consisting of drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the Oregon-California State line on the north to Cape San Martin, CA, on the south, except for basins tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which lie east of the Benicia-Martinez Bridge. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Crescent City Harbor, CA ............... 34-1 2. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels).......................... 34-2 3. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA ........................ 34-2 4. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .............................. 34-3 5. Navigation Work under Special Authorization........................... 34-3 Flood Control 6. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects......................... 34-3 7. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization........................... 34-3 Navigation 1. CRESCENT CITY HARBOR, CA Location. Harbor is 17 miles south of Oregon State line, 125 miles south of Coos Bay, OR, 70 miles north of Humboldt Bay, CA, and midway between San Francisco Bay and mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5895.) Existing project. A rubblemound outer breakwater extending about 3,700 feet on a bearing of S. 27 degrees ' fIrom Battery Point, thence about 1,000 feet on a ting of S. 80 degrees E.; for maintenance dredging of an outer harbor basin 1,800 feet long and 1,400 feet wideto20 foot depth at mean lower low water, except in rock; a rubblemound sand barrier from Whaler Island shore and maaeianstteenralyn ce dredging at seaward end of sand barrier; an inner breakwater extending northwesterly about 1200 feet from Whaler Island, thence westerly 400 feet to form a protected fish-boat r; for removal of pinnacle rock in fish-boat harbor General Investigations Page 8. Surveys ................................ 34-3 9. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 34-3 10. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ........................ 34-3 11. Advance Engineering and Design......... 34-3 Tables Table 34-A Table 34-B Table 34-C Table 34-D Table 34-E Table 34-F Table 34-G Cost and Financial Statement .................... 34-5 Authorizing Legislation ........ 34-8 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........... 34-8 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects . ...... 34-9 Not Applicable Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ......... 34-9 to 20-foot depth; and a T-shaped inner harbor basin 20 feet deep, 1,500 feet long extending along north side of Citizen's Dock for 325 feet, with a stem 1,000 feet long. Deepening of the harbor adjacent to Citizen's Dock was found to be not economically feasible, and this portion was reclassified to the "inactive" category. Approved estimated cost for new work (1983) is $4,565,000, of which $4,411,000 is Federal cost (includes $11,000 Coast Guard costs) and $154,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $54,000 cash contribution). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications and acts of 1927, 1937, 1945, and 1965 portion for construction of 400-foot extension of the inner breakwater. The Board of Harbor Commissioners, by its Resolution No. 77-10, dated September 6, 1977, reaffirmed its intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. A notification was received by letter from the President of the Board, dated February 10, 1978, stating that the area serving the Citizen's Dock 34-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 should not be included at this time. By Board of Harbor Commissioners letter dated February 10, 1978, local interests reaffirmed support for dredging in the vicinity of the oil dock. Rights-of-way are publicly owned and available for public use. Resolution No. 81-1 of March 17, 1981 gives assurance that the Harbor District will provide a cash contribution of $54,000 in lieu of providing land disposal sites. An agreement in conformance with the requirements of Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, was obtained from the local sponsor in April 1982. Terminal facilities. Three piers, one of which is publicly owned and from which boats are fueled; one oil terminal; and a private mooring for barges discharging petroleum products to pipelines on inner breakwater. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded in the first quarter of FY 84 for placement of 70,000 tons of rock along the outer breakwater. The total bid price was $1,275,000. Historical summary. Project is completed including deepening and enlarging the inner harbor basin adjacent to Petroleum Dock to a depth of 20 feet and deepening of the harbor adjacent to Citizen's Dock which was found to be not economically justified and reclassified to the "inactive" category in 1978. The 3,000-foot outer breakwater was completed in 1930, sand barrier in 1939, inner breakwater in 1946, removal of pinnacle rock in 1951, and outer breakwater extension in 1957. Major rehabilitation of outer breakwater was completed in 1964 and again in 1980. Minor repair of the outer breakwater was completed in 1984. The 400-foot extension of inner breakwater was completed in 1973. 2. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to vicinity of Concord through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and Solano Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Carquinez Strait, Suisun Bay Channel to vicinity of Concord to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet (currently 35 feet) for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Concord; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet (currently 35 feet) of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel. San Francisco Harbor Main Channel was completed February 1974. Approved cost estimate (1983) of Federal cost (Corps), see Sacramento District Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. See Sacramento District Annual Report. The local sponsor, Contra Costa County, supports the project. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1983, No. 31, revised 1982, and No. 32, revised 1975, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif."; "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg, and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction and continued planning activities. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AND DELTA MODEL, CA Location. The model, including a regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, CA, adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay/Delta Model, which covers 17 miles of the Pacific Ocean beyond Golden Gate, all of San Francisco Bay proper, San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and all of the Sacramento- San Joaquin Delta east of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the northeast and Stockton and Tracy on the south, was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at Sausalito, CA, as a part of the San Francisco Bay and Tributaries, California, Study authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (PL 81-516, Section 110). The model was authorized as an operation and maintenance project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, Section 8). The model successfully reproduces to the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and trends in disposition of sediments. It isa useful tool to examine forces existing in the bay and estuarine system and to predict results of proposed changes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the model continued. The tide generator was computerized in March 1984. Tests were conducted for FEMA to evaluate salinity chanat associated with delta levee failures and on deep draft navigation projects to evaluate salinity intrusion. Historical summary. Original model constructiof was initiated 1956 and completed 1957. The additio the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the orignh model was initiated 1966 and completed 1969. The central exhibits were completed in December 1981 Continued testing of proposals affecting the enviro mental quality of the region including, but not lirite 34-2 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT to: salinity intrusion, dispersion of pollutants, water quality, improvements for navigation, dredging, bay fill, physical structures, other shoreline changes. Total cost of regional visitor exhibits and model as of September 30, 1984, was $10,546,171, of which $4,643,322 was for the regional visitor center, $823,719 for exhibits, and $5,079,130 for maintenance. 4. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys of channels to be dredged in years other than FY 84 were conducted on the following projects: Bodega Bay; Monterey Harbor; NapaRiver; Petaluma River; Richardson Bay Channel; San Leandro Marina; San Rafael Creek; and Suisun Channel, all in California. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization studies was $4,861 for Larkspur Ferry, Marin County, CA. 6. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, included requirement that local interests maintain and operate completed flood control works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the year to determine effectiveness of operation and maintenance by local interests of completed local protection projects and works constructed under emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 and 208 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99, 84th Congress. Fiscal y19e8a4rwmcoas s t was $180,695. Total cost to September 30, $809,850. Projects inspected included Alameda Creek, March 1984; Butte Creek, August 1984; Canyon reek, August 1984; Coffee Creek, August 1984; Corte Madera Creek, April 1984; Coyote Creek, April 1984; t Weaver Creek, August 1984; Eel River at Sandy Pririe, June 1984; Klamath River, August 1984; Mad River at Blue Lake, May 1984; Mark West Creek, July 14; Meiss Lake, August 1984; Pajaro River, April 198; Pinole Creek, March 1984; Redwood Creek, May 18;Rheem Creek, March 1984; Rodeo Creek, March 98; Russian River, May and August 1984; San Leandro k, March 1984; San Lorenzo Creek, March 1984; July 1renzo River, January 1984; Santa Rosa Creek, Dril1984; Schell's Slough, July 1984; Smith River, rie, 1984 Sonoma Creek, July 1984; and Van Duzen River, Ma; 1984. 7. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies was $39,332 for Papermill Creek, Point Reyes, CA. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs of $3,580,845 were incurred for emergency flood control activities, of which $331,582 was for disaster preparedness; $12,004 for emergency operations; and $3,237,259 for rehabilitation. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year costs were $372,942 for emergency bank protection of which $113,110 was for Boronda Road Bridge, Carmel River, CA; $231,575 for San Francisquito Creek, Site 74, CA; $2,741 for Schulte Road Bridge, Carmel River, CA; $9,091 for River Road, Monterey County, CA; and $16,425 for Willow County, Water District Wells, Mendocino, CA. General Investigations 8. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys were $1,056,815, of which $71,093 was for navigation; $918,253 for flood damage prevention; $64,072 for inventory of dams; and $3,397 for coordination with other agencies. 9. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total costs of $22,360 were incurred, of which $20,360 was for flood plain management service program and $2,000 was for hydrologic studies. 10. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Fiscal year total costs were $353,998 of which $327,501 was for Fisherman's Wharf, CA, and $26,497 was for Oakland Outer Harbor (Deepening), CA. 11. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN BODEGA BAY, CA Bodega Bay is a triangular lagoon on the California coast, 85 miles south of Noyo River and 58 miles north of San Francisco. In March 1965, the Committee on Public Works authorized a modification to the existing project and the General Design Memorandum was approved by the Office of Chief of Engineers on June 30, 1982. The plan of improvement consists of a 19-acre marina 34-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 located at Spud Point on the west side of the harbor and protected by a 1,268 foot long baffled concrete pile breakwater and an access channel 1,992 feet long, 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep. The project is being constructed by the locals with a scheduled completion date of July 1985. Federal construction would have consisted of the access channel and the breakwater. The project accommodates 238 commercial fishing and recreational boats. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $585,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $4,314 with General Investigation funds. Since the project is being constructed by the locals, the Federal project was placed in inactive status. NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CA Noyo River rises in the Coast Range, flows westerly, and empties into Noyo Harbor. Noyo Harbor is a cove on the California Coast about 87 miles south of Humboldt Bay and 135 miles northwest of San Francisco. The 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act, modified by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act, authorized up to two breakwaters as necessary to provide protection. The 1976 WRDA authorized construction of additional channel improvements. Recommended plans of improvement for the breakwater and channel improvement were previously considered as a single project. Due to significant differences in the time required for planning and construction, each part is now reported separately. The plans of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Breakwater), CA, provide for a single breakwater immediately west of entrance channel in Noyo Harbor or for two breakwaters inside of Noyo Cove. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,430,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $75,547 with General Investigation funds. Planning is about 50 percent complete. Model studies, using a physical model to test alternative plans, were initiated in FY 84. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Channel Extension), CA, provides for a 60-foot wide extension channel, 7 feet deep, for a distance of about 3,000 feet upstream from the end of the Federal project existing river channel to the Dolphin Isle Marina. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $450,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $81,452 with General Investigation funds. 34-4 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Bodega Bay, CA 1. Crescent City Harbor, CA Fisherman's Wharf Area, San Francisco Harbor, CA Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA Moss Landing Harbor, CA Napa River, CA Noyo River and Harbor, CA Oakland Harbor, CA t:Petaluma River, CA Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. CAopsptrop. New Work Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep 30, 1984 25,000 33,471 153,000 153,414 100,000 138,763 264,000 255,228 129,000 28,721 1,070,000 549,307 2,117,000 1,677,366 2, 1,636,000 2,123,000 8, 1,653,268 2,098,890 2, 341,000 256,000 74,622 520,680 885,000 293,412 145,000 124,347 246,000 239,864 469,000 439,711 100,000 527,787 204,000 123,148 279,000 264,329 1,191,000 1 1,185,137 1 _ - 1,226,7651 2 99,249 4,314 1,226,3651 3 - 16,270 810,6644 - 16,270 810,6644 - - 397,7795 - - 397,7795 802,000 - 9,498,9726 419,303 850,808 9,441,569' 875,300 230,000 12,283,9747 645,408 2,333,215 11,708,844' - - 525,0008 - - 525,0008 - 350,000 350,000 - 180,543 180,543 - - 9,847,2994 0 - - 9,847,299' * 562,200 1,475,009 43,590,88110 40o 683,029 6,304,195 42,496,41010 40 - - 338,215w - - 338,2154 59,000 448,000 3,768,631" 40 47,971 427,295 3,734,93112 o - - 1,021,2741 40 - - 1,021,27418 40 72,000 38,254 1,814,0631 14M 240,156 43,816 1,814,063 14 4 79,000 275,000 1,521,4821" 1 181,133 156,999 1,392,484 '17 826,900 530,000 5,250,654" 19 314,635 991,649 5,178,3441 19 - - 222,810" 4 - - 222,810. 40 - - 9,646,98421 40 - - 9,646,9841 o40 ,796,000 1,294,000 26,316,27322 4 ,771,880 1,251,503 26,213,75522 40 - - 297,146 40 - 297,146 40 34-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep 30, 1984 Maint. Approp. Cost Redwood City New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Richmond Harbor, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost 2. San Francisco Bay New Work to Stockton, CA Approp. John F. Baldwin and Cost tockton Ship Channels) 3. San Francisco Bay New Work and Delta Model, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Francisco New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Francisco New Work Harbor and Bay, CA Approp. (Removal of Drift) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Leandro New Work Marina, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Pablo Bay New Work and Mare Island Approp. Strait, CA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Santa Cruz New Work Harbor, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work CCoosnttrib. Maint. Approp. Cost 358,000 1,560,000 670,000 1,025,407 7,955,5662 4 467,773 76,490 912,547 1,797,546 7 ,4 80,552u 40 -- - 1,672,7222640 - - - 1,672,7222650 1,199,000 90,000 44,000 3,079,000 7,913,325 40 1,042,130 227,129 61,044 2,868,440 7,699,7852 1 - - - 2,886,6957 2 - - - - 2,886,69527" 605,000 2,011,000 1,650,000 2,047,000 14,897,1162 601,144 1,987,571 493,783 2,663,006 14,327,823" - - - 164,689 -- - 164,689 665,000 600,000 432,000 1,200,000 8,542,200 434,944 555,315 467,014 628,744 7,670,828 736,000 513,000 1,782,000 1,141,000 10,623,700 618,490 584,347 1,530,770 1,400,852 10,546,171 - - - 2,689,356�" -- - - 2,689,3561 47,700 2,119,500 1,401,000 424,860 18,835,405"1 41,709 1,928,330 1,409,397 478,865 18,696,4701 40 40 1,324,000 1,167,000 1,073,000 1,143,000 19,028,1820 1,257,564 1,101,096 1,075,404 1,040,828 18,777,70340 18,000 17,955 - 410,176 1,054,52732 45 274,097 918,448" ... 1,369,372 33 ... 1,369,372 1,132,300 2,923,000 1,465,000 3,696,143 28,647,576 1,034,491 2,415,274 1,841,748 3,615,383 28,335,429 .... 1,852,340 - - - 1,852,340 ... . 160,00036 - - - - 160,000 675,000 595,000 742,000 659,000 7,646,159 503,639 679,855 566,161 769,335 7,494,082 34-6 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep 30, 1984 Suisun Bay Channel, New Work CA Approp. - - - - - Cost - - - - - Maint. Approp. 297,000 253,000 594,000 312,000 2,555,338 637 Cost 297,632 61,595 782,935 305,091 2,545,5193 37 Suisun Channel, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 217,6773 Cost - - - - 217,6775 Maint. Approp. 51,000 561,000 -32,000 15,130 1,351,087T Cost 50,806 434,762 94,431 15,130 1,351,08739 1. Includes $641,800 for jetties, bulkheads, main Bodega Bay Channel and turning basin completed in 1943. 2. Includes $585,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($456,000 Construction, General funds and $129,000 General nvestigation funds). 3. Includes $584,563 Preconstruction Planning costs $455,563 Construction, General costs and $129,000 eneral lnvestigation costs). 4. Includes $100,014 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1984. 5. Excludes contributed funds of $2,000. 6. Excludes contributed funds of $271,116 and $2,138 surplus material from Corps military activities. 7. Excludes contributed funds of $44,340. Includes $61,031 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956- 1984. 8. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds in lieu of royaltyfree rock. 9. Includes $2,261,371 for previous project. Excludes $95,000 contributed funds for existing project. 10. Includes $98,206 for previous project and $1,650 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1984. 11. Excludes $5,337 previous project costs. ct1i2v.i tiEesx. cludes $8,539 surplus material from Corps' military Includes $43,112 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1984. Excludes contributed funds of $149,179. 13. Excludes previous project costs. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 14. Includes $241,938 for reconnaissance and condition Surveys, FY 1956-1984. 15. Includes $11,985 for previous project. Excludes $7,180 contributed funds for previous project. 16. Includes $1,223,000 for Preconstruction Planning j73,000 for Breakwater of which $500,000 allocated under astruction, General and $273,000 under General Investii ons); ($450,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 Gneral under Construction, General and $285,000 under General Investigations). B17. Includes $1,094,001 Preconstruction costA$654,1 49 for reakwater of which $500,000 was under Construction, 14neral and $154,149 under General Investigations); ($439,852 nannel Extension of which $165,000 under Construction, 18 and $274,852 under General Investigations). r3'm$. Icludes $32,097 for previous project and $15,436 for '-.sance and condition surveys, Y 1956-1984. Excludes 19 ited funds of $820 for previous project. I 1. rixcludes contributed funds of $4,000 in lieu of provid disposal areas on existing project. 20. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 21. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on existing project. 22. Includes $684,028 for previous projects and $501 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1984. 23. Includes $212,083 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds of $15,559 for previous project. 24. Includes $314,692 for previous project and $79,316 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1984. Excludes contributed funds of $36,430. 25. Includes previous project costs $31,443. Excludes $119,572 contributed funds for existing project. 26. Includes $67,759 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1984. 27. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. Includes $105,000 Public Works Administration funds. 28. Excludes modification authorized October 27, 1965, under project "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)." 29. Excludes $34,800 contributed funds. Includes $3,138 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1984. 30. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. Excludes 134,591 contributed funds for existing project. Includes 193,000 Public Works Administration funds. 31. Includes $475,321 for previous projects and $20,319 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1984. 32. Authorized by FC Act of 1965 (Sec. 201); Maintenance R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes $24,527 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1979-1984. See FY 1977 Annual Report for last full report. Excludes contributed funds of $215,679. 33. Includes $1,086,703 for previous projects. 34. Includes $1,359,380 for previous projects and $1,047 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, F 1956-1984. 35. Excludes $810,046 contributed funds. 36. See Sacramento District FY 1974 Annual Report for deta3i7ls. . Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred to San Francisco DistrictJanuary 1,1974. Excludes Sacramento District's portion. Includes $8,588 for reconnaissance and project condition surveys, FY 1976-1984. 38. Project maintenance assigned to San Francisco District from Sacramento District January 1, 1974. See Sacramento District 1972 Annual Report for full report. 39. Includes $43,578 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1978-1984. 40. See FY 1981 Annual Report for last full report. 34-7 Se REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 34-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. CRESCENT CITY HARBOR, CA July 18, 1918 Breakwater. H. Doc. 434, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Sep. 22, 1922 Conditions of local cooperation modified, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. Jan. 21, 1927 Extend breakwater to 3,000 feet long. H. Doc. 595, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. Aug. 30,1935 Dredge harbor basin, 1,800 feet long, 1,400 feet wide, and Rivers and Harbors 20 feet deep. Committee Doc. 40, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 26, 1937 Sand barrier and maintenance dredging in vicinity of S. Commerce Committee seaward end thereof. print, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Extend breakwater to Round Rock (modified by Chief of H. Doc. 688, 76th Cong., Engineers). 3rd sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Inner breakwater and removal of rock in inner harbor. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers. Oct. 27, 1965 Extend inner breakwater 400 feet and dredge T-shaped H. Doc. 264, 89th Cong.' basin 20 feet deep. 1. Contains latest published map. TABLE 34-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Berkeley Harbor, CA' Berkeley Marina, CA' Halfmoon Bay Harbor, CA Lower San Francisco Bay, CA Monterey Harbor, CA San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA' San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA' San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA' San Rafael Creek, CA Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Completed Completed Completed Active 1966 1979 1979 1935 1971 1974 1976 1976 1981 155,5502 505,2014 6,697,3963 1,108,1825 180,4727 848,2278 210,3909 32,35910 1,801,25412 85,8806 2,008,825"1 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107, Public Law 28. 6-E6x4c5l)u.des $155,551 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds and $105,000 contributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. 4. Excludes $378,989 contributed funds. 5. Includes $207,800 Public Works Administration funds and breakwater modifications (1960 Act) placed inactive 1974. 6. Includes $8,041 for reconnaissance and condition surveys for FY 1956-1984. 7. Includes preauthorization costs $26,855 and exclude contributed funds $153,618. 8. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. d 9. Includes $72,000 preauthorization costs and exclud contributed funds $138,189. 10. Excludes $41,094 contributed funds.itin 11. Includes $108,378 for reconnaissance and conditio surveys FY 1956-1984.iti 12. Includes $11,754 for reconnaissance and conditio surveys FY 1970-1984. 34-8 TABLE 34-D Project SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Status For Last Full Report See Annual Report For Cost to Sep 30, 1984 Operation and Construction Maintenance Humboldt Bay, CA Inactive 1958 2,000 - Santa Cruz County, CA Inactive 1966 245,639 - TABLE 34-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA 1974 Aug. 5, 1977 -- Oakland Harbor, CA (Deepen Tidal Canal) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 - Oakland Harbor, CA (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 - San Lorenzo Creek, CA (Upper Portion) 1962 Nov. 6, 1977 San Pablo Ba and Mare Island Strait, CA pproaches to Vallejo and South Valejo) 1982 Nov. 6, 1977 - 34-9 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona, northwestern New Mexico, and western Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Sacramento River, CA ................... 35-1 2. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels).......................... 35-2 3. San Joaquin River, CA ................... 35-3 4. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ................................ 35-4 Flood Control 5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA ................... 35-4 6. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA ............................... 35-4 7. Corte Madera Creek, CA ................ 35-5 8. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA .............................. 35-6 9. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA ............ 35-7 10. Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA..... 35-8 11. Lower San Joaquin River, CA ............ 35-9 12. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA ............................ 35-9 13. Merced County Stream Group, CA ........ 35-10 14. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA ...................................... 35-10 15. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA ............................. 35-11 Navigation 1* SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 16. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam ...... 35-12 17. Walnut Creek, CA ...................... 35-14 18. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA ........ 35-15 19. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects......................... 35-16 20. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization........................... 35-16 21. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations.............................. 35-16 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 22. New Melones Lake, CA................... 35-17 General Investigations 23. Surveys .................................. 35-18 24. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 35-19 25. Research and Development .............. 35-19 26. Advance Engineering and Design.........35-19 Tables Table 35-A Table 35-B Table 35-C Table 35-D Table 35-E Table 35-F Table 35-G Cost and Financial Statement ..................... 35-21 Authorizing Legislation.....................35-25 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........... 35-27 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 35-27 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects .......... 35-29 Bay, at Collinsville, CA. (See Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA.) Previous projects. For details see page 1985 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual Report for 1938. 35-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. For description of Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 1969. l f. cos for completed portion was $43,932,558 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), $300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations) and excludes local interests cost $10,741,000 (June 1963) for 30-foot deep water ship channel and 13-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. Project also provides for a shallow-draft channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to Sacramento, CA, 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. Estimated Federal cost (July 1973) of new work for shallow-draft river channel is $1,360,000 (includes $1,163,000 for deferred portion between Colusa and Chico Landing). (See table 35-H on tidal and flood conditions prevailing.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep water ship channel project. None required on shallowdraft feature. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and docks at Port of Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are open-pile structures with timber decks, some of which are designed to meet extreme high waters of flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1975." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, Deep Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow Draft Channel: Minor maintenance and operation activities continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Fiscal year costs for major maintenance items consisted of: Maintenance dredging on Sacramento River, mile 12.9 to mile 13.1 and mile 26.9 to mile 35.5 by suction dredge completed by contract, $1,607,282; and stone protection on levees completed by contract, $116,598. Historical summary. Construction of 7-foot shallowdraft channel below Sacramento was initiated in September 1899 and completed in 1904. Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to Sacramento was initiated in FY 1928 and completed in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento was begun in April 1946 but new work was discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In February 1974, remaining work for shallowdraft portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all year; however, there is no regular navigation above Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. Construction of 30-foot deep water ship channel was initiated in July 1949; improvement dredging by continuing contracts resulted in provision of an operational facility for oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Bascule bridge was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August 1961, barge canal in November 1961, and entire deep water ship channel in June 1970. 2. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Port of Stockton through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, Solano, Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Suisun tBay Channel, and San Joaquin River navigation projectsto provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Avon, and 35 feet from Avon to Stockton; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel; reclaiming shoreline marshes and inundated or low lying areas by spoil deposit for public recreation and for industrial use; providing basic recreation facilities on some of the reclaimed areas for public use; and placing additional rock revetment on waterside of levees border ing channels. Approved project estimate (October 1984) is $202,700,000, (includes an allowance for estimat inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $149,000,000, including baSl recreation facilities ($4,780,000); Federal cost (CoaSt Guard) for navigation aids $1,300,000; and non-Feder cost of $52,400,000 for lands and damages, relocatioS berthing areas, and spoil retention dikes, includingu cash contribution ($250,000) that local interests nolS make for land enhancement at time of construction Local interests must also pay, contribute in kind, of repay with interest one-half of separable cost of proJ& allocated to recreation ($2,600,000). Existing pro was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (II.t 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest publish map). Local cooperation. Local interests, through a puli body legally authorized and financially capable, Id give assurances they will furnish lands, easements 35-2 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation, including spoildisposal areas designated by the Chief of Engineers; provide necessary spoil retention dikes, bulkheads, and embankments except as applicable to spoil-disposal areas designated as public recreation areas; make utility modifications and relocations required for construction, including new bridges or bridge alterations (except for railroad bridges), and absorb any increased annual maintenance and operation costs resulting therefrom; provide and maintain all necessary berthing areas, at a depth commensurate with project depth, at all terminals and wharves to be served by the deepened channels; and in recognition of the local land enhancement benefits to result from landfill during dredging, contribute to the United States 4 cents per cubic yard of all spoil material placed during initial construction for modification of Suisun Bay Channel project on areas not developed for public use. Local interests must also give satisfactory assurances, before starting construction of the affected units, that they will maintain and operate the Federally provided recreation areas and facilities, continue to maintain to adequate standards the levees altered, set back or provided revetment protection, and hold the U.S. Government free from damages due to deposition of spoil and construction of new levees or reconstruction of existing levees. Local interests, represented by Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County and Stockton Port District, must, at time of construction, contribute $250,000 in cash for land enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation ($2,600,000); and maintain and operate basic recreation facilities after construction and install additional basic facilities required as demands on area expand. No work shall be undertaken on a modification of Suisun Bay Channel project unit to deepen the channel to more than 35 feet between Avon and a proposed refinery or manufacturing plant, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for such installation Within the Avon-Chipps Island reach of channel. Also, no work shall be undertaken on modification of San Joaquin River navigation project unit, regarding access channels in vicinity of Antioch, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for Port of Antioch. Formal assurances for deepening and otherwise iproving the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel from Pittsburg to Stockton were furnished by Stockton Port District April 9, 1970. The Stockton Port District, in Alust 1980, formally provided their intent to sponsor t Avon to Pittsburg reach (Suisun Bay Channel) and eation development on Roberts Island. The Port of kton, by letter of October 20, 1981, stated that they W.d furnish the necessary assurances for fish and 1982ife mitigation and enhancement, and on April 13, to, rovided formal updated assurances for the Avon r ton portion. A sec. 221 agreement satisfying all 8huernents of local cooperation for Southampton '88and Richmond Long Wharf maneuvering area W obtained from Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and signed by District Engineer July 31, 1984. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1983, and 31, revised 1982, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif." and "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and Port Series No. 32, revised 1975, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Sacramento District: Engineering continued. Channel improvement-dredging mile 41.0-mile 30.9 John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channel was continued at fiscal year contract cost of $396,367. Dredging McDonald Island, mile 30.9 to Jersey Island, mile 10.1 was initiated at fiscal year contract cost of $2,317,437. San Francisco District: Continued planning activities including model studies. Historical summary. Construction of project was initiated in June 1971 and is about 25 percent complete. 3. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. Rises in east central California and flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to its confluence with Sacramento River at head of Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 miles from its mouth in Suisun Bay at Pittsburg to city of Stockton. Waterborne access to city provided by Stockton Channel, an artificial cut extending from river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Sheet 5527.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-I for total cost of new work for project completed in May 1960.) Projects units (1950 modification) reclassifed and excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-J. Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA, (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 209, 89th Cong., 1st sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 2. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for details of required cash contributions on completed, inactive and deferred portions of project, see Existing project paragraph, Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. For description of harbor facilities at Port of Stockton, CA, see Port Series 32, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif.," revised 1975. Downstream from Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, where there are wharves 35-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 for shallow- and deep-draft vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present and immediate future. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were accomplished by hired labor. Channel dredging by suction dredge, Stockton Deep Water Channel, San Joaquin River, was initiated at contract cost of $719,999. (Repair or restoration of wavewash protection is required by legislation authorized by Improvement No. 2.) Historical summary. Active portion of existing project was completed in May 1960. Construction of project was initiated in December 1877. 4. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Record and condition surveys were conducted at various times during fiscal year at several navigation projects at a cost of $15,000. Flood Control 5. BUCHANAN DAM-H. V. EASTMAN LAKE, CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CA Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city of Chowchilla, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 205- foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $28,919,597, of which $27,369,597 is Federal cost, including $4,580,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $1,550,000 non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $500,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 98, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on Chowchilla River was designated "H. V. Eastman Lake" by Public Law 93-217. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Chowchilla recreation area: Installation of solar heating was initiated and completed at fiscal year contract cost of $20,790; erosion control and road repair was initiated at fiscal year contract cost of $54,000; and paving of roads and parking areas was completed at fiscal year contract cost of $7,390. Runoff of Chowchilla River above Buchanan Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 124,300 acrefeet occurred March 15, 1984. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 4,200 cubic feet per second on December 25, 1983. Maximum release of 1,000 cubic feet per second on December 27, 1983, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 38,400 acre-feet of water was released for flood control and a total of 114,900 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in May 1979. Construction of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances were combined under one contract. Project was completed in September 1983, except for installation of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely). Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation structure was completed in February 1976. Channel improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in January 1976; Phase II was completed in February 1978. Residences, administration building, and visitors center contract was completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in April 1979. A resources interpretive display and road relocation were completed in FY 1982. Dam safety assurance studio were initiated in FY 1981. Solar heating was installed at Chowchilla recreation area in FY 1984. 6. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CA Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada and it foothills, flow easterly across flatlands of San J0 aqn Valley and empty into San Joaquin River directly or through various sloughs, in vicinity of Stockton, A Littlejohn Creek is in Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three principal stream syst e of the group are, from south to north, Lone Tree Crekt Littlejohn Creek, and Duck Creek. Calaveras Ri group is in Calaveras and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams of the groups are, from sout 35-4 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT north, Calaveras River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley Springs quadrangle for New Hogan reservoir area and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for Farmington reservoir area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost (July 1955) for project was $3,995,684, of which $3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New Hogan: Federal cost for project is $15,906,150, including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $897,742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is $6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, including reimbursement ($488,096) to local interests of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated Federal construction cost in accordance with section 3, Public Law 738, 74th Congress. Non- Federal cost included in above amount is $3,242,867 for relocations and lands and damages, exclusive of above Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to conservation functions of project. These costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of which was $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water; local interests paid $2,383,320 through December 31, 1983. A long-term contract between that agency and local water users was executed August 25, 1970. A concesaionaire at New Hogan Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $234,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: New Hogan Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: None. Maintenance: Bear Creek-Levee and channel improvenentprevented $300,000 in damages from the December 1983-April 1984 rainfloods. Farmington Dam-Maintenance and operation activities continued; structures Were maintained in serviceable condition. During the flood season, maximum flow of Duck Creek diversion as 5 1,430 cubic feet per second December 24, 1983. ,,ximum flow of Littlejohn Creek at Farmington was cubic feet per second December 26, 1983. Maxiun storage in reservoir was 13,400 acre-feet on t)5ember 26, 1983, and maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 9,000 cubic feet per second on Decemtb r 25, 1983 Project prevented an estimated $1,800,000 i damages from the December 1983-April 1984 rainfloods. New Hogan Lake-Maintenance and operation activities continued. Repaving of the administration area and access road was initiated at a fiscal year contract cost of $30,000. Installation of solar heating at recreation facilities was initiated and completed at fiscal year contract cost of $19,702. A cultural resources survey was completed at fiscal year cost of $1,577. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New Hogan was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 217,700 acrefeet occurred October 1, 1983. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 9,600 cubic feet per second on December 25, 1983. Maximum release of 4,000 cubic feet per second on December 26, 1983, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 203,300 acre-feet of water was released for flood control and 98,200 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Farmington Dam: Construction of Farmington project was initiated in July 1949 and completed for beneficial flood control operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement was completed in November 1951; and channel improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was completed in May 1955. There are no recreation facilities or public-use areas. All work completed. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, project completed for operational use in June 1964, and all work completed October 1973. Recreation facilities have been provided from Code 710 appropriations. Seepage measurement weir constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 and was completed in June 1967. Final cash contribution was made to local interests December 23, 1970. Solar heating was installed at recreation facilities in FY 1984. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 7. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Location. Creek and tributaries drain an area of 28 square miles in Marin County, CA, and discharge into west side of San Francisco Bay at a point about 9 miles north of Golden Gate. (See Geological Survey quadrangle San Rafael.) Existing project. Provides for about 11 miles of channel improvements, including realignment, enlargement, levees, riprapping, rectangular concrete sections, interior drainage facilities, bridge relocations, and debris removal on Corte Madera Creek and lower reaches of its tributaries, and a continuous channel rights-of-way to deep water in San Francisco Bay reserved to assure channel outlet in the event of future tideland reclamation. Approved estimated cost for new work (October 1984) is $19,000,000, of which $12,300,000 is Federal cost and $6,700,000 is non-Federal cost 35-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 (includes $160,000 to be contributed by local interests.) (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including suitable areas for disposal of waste material, modify or relocate all bridges and utilities necessary for construction and maintenance; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate the project after completion in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, and prevent encroachment on flood channels that would result in decreasing the effectiveness of project for flood control; adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project; and contribute in cash 1.5 percent of Federal construction cost of Ross Valley unit and tidal areas, an estimated $160,000. Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District previously furnished resolution of local assurances dated March 29,1966, March 28,1967, August 15,1967, and July 8,1969, and Marin County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed by letter dated September 28, 1978. The Ross Town Council approved the alternative plan on May 25,1978. The project was authorized by the State of California by 1965 Statute, Chapter 1388. The Board of Supervisors of Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District furnished assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements for portion of project below Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. Acquisition of rights-of-way and dredge material disposal areas, relocations and construction for remaining work is being held in abeyance as a result of a request from Congress for a review of alternatives other than completing the project as an open concrete channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: As directed by Congress, Sacramento District initiated plans and specifications for redredging Lower Corte Madera Creek channel. On December 13, 1983, Marin County Board of Supervisors reconfirmed assurances of local cooperation because a Superior Court judgment ordered that county to take all steps required by law to complete channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (Unit 4) and maintain entire project as agreed. Historical summary. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. Project is about 75 percent complete considering the portion being held in abeyance upstream of Sir Frances Drake Boulevard. Work remaining: Design and construction of the remaining 3,000 feet of channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Ross Creek. In lieu of the authorized concrete channel, an alternative plan consisting of wing walls and individual house floodproofing is being recommended in the Significant Post-Authorization Change Report. The portion of Corte Madera Creek upstream of intersection of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Corte Madera Creek in Ross, near the city of San Anselmo, was classified as "inactive" on July 11, 1984, due to lack of local support. 8. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVER, CA Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera, CA(See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a l63. foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In conjunction with the dam, the project provides for about 13 milesof downstream levee and channel improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream of Chowchilla Canal cros ing to accommodate project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Govern. ment. Total first cost for existing project is $31,785,426, of which $30,555,426 is Federal cost, including $3,564,168 for basic recreation facilities, and estimated $1,230,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local coopers. tion paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $300,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in the project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 87th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Lake created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno River was designated "Hensley Lake" by Public Law 93-603 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Installation of solar heating and paving of roads at recreation areas were initiated and completed at fiscal year contract costs of $15,798 and $49,000, respectively. Runoff of Fresno River above Hidden Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 51,700 acre-feet occurred October 1, 1983 Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 2,900 cubic feet per second on December 25, 1983. Maximum release of 2,300 cubic feet per second on December 27 1983, was below maximum permissible flood rele During the year, 27,300 acre-feet of water was rele2 for flood control and about 98,800 acre-feet of waterw released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam closUm was in March 1975; dam was completed Novems 1975. Instrumentation was completed in January 19,6 Downstream channel improvement, Fresno River, W' completed April 1976. Recreation areas: Phase t 9 completed in March 1976; Phase II was complet June 1978. Residences, administration building, grou and utilities contract was completed in February Landscaping was completed in December 1978 35-6 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT erosion control was completed in January 1979. Project was completed in September 1980. Final land audit was approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer installation was completed in September 1982. Solar heating was installed at recreation areas in FY 1984. 9. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CA Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of Bakersfield, CA, near confluence of north and south forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of vet) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. Federal cost for new work is $22,027,452. For future non-Federal reimbursement see Local cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost funded from Code 710 appropriations is $2,199,085. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projectby chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests, represented by North Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, were required to reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of project. These costs, based on a cost allocation study completed in December 1955, are $4,573,000 of first cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water. Under provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid $1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A long-term contract between the Bureau and local water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance due on allocated first cost of $4,573,000 was paid by the water users on March 31, 1965. Kern County assumed administration of recreation and development and maintenance of Public use areas at project in accordance with a 25-year license February 15, 1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for joint operation and development by the Corps and Kern County including permits granted t concessionaires by the county to provide certain services. As of September 30, 1971, Kern County relinquished all administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at the Project. A State law ermitting the Department of t..,g and Waterways (known as the Department of 19 )tion and Ocean Development prior to January Ae'd deeOr al paagretincciipeas tew ina si nslaignnde wd atbeyr dthevee lGopomveernnto rw oitnh tt ge11,1972. All concessionaires will operate under Prmits ranted by the Corps. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county and the marina concessionaires is about $880,000; $235,000 of this was a grant from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and about $449,000 is investment by marina concessionaires. Licenses. In accordance with Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578, issued April 1, 1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal Government by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ($108,352) and Southern California Edison Co. ($269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits from April 15, 1954, to December 31, 1962. Subsequent to 1962, the power companies have in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 for headwater benefits. That amount was to be paid each year until changes in operation, development, or costs indicated some modification to be advisable. Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578 was revised by Docket No. HBO7-75-4-000 (order issued July 11, 1983 under 24 FERC, paragraph 62052) which modified cumulative use charges for subsequent years. Cumulative use charges collected by the Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) and returned to the U. S. Treasury through period ending September 30, 1984, amounted to $1,359,726. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. Oxidation pond renovation at Main Dam campground was initiated and completed at a fiscal year contract cost of $179,368. A cultural resources survey was completed at fiscal year contract cost of $17,852. Dam safety assurance studies at Isabella Dam were continued by contract and hired labor at a fiscal year cost of $161,920. Structures were maintained in good condition. Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Lake was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 407,400 acrefeet occurred June 7, 1984. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 5,300 cubic feet per second on December 25, 1983, and maximum outflow of 2,230 cubic feet per second occurred February 1, 1984. During the year, 459,700 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 496,600 acre-feet was released for irrigation. Project prevented an estimated $10,900,000 in damages from the December 1983-April 1984 rainfloods and the May- June 1984 snowmelt runoff. Historical summary. Construction began in March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. Storage impoundment began December 1952. Piezometer was installed in August 1982. Project is operating to provide flood protection and irrigation benefits for which it was designed. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 35-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 10. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE, CA Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River about 20 miles east of Visalia, CA. Success Lake is on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is $19,302,957, including $242,605 for basic recreation facilities and excluding spreading works constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works portion of project has been deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of project. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $700,004. Success Lake: For description of completion improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work for Success Lake is $14,247,221, including $253,697 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $747,048. For future non-Federal reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District. Local interests for Success Lake are considered to be represented by the Vandalia, Porterville, and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and Pioneer Water Co., which represent over 90 percent of irrigated land and waterright holders along Tule River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of projects. These costs are estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and annual costs for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they will continue to operate and maintain spreading works and downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local interests for Success stated they will continue to maintain downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users for irrigation supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were executed January 11, 1965, and April 30, 1965, respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for irrigation storage as well as flood control and incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired water for recreation pools at the projects. Local interests paid the following total amounts for irrigation services from the reservoirs through December 31, 1983: Terminus, $1,484,955 and Success, $683,734. Tulare County was granted a 25-year license for planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success, July 10,1960, and at Terminus, Junes, 1961. Basic public-use facilities constructed by Corpsat the Success reservoir were transferred tojurisdictionof Tulare County on January 18, 1962; facilities at Terminus were transferred June 20, 1962. In March 1967, an amendment to the license agreements was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Under these amended licenses, Tulare County retained administration of only specified land areas and opera tion and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued their program of water safety, boat inspection, and law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took over the administration of the remainder of the project land areas and the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds to improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and manag. ment of public recreation areas at Terminus Dam Tulare County by expenditure of county funds and byn lease to a marina concessionaire has aided in the development of recreation facilities at an estimatedg of $145,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds in conjunction with Tulare Sportsmans Council, developing a habitat for upland game birdsat Success Lake. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and manage ment of public recreation areas at Success Lake, except for the Bartlett Park recreation area. Tulare Cout' has aided in development of recreation facilities. Tt cost to date of present recreation facilities developeby the county ($360,000) and the marina concessions"T ($368,000) is about $728,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Nen work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 71 funds: None. Success Lake, regular funds, None. Code 710 fun: None. Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance andos tion continued. A cultural resources survey was t pleted at fiscal year contract cost of $2,342. Piezomf installation was initiated and completed at fiscal contract cost of $97,788. Structures were maint1fll serviceable condition. Runoff of Kaweah River Terminus Dam was above normal for the year. mum storage of 143,000 acre-feet occurred on M it* 1984. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reserve r December 25, 1983, was about 7,300 cubic feet second. Maximum outflow of 2,650 cubic feet pe S," occurred December 29, 1983. Water released foT, control amounted to 198,800 acre-feet and irriPl and spreading releases totaled 329,400 acre-feet. prevented an estimated $11,300,000 in damas the December 1983-April 1984 rainfloods and th 35-8 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT June 1984 snowmelt runoff. Success Lake: Maintenance and operation continued. Paving of recreation roads and parking areas at Tule recreation area, Success Lake, was completed at fiscal year contract cost of $90,829. A cultural resources survey was completed. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above the reservoir was above normal during the year. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 3,900 cubic feet per second on December 27, 1983, and maximum outflow of 1,210 cubic feet per second occurred on December 30, 1983. Maximum storage of 61,000 acre-feet occurred on June 18, 1984. Water released for flood control amounted to 98,300 acre-feet and irrigation and spreading releases amounted to 85,600 acre-feet. Project prevented an estimated $4,300,000 in damages from the December 198-April 1984 rainfloods and the May-June 1984 snowmelt runoff. Historical summary. Terminus Dam: Construction of project began in July 1957 and was completed in June 1968 except for final settlement for one tract of land upon decision of pending court case. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in February 1959, was completed in June 1962. Dam has been operating since November 1961 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced May 1962. Appurtenances are in good condition. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. Piezometer installation and a cultural resources survey were completed in FY 1984. Success Lake: Construction of project began in November 1956, was completed in June 1968, and final audit of historical land record was approved December 17, 1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in October 1958, was completed in May 1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced March 1962. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 11. LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. On Lower San Joaquin River, CA, from City of Stockton, CA, upstream to Friant Dam (about 19 miles northeast of Fresno). Existing project. This project is a modification and extension of the previous Lower San Joaquin River and Tiutaries project (see Annual Report for 1976) to irovide clearing and snagging on the San Joaquin Rver from Stockton, CA, upstream to Friant Dam. Dproved estimate (October 1984) of Federal cost is *%.eo,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation cuugh the construction period). Existing project was Ulule in the 1983 Supplemental Appropriatins Act, role Law 98-63, July 29, 1983, which states that the Proect for flood protection on the Lower San Joaquin River, CA, authorized by the Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1984, as amended, is hereby further modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, to perform clearing and snagging on the San Joaquin River from Stockton, CA, to Friant Dam, at an estimated cost of $5,000,000. Local cooperation. Prior to initiation of construction, a non-Federal entity shall furnish adequate assurance for providing all lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility relocations at no expense to the Federal Government, execute a written agreement pursuant to sec. 221 Public Law 96-611; agree to operate and maintain the project works upon completion of construction in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Department of the Army; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Operations and results during fiscal year. A Plan of Action, February 1984, was prepared for the project. It identifies types of problems in the area, work tasks required to facilitate project modification, and an outline of schedule to accomplish required work. Design Memorandum No. 5 for Eastside Bypass at San Joaquin River was prepared in September 1984. First construction contract was scheduled for award in October 1984. Historical summary. A Plan of Action, February 1984, has been prepared. Design Memorandum No. 5 for Eastside Bypass at San Joaquin River was prepared in September 1984. First construction contract has been scheduled for award on October 12, 1984. 12. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NV AND CA Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary of Truckee River, near Truckee, CA; intermittent channel improvements are on Truckee River in Reno, NV. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance of reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of project, including recreation facilities, was continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 1,010 acre-feet occurred on December 25, 1983. Maximum daily inflow to the 35-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 reservoir on December 25, 1983, was about 240 cubic feet per second and maximum daily outflow of 230 cubic feet per second occurred December 26, 1983. Historical summary. Project construction began in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; dam was completed in August 1972; basic recreation facilities were completed in December 1972; and project was completed in June 1974. Recreation facilities under Code 710 funding were considered infeasible. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. 13. MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements are on Bear, Burns, Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of city of Merced, CA. (See Geological Survey Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and diversions from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek and from Owens Creek to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands including relocations and channel improvement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures were maintained in a serviceable condition. Runoff from drainage areas above Merced County stream group reservoirs was above normal for the year. (See table 35-K for maximum inflow storage and outflow for projects.) Outflows were less than channel capacity rates in the project streams. Historical summary. Construction was initiated March 1948, with construction of Mariposa project, which was completed in November 1948. Construction of Owens project, initiated in March, was completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and Bear project initiated in April, was completed in December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek diversion channels and streamgaging stations were completed in April 1956. Local interests completed channel enlargement and restoration of channel capacities of Miles, Burns, Owens, and Mariposa Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements downstream, outside limits of project. 14. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CA Location. Reservoir is on Kings River, about 25miles east of Fresno, CA, and channel improvements are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, about25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological Survey quad. rangles of area.) Existing project. Improvement is a unit in compre hensive plan for flood control and other related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin Basins. Project consistsof a 429-foot high concrete gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a maximum discharge capacityof 391,000 cubic feet per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, irrigation, and related purposes. Outlet provi sions for future power development are included in dam, but Federal construction of power-generating facilities is not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and channel work on Kings River and its distribu taries on valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno Channel improvement work will enlarge channel capaci ties and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings River. There are nine public-use and recreation areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is $42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal (including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and $570,000 non-Federal for rights-of-way for downstream channel improvement For future non-Federal reimbursement, see ILOe cooperation paragraph. Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,595,100 exclusive of recreation facilities previously provided at a cost of $13,7001n addition, Federal cost of recreation facilities for pine Flat Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239,1 (July 1963). Operation and maintenance of da-rn i reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing prOjt was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 630 76th Cong., 3d sess., contains latest published map) Local cooperation. Local interests must reimbu# the Federal Government for first costs allocaited irrigation functions of reservoir portion of projecti accordance with reclamation law. Under provision f War Department Civil Appropriations Act of 194'^ .f Secretary of War, with concurrence of the Secrero the Interior, determined allocation of cost to irrgtiOO should be set at an amount not to exceed $14,250 , addition, local interestsmust pay 37.4 percentofa maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. He ment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamatiofl0 the local water users for the irrigation use ofth reservoir were executed December 23, 1963. The Bu is administering the contracts in accordance WI 35-10 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT reclamation law as amended by the Reclamation Reform Act of October 12, 1982. That act generally exempts the limitations under the early reclamation laws as being applicable to projects constructed by the Corps with two exceptions; however, all existing contracts to share construction and maintenance costs remain in effect. Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Bureau provided conservation water to local interests under an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid $12,436,232 for irrigation services through December 31, 1983. With respect to the downstream channel improvements, sec.3, Flood Control Act of June 22,1936, applies. King River Conservation District represents local interests; assurances were accepted November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished all requirements for construction rights-of-way for construction of channel improvements required to date. Three concessionaires-one each at Lakeridge Marina (Deer Creek), Lakeview Marina (Lombardo's Fishing Village), and Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary of the Army. Estimated cost to date of facilities installed by these concessionaires is $1,694,000. Fresno County developed public-use facilities on an 85-acre tract immediately downstream from dam for picnicking, camping, swimming, and playground activities, at an estimated cost to dateof $476,000 under provisions of a license agreement. The U.S. Forest Service developed and operates a picnic area at the upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is about $37,500. Licenses. License No. 1988, effective April 1, 1955, WMas issued by Federal Power Commission to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power development of North Fork Kings River by the company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. Under interim Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1182 with the Department of the Army, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid for Storage of power water in the Pine Flat reservoir May 15,1954, through March 31,1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1328 with the Department of the Army provides for storage of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot; the contract covers April 1, 1955, through March 31, 2005. By an agreement of January 1972, supplementing the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. transferred ownership of nmostof its Kings River system water to the Kings River Water Association. Accordingly, no further significant storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the reervoir at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment ader these contracts through June 30, 1972, (last year 4ment), amounts to $2,478,798; these funds are Ptidto Sacramento District and deposited for return to th Treasury. okrations and results during fiscal year. New W:regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Itenance: Maintenance and operation actvtise respued. Improvement of access road to Deer Creek WmOID~PPleaterde aa tn feisacra l Isylaenard cPoanrtkra crte ccroesat tioofn $6a6r,e5a2 2w. aA cultural resources survey was completed at fiscal year contract cost of $1,065. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 949,200 acre-feet occurred on June 5, 1984. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 14,700 cubic feet per second on December 25, 1983, and maximum outflow of 6,630 cubic feet per second occurred on July 10, 1984. During the year, 489,500 acre-feet of water was released for flood control and 1,830,000 acrefeet of water was released for irrigation and spreading. Project prevented an estimated $24,000,000 in damages from the December 1983-April 1984 rainfloods and May-June 1984 snowmelt runoff. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $25,782. Historical summary. Construction began in April 1947 and project, including channel improvement, was completed in September 1977. Main dam was initiated in January 1950, completed in June 1954, and has been operating since February 1954 to provide flood protection for which it was designed. Total of 35.2 miles of new and reconstructed levees and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been transferred to the Kings River Conservation District for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are complete. Completed preliminary design and cost estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by the State, but the State was unable to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 15. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 35-L and 35-M for latest approved estimated costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from 35-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Actof 1958, as amended, for that part of the construction cost, (27.8% of total construction cost, currently estimated at $92,300,000) and the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, tentatively estimated at $358,000. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $74,900. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961. No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Local interests have expended approximately $1,000,000 to provide partial flood protection in project area and have constructed facilities at an approximate cost of $20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed Coyote Valley reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coyote Valley Dam: None. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities included initiation of plans and specifications for upgrading Rockpile Road, boat launching ramp Phase II, Buzzard Rock and Warm Springs recreation areas, and administration and operation facility. Remaining recreation facilities beyond minimal plan were unscheduled pending development of cost sharing agreement with local interests for construction and operation and maintenance. Fiscal year costs for major items of work included: Final payment of claims on main dam, $3,716,700 and a negotiated settlement with Sonoma County for the takeover and repair of relocated county roads, $4,000,000. Spillway repair, boat launching Phase I facilities, dam embankment turf and drainage, bank stabilization, and control tower epoxy contracts were completed at fiscal year costs of $471,168, $1,381,817, $479,705, $1,369,304, and $674,094, respectively. Construction contract for dam and appurtenances, awarded May 1978, is 99 percent complete. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: Operation and maintenance continued. Road repair at Bu Shay recreation area was completed at contract cost of $343,317. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork at Russian River was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 90,000 acre-feet occurred on April 10,1984. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 5,600 cubic feet per second on December 24, 1983. Maximum release of 2,000 cubic feet per second occurred on December 24, 1983. During the year, water released for all purposes totaled 260,800 acre-feet. Project prevented an estimated $30,000 in damages from December 1983-April 1984 rainfloods. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at fiscal year cost of $145,548. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at Warm Springs Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 51,000 acre-feet occurred December 26, 1983. Maximum daily inflow to reservoir was 9,500 cubic feet per second on December 24, 1983. Maximum release of 2,400 cubic feet per second occurred December 28, 1983. During the year, water released for all purposes totaled 194,100 acre-feet. Project prevented an estimated $10,000 in damages from the December 1983-April 1984 rainfloods. Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendo cino), is about 90 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility wAS transferred to the Sacramento District. Warm Springs construction completions include fish hatchery in December 1980, reservoir clearing in July 1981, project overlook in May 1981, downstream stabillzation sills in October 1981, and dam closure in October 1982. Major items of work remaining include upgrading Rockpile Road, minimal recreation facilities, boat ramp and administration facilities, vegetation management program with remaining boundary fencing and mo0n" toring of initial reservoir filling of Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake. Responsibility for construction was transferred to Sacramento District in August 198. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. 16. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 m'co and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, CA. Works covered by this improv ment are on Sacramento River and tributaries.fro?" Collinsville to Shasta Dam, about mile 312. Dralar area above Rio Vista is 26,500 square miles Geological Survey quadrangles of area for Sacrame River and Upper Butte Basin; Flournoy andF 35-12 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT quadrangles for Black Butte Lake; and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, Redding, and Hooker quadrangles for Table Mountain Lake.) Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes in Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries, for flood control purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing; construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension of Moulton weir, and construction of a bypass through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing levees in Sutter, Thdale, Sacramento, and Yolo Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel enlargement on following minor tributaries of Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek (Tehama County); Thomes Creek; and Willow Creek. Improvement provides for about 155 miles of channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees with an average height of 12 feet and a freeboard of 3 feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as required for protection of bypass levee slopes against erosion. Total first cost for project is $18,300,000 (October 1984), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, and $6,400,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations. (See table 35-N on project units classified and excluded from cost estimate.) (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA: An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood Control project which provides for construction of bank protection works and minor channel improvements as required on Sacramento River between Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1984) for project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties 18$32,90 0 ,00 0 , of which $31,000,000 is Federal cost and 1,900,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations. (c) Sacramento River, CA, Bank Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 405,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second phase covering 430,000 lineal feet of bank protection under a long range program of bank protection, erosion control works, and setback levees at critical locations within limits of authorized or existing levees included in the Sacramento River Flood Control project to protect integrity of levee system for flood control Purposes. Total estimated (October 1984) first cost for Project is $138,000,000, of which $92,000,000 is Federal (including $2,845,000 for recreation facilities) and ,000,00 0 non-Federal comprising $20,000,000 for ruand damages including relocations and $26,000,000 reouired cash contribution toward first cost. Construclev ee (a), (b), and (c) above supplements program of l eoodprovements as accomplished pursuant to 1917 inloodControl Act, as amended by subsequent acts, includiing 1941 Flood Control Act, and which are reported by California Debris Commission under Sacramento River, CA, flood control. (d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte Lake. For description of completed project see Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project is $14,508,820, including $475,507 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire at Black Butte Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $87,000. (e) Authorization also provided for construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 3 miles north of Red Bluff, CA. This project unit was deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all work completed or under contract, and local interests indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for the "active" project has been completed, transferred to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. Fully complied with for portions completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; completed work, bank protection at 31 sites, was transferred to and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash that, when added to costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1984) at $26,000,000. Local interests fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute costs over and above costs of setbacks, and provide local contribution indicated above. Completed units transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local interests must pay the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to the conservation functions of the project; these costs are estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to October 22, 1970, contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and the State of California provided for repayment of irrigation storage costs; Bureau administered contract in accordance with reclamation law. Local interests paid a total of $77,205 for irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided that Black Butte project be financially integrated with the 35-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Central Valley project, coordinated operationally with other Central Valley project storage units by the Bureau under the Secretary of the Interior, and that dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically operated and maintained by the Corps in a manner compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries-Engineering and design activities continued. A rock procurement contract for remedial work to be performed by the State of California was initiated at a fiscal year contract cost of $175,125. Project prevented an estimated $2,500,000 in damages from the December 1983-April 1984 rainfloods. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project-Engineering and design activities continued. Project prevented an estimated $1,200,000 in damages from the December 1983-April 1984 rainfloods. (See table 35-0 for construction accomplished and contract costs.) (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff-Bank protection, two sites, mile 209.5 and mile 217.5, (Unit 6), Sacramento River, Tehama County, was completed in November 1983 at fiscal year contract cost of $131,859. Bank protection on four sites, miles 241.0, 237.9, 237.7, and 237.5 (Unit 7), Sacramento River, Tehama County, was initiated at fiscal year contract cost of $1,658,870. Project prevented an estimated $60,000 in damages from the December 1983-April 1984 rainfloods, (d) Black Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Paving of recreation roads and parking areas at Buckhorn recreation area, Black Butte Lake, was initiated at a fiscal year contract cost of $200,000. Paving of recreation roads and parking areas at Eagle Pass recreation area, Black Butte Lake, was completed at fiscal year contract cost of $58,318. A cultural resources survey was completed at fiscal year cost of $2,419. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at fiscal year cost of $318,086. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 113,300 acre-feet occurred April 2, 1984. Maximum bihourly inflow to Black Butte reservoir was 25,600 cubic feet per second on December 25, 1983, and maximum outflow of 12,800 cubic feet per second occurred on December 25, 1983. Releases of water for irrigation totaled 189,400 acrefeet and flood control releases totaled 430,200 acre-feet. Project prevented an estimated $300,000 in damages from the December 1983-April 1984 rainfloods. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: None. Historical summary. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries (active portions): Construction was initiated in May 1949 on Deer Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder Creek, Chico and Mud Creeks, and Sandy Gulch units have been completed. Active portion of this improvement is about 96 percent complete. Work remaining is bypass levee revetment as required. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Construction of first unit was initiated in June 1963; initial phase of project was completed in November 1974. Phase II is underway, and overall project is about 76 percent complete. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Active portion of project, bank protection in Tehama County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 31 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties as of September 1984 and transferred to State for maintenance. Bank protection on Sacramento River, Tehama County-one site, mile 215, (Unit 5), was completed November 1982, and two sites, mile 209.5 and mile 217.5, (Unit 6), were completed in November 1983, and four sites, 241.0, 237.9, 237.7, and 237.5 (Unit 7) were initiated. (d) Black Butte Lake: Construction began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final land acquisition was completed in December 1966. Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 and completed in December 1963. Dam has been operating since November 1962 to provide the flood protection for which it was designed. Final cost allocation approved May 3, 1977. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer installation and slope for protection at the dam were completed in FY 1983. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 17. WALNUT CREEK, CA Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo, and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, CA. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about 1 mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Comprises extension of existing levees, construction of new levees and concrete channels channel rectification and enlargement, and utilization of improvements constructed or planned by local inter' ests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of levees. Cost estimate (1984) is $103,100,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period, of which $68,100,000 is Federal cost and $30,500,000 i non-Federal cost (includes $25,100,000 for lands and damages and relocations except railroad facilities, and $5,400,000 required cash contribution for land enhanc~ ment benefits provided by the project). Local interests have expended about $3 million for flood control in h project area during the period 1955-1965, includingth concrete conduits constructed through the city of Walnut Creek at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered a preproject condition to be incorporated in the CorP project. The cost thereof is not included in above costs local cooperation. Improvement adopted by 1960 Flo 35-14 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Control Act (H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22,1936, applies, except that relocation of railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In addition, local interests must make a cash contribution to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of cost of construction for land enhancement benefits provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated (October 1984) at $,400,000. Local interests are represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, including evidence of financial and legal ability to fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were accepted by the Sacramento District Engineer on November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District furnished all rights-of-way required to date and indicated that it will furnish all requirements as needed for future construction. The Flood Control District will arrange for highway bridge modifications and utility relocations before start of work by the Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed funds will bemade in installments in amounts equal to 7.4 percent of the estimated construction expenditure for each fiscal year. To date, $3,111,247 has been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for the uncompleted portions of Walnut and San Ramon Creeks and upper Pine Creek are continuing. Construction contract for upper Pine Creek channel improvement, Phase 3, was continued at fiscal year cost of $2,164,879. Historical summary. Construction was initiated June 1964; project is about 79 percent complete. Total of 16.7 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 miles of levee construction, part of channel improvement landscaping, and Drop Structures No. 1 and 2 have been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Planning and design continued on remaining reaches. Work remaining consists of channel improvement on Walnut Creek (SPRR bridge to Broadway Avenue) and San Ramon bypass (Ignacio Valley Road to Rudgear Road along SPRR alignment) and upper Pine Creek. Construction responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. 18. WILDCAT AND SAN PABLO CREEKS, CA Location. Project is located in vicinity of San Pablo and Richmond, Contra Costa County, CA, about 20 miles northeast of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Plan of improvement consists of 90 lineal feet of channel improvements on Wildcat k and 9,600 lineal feet of channel improvementson Pablo Creek. Improvements include channel deep- 8, levees, stilling basins, and flow control weirs. .Would also create a linear park environment wit Dieme facilities, comfort stations, full environment ment, and a two-mile segment of trail to connect her regional park trails in the vicinity. Approved estimated cost of new work (1984) is $32,000,000, of which $16,900,000 is Federal cost, and $15,100,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $800,000 cash contribution). Improvements adopted by House and Senate Public Works Committee Resolutions June 9 and 15, 1976, respectively, under provisions of sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 511, 94th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to: (a) provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and operation of the project, including disposal areas, and adhere to requirements of sec. 210 of the 1970 Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, Public Law 91-646; (b) modify or relocate all utilities and bridges (except railroad) necessary for construction and maintenance of the project with such modifications and replacements being in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers, and replace vehicular traffic facilities, including, but not limited to, streets, curbs, gutters, and signs affected by the project; (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the project after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, and prevent encroachment of the flood channels that may result in decreasing the effectiveness of the project; (d) maintain, operate, and replace recreation facilities; te) hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works; (f) adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project; (g) make a cash contribution prior to start of construction for that portion of the cost of recreation lands and recreational facilities; (h) assure access to all persons on equal terms for approved recreational use; (i) at least annually inform affected interests regarding the limitations of protection afforded by the project; and (j) publicize flood plain information in the areas concerned and provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies for their guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development in the flood plain, and in adopting such regulations as may be necessary to insure compatibility between future development and protection levels provided by the project. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County by Resolution 73- 466, June 25, 1973, agreed to assume obligations of local cooperation. On November 9, 1976, the Board reaffirmed sponsorship by Resolution 76-960. The Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors formed an Assessment District, August 3, 1982, which assures availability of funds for local share of non-Federal portion of project costs for a modified plan of improvement. Prior to construction, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County will be required to furnish assurances to comply with sec. 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and sec. 77 of the 1974 Flood Control Act and to furnish assurance that in the acquisition of all lands, easements, and rights-of-way they will comply with requirements of 35-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 sec. 210 of the 1970 Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Estate Acquisition Policy Act, Public Law 91-646. Operations and results during fiscal year. In October 1983, work was resumed by Sacramento District on the project. Drafts of a general design memorandum and an environmental impact statement were initiated and were scheduled for completion in December 1984. Historical summary. Project has been inactive since 1979. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. In October 1983, project work was resumed by Sacramento District. Drafts of a general design memorandum and an environmental impact statement have been initiated and have been scheduled for completion in December 1984. 19. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, part 208, title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance to determine status of project and insure compliance with regulations. During fiscal year, inspections were made of: Completed units of Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; completed units of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings River Channel Improvement (Pine Flat Lake project), and Walnut Creek project; American River levees; Chester, North Fork Feather River; Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, Littlejohn Creek, Mormon Slough, Bear Creek, Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee River, CA and NV; completed units of lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, CA; Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA; Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan River, Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek, all in Utah; various emergency flood control works under authority of sec. 208, Flood Control Act of June 30, 1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 28,1955, and antecedent legislation; and sec. 14 of Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946. Maintenance inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements and regulations are being complied with on completed flood control works. Continuing effort is required to improve maintenance practices and active steps are being taken by responsible State and local agencies to achieve desired results. Local agencies were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost of inspection for fiscal year of $699,726 included continuation of dam safety assurance program for Folsom Lake, CA ($531,179). 20. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthor. ization). Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year were $47,878 for Berryessa Creek, CA, and $131,492 for Lower Coyote Creek, CA (both studies were terminated and all data transferred to San Francisco District in July 1984). Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $12,507,759, of which $166,842 was for disaster preparedness, $3,795,774 for flood emergency operations, $5,500,818 for repair and restoration, and $3,044,325 for advance measures. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $70,242. Bank protection was completed, Mormon Slough, Jack Tone Road, CA ($69,948), and on Sutter Creek near lone, CA (reconstruction of revetment displaced by high flows) ($294). Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (sec. 208,1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). No snagging and clearing activities this fiscal year. Flood insurance activities (sec. 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, three flood insurance studies were initiated, one flood insurance study was continued, and one flood insurance study was completed in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreement EMW-E-1153 at a fiscal year cost of $185,238 under Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursable order. 21. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944 summaries of monthly operations at Big Dry Creek, Boca, Camanche, Del Valle, Folsom, Friant (Millerton Lake), Indian Valley, Los Banos Detention, NewBullars Bar, New Don Pedro, New Exchequer (Lake McClure), New Melones, Oroville, Prosser, Shasta, and Stampede, CA; East Canyon, Echo, Lost Creek, Pineview Starva tion, and Wanship, UT; Blue Mesa, Lemon, PeoniaS5 d Vallecito, CO; and Navajo, NM reservoirs were pre pared. Work on a revision to the Truckee River Basfl reservoir control manual (which includes Boca Stampede, and Prosser Reservoirs) continued and a minor revision to the Los Banos Detention Reservoir operating rules was completed. Corps personnel pro vided advice as requested during flood control operatios 35-16 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT at all sec. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year cost was $272,097. Total cost to September 30, 1984, $2,390,091. Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 22. NEW MELONES LAKE, CA Location. On Stanislaus River about three-quarters mile downstream from existing Melones Dam and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) an earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and other purposes, and (b) apowerplant below the dam with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon completion of construction of dam and powerplant by the Corps, the project became an integral part of Central Valley project and is being operated and maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood control operation of the project shall be in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River toa capacity of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second will alsobe Corps responsibility. Approved estimated (October 1984) Federal cost is $383,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). For future non-Federal reimbursement, se Local cooperation paragraph. In addition, local interests expended $300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). This act modified original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The 1944 Flood Control act established $8 million monetary limitation for partial accomplishment of project. Further monetary authorizations of $2.5 million, $5 million, $13 million, $2 million, $17 million, $18 million, $44 millon, $83 million, $46 million, $6 million, and $61 million were provided for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90-483, 91-282, 92-222, 93-251, 94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, making a total monetary authorization of $305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising Lower San uin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and tanislaus Rivers, CA. Since FY 1979, appropriations ave not been subject to the river basin monetary i1"ftation and legislation is before Congress to eliminate the monetary limitation ceiling. al cooperation. Based on approved preliminary Cot allocation studies (July 1965) local interests will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 12.7 Percent of annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 31.1 percent of first Ct and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be allocated to power. Local interests must also maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River and prevent encroachment on channel and floodway between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation. Reimbursement of costs will be in accordance with Bureau policies and procedures for the Central Valley project. State of California officially adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish required assurances. The Board, by letter dated December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required assurances when formally requested to do. Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 1977. On October 2, 1979, the Board reaffirmed its intent to furnish the required assurances. On January 6, 1983, the Board provided formal assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering activities continued including continuation of plans and specifications for the Lower Stanislaus recreation areas, minimal recreation facilities only. Fiscal year costs for major items of work included: Continuation of land acquisition activities, $1,069,984; completion of operations access road contract, $73,626; completion of Glory Hole Phase I recreation area contract, $453,086; initiation of Glory Hole Phase II recreation area contract, $2,529,653; initiation and completion of Lower Stanislaus Corporation Yard contract, $348,715; and initiation of Lower Stanislaus Administration Building contract, $382,748. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued on Lower Stanislaus River. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in August 1966. Main dam contract which was awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. Cultural resources preservation, water intake facilities, flood control and irrigation tailrace modification, reservoir area clearing, Tuttletown Phase I recreation area, Oakdale recreation, Glory Hole Phase I recreation area, and operations access road contracts have all been completed. Glory Hole Phase II recreation area and Lower Stanislaus Administration Building contracts have been initiated. Lower Stanislaus Corporation Yard contract has been initiated and completed. Overall project is nearing completion except for Lower Stanislaus River recreation facilities. Remaining recreation facilities were unscheduled pending development of cost sharing agreements with local interests. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army transferring the New Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of Engineers to the Bureau of Reclamation was executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement provides that the Corps complete land acquisition actions and retain budgeting, design, and 35-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 construction responsibility for reservoir clearing and recreation development; completion of cultural resources mitigation in project area was vested in the Department of the Interior. The California State Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of April 1973 established conditions which impacted on the planned filling and operation of the project by the Department of the Interior. As a result, the Department of Interior brought suit against the State of California claiming State limitations on project operation were contrary to Congressional intent and authority. The case was heard before the U.S. District Court in Fresno, CA, and in early March 1981, a Federal judge ruled that the Federal Government could fill the New Melones reservoir for purpose of generating electrical power, but not for agricultural or other purposes. Both the Government and the California State Resources Control Board appealed this decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, CA. On December 20, 1982, the Court upheld all 25 requirements placed on the Federal Government by the State Water Resources Control Board. The decision reversed the lower court's decision to permit filling of the reservoir for generating electrical power. The Bureau of Reclamation subsequently filed for a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board to fill the reservoir. Permit was approved. The Bureau had originally started generating power on a limited basis on July 1, 1979; however, after the filling of the reservoir in spring of 1983, full power generating benefits are being attained. Project is about 95 percent complete. General Investigations 23. Surveys Fiscal year costs were $1,774,601, of which $1,663,601 was for flood damage prevention studies; $3,000 for coordination with Soil conservation Service; $10,000 for coordination with Bureau of Reclamation pertaining to projects under reclamation program (including PL 984); $70,000 for special investigations; and $28,000 for review of FERC licenses. MORRISON CREEK STREAM GROUP, CA (PHASE I, FEASIBILITY STUDY) Phase I studies (estimated cost $3,000,000) were authorized by sec. 101(a), Water Resources Development Act, of 1976, in accordance with Report of Chief of Engineers, March 2, 1976. Proposed plan of improvement would be located on streams in Morrison Creek Stream Group Basin in the central part of Sacramento County and would provide for construction of a dam with an 11,000 acre-foot reservoir at the Vineyard site on Elder and Laguna Creeks, diversion of Morrison Creek flows into this reservoir, construction of 26 miles of levee and 66 miles of channel work along streams in the basin, and purchase of lands and related construction for a 7,800-acre flood retardation basin in the Beach. Stone Lakes area. Phase I studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $836,030. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA Project is located on eastern slope of the Coast Range. Clear Lake unit is about 110 miles north of San Francisco and Settling unit is about 15 miles northwest of Sacramento. Plan of improvement consists of two project units: Upper basin at Clear Lake-widening and/or deepening 3.3 miles of existing 5 mile long Clear Lake outlet channel to a capacity of 8,000 cubic feet per second, constructing a 1.1 mile long bypass channel around the highly developed area adjacent to existing channel, and nonstructural measures; and lower basin at the mouth of Cache Creek-enlarging existing perimeter leveesof Cache Creek Settling Basin an average of 12 feet to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity and enlarging existing project levees from settling basin mouth upstream to County Road 102, reconstructing and enlarging existing Cobble weir, degrading the existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to the western perimeter levee to allow utilization of entire basin for sediment deposition, purchasing in fee 3,600 acres of existing settling basin and establishinga wildlife refuge and nonstructural measures. Preconstruction planning estimate is $2,300,000. Con tinuation of planning and engineering (including a sedimentation study) was continued at a fiscal year cost of $348,869. REDBANK AND FANCHER CREEKS, CA Project is located northeast of Fresno-Clovis metro' politan area in Fresno County, CA. Plan of improvement includes flood control detention basins on Redbank Creek, Pup Creek, and Alluvial Drain; construction of a flood control reservoir 0n Fancher Creek; and enlargement of Big Dry Creek project to provide increased flood protection and recres' tion opportunities. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $3,425,00. General Design Memorandum studies including environmental, hydrology, real estate, cultural re sources, and foundation exploration studies and surveys were continued at a fiscal year cost of $1,025,446. SACRAMENTO RIVER DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA Plan of improvement consists primarily of deepening to 35 feet the Suisun Bay and Sacramento River V1 Water Ship Channels from New York Slough to Por Sacramento, and the Avon to New York Slough reach 35-18 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 35 feet which wil be accomplished under the San Francisco Bay to Stockton (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project. Selected plan also provides for a water quality monitoring program, authority to construct a submerged sill, 45 acres of land for establishment of wetland habitat, and 156 acres of land for upland habitat to mitigate for losses of such habitat. Preconstruction planning estimate is $1,475,000. Continuation of planning and engineering (including environmental studies and a Bay-Delta Model repeatibility test) was continued at a fiscal year cost of $295,317. 24. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year cost of $370,244. No Flood Plain Information Studies were prepared after FY 1980. Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were $8,000. 25. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated as a separate Field Operating Agency as of January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent orders 1-1, January 10,1979, but Sacramento District is continuing to provide advisory and administrative support services to HEC as specified in local support agreement DACW05-79-A-0038 of March 1979. Fiscal year costs were $1,099,966, of which $207,784 was for planning methodologies, $627,486 was for analytical techniques, $160,095 for Water Conservation and Supply, and $104,601 for earth resources satellites, all at the Hydrologic Engineering Center. 26. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN COTTONWOOD CREEK, CA outroject will be located on main stem and the North, Sth, and Middle Forks of Cottonwood Creek on ,and was authorized by the 1970 Flood Control Act $ cument not yet printed). Plan of improvement provides for two multiplepurpose reservoirs, one at Dutch Gulch (capacity 900,000 acre.feet) and one at Tehama (capacity 700,000 acrefeet), and includes base facilities for future installation of hYdropower generating equipment. General Design Memorandum and Environmental Imlpact Statement were completed. Estimated precon- Stflltion planning estimate is $20,900,000. FAIRFIELD VICINITY STREAMS, CA Project will be located on five streams in vicinity of cities of Fairfield and Suisun, Solano County, CA, and was adopted under sec. 201, 1965 Flood Control Act (1970 Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions (H. Doc. 159, 91st Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Plan of improvement provides for 8.7 miles of channel improvement on Ledgewood, Laurel, and McCoy Creeks and diversion of three creeks upstream from Fairfield (Pennsylvania Avenue Creek into Ledgewood Creek, Union Avenue Creek into Laurel Creek, and Laurel Creek into McCoy Creek). Project includes trail-based recreation facilities. Project has been in deferred status since September 1977 due to lack of local assurances. In April 1982, the cities of Fairfield and Suisun requested reactivation of project and expressed intent to provide local assurances for a modified project providing 100-year level of flood protection rather than 200-year level as authorized. A Phase II General Design Memorandum supplement and a draft Post Authorization Change have been initiated. Estimated Preconstruction Planning Estimate is $1,007,000. PAJARO RIVER BASIN, CA Pajaro River and tributaries drain an area of 1,300 square miles in the Coast Range and empty into Monterey Bay about 75 miles south of San Francisco. Pajaro Valley sub-basin in Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties includes 112 square miles in lower 13 miles of Pajaro River. Plan of improvement consists of construction of a variable setback levee beginning approximately 1,000 feet upstream of Miller Avenue and ending 2,000 feet below Thomas Road Bridge on north side of Uvas Creek. Phase I General Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement was completed by San Francisco District in FY 1982. A Post Authorization Change was approved by the Office of Chief of Engineers on August 4, 1982. Responsibility for remaining portions of advance engineering and design, plans and specifications and construction was transferred to the Sacramento District in April 1982. Preparation of Phase II General Design Memorandum was continued. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $500,000. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA Project will be located on streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of Sierra Nevada into Merced County in vicinity of city of Merced, CA. Project is modification of Merced County Stream Group, CA, Improvement No. 13, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act and completed FY 1957. Project providing for construction of three new reservoirs-Castle, Haystack Mountain, and Marguerite on Canal, Black Rascal, and 35-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Deadman-Dutchman Creeks, respectively, and enlargement of four existing reservoirs-Burns, Bear, Owens, and Mariposa, was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed). Current plan of improvement would defer enlargement of existing Burns reservoir, Mariposa reservoir, construction of Marguerite Dam, and the irrigation function associated with the latter two facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir and about 32 miles of levee and channel improvement on Owens, Mariposa, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks. Phase I General Design Memorandum was approved February 1982 and Phase II General Design Memorandum was approved June 1982. Channel Improvement Design Memorandum was completed in September 1984. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $4,550,000. 35-20 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep 30, 1984 1. Sacramento River, New Work CA Approp. - - - - 40.331.1921 2. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA John F. Baldwin and tockton Ship Channels) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 3. San Joaquin River, New Work CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. New Work Eastman Lake, Approp. Chowchilla River, CA Cost (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 6. Calaveras River and New Work Littlejohn Creek and Approp. Tributaries including Cost New Hogan Lake and Maint. Farmington Dam, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 7. Corte Madera Creek, CA New Work (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Required Contributed New Work unds) Contrib. Cost Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost S Hidden Dam-Hensley New Work Lake, Fresno Approp. River, CA Cost (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost Isabella Lake, Kern New Work River, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 2,597,300 3,480,162 850,000 647,007 2,927,000 3,057,288 1,574,000 1,437,564 1,514,000 618,949 6,700,000 3,890,097 851 2,021 3,681 4,31 'v, v4&,&v&. - 40,331,1921 6,000 35,280,8312 5,601 35,173,2633 0,000 21,363,0004 4,658 18,760,8761 - - - - 5,833,1176 - - - - 5,833,1176 -79,000 20,000 943,000 850,000 11,302,4767 -61,787 18,645 892,679 898,753 11,299,4437 60,000 - - - 27,369,597 41,050 42,078 33 - 27,369,597 647,000 769,000 830,000 804,000 5,054,500 598,841 704,757 766,878 889,621 4,937,635 - - - - 111,1878 - - - - 111,1878 -- - - 23,723,1449 - - - 23,723,14410 841,000 921,000 945,000 1,074,000 10,356,16911 765,773 915,116 923,280 1,093,472 10,329,09912 - - 10,000 30,000 1,334,25113 14 15 - - 2,248 24,440 1,320,93913s 14 s16 - - 35,000 325,000 7,359,72517 - - 34,868 281,271 7,315,86417 - - - - 106,09518 19 - - - - 101,32419 .- - 536,9212 - - 536,92120 .- - 30,555,426 .- - 30,555,426 1,499,000 1,216,000 510,000 773,000 6,015,500 946,240 1,456,926 742,736 855,484 5,966,181 .- - 165,112"1 - - 165,11221 .- - 24,450,53722 24 - - 24,450,53728 24 1,550,000 1,461,640 2,227,400 1,773,000 17,563,9982 1,596,512 1,244,401 1,924,520 1,920,956 17,169,6432 - -- - 438,00027 - - 438,00027 35-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 10. Kaweah and Tule New Work Rivers including Approp. Terminus Dam and Cost Success Lake, CA Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 11. Lower San Joaquin New Work River, CA Approp. Cost 12. Martis Creek Lake, New Work Martis Creek, NV, Approp. and CA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 13. Merced County Stream New Work Group, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 14. Pine Flat Lake and New Work Kings River, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 15. Russian River Basin, New Work CA Approp. Coyote Valley Dam Cost (Lake Mendocino) and Maint. Channel Improvements Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost Dry Creek (Warm New Work Springs) Lake and Approp. Channel Improvements Cost CA (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 16. Sacramento River and New Work Tributaries, CA Approp. from Collinsville to Cost Shasta Dam Mat (Federal Funds) aiprop. Cost (Required Contributed New Work unds) Contrib. Cost 34,997,2302 - 34,997,23028 1,575,000 1,616,000 1,850,000 1,524,000 1,532,424 1,534,147 1,660,695 1,758,899 350,000 - 311,799 17,428,525" 17,296,630� 42,42031 42,42031 350,000 311,799 - -- - 8,504,9891 - -- - 8,504,989n 210,000 192,000 243,000 242,000 2,377,350 217,492 192,004 165,188 300,768 2,347,060 _ - - 2,751,259" - - - - 2,751,259" 81,000 69,548 89,000 120,000 47,000 1,229,506 66,942 100,652 97,228 1,224,523 - - 43,356,26534 ..- - 43,356,265" " 1,232,000 1,337,000 1,498,000 1,481,000 15,308,285-m 1,187,602 1,383,372 1,381,523 1,401,043 15,046,811 - - - 110,000" - - - 110,000 - - - - 14,435,869" - -- - 14,435,869" 1,829,000 1,246,000 1,518,000 2,056,798 1,305,758 1,196,832 - - 20,000 - - 12,795 34,400,000 37,900,000 23,548,000 38,001,042 34,273,493 22,397,207 1,707,000 2,036,905 50,000 56,295 12,000,000 16,490,897 581,000 797,000 1,330,000 1,213,000 552,149 753,145 1,141,392 1,316,176 - - - 30,000 3,215,000 3,564,715 826,000 787,350 463,000 775,433 3,726,000 2,150,000 2,759,156 1,925,392 1,589,000 1,154,000 1,159,591 1,554,463 950,000 752,000 1,011,197 97,482 4,365,000 4,360,826 1,330,000 1,382,425 495,000 484,650 18,601,980 18,445,652" 70,000"2 69,090 279,334,645"4 278,040,593 3,921,0004 3,762,862 30,000" 84,498,508" 83,144,0684" 10,967,334 � 10,891,389' 15,232,538 14,496,382 35-22 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 Contributed Funds, New Work ther) Contrib. - - 10,000 34,000 2,486,3622 3 Cost - - 4,428 3,143 2,449,933M 17. Walnut Creek, CA New Work (Federal Funds) Approp. 5,045,000 5,965,000 4,050,000 1,335,000 37,576,430m Cost 4,454,990 4,971,022 4,119,569 2,848,189 37,487,1576 Required Contributed New Work unds) Contrib. - 482,688 928,624 47,165 3,111,2478' Cost 22,194 393,269 800,233 239,037 3,081,382" Contributed Funds, New Work ther) Contrib. 42,000 232,200 781,026 220,000 2,463,0716 Cost 29,080 177,082 877,114 - 2,338,312w 18. Wildcat and San Pablo New Work Creeks, CA Approp. - - - 320,000 1,430,000 Cost 7,782 - - 313,561 1,423,561 22. Lower San Joaquin New Work River and Approp. 9,000,000 12,700,000 6,849,000 5,700,000 336,737,996w Tributaries, CA Cost 9,828,850 12,207,662 5,825,274 6,251,283 335,326,6401 including Tuolumne Maint. AiMde Slontaes Lalakwe , CA CAopsptr op. 331111,,060009 336818,,604070 431608,,070000 411,000 1,923,000 433,032 1,866,537 Melones Lae, CA (Contributed Funds, New Work ther) Contrib. - - - 80,000 80,0002 Cost - - - 4,486 4,4868 1. Includes the following amounts for new work: Regular funds: Previous project, $185,198; existing project, $585,436 for shallow-draft and $39,560,558 for deep-draft. 2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: Regular funds:Previous project, $353,720; existing project, $15,315,907 forshallow-draft and $19,341,204 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: Regular funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,245,424 for shallow-draft and $19,304,119 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 4. Includes $12,820,800 funds for Sacramento District and $8,542,200 for San Francisco District. 5. Includes $11,090 047 costs for Sacramento District and 7,670,8 28 for San Francisco District. . Includes $1,158,348 public work funds, of which $207,198 was for work done along 30-foot channel in Suisun Bay .hannel; excludes $19,000 expended for engineering for Inactive portion of 1950 modification. In addition, $1,342,500 was ex nded from required contributed funds. tri7. n addition, $1,250 was expended from required conuted funds. d ,8. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for odign and construction of downstream channel improvements SAsh and Berenda Sloughs below Buchanan Dam. N 9. Includes Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at ew Hogan Lake: Total to date $897,742. H10. Includes Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at New H n Lake: Total to date $897,742. I encludes $99,000 special recreation use fees at New �n Lake. S12. Includes $99,000 special recreation use costs at New n Lake. I r3 For miscellaneous construction under local cooperation it uirements, primaril Bear Creek, San Joaquin County; caudes .$108,056 as related to Duck and Littleohn Creeks unitnel improvements as part of Farmington am projec 14. Includes $393,195 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities, and $30,000 for design and construction of a boarding float at orth Shore recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 15. Includes $40,000 contributed funds, other, from Calaveras County Water District for New Hogan hydropower studies. 16. Includes $26,688 contributed funds, other, costs for New Hogan hydropower studies. 17. Includes $6,999,725 San Francisco District construction funds and costs. 18. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to Sacramento District in FY 1983. 19. Includes $97,400 San Francisco District required contributed funds and costs. 20. Contributed funds, other, from Marin County for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations at Corte Madera Creek. 21. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for miscellaneous design and construction at Hidden Dam. 22. Includes total Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake: Total to date $2,199,085. 23. Includes total Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake: Total to date $2,199,085. 24. Includes $224,000 Code 713 funds and costs for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds. 25. Includes $407,640 special recreation use fees at Isabella Lake. 26. Includes $407,640 special recreation use costs at Isabella Lake. 27. Funds from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula. 28. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities: Success Lake: Total to date $747,048. Terminus Dam: Total to date $700,004. 35-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 29. Includes $165,000 special recreation use fees at Success Lake. 30. Includes $165,000 special recreation use costs at Success Lake. 31. Contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways and costs for acquisition of a boarding float at Success Lake, $30,000 and at Terminus Dam, $12,420. 32. Includes $1,200, initiation of plans and specifications for Code 710 recreation facilities, for FY 1978. Construction of recreation facilities at Martis Creek Lake under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. 33. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work from contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements as related to acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations for project. 34. Includes Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: Total to date $1,595,100. 35. Includes Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: Total to date $1,595,100. 36. Includes Public Works Acceleration, Executive (PL 87-658) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 funds for recreation facilities: Total appropriations $239,235 and total costs $239,235. 37. Includes $19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish barrier. 38. Includes $158,300 special recreation use fees and costs at Pine Flat Lake. 39. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations at Pine Flat Lake. 40. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds; $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711. 41. Includes $94,459 special recreation use fees and costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special recreation fees and costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 42. Contributed funds, other, from city of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies. 43. Contributed fund costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies. 44. Includes $253,421,793 San Francisco construction funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 45. Includes $964,114 San Francisco maintenance funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 46. Contributed funds, other, from Sonoma County for Dry Creek, Warm Springs, hydropower studies. 47. Excludes $614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5,1977, and $531,000 for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries portions which are considered inactive and deferred. 48. Includes Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at Black Butte Lake: Total to date $1,000,162. 49. Includes Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at Black Butte Lake: $2,868 for fiscal year 1981. Total to date $1,000,162. 50. Includes $104,100 special recreation use fees at Black Butte Lake. 51. Includes $104,100 special recreation use costs at Black Butte Lake. 52. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-wa and utility alterations (primarily for Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries roject). Includes State Highway Commission payment, 789,008, for use of excess excavation from Chico and Mud reeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries) for freeway embankment through city of Chico. 53. Includes $41,984, contributed funds, other, from State of California for required modification of existing private facilities, Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; $25,977 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for replacing a boarding float at Orland Buttes boat launching ramp at Black Butte Lake; and $10,000 contributed funds, other, from the t of Santa Clara for hydropower studies at Black Butte 54. Includes $7,571 contributed funds, other, costs for Black Butte hydropower studies. 55. Includes $8,849,825 San Francisco construction funds. 56. Includes $9,049,609 San Francisco construction costs. 57. Includes $450,268 San Francisco required contributed funds. 58. Includes $525,846 San Francisco required contributed costs. 59. Includes $400,348 San Francisco contributed funds, other, and contributed fund costs. 60. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries and Tuolumne River Basin, Calif.) (See Table 35-E). . 61. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 1957 Economic Feasibility Report and of Revised Feasibility Report (FY 1960,1961 and 1962) applicable to 1962 reauthorization of project. 62. Contributed funds, other, from the Bureau of Reclamation for visitors' center at Mark Twain area, New Melones Lake. 63. Contributed fund costs for visitors' center at Mark Twain area, New Melones Lake. 35-24 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep 30, 1984 Cottonwood Creek, New Work CA Approp. 1,650,000 3,150,000 3,375,000 2,885,000 14,760,0001 Cost 1,773,318 3,088,134 2,667,898 3,472,949 14,708,4802 Fairfield Vicinity New Work Streams, CA Approp. - - - 320,000 1,007,000 Cost - - - 282,442 969,442 Little Dell New Work Lake, UT Approp. - 100,000 50,000 515,000 2,719,9002 Cost - 87,570 12,430 143,472 2,298,3724 Merced County New Work Streams, CA Approp. 1,350,000 1,344,000 500,000 - 6,350,0002 Cost 1,368,594 1,317,691 522,953 6,141 6,349,9006 Pajaro River New Work Basin, CA Approp. - - 190,000 50,000 2,189,9687 Cost 67,159 17,228 95,129 132,984 2,178,0821 1. Includes 9,060,000 General Investigation funds. 6. Includes $1,034,000 General Investigation costs. 2. Includes 9,008,480 General Investigation cost. 7. Includes $1,949,968 San Francisco construction funds 3. Includes 665,000 General Investigation funds. and $240,000 Sacramento General Investigation funds. 4. Includes 243,742 General Investigation costs. 8. Includes $1,949,968 San Francisco construction costs 5. Includes 1,034,000 General Investigation funds. and $228,113 Sacramento General Investigation costs. TABLE 35-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and 48, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1898, p. 2844 and 1899, p. 3171). For work above Sacramento. H. Doc. 76, 62d Cong., 1st sess.' The 10-foot channel up to Sacramento. H. Doc. 123, 69th Cong., 1st sess. A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa and 5 feet Rivers and Harbors between Colusa and Chico Landing, at a cost of $390,000 Committee Doc. 35, provided flow of rivers is increased to minimum flow of 73d Cong., 2d sess. ,000 cubic feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. Authority for a special direct participation of Federal Rivers and Harbors Government of $12 million in cost of Shasta Reservoir. Committee Doc. 35, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Transfer of authorit for expenditure of above $12 million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Interior. Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento River, S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., CA, to provide or construction of a ship channel 30 2d sess. feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from deep water in Suisun ay to Washington Lake, including such works as may be necessary to compensate for or alleviate any detrimental salinity conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 aeaett Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, thence to Sacramento River. 35-25 Section in Text Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 35-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 May 17, 1950 Feb. 10, 1956 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 16. Dec. 22, 1944 May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 May 12, 1967 Mar. 7, 1974 June 19, 1975 7. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles of Corte Madera Creek and tributaries, as modified by Chief of Engineers. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide 1.5 percent cash contribution toward cost of Ross Valley unit. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River and lower reaches of tributaries. Increased appropriation authorization for initial stage of project development. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project to provide for extensions in levees and other structures along Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte Dam and Reservoir; construct lowlevel Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power facilities; and provision of monetary authorization of $15 million for initiation of modification. Improvement for protection of Upper Butte Basin (included full monetary authorization). Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control Project to Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning area below dam and modification of project by construction of bank protection and incidental channel improvements between Chico Landing and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive plan approved in act of December 22, 1944. Further modification of Sacramento River Flood Control Project by construction of initial 10-year phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River and authorization of $14,240,000 for prosecution of modification. Additional authorization of $7 million for bank protection approved in act of July 14, 1960. Initiation of construction of second phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14, 1960, and additional authorization of $16 million for such purpose.3 Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir 4 1. Contains latest published ma of section above Sacramento. For map of section below acramento, see H. Doc. 1123, 60th Cong., 2d sess. and S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Total monetary authorization available, exclusive of preauthorization studies from general investigations appropriations, amounts to $72,740,000. 4. The 90-day Congressional project review period, re quired by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by sec. 157 P 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorizatin of project unit. 35-26 H. Doc. 545, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 204, 1966 Flood Control Act. H. Doc. 585, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 404, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 2 H. Doc. 367, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., 2d sess. 2 S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., 2d sess. 2 PL 90-17 PL 93-251 H. Doc. 94-192, 94th Cong., 1st sess. 15. SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Feather River, CA 1951 - 5,7521 2 Middle River and Connecting Channels, CA Completed 1974 8,3548 93,4944 Mokelumne River, CA Completed 1974 8,500 189,152 Navajo Reservoir, NM Completed - 2,132 6 - Old River, CA Completed 1970 23,1857 631,128 Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA Completed 1970 253,1518 218,854 Suisun Bay Channel, CA Completed 1974 200,9289 10 11 3,316,62212 IS Suisun Channel, CA Completed 1973 217,677 733,4891a 1 Suisun Point Channel, CA Completed 1965 191,7286 16 1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for commerce. 2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and $3,840 for existing project for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $1,600 for previous project. 4. Includes $790 for previous project. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. 6. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District in FY 1968. 7. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,600 for lands, damages, and public landings. 8. U pon completion of Mormon Slough, Calaveras River, CA in February 1970, local interests accepted maintenance responsibility for Mormon Slough as well as for Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA, and Federal maintenance was discontinued. No Federal maintenance costs have been incurred since FY 1969. 9. Includes $58,901 for previous projects. 10. Excludes $59,551 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 11. Excludes work accomplished under existing project at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works Administration funds allotted to San Joaquin River, CA. 12. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. Excludes $5,449 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 13. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San Francisco District, January 1, 1974. 14. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys of $5,496 and $483 for fiscal years 1963 and 1964, respectively. 15. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was $12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. TABLE 35-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, CA Alhambra Creek, CA American River, CA Aquatic Plant Control, CA B River, CA Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA i Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT rh Creek, Weber County, UT Chester, CA Coyote Creek, CA Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA Est Weaver Creek, CA Eel River, CA P1sorA Lake, American River, CA llyon Creek, NV yen Valley Creek, Nonty, CA Solano Completedf Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Active/no FY 84 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Deferred Completed l7l 1981 1959 1967 1980 1955 1961 1964 1981 1968 1967 1965 1971 1967 1977 1963 J -.. , ,.6 4V, Q9F3n 5QqfA77R21 2 UJq,ttJ 300,0001 s 2,125,8184' 1,000 _.5 1,369,931$ 217,8797 8 26,0497 3,570,000s 705,6221 7 664,8257 10 220,6361 7 " 1,272,8161 12 63,014,8101s 215,82614 136,0267 15 35-27 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 35-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Humboldt River and Tributaries, NV Kays Creek, UT Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, CA Klamath River, CA Lake Camanche, CA Lake Oroville, CA Lakeport Lake, CA Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA Mad River Basin, CA Marysville Lake, CA Merced River, CA Middle Creek, CA Mormon Slough, CA Napa River Basin, CA New Bullards Bar, CA North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA Pinole Creek, CA Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV Rheem Creek, CA Rodeo Creek, CA Salinas River, CA Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT San Leandro Creek, CA San Lorenzo Creek, CA San Lorenzo River, CA Sevier River near Redmond, UT Sonoma Creek, CA Truckee River and tributaries, CA and NV Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Inactive Active/no FY 84 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Active/no FY 84 expenditure 1982 1973 1977 1972 1976 1981 1976 1976 1973 1980 1976 1967 1976 1979 1972 1974 1968 1970 1969 1962 1966 1952 1961 1973 1962 1966 1952 1973 1968 1,532,93216 407,9897 17 1,503,0737 s18 4,838,0001 10,252,95019 70,425,47020 2,353,00321 27,835,2632 4,243,750' 23 _24 10,918,79625 2,643,49926 2,965,402 7 2,639,9551 12,890,6252 904,2787 29 30 885,7501 7 4,620,0701 31 133,3397 32 400,000' 33 974,1001 7 94,213' 34 1,227,5706 1,000,0001 36 5,130,821'1 37 4,314,4061 38 919,000 9 781,500' 40o 1,038,960 1. Project responsibility transferred from San Francisco District to Sacramento District April 1, 1982. 2. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 3. Project classified as "inactive" January 19, 1982. 4. Excludes $54,919 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation were $951,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 5. Due to infeasibility, Bear River Phase I stud was suspended and project classified as "inactive" on November 6, 1981. 6. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for construction in connection with bridge construction pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation was $370,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 7. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 8. Excludes $22,000 for preauthorization studies. 9. Excludes $69,262 other contributed funds from State of California for two low water crossings and appurtenance at Chester. 10. Excludes $50,000 for preauthorization studies. Esti" mated costs to local interests were $665,000 for lands and dam11a.g eIsn cilnucdleusd ing relocations. $174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program Fun1d2s. . Excludes $194,821 contributed funds and placed in' active 1973. 13. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 1956for operation and maintenance b that agency in conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. 14. Due to lack of local support, Gleason Creek rojectWa reclassified as "deferred" on November 3, 1977. Fiscal year 1978 carryover funds of $27,984 were revoked. 15. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies.r, 16. Vista and Devils Gate reservoirs and channel improa ments were classified "inactive" on January 12, 198 Hylton reservoir was classified "inactive" on March 21,1' due to lack of economic feasibility. 35-28 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 17. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs (FY 1973) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for lands and namages including relocations. 18. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. Non- Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for road relocation was $18,260 (required contributed funds). Project prevented $5,200,000 in damages from May-June 1984 snowmelt runoff. 19. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs $24,876,842. 20. Constructed by State of California. Final Federal contribution of $64,186 was made on February 9, 1981 (total $69,994,015) for flood control reservation. 21. Preconstruction planning complete. Necessary reaffirmation of local cooperation assurances by Lake Count Flood Control and Water Conservation District not received. Project was reclassified as "deferred" on September 15,1977. Includes $298,500 costs for advance acquisition of land, Public Law 91-439. 22. Cherry Valley and New Don Pedro Reservoirs constructed by local interests. Federal contributions of $9,000,000 and $5,464,000, respectively, for flood control reservation. Final Federal contribution of $308,898 was made on January 18, 1972, for New Don Pedro. Excludes $3,004,946, contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous engineering and construction (non-project) at local interests expense under local cooperation requirements for acquisition of rights-ofway for levee and channel improvements on Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries. 23. Placed inactive 1974. Excludes $225,000 applicable to Public Works Acceleration Program and $162,761 previous project Blue Lake levee. 24. Planning and any future development is uncertain awaiting State of California's position on support of Marysville project. 25. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District. Final Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, 1975 (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation. 26. Estimated costs (FY 1967) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 27. Non-Federal cost $2,965,402 (FY 1976) for lands and relocations. Federal contribution of $599,336 made to State Reclamation Board. 28. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. Final Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in FY 1972 (total $12,759,127) for flood control reservation. 29. Includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. 30. Excludes $146,000 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation, and utility alterations. 31. Includes $107,000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in FY 1977. 32. Includes $19,000 for preauthorization studies. 33. Excludes $52,549 contributed funds. 34. Cost includes engineering and design prior to June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 FY 1962 and 1963 to determine if project classification to an active category was justified. 35. Estimated costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $463,000 (July 1962) for lands and damages including relocations. Project prevented $18,000,000 in damages from May-June 1984 snowmelt runoff. 36. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 37. Excludes $200,000 estimated valueof work performed in lieu of cash contribution. 38. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 39. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds toward first cost. Costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation, including required contributions, were $118,000 (1951). 40. Placed inactive 1974. TABLE 35-G FFullol rR Lepaosrtt Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT anish Fork River, UT eber River and Tributaries, UT (Morgan County) 1951 1955 1974 1977 1977 1972 20,000 75,120 35-29 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS ,.-,._ .. _ TABLE 35-H REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING (See Section 1 of Text) Miles from Range in Feet Mouth of Mean Extreme Ordinary Extreme Place River Tidal' Tidal2 Floods Flood' Collinsville 0 4.3 7 8 10 Sacramento 59 2.02 3 20 28 Verona (Mouth of Feather River) 80 - Trace 22 30 Colusa 144 - - 26 32 Chico Landing 193 - - 20 25 Red Bluff 248 - - 24 30 1. Mean lower low water to mean higher high water. 3. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 2. Tide at low water season only. 4. Extreme low water to indicated flood condition. TABLE 35-I SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT' (See Section 3 of Text) Modification Prior to 1950 Modification 1950 Modification Total Federal Corps of Engineers (Construction) (Co $4,009,938 1,823,179 $5,833,117 Coast Guard nstruction) $80,000 $80,000 Non-Federal 2 Required Lands and Cash Damages (includ- Contribution ing Relocations) $1,307,500 35,000 $1,342,500 $1,042,000 135,000 $1,177,000 1. Completed in May 1960. 2. Excludes $5,865,000 (Feb. 1954) local interests costs for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. TABLE 35-J SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: PROJECT UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST (See Section 3 of Text) Federal Corps of Unit Engineers Required Cash Contribution Non-Federal Lands and Damages (including Relocations) Settling Basin above head of Burns Cutoff Burns Cutoff improvement; new turning basin; dredging Mormon Channel2 Upper Stockton Channel enlargement4 $1,073,000 7,882,0001 535,000 1. July 1959 price index. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. De erred; July 1960 price index. 3. For lands and construction. $ 30,000 431,000 34,000 $ 200,000 1,455,000 15,000 $ 230,000 $1,303,00 1,886,000 9,768,000 49,000 584,000 4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act authorizatOn of San Francisco Bay to Stockton Channel, Sacramento District, Improvement No. 2. 35-30 Total $2,349,500 170,000 $2,519,500 Total Project $6,439,438 1,993,179 $8,432,617 Total Total Project _ - _ r SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-K MAXIMUM MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA, INFLOW, STORAGE, AND OUTFLOW FOR PROJECTS (See Section 13 of Text) Maximum Inflow Maximum Maximum (c.f.s.) Storage Outflow Stream (bihourly) (acre-feet) (c.f.s.) Burns 1,920 360 1,300 Bear 1,600 450 1,030 Owens 480 410 110 Mariposa 2,330 4,040 810 TABLE 35-L RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 15 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino); Cannel Improvements below Dam on lower 98 miles of Russian River $ 14,436,000 $ 5,598,000 $ 20,034,000' mprovements below D am ke; Channel 250,700,000 92,420,000 343,120,000 Total $265,136,000 $98,018,000 $363,154,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at ment for costs allocated to water supply storage to be paid completed projects over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of storage is 2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal Govern- initiated and exclusive of lands and damages. TABLE 35-M RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: PROJECT FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS (See Section 15 of Text) Nearest City (California) Distance Above Mouth Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Ukiah Mile 0.8-East Fork endocino of Russian River Channel Improvement (East Fork Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East Fork below Coyote Valley Dam and Guerneville Mile 0 to 98, Russian ower 98 miles of Russian River) River Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek hannel Improvement (Dry Creek) Healdsburg Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry lowDry rlCr a Wormsnrun e Creek 9an) -- a r g1 1 Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreatio Completed projects. 160 Feet-Earthfill 122,500 $ 17,550,000' - - 2,484,000 - - 339,300,000 319 Feet-Earthfill 381,000 3,820,000 n facilities at 35-31 Name Height of Dam and Type Reservoir Capacity (Acre-Ft) Estimated Cost REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 35-N SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST ESTIMATE (See Section 16 of Text) Current Estimated Cost Unit Classification Federal Non-Federal' Total 1944 Modification: Antelope Creek2 Inactive $1,400,000 $ 340,000 $1,740,000 Lower Butte Basin3 Deferred 7,286,000 2,285,000 9,571,000 Thomes Creek2 Deferred 1,140,000 140,000 1,280,000 Willow Creek2 Inactive 1,290,000 120,000 1,410,000 Bypass Levees Deferred 7,100,000 940,000 8,040,000 Bypass Levees' Inactive 3,010,000 - 3,010,000 1950 Modification: Upper Butte Basin2 Deferred 3,530,000 1,787,000 5,317,000 1. For lands and damages, including relocations. 4. July 1961 price level. 2. July 1960 price level. 3. Excludes work applicable to extension of Moulton weir (July 1954 price level). TABLE 35-0 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS (See Section 16 of Text) Required Contract Federal Contributed Total Contract 37 initiation (Bank protection, selected sites, Sacramento River, downstream from Sacramento) $1,078,996 $132,998 $1,211,994 35-32 I PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION This division comprises the State of Hawaii. The division also performs such actions pertaining to preservation and protection of navigable water on and about the island of Guam and American Samoa as provided for under River and Harbor Act of 1899, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands as provided for under Public Law 94-241 (H.J. Res 549) (March 24, 1976). IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii ...... 2. Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii .......... 3. Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii ........... 4. Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii.. 5. Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii......... 6. Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii ......... 7. Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas ......... 8. Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa.. 9. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ......................... Page 36-1 36-2 36-2 36-2 36-3 36 3 36 3 36-3 36-3 Beach Erosion Control 10. Asquiroga Bay, Territory of Guam........36-4 11. Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa ...... 36 4 12. Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa ...... 36 4 13. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ......................... 36-4 14. Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Projects .............................. 36-4 Flood Control 15. Asan Village, Territory of Guam ......... 16. Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii............... 17. Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii ........... 18. Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii ..... 19. Paauau Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii .......... 36-4 36-5 36-5 36-5 36-5 Navigation 1. BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the west coast of Oahu, about 25 miles from metropolitan Honolulu. (See Coast and Geodetic Sur- Vey Charts 4110 and 4133.) Existing project. Deep-draft harbor provides for an entrance channel 4,280 feet long, 450 feet wide and 38 to 42 feet deep; an inshore harbor basin of about 92 acres and 38 feet deep; and wave absorber 4,700 feet long. Light-draft harbor provides for a main access channel 1,200 feet long, 80140 feet wide, and 12 feet deep; and wave absorber 300 feet long. The small boat harbor project has been deleted at the request of the State. Plane of reference is mean lower Flood Control (Cont.) Page 20. Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii............ 36-6 21. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ......................... 36-6 22. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects........................... 36-6 23. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees ........ 36-6 General Investigations 24. Surveys .............................. 25. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 26. Continuation of Planning and Engineering, Tables Table 36 A Table 36-B Table 36-C Table 36-D Table 36-E Table Table Table 36-F 36-G 36-H Cost and Financial Statement.. Authorizing Legislation ........ Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .............. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ......... Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ..................... 36-6 36-6 36-7 36-8 36-10 36-12 36-13 36-13 36-14 36-14 low water datum. The mean tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.8 feet; extreme range under normal condition is 2.3 feet. Approved project cost estimate (October 1982) for deep-draft harbor is $66,000,000 of which $58,000,000 (includes $400,000 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $8,300,000 is nonfederal cost including lands and rights-of-way and cash contribution of $2,500,000. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interest must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, 36-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities open to all on equal terms; provide such utility and drainage relocations or alterations as necessary; hold the United States free from damages; and provide a cash contribution estimated to be $2,500,000 for the deep-draft harbor. Terminal facilities. Existing privately owned barge harbor consists of a concrete marginal wharf, 250 feet long along south side of the barge basin. An offshore tanker facility is connected to the oil refinery by pipelines. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded in March 1982 for $47,182,000. Construction contract is 85 percent complete and completion is scheduled in May 1985. The project has been in litigation since October 1982 which allegations included violations of National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act, and other Federal Statutes and regulations. On January 5, 1984, the court ruled in favor of the Government on all counts. In August 1984, the contractor submitted a claim of $6,798,175 for restrictions on blasting. The Appeal Court hearing is scheduled in November 1984. Remaining work includes dredging of basin, construction of wave absorbers and ground beautification. Maintenance: Routine operation cost for the Regional Visitor Center located at Fort DeRussy was $46,318. 2. HONOLULU HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the southern coast of the island of Oahu in the city of Honolulu. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4109.) Existing project. Completed portion of project comprises three channels 35-40 feet deep, two harbor basin 35 feet deep and a double-leaf bascule bridge. Last full report on this is on page 1828 and 1829 of Annual Report for 1962. Modifications provide deepening seaward 3,600 feet of Fort Armstrong entrance to 45 feet, deepening main harbor basin and Kapalama Channel to 40 feet; widening Kapalama Channel by 60 feet along Sand Island side for 3,100 feet; and relocating project line to provide a 100-foot offset from pierheads in Kapalama Channel and at piers 9, 10, and 11 and on offset of 50 to 75 feet elsewhere in the harbor. The mean tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.9 feet. The usual extreme range is 2.3 feet. Total project cost for modifications completed in March 1981 for $7,820,842 of which $7,615,143 is federal cost and $205,699 is non-federal cost. (See Thble 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Thrminal facilities. There are 34 piers and 2 marginal wharves, which include 3 piers and 1 marginal wharf owned by the federal government; 13 piers and 1 marginal wharf owned by the State of Hawaii; and 18 piers privately owned. All non-federal piers are open to all on equal basis, although certain ones are reserved for passenger terminals, for container ships or for handling specific bulk commodities such as petroleum products, pineapple, sugar, animal feeds, and cement. Operations during fiscal year. A law suit against the government filed in September 1981 for damages to a marine railway is pending. 3. KAHULUI HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Location. On the northern coast of the island of Maui at the town of Kahului (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4124.) Existing project. Rubblemound breakwaters on east and west sides of harbor, approximately 2,766 and 2,315 feet long, respectively, and an entrance 600 feet wide between breakwaters and a harbor basin 2,050 feet wide, 2,400 feet long, and 35 feet deep. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.2 feet and extreme tidal range under normal conditions is 4.5 feet. Tbtal project cost for breakwater rehabilitation is $2,704,000 in federal cost. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. lTerminal facilities. Two wharves owned and operated by State of Hawaii which are open to shipping on equal terms. Pipelines for fuel oil, distillate, kerosene, gasoline, molasses, and water are available. There is also a bulk-sugar plant of 30,000-ton storage capacity with a conveyor loading system capable of conveying at a rate of about 750 tons per hour. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A con struction contract for rehabilitation of breakwater was awarded in July 1982 and completed in December 1983 for $2,381,191. 4. KAULANA BAY BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. On the southern tip of the island of Hawaii in the Ka'u Judicial District about 80 road miles southwest of the city of Hilo. (See NOAA Chart 19320.) Existing project. Project provides for an entrance channel 135 feet long, 60-80 feet side tapered and 8.5 feet deep; a turning basin 200 feet long, 100 feet wide and 6.5 feet deep; and a rubblemound main breakwater 155 feet long, with a + 11.5 feet crest elevation at the head and a +8.0 feet crest elevation at the trunk; a new single-lane launch ramp; and appurtenant aids to navigation. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.5 feet. Estimated total project cost is $621,000 (includes $20,000 in Coast Guard cost) in federal cost Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Har bor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in April 1982. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in0 on page 36-3 of Fiscal Year 1982 Annual Report. Trminal Facilities. There is an existing boat launch ing ramp owned by the State of Hawaii and open to all or equal basis. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Favorable constructions bids were received in September 1983 but the construction contract was not awarded due to lawsuit filed in October 1983 for permanent injunction to enjoin cons truc tion contract award and negate lease agreement. A settle ment agreement was signed by plaintiffs on May 30, 194to removing the Corps from the suit. There is no schedule to award construction contract. 36-2 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION 5. NAWILIWILI HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII Location. On the southwest coast of the island of Kauai and about 100 nautical miles northwest of Honolulu. (See NOAA Chart 19383.) Existing project. Rubblemound breakwater 2,150 feet long; an entrance channel 2,400 feet long, 600 feet wide and 40feet deep; a harbor basin 1,950 feet long, 1,540 feet wide and 35 feet deep; and a revetted fill on the west side of the harbor. The tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.8 feet. Estimated total project cost for breakwater rehabilitation is $3,675,430 in federal cost. (See Thble 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Tebrminal facilities. The State of Hawaii owns a reinforced concrete wharf with two sheds. Bulk-storage facilities and pipeline are available for petroleum products, liquid fertilizer and molasses. There is also a bulk sugar plant of 28,000-ton storage capacity with a conveyor system capable of loading at a rate of about 750 tons per hour. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A General Design Memorandum for rehabilitation of the breakwater including repair of the breakwater damaged by Hurricane Iwa was approved in March 1984. Breakwater rehabilitation contract to be awarded in FY 1986. 6. PORT ALLEN HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII Location. On the southern coast of the island of Kauai in Hanapepe Bay, about 110 nautical miles northwest of Honolulu, (See NOAA Chart 19382.) Existing project. The project provides for a rubblemound breakwater 1,200 feet long on the east side of the bay; a harbor basin 1,200 feet wide, 1,500 feet long and 35 feet deep. The range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.7 feet, and the extreme tidal range under ordinary conditions is 2.7 feet. TIbtal project cost for storm damage repairs to breakwater is $250,731 (in- dudes $2,925 in Coast Guard cost) in federal cost. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one pier and a storage shed owned and operated by the State of Hawaii. Bulk Storage facilities and pipelines are available for petroleum Products, liquid fertilizer and molasses. The facilities are oPen to all on equal terms and are considered adequate for exsting commerce. OPerations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A construction contract for repair work on storm damages to breakwater caused by Hurricane Iwa in November 1982 was arded in September 1983 and completed in January 1984 for $177,600. 7* ROA HARBOR, NORTHERN MARIANAS Locaton. On the island of Rota within the Commonalth of the Northern Mariana Islands which is located in the Western Pacific, approximately 3,820 miles west of Hawaii and approximately 40 miles north of Guam. (See U.S. Defense Mapping Agency Hydrographic Map No. 81063.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel 685 feet long, 300 feet wide, 20 feet deep; a turning basin 440 feet long, 180-420 feet wide, 16.5 feet deep; a revetted mole of armor stones 535 feet long, 10 feet high; a basin extension 280 feet long, 150 feet wide, 16.5 feet deep; and appurtenant aids to navigation. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.4 feet. Estimated total project cost is $3,170,500 of which $2,087,000 (includes $87,000 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $1,083,500 is non-federal cost for cash contribution. Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in October 1980. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. TeIbrminal facilities. There is an existing 144 foot long concrete dock at the West Harbor. Presently, cargo is lightened from offshore of West Harbor by a U.S. Government surplus LCM which is able to navigate the narrow and shallow entrance at high tide and off-load at the existing concrete dock. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded in September 1982 for $2,482,982 and is scheduled for completion in October 1984. Construction is essentially complete except for correcting deficiencies, minor dredging and relocation of range pole. 8. TAU SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. On the island of Tau, American Samoa, about 2,300 miles southwest of Hawaii, 1,236 miles northwest of Tahiti, and 80 miles southeast of Western Samoa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190.) Existing project. Project provides for an entrance channel 520 feet long, 130 feet wide, 16 feet deep; a turning basin 85,000 square feet, 14 feet deep; a rubblemound breakwater 290 feet long, 13 feet high; a revettment 450 feet long and a rubblemound groin 200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean sea level. The range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.5 feet. Estimated total project cost is $2,058,034 of which $2,004,800 (includes $4,800 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $54,034 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in January 1975. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contruction contract for navigational aids was awarded in September 1984 for $16,531 (Corps of Engineers cost) and is scheduled for completion in December 1984. Maintenance: A wave gaging contract was awarded in June 1984 for $55,000 and is scheduled for completion in June 1985. 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 36-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Public Law 86-645. Preauthorization studies were initiated on Kahului Small Boat Harbor, Maui, $65,520; continued on East Molokai (Honouliwai) Small Boat Harbor, Molokai, $79,276; Kahana Bay, Oahu; $25,478; and Merizo Harbor, Guam, $55,022; completed Hana Bay, Maui, $7,500; and Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, $37,343; and terminated Saipan Deep-Draft Harbor, Northern Marianas, $14,819. Plans and specifications were initiated on Agat Harbor, Guam, $9,771. Beach Erosion Control 10. ASQUIROGA BAY, TERRITORY OF GUAM Location. On the southeastern shore of the island of Guam, about 3,318 miles west of Honolulu, Hawaii, (See NOAA Chart 81048.) Existing project. Project provides for a 275 feet rock revetment with a crest elevation + 14.0 feet MLLW with a slope of 1V on 1.5H. Estimated total project cost is $320,000 of which $250,000 is federal cost and $70,000 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in August 1980. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-4 of FY 83 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications are 99 percent complete. In April 1984, authorized to advertise for bids and to open bids prior to receipt of federal construction funds. 11. MATAFAO SHORELINE, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. On the south shore of the island of Tutuila, American Samoa, about 2,300 nautical miles southwest of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 83484.) Existing project. Project provides for a 430 feet long rock revetment with a crest elevation of + 9.5 feet MSL with a slope of 1V on 1.5H. Total project cost is $255,000 in federal cost. Project authority is Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in February 1980. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract for Matafao shoreline and Pago Pago Airport was awarded in July 1983 for $284,320 of which $166,720 was for Matafao. Both projects were completed in June 1984. 12. PAGO PAGO AIRPORT, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. On the south shore of the island Tutuila, American Samoa, about 2,300 nautical miles southwest of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 83484.) Existing project. Project provides for a 1,580 feet long rock revetment with a crest elevation of + 8.0 feet MSL with a slope of 1V on 1.5H. Total project cost is $175,000 in federal cost. Project authority is Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in February 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A con struction contract for Pago Pago Airport and Matafao Shoreline was awarded in July 1983 for $284,320 of which $117,600 was for Pago Pago Airport. Both projects were completed in June 1984. 13. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Preauthorization study was initiated on Niumalu Penin sula, Kauai, $9,969. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874. Preauthorization studies were initiated on Coconut Point, American Samoa, $49,990; and Masefau Bay, American Samoa, $25,623; continued Lepua Area, American Samoa,$58,474; and Makaha Beach Park, Oahu, $50,461; completed Paseo De Susana, Guam,$14; and Sand Island Oahu, $2,358; and terminated Kahaluu Beach Park,Hawaii $17,786. Plans and specifications were initiated on Sand Is land, Oahu, $15,428. 14. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS Inspection and survey were conducted in June 1984 for Afono Area, Aoa Area, Matafao Shoreline, Pago Pago to Nuuuli, Pago Pago Airport, Poloa Area and Vatia Area at American Samoa for a total cost of $2,000. Flood Control 15. ASAN VILLAGE, TERRITORY OF GUAM Location. On the west central coastal area of thies land of Guam and about 2.5 miles east of Agana, the caPi tal of Guam. The island of Guam is approximately 3,31 miles west of Honolulu, Hawaii, and 1,300 miles southof Tokyo, Japan. (See NOAA Chart 81048.) Existing project. Project provides for 400 feet of uor lined channel, 592 feet of grass-lined channel, 1,054 f of riprapped channel, and modification of Marine priverc vert. The interior drainage work by the Guam Housing a Urban Renewal Authority consists of a 1,960-foot swae an ocean outlet. Estimated total project cost is $1,920 of which $1,275,500 is federal cost and $64 5,000 is federal cost for cash contribution. Project authority s tion 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amen Project was authorized for construction in May 1983 CoI struction funds wer allotted under the Jobs Bill progr Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 36-4 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded in September 1983 for $1,349,500. Construction contract is 70 percent complete and is scheduled for completion in April 1985. Remaining work includes construction of channels and drainage structures. 16. IAO STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Iao Stream on the island of Maui drains a portion of the slopes of the West Maul mountains, and its lower course runs into the sea just to the east of the town of Wailuku, Maui. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4124.) Existing project. Project provides for a debris basin 2.5 miles upstream of stream mouth; channel improvement from the debris basin to about 1,100 feet downstream of Market Street bridge; diversion levees and floodplain management from the channel improvements for about 1,400 feet downstream of Waiehu bridge. The standard project design discharge is 26,500 cubic feet per second at the stream mouth. Total project cost is $12,899,000 of which $12,299,000 is federal cost which includes corrective measures work and $600,000 is non-federal cost for lands and relocations. Project was completed in May 1981 but required corrective measures in January 1982. Construction for corrective measures was authorized in January 1983. Total corrective measures cost is $546,000 in federal funds of which $470,000 were allotted under the Jobs Bill Program. (See Tabl36e-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Two contractor appeals filed in July 1980 for flood damages and Augus19t8 0 for defective specifications were dismissed without Prejudice by the Engineer Board of Contract Appeals in June 1983 and contractor must resubmit these claims. ConstructiC0onn tract for corrective measures for levee protection was awarded in June 1983 and was completed in November 1983 for $479,909. 17. KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Kahoma Stream drainage basin is located in Lahamna, Maui. Lahaina is on the west coast of Maui about 4 miles from Kaanapali. The drainage basin of Kahoma tream totals 5.3 square miles. (See NOAA Chart 19348.) Existing project. The project provides for a debris ba s1n With 120 feet maximum based width and a capacity of 55,0 cubic yards; a concrete trapezoid channel 5,415 feet long, three concrete bridges with a clear span of 60 feet; aadarevetted outlet extending 70 feet seaward of the river iouth. Tbtal project cost estimate (October 1984) is $23,900,000 of which $15,500,000 is federal cost and t400,000 is non-federal cost for lands, damages, relocaion, and cash contributions ($2,400,000). (See Table 36-B orAthorizing Legislation.) id 81 cooperation Local interests are required to pro- Sthout cost to the United States all lands, ease ments, i4lsrghts-of-way; all relocations of building and utilities, b, Y and street bridges and driveways, railroad track and ie, and other related facilities which may be required for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the work after completion; and prohibit encroachment on improved channels and debris basin. Local interest have agreed to voluntary pay a minimum of 35 percent of the costs allocated to flood control, but not less than that required by the project authorization. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications are 99 percent complete. Work on Section 221 Agreement and related agreements continuing. This project was included under the FY 1983 budget amendment of May 25, 1982 and then under the FY 1984 budget for initial construction funds. No construction funds were appropriated in FY 1984. 18. KANEOHE-KAILUA AREA, OAHU, HAWAII Location. Kamooalii-Kaneohe Stream drainage basin is on the east coast of the island of Oahu. The drainage basin is bounded on west and south by the Koolau Mountain range, on the east by the remnants of Kaneohe volcanic cone and on the north by Kaneohe Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 4134 and U.S. Geological Survey Quadrangles Kaneohe, Hawaii and Honolulu, Hawaii.) Existing project. Project provides for a dam and reservoir about 3.2 miles above the mouth of Kaneohe Stream on the tributary Kamooalii Stream. Project consists of an earth fill dam 80 feet high, with a crest length of about 2,300 feet, and about 1,274 feet of channel improvements, a concrete side channel and chute spillway and reservoir with storage of 2,500 acre-feet, of which 500 acre-feet for sediment reserve and recreation use and 2,000 acre-feet for flood control. Total project cost is $24,993, 100 of which $18,993,100 is ultimate federal cost (allocation received $24,786,400) and $6,000,000 is non-federal cost for recreation facilities, lands and damages, relocations. Non-federal reimbursement of construction cost is $5,668,300 at 5.116 percent with a repayment life of 35 years and an annual payment of $359,220 and annual reimbursement amounts are shown in Table 36-A. Project was completed in June 1981. (See Table 36 B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Contractor claims are pending for defective specifications filed in October 1979 and suspension of work for spillway filed in December 1980. Received $125,000 in May 1984 for claim evaluation work. Erosion damage repairs to culvert No. 7 were completed in March 1984 for $14,446 of which $7,223 is federal cost and $7,223 is non-federal cost. 19. PAAUAU STREAM, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. In the Ka u District on the island of Hawaii, approximately 45 miles southwest of Hilo. (See NOAA Chart 19320.) Existing project. Project provides for a 295 feet levee and three concrete rubble masonry walls of 550 feet, 272 feet and 670 feet. Estimated total project cost is $1,927,300 in federal cost. Project authority is Section 205 of the Flood Control Act. 36-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 of 1948, as amended. Project was authorized for construction in August 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded in September 1983 for $1,473,900. Construction contract is 94 percent complete and completion is scheduled in October 1984. Remaining work includes construction of concrete rubble masonry walls and levee. 20. WAIMEA RIVER, KAUAI, HAWAII Location. On the west-central portion of the island of Kauai which is about 103 statute miles northwest of Honolulu. (See NOAA Chart 19381.) Existing project. Project provides for 3,175 feet of concrete rubble masonry floodwall on existing levee, 4,650 feet of rock toe protection, 500 feet of road raise, 1,325 feet of levee extension, 250 feet of concrete wall, new floodgates and a flood warning system. Estimated total project cost is $2,990,400 of which $2,972,400 is federal cost and $18,000 is non-federal cost share of flood warning system. Project authority is Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Project was authorized for construction in May 1983. Construction funds were alloted under the Jobs Bill Program. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded in September 1983 for $2,454,400. Construction contract is 84 percent complete and completion is scheduled in December 1984 with the exception of the flood warning system which is scheduled for completion in summer of 1985. Remaining work includes construction of floodwalls and drainage structures. 21. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858. Preauthorization studies were initiated on Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, $48,434; continued on Lake Susupe, Northern Marianas, $21,746; and Garapan Area, Northern Marianas, $177,991; and Honaunau Area, Hawaii, $63,000. Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 84-99. A construction contract to repair damages sustained from Hurricane Iwa at Kekaha Beach, Kauai, was awarded in May 1983 and completed in October 1983 for $208,019. Federal cost during fiscal year for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation was $302,719 of which $170,624 was for disaster preparedness, $25,000 for emergency operations, and $107,095 for rehabilitation work for Kekaha Beach, $104,535 and Sand Island, $2,560. 22. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection was conducted on Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, in October 1983; lao Stream, Maui, in November 1983; and Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hanapepe River, Kauai, Wailoa Stream, Hawaii, and Namo River, Guam, in December 1983 for a total cost of $9,950. 23. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspection was conducted on Waialae-Iki Steam, Oahu, Waialae-Nui Stream, Oahu, in December 1983; Omao Stream, Kauai, Pearl City Channel, Oahu and Moanalua Channel, Oahu in September 1984 for a total cost of $1,803. General Investigations 24. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,000,236 of which $352,784 was for navigation studies, $442,758 for flood damage prevention studies, $48,527 for miscellaneous activities, and $156,167 for coordination with other agencies. 25. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206 PL 86-645, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program provides information on floods and flood related information to improve planning for the careful use of the nation's flood plains, thereby reducing the potential for losses to life and property from floods and wave actions. Federal and nonfederal agencies and the private sector are assisted with flood hazard evaluation and planning information for flood and coastal hazard areas. This assistance is in the form ofl0cal flood plain regulations, National Flood Insurance require ments, and Executive Order 11988 requirements for federn al agencies. Such assistance may include flood information and timing, flood-water velocity, extent of flooding, dura tion of flooding, flood frequency and regulatory flood al limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year. RequestS and responses for technical servicLs and planning assistal totalled 600. Of this total, 85 were from other federal agef cies, 215 from non federal agencies, and 300 from indiidi als, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, enginee. architects and others. Of the 600 requests, assistance resa ed in 2,200 site specific responses. A hurricane vulneraa ity study was initiated in September 1983 as joint studY i the State of Hawaii and is scheduled for completiof November 1985. The estimated total cost is $225,000 e eral: $55,000 Non-federal: $170,000.) Costs for providi Flood Plain Management services during fiscal year we $190,554. Hydrologic Studies. For the on-going storm study' ies, a storm which struck Oahu in March 1951 was if tigated. The meteorogical storm conditions and rainfall da were researched and compiled during fiscal year at a co 36-6 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION of $4,996. Tobtal costs for collection and study and basic data during fiscal year were $195,550. 26. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Agana River Flood Control, Guam. Preparation of a combined General Design Memorandum was initiated in October 1983 and is scheduled for completion in July 1985. CP&E cost estimate is $450,000. Fiscal year costs were $169,816. 36-7 TABLE 36-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 1. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 5. Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 500,000 10,192,000 422,970 5,954,543 17,690,000 16,500,000 21,659,777 14,346,100 594,095 875,801 567,464 220,615 943,309 673,952 2,480,000 1,195,000 3,142,126 1,338,290 171,199 34,500 158,489 39,805 107,000 119,572 -14,300 6,701 1,248 2,988 569 - 364,000 2,050,000 290,000 208,034 2,150,766 345,173 79,000 20,000 78,441 8,096 481,000 38,336 111,500 1,489,400 67,552 1,474,014 -406,000 13,221 46,072,178 43,490,776 2,037,360 1,837,876 16,079,095 16,044,093 2,038,271 2,038,271 205,699 201,282 2,388,693 2,388,693 6,738,020 6,738,020 4,814,528 4,814,501 30,200 30,200 195,000 158,176 2,127,724 S 2,127,724 25,000 5,725,220 34,328 5,725,214 233,261 233,261 45,000 258,000 8,100 28,573 60,535 205,757 70,000 350,000 1,490,500 63,308 6,356 1,821,053 - - 697,000 - 119,716 19,490 80,000 528,819 752,645 752,645 884,833 884,798 200,000 200,000 2.000,000 1,999,694 777,000 648,53 36-8 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sept. 30, 1984 8. Thu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Asquiroga Bay, Territory of Guam (Federal Funds) 11. Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa (Federal Funds) 12. Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa (Federal Funds) 15. Asan Village, Territory of Guam (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 17. Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 18. Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Non-Federal) 19. Paauau Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 20. Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Reimb: New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 121,917 1,840 20,000 15,574 -5,051 -97 9,000 9,000 25,000 25,586 903,000 1,271,121 27,500 423,803 18,181 433,219 -4,400 26 30,000 788 1,584 1,738 65,000 45,406 5,381 5,381 225,501 6,478 241,000 19,643 14,500 908,400 14,257 115,838 - 630,000 - 546,000 52,394 242,662 239,000 25,000 233,317 42,915 705,000 8,000 987,547 29,744 20,000 19,854 -25,000 192,951 -75,000 145,280 119,600 610,486 15,000 409,803 1,991,569 1,962,357 54,034 54,034 65,000 45,406 29,981 29,981 225,000 224,378 175,000 173,923 1,275,500 973,527 645,000 409,803 12,229,000 329,999 12,283,760 10,000 10,315 749,000 748,974 23,500 125,000 24,786,400 25,359 50,875 24,703,607 675 (359,220) (289,991) 7,500 8,159 (289,991) 75,000 85,000 150,000 1,617,300 73,300 84,686 134,347 1,502,387 12,000 11,579 1,000 2,564,000 1,421 109,505 -69,600 2,180,214 8,175 8,159 (939,202) 1,927,300 1,794,720 2,642,400 2,437,719 36-9 -- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Mar 3, 1905 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19351 Jul. 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 27, 1916 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 3, 1954 Dec. 31, 1970 BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII An entrance channel 42 feet deep, 450 feet wide, and 3,100 feet long; an inshore basin of about 46 acres, 28 feet deep, a breakwater on the north side of the entrance channel, if model study shows it to be necessary; spending beaches with wave absorbers within the harbor totaling 1,320 feet in length; and a main access channel 12 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long to a smallboat harbor on the west side of the deep-draft harbor to be developed by local interests. HONOLULU HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Deepening to 35 feet the inner harbor with a general width of 1,200 feet and casing the curve between the entrance channel and the inner harbor. For the channel 1,000 feet long. Channel connecting Honolulu Harbor and Kapalama Basin. Enlarging entrance channel to present project dimensions, widening of the harbor basin by 320 feet and the maintenance of the improved 400-foot wide portion of the reserved channel. A depth of 35 feet over the full width of 600 feet throughout the reserved channel; a turning basin in Kapalama Basin 35 feet deep by 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long; and a slip of like depth 1,000 feet long on the easterly side of Pier 39. The second entrance channel; and installation of a moveable type bridge across the 2nd entrance channel. (Modified by the Chief of Engineers.) Reopening Fort Armstrong entrance channel to 45 feet, Main Harbor Basin and Kapalama Channel to 40 feet, and relocating existing project lines. KAHULUI HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Extending east breakwater and dredging the basin. For the west breakwater. Extend both breakwaters and enlarge dredged basin. Enlarge harbor basin, 600 feet wide, 2,500 feet long, 35 feet deep. NAWILIWILI HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII An entrance channel 35 feet deep; a harbor basin 1,100 feet wide, 35 feet deep, and about 1,950 feet long; and a rubble-mound breakwater. Deepening entrance channel to 40 feet; enlarging harbor basin; and constructing a revetted-fill area. (Modified by the Chief of Engineers.) Modification of General Navigation features. H. Doc. 93, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1905 p. 2565 H. Doc. 392, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 753, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 54, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 705, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 717, 81st cong., 2nd sess. (Contains latest published map.) H. Doc. 93, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 593, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1330, 62nd Cong. 3rd sess. H. Doc, 235, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 109, 86th Cong., 1st sess. (Contains latest map.) H. Doc. 609, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess., as modified by the Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 453,, 83rd Cong. 2nd sess. (Contains latest published maps.) River and Harbor Act. 36-10 5. 1 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Thext Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935' Mar 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 31, 1970 PORT ALLEN HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII Construction of a breakwater 1,200 feet long; dredging of a harbor basin about 1,000 feet wide, 1,500 feet long, and 35 feet deep; and an entrance channel 500 feet wide and 35 feet deep. Additional dredging of an area at the northerly side of the existing project 200 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 35 feet deep. IAO STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Channel enlargement, levees, a debris basin and related works. KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII A debris basin 100 feet wide and 700 feet long with a capacity of 22,000 cubic yards; a rock sill, a diversion levee which is 80 feet long to direct flows into the concrete channel; a concrete trapezoidal channel about 5,280 feet long; three concrete bridges with clear span of 50 feet; and revetted outlet extending 70 feet seaward of the stream mouth. KANEOHE-KAILUA AREA, OAHU, HAWAII Provide a dam and reservoir about 3.2 miles above the mouth of Kaneohe Stream on the tributary Kamooalii Stream. Project consists of an earthfill dam 80 feet high, with a crest length of about 2,300 feet and about 1,000 feet of channel improvements at the entrance of Kaneohe Stream to Kaneohe bay; and reservoir with storage of 2,500 acre-feet of which 500 acre-feet would be for sediment reserve and recreation use and 2,000 acre-feet for flood control. H. Doc. 30, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 180, 77th Cong., 1st sess. (Contains latest published map.) H. Doc. 151, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 94-488, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 92-141, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. 'Included in the Public Works Administration program, Sep. 6, 1933. 36-11 16. 17. 18. TABLE 36-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana Small Boat Harbor, Territory of Guam Completed 1978 $ 937,7981 $ 11,196 Ala Wai Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1976 40,117- Auasi Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,033,0152- Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,783,1293 5,883 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1978 527,0474 208,902 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1972 1,481- Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1982 5,423,440 3,680,856 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1971 781,0365 63,693 Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1976 751,8676- Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1967 -- - Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1968 157,9977 3,127 Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Deferred 1966 138,188 292,441 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Active 1981 5,983,5018 61,800 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1956 3,348,0009 41,857 Kikialoa Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Active 1981 193,000- Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Inactive 1977 186,937- Maalaea Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Active 1981 195,000- Manele Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii Completed 1967 372,00010 255,256 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Small Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1972 30,378- Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1976 584,51311 30,707 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1976 980,01812 668,354 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1979 432,523'- Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Active 1967 -4_ Saipan Small Boat Harbor, Northern Marianas Active 1982 194,000- Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1979 1,940,01115 71,897 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island Inactive 1950 - 14,493 Welles Harbor, Midway Island Completed 1950 2,448,05616 2,111 'Autliorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in (.)Octobe r 1977. In addition, Contributed Funds of $282,747 for ('nst rlctioi. 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in February 1982. In addition, Contributed Funds of $86,563 for Construction. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in February 1982. In addition, Contributed Funds of $231,437 for Construction. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1975. In addition, Contributed Funds of $410,077 for Construction and $84,388 for Operation and Maintenance. 5Completed in March 1970. In addition, Contributed Funds of $630,568 for Construction. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1976. 7Autliorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in September 1967. "In addition, Contributed Funds of $62,102 for Construction. %A9 bandonment authorized by R & H Act of 1965 (HD 98, 89th Congress, 1st Session). 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1965. In addition, Contributed Funds of $370,845 for Construction. "Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1974. In addition, Contributed Funds of $405,471 for Construction. '2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in August 1965. In addition, Contributed Funds of $61,953 for Construction. ' 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1979. '4 Reclassified from deferred to active category on May 16. 1983. '5I1n addition, Contributed Funds of $1,791,068 for Construction. '6Completed in 1941 and Maintenance transferred to Department of Navy. 36-12 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 $254,015'-- Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 240,1482- lanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii Deferred 1965--- Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1976 176,4883 - Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1977 158,9164- Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1981 999,9965 - Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1972 154,3136- Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii Terminated 1982 355,4727 - Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa Active 1978 394,1878 - Poloa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 134,0409 - Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1981 301,87910 - Vatia Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 154,30911- Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Active 1979 729,08712-- Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii Deferred 13 85,043 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. In addition, Contributed Funds of $209,549 in Contributed Funds. 2Completed in April 1965. In addition, $160,098 in Contributed Funds. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1975. In addition, $97,075 in Contributed Funds. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in September 1976. In addition, $60,000 in Contributed Funds. 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1980. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed Funds. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1980. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed Funds. 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and terminated in April 1980 as a Circuit Court ruled sand mining to be illegal. TABLE 36-E OTHER AUTHORIZED Fl In addition, $177,300 in Contributed Funds. 8Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in September 1978. In addition, $312,480 in Contributed Funds. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. In addition, $101,547 in Contributed Funds. 1Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1981. In addition, $401,000 in Contributed Funds. "Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. In addition, Contributed Funds of $132,075 in Contributed Funds. '21In addition $82,000 in Advanced Funds and $17,640 in Contributed Funds. 13No previous full report; project authorized by R & H Act of 1958. LOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Status Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii Completed Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii Completed KWainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii Completed Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed Namo River, Territory of GuamCompleted Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report for: 1967 1950 1967 1971 1982 1966 Cost to September 30, 1984 Construction Operation and Maintenance $ 784,867' 73,7482 1,265,5673 1,000,0004 2,416,3145 1,044,8886 C'Completed in November 1966. In addition, $11,953 in ontributed Funds. 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1950. 'Completed in August 1966. 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in February 1970. In addition, $540,335 in Contributed Funds. 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1982. 6Completed in August 1965. 36-13 --- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 36-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECIS Project For Last Full Report See Annual Report for: Date and Authority Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, Hawaii Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Molokai, Hawaii Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii T'alofofo Bay Shore Protection, Territory of Guam 1967 1967 1975 1979 1976 November 1977 HD #94 413 November 1981 HD #97 59 July 1981 Director of Civil Works July 1981 Director of Civil Works September 1975 Director of Civil Works August 1981 Director of Civil Works TABLE 36-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Fiscal Year Project Survey Conducted Cost Agana Small Boat Harbor, Thrritory of Guam Auasi Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Aunuu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu; Hawaii Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawhii Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Manele Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii May 1984 July 1984 July 1984 August 1984 June 1984 June 1984 August 1984 September 1984 September 1984 June 1984 September 1984 January 1984 January 1984 July 1984 January 1984 July 1984 August 1984 36-14 Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended 86,235 221,500 80,764 $10,237 7,525 7(525 6,994 16,284 12,247 17,850 12,322 8,858 16,277 9,486 14,304 11,378 7,525 11,879 7,525 8,019 PORTLAND, OR, DISTRICT * The territorial limits of the Portland District include the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, the portions of the States of Oregon and Washington which lie within the Columbia River watershed downstream of the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and south central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the Steens Mountains, but not including that part which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR . 2. Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR ....... 3. Chetco River, OR..................... 4. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR . 5. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA ....... 6. Columbia River between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island ............... 7. Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA 8. Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR ................... 9. Coos Bay, OR ......................... 10. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, OR .......... 11. Coquille River, OR .................... 12. Cowlitz River, WA.................... 13. Depoe Bay, OR ........................ 14. Lewis River, WA ...................... 15. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 16. Nehalem Bay, OR ........ ....... 17. Pbrt Orford, OR ....................... 18. Project Condition Surveys .............. 19. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR... 20. Siuslaw River, OR ..................... 21. Skamokawa Creek, WA................. 22. Skipanon Channel, OR ............. 23. South Channel, Government Island, OR. 24. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR ............. 25. Umpqua River, OR .................... 26. Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR ..................... 27. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR .... .... ................. 28. Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR ...... 29. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR .......... 30. Yaquina River, OR .................. Flood Control 31. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR . 32. Beaver Drainage District, OR ......... 34. Blue River Lake, OR ................... 34. Cottage Grove Lake, OR .... ...... Page 37-2 37-2 37-2 37-3 37-4 37-4 37-4 37-5 37-5 37-6 37-6 37-7 37-7 37-7 37-7 37-7 37-8 37-8 37-8 37-8 37-9 37-9 37-9 37-9 37-10 37-10 37-11 37-11 37-11 37-12 37-12 37-13 37-13 37-13 Page 35. Dorena Lake, OR .................... . 37-13 36. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR .. 37-14 37. Fall Creek Lake, OR................... 37-14 38. Fern Ridge Lake, OR .................. 37-14 39. Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA ..... 37-15 40. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................... . 37-15 41. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects............................. 37-16 42. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees ........ 37-16 43. Lower Columbia River Fasin, OR and WA. 37-16 44. Lower Columbia River Lasin Bank Protection, OR and WA ................ 37-17 45. McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR. 37-17 46. Mt. St. Helens & Vicinity, WA .......... 37-17 47. Salmon Creek near Vancouver, WA ....... 37-17 48. Scappoose Drainage District, OR ........ 37-18 49. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .......................... 37-18 50. State Highway 101 and 401, Columbia River, WA ............................ 37-18 51. Trask River, Tillamook County, OR ...... 37-18 52. Tualatin, OR ....................... . 37-18 53. Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR ....... 37-19 54. Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, WA ................... . 37-19 55. Willamette River Basin, OR ............ 37-19 56. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR ................................. 37-20 57. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR ........ 37-20 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 58. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville, OR and WA ................ 37-20 59. Cougar Lake, OR...................... 37-21 60. Detroit Lake, OR ..................... 37-21 61. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR ........... 37-22 62. Hills Creek Lake, OR .................. 37-22 63. John Day Lock and Dam -- Lake Umatilla, OR and WA ................. 37-23 64. Lookout Point Lake, OR ................ 37-23 37-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 65. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR . 37-24 66. The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lake Celilo, WA and OR ......................... 37-24 General Investigations 67. Surveys....................... 68. Collection and Study of Basic Data 69. Continuation of Planning and Engineering .................... 70. Advance Engineering and Design.. ...... 37-25 ...... 37-25 ...... 37-25 ...... 37-25 Tables Thble 37-A Cost & Financial Statement .... 37-27 Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 37-35 Table 37-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 37-45 Table 37-D Not Applicable Table 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 37-46 Table 37-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power .. 37-50 Table 37-G Deauthorized Projects ......... 37-50 Table 37-H Columbia and Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR................. 37-51 Table 37-1 Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 ...................... 37-52 Table 37-J Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR, Principal Features of Existing Canal and Locks...... 37-52 Table 37-K Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 ...................... 37-53 Thble 37-L Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................. 37-53 Table 37-M Lower Columbia River Basin, OR and WA, Levees and Improvements to Existing Works .. 37-55 Table 37-N Willamette River Basin Comprehensive Plan .............. 37-56 Table 37-0 Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam and Powerplant . . . . . . . . . . . . 37-57 Navigation 1. BANDON SMALL BOAT BASIN, COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Coquille River rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into the Pacific Ocean at Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Provides for a protective rubblemound breakwater and an entrance and access channel, 13 feet deep, for a small boat basin at Bandon. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. At Bandon, there is a privately owned mill dock used exclusively for shipping lumber on coastwise vessels, a public owned wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Project fiscally completed. 2. CHARLESTON CHANNEL, COOS BAY, OR Location. Charleston Channel is located in south slough tributary of Coos Bay. The Charleston Channel follows the south slough from its confluence with the main channel of Coos Bay south to the Cape Arago highway bridge. Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for a 150 foot wide channel 6,800 feet long with depths between 16 feet to 17 feet mean lower low water. Also provides for a 180 foot by 900 foot turning basin and 100 foot by 400 foot access channel, both -16 feet mean lower low water. Local cooperation. Port of Coos Bay, project sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project was completed with removal of 1,545 cubic yards of rock by contract. 3. CHETCO RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, OR, 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties at the mouth of the river. Modification in 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450-foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with a top eleva tion of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Con' struction of jetties was completed December 1957 Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge stsu ture was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorz modification of October 1965, two contracts were com0 pleted. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was initiated in July 1968 and completed 37-2 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was started in September 1969 and completed in March 1970. (For plan of improvement authorized by Public Law 97-88, Dec. 4, 1981, see Section 70.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port Commission of Brookings has developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for small private boats, and a public boat launching ramp. There are four fish receiving docks and a sea going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of31,874 cubic yards of material was removed by the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina. The sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. 4. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan DeFuca. Total length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520, 18521, 18522, 18523, 18524, 18526, & 18531; also Geological Survey Map of Washington). Willamette River rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, WA, and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; achannel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 40 feet deep, 0 feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, WA, 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in the Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge (River Mile 11.6) which encompasses Portland Harbor area, subjct to provisions that channel from mouth of Willamette River to turning basin at Vancouver, WA, be limited to 50o feet in width until need for additional width is onstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also des for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet Wide near Cathlamet, WA; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens (Oregon) Channel; and 30 feet deep and 500 feet Wide connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with alin ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR, to include a sheet-pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with a 30-foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from mouth to Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and Vancouver about 3 feet at low stages of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver they average about 12 feet, while highest known reached a stage of 33 feet above low water at Portland. Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA, to the sea was completed in 1976 except for observation of channel to determine if additional control structures or dredging will be required. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the period immediately following the annual freshet in May-June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permit maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette River and Vancouver, WA, depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. (For details relating to previous project, see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Tlrminal facilities. At Portland, OR, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths with total capacity of 8,800,000 tons equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lift on-lift off and roll on-roll off containers, and breakbulk vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the West Coast's largest, and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. The Port of Portland also has a 450,000-cubic-foot cold storage warehouse. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities with total capacity of 16,200,000 tons for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement and steel products. 37-3 winae along frontage of town of Rainier, OR, extended at REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 At Astoria, OR, there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver, WA, there are municipal facilities capable of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a low dock to handle roll on-roll off and side-port discharging vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of about 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private, with a capacity of 6,000,000 tons. At other locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance continued through the year. A total of 1,681,163 cubic yards of material was removed by the U.S. hopper dredges Essayons and Yaquina, and contract hopper and pipeline dredges removed 7,911,846 cubic yards. In addition, the pipeline dredge Oregon removed 4,995,848 cubic yards. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia River near its mouth. Bay is separated from river by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet deep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 10 feet deep connecting basin with deep water in Columbia River, with a width of 150 feet, increased to 200 feet for 2,000 feet at southerly end; a channel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 5 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of authorized project is not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948. Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at Ilwaco, WA, finished December 1957, completed the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and tow-boats. Small-boat basin and protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fishing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 13,419 cubic yards of material was removed by the con. tract hopper dredge Westport. 6. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA, AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6151.) Existing project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook: a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, Chinook, WA. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme about 13 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. A portion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate ter minal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The Westport contract hopper dredge removed 15,932 cubic yards of material. 7. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA. For description of Columbia River see Improvement No. 4. Existing project. Provides for a one.half-mile-wide channel across a bar 55 feet deep (mean lower low water) for the northernmost 2,000 feet, and 48 feet deep (mea lower low water) along the southern 640 feet, to be secu by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "B" on the north shore and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the jetty about 6.6 miles long. The unconstrud spur jetty "B" would be about 1 mile long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet WB completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A") was comple in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified i active" Dredging of the 48-foot bar channel started APi 1956 was completed in September 1957. South je ' 37-4 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT rehabilitation started June 1962 was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965 was completed April 1965. Additional rehabilitation of the south jetty was initiated in May 1982 and completed in September 1982. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty which was completed in 1917. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Deepening of Columbia River to 55 feet: the U.S. hopper dredge Essayons dredged 497,288 cubic yards of material and contract dredges Manhattan Island and Padre Island removed 3,174,559 cubic yards. Code 710: Fiscal completion on construction of recreation facilities at Ft. Stevens State Park covered under costsharing agreement. Rehabilitation: Contractural work was fiscally completed. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 1,769,893 cubic yards of material and the contract dredge Manhattan Island removed 3,325,624 cubic yards. 8. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, WA, 106.5 miles above mouth and The Dalles, OR, mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, see Improvement No. 4, "Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR." Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, WA, and The Dalles, OR, 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, OR; a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, WA; a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville Pool level, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, i1n0g0 fbeaesti wn ifdoer asnmda allb obuota t1s, 0n0e0a fre eeta lsotn egn, dto oaf ncahtaunrnaell ;m oaonrd construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. isting project is complete. Construction of The Dalles .Mall boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredg- 1lg at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957 Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, OR, was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth between Vancouver, WA, and Bonneville, OR, was completed May 1960. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present time, the channel is maintained to a depth of 16 feet, which is adequate for using traffic. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, OR, and of Camas- Washougal, WA, turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, WA, was completed September 1963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, WA, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous idle ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, two boat building businesses (one temporary), and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. At Camas, WA, about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of papermill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There are two one-story timber and corrugated iron warehouses, each 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. A private elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800-bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to tugs and barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about three-fourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and tugs or barges. At numerous locations over entire waterway there are log rollways for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 92,980 cubic yards of material. 9. COOS BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. It is about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Existing project. Two rubblemound, high-tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about River Mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 37-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance to Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston Channel and small-boat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1970. Construction of the deeper and wider channel to River Mile 15 was completed in 1979. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1987 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, and three oil-receiving terminals in vicinity. At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300, 576, and 500-foot frontages, respectively. At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200-foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, also privately owned, for receipt of petroleum products by barge. At Charleston there are four wharves, one public and three private, with usable areas of 1,200, 750, 7,000, and 12,000 square feet, respectively, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There is also a municipally owned small-boat basin, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 33, Corps of Engineers, published in 1975.) Operations during fiscal year Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredges Essayons and Yaquina removed 1,315,752 cubic yards; contract hopper dredge Manhattan Island removed 407,135 cubic yards; and the contract hopper dredge Westport removed 159,781 cubic yards of material. 10. COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OR Location. South Fork and Millicoma Rivers rise in Coast Range in southern Oregon, flow generally wester. ly and join to make Coos River, 5.3 miles above mouth of Coos River in Coos Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18587, Allegany and Daniels Creek Quadrangle.) Existing project. Originally authorized project: a channel depth of 3 feet, generally, from mouth of Coos River and 1 foot near head of navigation. Project as modified: two channels 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide from mouth of Coos River to Allegany on Millicoma River, mile 13.8 and to Delwood on South Fork, mile 14, and thence a channel 3 feet deep and 50 feet wide to mile 14.7 on South Fork, including stabilization works on Coos River. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at the mouth of Coos River is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. Tidal range at head of navigation in both forks is about 1 foot. Freshet stages usually reach a height of from 10 to 15 feet at Allegany, head of navigation on Millicoma River. Originally authorized project providing for a channel from mouth of Coos River to head of navigation in both forks, to provide a depth of 3 feet generally and 1 foot near head of navigation, was completed in 1899. In March 1966 construction of project as modified by 1948 River and Harbor Act was completed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned docks and landing places on the river are used by towboats and pleasure craft. There are no publicly owned docks. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 29,578 cubic yards of material. 11. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Two rubblemound high-tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagg ing to State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951 South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938.) 37-6 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. However, restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects, funding required 50 percent cost sharing with non-federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A privately owned mill dock used exclusively for shipping lumber on coastwise vessels, a publicly owned wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 21,387 cubic yards of material from entrance channel. 12. COWLITZ RIVER, WA Location. Rises in Cascade Range in Washington, flows westerly and southerly about 120 miles and empties into Columbia River about 69 miles from its mouth. (See NOAA Chart 18524.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep at low water and 100 feet wide from the mouth to Kelso (4.2 miles), 4 feet deep and 50 feet wide from Kelso to Ostrander (4.8 miles), 2.5 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Castle Rock (10 miles), and 2.5 feet deep at low water and not less than 40 feet wide to Toledo (18 miles) to be secured by snagging, dredging, and regulating works. Water level due to tides varies from 4 feet at the mouth to zero at Ostrander. During ordinary freshets a stage of 20 feet, and at extreme floods a stage of 25 feet, is reached in the river at Kelso. The project as authorized in 1910 was completed in 1913. The modification authorized in January 1965 for deepening the lower 4.2 miles (old 4.75) to 8 feet was completed in August 1968. Project is normally maintained to River Mile 4.2; however, the authorized channel on the Cowlitz between River Miles 0 and 4.2 remains unusable due to continued sedimentation as a result of the Mt. St. Helens eruption. (For details relating to previous project see page 2000, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1763, Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned and operated landings, a sand and gravel dock, log rollways, and storage booms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Inspections were performed. 13. DEPOE BAY, OR Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; and inher basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally Uthorized was completed in 1939 and project modification, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, was accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed. A contract pipeline dredge removed 13,039 cubic yards of material. 14. LEWIS RIVER, WA Location. Rises in Cascade Range in Washington, flows westerly and southwesterly 110 miles, and empties into Columbia River about 88 miles from its mouth. (See NOAA Chart 18524.) Existing project. A low-water channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide to mouth of East Fork (3.75 miles); 4 feet deep and 50 feet wide on East Fork from its mouth to La Center (3 miles); 4 feet deep and 50 feet wide on Lewis River from the mouth of East Fork to Woodland (2.5 miles), secured by dredging and construction of regulating works and channel clearing to Merwin Dam (12.5 miles from Woodland). Maximum variation of water level, due to tide, ranges from about 3 feet at mouth to 1.5 feet at La Center and zero at Woodland. During ordinary freshets a stage of 14 feet and, at extreme floods, a stage of 24 feet is reached in main river at Woodland, WA. Existing project was completed in 1927. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2001, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1762, Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Woodland on Lewis River there are several privately owned facilities for mooring, fishing and pleasure craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Port of Woodland subleases a commercial log facility at River Mile 1.8, consisting of log rollways and booms for storage. Operations during fiscal year Maintenance: Routine maintenance continued. 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-45 (preauthorization). See Table 37-I. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298): Sampling and identification of aquatic plant infestation in Columbia River and Willamette River Basins were accomplished. Thtal costs for fiscal year were $8,289. 16. NEHALEM BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast, 40 miles from Columbia River mouth and 10 miles north of the entrance to Tillamook Bay. Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 3,850 feet long on the north side of entrance and a jetty 4,950 feet long on the south side. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 15 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1918. Rehabilitation work was initiated in May 1981 and cornpleted November 1982. 37-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project and the major rehabilitation. Terminal facilities. Facilities for pleasure craft only: Dart's Marina, Brighton Moorage, Jetty Fishery, Port of Nehalem and city of Nehalem Dock. All areas have approximately 50-60 slips. However, due to shoaling, all are semi-usable. Operations during fiscal year. Contractor claim was settled and project fiscally completed. 17. PORT ORFORD, OR Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, OR.) Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 550-foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. Breakwater was completed October 1968. Turning basin was completed September 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A dock which is a timber piling structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. About 500 fishing and private boats use this dock each year. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. A contract dredge removed 9,000 cubic yards of material. 18. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Surveys were conducted during FY 1984 at Depoe Bay, OR, and at Nehalem Bay, OR, at a cost of $28,834. The cumulative cost through FY 1984 is $433,570. 19. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon, flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme about 14 feet. Project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was completed during 1973. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined for various private landings between Wedderburn and Agness, OR. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal yeat Maintenance: Pile dike structure maintenance of three pile dikes, south side of channel, oceanward of boat basin entrance, was completed by contract in August 1984 for $379,000. Contract dredging was accomplished to clear the boat basin entrance channel with 39,684 cubic yards of material removed by a pipeline dredge. 20. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, CA. (See NOAA Charts 18583 and 18580.) Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Suislaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to River Mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles above mouth. (For details relating to previous project see page 1988 of Annual Report for 1915.) A modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980, and is currently under construction. Plan of improvement provides for extending the north and south jetties by 1,900 and 2,300 feet respectively. The jetty extensions will terminate at approximately the minus 25-foot contour. Spur jetties are being constructed on each jetty extension to preveh longshore currents from transporting material around th heads of the jetties. Each spur jetty will be about 400 feet long and originate approximately 900 feet shoreward of 37-8 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT the jetty head. The north jetty spur should be oriented 45 degrees to the north of the existing jetty alignment and the south jetty spur 45 degrees to the south of the jetty alignment. Estimated cost of new work is $30,727,000; $30,500,000 Corps of Engineers, $183,000 non-Federal, and $44,000 U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The principal terminal facility on the river is at Davidson Lumber Dock at Mapleton which accommodates ocean-going barges with packaged lumber. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, oil and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. The Port has recently acquired a marine travel lift to accommodate vessels 70 feet in length or 60 tons in weight. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Across the river and below highway bridge at Glaneda are floatways used by small craft. A modern dock for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton by U.S. Plywood Champion Lumber Company. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton to accommodate river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year New work: Contractual work on extension of the north and south jetties continued. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 221,063 cubic yards of material. 21. SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WA Location. Rises in Wahkiakum County, in southwestern part of the State of Washington, flows southwesterly and southerly about 10 miles, and empties into Columbia River about 34 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6.5 feet deep at low water and 75 feet wide, between Steamboat and Brooks Sloughs, about 1,600 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 7 feet and maximum variation of water level due to tides or freshets is about 12 feet. During ordinary freshets a stage of 12 feet is reached in creek at Skamokawa, WA. Project as authorized was completed in 1920. Local cooperation. None required. Tninal facilities. There are several privately owned docks on Skamokawa Creek, Steamboat Slough, and Brooks Slough for use of towboats and pleasure craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condirveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports. 22. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, OR, distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, OR, and channel 6 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme is about 13 feet. Project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, OR, was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 'lTerminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to public on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use of a maximum of 80 small boats. In channel above railroad bridge, facilities consist of log rollways used for sorting logs which are no longer operated. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft. These facilities, except during the fishing season, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract hopper dredge removed 159,588 cubic yards of material. 23. SOUTH CHANNEL, GOVERNMENT ISLAND, OR Location. South Channel is a side channel of the Columbia River about 7 miles long. It connects the main shipping channel of the Columbia River just downstream of Lemon Island with the main shipping channel just upstream of Maguire Island. The downstream end of the channel is just north of the Portland International Airport. Existing project. Provides for a small boat recreational channel 100 feet wide to a depth of 6 feet (Columbia River datum) between river mile 111.8 and 118.4. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Project sponsor, Port of Portland, contributed $99,059 towards construction. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract was awarded in September 1983 and work was completed in January 1984. 24. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) 37-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, OR. Project also provides for improvement of Bayocean Peninsula, OR, by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alinement extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956, and small-boat basin in 1958. Rehabilitation of north jetty was accomplished September 1965. Construction of south jetty was initiated April 1969 and was completed in September 1979. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1989 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-9 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. A privately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for recreational craft. At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports. 25. UMPQUA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) Existing project. A jetty on north side of entrance about 8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 22 feet deep; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in the river to vicinity of docks in Winchester Bay with a mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end; and a channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from main river channel near River Mile 8 to Gardiner, OR, and a turning basin of same depth, 500 feet wide, and 800 feet long, opposite Gardiner. Project was modified in 1954 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 11 feet. Project is complete. North jetty was completed in 1930. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. The 12-foot channel in Scholfield River is currently classified inactive. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August 1963. Extension of training jetty was completed October 9, 1980. (For details relating to previous projects see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898 and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Complied with for all work except Scholfield River channel modification. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also, there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 399,150 cubic yards of material. 26. WILLAMETTE RIVER ABOVE PORTLAND AND YAMHILL RIVEB. OR Location. Yamhill River rises in Coast Range, flows easterly, and empties into Willamette River about 42 miles above Portland. Its length from source of South Fork is about 52 miles. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) For description of Willamette River see Improvement No. 4. Existing project. Provides for improvement of Willamette River between Portland (mile 14) and Oregon City (mile 26) by a channel 8 feet deep at low water, 200 feet wide below Cedar Island and 150 feet wide thence to Oregon City; such channel improvement and contrac" tion works as may be necessary to secure with streamflw regulation, controlling depths of 6 feet at low water and of no prescribed width, from Oregon City to mouth of San" tiam River (mile 108.5), 5 feet from that point to Albany (mile 120) 2.5 to 3.5 feet deep from Albany to Corvallis (mile 132), and for necessary snagging between Corvallis and Eugene (mile 185). Local interests dredge and mai. tain a 20-foot channel to the dock at Lake Oswego. receipt of limerock. Project also provides for a channel1 " 37-10 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Yamhill River 4 feet deep at low water and 60 feet wide from its mouth to McMinnville (18 miles) secured by means of a lock and dam near Lafayette and by removal of obstructions. Section of Willamette River in vicinity of Willamette Falls at Oregon City is covered by Improvement No. 27. For Willamette River below falls at Oregon City ordinary fluctuation of stage of water is 15 feet and extreme fluctuation due to flood conditions 35 to 50 feet. Above Oregon City ordinary fluctuation is 12 to 20 feet and extreme is 20 to 27 feet. For Yamhill River ordinary fluctuation is 35 feet and extreme 48 feet. Tidal changes vary from about 2.5 feet at mouth of Willamette to zero, 26 miles above mouth. Project is about 18 percent complete. The 8-foot channel between Portland and Oregon City and 2.5 to 3.5-foot channel between Oregon City and Albany were completed in 1939. The 2.5 to 3.5-foot channel between Albany and Corvallis was completed in 1945. Remaining work required to complete project consists of construction of such contraction works and channel improvements as may be necessary, with streamflow regulation, to secure controlling depths of 6 feet at low water from Oregon City to mouth of Santiam River, and 5 feet from that point to Albany. This remaining portion has been placed in the deferred category. Due to lack of use by commercial traffifocr which facilities were provided, operation of Yamhill lock was discontinued February 7, 1954, and the lock and adjacent property reported surplus and turned over to Yamhill County January 16, 1959. There is no maintenance of the channel above Newberg, so it is only usable during higher river stages. (For details relating to previous projects see page 1997 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1754 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Between Ross Island Bridge at Portland and Willamette Falls at Oregon City: privately owned mill docks, sand and gravel wharves, a cement loading facility, a small shipyard, and oil-receiving stations. Above the falls there are privately owned landings including a facility at Pulp Siding (3 miles above the falls) with rail and water connections for shipment of clay and receipt of papermill products by barge. At Wilsonville and Newberg there are sand and gravel facilities. At numerous locations as far as Corvallis (River Mile 132) there are log rollways which are currently inactive. At Lake Oswego there is a dock for the receipt of lierock used in the manufacture of cement. Facilities Cosidered adequate for existing commerce. tioOn pseurravteiyosn, s cdouorridnigna ftiisocna l wyietha r.P Morati nateuntahnocreit: ieCs onadnidresource monitoring continued. 27. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR J400ation. Locks and dam covered by this project are at tlarnette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at gon City, OR, about 26 miles above the mouth of river. Caisting project. Provides for construction of a new i"lgle-lift main lock and a guard lock each with clear dimensions of 56 by 400 feet and a minimum depth over sills of 9.5 feet, to replace existing facilities which were provided for by purchase, rehabilitation, and deepening to 6 feet at low water of existing canal and locks and separation of canal from waterpower intake by construction of a concrete division wall. Construction of a new lock is currently an inactive project. The existing locks are on the National Register for historic sites, making their replacement unlikely. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 37-J. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. Canal and locks originally constructed by private interests in 1873 were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final report on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. Replacement of gates Nos. 6 and 7 was completed August 1967 under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in fair condition and in continuous operation except when flooded out by high water or undergoing repair. Facilities are obsolete and inadequate for existing traffic. No construction work has been done on lock and guard lock, which was authorized to replace existing facilities by Flood Control Act of 1939, and River and Harbor Act of 1945. This portion of the project has been reclassified "deferred". Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Crown Zellerbach Corp. has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by concrete division wall built in lock canal by United States. This wharf is used for receiving mill supplies and shipping paper and paper products. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance performed. 28. WINCHESTER BAY, UMPQUA RIVER, OR Location. Bay is on the Oregon coast about 180 miles south of the Columbia River, 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA charts, 18580 and 18584.) Existing Project. A channel 16 feet and 100 feet wide from deep water in the river to vicinity of docks in Winchester Bay with a turning basin 16 feet deep, 175 feet wide and 300 feet long; thence a channel 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep for approximately 500 feet, thence 75 feet wide and 12 feet deep for approximately 950 feet; a channel 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep extending from deep water in the river approximately 4,100 feet in length to a turning basin 160 feet wide, 16 feet deep and 200 feet long at the southerly end of the west basin. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract for rock removal awarded in late FY 1983 was completed in March 1984. 29. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) 37-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned railroad terminus at Yaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for two small boat mooring basins at Newport, OR. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Under modification of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel was completed in October 1968, and extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. (For details relating to previous projects see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annual Report for 1938, page 1736.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Yaquina Terminals has two berths capable of serving ocean-going vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. The company now has 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 acres were constructed in 1956-57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. No deep draft commerce presently use these facilities. Port of Newport has a public wharf within 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port of Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed South Beach Marina which can handle approximately 600 small pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. A dry boat moorage for 120 boats, is nearing completion. A swing hoist with 3-ton capacity is currently available and one with 60-ton capacity is planned. About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a commercial fish farm facility. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations during fiscal yean Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 99,850 cubic yards of material, and contract hopper dredge Westport removed 570,923 cubic yards. 30. YAQUINA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows about 50 miles in a westerly direction, and empties into Yaquina Bay, on Oregon Coast. (See U.S Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 5802 and 6058.) Existing project. Provides for two controlling half-tide dikes of piling, brush, and stone, each about 1,100 feet long (constructed by local interests), and for a channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depoe Creek, extending from town of Yaquina to Tledo, about 9 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme about 12 feet. Freshet heights are about 12 feet at mouth of Depoe Creek. Channel work authorized March 1913 was completed in 1914. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Near town of Yaquina at river mouth, which is also head of Yaquina Bay, there is a moorage for small vessels and a small-craft shipyard. Both port and city of Tbledo have public-terminal facilities for accommodation of local craft. There are also privately owned facilities for loading lumber barges, receipt of bunker fuel, and log rollways for receipt of logs. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S.G.S study on phenolic compounds performed. Flood Control 31. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR, on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 46, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chute-tYpe spillway on the left abutment, and a regulating outlet coD' duit, and intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 5 miles long, provides 75,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water con" servation utilization. Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood con trol, reservoir is operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, an recreation benefits. Project is complete and operating 37-12 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon insure maintenance of stream flow released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has made a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. The results of the study indicate that at present there does not appear to be a feasible Federal irrigation project for the Applegate River Valley. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous contracts for minor roadway ditch cleanup and roadway repair are underway. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance was performed. Freshets regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue River are shown in Thble 37-L. 32. BEAVER DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OR Location. In Columbia County, OR, north of town of Clatskanie and extends along Columbia River and Bradbury Slough between River Miles 49.7 and 55.4. Existing project. The project originally provides for construction of 10.4 miles of existing levee; construction of 2.5 miles stone revetment, one of pumping plant and 1.1 miles of diversion canal. The Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950, authorized additional improvements which include raising and strengthening the existing levee and installing toe drains where required; removing two antiquated pumping stations from the levee section; constructing a new pumping station with increased capacity; removing the existing Tank Creek tide box structure; and replacing the Tank Creek tide box with a fresh water intake. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 37-12 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project was fiscally completed. 33. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR .Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.8 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 42 miles easterly of Eugene, OR. E istng project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 th ong at crest including spillway and 319 feet above he lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete ravity chute-type spillway with two gates is located on left abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left aore of reservoir an earth-and-gravel fill embankment, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S Forest Service under a Memorandum of Agreement. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for flood control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. Eugene Water and Electric Board made an application in April 1982 for permit to install two small hydropower units at Blue River Lake project. They also made an application in 1982 for permit to build a dam with two hydropower units, called Sunnyside Dam, between Foster and Green Peter project. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Thble 37-L. 34. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Location. On Coast Fork of Willamette River, 29 miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, OR, on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity nonoverflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gate-controlled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runc.ff of drainage area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at four sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. Local cooperation. None required. No cost-sharing sponsor for recreation facilities has expressed an interest in this project. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-L. 35. DORENA LAKE, OR Location. On Row River, OR, 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow 37-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles, practically entire drainage area tributary to Row River. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities that were funded under the Code 710 program. Future recreation facility construction will be accomplished in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, OR. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. Local cooperation. Lane County Parks is participating in a multiple project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract for many of the existing parks at four projects; therefore, future recreation development at Dorena Lake will require 50 percent contribution by Lane County and is subject to funding availability by the government and Lane County. Operations during fiscal year. New work, Code 710: Contract modification for construction of restroom facilities at Schwarz Park completed in FY 1983. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Thble 37-L. 36. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, OR. Existing project. Design work continues to provide for a 249-foot high roller compacted concrete gravity dam, 2,600 feet long at the crest, with a gate controlled concrete chute spillway, regulating outlet conduits, power penstock and multiple use intake tower attached to the upstream face of the dam. Reservoir 6.2 miles long will provide 95,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project will control runoff from a drainage area of 135 square miles. Reservoir will be operated to provide future municipal and industrial water supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Construction of the project was initiated in February 1971. Work completed to date includes construction of a bypass road to route traffic away from the damsite and stockpiling of gravels to be used in the main dam and relocated roads. All lands for the project have been acquired. Final environmental statement was filed with Council of Environmental Quality June 15, 1972 and Supplement No. 1 addressing water quality and social/demographic information was filed with EPA on December 24, 1980. Estimated Federal cost of project is $128,000,000. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation laws and policies. On February 24, 1966, State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for withdrawal rights of 25 cfs to maintain minimum flow for fish. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Administration of project land continued. 37. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. Sky Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contracts with Lane County and Bethel School District. Local cooperation. Lane County Parks is participating in a multiple project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract for many of the existing parks at four projects, including Fall Creek Lake. Future recreation development at Fall Creek Lake will require the 50 percent contribution by Bethel School District, and is subject to funding availability by the Government and the Bethel School District. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork, Willamette River, are shown in Table 37-L. 38. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tom River rises in Lane County, OR, on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A main dam, 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general found" tion and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a con crete gravity spillway near left abutment with a non" overflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by si automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tbm River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and con0- trols runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square mlL1 Reservoir protects Long Tbm River Valley and is opera 37-14 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low water-flows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. -rovision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, and construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of future recreation facilities will be in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, and requires a 50 percent contribution by the county. Development is subject to availability of funds by the Government and the county. Local cooperation. Lane County currently provides operation and maintenance at three parks at Fern Ridge Lake and is participating in a multiple project costsharing (50 percent) contract for many of the existing parks at four projects, including Fern Ridge Lake. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown in Table 37-L. 39. HUNTINGTON AVENUE, CASTLE ROCK, WA Location. On the left bank of the Cowlitz River at River Mile 15.9 in Castle Rock, Cowlitz County, WA. Existing project. Work was authorized under the special continuing authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. This authority allows construction of emergency bank protection to prevent flood damages to public works. Riprap erosion protection along 550 linear feet of bankline was constructed to protect Huntington Avenue, a road that passes through the city of Castle Rock and provides connection at two locations with Interstate Highway 5. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, city of Castle Rock, provided construction easements and rights-of-way and made necessary utility relocations. The city also agreed to hold the United States free from damages and maintain and operate the completed bank protection works. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract was awarded in December 1983 and work was completed in February 1984. 4. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, hblic Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorlZtion). See Table 37-K. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 lood4 Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). iscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: McKenzie River, Rainbow, OR, $22; and Siletz Bay, Lin- County, OR, $470. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were: $222,593, disaster preparedness; $112,920, emergency operations; $78,180, rehabilitation; $9,493,187, advance measures; and $1,948, haza1 mitigation. Contributed funds for levee raising were $2,700. Mt. St. Helens Emergency Measures. The May 18, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens dramatically altered the hydraulic and hydrologic regimes of the Cowlitz and Toutle River valleys. Volcanic debris substantially reduced the river's hydraulic capacity to the point where major flooding could be expected with even normal runoff. A major recovery program for the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers funded under advance measures was initiated a short time after the eruption and was essentially completed during FY 1982. Total cost of Mt. St. Helens emergency measures, from initiation through FY 1984, with some contract modifications remaining to be negotiated, is $263,307,000. The authorized navigation channel on the Cowlitz between River Mile 0 and 4.2 remains unusable due to continued sedimentation. Spirit Lake, WA. Portland District was directed on August 24, 1982 to respond to the Presidential declaration of a State of Emergency for the Spirit Lake area. This declaration was precipitated by the release of a U.S. Forest Service Spirit Lake Interagency Task Force report assessing the flood hazard posed by that body of water, which has been without a natural outlet since the May 18, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The report concluded that Spirit Lake would fill to an extremely dangerous level by as early as spring 1983 and also mentioned concern over the structural stability of the debris plug holding back the lake due to the development of an extensive system of deep erosion gullies on its surface, some as deep as 40 feet. To contain the threat of a possible devastating flood caused by a failure of the Spirit Lake debris plug, and in response to a tasking from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Portland District initiated a program aimed at meeting two objectives: (a) Undertake interim measures to assure that the lake is not allowed to continue rising unchecked so that the threat of a possible flood during 1983 is averted, and, (b) perform field investigations and preliminary design work necessary to make a recommendation to FEMA for a permanent solution to the threat of flooding from Spirit Lake An interim solution was implemented to maintain the lake at a safe level through pumping water from the lake from October to July each year. A comprehensive plan for long-term flood control and navigation maintenance, as a result of the Mt. St. Helens eruption, was completed in 1983. This document included alternative methods of eliminating the threat of eatastrophic flooding due to the unstable avalanche debris dam at Spirit Lake. 37-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 A decision document selecting the final plan for responding to this threat was completed in February 1984. This plan called for the construction of an 8,500-foot-long tunnel through Harry's Ridge to permanently drain Spirit Lake into South Coldwater Creek. Construction of the tunnel began in June 1984, with the four-month long drawdown of the lake to begin in April 1985. The cost for tunnel construction through FY 1984 is $5,972,073. Until the tunnel is complete, the lake elevation will be maintained through pumping from barge-mounted pumping plant at Spirit Lake. Supplemental pumping resumed in September 1983, continuing through July 31, 1984, at a cost of $3,363,543. Rehabilitation of the pumping plant and equipment was undertaken prior to resumption of pumping on October 2, 1984. Pumping is scheduled to continue through April 1, 1985 when drawdown through the tunnel begins. 41. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine maintenance condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those works are being properly maintained by local interests. A total of 47 leveed areas and 268 bank protection works were inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. Of this total, 10 leveed areas in Oregon and 37 leveed areas in Washington were inspected during FY 1984. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette River Basin was supplemented by an onsite inspection at locations requiring maintenance. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recom.- mendations for improving maintenance. The program to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Periodic contact was maintained with uncooperative areas reported in FY 1983 to ascertain any change in attitude and to provide technical assistance, if requested. Of the 81 sponsors for some 125 local flood protection projects inspected in Portland District, 9 were reported deficient in maintenance. Fiscal year costs were $129,845 and total costs to September 30, 1984 were $1,049,873. 42. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Annual inspections are made of levees, flood control structures, and communities that have received previous assistance under the various features of Public Law 84-99 (flood fights, levee rehabilitation, advance measures). Inspections involve determining physical condition of levees and other structures, riprap displacement, and vegetation control. Inspections also serve a valuable disaster preparedness function in terms of explaining to local interests their preparedness responsibilities and criteria for qualifying for future emergency assistance under PL 84-99. Local sponsors are advised of results of inspections. Approximately 50 locations throughout the Portland District were inspected under this feature during FY 1984, at a cost of $52,814. 43. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and minor tributaries, chan. nels, and sloughs, between Sandy River, OR, about 15 miles east of Vancouver, WA, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Plan for bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin provides for new construction and supplementing and extending projects constructed in Lower Columbia River Basin under authority of 1936 Flood Control Act: (a) Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA provides for bank protection works at 96 locations on Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River and mouth of Columbia River, totaling about 224,000 linear feet. Estimated total Federal cost is $25,400,000 and non-Federal cost is $275,000; (b) See Table 37-M on Levees and Improvements to Existing Works; (c) Lower Columbia River Basin levees at new locations, Oregon and Washington, provides for construction of flood control works at: Washougal area, Clark County, WA, about 5.5 miles of levee and appurtenant works at a Federal cost of $1,803,488, and non-Federal cost at $98,000; and Vancouver Lake area in vicinity of Vancouver, WA, about 18 miles of levee and appurtenant works at an estimated Federal cost (1980) of $19,500,000 and non-Federal cost at $900,000. This portion, Vancouver Lake, WA, has been reclassified "de ferred". Total estimated Federal costs (1980) for both areas of work are $21,303,488 and non-Federal costs $998,000. Federal cost for all work under project, Lower Columbia River Basin, OR, and WA, is $67,361,776. Construction of improvement to existing project in Sandy Drainage District, OR, was completed by local interests at no construction cost to the Government. Improvements of levees have been accomplished by contract at the following locations: Multnomah County Drainage District, No. 1, OR, June 1962; Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR, October 1962; Woodson Drainage District, OR, December 1963; Rainier Drainage District, OR, June 1964; Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District, No. 15, WA, December 1965; Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Districts, Nos. 2 and 13, WA, June 1965; Midland Drainage District, OR, April 1967; Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District, No. 2, WA, June 1974; Beaver Drainage District, OR, June 1978; Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, WA, October 1979; and Scappoose Drainage District, OR, September 1980. Washougal Area, WA, (new location) levee construction has been completed. Under authorization for Lower Columbia River Basin bank prot& tion works, construction has been completed at numerous locations. (See Section 44 for additional information). Local cooperation. Flood Control act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; 0 kM necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alteratiod hold the United States free from damages; and maintain Sor operate completed works. Tbtal non-Federal costs for all 1r are $4,573,000. For details of status or requirements of l cooperation see individual project reports. Operations during fiscal year. See individual protj 37-16 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 44. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, OR, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,000 linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 78 percent complete. A total of 174,190 linear feet of bank protection work at 74 locations has been completed. Estimated Federal cost is $25,400,000. Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate works after completion. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $275,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: White, 122nd Avenue Extension, Cashdollar, Fraser, Hudson and Armstrong locations were completed. Gillnet, Rusty Bumper, and Janice locations that will provide 1,527, 3,065, and 2,550 linear feet of protection, respectively, are scheduled to be completed by November 1984. 45. MCDONALD DIKE ROAD, NEHALEM RIVER, OR Location. On the right bank of the Nehalem River at River Mile 3.5, along McDonald County Road, in Tillamook County, OR. Existing project. Work was authorized under the special continuing authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. This authority allows construction of emergency bank protection to prevent flood damages to public works. Riprap erosion protection consisting of 780 cubic yards of graded quarry rock along 85 linear feet of bankline was constructed to protect McDonald County Road, a county roadway that provides a local cross road connection between State Highway 53 and North Fork Road. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, Tillamook CoUnty, provided construction easements and rights-of- Way and made necessary utility relocations. The County also agreed to hold the United States free from damages and maintain and operate the completed bank protection Works. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract Was awarded in December 1983 and work was completed in January 1984. 46. MOUNT ST. HELENS & VICINITY, WA Location. Along the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers from Spirit Lake at the base ofMt. St. Helens to the confluence of the Cowlitz with the Columbia River (River Mile 68) aPProximately 55 miles downstream from Portland, OR. Existing project. The May 18, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens dramatically altered the hydraulic and hydrologic regimes of the Cowlitz and Thutle River valleys. Mudflows triggered by the eruption carried large volumes of sediment from the debris avalanche into these river valleys, reducing the hydraulic capacity to the point where major flooding could be expected with even normal runoff. Storm runoff and surface drainage continue to deliver sediment from the debris avalanche into the rivers. Funds allocated under Public Law 84-99 were used for major recovery work on the Cowlitz and Toutle rivers. In late FY 1983, interim flood control measures were implemented under the authority of Public Law 98-63 to assure 100-year flood protection to developed areas along the Cowlitz River. Measures implemented are primarily dredging on the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers and a monitoring program. An interim solution to the threat of a possible flood due to filling of Spirit Lake behind the debris plug was begun in late FY 1982. A contract to pump water from the lake, funded under Public Law 87-99, was completed on July 31, 1983. A supplemental contract was negotiated to continue pumping from October 1983 until April 1985. Local cooperation. Local sponsors will be requested to obtain any additional lands easements and rights-ofway. The State of Washington has agreed to act as the local sponsor. State funds have been appropriated for acquisition of lands and related expenses for Mt. St. Helens recovery operations. The State of Washington has spent over $2,000,000 to procure disposal sites for dredged material. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Dredging on the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers and monitoring were performed at a cost of $18,252,990. From October 1983 to March 1984, nearly 4.4 million cubic yards of sediment were removed from the sediment stabilization basin (LT-1) in the lower Toutle River and approximately 6.0 million cubic yards were removed from the Cowlitz River in the vicinity of Castle Rock. 47. SALMON CREEK, NEAR VANCOUVER, WA Location. On the left bank of Salmon Creek at River Mile 6.0 in Clark County, WA. Existing Project. Work was authorized under the special continuing authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. This authority allows construction of emergency bank protection to prevent flood damages to public works. Protection consists of a 23-foothigh binwall, 379 feet in length, backfilled with granular material. Riprap is to be placed at the upstream and downstream ends of the binwalls. This work protects N.E. 117th Avenue which serves as primary access to State Highway 99 and Salmon Greenway Park. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, Clark County, provided construction easements and rights-of-way and made necessary utility relocations. The County also agreed to hold the United States free from damages to maintain and operate the completed bank protection 37-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 works, and contributed $185,000 towards construction. In addition, the County will lower the grade of 117th Avenue an average of six feet over a length of approximately 700 feet and will install a corrosion protection system for the binwall during the construction season. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract was awarded in June 1983. The contractor was unable to order and receive binwall material in sufficient time to complete necessary in-water work prior to September 15, 1983. Therefore, a time extension was granted and construction was completed in September 1984. 48. SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OR Location. In Columbia County, OR, along left bank of Multnomah Channel opposite Columbia River Miles 90.3 to 97.0. Existing project. The project as originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, provided for reconstruction of the existing levee system. Additional improvements provide for raising and strengthening 52,000 feet of levee, construction of toe drains, and additional pumping capacity. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1941. Design memorandum approved by higher authority in September 1971. Final Environmental Impact Statement filed with CEQ April 24, 1972. Supplement to EIS was filed with CEQ July 29, 1974. Additional improvements were completed in September 1980. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-14 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Project is physically complete. Funds were expended for administrative costs. 49. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at four Bureau of Reclamation projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, and Scoggins) and (Mossyrock) a municipal power project operated by Tacoma City Light. The Bureau of Reclamation projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944. Monitoring of Mossyrock flood control operation is assigned to the Corps by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as the Mossyrock license calls for specific flood control regulation. Under licensing agreement, the Thcoma City Light utility is required to provide 360,000 acre-feet of flood storage by December of each year. The Bureau of Reclamation sponsored projects were operated satisfactorily during FY 1984 for flood control. At Mossyrock, three winter high water periods occurred, one in November 1983 and two in January 1984. During the early January high water period, reservoir regulation stored approximately 227,000 acre-feet at Mossyrock. Prior to the high water Mossyrock had been drafted 300,000 acre-feet into exclusive power use storage. Peak discharges at Castle Rock were well below the regulation goal of 70,000 cubic feet per second during the flood season. Unregulated flows would have also been below the 70,000 cubic feet per second goal. The spring snowmelt runoff was much above normal and all reser. voirs filled to normal full pool levels during the refill season. Preparation of Reservoir Regulation Manuals for Scoggins and Mossyrock Projects is scheduled. Total cost of monitoring the five projects during FY 1984 was $4,721. 50. STATE HIGHWAY 101 AND 401, COLUMBIA RIVER, WA Location. On the right bank of the Columbia River at River Mile 15.0, along Washington State Route 401 in Pacific County, WA. Existing Project. Work was authorized under the special continuing authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. This authority allows construction of emergency bank protection to prevent flood damages to public works. Riprap erosion protection along 1,450 linear feet of bankline was constructed to protect Washington State Route 401, a principal traffic route for southwestern Washington, including travel along the Washington and Oregon coasts. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, the Washington State Department of Transportation, provided construction easements and rights-of-way and made necessary utility relocations. The State also agreed to hold the United States free from damages and maintain and operate the completed bank protection works. In addition, the State contributed $267,500 for construction. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract was awarded in August 1984 and work is scheduled for completion in January 1985. 51. TRASK RIVER, TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OR Location. On south branch of Trask River about 1 mile west-southwest of Tillamook, Tillamook County, Oregon. Existing project. There is no existing project at the site Work was authorized under the special continuing authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. This authority allows construction of emergency bank protection to prevent flood damages to public works. Riprap erosion protection along 630 linear feet of bankline was constructed to protect Tone Road, a county roadway that provides the only vehicle access to seven dairy farms. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, Tillamook County, provided construction easements and rights-of way and made necessary utility relocations. The county also agreed to hold the United States free from damages and maintain and operate the completed bank protection works. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contrathu work was physically completed September 8, 1983 with final contract payments and administrative costs in 1984. 52. TUALATIN, OR Location. Tualatin River channel between river mile 7.6 and 8.8 above the confluence with the Willamette River. Project is located in the city of Tualatin. Existing project. Provides channel improvements o reduce potential flood damage in the river basin. MBjr 37-18 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT damage is concentrated in the city of Tualatin. Reduction of potential flood damage results from removal of channel constructions in the project area by increasing channel capacity. The city's core area lies in a high water secondary channel which floods when the river surface rises above 120 feet NGVD (National Geodetic Vertical Datum). The project will improve channel capacity and exceeding 120 feet NGVD would then average once in 13 years through the project area. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. City of Tualatin is project sponsor. Operations during fiscal year New work: Contractual work was physically completed September 1983 with contract completion and claim settlement in FY 1984. 53. UMATILLA RIVER, THORN HOLLOW, OR Location. On the left bank of the Umatilla River at River Mile 76.4 on the Umatilla Indian Reservation about 20 miles east-northeast of Pendleton in Umatilla County, OR. Existing project. Work was authorized under the special continuing authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. This authority allows construction of emergency bank protection to prevent flood damages to public works. Riprap erosion protection along 826 linear feet of bankline was constructed to protect a city of Pendieton waterline. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, city of Pendleton, provided construction easements and rightsof- way and made necessary utility relocations. The city also agreed to hold the United States free from damages and maintain and operate the completed bank protection works. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract was awarded in August 1984 and work will be completed in October 1984. 54. WAHKIAKUM COUNTY CONSOLIDATED DIKING DISTRICT NO. 1, WA Location. District occupies both Puget and Little Islands in Columbia River between River Miles 38.4 and 45.0. These islands are in Wahkiakum County, WA, near town of Cathlamet. Existing project. Provides for raising and strengthening existing levees, removing several abandoned tide boxes, constructing a new tide box, extending an existing tide box and adding a gate well structure, constructing a new Pumping station and relocating three existing pumping stations; raising the discharge lines of all pumping stations; and filling borrow ditches along the landward levee toe Construction of new tide box was completed January 1976. Replacement of three pump stations and 0e tide box and addition of one pumphouse is complete. Pinal EIS filed September 18, 1972. IL al cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides o interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make ecessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterat10l; hold the United States free from damages; and Satain and operate completed works. Operations during fiscal year. New work: O&M manuals were prepared. 55. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. Willamette River, formed by Coast and Middle Forks which join a few miles above Eugene, OR, flows north 189 miles, and enters Columbia River 101.5 miles above its mouth. The basin has an area of 11,200 square miles and lies between Cascade Range on the east and Coast Range on the west. Major tributaries of Willamette River rise in Cascade Mountains and consist of Coast and Middle Forks and McKenzie, Calapooia, Santiam, Molalla, and Clackamas Rivers. Important tributaries that head in the Coast Range are Luckiamute, Yamhill, and Tualatin Rivers. Minor tributaries, all of which enter the main stream from the west, are Long ITom River, Marys River, and Rickreall Creek. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Willamette River Basin and authorized funds for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan recommended for initial development: the reservoirs and related works to be selected by Chief of Engineers. Subsequent Flood Control Acts, 1941 through 1974, authorized additional flood control and other works and increased monetary authority. Following projects were completed as authorized and are in continuous operation: Fern Ridge Lake, August 1951; Cottage Grove Lake, April 1952; Dorena Lake, October 1952; Detroit Lake, December 1960; Lookout Point Lake, June 1961. Hills Creek Lake, June 1963; Cougar Lake, March 1964; Fall Creek Lake, November 1965; Green Peter-Foster Lakes, June-December 1967 respectively; and Blue River Lake, October 1968. Under the authorization for construction of recreation facilities at completed projects, work has been accomplished at Fern Ridge, Cottage Grove, Dorena, Lookout Point, and Fall Creek Lakes. Under the memoranda of agreements with the U.S. Forest Service, recreation facilities also have been constructed at Detroit, Lookout Point, Cougar, Blue River, and Hills Creek Lakes. Details of operation, construction, and financial status of projects are in individual reports. During low-water season, July-September, supplemental water releases are made from Willamette River Basin Reservoirs. Uses which benefit from increased downstream flows include irrigation, navigation, power, fisheries, pollution abatement, and recreation. Although optimum regulation cannot be provided for every purpose, water released from reservoirs during the low-water season for a particular purpose will usually provide benefits to other uses as well. Basic policy is to provide most beneficial overall regulation, consistent with established water-use priorities. (See Thble 37-N on Willamette River Basin Comprehensive Plan.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local cooperation for other projects is in individual reports for those projects. Operations during fiscal year See individual reports. 37-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 56. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, bet- C -le I:.. nge and Coast Range, from a point south of Eugene to Portland, OR. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and reveting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection at 236 locations. Estimated Federal cost is $31,400,000. Construction of project began in 1938 and is 96 percent complete. A total of 486,120 linear feet of bank protection work at 229 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $377,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A total of 2,250 linear feet of riprap revetment bank protection has been constructed at Cannon location. Maintenance: Annual inspection of revetments was made by helicopter in July 1984. 57. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Location. On Willow Creek immediately upstream from Heppner and just downstream fron junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. Project provides flood protection to the city of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam is a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs, an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the project is 13,250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acre-feet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acre-feet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities are being provided. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 20, 1979. The provision of the Clean Water Act were met by a Section 404(bX1) Evaluation and a public notice issued January 12, 1980, and a Section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. Contracts have been completed for relocation of the city water main, and construction of the water tank, road, and main dam. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: (See Walla Walla, WA District Annual Report.) Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance performed effective June 1, 1984. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 58. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAMLAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of Portland, OR, about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River see Improvement No. 4. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel from Washington shore to Bradford Island, which divides the river at this point. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 vertical-lift steel gates and 10 remote control main dam hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service roadway permits operation of two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse No. 1 extending across Bradford Slough to the Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of two units of 43,200 kilowatts and eight units of 54,000 kilowatts each, totaling 518,400 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders and locks to serve both main channel and Bradford Slough channel. Navigation lock and powerhouse are founded on andesite, and main dam rests upon solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. The pool created by dam provides a navigable channel 15 feet deep between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 37-0. Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildings and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian storage and Pacific Northwest - Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provides for increased power installa tion by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse contains eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a combined capacity.of aito 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the entire Bonneville capaClY1 to 1,076.6 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist o the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting 37-20 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT existing Washington shore fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in both the powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act(August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Construction of project started October 1933, was completed February 1953. Modification of powerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. First two power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. Construction of second powerhouse is near completion. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 1,500,000 projectwide, a visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-seat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Contracts for relocation of the highway, railroad and town of North Bonneville are 99 percent complete. Construction of the main powerhouse and supply contracts for associated powerhouse equipment are 99 percent complete and Units 11 through 18 were on-line by October, 1982. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require cost-sharing) is an integral part of that structure Estimated cost for construction of second Powerhouse is $636,000,000. Construction of future recreational facilities is contingent upon a cost-sharing contract with a non-federal sponsor. Skamania County, WA has indicated an interest s cost-sharing at Home Valley upstream from Bonneville Lock and Dam; however, a cost-sharing contract has not been consummated. Through September 1984 power generation totaled 179.8 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $193,949,950 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and OPerating costs. Local cooperation. None required, except for non- Ffeaecraill icotsite-ssh.aring for development of recreational Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued on restoration of areas disturbed by Poerhouse construction and will be completed in FY 1985. Final stages of the juvenile bypass system and tnitoring facilities were under construction. Correction fAiciencies in fish guidance efficiency at the Second rhouse will reduce fingerling mortality incurred durl annual downstream migration. aintenance: Normal operation and maintenance was mrfodnuedri ng period. During the fiscal year 6,160,797 tt-hours of electrical power energy were generated, of which 6,138,489 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock consisting of rafted logs, petroleum products, grains, and miscellaneous cargo amounted to 8,009,643 tons during calendar year 1983. 59. COUGAR LAKE, OR Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles east of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake, which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. Through September 1984 power generation totaled 2.8 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $13,495,050 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit is $107,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continuation of negotiations for the innovative financing of Strube Lake and Couger Additional Unit. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 186,858,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 186,072,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 37-L. 60. DETROIT LAKE, OR Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth 45 miles southeast of Salem, OR. North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. 37-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. One main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate-controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in interest of navigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acre-feet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed on-line June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Through September 1984 power generation totaled 15.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $18,577,700 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 622,957,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 619,912,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Thble 37-L. 61. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, OR. Existing project. One main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gate-controlled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Y-shaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and a concrete gravity gate-controlled spillway and still. ing basin for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with a capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power-generation unit was placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28,1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed on-line August 22,1968 and second, September 6, 1968. Through September 1984 power generation totaled 6.0 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $31,455,450 was reimbursed to the U.S Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During the fiscal year 454,402,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 451,330,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 37-L. 62. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest poin of the general foundation. A gate-controlled concrete gravity chute-type spillway is in right abutment. Diver sion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in sae abutment. Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt unitsi ,0 located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about.of miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool e 356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive 37-22 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power units were placed on-line. Through September 1984 power generation totaled 3.6 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $14,403,679 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 226,248,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated, of which 225,666,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-L. 63. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fishladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, and communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acre-feet of flood control storage. As modified, the project provides 500,000 acre-feet of flood control storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Thble 37-N. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Construction began July 1958 and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. The main dam contract is Coplete. Lock rehabilitation work begun in FY 1980 is essentially complete. Entire project is estimated to be 99 'ercet complete. Through September 1984 power generatio 1 totaled 170.4 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross ininse from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Ad- Stration, $193,269,300 was reimbursed to the U.S. traSury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $511,333,000, consisting of $511,000,000 Corps of Engineers and $333,000 for Coast Guard navigation aids. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contracts were awarded for the first of two phases of construction to start work on a juvenile by-pass system. The by-pass facility will consist of a collection system of submersible traveling screens, a conduit mined above the intakes to each turbine-generator unit and across the length of the powerhouse, a conduit extending from the powerhouse to an outfall structure downstream, and an intake gantry crane to handle fish facilities equipment. Future work will consist of completion of phase two of the by-pass facilities. Rehabilitation: Long range testing and monitoring (evaluation) was performed. Maintenance: Work continued to refurbish turbinegenerator units and auxiliary equipment. Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 11,480,512,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated by the 16 generating units of which 11,462,608,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of petroleum products, grains, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 7,123,070 tons during calendar year 1983. 64. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of main stem Willamette River. Dam is about 22 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel-fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at fullpool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000-kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low 37-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County and will require a 50 percent contribution by Lane County and is subject to funding availability by the Government and the County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1, 2 and 3 were placed in commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on-line May 1955. Use of Dexter Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Lookout Point units was effected in December 1954. Through September 1984 power generation totaled 12.3 billion kilowatt hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $50,855,935 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Lane County Parks is participating in a multiple project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract for many of the existing parks at four projects, including Lookout Point-Dexter. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 580,811,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 579,102,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Thble 37-L. 65. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. On upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, OR. Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gate-controlled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility with provisions for temperature regulation for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. Project provides control of runoff of drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. Construction of project initiated July 1967 is complete. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1972. Through September 1984, power generation totaled 2.2 billion kilowatt-hours, Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $9,863,750 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project invest. ment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that demands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville Power Administration. A survey in September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I supply has been completed with one of the communities. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Rogue River hatchery for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The hatchery became operational in 1972. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for minor roadway repair was awarded and work currently underway. Maintenance: During fiscal year 401,765,000 kilowatt. hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 399,414,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek Lake on Rogue River are shown in Table 37-L. 66. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM-LAKE CELILO WA AND OR Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 192 miles above mouth of river and 88 miles east of Portland, OR. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 23 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and cansists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section fro Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutment on Washingto0 shore. Fish-passing facilities including two laddersdand a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructe al 14 units initially and substructure for eight additif ' units, an ultimate total of 22 units. Initial installat i excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fishwater unitS, 37-24 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 1,092,000 kilowatts. With eight units installed for a capacity of 687,800 kilowatts, the 22 nit total is 1,808,800 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in Table 37-0. Major construction of project initiated February 1952, was completed October 1960 when unit No. 14 was placed in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15-22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Construction of future recreational facilities is contingent upon a costsharing contract with a non-federal sponsor. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water Supply System were initiated in October 1979 and completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact the present operation ofthe North Fish Ladder. Seufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. Through September 1984 power generation totaled 187.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $225,423,450 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investments and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required except for nonfederal cost-sharing for development of Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 9,547,119,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 9,528,741,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of petroleum products, grains and miscellaneous cargo amounted to 7,230,889 tons during calendar year 1983. General Investigations 67. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $4,178,443 of which $962,381 was for navigation studies, $1,076,642 for flood damage prevention studies, $90,568 for comprehensive studies, $1,796,907 for reviews of authorized projects, $207,317 for iscellaneous activities, and $44,628 for coordination with other agencies. 68. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA International water studies. The Columbia River eaty between Canada and the United States of America lating to cooperative Development of the Water Rees of the Columbia River Basin was signed at asiagton, D.C., on January 17, 1961, and the exchange u ratifications took place on September 16, 1964. IjPlementation of the Treaty by the United ,AI_.da entities under the guidance of the PSetramteasn aenndt 'osneering Board has continued. The two permanent Coittees established by the entities, the Operating t ttee and the Hydrometeorological Committee, conte to function. Costs for support of both committee activities were $13,987 for the fiscal year. Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and nonfederal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Technical services and planning guidance responses furnished totaled 750. Of this total, 100 were from other federal agencies; 230 from non-federal agencies; and 420 from private sector realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects, and others. Cost for providing these services during FY 1984 totaled $172,560. Hydrologic studies. Environmental and ecological aspects are being considered on all hydrologic studies. Improvements in procedures to determine reservoir temperatures, nitrogen supersaturation, dissolved oxygen, suspended sediment, turbidity, design floods, flood forecasting and flood regulation are a continuing program. Costs for hydrologic studies during the fiscal year were $3,016. Total costs for collection and study of basic data for fiscal year 1984 were $186,464. 69. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Bonneville Navigation Lock, OR and WA The proposed project would provide for a new lock just south of the existing lock on the Oregon shore and will have dimensions of 86 feet wide, 675 feet long and 15.0 feet deep over the sill. Work on the General Design Memorandum and a feature Memo (Relocation) was initiated in FY 1982 and completed in FY 1984. Other feature memorandums that were initiated in FY 1983 (with percentages completed) are Site Selection - completed in 1983 (100%), BPA Substation and Project Power Requirements (70%), Real Estate for Relocation (40%), Geology, Foundation and Excavation (100%), and Concrete Materials (30%). Lock feature design memo was initiated and completed in FY 1984. Thtal costs to September 30, 1984 are $8,406,000. Estimated Federal project cost is $191,020,000 (October 1984); Corps of Engineers, $191,000,000 and U.S. Coast Guard, $20,000. 70. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Chetco River, OR The modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 97-88, December 4, 1981. Plan of 37-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 improvement would deepen the existing navigation channel and turning basin by two feet to a depth of 16 feet MLLW and extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the north and 1,250 feet for the south jetty. (For details relating to previous project, see Section 2.) Work on the General Design Memorandum was initiated in FY 1982, was completed and is currently under review. Total costs were $235,353. Estimated project cost is $7,896,000; Corps of Engineers $7,800,000; (October 1984) U.S Coast Guard, $3,000; Non-Federal, $93,000. 'IbTotal cost of Advance Engineering and Design for FY 1984 was $6,701: Chetco River, OR, $4,701; Siuslaw River and Bar, OR, $2,000. 37-26 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 1. Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR 2. Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR 3. Chetco River, OR 4. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA 6. Columbia River Between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island 7. Columbia River at The Mouth, OR and WA 8. Columbia River Between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR Coos Bay, OR (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 15,000 438,691 601,000 15,101 111,798 925,771 40,000 35,704 63,000 67,032 1,156,000 48,538 345 143,000 1,035,967 438,000 515,000 535,500 361,300 414,518 536,070 537,204 361,560 10,007,000 9,027,100 15,812,000 20,815,100 28,326,565 14,286,451 17,042,261 20,716,288 80,000 114,461 92,000 150,400 107,273 137,965 158,000 847,000 148,446 229,649 250,000 198,546 100,000 -35,955 53,150 663,437 16,500 29,861 34,500 51,058 - 7,008,000 187,772 7,003,593 5,326,000 4,075,000 2,131,100 5,744,000 4,768,601 4,583,876 2,191,396 5,771,078 - 3,105,000 177,000 - 3,089,332 191,730 938 1,177,314 1,175,520 1,412,300 1,197,541 2,043,7131 2,043,7131 3,792,426 3,791,231 28,349,3042 28,349,3042 209,475,1263 209,351,1083 665,9544 665,9544 941,252 941,252 2,285,185 2,284,910 2,711,813 2,711,082 24,565,7616 24,560,7176 68,129,6847 68,116,7817 7,322,878 7,322,878 - 5,989,5098 - 5,989,5098 622,000 206,000 189,000 615,974 216,968 187,748 188,400 190,017 2,737,200 4,566,000 2,263,000 2,971,940 2,701,903 3,632,308 3,269,372 2,992,359 10,174,9489 10,174,8999 29,750,09210 29,750,09210 51,141,65211 51,140,15211 37-27 220,2835 220,2835 TABLE 37-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 (Contributed Funds) 10. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, OR 11. Coquille River, OR 12. Cowlitz River, WA 13. Depoe Bay, OR 14. Lewis River, WA 16. Nehalem Bay, OR 17. Port Orford, OR Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 67,000 130,000 136,400 121,900 109,343 132,768 122,851 135,609 - - - - 292,000 383,000 167,600 191,400 230,454 438,165 172,074 193,508 - - -- 248 165,000 140,925 3,500 2,468 -6,000 18,224 2,000 2,464 1,419 89,700 89,446 53 2,232,000 9,020,000 550,000 126,000 2,201,795 8,648,997 922,899 134,975 60,500 179,000 191,000 365,900 56,486 175,849 198,364 365,818 37-28 2,335,966 2,335,966 486,680 486,680 350,23812 350,23812 1,475,010 1,473,895 693,36611 693,36613 4,284,94414 4,284,152'14 277,4361s 277,43616 1,474,03616 1,473,85916 367,364 367,364 665,876 665,409 58,13217 58,13217 685,67718 685,63618 302,00619 302,0061s 55,195 55,195 12,088,0m 12,065,250 758,69220 758,69220 1,804,329 1,804,140 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 19. Rogue River Harbor New Work at Gold Beach, OR 20. Siuslaw River, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Skamokawa Creek, WA 22. Skipanon Channel, OR 23. South Channel, Government Island, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 399,000 755,000 1,044,500 387,700 552,841 718,623 796,151 677,713 4,156,25221 4,156,25221 6,974,72022 6,972,69822 635,783 635,783 210,000 115,042 4,999,813 8,000,000 196,104 107,638 287,947 12,713,495 943,000 1,088,000 504,000 719,900 909,802 1,122,756 503,243 723,964 - - - 45,000 - - - 45,000 - - - - 15,000 3,713 -10,000 59 -1,500 143 487,000 177,000 534,100 304,010 357,467 214,238 43,500 28,763 102,000 27,643 80,500 403,165 -5,000 42,654 - 102,000 - 99,054 230,000 229,073 67,000 60,312 68,800 74,903 31,000 32,593 14,484,21223 14,466,49223 9,257,09924 9,256,78124 879,285 879,285 367,532 322,532 2,400 2,400 293,299 293,060 280,854 280,854 2,201,014 2,200,981 140,500 99,060 102,000 99,054 22,434,82725 22,434,82725 2,641,79026 2,641,59826 2,839,799 2,839,799 37-29 24. L TABLE 37-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 25. Umpqua River, OR 26. Willamette River Above Portland and Yamhill River, OR 27. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 28. Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR 29. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR 30. Yaquina River, OR 31. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 32. Beaver Drainage District, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 15,000 -100,000 -170,736 18,076 -50,000 13,654 9,851 650,000 1,201,000 413,000 827,700 602,890 1,167,055 503,589 829,517 47,000 54,802 10,000 11,359 15,500 16,897 100 526,000 625,000 720,000 528,000 515,060 631,011 537,797 710,319 60,000 80,685 533,000 920,000 8,500 78,148 795,066 596,788 420,000 737,000 1,085,100 1,493,400 408,591 741,918 1,089,700 1,494,202 23,000 19,547 159,000 16,413 26,500 172,755 5,784,480 3,600,000 291,000 5,866,394 2,658,965 971,353 8,000 8,000 30,000 189,499 80,500 410,700 623,500 512,000 75,849 405,951 474,474 650,948 -8,000 45,632 7,066 3,247 37-30 17,718,87727 17,718,71627 19,847,989 19,847,765 2,500,677 2,500,677 862,91828 862,91828 17,653,65629 17,653,51329 520,00530 520,00530 12,961,82331 12,954,36531 234,794 234,794 1,617,098 1,616,369 19,242,04632 19,242,04632 17,051,30233 17,049,792 33 12,005 12,005 28,800 28,800 749,694' 749,35134 91,602,089 91,464,106 1,626,700 1,607,222 3,131,94435 3,131,94435 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 33 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 33. Blue River Lake, OR New Work 34. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 35. Dorena Lake, OR 36. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 37. Fall Creek Lake, OR 38. Fern Ridge Lake, OR 39. Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA 44. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR & WA 45. McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR 46. Mt. St. Helens and Vicinity, WA 47. Salmon Creek, Near Vancouver, WA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Scappoose Drainage District, OR 107,000 142,700 221,600 180,000 100,028 115,732 246,991 184,659 255,000 254,267 9,025 9,874 509,000 531,480 507,201 472,734 33,000 32,323 450,000 96,831 Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 537,698 673,000 607,162 655,509 354,286 1,200 1,600 307,200 342,000 342,935 342,563 8,550 1,495,000 1,350,000 23,072 1,460,877 1,389,366 916 3,500 -8,100 14 261,000 308,000 297,580 261,448 10,000 188,975 12,817 171,983 519,000 510,700 705,536 423,165 241,000 270,000 296,904 269,304 16,958 905,000 937,000 961,183 958,097 - - - 250,000 - - - 249,420 810,000 550,000 1,700,000 2,600,000 721,022 690,173 1,710,021 2,458,996 - - - 29,500 - - - 29,463 - - 15,730,000 10,345,000 - - 7,557,368 18,267,493 39,500 9,760 210,500 37,780 32,038,22536 32,038,22536 1,549,991 1,545,450 4,013,12337 4,013,12337 6,647,67838 6,578,52738 14,568,26239 14,568,26239 3,686,174 3,683,082 11,866,579 11,829,510 22,118,2644� 22,118,26440 3,556,415 3,554,290 8,526,93541 77 8,526,93541 8,575,63442 8,558,48042 250,000 249,420 16,724,745 16,572,225 29,500 29,463 26,075,000 25,824,861 250,000 248,700 185,000 185,000 3,991,55843 3,991,55843 201,160 - 185,000 - 185,000 50,000 8,759 26,867 -1,000 15,304 923 37-31 251,000 260,500 247,184 225,543 48. TABLE 37-A (Continued) REPORT TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 50. State Hwy. 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 51. Trask River, Tillamook County, OR 52. Tualatin, OR 53. Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR 54. Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No.1, WA 56. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR 57. Willow Creek Lake, OR 58. Bonneville Lock and Dam-Lake Bonneville, OR and WA 59. Cougar Lake, OR 60. Detroit Lake, OR New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost 35,000 6,302 215,000 78,804 - 267,500 15,000 8,842 2,073 120,000 5,266 106,136 35,000 1,200,000 31,341 1,200,860 - 165,000 - 38,301 - 300,000 36,201 317,775 -1,000 5,889 -15,800 1,028 100,000 98,545 10,000 115,546 3,375 1,935,000 1,150,000 1,050,000 624,500 1,931,497 1,054,893 1,086,098 636,359 93,000 87,657 50,000 160,000 43,024 165,055 56,600 62,436 (See Walla Walla, WA District Table 39-A) - - - 86,000 - - - 83,904 84,232,000 25,417,000 21,456,000 12,200,000 84,275,102 25,151,114 21,390,863 12,032,268 5,560,000 6,440,800 7,350,600 8,820,000 5,207,930 5,652,065 8,369,863 8,478,177 12,353 -12 86 15,000 8,233 6,241 508,000 555,700 682,000 860,000 591,598 523,511 716,706 861,133 1,190,000 1,206,600 1,232,000 1,789,000 1,183,361 1,142,679 1,312,198 1,757,050 86,000 83,904 720,940,6044 720,345,609 5 107,263,20746 106,677,92346 58,636,3934' 58,635,867' 7,658,816 7,642,652 62,729,698 62,729,698 20,993,772 20,958,592 363,086 363,086 37-32 250,000 85,106 267,500 121,273 121,273 1,335,000 1,330,746 175,000 153,847 5,289,833 5,289,403 23,221,816" 23,170,481" 3,267,544 3,266,014 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 61. Green Peter-Foster New Work Lakes, OR 62. Hills Creek Lake, OR 63. John Day Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, OR and WA 64. Lookout Point Lake, OR 65. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 66. The Dalles Lock and Dam-Lake Celilo, WA and OR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,547,500 1,310,800 1,423,000 1,694,000 1,501,227 1,236,338 1,550,143 1,679,567 360,000 510,600 693,900 591,000 320,090 447,630 747,486 641,968 84,005,78848 84,005,78848 16,555,132 16,532,208 45,700,619 45,700,619 6,116,267 6,115,624 1,009,000 2,143,000 1,298,000 10,624,000 494,768,24649 1,252,292 1,737,709 1,597,688 9,103,019 493,126,79749 6,199,500 7,795,000 9,496,100 9,746,000 7,573,634 7,056,756 10,637,483 9,956,705 4,300,000 645,000 4,339,347 502,806 10,000 9,968 -45,000 53,108 9669 32 1,746,000 1,911,900 2,092,100 2,348,000 1,695,300 1,697,620 2,356,652 2,332,882 -8,550 -218,984 - 250,000 85,018 537,648 235,687 1,908,000 1,620,000 2,092,300 2,105,000 1,722,303 1,761,302 2,157,181 2,100,169 -85,480 254,888 73,616,1595� 73,305,15250 7,155,000 7,121,452 88,238,39551 88,238,395s1 29,601,605 29,539,912 136,113,450 136,113,098 11,843,800 11,821,046 - 301,064,28852 301 - 301,064,28852 5,317,000 4,196,000 5,120,000 6,201,000 4.877.000 4.151104 5.763.701 5.840781 66,437,00853 65,996,74353 'Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 2Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. 3Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance fnds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated pro$ 2r4a,32r0e pair, and $1,214,865 for previous project. Excludes expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. 4Excludes $31,636 contributed by city of Astoria and Bumble Bee Sea Foods, Astoria, Oregon (not part of regula Project). Includes $223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and $428,136 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,79 2 by Port of Vancouver. 6Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $608,111 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 'Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under deferred maintenance, Code 700. 'Includes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) $30,393 Entrance to Oregon Slough; $161,897 Camas- Washougal Turning Basin; $227,908 Hood River Small Boat Basin; $157,470 Bingen, Wash., Barge Channel; and $140,619 The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 9Includes $2,033,408 under Code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 1oIncludes $802,096 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds. 37-33 i, -- , vt,. vv, NX ,, v L ,av TABLE 37-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT "Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed funds. 12'Excludes $80,000 (other funds) contributed for new work by Port of Coos Bay to cover additional cost of disposing of dredge spoils in Coos Bay, OR; includes $8,000 for previous project. 13Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72,891 contributed funds. Includes $36,000 under Code 711. 4"Includes $41,467 for previous project and $78,500 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 5"Includes $239,529 for Sec. 107 project. '6Includes $48,184 for previous project. "Includes $22,252 for previous project. "Includes $8,098 for previous project. ' 9Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. 20Excludes $9,900 contributed funds. 21Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. 22Includes $21,000, Wedderburn Study Funds. 23Includes $1,159,357 for previous projects. 24lIncludes $10,611 for previous project and $188,000 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 25"Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes $592,622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. ""Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 27Includes $39,242 for previous project and $58,824 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Winchester Bay and Schofield River, OR. Excludes $267,500 contributed funds. ""Includes $247,748 for previous project. Excludes $484,900 Emergency Relief Administration flood control funds for bank protection. 29Includes $51,500 deferred maintenance funds Code 700, and $35,935 for Public Works Acceleration program repair. In addition $7,500 for maintenance from contributed funds and $246,637 on operating and care of improvements under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. 30Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 31"Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 3"Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 33Includes $6,026 for previous project. 37-34 I 11 I 11 pl - Ii i 34Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 35lIncludes $274,578 for previous project. 3aIncludes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 37'Includes $1,639,828 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 38lIncludes $167,878 special recreation use fees. 39Includes $1,038,790 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 40 lIncludes $1,026,264 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 4 1lIncludes $3,894,673 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed projects and $136,482 allotted under 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 (other funds contributed). 42lIncludes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. 43Includes $424,310 for previous project. 44Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 45"Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, $20,240,700 National Recovery Act funds, $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $436,457 Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project funds and $610,063,352 allotted and expended second powerhouse funds; $6,000 allotted and $5,662 expended, power units funds. 46Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $1,692,148 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 47Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,789,988 allotted and $1,789,462 expended, for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 4sIncludes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Sweet Home Lake. 49Includes $25,984 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. "lncludes $1,361,900 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $423,800 special recreation use fees. Includes $933,438 allotted under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. "includes $457,611 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 52Includes $1,140,747 alloted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project, and $52,997,220 allotted and expended additional units 15-22 funds. " Includes $721,490 und, maintenance and operation of dams and other improvemt +s of navigable waters. TABLE 37-B PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Setion Authorizing inText Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Dec. 4, 1981 Feb. 27, 1911 July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22,1922 Mar. 4, 19232 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 3, 1927 July 3, 1930 Sep. 6, 1933s Aug. 30, 1935 BANDON SMALL BOAT BASIN, COQUILLE, OR A breakwater 413 feet in length, an entrance channel 100 feet wide, 250 feet long and 13 feet deep, an access channel 50 feet wide, 500 feet long, and 13 feet deep. CHARLESTON CHANNEL, COOS BAY, OR A channel 150 feet wide, 6,800 feet long with depths between 16 to 17 feet. CHETCO RIVER, OR To provide for the stabilization of the channel, by constructing jetties and dredging. Modification of channel entrance and channel improvements. Deepen channel 2 feet to 16 feet, extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the North, and 1,250 feet for the South jetty. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. Increasing main channel to 30 feet. Consolidating improvement below Portland, OR, and between Vancouver, WA, and mouth of Willamette. For the Cathlamet channel. Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) and accessories for better maintenance, and construct contraction works. Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep water in Columbia River. Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, WA. Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River on condition that main channel to be opened to project dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland. For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to the sea. A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning basins at Vancouver. Section 107, P.L. 86-645, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 18,1981 Section 107, P.L 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 8, 1983 H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sees. S. Doc. 10, 96th Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' No Prior Report. H. Doc. 120, 63d Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., 2d Seas. H. Doc. 126, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 249, 72d Cong., 2d Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 37-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 11, 1933 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 6. June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 7. Mar. 3, 1905 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Sep. 3, 1954 July 30, 1983 Maintenance of not to exceed 35-foot depth at low water in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 feet at St. Helens. Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 1,000 feet downstream. An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along waterfront at Rainier, OR. Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, WA. A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR. A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, with 2 turning basins of same depth. A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, a turning basin at Longview, WA, and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Main channel. Main channel. West channel 8 feet deep. West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with protecting breakwaters. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Channel 8 feet deep. Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore.9 Deepening the northermost 2,000 feet of the channel cross section to 55 feet. 37-36 5. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 235, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 630, 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' Public Works Administration H. Doc. 44, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 50, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 83d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 249, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' P.L. 98-63 TABLE 37-B (Continued) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 Dec. 31, 1970 10. June 3, 1896 June 30, 1948 11. June 25, 1910 COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from Vancouver, WA, to Bonneville, OR. Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide from Bonneville, OR, to The Dalles, OR. Construct a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Construct a barge channel at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep, 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide by 800 feet long. COOS BAY, OR Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel. A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill. Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South Jetty about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 as given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OR Dredging channel from mouth to head of navigation. For a 5 ft. depth from mouth to head of navigation on the Millicoma River and South Fork. Except on South Fork above M. 14 where 3 ft. will suffice. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Brandon H. Committee Doc. 94, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 218, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 89, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 958, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 110, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 646, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 237, 53rd Cong., 3d Sess. S. Doc. 124, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. 37-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. z, 1919 For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 12. June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug, 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1897 Mar. 4, 1913 July 25, 1912 Oct. 27, 1965 Dec. 31, 1970 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 19, 1890 June 25, 1910 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1958 Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Present project depth between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1 mile above Coquille River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. COWLITZ RIVER, WA To provide a channel 4 ft. deep from mouth to Ostrander, 2.5 ft. deep to Castle Rock. Extend channel to Toledo. DEPOE BAY, OR Construction of inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with entrance channel of same depth and 50 feet wide. Construction of inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 30 feet wide. LEWIS RIVER, WA Provide a channel to head of navigation. Increase the control depth and widen channel. NEHALEM BAY, OR Two rubber-stone jetties. PORT ORFORD, OR Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Build two high-tide stone jetties. Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot South Jetty. 12-foot deep channel. 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot extension of North Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred.) H.Doc. 207, 65th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Committee Print, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 1167, 60th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 404, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 202, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 64, 55th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 28, 62nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 623, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 83, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 71, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 648, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee Print, Serial, 68th Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.' 37-38 13. 14. 16. 17. 19. 20. 21. 22 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date horizing Act Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 1, 1980 Mar. 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 June 30, 1948 Project and Work Authorized Phase I advance engineering and design for north and south jetty extensions. Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and 2,500 feet, respectively. SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WA Channel 6.5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, at low water between Steamboat and Brooks Slough. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge. Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a distance of 4,500 feet. Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. TABLE 37-B (Continued) See Section Aul in Text July 14, 1960 24, July 26, 1912 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 25. SOUTH CHANNEL, GOVERNMENT ISLAND, OR A small boat recreational channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide between River Mile 111.8 and 118.4. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. Abandon that portion of project above Bay City. Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension of channels and turning basins with regulating works as needed.4 Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula caused by storm Jan. 1939. Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, OR, to depth of 12 feet Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula. Construct South Jetty, 8,000 feet long. UMPQUA RIVER, OR North Jetty, 7,500 feet long. Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging ocean bar. A short south jetty. A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging to a 26-foot depth. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth to Reedsport. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel to Gardiner, and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Section 107, P.L 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 25, 1983 H. Doc. 349, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 760, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 128, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2d Sees. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., 1st Sees.1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doe. 158, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' S. Doc. 86, 76th Cong., 1st Sees.' 37-39 Documents Final Report of Chief of Engineers P.L 96-367 H. Doc. 3, 63rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sees.' H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. - -- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 26. June 3, 1896 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 June 26, 19346 June 28, 1938' 27. June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 June 26, 19348 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 28. 29. Mar. 2, 1919 Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River.5 WILAMEITE RIVER ABOVE PORTLAND AND YAMHILL RIVER, OR Improvement of Willamette River above Oregon City. Improvement of Yamhill River by lock and dam construction. Project modified in 1904 by abandoning 20-mile stretch of river between Harrisburg and Eugene as unworthy of improvement. A 6-foot channel in Willamette River below Oregon City. Operating and care of lock and dam at Yamhill River and provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Streamflow regulation with controlling depths of 6 feet to mouth of Santiam River and 5 feet to Albany with enlargement of locks at Oregon City." Operation of Yamhill Lock was discontinued Feb. 7, 1954, and the lock and adjacent property turned over to Yamhill County Jan. 16, 1959. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR For purchase and rehabilitation of system and construction of concrete division wall. Deepening of locks. Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Construction of New Willamette Falls Locks.8 WINCHESTER BAY, UMPQUA RIVER, OR Channel 16 feet deep, 100 feet wide, changing to 75 feet wide by 12 feet deep in Winchester Bay; channel 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep, 4,100 feet long to turning basin 160 feet wide, 16 feet deep and 200 feet long in west basin. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2d Sees. 1 S. Doc. 154, 80th Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 260, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. (Annual Report, 1896, p. 3300) Annual Report, 1895, p. 3602 Annual Report, 1904, p. 3529 H. Doc. 438, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 554, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 202, 56th Cong, 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1900, p. 4374 H. Doc. 1060, 62d Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, July 6, 198 H. Doc. 109, 65th Cong, 1st Sees. 37-40 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 30. Mar. 4, 1913 31. Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 32. June 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 June 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 7, 1970 May 17,1950 Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, so far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, OR. 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel extension of jetties at entrance. A small boat basin, south shore. YAQUINA RIVER, OR Construction of channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depoe Creek. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. Authorizes construction of project but no operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. BEAVER DRAINAGE DISTRICT, COLUMBIA BASIN, OR Improvements to existing levee and additional levee and revetment construction. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. DORENA LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Rock and gravel embankment dam. Authorizes construction but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., sleSt ess. S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.' Section 107, P.L 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 4, 1977 Doc. 579, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 93-251 F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 91-439 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 37-41 TABLE 37-B (Continued) 34. 35, 37. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 39. July 24, 1946 43. May 17, 1950 44. May 17, 1950 45. July 24, 1946 46. July 30, 1983 July 24, 1946 June 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 50. July 24, 1946 38. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Section 14, P.L 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Oct. 18,1983 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Earthfill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. HUNTINGTON AVENUE, CASTLE ROCK, WA Construction of riprap bank protection. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA Bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Provides bank protection on Columbia River below river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. MC DONALD DIKE ROAD, NEHALEM RIVER, OR Construction of riprap bank protection. MT. ST. HELENS AND VICINITY, WA Implement and maintain flood control measures on the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers by dredging or other means determined by the Secretary to be necessary to assure flood protection for developed areas in the vicinity of such rivers against a onehundred- year flood on the lower Cowlitz River and to reduce sedimentation flow and the chance of blockage on the Columbia River. SALMON CREEK, NEAR VANCOUVER, WA Construction of riprap bank protection. SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OR Construction of levee system. Raising and strengthening of levee. STATE HWY. 101 & 401, COLUMBIA RIVER, WA Construction of riprap bank protection. P.L 98-63 Sec. 14, P.L .79- 526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Jan. 20, 1983 F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 14, P.L 79-526f Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Aug. 8,194 37-42 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 1, 1983 47. 48. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 51. July 24, 1946 52. June 30, 1948 July 24, 1946 54. May 17, 1950 55. June 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 TRASK RIVER, TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OR Construction of riprap bank protection. TUALATIN, OR Deepening an approximately one mile long reach of the Tualatin River. UMATILLA RIVER, THORN HOLLOW, OR Construction of riprap bank protection. WAHKIAKUM COUNTY CONSOLIDATED DIKING DISTRICT NO.1, WA Raising and strengthening all levees encircling islands. Construct drainage canal, tide box and pumping plant. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OR Comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. General improvements. Section 14, P.L 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Jan. 20, 1983 Section 205, P.L 804858 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 19,1983 Sec. 14, P.L 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Sep. 26, 1983 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d. Sess. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 22, 1936 June 28,1938 May 17, 1950 Oct. 27,1965 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 20, 1937 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Aug. 22, 1984 WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of projects. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM-BONNEVILLE LAKE, OR AND WA Existing project was originally authorized Sep. 30, 1933, by Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works. Existing project authorized by Congress. Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville Project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions therein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville to new town site. Acquisition of Steigerwald Lake wetland area. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers Dated Aug. 21, 1933) Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 98-396 37-43 57. I REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 59. COUGAR LAKE, OR May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 24, 1965 June 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended May 17, 1950 65. Sep. 21, 1962 Oct. 15, 1966 66. May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Rockfill dam. 60. Addition of Power. Strube Lake reregulating dam. DETROIT LAKE, OR Authorizes concrete gravity structure. Addition of power and regulating Big Cliff dam with power. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Authorized Green-Peter Dam in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938). Addition of power at Green-Peter and White Bridge Reregulating Dam. Changes location of reregulating dam from White Bridge location to Foster. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill dam. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. John Day waterfowl management area. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR Earth-and-gravel filled dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Addition of power and authorization of Dexter Lake as reregulating dam. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. Authorizes construction of project but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAMLAKE CELILO, WA AND OR Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. 'Contains latest published maps. Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. Public Works Administration. 4Includes following work, classified inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works as needed. 37-44 5lnactive. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 7Flood Control Act. 8Classified deferred. aSpur Jetty "B" classified inactive. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780 P.L. 87-874 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780 F.C. Act 1954 S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 89-689, Public Works Approp. Act, 1967. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong, 2d Seas. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 61. 62. 63. 64. I I __- - - - _- PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Project Alsea River, OR Astoria Turning Basin, OR' Bridges, Columbia River, CascadeLocks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) Cathlamet, WA' Clatskanie River, OR2 Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR' Deep River, WA'2 Depoe Bay, OR' Elochoman Slough, WA2 Grays River, WA2 Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR' Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver, WA (Alteration) Completed Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), OR' Completed Lake River, WA Completed Long Tom River, OR Completed Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR Completed Multnomah Channel, OR2 Completed Nestucca River, OR Completed Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor), OR2 Completed Salmon River, OR2 Completed Smith River, OR2 Completed South Slough (Charleston), ORI Completed The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, OR10 Abandoned The Dalles-Celilo Canal, OR and WA" Abandoned Umatilla Harbor, OR'2 Abandoned Westport Slough, OR2 Completed Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, OR' Completed aquina River, OR' Completed oungs and Klaskanine River, OR Completed Youngs Bay and Youngs R Completed Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 'Channel adequate for present commerce. includes $15,537 for previous project. Includes $23,489 for previous project. Excludes $42,000 contributed funds. Excludes $86,586 contributed funds. aExcludes $75,000 contributed funds. �e- Federal funds, $1,204,100. Includes $419,557 for Sec. 107 project. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1977 1944 1971 1969 1975 1963 1971 1971 1941 1977 1961 1963 1983 1982 1963 1949 1974 1970 1939 1957 1952 1966 1979 1971 Constr 8 Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Operation and ruction Maintenance 2,000 26,237 70,139 - 1,081,806 171,467 19,2403 329,423 15,384 145,5885 18,6418 2,500 519,090, 1,154,1628 15,281 2,700 4,000 25,000 437,6699 6,000 16,881 2,145 143,120 26,821 3,903,780 4,716,205 16,276 891,69513 195,31314 - 194,893' 32,768 16,648 35,670 58,127 90,514 205,130 559,858 2,833,888 171,909 2,000 1979 9,348 34,449 "�Project abandoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. "Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool. 12Project transferred to Portland District from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. "'Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. "4Excludes $50,565 contributed funds. 37-45 ... .. ..... TABLE 37-E Project COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Diking District 5, Clatsop County, OR Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, WA Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, WA Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR Knappa area, Clatsop County, OR Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Midland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR Peninsula Drainage District 2, Multnomah County, OR Port of Kalama, WA' Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Se Full Report See Annual Status Report For Construction Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1939 1941 1942 1943 1940 1940 1940 1941 1941 1951 1939 1942 1941 1942 1942 1962 1940 1940 1939 1951 1942 1942 1942 1951 1946 37-46 p. 30, 1984 Operation and Maintenance 163,397 163,291 69,724 574,123 43,150 25,609 161,381 258,795 26,810 169,542 240,939 33,080 25,773 18,789 158,419 181,652 61,186 39,475 77,7743 593,0344 211,160 241,148 99,844 47,662 1,623,505 178,885 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 133,778 - Upper Grays River Area, WA Completed 1947 61,263 - Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 66,932- Warrenton Diking District 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 69,503- Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 117,143- Warrenton Diking District 3, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 74,596- Webb District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 84,592 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 205,531 Westport District, Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR Completed 1943 40,658- Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 22,797- Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 248,802 - Total Columbia River Basin - 6,613,742 - LEWIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1943 172,521 COWLITZ RIVER BASIN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, WA Completed 1939 42,978- Diking Improvement District 2, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1940 121,165 iking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1939 28,592 Total Cowlitz - River Basin 192,735 - LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Columbia Drainage District 1, OR Inactive Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA Completed 1977 1,661,367 COWlitz County Diking ImProvement District 2, WA Completed 1967 363,000 COwlitz County Diking Iprovement District 13, WA Completed 1967 65,345 Cowiitz County Diking ImProvement District 15, WA Completed 1967 304,794 Altz River, Hopkins Creek, D l1 DCompleted-2386- OR and Drainage District, Inactive-- - 37-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hayden Island, OR Inactive 1950 - - Midland Drainage District, OR Completed 1971 304,511 - Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1964 1,499,186 - Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR Active 1961 35,265 - Rainier Drainage District, OR Completed 1967 593,945 - Sandy Drainage District, OR Completed 1954 154,0125 - Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR Completed 1966 674,137 - Vancouver Lake Area, WA Deferred 1981 889,391 - Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, WA Inactive 1971 48,619 - Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, WA Completed 1973 1,803,488 - Woodson Drainage District, OR Completed 1964 162,500 - Total Lower Columbia River Basin 8,796,420 - WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, OR Completed 1960 1,214,3006 - Cascadia Lake, OR Deferred 1976 1,066,1147 - Gate Creek Lake, OR Deferred 1972 840,0018 - Holley Lake, OR Deferred 1963 241,992 - Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR' Completed - 276,692 - Shelton Ditch, OR Inactive 1967 39,624 - Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging Inactive -- - Total Willamette River Basin 3,678,723 - ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR9 Abandoned 1950 23,439 - Bear Creek, Medford, OR' Completed - 23,050 - Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR2 Completed 1967 106,198 - Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA Completed 1957 104,921 - Catching Inlet Drainage District, Coos River, OR 2 Completed 1959 182,655 - Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR' Completed - 42,761 - Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR2 Completed 1952 70,845'o - Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) Deferred 1982 1,307,216 Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR' Completed - 22,963 Johnson Creek, OR Active 1981 170,245 - McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR2 Completed 1967 148,358 Miami River, OR' Completed - 15,321 37-48 TABLE 37-E (Continued) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR Molalla River at Mill Creek Location, OR2 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR2 Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR' Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR' Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR" (a)Riverside Area Units (b)State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1) (c)State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)2 Pendleton, Umatilla River, ORio Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR2 Rogue River, OR' Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR2 Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR' Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR2 Sumner Parker Airport, OR' Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR' Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR' Total All Other Flood Control Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1948 1955 1952 118,433 55,007 55,189 11,690 16,000 1960 1959 1960 1939 1971 1960 1961 1952 1952 9,100 267,748 161,540 143,263 968,71612 86,230 288,447 215,939 176,351 92,500 33,835 428,881 45,677 30,000 5,422,518 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 14). "Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 3Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act funds. Excludes $25,000 contributed funds. sPrevious completed project, $138,956; $15,056 engineercCgo sts project constructed by local interests. 6Excludes $154,751 contributed funds. of 8 Includes $112,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu tweet Home. 8 lncludes $95,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 9Project transferred from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. Includes $3,328 FY 1960 preauthorization costs, Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858. See FY 1960 Annual Report, page 1887. 'oExcludes $2,520 contributed funds. 11Reported by Walla Walla District prior to 1974. "2Excludes $230,070 contributed funds for new work and $31,284 Government furnished sheet steel pile. 37-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 37-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, OR Completed 1969 185,000 TABLE 37-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Contri- Full Report Date Federal buted See Annual Deauth- Funds Funds Project Report For orized Expended Expended Area East of Albany, OR - 1977 - Bachelor Island, WA - 1977 - Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1966 1971 4,559 Calapooya River, OR 1959 1965 11,595- Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR 1960 1965 268 - Clatskanie Drainage Dist. 1, OR 1964 1978 18,543 - Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR 1960 1974 4,472 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR 1938 1961 258 Clatsop County, Diking District 4, OR -1978- Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR 1961 1978 8,824 Columbia Slough, OR 1953 1978 21,352 Coquille River, OR 1948 1953 908 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, OR - 1977 - Cowlitz River at Randle, WA 1962 1977 11,095 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1960 1970 6,819 East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR 1959 1970 6,465 Ferguson Creek, Long Tom River, OR - 1978 - Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR - 1977 - Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR - 1977 - John Drainage District, OR 1961 1979 23,754 John Day River, OR 1974 1974 210,220 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA 1969 1978 55,594 Lake River Delta Area, WA - 1977 - Lewis River Area, WA - 1978 - Magruder Drainage District, OR 1940 1974 774 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR 1977 Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR 1942 1977 43,292 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR 1963 1968 4,558 37-50 TABLE 37-G (Continued) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Contri- Full Report Date Federal buted See Annual Deauth- Funds Funds Project Report For orized Expended Expended Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR 1941 1978 125- Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 1962 1977 11,318 - Pudding River, OR 1950 1979 5,000 - Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA 1939 1979 - - Soap Creek, WA - 1977 - - Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR - 1978 - - Umatilla River (Echo), OR 1960 1964 24,145 - Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR - 1958 - - West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR 1962 1970 4,056- Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) 1966 1977 - - Wiley Creek Lake, OR - 1960 112,000 - Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR - 1961 - - TABLE 37-H COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1984 (See Section 4 of Text) Funds Regular Public Works Emergency Relief Administration Total U.S. Contributed Prior to 1964 Contributed (1975) 35 to 40-foot Channel Total Contributed Total All Funds New Work Maintenance Total 26,235,146 446,296 138,449 26,819,891 223,026 442,928 665,954 27,485,845 208,023,061 14,515 98,668 208,136,244 24,320 24,320 208,160,564 234,258,207 460,811 237,117 234,956,135 247,346 442,928 690,274 235,646,409 37-51 t r ~ n. ww r sw n n r ii.. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Columbia River, Ilwaco, WA Kalama Turning Basin, WA Port of Camas, Washougal, WA Skamokawa Creek, WA Wind River, WA TOTAL TABLE 37-J WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (See Section 27 of Text) Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet 1 Lift of Each Lock Lock 1 (Lower), 22.5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet & Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet 2 Depth on Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of Foundation Rock Kind of Dam Fixed3 Type of Construction Concrete Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost Unknown; purchase price, $375,000 'A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher stages of water, is at upper end of canal basin. 2A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending from Lock 4 to Guard Lock, separates upper basin of canal from head race, which formerly led directly from basin and supplied water for powerplants operated by Crown Zeller bach Corp., and Portland Ry., Light & Power Co., which is now being operated by Portland General Electric Co. 3The dam is owned by private parties. 37-52 TABLE 37-I Fiscal Year Costs (1984) 20,374 41,976 42 23,437 10,079 $ 95,908 _ _ -. NME-.O-MP PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-K FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1984) Clatsop County DD Nos. 2 & 5, OR Depot Slough, Toledo, OR Goodpasture Island, Eugene, OR Libby Dike, Coos County, OR Malheur Lake, Harney County, OR Newton Creek, OR Svenson Island, OR Tucker & Battle Creeks Dike, OR Westport, OR Youngs River Dike No. 22, OR TOTAL TABLE 37-L FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Date of Peak Inflow Peak Inflow cu. ft./see. Storage Used acre/feet 31. Applegate Lake, OR 33. Blue River Lake, OR 34. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 59. Cougar Lake, OR 60 Detroit Lake, OR December 14, 1983 December 14, 1983 February 13, 1984 March 13, 1984 December 14, 1983 December 30, 1983 January 3, 1984 February 13, 1984 March 26, 1984 June 7, 1984 December 7, 1983 December 14, 1983 February 13, 1984 March 27, 1984 December 7, 1983 December 30, 1983 February 13, 1984 March 26, 1984 June 7, 1984 December 14, 1983 January 3, 1984 February 13, 1984 March 21, 1984 June 7, 1984 37-53 167,734 7,500 7,500 57,399 94 63,250 935 79,522 12,906 80,465 $ 477,305 See Section in Text 4,970 3,780 3,260 2,280 7,920 3,230 3,290 9,790 2,490 2,980 6,300 7,800 11,050 2,400 3,600 3,900 12,500 3,100 2,800 13,250 11,500 17,750 3,800 3,550 19,590 18,090 26,910 47,800 12,630 5,890 5,980 27,450 53,880 84,500 12,500 4,520 13,130 18,150 70,680 66,110 99,300 160,240 209,460 184,560 171,270 229,430 348,080 438,980 - -- --- wr r ^ II I I 11 1 I - - - - - i. r_ i r+ wr r r+rrr...rr ^ ri r ww r r. wr w Project TABLE 37-L (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Date of Peak Inflow cu. ft./sec. acre/feet 35. Dorena Lake, OR 37. Fall Creek Lake, OR 38. Fern Ridge Lake, OR 61. Foster Lake, OR 61. Green Peter Lake, OR 62. Hills Creek Lake, OR 64. Lookout Point Lake, OR 65. Lost Creek Lake, OR December 7, 1983 December 14, 1983 February 13, 1984 March 26, 1984 June 7, 1984 December 7, 1983 December 14, 1983 February 13, 1984 March 26, 1984 June 7, 1984 December 6, 1983 December 14, 1983 December 30, 1983 February 13, 1984 March 21, 1984 December 14, 1983 February 13, 1984 March 25, 1984 June 7, 1984 December 14, 1983 December 30, 1983 February 13, 1984 March 26, 1984 June 7, 1984 December 15, 1983 December 30, 1983 February 13, 1984 March 26, 1984 June 7, 1984 December 14, 1983 December 31, 1983 February 13, 1984 March 26, 1984 June 7, 1984 December 15, 1983 February 13, 1984 March 26, 1984 June 7, 1984 37-54 6,150 13,250 18,500 7,800 6,050 3,750 8,500 12,200 6,350 3,550 3,750 2,800 3,200 11,850 4,500 7,750 17,000 6,000 6,050 14,300 10,750 25,750 5,850 8,500 13,750 6,300 18,500 5,750 3,850 26,250 14,250 24,250 13,250 10,300 17,750 9,050 4,700 3,000 12,610 18,660 37,110 45,640 77,730 13,710 11,950 40,260 84,280 119,100 9,860 8,140 7,170 46,780 74,210 32,670 43,670 56,910 55,250 219,240 171,460 239,930 333,070 414,140 196,270 169,220 207,120 287,450 350,470 155,180 135,060 198,750 340,170 452,260 320,320 358,130 429,300 464,680 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-M LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA LEVEES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING WORKS (See Section 43 of Text) Estimated Cost of Work Location Approved 1984 Beaver Drainage District, OR $ 2,857,366 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA 363,000 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA 65,345 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA 304,794 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 2, WA 1,661,367 Midland Drainage District, OR 304,511 Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR 1,499,186 Peninsula Drainage District No. 2, OR 3,300,000 Rainier Drainage District, OR 593,945 Sandy Drainage District, OR 15,0561 Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR 674,137 Scappoose Drainage District, OR 3,567,248 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District 1, WA 5,289,833 Woodson Drainage District, OR 162,500 Total Estimated Cost, Federal Funds $20,658,288 Estimated Non-Federal Cost $ 3,300,000 Locations deauthorized or reclassified inactive and excluded from above cost estimate: Bachelor Island, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Clatakanie Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatakanie River Area, OR (Deauthorized - 1965) Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR (Deauthorized - 1974) Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Columbia Drainage District 1, OR (Inactive) Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Deer Island Drainage District, OR (Inactive) Hayden Island, OR (Inactive) John Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1979) Kalama River Levee, WA (Deauthorized - 1978) Lake River Delta Area, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) LWI River Area, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Magruder Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1974) Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR (Deauthorized - 1977) Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, WA (Inactive) 'Cost is for Engineering only. Project was constructed by local interests. 37-55 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 37-N WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (See Section 55 of Text) Estimated Federal Project Authorizing Act Cost(1984) Blue River Lake, McKenzie Basin' 3 Cascadia Lake, South Santiamn River 4 5 Channel Clearing and Snagging on Willamette River and Major Tributaries 6 Channel Improvements for Flood Control Major Drainage on 16 Streams Tributary to Willamette River' 7 Cottage Grove Lake, Coast Fork' Cougar Lake, South Fork McKenzie' Detroit Lake, Including Big Cliff Lake, North Santiam River' Dorena Lake, Row River' Fall Creek Lake, Middle Fork' Fern Ridge Lake, Long Tom River' Gate Creek Lake, McKenzie Basin 3 5 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Middle Santiam' 4 Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fork' Holley Lake, Calapooya River s Johnson Creek, Vicinity of Portland, OR Lookout Point Lake, Including Dexter Lake, Middle Fork' Strube Lake & Cougar Additional Unit, (South Fork McKenzie)(Modification to Cougar Lake) Waldo Lake Tunnel and Reregulating Works North Fork, Middle Fork, Willamette River May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc., 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and Sep. 3, 1954, S. Doc. 131, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. and June 30, 1948, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and Sep. 3, 1954, S. Doc. 131, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. and July 14, 1960, S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 5318 81st Cong., 2d Sess. $ 32,038,2252 104,000,000 (1975) 3,005,000 (1960) 1,214,3002 4,013,1232 s 56,750,4052 o 62,729,6982 14,568,26220 9 22,118,2642 9 8,526,9352 9 127,000,000 (1980) 84,005,7882 45,700,619 13,300,000 (1960) 5,710,000 (1984) 88,238,39529 107,000,000 (1984) 37-56 TABLE 37-N (Continued) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT WILI AMETTE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (See Section 55 of Text) Estimated Federal Project Authorizing Act Cost (1984) Willamette River Bank Protection' June 22, 1936, Special Report 31,400,000 Division Engr., June 28, (1984) 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess., and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 'See individual reports for details of the project. 'Actual cost. 3For construction in lieu of originally authorized Quartz Creek Lake. 'For construction in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake. 5Project classified deferred. 'Project classified inactive. TABLE 37-0 Project 7Does not include Reclassified Locations. 8Authorization rescinded August 28, 1958, Public Law 85-820. 9Includes cost of Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects (710). '�Does not include $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake and Strube Lake and Cougar additional unit. BOnneville Lock and Dam, OR and WA-Lake Bonneville (See Section 58 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Opened to Navigation 76 Feet 500 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 24.2 Feet Andesite January 1938 37-57 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT - .. REPORT TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 37-0 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION (Continued) LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height Above Lowest Foundation Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Pool Elevation(Normal)(Above Mean Sea Level) POWERPLANT Length Length (Second Powerhouse) Width Width (Second Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock) Height (Roof to Bedrock) (Second Powerhouse) Generator (Station Unit) Generators Generators (Second Powerhouse) Fishwater Supply Units (Second Powerhouse) Total Rated Capacity Speed Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 Cubic Feet Per Second 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 953 190 Feet 235 190 Feet 200 feet 1-4,000 kw 2 @ 43,200 kw each 8 @ 54,000 kw each 8 @ 66,500 kw each 2 @ 13,100 kw each 1,076,600 kw 75 Revolutions per Minute John Day Lock and Dam, OR and WA-Lake Umatilla (See Section 63 of Text) NAVIGATION Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width 86 Feet 669 Feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 15 Feet April 1968 Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Tainter 50 Ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 37-58 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-0 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION (Continued) LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project The Dalles Lock and Dam WA and OR-Lake Celilo (See Section 66 of Text) Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Type Lift Normal Net Clear Length Net Clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates Number of Gates Size of Gates Height (Foundation to Crest) Design Flood POWERPLANT Powerhouse Dimensions Generators Main Units Generators Main Units Fishwater Supply Units Total Rated Capacity Station Service Units 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 235 Feet July 1968 268-257 276 500,000 Ac.-Ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 Miles Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft. msl 23 50 by 43 Feet 120 Feet 2,290,000 cfs 240 by 2,150 Feet 14 @ 78,000 kw each Additional 8 @ 86,000 kw each 2 @ 13,500 kw each 1,807,000 kw 2 @ 3,000 kw each 37-59 SEATTLE, WA, DISTRICT * This District comprises Washington State except southern and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and northwestern Montana embraced in drainage basins tributary to Pacific Ocean south of international boundary to Cape Disappointment, and to Columbia River above Yakima River, inclusively. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. East Bay Marina, Olympia Harbor, WA .... 38-2 2. Ediz Hook, WA .......................... 38-2 3. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, W A ................................ 38-2 4. Floating Breakwater Prototype Test Program, West Point, Seattle, WA .......... 38-2 5. Friday Harbor Marina, WA ............... 38-3 6. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, W A ........................ ....... 38-3 7. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA ......... 38-4 8. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ........................... 38-4 9. Project Condition Surveys ................ 38-4 10. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA.................... 38-4 11. Quillayute River, WA...................... 38-5 12 Seattle Harbor, WA .................... 38-5 13. Swinomish Channel, WA................. 38-6 14.- Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA ............. 38-6 15. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA ....................... 38-6 Beach Erosion Control SBeach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization .......................... Flood Control 17. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization - Emergency Bank Protection ..................... SHoward A. Hanson Dam, WA ........... 19. n 1fspection of Completed Flood 20Co.n trol Projects.................. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees ........ 21. Mud Mountain Dam, WA ................ 2 Pilchuck River, WA ...................... 2 Placer Creek, ID ....... ................. 24 Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations.................... 38-7 38-7 38-7 38-7 38-7 38-8 38-8 38-8 38-8 25. 26. 27. Stillaguamish River, WA ................ Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA ............ Wynoochee Lake, WA ................... Page 38-8 38-9 38-9 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 28. Albeni Falls Dam, ID ................... 38-9 29. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, W A .................................... 38-9 30. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT ........ 38-10 General Investigations 31. Surveys................................ 38-11 32. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... 38-11 33. Continuation of Planning and Engineering........................ 38-11 Tables Table 38-A Cost & Financial Statement .................... 38-13 Table 38-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 38-18 Table 38-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 38-24 Table 38-D Not Applicable Table 38-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 38-25 Table 38-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ........................ 38-31 Table 38-G Deauthorized Projects ......... 38-31 Table 38-H Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA, Principal Features of Double Lock and Dam................ 38-32 Table 38-I Project Condition Surveys ...... 38-32 Table 38-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 ................... 38-33 Table 38-K Emergency Flood Control Activities - Public Law 99, 84th Congress ...................... 38-33 38-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. EAST BAY MARINA, OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Location. The city of Olympia, capital of the State of Washington, is located at the extreme southern end of Puget Sound. East Bay is just north of Olympia. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18445 and 18456.) Existing project. Construction of a 656-foot long general navigation facility which includes a 150-foot wide and 13-foot deep entrance channel, two access channels 12 and 13 feet deep, and a concrete floating breakwater for a new 800-boat marina. Dredging of the entrance channel and two access channels was completed in July 1982 and construction of the breakwater was completed in May 1983. The marina is currently in operation and project is physically complete. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: Fiscal settlement of contract continued. 2. EDIZ HOOK, WA Location. Ediz Hook and the city of Port Angeles are on the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Clallam County, WA, about 100 miles northwest of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18468.) Existing project. Provides for about 13,300 lineal feet of rock revetment and 3,100 lineal feet of rock blanketing, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment. Project was completed in October 1978. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1979.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 17 docks, wharves, and piers in Port Angeles protected by Ediz Hook, of which nine are public. Four of the private docks are operated by timber mills for transfer of logs, pulp and fuel. There are five general cargo/log docks, a ferry dock, three moorage docks (including docks for the Coast Guard and pilots), a fish unloading dock, and three log dump piers. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys of revetment and immediate offshore area accomplished. Engineering and design was accomplished for revetment repairs and beach nourishment contract. 3. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18443.) Existing project. Training dike extending from a point opposite 23d Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep up river to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. The 1968 modification included raising the southerly 4,100 feet of existing training dike, extending the training dike 1,500 feet farther south, and constructing a breakwater along the south and west sides of the existing small-boat basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. The boat basin breakwater has been deleted at the request of the local sponsor, and the remainder of the 1968 modification has been deferred indefinitely. Project was completed in April 1963, excluding the deleted and deferred portions. (For further details, see page 1683 of Annual Report for 1963. For details relating to previous projects, seepage 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with 4 berths handling ocean-going vessels and 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling fishing and pleasure craft. The rest are at Bayside and the Snohomish River. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Maintenance, contract: A dredging contract to maintain the Lower Snohomish River settling basin and channel, initiated in FY 83, was completed in December 1983. The volume was 208,427 cubic yards at a cost Of $378,239. Upper Snohomish River settling basin mainte nance dredging contract was awarded in May 1984to dredge 240,000 cubic yards at a cost of $545,000. Corn pletion is scheduled for November 1984 and is 75 percent complete. 4. FLOATING BREAKWATER PROTOTYPE TEST PROGRAM, WEST POINT, SEATTLE, WA Location. The floating breakwater prototype 'A was located at West Point, a point of land lO get about 6.8 miles northwest of Elliott Bay i 'l Sound within the boundaries of the city of Sea fL 4 ' 38-2 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT WA. The site was well suited for the project in that it often experiences waves that equal and exceed design waves contemplated at most potential floating breakwater sites. The site provided quick and easy access for purposes of maintenance and monitoring. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18440.) Existing project. The project provided for the construction, placement, monitoring, and removal of two types of floating breakwater at a site with a high occurrence of wave attack. The prototype structures built and monitored were a concrete box design, 16 feet wide and 150 feet long, with a depth of 5 feet and a 3.5-foot draft, and a pipe-tire mat design, 45 feet wide and 100 feet long. Information from the test program will be used on other Corps of Engineers projects throughout the nation to design and construct more economical and efficient wave protection structures. Test program information will also be available to other public entities and to the private sector. Construction was begun in September 1981 and the structures installed in June and July 1982. Estimated total costis $1,800,000, Federal funds ($1,446,000, Corps of Engineers; $354,000, Coastal Engineering Research Center). Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: Field data were collected during numerous winter storms. The anchor system and connection system on the concrete breakwater were modified and tested. Testing of the concrete breakwater was completed in January 1984, and the structure turned over to the Friday Harbor Marina Expansion contractor who successfully installed the structure at that project which is about 60 nautical miles north of Seattle. Tests on the pipe-tire breakwater were successfully completed in August 1983, and this structure was installed at a marina in South Puget Sound where it will continue to be monitored. Data analysis is being carried out with the assistance of the U.S. Army, Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC), and a final report on the test program is scheduled for completion in January 1985. 5. FRIDAY HARBOR MARINA, WA Location. Friday Harbor is located on the eastern shore of San Juan Island on the inland waters of northwestern Washington, about 28 nautical miles e'laislte so nf oVritcht oorfi Sa,e aBttrleit, isWh AC. oSluamn bJiuaa, na Insdla n60d nisa ountiec aolf OVer 170 islands in the San Juan Archipelago. Friday Harbor is the San Juan County seat and a United States Customs Port of Entry. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18425.) Ex sting project. Construction of a 1,600-foot con- Crete breakwater seaward of an existing breakwater to Protect the existing port facilities and to allow the Port OPriday Harbor to provide 294 additional permanent sorage spaces and 44 additional transient spaces. $ _ted total cost of project is $3,097,000, of which Fe ,000 is Federal funds and $1,360,000 is nonal funds. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-4 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: Breakwater construction contract was completed in March 1984. The marina is currently in operation and project is physically complete. 6. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance to Columbia River. Inner portion comprises two main channels, the south and the north, connecting harbor proper with Chehalis River at Aberdeen. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel across the bar 600 feet wide and 30 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, both at an elevation of 16 feet, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 30 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; a channel 14 feet deep and 100 feet wide in South Bay to Bay City; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; and protection of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). Project was completed in March 1965 excluding deferred and inactive portions. Rehabilitation of 4,000 feet of the south jetty was completed in October 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. For details relating to previous projects, see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 23 waterfront facilities (piers, wharves, and docks), exclusive of those available to recreational craft, at Grays Harbor, of which five are publicly owned. In foreign and domestic trade they serve various purposes which include the receipt and/or shipment of: logs and lumber, woodchips, conventional and containerized general cargo, seafood and fishing supplies, sand and gravel, and construction materials. Other uses include: mooring and icing fishing boats, mooring small vessels for outfitting and repair, and mooring company-owned tugs. Those piers operated by the U.S. Coast Guard 38-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 moor government-owned vessels. Refer to Port Series No. 35, revised 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. The Corps hopper dredges Yaquina and Essayons accomplished dredging assignments in the outer harbor in November 1983, removing 430,198 cubic yards of material at a cost of $740,011. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the inner and outer harbors was completed in May 1984 at a cost of $2,652,163 with 1,522,719 cubic yards of material being removed. 7. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Location. Entirely within city of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works, including fishladder, at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon Bay, about 1.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through Union Bay to Lake Washington. Section included in project is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is about 22 inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet. Principal features of double lock and dam (structures are at Seattle, WA) are set forth in Table 38-H. Project was completed in 1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935. For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1880 of Annual Report for 1938.) Estimated Federal cost of major rehabilitation is $6,800,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The eight waterfront facilities at Lake Washington Ship Canal are used for fuel oil, seafood, marine repair, drydocking, outfitting, mooring fishing vessels and repairs to the locks' equipment. Project is a part of Seattle Harbor's inner harbor. Refer to Port Series No. 36, revised 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Locks were operated and maintained all year, passing 20,000 commercial and 65,000 pleasure vessels, and 2,200,000 tons of commerce. Fishladder passed 500,000 fish and there were more than 800,000 project visitors. Major Rehabilitation. New work: Contract for construction of a new Emergency Closure System and rehabilitation of the downstream guard gate continues and is scheduled for completion in May 1985. Contract for reconstruction of retaining structure in Montlake Cut was completed in January 1984. 8. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: Gooseberry Point Small Boat Harbor, Hale Passage, WA, $39,423; Sandy Point Harbor, Whatcom County, WA, $20,915. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298): The program consists of control measures for selected water bodies currently infested with Eurasian watermilfoil and measures to prevent its spread into uninfested waters. Operations under the cost-share program included mechanical harvesting of 79 acres and maintaining 5 acres of fiberglass bottom screens at Lake Washington, Lake Union, and Lake Sammamish, WA; treating with 2,4-D/polymer 50 acres in Osoyoos Lake, WA and 80 acres at Pend Oreille River, WA. The Fiscal Year 1984 work also included a 2,4-D drift monitoring study, a treatment effectiveness and carry-over study, cooperation with the University of Washington on a Grass Carp study, aerial photography and interpretation of Columbia River reservoirs, and the preparation of baseline maps. Total costs for fiscal year were $270,752. Streambank erosion control evaluation and demonstration (Section 32, Public Law 93.251). Total costs for fiscal year were $3,844. 9. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Preliminary and detailed surveys to determine naigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, channels, and tributaries of major rivers not within major project boundaries. Soundings and visual inspections in subject areas are conducted in order to evaluate shoaling conditions. Channel centerlwS markers are inspected for visibility and proper operation in applicable areas frequented by boating trall consisting mostly of recreationalists. In addition, a subject areas are inspected to insure that they ar clean of snags and obstructions. Total costs for fiscal year were $85,724. 10. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA tonL.o Ccaittieiosn o. f PSuegaettt lSeo, und is in western partof WashinB Tacoma, Olympia, Everett, Bellingham, and many small towns are on its bays d 38-4 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT inlets. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18441 and 18448.) Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in cooperation with city of Seattle, of floating debris from the Seattle Harbor area. Work consists of collecting floating and partially floating logs and larger-sized debris from Puget Sound and Federally authorized channels. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. City of Seattle is cooperating in a program for control of floating debris in Seattle Harbor. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at numerous localities on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in general, considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: The debris vessel Puget operated continuously throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters. The patrol boat Walton removed floating debris in the greater Seattle vicinity. Together they removed approximately 2,500 tons of floating debris and hazards to navigation. Debris was disposed of locally or loaded aboard barges and disposed of by contract. Snagging operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, EverettHarbor, Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River, and Elliott Bay. Maintenance, contract: 1,815 tons of harbor debris were disposed of at a cost of $53,216. Current contractotis recycling approximately 90 percent of the debris and placing the remainder in a landfill. 11, QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) Jetty 15 feet high on easterly side of river mouth, and a dike on Westerly side, with a view of stabilizing entrance; (b) annel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 i Upstream from deep water; (c) basin 10 feet deep, Sto 425 feet wide, and 2,400 feet long upstream of Channel; and (d) maintenance of an ocean spit. Plane ofreference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at LitPush is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. The .it was nourished in conjunction with channel dredg- 'eCOntacts completed in 1973 and in 1977. The spit Wa8.rehabilitated with quarry rock in 1974, in 1979-80, ral 1982 In addition, a 500-foot breakwater section Pllelng the channel and extending the spit was $8atructed. Project was completed in February 1960; wever, the channel upstream of the boat basin has been classified as inactive. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that the requirement to provide a public landing open to all on equal terms in the boat basin was not complied with between May and July 1981, due to the closure of the Quileute Indian Reservation to the landing of salmon by sport and charter fishermen. Terminal facilities. There are 6 privately-owned docks at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River. In addition, there is a protected boat basin owned by the Quileute Tribe Port Authority which is used by fishing boats, pleasure craft, and the Coast Guard, which has a separate pier. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys and studies were made of the river channel throughout the year. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was performed in February and March of 1984. The volume removed was 66,930 cubic yards at a cost of $305,790. 12. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor at Seattle, WA, includes all waterways within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay; maintenance of East Waterway between upper end of 750-foot section and Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long, and 400 feet wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway at junction of waterways south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full project dimensions; and dredging Duwamish Waterway 200 feet wide and 30 feet deep between West Waterway and First Avenue South, 150 by 20 feet between First and Eighth Avenues South, thence 150 feet by 15 feet to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge, with turning basin 600 by 350 feet and 20 feet deep just south of First Avenue South Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep, and settling basin of about 100,000 cubic yards capacity at upper end of waterway, a distance of 5.12 miles. Total length of waterways included in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Project was completed in 1931, excluding the settling basin at upstream end which is classified inactive and East Waterway above the 750- foot section. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1932.) Local cooperation. Complied with, except for inactive portion of project. 38-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Terminal facilities. There are 196 piers, wharves, and docks located on the inner and outer harbors at Seattle, WA. Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay and Lake Washington form the inner harbor; Elliott Bay and East, West and Duwamish Waterways form the outer harbor. (Lake Washington Ship Canal, a part of the inner harbor, is a separate project in this report.) These terminals serve a variety of purposes which include cargo handling, bunkering vessels, ferry service (vehicular, passenger and rail car), marine repair/outfitting/drydocking/conversion, shipbuilding, handling supplies and equipment, and mooring company-owned equipment, excursion vessels, fire boats, fishing vessels, government equipment, harbor craft/tugs, and oceanographic research vessels. The numerous waterfront facilities in the port used exclusively by recreational craft are not included. Refer to Port Series No. 36, revised 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys made of channels. Maintenance, contract: A volume of 87,484 cubic yards of material was clamshell-dredged from Duwamish Waterway at the upper end (above 14th Avenue South Bridge) during February and March 1984 at a cost of $264,928. An isolated shoal of contaminated material in the lower Duwamish Waterway was also dredged. The material was disposed in a depression in the West Waterway and capped with sand from the upstream maintenance dredging. Volume was 1,100 cubic yards, dredged and disposed at a cost of $20,300. 13. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Location. An inland passage, 11 miles long, between Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction where necessary; and removal of protecting rocky points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation at "Hole-in-the-Wall." Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme tidal range is about 19.5 feet at south end of channel and about 16 feet at north end. Project was completed in March 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves, docks, and piers on Swinomish Channel, all but 3 of which are privately owned. Of these, 1 is used for handling general cargo, 5 are used exclusively for moorage, unloading, and servicing of fishing vessels; 2 are used for handling petroleum products; 3 facilities are used for log dumps; and 2 for handling non-metallic minerals. Three publicly owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various reaches of the channel. Maintenance, contract: 102,845 cubic yards of material were clamshell-dredged from June to September 1984 with open water disposal at a cost of $238,287. 14. WATERWAY CONNECTING PORT TOWNSEND AND OAK BAY, WA Location. Canal connects two bays which are arms of Admiralty Inlet on west side of Puget Sound, in northwestern part of Washington, about 40 miles north of Seattle. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 6405.) Existing project. Provides for a canal 15 feet deep, 75 feet wide on the bottom, and about 4,800 feet long, and for construction of jetties to protect channel at southern or Oak Bay end, and a bulkhead for retention of dredged material. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.3 feet in Port Townsend Bay and 9.4 feet in Oak Bay. Extreme tidal range is 16 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None directly served by the canal. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Volume dredged was 16,944 cubic yards at a cost of $48,971. Approximately 11,000 cubic yards were disposed in a shallow water site designated by the State for clam enhancement. 15. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of mouth of Columbia River in Washington. Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18504.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) channel over bar at mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet wide; (b) channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, thence 300 feet wide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at Mailboat Slough; (c) channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide up south forkW deep basin above Cram lumber mill, and up northfork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet widae,n feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; (d) chanli 10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palrd eRnivde rt ot op Broavyi dCee nat esr mdoacllk ,m woitohr iwngid ebnasimngn ; a(te s) hmoreorng basin 15 feet deep, 340 feet wide, and 540 feet 1g htast adjacent to port wharf at Tokeland; (f) entrance CU, wide, and nel at Nahcotta 10 feet deep and 200 feetwie 38-6 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,150 feet long, protected by a rubblemound breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and (g) removal of snags, piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of Naselle River between Naselle and mouth. Project includes about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River-Bay Center channel, and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 Bridge. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point, 9.9 feet at Raymond, 8.9 feet at Bay Center, and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 18 feet at Toke Point, 19.3 feet at Raymond, 16 feet at Bay Center, and 18feetnear Naselle. Project was completed in November 1958. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1959. For details relating to previous projects, see page 968 ofAnnual Report for 1910, page 2001 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1861 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local sponsor is financially unable to dredge Tokeland Boat Basin moorage area which has resulted in the deferral of maintenance dredging of the boat basin access channel. Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa River and Harbor, including 5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; one of these is publicly owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including 3 that are publicly owned and operated, are used by shallow-draft vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various segments of the project. Maintenance, contract: A contract for clamshell dredging of the Bay Center Channel was awarded in July 1984 with work completed in September 1984. otal volume dredged was 83,200 cubic yards at a cost of $413,670. Beach Erosion Control 16. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Setion 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA, were $84,159. Flood Control 17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION la ergency 7 9-526B ank Protection, Section 14, Pub- (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for Yakima River, Emerald Road, tiieoan) .Granger, WA, were $4,200 (unfavorable investiga- 18. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river mile 64, 6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and 1 mile downstream from mouth of North Fork. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake quadrangle, WA.") Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1176 feet above mean sea level and top of gates at elevation 1206, creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Improvement is designed to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural and urban flood damage, and make possible further expansion of Seattle industrial area. It also supplements Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. Project was completed in June 1963. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, turbidimeter, ditches, powerline, and other project features. The outlet works stilling basin was inspected. Work continued on water quality surveys, water storage studies, and channel capacity study. Maintenance, contract: Settlement of the fill for the relocated Burlington Northern Railway between stations 10989 and 10991 was under continued surveillance. The deferred construction period has been extended to cover this area to observe effect of remedial work. (Improvements to the drainage system have apparently stabilized the railroad fill.) 19. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections are made of Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are maintained by local interests; and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal year, inspections were made on Okanogan River at Omak and Oroville and Skykomish- Wallace River in the State of Washington and Clark Fork River at Missoula, MT. An inspection and backwater study were made on the Sammamish River, WA and an inspection and aggredation study on the Dungeness River, WA. Fiscal year costs were $72,949. Costs to date have been $523,126. 20. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspections are made of levees that have been rehabilitated under Public Law 84-99. Inspections involve determining condition of levees, riprap displacement and vegetative control. Local sponsors are advised of results and recommendations. Inspections made this fiscal year were on St. Joe and Coeur d'Alene Rivers, ID; Bitterroot and Flathead Rivers, MT; Clark Fork at Missoula, MT; and Nisqually, Deschutes, Puyallup, Carbon, Cedar, Green, Nooksack, and Snohomish 38-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Rivers, WA. Fiscal year costs were $38,735. Total costs to date have been $78,712. 21. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles southeast of Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east of Tacoma. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet "Cedar Lake quadrangle, WA.") Existing project. Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest elevation, rises 425 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Outlet works are in right abutment and permit controlled discharge of 17,700 cubic feet per second through two concrete-lined tunnels with uncontrolled discharge over spillway having maximum capacity of 139,000 cubic feet per second. Improvement affords flood protection to White and Puyallup River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Project was completed in June 1953, except for recreational facilities. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1953.) To date the Corps has constructed two vistas, a picnic area, and playground adjacent to the project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and fishermen, and a 1,760-foot trail leading to the lower vista area. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project features were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam facilities, intake structure, gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, and fish facilities. Work on the 9-foot tunnel during June-September 1984 consisted of replacing railing and regrouting the tunnel. Approximately 1,000 fish are transported annually from the fish collection facility. 22. PILCHUCK RIVER, WA Location. The project is located on the right bank of the Pilchuck River, five miles northeast of Granite Falls, WA, in Granite Falls Quadrangle NE 1 sec. 9, T. 29N., R. 7E. Existing project. A 1,000-lineal-foot riprap bank protection project consisting of a blanket 36 inches thick on a 1V to 2H slope and a 12-foot-wide, 4-footthick weighted riprap toe with a 12-inch gravel filter constructed beneath the blanket. Proposed work is considered the most effective and least costly method of protecting the waterline and treatment plant in the city of Snohomish and surrounding areas threatened by continual erosion at the river bank. Total estimated cost of the project is $86,000 of which $85,000 is Federal. Local participation costs are estimated to be $1,000 for legal requirements. Construction began September 10, 1984. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Proposed work, including letter report, plans and specifications, and construction by equipment rental, was physically complete on September 20, 1984. 23. PLACER CREEK, ID Location. Placer Creek rises in the St. Joe Mountains of northern Idaho, flows northerly about 7.8 miles, and discharges into the South Fork of Coeur d'Alene River at the city of Wallace. Existing project. Provides for flood control by construction of a 3,700-foot-long concrete channel to confine Placer Creek flows through Wallace. A debris basin capable of storing 17,000 cubic yards of debris is located upstream from the channel to prevent plugging of the channel. Project was physically complete in September 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for positioning access bridges. Requirements are described in full on page 38-10 of Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Joint caulking and landscaping were accomplished. An O&M manual was prepared and provided to local sponsor in April 1984 to assist in its 0&M responsibilities. Coordination with Shoshone County occurred to resolve the positioning of access bridges across the channel. Positioning was resolved. 24. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Flood control storage space was available in Hungry Horse Reservoir, MT, Flathead Lake, MT (controlled by Kerr Dam), Grand Coulee Project, WA, Upper Baker and Ross Reservoirs, WA. Guidance forecasts were made during the flood control season, as required No Lost Valley storage replacement was requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells Dams. Daily and/or hourly data were collected and tabulated as required to check compliance with operating criterinS Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of reservoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year with agencies responsible for the operation of these projects. Fiscal year costs were $241,333. 25. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Location. Formed by confluence of its north and south forks at Arlington, in northwestern Washing ton, Stillaguamish River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, entering Port Susan through Hat Slougb and South Pass, and Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441, and Geological Surt vey quadrangles Stanwood, Marysville, and Still guamish, WA.) Existing project. Works to reduce bank eroson and channel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 on between Arlington and head of Hat Slough, and t2 Cook Slough, 3 miles long, as follows: Revetme t places on river and Cook Slough; concrete weir i z'-_� long between steel-sheet-pile piers at head of o 38-8 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Slough to limit flow through slough; and two cutoff channels, each about 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook Slough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into improved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above low water at Cook Slough weir have been observed. Project was completed in July 1939. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1940.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Removed brush and trees on 6,500 linear feet of 4 segments; repaired 1 segment with gravel and riprap. Repaired 138 linear feet of Cook Slough Weir crest by removing old concrete and placing new crest. Sheet pile cut-off walls were driven upstream and downstream of repaired area. 26. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on western slopes of Mount Rainier, WA, flows northwesterly 50 miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Tacoma. Work covered by this project is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 cubic feet per second between East 11th Street Bridge and lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting channel and levees, and making necessary bridge changes. The 11th Street Bridge at lower end of project is 0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 feet. Improvement was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Project was completed in May 1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Repaired levee top by placing and compacting crushed gravel on approximately 8,000 linear feet oflevee. Other funds expended in trying to resolve atype of brush removal program acceptable to Puyallup Indian Nation and Corps of Engineers. 27. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Location. On Wynoochee River, a tributary of Chehalis River, about 28 miles north of Montesano, Grays Harbor County, WA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles, Grisdale, Wynoochee Valley, and Monte- Saab.) Existing project. Provides for a concrete and earthfill dam, 177 feet high, and reservoir of 70,000 fCreoife etot tal storage for water supply, flood con- O1. .irrigationa, nd fish and wildlife. Upstream fish fclities were operational in the fall of 1970. The proj- 19 completed and became operational in December '". Installation of power-generating facilities was ofauthorized, pending a reexamination report by the ef of Engineers. In February 1966, the Federal Power Commission asserted that power production as part of the Wynoochee project was not feasible at that time. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1972.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-12 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project facilities were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam and fish facilities, roads, ditches, culverts, and visitors' facilities. The project tank truck hauled upstream migrant fish past the dam. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 28. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Location. Dam is on Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of Spokane, WA. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. (See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, ID, and Newport, WA.) Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a part of the multiple-purpose plan for development of Columbia River Basin, including recreation development. At the dam, channel was formerly divided by an island and a low waterfall of about 7 feet. Dam is a gated, gravity-structure spillway in left channel and a powerhouse having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 1,153,000 acre-feet. Project was completed in June 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreational facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, Trestle Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy Point. (Strongs Island was closed in FY 1982 to reduce O&M costs.) (Refer to Albeni Falls Master Plan dated June 1981 for further planned development.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: A $35,700 debris facility rehabilitation contract, awarded in July 1984, was completed. A contract for $28,950 was awarded for rehabilitation of the Riley Creek restrooms in September 1984. Work continued on the station service circuit breaker contract. 29. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, at river mile 545, just upstream from mouth of Foster Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from Town 38-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 of Bridgeport. (Geological Survey topographic sheet Okanogan, WA, shows general locality.) Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. The powerhouse has sixteen 64,000 kilowatt and eleven 95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 2,069,000 kilowatts. Pool raising to elevation 956 was completed in 1981 which increased the powerplant capability to 2,482,000 kilowatts. Project providing initial 16 power units was completed in FY 1961. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Generator units 17 through 27 are producing power; however, additional work will be required to bring turbine efficiency up to design standards. Construction of structural modifications to dam and powerhouse, installation of additional units, uprating and plant modernization of units 1-16, and other miscellaneous project work is approximately 85 percent complete. Estimated cost of current construction project is $387,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Continued real estate acquisition and stability analysis. Plans and specifications were completed for drilling to install additional inclinometers, purchase of barge and maintenance boats, and accessioning of cultural resources artifacts. New work, contract: Contracts were awarded for turbine cavitation, main unit excitation system, drilling to install additional inclinometers, purchase of barges and maintenance boats, accessioning of cultural resources artifacts, and warehouse additions and sandblast building. Contracts continuing through the fiscal year included cultural resources relocation, spillway gate deficiencies, pier crack grouting, roads/ paving/utilities, battery chargers, generator stator rewind, installation and fire protection, transformers, governor system, station service system, protective relays, 15 kV circuit breakers, and wildlife mitigation: mule deer study and mitigation evaluation. Contracts completed during the fiscal year included plant propagation in the amount of $64,324, administration building renovation in the amount of $358,015, and Bridgeport State Park restroom and comfort station in the amount of $802,511. Maintenance, hired labor: Project was operated all year, and routine maintenance work was performed. Maintenance, contract: Generator Air Coolers (Units 17-27) contract in the amount of $57,886 was awarded in August 1984. Stator Bars contract in the amount of $153,340 and Stator Laminations contract in the amount of $47,410 were awarded in September 1984. 30. LIBBY DAM-LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, MT, about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream from confluence of Kootenai with Columbia River. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson Lakes, MT.) Existing project. Provides storage for local flood control protection in Montana and Idaho, and main stem flood control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation at-site and at downstream plants through storage release. Project will be operated as a unit of comprehensive system for improvement of Columbia River Basin for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Libby Dam-Lake Koocanusa Project. Dam is a straight concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2459 feet above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed capacity of 420,000 kilowatts from four hydroelectric generating units with provision for four additional units, one of which is currently under construction. Lake Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 4,965,000 acre-feet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction of dam was in accordance with treaty between United States and Canada relating to international cooperation in water-resource development of the Columbia River Basin. Construction is essentially complete. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: Contract for flood contingency plan continued. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. Libby Additional Units Project. Provides for installation of 4 additional units at the Libby Damn Powerhouse. Fabrication of generators for units 5 through 8 is complete; however, only the unit 5 generator is being installed. Installation of the electrical equipment is limited to unit 5. Parts for units 6 through 8 will be stored at the site. Project is 99% complete. Units 6 through 8 have been reclassified inactive. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: Contracts for turbines, generators, governors, switchgear, transformers, bus and grounding equip ment, and unit 5 installation continued. A contract for closing out construction facilities in the amount of $113,500 was awarded in September 1984. Libby Reregulating Dam Project. Provides .or construction of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream of Libby Dam and associated relocation of about 9 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, 7.5 miles of St. Regis log haul road, 0.5 miles of Forest Development Road, and 7.5 miles of Montana State Highway. Funds were provided for a construction start in 1977; however, courts have found that Con gress did not authorize construction of the reregulat ing dam. Operations during fiscal year. Construction work continues to be halted due to a court injunction. 38-10 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Libby Reregulating Dam - Power Units Project. Provides for installation of three hydroelectric generating units at the reregulating dam with 78,900 kilowatt installed capacity. A General Design Memorandum 1, Phase II, Preliminary Design Report was approved by the Office, Chief of Engineers on March 3,1981. General Investigations 31. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $146,274 for navigation studies, $199,944 for flood control studies, $375,792 for comprehensive basin studies, -$323 for review of authorized projects, $73,398 for inventory of dams, and $34,885 for coordination studies with other agencies, a total of $829,970. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The work programmed for collection and study of basic data covers precipitation studies, international water studies, flood plain management services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage computations to determine compliance of West Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International Joint Commission, and coordination with International Kootenay Lake, Osoyoos Lake, and Skagit River Boards of Control in enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. Technical assistance was provided other Federal and non-Federal agencies in flood hazard evaluation and related services as requested. Fiscal year costs were $54,951 for precipitation studies, $2,799 for international water studies, $104,154 for flood plain management services, and $4;955 for hydrologic studies, a total of $166,859. 33. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, WA Tacoma Harbor, Pierce County, is located in southern Puget Sound in the northwest corner of Washington about 30 miles south of Seattle in Washington's 6th Congressional District. The proposed plan of improvement provides for (a) modification of the existing Federal project for Blair Waterway to provide for the construction and maintenance of a 45-foot and a 41-foot channel including replacement of the East 11th Street Bridge and (b) ederal maintenance of the locally constructed Sitcum Waterway to depths of 40 and 35 feet. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included _enviromental coordination on contaminated sedialite and contract negotiations with Washington emZte teevpaalrutamtioennst. of Transportation for bridge replacep ,timatedp reconstruction planning cost is $980,000. calyear costs were $52,571. Total costs to date have been $566,380, including $300,000 appropriated and expended under Section 101(c). Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA The cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis are located at the mouth of the Chehalis River in Grays Harbor County, west central Washington. The Chehalis River, about 125 miles in length, rises in the Willapa Hills in west central Washington. The basin uplands include the Willapa Hills on the south, the western flank of the Cascade Mountains to the east, and the southern part of the Olympic Mountains to the north. The proposed plan of improvement would protect most of the left bank flood plain at the mouth of the Chehalis River in the cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. The improvement would include: an earthen levee 22,500 feet long roughly following the left bank of the Chehalis River from Devonshire Slough to Cosmopolis; 2,200 feet of concrete floodwall in two industrial areas; five pumping stations and tide gates; and 10 smaller gravity drain culverts with flap gates. The levee would protect 1,318 acres of the cities from inundation by the standard project flood. Continuation of planning and engineering studies were initiated in October 1983 and included environmental, survey, and economic studies and Fish and Wildlife coordination. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,097,000. Fiscal year costs were $161,044. Grays Harbor, Chehalis and Hoquiam Rivers, WA Grays Harbor is a large tidal estuary in southwestern Washington. The entrance is 45 miles north of the mouth of the Columbia River and 110 miles south of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The estuary lies entirely within Grays Harbor County, State of Washington. The proposed plan of improvement consists of modifying the existing Federal project for Grays Harbor. The existing 30-foot channel would be deepened to a depth of 46 feet through the Outer Bar and widened in this reach from the existing 600 feet to a 1,000-footwide channel; thence, the entrance reach would be widened and deepened from the existing designated 350 feet wide by 30 feet deep channel to a channel tapering landward from 1,000 to 600 feet wide and 46 to 38 feet deep; thence, the existing channel to Cow Point would be widened and deepened from 350 feet wide by 30 feet deep to 400 feet wide by 38 feet deep for the South reach and Crossover reach and to 350 feet wide by 38 feet deep for the Moon Island, Hoquiam, and Cow Point reaches; and thence, the Aberdeen and South Aberdeen reaches would be widened and deepened from the existing designated 200 feet wide by 30 feet deep channels to channels 250 feet wide by 36 feet deep. Two turning basins located at Aberdeen would be constructed and the existing railroad bridge would be replaced with a new bridge having horizontal clearance of 250 feet. 38-11 T REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Continuation of planning and engineering studies were initiated in October 1983. During the fiscal year a plan of action was completed and major environmental studies were begun. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $3,360,000. Fiscal year costs were $329,526. 38-12 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 . East Bay Marina, Olympia Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2. Ediz Hook, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Floating Breakwater Prototype Test Program, WA 5. Friday Harbor Marina, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib.Funds) Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 175,000 905,000 341,000 162,464 917,529 318,254 -10,000 11,341 - 1,614,000 276,000 163,478 - 1,044,205 723,671 279,634 24,000 22,588 4,605 5,700 34,000 31,394 1,655 3,284 15,000 8,925 855 2,165 80,000 81,492 1 54,000 522,000 363,617 792,000 52,654 523,497 363,615 689,169 251,000 793,000 402,000 250,121 792,047 403,779 -19,913 55,000 115,000 1,115,000 210,500 52,700 110,148 1,042,099 185,825 - - 60,000 1,200,000 - - - 1,239,917 60,000 60,259 37,545 38,026 35,000 35,010 3,972,800 3,193,000 3,289,000 4,347,000 3,946,277 3,224,499 3,289,402 4,339,277 38-13 1,719,976 1,718,4901 2,053,478 2,047,510 5,876,880 5,876,8802 178,000 169,399 396,000 396,000 8,210 5,450 1,775,744 1,775,7443 6,616,079 6,513,2474 116,618 116,618 584,090 584,090 1,446,000 1,426,034 1,748,537 1,643,7941 1,260,000 1,239,917 5,165,396 5,165,3956 70,057,464 70,046,4717 120,592 120,592 4,606,145 4,606,145 TABLE 38-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 (Contrib. Funds) 7. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA 10. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA 11. Quillayute River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 12. Seattle Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Swinomish Channel, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 472 -7,545 -7,519 2,938,000 2,837,000 2,851,000 2,999,240 3,429,332 2,814,197 2,856,510 2,936,228 - 1,100,000 2,275,000 2,970,000 - 1,099,779 2,275,220 2,951,805 1,160,800 927,000 600,000 593,000 1,168,840 928,715 601,269 552,674 370,000 3,074,000 -310,000 454,000 369,427 2,262,394 501,062 452,875 378,000 312,000 428,358 405,000 377,121 312,240 428,995 398,225 276,500 114,000 265,245 124,922 70,000 347,760 65,360 352,506 38-14 35,834 35,834 47,889 47,889 4,803,952 4,803,9528 53,773,470 53,680,4279 6,345,000 6,326,804 43,337 43,337 15,255,302 15,214,97610 521,850 521,850"11 8,582,761 8,580,135 20,000 20,000 170,335 170,335 5,917,746 5,910,969 69,333 69,333 20,000 20,000 808,332 808,3322 5,495,003 5,494,7761 32,000 32,000 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 14. Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA 15. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 21. Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 22. 23. 25. Pilchuck River, WA Placer Creek, ID Stillaguamish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 90,000 89,712 77,000 113,000 73,863 116,137 60,000 578,000 59,914 573,690 588,000 530,000 528,000 515,000 588,848 531,095 527,245 496,871 1,162,000 828,000 1,136,162 1,138,000 1,163,507 830,027 1,110,512 1,118,723 - - - 85,000 - -- -- 67,692 750,000 3,225,000 845,000 390,000 732,345 3,235,803 722,954 497,172 32,000 37,257 141,000 150,000 148,672 142,972 155,000 162,671 38-15 73,322 73,322 309,878 309,590 1,579,269 1,579,269"' 13,156,978 13,152,58213 98,372 98,372 37,048,061 37,048,061 8,138,251 8,119,084 2,000,000 2,000,000 13,295,848 13,295,84816 13,992,532 13,935,90717 285,908 285,908 3,928 3,928 85,000 67,692 5,865,000 5,842,972 220,594 220,59418 1,364,845 1,364,255 21,000 21,000 TABLE 38-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 26. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA 27. Wynoochee Lake, WA 28. Albeni Falls Dam, ID 29. Chief Joseph Dam- Rufus Woods Lake, WA 30. Libby Dam, Lake Koocanusa, MT (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 'Includes $330,517 appropriated and expended for preauthorization cost. 'Includes $1,157,570 preauthorization cost. 3Includes $418,209 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 4Includes $5,869 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 6Includes $43,037 for previous project and $235,341 preauthorization cost, appropriated and expended. 6 lncludes $134,545 appropriated and $134,544 expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), and $113,134 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $162,000 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 7includes $37,415 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $798,135 Emergency Relief Funds 4,000 730 32,000 29,593 3,270 39,000 41,406 3,947,853 3,947,85319 40,000 39,947 40,000 39,829 1 - - -- 1,013,000 891,000 908,000 994,500 1,158,860 873,785 934,637 963,671 1,408,000 1,377,320 1,923,231 2,018,000 1,391,276 1,364,305 1,843,759 2,062,473 20,858,000 8,170,000 11,900,000 18,200,000 21,556,256 8,091,788 12,088,050 18,292,811 4,551,800 4,381,000 5,198,000 5,890,000 4,648,742 4,379,283 5,194,095 5,811,108 406,597 406,372 23,494,445 23,494,44520 8,829,569 8,796,573 31,878,297 31,878,29721 22,919,831 22,841,22522 481,078,235 481,005,99923 60,293,935 60,175,87324 297,630 297,630 8,913,000 10,090,000 6,250,000 1,915,000 542,266,14025 9,959,243 9,943,442 6,365,210 1,844,303 542,137,3952 2,180,000 1,997,000 2,590,900 2,860,500 2,168,699 1,990,590 2,583,965 2,824,490 18,930,479 18,855,31827 - - - 1,458,252 -- - 1,458,252 and $57,000 Public Works Administration funds expended. 8Includes $779,655 for recreation facilities at conipleted project (Code 710), and $485,002 for previous projects appropriated and expended. 9Includes $1,631,195 (1916 to 1936) and $338,163 subse quently appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Nang able Waters. "Includes $67,496 appropriated and expended for pre vious project. "Excludes Navy funds expended on dredging river channel in 1944 and Coast Guard funds expended for chan" nel dredging in 1948 and 1949. ' 2Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. nd 13Includes applicable portion of Reconnaissance ad Condition Surveys appropriation and cost. 38-16 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT "Includes $228,084 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $40,000 Coast Guard funds and $192,557 Emergency Relief Funds expended. "Includes $309,177 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $78,532 Public Works Administration Funds expended. '6lncludes $87,785 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief Funds expended. "Includes $5,000 Advance Procurement Funds. "Excludes $281,000 Works Progress Administration Funds and $85,999 Emergency Relief Funds expended. "Includes $5,035 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 2 Includes $102,200 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 21lIncludes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act Funds and $971,947 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), appropriated and expended. 22 lncludes $174,776 Special Recreation Use Fees and $10,000 Advance Procurement Funds, appropriated and expended. 23lncludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act Funds and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), appropriated and expended. 24lncludes $774,561 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 25Includes $41,671,634 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, and $475,000 for power planning. 26 lIncludes $41,546,031 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, and $475,000 for power planning. 27 lIncludes $167,646 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Water. 38-17 TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 1. July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 July 14, 1960 as amended July 14, 1960 as amended June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Project and Work Authorized EAST BAY MARINA, OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Construction of 656 feet of concrete floating breakwater and dredging of the entrance and access channels and turning basin. EDIZ HOOK, WA Construction of 10,000 lineal feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment Emergency interim measures necessary to prevent breaching of Ediz Hook prior to construction of authorized project. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at outlet of old river channel. Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and channel to gap. Abandon project for Snohomish River and provide settling basin near 14th Street. Spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of river outlet, enlarge channel to 14th Street, and deepen settling basin. Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within upper channel reach. Raise and extend existing training dike; and construct breakwater on westerly and southerly sides of 14th Street small-boat basin.' FLOATING BREAKWATER PROTOTYPE TEST PROGRAM, WEST POINT, SEATTLE, WA Construction, placement, monitoring, and removal of two types of floating breakwater, a concrete box design and a pipe-tire mat design. FRIDAY HARBOR MARINA, WA Construction of 1600 feet of concrete floating breakwater. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA South jetty. A north jetty 9,000 feet long. The 18-foot channel. Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty fixed at 13,734 feet. Documents Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 13,1981 H. Doc. 93-101, 93d Cong. e1sSt es., P.L 93-251 H. Doc. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 546, 75th Cong,. 3d Sess. H. Doc. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sees. H. Doc. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 357, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.2 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 5, 1981 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, July 9, 1981 Annual Report, 1895, pp. 3517-3533 Rivers and Harbor5 Committee Doc. 2,59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 507, 59th Cong, 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. 38-18 2. 5. 6. TABLE 38-B (Continued) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30,1935 Dec. 2 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 June 26, 19345 Aug. 30,19356 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 13, 1892 A 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis. Dredging in bar channel. Dredging in bar channel 16foot channel from Cosmopolis to Monteeano.3 Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of 16 feet above mean lower low water. Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authorized by Public Works Administration Dec. 11, 1933) and combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance and Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Grays Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal, which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. 14-foot channel to Bay City; breakwater at Westhaven; protection of Point Chehalis; and maintenance of Westhaven entrance channel.4 Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA For a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works at entrance to Salmon Bay; dredging a channel from locks to deep water in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of a channel from locks into Lake Washington. Dredging below locks and revetting canal banks. Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by snagging and dredging; and removal of floating debris from Seattle Harbor. H. Doc. 1125, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1729, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 582, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 315, 70th Cong., 1st Sees. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sees. H. Doc. 53, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.; Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sees. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Report in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 30, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 800, 64th Cong., slet Sess. H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 140, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 2 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Annual Report for 1893, page 34257 38-19 See Section in Text 10. I C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 July 13, 1892 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 14. Mar. 4, 19131" 15. July 27, 1916 Aug. 30, 19356 Aug.30,193512 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 18. May 17, 1950 11. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a dike with groins, on westerly side, to stabilize entrance.' Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet deep and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet long; moorage basin.9 SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway.' � Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East and Duwamish Waterways. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike construction. Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". WATERWAY CONNECTING PORT TOWNSEND AND OAK BAY, WA Canal 15 feet deep, 75 feet wide on the bottom, and about 4,800 feet long; construct jetties to protect channel at southern or Oak Bay end, and a bulkhead for retention of dredged material. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide, in Willapa River, and 150 feet wide in the forks. Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet and minimum width of 500 feet. For cutoff channel at Narrows. Channel from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock. Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between South Bend and the forks; Tokeland and Nahcotta basins; and Naselle River clearance. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. 38-20 H. Doc. 125,. 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 2 S. Doc. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 108, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. and H. Doc. 126,71st Cong., 2d Ses.2 H. Doc. 211, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 2 H. Doc. 31, 52d Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1892, p. 2752 S. Committee Print, 73d Cong,. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 499, 87th Cong., 2d Sees. 2 H. Doc. 625, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 481, 76th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doe. 425, 83d Cong. 2d Sess." H. Doc. 271, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.2 12. 13. TABLE 38-B (Continued) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 21. May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 9, 1952 Aug. 6, 1958 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 as amended Dec. 15, 1970 June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam. P.L. 85-592 MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Flood control dam on White River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. PILCHUCK RIVER, WA Construction of riprap bank protection. PLACER CREEK, ID Construction of 3,700 feet concrete channel to confine Placer Creek flows through Wallace, Idaho. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank revetment at 26 places; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. Maintenance of improvements. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Channel improvement to protect people and industrial section of city of Tacoma. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Dam and reservoir for water supply, flood control, irrigation, fish and wildlife, and recreation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Transfer to State of Washington as a part of project costs $696,000 for construction of fish hatchery facilities. Amend contract between city of Aberdeen and United States for use of storage space, permitting deferral of the major portion of the first 10-year payments. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River at Foster Creek. Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. 38-21 S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, July 2, 1984 H. Doc. 357, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. 2 H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. 2 P.L. 75-761 S. Comm. Print, Puyallup River, Wash, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 601, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 2 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.2 P.L. 858, 80th Cong,. 2d Sess. P.L. 469, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 22. 23. 25. 6. 27. 28. 29. I REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 as amended on May 4, 1977 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7,1966 Jan. 2, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 30. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel, Libby project. Airport facility at Kelley Flats, MT. Design standards for relocation of Montana State Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. Participation with State of Montana in construction, operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. Design and construction of sewage collection and sewage treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, MT; and compensation for railroad employees suffering longterm economic injury through reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail transportation facilities due to the construction of Libby Dam. Phase I design memorandum stage for installation of power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. Construction of fish production measures to compensate for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and utilities (amends P.L. 91-282 by increasing limitation from $750,000 to $4,000,000). Acquisition of land not to exceed $2,000,000 for prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary County, ID for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Compensation, not to exceed $1,500,000, to Drainage Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands, in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, ID, for damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. 'Deferred. 2Contains latest published map. 'Inactive. 4A portion deferred. 'Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 6lncluded in Public Works Administration Program. 7Annual Report for 1913 contains latest published map (page 3127). 8A portion inactive. 9Maintenance of these items, as well as sandspit nort of James Island, is included in this modification. 38-22 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 94-587 P.L. 95-26 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong, 2d Sess.2 P.L. 89-789 P.L. 90-23913 P.L. 90-48314 P.L. 91-2821s P.L. 91-625 P.L. 91-611 S. Doc. 93-29, 93d Cong, 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) 1OIncludes settling basin of 100,000 cubic yards capacity 13Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, Section which has been classified as inactive. 502. "Annual Report for 1915 contains latest published map "4Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. (page 3441). '5River Basin Monetary Authorization and Miscellane- 12Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28,1935. ous Civil Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. 38-23 TABLE 38-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anacortes Harbor, WA Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA' Bellingham Harbor, WA Bellingham Harbor, WA (I&J Street Waterway)' Bellingham, Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, WA' Blaine Harbor, WA Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA Edmonds Harbor, WA2 Flathead River, MT Hammersley Inlet, WA Hoquiam River, WA Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA' Kingston Harbor, WA Kootenai River, ID and MT Lake Crockett, WA Mats Mats Bay, WA' Neah Bay, WA Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA Olympia Harbor, WA Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, MT Port Angeles Harbor, WA3 Port Gamble Harbor, WA Port Orchard Bay, WA4 Port Townsend, WA Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA5 Skagit River, WA Stillaguamish River, WA Tacoma Harbor, WA Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA' Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed 1983 1977 1983 1966 1981 1958 1923 1966 1901 1950 1950 1982 1967 1933 1983 1970 1982 1913 1975 1918 1960 1953 1928 1974 1962 1950 1946 1983 1981 222,34586 825,2637 1,566,8406 125,634 1,703,23510 346,650 274,39011 9,811 9,000 51,294 946,00012 262,57013 9,255 404,51315 137,67916 2,057,266 63,880 442,78217 4,491 470,873 11,91119 42,804 480,89920 2,575,09121 102,33022 4,23423 2,435,50024 2,000,00026 612,76127 1,049,0679 7,693 10,683 5,316 5,000" 5,643 512,940 1,819,706 7,634 525,377s18 259 13,337 26,787 36,258 1,446,33525 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107, Public Law 86-645. 2Constructed by local interests. Corps of Engineers is responsible for maintenance. 3Maintenance by Port of Port Angeles. 4No maintenance required. 5Maintenance by Port of Seattle. 6Excludes $157,523 contributed funds and $2,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 7lncludes $87,963 preauthorization cost. Excludes $457,200 contributed funds expended. "Includes $56,582 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $29,421 contributed funds and $13,000 Coast Guard funds expended, and $2,159,633 expended by Port of Bellingham in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 9Includes $1,092 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $9,103 contributed funds expended. 10Includes $132,349 preauthorization cost and exclude $1,570,886 contributed funds expended. 1"Includes $8,005 expended for previous project. Ex cludes $50,000 expended by State of Washington in fulfig terms of local cooperation. 12Includes $148,765 preauthorization cost 3 Excludes $390,753 contributed funds and $3,000 Cot Guard funds expended. "14Mitigation shore damages study expended. Main nance by Port of Kingston. 15Includes $146,000 appropriated and $144,273 expend for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 38-24 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) "'Excludes $28,288 contributed funds expended. 'Includes$258,011 forpreviousprojects, and$13,765expended for restudy Fiscal Years 1970-1973. Excludes $160,936 Public Works Administration Funds expended. "Includes $14,488 expended for previous project. 19Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. 20Excludes $92,423 contributed funds expended. 2 "Excludes $15,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 22lIncludes $2,500 expended for previous project. 23For economic study only. 24Includes $159,584 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $51,609 Public Works Administration Funds and $1,777,208 contributed funds expended. 25Includes $5,347 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $242,300 contributed funds expended. Includes applicable portion of reconnaissance and condition survey costs. 2 Includes $178,371 preauthorization cost and excludes $1,230,035 contributed funds expended. 27Includes applicable portion of reconnaissance and condition survey costs. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds expended. TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA' Bear Creek, Flathead County Bridge, near Essex, MT2 Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA2 Bogachiel River, Undie Road, Forks, WA2 Cedar River, Renton, WA2 Chehalis River, City of Chehalis, Raw Water Pumphouse, WA2 ChiSU River, IndependenceRoad, Thurston County, WA2 Chehalis River, Montesano, WA2 lallam Bay, Sekiu, WA2 2Oam River, Highway 112, WA2 Cark Fork River, Drummond, C rk Fork River, uo0ula, MT Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT2 ark Fork River, Superior, MT2 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1957 1971 1964 1981 1981 1949 1966 1965 1977 1977 1981 1978 1983 1978 1971 59,5826 1,424 17,836 156,000 57,000 32,264 35,454 47,916 140,080 48,698 43,500 18,660 385,0106 31,548 28,356 38-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) Project Clark Fork River, Vicinity of Plains, MT2 Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA 2 Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA 2 Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID Coeur d'Alene River, Springston, ID2 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Entiat River, WA Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, ID Methow River, WA Okanogan River, WA Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge, near Tumwater, WA2 Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA2 Dungeness River, Area #5, WA2 Dungeness River, Area #8, WA2 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA1 Dungeness River, Sequim, WA2 Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA2 Elwha River, Clallam County, WA2 Entiat River, Chelan County, WA 2 Flathead River, MT2 Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT2 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT2 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT2 Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA 2 Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA2 Green River, State Highway 181, WA2 Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA2 Hoh River, County Road 16, WA 2 For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Status Report for Construction Maintenance Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Inactive Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1950 1968 1950 1941 1950 1958 1959 1958 1958 1980 1965 1967 1950 1950 1964 1981 1961 1951 1978 1972 1955 1948 1981 1964 1962 1972 1976 1977 1980 27,947 50,0007 49,165 152,872 25,452 42,726 1,1008 30,0009 26,292 22,956 2,155 2,895 52,04011 99,000 14,09311 17,303 38,000 20,940 26,265 33,347 300,0008 13,438 50,000 24,605 27,001 37,359 143,000 38-26 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) Project Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA2 HohRiver Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1360)2 HohRiver Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1361)2 HohRiverRoad, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1362)2 Hoh River, near Forks, WA2 Hoko River, Sekiu, WA2 Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA2 Hoquiam River, WA2 Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID2 Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID2 La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA2 Methow River, WA (MET 1-74)2 Methow River, WA (MET 2-74)2 Methow River, WA (MET 3-74)2 Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA2 Methow River, Twisp, WA 2 Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA2 Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA2 Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA2 Mocipe River, Moclips, WA2 Naches River, Naches, WA 2 Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamnilton,WA2 Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA 2 Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA2 Nually RiverVicinity of Elbe, WA2 Nooksack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA2 Noo0ksack River above Highway lZ Bridge, WA2 North Fork Skykomish River, WA2 Okanogan River, WA2 Okanogan River, Omak, WA' .. . For Last Full Report See Annual Report for 1980 Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 194,000 Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Operation and nstruction Maintenance 22,08212 11,916 41,622 173,00013 21,083 59,812 52,600 42,325 1956 1961 1964 1983 1977 1977 1977 1950 1965 1979 1974 1974 1974 1976 1949 1951 1951 1972 1977 1982 1972 1948 1960 1952 1950 1960 1981 1974 1981 6,075 10,807 222,500 10,100 2,230,00014 38-27 r....--rte 14,885 40,525 15,700 11,200 13,450 19,810 31,783 33,200 11,726 11,836 17,608 59,000 24,792 37,636 26,790 19,445 Col REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Okanogan River, Oroville, WA Pilchuck River, WA 2 Pilchuck River, Everett, WA 2 Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA2 Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT2 Pysht River, Sekiu, WA 2 Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA2 Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA 2 Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA2 Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA2 Rock Creek, Granite County, MT2 Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT" Rock Creek Road, MT2 Rye Creek, MT' St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID Sammamish River, WA Sauk River, WA2 Sewage Treatment Plant, Missoula, MT'2 Shelton Creek, WA' Skagit Creek, WA (Avon Bypass) Skagit River, WA (Levee and Channel Improvements) Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA2 Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA2 Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 66-1)2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 67-1)2 Snohomish River, Lowell- Snohomish River Road, WA2 For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Status Report for Construction Maintenance Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1982 1971 1980 1971 1964 1977 1981 1972 1981 1961 1974 1973 1980 1973 1942 1967 1974 1965 1979 1968 1982 1966 1980 1980 1963 1966 1967 1969 1,779,50015 10,713 54,000 30,973 11,291 86,160 125,000 39,300 208,000 15,92816 49,657 31,565 50,000 22,819 357,698 2,582,536' 20,860 50,00018 872,02119 54,4687 1,934,79220 46,489 93,000 137,000 40,753 17,719 50,00021 44,227 38-28 TABLE 38-E (Continued) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA'2 Snoqualmie River, West Snoqulamie, WA2 Soleduck River Bridge, WA2 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA2 Spokane, Spokane River, WA Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA' Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA2 Stillwater River, MT2 Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MTr Strong Creek, Hope, ID 2 Tahola, WA2 Upper Puyallup River, WA3 Wenatchee Canyons 1 and 2, WA4 West Fork Foster Creek, WA2 Willapa River at Raymond, WA Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA2 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA2 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (WR-1-72)2 Yakima, Yakima River, WA Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA2 Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River, near Cle Elum, WA2 Ydma River, West Richland, WA2r Yiina River, Yakima, WA2 Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1970 1977 1961 1963 1939 1970 1964 1973 1977 1970 1979 1938 1977 1958 1982 1976 1969 1972 1948 1949 1947 1977 1983 60,90022 15,565 16,43623 11,433 2,9448 271,713 50,00024 17,457 34,513 8,442 223,893 71,49525 544,331 19,513 508,13026 111,072 50,00027 50,000 381,961 8,047 48,272 36,768 125,500 Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of S205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of un 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. p thorzed by Works Progress Administration Project No. -917 4AUthorized by Secretary of Army under authority of 201, Public Law 298, 89th Congress, H. Doc. 91-370. 5Excludes $10,000 contributed funds expended. 6lncludes $8,000 appropriated and $7,998 expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $13,500 contributed funds expended. "Excludes $24,728 contributed funds expended. sPreconstruction planning only. 9Excludes $14,300 for restudy. 38-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) 'oExcludes Public Works Acceleration Act funds of $340,066. "Excludes $3,314 contributed funds expended. 12Excludes $21,807 contribued funds expended. "3Excludes $189,000 Federal Highway Administration funds expended. '4Includes $125,000 preauthorization cost. '5 Includes $160,700 for preauthorization cost. "'6Excludes $4,843 contributed funds expended. '7Excludes $696,923 contributed funds expended. Includes $117,420 preconstruction planning. "Excludes $5,340 contributed funds expended. "'Includes $100,221 preauthorization cost. 2"lncludes $1,806,792 for preconstruction planning cost. 21Excludes $24,488 contributed funds expended. 22Excludes $14,307 contributed funds expended. 23Excludes $1,960 contributed funds expended. 24Excludes $46,182 contributed funds expended. 25Emergency Relief Funds, Works Progress Administration. Excludes $13,704 contributed funds expended. 26lIncludes $32,630 for preconstruction planning cost. 27Excludes $21,311 contributed funds expended. 38-30 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA 1954 350,0001 'For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended Public Law 544, 83d Congress. Project constructed by Grant for acquisition of lands under partnership arrangement for County Public Utility District. Priest Rapids and Wanapum Dams, in accordance with TABLE 38-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthoized Expended Expended Chrbia River Basin, Ical h*cn Projects, ID, MT, adWk Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA & Regis River, MT Wenatchee River, WA s y Inle, WA (Uncomnpleted Portion) PtAngele Harbor, WA (Unc mpleted Portion) Nt Gamble Harbor, WA (Unromnpleted Portion) SRiver, WA (Uncpleted Portion) 1958 1958 1958 1950 1960 1953 1950 1964 1978 1978 1978 1977 1977 1978 $ 9,100 4,40 4 ( 2,00O c 'Incrlounde ps $la1n0n0 ifnogr. preauthorization studies and $9,000 for pre- 2Includes $3,000 for preauthorization studies and $1,400 for preconstruction planning. Preauthoarization studies only. 38-31 -- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 38-H LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (See Section 7) Section Large Lock Small Lock Miles above mouth 1/ 1 Clear width of chamber Feet 80 28 Maximum available length Feet 760 123 Lift Feet 26 26 Depth on upper miter sill' Feet 33/2 16 Depth on intermediate miter sill2 Feet 29 - Depth on lower miter sill2 Feet 29 16 Character of foundation Clay Clay Kind of dam Fixed dam with Fixed dam with gated spillway. gated spillway. Type of construction Concrete Concrete Year completed 1916 1916 Cost 3 3 'Low water in upper pool. 3Cost of double lock and dam was $2,224,712 and the 2Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. emergency gates, completed in 1923, $174,693. TABLE 38-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Washington: Bellingham Harbor Kenmore Navigation Channel Lake Crockett Olympia Harbor Port Angeles Harbor Shilshole Bay, Seattle Tacoma Harbor May 1984 December 1983 May 1984 August 1984 April 1984 May 1984 October 1983 38-32 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 858, 80TH CONGRESS, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Bowman Hilton Mobile Home Park, WA Cottonwood Creek, Deer Lodge, MT Dosewallips River, Brinnon, WA Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA Sultan, WA TOTAL Fiscal Year Costs (1984) $ 3,705 4,674 28,916 49,810 31,919 $ 119,024 TABLE 38-K EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES REPAIR, FLOOD FIGHTING, AND RESCUE WORK (PUBLIC LAW 99, 84TH CONG., AND ANTECEDENT LEGISLATION) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs (1984) Advance preparation Repair and restoration: Kittitas County, WA Whatcom County, WA TOTAL 38-33 l TABLE 38-J $ 203,986 56,001 765,345 $1,025,332 - - -- -- I 1 \ 11 I W -I WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT * This District consists of all Columbia River drainage and tributaries thereto between the head of the McNary pool (River Mile 345.4) and the Umatilla Bridge (River Mile 290.5) below McNary Dam, except the Yakima River Basin above the Van Giesen Street Bridge near Richland, WA. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation F 1. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .......................... Flood Control 2. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects ................ 3. Big Wood River, ID ..................... 4. Boise River, ID ......................... 5. Colfax, Palouse, River, WA ............... 6. Cottonwood Creek Community Church Culdesac, ID ........................... 7. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................... 8. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ......................... 9. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees ......... 10. Lucky Peak Lake, ID .................... 11. Mill Creek Lake, WA ..................... 12. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations..................... 13. Sewage Lagoons, Vale, OR .............. 14. South Fork, Boise River, ID.............. 15. Weiser River, ID ........................ 16. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR ......... Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 17. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID ........ 18. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam-Lake Sacajawea, WA....................... 19. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID and W A .............................. 20). Little Goose Lock and Dam- Lake Bryan, WA........................ 21. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA ........ SLower Monumental Lock and Dam-Lake Herbert G. West, WA . . .. . . . .. 'age 23. Lower Snake River Fish & Wildlife 39-2 Compensation Plan, WA, OR, ID ........ 24. McNary Lock and Dam-Lake Wallula- OR and W A ............................ 25. Snake River Downstream from Johnson 39-2 Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID ........... 39-2 Page 39-8 39-8 39-9 39-2 General Investigations 39-2 26. Surveys................................. 39-9 27. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... 39-10 39-2 28. Continuation of Planning and Engineering........................ 39-10 39-2 29. Advance Engineering and Design ........ 39-10 39-3 39-3 39-3 39-3 39-4 39-4 39-4 39-4 39-4 Tables Table 39-A Table 39-B Table 39-C Table 39-D Table 39-E Table 39-F Table 39-G Table 39-H 39-5 Table 39-I 39-5 Table 39-J4 39-6 39-6 39-7 39-7 Table 39-K Cost & Financial Statement ..... 39-11 Authorizing Legislation ........ 39-14 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 39-17 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................... 39-17 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projectsm......... 39-19 Columbia River Basin, .ocal Flood Control Projects ......... 39-19 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................ 39-20 Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, Powerplant and Impoundment ....................... 39-21 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID ...................... 39-25 39-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Navigation 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $2,853 for Port of Clarkston, WA study. Flood Control 2. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Location. Improvements included in this project are along Columbia River and its tributaries. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1950 approved a general comprehensive plan for Columbia River Basin for flood control and other purposes based on plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial accomplishment of certain projects. Of that authorization, an amount not to exceed $15 million was allotted for construction of local flood protection works throughout Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions that all work undertaken pursuant to authorization should be economically justified prior to construction, and local cooperation specified in 1936 Flood Control Act, as amended, should be required. (See Tables 39-B and 39-H for projects in Walla Walla District.) Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. No projects were recommended for deauthorization during the fiscal year. 3. BIG WOOD RIVER, ID Location. Along Big Wood River from Eagle Creek downstream through the cities of Ketchum, Hailey and Bellevue to the Glendale Bridge in Blaine County, ID. Existing project. Debris removal from a 27.2-mile reach of the Big Wood River near Hailey, ID. Local cooperation. Flood Control District No. 9 has sponsored the project and complied with sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Work was initiated and will be completed in FY 1985. 4. BOISE RIVER, ID Location. In Ada and Canyon Counties, ID from the mouth of Boise River, upstream through city of Caldwell, ID to city of Boise, ID. Existing project. Tree and brush removal from Boise River starting at Boise, ID downstream to Caldwell, ID and gravel removal at six locations from Caldwell, ID downstream to the mouth of the Boise River, a total of 54.5 miles. Local cooperation. Flood Control Districts Nos. 10 and 11 and the city of Boise, ID sponsored the project for their respective areas of jurisdiction and complied with sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Work was initiated and will be completed in FY 1985. 5. COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WA Location. On the main stem North and South Forks of the Palouse River and includes a portion of Spring Flat Creek, a tributary stream, all within the city of Colfax, Washington. Existing project. Project consists of 3740 feet of concrete lined channel, 4910 feet of revetted channel, and 2330 feet of unrevetted channel and drainage structures. Authorizing legislation was provided under PL 78-534, Section 10, Flood Control Act of 1944. Local cooperation. The city of Colfax has provided the necessary right of way and other sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Several concrete flood slabs on the South Fork were cracked and in danger of being uplifted; they were removed and replaced. A problem with storm water collecting behind the levees was corrected by the construction of a drainage ditch on the North Fork in the vicinity of the Sixth Street Bridge. 6. COTTONWOOD CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCH, CULDESAC, ID Location. On Cottonwood Creek, Nez Perce County, ID. The project is located one mile upstream of the mouth of Cottonwood Creek at river mile 19 on the Clearwater River, near Myrtle, ID. Existing project. A levee was built for flood protection by locals in prior years. Local cooperation. Local entities have provided rights of way and other sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Fiscal completion of bank protection work accomplished in FY 1983. 7. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to SectiO 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amende& Fiscal year costs were $234,978 for preauthorizati studies: $1,800, Big Wood River, Hailey, ID; $7 , Burnt River, Baker County, OR; $3,200, Lawyer ceek Kamiah, ID; $217,174, Salmon River Vicinity of seJ mon, ID; and $5,304, Salmon River, Lemnhi CountY, ID. Emergency flood control activities-repair4 fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 9 9 , Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $84,483 for dis" ter preparedness, $101,611 for emergency operatioS 39-2 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT $414,616 for rehabilitation, and $263,246 for advance measures. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Congress). Fiscal year costs were $19,810 for preauthorization studies: $7,500, Malheur River,Malheur County, OR; $7,500, Owyhee River, Malheur County, OR; $700, Pine Creek, Halfway, OR; $2,000, Salt River, WY; $2,100, Snake River, Heise Roberts, ID; and $10, Touchet River, WA 8. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal law requires local interests to maintain and operate completed local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise local interests as necessary of measures required to correct deficiencies. A contract to investigate the geological and seismological conditions at Ririe Dam, ID continued through the fiscal year. See Table 39-I for inspections made during fiscal year. Fiscal year costs were $498,891. Total costs to September 30, 1984 have been $1,217,067. 9. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspections are pursuant to Public Law 84-99 which directs the Corps to establish through inspection whether n0on-federal flood control works will continue to provide the intended degree of flood protection and to determine if the maintenance program is adequate. FY 1984 costs for this program were $38,987. 10. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Location. On Boise River in southwestern Idaho about 10 miles southeast of city of Boise. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam about 250 feethigh above streambed and 1,700 feet long at crest, with a lake providing a total storage at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acre-feet. (For further details Peeage 2000 of Annual Report for 1962.) Construction of existing project was initiated November 1949 and completed June 1961. A feasible method of achieving better flood control through diversion ilto New York Canal, through Lake Lowell, and into the Snake River has been developed but rejected by local interests due to the infrequent use of this divermethod. Since 1961, $103,331,000 in potential f amages have been prevented by the project. l Environmental Impact Statement on the initial roject was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on November 29, 1976. A revised draft Environmental Impact Statement for the modification work Wfiled with the Council on Environmental Quality O September 18, 1978. -dtuhrei npgo ttheen tdiaelt ailed investigation of outlet capacity for adding hydropower to the existing project, a need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction of an auxiliary outlet was authorized in the Water Resource Development Act of 1976 but to date it has not been funded. In FY 1978, an "Interim Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and Lake" (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, agencies, and the Chief o' Engineers have commented on the report to the Secretary of the Army. The report was forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget in February 1982. No further action has been taken. A license to construct and operate power facilities at the project was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Project #2832) to the Boise Project Board of Control on June 10, 1980 and modified on October 9, 1980. The license required that construction begin within two years and be completed within four years of the issuing date of the license. A two year extension of the license was granted on June 10, 1982 by FERC. Construction of an auxiliary outlet tunnel by a public power utility was started in May 1984 and is expected to be completed in June 1985. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation for flood control, recreation, and irrigation continued. A contract was awarded and work began on rehabilitation of the existing outlet structure. Work consists of the placement of steel liners on the flip lip section which is immediatzly downstream from the outlet control valves. Code 710: Federal recreation funds of $71,400 were expended on the installation of two vault toilets; one at Placer Point and Charcoal Flat recreation area. 11. MILL CREEK LAKE, WA Location. In and upstream from Walla Walla, WA, on Mill Creek, a tributary of Walla Walla River. Existing project. Off-stream earthfill storage dam about 145 feet high and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concrete-lined outlet channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and division structures. Authorizing legislation to provide a channel through the city of Walla Walla was added to the project in 1941. Federal cost of original project was $2,162,155. Adding recreation facilities has thus far increased project costs by $96,340 to $2,258,495. Not included in that cost is $80,000 contributed by local interests toward construction of the channel through Walla Walla. (For further details see page 2005 of Annual Report for 1962.) Construction of dam and appurtenant works was completed in 1942. Paving of channel through city of Walla Walla was completed in 1948. Park and recreation facilities were opened to the public July 1, 1964. Since 1942, $4,143,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the combined storage and channel operation. 39-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on December 12, 1975. The rehabilitation of the existing project is designed to correct the seepage and internal erosion which have occurred during each subsequent filling of the reservoir requiring limited flood control use of the project. Project cost estimate for the rehabilitation is $17,400,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 2006 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. Major rehabilitation. New work: Contract for concrete cutoff wall at the dam is complete. Work was completed on the return channel from the reservoir to Mill Creek. Rehabilitation work also began on segments of project channels that have deteriorated. Work commenced on the construction of a new debris collection facility in the diversion structure forebay and seals on diversion control gates. This work will enable the channels to handle short duration standard project floods. Code 710: Federal recreation funds of $27,894 were expended for new restroom facilities at Rooks Park. Maintenance: Routine maintenance by Government forces continued, which included regulation of water control structures and care of recreation areas. 12. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was accomplished under several authorities. Regulations of Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoir in Idaho, and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and Mason Reservoirs in Oregon, was accomplished as authorized under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and coordinated with the Bureau of Reclamation. Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, Arrowrock Reservoir, and Lake Lowell were in accordance with formal agreements with the Bureau of Reclamation. Regulation of American Falls, Owyhee, Magic, Mackay, Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, Idaho, for flood control was accomplished under informal agreements. Brownlee, Oxbow, and Hells Canyon Reservoirs provided flood control regulation in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Commission license to Idaho Power Company. Fiscal year costs were $203,810. 13. SEWAGE LAGOONS, VALE, OR Location. On the Malheur River, Malheur County, OR. The project is located on the west half of Section 21 and east half of Section 20, T18S, R45E, Boise Meridian. Existing project. Channel rectification, levees and bank protection were provided to the city of Vale under Public Law 516 in 1960. The city has maintained the project and periodically placed concrete and asphalt rubble on the streambank for protection. Local cooperation. The city has sponsored the project and complied with sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Under Section 14 of Public Law 79-526 the unstable vertical bank between the city's sewage lagoons and the river was stabilized by placing stone riprap with bedding material on 800 feet of riverbank. The bank had been severely eroded by heavy spring runoff. Further erosion could have resulted in breaching of the lagoons and contamination of the Malheur River with the contents of the lagoons. Work is completed. 14. SOUTH FORK, BOISE RIVER, ID Location. In Elmore County, ID from village of Pine, ID (River Mile 58) upstream to village of Featherville, ID (River Mile 68). Existing project. Organic debris removal from a 10-mile distance and restoring channel alignment and an existing levee near the Ballentyne Subdivision (River Mile 63). Local cooperation. Elmore County has sponsored the project and complied with sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Since the region receives heavy recreational use in the late summer months, work was restricted to non-peak recreation season and will be completed in FY 1985. 15. WEISER RIVER, ID Location. In Washington County from mouth of Weiser River upstream to Galloway Diversion Dam. Existing project. Gravel removal at six locations from a distance of approximately 13.2 miles. Local cooperation. Flood Control District No. 3 has sponsored the project and complied with sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Work was initiated and will be completed in FY 1985. 16. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Location. On Willow Creek immediately upstream from Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. Project provides flood protection to the city of Heppner and downstream area by con" trolling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam is a roller compacted concrete strUCture 160 feet high at crest elevation 2130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway withe maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs, an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the proji is 13,250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acrefeet fo exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for jownt control and irrigation, 1,750 acre-feet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlie, 39-4 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities are being provided. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 20, 1979. The provisions of the Clean Water )A were met by a Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation and a public notice issued January 12, 1980, and a Section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. Contracts have been completed for relocation of the city water main, and construction of the water tank, road, and Main Dam. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Main dam construction was completed in March 1983. Core drilling and pressure grouting work designed to control seepage within the dam is completed. Other major contract work was the building of Alfalfa Street bridge and channel, right abutment access road, latex cement treatment on deck of dam, fencing at site, and boat launching ramp at Willow Creek Lake. Maintenance: (See Portland, OR District Annual Report). Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 17. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Location. Dam is on North Fork Clearwater River 1.9 miles above its junction with Clearwater River, near Orofino, ID, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. A straight concrete gravity dam about 717 feet in maximum structural height above foundation and 3,300 feet long at crest elevation 1613. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 3,453,000 acre-feet, of which 2,000,000 acre-feet are effective for both local and regional flood control, and for at-site and downstream power generation. In addition, the reservoir, extending 53 miles into a rugged and relatively inaccessible timberland, provides important transportation savings in connection with movenents of marketable logs. The project also provides substantial recreation benefits. Powerhouse includes two 90,000 and one 220,000 kilowatt generating units, wit provisions for three additional 220,000 kilowatt Uits for an ultimate installed capacity of 1,060,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 394. tish passage at Dworshak Dam is not feasible due tOheheight of the dam and a hatchery has been built below the dam to assure continuance of anadromous . The reservoir area has been habitat for elk t and other wildlife. Project plans include acquisi- Ofboigna me woiunttseird be rorewsseer vaoriera lsi miniutsn dtoa tmedi tbiyg aretes elrovsoseisr. Clstruction of the project started April 1963 and is '3Dlete except for recreation facilities and fish and dlife development. It became operational for flood contl June 1972 and has prevented about $737,000 in potential flood damages downstream since then. All project lands have been acquired except those required to replace the loss of wildlife browse areas from inundation by reservoir. Relocations are estimated to be 100 percent complete; dam, 100 percent; fish and wildlife facilities, 96 percent; powerplant, 100 percent; reservoir clearing, 100 percent; and recreation facilities, 90 percent. A reconnaissance report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the addition of a 220,000-kilowatt fourth generating unit was completed in FY 1978. Environmental and economic studies on additional generating units have been curtailed due to public opposition. Units 4, 5, and 6 are now classified "inactive." Power generating Unit No.1,90,000-kilowatt capacity, was put in service March 1, 1973; Unit No. 2, also 90,000-kilowatt capacity, began producing April 6, 1973; Unit No. 3, 220,000-kilowatt capacity, went on the line April 20, 1973. Power generation through September 1984 has been 22.48 billion kilowatt hours. Eighty mini-recreation sites have been established along the reservoir shoreline. Each site includes at least a picnic table, U.S. Forest Service-type fireplace, and chemical toilet. Some of the sites have several picnic tables. Dent Acres and Freeman Creek recreation sites are open to the public. Facilities consist of a boat launching ramp, boat docks, car-trailer parking, comfort stations, and fully developed overnight camping at each site. Estimated total cost for new work is $330,321,300 consisting of $327,581,300 for construction and $2,740,000 for value of public-domain lands. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Wildlife habitat browse development continues on project lands to provide winter browse for elk and deer. Contracts were awarded and work began on a 5.3 mile section of the road to Freeman Creek Recreation area. Other work included seal coating of project roads and the stockpiling of aggregate material. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Hatchery operations were impaired by an infection of IHN virus which caused a nine percent decrease in steelhead smolt releases from 1983 levels. In Spring 1984, 1,961,372 steelhead smolts weighing 338,847 pounds were released. A return of 3284 adults in Spring 1984 was expected to produce the hatchery's capacity of 2,900,000 smolts for 1985 release; however, virtually all were killed by the viral infection. After the infection was brought under control, 2,100,000 smolts were acquired from Kooskia hatchery. In addition to steelhead, the hatchery released 99,800 rainbow trout weighing 19,099 pounds into the reservoir in 1984. 18. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM-LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Location. On Snake River 9.7 miles above river mouth at head of Lake Wallula and 12 miles east of Pasco, WA. 39-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, appurtenant facilities, and relocation of railroads. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Reservoir has normal operating range between elevations 440 and 437 mean sea level, and extends upstream about 31.9 miles, providing slack water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Structure is about 2,790 feet long and about 130 feet high above streambed. Beginning at south end, project consists of a concrete nonoverflow section, concrete powerhouse, spillway dam, navigation lock, and an earth and rockfill embankment at north abutment. Fish passing facilities, including two ladders, are provided. Powerplant now has three 90,000-kilowatt units and three 111,000-kilowatt units in operation. Spillway dam is 610 feet long, and overflow crest at Elevation 391 mean sea level is surmounted by 10 radial gates, 50 feet wide by 51 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 453 mean sea level and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide and 14 feet deep is provided from the mouth of the Snake River to the dam. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started December 1955 and the project was placed in useful operation January 1962. The projject is complete. An Environmental Impact Statement concerning power units 4 through 6 was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality August 1971. Power generation through September 1984 has been 53.36 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, Code 710: Federal recreation funds of $200,106 were expended for two comfort stations at Fishhook Park. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Work continued on protective relaying, replacement of three circuit breakers, seal coating of project roads, relocation of Charbonneau Park sanitary facilities, generator thrust bearing repair, armor plate and timber replacement on the navigation lock. A total of 3.5 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 3,770,935 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1983. 19. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Location. On the Snake River, River Mile 141.3,1.7 miles upstream of the existing interstate bridge connecting the towns of Lewiston, ID and Clarkston, WA. Existing project. The project consists of a new fixed high-level four lane highway bridge and approaches on U.S. Highway 12 across the Snake River constructed at a cost "not to exceed $21,000,000." In December 1981 Congress authorized an additional expenditure of $2,200,000 for construction of Lewiston's North Ramp which had been an unfunded additive item. An approach roadway from the bridge to 16th Avenue in Clarkston, WA was authorized in July 1983 at an additional expenditure of $800,000. Final Environmental Impact Statement Supplement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on July 16, 1979. Local cooperation. Non-Federal interests have provided, without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the bridge and its approaches, and after construction have agreed to own, operate toll free, and maintain the bridge and approach facilities. The non- Federal costs for land and relocation are $755,193. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the main bridge structure and Lewiston ramp is complete. Work started on the 1600-foot roadway from the bridge to 16th Avenue in Clarkston, WA. 20. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM-LAKE BRYAN, WA Location. Dam is 70.3 miles above mouth of Snake River at head of Lower Monumental Lake, about 40 airline miles northerly of Walla Walla, WA, and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a darn, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities. Improvements provide navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 638 and 633 mean sea level. Lake Bryan extends upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Dam structure is 2,670 feet long and about 160 feet high above streambed and consists of a powerhouse, spillway dam, navigation lock, and necessary nonoverflow sections. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse now has six 135,000-kilowatt generating units for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam can pass a design flood of 850,000 cub feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type Wn clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a lon. imum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Relocations along the lake include 32 miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 5.8 miles of county roads, 2.2 miles of state highways, and Central Ferry bridge. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. A final Environmental Impact Statement was fled with the Council on Environmental Quality on ary 8, 1975. Power generation through September 1984 has been 40.25 billion kilowatt hours. 39-6 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. A total of 3.88 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy was delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Work completed included draft tube drain cleaning, navigation lock discharge culvert bulkhead and guide repair, installation of voltage regulators, spillway gate position indicators, turbine oil sump modifications and the purchase of a spare traveling fish screen with spare parts. Work is continuing on repairs to spillway gates. Problems with the fish collection facilities caused a high incidence of gas bubble disease symptoms and generally poor fish conditions causing an early closure in 1983. Several interim modifications have been made in 1984 including the application of shotcrete to the surface of the fingerling tunnel to alleviate last year's problems, until a new permanent facility can be constructed. Atotal of 3,218,032 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1983. 21. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Location. At River Mile 107.5 on Snake River at head of Lake Bryan and about 33 miles downstream from Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The facility includes a dam, Powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities, and requires about 8 miles of backwater levees along Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, ID. Benefits afforded by project include Slack-water navigation, power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Water surface at the dam Vies between Elevations 738 and 724 to maintain a 7ormal operating range between Elevations 738 and 733 in the Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area. Dam structure is about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet khigh above streambed. Powerhouse now has six 135,000- lowatt units. Spillway has a capacity for a design sood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation dS lock ingle- ft type (105 feet maximum) with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started July 1965 and is complete. cquisition of lands is also complete. Lake was filled Pebruary 15, 1975 and the first power generating unit etontheline April15,1975. Approximately $4,111,000 "'e Pleovteeenst ial flood damage has been prevented since became functional. An Environmental Impact atement was filed with the Council on Environment. Quality November 1971. A revised statement to 'Clude the additional units was filed with the Council oEfnn me Quality on July 23, 1975. Installaakof three additional 135,000-kilowatt generating Uiit was completed in May 1978. 2�wer generation through September 1984 has been lon kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, Code 710: Funds were expended for the installation of a new prefab restroom located in the recreation area next to the Clarkston Resource Office in Clarkston, WA. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Work completed includes construction of fish barge moorage facility, cleaning of draft tube drains, armor plating on navigation lock wall, turbine head cover modifications, security fencing around fingerling facility and purchase of a spare traveling fish screen with spare parts and trash shear boom. Work continues on spillway gate position indicators. A combination painting-sandblasting building and an addition to the Clarkston Resource Office were also completed. As the first collection point on the Snake River, Lower Granite is a primary component in the District's fish trapping and transport program. This program was begun because construction of eight dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers has had a significant impact on the life cycle and migration patterns of anadromous fish such as salmon and steelhead trout. Since the early 1960's, efforts to mitigate the adverse impacts have included extensive studies, structural modifications of the dams, installation of turbine screening systems, and implementation of a system for trapping and transporting juvenile fish. The Walla Walla District operates the fish trapping and transportation program for the Columbia-Snake system. Three primary collection points have been established at Lower Granite, Little Goose and McNary dams, with fish sorting and handling facilities. Fingerlings collected at these facilities are taken by specially designed barges and trucks to an area below Bonneville Dam and released to make the rest of their journey to the sea. In 1983 and 1984 a total of 7,562,999 and 8,946,732 fingerlings were transported. In 1982 and 1983, state and federal fishery agencies, as well as the tribes, requested increased spills at each dam as a back-up means of insuring continuance of the fish runs. This philosophy of spreading-the-risk is likely to continue for the foreseeable future and will necessitate both increased spillage for fish passage and a viable trapping and transport program. Advances in fish research and technology will no doubt require modifications to the facilities currently in use. A total of 3.92 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 1,997,377 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1983. 22. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM-LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Location. On Snake River at head of Lake Sacajawea, about 45 miles northeast of Pasco, WA, and 41.6 miles above river mouth. 39-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Existing project. The facility includes a dam, powerplant, fish ladders, navigation lock, appurtenant facilities, and relocated railroads and highways. The project functions include navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation and irrigation. Reservoir has normal operating range between Elevations 540 and 537. The lake extends about 28.7 miles upstream to Little Goose Lock and Dam. The dam is concrete gravity type with earthfill and rockfill abutments. It is 3,800 feet long including abutments, spillway, navigation lock, and powerhouse, and is about 135 feet high above streambed. There are two fish ladders, one at each end of the dam. Powerhouse has six 135,000-kilowatt units for a total capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway is 508 feet long, and overflow crest at Elevation 483 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 8 radial gates, each 50 feet wide and 61 feet high. Deck is at Elevation 553 feet and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type, with lock chamber 86 by 675 feet and minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction began June 1961, and the project was opened to navigation April 1969. The project is complete. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on May 21, 1976. Power generation through September 1984 has been 41.33 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Concrete repair to the navigation lock monolith was completed. Work continues on reconditioning of spillway gates and turbine repair to Unit #1. A total of 3.72 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy was delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Cargoes totaling 3,315,635 tons passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1983. 23. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, ID Location. At various locations within the Columbia Snake River drainage in the States of Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Existing project. The project will consist of a series of fish hatcheries and wildlife development areas at sites to be selected. The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of construction of four multiple purpose dams and reservoirs on the Lower Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite). In 1980 the first release from the McCall, ID summer chinook hatchery was made and the adult trapping facility which provides the fish egg supply for the McCall Hatchery became operational. The real estate design memorandum and feature design memorandums on the McCall Hatchery, Hagerman Hatchery, Lookingglass Hatchery, Lyons Ferry Hatchery, Dworshak Hatchery Expansion, Irrigon Hatchery, Buhl (Magic Valley) Hatchery, Sawtooth Hatchery, East Fork Salmon River Satellite Facility, the off-project wildlife lands, and the site selection report have all been approved. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality on November 2,1977. The compensation plan is 55 percent complete. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $168,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: McCall Hatchery, Lookingglass Hatchery, Lyons Ferry Phase I Hatchery, and spring chinook rearing facilities at Dworshak National Fish Hatchery are in operation. The latter three facilities made their first releases in FY 1983. Construction contracts were awarded for: automatic fish feeding system, Irrigon Hatchery, OR; rearing pond modification, Lyons Ferry, WA; Tucannon River Hatchery Satellite Facility, WA; operators residences, Sawtooth Hatchery, ID; fish acclimation pond, Cottonwood, ID; Irrigon Fish Hatchery, Irrigon, OR; Wallowa Satellite Hatchery, Wallowa, OR; water supply system pump repair, Lyons Ferry, WA. The design for Magic Valley, formerly called Crystal Springs, is complete. The final hatchery site has been selected at Ahsahka, Idaho, for the Clearwater River basin. This hatchery will rear both spring chinook and steelhead. Studies are continuing to identify satellite sites for this hatchery. Contacts with landowners for participation in off-project wildlife pro, grams in Washington are continuing. Several appraisals have been made but are not presently approved. Acquiring the various lands for wildlife compensation has been a problem. In March 1983 a report was prepared for Congress on the progress in implementing the plan. This report is currently being reviewed. The report recommends continuation of the willing-seller, willing-buyer acquisition but requests authority to acquire any combination of upland game, chukar hab itat, or fisherman access in fee and/or by easement. 24. McNARY LOCK AND DAMLAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 292 miles above mouth, near Umatilla, Oregon, and 3 miles above mouth of Umatilla River. Existing project. Includes a concrete dam 7 feet long overall and 183 feet high above streaibed powerplant with 14 power generating units, navigation 39-8 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT lock, fishways, levees and pumping plants, incidental irrigation, and modification and relocation of railroad bridges over the Columbia and Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started May 1947 and is complete. Project placed on permanent operating basis and lake raised to Elevation 340 in November 1953. Except for maintenance interruptions, all 14 power units have been in commercial operation since February 1957. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1976. Power generation through September 1984 has been 183.77 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, Code 710: Federal recreation funds of $223,599 were expended for two comfort stations at Hood Park and West McNary Park. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. Work accomplished during the year includes: acquisition of two spare traveling fish screens and spare parts; modifications to levee pumping plant; installation of fire detection system; oil pumps and 3D cams; transformer heat exchangers; and repair and modernization of elevator controls; Hood Park ramp and parking area. Contractual work continued on modification to intake gates and modernization of generator control system. Approximately 7.02 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 6,446,035 tons of commodities passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1983. 25. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA, AND ID Location. On Snake River downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, River Mile 230. Snake River, which islargest tributary of Columbia River, rises in Yellowstone National Park in western part of Wyoming, flows generally westerly for about 1,000 miles, and empties into Columbia River near Pasco, WA, 324 miles from Pacific Ocean. 19E45x isting project. The River and Harbor Act of authorized construction of dams as necessary and open channel improvements for purposes of pro- Viding slack-water navigation and irrigation between mouth of Snake River and Lewiston, ID. That authorization modified previous authorizations only for that portion of improvement below Lewiston, ID. Acts of June 13, 1902, and August 30, 1935, as they pertain to Open river improvement from Lewiston, ID, to John- Son Bar Landing, remain part of existing project. Improvements included in existing project are Ice bor Lock and Dam-Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose S and Dam-Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and am; Lower Monumental Lock and Dam-Lake Hebert G. West; and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in an individual report, and cost and financial data for the entire project are shown on Tables 39-A and 39-K. Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite are in full operation. (See individual reports for details.) (For further details see Annual Reports, page 2246 for 1903; page 1986 for 1906; page 1991 for 1915; and page 1981 for 1962.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. On Snake River from the mouth to Johnson Bar Landing there are 18 privately owned barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum products, fertilizers, cement, and other general cargo. There are also 5 marinas and 28 small-boat launching ramps, all open to public use. The facilities serve slack-water navigation to Snake River Mile 140, the site of Lewiston, ID. That slack-water reaches the Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area since the lake behind Lower Granite Dam was filled in February 1975. Operations during fiscal year. See individual reports for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite locks and dams. On Snake River from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted and survey markers were maintained. General Investigations 26. SURVEYS The Upper Snake River and Tributaries is the principal ongoing survey. The area covered by the study extends from the headwaters of the Snake River in Wyoming down to and including the Weiser River in Idaho. The potential for water storage, power generation, supplemental and streamflow augmentation to enhance fisheries, continues to be the primary focus. A survey study of the Mill Creek Basin continued in FY 1984. Mill Creek originates in the Blue Mountains in northern Oregon and southern Washington, and is tributary to the Walla Walla River. Water resource problems and needs being investigated include municipal and industrial water supply, power generation, fish enhancement, flood control, and irrigation. The Columbia River and Tributaries is a survey study directed by the North Pacific Division in which the Walla Walla District is participating. The feasibility of utilizing an outlet at McNary Lock and Dam to furnish water downstream on the Oregon shore for municipal, industrial, irrigation, and fish enhancement use is the primary investigation for Walla Walla District under this study. Also, identification of additional potential water storage sites for the Columbia River System was continued. Total cost of surveys during fiscal year was $736,879. That sum was expended for: flood control studies, $562,223; special studies including Soil Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, River Basin and Regional Planning Commissions, Cooperation with 39-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 States, $46,007; and Special Investigations and FERC Licensing Activities, $128,649. 27. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year flood hazard data for a number of locations in the District were collected and analyzed. Flood information was provided to several Federal agencies, to the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, to various cities and counties in those states, and to some private organizations. Total cost of collection and study of basic data during fiscal year was $105,000 which was expended for flood plain management services, $45,000; and technical services, $60,000. 28. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING McNary Lock and Dam (Second Powerhouse) OR and WA McNary Second Powerhouse is a proposed addition on the south shore of McNary Lock and Dam on the Columbia River near Umatilla, OR. The project will increase the present 1127 megawatt generating capacity by an additional 742 megawatts. Provisions are included for compensation of negative impacts on fish and wildlife. The project is estimated to cost $649,000,000 at October 1, 1984 price levels. Annual power benefits are estimated to be $90,063,000. The General Design Memorandum Phase I was prepared under the Water Resource Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, and submitted to the Secretary of the Army on July 1, 1981. Studies were initiated in FY 1982 and continued through FY 1984 on the General Design Memorandum Phase II and the Powerhouse Preliminary Design Report. FY 1984 expenditures were $1,332,727. 29. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Zintel Canyon Dam, WA The proposed project consists of a roller compacted concrete dam 102 feet high with uncontrolled spillway and a fixed maximum release outlet works that would create a detention reservoir of 2,500 acre-feet of capacity. The storage comprises 2,100 acre-feet for flood control and 400 acre-feet for sediment. In addition, the project also includes a channel with a capacity of 400 cfs. The plan of improvement would provide protection against heavy rainfall, snowmelt, and thunderstorm floods to the city of Kennewick, WA. Estimated Federal project cost is $10,200,000; non-Federal, $1,500,000. Reevaluation of the project was initiated to review economic feasibility with fiscal year costs of $21,121. 39-10 TABLE 39-A WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 360, 1984 3. Big Wood New Work River, ID 4. Boise River, ID 5. Colfax, Palouse River, ID 6. Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Culdesac, ID 10. Lucky Peak Lake, ID 11. Mill Creek Lake, WA 13. Sewage Lagoons, Vale, OR 14. South Fork, Boise River, ID Weiser River, ID Willow Creek Lake, OR Dworshak Dam and Reservior, ID Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 179,000 166,554 232,300 202,864 185,000 107,968 23,400 23,140 260 71,400 19,242 71,400 641,500 658,700 698,800 839,000 653,207 647,109 740,442 654,651 - -- -- 27,894 - - - 27,894 220,140 220,400 299,044 317,200 215,360 223,960 298,254 302,422 6,382,000 2,770,000 1,596,734 1,775,000 6,313,198 2,846,712 1,594,699 1,710,362 67,000 8,100 20,000 78,500 92,500 12,073 - -- -- 108,000 - - - 65,738 5,283,000 19,730,000 4,993,540 4,269,000 5,543,180 19,820,937 4,977,858 3,937,107 (See Portland, OR District Table 37-A) 179,000 166,554 232,300 202,864 5,742,240 5,665,208 23,400 23,400 19,652,0811 19,652,0811 7,892,204 7,701,946 2,258,4952 2,258,4952 5,599,393 5,580,948 12,997,564 12,930,495 87,000 86,502 92,500 12,073 108,000 65,738 37,118,114 36,766,006 4,616,000 3,755,000 1,630,000 3,081,000 325,490,1963 4,729,546 4,061,316 1,634,122 3,052,306 325,460,5663 3,911,700 4,798,496 3,750,922 4,527,800 3,879,789 4,079,228 4,515,463 4,478,567 37,660,7874 37,572,5704 39-11 15. 16. 17. TABLE 39-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 18. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, WA 19. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID & WA 20. Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA 21. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA 22. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA 23. Lower Snake Fish & Wildlife Compensation, ID, OR & WA 24. McNary Lock & Dam-Lake Wallula, OR & WA 25. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA & ID New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 972,000 951,132 30,000 131,082 -2,299 200,106 167,191,7535 -3,290 200,106 167,190,7536 2,953,000 3,549,684 4,800,141 4,004,900 3,216,745 3,665,786 4,869,452 3,969,635 9,050,000 4,535,000 692,664 640,000 8,632,959 4,979,230 693,216 486,402 2,095,850 505,000 1,779,273 1,044,258 41,205,4747 41,146,4227 22,877,644 22,723,939 1,000,500 221,299,0278 11 1,000,036 221,298,5629 2,477,360 2,896,600 4,904,122 5,436,056 2,528,912 2,913,390 4,868,523 5,292,141 31,171,25110 30,890,650 � 3,724,000 2,885,000 2,052,181 394,800 367,705,626" 4,063,602 2,956,258 2,047,995 396,804 367,695,71211 3,350,000 4,684,500 5,896,535 5,249,400 3,372,373 4,788,472 5,776,641 5,263,880 261,150 221,243 49,298 -906 30,488,29712 30,290,57112 -2,600 236,355,61113 -1,706 236,355,59114 2,173,000 2,372,100 3,677,483 4,300,500 2,143,387 2,540,071 3,691,797 3,390,678 14,811,000 18,660,000 19,656,180 25,225,000 15,030,546 19,253,981 19,706,580 25,024,768 27,526,7731 26,575,36715 90,930,780 90,719,674 8,126,000 1,137,000 439,000 202,600 322,496,08616 6,531,897 2,822,859 479,320 203,380 322,495,8631' 6,229,200 8,944,380 10,317,455 14,767,500 7,009,520 8,582,087 11,024,478 12,505,395 104,216,01118 101,906,07518 7,053,000 3,420,000 2,049,882 1,592,806 992,986,78019 7,015,246 4,180,896 2,043,810 1,595,240 992,975,3811' 10,943,360 13,533,584 19,311,281 18,990,856 11,274,502 13,933,979 19,254,422 17,916,334 130,932,31820 129,443,15021 'Includes $570,831 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 2Excludes $96,340 contributed funds, but includes $68,446 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 3Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds appropriated for and expended by Department of Interiloinr Fiscal Years 1969 through 1972 for hatchery operations. Includes $655,000 appropriated and expended for additional unit. 39-12 TABLE 39-A (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 4Includes $13,072,980 regular project operation and maintenance funds expended by Department of Interior starting FY 1972 for hatchery operations. FY 72-78 funds of $6,097,000 were charged to the project as a cost, but not as an expenditure for accounting purposes. Includes $59,996 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. 5Includes $914,256 appropriated for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Excludes $82,500 contributed for artificial spawning channel. Includes $36,699,017 appropriated for additional units 4 through 6. lncludes $913,256 expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $36,699,017 expended for additional units 4 through 6. 7Includes $71,507 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees; $641,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. sIncludes $60,885,811 appropriated for additional units 4 through 6. 91ncludes $60,885,346 expended for additional units 4 through 6. 'oIncludes $621,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. "Includes $46,211,511 appropriated and expended for additional units 4 through 6. Excludes $405,819 contributed funds on lock and dam project. "Includes $338,163 appropriated and expended under 39-13 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 13Includes $51,643,250 appropriated for additional units 4 through 6. 14Includes $51,643,230 expended for additional units 4 through 6. 15Includes $372,376 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 161ncludes $1,976,586 appropriated for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. '7 Includes $1,976,363 expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 18Includes $125,258 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees and $1,035,860 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation ofDams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 19lncludes $400,150 for new work on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston), and $34,613 for new work appropriation used for maintenance prior to 1953. Excludes $167,500 contributed funds for new work consisting of $82,500 for previous projects (Pasco to Riparia), plus $82,500 for new work on existing artificial spawning channel. 20Includes $186,570 appropriated for maintenance on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $353,953 open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. 2'Includes $186,570 expended for maintenance on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $353,570 open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN. LOCAL FLOOD May 17, 1950 3. 4. Sep. 24, 1954 as amended Sep. 24, 1954 as amended Dec. 22, 1944 PROTECTION PROJECTS Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID. Levee left bank. Blackfoot River, ID. Levees, channel improvement, and rectification works. Boise Valley, Boise River, ID. Channel improvement and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized April 18, 1967. Grande Ronde Valley, OR. Levees and channel clearing, straightening, and realignment; would complement stream regulation by upstream storage projects. Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, ID. Channel clearing and rectification, levees, and bank protection. Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID. Revetted levee. Malheur River, OR. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection at Vale. Willow Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Palouse River, WA. Flood protection for urban and rural areas at Garfield and near Malden. Payette Valley, ID. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below Black Canyon Dam. Payette Valley was deauthorized October 3, 1978. Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID. Concrete-lined channel through Pocatello. Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Shelley Area, Snake River, ID. Bank protection Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID. Intermittent channel realignment and improvement, levees, and bank protection, lower river area. BIG WOOD RIVER, ID Debris removal along Big Wood River. BOISE RIVER, ID Tree and brush removal from Boise River; gravel removal at six locations from Caldwell, ID downstream COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WA Provides for flood control works in vicinity of and through Colfax, WA, by channel enlargement and modification, levees, floodwalls, revetments, and modification of railroad bridges. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 208, P.L. 83-780 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 27, 1983 Sec. 208, P.L. 83.780 Authorized by Chief of Engineers March 5, 1984 Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 888, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 39-14 TABLE 39-B (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 6. July 24, 1946 10. July 24, 1946 Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 14. Sep. 24, 1954 as amended 15. Sep. 24, 1954 as amended Oct. 27, 1965 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 15, 1963 18. Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended COTITONWOOD CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCH, CULDESAC, ID Construction of riprap bank protection. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Dam for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. Second outlet for streamflow maintenance. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. MILL CREEK LAKE, WALLA WALLA, WA Off-stream storage project upstream from Walla Walla. Channel improvement through Walla Walla; concrete lined channel. SEWAGE LAGOONS, VALE, OR Construction of riprap bank protection. SOUTH FORK, BOISE RIVER, ID Organic debris removal and restoring channel alignment and an existing levee near the Ballentyne Subdivision WEISER RIVER, ID Gravel bar removal from Weiser River at six locations. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. (BRUCES EDDY) DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Preparation of detailed plans. Bruces Eddy dam and reservoir for flood control, navigation, power, recreation, and area redevelopment. Redesignation of project as Dworshak Dam and Reservoir. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM - LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Unit 1 of 4, Lower Snake River project, Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, March 14, 1983 P.L 79-526, Chief of Engineers Report dated May 13, 1946 P.L. 94-587 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 578, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Aug. 3,1983 Sec. 208, P.L 83-780 Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 11, 1984 Sec. 208, P.L 83-780 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Feb. 14, 1984 H. Doc. 233,89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 51, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 403,87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 88-96 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 39-15 11. 13. 167. 17. I@ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 39-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 22, Dec. 29, July 30, 1976 1981 1983 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 25, 1978 Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended 25. June 13, 1902 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 19. P.L. 94-587 P.L. 97-140 P.L. 98-63 LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Four lane highway bridge and approaches. Increase of authorized amount to $23,200,000. Approach roadway from bridge to Sixteenth Avenue in Clarkston, WA. Increase of authorized amount to $24,000,000. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAMLAKE BRYAN, WA Unit 3 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Bryan. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Unit 4 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, irrigation. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAMLAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Unit 2 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Herbert G. West LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR AND ID Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. McNARY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. SNAKE RIVER MOUTH TO JOHNSON BAR, OR, WA AND ID Open-river navigation. Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. Mouth to Riparia. Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar. Supersedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston, ID, only. See Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. 39-16 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. P.L 91-638 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. P.L 95-285 P.L 94-587 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 127, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 411, 55th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong, 2d Sess. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. TABLE 39-C WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Columbia River and Tribu- Completed 1968 1,851,195 taries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, WA' 'Obviated by The Dalles, John Day, and McNary Projects. TABLE 39-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Asotin Creek, Asotin, IDI Bear Creek, Kendrick, IDI Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Columbia River Basin, ID Blackfoot Reservoir, ID Blackfoot River, Columbia River Basin, ID Boise Valley, Ada County Unit, Columbia River Basin, ID Catherine Creek Lake, OR Connell, WA' Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, ID Dayton, Touchet River, WA Dry Creek, WA' Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA' Esquatzel Coulee, Mesa, WA' Gooding Area, ID I Grande Ronde Lake, OR Grande Ronde Valley, Columbia River Basin, OR Graves Creek, IDI Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID Heise-Roberts Extension, Columbia River Basin, ID (a) Henrys Fork Unit (b) Snake River Unit Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY Kendrick, Potlatch River, Columbia River Basin, ID LaDwai Creek, Culdesac, IDI Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Deferred Deferred Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Deferred Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed 1951 1970 1958 1980 1965 1967 1978 1967 1973 1966 1961 1967 1969 1954 1966 1958 1953 1955 1968 1978 1960 1972 12,019 133,518 42,796 267,626 391,143 46,084 1,552,000 60,000 183,100 380,617 384,426 232,792 2,665 59,167 102,458 75,469 1,575,838 27,800 3,375,158 2,388,270 59,942 176,833 L 39-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 39-E OTHER AUTHORIZED (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID' Completed 1973 113,296 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA' Completed 1972 17,592 Lower Walla Walla River, Columbia River Basin, WA Inactive 1953 4,000 - Lyman Creek, ID' Completed 1971 230,315 - Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR Completed 1957 55,894 Malheur River, Vale Unit, Columbia River Basin, OR Completed 1961 325,581 Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR3 Completed 1968 1,786,753 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID' Completed 1965 54,538 Mud Lake, Columbia River Basin, ID Inactive 1957 5,996 Orofino Creek & Clearwater River, Orofino, ID2 Inactive 1949 23,050 Palouse River, Columbia River Basin, WA Deferred - Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA2 Completed 1977 110,815 - Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID2 Completed 1967 39,172 Portneuf River & Marsh Creek Pocatello Unit, Columbia River Basin, ID Completed 1969 6,456,032 - Pullman, Palouse, WA Deferred 1964 99,540 - Riverside Area, Pasco, WA' Completed 1972 28,839 Ririe Lake, ID Completed 1983 39,677A448 - Shelley Area, Snake River, Columbia River Basin, ID Completed 1958 32,335 - Shobe Canyon, Heppner, OR' Completed 1970 5,000 Snake River, Blackfoot, ID' Completed 1980 131,700 - Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID2 Completed 1952 8,501 Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID' Completed 1968 32,425 South Fork Clearwater River, Columbia River Basin, ID Inactive 1973 3,899 South Fork Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, ID' Completed 1973 61,055 Teton River, Columbia River Basin, ID Inactive 1955 10,387 - Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID' Completed 1955 128,635 - Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA' Completed 1973 72,140 Tucannon River, Wooten, WA' Completed 1971 73,932 Umatilla River, OR' Completed 1961 161,540 - Wallowa River, Weaver Bridge OR2 Completed 1960 16,118 Weiser River, Columbia River Basin, ID Deferred 1960 37,757 Whitebird Creek, Columbia River Basin, ID Inactive 1956 1,896 39-18 TABLE 39-E (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Willow Creek, IDI Completed 1963 976 Yakima River, West Richland, WA' 4 Completed 1964 238,890 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 3Exclusive of $6,300 contributed funds. 205, PL 80-858. 4qncludes $9,000 contributed funds. 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 14, PL 79-526. TABLE 39-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Amtin Tam n.qnanPR TkT WhrA 1C6A 1Q75 - - g" I.L, U I* , I X Boise Valley, Canyon County Unit, ID Camas Creek, ID Little Wood River, ID Malheur River, Willow Creek Unit, OR Mill Creek, WA Payette Valley, ID Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek;, ID Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID Touchet River,WA Wieer River, Cambridge Midvale, ID 1974 J. lv 1967 1965 1965 1969 1977 1978 1969 1979 1977 10,600 9,080 21,334 13,000 3,537 23,178 234,100 11,198 75,000 TABLE 39-H COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 1 of Text) -. Project *oot Area, Snake River, ID o River, ID Be Valley, ID Ad County Unit C0 a yon County Unit WR Creek, ID Ronde Valley, OR Estimated Federal Status Cost Completed Completed Deferred Deauthorized Deauthorized Deferred 1,060,000 8,639,000 Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 42,796 391,143 46,084 10,600 9,080 102,458 39-1.9 - --- I $%-' REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 39-H (Continued) COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 1 of Text) Estimated Federal Project Status Cost Cost to Sep. 30,1984 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Henrys Fork Unit Deferred 165,000 27,800 Snake River Unit Completed - 3,375,158 Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID Completed - 59,942 Little Wood River, ID Deauthorized - 21,334 Lower Walla Walla River, WA Inactive 372,000 4,000 Malheur River, OR Vale Unit Completed - 325,581 Willow Creek Unit Deauthorized - 13,000 Mill Creek, WA Deauthorized - 3,537 Mud Lake, ID Inactive 1,187,000 5,996 Palouse River, WA Deferred 914,000 - Payette Valley, ID Deauthorized - 23,178 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID Pocatello Unit Completed - 6,456,0321 Shelley Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 32,335 South Fork Clearwater River, ID Inactive - 3,899 Teton River, ID Inactive - 10,387 Touchet River, WA Deauthorized - 11,198 Weiser River, ID Deferred 1,565,000 37,757 Weiser River, ID Cambridge-Midvale Deauthorized - 75,000 Whitebird Creek, ID Inactive - 1,896 Total 11,090,191 'Exclusive of $36,800 contributed funds. TABLE 39-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 8 of Text) Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID Camp Wooteen, Tucannon River, WA Colfax, Palouse River, WA Culdesac, Lapwai Creek, ID Dayton, Touchet River, WA Esquatzel, Coulee, WA Gooding Area, Little Wood River, ID Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, ID Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID Lyman, Lyman Creek, ID Mission Creek, ID Pocatello, Portneuf River, ID Shelley Area, Snake River, ID Tomanovich-Salmon City, Salmon River, ID Walla Walla, Mill Creek, WA West Richland, Yakima River, WA November 1983 September 1984 November 1983 November 1983 April 1984 April 1984 September 1984 August 1984 August 1984 August 1984 August 1984 August 1984 November 1983 April 1984 August 1984 May 1984 July 1984 March 1984 39-20 rrr+ n r i rnr --- i r e i TABLE 39-J WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (See Section 17 of Text) Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 18 of Text) SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1600 Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number Concrete Gravity September 1974 150,500 Cubic Feet Per Second 1613 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 55 Ft. 2 428 Feet 3 3 2 @ 90,000 kw; 4 @ 220,000 kw 400,000 kw 1,060,000 kw 150 Feet March 1973 1600-1445 Feet 1605 Feet 2,000,000 Ac.-Ft. 53 Miles 17,090 Acres 175 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 97 Feet 100 Feet 103 Feet 15 Feet May 1962 Concrete Gravity January 1962 850,000 cfs 391 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 51 Ft. 10 39-21 TABLE 39-J (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 20 of Text) POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 638 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 671 Feet 6 3 @ 90,000 kw; 3@ 111,000 kw 603,000 kw 226 Feet December 1961 440-437 Feet 446 Feet 31.9 Miles 9,200 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 80 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 93 Feet 98 Feet 101 Feet 15 Feet May 1970 Concrete Gravity January 1970 850,000 cfs 581 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 60 Ft. 8 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 244 Feet March 1970 638-633 Feet 646.5 Feet 37.2 Miles 10,025 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 92 Miles 39-22 TABLE 39-J (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 21 of Text) Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA (ee Section 22 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type: Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number 86 Feet 675 Feet 95 Feet 100 Feet 105 Feet 15 Concrete Gravity February 1975 850,000 cfs 581 Feet 581 Tainter 50 Ft. by 60.5 Ft. 8 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 246 Feet April 1975 738-733 Feet 746.5 Feet 38 Miles 8,900 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 91 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 97 Feet 98 Feet 103 Feet 15 Feet April 1969 Concrete Gravity March 1969 850,000 cfs 483 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 61 Ft. 8 39-23 ML TABLE 39-J (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project McNary Lock and Dam, OR and WA (See Section 24 of Text) POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 242 Feet May 1969 540-537 Feet 548 Feet 28.7 Miles 6,590 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 78 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 67 Feet 75 Feet 83 Feet 15 Feet November 1983 Concrete Gravity October 1953 2,200,000 cfs 291 Feet Vertical Lift 50 Ft. by 51 Ft. 22 1,348 Feet 14 70,000 kw 980,000 kw 193 Feet November 1953 340-335 Feet 356.5 Feet 64 Miles 38,800 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 242 Miles 39-24 TABLE 39-K WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING OR, WA, AND ID (See Section 25 of Text) Estimated Cost (Corps New Work Maintenance Percent of Engineers to Sep. 30 1984 to Sep. 30, 1984 Com- Constr. Project Funds Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost pleted Started Ice Harbor Lock & Dam Initial Project Code 710 Recreation Facilities Power Units 4-6 Totals Little Goose Lock & Dam Initial Project Power Units 4-6 Totals Lower Granite Lock & Dam Initial Project Code 710 Recreation Facilities Power Units 4-6 Totals Lower Monumental Lock & Dam Initial Project Power Units 4-6 Totals Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing Open River Pasco to Lewiston Totals Existing Project Previous Projects Pasco to Lewiston Totals Authorized Project 129,578,480 129,578,480 129,578,480 914,256 914,256 913,256 36,699,017 36,699,017 36,699017 167,191,753 167,191,753 167,190,753 160,413,215 160,413,215 160,413,215 60,885,812 60,885,812 60,885,347 221,299,027 221,299,027 221,298,562 321,430,315 321,430,315 321,426,898 63,800 63,800 57,323 46,211,511 46,211,511 46,211,511 367,705,626 367,705,626 367,695,712 184,712,361 51,643,250 236,355,611 34,613 992,586,630 400,150 992,986,780 184,712,361 51,643,250 236,355,611 34,6131 184,712,361 51,643,230 236,355,591 34,613' 41,205,474 41,146,422 41,205,474 31,171,251 31,171,251 41,146,422 30,890,650 30,890,650 30,488,297 30,290,571 30,488,297 27,526,773 27,526,773 30,290,571 26,575,367 26,575,367 100 100 100 99 100 100 100 99 FY 65 349,603 349,2202 4,350 4,350 992,586,630 992,575,231 130,745,748 129,256,580 400,150 992,986,780 'New work to appropriations used for maintenance prior 1953l 2 lflcludes $28,665 FY 1984 project condition survey cost. 400,150 992,975,381 186,570 186,570 130,932,318 129,443,150 39-25 FY57 FY 57 FY 71 FY63 FY 74 100 100 99 100 100 100 FY84 FY 74 FY61 FY 75 99 1 11tl1 1I 1 -_ - r - -_ ALASKA DISTRICT * This District consists of the State of Alaska. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK .................. 40-1 2. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK........... 40-2 3. Cordova Small Boat Harbor, AK ......... 40-2 4. Dillingham Harbor, AK ................. 40-2 5. Homer Harbor, AK ..................... 40-2 6. Kake Harbor, AK ................... 40-3 7. King Cove Harbor, AK ................ 40-3 8. Metlakatla Harbor, AK ................. 40-3 9. Ninilchik Harbor, AK .................. 40-4 10. Nome Harbor, AK ....................... 40-4 11. Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, AK ........ 40-4 12. Stikine River, AK ....................... 40-5 Flood Control 13. Chena River Lakes, AK ................. 40-5 14. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... 40-5 15. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects......................... 40-5 16. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees'......... 40-5 Navigation 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Location. Anchorage is in southcentral Alaska on the otheast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 1666 and 16664.) 3 EiStingproject. Provides for dredging along a d foot baseline adjacent to the Port of Anchorage d to, adepth of 35 feet below mean lower low water. idal ran ge between igher mean lower low water and mean high water is 29.0 feet and the extreme range is 42.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. o e r itsonfa l facilities. The Port of Anchorage facility nsists of a POL terminal at the southern end and three terfalcargo terminals northward. The northernmost CC,o mpleted during 1976 and 1977 was outside Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power Page 17. Snettisham, AK ......................... 40-6 General Investigations 18. Surveys ................................. 19. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... . 20. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ............................ 40-6 40-6 40-6 Tables Table 40-A Cost & Financial Statement..... 40-7 Table 40-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 40-9 Table 40-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....................... 40-11 Table 40-D Not Applicable Table 40-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................... 40-12 Table 40-F Not Applicable Table 40-G Deauthorized Projects .......... 40-12 Table 40-H Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.................. 40-13 Table 40-I Project Condition Surveys ...... 40-13 the Federal project limits. Extension of limits from 2,070 feet northward to 3,000 feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587 and funded in FY 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The dredging contract to remove 450,000 cubic yards of material was awarded June 26, 1984. This year's contractor proposed, and initially attempted, to dredge the harbor via agitation method. The method did not prove successful due to heavy shoaling and mechanical problems. The contractor converted his equipment to form in essence a hopper dredge which has proved to be fax more effective. Dredging has been accomplished across the entire project during FY 1984 and will continue into November 1984. Controlling depth at the ends of the harbor was -28 feet mean lower ow water, with a majority of the harbor at project depth. 40-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 2. BETHEL SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Location. The city of Bethel is 65 miles upriver on the north bank ofthe Kuskokwim River, which flows through southwestern Alaska. Bethel is about 400 miles west of Anchorage. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 9302 and USGS Map Bethel D8.) Existing project. Project (Section 107) includes provision of a 12-acre small boat harbor and 1,270 foot entrance channel by deepening, widening, and straightening a portion of the Lousetown Slough which is 0.3 miles east of Bethel. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 4.0 feet and extreme tidal range is 10.0 feet, during low summer water flow in Kuskokwim River. Water level also depends on river state; tidal effects decrease with higher river flows, disappearing only at the 20-year-frequency flood stage. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Bethel serves as a regional transportation center for approximately 50 villages. A medium-draft port facility was built along the city's riverfront in 1975. Goods, including gas, oil, food, clothing, and construction material are all brought into Bethel for redistribution to outlying villages. Generally, river shipments ofbulk goods are transported by mediumdraft barges. Personal supplies are often moved in individually owned riverboats which also are used for fishing activities. The riverboat fleet in Bethel is estimated to number between 1,000 and 1,100 boats, of which 400 are transient boats from other villages along the Kuskokwim River. There are also eight river barges varying in size to as large as 30 by 100 feet. The barges are powered by five locally-based tug boats with lengths ranging from 25 to 40 feet. No protected berthing areas exist at Bethel for any water craft. The riverboats are beached on the sandbars and banks for temporary storage. Brown's Slough is particularly popular as a berthing area, resulting in overcrowding and congestion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project fiscally completed. Construction was physically complete in FY 1983. 3. CORDOVA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Location. Cordova is on Orca Inlet, a strait near the eastern entrance of Prince William Sound, about 150 air miles south-southeast of Anchorage (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 8520, 8525, and 8551.) Existing project. The Office of the Chief of Engineers approved construction of a harbor expansion from 8.26 acres to 20 acres by removal of the existing 1400-foot breakwater and construction of a new 2000-foot long breakwater. The entrance channel is dredged to -16 feet mean lower low water and the turning basin is dredged from -10 to -12 mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 12.4 feet with an extreme range of 21.7 feet. The dredged material is disposed of in two diked upper tidal areas which will be used as staging facilities. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Two municipal docks accom. modate general cargo and passengers, including auto mobile ferry traffic. One privately owned wharf, reduced by fire, provides oil handling and bunkering facilities. Three privately owned wharves are used for industrial purposes. A small boat float system for public use is in original basin. State ferry dock in basin has been superseded by municipal dock and is inactive. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project is physically complete; however, contractor claim of dif. fering site conditions is pending. 4. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Location. At head of Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on right bank of Nushagak River just below its confluence with Wood River; about 470 miles northeast. erly of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles southwest ofAnchorage (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16660.) Existing project: A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet in area with a depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek; with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide in Scandinavian Creek and a sheet pile sill across the basin outlet with a top elevation of 7 feet above mean lower low water. During design stage the project was revised to include a rock sill with adjacent scour-protection blankets and the embank ment was relocated to include a berm between the basin and the embankment. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.8 feetd Extreme range is 30.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three docks at the city of Dillingham, all privately owned, and a publicly owned small-boat float in the project basin. Two docks are used for salmon-cannery operations; the third is an oil han. dling and bunkering terminal. Small boat approach and floats were installed in small-boat basin in summer of 1963, and were demolished by winter ice movement.New floats were installed in June 1982, and removed before fall freeze-up. They will be replaced each spring. Cargo and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered fronm the anchorage just below Snag Point, and are unloaded at the docks or in the small-boat basin. Facilities are cons" dered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Goverf ment plant and hired labor performed dredging fro June through August 1984 and 66,100 cubic yards of material were removed this fiscal year. 5. HOMER HARBOR, AK Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsl' 152 miles by water southwest of Anchorage. Harbor site is land based near the extremity of Homer Spit whiCh varies to one-quarter mile in width and extends 4.5 mil southeasterly from the mainland. (See NOAA/N0 Chart #16645.) Existing project. Provides for sheltered small-boat harbor, relocated and based within Homer Spit about 40-2 ALASKA DISTRICT 16.5 acres in area, below mean lower low water; a north entrance channel; protected by a main rock breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 feet. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1593 of Annual Report for 1964.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and oper.- ated wharf capable of handling oceangoing vessels serves for passengers and general cargo. Small-boat facilities in basin area include publicly owned mooring floats, a publicly owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. A separate basin with unloading facilities for barges and small boats is being constructed by private interests. Construction has tripled size of the harbor. The city of Homer has tripled the size of its fish dock located at the southern end of the harbor. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contractin the amount of $9,434,500 was awarded November 11, 1983. The contract involved excavating 2,000,000 yards of material, expanding the harbor from 16.5 to 50 acres, placing fill to construct a 30-acre staging area; quarrying and placing 130,000 yards of armor rock and construction of a new four-land launch ramp. Work is scheduled for completion in early FY 1985. Maintenance: During FY 1984, 9,700 cubic yards were removed by contractor plant. The material was disposed of in the construction staging area. 6. KAKE HARBOR, AK Location. Kake Harbor is located in the city of Kake, on the northwest corner of Kupreanof Island in southeastern Alaska, 39 air miles west of Petersburg, AK, and 850 water miles northwesterly of Seattle, WA. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 8201.) Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,580-foot-long west breakwater and a 900-foot long south breakwater, enclosing a 7-acre berthing area. Poor foundation conditions found during preconstruction investigations have forced modification of the project to include a 1,760-foot-long west breakwater and a 1,750- foot-long south breakwater. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.0 feet with an extreme range of 22 feet. Estimated project cost is $12,236,000 (October 1984), including $12,200,000 Corps of Engineers funds, $21,000 Coast Guard funds, and $15,000 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Kake, a publicly owned wharf with seaplane float equipped airplanes and shallowdraft vessels is located within area of proposed basin. At cannery 1 mile from city, there are two privately owned deep.draft piers: one for cargo, open to all local boat OWners, the second for fuel, including a float for fueling small boats. At Portage Cove, there is one publicly- Owned small-boat float. Facilities are not considered adequate for present commerce due to the following deficiencies in small-boat facilities: the complete lack of protection in the directions of the most severe storms; shallow water at Portage Cove float and its approaches; ice formation on the cove during the winter months causes small-boat major boat damage and limits the use ofthemooring float; and transportation problems'between city and present small-boat float at Portage Cove. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A biological study was conducted to investigate the aquatic habitats and organisms of the project area through the use of a joint United States Fish and Wildlife Service -Corps of Engineers dive effort. The data being gathered will be used to understand temporal changes in these natural systems, pre- and post-project conditions, as well as provide background information for a recolonization study of man-made rubble structures in Alaska. A field investigation to gather data was made in 1984. Analysis of the data will be completed in 1985. A temporary automatic meteorburst wind monitoring station was maintained to gather wind velocity and directional data more closely associated with the location of the project for comparison with data used in complying with the plans and specifications. 7. KING COVE HARBOR, AK Location. The city of King Cove, Alaska, is located near the southwesterly tip of the Alaska Peninsula in southwestern Alaska, 630 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16549.) Existing project. Provides for an 11-acre small-boat basin having an anchorage basin 900 feet long by 550 feet wide and an entrance channel 100 feet wide and about 400 feet long, both at a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water; a 1,400-foot long training dike, top elevation 10 feet above mean lower low water; and a 200-foot long rock sea groin, top elevation 14 feet above mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.8 feet, with an extreme range of 14.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consists of twin wharves with a small basin between them; marine rail and slipways flanked by catwalks and oil terminal facilities; and mooring buoys, dolphins, and piling for small boats. All are privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for present oceangoing commerce but inadequate for the commercial fishing vessels operating in the area. A study for a new dock to be built by the State has been completed and engineering specifications for the new dock are now in the process of being written. The new dock will be leased to the city after construction. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for dredging of the harbor was awarded July 20,1984. Approximately 26,500 cubic yards are expected to be dredged by the end of the contract. At the end of the fiscal year, approximately 12,750 cubic yards had been dredged. 8. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast 40-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 of Annette Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074,8075, and 8102.) Existing project. Consists of two small-boat basins. Existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. New basin consists of two rubblemound breakwaters, 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 feet wide, dredged to adepth of 15 feet below mean lower low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are one general-cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small-boat float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not adequate for mooring the commercial fishing vessels operating from Metlakatla. Existing protected harbor area is fully utilized. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project is physically complete; however, various contractor claims are still pending. 9. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Location. At mouth of Ninilchik River in Cook Inlet, at the community of Ninilchik, AK, about 40 miles upcoast from Homer and 112 miles southwest ofAnchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16640.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide dredged to elevation of 2 feet above mean lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean lower low water; protected by a pile jetty 410 feet long. Project was modified in design stage to delete pile jetty and revise harbor dimensions to 400 feet long by 125 feet wide, and was completed in November 1961. Modification, including river chaznnel diversion, two armor rock jetties, and beach protection, was accomplished 1967 and 1969. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 29.3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, limited to shallowdraft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at halftide or higher, are a cannery dock along Ninilchik River available for offloading fish, and small-boat floats in project basin, provided by State of Alaska. Other supplies are landed on beach or brought by road from deepdraft ports in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the number of boats presently using harbor. Expansion of facilities would require construction of additional protected harbor area. Operationsduringfiscalyear. Maintenance Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished with 7,200 cubic yards removed in 1984. A survey of the basin during May 1984 indicated project depth was available throughout the Federal limits. 10. NOME HARBOR, AK Location. At mouth of Snake River at the city of Nome, AK, on northerly shore of Norton Sound, an arm of Bering Sea. It is a shallow open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor and 545 air miles northwest ofAnchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16206.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties, the easterly 951 and the westerly not exceeding 676 feet long, at mouth of Snake River, a channel 8 feet at mean lowerlow water, 75 feet wide, from Norton Sound through Snake River to mouths of Bourbon and Dry Creeks, in city of Nome, ending in a turning basin of the same depth, 250 feet wide and 600 feet long; revetting banks of rivers; and protecting all existing water-front improvements on easterly beach by means of rock-mound seawall 3,350 feet long extending easterly from east jetty. Project has been completed except extension of jetties beyond present 400 and 240 feet, which is classified inactive. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet and extreme tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels are influenced more by wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a southerly storm. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered to and from shore a distance of about 2 miles. Traffic enters dredged channel and is handled over revetment, where lighterage company has transfer facilities which are open to the public. Facilities considered inadequate for existing commerce. In July 1984, the city of Nome received Department of Army authorization (permit) to construct a 3,600-foot gravelfilled causeway. At this time the city has not startl construction. Operations during fiscalyear. Maintenance Dredging by contract was accomplished throughout the icefree season and 15,099 cubic yards were removed. Damage the East Jetty during spring 1982 caused a separation of the last 40 feet. Removal of the damaged section an1 capping of the remaining jetty was not accomplished pending further study. An underwater inspection was accomplished in September 1983 and a reconnaissanc report on rehabilitating the project was prepared in 1984. 11. PORT LIONS SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Location. Port Lions is located on the north end of Kodiak Island, approximately 19 air miles west of the city of Kodiak. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16594.) Existing project. The Office of the Chief of Engi neers approved construction for a small boat harbor at Port Lions on April 9, 1979. Construction consisted ofa 600-foot-long breakwater, a 170-foot-long stub breakwater 40-4 - - - - - - - - - - -4;-.p -- - - - - - - -- - - - X - - - - - - - - - - -- C= - . ALASKA DISTRICT inclosing a 12-acre harbor. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 9.6 feet with an extreme range of 18 feet. A severe storm in November 1981 badly damaged the project. The repair work included replacing material of the existing main breakwater, extending the main breakwater 125 feet, changing the seaward breakwater slope to a 2.OH:1.OV adding a layer of armor rock and raising the design crest elevation from +18.5 mean lower low water to +22.0 mean lower low water. Minor dredging in the entrance channel to -15.0 mean lower low water was also included. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A municipal timber pile dock at Port Wakefield serves as both a shallow-draft and deep draft facility for Port Lions. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Survey was performed October 24-27, 1983. Project is complete; however, contractor claim for differing site conditions for dredging is pending. 12. STIKINE RIVER, AK Location. Rises in northwestern Canada and flows southwesterly through Canada for about 200 miles then about 30 miles westerly across Panhandle of Alaska to Sumner Strait. Mouth of river is on coast of mainland about 3 miles north of Wrangell. (See NOAA/NOS Chart 17360.) Existing project. Snagging Stikine River from its mouth for about 30 miles to Canadian border. The Canadian Government maintains that portion of the river between Alaskan border and Telegraph Creek, British Columbia, a distance of 130 miles. The head of navigation is at Telegraph Creek, B.C., about 160 miles above the mouth. No data is available concerning stages of high and low water in river. At mouth, tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 13.9 feet, and maximum range is about 25 feet. Tidal effects have been reported at a distance of 20 miles from the mouth. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None along Alaskan portion of river. Vessels operating on Stikine River are dependent on terminal facilities at Wrangell Harbor. Facilities include a city operated pier for general cargo and pastgers; two publicly operated small-boat mooring floats; o Privately operated small-boat fueling floats; a State of Alaska Ferry Pier, and three industrial Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Memorandum of Understanding between Corps and Forest Serce signed August 1972 provided for Forest Service Personnel to do project clearing. However, due to envirlllental restraints, no work was accomplished until 1977 after completion of an environmental assessment. The work has been accomplished annually by the U.S. Forest Service since 1977. Flood Control 13. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Location. In the vicinity of Fairbanks, AK, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena River, Little Chena River, and their tributaries. (See USGS map Fairbanks, C1, Dl, D2, and Big Delta D6.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Moose Creek Dam has been constructed 17 miles east of Fairbanks with control works on Chena River. The dam itself extends from a bluff one mile north of the Chena River and south past the control works for approximately six miles to the Tanana River. The dam connects with a completed 22-mile levee system along the north boundary of the Tanana River to a point south and west of Fairbanks. Estimated Federal cost is $263,000,000, (excluding Little Chena Damrn, presently deferred), and estimated non-Federal cost is $12,548,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contracts were awarded for constructing five new groins for Tanana River levee protection and for trash racks for debris protection on the Moose Creek Dam control works. Interior Drainage Channel "A," removal of a navigation hazard gravel bar in the Tanana River, safety catwalks and other control works modifications, and the Chena River Lakes recreation area were completed. The Tanana River levee system and interior drainage channels are complete except for minor repair work such as that due to permafrost settling and the construction of protective groins. Maintenance: Water control data collection processing and analysis were done during this fiscal year. Three high water events at the Chena Dam necessitated lowering the flood gates and required additional personnel to provide support during the observation periods. 14. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $139,201 for diaster preparedness, $5,273 for emergency operations. 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were made of flood control works at Lowell Creek on January 26 and March 19, 1984, Gold Creek, Skagway River, Salmon River during August 6-10, 1984, Talkeetna River, September 18, 1984, and Klutina River on September 26, 1984. Repairs at each project were recommended to the local authority. Total costs for the fiscal year $17,290. 16. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspections were made of levees rehabilitated under Public Law 84-99 and local sponsors advised of results and recommendations. Fiscal year costs were $1,190. 40-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 17. SNETTISHAM, AK Location. At mouth of Speel River, between Crater Lake to the west and Long Lake to the north, 28 nautical miles southeast of Juneau. (See Coast Geodetic Survey Chart 8227.) Existing project. Snettisham is a multi-stage power project. The initial stage of the initial phase which was completed in 1977 tapped Long Lake and included an underground powerhouse with two 23.4 megawatt units and a transmission line to Juneau, AK. The project was turned over to the Alaska Power Administration for operation and maintenance. The second stage, under design and construction, will provide a tap to Crater Lake and add a third unit. The final phase will provide a dam on Long Lake to increase storage and the energy capability of Long Lake. The Long Lake Dam is in a "Deferred" status. The existing Long Lake (elevation 815 feet) water is transported through an approximately horizontal 13-foot diameter tunnel 8,400 feet long and a 1,400-foot penstock dropping at a 46 degree angle to the undergound powerhouse at tidewater to drive two turbines with a combined generating capacity of 47,600 kilowatts. Power from two generators is supplied to Juneau by a 13.8 kilovolt overhead transmission line and a submarine cable traversing Taku Inlet. Crater Lake stage of construction provides for tapping Crater Lake (elevation 1,022 feet) to drive a third turbine to be installed in the existing underground powerhouse to provide an additional nameplate-rated generating capacity of 34,500 kilowatts. Estimated cost of initial phase construction is $150,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and Design on the Crater Lake Phase included approximately 90 percent completion of the feature design memorandum for power tunnel, penstock, lake tap, gate structure and surge tank; 100 percent completion of plans and specifications for upgrading an existing access road, construction camp facilities, 6,700 feet of 11-foot diameter tunnel, and turbine, and 95 percent completion of plans and specifications for generator, powerhouse completion and electrical contracts. Investigations included an evaluation of alternative power tunnel and surge tank schemes and an extensiVe study using side scan sonar, sub-bottom profiling, and corehole drilling to determine the amount and type of overburden and bedrock conditions in the lake tap area. General Investigations 18. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs of $1,472,783 for surveys include $231,879 for navigation studies, $1,085,256 for flood control studies, $42,648 for coordination studies and $113,000 for miscellaneous activities. 19. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance, information, flood plain manage ment guidance and other flood plain management services have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal agencies, local communities, State agencies, architectural/ engineering firms, lending institutions and private individuals at a fiscal year cost of $106,407. Other activities included continuation of Type 19 Flood Insurance Studies for the Municipality of Anchorage and the Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Fiscal year costs for Hydrologic Studies were $9,897. 20. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK The proposed project would provide streambank pro, tection to the city of Bethel, AK, located in western Alaska on the Kuskokwim River. The reconmmnended plan calls for rock riprap protection for 5,000 feet of river bank with the rock extending from above the active wave zone to the thalweg of the river. Work on the General Design Memorandum was initiatd in FY 1984 and is 17 percent complete. Estimated prec0nstruction planning cost is $550,000. Fiscal year costs were $93,954. 40-6 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 1. Anchorage Harbor, New Work 2. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 3. Cordova Small Boat Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 4. Dillingham Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 5. Homer Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 6. Kake Harbor, AK 7. King Cove Harbor, AK 8. Metlakatla Harbor, AK AK 1,935,000 2,374,900 964,000 1,679,000 1,923,216 2,001,021 1,225,405 754,434 14,500 25,855 690,000 307,000 73,665 915,017 - 2,000,000 -1,284,600 Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 299,975 550,205 2,090 -106,290 -633 - 113,000 1,954,080 301,525 52,800 53,677 533,235 533,235 14,228,447 13,172,431 1,520,272 1,514,044 609,110 609,110 2,000,000 1,998,973 4,813,000 4,713,160 548,790 548,790 331,000 384,500 266,000 350,000 808,750 352,356 295,862 325,219 94,000 70,579 115,000 90,786 30,000 1,723,000 78,817 1,729,421 267,000 296,400 294,000 249,473 288,570 316,897 70,000 72,435 4,566,821 4,506,408 1,700 1,700 3,512,3501 3,512,3501 2,348,711 2,348,642 67,974 67,974 - 8,057,500 - 8,010,237 80,000 79,588 860,000 184,628 -- 120,000 2,685 91,298 621,898 70,000 85,553 - 491,494 - 436,119 -25,000 -229,000 28,597 -204,702 8,057,500 8,010,237 830,700 817,550 2,264,948 2,264,948 491,494 436,119 4,847,470 4,827,468 40-7 1,410,000 1,166,754 4,647,200 2,403,878 TABLE 40-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30, 1984 (Contrib. Funds) 9. Ninilchik Harbor, AK 10. Nome Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 11. Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 12. Stikine River, AK 13. Chena River Lakes, AK (Contrib. Funds) 17. Snettisham, AK Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 200,000 329,656 200,007 216,000 270,700 237,000 300,000 216,881 260,871 244,916 302,425 488,000 753,700 291,000 273,000 475,218 432,511 532,403 367,979 2,500 1,700,000 1,697,929 2,500 5,000 -7,000 44,738 2,500 80,000 1,600,000 32,008 1,555,354 44,000 41,537 5,000 7,451 1,110,000 22,000 17,544 904,018 4,000 10,000 14,758,806 15,100,000 13,900,000 14,726,776 14,794,879 13,522,702 2,500 510 -83,423 9,215 - 56,387 10,000 4,722 4,656,300 5,349,609 350,000 459,700 538,000 718,000 176,685 571,821 536,356 685,741 - - 2,031,700 150,600 - - 1,616,440 522,722 - 2,000,000 570,000 1,499,700 4,872 1,347,018 1,157,838 1,258,244 'Includes $2,672 of Code 710 Rec. Funds and $1,512,350 for previous project. 2Includes $310,000 for previous project (Fairbanks). 3Includes $1,624 for previous project (Fairbanks). 40-8 50,520 50,520 828,000 828,000 428,720 428,720 2,964,476 2,964,462 1,348,240 1,348,240 6,393,907 6,362,688 125 125 152,500 152,500 1,825,311 1,825,311 1,596,577 1,596,577 1,061,137 1,001,942 161,364 154,294 189,414,7652 189,259,5062 2,067,3243 1,972,2273 2,182,300 2,139,162 85,452,556 85,1456871 rw ww ir r w- . rr - i - - r i ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR. AK July 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 July 14, 1960 3. July 14, 1960 July 3, 1958 5. July 3, 1958 Aug. 19, 1964 Jul. 14, 1960 6. Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 2. H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 P.L. 94-587 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 29, 1978 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 23, 1981 H. Doc. 390, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.2 Deep water harbor, adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties.' Extension of project limits. BETHEL SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Construct 7,700-foot-long small boat harbor and entrance channel by deepening, widening, and straightening the upper 6,800 feet of Brown's Slough. CORDOVA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Construction of 2,000-foot breakwater. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Basin 230,000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek, with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. HOMER HARBOR, AK Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and rock breakwater 1,260 feet long. Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by March 27, 1964 earthquake, by construction of basin 10 acres in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwaters, 1,018 feet and 238 feet long. Increased width and depth of entrance channel and an enlarged staging area. Basin enlarged from 16.5 to 50 acres. KAKE HARBOR, AK Basin 7-acre berthing area, 15 feet deep, inclosed by a 1,580-foot west rock breakwater and a 900-foot south rock breakwater. KING COVE HARBOR, AK Anchorage basin of 11 acres, 15 feet deep, an entrance channel 125 feet wide and 15 feet deep; an earth fill training dike; and a rockfill groin. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acres in extent to a depth of 10 feet below plane of mean lower low water; construction of rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. Entrance channel and two rubblemound breakwaters inclosing a 7.0 acre basin. 40-9 H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sees. 2 P.L. 88-451 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 13, 1981 S. Doc. 70, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.2 S. Doc. 13, 90th Cong., 1st Sess.2 H. Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sees. Section 201, P.L. 89-298 S. Doc. 92-64, 92d Cong. 2d Sess.2 Authorized Oct. 12, 1972 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 40-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 9. July 3, 1958 10. Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 1935 June 16, 1948 11. July 14, 1960 12. 13. Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 13,1968 Oct. 23, 1962 17. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by 410-foot jetty. NOME HARBOR, AK Two jetties, easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long revetment, channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet wide and 600 feet long. 3 Seawall PORT LIONS SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Construction of a 600-foot breakwater and a 170-foot stub breakwater inclosing a 12-acre harbor. STIKINE RIVER, AK Snagging from mouth to Canadian border. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Dam and reservoir on the main Chena River, a dam and detention reservoir on the Little Chena River, and a levee along the north side of the Tanana River. SNETTISHAM, AK Multi-purpose dam, with powerhouse and transmission facilities. H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 H. Doc. 1932,64th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 H. Doc. 404, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 2d Sess.2 Report of Chief of Engineers dated March 8, 1948. Section 107, P.L. 8645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 9, 1979 H. Doc. 210, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.2 S. Doc. 89, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 H. Doc. 40, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.2 'Purchase of dredge and deepwater jetties deauthorized November 6, 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 2Contains latest published map. 3Extension of jetties classified "inactive". 40-10 - -r -- -- ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AK1 Completed Bar Point Harbor, AK2 Completed Cook Inlet Shoals, AK Completed Cordova Harbor, AK Completed Craig Harbor, AK Completed Douglas Harbor, AK Completed Dry Pass, AK Completed Egegik River, AK Completed Elfin Cove, AK Completed Gastineau Channel, AK Completed Haines Harbor, AK 2 Completed Hoonah Harbor, AK Completed Humboldt Harbor, AK Completed Iliuliuk Harbor, AK Completed Juneau Harbor, AK Completed Kasilof Harbor, AK2 Completed Ketchikan Harbor, AK Completed Kodiak Harbor, AK Completed Myers Chuck Harbor, AK Inactive Naknek River, AK Completed Neva and Olga Straits, AK Completed Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK 2 Completed Pelican Harbor, AK Completed Petersburg Harbor, AK Completed Port Alexander, AK Completed Rocky Pass, AK Completed St Michael Canal, AK Completed Seldovia Harbor, AK Completed Serius Whitestone, AK Completed Seward Harbor, AK Completed Sitka Harbor, AK Completed Skagway Harbor, AK Completed Valdez Harbor, AK Completed Wrangell Harbor, AK Completed Wrangell Narrows, AK Completed 'Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., Ist Sess. 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 'Inad dition, $272,779 of State funds. 4'Includes $656,240 for Sec. 107 project. 5In addition, $925,500 of State funds. 6In addition, $973,875 of State funds. 1920 1983 1977 1978 1983 1963 1983 1972 1959 1964 1977 1983 1977 1941 1974 1975 1979 1973 1970 1961 1960 1972 1964 1972 1949 1960 1916 1974 1973 1973 1973 1972 1968 1969 1979 $ 128,896 2,000,0003 1,220,000 843,534 1,033,5004 282,019 943,351 4,441 154,191 789,461 1,000,0005 4,255,0006 3,679,6837 66,037 1,381,150 109,848 1,602,417 1.891,2128 9,700 20,789 155,009 370,415 369,683 252,932 17,000 337,668 377,062 1,051,8839 1,798,010 712,36910� 1,611,009 133,180 649,74011 537,020 3,562,343 $ 2,154 6,875 488,156 72,500 23,466 3,107 102,701 260,991 307,092 37,946 132,946 18,973 26,800 1,360 5,518 1,934 219,789 15,490 32,665 221,498 331,352 309,260 Tin addition, $857,000 of State funds. 8lncludes $594,163 for rehabilitation. "Includes $400,000 for rehabilitation. 'l�Includes $90,026 for rehabilitation and $2,528 Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed projects. "Includes $73,000 for rehabilitation and $2,713 Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed projects. 40-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 40-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1984 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK Completed 1943 557,000 - Gold Creek, AK Completed 1975 876,006 - Klutina River, Copper Center, AKI Completed 1973 260,681 - Lowell Creek, AK Completed 1945 416,3822 30,7713 Salmon River, AK Completed 1963 37,770~ 5 162,9256 Skagway River, AK Deferred7 1966 26,385 1,253 ralkeetna River, AK Completed 1981 516,694 - 1Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 21n addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 3In addition, $12,000 expended from contributed funds. 4In addition, $7,000 expended from contributed funds. 5Includes $34,197 of PWA funds. i61n addition, $27,400 expended from contributed funds. 7Project eligible for deauthorization. TABLE 40-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Anchnrawe Harhnr AK 1Q7 1977 - - LZ11.1E fg XACLI IU , X (Uncompleted Portion) Bradley Lake, AK Ketchikan Harbor, AK (West Breakwater) Port Alexander, AK (Inner Harbor) Tolovana River, AK (Snagging) 1983 1979 1949 1931 1982 1979 1977 1977 $6,701,000 40-12 t r ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Chignik, AK Dillingham Small Boat Harbor, AK Juneau Harbor, AK Mekoryuk, AK Ninilchik Harbor, AK Sand Point, AK Saxman, AK Seward Harbor, AK St. George Island, AK Togiak Harbor, AK Whittier, AK Total TABLE 40-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Alaska: Bethel Harbor Douglas Harbor Juneau Harbor Petersburg Harbor Seldovia Harbor Sitka Harbor Wrangell Narrows July 1984 March 1984 March 1984 February 1984 August 1984 February 1984 February 1984 40-13 $147,850 1,899 3,804 858 1,298 127,121 60,647 106,350 26,051 27,870 43,170 $546,918 BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR RIVERS AND HARBORS The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors is a continuing body created by Section 3 of the 1902 River and Harbor Act. The Board is selected by the Chief of Engineers and consists of seven senior engineer officers. The Deputy Chief of Engineers normally serves as Chairman. Five members are Division Engineers with membership rotated among divisions having Civil Works missions. The seventh member, assigned full time to the Board as Resident Member, also directs the staff in carrying out the responsibilities of the Board. The Board meets quarterly or on call of the Chairman. The Board has several statutory duties. It conducts independent reviews of Corps survey reports covering water resources projects and reports its conclusions and recommendations to the Chief of Engineers. The Chief of Engineers then forwards the reports with his conclusions and recommendations to the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) for transmission to the Congress. The Board also conducts independent reviews of special reports ordered by the Congress. It considers and approves general plans for major modification and reconstruction of any lock, canal, canalized river or other work for the use or benefit of navigation. In addition to its statutory duties, the Chief of Engineers has assigned further duties to the Board. It reviews Corps policies and procedures as directed, additional special reports for the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers, reports of other Federal agencies pertaining to water resources development as directed, and conducts a 10-month program of in-service training for approximately 15 Corps planners annually-- generally at GS 12 and 13 levels-in all aspects of Federal water resources development. The training Program helps meet Corps needs for increased numbers Oqfu alified people in the planning field. The Board also has administrative responsibility for processing pro- Posed reports of the Chief of Engineers, along with Final Environmental Impact Statements, to states and Federalagencies for their 90-day review. In addition to other duties, the Resident Member of the Board has served as second alternate for the Secretary of the Army on the Foreign Trade Zones Board. The Secretary of the Army has also appointed the Resident Member to serve as his representative on the Conittee of Alternates of the Foreign Trade Zones Board and authorized him to act directly on the . oltary's behalf on all nondiscretionary matters teolving foreign trade zones. This appointment relieves the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works of routine duties in this regard; however, discretionary ratters concerning the Foreign Trade Zones Board rTotin under previous delegations of authority. TOtal membership of the Board is fixed by law at .vei. In December 1982, the Chief of Engineers lebtiteurtesd a mechanism for predesignating future based on their time of service as division e peers, geographical factors, and other criteria. This P due achieves a wider involvement of division engineers and their staffs with the proceedings of the Board. Members Designate attend and participate in meetings of the Board, but are not permitted to vote on Board actions. The membership of the Board as of 1 September 1984 was as follows: Members: Major General Norman G. Delbridge, Jr., Chairman, Deputy Chief of Engineers, Casimir Pulaski Building, Washington, DC Brigadier General Forrest T. Gay III, Division Engineer, South Atlantic Division, Atlanta, Georgia Brigadier General Thomas A. Sands, Division Engineer, Lower Mississippi Valley, Vicksburg, Mississippi Brigadier General Robert M. Bunker, Division Engineer, Pacific Ocean, Fort Shafter, Hawaii Brigadier General Donald J. Palladino, Division Engineer, South Pacific, San Francisco, California Colonel Carl B. Sciple, Division Engineer, New England, Waltham, Massachusetts Colonel John W. Devens, Resident Member, Board of Engineers for River and Harbors, Fort Belvoir, Virginia Members Designate: Brigadier General Jerome B. Hilmes, Division Engineer, North Central, Chicago, Illinois Brigadier General Robert J. Dacey, Division Engineer, Southwestern, Dallas, Texas Official Board Actions: In compliance with resolutions of Congress and instructions from the Chief of Engineers, the Board completed 36 official report reviews during Fiscal Year 1984. The favorable reports category includes favorable recommended projects for Federal construction as well as projects for solving water resources problems for major metropolitan areas, even though they may not include recommendations for construction by any agency of the Federal Government. Reports Recommending Favorably for Federal Construction: The Board recommended 23 projects at an estimated total first cost of $1,201,629,000, of which $1,132,600,000 is the first to the United States, as follows: Centralia, Chehalis River and Tributaries, Washington Arkansas River Hydropower, Locks and Dams Nos 2-5 and David D. Terry, Arkansas Tonawanda Creek Watershed, New York Oliver Lock Replacement, Black Warrior- Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama Illinois Shoreline Erosion, Casino Beach, Illinois Mississippi River Lock and Dam 14, Iowa and Illinois 41-1 Maumee Bay State Park, Ohio Roughans Point, Revere, Massachusetts Sheyenne River, North Dakota Red River Waterway, Wildlife Mitigation Lands, Louisiana Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers, Mahwah, New Jersey, and Suffern, New York Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, New Hampshire and Maine Monongahela River Navigation System, Pennsylvania and West Virginia, Locks and Dams 7 and 8 Cape Girardeau-Jackson Metropolitan Area, Missouri Sugar Creek Basin, North Carolina and South Carolina Lorain Harbor, Ohio Fall Creek Lake, Willamette River Basin, Oregon Charleston Harbor, Wando River Extension, South Carolina Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Wildlife Mitigation, Alabama and Mississippi During this fiscal year, four reports were recalled by reporting officers without Board action: Apra Harbor, Guam; San Lorenzo River, California; Sweetwater River, Recreation and Marshland Conservation, California; and Littleville Lake, Massachusetts. Reports Recommending Unfavorably for Federal Construction: During Fiscal Year 1984, the Board concurred in unfavorable recommendations of the reporting officers for Federal construction on 13 projects: Metropolitan Washington Area Water Supply Study Volusia County Shores, Florida Chowan River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina Bogue Banks, Cateret County and Adjacent Shores, North Carolina Eastport Harbor, Maine Pembina River, North Dakota Savannah Metropolitan Area, Georgia Canal 18 Basin/Loxachatchee Slough, Central and Southern Florida Lumber River Basin, North Carolina and South Carolina Williamsport and South Williamsport, Pennsylvania Cape Fear River from Acme to Fayetteville, North Carolina Jones Inlet to Freeport, New York Choctawhatchee River and Tributaries, Florida and Alabama At the request of the Chief of Engineers, the Board conducted a special review of the report of the Mississippi River Commission on Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee and Mississippi. General Design Memoranda: The Board reviewed and submitted favorable recommendations on three General Design Memoranda during the reporting period: Little Calument River, Indiana; North Branch Chicago River, Illinois; and Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi. During Fiscal Year 1984, the Board held five meetings: 28 September 1983, 1 December 1983, 21 March 1984, 13 June 1984, and 30 October 1984. Since 1902, the Board has acted on 8,649 reports, recommending favorably on 3,846 and unfavorably on 4,803. 41-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All members are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: MG William E. Read, U.S. Army, President, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; Mr. Roy T. Sessums, civil engineer deceased, Mar. 10, 1984; Mr. Sam E. Angel; Mr. R. D. James, civil engineer, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; BG Richard S. Kemrn, U.S. Army, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; BG Jerome B. Hilmes, U.S. Army, appointed Nov. 21, 1983; and RA John D. Bossler, NOAA, appointed Mar. 14, 1984; COL Joseph Yore, U.S. Army served as Secretary of the Commission. The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, LA (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, MO (1,006 miles AIP-Lower Mississippi mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, IL (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, LA (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecution of certain flood control Works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape irardeau, MO, and Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP) and with prosecution of improvements on designated tributaries and outlets below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized operations of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts Within the areas described below, in accordance with approved directives and programs and congressional appropriations therefor. 1 New Orleans District: Mississippi River project evs and river channel stabilization as required from Head of Passes, mile 0 to 320 AHP, construction of four salinity-control structures for fish and wildlife enhancement in lower Mississippi River Delta region; Bonnet Carre and Morganza Floodways; maintenance and improvements of Mississippi River navigation channel from Baton Rouge, LA (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers; Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area; flood protection in eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA; and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) in vicinity of Black Hawk, LA, to Coahoma-Bolivar County line, MS (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to vicinity of mouth of White River, AR (mile 599 AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, AR, and north bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum Bayou, AR; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between miles 320 and 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a streambank erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control and drainage improvements in Red River backwater area including leveed portion east and west of Black River and south of Red River; Jonesville, LA, Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Bayou Macon Basins and tributaries, AR and LA, and Bayou Lafourche, LA; Yazoo River Basin, MS, including backwater area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS; and Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR, including provision for agricultural water supply. Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required, from upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of Little River diversion channel, MO (1,003 miles AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau. MO, on right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel (967 miles AHP) above Cairo, IL, on left bank, including levees and revetment on right bank of Ohio River, in Mounds-Mound City area, IL; except operations above Cairo, IL, do not authorizing legislation (Tables 42-D and 42-E) is listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 42-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 include channel stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of Memphis Harbor, TN; specific fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, AR, and a pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Arc, AR; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, AR; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries, AR; improvement works in St. Francis River Basin, MO and AR, including backwater area improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage District No. 17, AR; Little River diversion channel, MO, and L'Anguille River, AR; Wolf River Basin, TN; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, TN; Reelfoot Lake area, including channel improvement for Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, TN and KY; West Kentucky tributaries, KY; Mud Lake pumping station, TN; and pumping plants and outlet structures in the Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City area, IL. Field operations of the Commission restricted to levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act (local interests contributing one-third of costs and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within the following limits by two districts reporting directly to the Commission on matters within their jurisdiction- St. Louis District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of Memphis District to Clemens Station, MO (1,254 miles AHP), on right bank, and Hamburg Bay, IL (1,215 miles AHP), on left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 120 at Havana, IL. Rock Island District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. Louis District to Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP). For work accomplished see Table 42-N, page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL VALLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO. Location and description. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and flows generally southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 115 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, MN. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, Yazoo, and Red-Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 square miles in all or part of 31 states between the Rocky and Appalachian Mountains and part of two Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, MO, 53 miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen abruptly into an alluvial valley of 35,460 square miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. A major part of the alluvial valley has been protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows within a floodplain having an average width of 5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi River Commission to Sep. 30, 1982, show approximate alltime maximum and minimum discharges between levees as follows: Cairo to White River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not confined between levees, maximum discharges recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, maximum of record below White River. High water and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 occurred as early as January. Low water stages generally prevail from August to December. Extreme all-time ranges in stages recorded at representative gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 57 feet at Red River Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). The river is nontidal above Red River Landing where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 foot during extreme low water. Previous projects. For details see page 1944, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between Head of Passes, LA, and Cape Girardeau, MO, provides protection from floods by means of levees, floodwalls, floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. Francis Basins) bank stabilization, and channel improvements in and along the river and its tributaries and outlets insofar as affected by backwater of Mississippi River, including levee work on the main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will be protected from the Mississippi River project flood. The project also provides for a 12- by 300-fo0t navigation channel between Baton Rouge, LA, and Cairo, IL; for salinity-control structures; and for channel realinement and improvement including bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood heights, control natural tendency of river to lengthen by meandering and protect levees from being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of major main stem Mississippi River improvements are shown in Table 42-A and those for off-main stem tributaries are shown in Table 42-B. Pertinent data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 42-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation are shown in Tables 42-D and 42-E. Summary of presentlY estimated Federal cost of authorized improvements is shown in Table 42-F. Construction of the existing project began in 1928 and has continued througt0of ensuing years. Based on the estimated cost of $9,443,402,000 (Cost projected through the construc tion period), and actual expenditures through Sep.302 1984, of $3,722,652,728, the entire project is about 76.2 percent complete. Recommended modifications. None. Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of i 19 as amended, applies. Such requirements have, in general, been complied with by local interests. Terminal facilities. See volume 1 of two-volme Port Series No. 21, 1979, "Ports on the Gulf Coast ofthe 42-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION United States," for Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, LA; Port Series No. 20, 1981, for New Orleans, LA; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of Mississippi River Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico (50th edition), 1982. Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, including maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30, 1984, was $3,755,687,837. (See Table 42-S.) (See also Tables 42-R, 42-T, and 42-U for additional financial statements.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Commission activities: The 321st session was held on October 24-28, 1983, on board the U.S. MV Mississippi en route on the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to Morgan City, LA. Bank protection works, levees and channel conditions were observed en route, as well as an on-site inspection ofthe Morgan City Floodwall area which is under construction. Approximately 210 persons attended public meetings held at Cairo, IL; Memphis, TN; Greenville, MS; and Morgan City, LA. About 40 of the representatives presented various problems pertaining toflood control and navigation. This session adjourned atMorgan City, LA, at 11:30 a.m., October 28, 1983. The 322nd session was held May 14-18, 1984, on board the U.S. Motor Vessel Mississippi en route on the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to New Orleans, LA. Bank protection works, levees and channel conditions were observed en route, as well as an inspection of the Old River Complex on May 17, 1984. Approximately 180 persons attended public meetings held at Cairo, IL; Memphis, TN; Vicksburg, MS; and New Orleans, LA. About 39 representatives presented various programs for flood control and navigation. This session adjourned atNew Orleans, LA, at 10:50 a.m., May 18, 1984. Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi River Commission are on file in the office of the President. Alluvial Valley Mapping teneral. Contoured quadrangles and general maps Othf e alluvial valley are available for departmental use and public distribution under prescribed regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication of quadrangle 0 aps (scale 1:62,500) continued. Road-map-type information brochures of principal portions of the overall project were published along with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and navigation. Maps and 80plemental data sheets for active works were updated and Published as required. The 1983 (51st) edition of the folio of flood control and sippatRio maps (scale 1:62,500) covering the Missis- River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico was revised and printed. CtOAlorP; 1ro2x6i7m9ately 612 flight-line miles of infra-red hota 2,679 flight-line miles of black-and-white aerial oQbg raphy (various scales); and about 309.4 hours of Oque photography were flown along the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. Work accomplished in the Districts: New Orleans Revisions of Donaldsonville, Mount Airy, Chef Menteur, and Spanish Fort, LA, 1:62,500-scale quadrangles are complete. Revision of New Orleans Area Map, 1:250,000-scale is in progress. Memphis District-Series conversion of USGS 1:24,000 scale to 1:62,500 scale quads of Weiner and Edmondson, AR, are complete. Horseshoe Lake, AR, and Tilton, AR, are in progress. Vicksburg District-Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500-scale quadrangles, with addition of flood control features of Hernando, Senatobia, Greenwood, Lexington, Seven Pines, Sardis, Mileston, and Terry, MS, is in progress. Revision of Helena, Greenwood, Jackson, Natchez, Baton Rouge, Fort Smith, and McAlester, scale 1:250,000, is in progress. Mobile, Hattiesburg, West Point, Meridian, Tupelo, Tyler, Texarkana, El Dorado, Alexandria, Shreveport, Little Rock, Palestine, and Beaumont, scale 1:250,000 were printed. Floods Streamflow observations during the fiscal year follow: Memphis District-Mississippi River crest stage of 54.0 feet at Cairo gage on May 14-16, 1984, and maximum discharge of 1,454,000 cubic feet per second, occurred on May 15, 1984, at Hickman, KY and crest stage of 38.7 feet at Memphis on May 18-19, 1984, with maximum discharge of 1,590,000 cubic feet per second on May 15, 1984. Vicksburg District-The only river in the Vicksburg District to experience long duration flooding during FY 84 was the Mississippi. The Vicksburg stage remained above its bank-full stage of 43.0 feet from May 11 to June 5, 1984. Peak stages and discharges on the Vicksburg District's reach of the Mississippi River were as follows: Arkansas City-41.2 feet on May 23, 1984, and maximum discharge of 1,650,000 cubic feet per second; Vicksburg-45.8 feet on May 25-28, 1984, and maximum discharge of 1,600,000 cubic feet per second; and Natchez-52.0 feet on May 26-29, 1984, and maximum discharge of 1,530,000 cubic feet per second. New Orleans District-On the Mississippi River, the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum stage of 56.14 feet NGVD on May 29, 1984, and the New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 17.36 feet NGVD on May 30, 1984. On the Atchafalaya River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum stage of 38.10 feet NGVD on May 29, 1984. Studies and Investigations General investigations. Surveys and reports, authorized by laws and by Senate and House Public Works 42-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Committee resolutions, were made as required. Collection and study of basic data continued. Actions taken on various requests for modifications of the existing project, Mississippi River and Tributaries, authorized by the Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, as amended (see Table 42-D), follow: West Memphis, AR Feasibility Report-The MRC Report dated April 25, 1983, contained recommendations for 23.86 miles of channel improvement on Ten and Fifteen Mile Bayous, restrictive easements and a limited revegetation program and to provide a 10-year degree of protection in urban and rural areas. The total estimated cost of this recommended improvement is $20,600,000 (Oct. 84). Helena, AR and Vicinity Feasibility Report-The MRC Report dated Dec. 16, 1982, contained recommendations for a 225 cfs pumping station, 1.85 miles of channel enlargement to contain a 10 year storm and 7' x 7' gated culvert at Long Lake. The total estimated cost of this improvement is $13,700,000 (Oct. 84). Yazoo Backwater Project, Mississippi, Mitigation Report. The Chief of Engineers Report dated July 12, 1984, recommended the acquisition of perpetual landuse easements on 11,300 acres of woodlands, or any combination of easements and fee title that would provide the same level of mitigation for fish and wildlife losses associated with the Yazoo Area Pump Project. The total estimated cost of this acquisition is $4,993,000 (Oct. 84). Engineering studies. A research program was continued for development of materials and more effective and economical design of regulation features for placing and stabilizing the Mississippi River in a suitable alinement. Potamology investigations of river behavior continue to be made. Investigations into the major cause-andeffect relationships attributable to major changes in stage-discharge relationships on the Mississippi River as a result of both natural and man-made modifications are continuing. Mississippi River and Tributaries-Levees Operations and results during fiscal year. This feature consists of construction of new, and enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade and section; construction and restoration of levee berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized in Table 42-N and further broken down as follows: New Orleans District-Enlarged 7.6 miles of levees and surfaced 4.2 miles of roads on levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-K. Vicksburg District-Constructed 0.6 mile of berms, and enlarged 2.3 miles of levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-L. Memphis District-Constructed 2.3 miles of seepage control measures in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-M. Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 42-K, 42-L, 42- M, and 42-N.) There are 1,608.3 miles of levees authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, of which 1,601.5 are in place with 1,165.1 builtto approved grade and section. The Main Stem Levee System consists of 2,202.1 miles, of which 2,195.3 are in place with 1,571.4 miles completed to approved grade and section. Included in this system are additional levees and structures along the south bank of Arkansas River (85.4 miles); along the south bank of Red River (59.2 miles, with 59.2 completed); and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River Basin, with 449.2 in place with 261.7 completed to grade and section (see Table 42-N). Of the authorized 699 miles of berms, 487.7 are complete. Graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on 1,809.5 miles of these levees. There are an additional 1,608.2 miles of authorized levees off the main stem, of which 1,109.2 are in place with 812.6 to approved grade and section. Berms have been completed on 9.8 miles and 805.7 miles of graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on the levees. For last summary of levee work accomplished under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act, see Table 42-N, pages 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. Mississippi River and Tributaries- Channel Improvements Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredg ing: Mississippi River Main Stem-(See Table 42-G Work included dredging 31,018,400 cubic yards for maintenance of channel and harbor improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet was maintained Dredging was done with the following plant: New Orleans District, channel maintenance dredging was performed by the dredges Lenel Bea., StHP(e's t' Sugar Island, and Wheeler. Harbor in New Orleans District maintained by leased cutterhead dredges E. Stroud, Louisiana, and Arnadillo II. Vicksburg Dis trict, one leased dustpan dredge and one leased cutter head dredge. The Vicksburg District channel main tenance dredging was performed by the dredgeLei Bean. The harbors were maintained with the lease, contract cutterhead dredge Lewis James. Mempied District channel maintenance dredging was perforeu by one Government-owned dustpan dredge, one lease cutterhead dredge, and one contract dustpan dredge. Sole source negotiations with Bean Dredging Corps ration began in May 1984 for lease of the contracted dustpan dredge Lenel Bean. The contract was awar in July 1984. In addition to the contract dustpan, channel mail tenance dredging was performed by the dludi contract cutterhead dredge Na tchez. Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 42-a, and 42-J.) Construction of 26.04 miles of ne' lba 42-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION revetment and 160,349 squares of concrete mattress, for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was completed by Government plant and hired labor. Also, 11.33milesof new dikes were constructed and 0 squares were placed for maintenance. In addition, work on tributaries consisted of placement of 0 miles of new dikes and 0 squares for maintenance. Other work performed in the interest of navigation, supplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi River between Cairo, IL, and Baton Rouge, LA, included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions; issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District providing information on available high-water velocities at selected locations; maintenance of bulletin boards showing daily gage readings at regular MRC gages; and contact pilot service furnishing navigation interests with latest information and advice on channel conditions and navigation interests. Cost of this work is given in Table 42-R. Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized channel improvement program between Baton Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel development and alignment improvements, decreased channel length between these cities by about 170 miles. However, current velocities increased the attack on the banks and the river began to regain its length. As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. There are now in place 840.66 miles of operative bank revetment and 206.5 miles of dikes on the lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization should prevent the river from regaining much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation channel 9-by 300-feet is being accomplished by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging as required during the low-water season. Due to growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, average maintenance dredging requirements are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable depth is being obtained. APproximately 99.8 miles of foreshore protection have been constructed along the lower Mississippi River. There are 66.46 miles of revetment and 5.20 miles dikes of on tributary channels as listed in Tables 42-H, 42-1, and 42-J. New Orleans District ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA OPerations and results during fiscal year. New ork byhired labor: Real estate activities and planning Construction were continued. New Work by contract: Construction of floodside and landside berms and levee enlargement continued interittently on the east and west protection levees, although there was considerable delay during the year due to exceptionally high water flooding the borrow pits. One contract on the west protection levee. initiated in a prior year, was completed over a distance of 4.9 miles with placement of 244,751 cubic yards. One contract on the east protection levee, initiated last fiscal year, was completed over a distance of 0.9 mile with placement of 280,485 cubic yards, and one contract, initiated Oct. 10, 1983, was completed over a distance of 0.8 mile with placement of 288,771 cubic yards. An additional 6.3 miles of levee enlargement and floodside and landside berms are under construction on the west protection levee involving placement of 212,680 cubic yards during this period and 11.7 miles of levee enlargement and floodside and landside berms on the east protection levee with placement of 3,459,097 cubic yards. Contract for the new Tiger Island floodwall, initiated in a prior year, is 99 percent complete. Contract for the new Morgan City floodwall, south of Brashear Avenue, initiated last fiscal year, is 78 percent complete. Contract for the new Morgan City floodwall, north of Brashear Avenue, initiated Nov. 14, 1983, is 39 percent complete. A contract for the Berwick floodwall initiated last fiscal year, is 95 percent complete. Maintenance by hired labor: Operation and maintenance of Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrell Locks, Morganza Control Structure, and numerous drainage structures as required, condition and operation studies, and water control management. Maintenance by contract: A contract for construction of new dolphins, Bayou Boeuf Lock, initiated last fiscal year, was completed Feb. 14, 1984. A contract for seepage cutoff installation. Morganza Control Structures, was awarded Nov. 17, 1983, initiated Dec. 7, and completed Apr. 14, 1984. Contract for Goodwood levee setback, West Atchafalaya River levee, was awarded Jan. 23, 1984, initiated Feb. 10, and is 92 percent complete. Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting in the removal of 1,100,000 cubic yards by one leased cutterhead dredge from Berwick Bay harbor between Jul. 6 and Sep. 30, 1984. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, LA. The project is 69 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $1,463,000,000 and non- Federal cost of $11,000,000. Of the 449.2 miles of levees and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya system, 261.7 miles are built to grade. See Table 42-K for status of levees. Major items remaining to be completed include completion of levees to grade and section, training works in the lower basin, enlargement of Wax Lake Outlet, and construction of two freshwater distribution structures. Drainage improvements in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area have not been initiated. Approximately 36.7 miles of bank stabilization have been placed as shown in Table 42-H. 42-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 BATON ROUGE HARBOR (DEVILS SWAMP), LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by contract: Dredging for the removal of shoal from the entrance channel was performed, resulting in the removal of 81,130 cubic yards between Sep. 1 and Sep. 3, 1984. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5.0 miles of channel was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. The project is 16 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $699,200 and cash contributions of $650,000. Completion of the remaining 2.5 miles is dependent on economic justification by developments on the initial channel. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in June 1946 and is 57 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $26,000,000 and non- Federal cost of $323,000. See page 2031, Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed work. Work required to complete the project consists of enlargement of 13.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington, LA, to the west protection levee, and additional culverts through the west protection levee at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously authorized diversion channel from Washington to the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. BONNET CARRIt SPILLWAY, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation studies, water control management, and ordinary maintenance of the control structure and spillway continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the spillway was initiated in Fiscal Year 1929. The control structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed in 1932, and utility crossings were completed in 1936. The cost of the completed work is $14,212,200. It was necessary to operate the structure to reduce flood stages in 1937, 1945, 1950, 1973, 1975, 1979, and 1983. OLD RIVER, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. New work by contract: Old River Control Auxiliary Structure, Phase II construction initiated last fiscal year, is 59 percent complete. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and maintenance of the lock and control structures as required, condition and operation studies, water control management, maintenance of cleared areas, levee shaping, operation of a picket boat at the inflow channel to the low-sill control structure during high river stages, and engineering studies. Maintenance by contract: During the period Sep.6to Sep. 17, 1984, 173,099 cubic yards of shoal were dredged from the lock forebay. Contract for the over. bank outlet riprap repairs, initiated Oct. 17, 1983, was completed Dec. 18, 1983. A contract for the overbank outlet gabion repairs was awarded Oct. 24, 1983, initiated Nov. 15, and completed Jan. 14, 1984 Contract for the south radar tower scour protection was awarded Nov. 21, 1983, initiated Dec. 22, and completed Feb. 7,1984. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began September 1955 and is 85 percent complete based on the current estimated Federal cost of $307,000,000. Principal items completed are as follows: Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, October 1959; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; inflow and outflow channels for the low sill structure, February 1961; navigation lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation March 1963, at which timeOld River was closed to navigation with a rock and earthfill dam; highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed March 1965. Approximately 4.7 miles of bank protection have been constructed at the inflo' and outflow channels. (See Table 42-H for details of bank protection.) Principal items remaining to complete the projct consist of constructing additional bank protectin works and completion of the Auxiliary Structure. including levee realinements, relocations, construction of inflow and outflow channels, and bank stabilization, TECHE VERMILION BASINS, LA (WATER SUPPLY) Operations and results during fiscal year. Ne' work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. New work by contract: A contract for dredgingj1 inlet channel, Teche Vermilion pumping statio initiated last fiscal year, was completed Dec. 20, 1983t Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 99 perre t complete based on the current estimated Federa cos of $34,928,000 and non-Federal cost of $ 84'Oet Construction was authorized by the Flood Control Ac of May 15, 1928, as modified by the Flood Cont 6) 42-6 of 1966 (Public Law� 89-789 app' roved Nov., ni;~tehloe, ' the following: a low leveed excavated chan n rotz west bank of the Atchafalaya River north of a Springs; an inverted siphon under Darbonne cut gated controgl ass trcu cture in tnh e WABPL; a gaaeedU cultviert MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION in the berm between Bayou Courtableau and the WABPL borrow pit to the south; a slotted weir in Bayou Fusilier near Arnaudville; and a navigable sector control structure in the Loreauville Canal. Improvements are to provide additional surface water in Bayou Teche, Vermilion River, and the WABPL borrow pit to satisfy the present and future needs for municipal, industrial, and irrigation water supply and to prevent pollution of these streams. Vicksburg District TENSAS BASIN, ARK AND LA Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Planning and design were continued on project features. Contracts for the pumps and motors, Phase I recreational facilities, Connerly Bayou Dam, and Ditch Bayou Dam, slurry trench, and storage building are complete on the Lake Chicot Pumping Plant Project. The contract for the Lake Chicot Pumping Plant is under way. (b)R ed River backwater area. Planning and design continued on project features. The channel Improvement contract for Wild Cow Bayou and additional channel work contract for the Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant have been completed. The gravity structure contract is complete, and the pumping plant contract was initiated in FY 83. Design and right-ofway acquisition are continuing for the remainder of the Tensas-Cocodrie levee enlargement. An 8A contract is under way for construction of the 1.5-mile connecting channel and drainage structure at the Six Mile Bayou Project. A contract for Sicily Island Item 1A is Complete. Item 1A includes 1.0 mile of levee and a water control structure (two 60" pipes). The plans and ospecifications for item 1B are complete and preparation oft he Fool River Bayou Pumping Plant design documents is being initiated. Work on the Below Red River Phase II GDM is under way. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, 11AanRd LA. Channel improvement has been accomplished on 744.6 miles of project streams, providing Major drainage outlets for the tributary areas. Addihationally, 57.2 miles of channel previously enlarged has been further enlarged and 61.6 miles of the Tensas River has been cleared and snagged. A Reevaluation andPort for the Tensas River Project, above mile 61.6, nd the Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal project has been completed and is awaiting approval. (b) Red River backwater area. Levees in Tensas- Ocodrie area are complete except for levee raising eProesary to conform to the Refined 1973 MR&T Project Flood Flowline on the Mississippi River of Which 17.8 miles has been completed. The work coprised 93.1 miles of new levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on levees. Construction of 68.6 miles of levee, Larto Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. A levee grade reevaluation study is underway for all levee systems in the Red River Backwater area. Pending the outcome of this study, enlargement of the Tensas-Cocodrie levee system has been suspended. LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, AR Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank levees and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees have been completed to approved grade and section. These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bank-protection works constructed as a feature of project for Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK. For present status of this work, see report of Little Rock District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank protection is constructed with project maintenance funds. YAZOO BASIN, MS Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Yazoo City and Belzoni protection works. Hired labor forces continued operation and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and pumping plant. (b) Greenwood protection works. Hired labor forces continued operation and maintenance of pumping plant, levees, and drainage facilities. A review of the protection provided to Greenwood and vicinity was submitted Supplement C to Greenwood Protection Work (GDM #1) and approved subject to comments in March 1983. Detailed studies are under way for various proposals recommended in the Sup. C report. Three bank stabilization projects, Sites 1, 2, and Claiborne Ave., are included under the "not less than $250,000" authority in the Appropriations bill. The Site 1 contract was awarded July 20, 1982, and completed November 10, 1982, at a contract price of $388,085. Site 2 contract was awarded September 12, 1983, with a contract price of $582,850 and terminated in 1984 because of high water stages. A new contract for this work was awarded July 5, 1984, with a contract price of $432,000. The Claiborne Street contract was awarded June 6, 1984, at a contract cost of $622,000. (c) Main stem. Planning is under way to provide drainage structure and levee closure at Bee Lake. Construction is complete on the Wasp Lake drainage structure and levee closure. Bank stabilization of Sheley Bridge began in FY 84. Channel maintenance. No clearing and snagging and herbicide willow control were exercised in the Yazoo Basin Main Stem in FY 84. However, there are plans to initiate random clearing and snagging and herbicide willow control in the Coldwater, Little Tallahatchie, Tallahatchie, and Yazoo Rivers in FY 85. 42-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 (d) Big Sunflower River, etc. A contract was awarded on Item 55A, Steele Bayou Channel Improvement, Miles 51.6 to 63.0, on March 15, 1982, and is scheduled for completion in FY 85. Plans and specifications are being prepared for the next item which is scheduled for award in December 1985. (e) Tributaries. Construction: (1) Levees. Levee work associated with the last item of work on Ascalmore-Tippo Project and also Panola-Quitman Levee Item C(R) was awarded in FY 83. (2) Channels. Removal of a portion of the plug on Alligator-Catfish Bayou channel at the site of bridge relocations was accomplished. The Alligator-Catfish channel enlargement project is now complete except for removal of the remaining portion of the plug. Controls in Alligator-Catfish channel may be necessary prior to removal of the plug. A study is under way to evaluate these needs. Construction on the remaining channel work on the Ascalmore-Tippo Project is under way. (3) Bank Stabilization. Construction contracts of Tillatoba Creek Phase I and Phase II were awarded in July 1983 and May 1984, respectively. The planning of the Pelucia Creek Levee Project, printed as Supplement B to the Greenwood Protection Works (GDM #1), is complete and plans and specifications are being prepared for Items 1 and 1A construction. Channel maintenance was continued for Yalobusha, Little Tallahatchie, and Yocona Rivers; Cassidy, David, Burrell, and Bobo Bayous; and Ascalmore Creek, by random clearing and snagging and herbicide willow control. (f) Enid Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 259.74 feet NGVD on May 22, 1984, when storage in the flood control pool was 454,500 acre-feet. Peak 24-hr. inflow was 27,150 cubic feet per second on May 8, 1984. On Sep. 30, 1984, pool elevation was 243.20 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 174,900 acre-feet. (g) Grenada Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction of remaining public-use facilities has been deferred pending development of cost-sharing agreements with local interests for construction and non-Federal operation and maintenance, consistent with projects for which recreation facilities are being constructed under the provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreational Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-72), as amended. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 219.02 feet NGVD on May 14, 1984, when storage in the flood control pool was 705,500 acre-feet. Peak 24- hour inflow was 29,350 cubic feet per second on May 8, 1984. On Sep. 30, 1984, the pool elevation was 208.0 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 335,200 acre-feet. Construction of a levee to provide protection to the community of Coffeeville from high Grenada Lake stages was begun in FY 82. In addition to the levee, other features of Coffeeville project include: three drainage structures through the levee: portable pumps: area rehabilitation; and raising of a town street. Con. struction of the levee and two of the drainage structures was completed in FY 82. The remaining feature of the Coffeeville project was completed in early FY 84. (h) Sardis Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 269.43 feet NGVD on May 22, 1984, when storage in the flood control pool was 963,800 acre-feet. Peak 24- hour inflow was 37,950 cubic feet per second on May3, 1984. On Sep. 30, 1984, the pool elevation was 249.90 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 334,000 acre-feet. An 8-mile reach of the Little Tallahatchie River from Sardis Dam to Highway 51 was clogged with sediment restricting releases from the lake. This reach has been dredged to restore the design capacity of the river. Six disposal sites were selected, located in upland hill areas to reduce the adverse impact on prime agricultural lands along the river and still be in compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Dredging was completed in August 1982. (i) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The damand appurtenant structures were maintained and operated, Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 235.83 feet NGVD on May 12, 1984, and storage 2 flood control pool was 447,500 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 53,500 cubic feet per second on May 3, 19841 On Sep. 30, 1984, the pool elevation was 216.46 feet NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 83,100 acre-feet. (j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo Area back water levees are complete, including the backwater levee from the Mississippi River levee to the westlevee of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little Sunflonwer River drainage structure, and the connecting channel from the Steele Bayou drainage structure to the Big Sunflower River. A Phase I GDM was completed riFn 82 which addresses rural flooding from ponded runoff inside the backwater levee. The Satartia area backwater levee is complete Rocky Bayou area levee Item 1A is scheduled for award in January 1985. Plans and specificatiodule being prepared for levee Item lB with award sche for April 1985. Completed backwater leveetset require raising to provide the degree of prtectop intended based on the project design flow line develope for the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. Four Greentree Reservoirs are now comple te" the three remaining reservoirs will be construbt when funds are appropriated. One reservoir hasbe indefinitely delayed because of right-of-way pr-5ee Project funds will not be available until F , 0 f0ur supply contract for the pumps and motors tor g completed reservoirs is scheduled for award in The project is 42 percent complete. 42-8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION (k) Upper Yazoo projects. The first five items of work, approximately 40 miles of channel improvement, beginning at Yazoo City. MS, and extending upstream tojustsouth of Belzoni, MS, have been completed. The next item of work, Item 2-C, consisting of approximately 7.7 miles of channel improvement is under construction. Planning is continuing on the remainder of Items 2 and 3. (I) Streambank erosion control. Construction of the following projects has been completed: Tillatoba and Hunter Creeks, Items 1 and 2: Hunter Creek 1A: South Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items 5A and 5B: North Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items A and 3A; Batupan Bogue, Items 4A, 4A-1, and 4A-2; Perry Creek, Items 6A and 6B; Johnson Creek, Items 9A, 9B, and vegetative treatment, Item 12; Goodwin Creek, Items 8A, 8B, and 8C; and Hotopha Creek. Item 7. All construction under this feature is complete, and a final report was submitted to the Secretary of the Army Jan. 5, 1982. All work constructed has been turned over to the local sponsors for operation and maintenance except for the instrumented system on Goodwin Creek where the structures were retained for possible future studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature of Yazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the total project is about 35 percent complete. A total of 47.9 miles of backwater levee has been completed to the interim grade. The ongoing Yazoo Basin Comprehensive Study will address other water resources problems and needs in the area to include urban and rural flood damage prevention, hydropower, and water supply. LOWER RED RIVER-SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of wvater control management and economic studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated iFY 29 and is 90 percent complete, based on the currentestimated cost of $42,000,000. Of the 59.2 miles of levees authorized, 59.1 miles is complete. (See Table 42-L for status of levees and Table 42-I for status of revetments. Memphis District ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR AND MO Operations and results during fiscal year. a) Littl(ea) River Drainage. Channel improvement on Castor River, Item 1-Parcel 2 completed Jul. 15. 12 . Channel improvement on Ditch 19, Item 2-Parcel 2 Completed Apr. 20, 1983. County bridge, Ditch 24, Mile 5.4 completed Jul. 1, 1983. County bridge, Castor River, Item 1, Mile 7.85 completed Oct. 25. 1982. P&S alterations railroads facilities, Castor River, Item 1 awarded Jul. 26. 1982-98 percent complete. Railroad bridge, Ditch 19, Item 2 awarded Jan. 17, 1983, 2 percent complete. Channel enlargement, Ditch 24, awarded Jun. 17. 1983, 2 percent complete. County bridge, Mile 27.75 Ditch 19, Item 2 awvarded Jun. 17. 1983. Scour repair at Bridge Mile 1.65 Dudley Ditch- Lick Creek completed May 10. 1983. G(ravel below Kennett-Senath awarded Jul. 20, 1983. (b) Upper St. Francis River. (Maintenance) Completed. Gravel, Princedale; completed Gravel, Kennett to Senath; initiated and completed levee slope restoration, Drainage District No. 35. by hired labor forces; completed shoal removal, Huxtable outlet channel; completed engine replacement, W. G. Huxtable Pumping Plant; initiated and completed scour repair, Huxtable Landside Ditch by hired labor forces; completed alteration of U.S. Highway 63 bridge at Ditch 60; initiated and completed drift removal, Madison to Marianna by hired labor forces; scour repair. Piggott, Arkansas, awarded May 31, 1984, and completed: scour repair Mingo Ditch awarded July 17, 1984. 12 percent complete; completed channel cleanout, Item 1. Big Slough Ditch; initiated and completed scour repair at Jones cutoff by hired labor forces. (c) Lower St. Francis River. Aleration of four county bridges, Big Creek. Item 2-Phase II, awarded Feb. 26, 1979-34 percent complete. Relocation of county road and abandonment of one county road, Blackfish Bayou awarded FY 78. Outlet channel cleanout- shoal removal at Huxtable Pumping Plant awarded Aug. 16, 1983. Levee roadway resurfacing. Frenchman Bayou-Whitewall awarded Sep. 13, 1983. Stateline Outlet, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission. Bridge Mile 4.98 awarded Jun. 23, 1983. Engine replacement at Huxtable Pumping Plant awarded Aug. 5, 1983, is complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Little River Drainage. Project was initiated during 1938 and is 72 percent complete. (b) Upper and Lower St. Francis River and Tributaries. Project was initiated (luring 1937 and is i77 percent complete. (c) Wappapello Lake, MO. G(enerator replacement complete. WHITE RIVER BACKWATER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Completed metallizing three pump impellers and three exhaust and intake systems at Graham Burke Pumping Station; awarded painting contract for Graham Burke Pumping Station September 15. 1984; completed levee slide repairs. (b) Landside Berm Repairs, Item R-641. (c) Levee work, slide repairs. 42-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Graham Burke Pumping Plant, awarded Sep. 17, 1982, and is 77 percent complete. (b) Oldtown awarded Mar. 28, 1983, and completed Jul. 14, 1983. (c) Phillips and Desha Counties awarded Jun. 10, 1983, 79 percent complete. LOWER WHITE RIVER Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. (b) Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1972 and is 36 percent complete. CACHE BASIN, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1971 and is 4 percent complete. REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO.9, TN AND KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1974 and is 89 percent complete. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TN Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Obion River, TN. Obion River alteration Illinois Central Railroad bridge across South and Middle Forks. Obion River, Alteration of Hwy 22 Bridge and channel was completed Sep. 13, 1983. Obion River, Channel Improvement - 33 percent complete. (b) Forked Deer River, TN. Forked Deer River, Alteration of Illinois Central Gulf Railroad bridges across North and South Forks. (c) Bradford Creek Improvement started. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Project is 94 percent complete. (b) Project is 33 percent complete. (c) Contract awarded Sep. 21, 1983. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Operations and results during fiscal year. Reimbursable contract for alterations of Illinois Central Gulf Railroad bridge across Obion Creek, Item No.3,is under way. Phase I planning is complete, but construction has not started. However, the Interstate Commerce Commission has authorized the abandonment of this bridge. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1978 and is 4 percent complete. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Completed 1.6 miles of berm at Caruthersville MO, Sep. 1984; completed seepage Control CutoffiWal at Porter Lake, AR, Sep. 1984 (0.7 mile). Awarded Nash Relief Wells on Mar. 30, 1984, approximately: percent complete. Completed Nash Relief Wells Ditches on Sep. 1984. Charleston, MO, Berm awarded Sep 1982, 98 percent complete as of Sep. 30, 1984. Awarded Lambethville, AR, Berm May 1984, 75 percent complete. Cairo-Mound City Seepage Control awarded Aug. 1984, approximately 2 percent complete. (b) Completed floodwall repairs, Cache-Cairo; cor pleted levee protection, Allenville; completed slide repairs, Walls, MS; completed slide repairs, Poker Point to West Memphis; completed gravel resurfacing Frenchmans Bayou to Whitehall, completed gray resurfacing Whitehall to St. Francis River; co 0mpleted gravel resurfacing Williamson to Point Pleasant completed gravel resurfacing, Helena to Williamso0 : completed gravel resurfacing, Commerce, MO; initiated and completed slide repairs, Little River Divers 0 Levee by hired labor forces; initiated and completd slide repairs, Birds Point-New Madrid levee by hire labor forces; initiated and completed engine repairsa Goose Pond Pumping Station; awarded repairs * Caruthersville floodwall March 27, 1984, 47 pere complete; awarded gravel resurfacing, Madrid fle levee, September 28, 1984. 42-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS AbMovilee aHgeead of Passes 0-9571 10-81 11-25 38 45 59 75 44-91 81-96 91-104 96-279 101-234 127-129 235 279-287 287-303 303-314 306-572 437 437-721 490 537 646 605-666 672-993 722-725 721-734 Remarks 42-11 Locality Head of Passes, LA-Cairo, IL The Jump-New Orleans, LA Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, LA Homeplace, LA Bohemia, LA Myrtle Grove, LA Scarsdale, LA Bohemia, LA-New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans-Morganza, LA New Orleans-Baton Rouge, LA Bonnet Carre Floodway, LA Baton Rouge Harbor Morganza Floodway, LA Morganza-Old River, LA Old River, LA control Old River-Cypress Creek, AR Vicksburg Harbor, MS Vicksburg-Lake View, MS Wilson Point, LA Greenville Harbor, MS Long Lake, Helena, AR Henrico-Helena, AR St. Francis River-Commerce, MO' Industrial levee (Ensley Bottoms) Memphis Harbor, TN Improvement Dredging, revetment, and contraction work Main line levee, right bank Main line setback, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Regulating spillway, left bank Devils Swamp barge channel Regulating spillway, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee closure and enlargement, low and high water spillway structures, navigation lock, and approach channels, right bank Main line levee, right bank Harbor extension and industrial fill Main line levee, left bank Pumping Plant and drainage structure, right bank Harbor improvements and port area Culvert and floodgate, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee and pumping station Closure of Tennessee Chute, industrial fill, levee, harbor channels, etc. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Modified by Public Law 87-874. Extends up south bank of Old River to Barbre Landing. Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Joins Arkansas River, south bank levee. Authorized by Public Law 70-391. Modified by Public Laws 79-526 and 83-780. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report approved Apr. 14, 1966.2 Authorized by Public Law 85-500. Authorized by Public Law 79-526.2 Authorized by Public Law 79-526. TABLE 42-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 803-873 Tiptonville-Obion River Main line levee, left bank, levee Modified by Acts of Jul. 24, extension, and diversion Obion 1946 and Dec. 23, 1971. River 857 Near Mud Lake, TN Pumping station and adjacent Authorized Dec. 15 and 17, channel improvements 1970 under Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 1965 FC Act. 890 St. Johns Bayou, MO Drainage floodgate and levee Modified by Jul. 24,1946 closure Act. 890 New Madrid Floodway, MO Drainage floodgate and levee Modified by Sep. 3, 1954 closure Act. 890-954 New Madrid-Birds Point, MO Floodway, right bank 902-922 Slough Bend, Hickman, KY Main line levee, left bank 922 Hickman, KY Floodwall, left bank 946 Peafield, MO Drainage floodgate Authorized by Sep. 3,1954 Act. 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district Floodwalls and levees 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district, Floodwalls, levees, and pumping Mounds, Mound City, and plant vicinity Thebes-Rock Island, IL Levees, both banks Intermittent (Sec. 6). Cape Girardeau, MO to Rock Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). Island, IL 1. Cairo, IL, is on Ohio River about 3 miles above its mouth (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Commerce, MO, is on U miles above mouth of Ohio River. pper Mississippi River, 39 42-12 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA Atchafalaty Bsin. AMor)Ym ZZr awdt West AtcihaffhJia Flood twaY s West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City East protect ion hicrc (Morg n Z and Atchafalaya Flood ira .s) Lacour-Red Cross Morganza-Morgan City Bayou Latenache Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area Bayou Fordoche-Ramah Bayou Sorrell Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan City 117 Morgan City 17-129 Below Morgan City 17-129 Below Morgan City Ateh(falaya Baisi n FloontdwauY o05#1" Upr'otchti'o/i'l i 105 Calumet )5-120 Below Morgan City 115 Berwick' 116 Patterson West protect iot il v (AtchI lfaltai Basin an( Id( West Atchv1m(i*Yia Flood 'a tes) Simmesport-Hamburg 5-105 Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet Coulee des Grues 29 West Atchafalaya Floodway 29 Morganza Floodway 40 Bayou Darbonne 40 West Atchafalaya Floodway 40 Morganza Floodway Floodway Floodway Floodway 0-54 27-54 54-117 20-27 25-117 27 0-27 31-57 80 53-117 Including lower Morganza Floodway guide levee. Through upper Morganza guide levee and enlargement of outlet channel. Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See Table 42-D. Levee landside borrow pit. Alternate route. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Port Allen to Morgan City. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes levee wvest side borrow pit channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. East of lower river. Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. Inclosed area between Wax Lake Outlet and Berwick. Lower Atchafalaya River. Adjustment to provide fresh water. West Atchafalaya Floodway. Through West Atchafalaya protection levee. 42-13 Levee. upper Morganza guide Levee and Morgan City floodwall Drainage structure. Pointe Coupee. and channel enlargement Additional drainage facilities Drainage channel Lock Alternate navigation channel, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Lock in Bayou Boeuf' Channel relocation Levee, floodwall Floodgate, east Levees, floodwall, drainage structures, and pumping plants Lock Water system Levee fuse plug Protection levee Levee enlargement and floodgate extension Railway Rail way Gated drainage structures Highway Highway 1] 1] 1C TABLE 42-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River laya River Locality Improvement 41 41 41 94 94 105 105 0-54 5-6 5-66 28-30 40-41 54-117 94-106 Mileage Above Mouth 0-8 50-133 96 133 0-17 17-40 40-51 51-60 17-42 87-107 40 60 Bayou Courtableau West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Charenton Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe Calumet Wax Lake Outlet Atchafalaya Rirer Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou Simmesport Simmesport-Bayou Garofier Melville Krotz Springs Below Alabama Bayou Mississippi River-Morgan City TECHE-VERMILION BASINS, LA Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins Courtableau Basin, LA, and outlets Charenton Canal West Atchafalaya protection levee borrow pit channel Bayou Courtableau spillway Bayou des Glaises BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES Bayou Courtableau Bayou Cocodrie Bayous Cocodrie-Bouef diversion Bayou Boeuf Bayous Boeuf-Rapides diversion Upper Cocodrie Bayoui Boenif Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid Structures Lecompte Control Structure Bayou Rapides Control Structure Gated drainage control structures and channels Railway Railway Floodgate and approach channels Outlet, Charenton drainage canal and protection levee. Floodgate, west Drainage canal-railway and highway bridges East bank, levee Levee, ring, and drainage structure West bank, levee Levee, ring Levee, ring Channel enlargement 12- by 125-foot navigation channel Pumping station above Krotz Springs, conveyance channels, and appurtenant works Drainage channel Drainage channel Drainage control structure Diversion channel Enlargement and additional culverts Enlargement and realinement New channel New channel New channel Enlargement, clearing, and snagging Enlargement, realinement, clearing and snagging Fixed elevation weir Gated drainage structure 42-14 Remarks Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Restoration of drainage west of West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee. Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. To lower flood heights. Increase channel capacities to decrease flood heights Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. Freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya Riverto Teche-Vermilion Basins Outlet to gulf. Intercepting drainage channel. Washington to west protection levee. Locality MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks Bayou Lamourie Control Structure Various LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA AMITE RIVER, LA Amite River, LA LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK, RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Moncla-Hotwells Red River-Moncla to Lake Long EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA Eastern Rapides and southcentral Avoyelles Parishes, LA TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Red River backwater area Tensas-Cocodrie area Larto Lake-Jonesville Sicily Island area Below Red River area Black River, LA Six Mile Bayou area Jonesville, LA Ouachita River Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR, and LA Boeuf River, AR, and LA Below Bayou La Fourche Bayou LaFourche Boeuf River, AR, and LA above Bayou LaFourche Canal 19 Canal 19 extension Big and Colewa Creeks 87 (2, 3) Gated drainage structure Railway, highway, and local road bridges, and pipeline crossing Flood protection Bank protection Levee, south bank Levees Flood protection and drainage improvement Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plant Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, and structures Drainage structure and appurtenant channel works Levees, floodwall, pumping plant, and interior drainage Levees, drainage channels, and structures Clearing Channel improvement and realinement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvements 42-15 Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Authorized by Public Law 91-611. (4) (4) (4) (4) Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter Report dated May 31, 1977. MR&T authority.2 Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. Incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 81-516.2 Monroe to Sandy Bayou and Bawcomville (Sec. 6). (5) (5) Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 and 79-526. 2 :3 (5) (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 82-145 3-56 3-56 5 56 0-32 0-56 151-235 210-285 286-296 0-75 TABLE 42-B (Continued) Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Locality Improvement Remarks 0-8 0-7 0-33 0-10 0-9 0-14 0-170 0-34 0-35 Lake Chicot 0-6 0-160 0-16 0-0.2 Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement To divert flows from Lake Chicot (h) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) See Table 42-E (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Tributaries of Boeuf Rirer Canal 19 Fleschmans Bayou Caney Bayou Big Bayou Canal 18 Kirsch Lake Canal Black Pond Slough Bayou Macon, AR, and LA Bayou Macon Canal 43 Canal 81 Pumping plant and drainage structure Tributary of Bayou Macon Rush Bayou Tensas River, AR and LA Tensas River Tributary of Tensas Ricer Mill and Vidal Bayous Grant's Canal, LA Grant's Canal at Lake Providence LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, AR Yancopin-Pine Bluff Fletcher Bend, AR to Pine Bluff North Little Rock to Gillett (below Plum Bayou) GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU METO, AR Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR YAZOO BASIN, MS Yazoo Backwater area Yazoo River System below Arkabutla Lake Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Prichard Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Askew Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel Yazoo City protection Rocky Bayou area Belzoni protection Greenwood protection Arkabutla Lake Clearing Channel improvement Channel improvement Filling canal Levee, south bank Revetment Levee, north bank Water supply and drainage improvements Levees and pumping plants Channel improvement Levees, right bank Levees, left bank Authorized by Public Law 78-534., Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public La\w 81-516. (5) Authorized by Public La' 81-516. Including Tallahatchied Coldwater Rivers. Intermittent. Intermittent. Floodway channel Levee, drainage structure, and pumping plant Channel clearing and enlargement Levee and floodwall Levees, channel improvement, drainage structures, and pumping plants Flood detention and conservation Improvement of 7'8mile was approved Apr. 29 1970. See Table 42-C. 42-16 (6) 23-98 35-98 48-102 0-75 0-381 75-366 75-345 45-109 75 127 185 381 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River 0-64 64 0-24 0-26 26 0-13 13 0-88 137-260 75-381 0-8.3 0-23 0-42 275-290 0-204 0-8 0-28 0-81 0-43 0-4 0-27 153-160 0-68 13-55 0-68 99 Locality Improvement Remarks Yalobusha River below Grenada Lake Grenada Lake Tallahatchie River-Little Tallahatchie River Little Tallahatchie River below Sardis Lake Sardis Lake Yocona River below Enid Lake Enid Lake Cassidy Bayou below Old Coldwater River Upper Yazoo Projects Area between main stem and hills including Bobo Bayou McKinney Bayou Alligator-Catfish Bayous Bear Creek Whiteoak Bayou Tallahatchie River, MS Big Sunflower River, etc. Big Sunflower River Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal Hushpuckena River Quiver River Gin and Muddy Bayous, MS Bogue Phalia Ditchlow Bayou Little Sunflower River Deer Creek Steele Bayou Muddy Bayou LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, AR Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake Big Creek and tributaries Clarendon levee 42-17 Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Floodway channel Levees and channel improvement Channel improvement and enlargement of pumping plant Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Two road crossings of Panola- Quitman Floodway, MS and for protection of Sheley Bridge Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Water-control structure Levee, backwater including outlet Pumping plant Channel improvement and structures Levee and outlet structures - See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. Including Moores Bayou, Cutoff Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. As modified in GDM in 1967. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 90-147. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 87-874. Authorized by Public Law 78-534.1 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Modified in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See Table 42-D. Mile 605-645 Mississippi River. (6) Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. TABLE 42-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 108-192 122 143 0-196 0-90 260 0-225 225 0-105 86 0-36 0-29 0-17 0-12 0-108 0-25 0-20 0-15 Augusta to Clarendon De Valls Bluff Des Arc, AR CACHE BASIN, AR Cache River, AR Bayou DeView, AR ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND BASIN, AR, AND MO Inter-River Drainage District in Missouri Mouth of St. Francis River- Wappapello Dam Wappapello Lake Little River Basin Marked Tree, AR Tyronza River Big Slough Ditch Mayo Ditch Cross County Ditch Belle Fountain Ditch Drainage District No. 17 L'ANGUILLE RIVER, AR L'Anguille River and tributaries, Brushy and First Creeks WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Wolf River and tributaries, TN Obion River and tributaries, North, South, Middle, and Rutherford Forks Forked Deer River and tributaries, North, Middle, and South Forks Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Porter Gap, TN REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, KY and TN Levees, outlet structures Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and two outlet structures Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Flood detention and conservation Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Marked Tree Siphon Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement and pumping station Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Pumping plant Flood control improvements Construction to main-stem standards, levee and appurtanent structures for flood control Channel improvement Channel improvements and pumping station 42-18 (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized Dec. 16,1975. See Table 42-D. See Table 42-C. Authorized by PublicLaw 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 80-858. (6) Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by Res02Uiof Dec. 15 and 17,1970 Authorized by War t Resources Act o Oc 97 1976.2 Section 102,1 Section 183, 1976.2 Authorized by Public La0 83-780. - Authorized in Dec .t 1970, See Table 42-, MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Obion Creek, KY LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO Delta to Ancell, MO MISSOURI RIVER, MO Mouth to St. Charles, MO ILLINOIS RIVER, IL Mouth to Havana, IL OHIO RIVER, IL AND KY Cairo to Mound City and Mounds, IL Channel improvement Levees Levees Levees Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Mile 49 above Cairo. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Intermittent (Sec. 6). Floodwall, levee, revetment, and pumping plant 1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Atchafalaya Basin protection levees cross Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, LA and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Teche Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans district. 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 4. Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89-298. 5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526.3 See Table 42-D. 6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 42-19 0-47 0-28 0-120 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 42-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY DAMS AND LAKES Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Name' Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Nearest town to damsite Drainage area, square miles Conservation pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Elevation, feet, NGVD Flood control pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Runoff, inches Outlet gates: Number Size, feet Capacity, thousand cubic feet per second Spillway: Type, uncontrolled Length, feet Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD Discharge capacity, thousand cubic feet per second Surcharge pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Runoff, inches Elevation, feet, NGVD Dam: Type, earthfill Length, thousand feet Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD Yalobusha Grenada 1,320 10 86 193 65 1,252 17.8 3 7.5 by 14 10.7 Chute 200 231 52 106 1,385 19.7 247.5 Rolled 13.9 256.0 Yocona Enid 560 6 58 230 28 602 20.2 Little Tallahatchie Sardis 1,545 Coldwater Arkabutla 1,000 5 31 209.3 11 108 236.0 58.5 1,462 17.7 2 4 8by16 6 by12 9.4 Chute 200 268 50 41 554 18.5 284.0 Rolled 8.4 293.0 10.0 Chute 400 281.4 132 90 1,447 17.6 301.0 Hydraulic 15.3 311.4 33 494 9.3 3 8.5 by 19 10.0 Chute 300 238.3 89 63 858 16.1 256.3 Rolled Rolled 11.5 2.7 264.3 419.7 1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis and Arkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, MS; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, MO. 42-20 St. Francis Wappapello 1,310 4 31 354.7 23 582 8.4 3 10 by 20 18.0 Gravity 740 394.7 229 32 521 7.5 413.7 TABLE 42-D MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document May 15,1928 Jun. 19, 1930 Feb. 15, 1933 Apr.23, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 15, 1936 Aug. 28,1937 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River. revetment and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in floodcontrol works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carre Spillway and Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, and permits, in said lands Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and local levee districts for the cost of, levee rights-of-way for flood control work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, TN (Nonconnah Creek is correct title) Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, AR Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway: flood control. Yazoo River: construction of Morganza floodway: and an outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, LA. including a 6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and Atchafalaya River; and construction of roads on levees and drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. Provided for construction of floodwalls, levees, and revetments along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of Memphis, TN Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined reservoir floodway and levee plan. Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works along Cache River. IL Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets and lands therein; including program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening of levees. Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood control works in backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie. LA Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia. MS Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization program. $200 million. Flood control on the Big Sunflower. Little Sunflower., HHuulslh pBurackkee-nMa.i lal nCd rQeeuki vCear nRali.v ers and their tributaries, and on Bogue Phalia. Ditchlow Bayou. Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS' Improve Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon. AR' Improve Bayou Lafourche. LA Improve Yazoo River tributaries. North bank, Arkansas River levees (below Plum Bayou).' 42-21 H. Doe. 90. 70th Cong., 1st sess. Public 395, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public 351. 72d Cong. Public 171. 73d Cong. R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 45. 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report dated Apr. 2, 1925. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1.74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report on record in OCE. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 359. 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doe. 509, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 534. 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 151. 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 191. 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doe. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308. 74th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 42-D (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Actor Authorization Work Authorized Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).' Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, LA' Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo Basins. Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements.' Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, MO Big Sunflower River, etc.' Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), TN Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $100 million. Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, MO with respect to West Tennessee tributaries. Improve L'Anguille River, AR Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA' Flood protection at Des Arc, AR Improve St. Francis River and Basin, AR and MO Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, AR and MO Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA' Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, LA Additional protection to Red River Backwater Area. Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, LA Bank protection, Amite River, LA Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $200 million. Jonesville, LA levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure.' Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River Backwater Area, AR Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River to Morgan City, LA Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), MS Improve New Madrid Floodway, MO, including Peafield drainage floodgate. Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. Improve Reelfoot Lake area, KY and TN Improve Greenville Harbor, MS 42-22 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Oct. 30, 1951 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Document H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong.,2d sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doe. 138, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doe. 516, 78th Cong.,2d sess. S. Doe. 51. 80th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong.. 2d sess. H. Doe. 627, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doe. 651, 80th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doe. 321, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 132, 81st Cong.,1st sess. S. Doe. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doe. 255, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong.,2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong.. 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81stCong" 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong" 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81stCong" 2d sess. S. Doe. 117, 81stCong..l sess. Public Law 237, 82d Con. 1st sess. S. Doe. 53, 82d Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 85, 83d Cong.,st sess. 1st H. Doe. 183, 83d Cong, sess. Nd H. Doe. 478, 83d Cong. sess. ga S. Doe. 160, 83d Cong,, sess. S. Doe. 15, 86th Cong,1st sess. TABLE 42-D (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 18, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Apr. 14, 19662 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 20, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 10, 19683 Mar. 3, 19703 Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in Arkansas. White River backwater area pumping plant. Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-$50 million. Modification-Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, MS Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, AR Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $53 million. Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of main stem project. Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Meto. Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and Mississippi Delta region. Deauthorize Amite River, LA project. Modify St. Francis River, MO and AR, project within District No. 7, Poinsett County, AR Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson Point, LA Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, LA Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $100,000 for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, MS, and $80,000 for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, MS Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, AR Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, MO, and Drainage District No. 17, AR Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, IL, and vicinity. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout along David Bayou, MS Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in Muddy Bayou, MS 42-23 H. Doc. 108, 85th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 89-42. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report Approved-Apr. 14, 1966. H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 90-147. H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 90-483. Unpublished MRC report dated May 8, 1968. Unpublished MRC report dated Feb. 2, 1970. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document Apr. 29, 19703 Jun. 4, 19703 Dec. 31, 1970 Senate and House Public Works Resolutions adopted Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, respectively.' River Basin Monetary Act of Dec. 23, 1971 Jan. 19, 19732 TITLE I Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, MS Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, LA Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA, that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel and Lake Long, and their tributaries. Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), KY, to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all transmission lines required by the project. Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, TN and KY, authorized: a. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel improvements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in KY and TN b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent channel improvements. Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, MS Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $97 million. Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve local interests of all responsibility except that of providing maintenance. Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional drainage facilities in Long ake area, vicinity of Helena, AR Projects recommended by four completed reports were authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum of advance engineering and design on: a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, MS b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Natchez area). c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, LA Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes. Modification of the Yazoo Basin, MS, feature to provide for a streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta and hill areas of basin. Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized mitigation lands in: a. Tensas Basin, LA and AR, feature (Red River backwater). b. St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature. Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA, feature, to provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional culverts through west protection levee. Unpublished MRC report dated Mar. 6, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Sep. 22, 1969. S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. Public Law 91-611. H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Oct. 4, 1972. Sec. 1, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-157, lstsess5 Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 32, Public Law 93.251 Sec. 42, Public Law 93.251 Sec. 87, Public Law 93251 42-24 TABLE 42-D (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 River Basin Monetary Act of Oct. 2, 1975 Dec. 16, 19752 TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1977. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1978. Modification of Cache River Basin, AR. feature to provide for: acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife management, recreation, and environmental purposes. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $211 million. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $158,000,000. Modification of St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature to provide relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri. Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development during period Jul. 1 - Sep. 30, 1976. $60,300,000. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase I - Advanced Engineering and Design Memoranda - On: a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodwvay, MO. project: Report of OCE - Sep. 26, 1975. b. Nonconnah Creek. TN and MS. project: Report of OCE -Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, TN and MS. Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to: a. (Sec. 102) - Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, TN Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. Sec. 99. Public Law 93-251. Sec. 201. Public Law 93-251 Mar. 7, 1974. Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Nov. 11, 1975. Public Law 94-180, Dec. 26. 1975. Public Law 94-355. Jul. 12. 1976. Public Law 94-587, Oct. 22. 1976. Public Law 95-96 Aug. 7. 1977. 42-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document Dec. 9, 1977, 5th Ind. on VXD May 31, 1977, Letter Report.2 Jun. 28, 1980 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant channel works in the Six Mile Bayou area of Concordia Parish, LA The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge for the preservation and development of environmental resources and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which otherwise would be required for certain water resources projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood control projects, rescue work, repair, restoration or maintenance of flood control projects threatened or destroyed by flood, $232,519,000: Provided, That not less than $250,000 be available for control of bank erosion of streams in the Yazoo Basin, including the foothill area. Provided further, That funds for the Tensas Basin Red River Backwater Area, be used for flood control, etc. for Sicily Island and Below Red River including pumping stations. Unpublished Vicksburg District report dated May 31, 1977, on Cynthia and Six Mile Bayous, LA Public Law 96-285, Jun.28, 1980. Public Law 96-367, Oct. 1, 1980. 1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries project as shown in Table 42-E. 2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was approved under delegated authority of the President, Mississippi River Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of the 1946 Flood Control Act (Public Law 79-526). TABLE 42-E 3. Date minor modification was approved under di cretionary authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 15, 1928, Flood Control Act, as amended. 4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201f Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. Act of Incorporation Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Public Law No. 79-526 79-526 79-256 79-256 79-526 79-526 80-858 81-516 81-516 Authorizing Act Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 22, 1936 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 Description Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements, TN Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, LA From North Little Rock, AR, to Gillett, AR, on north bank of Arkansas River (portion below Plum Bayou). White River levees, Augusta to Clarendon and De Valls Bluff, AR Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, LA Big Sunflower River, etc. Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton Rouge, LA (Baton Rouge Harbor) Jonesville, LA Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, LA 42-26 INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION For Last Full Report See Annual Report for 1941, p.943 1946, P.1029 1946, p. 1053 1946, P. 1083 1945, P 982 1946, p. 1061 1948, p.1059 1953, p.773 1953, p. 737 -- - -- - MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Project Title Completed features 2 Mississippi River levees Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act Channel improvement Atchafalaya Basin, LA Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA Old River, LA Lower Red River- South Bank Red River levees. LA Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, LA Mississippi Delta Region, LA Teche-Vermilion Basins, LA Tensas Basin, AR and LA Lower Arkansas River, AR Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, AR Yazoo Basin, MS Lower White River, AR Cache Basin, AR St. Francis Basin, AR and MO L'Anguille Basin, AR West Tennessee Tributaries, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN & KY Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN & KY Reelfoot Lake, TN & KY (Completed) Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN & KY West Kentucky Tributaries, KY Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge TOTAL 1. Inflation projected through l2. the construction period. Includes onnet Carr6, Morganza, and New Madrid Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg Harbors: Lake Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed roads on main stem levees; channel construction works; Atchafalaya River Estimated Cost' $ 165,432,000 1,366,000,000 4,170,000 4,000,000 2,932,000,000 1,555,000,000 25,000,000 315,000,000 42,000,000 57,900,000 33,200,000 35,700,000 454,000,000 34,700,000 130,900,000 1,490,000,000 52,000,000 146,000,000 379,000,000 25,300,000 107,000,000 16,400,000 (10,600,000) 440,000 10,160,000 22,100,000 40,000,000 $ 9,443,402,000 and Basin: Wax Lake Outlet; Charenton Canal: Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, and Des Arc protection works; Baton Rouge Harbor; and miscellaneous features. 42-27 Estimated Cost' REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 42-G MIISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards Location Fiscal Year 1984 Mileage Above Head Channel District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total New Orleans Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) Main stem channel Vicksburg Main stem channel Vicksburg Harbor Greenville Harbor Memphis Main stem channel Memphis Harbor TOTAL 235 234-320 320-600 437 537 600-954 726 81.1 12,950.0 2,778.0 111.0 197.0 81.1 12,950.0 2,778,0 111.0 197.0 - 18,856.5 18,856.5 - 553.1 553.1 - 35,526.7 35,526.7 42-28 1 TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1984) Operations This FY Construction Construcerative Nonop- Otpiveera- Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Venice, LA .................. Lower Childress- Fort Jackson, LA ............ Buras, LA ................... Tropical Bend, LA ........... Bayou Lamoque, LA ......... Port Sulphur, LA ............ Point Michel, LA ............ Bohemia, LA ................ Diamond, LA ................ Gravolet, LA ................ Junior, LA ................... Harlem, LA ................. Myrtle Grove, LA ............ Monsecour,LA ............... Alliance, LA ................ Belair, LA .................. Jesuit Bend, LA ............. Linwood, LA ................ Oak Point, LA ............... Scarsdale, LA ............... English Turn, LA ........... Poydras, LA ................. Cutoff, LA ...................... Third district reach, LA ....... Algiers Point, LA ............ Gouldsboro Bend, LA ........ Gretna Bend, LA ............ Greenville Bend, LA ......... Carrollton Bend, LA ......... Avondale Bend, LA .......... Kenner, LA .................. Luling, LA ................... Good Hope, LA .............. Waterford, LA .............. M ontz, LA .................. Lucy, LA .................... Reserve, LA ................. Willow Bend, LA ............ Angelina, LA ................ Vacherie, LA ................ Belmont, LA ................ 12 R 16,216 22 25 30 33 39 44 46 49 51 54 56 59 61 62 65 68 71 72 75 78 82 88 93 95 96 97 100 104 109 114 119 126 128 132 136 138 141 145 148 152 R RRL R RL RLRL RLRL RL RLRL RL RR RRL RL RL R L RL RL RL 2,982 7,264 1,173 5,337 2,658 3,293 - 10,185 1,318 - 50,472 105 21,206 - 48,236 -_- 123 283 2,552 20,928 14,534 16,153 41,055 3,621 835 6,817 4(0,D 979 527 - 6,223 -1,093 -,09 3,118 H .< M C^ CO 16,210 13,097 17,283 25,012 7,264 27,238 17,842 12,380 8,750 17,435 17,570 15,148 15,925 10,020 9,750 21,295 22,860 9,125 12,377 11,575 16,408 44,814 21,256 24,394 7,728 4,960 9,662 22,045 15,015 22,371 32,404 28,908 16,298 12,295 17,502 17,826 20,947 7,618 19,000 13,295 24,785 797 2,623 7,877 TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1984) Operations This FY Construction eNroantiovpe- tpiveera- Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER continued Standard Revetment: Rich Bend, LA .............. Romeville, LA ............... St.Alice, LA ................ Burnside, LA ................ Aben, LA ................... St. Elmo, LA ................ Smoke Bend, LA ............ Marchand, LA .............. Philadelphia Point, LA ....... New River Bend, LA ......... White Castle, LA ............ St. Gabriel, LA .............. Plaquemine Bend, LA ........ Manchac, LA ................ Missouri Bend, LA ........... Arlington, LA ............... Port Allen, LA ............... Allendale, LA ................ Springfield Bend, LA ........ Arboth, LA ................. Grand Bay, LA .............. Bayou Sara, LA .............. Red Store, LA ............... Arrow Bend, LA ............. Boies Point, LA ............... Morganza, LA ............... Iowa Point, LA .............. Brunette Point, LA ........ Greenwood Bend, LA ......... Hog Point, LA ............... Carr Point, LA .............. Above Old River, LA .......... Fort Adams, MS ............. Point Breeze, LA ............ Coochie,LA ................. Palmetto, MS ............... Subtotal New Orleans District, Mississippi River ....... 157 161 165 170 172 174 177 180 183 185 193 201 209 215 222 227 231 238 244 250 258 265 269 272 275 279 282 285 289 296 304 305 308 313 317 322 RLRL RL RL RL RL R LRL RRL RRL R L RRL RL RR RL R RL 8,264 4,229 662 4,508 6,439 2,753 12,178 89,453 (16.94 Miles) 81 26,492 37 15,920 78 340 112 230 3,240 20,452 35,163 12,652 58,357 2,756 460 958 705 12,041 3,093 6,300 3,097 8,031 7,958 3,510 16,206 9,093 6,471 9,314 3,985 1,389 391,033 8,017 (1.52 Miles) 27,408 15,334 27,052 20,279 10,063 10,240 17,075 7,845 5,379 24,394 33,335 25,161 36,137 35,480 22,632 12,244 14,073 17,940 25,690 13,190 7,090 16,958 11,315 13,600 16,094 20,513 11,375 8,038 14,987 8,673 8,600 4,800 17,219 11,165 17,150 30.864 1,327,079 (251.34 Miles) 0 H O 0 0 z c Ca �46 19 Ca A ., - - 41,287 75,563 OLD RIVER CONTROL Standard revetment: Inflow channel .............. Inflow channel .............. Outflow channel ............. Total standard revetment, Old River ............. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER Standard revetment: Mile One, LA ................ Coville, Bayou, LA ........... Legonier, LA ................ Simmesport, LA ............. Kuhlman Bayou, LA ......... Odenburg, LA ............... Cason, LA ................... McCrea, LA ................. Woodside, LA ............... Provosty, LA ................ Crooked Bayou, LA ........... M ercier, LA ................. Barberton, LA .............. Evans Point, LA ............. Goudeau, LA ................ Morris Bayou, LA ........... Goodwood, LA ............... Red Cross, LA ............... M elville, LA ................. Cross Bayou, LA ............. Melville South, LA ........... Toles, LA ................... Petite Prairie, LA ........... Holloway Lake, LA ........... Bayou Sherman, LA ......... Krotz Springs, LA ........... Sherburne, LA .............. Bayou Big Graw, LA .......... Morgan City ................ Total standard revetment .. 315 315 315 LRR S- - 2,415 - - - - - - - 4,365 - - - - - - - 17,754 24,534 (4.65 Miles) Below Confluence of Red and Atchafalaya Rivers 1 34679 12 13 14 17 18 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 33 35 36 37 38 40 43 46 115 LRL RL RRL RLRL RL RL RL RL RL RLL RRR L 538 - 590 1,128 (0.21 Mile) 1,635 1,881 3.516 4,150 6,550 8,940 10,636 5,565 5,375 10,798 5,027 13,002 7,768 9,600 10,478 3,592 4,961 3,938 3,800 8,505 8,065 4,870 3,815 4,070 6,355 8,381 7,085 5,200 4,625 7,035 8,394 3,410 193,990 (36.74 Miles) 4,634 6,883 11.517 IO Ca Ca ca z Dikes: None ----- TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1984) Operations This FY Construction Nonop- Operaerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Below Confluence of Old River LOWER RED RIVER Outflow Channel and Red River Standard revetment: Long Lake, LA ............... 10 R - - - - - - - 6,652 Naples, LA ................... 7 R - - - - - - - 6,190 Turnbull Island, LA .......... 9 L - - - - - 2,313 - 6,815 Total standard revetment - - - - - - - 19,657 (3.72 Miles Dikes: None 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). ;} Oo m 0 z 0-0 z I, c Co TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1984) Operations This FY Construction eNroantoivpe- Above New Work Reinforcement Since Head Bank Exten- Prior Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Bougere Bend, LA ............ 329 R - - - - - - - Dead Mans Bend, MS ......... 335 L 6,990 - 23,247 - - - - Railroad Landing, MS ........ 346 L 4,425 - 17,000 - - - - St. Catherine Bend, LA ....... 350 R 5,023 - 12,321 - - - - Morville, LA ................ 356 R - - - - - - - Natchez Island, MS ........... 357 R - - - - - - - Carthage, MS ................. 361 L - - - - - - - Natchez Front, MS ........... 364 L - - - - - - - Gibson, LA ................ 371 R - - - - - - - Ashland, LA-MS ............. 374 L - - - - - - - Kempe Bend, LA ............. 383 R 1,600 - 4,812 -. Browns Field, LA ............ 389 R - -- - Goldbottom, MA ............ 392 L --- ?Hardscrabble, LA ............ 398 R - - - - - - - SGrand Gulf, MS .............. 403 L 4,845 - 13,856 -. Point Pleasant, MS-LA ........ 413 R -- - - TogolIsland, LA .............. 415 R - - - - - - - Lake Karnac, LA-MS ......... 419 L - - - - - - - Diamond Point, LA-MS ....... 423 R - - - - - - - Reid-Bedford, LA ............ 429 R - - - - - - - Racetrack, MS ............... 433 L - - - - - - - Barge Line Terminal, MS ..... 437 L - - - - - - - Vicksburg Harbor, MS ....... 437 L - - - - - Delta Point, LA .............. 437 R - - - - - King's Point-Opposite Delta Point, LA-MS ......... 439 L ... False Point, LA .............. 443 R ... Marshall-Brown's Point, LA-MS ................... 446 L - --. Milliken Bend, LA ............ 453 R - - - - - - - Belle Island, LA-MS .......... 460 L - - - - - - - Goodrich, LA .................. 467 R - - - - - - - Cottonwood Bar, MS, TF ...... 470 R 7,500 - - - - - - Fitler-Cottonwood, MS ........ 474 L - - - - - - - Hagaman, LA ... ................. 481 R .. - - Ben Lomond, MS ............. 486 L .- - Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island. LA-MS ............ 488 R - . - - - - Lake Providence, LA ......... 489 R .- - Mayersville, MS .............. 497 L .. - - Sarah Island-Opossum Point, LA-MS ................... 503 R Operative Thru This FY (Linear Feet) 20,805 17,370 11,595 26,493 11,815 2,180 , 14,700 6,510 - 22,735 18,657 28,285 9,280 30,250 22,530 53,948 32,345 5,670 19,260 12,125 18,392 1,935 3,040 7,350 0 7,650 19,330 12,860 19,580 44,650 24,160 37,220 7,500 28,427 37,756 10.235 52,1242 11,600 34,992 16,970 TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1984) OpeCraotniostnrsu cTtihoins FY Nonop- Opera- Constructionerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER continued Standard revetment: Carolina, MS ................ 507 L - - - - - - - 11,080 Cracraft, AR ................ 511 R - - - - - - - 22,210 Worthington, MS-AR ......... 514 R - - - - - - - 8,350 Walnut Point Kentucky Bend, MS .................. 519 L - - - - - - - 45,653 American Cutoff, MS-AR ..... 526 L - - - - - - - 2,980 Sunnyside-Lakeport, AR ...... 530 R - - - - - - - 33,685 Vancluse, AR ............... 534 R - - - - - - - 4,300 Island 84, AR, MS ............ 535 L - - - - - - - 13,475 Warfield Point, MS ........... 537 L - - - - - - - 4,320 Leland-LaGrange, AR-MS .... 538 L - - - - - - - 14,150 Spanish Moss, AR ............ 539 R - - - - - - - 4,580 Tarpley Island, MS ........... 542 R - - - - - - - 2,000 Miller Bend, MS ............. 544 L - - - - - - - 29,360 Island 82, AR ................. 546 R - - - - - - - 3,080 Ashbrook Island, MS ......... 549 R - - - - - - - 3,455 Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, AR .................. 553 R - - - - - - - 40,560 Huntington Point, MS ........ 556 L - - - - - - - 10,045 Pair O'Dice, AR .............. 561 R - - - - - - - 9,095 Eutaw-Mounds, MS .......... 563 L - - - - - - - 40,188 CypressBend, AR ............ 568 R - - - - - - - 26,585 Catfish Point, MS ............... 573 L - - - - - - - 20,075 Ozark, AR-MS ............... 578 R - - - - - - - 22,015 Prentiss, AR-MS ............ 582 L - - - - - - - 20,315 Rosedale Bend, AR ........... 585 L - - - - - - - 4,820 Riverton, MS ................. 586 L - - - - - - - 12,500 Klondike, AR ................ 588 R - - - - - - - 23,400 Victoria Bend-Terrene, MS ... 593 L - - - - - - -29,245 Big Island, AR ............... 598 R - - - - - - - 16,515 Smith Point, MS ............. 601 L - - - - - - - 18,185 Dennis, MS ................. 611 L 3,930 - 10,521 - - - - 25,195 Cessions, MS ................ 615 L - - - - - - - 10,910 Total revetment, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ......... 34,313 0 81,757 0 0 0 0 1,306,650 0 0 0 z OEM z Co CI >o (6.49 Miles) (247.5 Miles) Dikes: Jackson Point, MS ............ 330 L - - - - - - - Opposite Warnicott Ldg, MS 352 L - - - - - - - Natchez Island, LA-MS ....... 358 R - - - - - - - Waterproof Bar, LA .......... 379 R - - - - - - - Spithead Towhead, MS ....... 386 L - - - - - - - Browns Field, LA ............ 388 R - - - - - - - Cottage Bend, LA-MS ......... 389 L --. Bondurant Towhead, LA ...... 394 R --- Coffee Point, LA .............. 405 R - - - - - - - Yucatan, MS ................ 410 R - - - - - - - TogolIsland, LA .............. 416 L - - - - - - - Below Racetrack, MS ......... 430 L - - - - - - - Racetrack Towhead, MS ...... 431 R - - - - - - - Marshall Cutoff, LA .......... 448 R - - - - - - - Forest Home Towhead, LA .... 449 L - - - - - - - Willow Cutoff, LA . ......... 462 R - - - - - - - Arcadia Point, MS ............ 470 L 3,900 - - - - - - Point Lookout, LA ............ 478 R -.- Ajax Bar, MS ................ 482 L --.- Ben Lomond, MS ............. 488 L -.- Balshed Ldg., MS .............. 493 L ---. Wilson Point, LA ............. 500 R --.. Corregidor, MS .............. 505 L --.- Carolina, AR ................ 509 L ---- Cracraft Lower, AR .......... 510 R ---- Cracraft, AR ................ 513 R --.. Leota, MS ................... 514 L ---. SIsland, 86, AR ............... 520 R --.. 1 Seven Oaks, AR .............. 523 R --.. Walnut Point, MS ............ 525 L ---- Refuge, MS ................. 528 L --.. Island 84, AR ................ 532 L ---- Leland Bar, AR-MS .......... 538 R 1,000 -.- Leland Neck, AR-MS ......... 540 L --.- Tarpley Cutoff, MS-AR ....... 540 R --.. Island 82-Miller Bend, AR-MS ................... 544 R&L - Ashbrook-Miller Bend, AR-MS ................... 547 L&R -.. Ashbrook Cutoff, MS ......... 549 L -.. Chicot Ldg., AR .............. 564 R -.. Catfish Point, MS ............. 571 L - - - - - - - Below Prentiss, MS ........... 580 R - - - - - - - Malone Field, AR ............. 585 R - - - - - - - Terrene, MS ................ 590 L - - - - - - - White River Landing, AR ..... 591 R -.. Montgomery Towhead, AR .... 592 R --- Victoria Bend, AR ............ 596 R -.- Smith Point, MS ............. 600 L - - - - - - - Island 70, MS ................ 608 L - - - - - - - Total dikes, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ......... 4,900 - - - - - - 4,306 3,351 7,695 11,372 3,6614 4,8354 14,049 4,421 3,260 9,010 8,226 10,299 1,752 5,1664 4,609 4,275 3,900 2,751 24,319 24,6674 8,238 r 3,592 6,730 2,897 9,614 3,809 7,571 C 6,592 5,754 4,725 5,278 4,580 15,428 4,315 10,318 13,646 13,015 8,728 17,451 5,290 7,813 7,549 7,921 2,201 6,071 5,0334 7,617 14,949 372,649 (0.93 Miles) (70.57 Miles) TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1984) Operations This FY Construction Construcerative Nonop- Otpiverea- Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares) Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) ARKANSAS RIVER5 Standard Revetment: Menard Bend, AR ........... Como, AR ................... Morgan Bend, AR ............ Yancopin, AR ............... Total standard revetment, Arkansas River .......... Dikes Hopedale Cutoff, AR .......... Morgan Bend, AR ........... Fletcher Bend, AR ........... Total dikes, Arkansas River ... LOWER RED RIVER Standard revetment: Long Lake, LA .............. Naples, LA .................. Turnbill Island, LA .......... Total standard revetment Miles Above Mouth 31 34 36 24 30 36 39 C C 11,770 11,720 5,250 2,800 31,540 (5.97 Miles) C 1,848 3,658 z 2,187 0 7,693 Z (1.46 Miles) M L RL R RL R Below Confluence of Old and Mississippi Rivers 10 79 RRL - - - - - - - 6,652 - - - - - - - 6,190 - - - - - - - 6,815 - - - - - - - 19,657 (3.72 Miles) C Dikes: None RED RIVER" Standard revetment: 7 Dupre, LA .................. Bringol, LA ................. Egg Bend, LA ................ Cologne Bend, LA ........... Roxana, LA .................. RyXtand.A. W hitingt n, 69 73 75 77 83 as9 Hy RRRR RR R 2,690 4,000 2,400 650 3,325 3,925 2.900 Smith, LA ................... Latanier, LA ................. Hudson, LA .............. Robert, LA ................... Alexandria Front, LA ........ Callahan, LA ................. Cotton, LA ................... Rapides, LA .................. Boyce, LA .................... Total standard revetment, Red River .................... Dikes7 : Choctaw Bayou Bend, LA . Bringol (Egg Bend), LA ....... Egg Bend, LA ................ Cologne Bend, LA ............ Echo, LA .................... Richardson, LA ............. Alexandria, LA ............. Bertrand, LA ............... Total dikes, Red River ...... 91 93 99 102 105 110 116 119 125 71 73 75 77 78 79 105 122 R R R R RR RRR RRRRRRRR - - - - - - - 2,700 S- - 2,460 ..... 1,458 ....- 5,500 .-... 5,280 .- - - 4,000 - - - - - - - 14,700 - - - - 1,030 - - - - - - - 4,548 - - - - 61,566 (11.66 Miles) - - - - - - - 2,000 - - - - - - - 2,477 - - - - - - - 900 - - - - - - 1,850 - - - - - - - 1,900 ..... 2,700 - - - (Rock groin) 270 ..... 7,630 ..-- - 19,727 (3.74 Miles) 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Contains 7,814 linear feet of trenchfill revetment (stone). 3. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 4. Changed to correct previous errors. 5. See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK, under Little Rock District. 6. Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. 7. Includes all types of dikes and retards. tND cc ca n 0 0 CV Cm TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1984) Operations This FY Construction eNroantiovpe- Otpiveera- Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Big Island, AR ............... 598 R - - - - 3,905 Scrubgrass Bend, AR ......... 600 R - - - - 7,315 Henrico, AR ................. 606 R - - - - - 25,040 Cessions Towhead, AR ........ 615 L - - - - - - - 10,615 Knowton, AR ............... 620 R - - - - - - -16,900 Island 67, MS ................ 621 L - - - - - - - 7,625 Island 68 Bar, AR ............ 622 R - - - - - - - 6,445 Ludlow, AR ................. 626 R - - - - - - - 10,390 Rescue Landing, AR-MS ...... 629 L - - - - - - - 27,020 Fair Landing, AR ............ 632 R - - - - - - 25,690 Burke Landing, MS ........... 637 L - - - - - - - 19,070 Island 62, AR ................ 638 R - - - - - -9,030 Island 63, MS ................ 639 L - - - - - - - 11,454 Island 63 Bar, MS ............ 639 L - - - - - - - 3,795 Oldtown Bend, AR ............ 644 R - - - - - 5,494 - 25,995 Horseshoe, MS ............... 647 L - - - - - 3,020 - 16,385 Westover, AR ................ 650 R - - - - - - - 12,730 Delta-Friars Point, MS ....... 655 L - - - - - - 30,090 Helena, AR ................. 660 R - - - - - - 36,460 Trotters Landing, MS ......... 665 L - - - - - - 32,905 Flower Lake, MS ............. 667 L - - - - - - 16,385 St. Francis, AR ............... 672 R - - - - - - 24,663 Harbert Point, MS ............ 675 L - - - - - - 9,065 Walnut Bend, AR ............. 680 R - - - - - 4,480 - 27,220 Mhoon Bend, MS ............. 685 L - - - - - - 35,828 Peters, AR .................. 692 R - - - - - 11,667 - 23,675 Commerce, MS ... o............ 695 L - - - - - - 11,615 Porter Lake, AR .............. 700 R - - - - - 34,155 Pickett, MS-AR .............. 703 R - - - - - 12,575 Norfolk-Star, MS ............. 709 L - - - - - 35,582 Cow Island Bend, AR ......... 714 R - - - - - 22,274 Cow Island Bend (Upper), TN ....................... 716 R - - - - - 6,853 Coahoma, TN ................... 717 L - - - -9,270 Ensley,TN ................... 723 L 5,200 -. 41,766 Dismal Point, AR ............. 724 R - -7,200 Bauxippi-Wyanoke, AR ....... 730 R ... 24,530 Presidents Island, TN ......... .733 L ..- 12,755 Hopefield Point, AR, TN ...... 736 R --. 5,390 Loosahatchie-Memphis, TN ... 737 L - - - - - - 31,293 Loosahatchie Bar, TN .......... 740 R2,070 St. C air, ................ 42 R 2,9302 xan.d.O..T.......744 V30,750 m C 0 z C z ca to A Brandywine, AR-TN .......... Shelby Forest, TN ............ Dean Island, AR .............. Cedar Point-Densford, TN .... Chute of Island 35, TN ........ Lookout Bar, TN ............. Lookout, TN .............. Sunrise Towhead, TN ......... Lower Bullerton, AR .......... Kate Aubrey Towhead- Island 30, TN ............... Osceola, AR .................. Osceola, AR .................. Ashport-Keyes Point, TN ...... Kate Aubrey, TN ............. Island 26, TN ................. Bend of Island 25, TN ........ Barfield, AR ................ Obion-Tamm, TN ............ Huffman-Hickman, AR-TN .. Heloise, TN ................. Island 18, MO ............... Linwood Bend, TN ........... Blaker Towhead, TN ......... Bells Point, MO .............. Gayoso-Caruthersville, MO .... Island 15, TN ................. Hathaway Landing, TN ...... Robinson Bayou, MO .......... Fritz Landing, TN ............ Lee Towhead, MO ............ Bend of Island 14, TN ......... Above Lee Towhead, TN ...... Little Cypress, MO ........... Merriwether-Cherokee, TN ... Linda, MO .................. Below Toney's Towhead, TN ... New Madrid Bend, MO ...... Kentucky Point, KY .......... New Madrid Bar, KY ........ New Madrid, MO ............ La Forge, MO ............... Slough Landing Neck, TN-KY .............. Winchester Towhead, MO ..... Island 9, KY-TN ............. Milton Bell, MO ............. Chute of Island 8, KY ........ Bend of Island 8, MO ......... Island 8, KY ................. Hickman-Reelfoot, KY ........ Beckwith Bend, MO ......... Williams, KY ............... Wolf Island, KY ............. Columbus, KY ............... Belmont, MO ................ Island3and4,KY ............ Campbell, KY ............... 750 753 756 759 764 772 774 776 782 786 786 786 791 793 798 803 808 819 826 831 836 841 845 845 848 851 852 852 857 859 859 861 864 869 876 879 886 887 888 889 892 899 900 905 908 913 914 914 919 924 927 934 937 938 940 943 R LRLR RRR R RRRL RRL RL RL RLL RR LL RLLLL RL RL RL RRR L RL RL RRL RL RL RRL 2,150 2,030 1,450 140 3,907 50 6,215 10,060 tO WCGD 18,010 9,550 7,555 20,190 29,190 2,9902 5,005 14,615 28,350 30,808 1,3503 5,823 44,232 2,500 15,690 22,730 46,070 49,831 26,984 12,935 22,170 14,850 17,087 5,420 25,600 3,630 1,000 22,630 15,670 8,470 12,050 4,943 32,240 41,058 11,950 20,895 30,348 7,960 15,375 5,559 20,680 32,940 5,540 33,5854 14,375 12,620 9,800 13,175 43,359 14,588 10,015 19,205 3,825 5,785 19,970 6,865 Co Io 0 FBI Co2 Cz 4,380 4,220 8,506 9,735 4,315 6,761 8,441 3,707 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1984) Operations This FY Construction Nonop- Operaerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER continued Standard Revetment: Pritchard, MO .............. Mayfield Creek, KY ......... W ickliffe, KY ................ Cache-Cairo, IL (Ohio River) . Total revetment, Memphis District Mississippi River ......... Dikes: Henrico, AR ................. Below Knowlton, AR .......... Island 67, MS ............... Below Ludlow, AR ............ Sunflower, AR ............. Island 64, AR ................ Island 62, AR ................ Island 63 Bar, MS ........... Island 63, MS ............... Kangaroo Point, AR .......... Friars Point, MS ............ Montezuma Bar, MS ......... Montezuma Towhead, AR ..... Prairie Point, AR ............ Flower Lake MS ............. St. Francis Towhead, MS ..... Below Walnut Bend, AR ...... Bordeaux Point, MS ......... Commerce, MS .............. Basket Bar, AR .............. Buck Island, MS ............. Porter Lake, AR .............. Pickett, M S ................. Seyppel, AR ................. CatIsland, AR .............. Coahoma,TN ............... Armstrong, AR-TN ........... Dismal Point, AR ............. fPlRoog eifniesoldn PCoruinsot,e A, TR[..N... ............ 948 949 953 958 RLL R 3,00 13,830 (2.61 Miles) 603 616 621 624 627 630 638 639 640 649 652 657 656 668 668 671 676 681 694 696 700 701 704 706 710 718 720 724 736 7 38 RRLRL RRLL RL L RRLL RLL R L RL RRL R RR R. R. 15,045 8,935 8,455 26,152 190 10,122 0 (5) 3,520 - 200 400 600 290 11,140 - 6,700 3,430 75 nn - 0 84,786 0 1,804,930 (341.8 Miles) (6) 235 6,310 10,233 4,320 5,040 5,520 7,330 23,180 2,600 5,640 5,730 6,870 12,430 3,450 10,391 11,140 3,380 6,420 4,920 5,700 5,060 4,890 14,630 7,180 11,640 15,590 4,640 18,690 25,600 1,330 21,9397 3.950 75 625 150 2,050 3,530 to 0 0 0 0 Z H n c I - - GVV 9 Above Loosahatchie. TN ...... Redman Point. AR ............ Randolph Point. TN .......... Poker PIoint. AR ............. Corona Bar. TN-AR ......... Densford. TN ............... Cedar Point. TN .............. Below Richardson Landing. TN ........................ Lookout. TN-AR ............. Plum Point, TN ............. Lake Neark ................ Kate Aubrey, TN ............. Keyes Point. TN .............. Ashport-G(oldust, TN-AR ...... Forke(l Deer. TN ............. Island 25. AR ................ Nebraska Point, TN ......... Below Tamm Bend. TN ...... Wrights Point. AR ........... Island 21, Chute. TN ......... lHead of Island 21. TN ......... Island 20, MO-TN ........... Island 18. TN ................ Tennemo, TN ............... Caruthersville-Linwood Bend, MO ................. Sandy Hook. TN .............. Island 15, TN ................. Robinson Bayou, MO .......... Hathaway, TN ............... Island 15 Neck, TN ........... Above Lee Towhead. TN ...... Below Cherokee, TN ......... Stewart Towhead, MO ....... Ruddles Point, MO ........... Island 11, MO ............... Kentucky Point, KY ......... Morrison Towhead, MO ...... Hotchkiss Bend, MO ......... Below Island 9, TN .......... D)onaldson Point, MO ........ Island 9, KY ................. Campbell, KY ................ Pritchard, MO ............... Island 1. KY ................. Total dikes, Memphis District, Mississippi River ......... 742 7413 747 748 755 757 759 767 771 784 786 791 791 795 798 804 808 813 820 824 828 831 837 842 844 850 851 853 854 854 859 866 871 874 882 887 890 895 901 905 906 942 944 948 it i14 IA L R L RRL RL RLL RLL RLL RRL RLLL L RR RLRRL RLL RL 2.595 3,275 494 9,820 4,039 6,583 6,277 3.080 800 8.990) 7,754) 14),741 8,051)0 8,430 7,780 2,890 5,950 5,538 7.910 2,595 11,270 19,775 17,330 8,550 5,450 12,149 8,300 30,505 3,170 5,460 18,139 8,670 2,505 25,877 2,350 7,510 9,890 25,440 21,100 1,300 6,230 18,290 8,130 4,039 11,550 1,070 6,583 18,859 8,320 7,0106 2,610 9,390 15,260 850 600 450 200 1,500 400 700 900 1,180 500 54,643 (10.4 Miles) 22,585 720,447 (136.5 Miles) 1. Gross squares-articulated square feet). 2. Lumber mattress revetment 3. Rock groins. 4. Stone in pile dike. concrete mattress (100 5. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 6. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. 7. 20 feet not reported in FY 83. 4 Co Po 0 0 z I _ I_ TABLE 42-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1984) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade andSection In In Com- In Total System Corn- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Corn- This This Corn- This This System FY FY FY pleted1 FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER Fifth Louisiana Levee District .......... Levees ......................... Floodwalls .... ................. Old River structures and levees...... Atchafalaya Basin Levee District...... Levees ......................... Floodwalls .... ................. Morganza structure and levee....... Morganza forebay levee ............. Port Allen lock ...................... Lafourche Basin Levee District ......... Levees ............................. Plaquemines West Levee District...... Levees ......................... Floodwalls ............. ........ Buras Levee District ................... Levees ..................... ......... Floodwalls .... ................. Empire lock ................. ........ Baton Rouge front levees ............... Pontchartrain Levee District ........... Levees ....... ....................... Floodwalls .................... Bonnet Carre guide levees ........... Bonnet Carrb forebay levee .......... Bonnet Carre structure ............. East Jefferson Levee District ........... Levees ............. ............ Floodw alls ...... .................... West Jefferson Levee District ........... Levees ......................... Floodwalls ..................... Harvey Canal Lock ................. Orleans Levee District ................. Left descending, east bank Levees ................... .......... Floodw alls .......................... 11A N C l ock .... ......... ........... (16.8) 15.5 1.3 (126.3) 118.7 0.8 6.7 0.1 (61.7) 61.7 (37.9) 37.9 (34.1) 34.0 0.1 (2.1) (124.9) 110.8 11.3 1.3 1.5 (11.6) 11.6 (20.0) 19.8 0.1 0.1 (27.2) 4.6 8.6 0.1 (16.8) 15.5 1.3 (126.3) 118.7 0.8 6.7 0.1 (61.7) 61.7 (37.9) 37.9 (34.1) 34.0 0.1 (2.1) (124.9) 110.8 11.3 1.3 1.5 (11.6) 11.6 (20.0) 19.8 0.1 0.1 (27.2) (-) (9.6) - 8.3 - 1.3 (-) (85.4) - 77.8 - 0.8 - 6.7 - 0.1 (-) (24.1) - 24.1 (2.7) (28.5) 2.7 28.5 (-) (19.7) - 19.7 (-) (0.9) (-) (81.9) - 67.8 - 11.3 - 1.3 - 1.5 (-) (8.8) - 8.8 (-) (4.5) - 4.3 - 0.1 - 0.1 (-) (16.5) 4.6 8.6 0.1 (-) (5.3) 5.3 (0.1) 0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (1.0) 1.0 (0.1) 0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (15.5) 15.5 (118.7) 118.7 (61.7) 61.7 (37.9) 37.9 (34.0) 34.0 (2.1) (110.8) 110.8 (11.6) 11.6 (19.9) 19.8 0.1 (-) (18.4) (-) (15.5) - 15.5 (-) (118.7) - 118.7 (-) (61.7) - 61.7 (-) (37.9) - 37.9 (-) (34.0) - 34.0 (-) (2.1) (-) (110.8) - 110.8 (-) (11.6) - 11.6 (-) (19.9) - 19.8 - 0.1 (-) (18.4) 2.3 4.6 2.3 0.1 4.6 bm C zC y -I 0 0 z z ct2 00 Riht descending, west bank Levees .............................. Floodwalls ......................... Algiers Canal lock ................... Lake Borgne Basin Levee District ....... Levees ............................ Floodwalls ......... ........... Grand Prairie Levee District ........... Levees .............................. Floodwalls .... ................. Total Mississippi River ........... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY Atchafalaya River and Bayou des Glaises ..................... East bank Atchafalaya River ......... Bayou des Glaises ................... West bank Atchafalaya River ........ Simmesport Ring ................... M elville Ring ............... ........ Krotz Springs Ring ................. Mansura Hills to Hamburg ........... West protection levee, Hamburg to Berwick drainage canal via Calumet ....... Levees west of Berwick, Berwick drainage canal to Charenton drainage canal ... Morganza upper guide levee ............ East protection levee, Morganza to Cutoff Bayou, including 19.5 miles of Morganza lower guide levee ..................... Total Atchafalaya Basin and Floodway ..................... Total-Main Stem System ...... LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, LA ................ Item A levees ....... ................. Item B levees ....................... ItemC levees ........................ Total ....................... 13.8 0.1 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 511.6 (148.4) 52.5 7.9 60.1 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 13.8 0.1 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 511.6 (148.4) 52.5 7.9 60.1 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 (128.7) (128.7) (56.5) (56.5) (8.9) (8.9) (0.7) 0.7 (-) 3.4 (-) - 11.7 0.1 (11.5) 11.5 (19.0) 19.0 310.4 (143.9) 52.5 7.9 55.6 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 (-) (66.3) (-) (-) (9.6) (8.9) (-) (-) 10.1 (-) - (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 1.1 13.8 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 479.6 (-) (148.4) - 52.5 - 7.9 - 60.1 - 1.6 - 4.1 - 1.7 - 20.5 (-) (127.7) (-) (-) (56.5) (8.9) (-) (-) (-) 13.8 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 479.6 (43.9) 20.2 12.0 - 11.7 (-) (66.3) (-) (-) (-) (8.9) (106.7) (106.7) (4.2) (33.0) (-) (-) (-) (105.0) (4.2) (33.0) 449.2 449.2 4.2 261.7 - - - 446.5 4.2 152.1 960.8 960.8 7.6 572.1 10.1 - 1.1 926.1 4.2 631.7 (17.4) (17.4) (-) (17.4) (-) (-) (-) (17.4) (-) (17.4) 5.0 5.0 - 5.0 - - - 5.0 - 5.0 10.1 10.1 - 10.1 - - - 10.1 - 10.1 2.3 2.3 - 2.3 - - - 2.3 - 2.3 17.4 17.4 - 17.4 - - - 17.4 - 17.4 1. Figures indicate landside seepage berms only. rCo hCo F o Co 0 TABLE 42-L PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1984) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)1 Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In In Corn- In Total System Corn- Sys tem plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Corn- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY2 pleted3 FY4 FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER East bank in Mississippi ................ 178.35 178.3 - 109.1 158.9 - 108.1 168.4 - 168.4 Greenville Harbor dikes ................. 7.8 7.8 7.8 -7.8.- West bank in Arkansas ................. . 75.6 75.6 2.3 45.2 51.1 0.6 47.0 75.4 - 75.4 West bank in Louisiana (above Red River) ..................... 198.7 198.7 - 67.1 88.7 - 67.3 197.8 - 197.8 Total Mississippi River ............. .460.4 460.4 2.3 229.2 298.7 0.6 222.4 442.5 442.5 YAZOO RIVER BASIN Headwater ............................ 624.76 305.1 (-) 130.1 - - - 620.7 (-) 281.5 Backwater ........................... 96.6 44.6 - 0.0 - - - 96.6 - 39.0 Total Yazoo River Basin ............ 721.3 349.7 (-) 130.1 - - - 717.3 (-) 320.5 ARKANSAS RIVER, ARKANSAS North bank ........................... 61.57 56.2 - 56.2 8.3 - 8.3 47.4 - 47.4 South bank .......................... 85.4 85.4 - 85.4 24.7 - 24.7 84.1 - 81.1 Total Arkansas River .............. 146.9 141.6 - 141.6 33.0 - 33.0 131.5 - 128.5 RED RIVER BACKWATER LEVEES Total Red River backwater ......... 263.6 156.5 - 81.38 - - -249.0 - 141.9 LOWER RED RIVER-SOUTH BANK RED RIVER Lower Red River-South Bank Red River levees ..................... (59.2) (59.2) (-) (59.2) (-) (-) (-) (59.2) (-) (59.2) Hotwells to Moncla, LA, levees ........ 59.2 59.2 - 59.29 - - - 59.2 - 59.2 Floodwalls .......................... - - - - Total Lower Red River ............. . 59.2 59.2 - 59.2 - - - 59.2 - 59.2 1. This tabulation does not include riverside berms which are considered an integral part of the levee section. Riverside berms will be constructed along with levee enlargements or seepage berm contracts. 2. Levee that has adequate freeboard based on the refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line for the Mississippi River. Levees with more than 2 feet of freeboard are considered adequate. 3. Subject to change as planning progresses. Does not include existing bermns which need restudy. 4. Based on refined 1973 MR&T roject flood flow line. 5. Includes 1.4 miles of concrete floodwall and 0.3 mile of levee on Vicksburg city front. 6. Includes 36.9 miles of local protection works; 61.3 miles along Whittington Auxiliary Channel; 210 miles in Upper Yazoo Projects; 156.1 miles along main stem; and 160.4 miles on tributaries. 7. Includes 5.3 miles for Gillett new levee. 8. Revised to reflect 1973 project design flow line. 9. Reflects results of flowline reanalysis. C 0 z z o TABLE 42-M PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1984) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In In Com- In Total System Com- System lete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Corn- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER M ounds, IL ........................... Mound City, IL ........................ Cairo Drainage District ............... Cityof Cairo ................ ........ Little River Drainage District ......... Levee District No. 2, Scott County, MO .................... Levee District No. 3, Mississippi County, MO ............... St. Johns Leveee and Drainage District .................... St. Francis Levee District of MO ........ City of Hickman, KY .................. Fulton County Levee District of Fulton County, KY ................... Reelfoot Levee District of Lake and Obion Counties, TN .................. Madrid Bend Levee District ........... Lake County Levee and Drainage District .................... Dyer County Levee and Drainage District No. 1 ............... Tipton-Obion levee extension .......... St. Francis Levee District of AR ........ Helena Improvement District No. 1 .... Cotton Belt Levee District No. 1 ........ Laconia Drainage and Levee District Phillips County, AR ................... Laconia Levee District No. I of Desha County, AR ................... Laconia Circle Special Drainage District of Desha County, AR ........... Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee District ........... ............. New Madrid, MO, St. Johns Levee and Drainage District .......... 3.9 2.7 13.82 6.2 19.3 13.8 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 26.0 58.7 58.7 55.7 55.7 1.4 1.4 16.7 4.5 9.6 15.9 21.3 6.5 156.7 5.3 23.9 20.5 18.1 16.7 4.5 9.6 15.9 21.3 - 156.7 5.3 23.9 20.5 18.1 6.6 6.6 93.6 93.6 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 58.2 55.7 1.4 16.71 4.54 9.64 15.9 21.3 153.21 5.3 23.9 20.5 18.14 6.6 93.6 0.3 2.7 7.8 2.9 4.9 4.2 4.9 42.7 12.0 13.2 0.6 7.3 1.3 94.6 2.4 18.8 11.5 12.1 85.7 0.9 1.6 3.2 26.0 1.6 12.0 11.4 0.3 4.5 15.9 0.7 0.4 77.6 2.4 18.8 11.5 9.2 16.5 85.7 0.3 01 3.6 1.1 8.5 4.0 19.3 13.8 46.6 55.1 0.5 16.3 4.5 9.6 C!1 -1 a0 z 3.6 1.1 8.5 3.5 19.3 13.8 26.0 46.1 55.1 16.3 4.3 9.6 15.9 21.3 156.7 4.2 23.9 20.5 16.5 93.6 21.3 6.5 156.7 4.7 23.9 20.5 93.6 0.3 0.3 TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1984) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade andSection In In Com- In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER-continued Birds Point-New Madrid setback levee ........................ 35.3 35.3 - 35.3 35.3 - - 35.3 - 35.3 Total Mississippi River ............. .636.3 629.5 - 625.5 365.5 2.3 239.5 604.1 595.1 ST. FRANCIS RIVER East bank ........................... 159.5 156.2 - 156.2 - - - 156.7 - 81.7 West bank ............................. 148.7 146.7 - 146.7 - - - 144.3 - 38.8 Total St. Francis River ............. .308.2 302.9 - 302.9 - - - 301.0 - 120.5 LITTLE RIVER East bank(left) .............. .......... 40.7 40.7 - 40.7 - - - 40.7 - 13.1 West bank ............................ 35.1 35.1 - 35.1 - - - 35.1 - 23.7 Elk Chute ................... ......... 39.9 39.9 - 39.9 - - - 39.7 - 17.3 West Basin and middle valley ........... . 14.4 14.4 - 14.4 - - - 13.4 - 13.4 Total Little River .................. 130.1 130.1 - 130.1 - - - 128.9 - 67.5 LOWER WHITE RIVER White River backwater levee ........... . 40.2 40.2 - 40.2 - - - 38.8 - 38.8 Augusta to Clarendon .................. 49.2 39.5 - 39.5 - - - 49.2 - 36.2 Clarendon levee ........................ 6.2 6.2 - 4.4 --. Total Lower White River ........... . 95.6 85.9 - 84.1 - - - 88.0 - 75.0 MEMPHIS HARBOR Memphis Harbor ...................... 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 7.0 - 1.5 10.5 - 10.5 1. Subject to change as planning progresses. 2. Includes 5.1 miles of Cache River levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 3. Includes 12.1 miles of Farrenburg levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 4. Shown complete. Authority MSRC-ED-TL (MD 19 Mar. 80) 1st Ind. 21 Apr. 80. 2 00 1 0 z Co TABLE 42-N RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1984) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In In Corn- In Total System Corn- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built p lete When Built Thru for This This This Corn- This This Corn- This This System FY FY FY pleted FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVERMAIN STEM New Orleans District, Table 42-K ....... 511.6 511.6 3.4 310.4 10.1 (-) 1.1 479.6 - 479.6 Vicksburg District, Table 42-L .......... 460.4 460.4 2.3 229.2 298.7 0.6 222.4 442.5 - 442.5 Memphis District, Table 42-M .......... 636.3 629.5 - 625.5 365.5 2.3 239.5 604.1 - 595.1 Subtotal-Main Stem ................ 1,608.3 1,601.5 5.7 1,165.1 674.3 2.9 463.0 1,526.2 - 1,517.2 TRIBUTARIES (OFF MAIN STEM) INCLUDED IN MR&T SYSTEM Atchafalaya Basin Floodway-NOD .................... 449.2 449.2 4.2 261.7 - - 446.5 4.2 152.1 Lower Red River- South Bank-VXD................... 59.2 59.2 - 59.2 - - - 59.2 (-) 59.2 Arkansas River-South Bank-VXD ..... 85.4 85.4 - 85.4 24.7 - 24.7 84.1 - 81.1 Subtotal-Tribs. in MR&T System .... 593.8 593.8 4.2 406.3 24.7 - 24.7 589.8 4.2 292.4 Total in MR&T System ............. 2,202.1 2,195.3 9.9 1,571.4 699.0 2.9 487.7 2,116.0 4.2 1,809.6 OTHER TRIBUTARIES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA,-NOD ........ 17.4 17.4 - 17.4 - - - 17.4 - 17.4 Yazoo River Basin-VXD .............. 721.3 349.7 (-) 130.1 - - - 717.3 (-) 320.5 Arkansas River-North Bank-VXD ..... 61.5 56.2 - 56.2 8.3 - 8.3 47.4 - 47.4 Red River Backwater-VXD ........... 263.6 156.5 - 81.3 - - - - 249.0 - 141.9 St. Francis River-MD ................ 308.2 302.9 - 302.9 - - - 301.0 - 120.5 Little River-MD ...................... 130.1 130.1 - 130.1 - - - 128.9 - 67.5 Lower White River-MD .............. 95.6 85.9 - 84.1 - - - 88.0 - 75.0 Memphis Harbor-MD ............. ... 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 7.0 - 1.5 10.5 - 10.5 Subtotal-Other Tribs. in MR&T Project ..................... 1,608.2 1,109.2 (-) 812.6 15.3 - 9.8 1,559.5 (-) 805.7 Grand Total in Project ............. 3,810.3 3,304.5 9.9 2,384.0 714.3 2.9 497.5 3,675.5 4.2 2,615.3 xd Cd) CI) CI)~ H REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 42-0 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1984) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Comn- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) Bayou des Glaise diversion channel ................. 1938 6.0 - 6.0 100 Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie ............... 1946 92.6 - 63.4 68 Charenton drainage and navigation canal ........... 1939 6.3 - 6.3 100 Wax Lake Outlet ............................... 1938 15.7 - 15.7 100 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway ...................... 1933 244.2 - 186.4 76 Morganza Floodway ............................. 1941 3.3 - 3.3 100 Old River outflow channel ........................ 1956 8.3 - 7.4 89 Old River inflow channel ......................... 1960 2.3 - 0.4 17 Old River lock approach channels .................. 1961 2.2 - 2.2 100 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) ............... .1958 2.5 - 2.5 100 Eastern Rapides-S.C. Avoyelles ................... - 83.5 - - - Teche-Vermillion Water Supply .................... - 6.3 - 6.3 100 42-48 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1984) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Com- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, ETC., MS Big Sunflower River ..................... .......... 1947 199.1 - 199.1 100 Quiver River .. ................................ 1947 69.6 - 69.6 100 Deer Creek .... ................................... 1947 7.0 - 7.0 100 Steele Bayou ..... ................................. 1947 54.9 - 54.9 100 Steele Bayou' .... ................................. 1965 71.2 - 51.6 50 Main Canal .................................... 1959 21.1 - 21.1 100 Main Canal2 .................................... -22.2 - - Black Bayou ...........................- 36.5 - - Big Sunflower River tributaries .................... 1957 227.2 - 227.2 100 Quiver River tributaries .......................... 1960 35.4 - 35.4 100 YAZOO BACKWATER Yazoo Backwater ............................... 1960 39.9 - 39.9 100 YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS Upper Yazoo Project ............................. 1976 179.0 7.7 48.0 26 Coldwater River .................................. 1941 54.6 - 54.6 100 Arkabutla Canal .. .............................. 1948 0.4 - 0.4 Tallahatchie 100 Canal .. ............................ 1940 74.8 - 73.5 85 Little Tallahatchie River and Panola-Quitman Floodway ...................... 1939 48.0 - 48.0 100 Greenwood protection works ....................... 1971 2.9 - 2.9 100 YaconaRiver ...................... ........... 1952 1.8 - 1.8 100 Bobo Bayou ...... ................................. 1944 16.1 - 16.1 100 Cassidy Bayou ........... ......................... 1934 69.0 - 69.0 100 Cassidy Bayou ................................... . 26.0 - - Bear Creek Diversion ............................ . - 4.8 - LakeCormorant ............................ - 20.9 - Hurricane Bayou ......................... ...... . . - 2.5 - Opossum Bayou .................................. - 20.8 - AbaicaCreek .................................... - 7.7 - Chicopa Creek ................................... . 7.0 - Bear Creek ..................................... -23.3 - Rocky Bayou.... ...................... ....... - 7.8 - Whiteoak Bayou .................................. . 55.9 Miscellaneous ditches ................ .. ............ - 12.3 - - Yalobusha River ............................... 1939 46.0 - 46.0 100 YazooRiver .......... ........ ... ........... 1940 160.2 - 160.2 100 Whittington Auxiliary Chanel ...................... 1956 30.8 - 30.8 100 Thula Lake .. 1964 26.4 - 26.4 100 avid-Burrell Bayou ............................ 1957 40.4 - 40.4 100 McKinney Bayou ............................... 1960 3.5 - 3.5 100 illside Floodway ............................... 1964 11.0 - 11.0 100 azooCity protection works ............. ......... 1953 1.6 - 1.6 100 AscalmoreTippo Bayous .......................... 1975 30.2 - 15.1 50 p igator-Catfish Bayou ......................... 1973 8.3 - 8.2 99 Pelucia Creek ..................... ........... .1975 6.4 - 2.9 25 BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., g - LA AND AR ayou Lafourche .. ............................. 1949 45.3 - 45.3 100 Bigayou Lafourche ............................... 1972 43.0 - 4.4 10 olewaCreeks ................. ........... 1947 81.4 - 81.4 100 42-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1984) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Corn- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR- continued Big & Colewa Creeks ............................ 1965 86.8 - 51.5 60 Tensas River .. ................................ 1947 96.5 - 96.5 100 Tensas River6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1968 160.0 - 61.0 38 Boeuf River, AR and LA ........................ .. 1953 103.9 - 103.9 100 Fleschmans Bayou, AR .......................... 1963 6.6 - 6.6 100 Caney Bayou, AR ..... ............................. 1964 7.4 - 7.4 100 Canal 18, AR .. ................................ 1963 10.3 - 10.3 100 Big Bayou, AR ................................... 1952 33.3 - 33.3 100 Black Pond Slough, AR .......................... 1962 14.3 - 14.3 100 Bayou Macon, AR and LA 1959 150.8 - 150.8 100 Rush Bayou, AR ..... .............................. 1964 6.7 - 6.7 100 Canal 19, AR ...... ................................ 1957 50.2 - 50.2 100 Canal 43, AR ...... ................................ 1956 34.5 - 34.5 100 Canal 81, AR ...... ................................ 1957 32.7 - 32.7 100 Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal ................ ........... - 15.0 -- Kirsch Lake Canal ................................ .. - 9.3 -- Canal 19 Extension ............................. 1964 9.4 - 9.4 100 Lake Chicot Pumping Plant ........................- 2.5 - 2.4 96 RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant .................... 1976 6.9 - 6.5 94 Six Mile Bayou, LA ................................ - 1.5 - GRAND PRAIRIE, AR ............................ - 338.1 - BAYOU METO, AR ............................ .. - 164.9 - 1. Includes further work on 54.9 miles and adds 16.3 miles of channel to the project. miles of channel to the project. 5. Includes further work on 75.3 miles and adds l 2. Includes further work on 21.1 miles and adds 1.1 miles of channel to the project. miles of channel to the project. 6. Includes further work on 96.5 miles and adds 63 3. Includes further work on 26.0 miles. additional miles of channel to the project. 4. Includes further work on 38.6 miles and adds 4.4 42-50 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-Q CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1984) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Corn- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BIRDS POINT-NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting Ditch Enlargement, Samos and Vicinity, MO ............ 1952 9.6 - 9.5 100 ST. FRANCIS BASIN Little River Drainage, MO ....................... 1963 291.3 6.1 239.7 80 St. Francis River, MO and AR .................. ... 1953 602.7 7.1 371.0 60 WestMemphisDrainage, AR ...................... 1951 19.8 - 19.8 100 BigSloughand Mayo Ditch, AR .................... 1960 28.0 - 28.0 100 Tyronza River, AR ............................... 1939 12.7 - 12.7 100 L'Anguille River, AR ............................. (1) 112.0 - - LOWER WHITE RIVER BASIN, AR Cache River Basin, AR ........................... 1972 231.5 - 7.2 3 Big Creek and tributaries, AR ...................... (1) 103.8 - - WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES ObionCreek,KY ................................. (1) 41.7 - - WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES MS River, Western TN tributaries (Backwater Areas) (1946 Act) .................. 1952 34.3 - 34.3 100 Obion River Diversion Channel, TN (1946 Act) .................................. 9.3 - - (1) 9.3 Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, KY and TN ................................. 1974 15.8 - 3.0 19 Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN ...................... 1955 19.7 - 19.7 100 MS River Below Cape Girardeau; West TN tributaries. (1948 Act) ..................... 1961 225.0 - 84.8 38 Wolf River and tributaries, TN ..................... 1960 25.5 - 25.5 100 1. Not started. 42-51 TABLE 42-R REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1984 Item Construction Maintenance Other FEDERAL FUNDS Flood control. Mississippi River and tributaries: St. Louis District: General investigations Advance engineering and design St. Francis Basin-Wappapello Lake Subtotal Memphis District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees St. Francis Basin Lower White River Cache Basin, Ark. Channel improvement West Tennessee tributaries West Kentucky tributaries Inspection of completed works Mapping Reelfoot Lake No.9, TN-KY Mud Lake, TN Subtotal Vicksburg District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees Lower Arkansas River Tensas Basin Yazoo Basin Channel improvement Mapping Inspection of completed works Streambank erosion control Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Lower Red River-South Bank Red River Levee Subtotal New Orleans District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees Old River Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries Atchafalaya Basin Channel improvement Bonnet Carre Teche-Vermilion Basin water supply Inspection of completed works Mapping Major Rehabilitation Old River Subtotal Total Federal Funds 6,323,198 4,723,137 22,287 11,128,597 2,654,026 12,806 7,215 7,113 24,878,379 3,174,385 21,729,966 23,377,910 20,037,975 (18,740) 19,842,905 69,354 88,251,235 12,467,476 58,193,004 226,117 35,694,968 45,249,379 178,064 2,757,174 2,757,174 3,378,948 5,597,329 706,748 20,157,605 173,732 101,829 30,116,191 -- 830,128 261,049 1,524,662 19,103,113 13,857,848 175,006 89,860 -63,844 63,844 35,905,510 10,745,549 7,818,870 75,506 10,510,049 12,828,403 602,335 247,858 170,058 152,009,008 42,998,628 265,138,622 111,777,503 42-52 2,229,648 2,229,648 2,567,718 2,567,718 925,279 925'2+ 5,722,640 TABLE 42-R (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1984 Item Construction Maintenance Other CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Memphis District: Lake Neark AR. Recreation Facility 1.198-- New Orleans District: Old River -- 161,616 -- Channel Improvement Operations 56.321 -- Total Contributed Funds 57,519 161.616-- Grand Total, Federal and Contributed Funds 265,196,141 111,939,119 5.722,645 42-53 TABLE 42-S REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1984 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1984 ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES CHARGEABLE AGAINST FLOOD CONTROL ACT LIMITATIONS: COMPLETED WORKS: Waterways Experiment Station Office, Chief of Engineers Rock Island District: S. G. & 0. prior to Aug. 18,1941 St. Louis District: S. G. & 0. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Memphis District: Des Arc, Ark. Contraction works DeValls Bluff, Ark. Mapping Memphis Harbor New Madrid Floodway Wolf River and tributaries Roads on levees (Mississippi River levees) S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18,1941 Subtotal Vicksburg District: Boeuf Basin levees Channel realignment, Arkansas River Contraction works Eudora Floodway Vicksburg Harbor Greenville Harbor Grants Canal (Mississippi River levees) Mapping Jonesville, LA Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal New Orleans District: Baton Rouge Harbor, LA Atchafalaya River and Basin, LA Bonnet Carre Spillway, LA Contraction works Mapping Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Wax Lake Outlet and Charenton Canal Morganza Floodway and structure Lake Pontchartrain Atchafalaya Basin, rights-of-way and flowage, Bayou des Glaises setback Subtotal All other completed items: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 Impounded savings Plant transferred to revolving fund OCE (portion of allotment transferred to revolving fund, Washington Dist.) Subtotal Total completed works $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 169,352 169,352 1,076,520 1,076,520 178,925 178,925 8,692,791 8,692,791 231,215 231,215 1,450,337 1,450,337 18,736,432 18,736,432 6,521,543 6,521,543 1,723,620 1,723,620 12,426 12,426 1,998,766 1,998,766 39,546,055 39,546,055 2,764,605 125,074 1,972,183 826,235 4,664,515 2,864,516 7,070 1,531,021 172,950 105,660 2,350,201 17,384,030 699,185 3,375,492 14,212,198 1,258,916 1,112,967 540,838 2,701,566 10,098,817 35,992,117 5,513,110 387,917 75,893,123 4,995,215 1,593,097 24,924,578 19,882 31,532,772 165,432,500 2,764,605 125,074 1,972,183 826,235 4,664,515 2,864,516 7,070 1,531,021 172,950 105,660 2,350,201 17,384,030 699,185 3,375,492 14,212,198 1,258,916 1,112,967 540,838 2,701,566 10,098,817 35,992,117 5,513,110 387,917 75,893,123 4,995,215 1,593,097 24,924,578 19,882 31,532,772 165,432,500 42-54 I. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1984 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1984 UNCOMPLETED WORKS: Rock Island District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 St. Louis District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Subtotal Memphis District: Mississippi River levees Mississippi River levees New Madrid Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Reelfoot Lake Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9, TN-KY St. Francis Basin: Wappapello Lake St. Francis River and tributaries Big Slough and Mayo ditch Little River drainage Lower White River: Clarendon Levee Augusta to Clarendon, AR White River backwater levee, AR Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 West Tennessee tributaries Cache Basin, AR West Kentucky tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Subtotal Vicksburg Distict: n Mississippi River levees (excludes Grants Canal $7,070, shown under completed works) Lower Arkansas River: North Bank South Bank Tensas Basin: Lake Chicot pumping plant Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, etc. Red River Backwater: Red River backwater levee, LA Tensas, Cocodrie pumping plant Lower Red River South Bank Red River Levees Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Yazoo Basin: Sardis Lake EAnrikda bLuatklea Lake GGrreeennawdoao Ldake Belzonid Yazoo City 42-55 579,462 1,897,980 2,477,442 152,477,354 98,000 311,834,307 57,249,400 102,258,000 439,434 7,895,000 9,019,908 177,081,282 965,429 45,764,992 496,715 1,779,846 10,624,501 108,651 30,625,900 7,915,000 994,000 107,000 917,734,719 181,124,991 7,049,414 15,676,286 83,172,800 40,125,200 49,461,646 38,159,300 438,400 24,900,000 329,031,065 23,549,260 71,506,040 958,175 26,512,600 21,307,400 16,017,700 45,240,900 11,800,000 316,656 2,205,611 579,462 1,897,980 2,477,442 151,200,777 98,000 311,641,319 57,249,400 102,181,395 439,434 7,834,238 9,019,908 176,203,112 965,429 45,711,329 496,715 1,779,846 10,624,501 108,651 29,739,646 7,909,607 985,950 65,717 914,254,974 180,694,379 7,049,414 15,676,286 82,312,703 39,891,132 48,802,332 35,243,103 87,082 24,674,435 323,184,363 23,549,260 70,684,815 958,175 26,478,697 21,272,797 16,016,381 44,925,955 10,950,960 316,656 2,205,611 1,276,577 192,988 76,605 60,762 878,170 53,663 886,254 5,393 8,050 41,283 3,479,745 430,612 860,097 234,068 659,314 2,916,197 351,318 225,565 5,846,702 821,225 33,903 34,603 1,319 314,945 849,040 TABLE 42-S (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1984 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1984 Yazoo Basin: (Continued) Will M. Whittington auxiliary channel Big Sunflower, etc. Main Stem Upper Yazoo Projects Yazoo Basin-Tributaries Tributaries (Except Ascal-Tippo-Opossum Bayous) Tributaries-Bank Stabilization Ascalmore-Tippo-Opossum Bayous Yazoo Basin Backwater Yazoo Backwater (Except Muddy Bayou) Muddy Bayou Steambank Erosion Control, Eval. and Demo. Subtotal New Orleans District: Teche-Vermilion Basin Water Supply Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries Channel improvement: Dredging Revetments Lower Red River (South Bank Levees) Levees Under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Mississippi River Levees Atachafalaya Basin: Atachafalaya Basin Floodway Atachafalaya River Navigation Old River Subtotal TOTAL UNCOMPLETED WORKS ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (CONSTRUCTION) Memphis District: L'Anguille River Basin, AR Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9 Cache River Big Creek and Tributaries, Lower White River Clarendon Levee, Lower White River West Kentucky Tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, KY & TN Subtotal Vicksburg District: Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River, Steele Bayou Tensas - National Wildlife Refuge, LA Subtotal New Orleans District: Mississippi Delta Region Teche Vermilion Basin-Water Supply East Rapides & S. Central Avoyelles Parishes Subtotal TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS, UNCOMPLETED WORKS AND ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 10,950,966 34,114,300 27,124,000 39,727,006 57,715,310 612,484 19,689,200 55,565,200 5,145,200 15,291,000 1,257,246,110 33,819,000 4,519,008 35,945,266 453,856,117 18,056,600 200,680 183,276,000 470,614,537 303,463 197,606,000 1,398,196,671 3,575,654,942 150,000 30,000 420,000 365,000 65,000 175,000 350,000 540,000 2,095,000 29,700 200,000 229,700 69,753 1,109,000 965,247 2,144,000 4,468,700 3,745,556,142 10,950,966 32,498,805 26,615,330 35,062,418 55,167,719 612,484 18,583,892 53,213,488 5,145,200 14,766,251 1,234,732,655 33,603,385 4,476,490 35,945,266 453,398,738 18,056,600 200,680 182,544,676 469,558,470 303,463 193,221,129 1,391,308,897 3,542,773,968 150,000 30,000 420,000 364,339 65,000 175,000 350,000 540,000 2,095,000 29,700 200,000 229,700 69,753 1,109,000 965,247 2,144,000 4,468,700 3,712,675,168 42-56 1,615,495 508,670 4,664,588 2,547,591 1,105,308 2,351,712 524,749 22,513,455 215,615 42,518 457,379 731,324 1,056,067 4,384,871 6,887,774 32,880,971 32,880'974 -- - -. -. - 7 - 7 - - - 7 - - - 1. ii MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1984 District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Accrued Expenditures Unexpended Balance Sep. 30,1984 RECREATION FACILITIES-COMPLETED PROJECTS Eight-Year Program Funds St. Louis District: Wappapello Lake, MO Wappapello Lake, MO, Rockwood Landing Subtotal Vicksburg District: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Subtotal Total Eight-Year Program Funds Total chargeable against Flood Act Control Limitations excluding flood control emergencies Total maintenance since Aug. 18, 1941 Total rehabilitation Total flood control emergencies Total general investigations Total flood control, MR&T appropriations Appropriations in addition to flood control, MR&T Other appropriations itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953 Grand total appropriated to Sep. 30, 1984 2,255,300 203.286 2.458,586 1,584,339 2,268,209 2,189,280 1,631,281 7,673,109 7,673,109 -- 10,131,695 9,977,560 154,135 3,755,687,837 3,722,652,728 33,035,109 1,384,393,855 1,376,473,611 7,920,244 31,113,000 31,113,000 -- 14,900,300 14,900,300 -- 49,022,881 46,774,288 2,248,593 5,235,117,873 5,191, 13.,927 43,203,946 32,068,909 32,068,909 -- 5.267,186,782 5,223,982,836 43,203,946 2,101,165 203.286 2,304,451 1,584,339 2,268,209 2,189,280 1.631,281 154,135 154,135 -- Note: Preauthorization study costs chargeable to the MR&T authorization have been transferred tocompleted work.Costc not chargeable have been exluded from this report. TABLE 42-T STATEMENTS OF EXPENDITURES FOR LEVEES BY STATE AND LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH DEC. 31, 1984 Engineer District Rock Island St. Louis Memphis Vicksburg New Orleans Total Expenditures $ 11,228,088 73,390,273 217,515,131 117,751.386 503.310,999 $922.195.877 42-57 - TABLE 42-U REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT' Total Project Funding FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep. 30,1984 Mississippi River and tributaries (Regular Funds)1' (Contributed Funds) General investigations: Alloted Cost Construction (includes advance engineering and design): Alloted Cost Maintenance Alloted Cost Rehabilitations Alloted Cost Flood control emergencies (Maintenance): Alloted Cost New Work: Contributed Cost Maintenance Contributed Cost 3,720,000 5,315,000 4,271,000 4,101,537 4,158,386 4,583,214 140,644,000 162,592,395 179,793,000 289,370,000 176,047,889 204,211,601 6,805,000 49,022,8812 5,722,645 46,774,289 199,330,000 3,705,167,422 265,108,622 3,672,200,269 79,794,000 78,290,000 109,548,000 94,345,000 1,434,772,406 77,674,822 79,934,108 90,732,587 111,777,503 1,426,852,157 8,150,000 600,000 137,000 13,151,406 339,193 18,385 53,201 1,876 54,930 145,254 40,736 393,600 81,201 296,065 169,852 145,008 125,424 51,592 -- 31,113,000 -- 31,113,000 -- 14,885,922 -- 14,885,922 46,311 9,245,477 56,321 9,142,254 128,923 1,885,763 161,616 1,788,127 1. Appropriations were as follows: Appropriations chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Flood Control, MR&T except for emergencies (excludes Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1984): Net total allotted for works under Mississippi River Commission: Eight-Year Program Funds, Construction General: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Transferred to revolving fund: Impounded savings: Flood control emergencies: Net total alloted: Impounded savings: Additional funds not chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: ApGpernoeprraila tions for Flood Control, MR&T, except for flood control emergencies: investigations: Maintenance allotments Aug. 18,1941, through Sep. 30, 1984 Appropriations in addition to appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T (itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953): Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Grand total: Reconciliation of appropriations and allotments: Total allotted to Sep. 30, 1984 Transferred to revolving fund: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Impounded savings withdrawn by Chief of Engineers: Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Total Appropriations to Sep. 30, 1984: Appropriations for past four reporting periods were as follows: FY 81: $232,308,000; FY 82: $262,798,000; FY 83: $403,052,000; FY 84 $300,480,000. $3,745,136,370 10,131,695 4,995,215 24,944,460 1,593,097 $3,786,800837 14,885,922 14,378 49,022,881 1,384,393,855 14,900,300 1,433,416,736 32,068,909 5,267,186,782 5,235,639,632 24,944,460 4,995,215 1,607,475 1,607,475 5,267,186,782 Totals for General Investigations include four projects transferred from Construction totals per DAEN-CWB-W, Aug. 4, 78, teletype. 42-58 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-V MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3112) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 84 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention (112) New Orleans District Atchafalaya Basin Water & Land Res - 12026 341,056 Mississippi-Louisiana Estuarine Area - 12193 65,900 Subtotal 406,956 Vicksburg District Boeuf-Tensas Basin, AR & LA - 81273 693,350 Larto Lake-Saline Lake, LA - 12065 130,817 Southwest Tributaries Basin, MS - 12351 434,463 Yazoo River Basin, MS - 12074 852,120 Subtotal 2,110,750 Memphis District Eastern AR Reg-Comprehensive Study - 81266 332,629 Helena & Vicinity - 12165 3,840 Mayfield Creek - 10850 303,241 St. Francis River Below Wappapello - 22000 West 573,731 Memphis, AR - 12164 12,158 Wolf-Loosahatchie Rivers, TN & MS Nonconnah - 33009 6,763 Subtotal 1,232,362 TOTAL (Category 110) 3,750,068 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 120) New Orleans District 0 Vicksburg District 191,644 Memphis District 75,773 TOTAL (Category 120) 267,417 SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-AUTH STUDIES (Category 130) Flood Damage Prevention (132) Vicksburg District MS River East Bank Natchez - 76022 120,586 Memphis District Nonconnah Creek, TN (Phase I) - 77007 125 TOTAL (Category 130) 120,711 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 140) iggation Projects (141) Greenville Harbor, MS - 76021 84,779 F!oodiControl Projects (142) Bushley Bayou Area, LA - 75226 59,958 St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid Fdwy - 77005 267,678 TOTAL (Category 140) 412,415 42-59 TABLE 42-V (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3112) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 84 Categories ADVANCE ENGINEERING & DESIGN (Category 160) Flood Control Projects (162) New Orleans District Eastern Rapides & S.C. Avoyelles Parishes - 75031 145,292 Mississippi Delta Region - 23270 373,031 Subtotal 518,323 Memphis District Harris Fork Creek, TN & KY - 77009 25,117 L'Anguille River Basin - 00082 628,594 Subtotal 653,711 TOTAL (Category 160) 1,172,034 GRAND TOTAL MR&T GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 5,722,645 42-60 NATURAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY ACTIVITIES Authority. Public Law 84-99, as amended, (Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies) provides authority for the Chief of Engineers to undertake disaster preparedness activities, flood fighting and rescue work, rehabilitation of flood control works damaged or destroyed by flood, protection or repair of Federally authorized shore protective works threatened or damaged by coastal storm, provision of emergency drinking water, and drought assistance. Activities. FY 1984, disaster preparedness activities included the review and update of existing emergency response plans; development of required new plans; training of response personnel; exercises to test plans, personnel and training; procurement and maintenance of critical supplies and equipment not readily available during initial response phase; maintenance and required upgrade of emergency operations centers; coordination with Federal, state and local response agencies and other public entities; and, overall management of the preparedness program. The Corps responded to widespread emergencies beginning with major flooding in New Mexico and Arizona during October 1983. Subsequence responses were to the remnants of hurricane Tico which caused record flooding in Oklahoma and parts of northern Texas in late October. In Idaho the Corps responded to changed streamflow conditions due to an earthquake and to major ice jam problems from November through January. In addition, well above normal snowpacks across the West resulted in major flood problems during the spring melt in many of the "closed" basins (Great Salt Lake Basin, UT; Humboldt River Basin, NV; Malheur Lake, OR; Mud Lake, ID) and the Snake and Colorado River basins. As summer approached and snowmelt flood problems began to ease, a very wet weather pattern settled over the middle of the country. In the lower half of the Missouri River basin, widespread flooding developed with record to near record flooding on tributary streams in Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, Missouri and Iowa. Flooding from this system extended through the middle Mississippi and Ohio River valleys into New England. Severe storms and flooding continued to occur through the summer and early fall. The heaviest damage occurred in Pennsylvania, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Texas and Louisiana. Hurricane Diana blasted North Carolina and caused flooding and damages along the East Coast. Major levee rehabilitation efforts were undertaken along the Missouri River and its tributaries as well as damaged coastal projects in Georgia and New Jersey. In the Mount St. Helens area, work continued on the permanent outlet to Spirit Lake. Status of the PL 84-99 Emergency Fund Unallocated Balance as of 30 Sep 83 FY 1983 Appropriations Revocations, FY 1983 Total Funds Available Allocations Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation Advance Measures Hazard Mitigation Unallocated Balance as of 30 Sep 84 $43,104,706 10,000,000 8,642,990 $61,747,696 $12,409,140 6,513,209 18,563,256 15,406,565 6,376 $ 8,849,150 43-1 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION This Commission, consisting of three Corps officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San Francisco, CA, on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction and duties extending over drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great central valley of California and extending from crest of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay ultimately discharging into Pacific Ocean through connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, CA, so that debris will not be carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and power development purposes; and direction of improvements for control of floods on Sacramento River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Regulation of hydraulic mining and preparation of plans ..................... 44-1 2. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA (debris control) .......................... 44-2 3. Treatment of Yuba River debris situation-restraining barriers, CA........ 44-2 Navigation 1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Location. Operations largely limited to territory between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 25 In number.) Existing project. Provides for regulating hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement of conditions Upon Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries affected by such operations, and preparation of plans to enable hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage areas. In addition, the Secretary of the sAtormrayg ei s authorized to enter into contracts to supply for water and use of outlet facilities from ebris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation Purposes and power development upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve. tP lications of prospective miners are fully investigated YCalifornia Debris Commission and permits to operate Flood Control Page 4. Sacramento River, CA ................... 44-3 Tables Table 44-A Table 44-B Cost and Financial Statement ..................... 44-5 Authorizing Legislation .................... 44-6 are issued to those who provide satisfactory debrisrestraining basins by construction of suitable dams where necessary or agree to make payment for storage in Government-constructed debris-restraining reservoirs constructed under act of June 19, 1934, as set forth below. For location and description of Governmentconstructed, debris-restraining reservoirs for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 2. Local cooperation. Mineowners must bear all expenses incurred in complying with orders of the Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of debris. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor administrative duties were accomplished. Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 3, and 4, hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. Historical summary. The Commission received 1,292 applications for hydraulic mining licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, in general, continuation of above or similar operations. 44-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA (DEBRIS CONTROL) Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed in watersheds of Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers, CA (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, seven in number.) Existing project. For description of completed North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial recreation facilities were provided in FY 1959. Recreation areas at Harry L. Englebright Dam are maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but have been turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) on a permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle Fork of American River and on Bear River have been deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that portion is $1,820,000 (1935). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an estimated cost of $46,000 since September 1953. On March 1, 1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dam were turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation on a 5-year renewable basis. On March 1, 1984, Permit No. DACW05-4-79-527 was renewed for another 5 years and will be effective until February 28, 1989. Bureau will operate and maintain such use until Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the recreation resource is being done by State of California by contract with the Bureau. Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. W-1105- eng-2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $18,000 per year for the first 30 years (December 29, 1942 through December 28, 1972) and $48,000 per year between December 29, 1972, and December 28, 1992, in return for use of head at Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric power. Total payment through September 30, 1984, amounts to $1,086,393; these funds are paid to California Debris Commission and deposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2246, effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows powerplant put in operation) was issued by Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) to Yuba County Water Agency for hydroelectric power development of Yuba River by the company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under provisions of Contract No. DA-04-167-CIVENG-66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1, 1971; total payment through September 30, 1984, amounts to $1,373,151. These funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued at North Fork Dam at a cost of $423; and at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a cost of $604,777, including recreation facilities. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at Englebright Dam at a fiscal year cost of $88,768. Historical summary. Construction of dams was initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed and in use at end of FY 1939, and Harry L. Englebright project was completed in January 1941. The two debriscontrol structures are in good condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam in FY 1981. 3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DEBRIS SITUATIONRESTRAINING BARRIERS, CA Location. Works are on Yuba River between Marysville and where the river emerges from the foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. (See Geological Survey Topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA) Existing project. For description of completed project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which $361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required contributed funds by State of California. (For details of projectinl it! original form, see Annual Report, 1917, p. 1810.) In February 1963, center section of dam failed and major rehabilitation of structure was completed in December 1964. Total cost for required rehabilitation was $1,660,000, of which $830,000 was Federal cost and $830,000 required contribution by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. During the December 24 1964, floodflows on the Yuba River, the rehabilitte Daguerre Point Dam sustained considerable damage (See 1965 Annual Report, p. 1647 "Operations n results during fiscal year.") The reconstructed por, " of the dam completed earlier in December 1964 re undamaged by the flood. Permanent repair of Daq Point Dam abutment and fish facilities was compl ea in October 1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal a. required State contributed funds on a matching basis 44-2 - - -1 --- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - --- -- - -- -- - CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to local interests for new work was $361,777 (required contribution by State of California). In addition, training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre Point for 11,250 feet and just above Daguerre Point, on the south bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two gold-dredging companies in connection with their dredging operations. To build these training walls would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 estimate). Flood channels were also built by gold-dredging companies within confines of project works. Cost to the United States of equally effective works to restrain debris movement would have been more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to local interests for initial and permanent major rehabilitation works were $830,000 from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. and $223,904, respectively, (required contribution by State of California). State of California must contribute annuallyan amount equal to the Federal allotment for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations included condition and operation studies by hired labor; and bank protection, Yuba River, various locations upstream from Marysville completed by contract, $19,435. Historical summary. Construction of project works was initiated in November 1902. Construction of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; training walls and dikes were completed in 1935. About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and downstream end of training walls. About 20 million cubic yards are confined in river channel by Daguerre Point Damn. Additional millions of yards of loose material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project training walls in upper 7-mile reach of project. Initial rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in July and completed in October 1965. Flood Control 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA g Location. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central Clifornia from Collinsville to Ordbend, a distance of 14miles. APrevious project. For details see page 1815 of Anai Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report for o8, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Sacramento River flood control project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento River from Ordbend in Glenn County, CA, 184 miles downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average height of 15 feet, and 98 miles of bank protection are involved in project. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 2115. Estimated (October 1984) cost for existing project (exclusive of supplemental levee improvements), including new work and maintenance, is $170,525,000 of which $75,525,000 is Federal cost and $95 million non- Federal ($90,050,562 for lands and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 required contributed funds for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this amount, $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. In addition to project requirements, local interests constructed several pumping plants for drainage of agricultural and urban land protected by project levees. Some channel clearing work was accomplished by State of California and other local interests to supplement project levee construction. Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. Operation and maintenance of completed project will be responsibility of local interests; as units of project are completed, they are transferred to agencies of State of California for operation and maintenance. Existing project was adopted by 1917 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 81, 62d Cong., 1st sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th Cong., 1st sess.), River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. Committee print 75th Cong., 1st sess.), and 1941 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Local interest costs from required contributed funds for project work total $4,929,438 for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks, of which $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Engineering continued. Project prevented an estimated $40,000,000 in damages from the December 1983-April 1984 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction of existing project began in FY 1918 and is about 99 percent complete. Channel improvement to date has produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache Slough. In addition, 44-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 discharges up to 21,000 cubic feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major project items include about 977 miles of levees; five weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of outfall gates; channel improvement and clearing in Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses at Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and of Cache Creek settling basin; installation of gaging stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale and Moulton weirs in 1932, and Colusa weir in 1933. Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping plants on Sutter Bypass were completed in 1944. Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, rectification of channels, and bank protection on Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by 1941 Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 1947, 1948,1949, and 1951. Work remaining comprises completion of levee stage construction, Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough. (See table 44-C for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1984.) 44-4 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION TABLE 44-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT iL in Total Cost to FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 FY 84 Sep 30, 1984 821,325 821,325 - 50,000 - - 50,000 - 479,000 633,000 713,000 55 511,710 635,354 605,227 65 in Text Project 1. Resculation of Hy.lraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA (Debris Control) Contributed Funds, ther) 3. Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation Restraining Barriers, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed unds) Contributed Funds, ther) 4. Sacramento River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Funding Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Rehab. Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost - 2 16,564 2 20,000 1 19,026 1 2,257 S 5,093,9991 2 S 5,093,9991 a 4,000 5,765,0434 3,198 5,724,3645 - 12,420' - 12,4206 - 361,482 - 361,482 5,000 1,622,6567 2,435 1,608,8057 - 1,053,904 - 1,053,904 - 361,777 - 361,777 5,000 1,620,223 9,436 1,604,141 - 1,053,904 - 1,053,904 - 34,000 - 34,000 - 67,626,3359 - 67,626,335* - 1,979,104 - 1,979,104 - 10,724,085o10 - 10,724,085'0 - 9,68611 - 9,68611 1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost on inactive rrtion of Project. Fo ,. Includes $447,127 for recreational facilities at North 710r ka p($p3ro2,p4r7i3a)ti oannsd. Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 3. Includes $447,127 for recreational facilities at North 7o0rk ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code costs. frroor4n .H Iyndcrlauudleics $M4,i7n3i2n,g9 6i1n fCroamlif orerngiual afru nfudns.ds and $1,032,082 f5.Includes $4,692,684 from regular costs and $1,032,080 fromIYd raulic Mining in California costs. t 6. unds from State of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float .U+Vt -,L 7. Includes deferred maintenance funds in amount of $207,500. 8. Miscellaneous engineering and construction accomplished at expense of ocal interests in connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. 9. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 public works funds for new work for existing project. 10. Includes $680,000 required contribution for previous project; $4,939,752 required contributed funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary contribution for bank protection for existing project. 11. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for existing project. 44-5 6,000 5,806 807 10,000 68,911 28,000 344 2,851 3,255 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 TABLE 44-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Mar. 1, 1893 Feb. 27, 1907 June 19, 1934 June 25, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 and May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Created California Debris Commission and authorized: (a) Ex. Doc. 267, 51st Cong., Hydraulic mining under its regulation in drainage areas of 2d sess., Ex. Doc. 98, Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without 47th Cong., 1st sess. injury to navigability of these river systems or to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation of plans by Commission for improvement of navigability of these river systems, and flood and debris-control therein. Authorized California Debris Commission to permit (Amendment of sec. 13, hydraulic mining without construction of impounding Act of Mar. 1, 1893.) works, provided there is no injury to navigability of above river systems or lands adjacent thereto. Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides for construction of debris dams or other restraining works by California Debris Commission and collection of a 3-percent tax on gross proceeds of each mine using such facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and substitute an annual tax per cubic yard mined, obtained by dividing total capital cost of each dam, reservoir, and rights-of-way, by total capacity of reservoir for restraint of debris; and authorized revocation of Commission orders permitting such mining, for failure to pay this annual tax within 30 days after its due date; and also authorized receipt of money advances, from mineowners to aid such construction, to be refunded later from annual payments of yardage taxes on material mined. Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve, these payments are to be deposited to credit of such reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to be repaid by tax on mining operations. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Additional levee construction and reconstruction, including H. Docs. 649, 78th Cong, levee protection of Upper Butte Basin, and multipurpose 2d sess., and 367, 81st reservoirs.2 Cong., 1st sess. Bank protection and incidental channel improvements, H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., Sacramento River from Chico Landing to Red Bluff, and 2d sess. local interests flood plain zoning above Chico Landing. 2 Bank protection works at critical locations, Sacramento S. Doc. 103, 86th Cong. River.2 2d sess. 1. For latest published map, see Annual Report for 1913, p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 50, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 16. 44-6 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION TABLE 44-C SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 (See Section 4 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $65,459,866 $1,979,104 $67,438,9701 Public Works 1,486,469 - 1,486,469 Total U.S. $66,946,335 $1,979,104 $68,925,439 Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 Contributed, Other 5,104,333 - 5,104,333 Total All Funds $76,990,420 $1,988,790 $78,979,210 1. Includes $429,671 representing book value of plant purchased with previous project funds and transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 44-7 U. S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION Organization and functions. The Waterways Experiment Station (WES) is a field operating agency of the Chief of Engineers operating under the staff supervision of the Director, Research and Development. COL Robert C. Lee, Corps of Engineers, is Commander and Director. Mr. Frederick R. Brown is Technical Director. WES, the Corps of Engineers largest laboratory complex for research, testing, and development, consists offivetechnical laboratories: Hydraulics, Geotechnical, Structures, Environmental, and Coastal Engineering Research Center. The Hydraulics Laboratory, the largestlaboratory of its kind in the world, uses a wide range of working models and computer-based numerical models for research and analysis of dams, levees, river and harbor projects, soil and streambank erosion, thermal pollution, etc. The Geotechnical Laboratory conducts research in soil mechanics, structural foundation design, embankment design and slope stability, seepage analysis, military pavements, engineering geology, rock mechanics, expedient surfacing, earthquake engineering, and mobility and trafficability. The Structures Laboratory uses theoretical, analytical, experimental, and modeling approaches to research the effects of nuclear and nonnuclear explosions, the response of structures to natural and explosive disturbances, and various construction materials with emphasis on concrete, especially the testing, repair, and reservation of existing concrete structures. The avironmental Laboratory researches the problems caused by man's activities with respect to the environ- Ment. Research programs include Dredged Material, Aquatic Plant Control, Environmental and Water Quality Operational Studies, Environmental Impact, Wetlands, and the Natural Resources Research Program. These and other programs of the Environmental Laboratory range through waste management, environmental regulations, and military aspects of terrain Iencda mouflage. The Coastal Engineering Research Center conceives, plans, and conducts research and data olion in coastal/ocean engineering and nearshore OCanography to: provide a better understanding of waves, winds, water levels, tides, and currents; provide scientific and engineering data and design criteria; and determine the effects of the coastal activities of the Corps of Engineers which are important to environmental considerations in the coastal zone. WES Laboratories are engaged in research and engineering investigations in support of the civil and military missions of the Chief of Engineers. On a reimbursable basis, WES performs basic and applied research, develops state-of-the-art methods and techniques, tests materials and equipment, and provides consulting services. Subject to the approval of the Chief of Engineers, studies and investigations may be undertaken for agencies outside the Department of the Army. WES maintains an extensive scientific and engineering reference library to serve the specialized needs of the Corps of Engineers and issues publications of general interest; operates DoD Information Analysis Centers in the fields of Pavements and Soils Trafficability, Concrete Technology, Hydraulic Engineering, Soils Mechanics, and Coastal Engineering; and maintains the Corps of Engineers Engineering Computer Programs Library. During Fiscal Year 1984,221 WES numbered reports of individual studies conducted at or for WES, 17 instructional reports, and 61 unnumbered publications (conference reports, special study reports, etc.) for WES and other offices were printed and distributed to Corps offices and interested outside agencies. Operations and results during the period. Work accomplished at WES is, in general, initially financed by the Corps of Engineers Revolving Fund, with direct reimbursement from agencies requesting research investigations and related services. The Station's total program during Fiscal Year 1984 was $97,584,000 which included $34,734,836 performed by contract. Of the total program $50,218,000 was oriented toward the civil sector, $46,956,000 to military, and $410,000 to non-Government activities. The plant replacement and improvement program was $4,149,247 for this period. 45-1 PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NAVIGATION CONGRESSES (PIANC) The Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC) is an international organization with headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. It is a learing house where the views and experiences of engineers and port operators of the nations of the world are exchanged on problems relating to ocean and inland navigation improvements. Its objective is broadly stated "to promote the progress of inland and maritime navigation". In 1902, the United States appropriated $3,000 annually for support and maintenance of the Permanent International Commission of Congresses of Navigation and for payment of the actual expenses of properly accredited national delegates of the United States to meetings of the Congresses and Commissions. An increase in the appropriation to $5,000 annually was authorized by the 1948 River and Harbor Act and an appropriation of $22,000 annually by the 1965 River and Harbor Act. The current appropriation of $45,000 was authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act. Of this amount, an annual subvention of about $6,900 is paid by the U. S. Section to the International Association in Brussels, Belgium. The objective of the Association - to promote the progress of inland and maritime navigation - is met by holding International Congresses and publishing technial bulletins and other documents. The Congresses are held in various member countries, usually at four-year intervals. The Association is supported principally by member governments, but membership also extends to orporations and to individuals. Member governments S represented at the Congresses and at meetings of the Permanent International Commission by delegates, the number of official delegates to be determined by the amount of the annual subsidy paid by the government, but not to exceed ten in number. Corporate members ly send one official representative to the Congresses. "ently, the Permanent International Commission has 37 countries represented. Individual membership is f two classes - Annual and Life - depending on the '*thod of payment of dues. There are 1,295 annual Iiterlational members, 636 life members, and 641 corporate members, for a total of 2,572 members. Membership of the U. S. section on December 31, 1984, totaled 678, consisting of 119 life members, 459 UldiVidual members, and 100 corporate members. The affairs of the Association are managed by the Peranent International Commission composed of dgates from the supporting governments. The Na- Commission constitutes the governing body of the , .ection and the U. S. Members of the Permanent 'U ational Commission. The Director of Civil Works, fce of the Chief of Engineers, US Army, and the lander and Director, Water Resources SuDort "uter, are the ex-officio Chairman and Secretary, iPeively, of the National Commission. The Secretary zdles all administrative matters of the U. S. Section. During Fiscal Year 1984, National Commissioners were: Major General John F. Wall, USA, ex-officio Chairman; Colonel George R. Kleb, CE, ex-officio Secretary; Rear Admiral Richard A. Bauman, USCG; Mr. Harry N. Cook; Mr. James M. Goldston; Colonel Herbert T. Haar, Jr., USA (Ret); Mr. Vernon J. Ljungren; Mr. William R. Murden; Mr. John Pisani; and Mr. Jack E. Ravan. Lieutenant General John W. Morris, (Ret) is an honorary Vice President of PIANC, having served two terms as a Vice President. Major General Charles G. Holle, USA (Ret), Secretary-General, XXth International Navigation Congress, 1961, is ex-officio member of the Permanent International Commission. The annual meeting of the Permanent International Commission (PIC) was held in Helsinki, Finland, on June 5, 1984, and was attended by all National Commissioners, except Rear Admiral Bauman. Lieutenant General J. K. Bratton, Chief of Engineers, attended the PIC meeting as Admiral Bauman's alternate. Lieutenant General E. R. Heiberg III, PIANC International Vice-President, Lieutenant General John W. Morris, USA (Ret), and Major General Charles G. Holle, USA (Ret), also attended the PIC meeting. American representatives attended meetings of the International Study Commissions, two Permanent Technical Committees (PTCs) and Working Groups of PTCs. U. S. representation on these groups during this fiscal year was as follows: International Commission for Study of Locks, Ship Lifts, and River Weirs - Mr. John Davis Permanent Committee for Developing Countries - Brigadier General Herbert D. Vogel, USA (Ret) Permanent Technical Committee I - Major General Robert Seedlock, USA (Ret) Working Group 1, Identification of Methods for Economic Study of Inland Waterways - Mr. Howard E. Olson Working Group 2, Disposal of Dredged Materials - Mr. Alf H. Sorensen Working Group 3, Consideration of Risk in Determining Bank Protection - Mr. Alan D. Crowhurst Working Group 4, Use of Geotextiles for Inland Waterways Bank Protection - Mr. Rodney H. Resta Working Group 5, Container Transport with Inland Vessels - Mr. Morris A. Clyde Permanent Technical Committee II - Mr. Eugene H. Harlow Working Group 1, Shipping and Handling of Dangerous Cargo - Captain William R. Riedel, USCG (Ret) Working Group 2, Stability of Rubble Mound Breakwaters - Mr. Eugene H. Harlow Working Group 3A, Minimum Underkeel Clearances - Mr. Ronald C. Uhlin Working Group 3B, Navigation in Muddy Waters - Dr. John B. Herbich 46-1 Working Group 4, Winter Ice Navigation- Professor C. Allen Wortley Working Group 5, Disposal of Dredged Material Into the Sea - Colonel Herbert R. Haar, Jr., USA (Ret) Working Group 6, Classification of Soils to be Dredged - Mr. J. W. Bean Working Group 7, Dimensions and Layouts of Channels - Mr. Leonard E. Van Houten Working Group 8, Consequences of New Developments in Loading/Unloading on the Design of Ports- Mr. Charles R. Roberts Joint Subcommittee on Sport and Pleasure Navigation - Mr. John M. Nichol Working Group 1, Ecological Conservation in Relation to Sport and Pleasure Navigation - Mr. Robert J. Colleran U.S. Section regional meetings were held on 20-22 June 1984 in Chicago, Illinois, by the Central Region and on 25-26 October 1984 in Oakland, California, by the Western Region. During 1984, the U. S. Section also held concurrent meetings and the PIANC exhibit was displayed by the Executive Secretary, Mr. Vincent Montante, at meetings with the Western Dredging Association, American Association of Port Authorities, American Water Resources Association, National Waterways Conference, and the American Society of Civil Engineers. 46-2 INVESTIGATIONS OF PROJECTS UNDER THE FEDERAL POWER ACT The Federal Water Power Act of June 10, 1920, created the Federal Power Commission (in 1977 renamed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC) composed of the Secretaries of War, Interior, and Agriculture, with authority to grant permits and licenses for hydroelectric development in all water over which Congress has jurisdiction. The act further required that work of the commission be performed by and through the Departments of War, Interior and Agriculture and their engineering, technical, and other personnel except as may be otherwise provided by law. By an act of June 23, 1930, entitled "An Act to Reorganize the Federal Power Commission," Secs. 1 and 2 of the Federal Water Power Act of 1920 were amended. A commission was provided for, to be composed of five commissioners to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The necessity of performing work through the Department of War, Interior and Agriculture was removed and the commission was authorized to appoint such officers and employees as necessary in executing its function. By Title II, Public Utility Act of 1935, the original Federal Water Power Act was made Part I of the Federal Power Act, and Parts II and III were added to that Act. On October 1, 1977, pursuant to the provisions of the Department of Energy Organization Act (DOE Act), Public Law 59-91 Stat. (August 4, 1977) and Executive Order No. 12009, 42 Fed. Reg. 46267 (September 15, 1977), the Federal Power Commission ceased to exist and its functions and regulatory responsibilities were transferred to the Secretary of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) which, as an independent commission within the Department of Energy was activated on October 1, 1977. Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act provides that no water power license affecting navigable capacity of any navigable waters of the United States shall be issued until plans of the dam or other structures affecting navigation have been approved by the Chief of Engineers and the Secretary of the Army. By an action, notice of which was published in the Federal Register Volume 40, Number 74, dated April 16, 1975, the Secretary of the Army delegated to the Chief of Engineers his authority under Sec. 4(e) of the Federal Power Act. The Chief of Engineers on 5 September 1980 delegated to the Corps division engineers the authority for Section 4(e) approval of plans for non-Federal hydropower development affecting navigation. The following work of an engineering nature was accomplished by the Corps division and district offices under the direction of the Chief of Engineers during the fiscal year: 1003 applications from non-Federal entities for planning, design, construction and operation of hydropower projects were reviewed and appropriate recommendations in the interest of flood control, navigation, and structural safety, relative to Corps projects, were furnished to the FERC. Of the total 1003 applications, 94 applications were specifically for hydropower development at the existing Corps projects. Recommendations were furnished to the Commission concerning the impact of hydroelectric power development on the existing and proposed Federal water resources projects. Recommendations also were provided to the Commission on the environmental impacts of constructing power plant(s) at either proposed or existing projects. To date, there are 32 constructed non-Federal power plants at Corps projects with a total capacity of 1,058 MW. Non-Federal entities had 5 power plants under construction at Corps projects during the fiscal year, and had 14 licensed power plants in final design stages. The Corps bills FERC licensees for the costs incurred by the Corps in approving final design, plans and construction of power plants at Corps projects. In FY 1984 the total cost reimbursement to the Corps for this service was $165,291. Review of license applications is funded by the Corps as a line item in the General Investigation Account. In FY 84, the Civil Works budget contained $580,000 dollars for this pre-licensing activity. 47-1 REGULATORY, SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL & NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 1. Regulatory Activities Authorities. The following authorities charge the Corps of Engineers with the regulation of various water-related construction activities: Sections 9 and 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899 (structures in an alteration of waterways, e.g. boat docks); Section 103 of the Marine Protection and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (ocean dumping); and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (discharge of dredged and fill material). Work Completed. During FY 1984, the Corps received approximately 13,500 applications for permits and issued 8,100 permits and 2,700 letters of permission. In addition about 15,000 activities were authorized by regional or statewide permits which did not require individual applications from the public. Many thousands of other minor activities were authorized by the Corps' nationwide permits. The Corps discovered or was notified of a total of 4,300 alleged violations to be investigated. In FY 1984 the Corps continued its efforts toward regulatory reform based on a May 7, 1982, directive from the President's Task Force on Regulatory Relief By the end of FY 1984, actions to streamline the Corps' procedures had reduced average permit application processing time to 77 days compared with 119 days at the end of FY 1984. TABLE 48-A GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Obligations Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 83 ..... Allotments ......................... Total Funds Available .............. Obligations ............. ........... Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 84..... Expenditures Unexpended Balance--30 Sep 83 .... AlloAtmloetenntss. . ...................... Total Funds Available ............. Expenditures ... E xpende.. ................. Unexpended Balance--30 Sep 84 .... $ 2,145,594 + 51,997,986 54,143,580 52,859,763 $ 1,283,817 5,470,220 + 51,997,986 57,468,206 - 53,260,512 $ 4,207,694 2. Investigation and Removal of Sunken Vessels Under the authority of Sections 19 and 20 of the River esnH arbor Act of 1899, the Corps of Engineers rvestigated sunken vessels in navigable waters and rer4oved those obstructing navigation For obligations Peditures, see Table 48-B. TABLE 48-B REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS Obligations Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 83 ..... A llotm ents ............. ............ Total Funds Available ................ O bligations ............. .............. Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 84....... Expenditures Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 83 .... A llotm ents ............. ............ Total Funds Available ................ Expenditures ............ ...... ....... Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 84 ...... $ 244,120 + 876,121 1,120,241 -1,052,066 $ 68,175 $ 996,561 + 876,121 1,872,682 - 1,663,150 $ 209,532 3. National Emergency Preparedness Activities Authority. Executive Order 11490, as amended, assigns responsibilities to executive departments and agencies to undertake national emergency planning and preparedness to develop an effective national capability to meet essential civilian and defense needs during major domestic emergencies and national security emergencies. Status: The Corps of Engineers Readiness Posture has improved through the preparedness activities undertaken to maintain a national engineering and construction capability for an effective response to any national emergency. Planning and preparedness initiatives were in these major program areas: (1) to define the Corps' national support requirements; (2) to prepare national emergency preparedness plans; (3) to develop an engineering organization structure which supports mission accomplishment; (4) to maintain an adequate level of national emergency operational readiness for rapid response to requirements; (5) to develop program controls which guide plan formulation and periodically test plans to ensure feasibility, applicability and effectiveness. For Fiscal Year obligations and expenditures see Table 48-C. TABLE 48-C NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Obligations Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 83 ..... Allotments................. ........ Total Funds Available .............. Obligations.............. ........... $ 655,647 + 5,424,363 6,080,010 -5,819,412 48-1 Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 84....... Expenditures Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 83 .... A llotm ents ............. ............ 256,162 Total Funds Available .............. Expenditures .................. 913,447 + 5,424,363 Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 84 .... 48-2 6,337,810 5,737,106 $ 600,704 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY WATERS BOARDS In order to carry out United States obligations under international agreements, the Office of the Chief of Engineers and several Corps Divisions and Districts with jurisdiction over areas bordering Canada have representation on numerous international boards and committees. The majority of these boards were established by the International Joint Commission (IJC) as empowered in accordance with the provisions of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada). IJC boards fall into two broad categories: boards of control, which are more or less permanent and supervise compliance over an IJC order; and engineering or technical boards, which are usually dissolved after completing and reporting on an investigation assignment. In addition to boards created by the Commission, other international boards and committees are created by treaties or other informal arrangement in matters concerned with the water resources of joint interest, and the members report directly to the Governments or establishing agency. Internationa boundary waters boards and committees having Corps of Engineer memberships during the fiscal year are listed in Table 49-1. For an explanation of the constitution of the various boards and committees, see the FY 77 and FY 80 annual reports. TABLE 49-1 IJC BOARDS OF CONTROL HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME YEAR ESTABLISHED UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Int. Lakes Superior Int. St. Croix River Int. Lake of the Woods Int. Lake Champlain Int. Kootenay Lake 6. Int. Rainy Lake 7. Int. Osoyoos Lake 8. Int. Niagara 9. Int. St. Lawrence River 10. Int. Skagit River 1914 1915 1925 1937 1938 1941 1943 1953 1953 1967 *Div. Engr., NCD *Div. Engr., NED *Dist. Engr., St. Paul *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Dist. Engr. Seattle 2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Boise, ID *Dist. Engr., St. Paul 1. Dist. Engr., Seattle *2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Tacoma, WA 3. Washington Dept. of Ecology, Olympia *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Washington, D.C. *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, Massena, NY 3. St. Lawrence-Eastern Ontario Commission, Waterton, NY 4. NY State Power Authority, Massena, NY *Dist. Engr., Seattle *Signifies U. S. Section Chairman. IJC ENGINEERING OR STUDY BOARDS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME 1. Int. Souris-Red Rivers Engineering 2. Int. Champlain-Richelieu YEAR ESTABLISHED 1948 1975 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. Dept. of Interior, BOR, Washington, D.C. 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Washington, D.C. *1. New York Depart. Envir. Conser. 2. Dist. Engr., New York 3. Vermont Agency Envir. Conser. 4. New England River Basins Commission, Staff Associate 5. Dept. of Interior, F&WS, Boston, MA 49-1 3. Int. Lake Erie Regulation Study 4. Int. Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study 15. Int. Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board 1977 1977 1979 *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 3. New York Dept. Envir. Conser. 4. Dept. of Interior, F&WS, Boston, MA *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Michigan Dept. Nat. Res. 3. Illinois Dept. of Trans. 4. Pennsylvania Dept. of Envir. Res. 5. Dept. of Energy, FERC, New York, NY *1. NCEED-L, Detroit, MI 2. Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab., NOAA, Ann Arbor, MI 3. USGS, Reston, VA OTHER INTERNATIONAL BOARDS OR GROUPS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME 16. Int. Lake Memphremagog 17. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data 18. Int. Niagara Committee 19. Columbia River Treaty Entities 20. Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering *Signifies U. S. Section Chairman. YEAR ESTABLISHED 1920 1953 1955 1964 1964 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Dist. Engr., New York *1E.n g. Div., North Central Div. 2. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Rockville, MD *Div. Engr., NCD 1. Div. Engr., NPD *2. Bonneville Power Admin., Portland, OR *1. OCE, DAEN-CWE, Washington, D.C. 2. Dept. of Energy, Washington, D.C. 49-2 U.S. ARMY CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORY Organization and functions. The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) is a field operating agency of the Chief of Engineers operating under the supervision of the Chief, Research and Development Office. CERL, which is located in Champaign, IL, was officially dedicated on July 25, 1969, and is one of the Corps' five major laboratories. The laboratory is closely affiliated with the University of Illinois, sharing laboratory, library, computer, and personnel resources with the University. Colonel Louis J. Circeo, Corps of Engineers, is Commander and Director. CERL research programs are oriented toward the support of the total Army, the Army in garrison, the military installation, the Department of Defense, and to the nation as a whole. The laboratory, which has base support, combat support, and civil works missions, is engaged in a construction research program designed to improve planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of a variety of Army facilities. The ultimate goal of the overall research effort is to create products that will save the Army resources. Research findings are transmitted directly to the field, as well as to private industry and the academic community. Within the Corps, research supports both military and civil works projects in the general areas of environmental quality, energy, materials, engineering management, and military engineering. In the area of environmental quality, CERL has developed a broad-based program designed to maintain military readiness standards, while still conforming to environmental quality regulations. These programs have included development of methods to predict noise 'ipacts, water and air pollution control techniques, adaptations of currently used technologies to more stringent fluid and solid waste control, and computeriz methods to cut the time and costs involved in environmental impact assessment. Energy research is oriented toward helping the Army meet its energy conservation goals. These projects iclude development of computer simulation technology for selection of more fuel-efficient energy systems and design methods and exploration of alternative fuel rces like solar energy and biomass. CERL's materials program is designed to lower the costs for construction, modification, operation, and maitenance of its facilities. These projects include gaestigatjons on protective coatings, polymer technology, seismic criteria, quality monitoring systems, and materials syntheses and selection programs. CERL supports the Army decision-maker through its engineering management programs that are designed to increase facility efficiency and productivity. The development of automated data processing systems for management information, cost estimating, profit determination, architecture and design, corrosion mitigation, pavement management, housing contract maintenance, and habitability information have helped reduce costs throughout the military. CERL's military engineering program provides direct support to the battlefield engineer and to the maintenance of military readiness. This research has developed training aids, field-protective structures to increase combat survivability, and methods to enhance the effectiveness of operations during combat situations. In mobilization, CERL research has led to the development of planning systems to evaluate installation troop housing and other requirements, and to the development of low-cost, troop constructible foam shelters for use as emergency housing during the critical early stages of mobilization. During Fiscal Year 1984, USA-CERL produced 212 publications, of which 62 were technical reports, 21 were Army-level publications, and 67 were publications presented in the public domain. In addition, USA-CERL personnel presented 62 papers at scientific meetings. USA-CERL personnel prepared and presented 37 training programs in areas such as corrosion, automated specification editing, and energy conservation. A highlight of USA-CERL technology transfer activities was the licensing of two patented products to companies for manufacture and sale. These products were the Weld Quality Monitor and the Ceramic Anode. This is the first and only time in Corps history that a product of a Corps laboratory has been licensed to the private sector. Operations and results during the period. Work performed during Fiscal Year 1984 was funded both directly and through reimbursable programs. USACERL's total program was $31.0 million, of which $13.0 million was direct RDT&E funding and $9.0 million was reimbursable funding from the Office of the Chief of Engineers and Corps Divisions and Districts. Other Federal agencies, such as the Air Force, Navy, Department of Energy, and Environmental Protection Agency accounted for $9.0 million. 50-1 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER TOPOGRAPHIC LABORATORIES Organization and functions. The U.S. Army Engineer Topographic Laboratories (ETL) began during World War I as a temporary Engineer Detachment, formed to test aerial photography for topographic mapping. Since that time, ETL has grown into a sophisticated, modern research and development laboratory, applying the latest advances in optics, electronics, computer data processing, space sciences, and related technologies to military and civil problems in mapping, surveying, land navigation, and geodesy. ETL is now a field operating agency of the Corps of Engineers and was commanded by Colonel Edward K. Wintz in 1984. Colonel Alan L. Laubscher took command in 1985. The Engineer Topographic Laboratories is the only defense research and development laboratory that addresses the full range of development from basic research to a final product in the topographic sciences. Support is provided to both the Military and Civil Works elements of the Corps and to the Army Materiel Command and the Defense Mapping Agency. To provide this support, ETL is organized into five operational elements, three of which are developmental laboratories. The Geographic Sciences Laboratory performs research and development associated with the extraction and presentation of geographic data for the Army in the field. The Topographic Development Laboratory supports technological development in surveying and mapmaking. The Computer Sciences Laboratory develops advanced computer techniques and systems for processing, analyzing, and displaying topographic data derived from digital photography. The Research Institute performs most of the Laboratories' basic and applied research, and the Terrain Analysis Center prepares terrain studies needed by field Army elements, " directed by the Assistant Chief of Staff of the Army foIrn telligence. During Fiscal Year 1984 copies of 33 Engineer Topographic Laboratories numbered reports of individual studies conducted at or for the Engineer Topographic Laboratories were distributed to Corps' offices and interested outside agencies. In recent years, the emphasis of ETL's research and development program has shifted from conventional mapmaking and surveying equipment and related techniques to new topographic data systems, which are required to support the coming generation of complex weapons systems and military geographic information systems required by field commanders for improved command, control, communications, and intelligence. The new systems frequently use data acquired by remote sensing, and much of the work done at ETL involves this technology. Several projects are investigating the types of data derived from sensors and means for exploiting those data. Central to this work are studies regarding the possibilities of automating image interpretation. Research in pattern recognition theory, hybrid optical digital devices, and artificial intelligence methodologies offers long-range promise toward this objective. Meanwhile, the extension of manual photo analysis to create knowledge-based/expert software indicates near-term improvements to interactive computer- assisted photo interpretation. The knowledge gained in these areas will be applicable not only to the mapping and terrain analysis missions of ETL, but also to the Army thrust of teleoperated and autonomous robotic vehicles. Other work is to investigate the digital processing of remotely sensed data and to define remote sensing inputs required for Army terrain graphics and terrain data bases. In addition, a Remote Sensing Consultant conducts short courses on remote sensing for Corps of Engineers and other government personnel. Operations and results during FY 84. The Engineer Topographic Laboratories' total program for FY 84 was $53,700,000. This included work done for other agencies as well as for the Corps of Engineers. Of this total program, $36,800,000 supported work performed by contract. Reimbursable work in FY 84 included $36,000 charged to civil works funds. 51-1 U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY BaDckground. The U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (USACRREL), located in Hanover, New Hampshire, was created in January 1961. It merged the Snow, Ice and Permafrost Research Establishment (created in 1949) and the Arctic Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory (created in 1953), both of which were outgrowths of the Army's World War II experience in Alaska, Iceland and Greenland. The Laboratory's mission is to conduct and coordinate research and technology applicable to the Army's needs in those geographic areas of the world where cold presents a problem. The total authorized strength of USACRREL is 297 (279 civilian and 18 military), with a budget for FY84 of over $20 million. USACRREL has six main buildings in Hanover (which total 272,000 square feet on 31 acres of land), including the main laboratory, the ice engineering facility, the logistics and supply building, the plant and equipment building, the equipment storage building and the new frost effects research facility. CRREL's Frost Effects Research Facility (FERF) is operational and will aid in the study of frost heave. This unique facility will allow research into the freezethaw phenomena of soil at an accelerated rate. This year's test program is placing emphasis on research into better ways of installing and maintaining paved surfaces, on frost heave problems, and on improving the performance of buried utilities in cold regions. USACRREL maintains a presence in Alaska at facilities located at Ft. Wainwright in Fairbanks. Applied cold regions research, appropriate to the Alaska location, is carried out by CRREL researchers. Facilities available include six buildings (totaling 30,000 square feet) and a permafrost tunnel (360-ft shaft drilled into frozen ground). USACRREL's basic and applied research covers a broad spectrum of cold regions studies. Basic research includes work in the physical, mechanical and chemical properties of snow and other forms of frozen Precipitation, freshwater ice, sea ice and frozen Plound. Basic research supports applied the major research in cold regions mission areas of Fire Support, Combat Support, Combat Service Support, Base SUpport, Flood Control and Navigation, Surveying Remote Sensing, Civil Works Environmental Qualty and Civil Works Construction, and Operation ad Maintenance. Major Civil Works cold res research topics include Ice Engineering, River nagement, Cold Regions Hydrology, Remote ig, and Environmental Impact. As the only Federal laboratory dedicated to cold regions research, USACRREL has an international reputation and maintains close ties with the international research community and with Federal and state agencies where it provides consulting services on a reimbursable basis. As the center of cold regions scientific and engineering expertise for the Corps of Engineers, USACRREL supports Corps districts and divisions by publishing field engineering reports, conducting demonstrations, sponsoring technical seminars for field engineers, and by making field visits to consult on engineering problems. Operations and Results During FY84. During FY84, USACRREL published and distributed over 342 scientific and engineering reports (CRREL Reports; Monographs; Special Reports; Technical Notes; Technical Digests and information bulletins; journal articles; conference papers and abstracts; Corps, DA and other government publications; and books and nongovernment publications), contributed to 20 U.S. Army publications and presented 27 technical seminars and meetings. CRREL personnel consulted with divisions and districts on a broad range of topics and problems, including Ice Engineering and Remote Sensing and the SPOT Simulation evaluation. Also, prototype sensor packages have been installed and interfaced within the St. Paul, Detroit and Pittsburgh Corps districts using near-real time collection systems. A total of 434 One-Stop Consulting Services were performed in FY84. The CRREL River Ice Management Program began in FY83. Included in the RIM start was the initiation of the development of an ice forecasting model. A meteorological station for a test reach on the Ohio River has been installed to assist in the development of this computer model. The soil moisture sensor developed by CRREL was successfully demonstrated at REFORGER 85 in Germany. Use of this sensor assisted in predicting nearreal time mobility of combat vehicles, reducing maneuver damage costs and keeping 60,000 men in the field throughout the exercise. SNOW-TWO/SMOKE WEEK VI experiments were conducted during December 1983 and January 1984, addressing the effects of both the natural environment and smokes on Army systems and operations in winter. Thirty-two agencies participated in the experiments (from Army, Air Force, Navy, universities and industry). U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER The Water Resources Support Center (WRSC), under the staff supervision of the Director of Civil Works, Headquarters, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, is commanded by Colonel George R. Kleb. The Center is located at the Humphreys Engineer Center, Ft. Belvoir, Virginia. Its divisions are the Institute for Water Resources, Dredging Division, Data Collection and Management Division, Publications and Training Division, and Office of Budget and Management Support. Elements managed by the Center in other locations include the Hydrologic Engineering Center at Davis, California; the Marine Design Branch of the Dredging Division at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center of the Data Collection and Management Division at New Orleans, Louisiana. The accomplishments of WRSC during 1984 are given by division. DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT DIVISION Video Disc WRSC-C, is evaluating the state-of-the-art in data transmission technology to facilitate and improve information transfer within the Corps of Engineers. At the present time, one area being investigated is the use of video disc technology to reduce the amount of data which must be transmitted in order to provide an effective teleconferencing. WRSC-C is the program manager for the interagency emergency operations video disc prototype system which will be completed for testing and evaluation in summer 1985. This cooperative program involves Chief of Engineers Civil Works Operations and Readiness Division (DAEN-CWO), Southwestern Division (SWD), Lower Mississippi Valley Division (LMVD), Engineer Automation Support Activity (EASA), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The objective is to provide the capabilities to transfer geographically related emergency operation data in near-real-time between Corps elements and other federal, state, and local organizations for improved emergency management coordination. The system integrates "off the shelf," low cost video disc, microcomputer, graphics, and telecommunications technologies. The prototype system will consist of ten networked video disc Workstations for teleconferencing capabilities located at EMA~ Headquarters, FEMA Region 6, States of tuesiana, and Texas, LMVD, SWD, OCE Headquarc, C NOAA-NOS and NEDSIS, and USGS. pvner applications for storage and retrieval of map Proucts, training and briefing systems, as a subsystem for nforation network, are being explored. Remote Sensing As a result of the FY 1983 technical monitorship expansions to four co-technical monitors, FY 1984 was a transition year regarding the Corps of Engineers Remote Sensing Program. A remote sensing program management plan was developed and is presently being reviewed. WRSC initiated the planning for the Corps 5th Remote Sensing Symposium being held in Ann Arbor, Michigan, October 28-30, 1985 and hosted by the North Central Division. An attendance of over 200 people is expected. The Remote Sensing Demonstration Program, a mechanism for technology transfer, has received formal project proposal from the South Pacific and North Central Divisions. With the Administration's increased activities to commercialize land civil satellites and the French emergence into the land satellite remote sensing technology with SPOT, to be launched in 1985, WRSC has been required to increase its interagency and international coordination. WRSC is the Corps representative to the Department of Commerce Civil Land Satellite Source Evaluation Board. The Corps' use of the GOES (Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite) data collection system is increasing significantly. The number of data collection platforms installed or authorized through FY 1984 totals 1557. Water control management procedures are becoming increasingly automated with the addition of several minicomputers dedicated to water control, and more are planned for FY 85. The cooperative stream gaging program with the U.S. Geological Survey, automated in 1982, was released to the field for testing in 1983. Changes to the program were conducted in 1984. This program will be operational for the 1985 program. Navigation Division The Navigation Division was formed in 1983 by combining the Navigation Analysis Center and the National Waterways Study staff. The Navigation Division supports Corps planners by development and maintenance of transportation planning data bases on waterway carriers, other transportation modes, and commodity movements; development of analytical capabilities; and dissemination of technical information and advice with regard to use of navigation data and analytical techniques. The division also conducts policy studies and performs reimbursable and research studies for HQ, USACE, and field offices. One of the important data bases is the lock Performance Monitoring System (PMS), which contains information of Corps lock operations on the inland waterways. This data base enables Corps personnel to study lock operation and performance; to determine 53-1 methods, benefits, and costs of improving the waterway system; to monitor traffic and commodities moving on the inland waterways; and the monitor conditions that could affect traffic flow. Vessel operating costs (ocean and inland), waterway and tow characteristics, and commodity and other economic projections are maintained to support various navigation systems studies. The Navigation Division has developed computer models to estimate economic development which would occur due to water resource and navigation projects, and supports the navigation user charge data base, which is used to estimate impacts of various cost recovery policies and strategies. Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center The Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center (WCSC) has accomplished significant milestones toward its primary goal of a more timely and accurate reporting program. WCSC has designed an improved reporting form and instructions which will simplify and improve the accuracy of waterborne commerce data. The new form will be available for CY1985 data collection. A contractor has implemented a data base and query system which has facilitated WCSC's extraction of data to satisfy special requests for information. To date, the data base has been limited to WCSC internal use; however, the plan is to create standard queries that Corps offices can use to extract data directly from the WCSC data base. WCSC also plans to provide preliminary quarterly data in addition to final yearly data. This will allow Corps offices to access the data as WCSC collects it instead of having to wait until a final yearly data base is created. WCSC requested comments from the vessel operating companies concerning WCSC'S plans to create a public domain data base. Several large companies reacted negatively to the idea and feared that their competitive position could be compromised if such a data base were made public. WCSC intends to create a data base and convince the companies that their data is sufficiently submerged such that no competitor could infer company specific information. If WCSC is successful in this endeavor, the data base will be made available to the public. The Director of Civil Works approved giving WCSC total data collection responsibility for all Corps divisions except the Ohio River Division. This transfer of responsibility from the district offices to WCSC is being phased in and will be completed by 30 Sep 85. This will result in a ssvings of 22 full-time-equivalent man-years and $450,000.00 per year. Port Facilities Branch The Port Facilities Branch collects and publishes data on the physical characteristics of the coastal, Great Lakes, and inland waterway ports of the United States. Fifty-six port series reports are published at intervals of approximately six to eight years, covering approximate. ly 190 port areas. During the FY 1983, 10 reports covering 40 port areas were published and offered for sale. No. 3-Boston, MA No. 4-Ports of Southern New England (Providence, RI; Fall River, MA; and New London, New Haven, and Bridgeport, CT) No. 6-Albany and Ports on Hudson River, NY No. 35-Tacoma, Grays Harbor, and Olympia, WA No. 36-Seattle, WA No. 38--Ports of Alaska (Anchorage, Kenai/Nikiski, Homer, Seward, Whittier, Valdez, Kodiak, Unalaska/Dutch Harbor, Kotzebue, Nome, Bethel, Dillingham, Metlakatla, Ketchikan, Wrangell, Petersburg, Sitka, Juneau, Haines, and Skagway) No. 45-Detroit and Ports on the Saginaw River, MI No. 47-Milwaukee, WI No. 62-Cincinnati, OH and Ports on Ohio River Miles 317-560 No. 63-Louisville, KY and Ports on Ohio River Miles 560-980 DREDGING DIVISION National Dredging Program In FY 1984, the Corps of Engineers spent $549 million for maintenance and improvement to dredge rivers, channels, and harbors to remove 346 million cubic yards of material. This was an increase from FY 83 of $106 million or 24 percent in expenditures and 60 million cubic yards or 21 percent of dredged material. Private industry continued to increase its share of dredging for the Corps in FY 84 by 60 million cubic yards and $91 million. Private industry dredged 297 million cubic yards and received $470 million for its work. This represents 85 percent of the expenditures and 86 percent of the cubic yardage for the Corps dredging requirements in FY 84. Corps dredges in FY 84 removed 48 million cubic yards of material, the same number as FY 83, at a cost of $79.6 million dollars. Corps of Engineers Reserve Fleet (CERF) During the mobilization exercise, Army officials requested the Director of Civil Works to authorize activating the CERF for an industry hopper dredge to remove shoaling in Mobile Harbor entrance channel, Alabama. In less than 69 hours, the EAGLE I, built in 1981 by the Bean Dredging Company was mobilized, steamed from New Orleans to Mobile, and began dredging the critically shoaled areas. The EAGLE worked 9 24 hour days and removed 315,000 cubic yar of material which was an exceptional performance. For FY 85, all 12 of industry's hopper dredges are available for emergency and national defense requirements 1f Continental United States. The goal for 1985 will be to 53-2 extend procurement actions for CERF to overseas dredging for OCONUS. Retirement of Dredges Consistent with direction of Public Law 95-269 to increase private industry's share of dredging, the Corps continued to retire its dredges. In FY 84, the MARKHAM and the HAINS, hopper dredges were retired, but are maintained on a stand by status until industry demonstrates a capability to perform all work these dredges have previously performed. The STE. GENEVIEVE, cutterhead dredge, was retired at the end of CY 1985. Marine Design Center The Marine Design Center (MDC) worked on 21 different types of vessels for the Corps of Engineers with a project value of $84 million. Contract earnings for MDC designs, engineering, and management of construction were $4 million. The MDC worked on marine designs and engineering for: 2 power service barges, 5 deck cargo barges, 4 survey boats, 5 superior class tugboats, 3 towboats, 3 floating cranes, a gatelifter, controls for the Corps hopper dredge inboard pumps on the ESSAYONS, a davit for the Corps hopper dredge WHEELER, preliminary designs for overhaul of the Corps hopper dredge McFARLAND, a drift collector, a dustpan dredge, a sidecaster dredge, repowering of the Corp dustpan dredge, the JADWIN, to energy-saving diesel fuel, as well as several other marine vessels. The MDC designed a unique dredging system for the oseires Dam on the Blue Nile in Sudan which included a clamshell dredge, tender, and scow. It also provided asistance for marine design and procurement of a cutterhead dredge to be used by the U. S. Air Force for the maintenance of the Port of Praia in the Azores, Portugal. Dredge Advertising Schedules Water Resources Support Center-Dredging Division (WRSC-D) developed and made operational a nationwide database of Corps of Engineers advertisements for dredging contracts. This database can be accessed by the public from most major cities in the U. S. through Control Data's Cybernet Services, the Corps current tilesharing computer contractor. The database conrans current advertising information and the results of cotractor's proposals after the bids are opened. Currently, the database is being updated on every other Monday. Evronmental and Economic Studies Nignation studies for each of the 57 top priority �h dredged material disposal sites included under COe jIoleintet . Corps/EPA Site Designation Program are now Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is continuing its efforts to complete all required supporting documentation for final designation of these sites. Studies for 22 additional EPA interim designated sites were initiated by the Corps in FY 84. Studies were also completed on requircl new ocean disposal sites for the proposed Mobile and Norfolk deepening projects and a third study was initiated at Grays Harbor. To assist these efforts, a Site Designation Technical Guidance Workbook was jointly prepared by the Corps and EPA in FY 84 and is now being applied nationwide, on a developmental basis, for all new site designation studies. A draft sediment assessment and disposal management protocol was also developed for the Dredging Division by the Environmental Laboratory of the Waterways Experiment Station (WES), to provide consistent and technically appropriate testing procedures and disposal alternative evaluations for dredging and disposal of highly contaminated sediments. This protocol was developed to address the existing gap in environmental legislation regarding the small fraction of highly contaminated sediments encountered in navigable waterways and provides necessary guidance in selecting economically feasible and environmentally acceptable dredging and disposal alternatives. This protocol is now undergoing further refinement and field verification within the North Central and North Pacific Divisions. Draft revisions to 33 CFR 209.145 were also completed in FY 84 and submitt-d for consideration to the office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works by the Director of Civil Works. This proposed revision would specifically address environmental compliance requirements for Corps maintenance dredging and disposal activities. Work for Others In addition to assistance to Sudan for the Roseires Dam the Dredging Division provided technical assistance to Argentina, Panama Canal, and the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). In Argentina, sedimentation (shoaling) of river waterways caused serious impediments to navigation and particularly critically needed grain exports. The Corps provided immediate technical information and proposed training workshops for Dredge Masters, overdepth dredging for rapidly shoaling rivers, maintenance schedules, a central control facility, buoying channels along navigable waterways, a spare parts control system, and precautions for the planned hydroelectric facility on the middle Parana River. The Panama Canal Commission has requested assistance to develop a construction cost estimate and technical construction methodology for widening the Gaillard Cut of the Panama Canal. WRSC-D performed a preliminary estimate of the scope of the technical activities to perform the work. For the United Nations, a team of experts from the 53-3 Corps, developed a realistic and acceptable plan of study, developed procedures with ESCAP and the American Embassy in Bangkok, Thailand, and a guide to facilitate advance preparation of waterways officials in the ten member countries of ESCAP which have problems, need assistance, and visits of future technical assisting missions. Under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the United States and The Netherlands, the third annual meeting to exchange technical dredging research information and dredging experiences was hosted by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, in Charleston, SC. In the plenary session, 4 projects were presented and discussed including the Gaillard Cut in Panama. Experiences with polluted sediments, windscreen, mining and river re-diversion were other topics of interest. In the work group for Management Strategies, beneficial uses of dredged material, coal slurry transport, and minimizing dredging costs for specific silt characteristics were presented and discussed. Work Group II, Management of Contaminated Sediment, worked on various disposal options, open water capping, and improved techniques for removal and clean up of highly contaminated dredged sediments. Work Group III on Channel Design and Maintenance included work on safety, models, simulation, and training among 11 major work areas for exchange of research by the experts in the two countries. Under a similar agreement between Japan and the United States, the tenth annual meeting was held in Kyoto, Japan, for cooperation in the field of environmental protection. Technical research papers were presented to evaluate and predict the behavior of nutrients, organics, and contaminants in dredged sediments as well as identifying the many alternatives to dredging and disposing contaminated sediments and waters with these sediments. WRSC-D is also working closely with the Minerals Management Service of the Department of Interior in carrying out their responsibilities in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). WES and WRSC-D are represented in work groups on the west coast and Hawaii formed to determine the economic, engineering, and environmental feasibility of recovering hard minerals at depths between 800 and 3,000 meters within the EEZ. Revolving Fund WRSC-D allocated in excess of $75 million from the Plant Replacement and Improvement Fund (PRIP) to all Divisions, Districts, and Field Operating Activities for Fiscal 84. These allocations were for replacements and improvements to the structures, dredges, floating plant, mobile land plant, fixed land plant, and tools, office furniture, and equipment necessary to support Corpswide missions and activities. The Director of Civil Works has reviewed the use and status of PRIP and has implemented procedures for more effective management of the Revolving Fund and Plant Replacement and Improvement Program. HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER The Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) was productive in several areas in FY 1984. Significant advances were made in increasing the capability of new computer models as well as extending the utility of basic rainfall-runoff and reservoir operation models. The water control software programs have been expanded and improved, the family of automated flood damage computation programs have been consolidated and are experiencing increased usage, and the Data Storage System is enjoying widespread use both in HEC and in district studies. The recently developed program for dredged disposal material management was improved and was extensively used in a project application. The storm runoff forecasting version of the basic rainfallrunoff model and the reservoir operation program were both enhanced to improve their capability to perform in a real-time operation mode. HEC has formulated computer program development guidelines that are designed to improve the ability to develop modular, easy-to-read, maintainable computer codes. The guidelines received an initial trial on the reservoir operations program. The program was substantially modified to most portions of the guidelines, and the result appears to be a very positive improvement in the computer code. The Center provided technical assistance to 29 Corps field offices; the Waterways Experiment Station; Headquarters, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers; and the Bureau of Reclamation during FY 1984. About onethird of the efforts were devoted to direct assistance to Corps field offices in the performance of these studies. HEC assisted four or more offices in each of the areas of real-time water control and data management, river hydraulics, and reservoir system analysis. Two offices were assisted in each of the areas of rainfall-runoff analysis, economic analysis, project formulation, and hydrodynamics. Eight formal training courses involving nine weeks of training were conducted at HEC for 250 Corps professionals. In addition, three weeks of special training, specifically requested by Corps field offices, were conducted for 54 Corps and other employees. Twenty" five foreign visitors were hosted, mostly one-day visits. HEC will continue to emphasize the high-priority technical areas identified by HQ, USACE, and the field offices during FY 1985. Strong interest seems to continue in real-time water control activities, analytical techniques for planning (such as the geographic 1in formation system work), and water supply, both surface and groundwater. Also recent successes with two" dimensional hydrodynamic math models will encourage their application to complex river mechanisms prob lems. 53-4 INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES Organization and Functions The Institute for Water Resources (IWR), established in 1969, consists of three units: the Research Division, the Policy Studies Division, and the Navigation Division. IWR's mission is to perform research in planning methods, conduct policy studies, manage data systems for planning and operations, maintain a center of expertise on water transporation, manage national and special studies, train Corps personnel in water resources planning, and provide technical assistance on water reurce related problems and studies confronting HQ, USACE, division and district offices, other government agencies, and foreign nations. Research The Research Division work in FY 1984 included development of a water demand forecasting model for use in water supply and conservation studies, development of a contingent valuation methodology for recreation assessment, and employment benefit procedures. Work continues in the areas of economic and demographic forecasting, economic effects of lock congestion, and flood damage assessment techniques. Research into microcomputer applications for planning analysis was initiated. The Institute's training program provides a means for transferring technical information and state-of-the-art techniques to various Corps users. Courses on topics ranging from Conflict Management and Economic Analysis for Water Resources Planning were conducted during the year. During FY 1984 approximately 350 Persons attended 13 sessions of 11 training courses. The Policy Studies Division provides analysis and decision support on critical policy issues for the Director of Civil Works through investigations in policy development, program management and evaluation methods, and new missions and strategic planning. Fiscal Year 1984 work included studies of the Corps role in flood warning and evacuation, the effects of reallocating the costs of existing projects, the potential impacts on the Corps program of delays in designation of ocean sites for the disposal of dredged material, criteria for the disposal or retention of Corps hydroelectric facilities, and the role of non-federal financing capability in plan selection. Additionally, a precedent-setting seminar on new water project financing techniques was given. Other work involved facilitation and support activities and special reports for elements of OCE and the field like information systems planning, an evaluation of an alternative to the transfer funding agreement with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, a report on enhanced non-federal contributions for special and local benefits, a report on implications of the Roe Bill for the Civil Works program, and a report on human impacts of Pearl River flooding. The Division continues to assist HQ, USACE in conducting interagency and internal task force studies recommending changes in management strategies, techniques and methods as in the Chief of Engineer's Blue Ribbon Panel on Construction Quality and Engineering Capability, Emergency Water Planning, Planners' Training Needs, and Special Provisions of Contracts. 53-5 Policy Studies APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) i Characteristics of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Heirht Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre.Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) AIAM Chma River Lakes Yukon-Kuskokwim ARIZONA Adobe Alam CavBeu ttes Painted Rock DreamDyra w Tat monolikot WhitlRoawnc h Gila Colorado Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Bkely Mountain Dam Ouachita Bie Mountain Arkansas DIGMy Ouachita Red DWb Red GhM Red MfnwRed NR Dam Ouachita Nba Arkansas CALIFORNIA Blk Butte Sacramento U Santa Ana BUdMasD am. RV. Famtman Lake San Joaquin CarbhoC anyon Santa Ana Ct Valley Russian Dry Creek AMSpring ) L and Channel Russian Fa i San Joaquin ullertn Santa Ana Hme Los Angeles Hry L. Eglebright Sacramento HeyLake San Joaquin lablla San Joaquin Los Angeles m creek Sacramento MergeCdo unty MhGroup: San Joaquin San Joaquin MV&ia San Joaquin 052sSan Joaquin ViV River Mojave Nop San Joaquin ForkSacramento PsFlatSan Joaquin Santa Ana AnPtSoi o Santa Ana &MU1e San Gabriel SOV Los Angeles SmM1 San Joaquin tier Ns San Joaquin WtteNra rrows San Gabriel COLORADO Creek J6er Creek Chat~ald Triidad CO CTICUT BlWAkock lo'"River i rIoolo ok II! l Missouri Missouri Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Housatonic Connecticut Housatonic Housatonic Thames Thames Housatonic Thames Columbia Chena River Fairbanks Skunk Creek Phoenix Bill Williams River Wenden Cave Creek Phoenix Gila River Gila Bend Dreamy Draw Phoenix Santa Rosa Wash Casa Grande Queen Creek Superior Ouachita Hot Springs Petit Jean River Paris Caddo Arkadelphia Rolling Fork River DeQueen Saline River Dierks Cossatot River Gillham Little River Ashdown Little Missouri Murfreesboro Fourche La Fave River Plainview Stony Creek Brea Creek Orland Fullerton Chowchilla River Chowchilla Carbon Canyon River Brea East Fork Russian Ukiah River Dry Creek Healdsburg Littlejohn Creek Farmington East Fullerton Creek Fullerton Big Tujunga Wash Los Angeles Yuba River Marysville Fresno River Kern River Pacoima Wash Martis Creek Madera Bakersfield San Fernando Reno Bear Creek Merced Burns Creek Merced Mariposa Creek Merced Owens Creek Merced Mojave Victorville Calaveras Valley Springs American River Auburn Kings River Piedra Santa Ana River Corona San Antonio Creek Upland San Gabriel River Duarte Los Angeles River Van Nuys Tule River Porterville Kaweah River Visalia San Gabriel River and Rio Hondo El Monte Bear Creek Denver South Platte River Denver Cherry Creek Denver Arkansas River Lamar Purgatoire River Trinidad Branch Brook Thomaston West Branch, Farmington River Riverton Hancock Brook Plymouth Hop Brook Middlebury Natchaug River Willimantic Northfield Brook Thomaston Naugatuck River Thomaston Quinebaug Thompson Boise River Boise 1981 2,000 NPP FR Earth 1982 18,350 NPP FR Earth 1968 1,046,310 560 FRWX Earth 1979 46,600 NPP FRX Earth 1959 2,491,700 NPP FRWX Earth 1973 320 NPP FRX Earth 1974 198,550 NPP FWX Earth 1960 35.590 NPP FX Earth 50 40,200 109 2,275 283 975 109 2,275 181 4,780 50 448 75.5 12,500 149 837 1955 2,768,500 20,900 FP Earth 235 1,100 1947 257,900 2,910 FRWX Earth 115 2,800 1971 881,900 6,400 FPQRS Earth 243 3,400 1977 136,100 1,680 FSQRW Earth 160 2,360 1975 96,800 1,360 FSRAW Earth & Rock 153 2,500 1975 221,800 1,370 FSQW Earth & Rock 160 1,750 1966 1,854,930 29,200 FSW Earth 88 17,554 1949 407,900 2.500 FP Concrete 175 941 1942 336,010 3,550 FSWX Concrete 97 1,012 1963 160,000 770 FIRX Earth 1942 4.010 NPP FRX Earth 156 2,970 87 1.765 1975 150,000 470 FIRW Earth & Rock 205 5 1.800 1961 6,610 NPP FRX Earth 99 2,610 1959 122,500 1,700 FRX Earth 160 3,500 1983 381.000 500 FRSW Earth 319 3,000 1952 52,000 NPP F Earth 60 7,800 1941 760 NPP FRX Earth 46 575 1940 25,450 120 FRWX Earth 97 10,475 1941 69,000 400 DR Concrete 280 1,142 1975 90,000 5,000 FIRW Earth 1953 570,000 1,850 FIRW Earth 1954 440 NPP FX Earth 1971 20,400 71 FSR Earth 163 5,730 185 4,952 50 1,300 113 2,670 1954 7,700 NPP F Earth 92 1,830 1950 7,000 NPP F Earth 55 4,075 1948 15,000 NPP F Earth 88 1,330 1949 3,600 NPP F Earth 75 790 1971 89,670 NPP FRWX Earth 200 2,200 1963 325,000 715 FIRX Earth & Rock 210 1,960 1939 14,700 280 DR Concrete 155 620 1954 1,000,000 NPP FIRX Concrete 429 1,820 1941 196,240 NPP FRX Earth 106 2,280 1956 7,700 NPP FX Earth 160 3,850 1948 32,110 NPP FRX Earth 92 23,800 1941 17,430 NPP FRX Earth 57 15,444 1960 85,000 400 FIRX Earth 142 3,490 1961 150,000 345 FIRX Earth 250 2,375 1957 35,150 NPP FRWX Earth 56 16,960 1978 30,810 109 FRX Earth 180 5,300 1974 231,429 1,412 FRX Earth 148 12,500 1950 93,920 852 FRX Earth 141 14,300 1948 615,500 2,050 FIR Concrete & Earth 106 13,274 1977 123,500 280 FIRX Earth 200 6,610 1970 8,700 20 FR Earth 1969 97,700 760 FRSX Earth 1960 4,030 40 FRW Earth 1968 6,970 21 FR Earth 1952 52,000 450 FRW Earth 1965 2,430 8 FRW Earth 1960 42,000 NPP F Earth 1965 26,800 200 FRW Earth 1956 306,000 2,850 FIR Earth 154 933 223 1,300 57 630 97 520 68 12,420 118 810 142 2,000 70 2,550 250 1,700 A-1 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (AcreageI ('haracteristics of [)anm Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. IAcre-Ft.i Pool Nl'P P) Functions Type Feetl IFeet) ILLINOIS Carlyle Farmdale Fondulac Shelbvville Rend Lake INDIANA Brookville Cagles Mill Cecil M Harden Huntington Mississinewa Monroe Patoka Salamonie IOWA Coralville Rathbun Red Rock Saylorville KANSAS Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Upper Mississippi Missouri Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Clinton Missouri Council Grove Arkansas El Dorado Arkansas Elk City Arkansas Fall River Arkansas Hilladale Missouri John Redmond Arkansas Kanopolis Missouri Marion Arkansas Melvern Missouri Milford Missouri Pearsonm Skuhitz Big Hill Arkansas Perry Missouri Pomona Missouri Toronto Arkansas Tuttle ('reek Missouri Wilson Missouri KENTIUC('KY Barren River Buckhorn Carr Fork Cave Run Dewey Fishtrap Grayson Green River Martins Fork Paintsville Nolin Rough River Taylorsville LOUISIANA Bayou Bodcau Caddo Lake Wallace Lake MARYILANDI) Bloomington Lake MASSA('CHUSE'T'S Barre Falls Birch Hill Buffumville Conant Brook East Brimfield Hodges Village Knightville Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio ('umberland Ohio (Ohio Ohio Ohio Red Red Red Potomac Connecticut Connecticut Thames Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Kaskaskia River Farm (Creek Fondulac Creek Kaskaskia River Big Muddy River East Fork of Whitewater River Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Wabash River Missisminewa Salt ('reek Patoka River Salamonme Iowa River Chariton River Des Moines River Des Moines River Wakarusa River Grand iNeosho P Walnut River Elk River Fall River Big Bull Creek Grand I Neoshoi Smoky Hill River Cottonwood River Marias Des Cygnes Republican River Big Hill (Creek Delaware River 110 Mile ('reek Verdigris River Big Blue River Saline River Barren River Middle Fork of Kentucky River Carr Fork Licking River Johns Creek Levisa Fork, Big Sandy River Little Sandy Green River Martins Fork Paint Creek Nolin River Rough River Salt River Bayou Bodcau Cypress Bayou Cypress Bayou North Branch Potomac River Ware River Millers River Little River Conant Brook Quinebaug River French River Westfield River ('arlvle East Peoria East Peoria Shelbyville Benton Brookville Terre Iaute Rockville Huntington Peru Harrodsburg Ellsworth Wabash Iowa ( ity C'entervillee Des Moines Des Moines l.awrence Council Grove El Dorado Independence Fall River Kansas (ity Burlington Salina Marion Melvern Junction Citv ('Cherryvale Perry Pomona Toronto Manhattan Wilson Glasgow Buckhorn Hazard Farmers Paintsille Pikeville Gravson Campbellsville Harlan Paintsville Kyrock Leitchtield Taylorsville Shreveport Shreveport Shreveport Barnum Barre So. Royalston Charlton Monson Fiskdale Oxford Huntington 1967 983,00(0 26,000( FSNRWA Earth 1951 15.50() NPP F Earth 1951 3.780(1 NPP F Earth 1970 0414.1(100 11.100 FSNRW Earth 1970 294.00 18.90( FtQRSW Earth 1974 1952 196(0 1969 1967 1964 1978 1966 1958 1969 1969 1975 1977 1964 1981 1966 1949 1981 1964 1948 1968 1972 1965 1981 1969 1963 1960 1962 1964 1964 1960 1976 1974 1949 1968 1967 1969 1978 1983 1963 1958 1983 67 6,570 1J 1,275 67 1000 11us 3,000 54 10600 359.600 2,2501 FRSW Earth & Rock 182 3,000 228,120 1,4(X) FRX Earth 150 950 1312.800 .10(0 FRX Earth 117 1790 15:3,100 500 FRW Earth 91 5,332 368,400 1.100 FRW Earth 137 8,100 441 ,0(1 3,280 FARS Earth 93 1,400 3{11 600 2,010 FRSQW Earth & Rock 84 1,550 263 600 976 FRW Earth 133 6,100 492,100 1 821) FARW Earth 552, 000 11,000 FNRWXQ Earth 1, 830()000 8,950 FARWQ Earth 6()12,10(0 74 000 FARWQ Earth 1U( 1,400 s6 10,600 110 5,676 125 6.750 397 200 7,000 FSWAXR Earth 114 9,250 112,265 3.235 FSQR Earth 96 6,500 236,200 8 1h,0(00 FSQR Earth 99 20,930 284,300 4,4510 FSQ Earth 107 4,840 256,400 2 350( FSX Earth 94 6,015 160.000 4,580 FSQR Earth 75 11,600 630, 25(0 9,28( FSQR Earth 86.5 21,790 450,000 3,815 FRWX Earth 131 15,360 143,850 6,200 FRQS Earth 67 8375 363,000 693 FRQWX Earth 98 900 1.161,0(00 15,600 FILSXWQ Earth & Rock 126 6300 40 600 1,2411 FSR Earth s 3,870 77(1(111 12,200 FILSXW Earth & Rock 95 7,750 23( (000 4,000 FR-WXQ Earth & Rock 85 7750 200(,800 2,660 FX Earth 90 4712 2,346,000 15,800 FRWXQAN Earth & Rock 157 7500 776.000( 9,000 FIRWXNA Earth 160 5,60 815,200 4,340 FARS Earth 146 3970 168,000 550 FR Earth 162 1,020 47,700 530 FQRW Earth & Rlock 130 720 614,100 6,790 FQRW Earth & Rock 148 23740 93,000 1,100 FARW Earth 118 913 164,360 569 FARW Rock 195 1100 118,990 1,050 FQRW Earth & Rock 120 1460 723,200 5.070 FRSQW Earth & Rock 142 2350 21,000 578 FQ Concrete 97 574 73,500 261 FQRW Earth & Rock 160 1,600 609,4(00 2,890 FAR Earth & Rock 174 990 334,400 2,180 FRX Earth & Rock 124 1530 291 670 1,625 FQRW Earth & Rock 164 1280 1949 357,300 NPP FRW Earth 1971 175,000 32,700 NFRS Concrete & Earth 1946 88 300 2,300 FR Earth 76 12,50 3,00 48 4,934 1981 130,900 952 FQRS Earth & Rock 296 2,130 1958 1941 1958 1966 1960 1959 1941 885 24,000 NPP FRW Earth & Rock 62 1,400 49,900 NPP FRW Earth & Rock 56 3255 12,700 200 FRW Earth & Rock 66 3,20 50 3,740 NPP F Earth & Rock 85 105200 30,000 360 FRW Earth & Rock 55 2140 12,800 NPP FRW Earth & Rock 55 1,200 49,000 NPP FRW Earth & Rock 160 A-2 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' Characteristics of [lam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Naure River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) MASSACHUSETTS (Continued) Littleville Connecticut Tully Connecticut WesHt ill Blackstone Westville Thames MINNESOTA BigS toneLa ke- Whetstone River Lae Qui Parle Chippewa River Le Qui Parle Marsh Lake Orwell Red Lake MISSISSIPPI Middle Branch, Westfield River Tully River West River Quinebaug River Upper Mississippi Minnesota River Upper Mississippi Chippewa River Upper Mississippi Minnesota River Upper Mississippi Minnesota River Red River of the North Otter Tail River Red River of the North Red Lake River Arkabutla Lake Lower Mississippi Enid Lake Lower Mississippi Gmeada Lake Lower Mississippi Okatibbee Pascagoula Sardia Lake Lower Mississippi MISSOURI Clerwmater White LongBranch Grande Chariton Pamme de Terre Missouri Smithville Missouri Wappapello Lower Mississippi NEBRASKA Harlan County Missouri Papillion Creek ManTdr ibutaries Glenn Cunningham (Site 11) Missouri tnding Bear Lake (Site 16) Missouri Salt Creek & Tributaries: Olive Creiek (Site 2) Missouri Blue Stem (Site 4) Missouri WaM Train (Site 8) Missouri Stagwoach (Site 9) Missouri Yankee Hill (Site 10) Missouri Conetoga (Site 12) Missouri Twi Lake (Site 13) Missouri Pown (Sirt e 14) Missouri Holmes Park Lake (Site 17) Missouri Brnched Oak (Site 18)Missouri NhEWHA MPSHIRE Blackwater Merrimack Zdwar MacDowell Merrimack P*klin Falls Merrimack Okiton.-Everett Merrimack Oter Brook Merrimack Connecticut Burry Mountain Connecticut NEVADA Mathews Canyon Colorado Pine Canyon Colorado NEW MEXICO biquju cohiti Concehu Rio Grande Rio Grande Arkansas Chester Fryville Uxbridge Sturbridge Ortonville Montevideo Montevideo Montevideo Fergus Falls Red River Coldwater River Arkabutla Yocona River Enid Yalobusha River Grenada O)katibbee Creek Meridian Little Tallahatchie River Sardis Black River Piedmont Little Chariton Macon Pomme de Terre River Hermitage Little Platte River Smithville St Francis River Wappapello Republican River Republican City Knight Creek Omaha Trib. of Big Papillion Omaha Creek S. Trib. Olive Br Creek Kramer N. Trib. Olive Br Creek Sprague N. Trib. Hickman Creek Holland S. Trib. Hickman Creek Hickman Cardwell Creek Denton Holmes Creek Denton Middle Creek Pleasantdale N. Middle Creek Emerald Antelope Creek Lincoln Oak Creek Raymond Blackwater River Webster Nubanusit Brook West Perterborough Pemigewasset River Franklin Contoocook River West Hopkinton Piscataquog River East Weare Otter Brook Keene Ashuelot River Keene Mathews Canyon Caliente Pine Canyon Caliente Rio Chainsma Abiquiu Rio Grande Pens Blanca Canadian River Tucumcari 1965 32,400 275 FRWS Earth & Rock 164 1,360 1949 22.000 300 FRW Earth & lRock 62 1.570 1960 12.350 NPP FRW Earth & Rock 51 2,400 1961 11,100 23 FRW Earth & Rock 78 560 1973 1950 1950 1950 1953 1951 1943 1951 1954 1969 1940 1948 1980 1961 1982 1941 45,000 12,700 FRW Earth 25 13,700 2) NPP FRWX Earth & Rock 23 3 17.975 122,800 6,500 FRWX Earth & Rock 21 4,100 35,000 5,100 FRWX Earth & Rock 195 11,8[0() 14,100 210 FARS Earth & Rock 47 1,355 2,680,000 279,000 FARSX Earth & Rock 15 5 36,500 525,300 660,000 1.337,400 142,400 1,570,000 413,700 65,000 650,000 246,500 613,200 5.100 F Earth & Rock 81 11.500 6.100 F Earth & Rock 99 8,400 9,800 F Earth & Rock 102 13,900 1,280 FQSR Earth 67 6,543 10.700 F Earth & Rock 117 15,300 1,630 FRWX Earth & Rock 154 4,225 2,430 FRSQW Earth 71 3,800 7.820 FRWX Earth & Rock 155 4,630 7,190 FSQRW Earth 95 4,200 4,100 FR Earth & Rock 109 2,700 1952 850,000 13,600 FIRWX Earth & Rock 107 11,827 1975 1973 1964 1963 1963 1964 1966 1964 1966 1965 1963 1968 1941 1950 1943 1962 1962 1958 1941 17,910 392 FQRX Earth 5,220 137 FRX Earth 5,470 10,260 9,280 6,640 7,560 10,640 8,080 29,520 6,510 97,560 46,000 12,800 154,000 71,500 87,500 18,300 32,500 174 FR 315 FR 303 FR 196 FR 208 FR 230 FR 255 FR 728 FR 100 FR 1,780 FR NPP FRW NPP FRW NPP FRW 200 FRW 120 FRW 85 FRW 265 FRW Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 1957 6,270 NPP FX Earth 1957 7,750 NPP FX Earth 1963 1,212,000 NPP FXS Earth 1975 596,300 1,200 FRWX Earth 1939 529,000 3,000 FI Concrete &Earth 67 1,940 70 1,460 45 3,020 57 2,760 52 1,650 48 2,250 52 3,100 63 3,000 58 2,075 65 5,000 55 7,700 70 5,200 75 1,150 67 1,030 140 1,740 76 790 115 2,000 133 1,288 86 1,670 71 800 92 884 325 1,540 251 28,300 200 19,400 A-3 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acrear) Characteristics of D)am Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet( (Feet) NEW MEXICO (Continued) Galisteo Rio Grande Jemes Canyon Rio Grande Two Rivers Diamond "A" Dam Rio Grande Rocky Dam Rio Orande Santa Ross Dam & Pecos Reservoir NEW YORK Almond Arkport East Sidney Mount Morris Whitney Point NORTH CAROLINA B. Everett Jordan Falls W. Kerr Scott NORTH DAKOTA Baldhill Bowman-Haley Homme Pipestem OHIO Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Genesee Susquehanna Cape Fear Neuse Yadkin-Pee Dee Galisteo Creek Jemes River Rio Hondo Rocky Arroyo Pecos Canacade Creek Canisteo Creek Ouleout Creek Genesee River Otaelic River New Hope Neuse Yadkin Albuquerque Berrnalillo Roswell Santa Rosa Hornell Hornell Sidney Mount Morris Binghamton Durham Raleigh Wilkesboro Red River of the North Sheyenne River Valley City Missouri North Fork, Grand River Haley Red River of the North South Branch of Park River Park River James River Pipestem Creek Jamestown Alum Creek Ohio Berlin Ohio Caesar Creek Ohio Clarence J. Brown Ohio Deer Creek Ohio Delaware Ohio Dillon Ohio Michael J. Kirwan Ohio Mosquito Creek Ohio Muskingum River Reservoirs: Atwood Ohio Beach City Ohio Bolivar Ohio Charles Mill Ohio Clendening Ohio Dover Ohio Leesville Ohio Mohawk Ohio Mohicanville Ohio Piedmont Ohio Pleasant Hill Ohio Senecaville Ohio Tappan Ohio Wills Creek Ohio North Branch, Ohio Kokosing River Lake Paint Creek Ohio TomnJe nkins Ohio West Fork Mill Creek Ohio William H. Harsha Ohio OKLAHOMA Birch Canton Copan Fort Supply Greak Salt Plains Heyburn Hugo Hulah Kaw Oologah Optima Pins Creek Sardis Waurika Wister Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Red Red Arkansas Alum Creek Mahoning River Caesar Creek Buck Creek Deer Creek Olentangy River Licking River West Branch, Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Africa Deerfield Wilmington Springfield New Holland Delaware Zanesville Newton Falls Cortland Indian Fork New Cumberland Sugar Creek Beach City Sandy Creek Bolivar Black Fork Mufflin Bruahy Fork Tippecanoe Tuscarawas River Dover McGuire Creek Laesville Walhonding River Nellie Lake Fork Mohicanville Stillwater Creek Piedmont Clear Fork Perrysville Seneca Fork Senecaville Little Stillwater Creek Tappan Wills Creek Coneaville North Branch of Fredericktown Kokosing River Paint Creek New Petersburg East Branch, Gloucester Sunday Creek Mill Creek Mount Healthy Little Miami River Williamsburg Birch Creek Barnsdall North Canadian River Canton Little Caney River Copan Wolf Creek Fort Supply Salt Fork, Cherokee Arkansas River Polecat Creek Sapulpa Kiamichi River Hugo Caney River Caney Arkansas River Ponca City Verdigris River Oologah North Canadian River Hardesty Little River Wright City Jackfork Creek Clayton Beaver Creek Waurika Poteau River Wister 1970 1953 1963 1979 1949 1939 1950 1952 1942 89,000 NPP FX 106,100 NNP FX 168,000 NPP FX 447,000 NPP FIX Earth Earth Earth Earth 14,800 124 FRW Earth 7,900 NPP F Earth 33,550 210 FRW Concrete & Earth 337,000 170 FR Concrete 86,440 1,200 FRW Earth 1982 778,000 14,300 FQRSWX Earth 1983 397,000 12,490 FQRSWX Earth 1963 153,000 1,470 FARSX Earth 1950 1967 1951 1974 1975 1943 1978 1974 1968 1951 1961 1966 1944 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 1937 1937 1936 1937 1938 1937 1936 1937 1973 1972 1961 1952 1978 1977 1948 1983 1942 1941 1950 1974 1961 1976 1963 1978 1969 1983 1977 1949 70,000 325 FAILS Earth 92,980 1,750 FSRWX Earth 3,650 51 FARS Earth 146,880 885 FRWX Earth 158 2,820 135 780 98 4,885 118 2,940 212 1,950 90 1,260 113 1,200 130 2,010 210 1,028 95 4,900 112 1,330 92 1,915 148 1,740 61 1,650 79 5,730 67 865 108 4,000 134,800 348 FRSW Concrete 93 10,000 & Earth 91,200 240 FARSWQ Concrete 96 5,750 & Earth 242,200 13,300 FRSQW Earth & Rock 165 2,750 63,700 1,010 FQRW Earth & Rock 72 6,620 102,500 727 FRW Earth 93 3,880 132,000 950 FARWX Earth 92 18,600 273,000 1,325 FRWX Earth 118 1,400 78,700 580 FAQRSW Earth 83 9,900 104,100 700 FARSWQ Earth 47 5650 49,700 1,540 FRX 71,700 420 FRX 149,600 NPP FR 88,000 1,350 FRX 54,000 1,800 FRX 203,000 350 FRX 37,400 1,000 FRX 285,000 NPP FR 102,000 NPP FR 65,000 2,270 FRX 87,700 850 FRX 88,500 3,550 FRSX 61,600 2,350 FRX 196,000 900 FRX 14,900 98 FRW 145,000 710 FRSQW 26,900 394 FRSWX 11,380 200 FRX 284,500 18,760 FRSQW Earth 65 3,700 Earth 64 5,600 Earth 87 6,300 Earth 48 1,390 Earth 64 950 Concrete 83 824 Earth 74 1,694 Earth 111 2,330 Earth 46 1,220 Earth 56 1,750 Earth 113 775 Earth 45 2,350 Earth 52 1,550 Earth 87 1,950 Earth 71 1,400 Earth & Rock 118 700 Concrete 84 944 Earth 100 1,100 Earth 200 1,450 58,200 1,137 FSQRW Earth 377,100 7,910 FSI Earth 227,700 4,850 FSQRW Earth 100,700 1,820 FSX Earth 271,400 8,690 FRWX Earth 55,030 880 FRWXS Earth 966,700 13,250 FSQRW Earth 289,000 3,570 FSAX Earth 1,348,000 17,040 FSQRW Earth 1,519,000 29,460 FSN Earth 229,500 5,340 FSRW Earth 465,780 3,750 FSQW Earth 429,600 14,360 FSRW Earth 343,500 10,100 FISQWR Earth 427,900 5,360 FSAX Earth 97 3,193 73 15,140 70 7,730 85 12,225 68 6,010 89 2,920 101 10,200 94 5,200 125 9,466 137 4,000 120 15,200 124 7,712 124 14,138 106 16,600 99 5,700 A-4 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' Characteristics o Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Nae River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPPI Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) OUGON Applegate River Blue River Coast Fork, Willamette River Row River Middle Fork, Willamette River Long Tom River Willow Creek Medford Blue River Cottage Grove Cottage Grove Eugene Eugene Heppner Applegate Rogue River Blue River Columbia Coiag Grove Columbia Drna Columbia Fall Creek Columbia Pir Rdge Columbia Willow Creek Columbia PNNIYLVANIA Alvin R. Bush Susquehanna Aylosworth Creek Susquehanna Beavill Delaware aLe Marsh Delaware Comaugh Ohio Cowanesque Susquehanna Croke"dC reek Ohio Cuweville Susquehanna River e Branch, Ohio Clarion River PtWeJro seph Sayers Suaquehanna Me 2. Waiter Delaware WearC reek) Gee.E dgar Jadwin Delaware anRok Susquehanna Kinae Ohio I sfnaOhio hhlng Creek Ohio Delaware Susquehanna Ohio WlnWMI Susquehanna U-Hamnond Lakes Susquehanna Ohio LniftCit Ohio W Oc Creek Ohio ' u River Ohio DAKOTA CIkok Missouri 0MMwood Spring Missouri I.L,. n- M Control Red River of the North Bois de Sioux River Wheaton Deo Whta RockRed River of the North Bois de Sioux River Wheaton Thas iAqdlek San Jacinto Bsudwe Brazos Trinity Bem San Jacinto 1 ~Swo~kBraxoe CUM aTrinity ~frrllaspB r Da- Guadalupe Dam- Red the Pines Red Iam and Lake Brazos Crek Trinity Ike Ker Colorado Red Ltlsevlle Trinity Nar Mill Trinity no DmTrinity Bras South Mayde Creek Addicks Aquilla Creek Hillsboro Waxahachie Creek Ennis Buffalo Bayou Barker Leon River Belton Clear Fork, Trinity River Fort Worth Guadalupe New Braunfels Cypress Creek Jefferson San Gabriel River Granger Denton Creek Grapevine Hords Creek Coleman Wichita River Wichita Falls East Fork, Trinity River Fort Worth Elm Fork, Trinity River Lewisville Richland Creek Corsicana North Fork, Georgetown San Gabriel River 1981 1968 1942 1949 1965 1941 1983 1962 1970 1971 1979 1952 1980 1940 1965 1952 1969 1961 1969 1942 1965 1942 1941 1960 1973 1966 1960 1979 1979 1940 1970 1973 1943 82,000 988 AFIQRSW Gravel Emr- 242 1,300 bankment 85,000 975 FINR Earth 319 1,329 30,060 1,155 FINR Concrete 114 2,110 & Earth 70,500 1,885 FINR Concrete 145 3,352 & Earth 115,000 1,865 FINR Rockfill 193 5,100 & Concrete 110,000 10,305 FINR Rockfill 49 6,624 & Concrete 13,250 96 FRN Roller 160 1,780 Compacted Concrete 75.000 160 FRW Earth & Rock 165 1,350 1,760 NPP F Earth & Rock 90 1,270 68,250 947 FQRSW Earth & Rock 170 4,200 500,000 22,900 FAQRS Earth 98 1,775 274,000 300 F Concrete 137 1,265 & Earth 89,000 410 FR Earth & Rock 151 3,100 93,900 350 FRW Earth 143 1,480 124,200 790 FR Earth 131 2,850 84,300 90 FARQ Earth 184 1,725 99,000 1,730 FRW Earth 100 6,835 110,000 90 FNRW Rockfill 263 3,500 24,500 NPP F Earth 109 1,255 28,000 NPP FRW Earth 83 1,000 1,180,000 1,900 PFAQR Concrete 177 1,877 & Earth 95,300 210 FRW Concrete 144 960 & Earth 74,200 170 FRW Concrete 162 926 52,000 290 FNRW Earth 140 1,230 762,000 8,300 FRW Earth & Rock 225 1,700 191,400 1,910 FAQRW Concrete 68 720 12,000 85 FS Earth 77 1,700 62,000 470 FR Earth & Rock 140 2,738 63,000 680 FR Earth & Rock 122 6,000 133,400 480 FRW Earth 154 1,050 47,640 NPP F Earth 88 1,420 20,000 118 FQRA Earth 90 4,650 254,000 450 FARWQ Earth 184 1,610 Kettle Creek Renovo Aylesworth Creek East Jermyn Pohopoco Lehighton Tulephocken Reading Conemaugh River Saltsburg Cowanesque River Lawrenceville Crooked Creek Ford City West Branch, Clearfield Susquehanna River East Branch, Wilcox Clarion River Bald Eagle Creek Blanchard Lehigh River Wilkes-Barre Dyberry Creek Honesdale Codorus Creek York Allegheny River Warren Loyalhanna Creek Saltaburg Mahoning Creek New Bethlehem Lackawaxen River Honesdale Raystown Branch, Huntingdon Juniata River Shenanago River Sharpsville Lackawanna River Forest City Tioga River Tioga Crooked Creek Tioga Tionesta Creek Tionesta French Creek Union City French Creek Meadville Youghiogheny River Confluence Cold Brook Hot Springs Cottonwood Springs Hot Springs Creek 1941 1941 1948 1983 1965 1945 1954 1952 1964 1959 1980 1952 1948 1972 1953 1954 1962 1980 164,500 10,925 FRX Earth 85,000 6,500 FRX Earth 127 925 123 1,190 14 9,100 16 14,400 204,500 NPP FX Earth 49 61,166 146,000 3,280 FSX Earth 104.5 11,890 140,000 3,570 FRSX Earth 82 15,400 207,000 NPP FX Earth 37 72,844 1,097,600 12,300 FIRSX Earth 192 5,524 258,600 3,770 FNRXA Earth 130 9,130 740,900 8,240 FRSX Earth 224 6,830 842,100 18,700 FRS Earth 97 10,600 244,200 4,400 FRSWX Earth 115 16,320 425,500 7,280 FNRSXA Earth 137 12,850 25,310 510 FARSX Earth 91 6,800 502,900 15,590 FX Earth & Rock 115 8,890 748,200 21,400 FRSX Earth 81 19,483 989,700 23,280 FRSX Earth 125 32,888 212,200 5,070 FRSX Earth 82 7,570 130,800 1,310 FRSWX Rock 164 6,700 A-5 1953 7,200 36 FRWX Earth 1970 8,385 41 FRWX Earth APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 10m2.01 Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 1 Characteristics of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) O. C Fisher Colorado Pat Mayne Red Proctor Bravo Somerville Brazos Stillhouse Hollow Brazoes Waco Brazos Wright Patman Red VERMONT Ball Mountain North Hartland North Springfield Townshend Union Village VIRGINIA Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut John W Flannagan Ohio Gathright Dam & James Lake Moomaw North Fork of Ohio Pound River WASHINGTON Howard A Hanson Green Mill Creek Columbia Mud Mountain Puyallup Wynoochee Chehalis WEST VIRGINIA Beech Fork Ohio Bluestone Ohio Burnaville Ohio East Lynn Ohio R. D. Bailey Ohio Summeraville Lake Ohio Sutton Ohio Tygart River Ohio WISCONSIN North Concho River San Angelo Sanders Creek Paris Leon River Comanche Yegua Creek Somerville Lampasas River Belton Boeque River Waco Sulphur River Texarkana West River Jamaica Ottauguechee River North Hartland Black River Springfield West River Townshend Ompompanoosuc River Union Village Pound River Haysi Jackson Alleghany North Fork, Pound River Pound Green River Mill Creek White River Wynoochee River Kanaskat Walls Walla Enumclaw Montesano Beech Fork Lavalette New River Hinton Little Kanawha Burnsville Twelve Pole Creek East Lynn Guynabdot River Justice Gauley River Summersville Elk River Sutton Tygart River Grafton 1952 396,400 5,440 FRSX Earth 128 40,885 1967 189,100 5,993 FRSX Earth 96 7,080 1963 374,200 4,610 FRSX Earth 86 13,460 1967 507,500 11,460 FRSX Earth 80 26,175 1968 630,400 6,430 FRSX Earth 200 15,624 1965 726,400 7,270 FRSX Concrete & 140 24,618 Earth 1957 2,654,300 20,300 FRSX Earth 100 18,500 1961 54,600 75 FRW Concrete & 265 915 Earth 1960 71,420 220 FRW Concrete & 185 1,520 Earth 1960 51,067 290 FRW Concrete & 120 2,940 Earth 1961 33,700 100 FRW Concrete & 133 1,700 Earth 1950 38,000 NPP FRW Concrete & 170 1,100 Earth 1963 145,700 310 FAQR Concrete & 250 960 Earth 1979 123,739 2,532 FQR Earth & Rock 257 1,172 1966 11,293 106 FR Rock 122 600 1961 106,000 1,600 FAS Rock 235 675 1942 8,300 225 FR Earth 145 3,200 1953 106,000 NPP FR Rock 425 700 1972 70,000 1,150 FSARI Concrete & 177 1,700 Earth 1977 37,540 450 FRW Earth 86 1,080 1952 631,000 1,800 FRWX Concrete 180 2,048 1977 65,400 550 FQRW Earth & Rock 89 1,400 1970 82,500 823 FQRW Earth & Rock 122 650 1979 203,700 440 FQRW Earth & Rock 310 1,397 1965 413,800 407 FANR Rock 390 2,280 1960 265,300 270 FARWX Concrete 220 1,178 1938 287,700 620 FNAR Concrete 230 1,921 Eau Galle Chippewa Eau Galle Spring Valley 1969 43,600 150 FR Earth 122 1,600 A-6 FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' Characteristics of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length lme River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) CALIFORNIA DigD ry Creek Csmmdm Camy Valley" DlVdale lt. Wash New ulards Ba r New Don Pedro3 New Eachequer2 Tahheah Creek CODLADO Plain Canyon CONNECTICUT BesBtr anch HallM eadow Brook MaRidiv er Brook IDAHO MARYLAND Same River Magoum MI8oURI BearCreek NEWYO RK oELAHOIA Ahs4 Mdahm Per9 OreLke ar ~Chrokees WAR San Joaquin San Joaquin Tuolumne Alameda Rio Hondo Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Sacramento Whitewater Colorado Housatonic Housatonic Connerc Conmn Upper Snake Potomac Upper Mississippi Oswego Red Arkansas Arkansas ig Wah Beaver Big Wash VERMONT Brm Winooski Jail Branch W*any Winooski Waterbury aille Winooski North Branch, Winooski River OMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS: Big Dry Creek Fresno Mokelumne River Clements Cherry Creek Sonora Arroyo Del Valle Livermore Eaton Wash Pasadena Yuba River Marysville Tuolumne River Modesto Merced River Merced Feather River Oroville Tahchevah Creek Palm Springs Pinon Canyon Arroyo Trinidad East Branch, Torrington Naugatuck River Hall Meadow Br,' rrington Mad River inchester Sucker Broo Winchester Willow Creek Idaho Falls Savage Western Port Bear Creek Hannibal Onondaga Creek Syracuse North Fork, Red Altus Grand (Neosho) River LocustGr ove Grand (Neosho) River Disney Milford East Barre Waterbury Wrightaville 1948 1963 1956 1968 1937 1968 1970 1966 1964 1965 1964 1964 1962 1963 1970 1979 1952 1962 1949 1948 1964 1941 1961 1938 1938 1938 16,250 431,500 268,000 77,000 960 960,000 2,030,000 1,026,000 3,539,000 950 4,350 4,350 8,620 9,700 1,480 100,500 20,000 8,700 18,200 152,429 444,500 2,197,000 1,200 23,550 82,100 36,000 NPP F NPP FRS 475 FS 200 FRS NPP F 1,910 FIRPW 3,520 FISP 1,900 FIR 5,838 FIRSW NPP F NPP FRW NPP FR NPP F 10 FR NPP F 364 FIR 360 FRS NPP F NPP F 6,260 FISR 10,9008 FRP 46,5008 FRP NPP F NPP F 900 FRH 90 FR ,r uality Control '_ 1sWrue 1p tiponl (Aynnual Attendance exceeding 5,000) Wsa Wildlife (Federal or State) a *t rvation and Sedimentation wat su r face at top of permanent pool. al,- -- erwnt contributed for flood control storage. Vs&lle Y Reservoir: Planned and constructed by local interests as initial phase; provided flood control on interim basis. Second and final phase, New Don Pedro ReservoiFred-e ral Cwtcifcontrfiobruf tleodop dr otecticoonn,s tructainodn o peratiboyn C itya nd County ofS an Franciscaond, Turlock and Modesto IrrigatiDoins tricts. Iv@tIrO byB ureau ofR eclamation. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood controplo rtion. PO b Grand River Dam Authority. Participation by Department of the Army tof inancfel oocdo ntroplo rtion. - pPool, A-7 Earth 40 20,038 Earth & Rock 171 2,450 Earth & Rock 315 2,500 Earth 223 880 Earth 82 1,795 Concrete 645 2,323 Earth & Rock 565 1,920 Rock 480 1,200 Earth 770 6,850 Earth 42 3,610 Earth 92 700 Earth 92 100 Earth & Rock 73 1,200 Earth 178 940 Earth 68 1,160 Earth 184 840 Earth 184 1,050 Earth 65 1,450 Earth 67 1,782 Concrete 98 1,112 Concrete 90 4,494 & Earth Concrete 147 6,565 Earth 34 2,814 Earth & Rock 65 1,460 Fill Earth & Rock 158 1,800 Fill Earth & Rock 115 1,525 Fill APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1984 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Airport Rel, 20 Mile Cr, Prentiss Co, MS (Sec 14)............... Alamosa, CO (Sec 14) .................... ..................... Allegheny River, Oil City, PA (Sec 205) .................... Allegheny River, Tionesta, PA (Sec 14) ........................ Alpen, MI (Sec 14) .......................................... Alum Creek Lake, OH ........................................ Alum Creek Lake, OH ................. ....................... Alton to Gale Levee System, Mississippi River, IL and MO ...... Arcadia Lake, O K .......................... ... .............. Arkansas-Red Basins Chloride Control (Area III), OK, TX, and KS (Stage I) ...................................... Arroyo Colorado River, Rio Hondo, TX (Sec 14) ................. Alan Village (Guam) (Sec 205) ................. ............... Ascalmore-Tippo Items, M S ................ ................... B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC ........................ Bagauce River, Castine ME (Sec 14) .......................... Beech Fork Lake, W V ....................... .............. Bettendorf, IA........ ............................. Big South Fork National River & Recreation Area, KY and TN . Big Stone Lake & Whetstone River, MN and SD................ Big Wood River, ID (Sec 208) .................................. Black Rock Harbor, Bridgeport, CT (Sec 14) .................... Blanchard River, Ottawa, OH (Sec 14) ......................... Bloomington Lake, MD and WV............................... Boie River, ID (Sec 208)................................... Bradford, TN (Sec 208) ....................................... Brookville Lake, IN .......................................... Brush Bayou, LA ............................................. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX ............................ Burketts Cr, Amory, MS (Sec 205) ............. ................ Burlington, IA ............................................... Burnmsville Lake, WV ......................................... Casar Creek Lake, OH ................. ...................... Candy Lake, OK ............................................. Canon City, CO County Rd 9 (Sec 14) .......................... Cave Run Lake, KY ................. ......................... C tral and Southern, FL ..................................... Chagi River, Gates Mills, OH (Sec 14) ....................... Clhatfield Lake, CO ........................................... hna River Lakes, AK ................ ....................... Chillicothe, O H ........ ..................................... C ton Lake, K S .............................. .............. Col , Palouse River, ID ..................... ............... Colum0bus, NE (Sec 205) ...................................... Cooper Lake and Channels, TX .............. .................. Oh Lake, OK ....... ............................ C Madera Creek, CA ................. ..................... aswque Lake, PA............... ................... OWC astle Cr, SC ............................................ C Cr, Rossville, KS (Sec 14) .............. ................. CtMonga Creek, CA................... . ............ Clyahoga Street Bridge, Akron, OH (Sec 14) ................... 0aeCounty, FL .. Da (a,o uKnYty -,. .F L. ............. ............................... D" Cr, Edgecombe, NC (Sec 205) ........ .................... Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel, CA.............. ec Creek Channel Improvement, TX ...................... Eaqle Cr, SC (Sec 205)...... ayer River, Vail, IA (Sec 14) .. .................... rn *wton AL (Sec 205) ................ .......... Lake WV................................ M olie, IL ........................................ p ckaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet & Jamaica Bay, NY, S8 u.i, .aci.t.yIL ......... .............. t Mile Cre2k, Hamburg, NY (Sec 208). .. .. .. .. . .. .... 1984 1983 1982 1983 1982 1970 1970 1983 1980 1976 1984 1983 1984 1967 1983 1970 1982 1979 1971 1984 1984 1983 1971 1984 1983 1966 1977 1956 1982 1982 1972 1971 1976 1983 1965 1950 1984 1967 1973 1971 1972 1962 1982 1958 1973 1966 1973 1983 1984 1976 1984 1975 1978 1982 1967 1973 1983 1983 1982 1965 1980 1975 1974 1983 1974 1971 1984 1983 1984 1983 1975 1975 1984 1984 1982 1978 1975 1983 1981 1984 1974 1983 1978 1984 1982 1976 1981 1977 1966 1983 1980 1984 1982 1983 1983 1984 1970 1977 1981 1973 1985 1984 1984 1984 1983 1984 1984 1984 1987 1985, 1984 1985 1985 1989 1984 1986 1987 1988 1985 1985 1984 1984 1984 1985 1984 1984 1980 Indefinite 1984 1984 1985 1985 Deferred 1984 1986 1993 1985 1988 1994 1985 1984 1984 1986 Indefinite 1985 1987 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985 1982 1985 1984 1987 Indefinite 1985 1984 1984 1982 1984 1988 1986 1984 1986 Indefinite Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Chloride Control Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection National Recreation Area Local protection Snagging and Clearing Local protection Local protection Reservoir Snagging and Clearing Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Streambank protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir and Channel Improvement Reservoirs and levee Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir, channel improvement and levees Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Shore protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection, FP evacuation Reservoir Local protection Beach nourishment Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection B-1 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1984 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project El Tuque Beach, PR (Sec 103) ........... ...................... Elizabeth, NJ .................... . ................... Elk Creek, Clyde, KS (Sec 205).......... ... ................... Elm Creek, Bridges, Burt Co., NE (Sec 14) ..................... E m erson, G A (Sec 14) ............. ........................... Euclid Creek, OH (Sec 205) ................. .................. Euclid General Hospital, Euclid, OH (Sec 14)................... E van sdale , IA ............... ................................. Falls Lake, NC .................. ....... . ...... Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY ................. . (R em ainder) ................... ............ ... ............. Fountain Creek, CO (Sec 14) (a Fountain Cr, CO ............... Fountain Creek, 1-25, CO (Sec 14) .............. ..... ......... Fountain Creek, Security, CO (Sec 14) .............. ........... Fourm ile Creek, CO (Sec 14) .............. .................... Fourm ile R un, V A ............. ............................... Four R ivers Basin, FL ........................................ F u lto n , IL .... . .... .... . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .... . . . ... . . . . . .. ..... .. Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne Co., NC (Sec 14) ............. Grand Prairie, TX (Meyers Road-Sec 14) ....................... Grand Prairie, TX (Sanitary Landfill-Sec 14) ................... G reat F alls, M T ............... ............................... G reenville, T X ............. . ... .............................. Greenwood, Claiborne St., M S ................ ................. Greenwood, Site, 2, MS ................ .. ............ Gypsum, KS (Sec 205) ................ .. .............. H ighland Bayou, TX ............... . .......................... Hillsdale Lake, KS.................... ............ Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA (Sec 205) ................ Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA (Sec 14) ................. Indian Bend W ash, AZ.................... .................. Indian Creek, Emerson, IA (Sec 205) ............... ............ Islesboro Harbor, Islesboro, ME (Sec 14) ................... Joe Pool Lake, TX (formerly Lakeview Lake)................... Joyce Creek, Camden Co, NC (Sec 205) ............. ........... Kansas City, KS (1962 M od.) .................. ................ Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Levee Dist, IL ................... K ing Arroyo, CO (Sec 14) .............. ...................... Lake Chicot Pumping Plant, AR............................... Lake Ontario State Pkwy, Kendall, NY (Sec 14) ................ Lake Pontchartrain, LA ................................... Larose to Golden Meadow, LA............................. Las Animas, Hwy 101, CO (Sec 14) ........................... Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . Lead Bayou, MS (Sec 205) .................................. Levee Unit 5, W abash River, IN ............................... Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River & Cumberland River, KY, W V & VA ................ ....................... Lewisville Dam, TX ........................................ Little Blue River Channel, M O .............. .................. Little Blue River Lakes, M O ............. ..................... Little Elk Creek, Girard, PA (Sec 14) .......................... Little Massard Creek, Ft. Smith, AR (Sec 205) ................. Long Branch Lake, MO.................................... Lorraine Rd, Biloxi River, MS (Sec 14) ......................... Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA ........... Mankato and N. Mankato, MN............................ Martins Fork Lake, KY.................................. Matafao Shoreline, American Somoa (Sec 14)................... McDonald Dike Road, Tillamook, OR (Sec 14) .................. McGee Creek Drainage and Levee Dist., IL ................... Meridian Township, MI (Sec 14)........................... Milan, IL ............ . .................................. Mill Creek, OH ......................... ............ Miss R. Ag Area 8, Elsberry, MO................. .......... Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO............. Mt. St. Helens & Vicinity, WA ............................ Muddy Creek, Syracuse, NE (Sec 14) ........................ 1982 1972 1983 1984 1983 1983 1984 1981 1973 1963 1963 1983 1983 1983 1983 1974 1966 1978 1984 1984 1983 1982 1973 1984 1984 1978 1974 1975 1982 1984 1976 1983 1983 1975 1982 1971 1980 1983 1981 1983 1967 1972 1983 1970 1982 1964 1981 1979 1975 1978 1984 1983 1973 1983 1962 1971 1973 1983 1984 1979 1982 1980 1981 1979 1948 1983 1984 1984 1983 1983 1984 1984 1984 1984 1982 1979 1980 1984 1981 1983 1979 1984 1984 1984 1984 1986 1984 1984 1984 1985 1985 1983 1990 Indefinite Indefinite 1984 1984 1984 1984 1984 1986 1984 1985 1985 1984 1984 1983 1985 1985 1982 1984 1983 1984 1984 1985 1985 1984 1989 1984 Indefinite 1986 1984 1985 1984 Indefinite 1992 1984 1976 (mod.) 1985 1985 1969 1985 Indefinil 1984 1986 1987 1984 1983 1984 1984 1980 Indefini 1983 1984 1989 1990 1978 1982 1984 1984 1984 1985 1983 1983 1986 1999 1982 1982 Indefini 1988 1985 Shore protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection River bank protection River bank protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Reservoir and channel improvement Local protection Local protection te te te Local protection Major protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Emergency protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection B-2 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1984 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Muskingham River Lakes, OH .............. .................. Muskingum River Lakes, OH (Dam Safety Assurance) ................ .................... Namo River, Guam (Sec 205).................. ............... New London, CT .................... . .............. New Orleans to Venice, LA ................................... N ew ark, O H ................................. ............... Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT (Sec 14)....................... Ohio River, Chester, WV (Sec 14).............................. Osborne Creek, Prentiss Co., MS (Sec 14) ...................... Otter Creek, Shannon Hills, AR (Sec 205) ...................... Paauau Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii (Sec 205) .................... Pago Pago Airport, American Somoa (Sec 14) ................. Paintsville Lake, K Y ......................................... Panola-Quitman Item C, M S .................................. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lake, NE ..................... Patoka Lake, IN .......................... ................. Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI (Sec 205) ........................ Pearl R iver, M S .............................................. Perry County L & D Nos. 1, 2, 3, MO .................... Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity (including New River) ............... Pilchuck River, WA (Sec 14) .............. ................ Porter Bayou, M S (Sec 205) ................ .................. Placer C reek, ID ............................................. Plum Creek, Penn Hills, PA (Sec 14) .......................... Point Place, O H .............................................. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX ................. ................ Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR ....................... Prairie Du Chien, WI........... ..................... Preoque Isle Peninsula, PA ................................... Punta Salinas, PR (Sec 103)............ .. ..................... R. D. Bailey Lake, WV ....................................... Rapidan River, Orange, VA (Sec 14) ........................... Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, Matawan and Union Beach Sections ............................................. R y Roberts Lake, TX ........................................ Red Oak, IA (Sec 205) ........................................ Red River below Denison Dam, TX ............. ............... Red River Emergency Bank Protection......................... Roberto Clemente Park, Pittsburgh, PA (Sec 14)................ Rockford, IL (Kent Creek) ............... ...................... Root Creek, Bolivar, NY (Sec 205) ......... .................... Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA ........................ Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA ............. Sacramento River Flood Control, CA ........................... Scramento River, Major and Minor Tributaries, CA............ Saginraw R iver, M I ........................................... Salmon Creek, Near Vancouver, WA (Sec 14) .................. Sa Antonio Channel Improvement, TX........................ San Gabriel River, TX ........................................ San Jacinto River Levee & Bautista Creek Channel ............ Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME (Sec 14) ........ ................... S dY Creek, Jackson, TN (Sec 14) ........ .................... ais Lake, OK ........ .. .. . ......... . ........ .... aylorville Lake, IA ................................. Sa.ns River, Rockingham, VT (Sec 14) ....................... aSquca da Creek, N Y ..... ..... ............................. Sebasticook River Harland, ME (Sec 205)................. Sicily Island, LA, Levee.......... Sgtna Center, Racine, WI (Sec 14) .. .................... Skiatook ae, OK .... ....... ........... Shoslone River, Byron, WY (Sec 14)... Silouthville Lake, MO ................................ South Pork, Boise River, ID (Sec 208) .. .................. tthwestern Jefferson County, KY ..................... StaesPh HS, Cleveland, OH (Sec 14) ................... Stel rWy 101 & 104, Columbia River, WA (Sec 14) ......... le Bayou, MS .................................. newall Jackson Lake, WV...... .... ............... Stratnore Hills, Colorado Springs, CO (Sec 14)............. 1976 1982 1978 1978 1969 1976 1984 1983 1983 1984 1983 1983 1973 1984 1972 1972 1982 1984 1977 1973 1984 1982 1981 1983 1982 1966 1975 1979 1975 1981 1967 1983 1965 1975 1982 1948 1971 1983 1979 1979 1963 1963 1918 1949 1965 1984 1957 1973 1960 1984 1984 1976 1965 1983 1978 1982 1983 1981 1974 1983 1974 1984 1974 1983 1984 1966 1977 1983 1993 Major rehabilitation 1981 1984 1983 1984 1984 1983 1974 1978 1984 1981 1982 1983 1984 1984 1979 1980' 1983 1977 1982 1983 1982 1984 1982 1983 1984 1984 Indefinite 1980 1985 Indefinite 1987 1984 1984 1984 1985 1985 1984 1986 1985 1987 1985 1985 1985 1983 1991 1984 1985 1984 1984 1985 1984 1990 1985 1986 1982 1985 1984 Indefinite 1989 1983 1986 1985 1984 1987 1984 1991 1990 1989 1987 1992 1984 1989 19842 1985 1984 1985 1986 Indefinite 1984 1982 1984 1990 1982 1986 1984 1985 1985 1988 1984 1985 1995 1988 1984 Modernization of Dams Local protection Local protection (hurricane) Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Emergency protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoirs Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Non-structural local protection Beach replenishment Shore protection Reservoir Streambank Erosion Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Snagging and clearing Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Reservoir Streambank protection B-3 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1984 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Sun Creek, M S (Sec 208) ...................................... Sweetwater River, CA ........................................ Taylors Bayou, TX ........................................... Tayloreville Lake, KY ........................................ Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant, LA 11 ........................ Texas City and Vicinity, TX (1958 authorization)............... Tillatoba Creek Levee Repair, MS ............................. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA ................................... Tombigbee River Tributaries, AL and MS ...................... Trim Cane Cr, MS (Sec 205) .................................. Trinidad Lake, CO (Dam Safety Assurance) .................... Trout Run, Portage Borough, PA (Sec 14) ...................... Truchas Creek, Ft Summer, NM (Sec 14)....................... Tualation, OR (Sec 205)....................................... Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR (Sec 14) .................... Upper Yazoo Projects ......................................... Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX ............................ Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii (Sec 205) ....................... W alnut Creek, CA ............................................ W aterloo, IA ................................................. W eiser River, ID (Sec 208) .................................... Weldon Fork River, MO (Sec 14) .............................. Wendt Beach, Evans, NY (Sec 14) ........ ..................... West Springfield, WA (Sec 205) ................................ Wheeler Creek, Gainesville, TX (Sec 205) ...................... Wild Rice River S. Branch Felton Ditch, MN ................... Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR................... William H. Harsha Lake, OH ..................... ........... W illow Creek, OR ............................................ Wilson Branch, Cheraw SC (Sec 205) ........ .................. W inona, M N ................................................. W olf Cr., Hwy 362, MS (Sec 14) ........ ....................... Wolf Cr., Hwy 45, Prentiss Co, MS (Sec 14) .................... Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL ................... Yatesville Lake, KY .......................................... Y onkers, N Y ................................................. 'Granger Dam & Lake Georgetown - complete FY 83 1983 1984 1982 1974 1983 1962 1983 1972 1965 1983 1982 1984 1983 1983 1984 1976 1968 1968 1964 1973 1984 1983 1982 1983 1983 1981 1938 1970 1974 1982 1979 1983 1984 1953 1964 1975 1983 1978 1983 1984 1984 1984 1984 1984 1978 1983 1984 1983 1962 In In Not 1984 Local protection 1988 Local protection 1990 Local protection 1986 Reservoir 1986 Local protection 1985 Local protection 1984 Local protection definite Reservoir idefinite Local protection 1984 Local protection 1984 Reservoir, spillway modification 1984 Local protection 1984 Streambank protection 1984 Local protection 1984 Stream bank protection 2013 Local protection 1987 Local protection 1987 Local protection 1988 Local protection 1985 Local protection 1985 Snagging and clearing 1984 Local protection 1984 Local protection 1984 Local protection 1984 Local protection 1984 Local protection 1988 Local protection 1986 Reservoir 1984 Reservoir 1985 Local protection, FP Evacuation 1985 Local protection 1985 Streambank protection 1985 Streambank protection 1986 Local protection scheduled Reservoir 1984 Local protection 2 South Fork - Construction deferred indefinitely, work on Reevaluation Report only SCompletion of Stage I (Truscott facilities) only. Stage HI (Ross facilities) indefinite B-4 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Locks Dam Authored Chamme LIft at Miles Width Available Normal Dth Above Communiaty o Legth for Pool LAngth Year Legth Depth Width let Mouth Viciniaty Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type (feetl Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) AbameCoos Riven. AL bors Lock and Dam 81 8 Claiborne. AL Mle Irry Lock mand Dg142 3' Camden, AL Jl Bhff Lock nd Dam 25442 Benton AL Alehsmy River, PA and NY Lac adDa nNo 2 6 7 Aspinwall. PA lck ad Dam No. 3 14.5 Cheswick, PA Lock ad Dam No 4 24 2 Natrona, PA Lodk ad Dam No 5 304 Freeport, PA L&ck ad Dam No. 6 363 Clinton, PA Lock ad ~ No 7 45 7 Kintanning, PA Lock ad Dam No 8 52,6 Templeton, PA Locka m DDnmNo 9 62.2 Rimer, PA A-lcicl Osuoochee, d Fliat Riven, GA, AL ad FL F Wooeuff Lock a DaD 107 6 Chattaboochee, FL GaergWe. Anews ckand Dam 154.3' Columbia. GA Waer .George Ldck d Danm 182.8 ' Fort Gaines GA 84 84 84 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 82 82 82 600 30 600 45 600 45 360 II 360 13 360 10 360 12 360 12 360 13 360 18 360 22 450 33 450 25 450 88 16 16 16 II 12 9 10 It II 14 11 14 19 18 13 Movable 13 Movable 13 Movable 12 Fixed 11 Fixed 10 Fixed II Fixed II Fixed 10 Fixed 10 Fixed II Fixed 14 Movable 13 Movable 13 Movable 3, 160 1973 60.5 9 200 9,900 1969 103 1 9 200 14,962' 1974 88 0 9 200 1.393 193420 7 8 9 200 1,436 19342 9.7 9 200 876 1927 62 9 200 780 1927 59 9 200 1,140 1928 9.4 9 200 916 1930 6.9 9 200 984 1931 96 9 200 950 1938 98 9 200 5,924 1957 46 7 6 100 620 1963 285 6 100 13,371 1963 85 0 6 100 A intracaul waerw Albe a ad Osapeake CaM Rout: leW Bridge Lock Dinal Swamp Canal Rote: DeepC reeLko ck SoauMk ill Lock 11 56 GreatBndge, VA 10.66 Deep Creek, VA 33.2 South Mills, NC Bayouhc he, LA Swlck k1.5 Berwick. LA eyae Lock 725' New IbenriaL. A lt Rock haml and 'lbawamjHarbor, NY BlackR ockL ock 0.0 Buffalo, NY Bck arrior. Warrior, andT ombigbeReiv ers, AL Cotywe(Jackon) Loand Dam 1I16.6o Coffeeville, AL NlllPoLck and Darn 213.2o Demopolis, AL W r nLDodakmand 261 1lo Eutaw, AL Wa, Bac Oliver L tad Dam 338 I iTuscaloosa, AL Ht Lockand Damu 347.0Oi Holt, AL kHa dBoar nkhead Lockad Dam (new lock) 365. I1o Adger, AL 75 600 3 167 167 None 52 300 12 12' 12' None 52 300 12 127 12' None 45 307 79 97 9' None 36 162 9 9 8 Fixed 68 625 5 21.6 21.6 None I10 110 110 95 110 110 600 33 600 40 600 22 460 28 600 64 600 68 13 Movable 13 Fixed 13 Movable 12 Fixed 13 Movable 13 Fixed 1932 1940 1941 9 90 9 50 9 50 1950 8 175 1913 34.5 6 80 80 1914 7.1 21 200 1,185 1965 96.6 9 200 1,485 1962 47.9 9 200 1,832 1962 77.0 9 200 700 1940 8.9 9 200 1,138 1969 18 1 9 200 1,170 1975 42.7 9 200 CC awe1Hsa~rb oLr ocFL eiarmRiNveCr. Lok ad Da No 2 Locka d Darn C i lorida S-61Lock Lock S- 5A Lock S 4 5 5 Lock 5C Lock 84ELock S-3O0 5-310 2.7 Cocoa, FL 67 0 Kings Bluff, NC 99 0 BrownsL anding, NC 123.0 TolarsL anding, NC 0.0 St. Cloud, FL 56.0 Frostproof, FL 46.0 Avon Park, FL 32.0 SebringF, L 25.0 SebringF, L 16.0 OkeechobeeF,L 12.0 Okeechobc, FL 38.7 Port Mayaca, FL 0.0 ClewstonF, L HabrIL cicaoL0.0 Chicago, IL Cior ' OR ad WA -sLoad Dam 146.0 BonnevillcO, R IdLoa Dam 190.0 TheD allesO, R cakd Dam 215.0 Rufus, OR d Dam 292.0 Umatilla, OR bof lssa1 68.6"1 Inglis, FL a0 4 k20.0 I B acknL ack 90.4 Palatka, FL 90 600 40 40 40 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 56 50 200 i1 200 9 300 9 90 2 90 6 90 6 90 6 90 7 90 6 90 5 400 14 60 5 14 14 None 9 12 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 14 13 9 Fixed 12 Fixed 9 Fixed 6 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 14 Movable 13 Movable 80 600 4 23 23 None 76 86 86 86 84 84 84 500 65 675 88 675 110 675 75 32 15 15 15 600 28 18 600 20 14 600 20 14 24 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 20 Movable 1965 12 125 275 1915 32.0 8 100 229 1917 24.0 8 100 220 1935 20.0 8 100 1963 8 20 1964 28.0 3 30 1967 10.0 3 30 1965 14.0 3 30 1965 7.0 3 30 1964 9.0 3 30 1964 4.0 3 30 1977 5.0 8 100 1980 5 6 50 1939 .15 21 470 2,680 1938 47.5 27 300 8,735 1957 25.0 14 250 5,900 1968 76.0 14 250 7,365 1953 64.0 14 250 15 Movable 5,100 1968 11 0 12 150 Movable 3,830 1971 12 150 15 None 1972 21 2 12 150 C-1 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Cumberland River. KY and TN Barkley Dam Cheatham Lock and Dam Old Hickory Lock and Dam Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir tFoRxiv er, WI DePere Lock DePere Dam Little KaukaunaL ock Little KaukaunaD am Rapide Croche Lock Rapide Croche Dam KaukaunaF ifth Lock KaukaunaF ourth Lock KaukaunTah ird Lock KaukaunSae cond Lock KaukaunFai rst Lock KaukaunaD am KaukaunaG uard Lock Little Chutec ombinedL ock Lower Upper Little ChuteS econdL ock Little Chute First (Guard) Lock Little Chute Dam Cedars Lock Cedars Dam Appleton Fourth Lock Appleton Lower Dam Appleton Third Lock Appleton Second Lock Appleton First Lock Appleton Upper Dam Menasha Lock Menasha Dam Freshwater Bayou, LA Freshwater Bayou Lock Green and Barren Rivers, KY Green River: Lock and Dam No I Lock and Darn No 2 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Inner Harbor Navigation Channel Lock Harvey Lock Algiers Lock Bayou Boeuf Lock Bayou Sorrel Lock Port Allen Lock Vermilion Lock Calcasieu Lock Brazos River Floodgates Colorado River East lAck West Lock Hudson River, NY Troy Lock and Dam Illinois Waterway, IL LaGrange Lock and Dam Peoria Lock and Dam Starved Rock Lock and Dam Marseilles Lock Marseilles Dam DresdenIs land Lock and Dam BrandonR oadL ock and Darn Lockport Lock Thomas JO'Brien Lock and Dam Inland Route, MI CrookedR iver Lock and Weir 306 Kuttawa,KY 148 7 Ashland City, TN 216.2 Old Hickory, TN 313 5 Carthage. TN 7.1 7.2 13.0 13.1 19 2 19 3 22 8 23 1 23 3 23 4 23 6 24 0 24 0 25 4 25 4 26 4 26 5 26 6 27 3 27.4 30.7 30.9 31.3 31 6 31 9 32 2 37 8 37 8 DePere, WI DePere, WI DePere. WI DePere, Wl Wnghtstown, W1I Wnghtstown, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, Wl Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna. Wl Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Appleton, WI Appleton, WI Appleton, WI Appleton. WI Appleton. WI Appleton. WI Menasha, WI Menasha, WI 19o s IntracoasCtiatly L.A 9 I SpotisvilKlYe, 63 1 Calhoun, KY 92.612 New Orleans, LA 98.3 Harvey, LA 88.0 2 Algiers, LA 93 3 Morgan City, LA 131.03 Plaquemine, LA 228.52 Port Allen, LA 162.71 Abbeville, LA 238.15 LakeC harlesL,A 404 1 FreeporTtX. 444 8 MatagordaT,X 444.8 Matagorda. TX 153.8 Troy, NY 80 2 Beardstown, IL 157 7 Peoria, IL 2310 UticaI,L 244 6 Marseilles, IL 247 0 Marseilles, IL 271 5 MorrisI,L 286 0 Joliet, IL 291 1 Lockport, [L 326 5 Chicago, IL 30.0 AlansonM,I 110 110 84 800 800 400 57 26 60 i3 Movable 9,959 1964 118.1 9 12 Movable 801 1959 67 5 9 10 Movable 3,605 1957 97 3 9 150 150 150 84 400 59 14 13 Movable 1,138 1973 71 9 9 150 36 36 36 36 37 31 35 35 40 35 36 35 35 35 35 35 35 34 34 146 146 146 144 144 144 144 144 147 144 144 144 144 144 145 145 144 84 600 9 10 12 7 8 10 8 9 10 9 7 9 10 7 6 10 7 6 10 6 6 11 7 6 7 10 8 9 10 10 1936 Movable 986 1929 1938 Movable 588 1926 1934 Movable 461 1930 1898 1879 1879 1903 1883 Movable 603 1931 1891 1879 1879 1881 1904 Movable 562 1932 1888 Movable 654 1933 1907 Movable 549 1934 1900 1901 1884 Movable 691 1940 1899 Movable 401 1937 16 16 None 401 1968 84 600 12 12 11 Fixed 84 600 14 15 12 Fixed 75 75 75 75 56 84 56 75 75 640 425 797 1,158 800 1,198 1,200 1,205 99 10, 69 109 45 39 69 31 7 12' 13' 13' 14 7 13' 13 7 15' 317 127 137 13 7 147 147 II 7 137 157 None None None None None None None None None 75 1,200 59 15 157 None 75 1,200 59 15' 15, None 44 493 17 16 13 Fixed 59 6 62 6 3.6 6 0.3 6 02 6 0 I 6 0 2 6 0.4 6 1.4 6 6 6 1.0 6 0 7 6 3.4 6 06 6 0 3 6 0,3 6 51 6 28.3 6 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 12 125 482 1956 540 9 200 519 1956 45.4 9 200 1923 1935 1956 1956 1952 1961 1934 1950 1943 1954 1954 1,495 1917 150 125 150 150 125 125 200 200 125 12 125 12 125 22 14 200 110 600 10 16 13 Movable 1,066 1939 775 9 300 110 600 11 16 12 Movable 536 1939 733 9 300 110 600 19 17 14 Movable 1,280 1933 13.6 110 600 24 19 14 1933 26.9 Movable 819 1933 24 6 110 600 22 17 12 Movable 1,616 1933 14.5 9 3 110 600 34 18 14 Movable 2,373 1933 110 600 40 12 15 None 1933 110 1,000 17.8 66 14 14 Movable 257 1960 9 300 9 300 300 6.9 9 300 6.9 7.9 SSP Weir 83 1967 4.0 5 C-2 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Nles Mouth I Vicialty Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) IanmsRhiv er, WV Wiafield Lock and Dam Marct Lock and Dam ladon Lock and Dam Lkekids River, IL Kkaskia Lock and Darn Iticky River, KY Lockand Dam No. I Lock adDam No 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 54 Loasd Dam No 6'1 Loak and Dam No 724 Lock and Danm No .g 4 Lock and Dam No 924 Lock ad Dam No 10' Lock ad DamNuo 1124 Locka nd Dam No 1224 Lda k DanmN o 1324 Loc and DamNo 1424 La WashlingtonS hip Canal Hiram M. Chittenden Lock lsamra u 1LAoAck MkCklM-K err Arkansas River Navigation System, AR and OK No wrelLl ock and Dam Lock No. 2 ImNo 2 lAck and Dam No 3 Lo and Dam No. 4 Lotm adD amN o S David. Terry Lock DanM M* Lock and Dam ToadS uck FerryL ock ad Darn LodcAka dD anmN o 9 Drdalle Lock and Dam Oce-ktna Taylor Lock ad Darn lOck A Dam No 13 W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam abutS. Kerr Lock and Du and Reservoir bberals Lock and Darm 1 CA Lock and Dam 4M rOhsr Lock sad Damn Mainsppi River BetweeOnh io and Missouri Rivers Lock and Dam No. 27 MisissiPpi River Between MissouriR iver and M t eapolis, MN Lock ad Dam No 26 Lock and Dam No 25 Lock and Dam No. 24 Lock and Dam No 22 Lok andI Dam No 21 Lock and Dam No 20 Lock and Dam No 19 Lck an DanmN o 18 lekand Dam No 17 Loekand Darn No 16 lck ad Dam No 15 Lokand Dam No 14 Lo kndDamNo 13 Lsa andd DamamN Noo.. 11122 LokanDda mad aNmoN. .190 oiand Dam No. 8 and Dam No. 7 31 WinfielWdV. 67.8 Marmet. WV 828 London,W V 8 ElliGsr ove,IL 4 0 CarroltoKnY, 31 0 LockportK.Y 42 0 Gest,K Y 65,0 FrankforKtY. 82.2 TyroneK,Y 96.2 HighB ridgeK,Y 117.0 High Bndge, KY 1399 Camp NelsonK,Y 157 5 Valley View, KY 1764 Ford.K Y 201 0 IrvineK,Y 220 9 RavennaK,Y 239 9 Willow.K Y 249 0 HeidelberKgY. 13 SeattlWeA, 1 3 SeattlWeA, 103 ArkansaPso stA,R 13,3 ArkansaPso stA,R 40,5 ArkansaPso stA,R 50.2 Grady,A R 66 0 Pine Bluff. AR 86 3 RedhielAdR, 108 I LittlReo ck,A R 1254 LittlReo ck,A R 155 9 Conway, AR 1769 MorriltoAnR, 205 5 RussellvilAlRe, 2568 Ozark,A R 292 8 Fort SmithA.R 319.6 FortS mithA,R 336 2 Sallisaw, OK 366.6 WebbersF allsO.K 401 2 MuskogeeO,K 421 4 InolaO,K 185 I 4 GranitCei tyI,L 202.9 AltonI,L 241.415 Cap Au GrisM,O 273 45 ClarksvilMlOe, 301L2i SavertoMnO, 324.9 1 Quincy,I L 343 2'5 Canton,M O 364 2' Keokuk,I A 410 5" BurlingtoInA, 437 11 New BostonI,L 457.2" MuscatinIeA, 482.9i5 RockI slanIdL, 493. I' LeCaireI,A 493 315 LeClairIeA, 522.5 ClintoInA, 556 7" Bellevue, IA 583.0" Dubuque, IA 615 1" GuttenberIgA, 647.9" LynxvillIeA, 679 2" Genoa, W1 702 5 Dresbach, MN 56 56 56 360 360 360 28 24 24 18 18 18 12 Movable 834 1937 36 7 9 12 Movable 707 1934 15 0 9 12 Movable 707 1934 7 8 9 84 6(0 32 18 II Movable 130 1973 350 9 38 38 38 38 38 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 145 145 145 145 145 147 147 146 148 148 148 148 148 148 8 14 13 13 15 14 15 19 17 17 18 17 18 17 15 Fixed 6 Fixed 7 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 7 Fixed 6 Fixed 7 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 80 760 26 33.5 29 Movable 28 123 26 16 16 I10 110 110 110 I10 600 600 600 600 600 30 20 20 14 17 16 18 18 18 18 IS Fixed 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 424 1839 270 6 400 1939 II 0 6 465 1844 23.0 6 543 1844 172 6 556 1844 14.0 6 413 1891 20.8 6 350 1897 22 9 6 257 1900 176 6 362 1907 189 6 472 1907 246 6 208 1906 199 6 240 1910 19.0 6 248 1915 9. I 6 248 1917 9.6 6 235 1916 170 34 4,677 1967 3 0 9 1967 36.9 9 42,073 1968 6,110 1968 15.8 9 5,745 1968 20 3 9 7,455 1968 21 8 9 I 10 600 18 18 14 Movable 8,890 1968 173 9 110 600 18 18 14 Movable 3,930 1%969 305 9 110 I 10 110 110 110 110 600 600 600 600 600 600 16 19 54 34 20 20 18 18 18 18 18 14 14 Movable 1,580 1969 21 0 9 14 Movable 1,505 1969 28.6 9 14 Movable 1,815 1969 51 3 9 15 Movable 2,480 1969 36.0 9 14 Movable 4,725 1969 26 8 9 15 Movable 7,400 1970 16.6 9 110 600 48 18 14 Movable 7,230 1970 30.4 9 110 600 30 19 16 Movable 4.370 1970 34.8 9 110 600 21 15 14 Movable 11.490 1970 20.2 9 110 600 21 15 14 Movable 1,629 1970 23.7 9 It0 1,200 21 16 15 Fixed I 10 110 110 I 10 110 110 110 110 100 110 I10 110 80 110 I10 110 I10 110 I 10 110 110 600 360 600 600 600 600 600 1,200 600 600 600 600 360 320 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 24 24 15 15 10 10 10 38 10 8 9 16 16 11 11 I1 9 11 8 9 881 19 16 19 19 18 17 15 15 17 16 17 27 27 18 21 19 17 19 15 16 22 18 10 Movable 10 12 Movable 12 Movable 14 Movable 12 Movable 12 Movable 13 Fixed 14 Movable 13 Movable 12 Movable 11 Movable II 11 14 Movable 13 Movable 13 Movable 13 Movable 12 Movable 13 Movable 14 Movable 12 Movable 3,240 1953 17 8 9 1,725 1938 38.5 9 1,296 1939 32.0 9 4,280 1940 27. 8 9 1,024 1938 23.7 9 1,066 1938 18 3 9 2,144 1936 21 0 9 4,434 1913 46 3 9 1,350 1937 26.6 9 921 1939 20 1 9 1,099 1937 25.7 9 1,203 1934 10.4 9 1922 1,343 1939 29.2 9 1,066 1939 34.2 9 849 1938 26.3 9 1,278 1937 32.1 9 763 1937 32 8 9 811 1937 31.3 9 935 1937 23 3 9 940 1937 11.8 9 300 300 300 225 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 150 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 150 150 200 200 200 200 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS C-3 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Pool Length Year Length Depth Width PIrojtt Mouth In Vicinity Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Mississippi River (Continued) Between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN Lock and Dam No 6 714.31 Trempleaau. WI Lock and Dam No 5A 728 51 - Winona, MN Lock and Dam No 5 738 1 Minneiska, MN Lock and Dam No 4 752 8'1 Alma. WI Lock and Dam No 3 796915 Red Wing. MN Lock and Dam No 2 815. 2" Hastings, MN Lock and Dam No 1 847 61 Minneapolis-St Paul, MN St. Anthony Falls Lower Lock and Dam 853 3 Minneapolis, MN Upper Lock and Dam 853 91 Minneapolis, MN Monongahela River, PA and WV Locks and Darn No 2 11,2 Braddock, PA Locks and Dam No 3 23 8 Elizabeth, PA Locks and Dam No 4 41.5 Monessen. PA Maxwell Locks and Dam 61 2 Maxwell, PA Locks and Dam No 7 85.0 Greensboro. PA Locks and Dam No 8 90.8 Point Marion, PA Morgantown Lock and Darn 102 0 Morgantown, WV Hidebrand Lock and Dam 108 0 Morgantown. WV Opekiska Lock and Dam 115 4 Morgantown, WV Ohio River Locks and Dam No 53 18.4 Mound City, IL Locks and Dam No 52 42 1 Brookport, IL Smithland Locks and Dam 35 3 Smithland, KY Uniontown Locks and Dam 135 0 Uniontown, KY Newburgh Locks and Dam 204 9 Newburg, IN Cannelton Locks and Dam 260.3 Cannelton. IN McAlpine Locks and Dam 374 2 Louisville, KY Markland Locks and Dam 449.5 Markland, IN Captain Anthony Meldabl Locks and Dam 544.8 Chilo, OH Greenup Locks and Dam 640.0 Greenup, KY Gallipolis Locks and Dam 701.8 Hogsett, WV Racaine Locks and Dam 743 5 Letart Falls, OH Belleville Locks and Dam 777 I Reedsville, OH Willow Island Locks and Dam 819.3 Waverly, WV Hannibal Locks and Dam 854.6 New Martinsville, WV Pike Island Locks and Dam 896.7 Warwood, WV New Cumberland Locks and Dam 926.6 Stratton, OH Montgomery Island Locks and Dam 949.3 Industry, PA Dashields Locks and Dam 967 7 Glenwillard, PA Emsworth Locks and Dam 974 8 Emsworth, PA Okeechobee Waterway, FL St. Lucie Lock and Dam Moore Haven Lock Ortona Lock and Dam W. P Franklin Lock and Control Structure 15. I SmtuarFt,L 78.0 Moore Haven, FL 93.6 LaBelle, FL 121.4 Fort Myers, FL 110 110 110 110 110 I10 56 56 600 600 600 600 600 600 500 400 400 7 6 9 7 8 12 12 38 38 17 18 18 17 17 22 16 13 13 13 Movable 13 Movable 12 Movable 13 Movable 14 Movable 13 Movable 15 8 Fixed O10 893 1936 14.2 9 NS 682 1936 9.6 9 NS 1.619 1935 14.7 9 NS 1,367 1935 44 I 9 NS 365 1938 18.3 9 NS 822 1931 32.4 9 NS 1948 574 1932 5.7 9 NS 1917 56 400 25 14 10 Movable 188 1959 0.6 9 100 56 400 49 16 14 Fixed 3,584 1963 3.8 9 100 56 110 56 56 56 56 84 84 56 56 84 84 84 I10 110 110 110 110 110 I10 110 110 110 110 I10 56 I10 110 110 I10 110 110 110 I10 110 1 10 110 110 I10 I10 110 110 110 I10 110 110 110 56 110 56 110 56 50 50 50 56 360 720 360 720 360 720 720 720 360 360 600 600 600 600 1.200 600 1.200 1.200 1,200 1.200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 600 360 600 360 600 360 250 250 250 400O 9 9 8 8 17 17 20 20 15 19 17 21 22 12 12 12 12 22 22 22 22 16 16 25 25 37 37 37 35 35 30 30 30 30 23 23 22 22 22 22 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 21 18 18 10 10 18 18 13 2 11I 3 16 16 12 12 20 20 21 21 1I1I 15 18 14 18 15 15 15 I5 34 34 34 34 32 32 38 38 49 19 19 50 50 45 45 45 45 18 18 37 37 37 37 35 35 38 38 17 17 17 17 16 16 13 13 17 16 14 10 12 13 16 Fixed 16 12 Fixed 12 II Movable 11 15 Movable 15 10 Fixed 10 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 14 Movable 748 1951 12.6 9 300 195321 670 1907 17.7 9 300 19072 535 1932 19.7 9 300 193221 460 1964 23.8 9 300 1964 610 1925 21 5.8 9 300 560 19252122 112. 9 300 410 1950 6.0 9 300 530 1959 7.4 9 300 366 1964 7.0 9 300 10 Movable 3,978 1929 23.7 9 300 10 Temporary Lock 1980 11 Movable 3.073 1928 35. 8 9 300 11 Temporary Lock 1969 12 Movable 3,560 1980 997 9 300 12 12 Movable 12 16 Movable 16 13 Movable 13 12 Movable 11 11 15 Movable 15 15 Movable 15 15 Movable 15 15 Movable 15 15 Movable 15 15 Movable 15 15 Movable 15 17 Movable 17 18 Movable 18 15 Movable 15 15 Movable 15 18 Fixed 18 13 Movable 13 12 Movable 11 None 11 Movable - Movable 3.516 1975 699 9 300 2,272 1975 55 4 9 300 1,965 1972 116.3 9 400 8,627 1961 75 3 9 300 1921 1930 1,395 1963 95.3 9 300 1963 9 300 1,756 1962 95.2 9 300 1962 1,287 1962 61 8 9 300 1,132 1937 41.7 9 300 1,202 1970 33.6 9 300 1,206 1969 36.4 9 300 1,128 1973 35.3 9 1,000 1,098 1972 36.0 9 300 1,306 1965 29.9 9 300 1,315 1961 22.7 9 1,379 1936 18.4 9 300 1,585 1929 7 I 9 300 1,717 1921 6.2 9 300 170 1941 15.1 8 80 1953 15.6 8 9 I04 1937 15.6 8 0 1,150 1965 7.9 8 0 C-4 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Locks Dam Autorimd Chkamed Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth o S Above Community of ieagth for Pool Leagth Year Leagth Depth Width fst Mouth In Vicinity Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type (feet) Opeed (miles) (feet) (feet) Old River, LA Old RiverL ock Oashis and BlackR ivers, AK & LA ]onesvillLeo ck and Dam (BlackR iver) Collabia Lock and Dam (Ouachita River) Locahnkd Dam No 6 (0achita River) Locska d Dam No 8 (Oachita River) areRdiv er, MS and LA LockI Lock2 Lock3 Smaaealo River, CA BargeCana Lock Sake River, WA loe Harbor Lock and Dam LaweMr onumental Lock and Dam Little Goose Lock and Dam LowerGranite Lock sad Dam St Mary'Rsi ver, MI Sou Cana: MacArthuLr ock Poe Lock NorthC anal: Davis Lock Sabin Lock 304 0 Simmesport. LA 25 0 Joncssillc, ILA 117 2 Columbia. L.A 223 4 Fclsenthal. AR 282 8 Calion. AR 29.4' Pearl River, LA 40.717 Bush, LA 43.917 Sun, LA 42 8 West Sacramento. CA 9 7 Pasco, WA 41 6 Kahlotus, WA 70. 3 Starbuck, WA 107 5 Pomeroy, WA 47 0 SaultS teiMca rie, MI 47 0 Saull Ste Mane,. MI 47 0 Sault Ste Manrie, MI 47 0 Sault Stic Marie, MI 75 1,200 35 II I 1 None 84 84 55 55 65 65 65 600 600 268 268 310 310 310 30 18 IO 10 14 26 7 15 II 86 600 86 86 86 86 80 110 80 80 675 675 675 675 800 1,200 1,350 1,350 100 98 98 100 22 22 22 22 18 14 Movable 18 13 Fixed 14 7 Movable 17 7 Movable 10 10 None 10 10 None 10 10 None 13 13 None 1963 12 125 450 1972 92.2 9 100 400 1972 106.2 9 100 314 1923 59.4 9 100 306 1926 55.2 9 16 100 1951 II.I 7 1951 3.2 7 1951 13.2 7 80 80 80 1961 1.5 13 120 15 Movable 2,790 1962 31 9 14 250 15 Movable 3,800 1969 28.7 14 250 15 Movable 2,670 1970 37.2 14 250 15 Movable 3,200 1975 32.0 14 250 31 32 24 24 31 None 32 None 23 None 23 None 1943 1968 1914 1919 27 Savasnh River, GA New Savannah Bluff Lock adDamrn 187 2 Augusta GA Teueae River, TN, AL, MS, and KY"i KNtaCkLoyc k andD am 22 4 Gilbertsville, KY Plkwick Landing Lock andDl amn 0dDmm Auxiliary Lock 206 7 Hamburg, TN Main Lock 206.7 Hamburg, TN MW Connecting Tombigbee and Tennesae Rivers, Alabama and M issippi Rivers Gaiville Lock and Dam 49 I Gainesville Alieville Lock and Dam 89 8 Aliceville Canbts Lock and Dam 117 6 Columbus WilhmoLno ck and Dam MainLock 259.4 Florence, Al. Auxiliary Lock 259 4 Florence, Al. erlJoe Wheeler Lock aM Dam MaiLonck 274 9 Florence. AL Auxiliary Lock 274 9 Florence, AL OftmvillLeo ck and Dam MainL ock 349 0 Guntersville, AL Auxiliary Lock 349 0 Guntersville. AL NicklJackL ock and Dam 424 7 Chattanooga, TN ' 8kaLnoacgka a nd Dam 471 0 Chattanooga, TN W B8aLro ck and Dam 529.9 Breedenton, TN F ndon Lock and Dam 602.3 Lenoir City, TN Mea Hill Lock and Dam (Clinch River) 23 I Kingston, TN CaeTombigbee WaterwayA, L and MS ing of Project 217 .0(O GanesvilleL ock and Dam 266. t10 Gainesville, AL Alic'ville Lock and Dam 306.810 Aliceville, AL Lock and Dam 3 3 4.710 Columbus, MS *lmLock and Dam 3 5 7 .5 to Aberdeen, MS 56 360 15 14 12 Movable 360 1936 16.2 9 90 I10 600 56 11 13 Tainter 7,976 1944 184.3 9 300 110 600 55 10 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1937 52.7 9 300 110 1,000 55 10 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1984 52.7 9 300 110 110 I10 110 60 110 60 110 60 I10 60 60 60 75 110 110 I10 110 600 600 600 600 292 600 400 600 400 600 360 360 360 400 600 600 600 600 36 27 27 94 94 48 48 39 39 39 49 58 72 54 36 27 27 27 15 15 15 13 11 13 15 13 13 13 10 12 12 13 15 15 15 15 15 Movable 15,460 1978 49 I 9 300 15 Movable 14.790 1979 40.7 9 300 15 Movable 10,040 1981 27.8 9 300 13 Bulkhead 3,728 1959 15.5 9 300 II Bulkhead 3,728 1927 15.5 9 300 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1963 74. I 9 300 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1962 74.1 9 300 13 Tainter 3,837 1965 75.7 9 300 12 Tainter 3,837 1939 75.7 9 300 11 Tainter 3,763 1967 46.3 9 300 14 Tainter 5,654 1940 58.9 9 300 12 Tainter 2,646 1942 72.4 9 300 12 Tainter 3,687 1943 49.8 9 300 13 Tainter 1,072 1963 38.2 9 30019 15 Comb. Fixed 15,460 1978 49.1 9 300 & Movable IS Comb Fixed 14,790 1979 40.7 9 300 & Movable 15 Movable 10,040 1981 27.9 9 300 15 Movable 10,640 1984 22.8 9 300 C-5 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth In Vicinity Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type (feet) Opened Imiles) feet) (feet Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR Lock No. I 26,0 Oregon City. OR 40 210 20 6 8 None 1872 6 150 Lock No. 2 26.0 Oregon City. OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 Lock No. 3 26,0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 Lock No, 4 260 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 4 Guard Laxck 26.4 Oregon City. OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 23 6 6 NS 'Fixed. crest without gates or other facility to control streamflow. Movable includes any type of crest gates, tainter gates, wickets, or others to control streamflow 2 Above mouth of Mobile River 3 lncludes length of earth dikes 4 From mouth of Apalachicola River 6 Above Norfolk, VA 7With reference to mean low water, or low mean Gulf as case may be From Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 9 Average high and low water conditions, lift varying widely, depending on tides and river stages. %-rom foot of Government Street. Mobile, Al 1From mouth of St Johns River 2 Above Head of Passes. "From New Orleans, LA. 4Salt water barrier in down position Will clear 15-foot vessels in normal position "Above the Ohio River hannel completed to depth of 6 5 feet 7 From mouth of West Pearl River 3 Tennessee River locks operated by the Corps, dams operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority. 1 9 300- foot width from lock to mouth of Cinch River and 175-foot width upstream from lock to Clinton. TN Dates shown represent replacement structures 2'Dates shown represent reconstruction for locks and dams Nos 2 8 inclusive. 22 Dam was rebuilt in 1959 2 O01dI 10' x 358 lock replaced in 1957 24 Inoperable, caretaker status September 7. 1982 2 -lnoperable, caretaker status October 1, 1981. C-6 APPENDIX D NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1984 Fiscal Year Project Started Placed in Useful Operation Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion Nature of Project AIWW-Replacement of Federal Hwy Bridges in NC ........... Aquatic Plant Control ........ ...................... Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii ................... Brandon Road Lock and Dam, IL Waterway, IL ........... Buttermilk Bay, Bourne, MA (Sec 107) ........................ Calumet Harbor & River, IL and IN .......................... Calumet-Sag. Mod., IL Waterway, IL and IN, Part 1 ........ Cannelton Locks and Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY ............ Channel to Newport News, VA (1965 Mod.) ............... Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR (Sec 107) .................. Columbia River at the Mouth, 55' Channel, WA and OR ....... Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC ......................... Cordova Harbor, AK (Sec 107 ................................ Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ....................... Crescent City Harbor, CA ........ .................... Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE, Philadelphia to Sea (A nchorage) ................ ... . . .......................... Eastpoint Breakwater, FL (Sec 107) .......................... Erisworth Locks and Dams, Ohio River, PA .................... Fisherman's W harf Area, CA ................................. Dresden Island Lock and Dam Illinois Waterway, IL ........... Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, IN and KY ........................................... Floating Breakwater Prototype Test Program, West Point, Seattle, W A (Sec 107) ................ ... ................... Friday Harbor Marina, WA (Sec 107) ..... ............... Homer Harbor, AK (Sec 107) ................................. Iland Waterway, Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE and M D , Part II ............... .............................. Irondequoit Bay, N Y ................. ...................... Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii ........................... Kaskaskia R iver, IL .................. ...................... Ih lk Lake, M S (Sec 107) ....................... .......... Little River Inlet, NC & SC .................................. LocIkwoods Folly Inlet, NC (Sec 107) .......................... Lock and Dam 26 Replace ILL-MO .......................... Lockport Lock, Illnois Waterway, IL .......................... Locks and Dam 52, IL and KY .............. .................. Loks and Dam 53, IL and KY ............................. 1 a' itowoc H arbor, W I ....................................... lClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AB ........ Metlakatla Harbor, AK .............................. ."isppi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers ......... Meissipi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN 5isippi River, Gulf Outlet, LA........................ uri River, Sioux City, IA to mouth .................. Mobile Harbor (Theodore Channel) .. .................... omery Locks & Dams, Ohio River, PA ................... Creek, Beaufort, NC .......................... of Colorado River, TX (Gulf Intracoastal Waterway) ..... New York Harbor, NY and NJ ......................... 1974 1959 1982 1983 1983 1964 1981' 1966 1955 1968 1962 1967 1983 1984 1977 1981 1972 1970 1964 1983 1980 1984 1980 1984 1982 1981 1984 1962 1984 1982 1966 1983 1981 1982 1974 1983 1979 1979 1981 1963 1979 1910 1979 1958 1912 1979 1983 1983 1984 1976 1966 1968 1983 1984 1984 1974 1983 1984 1984 1968 1981 1980 1981 1984 Incremental Indefinite Replacement of existing bridges Indefinite Control and eradication of aquatic plants 1985 Dredging and breakwater 1986 Major Rehabilitation of lock and dam 1984 Dredging Indefinite Dredging and channel, widening and deepening Indefinite Channel Improvements and relocation 1984 Replacement of existing locks and dams 43-45 inclusive Indefinite Deep draft channel widening and deepening, deferred anchorage construction 1984 Dredging 1985 Dredging 1985 Rediversion of river and powerhouse construction 1983 Breakwater 1988 Dredging 1984 Dredging and breakwater Indefinite Dredging 1984 Dredging and breakwater 1985 Major rehabilitation of locks and dams 1987 Breakwater 1984 Major rehabilitation of locks and dams 1986 Protection of a National Natural Landmark 1985 Test Floating Breakwaters 1984 Breakwater 1985 Harbor expansion Indefinite Dredging and bridge const. 1985 Dredging and breakwater 1984 Rehabilitation of Breakwater 1986 Lock, dam and channel 1984 Dredging, navigation channel 1984 Dredging and jetties Indefinite Dredging 1990 Lock and Dam 1986 Major Rehabilitation of Lock 1985 Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 1986 Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 1984 Dredging and breakwater 1985 Locks and dams 1984 Breakwater and dredging 2000 Regulating works 1983 Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam No. 1 1984 Dredging and jetties Indefinite Navigation and bank stabilization complete-wildlife mitigation awaiting authorization 1985 Dredging 1987 Major rehabilitation of locks & dams 1984 Dredging, navigation channel 1989 Breakwaters, dredging, and recreation 1993 Collection and removal of drift D-1 APPENDIX D NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1984 Fiscal Year Project Started Placed in Useful Operation Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion .N4at+u r"e .. ofMPr oe.uJ. Newburgh Locks & Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY .............. Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1965 Mod.) ..................... Ogdensburg Hbr, NY (Sec 107) ............................... Ouachita and Black River, AR and LA ........................ Patchogue River, Westbrook, CT (Sec 107) ..................... Port Everglades Harbor, FL .................................. Red River Emergency Bank Protection ........................ Red River WW, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA ............ Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas (Sec 107) .................... San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA ........................ San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ....... ..................... Siuslaw River and Bar, OR ................................... Sm ith Island, M O (Sec 107) .................. ........... Smithland Locks and Dam, IL, IN, and KY .................... South Channel, Government Island, OR (Sec 107) .............. St. George Creek, M D (Sec 107) ............................... St. Lucie Inlet, F L ......................................... Starved Rock Lock and Dam Illinois Waterway, IL ............. Swanquarter Harbor, NC (Sec 107) ........................... Stonington Harbor, ME (Sec 107) ..................... Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) .......... ........... Tau Harbor, American Samoa (Sec 107) ....................... Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS .................. Tilghman Island Harbor, MD (Sec 107) ........................ Uniontown Locks and Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY ............ Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI ........................ W allisville Lake, T X ............... .......................... W est H arbor, O H ............................................ Wincnester Bay, Umpqua River, OR (Sec 107) ................. 1965 1969 1966 1967 1983 1964 1983 1979 1973 1974 1982 1948 1971 1983 1982 1971 1983 1983 1979 1980 1984 1984 1976 1977 1973 1982 1965 1977 1967 1981 1982 1982 1980 1983 1983 1984 1981 1982 1970 1981 1983 1985 Replacement of locks and dams 46 and 47 Indefinite Deep draft channel, deepening and deferred anchorage const. 1985 Dredging and diked disposal 1983 Replacement of existing lock and dams 6 and 8 1984 Dredging 1984 Dredging 1985 Bank protection Indefinite Channel improvement and realignment 1985 Dredging and breakwater Indefinite Dredging and breakwater Indefinite Deep draft channel, widening, deepening and dredging 1986 Extending jetties 1983 1987 Replacement of existing locks and dams 50 and 51 1984 Dredging 1984 Dredging 1984 Dredging, jetties & breakwaters 1985 Major rehabilitation of lock and dam 1984 Dredging 1984 Dredging 1986 Dredging 1981 Dredging and breakwater 1985 Dredging and Locks and dams 1983 Breakwater 1985 Replacement of locks and dams 48 and 49 1979 Dredging and breakwater Indefinite Multipurpose lake (navigation, salinity control, water supply, fish & wildlife, & recreational) 1983 Breakwaters 1984 Channel Improvement SWalter Jones Bridge completed; Coinjock Bridge under contract; the three remaining bridges have not been funded. D-2 Nature of Proiect APPENDIX E MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER IN OPERATION SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Flood Control and or Total Nayv. Feature Storage Placed Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Community in Capability in Useful Power Installation Installation Installation Project Height Length River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY In FY (KW) KW ) (KW) Functions Type2 (Feet) (Feet) AlbiFalls, ID Pend Oreille Allsan Lake, GA Etowah Barkley Dam & Cumberland Lake Barkley, KY & TN Bae Lake, AR White BigB end Dam (Lake arpe), SD Missouri lakely Mountain Dn.Lake Odachita, AR Ouachita Boaeville LAD Lake Bonneville, OR & WA Columbia BArBkoewn L ake, OK Mountain Fork bfrd Dam Lanier, GA Chattahoochee Bll oele Lake, White AR & MO Carters Dam, GA Coosawatte Cnter Hill Lake, TN Caney Fork ChNatham LAD, TN Cumberland Chief Joseph Dam ts Woods 4ike), WA Columbia Clark Hill Lake, GA & BC Savannah Crdmll Hull L&D, TN Cumberland COIgar Lake, OR S Fork McKenzie DalHe ollow Lake, TN & KY Obey ll e L&D, ARArkansas DIry Lake, AR Caddo Daim Dam (Lake Tanma), TX & OK Red D*t Lake, OR, audingBig Cliff lake, OR North Santiam D*iak Dam & N Fork, DaItmir, ID Cleanwater tbae Lake, OK Canadian lrt Gsfmoi Lake, Grand (Neosho) OK prt POk Lake, MT Missouri ?f llDamn %AkeP rande (12 tD),m (, SD & ND Old Hickory L&D, TN Ozark-Jets Taylor L&D, AR Philpott Lake, VA Robert S Kerr L&D and Reservoir, OK Sam Rayburn Dam & Reservoir, TX St Mary's River, MI Snettisham, AK 7 Stockton Lake, MO Table Rock Lake, AR & MO Tenkiller Lake, OK The Dalles L&D (Lake Celilo), WA & OR Walter F. George L&D, GA & FL Webbers Falls L&D, OK West Point Lake, AL & GA Whitney Lake, TX Wolf Creek Dam (Lake Cumberland), KY Flood Control and or Total Nay. Feature Storage Placed Initial Community in Capability in Useful Power Vicinity (acre-feet 0 River ' Operation CY In FY Arkansas Tulsa, OK Laurel London, KY Kootenai Libby, MT Snake Middle Fork, Willamette Rogue Snake Snake Columbia Alabama Little Missouri Stanislaus North Fork Missouri Cumberland Akansas Roanoke Arkansas Angelina Great Lakes Speel Sac White Illinois Columbia Chattahoochee Arkansas Chattahoochee Brazos Starbuck, WA Lowell, OR 1,737,600 435,600 5,869,000 1964 1973 1972 1968 1978 1975 Existing Scheduled Ultimate Installation Installation Installation (KWi iKW) LKWI 70,000 61,000 525,000 565,000 1970 1970 810,000 483-000 Trail, OR 465,000 Pomercy, WA 484,000 1954 1977 1975 1955 135,000 1977 49,000 1975 810,000 70,000 61,000 840,000 Project Height Length Functions T-p.- Fet ( Feeti FNPWS FPRW FPR E. R 121 4,600 282 1,420 420 3,055 810,000 NPRI ('E 160 2,670 135,000 49,000 810,000 Kahlotus, WA 376,000 1969 1969 810,000 Umatilla, OR Camden, AL Murfreesboro, AR Oakdale, CA Norfolk, AR Pierre, SD Hendersonville, TN Ozark, AR Bassett, VA Sallisaw, OK Jasper, TX Sault Ste. Marie, MI Juneau, AK Stockton, MO 1,550,000 1953 331,800 1969 407,900 2,400,000 1,983,000 23,337,000 545,000 148,400 318,500 525,700 3,997,600 352,400 1,674,000 1950 1978 1943 1959 1954 1969 1951 1954 1970 1950 1979 1944 1962 1957 1973 1954 1970 1971 1965 1966 1855 1952 1973 1969 1973 Branson, MO 3,462,000 1958 Gore, OK 1,230,800 1952 The Dalles, OR Fort Gaines, GA Webbers Falls, OK West Point, GA 53,000 1957 934,000 1963 170,100 1970 1959 1953 1957 1963 1973 980,000 75,000 25,500 300,000 80,550 595,000 100.000 100,000 14,000 110,000 52,000 18,400 46,700 45,200 200,000 34,000 1,806,800 130,000 60,000 NFPRI DFPISWR NPRIF (E ('EF ('E 243 3,381 345 3,600 146 3,200 810,000 NPRI ( E 135 3,800 1,625,000 NPRI 75,000 NPRW 25,500 300,000 163,000 595,000 100,000 100,000 14,000 110,000 52,000 18,400 27,00 73,700 45,200 FPRW FIPRW FPRS NFPRIW NPR NPR FPR NPR FPWR NP P FPRW ('E 183 7,300 (E 90 11,380 C 183.5 941 ER 625 1,560 S 216 2,624 F 245 9,300 ('E 98 3,605 c 58 2,480 S 220 892 E 75 7,230 CE 120 19,430 Control Gate C 9 18 338 CE 128 5,100 200,000 FPR CE 252 6,423 34,000 FP E 197 3,000 1,8(06,800 130,000 60,000 604,500 1975 1975 73,375 Whitney, TX 1,999,500 1953 1954 30,000 Cumberland Jamestown, KY 6,089,000 1950 1952 270,000 NPR NPRW NP 108,375 FPRW 30,000 FPR CR 300 8,875 CE 114 13,585 E 84 4,370 CE 97 7,250 CE 159 17,695 270,000 FPR CE 258 5,736 1 Total of all storage functions, including inactive and dead storage to normal full pool level 2 G: gravel; R: rock; C: concrete; E: earth 3 Chief Joseph Additional Units & Operating Units 1-16 All units are synchronized-to-line and two units have passed the pumpback test. However, due to damaging effects to fish, no further pumping will be done for their testing or operation until a solution to the problem is found. Being operated for the Department of Interior by the Bureau of Reclamation 7 Being operated by the Alaska Power Administration SCrater Lake Unit 9 Weir for Long Lake Nomenclature for Project Functions D -Debris Control P -Power F -Flood Control R -Public Recreation Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000 I -Irrigation S -Water Supply N-Navigation W-Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) E-2 APPENDIX F MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER UNDER CONSTRUCTION SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 Fiscal Scheduled Scheduled Nameplate Capacity Year for for Scheduled Ultimate Project Started Operaton Completion Functions Installation Installation Bonneville Second Powerhouse OR and WA . 1974 1981 1986 PR 558,200 558,200 Clarence Cannon Dam, Salt River, MO ... 1966 1985 1985 FSRPW 58,000 58,000 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO .............................. 1965 1982' 19871 FRPW 160,000 160,000 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Savannah River, GA and SC ....................... 1975 1984 1990 FRP 600,000 600,000 Copper River, Charleston Hbr, SC .......... 1977 1985 1985 NWD 84,000 84,000 8nettisham, AK ........................... 1967 1989 1989 P 73,700 27,000 ' All units are synchronized-to-line and two units have passed the pumpback test. However, due to damaging effects to fish, no further pumping will be done for either testing or operation until a solution to the problem is found. KEY D-Redevelopment F -Flood Control I -Irrigation N-Navigation P -Power R -Recreation 8 -Water Supply W-Fish and Wildlife & F-1 FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS PROJECTS (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) During FY 1984 Memphis New Orleans St. Louis Vicksburg Kansas City Omaha New England Baltimore New York Norfolk Philadelphia Buffalo Chicago Detroit Rock Island St. Paul Alaska Portland Seattle Walla Walla Huntington Louisville Nashville Pittsburgh Pacific Ocean Charleston Jacksonville Mobile Savannah Wilmington Los Angeles Sacramento San Francisco Albuquerque Fort Worth Galveston Little Rock Tulsa 683,281 8,002,119 18,530 1,609,589 777,752 300,076 837,465 2,431,192 6,568 1,075 49,021 23,755 0 1,198 45,033 3,960 5,055 908,208 29,529 41,571 204,620 96,079 192,361 63,543 0 167 297 12,759 6,747 7,786 90,630 120,960 0 99,458 8,513 0 16,500 70,688 1 c 'fb " c no-=r, BY DISTRICTS Cumulative through FY 84 6,362,511 66,488,793 1,236,729 26,030,099* ' 5,392,468* 1,959,045 1,774,338 4,760,126 108,682 6,757 87,225 425,718 02 39,632 775,077 290,414 36,473 6,913,490 243,819* 179,749 3,370,811 1,207,914 631,951 2,850,456 11,511 3,364 516,131 120,206 28,841* 166,928 6,922,719 2,935,2333 112,5944 351,407 1,525,6266 745,230* 377,9596 1,033,345*7 TOT A *R evised Figures 16,766,085 1A4b6,J13) 7,849 Pearl River Basin transferred to LMVD in 1982, Cumulative flood damages through FY 1981 of $114,208 tnferred to the Vicksburg District; however, Pearl River Basin remains within the Gulf and South Atlantic gion, Adutment in boundaries between Chicago and Rock Island District ($45,444) transferred from Chicago to Rock Island. 'xfcludes 2 projects transferred from San Francisco District (Walnut Creek and Coyote Valley Dam) ' XCludes 2 projects transferred from San Francisco District (Walnut Creek and Coyote Valley Dam) Inludes 2 projects previously in New Orleans District "ncludes post-FY 1980 data on 4 projects transferred from Tulsa District (Dierks, De Queen, Gillham, and 'llwood Reservoirs, Little River Basin, Arkansas) Ithcludes pre-FY 1980 data on 4 projects transferred from the Tulsa District (Dierks, De Queen, Gillham and llwood Reservoirs, Little River Basin, Arkansas) 6G-1 A , -P- An Region FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS PROJECTS (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) During FY 84 New England Mid-Atlantic Gulf and South Atlantic Ohio Tennessee Great Lakes Upper Mississippi Souris-Red-Rainy Missouri Arkansas-Red-White Lower Mississippi Rio Grande Texas and Gulf Colorado Great Basin California Columbia-North Pacific Alaska Hawaii TOTAL 839,029 2,486,292 27,756 556,603 0 24,953 66,209 1,314 1,077,828 88,788 10,294,428 98,419 8,513 90,630 18,600 102,360 979,308 5,055 0 16,766,085 BY REGION Cumulative through FY 84 1,797,249 4,923,842 949,948 8,051,646 9,486 484,929 2,102,165 189,746 7,351,513* 2,463,310* 97,910,643* 276,928 2,270,856* 415,961 45,140 9,509,445 7,337,058* 36,473 11,511 146,137,849 G-2 ANNUAL REPORT FY 84 OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES INDEX The following abbreviations are used in the index: LMK LMM LMN LMS MR+T MRK MRO NAB NAN NAO NAP NCB NCC NCD NCE NCR NCS NED NPA NPP VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT MISSISSIPPI, RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES PROJECT KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT NEW YORK, N.Y., DISTRICT NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT NEW ENGLAND DIVISION ALASKA DISTRICT PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT A Aberdeen, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Aberdeen Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Abilene, Kans. (MRK) 20-19, 20-23 Abiquiu Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-9, 17-11 Absecon Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Absecon Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-2, 3-18, 3-22 Accotink Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Adams, Mass. (NAN) 2-33 Adams Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-15 Adams Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 Addison, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-25 Adena, Ohio (Short Creek) (ORP) 26-23 Adkin Branch, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Afoo Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36- 13 Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-12, 36-14 AiW -Mooring Basins, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Aitken, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Ala Wai Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Alabama River at Montgomery, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Al abaa-Coosa Rivers, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-15, 10- 26, 10-35, 10-41 Alamneda Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-27 NPS NPW ORD ORH ORL ORN ORP POD SAJ SAM SAN SAS SAW SPK SPL SPN SWA SWF SWG SWL SWT SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT OHIO RIVER DIVISION HUNTINGTON, W. VA., DISTRICT LOUISVILLE, KY., DIVISION NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION JACKSONVILLE, FLA., DISTRICT MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT SAVANNAH, GA., DISTRICT WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT Alamo Lake, Ariz. (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-21 Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (Closed) Basin, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-11 Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal (Great Bridge, Va.) (NAO) 5-19 Albeni Falls Dam, Idaho (NAS) 38-9, 38-16, 38-21 Albuquerque Diversion Channels, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-1, 17-8 Alford, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-53 Algoma Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Alhambra Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-27 Aliso Creek Dam, Calif (SPL) 33-29 Allatoona Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-18, 10-26, 10-35 Allegany, N.Y. Unit I (Allegheny River) (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Allegany, N.Y. Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-2, 26-13, 26-17, 26-21, 26-26 Allegheny River, Pa., Locks and Dams (ORP) 26-24 Allegheny River, Oil City, Pa. (ORP) 26-3, 26-13 Allentown, Pa. (NAP) 3-27 Allenville, Ariz. (SPL) 33-7, 33-15, 33-21 Alley Bay, Beals, Maine (NED) 1-46 Alloway Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Alluvial Valley Mapping (MR + T) 42-3 Alma Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 I-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Almond Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-25 Almond Village, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-31, 12-25, 12-26 Alpena Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Alpine Dam, Rockford, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Alpine, Tex. (SWA) 17-11 Alsea River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, Ga. (SAS) 8-1, 8-11, 8-12 Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge (LMN) 11-30 Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir (NED) 1-48 Alton, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Altus Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-17 Alum Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-2, 25-11, 25-15 Alvin R. Bush Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Amazon Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 American River, Calif (SPK) 35-27 Ames Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-15 Amesbury, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-46 Amesbury, Powwow and Merrimack Rivers, Mass. (NED) 1-54 Amite River, La. (MR+T) 42-15 Amite River and Bayou Manchac, La. (LMN) 11-30 Amite River and Tributaries, La. (LMN) 11-31 Amsterdam, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Anacortes Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Anacortes Navigation Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Anacostia River and Flats (NAB) 4-34 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Md. (NAB) 4-36, 4-38 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, D.C. and Md. (NAB) 4-36 Anacostia River Basin, Md. (NAB) 4-38 Anaheim Bay Harbor, Orange County, Calif. (SPL) 33- 24 Anahuac Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-7 Anchorage Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-1, 40-7, 40-9, 40- 12 Anchorages, Va. (NAO) 5-17 Anclote River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Andalusia Harbor, Ill. (NCP) 29-7 Anderson, Ind. (ORL) 24-21 Anderson Park, Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Andover Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-48 Andrews, George W., Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-20, 10-27, 10-36 Andrews River, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Angler-Use Sites, Meramec Basin, Mo. (LMS) 14-14 Annapolis Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Ansonia, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-53 Anthony Shoals Dam and Lake, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Apalachee Bay, Fla. to New Orleans, La. (SAM) 10-31 Apalachicola Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-2, 10-23, 10-28 Apalachicola Bay to St. Marks River, Fla. (SAM) 10-31 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, Ala. Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-18, 10-26, 10-36, 10-42 Apalachicola River to St. Andrew Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10- 31 Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Appanoose Township, Hancock County, Ill. (NCR) 28-18 Appleton First Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Appleton Fourth Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Appleton Lower Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Appleton Second Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Appleton Third Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Applegate Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-30, 37-41, 37-53 Appomattox River, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Apponaug Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Appoquinimink River, Del. (NAP) 3-25, 3-28 Aquashicola Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-27 Aquatic Plant Control Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-2, 7-10, 7-12, 7- 15 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-2, 15-13, 15-16, 15-27 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-2, 9-25, 9-31, 9- 46 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-3, 10-23, 10-28 New England Division (NED) 1-3, 1-27, 1-35 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-2, 11-20, 11-23 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-2, 2-21, 2-24 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-25 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-7 Sacramento, Calif, District (SPK) 35-27 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-2, 8-11, 8-16 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-4 Southwestern Division (SWG) 15-2, 15-13, 15-16, 15-27 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-15 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-2, 6-19, 6-27 Aquia Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Aquilla Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-2, 16-14, 16-18 Ararat River, Surry County, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-21 Arbuckle Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-17 Arcadia, Wis. (NCS) 27-26 Arcadia Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-2, 31-37, 31-53 Arcadia Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-2, 19-10, 19-14 Arch Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-53 Archers Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Ardsley, N.Y. (NAN) 2-13, 2-23, 2-28 Area East of Albany, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Arecibo Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-2, 9-25, 9-31 Arkabutla Lake, Miss. (MR+ T) 42-20, 42-57 Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Okla. afd Tex. (SWT) 19-2, 19-3, 19-10, 19-14, 19-16 Arkansas River Basin, Ark. Okla. & Kans. (SWL) (SWT 18-2, 18-10, 18-13, 18-18, 18-21, 19-17 I-2 INDEX Arkansas River Plan, Okla. (SWT) 19-17 Arkansas River Project Levees (MR + T) 42-44, 42-47 Arkansas River Standard Revetments and Dikes (MR+T) 42-36 Arkport Dam, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-25 Arlington, Alkali Canyon, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 Arlington Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-20 Armuchee Creek, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 Arroyo Colorado, Tex. (SWG) 15-9, 15-14, 15-25 Asan Village, Territory of Guam (POD) 36-4, 36-9 Ashland, Ky. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Ashland Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-2, 31-37, 31-53 Ashley River, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-15 Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-2, 32-16, 32-20 Asotin Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Asotin Dam, Idaho and Wash. (NPW) 39-19 Asquiroga Bay, Territory of Guam (POD) 36-4, 36-9 Astoria Turning Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway (MR+T) 42-43, 42-47, 42- 48 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, La. (LMN) 11-2, 11-20, 11-23 Atchalafaya River Basin, La. (MR+T) 42-5, 42-13, 42- 27, 42-56, 42-59 Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, La. (LMN) 11-30 Atchalafaya River, Standard Revetments (MR + T) 42- 31 Atchison, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Athalia, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Athens, Ohio (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Atlantic Beach Channels, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-31 Atlantic City, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Atlantic Coast of N.J. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlets (NAN) 2-32 Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (NAO) (SAW) (SAN) (SAS) (SAJ) 5-2, 5-11, 5-14, 5-19, 5-22, 6-2, 6-19, 6-24, 7-2, 7-10, 7-12, 8-2, 8-11, 8-13, 9-2, 9-25, 9-31 Au Sable Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-3, 31-37, 31-53 AUMsi Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Aubrey Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-15, 16-19 Auburn, N.Y., Owasco Outlet (NCB) 32-33 Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Augusta, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 Augusta Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-16 Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Aurora, ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 AUrora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road 21-22 Dam, Colo. (MRO) Avoca, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-25 Avon Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Aylesworth Creek Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-12, 4-24 B B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N.C. (Formerly New Hope Lake, N.C.) (SAW) 6-11, 6-17, 6-21 Bachelor Island, Wash. (NPP) 37-50, 37-55 Back Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-22 Bagaduce River, Maine (NED) 1-21, 1-33, 1-40, 1-48 Bailey, R.D., Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-8, 25-13, 25-17 Bainbridge, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Baker Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-48 Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-3, 9-25, 9-45 Ball Mountain Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-13, 1-30, 1-51 Baltimore Harbor, Md. Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-4, 4-22, 4-29 Baltimore Harbor, Md. Prevention of Obstruction and Injurious Deposits (NAB) 4-8, 4-23, 4-31 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Md. and Va. (NAB) 4- 3, 4-22, 4-28 Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) (NAO) 5-2, 5-11, 5-14, 5-22 Bandon Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-2, 37-27, 37- 35 Bank Revetments and Dikes (MR+T) 42-29, 42-33, 42- 38 Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-10, 18-20 Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Arkansas River, Ark. and Okla. (SWT) 19-17 Bank Stabilization, Red River Below Dennison (SWT) 19-16 Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts (NCR) 28- 14, 28-16 Banning Levee-San Gorgonio River, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Bar Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-41 Bar Point Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Barataria Bay Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-3, 11-20, 11-23 Barbers Point Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-1, 36-8, 36-10 Barbourville, Ky. (ORN) 23-13, 23-19 Barcelona Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-2, 32-16 Bardwell Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-14, 16-18 Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley, Ky. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Barnard, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Barnegat Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-2, 3-18, 3-22 Barnegat Light, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Barnett Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-24 Barre Falls Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-30, 1-51 Barren River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-5, 24-14, 24-27 Bartley, Nebr. (MRK) 20-19, 20-23 Bass Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-41 I-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Bass Harbor Bar, Maine (NED) 1-41 Bassett Creek, Minn. (NCS) 27-3, 27-17 Bastrop Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Batavia and Vicinity, N.Y. (NCB) 32-33 Bath, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Baton Rouge Harbor, La. (LMN) 11-30 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devil's Swamp), La. (MR+T) 42- 6, 42-28, 42-48 Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Baudette Harbor, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Bay City Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2- 21, 2-24, 2-30 Bay River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Bayard, W. Va. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Bayfield Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-5, 12-15, 12-18, 12-22, 12-23 Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12- 6, 12-15, 12-18, 12-24 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-31, 12-25, 12-26 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, La. (LMK) 12-6, 12-15, 12-18, 12-23, 12-25 Bayou Bonfouca, La. (LMN) 11-30 Bayou Choupique, La. (LMN) 11-31 Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries, La. (MR+T) 42-6, 42- 14, 42-27, 42-52, 42-56 Bayou Coden, Ala. (SAM) 10-3, 10-23, 10-28 Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, La. (LMN) 11-30 Bayou Dupre, La. (LMN) 11-30 Bayou Galere, Miss. (SAM) 10-39 Bayou Grosse Tete, La. (LMN) 11-30 Bayou La Batre, Ala. (SAM) 10-3, 10-23, 10-28 Bayou La Loutre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, La. (LMN) 11-30 Bayou Lacombe, La. (LMN) 11-30 Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche-Jump Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-3, 11-20, 11-23 Bayou Meto, Ark. (MR + T) 42-50 Bayou Nicholas, Coushatta, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-31, 12-24 Bayou Pierre, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-31, 12-7, 12-15, 12- 18, 12-24, 12-25, 12-26 Bayou Plaquemine Brule, La. (LMN) 11-30 Bayou Queue de Tortue, La. (LMN) 11-30 Bayou Rapides, La. (LMN) 11-31 Bayou Segnette Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-30 Bayou Teche, La. (LMN) 11-4, 11-20, 11-23, 11-27 Bayou Teche and Vermilion River, La. (LMN) 11-30 Bayou Terrebonne, La. (LMN) 11-30 Bayou Vermilion, La. (LMN) 11-30 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, La. (LMK) 12-22 Bayous Des Glaise Diversion Channel, La. (MR +T) 42- 48 Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie (MR+ T) 42-48 Bayport, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Bayport Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Baytown, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Beals, Maine (NED) 1-23 Beals Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-41 Bear Creek, Mont. (NPS) 38-25 Bear Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48, 37-50 Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, Mo.) (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Bear Creek, Hannibal, Mo. (NCR) 28-16 Bear Creek, Kendrick, Idaho (NPW) 39-17, 39-20 Bear Creek Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-2, 21-11, 21-14 Bear River, Calif. (SPK) 35-27 Beards Brook Reservoir, N.H. (NED) 1-48 Beatrice, Nebr. (MKR) 20-20 Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-4, 6-19, 6-25 Beaver and Mahoning Rivers, Pa. and Ohio (ORP) 26-21 Beaver Bay Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Beaver Brook Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-48 Beaver Creek, Montezuma, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 Beaver Creek near Tillamook, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 Beaver Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-13, 37-30, 37- 41, 37-55 Beaver Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-7, 18-11, 18-23 Bedford, Iowa (MRK) 20-19 Beech Fork Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-2, 25-11, 25-15 Belfast Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-41 Belhaven Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-31 Bell Foley Lake, White River Basin, Ark. (SWL) 18-16, 18-23 Bellaire, Ohio (ORP) 26-23 Bellamy River, N.H. (NED) 1-41 Belle Fourche, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-22 Belle River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Belleville Locks and Dam, Ohio (ORD) 22-1, 22-8 Bellevue, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Bellingham Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-32 Bellingham Harbor, Wash. (I and J Street Waterway) (NPS) 38-24 Bellingham, Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Belpre, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Belton Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-14, 16-18 Belton Lake Modification, Tex. (SWF) 16-12 Beltzville Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-12, 3-20 Benbrook Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-14, 16-18 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River, Iowa (MRO) 21-23 Bennington, Vt. (NAN) 2-33 Bennington Reservoir, N.H. (NED) 1-48 Benwood, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 I-4 INDEX Berkeley Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-8 Berkeley Marina, Calif (SPN) 34-8 Berlin Lake, Ohio (ORP) 26-5, 26-13, 26-18 Berwick Bay Bridge Alteration (LMN) 11-30 Bethel Bank Stabilization, Alaska (NPA) 40-6 Bethel Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-7, 40-9, 40-13 Bethlehem, Pa. (NAP) 3-27 Bettendorf, Iowa (NCR) 28-3, 28-8, 28-11 Betterton Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Beverly Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Big Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-3, 31-37, 31-53 Big Bend, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-7, 21-12, 21-16 Big Black River, Miss. (LMK) 12-22, 12-26 Big Blue Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-28 Big Blue River, Nebr. (MRK) 20-19 Big Choctaw Bayou, La. (LMK) 12-26 Big Creek and L'Anguille River, Ark. (LMM) 13-10 Big Creek Canal, Millington, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 Big (Cunningham) Creek, Ohio (NCB) 32-31 Big Darby, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Big Dry Creek Dam and Diversion, Calif. (SPK) 35-27 Big Fossil Creek, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Big Fossil Creek Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, near Twin Bridges, Mont. (MRO) 21-21 Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, near Hardin, Mont. (MRO) 21-21 Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Big Nemeha River, Neb. (MRK) 20-9 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, La. (LMN) 11-30 Big Pine Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-21 Big Pine Lake, Tex. (SWT) 19-3, 19-10, 19-14 Big Run, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Big Sandy Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-14, 16-18 Big Sandy River, W. Va. and Ky., including Levisa and Tug Forks (ORH) 25-18 ig Sioux River at Sioux City, Iowa and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, near Flandreau, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-21 Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, near Flandreau, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-21 Big Slough & Mayo Ditch, Ark. (MR + T) 42-55 Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Ky. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-4, 23-9 Big Spring, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 SS tone Lake and Whetstone River, Minn. and S. DIg. (NCS) 27-4, 27-17 Big Stranger Creek, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Big Suamico River, Wis. (NCE) 31-74 Big Sunflower River, Miss. (LMK) (MR&T) 12-22, 42-49 Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Big Timber Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Big Walnut Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-28 Big Wash, Milford, Utah (SPK) 35-27 Big Wood River, Idaho (NPW) 39-2, 39-11, 39-14 Billings, Montana (MRO) 21-19 Biloxi Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-4, 10-23, 10-29, 10-37 Binghamton, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-25 Birch, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Birch Hill Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-14, 1-30, 1-51 Birch Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-10, 19-14 Bird Rock Area, La Jolla, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway, Mo. (MR+ T) 42-51 Biscayne Bay, Fla., Hurricane Protection (SAJ) 9-53 Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, La. (LMN) 11-31 Black Bayou Reservoir, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-31, 12-25, 12-26 Black Creek, Gadsden, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Black Fork at Hendricks, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22 Black River, Ark. & Mo. (SWL) 18-15 Black River, Mich. (NCE) 31-75 Black River, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-21, 6-27 Black River, Wis. (NCS) 27-21, 27-23, 27-26 Black River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-4, 31-37, 31-54, 31-77 Black River Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-31 Black River Lake, Wis. (NCS) 27-23 Black River, Poplar Bluff, Mo., to Knobel, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Black River (Port Huron), Mich. (NCE) 31-3, 31-37, 31- 53 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-3, 32-16, 32-21, 32-35 Black Rock Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-3, 1-27, 1-35 Black Rock Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-32, 1-52 Black Walnut Point, Md. (NAB) 4-11, 4-24, 4-32, 4-34 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Ala. (SAM) 10-4, 10-23, 10-29, 10-37 Blackbird Creek near Macy, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-22 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Idaho (NPW) 39-17, 39-19 Blackfoot Reservoir, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Blackfoot River, Idaho (NPW) 39-17, 39-19 Blackfoot River, Mont. (NPS) 38-25 Blackstone, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Blackstone River Basin, Mass. and R.I. (NED) 1-12, 1- 24, 1-50 Blackwater Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-19, 1-32, 1-54 Blackwater River, Fla. (SAM) 10-37, 10-38 Blackwater River, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Blaine, Maine (NED) 1-23 Blaine Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Blair and Sitcom Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-11 I-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Blakely Mountain Dam-Lake Quachita, Ark. (LMK) 12- 7, 12-15, 12-23 Blind Slough Diking District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46 Bloomington Lake, Md. and W. Va. (NAB) 4-11, 4-24, 4-32 Blue Marsh Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-20 Blue Mountain Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-11, 18-21 Blue River Basin (Kansas City District) (MRK) 20-2, 20- 15 Blue River Channel, Kansas City, Mo. (MRK) 20-2, 20- 11, 20-15 Blue River Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-13, 37-31, 37-41, 37- 53, 37-56 Bluestone Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-3, 25-11, 25-15 Bluff Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-38 Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors (BERH) 41- 1 Bodega Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-3, 34-5 Bodie Island, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. (MR+T) 42-49 Boeuf River, La. (LMN) 12-22 Bogachiel River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Boggy Creek, Tex. (SWF) 16-4, 16-14, 16-18 Boise River, Idaho (NPW) 39-2, 39-11, 39-14 Boise Valley, Idaho (NPW) 39-17, 39-19 Bolles Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Bon Secour River, Ala. (SAM) 10-5, 10-23, 10-30, 10-38 Bonnet Carre Spillway, La. (MR+ T) 42-6, 42-52, 42-54 Bonneville Lock and Dam-Lake Bonneville, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-20, 37-25, 37-32, 37-43, 37-57 Bonpas Creek, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 Bonum Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Boone County, Ky. (ORL) 24-20 Booneville Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-27 Boothbay Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-41 Boston Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-3, 1-27, 1-35, 1-55 Boswell Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Boulder Creek, Boulder, Colo. (MRO) 21-17 Bound Brook, Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Bowman, Leland, Lock, La. (formerly Vermilion Lock) (LMN) 11-9, 11-21, 11-25 Bowman-Haley Lake, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-2, 21-11, 21-14 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Bradford, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Bradford, Tenn. (LMM) 13-3, 13-7, 13-9 Bradley Lake, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Bramwell, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Brandon Road Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-19, 28-20 Branford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Branson Cove, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, Mass. (NED) 1-48 Braymer Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Brazos Island Harbor, Tex. (SWG) 15-2, 15-13, 15-16, 15-28, 15-29, 15-34 Brazos River, Tex., Velasco to Old Washington (SWG) 15-27 Breton Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Brevard County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-16, 9-28, 9-39 Brevoort Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Bridge Alterations Authorized Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-14 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-4 New England Division (NED) 1-11 Bridgeport Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-41, 1-48 Bridges, Columbia River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Bridgewater, Va. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Brilliant, Ohio (ORP) 26-23 Bristol Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Broad Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Broad Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Broad Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-11, 5-14, 5-22 Broad Creek River, Del. (NAB) 4-34 Broadkill River, Del. (NAP) 3-25 Broadwater Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Broadway Lake, S.C. (SAS) 8-7, 8-11, 8-15 Brockway, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Brockway Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-48 Broken Bow, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Broken Bow Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-8, 19-13, 19-15 Bromley, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Bronx River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Brookfield Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Brooklyn, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Brookport, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Brookville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Brookville Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-5, 24-14, 24-27 Broward County, Fla., Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project (SAJ) 9-17, 9-28, 9-39 Brown, Clarence J., Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORL) 24- 8, 24-15 Browns Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Brownwood Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Brunswick County Beaches, N.C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina-South Carolina State Line) (SAW) 6-29 Brunswick Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-3, 8-11, 8-13 Buchanan Dam-H. V. Eastman Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-21 Buck Creek, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Buckhannon, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-23, 26-28 Buckhannon River, W. Va. (ORP) 26-21 Buckhorn Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-6, 24-14, 24-27 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, Maine (NED) 1-41 Bucksport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-41 Buena Vista, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Buena Vista, Va. (NAO) 5-21 I-6 INDEX Buffalo, Wyo. (MRO) 21-17 Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, Tex. (SWG) 15-9, 15-14, 15-25 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21- 22 Buffalo Creek, Scranton, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-22 Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-3, 32-16, 32-21 Buffalo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-26 Buffumville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-33, 1-55 Buford Dam, Ga. (SAM) 10-19 Bull Run, Pa. (NAB) 4-11, 4-24, 4-32 Bull Shoals Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-7, 18-11, 18-23 Bullocks Point Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Bunker Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-41 Burbank-Eastern System, Calif. (SPL) 33-27 Burbank-Western System (Lower) Calif (SPL) 33-27 Burbank-Western System (Upper) Calif (SPL) 33-27 Burch Creek, Weber County, Utah (SPK) 35-27 Burgettstown, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Burgettstown-Slovan, Pa. (ORP) 26-28 Burial Hill Beach, Westport, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Burketts Creek, Amory, Miss. (SAM) 10-13, 10-26, 10- 35 Burlington, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-11 Burlington, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Burlington Dam, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-22 Burlington Harbor, Vt. (NAN) 2-31 Burns Waterway Harbor, Ind. (NCD) 30-2, 30-5, 30-8, 30-10, 30-13, 30-14 Burnsville Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-3, 25-11, 25-15 Bush, Alvin R., Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Butler, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Buttermilk Bay Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-3, 1-27, 1-35 Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn. (NAN) 2-33 C Cache Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-10, 42-18, 42-27, 42-52 Cache Creek Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-18 Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins, Colo. (MRO) 21-22 Cache River Diversion, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Caddo Lake, La. (LMK) 12-7, 12-15, 12-18, 12-24 Cadet Bayou, Miss. (SAM) 10-6, 10-23, 10-30, 10-37 Cadle Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Caesar Creek Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-6, 24-15, 24-27 baMlesi ll Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-6, 24-15, 24-27 Cahaba River, Ala. (SAM) 10-38 Cair, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Calabash Creek, N.C. (SAN) 7-17 Calapooya River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Calaveras River and Little John Creek and Tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-21 Calcasieu River and Pass, La. (LMN) 11-5, 11-20, 11-24 Calcasieu River at Coon Island, La. (LMN) 11-30 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, La. (LMN) 11-30 Calcasieu River Salt Water Barrier, La. (LMN) 11-30 Caledonia, N.Y. (NCB) 32-33 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Conn. (NED) 1-45 California (Cincinnati) Ohio (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 California Debris Commission (CDC) 44-1 Calion, Ark. (LMK) 12-23 Calumet Harbor and River, Ill. and Indiana (NCC) 30-2, 30-8, 30-10, 30-13, 30-14 Calumet River Bridges, Ill. (NCC) 30-14 Camas Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-19 Cambridge Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-4, 4-22, 4-29 Cambridgeport Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-48 Camden Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-41 Camelsback Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-25 Camp Ground Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21 Camp Perry, Ohio (NCB) 32-33 Camp Wooten, Wash. (NPW) 39-20 Campbells Island, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-31, 12-24, 12-26 Canapitsit Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Canaveral Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-3, 9-25, 9-31, 9-42 Candy Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-10, 19-14 Cane River, La. (LMN) 11-30 Caney Fork River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Canisteo, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-25 Cannelton, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Cannelton Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 Cannon, Clarence, Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (LMS) 14-7, 14-10, 14-12 Canoe Creek, Henderson, Ky. (ORL) 24-20 Canton, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-46 Canton, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Canton Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-21, 19-3, 19-10, 19- 14, 19-17 Canton (Nimishillen), Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Canyon Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-4, 16-14, 16-18 Cape Charles City Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-11, 5-14, 5-22 Cape Cod Canal, Mass. (NED) 1-4, 1-27, 1-36 Cape Fear River, N.C., above Wilmington (SAW) 6-4, 6- 19 Cape Fear River Basin, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-32 Cape Florida State Park, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Cape Girardeau, Mo., No. 2 (LMS) 14-14 Cape Girardeau, Mo., Reaches Nos. 1, 3 and 4 (LMS) 14- 14 Cape Henry Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-14 I-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Cape Lookout, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Cape May City, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, N.J. (NAP) 3-13, 3- 20 Cape Porpoise Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-41 Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-31 Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-3, 22-8 Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Carlyle Lake, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-21 Carr Fork Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-7, 24-15, 24-27 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-38 Carrabelle, Fla. (SAM) 10-37 Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Carrollton, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Carters Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Carters Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-16, 10-26 Caruthersville Harbor, Mo. (LMM) 13-1, 13-7, 13-9 Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, Maine (NED) 1-41 Cascadia Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48, 37-56 Caseville Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Caseyville, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Cashie River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Cassville Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Castle Rock, Wash. (NPP) 37-48 Castlewood Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-17 Catching Inlet Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 Cathance River, Maine (NED) 1-41 Catherine Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPW) 39-17 Cathlamet, Wash. (NPP) 37-45 Catlettsburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Cattaraugus Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-31 Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-3, 32-16 Cave Run Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-7, 24-15, 24-27 Cave-In-Rock, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, N.Y. (NCB) 32-12, 32-19 Cecil M. Harden Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-7, 24-15, 24-27 Cedar Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-2, 15-13, 15-16, 15-28 Cedar Canyon Dam, S.Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-22 Cedar Creek, Del. (NAP) 3-17, 3-25 Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Cedar Point, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Cedar Point Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-16 Cedar River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Cedar River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-75 Cedars Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Celina Dam, Ky. (ORN) 23-14 Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. (ORN) 23-6, 23-9, 23-18 Central and Southern Florida (SAJ) 9-21, 9-29, 9-40, 9- 47, 9-48, 9-49, 9-50, 9-51 Central City Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-16 Ceredo-Kenova, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Chambersburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Channel between North and South Hero Island, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-31 Channel Clearing and Snagging on Willamette River and Major Tributaries, (NPP) 37-56 Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Channel Connecting York River, Va. with Back Creek to Slaights Wharf (NAO) 5-20 Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-19 Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9- 25, 9-31, 9-46 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Channel from Phoebus, Va. to Deep Water in Hampton Roads (NAO) 5-20 Channel Improvements for Flood Control and Major Drainage on 16 Streams Tributary to Willamette River (NPP) 37-56 Channel Islands Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-13, 33-18 Channel to Liberty, Tex. (SWG) 15-7 Channel to Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Channel to Port Bolivar, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Channels, Straits of Mackinac, Mich. (NCE) 31-4, 31-37, 31-54 Chaplin River, Perryville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20 Chappaqua, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Charenton Drainage and Navigation Canal (MR+T) 42- 48 Chariton River, Mo. (1944 Act) (MRK) 20-19 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, Mo. (1965 Act) (MRK) 20-19 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), Mass. (NED) 1-12, 1-30, 1-39 Charles River Dam,s. (NED) 1-23, 1-46 Charleston Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-2, 37-27, 37-35 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28- 14, 28-16 Coal Grove, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Coal River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Coan River, Va. (NAB) 4-37 Coast of California, Point Mugu to San Pedro Breakwater, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) 45-1 Coasters Island Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Cobscook Bay, Maine (NED) 1-41 Cocheco River, N.H. (NED) 1-41, 1-46 Cochiti Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-9, 17-11 Cochrane, Wis. (NCS) 27-26 Cockrells Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 I-8 INDEX Coeur D'Alene, Idaho (NPS) 38-7, 38-26 Cohansey River, N.J. (NAP) 3-3, 3-17, 3-18, 3-22 Cohasset Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Colchester, Conn. (NED) 1-23 Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) 52-1 Cold Spring Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-3, 3-18, 3-22 Colebrook River Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-14, 1-30, 1-51 Colfax, Wash. (NPW) 39-2, 39-11, 39-14, 39-20 Colfax, Grant Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-32, 12-25, 12-26 Colliers, W. Va. (ORP) 26-28 Collinsville, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Colonial Beach, Va. (NAB) 4-36 Colorado River, Matagorda, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Colorado Springs, Colo. (Templeton Gap Floodway) (SWA) 17-11 Columbia, La. (LMK) 12-23 Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, Wash., and Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-3, 37-27, 37-35, 37-51 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Columbia Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46, 37-55 Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, Wash. (NPW) 39-17 Columbia River at Baker Bay, Wash. (NPP) 37-4, 37-27, 37-36 Columbia River at the Mouth, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-4, 37-27, 37-36 Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects (NPW) 39-2, 39-14, 39-19 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, Idaho, Mont., and Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-31 Columbia River between Chinook, Wash., and Head of Sand Island (NPP) 37-4, 37-27, 37-36 Columbia River between Vancouver, Wash., and The Dalles, Oreg. (NPP) 37-5, 37-27, 37-36 Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering Board 49-2 Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Columbia Slough, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Columbus, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Compo Beach, Westport, Conn. 1-45 Computer Sciences Laboratory 51-1 Conant Brook Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-14, 1-30, 1-51 Conchas Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-2, 17-8 Concordia, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Conemaugh River Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-14, 26-18 Conetoe Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Coey Island Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 COagaree River, Cayce, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Conklin-Kirkwood, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Conneaut Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-5, 32-16, 32-24 Connecticut River (above Hartford), Conn. (NED) 1-41 Connecticut River Basin, Vt., N.H., Mass. and Conn. (NED) 1-12, 1-24, 1-51 Connecticut River below Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-5, 1- 27, 1-36, 1-48 Connecticut River, North Stratford, N.H. (NED) 1-46 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, N.H. (NED) 1-46 Connell, Wash. (NPW) 39-17 Conoho Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-46 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) 50-1 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORD) 22- 1, 22-5, 22-6 Contentnea Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-29, 6-30 Conway County Drainage & Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, & 8, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Cook Inlet Shoals, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Cooper Lake and Channels, Tex. (LMN) 11-32 Cooper Lake and Channels, Tex. (SWF) 16-4, 16-14, 16- 18 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-3, 7-10, 7-12 Cooper River, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Cooper River Seismic Modification, S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7- 10, 7-12 Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data Board 49-2 Coos and Millicoma Rivers, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-28, 37- 37 Coos Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-5, 37-27, 37-36 Coosa River Navigation, Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10-26 Copan Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14 Copes Corner Lake, New York (NAB) 4-37 Coquille River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-28, 37-37, 37-50 Coralville Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-12 Coraopolis, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Corbin, Ky. (ORN) 23-19 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), Ky. (ORN) 23-13 Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Cordova Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Cordova Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-7, 40-9 Core Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Corea Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-5, 1-27, 1-36 Corning, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 Corning-Monkey Run, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 I-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Cornucopia Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Corps of Engineers Reserve Fleet (CERF) 53-2 Corpus Christi, Tex., Channel to Navy Seaplane Base, Encinal Peninsula (SWG) 15-27 Corpus Christi Beach, Tex. (Restoration Project) (SWG) 15-8, 15-14, 15-25 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-2, 15-13, 15-16, 15-28, 15-29, 15-34 Corsica River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Corte Madera Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-5, 35-21, 35- 26 Cortland, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Cottage Grove Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-13, 37-31, 37-41, 37-53, 37-56 Cottonwood Creek, Calif (SPK) 35-19, 35-25 Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Idaho (NPW) 39-2, 39-11, 39-15 Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Cottonwood Slough Pumping Plant, Ill. (LMN) 13-10 Cotuit Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-41, 1-48 Cougar Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-21, 37-32, 37-44, 37-53, 37-56 Council Bluffs, Iowa (MRO) 21-17, 21-23 Council Grove Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14 Courtenay Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Cove Island, Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Covington, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Cow Castle Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-11, 7-14 Cow Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-16 Cowanesque Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-26 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-46, 37-50, 37-55 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Districts 2, 13, and 15, Wash. (NPP) 37-47, 37-55 Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-47 Cowlitz River, Wash. (NPP) 37-7, 37-28, 37-38, 37-47 Cowlitz River at Randle, Wash. (NPP) 37-50 Cowpen Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Coyote and Spencer Creeks, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Coyote Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-27 Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements, Calif (SPK) 35-22, 35-31 Crabtree Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Craig Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Cramerton, S. Fork, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Crane Creek State Park, Ohio (NCB) 32-35 Cranes Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20, 5-22 Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Creede, Willow Creek, Colo. (Floodway) (SWA) 17-11 Crescent City Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-1, 34-5, 34-8 Criehaven Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-41 Crisfield Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Crooked Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-14, 2 -18 Crooked Creek Lake & Levee, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Cross Creek, Rossville, Kan. (MRK) 20-9 Cross-Florida Barge Canal (SAJ) 9-4, 9-25, 9-31, 9-42, 9-43 Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Crutcho Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19- 16 Crystal River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Cucamonga Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-7, 33-15, 33-21 Cuckold Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Cuivre River, Mo. (LMS) 14-13 Culdesac, Idaho 39-20 Cumberland, Ky. (ORN) 23-9, 23-18 Cumberland, Md., and Ridgeley, W. Va. (NAB) 4-12, 4- 24, 4-32, 4-38 Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-2, 23-9, 23- 11, 23-15 Cummings Park, Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Cunninghill Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Current River, Ark. & Mo. (SWL) 18-15 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Curwensville Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Cushman-Mapleton Channels Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Cuttyhunk Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio (NCB) 32-13, 32-19 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, Tex., and Shreveport, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-30, 12-22 Cypress Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Cypress Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 D Dade County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-17, 9-28, 9-39 Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Dallas Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Dam 'A' Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-12, 16-20 Dam Neck Disposal Area, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Dam Safety Program, New York District (NAN) 2-19 Damariscotta River, Maine (NED) 1-41 Dana Point Harbor, Calif (SPL) 33-2, 33-13, 33-18 Danbury, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-53 Dansville and Vicinity, N.Y. (NCB) 32-13, 32-19 Dardanelle Lock & Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-7, 18-12, 18- 9 Darien Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Dashields Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Data Collection and Management Division, 53-1 I-10 INDEX Dauphin Island Bay, Ala. (SAM) 10-6, 10-24, 10-30, 10- 37 Davenport, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-12 Davenport Center Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 Davenport Harbor, Iowa (Lindsay Park) (NCD) 29-7 David D. Terry Lock & Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-18 Davids Creek Lake, Iowa (MRO) 21-17 Davis, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Davis Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Day, John, Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-23, 37-33, 37-44, 37-58 Day, John, River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46, 37-50 Days Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 Dayton, Ky. (ORL) 24-3, 24-14, 24-24, 24-29 Dayton, Wash. (NPW) 39-17, 39-20 Dayton, Wyo. (MRO) 21-19 De Kalb, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Decorah, Iowa (NCS) 27-26 Deep Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-13, 6-21 Deep Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Deep Creek, Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Deep Fork Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Deep River, Wash. (NPP) 37-45 Deep River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-46 Deer Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-3, 25-11, 25-15 Deer Creek Prairie Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Deer Island Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46 Deer Island Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-47, 37-55 Deer Island Thoroughfare, Maine (NED) 1-41 Degonia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Degray Lake, Ark. (LMK) 12-8, 12-15, 12-23 Delaware Coast Protection, Del. (NAP) 3-13, 3-20 Delaware Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-4, 25-11, 25-15 Delaware River, Mouth of Neversink (NAP) 3-28 Delaware River, Pa., N.J. and Del., Philadelphia to the Sea (NAP) 3-4, 3-18, 3-22 Delaware River at Camden, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Delaware River at East Branch, N.Y. (NAP) 3-15 Delaware River at Pennsville, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Delaware River between Philadelphia, Pa., and Trenton, N.J. (NAP) 3-3, 3-18, 3-22 Delphi, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Denison Dam-Lake Texoma, Tex. and Okla. (SWT) 19- 13, 19-19 Dennis Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Depere Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Depoe Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-28, 37-38, 37-45, 37-48 Depue, Ill. (NCR) 28-18 DeqUeen Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-11, 18-22 Derby, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-53 Derby, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Des Moines, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, Mo. (NcR) 28-14, 28-16 Deschutes River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Detour Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-5, 31-38, 31-55 Detroit Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-21, 37-32, 37-44, 37-53, 37-56 Detroit River, Mich. (NCE) 31-6, 31-38, 31-55, 31-71, 31-77 Devils Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-5, 27-17 Devil's Swamp, La. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-26 Dewey Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-4, 25-12, 25-15 Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes, Maine (NED) 1-20, 1-33, 1-40 Dickey Lake, Maine (NED) 1-48 Dickinson Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18- 11, 18-22 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, Wash. (NPP) 37-46 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-46 Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-47 Diking Districts 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wash. (NPP) 37-46 Diking Districts 2, 3, and 5, Clatsop County, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, Wash. (NPP) 37-46 Diking Improvement Districts 2 and 13, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-47 Dillingham Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-7, 40-9 Dillon Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-4, 25-12, 25-15 Dillonvale, Ohio (Short Creek) (ORP) 26-23 Dismal Swamp Canal (Deep Creek), Va. (NAO) 5-19 Dismal Swamp Canal, (South Mills, N.C.) (NAO) 5-19 Dively Drainage & Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Dodge City, Kans. (SWA) 17-11 Dodge City, Kans. (SWT) 19-18 Dog and Fowl Rivers, Ala. (SAM) 10-6, 10-24, 10-30 Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Dorena Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-13, 37-31, 37-41, 37-54, 37-56 Double Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Double Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Douglas Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11, 40-13 Douglass Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-16 Dover, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 Downeyville Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-28 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46 Dresden Island Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-19 Drinkwater Sewer, Mo. (LMM) 13-4, 13-7, 13-9 Drum Inlet, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Drury Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 I-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Dry Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-17 Dry Creek, Hawarden, Iowa (MRO) 21-17, 21-23 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPK) 35-22, 35-31 Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Dry Pass, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Dry Run, Iowa (NCS) 27-22 Dubois, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Dubuque, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Dubuque Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Duck Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-27 Duck Creek Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Duck Island Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Duck Point Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Duck River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minn. and Wis. (NCE) 31-6, 31-38, 31-56 Dungeness River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-5, 32-16, 32-24 Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, Ga. (SAS) 8- 7, 8-16 Duval County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-18, 9-28, 9-39 Duxbury Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, Idaho (NPW) 39-5, 39- 11, 39-15, 39-21 Dyersburg, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 Dyersburg, Tenn. (Southwest) (LMM) 13-10 Dymers Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 E Eagle Bay and Fort Yates Highway Bridges, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-18 Eagle Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-11, 7-14 Eagle Creek Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21 Eagle Creek Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26-22 Eagle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-7, 31-39, 31-56 East Barre Dam, Vt. (NAN) 2-33 East Bay (Hanna Reef), Tex. (SWG) 15-27 East Bay Marina, Olympia Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-13, 38-18 East Boothbay Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-41 East Boyer River at Vail, Iowa (MRO) 21-3, 21-11, 21- 14 East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-14, 26-18 East Branch, Conn. (NED) 1-23 East Branch Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-46, 1-52 East Brimfield Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-34, 1-55 East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 East Chester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 East Fork, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 East Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-52 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28- 14, 28-16 East Lynn Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-4, 25-12, 25-16 East Moline, Ill. (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-12, 28-16 East Muddy and Lake Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 East Muddy Creek, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold, Iowa (MRO) 21-23 East Nishnabotna River, Page Co. Bridge, Near Essex, Iowa (MRO) 21-23 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak, Iowa (MRO) 21-3, 21-11, 21-14 East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-7, 10-24, 10-31 East Peoria Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 East Peoria Sanitary District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 East Point, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-32, 12-26 East Poplar Bluff & Poplar Bluff, Mo. (SWL) 18-16 East Rainelle, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 East River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 East Rockaway (DEBS) Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-21, 2-24 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I) (NAN) 2-13, 2-23, 2-28 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part II) (NAN) 2-33 East Sidney Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 East St. Louis and Vicinity, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-9, 14-11 East Weaver Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-27 Eastern Branch, Va. (NAO) 5-16 Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, La. (MR+T) 42-15, 42-27, 42-48, 42-56 Eastlake, Ohio (NCB) 32-33 Eastman, H. V., Lake, Calif (SPK) 35-4, 35-21 Eastport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-6, 1-28, 1-36 Eau Galle River, Wis. (NCS) 27-5, 27-17 Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-4, 9-25, 9-45 Echo Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Edenton Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Edgar Jadwin, General, Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-15, 3-20 Edgartown Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Edisto River, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-15, 7-16 Edisto River, North Fork, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, S.C. (SAN) 7- 16 Ediz Hook, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-13, 38-18 Edmonds Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-31 Edward Macdowell Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-19, 1-32, 1-54 Eel River, Calif. (SPK) 35-27 Eel River, Ind. (ORL) 24-30 1-12 INDEX Egegik River, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Eighteen Mile Island, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Eightmile River, Conn. (NED) 1-41 El Dorado, Kans., W. Br., Walnut River, Channel Improvement (SWT) 19-16 El Dorado Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14 El Paso, Tex. (SWA) 17-2, 17-8, 17-10 El Tuque Beach, P.R. (SAJ) 9-18, 9-28, 9-39 Eldred, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Eldred, Pa. (ORP) 26-28 Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-9, 14-11 Elfin Cove, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Elizabeth, N.J. (NAN) 2-14, 2-23, 2-28, 2-35 Elizabeth River, N.J. (NAN) 2-37 Elizabethtown, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Elk City Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-21, 19-4, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Elk Creek, Clyde, Kans. (MRK) 20-3, 20-9, 20-11, 20-15 Elk Creek Harbor, Pa. (NCB) 32-31 Elk Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-14, 37-31, 37-41 Elk River, Ala. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Elk River, Minn. (NCS) 27-22, 27-26 Elk River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-18 Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, near Gretna, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, near Norfolk, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Elkins, W. Va. (ORP) 26-4, 26-13, 26-18, 26-26 Elkland, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Elkport, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Ellicott Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-13, 32-19 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Elm Creek Bridges, Neb. (MRO) 21-2, 21-11, 21-14 Elm Fork Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-5, 16-14, 16-18 Elmira, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 Elochoman Slough, Wash. (NPP) 37-45 Elwha River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Emergency Bank Protection Activities Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 17-8 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-34 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-7 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-31 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-10 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 20-9 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-7 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-11 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-13, 24-31 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-6 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-19 New England Division (NED) 1-25 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-37 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO) 21-7 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-4 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-15 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-18 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-16 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-3 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-7 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-7, 14-14 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-27 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-19 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-12 Emergency Flood Control Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-5 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 17-8 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-20 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-34 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-9 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-7 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-33 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 16-12 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-11 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-10 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-24 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 20-9 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-7 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-11 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-13 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-6 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-40 New England Division (NED) 1-25 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-19 New York District (NAN) 2-19 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-10 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO) 21-7 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-6 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-14 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-15 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-19 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-16 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-3 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-7 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-33 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-7 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-27 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-19 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-12 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-16 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-24 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-40 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-37 Empire-Stratton, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Emsworth Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-2, 22-; I-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Enderlin, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-5, 27-17, 27-26 Endicott-Johnson City and Vestal, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4- 39 Engineer Topographic Laboratories (ETL) 51-1 England Pond Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 English, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 English Coulee, Grand Forks, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-27 Enid Diversion Canal and Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Enid Lake, Miss. (MR+T) 42-20, 42-57 Enid Levee Floodway, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Entiat River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Ephraim Canyon Wash, Nogales, Ariz. (SPL) 33-29 Erie Harbor, Pa. (NCB) 32-5, 32-17, 32-24, 32-35 Escambia and Conecuh Rivers, Fla. and Ala. (SAM) 10- 37, 10-38 Esopus Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Esquatzel Coulee, Wash. (NPW) 39-17, 39-20 Essex River, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Estes, Carl L., Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Euclid Creek, Cleveland, Ohio (NCB) 32-13, 32-19 Eufaula Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-21, 19-8, 19-13, 19-15, 19-17 Evansdale, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Evanston, Ill. (NCC) 30-14 Evansville, Ind. (ORL) 24-3, 24-14, 24-24, 24-29, 24-30 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38- 2, 38-13, 38-18 Everglades Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Exeter River, N.H. (NED) 1-41 Existing levees and extensions from Bastrop, La. to mouth of Boeuf River (LMK) 12-23 F Fabius River Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Fair Haven Beach State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-32 Fairbanks, Tanana River and Chena Slough, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Fairbury, Nebr. (MRK) 20-19 Fairfield Vicinity Streams, Calif (SPK) 35-19, 35-25 Fairport Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-6, 32-17, 32-25 Fajardo Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-46 Fall Brook Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-37 Fall Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-14, 37-31, 37-41, 37- 54, 37-56 Fall River Basin, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-4, 21-11, 21-14 Fall River Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-6, 1-28, 1-37 Fall River Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-21, 19-4, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Falls Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-17, 6-22 Falmouth Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Falmouth Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-27 Fancy Bluff Creek, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Far Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Fargo, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-26 Farm Creek, Ill. (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-12 Farmers Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-14, 28- 16 Farmers Levee and Drainage District (NCR) 28-14, 28- 15 Farmington, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Feather River, Calif. (SPK) 35-27 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 47-1 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses at Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORD) 22-6 Ferguson Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Fern Ridge Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-14, 37-31, 37-42, 37- 54, 37-56 Fernandina Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-25, 9-31, 9-45 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines, Tex. (LMN) 11-32 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines, Tex. (SWF) 16- 5, 16-14, 16-18 Filberts Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-21, 2-24, 2-32 Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, N.Y. (NAN) 2-14, 2-23, 2-28 Fisher, O. C., Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-15, 16-19 Fisherman's Wharf Area, San Francisco Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Fishing Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-29 Fishing Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Fishing Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Fishtrap Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-5, 25-12, 25-16 Fitchburg, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-46 Fivemile River Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-41, 1-48 Flannagan, John W., Dam and Reservoir, Va. (ORH) 25-5, 25-12, 25-16 Flat Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Flat Rock Creek Channel Improvement, Tulsa, Okla. (SWT) 19-16, 19-18 Flathead River, Mont. (NPS) 38-24, 38-26 Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24- 22, 24-25 Floating Breakwater Prototype Test Program, Seattle, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-13, 38-18 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency Activities Huntington, W.Va., District (ORH) 25-10 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-12 Flood Damage Prevention Studies, Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-19 Flood Insurance Activities I-14 INDEX Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-11 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-16 Flood Insurance Studies and Flood Hazard Information Reports, Mobile, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Florence Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-16, 19-18 Floyd River, Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-17, 21-23 Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-21, 2-24 Fly Creek, Ala. (SAM) 10-7, 10-24, 10-31, 10-37 Follansbee, W. Va. (ORP) 26-23 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, Conn. (NED) 1-46, 1-52 Folly River, S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-10, 7-13 Folsom Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-27 Fore River, Braintree and Weymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Forest Heights, Md. (NAB) 4-36, 4-38 Forest River, N.D. (NCS) 27-26 Forestville, Mich. (NCE) 31-75 Forked Deer River, Tenn., including South Fork (LMM) 13-10 Forsyth, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-21 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Fort Cobb Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-17 Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-21 Fort Gibson Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-21, 19-8, 19- 13, 19-15, 19-17 Fort Kent, Maine (NED) 1-23, 1-46 Fort Leavenworth, Kans., Bridge Removal (MRK) 20-18 Fort Loudon Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Fort Macon State Park, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Fort Madison Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Fort Myers Beach, Fla. (SAJ) 9-32, 9-45, 9-46 Fort Niagara State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-32 Fort Peck Lake, Mont. (MRO) 21-8, 21-13, 21-16 Fort Pierce, Fla. (SAJ) 9-19, 9-28, 9-39 Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-25, 9-32, 9-45 Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-13, 21-16 Fort Scott Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-19, 20-23 Fort Smith, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Fort Supply Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-11, 19-14 Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Fos Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-17 Foster Creek Road, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-19, 4-27 Foster Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-54 Four Pole Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 FOur River Basins, Fla. (SAJ) 9-23, 9-29, 9-41, 9-52 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 FoulRile Run, Va. (NAB) 4-12, 4-24, 4-32 Fowl River, Ala. (SAM) 10-37 Fox Point and Pawcatuck Barriers, R.I. (NED) 1-25 Fox Point Barrier, R.I. (NED) 1-23, 1-46 Fox River, Wis. (NCE) 31-7, 31- 39, 31-56 Fox River Locks and Dams, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Francis E. Walter Dam, Pa. (NAP) (NAB) 3-14, 3-20 Frankfort, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Frankfort, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-21, 24-24, 24-29 Frankfort Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-8, 31-39, 31-57 Franklin Falls Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-19, 1-33, 1-54 Franklin, W. P., Lock and Dam, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Frazer-Wolf Point, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Frazeysburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Freeport, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Freeport, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Freeport and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-9, 15-11, 15-14, 15-25 Freeport Harbor, Tex. (SWG) 15-3, 15-13, 15-18, 15-28, 15-29, 15-34 Fremont, Ohio (NCB) 32-33 French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Frenchboro Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-41 Freshwater Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-6, 11-20, 11-24 Friday Harbor Marina, Wash. (NPS) 38-3, 38-13, 38-18 Friendly, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Friendsville, Md. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 From North Little Rock to Gillett, Ark. (Above Plum Bayou) (SWL) 18-16 Fullerton, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 Fulton, Ill. (NCR) 28-5, 28-8, 28-12, 28-16 G Galax, Va. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Galena, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Galisteo Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-9, 17-11 Gallepolis Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-3, 22-8 Gallipolis, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Galveston Harbor and Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-4, 15-13, 15-19, 15-28, 15-29,15-34 Gapway Swamp, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-29, 7-8 Gardner, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-52 Gardners Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Garland City, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-32, 12-24, 12-26 Garnett Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-19, 20-23 Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-13, 21-17 Gasconade River, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Gastineau Channel, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Gate Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48, 37-56 Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5- 13, 5-18 Gauley River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-18 I-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-9, 21-13, 21-17, 21-19 }aysville Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-48 Genegantslet Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-15, 3-20 General Joe Wheeler Dam (ORN) 23-17 Geneva-On-The-Lake, Ohio (NCB) 32-6, 32-17, 32-31 irenoa Sewer Facility, N.C. (SAW) 6-13, 6-21 CGeographic Sciences Laboratory 51-1 eorge, Walter F., Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-21, 10-27, 10-36 keorge W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-20, 10-27, 10-36 leorges River, Maine (NED) 1-41 TGeorgetown Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-10, 7-13 Gering Valley, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Gila and Salt Rivers Levee and Channel Improvements, Ariz. (SPL) 33-25 Gila River Basin, Ariz. (SPL) 33-7, 33-15, 33-21, 33-25 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 kill Township Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 illham Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-11, 18-22 lill's Creek, Lancaster, S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Girty's Run, Millvale, Pa. (ORP) 26-4, 26-13 Glasgow, Mont. (MRO) 21-18, 21-21 Gleason Creek, Nev. (SPK) 35-27 Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, Mass. (NED) 1-41 oat Island, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-17 rolconda, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 lold Creek, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-12 oldsboro, Neuse River, N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-22 oleta, Calif., and Vicinity (SPL) 33-12, 33-25 looding Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-17, 39-20 loose Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 ioose Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 ordons Creek, Hattiesburg, Miss. (SAM) 10-14, 10-26, 10-35 Tordons Landing, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-31 Toshen Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Tovernor's Run, Md. (NAB) 4-37 bowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Trafton, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-22 ,rafton Small Boat Harbor, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 rahn, Ky. (ORH) 25-21 brand Bayou Pass, La. (LMN) 11-30 rand Calumet River Lock, Ind. (NCC) 28-21 rand Forks, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-26 brand Haven Harbor and Grand River, Mich. (NCE) 31-9, 31-39, 31-57, 31-77 irand Isle and Vicinity, La. (LMN) 11-14, 11-21, 11-26 Grand Lake O' the Cherokees, Okla. (SWT) 19-8, 19-13, 19-15, 19-18 Grand Marais Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Grand Marais Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-9, 31-39, 31-58 Grand Prairie, Tex., Sanitary Landfill (SWF) 16-6, 16- 14, 16-18 Grand Prairie, Tex., Streambank Erosion at Meyers Road (SWF) 16-6, 16-14, 16-18 Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, Ark., (MR+T) 42-16, 42-27, 42-50 Grand River, Grandville, Mich. (NCE) 31-76, 31-77 Grand River, Lansing, Mich. (NCE) 31-76 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-9, 31-40, 31-58 Grande Ronde Lake, Oreg. (NPW) 39-17 Grande Ronde Valley, Oreg. (NPW) 39-17, 39-19 Grandview, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Grandview Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Granger, Tex. (SWF) 16-16 Grant Parish, Below Colfax, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-32, 12-25, 12-26 Grant's Canal Lake Providence, La. (MR+ T) 42-54 Granville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Grapevine Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-6, 16-15, 16-18 Grasse River (Massena), N.Y. (NCB) 32-31 Grassy Creek, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Graves Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, Wash. (NPS) 38-3, 38-11, 38-13, 38-19 Grays Landing Lock and Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Grays Reef Passage, Mich. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Grays River, Wash. (NPP) 37-45 Grayson Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-5, 25-12, 25-16 Great Chazy River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Great Coharie Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-33 Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, N.J. (NAP) 3- 27 Great Falls, Mont. (MRO) 21-4, 21-11, 21-14 Great Kills Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Great Lakes to Hudson River Waterway, N.Y. (NAN) 2- 31 Great Miami River, Ind. (ORL) 24-27, 24-30 Great Pee Dee River, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Great Salt Plains Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-11, 19-14 Great Salt Pond, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-6, 32-17, 32-26, 32-35 Great South Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Green and Barren Rivers, Ky. (ORL) 24-2, 24-14, 24-18, 24-23, 24-27 Green Bay Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-10, 31-40, 31-58 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Green Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-6, 1-28, 1-37 1-16 INDEX Green Island Levee and Drainage District, Iowa (NCR) 28-16 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Oreg. (NPP) 37-22, 37-33, 37-44, 37-54, 37-56 Green River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Green River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-8, 24-15, 24-27 Green Valley Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-27 Greene, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Greenfield Bayou Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Greenport Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Greenup, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 Greenup Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-3, 22-8 Greenvale Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20, 5-22 Greenville, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Greenville Floodway, Tex. 16-23 Greenville Harbor, Miss. (MR +T) 42-28, 42-54 Greenwich Bay, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Greenwich Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Greenwich Point Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-48 Greenwood Beach, Evanston, Ill. (NCC) 30-6 Greers Ferry Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-8, 18-12, 18-23 Gregory Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Grenada Lake, Miss. (MR+T) 42-20, 42-57 Greybull, Wyo. (MRO) 21-18, 21-21 Griffithsville-Yawkey, W.Va. (ORH) 25-21 Grove Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Guayanes Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-46 Guilford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Gulf Beach, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. and Mexican Border (Mobile District) (SAM) 10- 7, 10-24, 10-31 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.) (LMN) 11-6, 11-20, 11-24, 11-28 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (Galveston, Tex., District) (SWG) 15-4, 15-13, 15-19, 15-28, 15-32, 15-33, 15-34 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Gulfport Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-8, 10-24, 10-31 Gull Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Guntersville Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Guttenberg, Iowa (NCS) 27-22, 27-26 Guyandotte River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-18 Gypsum, Kans. (MRK) 20-3, 20-11, 20-15 H H. V. Eastman Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-21 Hackleman Corners Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-20 Haines Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Haleiwa Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Halfmoon Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-8 Hall Meadow Brook, Conn. (NED) 1-23 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-46, 1-52 Halsite Area, Huntington, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Hamburg L-575, Iowa (MRO) 21-23 Hamlin Beach Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-31 Hamlin Beach State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-32 Hammersley Inlet, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-31 Hammonassett Beach, Madison, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Hammond Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-10, 31-40, 31-58 Hammond Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Hammondsport, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Hampton Beach, Hampton, N.H. (NED) 1-45 Hampton Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Hampton Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-6, 1-28, 1-37 Hampton Institute, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, Va.-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAO) 5- 4, 5-12, 5-15 Hampton Roads Harbor, Supervision of (NAO) 5-7, 5-13 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-14 Hanalei Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-14 Hanapepe Bay, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Hanapepe River, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36-13 Hancock Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-32, 1-53 Hanging Rock, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Hannibal, Mo. (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12 Hannibal Harbor, Mo. (NCD) 29-8 Hannibal Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Hanson, Howard A., Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-7, 38-15, 38- 20 Harbor Beach Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-11, 31-40, 31-58 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Harbor of Refuge, Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-5, 3-18, 3-23 Harbor of Refuge, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Harbor of Refuge and Pt. Judith Pond, R.I. (NED) 1-9, 1-29, 1-38, 1-48 Harden, Cecil M., Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-7, 24-15, 24-27 Harkers Island Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Harlan County Lake, Nebr. (MRK) 20-3, 20-12, 20-15, 20-23 Harlem River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Harpers Ferry, W. Va. (NAB) 4-37 Harpswell, Maine (NED) 1-23 Harraseeket River, Maine (NED) 1-41 Harriet Island Harbor, St. Paul, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Harris Fork Creek, Tenn. and Ky. (MR+T) 42-56 Harrisburg, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Harrison County, Miss. (SAM) 10-39 I-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 iLa risonri e i dvee and Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Harrisville Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-11, 31-40, 31-59 Harrodsburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (MRK) 20-9, 20-14, 20-18, 20-23 Harsha, William H., Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-12, 24-17, 24- 27 Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-52 Hartford, Vt. (NED) 1-46, 1-52 Hartford, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Hartland, Maine (NED) 1-23 Hartwell Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-9, 14-11 Hartwell Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-8, 8-12, 8-15, 8-17 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, La. (LMN) 11-32 Hastings, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Hastings Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Haverhill, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Havre, Mont. (MRO) 21-18, 21-21 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam, Mont. (MRO) 21- 21 Hawarden, Iowa (MRO) 21-23 Hawesville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29, 24-30 Hay Creek, Birdsboro, Pa. (NAP) 3-15, 3-20 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, N.Y. (NED) 1-41 Hayden Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48, 37-55 Hays, Kans. (MRK) 20-20 Haysi, Va. (ORH) 25-19 Hayward Creek, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Hayward Creek, Quincy-Braintree, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Heise-Roberts Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-17, 39-20 Heise-Roberts Extension, Idaho (NPW) 39-17, 39-20 Helena Harbor, Ark. (LMN) 13-1, 13-7, 13-9 Hellens Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Helm Lake, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-28 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-32, 12-25, 12-26 Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Henderson, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Henderson Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Henderson County Drainage Districts Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Henderson River, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Hendrick's Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-41 Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Henry, Robert F., Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10- 26 Henry T. Rainey Dam, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Hergot Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-17 Herkimer, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 Herreid, Spring Creek, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Herring Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, Okla. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14 Hickman Harbor, Ky. (LMM) 13-2, 13-7, 13-9 Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, Calif. (SPK) 35-6, 35-21 Higginsport, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Highland Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-9, 15-15, 15-25 Highway 12, Colo. (SWA) 17-2, 17-8, 17-10 Hildebrand Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-25 Hills Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-22, 37-33, 37-44, 37- 54, 37-56 Hillsborough Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-53 Hillsborough River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-38 Hillsdale Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-4, 20-12, 20-15, 20-23 Hillview Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-4, 14-9, 14-11 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Hingham Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Hiwassee River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Hockingport, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Hodges Dam, Calif (SPL) 33-26 Hodges Village Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-34, 1-55 Hoh River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 Hoko River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Holbrook Levee, Ariz. (SPL) 33-11, 33-25 Holland Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-11, 31-41, 31-59 Holley Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48, 37-56 Holly, Colo. (SWA) 17-3, 17-8, 17-10 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach along Lake Michigan, Ill. (NCC) 30-14 Holmes Bay, Whiting, Maine (NED) 1-46 Holmes Creek, Fla. (SAM) 10-38 Holston River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Holyoke, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-52 Homer Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-7, 40-9 Hominy Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Homme Lake and Dam, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-6, 27-17 Homochitto River, Miss. (LMK) 12-22, 12-26 Homosassa River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Honey Creek Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Honey Hill Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-48 Honga River and Tar Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 429 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Honolulu Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-8, 36-10, 36- 14 Hood Canal, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Hoonah Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Hooper, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 Hop Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-32, 1-53 Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, N.H. (NED) 1-20, 1-33, 1-54 Hoquiam River, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-27 I-18 INDEX Hords Creek Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-15, 16-19 Horn Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Hornell, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-26 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Hoskins Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-5, 5-15, 5-20, 5-22 Hot Springs, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-22 Houlka Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-39 Houma Navigation Canal, La. (LMN) 11-9, 11-20, 11-25 Housatonic River, Conn. (NED) 1-41, 1-48 Housatonic River Basin, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-24, 1-52 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, Mass. (NED) 1-17, 1-32, 1- 39 Housatonic River, Salisbury, Conn. (NED) 1-46 Housatonic River, Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Houston Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-5, 15-14, 15-21, 15-28, 15-30, 15-34 Howard A. Hanson Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-7, 38-15, 38- 20 Howards Mill Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Hudson Channel, Freeport, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Hudson River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Hudson River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-21, 2-24, 2-29, 2-35, 2-37 Hudson River Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Hugo Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14 Hulah Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14 Humboldt, Tenn. (LMM) 13-4, 13-7, 13-9 Humboldt Bay, Calif (SPN) 34-9 Humboldt Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Humboldt Harbor and Bay, Calif (SPN) 34-5 Humboldt River and Tributaries, Nev. (SPK) 35-28 Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Hunting Island Beach, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-11, 7-14 Huntingdon, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 Huntington, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-52 Huntington, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, Wash. (NPP) 37-15, 37-31, 37-42 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Huntington Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-8, 24-15 Huron Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-7, 32-17, 32-26 Hurricane Barrier Operations, New (NED) England Division 1-24 Hutchins, Ky. (ORH) 25-21 HUtchinson Levee and Channel, Kans. (SWT) 19-16, 19- 18 HYannis Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Hyde County Dike, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 HYdraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes 31-35 Hydroogic Engineering Center 53-4 I lao Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-5, 36-6, 36-9, 36-11 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, Pa. (NAP) 3-25 Ice Harbor at New Castle, Del. (NAP) 3-25 Ice Harbor Lock and Dam-Lake Sacajawea, Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-12, 39-15, 39-21, 39-25 Ida Grove, Iowa (MRO) 21-18, 21-23 Iliuliuk Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Illinois and Mississippi Canal, Ill. (NCR) 28-3, 28-8 Illinois River, Ill. (MR + T) 42-19 Illinois Waterway, Ill. and Ind. (NCR) 28-2, 28-8, 28-10, 28-16, 28-19, 28-20, 28-21, 28-22 Imperial Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-21 Indian Bend Wash, Ariz. (SPL) 33-7, 33-15, 33-21 Indian Creek Area, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Indian Creek, Corydon, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Indian Creek Lake, Emerson, Iowa (MRO) 21-4, 21-12, 21-14, 21-19 Indian Grave Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Indian Island, Maine (NED) 1-23 Indian Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-5, 3-19, 3-23 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Emergency Stone Repairs, Beverly Shores, Ind. (NCC) 30-5, 30-9, 30-12 Indiana Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 30-3, 30-8, 30-11, 30-13, 30- 14 Indianapolis, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-30 Indianapolis, Ind. (Fall Creek Section) (ORL) 24-20 Indianola, Nebr. (MRK) 20-19, 20-23 Industry, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Inez, Ky. (ORH) 25-21 Inland Route, Mich. (NCE) 31-12, 31-41, 31-59 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va., to Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-25 Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del. and Md. (NAP) 3-6, 3-19, 3-23 Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, La. (LMN) 11-30 Inland Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, La. (LMN) 11-30 Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-6, 3-19, 3-23 Institute for Water Resources 53-5 Intercounty D. D., Little Sioux River, Iowa (MRO) 21-23 International Boundary Waters Boards, 49-1 International Champlain-Richelieu Board 49-1 International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board 31-35, 49-1 International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board 31-35, 49-2 I-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 International Joint Commission Board of Control (IJC) 49-1 International Kootenay Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Lake Champlain Board of Control 49-1 International Lake Erie Regulation Study Board 31-35, 49-2 International Lake Memphremagog Board 49-2 International Lake of the Woods Control Board 49-1 International Lake Superior Board of Control 31-34, 49-1 International Niagara Board of Control, 31-34, 49-1 International Niagara Committee 49-2 International Niagara Working Committee 31-34 International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Rainy Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Skagit River Board of Control 49-1 International Souris-Red Rivers Engineering Board, 49- 1 International St. Croix River Board of Control 49-1 International St. Lawrence River Board of Control 31- 35, 49-1 Interstate Bridge, Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-26, 9-32 Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla. (SAJ) 9-6, 9-26, 9-32, 9-45 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Intracoastal Waterway, Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, La. (LMN) 11-30 Investigations of Projects Under the Federal Power Act 47-1 Iola Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-16, 19-18 Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Ipswich Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Irondequoit Bay, N.Y. (NCB) 32-7, 32-17 Ironton, Ohio (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Irving Township, Jackson Co., Wis. (NCS) 27-6, 27-18 Irvington Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Isabella Lake, Kern River, Calif. (SPK) 35-7, 35-21 Island Avenue, Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-32 Island Creek, Md. (NAB)4-34 Island Creek, St. Georges Island, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Island End River, Chelsea, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Island Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, Maine (NED) 1-42 Isle of Shoals Harbor, Maine and N.H. (NED) 1-42 Islesboro (The Narrows), Maine (NED) 1-18, 1-32, 1-40 Israel R., Lancaster, N.H. (NED) 1-52 Ithaca, N.Y., Cascadilla Creek (NCB) 32-35 Ithaca, N.Y., Cayuga Inlet (NCB) 32-33 Ithaca, N.Y., Fall Creek (NCB) 32-35 J J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Jackson, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-30 Jackson and East Jackson, Miss. (SAM) 10-39 Jackson Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Jackson Hole, Wyo. (NPW) 39-17, 39-20 Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, W.Va. (ORH) 25-21 Jacksonville Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-7, 9-26, 9-33 Jadwin, General Edgar, Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-15, 3-20 Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 James River, Va. (NAO) 5-5, 5-15, 5-22 Jamestown Reservoir, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-18 Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, Wis. (NCR) 28-16 Jarvis Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Jefferson River, Bank Protection, near Waterloo, Mont. (MRO) 21-21 Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, near Three Forks, Mont. (MRO) 21-21 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24- 29 Jemez Canyon Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-5, 17-9, 17-11 Jenkins, Tom, Dam, Ohio (ORH) 25-14, 25-17 Jenkins, Tom, Reservoir, Ohio (ORH) 25-9 Jenks Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-16, 19-18 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Jeremy Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-10, 7-13 Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10- 20, 10-27, 10-36 JOBS ACT CONTRACTS AWARDED Albuquerque, New Mex., District (SWA) 17-12 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 16-23 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-36 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-25 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-21 Joe Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Joe Pool Lake (Lakeville Lake), Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-15, 16-19 John Day Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-23, 37-33, 37-44, 37-58 John Day River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46, 37-50 John Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50, 37-55 John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-16, 6-17, 6-22 John Martin Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 17-3, 17-9 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, Kans. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14 John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Va. (ORI) 25- 5, 25-12, 25-16 Johns Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-7, 9-26, 9-33, 9-45 I-20 INDEX Johnson Bay, Lubec, Maine (NED) 1-18, 1-32, 1-40, 1- 46 Johnson Bayou, La. (SWG) 15-27 Johnson Creek, Vicinity of Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48, 37-56 Johnsonburg, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26, 26-28 Johnstown, Pa. (ORP) 26-4, 26-13, 26-18, 26-26 Jones Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-4, 2-21, 2-25, 2-30 Jonesport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-42 Jordan, B. Everett, Dam and Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6- 17, 6-21 Josias River, Maine (NED) 1-42 Joyce Creek, Camden County, N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-22 Julian, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Juneau Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11, 40-13 K Kaaawa Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kaaterskill Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Kahoma Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-5, 36-9, 36-11 Kahului Beach Road, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Kahului Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-8, 36-10, 36-14 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-14 Kake Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-7, 40-9 Kalana River (South Area) Levee, Wash. (NPP) 37-50, 37-55 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek), Mich. (NCE) 31-76 Kalamazoo River (Kalamazoo), Mich. (NCE) 31-76 Kalaupapa Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Kanawha River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-2, 25-11, 25-15 Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Hawaii (POD) 36-5, 36-6, 36-9, 36-11 Kankakee River, Ill. and Ind. (NCC) 30-14 Kanopolis Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-4, 20-12, 20-15, 20-23 Kansas City, Kans. (1962 Mod.) (MRK) 20-4, 20-12, 20- 16 Kansas Citys on Mo. and Kansas Rivers, Mo. and Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Kansas River and Minor Tributaries (MRK) 20-24 Kansas River Navigation, Kans. (MRK) 20-18, 20-19 Kapaa Town, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Hawaii 14 (POD) 36- Karlson Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46 Ksilof Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (L S) 14-4, 14-9, 14-11, 14-14 Kaskaskia River, Ill. (LMS) 14-2, 14-9, 14-11 Raukauna Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Katauna Fifth Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Kaukauna First Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Kaukauna Fourth Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Kaukauna Guard Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Kaukauna Second Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Kaukauna Third Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-8 Kaunakakai Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Kaunakakai Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kaw Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Kawainui Swamp, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36-13 Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, Calif (SPK) 35-8, 35-22 Kays Creek, Utah (SPK) 35-28 Keach Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Keehi Lagoon, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Keene, N.H. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-52 Kehoe Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 Keithsburg Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Kekaha Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kelleys Island, Ohio (NCB) 32-31 Kendrick, Idaho (NPW) 39-17, 39-20 Kenmore Navigation Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38- 32 Kennebec River, Maine (NED) 1-42 Kennebunk River, Maine (NED) 1-7, 1-28, 1-37 Kenosha Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-12, 31-41, 31-59 Kentucky Lock and Dam, Ky. (ORN) 23-17 Kentucky River, Ky. (ORL) 24-2, 24-14, 24-23 Keokuk Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-8 Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, Calif (SPK) 35-28 Kerr, John H., Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-16, 6-17, 6-22 Kerr, Robert S., Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18- 19, 19-9, 19-13, 19-15, 19-17 Kerr, Robert S., Marine Terminal, Sallisaw, Okla. (SWT) 19-17 Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCC) 28-17 Ketchikan Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11, 40-12 Kewalo Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-14 Kewaunee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-13, 31-42, 31-60 Kewaunee River, Wis. (NCE) 31-77 Keweenaw Waterway, Mich. (NCE) 31-13, 31-42, 31-60 Key West, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Key West Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Keyport Harbor, N.J. (NAN) 2-5, 2-21, 2-25 Keystone Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-21, 19-8, 19-13, 19-15, 19-17 Kihei Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 King Cove Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-7, 40-9 Kings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 1-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Kingston-Edwardsville, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Kingston Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), Mass. (NED) 1-42 Kingstree Branch, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Pa. and N.Y. (ORP) 26-7, 26-14, 26-18 Kirwan, Michael J., Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26-8, 26-14, 26-19 Kishwaukee River at De Kalb, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 Kissimmee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Kittanning, Pa. (ORP) 26-28 Kittanning, Pa. Part I (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Kittanning, Pa. Part II (ORP) 26-23 Kitzmiller, Md. (NAB) 4-36, 4-38 Klamath River, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 35-28 Klutina River, Copper Center, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40- 12 Knappa Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46 Knapps Narrows, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-29 Knife River Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-14, 31-42, 31-60 Knights Valley Lake, Calif. (SPN) 34-9 Knightville Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-14, 1-30, 1-51 Knobb's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Kodiak Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Kootenai River, Idaho and Mont. (NPS) 38-24, 38-27 Kualoa Regional Park, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kuliouou Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36-13 L L'Anguille Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-27 L'Anguille River, Ark. (MR + T) 42-18 La Conner, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 La Crosse, Wis. (NCS) 27-22 La Farge Lake and Channel Improvement, Wis. (NCS) 27-7, 27-18 La Grange Bayou, Fla. (SAM) 10-37, 10-38 La Grange Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-19, 28-20 La Pointe Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-14, 31-42, 31-60 La Trappe, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Lac La Belle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-14, 31-42, 31-61 Lac Qui Parle Lake, Minnesota River, Minn. (NCS) 27- 6, 27-18 Lacey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCC) 28-17 Lacey, Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 Lackawanna, N.Y. (NCB) 32-33 Lackawanna River Basin, Pa. (NAB) 4-12, 4-32 Lafayette Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-21 Lafayette River, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Lago De Cerrillos, P.R. (SAJ) 9-41 Lago De Portugues, P.R. (SAJ) 9-41 Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-7, 27-18 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur-Bulkheads and Jetties (LMN) 11-30 Lake Brownwood Modification, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Lake Bryan, Wash. (NPW) 39-6 Lake Camanche, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 Lake Celilo, Wash. and Oreg. (NPP) 37-24, 37-33, 37-44, 37-58 Lake Champlain Narrows, N.Y. and Vt. (NAN) 2-7, 2- 22, 2-25 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, La. (LMN) 11-30 Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, N.Y. (ORP) 26- 23 Lake City Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Lake Crockett, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-32 Lake Darling, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-7, 27-18 Lake Douglas, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, Ohio and Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Lake Francis Case, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-13 Lake Georgetown, Tex. (SWF) 16-16 Lake Greeson, Ark. (LMK) 12-8, 12-15, 12-23 Lake Herbert G. West, Wash. (NPW) 39-7 Lake Hudson, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Lake Kemp, Tex. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-15 Lake Meredith, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, Ill. (NCC) 30-14 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, Ill. (NCC) 30-14 Lake Montauk Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-21, 2-25 Lake Neatahwanta, Fulton, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11 Lake Ocklawaha, Fla. (SAJ) 9-4 Lake Ogleton, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Lake Oroville, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 Lake Ouachita (Blakely Mountain Dam), Ark. (LMK) 12-7, 12-15, 12-23 Lake Pontchartrain, La. (MR + T) 42-15, 42-54 Lake Pontchartrain, La. Project Levees (MR+T) 42-43, 42-47 Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, La., (Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-15, 11-21, 11-26 Lake Providence Harbor, La. (LMK) 12-2, 12-14, 12-1 Lake River, Wash. (NPP) 37-45 Lake River Delta Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-50, 37-55 Lake Rousseau, Fla. (SAJ) 9-4 Lake Sacajawea, Wash. (NPW) 39-5 Lake Sakakawea, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-13 Lake Sharpe, S. Dak (MRO) 21-7, 21-12 Lake Shelbyville, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Lake Sidney Lanier, Ga. (SAM) 10-27, 10-36 I-22 INDEX Lake St. Clair, Mich., Channels (NCE) 31-15, 31-42, 31- 61 Lake Texoma, Tex. and Okla. (SWT) 19-8, 19-13, 19-15 Lake Thunderbird, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Lake Traverse, Minn. and S. Dak. (NCS) 27-21 Lake Traverse and Boise De Sioux River, S. Dak. and Minn. (NCS) 27-8, 27-18 Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-23, 37-33, 37-44, 37-58 Lake Wallula, Wash. (NPW) 39-8, 39-10 Lake Washington Ship Canal, Wash. (NPS) 38-4, 38-14, 38-19, 38-32 Lakeport Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 Lakeshore Park, Ashtabula, Ohio (NCB) 31-12, 32-19 Lakeview Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-15, 16-19 lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio (NCB) 32-11, 32-19 Lamoille River, Vt. (NAN) 2-33, 2-35 Lamprey River, N.H. (NED) 1-42 Lancaster, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Lancaster, N.H. (NED) 1-23, 1-46 Lancaster, N.Y. (NCB) 32-33 Langdon Park, Wilmette, Ill. (NCC) 30-6 Langellier Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCC) 28-17 Lansing (Grand River), Mich. (NCE) 31-77 Lansing Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Larchmont Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Largo Sound Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Lamed, Kans. (SWA) (SWT) 17-3, 17-9, 17-10, 19-18 roe to Golden Meadow, La. (Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-16, 11-22, 11-26 La Animas, Colo. (SWA) 17-11 1s Cruces, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-11 Las Tunas Beach, Calif (SPL) 33-24 LasV4e8g as Wash Tributaries, Nev. (SPL) 33-26 Latrobe, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26, 26-28 Latta Brook Road, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-24, 4-32 Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ky. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Lava Hot Springs, Idaho (NPW) 39-18 Lavaca-Navidad River, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Lavon Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-15, 16-19 LaVon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel LIamwpnrcoev,e ment, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-15, 16-19 Kans. (MRK) 20-4, 20-12, 20-16, 20-23 nceburg, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Lead Bayou, Miss. (LMK) 12-8, 12-15, 12-18 Ling Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Le_ and Chickasawhay River, Miss. (SAM) 10-38 Leavenworth, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Leaon Junction, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Lee0 lire Lock (Canal), Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Le, Mas. (NED) 1-23, 1-46 , County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Lh Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Leesville, Va., Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo. Project (SAW) 6-14, 6-22 Leetonia, Ohio (ORP) 26-22 Leetsdale, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Lehigh River at Allentown, Pa. (NAP) 3-15 Lehigh River at Bethlehem, Pa. (NAP) 3-15 Leipsic River, Del. (NAP) 3-25 Leith's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Leith's Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Leland Bowman Lock, La. (formerly Vermilion Lock) (LMN) 11-9, 11-21, 11-25 Leland Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-15, 31-43, 31-61 Lemon Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Les Cheneaux Islands, Channels, Mich. (NCE) 31-75 Letart, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Letart Falls, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Levee Unit No. 1, Ill. (ORL) 24-21 Levee Unit No. 5, Ind. (ORL) 24-3, 24-14, 24-29 Levee Unit No. 8, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Levees (LMK) (LMS) (MR+ T) (ORL) 42-4, 42-9, 42-23, 42-27, 42-44, 42-45, 42-47, 42-54, 42-55, 42-57, 14-14, 24-22, 24-25 Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W. Va., Va., and Ky. (ORH) 25-6, 25-12, 25-16 Lewes, Del. (NAP) 3-12 Lewis and Clark Lake, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-9, 21-13, 21-17 Lewis and Clark River Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46 Lewis River, Wash. (NPP) 37-7, 37-28, 37-38 Lewis River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-50, 37-55 Lewisport, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, Idaho and Wash. (NPW) 39-6, 39-12, 39-16 Lewisville Dam, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-15, 16-19 Lexington Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-15, 31-43, 31-61 Libby Dam-Lake Koocanusa, Mont. (NAS) 38-10, 38-16, 38-22 Liberty Local Protection Project, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, N.J. (NAN) (NAP) 2-33 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va. (SAW) 6-29 Licking River, Ky. (ORL) 24-19, 24-30 Lido Key, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Lighthouse Point Park, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Lincoln, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Lincoln, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Lincoln Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-22 Linton, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-18 Lisle, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-26 1-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Little Bay, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31- 74, 31-75 Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Mo. (MRK) 20- 5, 20-12, 20-16 Little Blue River Lakes, Mo. (MRK) 20-5, 20-12, 20-16 Little Caillou Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-30 Little Calumet River, Ill. (NCC) 30-6, 30-9, 30-14 Little Chute Combined Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Little Chute Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Little Chute First (Guard) Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Little Chute Second Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Little Creek, Kent Island, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Little Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-8 Little Cypress Bayou Levee, Tex. (SWG) 15-11 Little Dell Lake, Utah (SPK) 35-25 Little Egg Harbor, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Little Goose Lock and Dam-Lake Bryan, Wash. (NPW) 39-6, 39-12, 39-16, 39-22, 39-25 Little Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-42 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Little Kanawha River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-18 Little Kaukauna Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Little Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-16, 31-43, 31-61 Little Machipongo River, Va. (NAO) 5-20, 5-22 Little Manatee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Little Missouri River, Ark. (LMK) 12-22, 12-23 Little Narragansett Bay, R.I. (NED) 1-42 Little Neck Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Little Nemaha River, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18 Little Papillion, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Little Pee Dee and Pee Dee Rivers, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Little River, Del. (NAP) 3-25 Little River, La. (LMK) 12-22 Little River at Cayuga Island, N.Y. (NCB) 32-31 Little River Basin (Little Rock District) (SWL) 18-4, 18- 10, 18-22 Little River (Creek), Va. (NAO) 5-20 Little River Dike, Westfield, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Little River Diversion Channel, Mo. (MR+T) 42-19 Little River Inlet, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-10, 7-13 Little River Project Levees (MR + T) 42-46 Little Rock Levee, Ark. (East End Fourche Bayou) (SWL) 18-14, 18-16 Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Little Sioux River and Tributaries, Iowa (MRO) 21-4, 21-12, 21-14 Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-7, 32-17, 32-26 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Little Tallahatchie River, Miss. (LMK) 12-22 Little Tennessee River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Little Valley Wash, Magna, Utah (SPK) 35-29 Little Wicomico River, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Little Wood River, Idaho (NPW) 39-19, 39-20 Littleville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-14, 1-30, 1-51 Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Lloyd Park, Winnetka, Ill. (NCC) 30-6 Lock and Dam No. 1, Minn. (NCD) 29-5, 29-9 Lock and Dam No. 2, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 2, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-18 Lock and Dam No. 2, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 2, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 3, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 3, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-18 Lock and Dam No. 3, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 3, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 4, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 4, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-18 Lock and Dam No. 4, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 4, Wis. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 5, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 5, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-18 Lock and Dam No. 5, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 5A, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 6, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 6, Wis. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 7, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 7, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 7, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 8, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 8, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 8, Wis. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 9, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 9, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-18 Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. 19-17 Lock and Dam No. 9, Wis. (NCD) 29-5 10, Iowa (NCD) 29-5 11, Ark. (SWL) 18-19 11, Iowa (NCD) 29-5 12, Iowa (NCD) 29-5 13, Ark. (SWL) (SWT) 18-3, 18-19, 13, Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 14, Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 15, Ill. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 16, Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 17, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 18, Iowa (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 19, Iowa (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 20, Mo. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 21, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 22, Mo. (NCD) 29-6 I-24 INDEX Lock and Dam No. 24, Mo. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 25, Mo. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 26, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 52, Ill. (ORD) 22-10 Lock and Dam No. 53, Ill. (ORD) 22-10 Lock 8-53, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock 8-55, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock 8-57, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock 8-58, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-59, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-60, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-61, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock 8-62, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock 8-63, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-63A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock 8-65, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65B, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65C, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65D, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65E, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-96, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-96A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock 8-157, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-158, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock 8-193, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-308B, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock 8-310, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock Haven, Pa. (NAB) 4-36 Locklies Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Lockport Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-19, 28-20 Icks in Pearl River Project, La. (LMK) 12-21 Lockwoods Folly River, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-19 Logan, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Logan Creek, Bank Protection, near Bancroft, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Lone Rock, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Long Beach Island, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Long Branch Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-5, 20-12, 20-16 Longt Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2- 21, 2-25, 2-30 Long Lake Area, Helena, Ark. (LMM) 13-10 Long Torn River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 gboat Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-33, 9-45, 9-46 kout Point Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-23, 37-33, 37-44, 37-54, 37-56 Lopez Canyon Diversion, Los Angeles River Basin, Caif. (SPL) 33-27 pez Dam, Los Angeles River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-27 rain Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-8, 32-17, 1Ageles 32-27 and Long Beach Harbors, Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-13, 33-18 L33Angeles County Drainage Area, Calif. (SPL) 33-8, -i10, 33-15, 33-22, 33-27 IosCoches Creek, Calif (SPL) 33-29 Lost Creek, Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-5, 21-12, 21-14 Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28- 14, 28-17 Lost Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-24, 37-33, 37-44, 37-54 Lost River, Minn. (NCS) 27-22, 27-26 Louisville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Louisville Lake, Ill. (ORL) 24-21, 24-28 Loup River, Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18 Lowell, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-54 Lowell Creek, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-12 Lower Arkansas River, Ark. (MR+T) 42-16, 42-27, 42- 52, 42-55 Lower Arkansas River Basin, Ark. (MR + T) 42-7 Lower Big Sioux River, Iowa and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-18 Lower Branch Rush River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-22, 27-26 Lower Columbia River Basin, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-16, 37-31, 37-42, 37-55 Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-17, 37-31, 37-42 Lower Cowlitz River, Wash. (NPP) 37-46 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, Wash. (NPW) 39-18 Lower Gila River Levee and Channel Improvements (Gila River and Tributaries) Downstream from Painted Rock Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-25 Lower Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-7, 39- 12, 39-16, 39-23, 39-25 Lower Guyandotte River Basin, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Lower Heart River, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-18 Lower Machodoc Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-7, 39-12, 39-16, 39-23, 39-25 Lower Red River-South Bank, Red River Levees, La. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-15, 42-27, 42-44, 42-47, 42-55 Lower Red River Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-32, 42-36 Lower San Francisco Bay, Calif (SPN) 34-8 Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, Calif (SPK) 35-9, 35-22, 35-28 Lower Snake River, Wash., Oreg., Idaho, Fish and Wildlife Compensation (NPW) 39-8, 39-12, 39-16 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Lower Walla Walla River, Wash. (NPW) 39-18, 39-20 Lower White River and Basin, Ark. (MR +T) 42-10, 42- 17, 42-27, 42-51 Lower White River Levees (MR+T) 42-10, 42-46, 42-51, 42-55 Lower Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-46, 1-51 Lowes Wharf, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-30 Loyalhanna Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-7, 26-14, 26-19 Loyalsock, Pa. (NAB) 4-39 Lubec, Maine (NED) 1-23 Lubec Channel, Maine (NED) 1-42 I-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Lucky Peak Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-3, 39-11, 39-15 Ludington Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-16, 31-43, 31-61 Ludlow, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Ludlow Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-48 Lukfata Lake, Okla. and Ark. (SWT) 19-16 Lumber River, N.C. and S.C (SAN) 7-17 Lutsen Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-75 Lyford Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Lyman, Idaho (NPW) 39-20 Lyman Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-18, 39-20 Lynches River and Clark Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Lynn Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Lynn-Nahant Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Lynnhaven Inlet, Va. (NAO) 5-6, 5-12, 5-16, 5-22 Lytle and Warm Creeks, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 M Maalaea Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Macdowell, Edward, Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-19, 1-32, 1-54 Machias River, Maine (NED) 1-42 Mackay Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-30 Mackinac Island Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-75 Mackinaw City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-75 Macon, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Macy, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Mad Creek, Muscatine, Iowa (NCR) 28-17 Mad River, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-51 Mad River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 Mad River Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-46 Madison, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25, 24-30 Madison, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Madison Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Madison Parish Port, La. (LMK) 12-2, 12-14, 12-17 Magruder Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46, 37-50, 37-55 Mahoning Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-7, 26-14, 26-19 Maiden Creek Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-27 Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-20 Malden River, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Malheur Improvement District, Oreg. (NPW) 39-18 Malheur River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-18, 39-19, 39-20 Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Manasquan River, N.J. (NAP) 3-7, 3-19, 3-23 Manatee County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-40, 9-45, 9-46, 9-47 Manatee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Manchester, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Manchester Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-48 Mandan, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Manele Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Manhasset Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Manhattan, Kans. (MRK) 20-19, 20-23 Maniece Bayou, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-32, 12-24, 12-26 Manistee Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-16, 31-43, 31-61 Manistique Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-17, 31-44, 31-62 Manitowoc Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-17, 31-44, 31-62 Mankato and North Mankato, Minn. (NCS) 27-8, 27-18 Mann's Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Manokin River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Mansfield Hollow Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-34, 1-55 Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-19 Mantua Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Maple River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-23 Mapleshade, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Marais de Cygnes River, Kan. (MRK) 20-9 Marblehead Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-48 Marengo, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Marietta, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Marina Del Rey, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Marion, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-28 Marion, Kans. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-15 Marion County Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28- 17 Marion Diversion Channel and Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19- 18 Marion Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-6, 19-12, 19-15 Markham Ferry Lake, Okla. (SWL) 18-21 Markham Ferry Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-17, 19-18 Markland Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 Marmarth, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Marquette Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-18, 31-44, 31-62 Marseilles Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-19 Marsh Creek, Geneva, N.Y. (NCB) 32-33 Marsh River, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Marshall, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Marshalltown, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Marshland Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46 Martin, John, Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 17-3, 17-9 Martin, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 Martins Ferry, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Martins Fork Lake, Ky. (ORN) 23-5, 23-9, 23-18 Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, Nev. and Calif. (SPK) 35-9, 35-22 Marysville, Kans. (MRK) 20-20 Marysville Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 Mason, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Mason and Menard Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Mason J. Niblack Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-4, 24-14, 24-20, 24-24, 34-29 Massillon, Ohio (ORH) 25-6, 25-12, 25-16 Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa (POD), 36-4, 36-9 Matagorda Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-6, 15-14, 15- 22, 15-30, 15-34 Matawan Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-6, 2-22, 2-25 I-26 INDEX Matinicus Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-42 Mats Mats Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Mattapoisett Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-48 Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Matunuck Beach, South Kingston, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Mauckport, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Maumee River, above Toledo, Ohio (NCB) 32-35 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Maurice River, N.J. (NAP) 3-25, 3-28 Maxwell Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-8, 9-26, 9-33, 9-45 Mayo, W. D., Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-19, 19-17 Mayse, Pat, Lake, Tex. (SWT) 19-6, 19-12, 19-15 Maysville, Ky. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 McAlpine Locks and Dam (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System (SWT) 19-2, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 McCook Lake, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-18 McDonald Dike Road, Ore. (NPP) 37-17, 37-31, 37-42 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9, 14-12 McGinnis Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 McKees Rocks, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 McKenzie River near Walterville, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 McKinney Bayou, Ark. and Tex. (LMN) 11-17, 11-22, 11-26 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-32, 12-24, 12-26 McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 McNary Lock and Dam-Lake Wallula-Oreg. and Wash. (NPW) 39-8, 39-10, 39-12, 39-16, 39-24 Meadow Grove, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Medomak River, Maine (NED) 1-42 Meherrin River, N.C. (NAO) 5-20 Melbourne Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-8, 9-26, 9-34 Meldahl Captain Anthony, Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) M22-3, 22-8 Melton Hill Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Melvern Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-6, 20-13, 20-16, 20-23 Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), %ans. (MRK) 20-23 Memphis Harbor, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-28 Memphis Harbor Project Levees (MR+ T) 42-46, Memphis, 42-47 Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. (IlMM) 13-10 Menasha Lock and Dam (NCE) 31-73 Menemsha Creek, Martha's Vineyard, Mass. (NED) 1- 42 Menominee Harbor and River, Mich. and Wis. (NCE) 3 1-i8, 31-44, 31-63 Meramec Park Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-4, 14-9 Meramec River Basin, Mo. (LMS) 14-4, 14-11, 14-13 Merce3 County Stream Group, Calif. (SPK) 35-10, 35- 22, 35-3i Merced County Streams, Calif. (SPK) 35-19, 35-25 Merced River, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 Mercer Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Meredosia, Ill., and Meredosia, Willow Creek, and Coon Run Drainage and Levee Districts, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9, 14-12 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9, 14-12, 14-14 Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28- 14, 28-17 Mermentau River, La. (LMN) 11-10, 11-21, 11-25 Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, La. (LMN) 11-30 Merriam, Kans. (MRK) 20-20 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, Maine (NED) 1-46 Merrimack River, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Merrimack River Basin, N.H. and Mass. (NED) 1-19, 1- 24, 1-54 Metamora Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27 Methow River, Wash. (NAS) 38-27 Metlakatla Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-7, 40-9 Metropolis, Ill. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Miami Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-8, 9-26, 9-34, 9-45 Miami River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 Mianus River, Conn. (NED) 1-7, 1-28, 1-37 Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26- 8, 26-14, 26-19 Michigan City Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 30-4, 30-8, 30-11, 30- 13, 30-14 Middle Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Middle Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 Middle Gila River Channel Improvements, Upper End of Safford Valley to Buttes Damsite (Camelsback Damsite to Salt River), Ariz. (SPL) 33-25 Middle River and Connecting Channels, Calif. (SPK) 35- 27 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Middleport, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Middlesboro, Ky. (ORN) 23-5, 23-9 Middlesboro, Ky. (Diversion Canal) (ORN) 23-19 Middlesboro, Ky. (Yellow Creek) (ORN) 23-13, 23-18, 23-19 Middleton Shoals, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-17 Midland Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46, 37-48, 37-55 Milan, Ill. (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12 Miles City, Mont. (MRO) 21-18 Milford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Milford Haven, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Milford Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-6, 20-13, 20-16, 20-23 Mill Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Mill Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Mill Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Mill Creek, Ohio (ORL) (ORH) 24-4, 24-14, 25-20 I-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Mill Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Mill Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Mill Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-19, 39-20 Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, Ill. (NCR) 28-3, 28-8, 28-11 Mill Creek Lake, Wash. (NPW) 39-3, 39-11, 39-15 Mill Four Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Mill Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Miller, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Miller Pond Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10-26 Millersburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Millican Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-15, 16-19 Millwood, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18- 11, 18-22 Milton, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Milton, Pa. (NAB) 4-39 Milton-Freewater, Oreg. (NPW) 39-18 Milton Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-6, 2-22, 2-25 Milwaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-19, 31-44, 31-63 Mineral Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Mines Creek, Wis. (NCS) 27-26 Mingo Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Mingo Junction, Ohio (ORP) 26-23 Mining City Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-27 Minneota, Minn. (NCS) 27-22, 27-26 Minnesota River, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-17, 27-20 Minot, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-22, 27-26 Mispillion River, Del. (NAP) 3-8, 3-17, 3-19, 3-24 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, Idaho (NPW) 39-18 Mission Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-20 Mission Zanja Creek, Calif (SPL) 33-29 Mississinewa Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-9, 24-16 Mississippi and Leech Rivers, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Mississippi Delta Region, La. (MR+T) 42-27 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 8, Mo. (LMS) 14-6, 14-9, 14-12 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Alluvial Valley Mapping (MR+T) 42- 3 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, Ill., Underseepage Measures (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River and Alluvial Valley below Cape Girardeau, Mo. (MR+ T) 42-2 Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR + T) 42-1 to 42- 60 Mississippi River and Tributaries-Channel Improvements (MR � T) 42-4 Mississippi River and Tributaries-Levees (MR + T) 42-4 Mississippi River at Alton, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Mississippi River at St. Louis, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Bank Revetments and Dikes iMR+T) 42-29, 42-33, 42-38 Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, La. (LMN) 11-10, 11-21, 11-25 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. (NCS) 29-1, 29-4, 29-10 Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, Mo. and Ill. (LMS) 14-2, 14-9, 14-11 Mississippi River Channel Improvements (MR + T) 42- 27, 42-48, 42-49, 42-51 Mississippi River Commission (MR + T) 42-1 Mississippi River Delta at and below New Orleans, La., (New Orleans to Venice, La., Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-22 Mississippi River Delta Region, La. (MR+T) 42-56 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, La. (LMN) 11-12, 11-21, 11-25 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, La. (LMN) 11-30 Mississippi River Headwater Reservoirs, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-20, 27-24 Mississippi River Improvements (MR+T) 42-11 Mississippi River Levees (MR+T) 42-10, 42-27, 42-42, 42-44, 42-45 Mississippi River Main Stem Channel Improvements (MR + T) 42-28 Mississippi River near Aitkin, Minn. (NCS) 27-22 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, La. (LMN) 11-13, 11- 21, 11-26 Mississippi River Project Levees (MR + T) 42-42, 42-44, 42-45 Mississippi River Tributary and Outlet Improvements (MR+T) 42-13 Mississippi River Tributary Dams and Lakes (MR+T) 42-20 Mississquoi River at Richford, Vt. (NAN) 2-33, 2-37 Missouri National Recreational River, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-5, 21-12, 21-14 Missouri River, Mo. (MR+T) 42-19 Missouri River at New Haven, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Missouri River, Aten, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18 Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-22 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton, Mont. (MRO) 21-21 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-5, 21-12, 21-14 Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, Nebr. to Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-5, 21-12, 21-14 Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr., Kans., and Mo. (Rulo, Nebr. to Mouth) (MRK) 20-6, 20-13, 20-16, 20-22, 20-23 I-28 INDEX Missouri River Main Stem (MRK) 20-24 Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-23 Missouri River, Niobrara, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Fort Benton, Mont. (MRO) 21-17 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Mouth (Rulo, Nebr., to Mouth) (MRK) 20-2, 20-11, 20-14, 20-20 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Mouth, Terminal Facilities (MRK) 20-21 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebr. (MRO) 21-2, 21-11, 21-13, 21-19 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebr., Terminal Facilities (MRO) 21-20 Mobile Bay, Ala. to New Orleans, La. (SAM) 10-31 Mobile Harbor, Ala. (SAM) 10-9, 10-24, 10-32 Mocassin Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Moccasin Springs, Mo. (LMS) 14-13 Moclips River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Mojave River Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-9, 33-16, 33-22 Mokelumne River, Calif (SPK) 35-27 Molalla River at Milk Creek location, Oreg. (NPP) 37- 49 Molalla River at Ressel location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Moline, Ill. (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12 Moline Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 Monongahela River, Pa. and W. Va. Locks and Dams (ORP) 26-2, 26-13, 26-17, 26-25, 26-26 Monoosnoc Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Monoosnoc Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Monroe, La., floodwall extension (LMK) 12-23 Monroe Bay and Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Monroe Floodwall, La. (LMK) 12-8, 12-15, 12-18 Monroe Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-19, 31-45, 31-63 Monroe Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-9, 24-16, 24-27 Montcalm, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Monterey Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-8 Montgomery Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-2, 22-7 Montour Falls, N.Y. (NCB) 32-33 Moore Haven Lock, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Moorefield, W. Va. (NAB) 4-37 Moores Ferry, Va. (ORH) 25-19 Moorhead, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Mooring for Battleship Oregon, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Moosabec Bar, Maine (NED) 1-42 Morehead, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Morehead City Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-6, 6-20 Morgan City and Vicinity, La. (LMN) 11-17, 11-22, 11- 27 Morgantown Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-25 Morganza Floodway, La. (MR + T) 42-48 Moriches Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-6, 2-22 Mormon Slough, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 Morison, Colo. (MRO) 21-19 Morrison Creek Stream Group, Calif. (SPK) 35-18 Morristown Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-31 Morro Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-13, 33-19 Moscow, Ohio (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio (ORP) 26- 8, 26-14, 26-19 Moss Bluff Lock, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Moss Landing Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Mott, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-18 Mound City Locks and Dam, Ill. (ORD) 22-1, 22-10 Mounds and Mound City, Ill. (LMM) 13-10 Moundsville, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 31-76 Mount St. Helens and Vicinity, Wash. (NPP) 37-17, 37- 31, 37-42 Mountain Brook Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-48 Mountain Park Reservoir (Tom Steed Lake), Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Mouth of Yazoo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-22 Moyock Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Ind. (NCC) 30-5, 30-8, 30-12 Mt. Carmel, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Mt. Holly, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y. (NCB) 32-14, 32-19 Mt. St. Helens Emergency Measures, Wash. (NPP) 37- 15 Mud and Basket Slough, Rickreall Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Mud Creek, Broken Bow, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Mud Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Mud Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-18, 39-20 Mud Lake Pumping Station, Tenn. (MR+ T) 42-27 Mud Mountain Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-8, 38-15, 38-21 Mud River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Muddy Creek Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Muddy Creek near Syracuse, Neb. (MRO) 21-5, 21-12, 21-15 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4- 30 Mulberry Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Mullet Key, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Multnomah Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Multnomah Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46, 37- 48, 37-55 Muncie, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Munday Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Murder Creek, East Brewton, Ala. (SAM) 10-14, 10-26, 10-35 Murderkill River, Del. (NAP) 3-8, 3-9, 3-17 Murfreesboro Dam and Lake (LMK) 12-26 Murray Lock & Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-18 Murrells Inlet, S.C. (SAN) 7-6, 7-10, 7-13 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, Ind. (ORL) 24-30 I-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Muscatine, Iowa (Mad Creek) (NCR) 28-14 Muscatine Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Muscatine Island L. and D. D., Louisa D. D. No. 13, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Muscooten Bay, Ill. (NCR) 28-3, 28-8, 28-11 Muskegon Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-20, 31-45, 31-64 Muskingum River, Ohio (ORH) 25-18 Muskingum River Lakes, Ohio (ORH) 25-6, 25-13, 25-16 Mustinka River, Minn. (NCS) 27-25, 27-26 Myers Chuck Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Myrtle Beach, S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Mystic, Conn. (NED) 1-48 Mystic River, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Mystic River, Mass. (NED) 1-7, 1-28, 1-37 N Naches River, Naches, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Nagel Drainage District, Iowa (MRO) 21-23 Nahunta Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Naknek River, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Namo River, Territory of Guam (POD) 36-6, 36-13 Nan Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Nandua Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Nansemond River, Va. (NAO) 5-20, 5-22 Nantasket Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Nanticoke River, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Nanticoke River (including Northwest Fork), Del. and Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-30 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), Mass. (NED) 1-42 Napa River, Calif (SPN) 34-5 Napa River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 Napatree Beach, R.I. (NED) 1-48 Narragansett Pier, R.I. (NED) 1-48 Narraguagus River, Maine (NED) 1-42 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Ark. (LMK) 12-8, 12-15, 12-23 Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. and Vt. (NAN) 2-7, 2-22, 2-25, 2-30 Nashua, N.H. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-54 Natchez Port Area, Miss. (LMK) 12-26 Natchitoches Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-32, 12-25, 12-26 National Dam Safety Program (MRO) 21-9 National Emergency Management Activities, Huntington, W.Va., District (ORH) 25-10 National Emergency Preparedness Activities, 48-1 Natural Disaster Activities, New York District (NAN) 2-19 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response and Recovery Activities, 43-1 Navajo Reservoir, N. Mex. (SPK) 35-27 Navarro Mills Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-15, 16-19 Navasota Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Navigation Aids (U.S. Coast Guard), Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Navigation Locks and Dams, Ark. (SWL) 18-10 Navigation Work under Special Authorization (Calcasieu Pass Channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, La.) (LMN) 11-30 Nawiliwili Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-3, 36-8, 36-10, 36- 14 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36- 14 Neabsco Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Neah Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Neale Sound, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 Neavitt Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, Tex. (SWG) 15-11 Needles, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Nehalem Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-28, 37-38 Neodesha Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-21, 19-16, 19-17 Neon-Fleming, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Neptune City, N.J. (NAN) 2-36 Neshaminy State Park Harbor (NAP) 3-25 Nestucca River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Neuse River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-30 Neuse River Barrier, N.C. (SAW) 6-30, 6-32 Neuse River Basin, N.C. (SAW) 6-14 Neva and Olga Straits, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Nevile Island, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 New Albany, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 New Amsterdam, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, Mass. (NED) 1-42 New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, Mass. (NED) 1- 20, 1-33, 1-40 New Bedford-Fairhaven Barrier, Mass. (NED) 1-25 New Boston Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 New Buffalo Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-20, 31-45, 31-64 New Bullards Bar, Calif (SPK) 35-28 New Cumberland, W. Va. (ORP) 26-23 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, Ohio (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 New Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-42 New Harmony, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25, 24-30 New Harmony Bridge, Ill. and Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-21, 24-24 New Haven Breakwater, Conn. (NED) 1-42 New Haven Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-8, 1-28, 1-37 New Hope Lake (B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake), N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-17, 6-21 New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NAP) 3-9, 3-19 New Kensington and Parnassus, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 I-30 INDEX New Lock and Dam 26, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 New London, Conn. (NED) 1-20, 1-23, 1-33, 1-40 New London Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-8, 1-28, 1-38 New Madrid Harbor, Mo. (LMM) 13-2, 13-7, 13-9 New Martinsville, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 New Matamoras, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 New Melones Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-17 New Orleans to Venice, La. Hurricane Protection (LMN) 11-18, 11-22, 11-27 New Pass, Sarasota, Fla. (SAJ) 9-34, 9-45, 9-46 New Richmond, Ohio (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 New River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 New River, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 New River, Onslow County, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 New River, Va. and W. Va. (ORH) 25-18 New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 New York and New Jersey Channels, (NAN) 2-8, 2-22, 2-26, 2-29, 2-35 New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAN) 2-9, 2-22, 2-26 New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas (NAN) 2-9, 2-22, 2-26 New York Harbor, Supervisor of (NAN) 2-12, 2-23, 2- 29, 2-30 Newark, Ohio (ORH) 25-7, 25-13, 25-16, 25-21 Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, N.J. (NAN) 2-7, 2-22, 2-25, 2-35 Newaukum River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Newbegun Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Newburgh, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-31 Newburgh Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 Newburyport Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Newhall Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-29 Newmarket Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Newport, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Newport, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-21, 24-24, 24-29 Newport, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Newport Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-24, 33-27 Newport Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-42 Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Newport News Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Newport News Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Newry-Old Pickens Dam and Lake, S.C. (SAS) 8-17 Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 19, 19-17 18- Newtown Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Niagara Remedial Works, N.Y. (NCB) 32-31 Niagara River, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11, 32-35 Niantic Bay and Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Niblack, Mason J., Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-4, 24-14, 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Nicholasville, (Townfork) Vicinity, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Nichols, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Nickajack Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Ninrod Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-11, 18-21 Ninilchik Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-8, 40-10 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, Iowa (MRO) 21-18, 21- 23 Nisqually River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Nixon Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 Nolin Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-9, 24-16, 24-27 Nome Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-8, 40-10 Nomini Bay and Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13- 10 Nonewaug River, Conn. (NED) 1-18, 1-32, 1-39 Nookagee Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Nooksack River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Norfolk, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Norfolk Floodwall, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Norfolk Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-6, 5-12, 5-16, 5-22 Norfork Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-8, 18-12, 18-23 Normal, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 Norman Reservoir (Lake Thunderbird), Okla. (SWT) 19- 18 Norrell Lock & Dam (No. 1) & Entrance Channel, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-18 North Adams, Mass. (NAN) 2-33 North Alexander Drainage an, Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 North Andover and Lawrence, Mass. (NED) 1-48 North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25- 7, 25-13, 25-16 North Canaan, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-53 North Ellenville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 North Fork of Pound River Lake, Va. (ROH) 25-7, 25- 13, 25-16 North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, Calif (SPK) 35-28 North Fork Skykomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, N.H. (NED) 1- 45 North Hartland Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-14, 1-31, 1-51 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 North Middletown, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, Mass. (NED) 1-46 North Nashua River, Lancaster, Mass. (NED) 1-46, 1-54 North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 North River Dike, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-45 North Second St., Memphis, Tenn. (Wolf River Bridge) (LMM) 13-10 North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, N.Y. (NAN) 2-32 North Springfield Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-15, 1-31, 1-51 North Stratford, N.H. (NED) 1-23, 1-52 North Wildwood, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Northampton, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-52 Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-29 I-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Northeast Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-42 Northeast River, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-23, 4-30 Northfield Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-18, 1-32, 1-52 Northport Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Northport Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-75 Norwalk, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-46 Norwalk Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Norwalk-Wilton, Conn. (NED) 1-48 Norwich, Conn. (NED) 1-46, 1-55 Norwich, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Nottoway River, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Noxubee River, Miss. (SAM) 10-38 Noyo River and Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-4, 34-5 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-6, 14-10, 14-12 O0 0. C. Fisher Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-15, 16- 19 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin S. Dak. and N. Dak. (MRO) 21-9, 21-13, 21-17 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-8, 32-18 Oakdale, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Oakford Special Drainage District (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Oakland Beach, Warwick, R.I. (NED) 1-29, 1-45 Oakland Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5, 34-9 Obey River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Obion River, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 O'Brien, T.J., Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-19, 28-20 Occohannock Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Occoquan Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Ocean Beach, Calif (SPL) 33-24 Ocean City, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-23, 4-30 Oceana, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Oceanside, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Oceanside Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-13, 33-19 Ocholockonee (Ochlockney) River, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-38 Oconto Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-21, 31-46, 31-64 Ocracoke Inlet, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-20 Ocracoke Island, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-8, 32-18, 32-27 Ohio River, Ill. and Ky. (MR +T) 42-19 Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) (ORH) 25-7, 25- 13 Ohio River Basin (Louisville Dist.) (ORL) 24-10, 24-16, 24-18, 24-24, 24-30 Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) (ORN) 23-6, 23-12, 23-18 Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) (ORP) 26-9, 26- 14, 26-19, 26-26, 26-27 Ohio River, Locks and Dams (ORD) 22-1, 22-5, 22-7 Ohio River, Open Channel Work (ORD) 22-3, 22-5, 22-6 Oil City, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Okabena Creek at Worthington, Minn. (NCR) 28-14 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers (NPS) 38-24 Okanogan River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Okanogan River, Omak, Wash. (NPS) 38-7, 38-27 Okanogan River, Oroville, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Okatibbee Lake, Miss. (SAM) 10-13, 10-25, 10-35 Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-26, 9-34, 9-44 Oklahoma City Floodway, Okla. (SWT) 19-16, 19-18 Oklawaha River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-10, 9-26, 9-35 Olcott Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11, 32-31 Old Field Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Old River, Calif. (SPK) 35-27 Old River, La. (MR+ T) 42-6, 42-27, 42-48 Old River, Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-31 Old Town, Maine (NED) 1-46 Old Town Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-38 Oldmans Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-25, 3-28 Olean, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Olive Hill, Ky. (ORH) 25-21 Olympia Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-32 Omaha, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Onaga Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Onancock River, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Oneonta, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, N.Y. (NCB) 32-33 Ontonagon Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-21, 31-46, 31-64 Oologah Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-21, 19-6, 19-12, 19-15, 19-17 Oostanaula and Coosawatee River, Ga. (SAM) 10-38 Opekiska Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-25 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORD) 22-3, 22-5, 22-6 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing (NPW) 39-25 Open River Pasco to Lewiston (NPW) 39-25 Optima Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-12, 19-15 Orange River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Orchard Beach, Bronx, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor), Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Orleans, Ind. (ORL) 24-22 Oro Grande Wash Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Orofino Creek and Clearwater River, Idaho (NPW) 39- 18 Orowoc Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 I-32 INDEX Orwell Reservoir (Ottertail River) (NCS) 27-25 Osage River, Kans. and Mo. (MRK) 20-24 Osage River, Mo., Lock and Dam (MRK) 20-18 Osawatomie, Kans. (MRK) 20-19, 20-23 Osceola Harbor, Ark. (LMM) 13-2, 13-7, 13-9 Oslo, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Oswego, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Oswego Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-9, 32-18, 32-27, 32-35 Ottawa, Kans. (MRK) 20-19, 20-23 Ottawa, Ohio (NCB) 32-33 Ottawa River Harbor, Mich. and Ohio (NCB) 32-31 Otter Brook Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-15, 1-31, 1-51 Otter Creek, Vt. (NAN) 2-31 Otter Creek Park, Ky. (ORL) 24-31 Otter Tail River, Minn. (NCS) 27-25 Ottumwa, Iowa (NCR) 28-15 Ouachita and Black Rivers, Ark. and La. (Felsenthal Canal) (LMK) 12-22 Ouachita and Black Rivers, Ark. and La., Locks and Dams (LMK) 12-20 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, Ark. (LMK) 12-2, 12-14, 12-17 Ouachita River and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-9, 12-19, 12-23 Ouachita River Levees, La. (LMK) 12-9, 12-16, 12-23 Overton-Red River Waterway, La. (LMK) 12-3, 12-14, 12-17 Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, N.Y. (NCB) 32-33 Owensboro, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Owl's Head Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-42 Oxford, Md. (NAB) 4-36 Oxford, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-26 Oyster Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-7, 5-12, 5-17 Oyster Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Ozan Creek, Ark. (LMK) 12-23 Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock & Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-8, 18- 12, 18-19 Ozona, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 P Paauau Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-5, 36-9 Paduc Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Pagan River, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa (POD) 36-4, 36-9 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa (POD) 36-13 Pint Creek at Chillicothe, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Paint Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-7, 25-13, 25-17 Paint Rock River, Ala. (ORN) 23-13, 23-19 Painted Post, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Painted Rock Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-7, 33-15, 33-22 Paintsville Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-8, 25-13, 25-17 Pajaro River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-19, 35-25 Palm Beach, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet (SAJ) 9-47 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Martin County Line of Lake Worth Inlet and from South Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County Line (SAJ) 9-19, 9-28, 9-40 Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-10, 9-27, 9-35, 9-45 Palouse River, Wash. (NPW) 39-18, 39-20 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-20, 6-30 Pamunkey River, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Panacea Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-37, 10-38 Panama City Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-9, 10-25, 10-33 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Panther Creek, Curdsville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Panther Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, Nebr. (MRO) 21-6, 21-12, 21-15 Parish Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Park River, N.D. (NCS) 27-26 Park River, Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-15, 1-31, 1-39, 1- 52 Parker Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Parkersburg, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Parrotts Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Pascagoula Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-10, 10-25, 10-33 Pascagoula River, Miss. (SAM) 10-37, 10-38 Pasquotank River, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Pass Christian, Miss. (SAM) 10-37 Pass Christian Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-38 Pass Manchac, La. (LMN) 11-30 Pass-a-Grille Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Passaic River Basin, N.J. and N.Y., Phase I (NAN) 2-17, 2-23, 2-28 Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, Maine (NED) 1-47 Pat Mayse Lake, Tex. (SWT) 19-6, 19-12, 19-15 Pataha Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-18 Patchogue River, Conn. (NED) 1-8, 1-29, 1-38 Patman, Wright, Dam and Lake, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11- 32, 16-11, 16-16, 16-20 Patoka Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-10, 24-16, 24-27 Patoka River at Jasper, Ind. (ORL) 24-30 Patriot, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Pattonsburg Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Patuxent River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Pawcatuck, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-46 Pawcatuck River, R.I. and Conn. (NED) 1-42, 1-48 Pawtucket, R.I. (NED) 1-48 Pawtuxet Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-42 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, R.I. (NED) 1-12, 1-30, 1-39 I-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Pax, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Payette River, Idaho (NPW) 39-18 Payette Valley, Idaho (NPW) 39-19, 39-20 Peacock Creek, Liberty County, Ga. (SAS) 8-7, 8-16 Pearl River, Miss. and La. (LMK) 12-3, 12-14, 12-16, 12-17, 12-19 Pearl River Basin, Miss. and La. (LMK) 12-9 Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-6, 19- 12, 19-15 Pebble Creek, Scribner, Nebr. (MRO) 21-24 Pecan Bayou Lake, Pecan Bayou, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Pecatonica River at Darlington, Wis. (NCR) 28-16 Peconic River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Pecos, Tex. (SWA) 17-11 Peekskill Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Pelican Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Pembina, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-26 Pembina River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-22 Pembina River Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-22 Pembroke Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Pendleton, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Pendleton Levees, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46, 37- 50, 37-55 Peninsula Drainage District 2, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46, 37- 48, 37-55 Penny Slough, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-6 Penobscot River, Maine (NED) 1-9, 1-29, 1-38 Pensacola Bay, Fla. to Mobile Bay, Ala. (SAM) 10-31 Pensacola Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-10, 10-25, 10-33, 10-37 Pensacola Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-21, 19-17 Pensacola Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Pensaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Pentwater Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-21, 31-46, 31-64, 31- 77 Peoria, Ill. (NCC) 28-15 Peoria Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-19, 28-20 Pepin Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Pepper Creek, Del. (NAP) 3-25 Pepperell Cove, Maine (NED) 1-42 Perdido Pass Channel, Ala. (SAM) 10-11, 10-25, 10-34 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congress (PIANC) 46-1 Perquimans River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-29 Perry County Drainage and Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Mo. (LMS) 14-6,14-10, 14-12 Perry Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-6, 20-13, 20-16, 20-23 Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements) Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Perth Amboy, N.J. (NAN) 2-32 Petaluma River, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Petersburg Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11, 40-13 Petit Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, La. (LMN) 11-30 Petit Jean River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Petoskey Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Peyton Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Phillippi Creek Basin, Fla. (SAJ) 9-53 Phillips Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Philpott Lake, Va. (SAW) 6-6, 6-17, 6-22 Phoenix, Ariz., and Vicinity (including New River) (SPL) 33-8, 33-15, 33-22 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist) (MRK) 20-7, 20-13, 20-16, 20-23 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Omaha Dist) (MRO) 21-6, 21-15, 21-21 Pickwick Landing Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Pierce, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-22 Pig Island Gut, Maine (NED) 1-42 Pike Island Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Pilchuck River, Wash. (NPS) 38-8, 38-15, 38-21, 38-28 Pilot Rock, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Pinal Creek Channel Improvements (Globe), Ariz., (SPL) 33-25 Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Nev. (SPL) 33-9, 33- 16, 33-23 Pine Bluff, Ark. (LMK) 12-23 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Pine Creek Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-12, 19-15 Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, Calif. (SPK) 35-10, 35- 22 Pine Ford Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9 Pine Mountain Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-11 Pine River, Mich. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Pine River Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Pinellas County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-20, 9-29, 9-40 Pineville, Ky. (ORN) 23-13, 23-19 Pineville, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-32, 12-25, 12-26 Pinole Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colo. (SWA) 17-11 Pioneer Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-20 Pipestem Lake, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-6, 21-12, 21-16 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Pittsburgh, Pa. (Golden Triangle) (ORP) 26-23 Pittsburgh, Pa. (North Side) (ORP) 26-23 Pittsburgh, Pa. (The Strip) (ORP) 26-23 Pittsburgh Harbor, Pa. (ORP) 26-21 Pittsfield, Mass. (NED) 1-53 Placer Creek, Idaho (NPS) 38-8, 38-15, 38-21 Plainview Local Flood Protection Project (SWF) 16-21 Platoro Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 17-7 Platte River, Mo., Channel Improvement (MRK) 20-19 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21 18, 21-22 Platte River and Tributaries, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18 1-34 INDEX Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Platte River near Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Pleasant Bay, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Pleasant River, Maine (NED) 1-42 Pleasanton Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Plum Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Plum Creek, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora, Colo. (MRO) 21-22 Plum Island, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Plymouth, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Plymouth Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Poca, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Pocatello, Idaho (NPW) 39-20 Pocomoke River, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-23, 4-30 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, R.I. (NED) 1- 9, 1-29, 1-38, 1-48 Point Lookout Harbor (Au Gres River), Mich. (NCE) 31- 22, 31-46, 31-64 Point Place, Toledo, Ohio (NCB) 32-14, 32-19 Point Pleasant, W. Va. (ORL) 25-19, 25-21 Pokegama Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Polecat Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19- 27 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Poloa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-13 Poison Bay, Flathead Lake, Mont. (NPS) 38-24 Pomeroy, Ohio (ORL) 25-20 Pomme De Terre Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-7, 20-13, 20-17, 20-23 Pomona Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-7, 20-13, 20-17, 20-23 Ponce, P.R. (SAJ) 9-41 Ponce De Leon Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-11, 9-27, 9-35 Ponce Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-11, 9-27, 9-35, 9-45 Pontiac Diversion, R.I. (NED) 1-48 Pool, Joe, Lake (Lakeview Lake), Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16- 15, 16-19 Port Alexander, Alaska (NPA) 40-11, 40-12 Port Allen Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-3, 36-8, 36-11, 36- 14 Port Angeles Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-31, 38-32 Port Arthur and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-10, 15-11, 15-15, 15-25 Port Austin Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-22, 31-46, 31-64 Port Bay, N.Y. (NCB) 32-31 Port Clinton Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-9, 32-18, 32-28 Port Dickenson, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Port Everglades Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-12, 9-27, 9-36 Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, Conn. (NED) 1-19, 1-32, 1- 40 Port Gamble Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-31 Port Henry Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Port Hueneme, Calif. (SPL) 33-4, 33-13, 33-19 Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40- 8, 40-10 Port of Kalama, Wash. (NPP) 37-46 Port Mahon, Del. (NAP) 3-12 Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-31 Port Orchard Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Port Orford, Oreg. (NPP) 37-8, 37-28, 37-38 Port Royal Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-17 Port San Luis, Calif. (SPL) 33-4, 33-13, 33-19 Port Sanilac Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-22, 31-47, 31-65 Port St. Joe Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-11, 10-25, 10-34, 10- 37 Port Townsend, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Port Washington Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-23, 31-47, 31- 65 Port Wing Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-23, 31-47, 31-65 Portage, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Portage Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-22, 31-46, 31-65 Portchester Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Porter Bayou, Miss. (LMK) 12-10, 12-16, 12-19 Portland, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Portland, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Portland Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-10, 1-29, 1-38 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-18, 39-19, 39-20 Portsmouth Harbor, Va. Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot (NAO) 5-20 Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, Maine and N.H. (NED) 1-10, 1-29, 1-39 Portsmouth-New Boston, Ohio (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Portugues and Bucana Rivers, P.R. (SAJ) 9-23, 9-29, 9- 41 Portville, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Posten Bayou, Ark. and La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-32, 12-24, 12-26 Poteau River Navigation, Ark. and Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Poteet Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, D.C., Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-8, 4-23, 4-31 Potomac Estuary Pilot Water Treatment Plant, D.C. (NAB) 4-20, 4-27, 4-33 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, D.C., Elimination of Waterchestnut (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River at Alexandria, Va. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River at Mount Vernon, Va. (NAB) 4-8, 4-23, 4-30 Potomac River below Washington, D.C. (NAB) 4-8, 4-23, 4-31 I-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, D.C. (NAB) 4-34 Potowomut River, R.I. (NED) 1-42 Pottstown and Vicinity, Pa. (NAP) 3-16, 3-21 Powell County High School, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Powhatan Point, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Prairie Du Chien, Wis. (NCS) 27-9, 27-18 Prairie Du Chien Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prairie du Rocher and Vicinity, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prattville, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Pre-Authorization Studies for Beach Erosion Control Activities Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-11 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-12 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-6 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-31 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-21 New England Division (NED) 1-49 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-36 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-4 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-12 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-6 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-7 Pre-Authorization Studies for Flood Control Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-5 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 17-8 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-20 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-34 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-15 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-7 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 16-12, 16-22 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-11 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-10 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-53 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 20-26 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-7, 18-24 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-29 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-13, 24-31 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-6 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-40 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-6, 23-19 New England Division (NED) 1-50 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-19 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-19 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-10 Omaha, Nebr., District (NRO) 21-7, 21-24 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-6 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-14 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-53 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-18 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-16 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-3 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-7 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-7, 38-33 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-7 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-27 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-8, 19-19 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-13 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-33 Pre-Authorization Studies for Navigation Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-13 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-11 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-31 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-17 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-5 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-30 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-8 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-16 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-3 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-38 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-4 New England Division (NED) 1-49 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-14, 11-30 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-36 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-8 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-4 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-9 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-52 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-3 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-6 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-4 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-7 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-25 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-5 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-31 Pre-Authorization Studies for Streambank Erosion Control Activities Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-7 Prescott Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Presque Isle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-23, 31-47, 31-65 Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa. (NCB) 32-11, 32-19, 32-30 Prestile Stream, Blaine, Maine (NED) 1-46 Preston Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prestonburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-21 Prestonville, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Priest, J. Percy, Dam and Reservoir, Tenn. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Priest Rapids Dam, Wash. (NPS) 38-31 Princeton, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Prineville Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Proctor, Vt. (NAN) 2-35 Proctor, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Proctor Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-15, 16-19 1-36 INDEX Proctorville, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Prompton Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-16, 3-21 Prospect Beach, West Haven, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Providence River and Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-42 Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), Mass. (NED) 1-48 Provincetown Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-10, 1-29, 1-39, 1- 48 Pudding River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Pueblo Arkansas River, Colo. (Floodway Levee Extension) (SWA) 17-11 Pueblo Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 17-7 Puget Sound and Its Tributary Waters, Wash. (NPS) 38-4, 38-14, 38-19 Pullman, Palouse, Wash. (NPW) 39-18 Pultneyville Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-31 Pungo Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Pungo River, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Punta Salinas, P.R. (SAJ) 9-20, 9-29, 9-40 Punxsutawney, Pa. (ORP) 26-5, 26-13, 26-18, 26-26 Punxsutawney, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 26- 26 Put In Bay, Ohio (NCB) 32-31 Pysht River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Q Quail Wash Levee, Joshua Tree, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Queens Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-21, 5-22 Queenstown Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Queets River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Quillayute River, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-14, 38-20, 38-28 Quinault River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Quinby Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-21, 5-22 Quincy, Ill., Harbor Access Channel (NCR) 28-13 Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Quincy Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-8 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-45 R R. D. Bailey Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-8, 25-13, 25-17 Raccoon Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Raccoon Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Racine, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Racine Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-24, 31-48, 31-65 Racine Locks and Dam, Ohio (ORD) 22-3, 22-8 Rahway, N.J. (NAN) 2-33 Rahway, South Branch, N.J. (NAN) 2-33 Rahway River, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Rainey, Henry T., Dam, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Rainier Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46, 37-48, 37- 55 Rancocas Creek at Mt. Holly, N.J. (NAP) 3-15 Rancocas River, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Randleman Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-21 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-22 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-22 Rapidan River, Va. (NAO) 5-10, 5-13, 5-18 Rapide Croche Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Rappahannock River, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Rappahannock Shoal Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-14 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. (NAN) 2-33 Raritan River, N.J. (NAN) 2-10, 2-23, 2-27, 2-35 Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cutoff Channel, N.J. (NAN) 2-31 Rathbun Lake, Iowa (MRK) 20-7, 20-13, 20-17 Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery (MRK) 20-19 Ravenswood, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Ray Roberts Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-15, 16-19 Rayburn, Sam, Dam and Reservoir, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-15, 16-19 Raystown Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-13, 4-25, 4-33 Red Bank and Fancher Creeks, Calif. (SPK) 35-18 Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Red Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-33 Red Lake and Red Lake River, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Red Lake Falls, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Red Lake River, Minn., including Clearwater River, Minn. (NCS) 27-9, 27-18 Red Lake River at Huot, Minn. (NCS) 27-9, 27-18, 27-26 Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, Minn. (NCS) 27-9, 27-18 Red River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Red River at East Grand Forks, Minn. (NCS) 27-25 Red River at Fargo, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-25 Red River at Grand Forks, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-25 Red River Backwater Levees (MR+T) 42-44, 42-50 Red River below Denison Dam including Little River Basin, Okla. and Ark. (SWL) 18-14 Red River below Denison Dam, Levees and Bank Stabilization (Vicksburg Dist.) (LMK) 12-10, 12-16, 12-19, 12-24 Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) (LMK) 12-10, 12-24, 12-25 Red River below Fulton, Ark. (LMK) 12-22 Red River Emergency Bank 14, Protection (LMK) 12-4, 12- 12-17 Red River from Fulton, Ark., to Mouth of Washita River (SWT) 19-16 Red River in Vicinity of Shreveport, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-32, 12-25, 12-26 Red River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21 I-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Red River of the North, Minn. and N. Dak. (NCS) 27-21 Red River of the North, Argusville, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-27 Red River of the North at Oslo, Minn. (NCS) 27-11, 27- 19 Red River of the North at Pembina, N. Dak. (NCS) 27- 22 Red River of the North Drainage Basin, Minn., S. Dak. and N. Dak. (NCS) 27-10, 27-18, 27-25 Red River of the North, Halstad, Minn. (NCS) 27-10, 27-18 Red River Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-32, 12-25, 12-26 Red River Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-36 Red River Waterway, La., Ark., Okla., and Tex. (LMK) 12-22 Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, La. (LMK) 12-4, 12-14, 12-17 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, La., to Daingerfield, Tex. (LMK) 12-22 Red River Waterway-Shreveport, La., to Index, Ark. (LMK) 12-11, 12-16, 12-19 Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, Iowa (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12 Red Run Drain-Lower Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 31- 76 Red Wing Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Redbank and Fanches Creeks, Calif. (SPK) 35-18 Redbank Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Reddies River Lake, N.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-29, 7-16 Redmond, John, Dam and Reservoir, Kans. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14 Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), Calif (SPL) 33-5, 33-14, 33-20 Redwater River and Hay Creek, S.D. (MRO) 21-19 Redwood City Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 Redwood River at Marshall, Minn. (NCS) 27-11, 27-19 Redwood River below Marshall, Minn. (NCS) 27-22, 27- 26 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Reedsport Levees, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Reedy River, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, Tenn. and Ky. (MR+T) 42- 10, 42-18, 42-27 Reese River, Battle Mountain, Nev. (SPK) 35-28 Reevesville, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans (CDC) 44-1, 44-5, 44-6 Regulatory and Sunken Vessel Removal and National Emergency Preparedness Activities 48-1 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, Del. (NAP) 3-27 Removal of Aquatic Growth, La. (LMN) 11-13, 11-21, 11-26 Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida (SAJ) 9-12, 9-27, 9-36, 9-45 Removal of Sunken Vessels 48-1 Removing Snags and Wrecks from Mississippi River below Mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers (LMK) (LMM) 12-22, 13-10 Removing Water Hyacinths, Mobile District (SAM) 10- 11, 10-25, 10-34 Rend Lake, Ill. (LMS) 14-6, 14-10, 14-12 Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, Ohio (NCB) 32-14, 32-33 Republican River, Neb. and Kan. (MRK) 20-24 Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-17, 27-20, 27-24 Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, Oreg. (NPP) 37-50 Revere Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Reynoldsville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Rheem Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Rice Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Ga. and S.C. (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake) (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-15 Richland Creek, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Richland Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-20 Richmond Filtration Plant, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Richmond Harbor, Calif (SPN) 34-6 Richmond Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-42 Richmond's Island Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-42 Richwood and Fenwick, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Ridgecrest, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Ridgeley, W.Va. (NAB) 4-39 Ridgway, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 26-26 Ridgway, Pa. (Elk Creek) (ORP) 26-22 Ridgway and Vicinity, Pa. (On Clarion River) (ORP) 26- 22 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, Ky. (ORH) 25-21 Rio Grande Basin, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-3, 17-9, 17-10, 17- 11 Rio Grande Floodway, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-5, 17-9, 17-10, 17-11 Ripley, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Ripley, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Ririe Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-18 Rising Sun, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 River Rouge, Mich. (NCE) 31-76 Riverdale, Mass. (NED) 1-46, 1-52 Riverland Levee District, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Riverside Area, Pasco, Wash. (NPW) 39-18 Riverview, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Roanoak Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Roanoke River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-16, 6-32 Roaring River, N.C. (SAN) 7-16 Roaring River Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10- 26 I-38 INDEX Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18- 19, 19-9, 19-13, 19-15, 19-17 Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sallisaw, Okla. (SWT) 19-17 Roberts, Ray, Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-15, 16-19 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 29-29 Rochester, Minn. (NCS) 27-12, 27-19 Rochester, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Rochester Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-9, 32-18, 32-28 Rochester Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-16 Rock Creek, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Rock Hall Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Rock Island, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Rock Island District (NCD) 29-4 Rock Island Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 Rock River Agricultural Levees, Ill. (NCR) 28-6, 28-9, 28-13 Rockfish Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Rockford, Ill. (NCR) 28-6, 28-9, 28-12 Rockland Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-42 Rockland Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-19 Rockport, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Rockport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-42 Rockport Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28- 15 Rocky Fork, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Rocky Pass, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Rocky River Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-9, 32-18, 32-28 Rodeo Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 Rogers City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-77 Rogue River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, Oreg. (NPP) 37-8, 87-29, 37-38 Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Rollinson Channel, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-20, 6-30 Rome, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 Rome, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Rome, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Roadout Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Root Creek, Bolivar, N.Y. (ORP) 26-5, 26-13 Rse Creek Channel Improvements, San Diego, Calif. (SPL) 33-10, 33-25 Roeau River, Minn. (NCS) 27-12, 27-19 Rosedale Harbor, Miss. (LMK) 12-5, 12-14, 12-18 osndale, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 R ville, Ohio (ORH) 25-8, 25-14, 25-17, 25-21 Rosciare, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 R vew Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-13, 23-18 Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-3, 36-8 Rouge River, Mich. (NCE) 31-24, 31-48, 31-65, 31-77 Rough River, Ky. (ORL) 24-19, 24-24, 24-30 Rough River Lake and Channel Improvements, Ky. (ORL) 24-10, 24-16, 24-27 Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Rouseville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Rowlesburg Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22 Royal River, Maine (NED) 1-56 Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, near Twin Bridges, Mont. (MRO) 21-21 Ruffy Brook, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Rufus Woods Lake, Wash. (NPS) 38-9, 38-16, 38-21 Rush River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-25, 27-26 Rushford, Minn. (NCS) 27-22, 27-26 Russell, Ky. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Russell and Allison Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24 Russell, Richard B., Dam and Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-15 Russian River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-11, 35-22, 35-26, 35-31 Rutland, Otter Creek, Vt. (NAN) 2-33 Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Rye Creek, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Rye Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-42 S Sabine-Neches Waterway, Tex. (SWG) 15-6, 15-14, 15- 22, 15-28, 15-30, 15-34 Sabine River and Tributaries, Tex. (Echo to Morgan Bluff) (SWG) 15-27 Sabula, Iowa (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Sackets Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11, 32-31, 32-35 Saco, Mont. (MRO) 21-18, 21-21 Saco River, Maine (NED) 1-42, 1-48 Sacramento River, Calif. (CDC) 44-3, 44-5, 44-6, 44-7 Sacramento River, Calif (SPK) 35-1, 35-21, 35-25, 35-30 Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif (CDC) 44-2, 44-5 Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif., from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (SPK) 35-12, 35-22, 35-26, 35-32 Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, Calif. (SPK) 35-18 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Sag Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Saginaw River, Mich. (NCE) 31-25, 31-31, 31-48, 31-51, 31-66, 31-70 Saint John River Basin, Maine (NED) 1-20 Saipan Small Boat Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-12 Sakonnet Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-42, 1-48 I-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Sakonnet River, R.I. (NED) 1-42 Salamanca, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22 Salamonie Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-11, 24-16 Salem Church Lake, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Salem Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Salem River, N.J. (NAP) 3-10, 3-20 Salina, Kans. (MRK) 20-19, 20-23 Salinas River, Calif (SPK) 35-28 Saline Point, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-32, 12-25, 12-26 Saline River, Ark. (LMK) 12-22 Saline River and Tributaries, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Salisbury, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-53 Salkahatchie River, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Salmon Creek near Vancouver, Wash. (NPP) 37-17, 37- 31, 37-42 Salmon River, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-12 Salmon River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Salmon River, Colchester, Conn. (NED) 1-31, 1-52 Salt Creek, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Salt Creek and Tributaries, Nebr. (MRO) 21-6, 21-12, 21-16 Salt Creek, Barnard, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Salt Lake City, Jordan River, Utah (SPK) 35-28 Saluda River, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Salyersville, Ky. (ORL) 24-21 Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-15, 16-19 Sammamish River, Wash. (NAS) 38-28 San Antonio Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-16, 16-19 San Antonio Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 San Diego Creek, Alice, Tex. (SWG) 15-11, 15-27 San Diego Harbor, Calif (SPL) 33-5, 33-14, 33-20 San Diego River and Mission Bay, Calif. (SPL) 33-5, 33- 14, 33-21 San Diego River (Mission Valley), Calif. (SPL) 33-25 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), Calif (SPL) 33-24 San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, Calif (SPN) 34-2, 34-6 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) (SPK) (SPN) 34-2, 34-6, 35-2, 35-21 San Francisco Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-6, 34-8 San Francisco Harbor and Bay (Removal of Drift), Calif. (SPN) 34-6 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), Calif. (SPN) 34-8 San Gabriel River, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-16, 16-19 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Calif. (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-21 San Jacinto River Levee and Bautista Creek Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-9, 33-16, 33-23 San Joaquin River, Calif. (SPK) 35-3, 35-21, 35-30 San Juan, P.R. (SAJ) 9-47 San Juan Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-29 San Juan Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-14, 9-27, 9-37, 9-45 San Leandro Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 San Leandro Marina, Calif. (SPN) 34-3, 34-6 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), Calif. (SPN) 34-8 San Lorenzo Creek, Calif (SPK) (SPN) 34-9, 35-28 San Lorenzo River, Calif. (SPK) 35-28 San Luis Rey River, Calif (SPL) 33-12, 33-25 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Calif. (SPN) 34- 6, 34-9 San Rafael Creek, Calif (SPN) 34-8 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, Me. (NED) 1-21, 1-33, 1-40 Sand Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-16, 19-18 Sand Hill Cove Beach, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Sand Hill River, Minn. (NCS) 27-25, 27-26 Sand Island, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Sand Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-37 Sandusky Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-10, 32-18, 32-29 Sandusky River, Ohio (NCB) 32-31 Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, Mass. (NED) 1-48 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Sandy Creek, Jackson, Tenn. (LMM) 13-5, 13-7, 13-9 Sandy Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48, 37-55 Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. (NAN) 2-31 Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo, N.J. (NAN) 2-31 Sandy Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Sandy River and Sleepy Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 Sanford Reservoir (Lake Meredith), Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Sangamon River (Mouth), Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Sanitary District of Beardstown, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 Sans Bois Navigation Channel, Okla. (SWT) 19-17 Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), Calif. (SPL) 33-9, 33-16, 33-23, 33-25, 33-29 Santa Ana River Basin, Calif: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks Channel Improvements (SPL) 33-25 Santa Ana River Main Stem, Calif (SPL) 33-11 Santa Barbara Harbor, Calif (SPL) 33-5, 33-14, 33-21 Santa Clara River Levee Improvement, Calif. (SPL) 33- 25 Santa Cruz County, Calif. (SPN) 34-9 Santa Cruz Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-11 Santa Maria Valley Levees, Calif. (SPL) 33-10, 33-16, 33-23 Santa Paula Creek Channel and Debris Basins (including Mud Creek), Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-6, 17-9 Santa Rosa Wash (at Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair), Ariz. (SPL) 33-25 Santee River, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-15 I-40 INDEX Sapelo Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Sardis, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Sardis Lake, Miss. (MR + T) 42-20, 42-57 Sardis Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-12, 19-15 Sasanoa River, Maine (NED) 1-43 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Satilla River, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, Mich. (NCE) 31-27, 31-49, 31-68 Saugerties Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Sauk River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Sauvie Island Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46, 37- 48, 37-55 Savage, Md. (NAB) 4-38 Savage River Dam, Md. (NAB) 4-36 Savanna Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 Savannah Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-4, 8-11, 8-14 Savannah River above Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Savannah River at Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Savannah River Basin, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-8, 8-17 Savannah River below Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-5, 8-11, 8- 15 Saw Mill River at Elmsford and Greenburgh, N.Y. (NAN) 2-17, 2-23, 2-28 Sawmill Branch, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Saxon Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-28, 31-49, 31-68 Saxonville, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-46, 1-54 Saxtons River, Rockingham, Vt. (NED) 1-15, 1-30, 1-39 Sayers, Foster Joseph, Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-19, 4-27 Saylorville Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-6, 28-9, 28-13 Scajaquada Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-15, 32-19 Scappoose Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-18, 37-31, 37-42, 37-55 Scarboro River, Maine (NED) 1-43 Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Schuylkill River, Pa. (NAP) 3-10, 3-20, 3-24 Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, Pa. (NAP) 3-25 Scioto River at Portsmouth, Ohio (ORH) 25-18 Sciotoville, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Scituate Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Scott, W. Kerr, Dam and Reservoir, N.C. (SAW) 6-15, 6- 17, 6-22 Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Scotts Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-17 Scottsville, Va. (NAO) 5-10 SCranton, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 SCranton, Buffalo, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-22 Sctipernong River, N.C. (SAW) 6-15, 6-22, 6-27 2817 Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, eaSPort Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-43 Seaside Park, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Seattle Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-14, 38-20 Sebasticook River, Hartland, Maine (NED) 1-21, 1-33, 1-40 Sebewaing, Mich. (NCE) 31-32, 31-51, 31-70 Sebewaing River, Mich. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Seekonk River, R.I. (NED) 1-43 Seldovia Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11, 40-13 Selkirk Shore State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-32 Sergius Whitestone, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Calif (SPL) 33-10, 33-16, 33- 23 Sesuit Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Sevier River near Redmond, Utah (SPK) 35-28 Sewage Lagoons, Vale, Oreg. (NPW) 39-4, 39-11, 39-15 Sewage Treatment Plant, Missoula, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Seward, Nebr. (MRK) 20-19 Seward Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Shad Landing State Park, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Shallotte River, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-20 Shark River, N.J. (NAN) 2-10, 2-23, 2-27 Shawneetown, Ill. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24, 24-29 Sheboygan Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-28, 31-50, 31-68 Sheepshead Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31, 2-36 Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-53 Sheffield Lake Community Park, Ohio (NCB) 32-35 Shelburne, N.H. (NED) 1-23, 1-46 Sheldon Brook, Tarrytown, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Shell Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 21-19 Shelley Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-18, 39-20 Shelton Creek, Wash. (NAS) 38-28 Shelton Ditch, Oreg. (NPP) 37-48 Shenango River Lake, Pa. and Ohio (ORP) 26-9, 26-14, 26-20 Shepard Road, St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 27-12, 27-19 Sherburne, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Sheridan, Wyo. (MRO) 21-18, 21-21 Sherwood Island State Park, Conn. (NED) 1-29 Sheyenne River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-13, 27-19, 27-23, 27- 26 Shidler Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Shields River, near Clyde Park, Mont. (MRO) 21-18, 21- 21 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-32 Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31, 2-36 Shipyard River, S.C. (SAN) 7-6, 7-10, 7-13 Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-11, 2- 23, 2-27, 2-30 Shoals, Ind. (ORL) 24-22 Shobe Canyon, Oreg. (NPW) 39-18 Shooters Island, N.Y. and N.J. (NAN) 2-31 Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration, Philadelphia, Pa. (NAP) 3-12 Shoreline Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization 1-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-31 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-12 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-15 Short Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell, Wyo. (MRO) 21-21 Shoshone River, Byron, Wyo. (MRO) 21-7, 21-12, 21-16 Shoshone River, Lovell, Wyo. (MRO) 21-18, 21-21 Shot Pouch Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Shrewsbury River, N.J. (NAN) 2-31 Shufflebarger Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Sid Simpson Project, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Silver Lake Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-20, 6-25 Simmons Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Simpson Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-23 Sioux Falls, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Sistersville, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Sitka Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11, 40-13 Siuslaw River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-8, 37-29, 37-38, 37-49 Six Runs Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Sixes Bridge Lake, Md. and Pa. (N) 4-37 Skaggs Ferry, Black River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Skagit River, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-28, 38-31 Skagit River, Wash. (Avon By-Pass) (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, Wash. (Levee and Channel Improvements) (NPS) 38-28 Skagway Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Skagway River, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-12 Skamokawa Creek, Wash. (NPP) 37-9, 37-29, 37-39, 37- 51 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-46 Skiatook Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-7, 19-12, 19-15 Skipanon Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-29, 37-39 Slaughter Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Slovan, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Small Boat Harbor Opposite Chester, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Small Boat Harbor Opposite Hamburg, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21- 17 Smelt Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-46 Smith Creek, Colo. (SWA) 17-6, 17-9, 17-10 Smith Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-35 Smith River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Smithfield, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Smithland, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Smithland Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 Smiths Creek, Pamlico County, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-20 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Smiths Ferry, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, Mo. (MRK) 20- 19 Smithville Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-8, 20-13, 20-18 Smoky Hill, Saline, and Solomon Rivers (MRK) 20-24 Smyrna River, Del. (NAP) 3-25, 3-28 Snagging and Clearing Activities Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-34 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-7 Huntington, W.Va., District (ORH) 25-10 Los Angeles, Calif, District (SPL) 33-11 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-13, 24-31 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-15 New England Division (NED) 1-25 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-18 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-16 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-27 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-12 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-3 Snake River, Idaho (NPW) 39-18 Snake River, below Warren, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, Oreg., Wash., and Idaho (NPW) 39-9, 39-12, 39-16, 39-25 Snettisham, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-8, 40-10 Snohomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28, 38-29 Snoqualmie River, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Sny Basin, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Soap Creek, Wash. (NPP) 37-51 Socastee Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-11 Soleduck River Bridge, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Somerville Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-16, 16-19 Sonoma Creek, Calif (SPK) 35-28 South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 South Bank Arkansas River, (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), Ark. (SWL) 18-16 South Bank Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, Ark. Tucker Lakes (SWL) 18-16 South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 South Beloit, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 South Bristol Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-43 South Channel, Government Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-29, 37-39 South Coventry Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-48 South Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 South Deer Creek Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 South Ellenville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-18, 2-23, 2-28 South Fabius River, Mo. (NCR) 28-18 South Fork, Boise River, Idaho (NPW) 39-4, 39-11, 39 15 I-42 INDEX South Fork, Clearwater River, Idaho (NPW) 39-18, 39- 20 South Fork of Cumberland River, Ky. (ORN) 23-13 South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Calif (SPL) 31-29 South Haven Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-28, 31-50, 31-69 South Milwaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-77 South Orange, N.J. (NAN) 2-33 South Platte River, Bank Protection, Denver, Colo. (MRO) 21-22 South Platte River Basin, Colo. (MRO) 21-7, 21-16 South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, Colo. (MRO) 21-18 South Plymouth Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 South Point, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 South Portsmouth, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 South River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 South River Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 South Slough (Charleston), Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 South St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 South Tunbridge Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-48 South Williamson, Ky. (ORH) 25-21 South Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-39 Southern Branch, Va. (NAO) 5-16 Southern New York Flood Control Projects (NAB) 4-13, 4-33 Southport Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Southport Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-43 Southport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-43 Southwest Harbor, Maine (NEO) 1-43 Southwestern Jefferson County, Ky. (ORL) 24-5, 24-14 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Miss. (SAM) 10-39 Spanish Fork River, Utah (SPK) 35-29 Spewrell Bluff Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-20, 10-27, 10-36 Spirit Lake, Wash. (NPP) 37-15 Spokane, Wash. (NAS) 38-29 Spring City, Tenn. (ORN) 23-19 Spring Creek Channel Improvement, Springdale, Ark. (SWT) 19-24 SPring Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28- 15, 28-17 Springdale, Mass. (NED) 1-46, 1-52 SPringer, William L., Lake, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Springfield, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-47, 1-52 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-32, 1-53 Squaw Chute at Quincy, Ill. (NCR) 28-13 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-31 St.Anthony Falls, Lower Lock and Dam, Minn. (NCD) 2t-5, 29-9 St. Anthony Falls, Upper Lock, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-13, 9-27, 9-36 St. Catherines Sound, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 31. 7 r River, Mich. (NCE) 31-25, 31-49, 31-66, 31-71, St. Croix River, Maine (NED) 1-42 St. Croix River, Minn. and Wis. (NCS) 27-3, 27-17, 27- 20 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, Ark. (LMM) 13-10 St. Francis Basin, Ark. and Mo. (MR+ T) 42-9, 42-27 St. Francis River and Basin, Ark. and Mo. (MR+T) 42- 9, 42-18, 42-51 St. Francis River, Highway 90, Ark. (LMM) 13-5, 13-7, 13-9 St. Francis River Levees (MR + T) 42-46 St. George Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-23, 4-31, 4-34 St. James, Beaver Island, Mich. (NCE) 31-75 St. James Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-74 St. Jeromes Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-35 St. Johns River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-33 St. Johns River, Fla., Jacksonville to Lake Harney (SAJ) 9-13, 9-27, 9-36, 9-45 St. Johns River, Fla., Jacksonville to the Ocean (SAJ) 9-33 St. Johns River, Fla., Opposite the City of Jacksonville (SAJ) 9-33 St. Jones River, Del. (NAP) 3-25, 3-26 St. Joseph Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-26, 31-49, 31-67 St. Joseph River, Mich. (NCE) 31-75 St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 St. Louis District (NCD) 29-4 St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-13, 9-27, 9-36, 9-45 St. Maries, Idaho (NAS) 38-28 St. Marks River, Fla. (SAM) 10-37, 10-38 St. Marys, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 St. Marys, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 St. Marys River, Ga. and Fla., and North River, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 St. Marys River, Mich. (NCE) 31-26, 31-49, 31-67, 31- 72, 31-77 St. Michael Canal, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 St. Michaels Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-35 St. Patricks Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 St. Paul and South St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 27-22, 27-26 St. Paul District (NCD) 29-4 St. Paul Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 St. Peters Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-35 St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-37, 9-45, 9-46 St. Thomas Harbor, V.I. (SAJ) 9-46 Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-23, 1-33, 1-40 Stamford Barrier, Conn. (NED) 1-25 Stamford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-43, 1-48 Starlings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-21, 5-22 Startup, Wash. (NAS) 38-29 Starved Rock Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-19, 28-20 I-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 State Highway 101 and 401, Wash. (NPP) 37-18, 37-32, 37-42 State Road and Ebner Coulees, Wis. (NCS) 27-13, 27-19 Staten Island, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. Bridge Across Arthur Kill, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Steinhatchee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Stewart Canyon Debris Basin and Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Stikine River, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-8, 40-10 Stillaguamish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-8, 38-15, 38-21, 38-24, 38-29 Stillhouse Hollow Dam, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-16, 16-20 Stillwater Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-26, 4-33 Stillwater River, Mont. (NPS) 38-29 Stillwell Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Stockton and Mormon Channels, Calif (SPK) 35-27 Stockton Harbor, Maine (NE) 1-43 Stockton Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-10, 20-14, 20-18, 20-23 Stone Harbor, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Stonehouse Creek, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Stonewall Jackson Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 26-9, 26-15, 26- 20 Stonington Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-43 Stonington Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-10, 1-29, 1-39, 1-48 Stony Brook, Wilton, N.H. (NED) 1-47 Stony Creek, Branford, Conn. (NED) 1-43 Stratford, Conn. (NED) 1-48 Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Project Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-10 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-13 New England Division (NED) 1-25 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 21-9, 21-13, 21-17 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-4 Strington, Ft. Chartres and Ivy Landing, Ill. (LMS) 14- 15 Strong Creek, Idaho (NPS) 38-29 Strube Lake & Cougar Additional Unit, (South Fork McKenzie) (Modification to Cougar Lake) Oreg. 37-56 Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, Idaho (NPW) 39-19 Stumpy Point Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-20 Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, Wis. (NCE) 31-29, 31-50, 31-69 Sturgis, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Sucker Brook, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-47, 1-51 Sugar Creek Basin, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Sugar Creek Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Sugar Hill Reservoir, N.H. (NED) 1-48 Suisun Bay Channel, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-7, 35-27 Suisun Channel, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-7, 35-27 Suisun Point Channel, Calif. (SPK) 35-27 Sullivan Falls Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-43 Sulphur River, Ark. and Tex. (LMN) 11-30 Sulphur River Levees, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Summersville Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-8, 25-14, 25-17 Sumner Parker Airport, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Summer Reservoir, N.M. (SWA) 17-7 Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Sun Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-14, 10-26, 10-35 Sunbury, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Sunken Vessel Removal 48-1 Supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) (NAO) 5-7, 5-13 Supervisor of New York Harbor (NAN) 2-12, 2-23, 2-29, 2-30 Surry Mountain Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-16, 1-31, 1-51 Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters (NCE) 31- 34, 31-51 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-23, 4-31 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-35 Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, N.Y. and Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-33 Sutton Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-9, 25-14, 25-17 Suwannee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Swanton Harbor, Vt. (NAN) 2-35 Sweetwater Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Sweetwater River, Calif (SPL) 33-10, 33-16, 33-23 Swift Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Swiftereek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Swinomish Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-6, 38-14, 38-20 Swoyersville, and Forty Fort, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Sykesville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Syracuse, N.Y. (NCB) 32-33 Syracuse, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 T T. J. O'Brien Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-19, 28-20 Table Rock Lake, Mo. (SWL) 18-8, 18-12, 18-23 Tacoma, Wash. (NPS) 38-9, 38-16, 38-21 Tacoma Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-32 Tahchevah Creek Detention Basin and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Tahola, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Tahquitz Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Talkeetna River, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-12 Tallahala Creek Lake, Miss. (SAM) 10-13, 10-25, 10-35 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, Miss. (LMK) 12-22 Tallapoosa River, Ala. (SAM) 10-38 I-44 INDEX Tallow Hill, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam (POD) 36-14 Tamaqua, Pa. (NAP) 3-17, 3-21 Tampa and Hillsborough Bays, Fla. (SAJ) 9-38 Tampa Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-37 Tampa Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-15, 9-28, 9-37 Tangeman, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Tangier Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-21, 5-22 Tangipahoa River, La. (LMN) 11-13, 11-21, 11-26 Tar River, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Tar River and Tributaries, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Tar River, Princeville, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Tarentum, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Tarkio River, Iowa (MRK) 20-9 Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Taskinas Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-3, 36-9, 36-14 Taunton River, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Tawas Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Taylors Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-10, 15-15, 15-25 Tayloreville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Taylorsville Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-11, 24-17 Teche-Vermilion Basins, La. (Water Supply) (MR +T) 42-6, 42-14, 42-27, 42-48, 42-56 Telegraph Canyon Creek, Calif (SPL) 31-29 Tell City, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Tenants Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-42 Tenasillahe Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-47 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-21, 19-9, 19-13, 19-15, 19-17 Tenmile Creek at Marianna, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Tennessee River, Tenn., Ala., and Ky. (ORN) 23-3, 23-9, 23-11, 23-17, 23-18 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Ala. and Miss. (ORN) 23-4, 23-9, 23-12 Tensas Basin, Ark. and La. (MR+ T) 42-7, 42-15, 42-27 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, La. (LMK) 12-22 Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge (MR+ T) 42-27 Terrain Analysis Center 51-1 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Terre Noire Creek, Ark. (LMK) 12-23 Terry, David D., Lock and Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-18 Teton River, Idaho (NPW) 39-18, 39-20 Texas City and Vicinity, Tex., Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-10, 15-15, 15-25 Texas City Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-7, 15-14, 15-24, 15- 28 Thames River, Conn. (NED) 1-43 Thames River Basin, Conn., R.I., and Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-24, 1-55 ' The Cascades Canal, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-45 The Dalles Lock and Dam-Lake Celilo, Wash. and Oreg. (NPP) 37-24, 37-33, 37-44, 37-58 The Island Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-48 The Sny Basin, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 Thimble Shoal Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-8, 5-13, 5-17, 5-22 Thomaston Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-18, 1-32, 1-52 Thoroughfare Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Three Forks, Mont. (MRO) 21-21 Three Islands Reservoir, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Three Rivers, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-47, 1-52 Three Rivers, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Thumpertown Beach, Eastham, Mass. (NED) 1-48 Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, La. (LMN) 11-30 Ticonderoga River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Tijuana River Basin, Calif (SPL) 33-25 Tilghman Island Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-35 Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-29, 37-39 Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Tionesta Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-10, 26-15, 26-20 Toad Suck Ferry Lock & Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-4, 18-18 Tocks Island Lake, Pa., and N.Y. (NAP) 3-28 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 Only) Pa. (NAP) 3-28 Todd Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Toledo Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-10, 32-18, 32-29 Tolovana River, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Tolu, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio (ORH) 25-9, 25-14, 25-17 Tom Jenkins Reservoir, Ohio (ORH) 25-9 Tomahawk Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Tomanovich-Salmon City, Idaho (NPW) 39-18, 39-20 Tombigbee River, Miss. and Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Tombigbee River Tributaries, Miss. and Ala. (SAM) 10- 14, 10-26, 10-35 Toms River, N.J. (NAP)3 -25, 3-28 Tongue River Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-22 Topeka, Kans. (MRK) 20-19, 20-23 Topographic Laboratory 51-1 Topsail Beach and Surf City, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Toronto Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-21, 19-7, 19-12, 19-15, 19-17 Torrington, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-47, 1-53 Totuskey Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Touchet River, Wash. (NPW) 39-18, 39-19, 39-20 Towanda Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-16 Town Beach, Plymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Town Bluff Dam-B. A. Steinhagen Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-16, 16-20 Town Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-35 Town Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-6, 7-11, 7-13 Town Creek, Americus, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-20 Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Townsend Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Townshend Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-16, 1-31 I-45 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Trabuco Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-29 Tradewater River, Ky. (ORL) 24-19 Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Tex. (SWG) 15-11, 15-27 Tranters Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Trask River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-18, 37-32, 37-43 Traverse City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Treasure Island, Mo. (LMM) 13-10 Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation-Restraining Barriers, Calif. (CDC) 44-2, 44-5 Tred Avon River, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-23, 4-31 Trent River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-29, 6-30 Trenton Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Trexler Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-27 Trim Cane Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-14, 10-26, 10-35 Trinidad Lake, Colo. (SWA) 17-6, 17-9 Trinity River and Tributaries, Tex. (SWG) 15-7, 15-14, 15-24, 15-28, 15-35 Trinity River Project, Tex. (SWF) 16-2, 16-14, 16-20 Triplett Creek, Morehead, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Tri-Pond Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Trotters Shoals Lake (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-15 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Troy, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25, 24-30 Truckee River and Tributaries, Calif and Nev. (SPK) 35-28 Truman, Harry S., Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (MRK) 20- 9, 20-14, 20-18, 20-23 Trumbull Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-47 Trussville, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) Unit, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-5, 17-10, 17-11 Tualatin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-18, 37-32, 37-43 Tucannon River, Camp Wooten, Wash. (NPW) 39-18 Tuckahoe River, Md. (NAB) 4-35 Tuckerton Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Tucson Diversion Channel, Ariz. (SPL) 33-25 Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W. Va., Va., and Ky. (ORN) 23-6, 23-9 Tully Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-16, 1-31, 1-51 Tulsa and West Tulsa Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-16, 19-18 Turkey Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Turtle Creek, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Turtle Creek Channel Improvement, Yukon, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Tuskahoma Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Tuttle Creek Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-8, 20-13, 20-18, 20- 23 Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Twelvemile Bayou, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-32, 12-26 Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, Minn. (NCS) 27-13, 27-19 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, Md. (NAB) 4-35 Two Harbors, Minn. (NCE) 31-29, 31-50, 31-69 Two Rivers Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-9 Two Rivers Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-29, 31-51, 31-69 Tyaskin Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Tybee Island, Ga. (SAS) 8-6, 8-11, 8-15 Tygart Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 26-3, 26-13, 26-17 Tylers Beach, Va. (NAO) 5-21, 5-22 Tyrone, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 U Umatilla Harbor, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Umatilla River (ECHO), Oreg. (NPP) (NPW) 37-19, 37- 32, 37-43, 37-51, 39-18 Umpqua River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-10, 37-30, 37-39, 37-49 Umpqua River and Tributaries, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Unadilla, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Union City Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-10, 26-15, 26-20 Union Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Union River, Maine (NED) 1-43 Union Township Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Union Village Dam, Vt. (NED) 1-16, 1-31, 1-51 Uniontown, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Uniontown, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Uniontown Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORL) 22-3, 22-9 University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Upper and Lower Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-23 Upper Chipola River, Fla., from Mariana to its mouth (SAM) 10-38 Upper Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Upper Grays River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-47 Upper Iowa River, Iowa (NCS) 27-22, 27-26 Upper Machodoc Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Upper Marlboro, Md. (NAB) 4-36, 4-38 Upper Puyallup River, Wash. (NAS) 38-29 Upper River Road, Jefferson Co., Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Upper River Rouge, Mich. (NCE) 31-76 Upper Thorofare, Deal Island, Md. (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Upper White River, Ark. (SWL) 18-15 Urban Areas at Alton, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Urbanna Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-21 U.S. Highway 51, Tenn. (LMM) 13-5, 13-8, 13-9 Utica, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 Utica, Ohio (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 I-46 INDEX V Valdez Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Valley City Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14- 15 Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 Van Buren, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Van Meter, Iowa (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Vanceburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 Vancouver Lake Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-48 Vatia Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-13 Vaughn, Mont. (MRO) 21-18, 21-21 Velva, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-22, 27-26 Ventnor, Margate and Longport, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), Calif (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-21 Ventura-Pierpont Area, Calif (SPL) 33-24 Ventura River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Vermilion Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-10, 32-18, 32-29 Vermilion Lock, La. (Replacement of Lock) (LMN) 11-9, 11-21, 11-25 Vermillion River, S.D. (MRO) 21-19 Vermillion River, Hastings, Minn. (NCS) 27-22 Verona Lake, Va. (NAB) 4-36 Veteran's Memorial Levee, Hastings, Minn. (NCS) 27- 14, 27-19 Vevay, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Vicinity of Nehalem, Oreg. (NPP) 37-49 Vicksburg Harbor, Miss. (MR+ T) 42-28 Victory Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-48 Villa Park Dam, Calif (SPL) 33-26, 33-29 Village Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-11, 7-13 Village Creek, Jackson & Lawrence Counties, Ark. (8WL) 18-16, 18-23 Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee District, Ark. (SWL) 18-14, 18-16 Village of New Athens, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Vince and Little Vince Bayous, Tex. (SWG) 15-10, 15- 15, 15-26 Vincennes, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Vineyard Haven, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Vinton Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-30 Virginia Beach, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5-13, 5-18 Virginia Beach Streams Canal Number 2, Va. (NAO) 5- 10, 5-13, 5-18 Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 W W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-19, 19-17 W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C. (SAW) 6-15, 6- 17, 6-22 W. P. Franklin Lock and Dam, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Wabash River Basin, Ind., Ill., and Ohio (ORL) 24-12, 24-19, 24-28 Wabasha Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Waccamaw River, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Waccamaw River and Seven Creeks, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 6-29 Waco Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-16, 16-20 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-19, 37-32, 37-43, 37-55 Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, Wash. (NPP) 37- 48, 37-55 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36- 14 Waikiki Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36- 13 Waimea Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36-9, 36-13 Waimea River, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36-9 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island (POD) 36-12 Waldo Lake Tunnel and Reregulating Works, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51, 37-56 Walla Walla, Wash. (NPW) 36-20 Wallabout Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Wallace, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Wallace Lake, La. (LMN) (LMK) 12-12, 12-16, 12-19, 12-23, 12-25 Wallis Sands State Beach, N.H. (NED) 1-45 Wallisville Lake, Tex. (SWG) 15-8 Wallowa River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-18 Walluski River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-47 Walnut Creek, Calif (SPK) 35-14, 35-23 Walter, Francis E., Dam, Pa. (NAP) 3-14, 3-20 Walter F. George Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-21, 10-27, 10-36 Walters Slough, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Wappapello Lake, Mo. (MR+T) 42-20, 42-57 Wappinger Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 Ware, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-47, 1-52 Wareham Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Wareham-Marion, Mass. (NED) 1-48 Warren River, R.I. (NED) 1-43 Warrenton Diking Districts 1, 2, and 3, Oreg. (NPP) 37- 47 Warroad Harbor and River, Minn. (NCS) 27-3, 27-17, 27-20, 27-23 Warroad River and Bull Dog Creek, Minn. (NCS) 27-22 Warsaw, N.Y. (NCB) 32-33 1-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Warsaw Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-8 Warwick Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-43 Warwick River, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-24, 4-31 Warwood, W. Va. (OPR) 26-22, 26-26 Washington, D.C. and Vicinity (NAB) 4-36, 4-38 Washington, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Washington Aqueduct (NAB) 4-20 Washington Canal and South River, N.J. (NAN) 2-31 Washington Harbor, D.C. (NAB) 4-10, 4-24, 4-31 Washington Island, Wis. (NCE) 31-75 Washougal Area Levees, Wash. (NPP) 37-48 Water Resources Support Center (WRSC) 53-1 Water Valley, Ark. and Mo. (SWL) 18-17 Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center 53-2 Waterbury, Vt. (NAN) 2-35 Waterbury Reservoir, Vt. (NAN) 2-33 Waterbury-Watertown, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-47, 1-53 Wateree River, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Waterford, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Waterloo, Iowa (NCR) 28-7, 28-9, 28-13, 28-17 Waterloo, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, S.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-20, 6-25, 6-30 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-6, 38-15, 38-20 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-9, 6-21 Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, Ala. and Miss. (SAM) 10-12, 10-25, 10-34 Waterway from Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico (LMN) 11-31 Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-25 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, La. (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, La.) (LMN) 11-14, 11-21, 11-26 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, La. (LMN) 11-31 Waterway-Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Waterway on the Coast of Virginia (NAO) 5-8, 5-13, 5- 17, 5-22 Waterways Experiment Station (WES) 45-1 Watkins Glen, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Watts Bar Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Waukegan Harbor, Ill. (NCC) 30-4, 30-8, 30-11, 30-13, 30-14 Waurika Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-7, 19-12, 19-15 Waverly, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Wax Lake Outlet, La. (MR + T) 42-48 Waycake Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-31 Webb District Improvement Co., Oreg. (NPP) 37-47 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18- 19, 19-9, 19-13, 19-15, 19-17 Weber River and Tributaries, Utah (SPK) 35-29 Weiser River, Weiser Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-4, 39-11, 39-15, 39-18, 39-20 Weldon Fork River, Mo. (MRK) 20-9 Wellfleet Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Wells Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-43 Wells Harbor, Territory of Guam (POD) 36-12 Wellsburg, W. Va. (ORP) 26-23 Wellsville, N.Y. (NCB) 32-33 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. I (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. II (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Wenatchee Canyons 1 and 2, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-45 West, Herbert G., Lake, Wash. (NPW) 39-7 West Atchalafaya Floodway, La. (MR+T) 42-13 West Branch Chisholm Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-16 West Branch of Susquehanna River, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4- 33 West Bridgewater, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 West Brookfield Reservoir, Mass. (NED) 1-48 West Canaan Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-48 West Fork, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 West Fork, Foster Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 West Fork Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 20-9 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-12, 24-17, 24-27 West Glendive, Mont. (MRO) 21-21 West Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-11, 32-19 West Hickman Area, Hickman, Ky. (LMM) 13-10 West Hill Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-12, 1-30, 1-50 West Kentucky Tributaries, Ky. (MR+ T) 42-10, 42-19, 42-27, 42-51 West Magnesia Canyon Channel, Calif. (SPL) 31-29 West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 West Muddy Creek and Marys River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, near Hastings, Iowa (MRO) 21-23 West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, near Malvern, Iowa (MRO) 21-23 West Nishnabotna River, near Hancock, Iowa (MRO) 21-23 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 West Oneonta Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-38 West Point, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 West Point, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 West Point, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18, 21-22 West Point Lake, Ga. and Ala. (SAM) (SAS) 8-10, 10-21, 10-27, 10-36 West Richland, Wash. (NPW) 39-20 West Springfield, Mass. (NED) 1-16, 1-23, 1-31, 1-39, 1- 47, 1-52 West Stewartstown, N.H. (NED) 1-23 I-48 INDEX West Tennessee Tributaries, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-10, 42- 18, 42-27, 42-51 West Terre Haute, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 West Thompson Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-34, 1-55 West Union, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 West Warren, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-47, 1-52 Westchester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Westcott Cove, Conn. (NED) 1-43 Westerly, R.I. (NED) 1-47 Western Branch, Va. (NAO) 5-17 Westfield, Mass. (NED) 1-48 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin (Westport Marina), Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Westland District Improvement Co., Oreg. (NPP) 37-47 Weston, Vt. (NED) 1-23, 1-47, 1-52 Weston Mills, Olean, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22 Weston Mills, Portville, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22 Westport, Conn. (NED) 1-48 Westport, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Westport District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-47 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, Conn. (NED) 1- 43, 1-48 Westport River, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Westport Slough, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-51 Westville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-34, 1-55 Wethersfield, Conn. (NED) 1-23 Wethersfield Cove, Conn. (NED) 1-43 Weymouth Back River, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivers, Boston Hbr., Mass. (NED) 1-43 Wheeler, General Joe, Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Wheeling, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Wheeling, W. Va. (North Wheeling) (ORP) 26-22, 26-27 Wheeling, W. Va. (Wheeling Island) (ORP) 26-22, 26-27 White Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-30, 31-51, 31-70 White Oak Creek, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 White Oak River, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 White River, Ark. (above Peach Orchard Bluff) (SWL) 18-15 White River, Ark. (below Newport) (LMM) 13-2, 13-7, 13-9 White River, Ind. (ORL) 24-19, 24-30 White River Backwater Levees (MR+ T) 42-9 White River Basin (Little Rock District) (SWL) 18-4, 18- 10, 18-14, 18-23 White River Fish Hatchery, Ark. (SWL) 18-23 Whitebird Creek, Idaho (NPW) 38-18, 39-20 Whitefish Point, Mich. (NCE) 31-74, 31-75 Whitesburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Witewater River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Whiting, Maine (NED) 1-23 Whitings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Whitlow Ranch Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-8, 33-15, 33-22 Whitmanville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-47, 1-54 Whitney Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-16, 16-20 Whitney Point Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-26 Whitney Point Village, N.Y. (NAB) 4-17, 4-26 Wichita and Valley Center Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-16, 19-18 Wickford Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-43 Wicomico River, Md. (NAB) 4-10, 4-24, 4-32 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Wilcox, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers, Minn. (NCS) 27-25 Wild Rice River, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, Minn. 27-14, 27-19 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, Calif (SPK) 35-15, 35-23 Wilders, Ky. (ORL) 24-24 Wiley Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Wilkes-Barre, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Willamette Falls Fishladder, Oreg. (NPP) 37-51 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-10, 37-30, 37-40 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, Oreg. (NPP) 37- 11, 37-30, 37-40, 37-52 Willamette River Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-19, 37-43, 37- 57 Willamette River Basin, Oreg.-Bank Protection (NPP) 37-20, 37-32, 37-43, 37-56, 37-57 Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging (NPP) 37-48 Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, Wash. (NPS) 38-6, 38-15, 38-20 Willapa River at Raymond, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Willard Beach, South Portland, Me. (NED) 1-30 William H. Harsha Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-12, 24-17, 24- 27 William L. Springer Lake, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Williamson, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Williamstown, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Williamsville Reservoir, Vt. (NED) 1-48 Williston, N.D., Water Intake (MRO) 21-19 Willoughby Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Willow Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-19 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, Oreg. (NPP) 37-20, 37-32, 37-43 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, Oreg. (NPW) 39-4, 39-11, 39-15 Willow Island Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-2, 22-7 Wilmington Harbor, Del. (NAP) 3-11, 3-20, 3-24 Wilmington Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-9, 6-21 Wilmore, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Wilson Branch, Cheraw, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-11, 7-14 Wilson Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11, 32-31 1-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1984 Wilson Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-8, 20-14, 20-18, 20-23 Wilson Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Wilson Point Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-43 Wilson River, Oreg. (NPD) 37-49 Wilton, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Winchester Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-11, 37-30, 37-40 Winfield Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-16 Winnibigoshish Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Winnipesaukee Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-43 Winona, Minn. (NCS) 27-15, 27-19 Winona Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Winooski River, Vt. (NAN) 2-33, 2-37 Winslow (Tributaries of Little Colorado River), Ariz. (SPL) 33-26 Winsted, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-47, 1-52 Winter Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-43 Winter Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Winthrop Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Winthrop Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Wisconsin River, Wis. (NCS) 27-21 Wishart Point Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Wister Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-21, 19-7, 19-12, 19- 15, 19-17 Withlacoochee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, Miss. (SAM) 10-37, 10-38 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, Ky. (ORN) 23-8, 23-10 Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), Tenn. (LMM) 13-3, 13-7, 13-9 Wood Island Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-43 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14- 7, 14-10, 14-12 Woodbridge Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-31 Woodbury Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Woodcleft Canal, Freeport, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Woodcock Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-11, 26-15, 26-20 Woodland St. Bridge, Tenn. (ORN) 23-4 Woodlands, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-27 Woodmont Shore, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Woodruff, Jim, Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10- 20, 10-27, 10-36 Woods Hole Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Woodson Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-47, 37-48, 37-55 Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-47, 1-51 Worcester, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-51 Worcester Division, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Worthington, Minn. (NCR) 28-17 Wrangell Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-11 Wrangell Narrows, Alaska (NPA) 40-11, 40-13 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11- 32, 16-11, 16-16, 16-20 Wright's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-21, 6-31 Wrightsville Beach, N.C. (SAW) 6-19 Wrightsville Dam, Vt. (NAN) 2-33 Wynoochee Lake, Wash. (NPS) 38-9, 38-16, 38-21 Wynoochee River, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Wyoming Valley, Pa. (NAB) 4-19, 4-27, 4-33 Y Yadkin River Basin, N.C. & S.C. (SAW) 6-15, 6-32 Yakima, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Yakima River, Cle Elum, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Yakima River, West Richland, Wash. (NPS) (NPW) 38- 29, 39-19 Yakima River, Yakima, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Yalobusha River, Miss. (LMR) 12-22 Yaquina Bay and Harbor, Oreg. (NPP) 37-11, 37-30, 37- 40 Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Yaquina River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-30, 37-41, 37-45 Yatesville Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-9, 25-14, 25-17 Yazoo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-5, 12-15, 12-18 Yazoo River Backwater Area (MR + T) 42-49 Yazoo River Basin, Miss. (MR+T) 42-7, 42-16, 42-27, 42-47, 42-49 Yazoo River Basin Project Levees (MR + T) 42-44 Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings, Mont. (MRO) 21-21 Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21-21 Yellowstone River, near Miles City, Mont., Water Intake and Sewage Lagoon (MRO) 21-21 Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21- 21 Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21- 21 Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, near Big Timber, Mont. (MRO) 21-21 Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, Mont. (MRO) 21-18, 21-21 Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston, Mont. (MRO) 21-21 Yellowstone River, Yellowstone Co. Bridge, near Billings, Mont. (MRO) 21-21 Yonkers, N.Y. (NAN) 2-18, 2-23, 2-28, 2-37 York, Pa. (NAB) 4-19, 4-27, 4-33 York Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-43 York River, Va. (NAO) 5-21, 5-22 York Spit Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-14 Youghiogheny River, Pa. and Md. (ORP) 26-21 Youghiogheny River Lake, Pa. and Md. (ORP) 26-11, 26-15, 26-20 Youngs and Klaskanine River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 I-50 INDEX Youngs Bay and Youngs River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Youngs River Dikes, Oreg. (NPP) 37-47 Youngstown, Ohio (ORP) 26-22 Z Zacate Creek Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-21 Zanesville, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Zintel Canyon Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-4, 39-10 Zippel Bay, Minn. (NCS) 27-25 Zippel Bay Harbor, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Zumbro River, Minn. (NCS) 27-22, 27-26 *U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE :1986-156-677: 5 0 5 3 8 1-51